however proper funny they think they can influence us rather than trigger the general nerdy binary response of walking away or blowing holes in their nonesense.
oh my god, we must act now, the best solution is to double the Tax rate for American wage slaves immediately, and use the money to fund mass beer production in China.
On the plus side, it seems this is actually about trying to get the stealth working against the 1998 s300s just delivered to syria, rather than the 1978 s300s they were tested against, if they cant, they are just less maneuverable, smaller payload f15s, for 10 times the price.
It starts with "Once again, a nasty legal battle has pulled back the curtain of secrecy that shrouds major game-industry deals. " i.e. there's been a lot of them. Agreements with microsoft to not let any of their studios produce linux versions, replying to linux support requests that they are breaching terms of service by using their pc games on Linux (that was the point I banned them iirc), just a pile the size of everest of examples, I didn't exactly keep a journal, but as far as I know its well known to linux gamers.
The one that immediately springs to mind is the various id software court cases. but there are a lot of them, as mentioned in https://www.gamespot.com/artic...
basically they do everything they can to subvert linux developement, its one of the reasons they have only 3 titles on android vs 10 on ios, when android destoys ios for graphics subsystems.
You clearly miss the point entirely. Activision, for nearly two decades have done everything they could to undermine, damage and thwart gaming on linux. from legal action to firing any developer that dared use it. for example. https://www.gamingonlinux.com/...
it is definately not a coincidence that a couple of months after someone starts a thread asking "will i be banned for using linux", acti starts hunting down and banning linux users.
The fact they now have to advertise the fact that playing on linux isn't a bannable offensive kinda suggests its not false positive; and even if it is a false positive, its one false positive among a pile the size of E verest of true positives.
there is significant intrisic value in not having to rely on the banks to store the digits of your financial value, or decide how and who you conduct financial transactions with. Economics 401.
but without an editor and very (still to) limited debugging and error logging.
its definately getting there. but i had a check on js after posting and still found literally nothing but unanswered questions, python seems to have slightly better support but still includes warnings that things silently fail, plus requires additional setup on the user side which completely defeats the point.
such clients typically cannot install software on the computers they use without jumping through a thousand hoops. even "installerless" software requires preauthorisation.
Excel VBA is more like a loophole that lets them order bespoke software without having to get pre approval from IT.
its getting there, but not quite there yet. Tons of consultants justify their fees (and go for lock in to their services) using excel vba. if libreoffice would introduce "javascript for spreadsheets" google docs and office would die the day after.
Slashdot Mirror
eh?
facial recognition wont help with that, any more than photo id. in fact computers are even less reliable at recognising faces than people.
however proper funny they think they can influence us rather than trigger the general nerdy binary response of walking away or blowing holes in their nonesense.
i don't, after they posted winter 2000 polar sat images and compared them with summer 2016 polar sat images.
oh my god, we must act now, the best solution is to double the Tax rate for American wage slaves immediately, and use the money to fund mass beer production in China.
On the plus side, it seems this is actually about trying to get the stealth working against the 1998 s300s just delivered to syria, rather than the 1978 s300s they were tested against, if they cant, they are just less maneuverable, smaller payload f15s, for 10 times the price.
Automatic, zero bit watches still rule the roost.
probably a better way than being an intern for the WHO tho, but its ok, they promise to stop treating their interns like cattle by 2020.
It starts with "Once again, a nasty legal battle has pulled back the curtain of secrecy that shrouds major game-industry deals. " i.e. there's been a lot of them. Agreements with microsoft to not let any of their studios produce linux versions, replying to linux support requests that they are breaching terms of service by using their pc games on Linux (that was the point I banned them iirc), just a pile the size of everest of examples, I didn't exactly keep a journal, but as far as I know its well known to linux gamers.
The one that immediately springs to mind is the various id software court cases. but there are a lot of them, as mentioned in https://www.gamespot.com/artic...
basically they do everything they can to subvert linux developement, its one of the reasons they have only 3 titles on android vs 10 on ios, when android destoys ios for graphics subsystems.
You clearly miss the point entirely. Activision, for nearly two decades have done everything they could to undermine, damage and thwart gaming on linux. from legal action to firing any developer that dared use it.
for example.
https://www.gamingonlinux.com/...
it is definately not a coincidence that a couple of months after someone starts a thread asking "will i be banned for using linux", acti starts hunting down and banning linux users.
No, they started taking action a couple of months after they found out people were playing their games on linux
https://eu.battle.net/forums/e...
The fact they now have to advertise the fact that playing on linux isn't a bannable offensive kinda suggests its not false positive; and even if it is a false positive, its one false positive among a pile the size of E
verest of true positives.
I'm willing to rethink the ban if they stop actively trying to undermine linux gaming.
not really, I banned activision from my house due to their treatment of linux.
as reported on tuesday
nah, they hacked and shutdown various nsa servers, users seeing the messages were having their content routed through them.
more like the EUs are upset all the content the paid for is available on thepiratebay and not netflix.
probably the conventional thinking. similar to when you could only fill up fords at a ford gas station back in the day I guess.
uk jails are full of people who hate sodomites. The sidomites are all outside running the shithole country.
there is significant intrisic value in not having to rely on the banks to store the digits of your financial value, or decide how and who you conduct financial transactions with.
Economics 401.
They're available from the canteen.
but without an editor and very (still to) limited debugging and error logging.
its definately getting there. but i had a check on js after posting and still found literally nothing but unanswered questions, python seems to have slightly better support but still includes warnings that things silently fail, plus requires additional setup on the user side which completely defeats the point.
no.
such clients typically cannot install software on the computers they use without jumping through a thousand hoops. even "installerless" software requires preauthorisation.
Excel VBA is more like a loophole that lets them order bespoke software without having to get pre approval from IT.
on the other hand.
any "it professional" using windows 10 should be immediately fired for gross negligence.
its getting there, but not quite there yet.
Tons of consultants justify their fees (and go for lock in to their services) using excel vba. if libreoffice would introduce "javascript for spreadsheets" google docs and office would die the day after.