Indeed. If it is the case that the Saudis will be reading all the blackberry messages made within their country, it will be interesting to see if President Obama continues to use his Blackberry, deciding it's easier to just never visit Saudi Arabia..
about 1000W of that makes it to the ground, depending on what the water vapor is doing. Maybe the OP means that that's the amount specifically absorbed by the atmosphere?
I think you're almost right. I would've ended the sentence a little sooner, though: "why would anyone keep their personal stuff that really is embarrassing"
I hope you're wrong. It doesn't give ME headaches, and I really enjoy it when it's done well*.
*It is necessary but not sufficient, that there must not be anything that comes so "close" that I can't physically position my eyes to line up the images. And probably a bit of a margin. i.e. no eye-poking. Keep it to the texture.
Phone companies are required by law in the US to move the phone number also. I don't think it's been a "pain in the ass" for like a decade to move the phone number to another network.
But there do seem to be a couple of loopholes around moving to subsidiary networks of the *same* network: e.g. Moving from Sprint to Boost looks like they might be able to give you a hard time.
You're confused about what is a right. Stop re-reading the first five (they're important, but there are five more after that) ammendments in the bill of rights. When you get to number ten, it'll start to become more clear.
Of course, that doesn't mean that the government is authorized to maintain the markets, either...
On an actual set, the sheer size, weight, and complexity of these 3D camera rigs means that a lot of things directors enjoy being able to do, especially shooting handheld and moving quickly
Well there's a tangible benefit to 3D right there! No more supertrendyshakycam!
Well, my favorite movie was shot on Zoopraxiscope. That's more than enough resources to tell a compelling, riveting story. You newcomers and your gimmicky "film reels" showing off the tremendous waste of frames.
I've always said, "If you can't make it good, make a lot of it."
Unfortunately, they're making the wrong stand. 3D is only a gimmick if you make it gimmicky. Just like color. And motion, for that matter.
Now that full-color 3D is practically mature, it's only a matter of time before we get over the "It's 3D! See how 3D it is, I'm putting my finger in your eye!" phase, you're going to start seeing films where the 3D just brings you all the more into the story. Avatar, for instance, was one of the first to hold back on the "It's 3D!"isms and just show a great film with a great story. (With an admittedly poorly thought out moral about white man being superior to natives or something...)
They don't call out the poor. They just quietly make everything less available or more expensive. As in the president's stated goal to reduce the number of NMRI machines, and federal education loan guarantees.
They use rhetoric of evening things out, being harder on the rich, but their actual actions do more to cement the classes and trap the poor with higher costs, lifetime debt obligations, and fewer opportunities.
Indeed. but in the case of electric cars, not only will the new technology end up in the hands of the rich, but also some of your money will end up there as well.
Further, don't be thinking that you'll get the subsidy when the price drops into your range. As the price falls and volume increases, the subsidies will be phased out! These subsidies are only for the rich.
If you don't specify a term on the VAN, I think it defaults to the max of a year. You can increase the time and money limits at any time, so theoretically you should be able to keep it going by just adding time as you get close to the end of the term.
Probably someone should point out that on many unixy systems, the mouse pointer disappears after a few moments of not moving it, and/or typing, which also would solve the original poster's problem of wanting to move the mouse off-window to get rid of the pointer.
What if you just take a quarter of those pixels, four times, and then march them out, as in the mentioned-not-too-long ago high-speed-photography trick later incorporated into CHDK?
That's because that's not how "focus follows mouse" should work. You don't move *all* the ui elements over to what the mouse is over. You move the *mouse* ui events over there, and maybe some others, depending on context. Certainly not typing, though.
The biggest, most useful one, IMO, is scroll. I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to scroll a window to view some stuff, but not have that window cover up the one for the app I'm actually working in.
It's doubly frustrating, because when I get home, my mac does exactly what I expect it to...
Carter was the only one among the bunch claiming to be a Nuclear Engineer, though. Of all of them, he should've known better. That is why his sin was the greater.
The level of stupidity they appear to be assuming is greater than the level of stupidity at which it makes sense to even allow drivers on the road at all.
I mean, are they seriously saying that a driver can't be expected to notice a signal if they haven't seen it before? Does that mean that I can just zip through reds when I travel through towns I haven't been to before, because by definition I haven't had months to "get used to" their signals?
The loan Is a subsidy. If it wasn't, they'd have to get the loan on their own, and they'd be paying more for the money (e.g. interest). Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered getting it from the government.
Plus, unlike the float, you don't have to put the cells *in* the tanks, running a voltage through gasoline vapor and hopefully not much else.
Considering how easy it is to make a strain gauge, for instance (they can be as simple as just a folded up length of fine wire), I'm putting money on "the float is cheap enough, and we've done it for years and we don't want to confuse (the stupid) drivers with an accurate reading" being reason, rather than the real cost.
Similar to the reason that new traffic lights don't get turned on immediately upon finishing the installation: unwarranted assumption of incredible driver stupidity.
Slashdot Mirror
...and because it effected children
That is an impressive virus. Does it increase libido or fertility?
Indeed. If it is the case that the Saudis will be reading all the blackberry messages made within their country, it will be interesting to see if President Obama continues to use his Blackberry, deciding it's easier to just never visit Saudi Arabia..
about 1000W of that makes it to the ground, depending on what the water vapor is doing. Maybe the OP means that that's the amount specifically absorbed by the atmosphere?
I think you're almost right. I would've ended the sentence a little sooner, though: "why would anyone keep their personal stuff that really is embarrassing"
Well, it wouldn't work with a torsion pendulum, for instance. There are lots of kinds of pendulums. (pendula?)
Pi has decimal digit extractors. In fact, I think there's an arbitrary base algorithm.
I hope you're wrong. It doesn't give ME headaches, and I really enjoy it when it's done well*.
*It is necessary but not sufficient, that there must not be anything that comes so "close" that I can't physically position my eyes to line up the images. And probably a bit of a margin. i.e. no eye-poking. Keep it to the texture.
Phone companies are required by law in the US to move the phone number also. I don't think it's been a "pain in the ass" for like a decade to move the phone number to another network.
But there do seem to be a couple of loopholes around moving to subsidiary networks of the *same* network: e.g. Moving from Sprint to Boost looks like they might be able to give you a hard time.
You're taking it out of context.
Clearly, when you add in the context, it's, "Do No Evil, Unless It's Convenient."
You're confused about what is a right. Stop re-reading the first five (they're important, but there are five more after that) ammendments in the bill of rights. When you get to number ten, it'll start to become more clear.
Of course, that doesn't mean that the government is authorized to maintain the markets, either...
On an actual set, the sheer size, weight, and complexity of these 3D camera rigs means that a lot of things directors enjoy being able to do, especially shooting handheld and moving quickly
Well there's a tangible benefit to 3D right there! No more supertrendyshakycam!
Well, my favorite movie was shot on Zoopraxiscope. That's more than enough resources to tell a compelling, riveting story. You newcomers and your gimmicky "film reels" showing off the tremendous waste of frames.
I've always said, "If you can't make it good, make a lot of it."
You might argue that, but keep in mind, "How to Train Your Dragon" is an animated film. You're supposed to notice it. Otherwise, why bother?
Unfortunately, they're making the wrong stand. 3D is only a gimmick if you make it gimmicky. Just like color. And motion, for that matter.
Now that full-color 3D is practically mature, it's only a matter of time before we get over the "It's 3D! See how 3D it is, I'm putting my finger in your eye!" phase, you're going to start seeing films where the 3D just brings you all the more into the story. Avatar, for instance, was one of the first to hold back on the "It's 3D!"isms and just show a great film with a great story. (With an admittedly poorly thought out moral about white man being superior to natives or something...)
I'll get off your lawn now.
They don't call out the poor. They just quietly make everything less available or more expensive. As in the president's stated goal to reduce the number of NMRI machines, and federal education loan guarantees.
They use rhetoric of evening things out, being harder on the rich, but their actual actions do more to cement the classes and trap the poor with higher costs, lifetime debt obligations, and fewer opportunities.
Indeed. but in the case of electric cars, not only will the new technology end up in the hands of the rich, but also some of your money will end up there as well.
Further, don't be thinking that you'll get the subsidy when the price drops into your range. As the price falls and volume increases, the subsidies will be phased out! These subsidies are only for the rich.
If you don't specify a term on the VAN, I think it defaults to the max of a year. You can increase the time and money limits at any time, so theoretically you should be able to keep it going by just adding time as you get close to the end of the term.
Probably someone should point out that on many unixy systems, the mouse pointer disappears after a few moments of not moving it, and/or typing, which also would solve the original poster's problem of wanting to move the mouse off-window to get rid of the pointer.
What if you just take a quarter of those pixels, four times, and then march them out, as in the mentioned-not-too-long ago high-speed-photography trick later incorporated into CHDK?
That's because that's not how "focus follows mouse" should work. You don't move *all* the ui elements over to what the mouse is over. You move the *mouse* ui events over there, and maybe some others, depending on context. Certainly not typing, though.
The biggest, most useful one, IMO, is scroll. I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to scroll a window to view some stuff, but not have that window cover up the one for the app I'm actually working in.
It's doubly frustrating, because when I get home, my mac does exactly what I expect it to...
Uh.. It's the UK. The units are clearly *not* the same type: ounces are mass, but pounds are money!
Carter was the only one among the bunch claiming to be a Nuclear Engineer, though. Of all of them, he should've known better. That is why his sin was the greater.
The level of stupidity they appear to be assuming is greater than the level of stupidity at which it makes sense to even allow drivers on the road at all.
I mean, are they seriously saying that a driver can't be expected to notice a signal if they haven't seen it before? Does that mean that I can just zip through reds when I travel through towns I haven't been to before, because by definition I haven't had months to "get used to" their signals?
The loan Is a subsidy. If it wasn't, they'd have to get the loan on their own, and they'd be paying more for the money (e.g. interest). Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered getting it from the government.
Plus, unlike the float, you don't have to put the cells *in* the tanks, running a voltage through gasoline vapor and hopefully not much else.
Considering how easy it is to make a strain gauge, for instance (they can be as simple as just a folded up length of fine wire), I'm putting money on "the float is cheap enough, and we've done it for years and we don't want to confuse (the stupid) drivers with an accurate reading" being reason, rather than the real cost.
Similar to the reason that new traffic lights don't get turned on immediately upon finishing the installation: unwarranted assumption of incredible driver stupidity.