That makes sense. 1.0.3 doesn't contain any serious rendering updates. The 1.0.x updates are only meant to fix potentially serious bugs like newly discovered possible exploits.
More structural changes shouldn't be included in maintenance updates. Instead they are going into the 1.1 release for Firefox.
Microsoft got bashed early this week for only talking about the NUMBER of security patches, but saying nothing about UNFIXED issues, size or criticality.
You make the very same mistakes and apply VERY poor arguments/logic in doing so.
It's about emissions. Not about plants. Don't narrow down the topic. There are many other sources of emissions, like cars with 5 liter engines.
But even if it WERE only about plants, you keep on making FUDdy statements:
1) you overlook the fact that new plants generally is less polluting than old plants.
2) you say nothing about the SIZE of these new plants.
3) you imply that the number of new plants is related to the total emission. This is of course not true. Suppose the US has 1000 plants and build 10 new ones and India has 100 plants and build 100 new ones. Then where will the greatest pollution come from?
I don't have an opinion either way on this topic to be honest, but such misleading statements as you make don't make "Kyoto is not necessary" feelings any stronger.
I think you misunderstand what Firefox is. Firefox is just the new name for the browser component of Mozilla. It's all the same open source project, they just changed the naming around a bit.
Not true. Firefox uses the same technology [XUL, Gecko etc.] but IS not "the same with some name changes". Originally Firefox was based on Mozilla but but they redesigned it step by step. First taking out the mail UI and prefs and then redesigning the UI and adding Firefox only features, extension manager etc etc.
At bugzilla you can file bugs against the suite [mozilla browser+mail], firefox [a browser-only implementation], thunderbird [mail-only implementation] and core components [covering "rendering", "dom", "forms" etc etc.]
I know that MS-TNEF is generated by a lame Outlook. But, I get a lot of email from corporate clients that I wouldn't be able to read (either partially or entirely), and it's not appropriate for me to tell them it's their problem.
This issue is the one that prevents me (and others) from abandoning Outlook altogether and switching to Thunderbird.
How convenient for Microsoft that it works that way! If i hadn't known better you might start to think that this was an intentional lock-in.
In all honesty though: any software intended for people to communicate with each other [like e-mail programs usually are] and then uses a format by default that pretty much only is supported out-of-the-box by itself is of course a complete misfit.
Plus, when is the suite's mail client getting the juicy new features from Thunderbird such as RSS support, saved search folders (a real killer feature) and improved grouping?
how about searching bugzilla?
bug 11051. Looks like it's there already.
You missed the Netherlands. Remember the guy lighting up the bong? That was his reference to the Netherlands (yes, the name of the Netherlands was displayed, too). The Netherlands have 1,300 troops in Iraq, making them one of the larger contingents.
In all honesty, people should distuingish between forces participating in the overthrowing of Saddam's gov't [no Dutch troops participated in that] and forces taking part in the transition from post-Saddam Iraq to a democrazy.
Similarly, Norway has forces in Iraq now, but not during the invasion. The norwegian troops are mostly engineers.
* The list of the "coalition of the willing" mentioned only tiny, irrelvant countries, and skipped over really important ones: England, Spain, Poland, the Netherlands. Yes, we did 90% of the work ourselves, but the film implied that we had absolutely no international support, which is simply not true.
The Netherlands exactly had ONE [1] person present before the invasion of Iraq. The task of this person was to act as a liason with the Dutch troops operation Patriots in Turkey, in case Iraq would retaliate that way.
This one person was shown off during a US press conference as proof of the Dutch support which lead to much political upheaval in the NL. The military official was called back to the NL to explain his presence at the press conference and he said that he was invited and didn't know that he would be "shown off" as proof of Dutch support.
The toolbar correctly shows a bold F for bold (called 'fed' in danish), but you still need to type Ctrl-B to activate it. I can not even begin to explain how totally counter-intuitive that is.
And of course you can just as well reverse that. As an non-native Norwegian i have to use Norwegian Word now from time to time, meaning that my keyboard shortcuts are totally horked...It made for some funny effects for a while, but the fun quickly grew stale!
Working with the same shortcuts regardless of the interface language may be your curse, but it's my blessing.
Slashdot Mirror
That makes sense. 1.0.3 doesn't contain any serious rendering updates. The 1.0.x updates are only meant to fix potentially serious bugs like newly discovered possible exploits. More structural changes shouldn't be included in maintenance updates. Instead they are going into the 1.1 release for Firefox.
Microsoft got bashed early this week for only talking about the NUMBER of security patches, but saying nothing about UNFIXED issues, size or criticality.
You make the very same mistakes and apply VERY poor arguments/logic in doing so.
It's about emissions. Not about plants. Don't narrow down the topic. There are many other sources of emissions, like cars with 5 liter engines.
But even if it WERE only about plants, you keep on making FUDdy statements:
1) you overlook the fact that new plants generally is less polluting than old plants.
2) you say nothing about the SIZE of these new plants.
3) you imply that the number of new plants is related to the total emission. This is of course not true. Suppose the US has 1000 plants and build 10 new ones and India has 100 plants and build 100 new ones. Then where will the greatest pollution come from?
I don't have an opinion either way on this topic to be honest, but such misleading statements as you make don't make "Kyoto is not necessary" feelings any stronger.
At bugzilla you can file bugs against the suite [mozilla browser+mail], firefox [a browser-only implementation], thunderbird [mail-only implementation] and core components [covering "rendering", "dom", "forms" etc etc.]
can't you put it in a custom CSS and tell Moz to use that all the time?
I know that MS-TNEF is generated by a lame Outlook. But, I get a lot of email from corporate clients that I wouldn't be able to read (either partially or entirely), and it's not appropriate for me to tell them it's their problem.
This issue is the one that prevents me (and others) from abandoning Outlook altogether and switching to Thunderbird.
How convenient for Microsoft that it works that way! If i hadn't known better you might start to think that this was an intentional lock-in.
In all honesty though: any software intended for people to communicate with each other [like e-mail programs usually are] and then uses a format by default that pretty much only is supported out-of-the-box by itself is of course a complete misfit.
NB: i think this is fixed in Outlook 2003 though.
they did. it's called blogger.com
Read the fine print on that page "Copyright © 1999 - 2004 Google "
Plus, when is the suite's mail client getting the juicy new features from Thunderbird such as RSS support, saved search folders (a real killer feature) and improved grouping?
how about searching bugzilla?
bug 11051. Looks like it's there already.
I haven't checked for your other things.
and invite patrickhendriks@hotmail.com
Hmm..i missed the obvious similarity: Primus inter pares: "The term was used by Roman Emperors as a means of reducing the appearance of dictatorship."
2 0inter%20pares
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/primus%
primus inter pares: http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/primus%2 0inter%20pares
You missed the Netherlands. Remember the guy lighting up the bong? That was his reference to the Netherlands (yes, the name of the Netherlands was displayed, too). The Netherlands have 1,300 troops in Iraq, making them one of the larger contingents.
In all honesty, people should distuingish between forces participating in the overthrowing of Saddam's gov't [no Dutch troops participated in that] and forces taking part in the transition from post-Saddam Iraq to a democrazy.
Similarly, Norway has forces in Iraq now, but not during the invasion. The norwegian troops are mostly engineers.
* The list of the "coalition of the willing" mentioned only tiny, irrelvant countries, and skipped over really important ones: England, Spain, Poland, the Netherlands. Yes, we did 90% of the work ourselves, but the film implied that we had absolutely no international support, which is simply not true.
The Netherlands exactly had ONE [1] person present before the invasion of Iraq. The task of this person was to act as a liason with the Dutch troops operation Patriots in Turkey, in case Iraq would retaliate that way. This one person was shown off during a US press conference as proof of the Dutch support which lead to much political upheaval in the NL. The military official was called back to the NL to explain his presence at the press conference and he said that he was invited and didn't know that he would be "shown off" as proof of Dutch support.
Q: what if you don't press SHIFT the first time you inser the CD? Will the software be forever installed on your PC? If so, how to get rid of it?
The toolbar correctly shows a bold F for bold (called 'fed' in danish), but you still need to type Ctrl-B to activate it. I can not even begin to explain how totally counter-intuitive that is.
And of course you can just as well reverse that. As an non-native Norwegian i have to use Norwegian Word now from time to time, meaning that my keyboard shortcuts are totally horked...It made for some funny effects for a while, but the fun quickly grew stale!
Working with the same shortcuts regardless of the interface language may be your curse, but it's my blessing.