Slashdot Mirror


The iPod Gets WiFi, Sort Of

thecounterfeit writes "Engadget has a story on Pocketster Pro, a new application that lets you add WiFi to the iPod. The catch? You have to connect it to a Pocket PC with both USB Host capability and WiFi first, but once it's up and running you can wirelessly swap tunes with any other similarly equipped iPods."

206 comments

  1. In a related story by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a related story, an iPod can carry 490 passengers from New York to Sydney, Australia. The catch? You have to put it inside a Boeing 747 ....

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:In a related story by zaxios · · Score: 1

      Er, great, but how will that help me use my iPod?

    2. Re:In a related story by System.out.println() · · Score: 3, Funny

      this is Slashdot. I think I speak for most of the people here when I say "Priorities? wtf?"

    3. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      What the hell is wrong with you people? George Bush has asked Congress for the power to suspend the presidential elections and you people can only talk about iPods? Get some priorities for fuck's sake!

      As long as Apple gets a G5 Powerbook out before next summer I couldn't care less. Democracy is an illusion anyway, but Macs are a way of life.

    4. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must obviously be new here, and the rest of what I am typing is simply to counter the 20 second limit la-di-da

    5. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      erm... that's "In Soviet Russia, the iPod listens to YOU!",
      followed by
      I got sued by the RIAA you Insensitive CLOD!

    6. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this is a Russian product then?

    7. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, good ole priority troll. Haven't seen one of them for a while.

    8. Re:In a related story by atheken · · Score: 1

      What is up with the moderators? HOW is that a TROLL?

  2. Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    somebody ping the RIAA!

    1. Re:Quick by ThePDW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can bet the RIAA is having kittens right now!

    2. Re:Quick by sploo22 · · Score: 4, Funny
      PING www.riaa.com (68.163.90.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=1 Destination monopoly unreachable
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=2 Destination monopoly unreachable
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=3 Destination monopoly unreachable
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=4 Destination monopoly unreachable

      Control-C
      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    3. Re:Quick by GORby_ · · Score: 1

      You can bet the RIAA is having kittens right now!

      Ah, that's where that 'RIAAaaauuw' sound is constantly coming from...

    4. Re:Quick by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahem. A monopoly is a company that has attained the majority of the market in a segment of the economy and uses its position as the market leader to supress potential competitors.

      The RIAA is not a company, they don't sell products -- it's an independent organization created by the 5 major record labels and many independents to protect their shared interests. And last I checked, 5 companies is significantly more than the 1 company required for a "monopoly."

      Furthermore, they're not exactly doing anything anti-competetive, at least nothing effective. The last dozen or so CDs I bought at my local record shop were all independent artists with no influence on the RIAA. The shop, incidentally, is owned by TransWorld and closely tied to Ticketmaster and ClearChannel -- but they have no problem selling me non RIAA-cds, and for less money ($10-15). Price fixing collusion is bad, but by definition collusion requires two companies...so it can't be monopolistic, and it's not anti-competetive because LOTS of artists sell their albums in stores and online for WAY less than the average CD cost reported by the RIAA.

      The "problem" with RIAA cd prices isn't that they are anti-competition, but that the RIAA members know they have music you want, and they know they can charge a lot for it and still make money. So that's what they do. Kind of unfair, but not illegal, not anti-competetive, and not monopolistic.

      Nice joke and all. But it's not accurate.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:Quick by decepty · · Score: 1

      How about a quintopoly then? And the last time the RIAA had anything I wanted to listen to, I was 8 years old and wanted to be Vanilla Ice... too cold, too cold...

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    6. Re:Quick by zurab · · Score: 2, Informative

      RIAA is not a monopoly - you are right; they are a cartel. RIAA members do not fix prices for consumers - they don't sell directly to consumers (unless you are a part of some "11 CDs for the price of 1 plus 'shipping'" club). RIAA and its members fix wholesale prices to stores - i.e. they are not competing against each other on the pricing basis. One of the reasons, as I understand it, is that they want to keep more small stores on par with big businesses so they can have more outlets for their products while reeling in more cash. I don't know what the actual numbers are but the cartel controls most (nearly all) of the market by both units sold and sales amounts; so they are in a position to do this with their non-compete agreements amongst each other.

      This actually makes more sense if you consider that RIAA member companies are also part of or own other media channels like broadcast media and movie production; in which they also hold majority shares. The media outlets that they do not directly control, they have asked (read bribed) the Congress to enact legislation to help them out: indefinite extension of copyrights, broadcasters/webcasters fees, taxes from sales of consumer products that can copy content, DMCA, as well as newly proposed acts like INDUCE act, CBDTPA, etc. This is generally bad for consumers as it prevents true competition in the industry by guaranteeing revenue models for the cartel members; mostly non-competitive state of the industry also prevents any innovation in the type of content, its price and its delivery methods.

      Such behavior is not only bad for consumers, it's also bad for artists; but I'll let you figure that out yourself since I gotta sleep now.

  3. This is too fucked up. by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Funny

    The thing only works with Pocket PCs? How ironic is that? Apple's latest brainchild, co-opted by Windows CE hackers, to do something so geeky that only Unix nerds would want to do it... my head is spinning. Part of me says "Wow, this is cool", but an equally large part says "EW, Windows!"... I'm so lost and confused.

    1. Re:This is too fucked up. by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Insightful
      to do something so geeky that only Unix nerds would want to do it
      Oh yes, transferring twelve new CDs from your mate's iPod to yours wirelessly. Clearly something only "Unix nerds" want to do.
      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    2. Re:This is too fucked up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit like adding anti-matter and matter together in the minds of geeks everywhere.

      The iPod is widely regarded to be a beautiful piece of electronics. The PocketPC is widely regarded to be the bastard-child of Microsoft's attempt to replicate what the Palm was good at, while letting Marketing get their hands in the pot as well.

      I'm sure other creative folks will figure out alternate symbolisms.

    3. Re:This is too fucked up. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But it brings up the question... who owns both an iPod and a Pocket PC?

    4. Re:This is too fucked up. by 0racle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unix nerds would alreay be doing it with a very small shell script.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    5. Re:This is too fucked up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      a vegan who votes for Pat Buchanan?

    6. Re:This is too fucked up. by westhebass · · Score: 1
      I do.

      However my iPod's hdd is dead (rolled around the car when I wasn't there...), and my PocketPC doesn't have WiFi...

      :'(

    7. Re:This is too fucked up. by metalligoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plenty of people like the PocketPC because it has an interface superior to the Palm, and the OS is less buggy. I'm a long time Apple user and I think PocketPC is one of two things M$ has ever done right. My last PDA was a PocketPC, my current is a Treo, but my next will be a PocketPC again. Palm sucks.

      This post is coming to you from my OS X iBook.

    8. Re:This is too fucked up. by hatter3bdev · · Score: 1

      I do. Though I don't use the PPC all that much, I do own them both.

    9. Re:This is too fucked up. by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 1

      I do (tough to jog with a PDA or visit web sites with an iPod), and now that I think about it, my current job puts me in the Unix geek category as well...I am going to go back to my cave now...

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    10. Re:This is too fucked up. by christopher240240 · · Score: 1

      I do. And all I do is play games on both of them. (breakout on the ipod and solitaire on the ppc)

    11. Re:This is too fucked up. by GFLPraxis · · Score: 1

      " I do. And all I do is play games on both of them. (breakout on the ipod and solitaire on the ppc)"

      Why not just play solitaire on the iPod? It has it, you know ;)

    12. Re:This is too fucked up. by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plenty of people like the PocketPC because it has an interface superior to the Palm, and the OS is less buggy

      This could go either way. Why should programs I close on PPC just hang around in the background until I run out of memory and kill them through Start/Settings/System/Memory/Running Programs?

      But mostly both Palm and PPC suck, especially when it comes to developing software. Sun 3 with a 68K processor, 8MB of ram and 100MB hard drive was a usable development machine with a standard C++ compiler - exceptions and all, on-"device" debugger, an easy to use UI toolkit (XView) and lots more. For todays 400Mhz XScale PDAs with 256MB RAM, I would settle for an equivalent functionality from remote. But no, we get crippled compilers (CE), ridiculous heap sizes (Palm) and tedious UI programming (both, although .Net is making a dent).

    13. Re:This is too fucked up. by torpor · · Score: 1


      I just wget ... straight to my iPod's mp3 dir ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    14. Re:This is too fucked up. by babbage · · Score: 2, Funny
      Unix nerds would alreay be doing it with a very small shell script.

      ...and that's why they never seem to have girlfriends... :-)

    15. Re:This is too fucked up. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Why should programs I close on PPC just hang around in the background until I run out of memory and kill them through Start/Settings/System/Memory/Running Programs?

      Because Pocket PC applications take a long time to load and most people won't have more than four or five of them? The PocketPC was designed to operate like an appliance. Hardware buttons perform functions, they don't merely open programs. You can't have that kind of insant-on interface if you're loading programs all the time on a machine with a slowish processor and bus -- so, to make the whole machine faster for the 95% of users who don't need 32 meg of free ram, they moved the functionaity to close programs. With my Tosh 64 meg PPC, I could load every program I had at the same time and still have a few meg of leg room.

      Still, for you power users who want to free up memory you'll never need for whatever masochistic reason, there are about thirty or forty third party tools which make it easy to close programs.

      As for the "crippled compilers" and "tedius UI programming," you are probably doing something wrong. I've found the Embedded tools to be fantastic, the compilers very effective (and, I should point out, easy to swap out for Intel's or Motorola's if you wanted) and the device emulation pretty accurate. My biggest beef with PPC is not the programming, nor the device UI, but ActiveSync, which is slow, buggy garbage.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    16. Re:This is too fucked up. by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      I've just ordered a PocketPC because, like Windows, it's the platform that supports most of the hardware I like to play with. Sure, my TRGpro has a CF slot, but are there drivers for the Colorgraphic Voyager VGA adapter?

  4. share!~ by 2057 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been a big fan of large size Mp3 Players, but I always wanted to be able to go up to my friend and zap him the latest albums I got, then also recieve all the albums he had...If a TI-83 can do it, then the next gen ipod should also!

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
    1. Re:share!~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't it be easier and faster for them to copy exactly what TI 83's do and make an iPod to iPod cable...

    2. Re:share!~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be possible with firewire, but it would pretty much require that the firmware would support it--which if it did, (which it never will, for exactly this reason), the RIAA would have a fit (not to mention that Apple is trying to push their own music business.

    3. Re:share!~ by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I always wanted to be able to go up to my friend and zap him the latest albums I got

      I think you want to hook up your iPod to a cattle prod, not a PPC.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  5. Holy battery drainer, batman! by Shoeler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see - my iPaq with wifi gets maybe 1.5-2 hours of playtime.

    Add USB usage and that's gotta drop - at least a little.

    Add processing for data transfer.

    Add external battery.

    Call this a novelty, I will.

  6. The catch? by yawhcihw · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll be clubbed to death by any Apple evangelist who sees you doing this...

    1. Re:The catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      That's fine, Apple users hit like girls.

  7. Let's just hope by foidulus · · Score: 1

    people dont' start swapping the music equivalent of goatse...
    And watch out for the RIAA on the subway!

    1. Re:Let's just hope by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Or that you don't suddenly get a few gigabytes of spam music tracks by the Al Ralsky and Bloody Vikings.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Let's just hope by DeltaSigma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are many audio equivalents to goatse. I might be into wireless music swapping were it not for the fact that I could count on all of my associates sending me the same crap I can hear on any clearchannel station.

      Wireless music swapping promises me nothing more than clearchannel without the ads (which isn't much better). The entire feature as envisioned by hundereds, if not thousands, of ecstatic individuals is entirely asinine to me.

    3. Re:Let's just hope by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      You mean audio that makes your insides want to become your outsides?

      I can give you that. :)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:Let's just hope by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Mod up any post that dispareges Clearchannel.

  8. Newton... by Rgb465 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too bad the Apple Newton didn't come with WiFi... ;)

    1. Re:Newton... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's got PC card slots. I'm pretty sure there's Newton drivers for a couple of 802.11b cards.

    2. Re:Newton... by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Too bad the Apple Newton didn't come with WiFi... ;)

      All we have to do is wait for the next generation Newton. Oh wait, nevermind......sighs.

    3. Re:Newton... by Tycho · · Score: 1

      There are Newton drivers for some 802.11b cards. However, the lack of cardbus slots on a Newton makes adding USB or Firewire impossible.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    4. Re:Newton... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 4, Informative
      Too bad the Apple Newton didn't come with WiFi... ;)

      It didn't come with it, but the good news is, you can run a Newton with WiFi!

      You can do it two ways:

      I'm currently using a Farallon PN595 hooked up to a wireless ethernet bridge, so I have access to my contacts and notes through NPDS using a web browser.
      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    5. Re:Newton... by pHDNgell · · Score: 1

      Too bad the Apple Newton didn't come with WiFi... ;)

      The very first time I saw wireless ethernet was on a Newton.

      --
      -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
  9. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always wondered why iPod doesn't come with bluetooth? I don't see a reason.

    1. Re:Question by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for this at least, bluetooth makes much more sense than wifi -- especially since lots of Macs come with it (and all have it as a built-in option).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Question by corian · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why iPod doesn't come with bluetooth? I don't see a reason.

      cost? they're fairly expensive to begin with, before you start adding alternate interfaces...

    3. Re:Question by gabebear · · Score: 1
      Buetooth chips are pretty amazingly cheap, and it would be SOOOO cool, I'd love to use a bluetooth headset/remote and use isync wirelessly. Hell, you could even use your iPod to control your computer for presentations.

      I really hope bluetooth makes it into the next iPod.

    4. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      One reason:
      Power consumption. The iPod was already pushing the outer envelope for it's power budget during design, and it was decided that putting any kind of wireless interface, including Bluetooth, would push the power utilization too far. If we could get a battery with 15% more power in the same volume and flexible form factor as the current lithium-ion-polymer unit, then it'd be possible. Until then, it'll have to be done in an external device with a separate power cell.

    5. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      bluetooth is too slow for use with isync, it's much slower than usb1.1 and would use twice the battery power to transfer the same amount of data.

    6. Re:Question by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you're thinking remotes and what not --- I'd hate to transfer music over bluetooth.

    7. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1) it's not really fast enough, nor does it have long enough range to provide much of a benefit, except with the possible possibility of people wanting to share (at fairly slow speeds), whilst sitting next to eachother. It's just as easy to plug it in for 99% of it's use; tons faster, and it recharges.

      2) cost

      3) RIAA

    8. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad Bluetooth dosen't support any audio better than mono...

      I think Bluetooth stereo headsets would be awesome, but alas, it's not possible without stupid hacks.

    9. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then send the raw MP3 file and let the headset decode it, should work

    10. Re:Question by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because bluetooth has a ridiculously low transfer speed, and would be nearly useless in this situation. Bluetooth earpieces for the iPod would be a great idea, however, if they could get the frequency response good enough to not piss people off.

    11. Re:Question by gabebear · · Score: 1
      It's too bad Bluetooth dosen't support any audio better than mono... I think Bluetooth stereo headsets would be awesome, but alas, it's not possible without stupid hacks.

      These stereo bluetooth headsets are out now. As far as I can see stereo is supported in bluetooth.

    12. Re:Question by gabebear · · Score: 1
      1. Plenty of people already use isync via bluetooth with their phones(as well as everything else I mentioned)
      2. bluetooth is about 1/2 the speed of USB1.1(721 Kbps vs 1.2Mbps), if you can't wait the extra couple seconds then there is something wrong with you.
      3. bluetooth uses power, although very little(20mW-80mW); USB1.1 can be used to charge an iPod
      Bluetooth doesn't compete with USB, they are completely different ways of connecting devices.
  10. Aireo 802.11 Interface Works Today by wyngarth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    SoniqCast's Aireo player already has 802.11b (11Mb) integrated already. Interesting option to download files to it while it's sitting in your car. Interesting quirk however, is that it doesn't take DRM-protected files. SoniqCast says they're working on it. Good think I still have all my P2P files...

    1. Re:Aireo 802.11 Interface Works Today by AndreyF · · Score: 1

      Even my playlist is more than 1.5GB though, it's hard to compete with the 40GB iPods...

    2. Re:Aireo 802.11 Interface Works Today by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's still not an iPod... :-P

    3. Re:Aireo 802.11 Interface Works Today by ASZ · · Score: 1

      Truthfully, I own an Aireo, and 1.5gb is just fine for me, and with the wireless 802.11b features, it sits outside, with my wireless LAN, if i want new songs after the day, just load em up. iPod may have the space, but the Aireo makes more sense. WiFi, FM Transmitter, FM Tuner, its worth the money. Even though its not an iPod, i'd chose this over the iPod anyday. Smaller companies deserve a chance to!

      --
      ASZ
  11. FireWire CF adapters for older iPods? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    I've got a 2nd gen iPod. Is there any way to talk to a firewire device from a PocketPC?

    1. Re:FireWire CF adapters for older iPods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just use a Firewire to USB conversion kit. Or, if it's an older PocketPC, a Firewire to RS232 conversion kit. I think you can get both on Amazon for about $49.

    2. Re:FireWire CF adapters for older iPods? by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Just use a Firewire to USB conversion kit
      I remember hearing something about these, but my searches keep kicking up USB and Firewire PCI cards and external hard drive enclosures. Anyone got a direct link, or a magic word (like a brand) to feed the search engines?
    3. Re:FireWire CF adapters for older iPods? by Cloud+9 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Apple dock connector. Available at many fine electronics stores.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    4. Re:FireWire CF adapters for older iPods? by ian+mills · · Score: 2, Informative

      he said he had a second gen not a third gen ipod. ie the ones that had touch pad scroll wheels. the docks are only for 3rd gen ipods.

    5. Re:FireWire CF adapters for older iPods? by PopCulture · · Score: 0, Troll

      well its a damn shame that apple doesn't respect its customers like microsoft does (M$) (haha trolls i used the $ sign) and ensure BACKWARDS COMPATABILITY to all OS written since 1998, huh???

      enjoy your overpriced mp3 players. really. best of luck.

      --

      Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
  12. Re:How is this possible? by ischorr · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the iPod can play copy-protected files, the protection that Apple uses currently allows protected files to play on an unlimited number of iPods.

    The iPod can, however, also play unprotected MP3s and AAC files.

  13. Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these wireless iPods piggybacking on a PocketPC!

    1. Re:Obligatory comment by nuggetman · · Score: 0

      But can they run Linux?

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    2. Re:Obligatory comment by christopher240240 · · Score: 1
  14. iPod + iBook by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't we just connect iPod to a iBook, which conects to a AirPort? This will keep everything in the same franchise :)

    1. Re:iPod + iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or indeed, drop the iPod altogether, and simply share music between iBooks over airport! Wouldn't that be cool... err... oh, wait... it already does that. Hrrrmmmm.

    2. Re:iPod + iBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Or indeed, drop the iPod altogether, and simply share music between iBooks over airport! Wouldn't that be cool... err... oh, wait... it already does that. Hrrrmmmm.

      Damn Apple! Damn you for stopping hackers from innovating!

    3. Re:iPod + iBook by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because a 12" iBook is about 5 pounds, while a pocket pc is on the order of 5 ounces?

      What would really be better is using a Palm OS PDA, or if Apple came out with something like a "Newton II"

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:iPod + iBook by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Because apple is fascist in not letting you get your music off your iPod, without downloading extra stuff or writing your own scripts... anything else? :-P

  15. Heresy by supercytro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple products working with Microsoft products? What vile heresy is this?

    1. Re:Heresy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, how did Microsoft allow this to happen?

  16. It might be more useful if... by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as I'm aware, there's no way to connect two iPods directly to each other. If you could use a small USB hub and a pocket PC to bridge the two, I could see that being a lot more useful than having two PocketPCs, each equipped with wifi adapters.

    Just a thought.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  17. Crystal Ball of Real Slim Shady? by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If wirelessly beaming songs between iPods is popular, wouldn't Apple develop something to fill the need rather quickly?

    Do all these 'Get-Around-Something' companies just try to make a quick profit before the "Real Slim Shady" comes into play? Or do they actually have a bright future?

    1. Re:Crystal Ball of Real Slim Shady? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Sometimes Apple takes over a 3rd-party idea, but only if they think they can give it an Apple flavor (e.g. Dashboard vs. Konfabulator). Other times they do something a little similar, but in a completely different way (e.g. virtual desktops vs. expose, iTrip vs. "iPod your BMW").

      This time, however, I think they won't even touch it -- other companies have nothing to lose, but Apple could concievably lose support for iTMS if they piss off the RIAA (and this might piss them off).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Crystal Ball of Real Slim Shady? by fupeg · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be authorized to play a song bought on iTunes, on an iPod. In other words, if you bought a song on iTunes Music Store, and put it on my iPod, I would be able to play it. I wouldn't be able to play it on my iBook or PC or whatever, but there is no DRM checking on iPods. So super easy song swapping on iPods might not be such a desireable thing for Apple. At the very least, it would probably force them to add DRM checking to iPods equipped with file swapping abilities.

    3. Re:Crystal Ball of Real Slim Shady? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " If wirelessly beaming songs between iPods is popular, wouldn't Apple develop something to fill the need rather quickly?"

      Yes, unless they thought it would damage their standing with the record labels who's acceptance they require to make ITMS successful.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Crystal Ball of Real Slim Shady? by ASZ · · Score: 1

      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=114139&c id=9670776

      It is the "Real Slim Shady" it was the first to come with fully integrated features that the iPod, plus WiFi, AND FM Transmitter, all in one.

      --
      ASZ
  18. Why not just connect it to a laptop... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With either a Mac or Windows laptop, the iPod can be mounted as a drive and then shared... which is all that's really going on here anyway. That's just functionality of the OS, no extra software needed.

    Of course, this is Slashdot where we like to do things the hard way...

    1. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      With either a Mac or Windows laptop, the iPod can be mounted as a drive and then shared...>br>
      How? whenever I can get my ipod recognized as a drive in windows, I still can't copy stuff to or from it using just explorer.

    2. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Because it's smaller. If you're carrying around a laptop why not just have the files on your hard drive anyway?

    3. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by sokoban · · Score: 1

      Why not just connect it to a laptop... ...because you cannot download songs from an iPod onto a computer (without 3rd party software). ...because that defeats the purpose of wireless filesharing. ...then you have to actually borrow someone's ipod and interrupt their listening, while this allows you to grab tunes off their iPod via P2P networking. ...because hooking up someone's iPod to a computer just to see if they have the song(s) you are looking for is lame and probably fruitless.

      Yeah, this solution is inelegant and you probably will not find anyone else sharing tunes on an iPod with a PocketPC, but this shows it is possible and at least some people want it. I would buy one of these if it were just some sort of iPod attachment with BT or 802.11 buit in (Come on, this kind of product is bound to be released now that AP Express has already kind of done a similar thing), but I can't justify buying a PDA which is otherwise useless to me just for this. Right now, there is no way using "just the functionality of the OS" to swap songs from iPod to iPod.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    4. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think if you have a snoop around, you can find all the goodies hiding away in a hidden directory. That's how they appear on macs or linux machines.

      I think part of this is to slow down average joes from copying their music onto random computers, but the other part is that the iPod uses xml trees to store track information, etc, instead of just scanning the files ( which it's too slow to do ). Making sure that users add and remove tracks via a specific interface ensures that the xml is kept up to date.

    5. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by Graff · · Score: 3, Informative
      you cannot download songs from an iPod onto a computer (without 3rd party software)

      Sure you can. Plug the iPod in. Open up a terminal window. Type in (replacing iPodName with the actual name of the iPod):
      ditto --rsrc /Volumes/iPodName/iPod_Control/Music/ ~/Desktop/Music/
      I'm using the ditto command (a standard shell tool that comes with Mac OS X) because it properly preserves data forks and file metadata. You can use any copying tool you want, but some may not get all of the filesystem metadata. The files will still play fine but they might lose custom icons and stuff like that. No big deal either way.

      You can copy the files directly through the Finder but that's a little tougher since the Music directory is an invisible folder. There are ways of making it visible but its just easier to use the Terminal.

      By the way, it's more fun to use this command because then you can see each file listed as it is copied:
      ditto --rsrc -V /Volumes/iPodName/iPod_Control/Music/ ~/Desktop/Music/
      When the copy operation is finished you'll have a folder named Music on your Desktop (assuming Mac OS X here). Just import the whole folder into iTunes - much easier because the files are sorted in a way that doesn't make much sense at a first glance (the folders are a type of hash that makes it easy for the iPod to find a song quickly against an internal table).
    6. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by burnunit0 · · Score: 1

      Okay, that's very clever, I tried it and it did copy everything to the folder as you described. However, it did not import nearly the entire folder. It wound up importing about 1/10 the total # of songs. Fascinating hack, but I'm not sure I did it right.

      --
      yes. that's all I'm going to say in all comments from now on.
    7. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by Graff · · Score: 1
      I tried it and it did copy everything to the folder as you described. However, it did not import nearly the entire folder. It wound up importing about 1/10 the total # of songs.

      Did all of the songs copy? How did you do the importing to iTunes - through the iTunes menu item File->Import... or by drag-and-drop? Did you get any messages as to why some of the songs didn't import?

      The last time I tried this it worked just fine. Took a bit of time to copy 9 GB of songs but other than that... :-)
    8. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      When you've got an iPod plugged into iTunes, you'll have an extra menu item. I think its called iPod Options. The setting is in there.

  19. An inevitable evolution of bluetooth phones by ehack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An inevitable evolution of bluetooth phones is going to be P2P. Tell your phone what you're looking for, go for a walk on campus, or have coffee at starbucks, and it'll be there when you get back home. The phones eg. P800 can already be used for listening to MP3s, and they can be programmed in Java and C++, it's only a matter of month till we get fully integrated Bluetooth P2P.

    --
    This is not a signature.
    1. Re:An inevitable evolution of bluetooth phones by mikrorechner · · Score: 1
      Tell your phone what you're looking for, go for a walk on campus, or have coffee at starbucks, and it'll be there when you get back home.
      ...to recharge your phone, because hour-long Bluetooth session drained it faster than you can say "mobile bluetooth virus".
      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    2. Re:An inevitable evolution of bluetooth phones by shumacher · · Score: 1
      An inevitable evolution of bluetooth phones is going to be P2P. Tell your phone what you're looking for, go for a walk on campus, or have coffee at starbucks, and it'll be there when you get back home. The phones eg. P800 can already be used for listening to MP3s, and they can be programmed in Java and C++, it's only a matter of month till we get fully integrated Bluetooth P2P.
      I tend to doubt that. Bluetooth has been out for a time. Besides, it's too slow and the range is too limited. In your walk scenario, you'd have to walk slowly or in the same direction as those with whom you're sharing files. It would take longer to transfer an MP3 than the time required for an average person walking at a comfortable pace to pass through the range of bluetooth coverage.

      I could see 802.11g ad hoc networks supporting this. Some sort of coffee shop/mall/airport/college/theatre thing would make sense. People would spend enough time in one place to actually transfer some files.

      By the way, for those that worry about phones and text entry, this entire post was created on a phone in fairly short order, at a rate only slightly slower than on my desktop.
  20. The odds... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The catch? You have to connect it to a Pocket PC with both USB Host capability and WiFi first, but once it's up and running you can wirelessly swap tunes with any other similarly equipped iPods.

    What are the odds that 2 out of the 14 people who actually buy and use this device will be in range of each other.

    1. Re:The odds... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Since the product already supports PocketPC swapping without storing MP3s on an iPod, the odds aren't that bad. The iPod is just being a big storage area. A 1Gig SD card would probably be pretty effective too.

    2. Re:The odds... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
      What are the odds that 2 out of the 14 people who actually buy and use this device will be in range of each other.

      100%... When I put them all in a room and shoot them.

      - Apple Lover

  21. iPod Exchange Provider by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will we start seeing hotspots (intentional or otherwise) allowing iPod users to exchange files?

    Imagine a pseudo-P2P service run by hotspots installed (or infected) with the P2P apps......

  22. Re:How is this possible? by Justin205 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you either A) use unprotected MP3s or B) use iTunes to rip CDs to AAC format, its all unprotected.

    iTunes simply outputs standard old M4A files, not the copy protected ITMS ones.

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  23. You thought wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Only music downloaded from the iTunes music store is protected - normal MP3s etc, which the iPod supports, are not.

  24. Forget file-swapping by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forget file-swapping, and give me an iPod that can stream music directly to airport-express... I really believe this is what the next-generation iPod will be. Battery life will be a bitch though. In 2 or 3 revisions we probably even have Airport-express-extreme which will do audio AND video, and the assorted iPod capable of streaming your photos, mpegs and mp3s to your home cinema. This will be the day I buy another iPod.

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    1. Re:Forget file-swapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      don't forget it! imagine a future where a lot of people own ipods. you're sitting on a bus and you get a "knock." another ipod user activated a "wireless knock" to check to see if anyone on the bus had an ipod, and it found you. you accept this "knock" which lets him browse your songs, and you can browse his as well. you swap a couple of songs and move along, perhaps w/o knowing who you just exchanged songs with. illegal? maybe, but fucking cool!

    2. Re:Forget file-swapping by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny
      you accept this "knock" which lets him browse your songs, and you can browse his as well. you swap a couple of songs and move along, perhaps w/o knowing who you just exchanged songs with.

      Then you play one of the MP3s which you got off his ipod, which exploits a buffer overrun in the ipod's MP3 codec. When the bus passes by a WiFi hotspot the exploit's embedded P2P server connects to thousands of users worldwide. As you step off the bus, you get a "knock" on the back of the head from the RIAA's jack-booted shock troops who arrest you for being a terrorist.

      But it's fucking cool!

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    3. Re:Forget file-swapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you play one of the MP3s which you got off his ipod, which exploits a buffer overrun in the ipod's MP3 codec. When the bus passes by a WiFi hotspot the exploit's embedded P2P server connects to thousands of users worldwide. As you step off the bus, you get a "knock" on the back of the head from the RIAA's jack-booted shock troops who arrest you for being a terrorist.

      Hyperbole much?

    4. Re:Forget file-swapping by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

      short of your 2nd and 3rd generation dreams coming true, why wouldn't you just want an FM transmitter to play directly to the radio, instead of WiFi to the Airport Express, and then to the receiver? Seems like a useless step to me

  25. it's going to be a while by jbellis · · Score: 2, Informative

    a full-fledged computer can barely do acceptable voice recognition after hours of training (or not, depending on your tolerance for error). It's going to be a while before you can "tell your phone what you're looking for."

    Unless you meant typing it on the phone's chiclet-keyboard. Eww...

    1. Re:it's going to be a while by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Nobody said you had to tell it with your voice. Most people with advanced cell phones are quite used to typing text into them using the standard number pad, and some companies, Nokia for example, are coming out with phones with built in full keyboards. This would make it very easy to 'tell your phone what you're looking for'

    2. Re:it's going to be a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it uses Bluetooth or similar, it could always pick up a wishlist from your desktop PC when it syncs phone numbers, calendar info, etc...

  26. Spiritualist mediums & wi-fi ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could be a boon to the spiritualist medium industry.

  27. I Have Something Even Cooler... by bfg9000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it's called, uh.. a radio. You guys should try it. It cost me like a tenth of what my iPod cost me, and already has some sort of integrated wifi. I've listened to like a million songs and didn't pay for ANY of them! I don't know how Kazaa is gonna survive in the face of this new technology. I just hope it stays underground, otherwise Microsoft or someone will buy it all up and ruin it.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:I Have Something Even Cooler... by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      Yes but the advertisers have been brainwashing you, and you don't get much selection. It's all ClearChannel A, ClearChannel B, etc...

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    2. Re:I Have Something Even Cooler... by Wayfare · · Score: 1

      Great, now you've ruined it for all of us. Thanks. There goes the last free and legal source of music.

    3. Re:I Have Something Even Cooler... by Holi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      otherwise Microsoft or someone will buy it all up and ruin it.

      A company far more evil than Microsoft has already done this.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    4. Re:I Have Something Even Cooler... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Funny, how do you get perfect reception 100% of teh time.

    5. Re:I Have Something Even Cooler... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      I have one of these. The pop-up ads are a bitch though.

  28. Similarly equipped ipods? by GarfBond · · Score: 1

    Similarly equipped? In the range of 11b, isn't that going to be all of...well, you?

    As if you weren't lonely enough ;)

  29. Dazed and confused by hrbrmstr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, I own an iPod and would actually like it to stay off of the contraband list. While I am in favour of a paradigm shift in the way music is distributed and artists are compensated (do we really need to make millionaires out of artists like 'Ms Spears' and the record execs who create those monsters?) pirating music is not going to get us there. I've seen a number of posts already that seem to indicate that copying of music (without payment or compensation) is just fine and dandy.

    What's wrong with taking a long stroll through the city and having your 802.11/Bluetooth device capturing all files that are of broadcast interest? Right now, quite a bit. No matter how overpriced the current products are (even $0.99 / song @ iTunes is robbery, esp for 128 DRM'd MP4's) there are still laws that govern how we can obtain and use them - whether we agree with those laws or not (NOTE: I'm in the US, so YMMV). Using a device like Pocketster Pro to actually copy music without payment is no better than shoplifting at FYE or Best Buy.

    Now, if Apple or someone else could make an adapter for the iPod to work with the new 802.11 multimedia extensions in devices like Apple's AirPort Express, then there is only the issue of potentially violating the rules about how large an audience or what the venue is when playing a song this way.

    Heck, I'd settle for just a Bluetooth or FireWireless or Wireless USB rig on the iPod so I don't have have to connect it up (though one will have to charge it at some point) to put my songs on it.

    But please don't give the RIAA any more ammo to declare my iPod a concealed audio weapon!

    --
    Mind the gap...
    1. Re:Dazed and confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Using a device like Pocketster Pro to actually copy music without payment is no better than shoplifting at FYE or Best Buy."

      Bullshit. As long as you're on your mighty moral high horse, tell me which moral code you follow that says copying is wrong. My Bible doesn't mention it anywhere, and neither does my neighbour's Talmud.

      Stealing is bad because the person you steal from is deprived of his possession. Copying is merely outlawed because the music industry finds it's easier to buy politicians than to produce a product you're willing to exchange money for.

    2. Re:Dazed and confused by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      there are still laws that govern how we can obtain and use them - whether we agree with those laws or not (NOTE: I'm in the US, so YMMV).

      Yes, and HOW DARE anybody state that those laws are morally unjust. In AMERICA of all places! Won't someone please think of the corporations!

      Not paying money for music produced by long-dead artists to people who had no hand in actually creating it is just plain un-american!

      But please don't give the RIAA any more ammo to declare my iPod a concealed audio weapon!

      Forget about it. The RIAA has fought against just about every single new (recordable) format out there. ANYTHING that makes it possible for my brother's band to record their own album hurts them. It's not about piracy, it's about control.
      If they had their choice, they'd send us back to the days when the ONLY way to distribute music was on a vinyl record. The RIAA want to keep their stranglehold no matter what and has even been convited of using criminal means to do so.

      Not paying those guys is like not paying protection money to the mob. Society doesn't need them. They've been outmoded, and do nothing but act as a drain on the economy.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    3. Re:Dazed and confused by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I understand your sentiment, but disagree:

      1. When you're using this device, you're walking down the street recieving information from the 802.11 radio, and storing it on your iPod. Compare this to walking down the street recieving information from the FM radio and storing it on your tape recorder. Remember, the vast majority of music is stored in a lossy format -- you won't get a "perfect digital copy" (perfect compared to a CD, anyway).

      2. "Using a device like Pocketster Pro to actually copy music without payment" IS better than shoplifting at FYE or Best Buy, because they don't have one less CD to sell.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Dazed and confused by dont_think_twice · · Score: 1

      Using a device like Pocketster Pro to actually copy music without payment is no better than shoplifting at FYE or Best Buy

      It is no different? What if I tape a song off the radio, and convert it to mp3 and listen to it on my ipod? Is this also exactly the same as shoplifting at Best Buy? If so, I am going to make a trip to Best Buy, since what I described is perfectly legal. As far as I can tell, no court has yet ruled that it is illegial to download music. It is illegial to share music, but just downloading it seems to be protected by fair use. I can't see why the Pocketmaster Pro would be any different.

      I understand your opinion, but I am not sure it is grounded in fact.

    5. Re:Dazed and confused by dave420 · · Score: 1
      uh-oh... "paradigm shift" on the first row of a post...

      I'll get my coat.

    6. Re:Dazed and confused by hrbrmstr · · Score: 1

      OK, top level reply since the sub-posts seem to be either (a) 'screw the RIAA and the government' or (b) 'it's just like radio'.

      I don't think that the purchasing of music is on par with the formation of a democracy or stopping slavery or fighting to have inherent civil rights acknowledged. Those kinds of issues are worth taking up arms for and going against the law to begin a change (I'm still mortified that America had laws stating where people of a certain color could sit, eat and walk). There *are* *legal* ways to fight copyright extension and the stranglehold the industry has on music distribution and usage (be it radio, CDs, downloads...). In the US, Prohibition was ended because a politically active group worked and fought (legally) to have it repealed. If we are as convicted about music, this is the model we should follow, not flagrant law breaking (and, yes, there were speakeasy's during Prohibition, there will always those who choose such paths). Try explaining that to 12-year-old's though.

      As far as the 'it just like radio' argument, how is it just like radio when you copy music from me and I haven't paid for a broadcast license nor have I paid an RIAA/ASCAP/CCLI/MPA/NMPA/BMI/etc distribution/reuse license? I'm not saying that the 'perfect world' would have this requirement, but that's how things are done now. Unless we all work to change the system, we have an obligation to play by the rules.

      Breaking the law because it's easy to do without being caught and because you don't like the rules and are unwilling to fight within the system to make a change is a frightening scenario.

      Finally, to the one poster: yes, my apologies for using 'paradigm shift'. Far too many meetings with managers these days...

      --
      Mind the gap...
    7. Re:Dazed and confused by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. As long as you're on your mighty moral high horse, tell me which moral code you follow that says copying is wrong. My Bible doesn't mention it anywhere, and neither does my neighbour's Talmud.

      It's ironic that you chose that example, because IIRC there is in fact a rabbinical law to the effect that people should not make copies of various important works (e.g. the Talmud) so that a monopoly on such copying can be given to a single source, lest there be no source willing to copy them at all. It's a fairly dumb law, but I have it on good authority that it's there. Perhaps some learned scholar can find it?

      Copying is merely outlawed because the music industry finds it's easier to buy politicians than to produce a product you're willing to exchange money for.

      This is untrue. What if, for example, I could prove to you -- and don't seriously examine this, just assume that I could for sake of argument -- that if you didn't copy something for the first 24 hours after it was first published, that you would, I don't know, automatically get a $1000 back on your taxes.

      I bet you would be willing to abide by those provisions since they obviously benefit you -- whatever else might be going on -- and are more beneficial than they are harmful. This is more or less the logic behind copyright; that by refraining from copying and gratifying yourself immediately, you can encourage more production and THEN copy it, benefitting more than you otherwise would've. Kind of like planting corn and getting a crop later, instead of eating your seed corn and having no crop.

      Copyright might not be doing a good job anymore, it's so fucked up, but there is a clever logic behind it that is intended to benefit the public. Hopefully we will soon reform copyright law so that it actually does result in a public benefit once again.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    8. Re:Dazed and confused by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I've seen a number of posts already that seem to indicate that copying of music (without payment or compensation) is just fine and dandy.

      I don't see how payment is the essential factor. I can copy Shakespeare without paying, and that's fine and dandy. And I can videotape stuff off of TV, and that's fine and dandy. I agree that there may be a problem with copying music indiscriminately, but I don't think that it hinges on payment. It's probably something else.

      Using a device like Pocketster Pro to actually copy music without payment is no better than shoplifting at FYE or Best Buy.

      Morally? Meh. Maybe, maybe not. Personally I find infringement to be amoral, and copyright to be amoral.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  30. Doesn't it run Linux? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What about running uCLinux on it, and plugging in a USB WiFi stick?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Doesn't it run Linux? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That could work, but when you put Linux on it, half the stuff that makes it an iPod (iTunes syncing, user interface) is gone.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Doesn't it run Linux? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Well, iTunes sync'ing seems hard without specs from Apple, but what about cloning the UI, in something like Tk or ncurses, if not Gtk or KDE? And "syncing" MP3s or other non-DRM audio files for playback?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Doesn't it run Linux? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Apple already went after that company that made a "virtual iPod" interface for the Pocket PC...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  31. If you have a Pocket PC and Wifi, skip the iPod by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you've got a PocketPC and Wifi, just keep your music on your home computer, and run a streaming server, to stream the music to your PocketPC.

    1. Re:If you have a Pocket PC and Wifi, skip the iPod by scribblez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It'd be out of juice before long, though

      --
      "What seems to be the problem, osciffer?" (pronounced aus-if-fer.. bah forget it)
    2. Re:If you have a Pocket PC and Wifi, skip the iPod by nerph · · Score: 1

      I think you've missed the point of __portable__ music players.

    3. Re:If you have a Pocket PC and Wifi, skip the iPod by techefnet · · Score: 0

      Well. If you got a provider with good GPRS prices, like a monthly fee, it would work. Ofcourse, you need to stream at a bitrate your gprs could handle. im not sure what that is, but my gprs can handle only slow 3 kilobytes a second, but i think ive read it can do more :)

  32. who owns an ipod and a pocket pc? by wolf_m16 · · Score: 1

    slashdot users who get gifts at holidays from non-techy family...

    traded that evil h1910 (crashed 2x a day) in for a tungsten e (bliss)

    1. Re:who owns an ipod and a pocket pc? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Exactly! (h3650 that I STILL HAVE because I can't afford a Tungsten E... AARRGGHHH!!)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  33. There is a way to connect two iPods by gotr00t · · Score: 5, Informative
    Since Firewire is a peer to peer protocol, unlike USB being host and client, it is technically possible to connect two iPods together and share files. An implementation does exist, but its described as being "slow and buggy"

    One of the iPods must have iPodLinux installed, which should include firewire support, as well as SBP2 support. Compile this as a module, and then connect the two iPods together with the Sendstation Pocketdock if they are 3G, or just a regular 6pin to 6pin FW cable if they are 1st or 2nd generation. Put the other iPod into firewire disk mode, and the one running linux should be able to mount it and access the files. This is incredibly impractical, as typing on the iPod requires turning the scroll wheel until the right character appears (incredibly annoying), and also very slow. However, it just goes to show that it _is_ possible for iPods to share files with just minimal extra hardware.

    1. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Kenja · · Score: 1

      All Sony notebook and desktop computers have TCP/IP over firewire driver for Windows. It works VERY well and is not "slow" nor "buggy". Just because Apple hasn't figured it out dont mean it dont exist.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's too bad nobody has come out with a little box with a firewire controller, disk controller, and just enough logic to do a one-way sync. If you could make it cheap enough (and perhaps build in an uplink, so it could act like a firewire hub or something) I could see it selling (however, IANA Market Analyst)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't recall mentioning Sony anywhere in there, or TCP/IP over firewire. Moreover, Apple was the developer of Firewire, so I would guess there isn't anything they haven't "figured out."

    4. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Kenja · · Score: 1

      It was claimed that peer to peer file transfer over firewire is "slow and buggy". However Sony has standard TCP/IP network drivers for firewire. Plug a cable twixt two computers and exhange files. Not slow, not buggy.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by EvilFrog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firewire is an Apple technology, and networking over it is part of the specification. It was Apple that figured it out to begin with. It's the user-made implementation that's "slow" and "buggy". The reason why Apple hasn't implemented this is because it would piss off the RIAA if they made it any easier for people to share files, and a moderately healthy relationship with the RIAA is necessary to keep iTMS running. This is the same reason why they make the music files on the iPod invisible when you mount it on your computer, and why music bought from iTMS has DRM.

    6. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Oh, by that I meant file transfer between the iPods is slow and buggy. Yeah, peer to peer file transfer over ethernet over firewire has excellent speed.

    7. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Ah, well never mind then.......

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Smurf · · Score: 2, Informative
      All Sony notebook and desktop computers have TCP/IP over firewire driver for Windows. It works VERY well and is not "slow" nor "buggy". Just because Apple hasn't figured it out dont mean it dont exist.
      Actually, Panther also supports TCP/IP over FireWire. It works VERY well, and is not "slow" or "buggy". It works with any FireWire enabled Mac, iBook or PowerBook.

      You see, they are actually talking about connecting two iPods directly through FireWire, without a computer in the middle. Connecting computers through FireWire is a problem that was solved long ago.

    9. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      you know it works just as well on my Dell as any other laptop.

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    10. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would've gotten first post but I couldn't scroll fast enough.

    11. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, learn to read. He said transferring songs (or whatever) from iPod to iPod is slow and buggy... Due the nature of having to use the scrolly deal for input, and due to the fact that Linux on iPod is still very very very very very very BETA.

      IP over Firewire is pretty slick, no doubt. You missed his point by a mile.

    12. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, there is something like this for USB. The problem with the iPod is that I don't think it will work if you want to use it as a music player (playlists, etc.) You probably have to treat the iPod as an external HD.

  34. IPod + Pocket PC, umn yahh, there will be so many by XMichael · · Score: 1

    Wow the RIAA must really be loosing sleep now. Just imagine how many people will be packing a IPod + PocketPC (Wifi enabled) ... wow the warez frenzy is going to get out of control, I be in metro New York theres a very very strong possiblity that 4 geeks will be doing this.

    However, they'll all be listening to the blue man group ... as there just that geeky. Guess no piracy.

    hehe, Mike

  35. STOP STEALING MUSIC. by atheken · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I am irritated when people "taint" the iPod by doing such thngs, not only because it does very well at the job it was designed for, but that it bastardizes the thing... asside from that, it's just a ploy to steal music, which is not what the iPod culture is about. Anyone that disagrees is just a common thief.

    1. Re:STOP STEALING MUSIC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you one of those people who sucks RIAA execs dicks just for pleasure?

  36. Great idea, but integration? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    So now can we just go to the next logical step and just stick the mini hd from the ipod into the pocketpc/pda? whats the point of having two devices? we seem to want to integrate stupid things like cameras and mp3 players so why not something useful like this?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Great idea, but integration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are right, but Jobs is waiting till the market has forgotten that he killed Sculley's baby (Newton) out of spite, saying things like "Apple makes computers: computers have keyboards" and "...that scribble pad thing". Apple apologists said there was no profit in handheld devices so Jobs was right to axe what became, and remains, the only serious handheld device. Apple fucked up big time by not continuing development of Newton. IPod is a pale shadow of the pocket device Apple would have been supplying by now. And it had a range of built-in copy protection options for files and software. Having spent a $billion Apple fell at the final hurdle on universal handheld device market domination. IMO A small Newton based Quicktime/Firewire/HD/Wifi/GPRSphone device on current hardware would have had even less competition than iPod.

  37. Toshiba e740 Pocket PC by supertbone · · Score: 1, Informative

    FYI the Toshiba e740 Pocket PC comes with a 802.11b adapter built in and has USB Host functionality (and VGA functionality) with a Toshiba expansion pack. I have one of these but I would not connect my iPod to it. The battery does not last very long (an hour) if you have WiFi enabled. They have a switch to turn it on and off. It would probably be worse when enabling USB host function. I have a 2 gig CF card with mp3s in it in the PDA. I also have additional storage on an SD/MMC slot that it is also built in. I use an iPod clone mp3 player on my PDA.

  38. This is about as elegant as... by LightningBolt! · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is about as elegant as adding WiFi to your lawnmower... by running over a PocketPC with the lawnmower.

    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
  39. Thats weak by pretzelsofwar · · Score: 1

    Thats like saying: you can talk to people but first they must have the same blood type, then they have to have a penny in their right pocket from 2000-2004, and who knows their penny's music might not be the music that you want to listen to. Yeah ok, maybe there might be a few people in dorms that think this is cool, but humm how many people do you think are going to have all of this available to them and how many people are going to keep it on long enough and be in the correct distance to keep a good strong connection going. They might as well make a ipod trading software online thats peer to peer, they would get so much more traffic.

    --
    redvsblue.com
    ::BANG!::
    Sarge: Did you just shoot yourself in the foot?
    Simmons: Yeah I do that sometimes now..
  40. Speed...and power by Reverant · · Score: 1

    The main reason is speed...when I transfer stuff via Bluetooth from my phone to my PowerBook, I can get 30kb/s at most...this means that an average 5MB song takes something like, 3 minutes to transfer. This might not be bad at all, if all you want to transfer is a track or two that you've just downloaded (and you're bored enough to pull that cable out of your laptop bag...) and wanna listen in your car or in the train right after work. For many songs however, the iPod will propably drain itself before you even finish transfering...

    1. Re:Speed...and power by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      That's perfect - it's sort of pirate-self-limiting. That's what the RIAA wants - to make it inconvenient, not impossible.

      As for power consumption, make it a toggle button with an auto-off for no devices in range. If you only use the extra juice during transfer, it shouldn't have a serious impact.

      OTOH, the other post about bluetooth headsets is pretty enticing. I'd be next in line to buy one if I could get it with a waterproof BT headset for swimming laps (the ipod being safely inside a sealed pouch).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  41. MS did something right? by Coolpup · · Score: 0, Troll

    What was the other thing M$ did right?

    1. Re:MS did something right? by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

      ...create hatred of their monopoly causing Linux to begin flourishing.

  42. Re:How is this possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If any iPod can read protected AAC files, then what is stopping any good hacker from getting whatever universal key iPods have and put it in VLC, so that it can directly play any protected AAC file, too ?

    Or is it really that syncing an iPod to a computer transmits the owner's iTMS key from the computer to the iPod, to be used for reading the protected files ? In that case, exchanging these files won't do any good unless the key can be attached to them in some way.

  43. PocketPC Interface by Baricom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the other hand, I think Palm's user experience knocks Pocket PC out of the water. I am very much a fan of their interface design. They built the Palm organizer from start to finish to simplify use on the go, and the fact that they broke into a market where Apple tried and utterly failed is enough to earn my respect.

    May I recommend Piloting Palm, ISBN 0471089656? It's an excellent look into the planning that went into engineering the first Palm Pilot. It's written by two Palm executives, so there's probably some bias, but then again, I doubt you'd be able to find neutrality from Microsoft, either.

    Remember, not everybody wants to carry a full-featured computer around in their pocket. My Tungsten C does everything I could possibly need to do away from a computer.

    1. Re:PocketPC Interface by Orick · · Score: 1

      I agree. Trying to use a laptop "on the go" is bad enough, but a pocket PC basically takes all the bad parts of a laptop experience and makes them much worse.

      --
      Kirby

  44. http://hymn-project.org/forums/ for m4p - m4a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    http://hymn-project.org/forums/ for iTMS m4p DRM removal to a plain m4a file. No transcode. Pure DRM removal, nothing else.

  45. But e740 is two years old and not made anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But e740 is two years old and not made anymore.

  46. Hey, look at me! by klang · · Score: 1

    I can run my iPod as an external harddisk on a pocket PC giving the iPod all the capabilities of the PC .. (wow, really!?!)

    Some would say that you have just added extra space to your pocket gizmo and that's that .. It's not like the iPod suddenly gets WiFi, now is it?

    There is no news here, move along ...

  47. Newton II by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    Why oh why is Steve Jobs against reviving the Newton? I recently got an emate cheap on ebay. While it is slow as molasses and hardly more than a toy for me at this point, I can see what they had in mind here and it is brilliant -- it makes me really wish Apple would revive it in some way. It is light and sturdy and it looks really cool. They could easily make something like this with a modern processor like the ones in recent palms, wifi, usb, and some basic software tools. Updated NewtonOS would be cool, but it also wouldn't take too much to throw a team on a stripped down version of OS X for use in PDA-like machines.

    I want a mini-laptop/pda like the emate that is actually usable for basic text processing, web browsing, email, ssh, and simple database tasks (address, calendar, etc.) PDAs are great but I want a keyboard for on-the-go typing, for taking notes at lectures, for putting ideas into. I don't even want a color screen -- I prefer battery life, and lots of it. And I don't need the OS to do anything fancy or even look that great; I prefer that it boot fast and sleep stable so it is always instant-on whenever I pop the hood. I want the keys to be quiet enough that I could type in a synagogue without bothering the person sitting next to me. And I want it to weigh 2 lbs and be made out of plastic and sturdy like the emate, which looks like it could be knocked around pretty badly without trouble (I've already dropped it twice on concrete and no problems other than cosmetic). And I want it to be as much of a chick magnet as the emate is; this is a fine, under-appreciated example of Apple's superior design. I think this is a great idea for Apple to do right; but I would just as happily see some other company do it using the PDA linux that runs on the yopy and zaurus...

    1. Re:Newton II by AlexV · · Score: 1

      What you want, then, is a Psion Revo. You can probably get them on eBay still.

    2. Re:Newton II by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info -- that's not really what I want, but searching led me to this: http://www.brighthand.com/article/Details_Leaked_o n_Rumored_Nokia_Handheld That could be something worth looking into. Thanks!

  48. Lance's sunglasses by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

    screw the ipod, I need sunglasses with a builtin MP3 player! 128 megs ought to get me through most of my bike rides...

  49. Movement by mfisher · · Score: 1

    I think alot of people will bad mouth this idea - but you should take a step back a look at the ideas that will be brought up with this idea. This is just a 1st step in the large uprise of the portable media empire. Small additions like this one will come and go fast but it will force manufactures to create a new Mp3 player with even more features.

  50. moot by jcsehak · · Score: 1

    I make music (c-hack.com), and giving it away for free is a great marketing tactic -- it gets more people to come to your shows. I want people to swap my music. Many professional artists (Jim's Big Ego, for instance) also like file sharing. I've just made your whole argument moot.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  51. not ipod specific by rizzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's no reason why a similar hack couldn't be used to swap songs between two Rio Karmas. Remember, the Rio Karma comes with enough connectivity options to make a grown man weep (usb, ethernet, RCA). And with the Karma, you can do it out of the box without any 3rd party add-ons.

    Why is this special?

  52. Excuse me..... by Andonyx · · Score: 1

    I have to run off and trademark the phrase....Wi-pod!

    --
    Andonyx www.andonyx.com
  53. "typing" by chrwei · · Score: 1

    "typing on the iPod requires turning the scroll wheel until the right character appears"

    only slightly better than filtering /dev/urandom until you what you wanted

    --
    - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
  54. Many, as Apple no longer sells Newtons. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Since PalmOS is pretty much a rag, there arent many alternatives for a *useable* PDA, but WinCE..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----