Just yesterday I was trying to compile libgcrypt on Cygwin to experiment with it. All the tests failed with "undefined reference" link errors. It's been known and discussed on the mailing list for over a year, but nobody's ever done anything about it.
As pretty as it looks, Superkaramba doesn't use real transparency. It just paints a copy of the root window onto its own widgets, and overlays alpha-blended graphics on that. If you put one in front of another window, it can't overlay at all. Let's just cross our fingers and hope the Compositing extension gets out of testing at freedesktop.org soon.
If you knew what you were talking about, you'd know that switching virtual consoles leaves X running in the background, so the driver still wouldn't install. Nice try.
I guess it would be too much to ask for you to stop trolling, BTW? Just a thought.
I'm not a networking expert either, but to the best of my knowledge this is usually done with IP tunnelling. You don't have to have any coordination between AP's - each of them can have its own subnet or something. To connect, you log in and set up a tunnel to the gateway, which gives you another IP address with Internet access. When you switch cells, your actual wireless interface gets a new IP address, your tunnel re-authenticates and you're back online with maybe a few dropped packets, but no interrupted connections.
Uh, the elevator algorithm is for controlling drive seeks. It makes no sense in the context of a CPU scheduler, unless maybe you're talking about a Turing machine.
So, when was the last time that Kazaa told kids to steal music? Shouldn't the parents be the ones looking out for their kids? The RIAA is (surprise!) in favor of this, while P2P groups are (surprise!) opposed.
My gosh! Thanks to the submitter, I know exactly what position to argue! Thanks so much!
Not only that, but despite the headline, it doesn't attack the email servers in any way whatsoever, other than sending itself through them like every other email worm.
And it just goes to show that under pressure, the impossible can be done. It makes me wonder how much shit actually goes on in the world which nobody but solitary, terrified individuals ever know about.
Sorry, you're right. What I was actually thinking of was never getting cryptanalysts get their hands on both the plaintext and ciphertext. IIRC, that was the main way the Enigma machine was cracked for example. Obviously, though, it's not very applicable to DVDs.
1. DVDs have one key for the disc, which is encrypted about 400 different times. One of the basic rules of cryptography is that you NEVER encrypt the same thing with different keys.
2. The DVD players are publicly available, so it's not too hard to take out a ROM chip and analyze it.
3. The key size was only 40 bits.
Suppose this new system has only one key per disc, coded for a particular private player, using 256-bit Rijndael encryption. It will indeed be uncrackable given only the disc, which is what the quote said.
Slashdot Mirror
Whaddya mean? This isn't just cool, it's downright l33t. Check out the operating system - it's called 3ActilOS! How much more l33t can you get?
So a three-month-old baby has a chance of accidentally conceiving each time it breastfeeds? Wow, you learn something new every day.
Just yesterday I was trying to compile libgcrypt on Cygwin to experiment with it. All the tests failed with "undefined reference" link errors. It's been known and discussed on the mailing list for over a year, but nobody's ever done anything about it.
Nah, that looks more like a jazzed-up version of Looking Glass.
As pretty as it looks, Superkaramba doesn't use real transparency. It just paints a copy of the root window onto its own widgets, and overlays alpha-blended graphics on that. If you put one in front of another window, it can't overlay at all. Let's just cross our fingers and hope the Compositing extension gets out of testing at freedesktop.org soon.
Censors would probably be more likely to go for your hosting provider anyway, wouldn't they?
Um, what point is there in buying new copies of Office/Photoshop if you can run your old ones under VPC? That knocks your estimate down by $900.
If you knew what you were talking about, you'd know that switching virtual consoles leaves X running in the background, so the driver still wouldn't install. Nice try.
I guess it would be too much to ask for you to stop trolling, BTW? Just a thought.
It's not a milligram, it's a milligig - 1/1024 of a gigabyte. :)
On Mac OS 9, the IE icon was labeled "Browse the Internet".
Then you can pronounce it "apps" if it makes you happy.
I'm not a networking expert either, but to the best of my knowledge this is usually done with IP tunnelling. You don't have to have any coordination between AP's - each of them can have its own subnet or something. To connect, you log in and set up a tunnel to the gateway, which gives you another IP address with Internet access. When you switch cells, your actual wireless interface gets a new IP address, your tunnel re-authenticates and you're back online with maybe a few dropped packets, but no interrupted connections.
$ mmsclient mms://wmt-vod.video.francetelecom.com/www2.francet elecom.com/ftrd_2004/image_portee-hd.wmv
$ mplayer image_portee-hd.wmv
Now stop complaining.
You mean an exokernel?
Uh, the elevator algorithm is for controlling drive seeks. It makes no sense in the context of a CPU scheduler, unless maybe you're talking about a Turing machine.
It has to be said...
$300K should be enough for anybody!
So, when was the last time that Kazaa told kids to steal music? Shouldn't the parents be the ones looking out for their kids? The RIAA is (surprise!) in favor of this, while P2P groups are (surprise!) opposed.
My gosh! Thanks to the submitter, I know exactly what position to argue! Thanks so much!
Baaaaaa.
Not only that, but despite the headline, it doesn't attack the email servers in any way whatsoever, other than sending itself through them like every other email worm.
AAAAAAAAH! Don't do that!!!!
And it just goes to show that under pressure, the impossible can be done. It makes me wonder how much shit actually goes on in the world which nobody but solitary, terrified individuals ever know about.
.
;)
I'm not sure I really want to know. .
Wasn't that the theme of Men in Black?
Come on, you can't accept cheap substitutes when it comes to your technological baking needs! Go for the real thing.
Sorry, you're right. What I was actually thinking of was never getting cryptanalysts get their hands on both the plaintext and ciphertext. IIRC, that was the main way the Enigma machine was cracked for example. Obviously, though, it's not very applicable to DVDs.
Here's a list of the flaws in CSS:
1. DVDs have one key for the disc, which is encrypted about 400 different times. One of the basic rules of cryptography is that you NEVER encrypt the same thing with different keys.
2. The DVD players are publicly available, so it's not too hard to take out a ROM chip and analyze it.
3. The key size was only 40 bits.
Suppose this new system has only one key per disc, coded for a particular private player, using 256-bit Rijndael encryption. It will indeed be uncrackable given only the disc, which is what the quote said.