and gave look at./ finding that "no one is going to work for free.".
mh...
Paradoxally it is easer to find people willing to work for free on difficult (and interesting) algorithms, than people willing write a lot of trivial code (like a gui:).
And this shows up a lot on linux, where we have a lot of very good but difficult to use programs.
is that they do not want something that is like windows, they just want windows.
I've seen people that prefer to do very complicated things on windows rather than running a couple of unix commands.
Most people do not "choose" to use linux, they just learn one way to do thing, and this will be "the way" to do things.
They are more sure to use windows than you will ever be to use linux, as a superior entity (the computer seller) imposed it to them.
Instead you choosed to use linux, you know that there are many OSes, so you'll never be 100% sure that linux is the right choice over all other OSes.
How strange is world we are living...
Dual Geforce 7800 in SLI??????????
With the insane amount of money required to buy 2 Geforce 7800 a whole opteron cluster could be built (or little less):-)
that, since graphic hardware is now completely programmable, ATI and Nvidia realese their specs, so that everyone can use the GPU as a specialized vectorial coprocessor.
A CPU that cannot be programmed freely just makes no sense, the same should be for GPU.
This was for sure not intended as a flamebait, as there is really no Exa vs Xgl, they are being both developed by Xorg people.
BTW, if you mods were just helping me to get a +5 flamebait rating, this is really going to make me happy:-)
that, as X developers said, this is only a temporary solution, so that while Xgl matures we will have hardware alpha compositing in hardware.
The final solution will be pushing the entire hardware abstaction layer (OpenGL) under the Xserver, in order to take advantage of the 3D hardware on the desktop too.
While i love enlightement, evas just provides i a layer on the top of X (or some thing else).
A new x driver architecture is requite to let evas, qt, gtk (and your other favourite toolkits) to really take advantage of you graphic hardware with accelerated alpha blending and window backing store.
This is not to compete with evas, just to allow it to do better things.
i find quite sad that someone who can access the source code is looking for the help of someone who cannot access it...
Sorry, but your comparison with a manuscript doesn't really make sense (i this context).
something really interesting in the code, now that Solaris is open?
People has been saying "Sun will never open Solaris" for month, now that it is open all that they do is to grep "fuck" or "shit", or look for frustrated comments?
Slashdot Mirror
mh...
Paradoxally it is easer to find people willing to work for free on difficult (and interesting) algorithms, than people willing write a lot of trivial code (like a gui :).
And this shows up a lot on linux, where we have a lot of very good but difficult to use programs.
How much will i have to pay to try the beta?
So are videos using US patented windows/real codecs to show that we are free to use them?
Luckily i will not have to feel ashamed of being european (i already have to feel ashamed of being italian, for many reasons).
is that they do not want something that is like windows, they just want windows. I've seen people that prefer to do very complicated things on windows rather than running a couple of unix commands. Most people do not "choose" to use linux, they just learn one way to do thing, and this will be "the way" to do things. They are more sure to use windows than you will ever be to use linux, as a superior entity (the computer seller) imposed it to them. Instead you choosed to use linux, you know that there are many OSes, so you'll never be 100% sure that linux is the right choice over all other OSes. How strange is world we are living...
"Star Builder Destroyed Before Your Eyes"
as windows is (still) where it is only for compatibility.
while(1) fork();
as they are breaking Beethoven's copyright.
Dual Geforce 7800 in SLI?????????? With the insane amount of money required to buy 2 Geforce 7800 a whole opteron cluster could be built (or little less) :-)
that, since graphic hardware is now completely programmable, ATI and Nvidia realese their specs, so that everyone can use the GPU as a specialized vectorial coprocessor. A CPU that cannot be programmed freely just makes no sense, the same should be for GPU.
I can't SEE what the problem is.
Thank you, DrWhizBang.
if they are going to be modded -1,flamebait by uninformed moderators. In my previous post i wrote that Exa is a temporary solution before Xgl (as it is http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2005-J une/008356.html), please think before modding.
How can i do an informative post if uninformed moderators are going to mod me -1,flamebait? Please check Xorg ml, and think before modding: http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2005-J une/008356.html
Just ask Nvidia, Xorg people can do nothing to fix Nvidia drivers problems.
This was for sure not intended as a flamebait, as there is really no Exa vs Xgl, they are being both developed by Xorg people. BTW, if you mods were just helping me to get a +5 flamebait rating, this is really going to make me happy :-)
that, as X developers said, this is only a temporary solution, so that while Xgl matures we will have hardware alpha compositing in hardware. The final solution will be pushing the entire hardware abstaction layer (OpenGL) under the Xserver, in order to take advantage of the 3D hardware on the desktop too.
While i love enlightement, evas just provides i a layer on the top of X (or some thing else). A new x driver architecture is requite to let evas, qt, gtk (and your other favourite toolkits) to really take advantage of you graphic hardware with accelerated alpha blending and window backing store. This is not to compete with evas, just to allow it to do better things.
are food for the trolls... 100+ replies in about 2 minutes :-)
In a study sponsorized by microsoft.
i find quite sad that someone who can access the source code is looking for the help of someone who cannot access it... Sorry, but your comparison with a manuscript doesn't really make sense (i this context).
Black hats do black magic
Blue hats do blue screens of death
to have bugs found by hackers rather than by its own employes (that have access to the source code).
something really interesting in the code, now that Solaris is open? People has been saying "Sun will never open Solaris" for month, now that it is open all that they do is to grep "fuck" or "shit", or look for frustrated comments?