There is another argument about sentience and spatial awareness, as many with autistic spectral disorders lack personal displacement awareness. Understanding spacial relativity helps humans, who largely understand this, design objects with this 'sense', and can therefore increase the probability that object interaction can be predictable, and therefore collisions and undesired actions preventable.
Maybe you never wrote a book. You didn't do the research, battle editors, publishers and the gooby sales people at the publishers. Maybe you didn't go out and do this numerous times. Maybe you haven't got a clue as to why authors believe, like others, that copyrights and copyright derivatives are a tangible asset, just like a car you might build from scratch. I've done both.
When someone utters my text to someone else apart from obvious fair use, then they're making money from my work and robbing me of my deserved income. They're imparting the content of what I've done. I don't do children's books or fiction-- and I doubt someone's going to recite crap about hardware. If, however, I'm a fiction author, and someone tapes my work and sells it without respecting my copyright, then I'll sue them and win, just like the out of court settlment Google is sending us (where's the check, Eric?) for wholesale ripping authors off for books.google.com
Understand what fair use is. Use it liberally, as I do. Understand what fair use *isn't* and don't rob me.
Xen as Novell ships in SUSE 10.1/10.2 is dramatically better, if bereft of tools. xVM is also very good, but suffers the same problem. Adding value is the name of the game, and Maritz fights more than the lackluster implementations of Hyper-V. Ask Microsoft for their Windows 2008 sales numbers and watch them distract you from the question. It's selling like Vista, although it's not bad-- just difficult to value-justify upgrading to.
xVM on the desktop or server is nice... but lacks compatibility that ESX and Xen-alikes are pounding them with. Xen has improved dramatically, even from versions of six months ago. Citrix/XenServer is decent, but the SLES 10.2 version is ready to rock.
None of the conflicts that the US is in are defense wars. A bunch of people got past security in Manchester and Boston and now we're torching up the Middle East.
It's a good policy to use these devices to save soldier's lives now that we're caught in this mess.
An ounce of prevention and disbelief in obvious propaganda would have prevented the pounds, no megatons of cure we've needed subsequently.
And if a better version of the Linux kernel emerges, so much the better. Utilities that work and software that's supported knows no boundaries.
Michael Dell is a follower, not a leader. He's trying to be Steve, but it doesn't work. You could collapse about 2/3rds of Dell's mgmt, IMHO, and make them a lot more profitable and take the funds and do real R&D. Then he'd be more like Steve-- except he'd need to grow a beard and start wearing sweatshirts.
You don't recognize a typical negotiating stance when you see one. Russian pride is important, just like German pride, Chinese pride, etc. Home grown efforts are typical chest-thumping moves. Michael Dell pissed off Putin. Putin thumped his chest.
Much of the world, including in the USA, would like to tell Microsoft to self fornicate. Do you think we LIKE to pay money to Microsoft? Microsoft is a business plan. There's no inherent love for what they produce, only the value of what they produce gives you or I.
For Putin, BeetWare is a great way to snub the pseudo-erudite Dell at a major world conference. His 'status' is therefore enhanced, in the same stupid way that the Premier of Turkey is now a local hero.
Your understanding of the situation reminds me of Bush looking at his polls.
Putin, not big on technology, took Dell's question as an insult, and retorted with a prideful display. Nothing more than that.
Chances of Dell selling much into Russia? Poorer-- although it would be a great counter-culture way to insult Putin. For that alone, an offset may have been made so as to prevent Dell from having to file an 8K (for downward trend warning due to sales-geek faux pas).
XP was solid, if you mean they had to coat it with the titanium of XP SP2+. Then there was the deliciousness of Vista, an enormous debacle- even for Microsoft. Now the spin is "Oh, Windows 7, so sexy and fixed!".
This while netbooks arrive with a diversity of operating systems, Macs take the only burgeoning segment in computing-- laptops to the bank, and Windows Mobile can't get out of the ditch, let alone compete with the ugliness of Android, the closed architectures of the iPhone, and so on.
I wonder if and how some people get paid to make such delightful astroturfing trolling statements. Maybe there's a job for them at Amazon.
Right. Walking down the street, a guy comes up and sticks them up. Shoot the victim. Aid? Abet? Just by surfing some place or by being unarmed and perhaps not smart as you are?
There should be 250,000 litigants, one each for the number of botted machines out there filing suit against him in addition to being behind bars with his hands cuffed (can one type in cuffs? might be interesting).
This guy is a poster boy for how due process ought to work for computer criminals. The trust factor should be zero. This isn't a hero, this is a master thief.
In real terms, husbands leave wives with children. Support is iffy. There are the blind, the developmentally disabled, the physically disabled, and others that we as a society have a need to care for, lest they find themselves in the gutter.
You can buy lots of pasta and pork hocks for cheap. You eat them and get fat.
No no no. This is a great ploy to keep the costs of operating systems low, and to standardize. It's a jab at Microsoft, but also to others with high costs (read Solaris, IBM's long list, HP's long list, etc.).
And if it works, and puts pressure on other OS makers to do better, so much the better.
Will we want to code in RussOS? Why not-- if there's a good reason to.
Personality and other heuristics are bound to occur. The tests, however, aren't really based on whether someone can play like Billy Joel or Chopin.
Turing was very aware of asking the right questions to get the right answers of a cognitive, self-aware entity. How that entity is abstracted as a physical entity is the mistake of the article. I can't play piano-- do I fail the test? Through what disciplines do we decide that there are cognitive components that establish a baseline of sentience and intelligence? Some of these, Turing tests for. Others are excellence (or not) in communications transports. That's my truck with the article.
The article makes the mistake, however, of adding heuristics that really don't have anything to do with the tenets of the Turing Tests. Robotics aren't really allied, only cognitive results. Robotics is one discipline, where cognitive response is another. That's my problem with it.
The Turing test is for apparent 'human' intelligence, where robotics adds communications via 'expressiveness'. These are two different vectors: rote intelligence and capacity to communicate (via body language, and the rest of linguistics/heuristics).
The article doesn't abstract the basic cognitive capacity because it entangles it with the communications medium. The Turing Test ought to be done in a confessional, where you don't get to see the device taking the test. It would also provide a feedback loop on the test as well.
Co-generation, or taking the products of one process and using the heat products or byproducts to power another has been around for generations. The distributed (geographically) nature of the co-generation process and the inability to handily drop the generated power into a grid is what kills that process.
In terms of toxicity, the groundwater is already contaminated in many areas with PERC (which could have been broken down through cheap catalysts and then 'burned') because we don't handle toxic chemical 'life cycle' production correctly. We have to close the loops on these processes, and this is one of the ways to do it.
Slashdot Mirror
Even 'the cloud' needs availability procedures, backups, and though provided to the entire process.
But you didn't RTFA, did you?
Developers are one community supported in the paper, but it mostly speaks to SaaS, including observations of Ellison to Stallman.
There is another argument about sentience and spatial awareness, as many with autistic spectral disorders lack personal displacement awareness. Understanding spacial relativity helps humans, who largely understand this, design objects with this 'sense', and can therefore increase the probability that object interaction can be predictable, and therefore collisions and undesired actions preventable.
Spatial awareness is one more step towards real sentience... self-awareness by displacement. Non-trivial.
If I just had mod points....
Das Penguinistas! Viva Che Stallman!!!!!
Maybe you never wrote a book. You didn't do the research, battle editors, publishers and the gooby sales people at the publishers. Maybe you didn't go out and do this numerous times. Maybe you haven't got a clue as to why authors believe, like others, that copyrights and copyright derivatives are a tangible asset, just like a car you might build from scratch. I've done both.
When someone utters my text to someone else apart from obvious fair use, then they're making money from my work and robbing me of my deserved income. They're imparting the content of what I've done. I don't do children's books or fiction-- and I doubt someone's going to recite crap about hardware. If, however, I'm a fiction author, and someone tapes my work and sells it without respecting my copyright, then I'll sue them and win, just like the out of court settlment Google is sending us (where's the check, Eric?) for wholesale ripping authors off for books.google.com
Understand what fair use is. Use it liberally, as I do. Understand what fair use *isn't* and don't rob me.
There would be volunteers, especially sex workers. [please, no seemingly obligatory replies with additional volunteer types]
Xen as Novell ships in SUSE 10.1/10.2 is dramatically better, if bereft of tools. xVM is also very good, but suffers the same problem. Adding value is the name of the game, and Maritz fights more than the lackluster implementations of Hyper-V. Ask Microsoft for their Windows 2008 sales numbers and watch them distract you from the question. It's selling like Vista, although it's not bad-- just difficult to value-justify upgrading to.
xVM on the desktop or server is nice... but lacks compatibility that ESX and Xen-alikes are pounding them with. Xen has improved dramatically, even from versions of six months ago. Citrix/XenServer is decent, but the SLES 10.2 version is ready to rock.
None of the conflicts that the US is in are defense wars. A bunch of people got past security in Manchester and Boston and now we're torching up the Middle East.
It's a good policy to use these devices to save soldier's lives now that we're caught in this mess.
An ounce of prevention and disbelief in obvious propaganda would have prevented the pounds, no megatons of cure we've needed subsequently.
Nothing more than nationalistic pride.
And if a better version of the Linux kernel emerges, so much the better. Utilities that work and software that's supported knows no boundaries.
Michael Dell is a follower, not a leader. He's trying to be Steve, but it doesn't work. You could collapse about 2/3rds of Dell's mgmt, IMHO, and make them a lot more profitable and take the funds and do real R&D. Then he'd be more like Steve-- except he'd need to grow a beard and start wearing sweatshirts.
You don't recognize a typical negotiating stance when you see one. Russian pride is important, just like German pride, Chinese pride, etc. Home grown efforts are typical chest-thumping moves. Michael Dell pissed off Putin. Putin thumped his chest.
Much of the world, including in the USA, would like to tell Microsoft to self fornicate. Do you think we LIKE to pay money to Microsoft? Microsoft is a business plan. There's no inherent love for what they produce, only the value of what they produce gives you or I.
For Putin, BeetWare is a great way to snub the pseudo-erudite Dell at a major world conference. His 'status' is therefore enhanced, in the same stupid way that the Premier of Turkey is now a local hero.
Swell.
Your understanding of the situation reminds me of Bush looking at his polls.
Putin, not big on technology, took Dell's question as an insult, and retorted with a prideful display. Nothing more than that.
Chances of Dell selling much into Russia? Poorer-- although it would be a great counter-culture way to insult Putin. For that alone, an offset may have been made so as to prevent Dell from having to file an 8K (for downward trend warning due to sales-geek faux pas).
Don't go in to politics.
There's a Microsoft troll in our midst.
XP was solid, if you mean they had to coat it with the titanium of XP SP2+. Then there was the deliciousness of Vista, an enormous debacle- even for Microsoft. Now the spin is "Oh, Windows 7, so sexy and fixed!".
This while netbooks arrive with a diversity of operating systems, Macs take the only burgeoning segment in computing-- laptops to the bank, and Windows Mobile can't get out of the ditch, let alone compete with the ugliness of Android, the closed architectures of the iPhone, and so on.
I wonder if and how some people get paid to make such delightful astroturfing trolling statements. Maybe there's a job for them at Amazon.
I can see use beyond military applications.
But we need to do something besides crop dusting. Look at the deadzone in the Gulf of Mexico if you have any doubt.
Postal/parcel delivery of perhaps the most important things, like organ transplants or something. Otherwise the use is over the top.
Search and rescue, maybe. Would Steve Fossett have been found any sooner?
I know that from a defense standpoint, these things have to be developed. On the other hand, one less military weapon would do the world some good.
Right. Walking down the street, a guy comes up and sticks them up. Shoot the victim. Aid? Abet? Just by surfing some place or by being unarmed and perhaps not smart as you are?
There should be 250,000 litigants, one each for the number of botted machines out there filing suit against him in addition to being behind bars with his hands cuffed (can one type in cuffs? might be interesting).
This guy is a poster boy for how due process ought to work for computer criminals. The trust factor should be zero. This isn't a hero, this is a master thief.
Linking obesity and welfare is a stretch.
In real terms, husbands leave wives with children. Support is iffy. There are the blind, the developmentally disabled, the physically disabled, and others that we as a society have a need to care for, lest they find themselves in the gutter.
You can buy lots of pasta and pork hocks for cheap. You eat them and get fat.
But then, an XBox life can do that to you, too.
No no no. This is a great ploy to keep the costs of operating systems low, and to standardize. It's a jab at Microsoft, but also to others with high costs (read Solaris, IBM's long list, HP's long list, etc.).
And if it works, and puts pressure on other OS makers to do better, so much the better.
Will we want to code in RussOS? Why not-- if there's a good reason to.
I said it before: Lake Hadron. New shoreline real estate for sale, soon.
Don't mind the Schwarzchild radius, come on in!
Personality and other heuristics are bound to occur. The tests, however, aren't really based on whether someone can play like Billy Joel or Chopin.
Turing was very aware of asking the right questions to get the right answers of a cognitive, self-aware entity. How that entity is abstracted as a physical entity is the mistake of the article. I can't play piano-- do I fail the test? Through what disciplines do we decide that there are cognitive components that establish a baseline of sentience and intelligence? Some of these, Turing tests for. Others are excellence (or not) in communications transports. That's my truck with the article.
The article makes the mistake, however, of adding heuristics that really don't have anything to do with the tenets of the Turing Tests. Robotics aren't really allied, only cognitive results. Robotics is one discipline, where cognitive response is another. That's my problem with it.
The Turing test is for apparent 'human' intelligence, where robotics adds communications via 'expressiveness'. These are two different vectors: rote intelligence and capacity to communicate (via body language, and the rest of linguistics/heuristics).
The article doesn't abstract the basic cognitive capacity because it entangles it with the communications medium. The Turing Test ought to be done in a confessional, where you don't get to see the device taking the test. It would also provide a feedback loop on the test as well.
If you look up thread, you'll note the hawks are in today.
Tell that to the guys in the cemetary, their widows, their children.
Co-generation, or taking the products of one process and using the heat products or byproducts to power another has been around for generations. The distributed (geographically) nature of the co-generation process and the inability to handily drop the generated power into a grid is what kills that process.
In terms of toxicity, the groundwater is already contaminated in many areas with PERC (which could have been broken down through cheap catalysts and then 'burned') because we don't handle toxic chemical 'life cycle' production correctly. We have to close the loops on these processes, and this is one of the ways to do it.
Hey, you seem to get it.
Wanna job?
HR@microsoft.com
HR@att.net
HT@google.com
Oh... wait.