I speak British English, so that's Aluminium with an i, you insensitive CLOD! Tin Foil! BAH! You blasted colonials need to get with it! In Soviet Russia, the tin foil hat blocks out YOU! All your brain waves are belong to us. Finally, I, for one, welcome our military-industrial-tinfoil-complex overlords!
Wow dude, has anybody seen the last article - Yellow Dog Linux? It's become a GNAA nest, I think. To be more on-topic, this dude does have some interesting views on wikipedia, but I think the core of it lies in the article summary - "it's all about having faith in people's ability to work together...". For a cynic like me, I don't have that faith - at least for something like an encyclopedia. There are enough people who like destruction for the sake of destruction, see previous article on Yellow Dof (and 9/11) for an example. What does it cost somebody to revert a wikipedia article and totally trash it? It's a teency-weency bit harder to do the same thing on a FOSS project. As it is, skeptics/cynics like me take all encyclopedias with a pinch of salt, be they online or on dead trees.
Does it Run Linux? And will they making a beowulf cluster of Gingerbread CPUs out of YOU! in Soviet Russia, or do only old people do that in Korea, you insensitive CLOD!
Also, they did not publish the names of the guy and girl having sex because they are minors, and thus their names are not mentioned. This applies to ALL criminal cases involving minors. The media is NOT ALLOWED to publish their names.
No this guys crime was profiting from the misfortune of a woman, whose only flaw was being made an ass of out of her boyfriend. He deserves punishment for that. If this guy is such a nice respectable hard-working engineer, why did he feel the need to sell this video, which shows sexual acts involving a MINOR. The law is the law. This asshole wanted to make some money of this, and he deserves punishment.How would you like it if somebody sold pictures of your younger, 16-year-old sister giving a blow job to somebody? Maybe if he did what other IITians do, like study, or try and help his country get out of poverty, he wouldn't be in this mess. I know when I wake up in the morning, my first thought is not: Hmmm, how can I ruin another teenager's life today?
It's not child porn. It's the depiction of sexual acts involving minors. They are minors. And the law makes the peddling of sex with Minors illegal. The same law is found in the United States constitution. Whether it's true or not, why do you think porn sites state clearly that all 'actors' are aged 18 and above? Because if they're not, the websites are liable for prosecution.
It is not the kids that will be punished. It is the peddling or display of a sexual act involving minors which will be punished. This kids were underage, and although technically illegal for them to have sex, they will not be prosecuted just for their act. The guy will be prosecuted for violating the woman's privacy and right to dignity or some such law, I forget which), and case against Baazee is for the distribution and profiting from the taping of an act involving minors, which they are according to Indian Law, despite what some trolls are claiming
BZZZZTTTTTTTTT! Wrong. Close, but no cigar. I think the age of consent in India is 18. And I have a feeling that my source a teency-weency bit more credible than yours, considering what's at stake.
You're so full of shit it's hilarious.
1) She did not consent to being video-taped.
2) The girl is 16, and the boy 17. That makes them Minors. In your advanced country, apparently selling porn of minors is ok. Sorry, I'll stick to my backwards country. At least learn to disguise your flamebait so it looks like a reasonable post, fuckface.
1) The Police claim that Baazee.com did not take down the video clip, even after being notified of the complaint. This is why they arrested the CEO
2) This not regular old porno. The girl involved in this did not give her conest to the release of the video - nor did she know she was being filmed
3) Strict moral standards blah blah bullshit. It's just that in this particular case is publicised so the police had to act. The bottom line is, that these people got caught. Otherwise, sale of porno in India is rampant (but yes, it's illegal).
You think somebody who clicks on the big blue e to turn on the internet is gonna give a crap about 'IE-only' code? Second, it's not just looking different. I can NOT access my online banking features through FireFox. Until my bank changes, I will using two browsers. End of story.
RATS! And I thought it was ************. Oh well, back to the 133T Guide to H4CKing....
In Soviet Russia, your password hacks YOU!
I, for one, welcome our PPTP-password-cracking-slammer-leaving overlords
Well I would put the programs that acknowledge multi-users with those that don't at about a 50-50. The newer versions of most programs work fine with under a non-admin user. I'm just curious how this is Microsoft's fault? They finally separate user access, and some programs still insist on messing with memory space that doesn't belong to them. How is this MS's fault? If programs want root access in Linux, does that mean Linux sucks? Please, let's try and keep the MS-Flaming to the facts. (I must be new here, I know I know).
Yea, microsoft has the equivalent of an su command. Right click on the program you want to run, and there's an option 'Run As'. It allows you run that program as a different user, which as you say can be used to install things while logged in as a different user. Fast user switching is heavily dependent on your memory (what isn't, on an MS OS?). I have 256 MB, and it's pretty fast switiching with that. Also, I don't quite understand the secure website thing - the way I see it, you log into a secure website. You leave the browser window open, then switch users, do something else and then switch back? If that's what you're doing, I don't think you have to relogin - unless your secure website has a timeout, in which case duh. Dunno not seeing this bug on my system, which of course, doesn't mean it doesn't exist...
See this is fine and dandy, until said user runs into an IE only website. Then he finds that his 'Internets' aren't working, and he knows that you 'messed it up'. Then expect a tirade on how those fucking computer geeks are all pompous and always tampering with things blah blah blah. Not a pleasant sight. My bank uses an asp-based site, which loses some of its functionality in FireFox. Yes, some Firefox jihadi will recommend switching banks, as though it's as easy as switching browsers. No thanks. I like my current bank. Basically we shall have to accept the duality of IE and FF for now...and as web admins around the world start noticing that the share of FF browsers is increasing they'll come up with a browser-independent site themselves (yes they should have done this to start with, blah blah, but they didn't). Of course, that doesn't mean I haven't already made this suggestion to customer service, and told my buddies to do the same. A little nudging and we'll get there.
ummm, yeah REPUBLIC of China, as opposed to the People's Republic of China. Taiwanese people are CHinese, it's just they believe in Democracy - well more than people on the mainland. And that's the whole fucking reason they distinguish themselves - they're not a part of the PEOPLE's republic of China. "fukstik".
Hello, welcome to the 21st Century. Would just like to correct you - there is such a thing as MULTIPLE users in Windows - NT, 2000, 2003, XP (Home & Professional) all have this facility. There's no shortage of security holes, no argument. Fact is, you can set user access in Windows too. Now just because peopledecide not to, that's not a windows bug. Like you said if you run things as root in Linux...
I'm curious... are there Hindu Cows? And if so, do the Cows in Texas believe that all Hindu Cows will go to hell about their different beliefs, and misunderstood MONO-theism? What about them thar Mormon cows?....
Slashdot Mirror
I speak British English, so that's Aluminium with an i, you insensitive CLOD! Tin Foil! BAH! You blasted colonials need to get with it! In Soviet Russia, the tin foil hat blocks out YOU! All your brain waves are belong to us. Finally, I, for one, welcome our military-industrial-tinfoil-complex overlords!
Wow dude, has anybody seen the last article - Yellow Dog Linux? It's become a GNAA nest, I think. To be more on-topic, this dude does have some interesting views on wikipedia, but I think the core of it lies in the article summary - "it's all about having faith in people's ability to work together...". For a cynic like me, I don't have that faith - at least for something like an encyclopedia. There are enough people who like destruction for the sake of destruction, see previous article on Yellow Dof (and 9/11) for an example. What does it cost somebody to revert a wikipedia article and totally trash it? It's a teency-weency bit harder to do the same thing on a FOSS project. As it is, skeptics/cynics like me take all encyclopedias with a pinch of salt, be they online or on dead trees.
Wow dude, you really do lack a sense of humour. You really need to get over yourself.
Does it Run Linux? And will they making a beowulf cluster of Gingerbread CPUs out of YOU! in Soviet Russia, or do only old people do that in Korea, you insensitive CLOD!
Also, they did not publish the names of the guy and girl having sex because they are minors, and thus their names are not mentioned. This applies to ALL criminal cases involving minors. The media is NOT ALLOWED to publish their names.
No this guys crime was profiting from the misfortune of a woman, whose only flaw was being made an ass of out of her boyfriend. He deserves punishment for that. If this guy is such a nice respectable hard-working engineer, why did he feel the need to sell this video, which shows sexual acts involving a MINOR. The law is the law. This asshole wanted to make some money of this, and he deserves punishment.How would you like it if somebody sold pictures of your younger, 16-year-old sister giving a blow job to somebody? Maybe if he did what other IITians do, like study, or try and help his country get out of poverty, he wouldn't be in this mess. I know when I wake up in the morning, my first thought is not: Hmmm, how can I ruin another teenager's life today?
It's not child porn. It's the depiction of sexual acts involving minors. They are minors. And the law makes the peddling of sex with Minors illegal. The same law is found in the United States constitution. Whether it's true or not, why do you think porn sites state clearly that all 'actors' are aged 18 and above? Because if they're not, the websites are liable for prosecution.
It is not the kids that will be punished. It is the peddling or display of a sexual act involving minors which will be punished. This kids were underage, and although technically illegal for them to have sex, they will not be prosecuted just for their act. The guy will be prosecuted for violating the woman's privacy and right to dignity or some such law, I forget which), and case against Baazee is for the distribution and profiting from the taping of an act involving minors, which they are according to Indian Law, despite what some trolls are claiming
BZZZZTTTTTTTTT! Wrong. Close, but no cigar. I think the age of consent in India is 18. And I have a feeling that my source a teency-weency bit more credible than yours, considering what's at stake.
Yea, and that site is a crock of shit. I think this is a slightly more credible source.
No it isn't. Now STFU.
You're so full of shit it's hilarious.
1) She did not consent to being video-taped.
2) The girl is 16, and the boy 17. That makes them Minors. In your advanced country, apparently selling porn of minors is ok. Sorry, I'll stick to my backwards country. At least learn to disguise your flamebait so it looks like a reasonable post, fuckface.
1) The Police claim that Baazee.com did not take down the video clip, even after being notified of the complaint. This is why they arrested the CEO
2) This not regular old porno. The girl involved in this did not give her conest to the release of the video - nor did she know she was being filmed
3) Strict moral standards blah blah bullshit. It's just that in this particular case is publicised so the police had to act. The bottom line is, that these people got caught. Otherwise, sale of porno in India is rampant (but yes, it's illegal).
Feel free to post a few comments here
This site is fucking hilarious.
You think somebody who clicks on the big blue e to turn on the internet is gonna give a crap about 'IE-only' code? Second, it's not just looking different. I can NOT access my online banking features through FireFox. Until my bank changes, I will using two browsers. End of story.
RATS! And I thought it was ************. Oh well, back to the 133T Guide to H4CKing....
In Soviet Russia, your password hacks YOU!
I, for one, welcome our PPTP-password-cracking-slammer-leaving overlords
Yeeouch, and just for that I've become your foe?
Well I would put the programs that acknowledge multi-users with those that don't at about a 50-50. The newer versions of most programs work fine with under a non-admin user. I'm just curious how this is Microsoft's fault? They finally separate user access, and some programs still insist on messing with memory space that doesn't belong to them. How is this MS's fault? If programs want root access in Linux, does that mean Linux sucks? Please, let's try and keep the MS-Flaming to the facts. (I must be new here, I know I know).
Yea, microsoft has the equivalent of an su command. Right click on the program you want to run, and there's an option 'Run As'. It allows you run that program as a different user, which as you say can be used to install things while logged in as a different user. Fast user switching is heavily dependent on your memory (what isn't, on an MS OS?). I have 256 MB, and it's pretty fast switiching with that. Also, I don't quite understand the secure website thing - the way I see it, you log into a secure website. You leave the browser window open, then switch users, do something else and then switch back? If that's what you're doing, I don't think you have to relogin - unless your secure website has a timeout, in which case duh. Dunno not seeing this bug on my system, which of course, doesn't mean it doesn't exist...
See this is fine and dandy, until said user runs into an IE only website. Then he finds that his 'Internets' aren't working, and he knows that you 'messed it up'. Then expect a tirade on how those fucking computer geeks are all pompous and always tampering with things blah blah blah. Not a pleasant sight. My bank uses an asp-based site, which loses some of its functionality in FireFox. Yes, some Firefox jihadi will recommend switching banks, as though it's as easy as switching browsers. No thanks. I like my current bank. Basically we shall have to accept the duality of IE and FF for now...and as web admins around the world start noticing that the share of FF browsers is increasing they'll come up with a browser-independent site themselves (yes they should have done this to start with, blah blah, but they didn't). Of course, that doesn't mean I haven't already made this suggestion to customer service, and told my buddies to do the same. A little nudging and we'll get there.
ummm, yeah REPUBLIC of China, as opposed to the People's Republic of China. Taiwanese people are CHinese, it's just they believe in Democracy - well more than people on the mainland. And that's the whole fucking reason they distinguish themselves - they're not a part of the PEOPLE's republic of China. "fukstik".
Hello, welcome to the 21st Century. Would just like to correct you - there is such a thing as MULTIPLE users in Windows - NT, 2000, 2003, XP (Home & Professional) all have this facility. There's no shortage of security holes, no argument. Fact is, you can set user access in Windows too. Now just because peopledecide not to, that's not a windows bug. Like you said if you run things as root in Linux...
In Soviet Russia, the whore for slow news days is YOU!
All your consuming $ are belong to us. Somebody set up us the credit card reader!
I'm curious... are there Hindu Cows? And if so, do the Cows in Texas believe that all Hindu Cows will go to hell about their different beliefs, and misunderstood MONO-theism? What about them thar Mormon cows?....