At my company we base all our data on powerpoint slides. That way managers are able to present the data to other managers with the ease of 2 hours of clicking "next slide". Truly you are behind the times.
If you'd read, it's not that either. It's that companies are only looking for perfect candidates for the particular thing they want done, as that saves them time and effort, and allows them to downsize as soon as the requirement is done. The removal of the concept of a "trainable" employee has been sabotaging their ability to find anyone, and since everyone else is engaged in poach-based hiring, the system is self-reinforcing.
In particular, it also explains why unemployment among the recently graduated is so high.
In fact, low grade EM radiation with a constant rate of delivery is used to treat cancers in lieu of chemotherapy now. Definitely has some effect on cell division.
Irrelevant. Geographic separation is a direct cause of speciation. Gene pools stop mixing, genetic drift pushes two similar groups far enough apart that they are no longer compatible.
There's morphic phenotypes that are different, for one. Bonobos are actually a lot smaller than chimps as mature adults. They are also much less able to solve complex puzzles, a difference that persists even when raised in complete separation of others from their own species. There's also the biological definition of species that requires that they be able to interbreed, we have never seen that happen.
It was kind of a joke about the state of healthcare in the United States. A prescription is a kind of announcement of a death sentence, you know, the other use of the world.
It was a bit of a stretch, but it was a hard mistake to pun on.
More generally, because everything medical in the United States is overpriced, because you can't go without them and there's functionally no competition.
What competition there is, is in getting doctors to proscribe things, rather than for the end consumer. Price never really factors in.
It's not a fundamental problem with capitalism; it's a (very slowly) emerging consequence. Capitalism does not NEED to have this problem, as long as all participants are self-determining, self-interested, rational actors. It's just that all 3 of those points are, at best, approximately true or true for most participants. The introduction of AI into the equation just adds actors who aren't self-determining(the goals of their decisions are predefined) or self-interested(they are programmed/trained to be interested in their owner's success). That will eventually collapse the system, if prevalent enough.
For the moment, though, there are enough tasks that humans are better at than computers that this does not need to be a concern. 50 years from now, being in a true capitalist economy will make your life hell.
Reality: customer actually wanted DEF. Sales guy just didn't understand what customer said. Developer spends 50% of time developing and supporting unwanted feature.
Well, I don't think Bradbury was a luddite who liked old entertainment and hated new, if that's what you mean. I can't imagine the format of the book mattering that much.
The reason's people became anti-intellectual was the intellectually vacant entertainment and lifestyle that had become normal. It's like Idiocracy without the implied support for eugenics. I didn't say it was causeless, that was an invention of your fevered imagination.
The book burning is pointless. The anti-intellectualism is there. The apathy towards real knowledge with supporting context is gone. Censorship only matters to people who care about deep understanding of things. There aren't many of those.
Humans have different needs than computers. It's almost like we need a table of easy to remember names that can be used to look up IP addresses automatically by a computer. Then that table needs to be distributed automatically to all the ISPs in the world. That'll never happen. Sounds impossible.
It doesn't NEED to be there. Books are just things, and their presence doesn't really deflect the problem unless the appreciation for careful, organized thought is also there.
If people aren't interested in reading, the biggest library in the world is pointless.
Texas and Alaska are also acceptable units.
Bad.
I provided 1 trillion times the evidence and supporting reasoning of the parent. My post is better.
Mars is easier to get to than the sun. The energy difference between the Earth's velocity and Mars' are much less than between the Earth and the Sun.
There are real people behind those posts now?
Close, there's redditors.
Bus.
I think you mean multi-pupil relocation device
At my company we base all our data on powerpoint slides. That way managers are able to present the data to other managers with the ease of 2 hours of clicking "next slide". Truly you are behind the times.
If you'd read, it's not that either. It's that companies are only looking for perfect candidates for the particular thing they want done, as that saves them time and effort, and allows them to downsize as soon as the requirement is done. The removal of the concept of a "trainable" employee has been sabotaging their ability to find anyone, and since everyone else is engaged in poach-based hiring, the system is self-reinforcing.
In particular, it also explains why unemployment among the recently graduated is so high.
I could probably dig it up if I weren't at work.
In fact, low grade EM radiation with a constant rate of delivery is used to treat cancers in lieu of chemotherapy now. Definitely has some effect on cell division.
Too bad the people who are going to be doing the attacks are hiring up all the possible defenders then.
Irrelevant. Geographic separation is a direct cause of speciation. Gene pools stop mixing, genetic drift pushes two similar groups far enough apart that they are no longer compatible.
Assuming you're not trolling here:
There's morphic phenotypes that are different, for one. Bonobos are actually a lot smaller than chimps as mature adults. They are also much less able to solve complex puzzles, a difference that persists even when raised in complete separation of others from their own species. There's also the biological definition of species that requires that they be able to interbreed, we have never seen that happen.
It was kind of a joke about the state of healthcare in the United States. A prescription is a kind of announcement of a death sentence, you know, the other use of the world.
It was a bit of a stretch, but it was a hard mistake to pun on.
Yep, because one wrong vowel is going to ruin your day. Come on. And to be fair, a prescription is a kind of proscription.
More generally, because everything medical in the United States is overpriced, because you can't go without them and there's functionally no competition.
What competition there is, is in getting doctors to proscribe things, rather than for the end consumer. Price never really factors in.
It's not a fundamental problem with capitalism; it's a (very slowly) emerging consequence. Capitalism does not NEED to have this problem, as long as all participants are self-determining, self-interested, rational actors. It's just that all 3 of those points are, at best, approximately true or true for most participants. The introduction of AI into the equation just adds actors who aren't self-determining(the goals of their decisions are predefined) or self-interested(they are programmed/trained to be interested in their owner's success). That will eventually collapse the system, if prevalent enough.
For the moment, though, there are enough tasks that humans are better at than computers that this does not need to be a concern. 50 years from now, being in a true capitalist economy will make your life hell.
Reality: customer actually wanted DEF. Sales guy just didn't understand what customer said. Developer spends 50% of time developing and supporting unwanted feature.
Well, I don't think Bradbury was a luddite who liked old entertainment and hated new, if that's what you mean. I can't imagine the format of the book mattering that much.
The reason's people became anti-intellectual was the intellectually vacant entertainment and lifestyle that had become normal. It's like Idiocracy without the implied support for eugenics. I didn't say it was causeless, that was an invention of your fevered imagination.
What if you get severely burned and then have no irises, fingerprints, and your face looks different? They should be incorporating DNA too.
Flip-side: it was the job of the main character, and therefor that character would be more likely to focus on it.
Nah, they'd already know what you were up to from having taped all your phone calls first.
The book burning is pointless. The anti-intellectualism is there. The apathy towards real knowledge with supporting context is gone. Censorship only matters to people who care about deep understanding of things. There aren't many of those.
Humans have different needs than computers. It's almost like we need a table of easy to remember names that can be used to look up IP addresses automatically by a computer. Then that table needs to be distributed automatically to all the ISPs in the world. That'll never happen. Sounds impossible.
It doesn't NEED to be there. Books are just things, and their presence doesn't really deflect the problem unless the appreciation for careful, organized thought is also there.
If people aren't interested in reading, the biggest library in the world is pointless.