Yes, they have a proven history. Yet Citrix and Xen has made lots of gains, into places like AWS, etc. Hyper-V, despite its being hamstrung, isn't bad, either. KVM and LVM are pretty darn good, but work only with Linux (a good or bad thing depending on your choice).
So they're not wannabes. VMWare has priced itself at an insanely high price point, making many organizations want to leave. Yes, there's a great ecosystem and lots of attachments, options, third party support, and it's all REALLY EXPENSIVE. Got budget?
I know fully well what kind of compression yields occur after various renderings.
So go ahead. Use that 1080p movie. Not 1 in 100 can visually discern the difference, and not 1 in 5000 use more than two channels for playback. Lots of empty cars on that train, eh?
Do people need more space? Yes. Should they all have their own copies? No. We need the pipes that allow deduplicated streams, regionalized/localized cache, and other more astute distribution mechanisms. We already have data rates that exceed the realtime needs of 1080p-- why don't we use THOSE (speaking to those in the USA)? Why must the wheel be constantly reinvented? Why have AT&T and Verizon been allowed to lay new copper instead of fiber *everywhere*? Sorry for the rant, but quoting raw data rates is a red herring.
Lossy codecs suck. I understand the implications of that statement, but lost quality these days is like death by a thousand cuts. You can do varying kinds of compression, but the net result is that media will tend to fill the space provided for it, no matter the compression type or level. It's all about consumption, not letting go when you're done. We hoard media like we hoard hobbyist materials, and so forth.
You can argue, successfully, that via virtualization and multi-core relationships that the ARM power argument is goofy, as number of threads per process and virtualization favors the CISC architectures. The ARM infrastructure, however, the foundation for a couple of decent server product lines. The architecture cited is very much like getting a bunch of ARM CPUs together to do what more power hungry quad/multi-core Intel and AMD chips are doing to day. Remember: the ARM is 32-bit, and the number of threads are limited both by inherent architecture as well as the memory ceiling.
What's scary to me is that someone wrote that it has a crossbar switch on it without understanding what that implies in terms of inter-CPU communications, cache, cache sync/coherence, etc. A well-designed system will perform almost as well with iSCSI (on a non-blocking, switched backplane) as it will with SAS so IO isn't quite the issue; the power claim vs thread density per watt expended claim has yet to be proven.
Ideas aren't patent-protected. They might be trade secrets, but are revealed when put into a product. Just because you dreamed it doesn't mean you own it, by any means. The patent process is well known. On the surface, it sounds like Jobs, similar to many entrepreneurs, was fearful of how fast Google evolved Android-- and with good reason. You don't get a free ride in tech, as if you're successful, there's competition as you don't have a monopoly on product development and marketing thought.
That someone else thought up ideas, or made something similar with or without the inspiration of something you've done, isn't illegal or even immoral. It might be a violation of patents granted. Then you open up the old Pandora's Box of patent problems.
When a theatre or gas station refuses big bills, it means you can still pay in smaller bills.
If you steal, that's criminal, but can also be civil so as to recover it if you eat the bar. I'm sure they don't want it after it goes through your digestive system.
Despite the fact that Lousiana doesn't subscribe to the UCC, a debt is uncurred when you purchase something, until you satisfy that debt-- by paying for it.
I think the whole idea of passing such a law means they've been out in the bayou snorting swamp gas again. What a goofy bunch of elected officials. Oh, wait.
CItations regarding oil economics are usually invalid, because the oil companies live in an alternate universe where supply and demand are mirages. It's not capitalism, it's poker.
There are more than three players in the HD market; this is my point--> an artificial shortage to drive prices up in a razor-thin-margin industry is common practice; it happens with memory chips frequently, tho less so than before (lots of litigation has helped). In this case, market manipulation may not be in the offing, as subsequent investigations reveal more details. It's a sad situation there. Ugly, in fact.
I do. It's just a visible example of a company not in the oil biz that raised its price based on commodity price increase claims that were mostly bogus. They just need to report a way-cool quarter to Wall Street. As for their coffee.... well..... that's another website.
SKU quantities belie the actual drives that are manufactured and how many of *those* go inside. Hitachi, Samsung, and a bunch of others make drives. Who makes the drives that go inside those cans? Ah-- there's the interesting statistic.
If so, then it's a disaster for them. Yet I've seen SE Asian plants go from hills near a rice paddy to full production in less time. Perhaps I'm wrong about the size of the disaster, and if so, my bad. I've also seen lots of PR and disinformation poised at market price manipulation, so I'll retain my skepticism and hope for the best outcome for all.
If Seagate had such a huge presence in consumer drives, they might be worrisome, but WD and Seagate live in different sales channels, as well as different markets. Go look at a big box computer store these days and tell me about the overlap.
Drives are OEM'd. If a manufacturer has a single point of failure in their process chain, then they're in deep donuts. While I feel for the employees of the affected factories, I don't believe it's going to cause the crisis predicted.
If it takes this long to bring production back up to schedule after a couple weeks delay, I'd say we're looking at a marketplace price manipulation with a convenient excuse of flooding in Thailand.
The commodity markets use weather as an excuse to try to boink up prices all of the time. Hey Starbucks-- coffee is down 23%-- are you going to drop your recent price hike? Oh, I thought not.
Now stop that. It's against the rules to RTFA around here, so that everyone can sound like an authority.
Plainly, according to the author's side and if the sequence of events is truthful, Penguin The Publisher is most certainly breaching their contract. She, and her attorney, will be rich despite how many books or copies she eventually sells. Penguin ought to be unabashedly apologetic. But I doubt they get that. 99% and all that.
Anyone is a candidate for OS switching. Some desktop hypervisors have a mode called coherence, which does exactly what the poster desires. Parallels, for one, VMware's versions do, too.
The host becomes irrelevant, the OS becomes irrelevant. Even the storage, to an extent, is locationally irrelevant.
Uh, they were not involved as they weren't a target. Note the keyword in the post regarding the word: registry, which Apple currently doesn't have. It has things that are similar, but their security architecture is vastly different than that of Windows.
But it's patentability is dubious at best, unless they're patenting something more obscure. Charge/discharge and balancing are inherent physical characteristics of the grid.
I understand that it's not a demand of "accent-free". It's a second guessing of the HR process.
Anecdotally, I deal with lots of accents every day. Indian, Chinese, Japanese, German programmers and admins. I have an ear for English. Many others do, too. I also know there are people that have a great deal of difficulty with accented English. They're usually in the clear minority, and they need to understand spoken language.
But what we have here is a policing of accent control, the only one in the United States. In the State of Arizona, there's a lot of hostility towards people termed (pejoratively) "illegals". This has also been the crux of legislation in Arizona, parts of which have been found to be discriminatory towards people that are both immigrants, but also natives of Arizona; mostly these individuals have a Latino/Hispanic but probably Spanish-speaking background. The xenophobia, in my estimation, stems from a fear of the ultra-conservative, often xenophobic State Legislators in Arizona. The accent control is one more pressure put on the populace. The HR department that hires teachers knows the rules; the Accent Police are discriminatory pressure applied to a minority. This is America, and we believe in civility; such Accent Police dissolve some of that civility at the price of the pressure.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, they have a proven history. Yet Citrix and Xen has made lots of gains, into places like AWS, etc. Hyper-V, despite its being hamstrung, isn't bad, either. KVM and LVM are pretty darn good, but work only with Linux (a good or bad thing depending on your choice).
So they're not wannabes. VMWare has priced itself at an insanely high price point, making many organizations want to leave. Yes, there's a great ecosystem and lots of attachments, options, third party support, and it's all REALLY EXPENSIVE. Got budget?
That's a VDI link. Virtual desktop technology is vastly different than desktop hypervisors, and boot-time hypervisors like Xen, Hyper-V, ESXi, etc.
So instead of Oracle, I'll tell you: oranges and tomatoes.
Fine. Quote ridiculous raw numbers.
I know fully well what kind of compression yields occur after various renderings.
So go ahead. Use that 1080p movie. Not 1 in 100 can visually discern the difference, and not 1 in 5000 use more than two channels for playback. Lots of empty cars on that train, eh?
Do people need more space? Yes. Should they all have their own copies? No. We need the pipes that allow deduplicated streams, regionalized/localized cache, and other more astute distribution mechanisms. We already have data rates that exceed the realtime needs of 1080p-- why don't we use THOSE (speaking to those in the USA)? Why must the wheel be constantly reinvented? Why have AT&T and Verizon been allowed to lay new copper instead of fiber *everywhere*? Sorry for the rant, but quoting raw data rates is a red herring.
Lossy codecs suck. I understand the implications of that statement, but lost quality these days is like death by a thousand cuts. You can do varying kinds of compression, but the net result is that media will tend to fill the space provided for it, no matter the compression type or level. It's all about consumption, not letting go when you're done. We hoard media like we hoard hobbyist materials, and so forth.
Gosh, what do I do with that USB thingie?
Tablets are entertainment devices. They don't use huge files, like those in movies, music.... oh, wait.
You can argue, successfully, that via virtualization and multi-core relationships that the ARM power argument is goofy, as number of threads per process and virtualization favors the CISC architectures. The ARM infrastructure, however, the foundation for a couple of decent server product lines. The architecture cited is very much like getting a bunch of ARM CPUs together to do what more power hungry quad/multi-core Intel and AMD chips are doing to day. Remember: the ARM is 32-bit, and the number of threads are limited both by inherent architecture as well as the memory ceiling.
What's scary to me is that someone wrote that it has a crossbar switch on it without understanding what that implies in terms of inter-CPU communications, cache, cache sync/coherence, etc. A well-designed system will perform almost as well with iSCSI (on a non-blocking, switched backplane) as it will with SAS so IO isn't quite the issue; the power claim vs thread density per watt expended claim has yet to be proven.
Feel free to suggest a legal procedure that has a chance of working. Failing that, dream on.
Like you have control over it. Whatchya going to do? And what good will it do ya?
Ideas aren't patent-protected. They might be trade secrets, but are revealed when put into a product. Just because you dreamed it doesn't mean you own it, by any means. The patent process is well known. On the surface, it sounds like Jobs, similar to many entrepreneurs, was fearful of how fast Google evolved Android-- and with good reason. You don't get a free ride in tech, as if you're successful, there's competition as you don't have a monopoly on product development and marketing thought.
That someone else thought up ideas, or made something similar with or without the inspiration of something you've done, isn't illegal or even immoral. It might be a violation of patents granted. Then you open up the old Pandora's Box of patent problems.
Of Apple, my thoughts aren't printable.
When a theatre or gas station refuses big bills, it means you can still pay in smaller bills.
If you steal, that's criminal, but can also be civil so as to recover it if you eat the bar. I'm sure they don't want it after it goes through your digestive system.
Despite the fact that Lousiana doesn't subscribe to the UCC, a debt is uncurred when you purchase something, until you satisfy that debt-- by paying for it.
I think the whole idea of passing such a law means they've been out in the bayou snorting swamp gas again. What a goofy bunch of elected officials. Oh, wait.
CItations regarding oil economics are usually invalid, because the oil companies live in an alternate universe where supply and demand are mirages. It's not capitalism, it's poker.
There are more than three players in the HD market; this is my point--> an artificial shortage to drive prices up in a razor-thin-margin industry is common practice; it happens with memory chips frequently, tho less so than before (lots of litigation has helped). In this case, market manipulation may not be in the offing, as subsequent investigations reveal more details. It's a sad situation there. Ugly, in fact.
I do. It's just a visible example of a company not in the oil biz that raised its price based on commodity price increase claims that were mostly bogus. They just need to report a way-cool quarter to Wall Street. As for their coffee.... well..... that's another website.
SKU quantities belie the actual drives that are manufactured and how many of *those* go inside. Hitachi, Samsung, and a bunch of others make drives. Who makes the drives that go inside those cans? Ah-- there's the interesting statistic.
If so, then it's a disaster for them. Yet I've seen SE Asian plants go from hills near a rice paddy to full production in less time. Perhaps I'm wrong about the size of the disaster, and if so, my bad. I've also seen lots of PR and disinformation poised at market price manipulation, so I'll retain my skepticism and hope for the best outcome for all.
If Seagate had such a huge presence in consumer drives, they might be worrisome, but WD and Seagate live in different sales channels, as well as different markets. Go look at a big box computer store these days and tell me about the overlap.
Drives are OEM'd. If a manufacturer has a single point of failure in their process chain, then they're in deep donuts. While I feel for the employees of the affected factories, I don't believe it's going to cause the crisis predicted.
If it takes this long to bring production back up to schedule after a couple weeks delay, I'd say we're looking at a marketplace price manipulation with a convenient excuse of flooding in Thailand.
The commodity markets use weather as an excuse to try to boink up prices all of the time. Hey Starbucks-- coffee is down 23%-- are you going to drop your recent price hike? Oh, I thought not.
Now stop that. It's against the rules to RTFA around here, so that everyone can sound like an authority.
Plainly, according to the author's side and if the sequence of events is truthful, Penguin The Publisher is most certainly breaching their contract. She, and her attorney, will be rich despite how many books or copies she eventually sells. Penguin ought to be unabashedly apologetic. But I doubt they get that. 99% and all that.
Hey-- 640K is all you're every going to need. You have my word on that.
Anyone is a candidate for OS switching. Some desktop hypervisors have a mode called coherence, which does exactly what the poster desires. Parallels, for one, VMware's versions do, too.
The host becomes irrelevant, the OS becomes irrelevant. Even the storage, to an extent, is locationally irrelevant.
Uh, they were not involved as they weren't a target. Note the keyword in the post regarding the word: registry, which Apple currently doesn't have. It has things that are similar, but their security architecture is vastly different than that of Windows.
But it's patentability is dubious at best, unless they're patenting something more obscure. Charge/discharge and balancing are inherent physical characteristics of the grid.
Monitors, in this case, are human monitors of the situation.
I understand that it's not a demand of "accent-free". It's a second guessing of the HR process.
Anecdotally, I deal with lots of accents every day. Indian, Chinese, Japanese, German programmers and admins. I have an ear for English. Many others do, too. I also know there are people that have a great deal of difficulty with accented English. They're usually in the clear minority, and they need to understand spoken language.
But what we have here is a policing of accent control, the only one in the United States. In the State of Arizona, there's a lot of hostility towards people termed (pejoratively) "illegals". This has also been the crux of legislation in Arizona, parts of which have been found to be discriminatory towards people that are both immigrants, but also natives of Arizona; mostly these individuals have a Latino/Hispanic but probably Spanish-speaking background. The xenophobia, in my estimation, stems from a fear of the ultra-conservative, often xenophobic State Legislators in Arizona. The accent control is one more pressure put on the populace. The HR department that hires teachers knows the rules; the Accent Police are discriminatory pressure applied to a minority. This is America, and we believe in civility; such Accent Police dissolve some of that civility at the price of the pressure.