Slashdot Mirror


Boeing Eyes In-Flight Live TV on Your Laptop

cobravenum2 writes "Boeing is planning to add live television to its Connexion by Boeing service during 2005, The television programs will be delivered across the Connexion network, which uses satellites to provide high-speed data connections between aircraft in-flight and ground stations linked to the Internet. The service entered commercial use earlier this year and provides a 5 megabits per second shared downstream and 1 mbps shared upstream connection to suitably equipped aircraft. You'll be able to view up to four channels of live TV over your laptop."

205 comments

  1. Thank god... by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I won't miss Adult Swim while I'm taking my flights to Europe and back.

    1. Re:Thank god... by JonLatane · · Score: 2, Funny
      Now I won't miss Adult Swim while I'm taking my flights to Europe and back.
      Because, you know, of the four channels the plane is able to receive, they would prioritize Cartoon Network over anything else available.
    2. Re:Thank god... by adeydas · · Score: 1

      don't forget sex and the city...

    3. Re:Thank god... by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 1

      Because, you know, of the four channels the plane is able to receive, they would prioritize Cartoon Network over anything else available.

      They would if they knew what was good for them. I have a bomb in my shoe!

    4. Re:Thank god... by geomon · · Score: 1

      I NEVER forget sex in the city.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    5. Re:Thank god... by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      Actually, Cartoon Network would be a pretty good choice. It's relatively unoffensive programming to the majority of people.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    6. Re:Thank god... by dshaw858 · · Score: 1

      Because, you know, of the four channels the plane is able to receive, they would prioritize Cartoon Network over anything else available.

      Yeah; children generally like cartoons.

      - dshaw

    7. Re:Thank god... by maharg · · Score: 1

      There go your frequent flyer perks..

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    8. Re:Thank god... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Which means they'd probably choose Nickelodeon material over Cartoon Network's. That's pretty much how it's worked out for Armed Forces Network television for U.S. military overseas, which also only consists of about four or five channels in most areas (usually much less if you're a non-subscriber living outside the installation).

      Sucks having something obnoxious like Rugrats on instead of Dexter's Lab.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    9. Re:Thank god... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      BBC World Service, what else?

      Better news coverage than any of the US news channels.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:Thank god... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      cartoon network seems pretty likely, actually. distracting children is a multibillion dollar industry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Airlines become profitable again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they make those four channels of porn they might just get the airlines back in the black.

    1. Re:Airlines become profitable again by svallarian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not sure if I want to mod this +1 funny or +1 (eww-hate to be sitting next to THAT guy on the plane)

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    2. Re:Airlines become profitable again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But remember, the laptop is frying your testicles so the porn will just make you more frustrated.

    3. Re:Airlines become profitable again by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      (Score: -1, Paul Reubens) ?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    4. Re:Airlines become profitable again by ehack · · Score: 1

      Don't need the Internet for that - just put a camera in those little cubicles :)

      --
      This is not a signature.
    5. Re:Airlines become profitable again by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      i don't really care if my porn is live. do you?

    6. Re:Airlines become profitable again by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      (all necrophelia jokes aside)

  3. Great by mordors9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can have some loudmouth on one side talking on his cell phone and some woman watching oprah on the other. Life can't get much better.

    1. Re:Great by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Almost makes a First Class upgrade worth it, eh?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Great by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Sure. All that burning in hell you're going to be doing for however you got that filthy lucre, you deserve an extra cookie on the flight.

    3. Re:Great by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      except those people up there are more likely to have the cash to have
      1) mobile phone with 50 note polyphonic ring tone
      1b) the cash to talk on it non stop (loudly)

      2) a notebook with a widescreen
      2b) case of batteries to run it for the duration of the trip, on brightness setting requiring spf50+ sunscreen
      2c) the cash to pay several dolars a minute to watch an inflight movie on it

      and
      3) to fall asleep from the combination of moet and antidepressent/sedative coctail anyway and leave it all on, bleeping, squarking and ringing

    4. Re:Great by KingPunk · · Score: 0

      what first class?
      have you tried flying lately, being smacked down by multiple "security" gaurds,
      isn't exactly the VIP treatment i pay for.
      much less hearing that the airline i use, is going to
      attempt to file bankruptcy,.. what happens to the 500$+ a pop im coughing up?
      like please, and then they talk about how they want to allow people to watch live tv?
      for the most part, its a 3hr flight, tops, in general.
      and somebody cant program their DVR, TiVO, or VCR?
      sad, sad i say!

    5. Re:Great by Remlik · · Score: 1

      Already happens. When I flew to Vegas last month there were at least 10 people watching DVD's on those portable players WITHOUT headphones. They'd just crank it up as high as it could go to hear over the engines/cabin noise. Made reading a book near impossible.

      Am I the only one who files with at least 2 pair of headphones and a splitter so the person next to me can enjoy my movie too?

      --
      Apple free since 1990!
  4. Free laptop? by quaker5567 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Quote: "You'll be able to view up to four channels of live TV over your laptop." Bearing in mind that most airlines won't even give you headphones for free, how are the people without laptops going to view this?

    1. Re:Free laptop? by ThomasFlip · · Score: 1

      they won't. I didn't rtfa, but I doubt you have to pay for the service if you're not using it, so why care ?

      --
      If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    2. Re:Free laptop? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

      Why would you buy the internet access on the plane to get the live tv on your laptop if you don't in fact have a laptop?

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    3. Re:Free laptop? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Simple.
      They aren't.

      Just like the cable company doesn't provide you with a TV.

    4. Re:Free laptop? by JPWhite · · Score: 1


      how are the people without laptops going to view this?


      They will, no doubt, rent you a laptop for a 'nominal fee' like $50 per flight. If you steal the rented laptop they will charge your credit card $6000.

      Very convenient huh?

  5. The problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is, how many people can watch TV at once before that 5 mbps is all used up?

    1. Re:The problem is... by stuuf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume they'll pipe one stream of each of the 4 channels into a router on the plane and then multicast it to everyone, so the bandwidth won't depend on how many people are watching. If they want to offer more channels at a relatively high quality then they will need more bandwidth.

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    2. Re:The problem is... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I can somewhat confirm that this is how it works. TV over IP is sent via broadcast (or multicast, I guess). We have a system like that where I am. Open up the viewer, watch TV, and also watch how there is no extra network traffic at all.

      Internetwork IP TV is another story. Sounds like a lot of work for the routers and services would probably be limited per ISP.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  6. What about Over-Ocean Flights? by wasted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The television programs will be delivered across the Connexion network, which uses satellites to provide high-speed data connections between aircraft in-flight and ground stations linked to the Internet.

    So those long TransPacific flights will only have sporadic TV coverage? Those are the ones that could use it the most. Or will 747 aircraft start following the equivalent of ETOPS routes to ensure internet coverage?

    * ETOPS Routes - Routes flown by twin engine aircraft on extended overwater flights to ensure that they can reach land within a certain amount of time in the event of an engine failure.

    1. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Informative
      So those long TransPacific flights will only have sporadic TV coverage?
      No. As what you quoted clearly says a satellite connects the plane to the ground station.
      Plane <--> Satellite <--> Ground station
      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    2. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by wasted · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ahhh, got it. Misread what I quoted.

    3. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      The plane doesn't have to be within range of the ground station, just the satellite. Your flight over the Pacific could be linked to Fresno, as long as the satellite can "see" them both.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and still +3 INSIGHTFUL because nobody reads posts before moderating!

    5. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errr, I think "which uses satellites to provide high-speed data connections between aircraft in-flight and ground stations linked to the Internet" means ground station -> satellite -> aircraft, and you know how satellites can cover huge expanses right?

    6. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly all commercial airliners fly on some level of ETOPS route. It's for all aircraft, not exclusively for twin engine aircraft. It's the reason why you fly along the Alaskan coast when you fly to Japan.

    7. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason why you fly along Alaska when you fly to Japan from your coutry is: earth is spherical, that's the shortest path!

    8. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only are you wasted, evidently you're stupid too.

      Plane Satellite Ground Station

    9. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only are you wasted, evidently you're stupid, too.

      Please use proper punctuation when insulting another's intelligence.

    10. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Too" doesn't need to be preceded by a fucking comma all the time, you moron. 95% of the time it should be, but it's not a black and white rule. In this case, it didn't have to.

      Fucking idiot.

      Rob

    11. Re:What about Over-Ocean Flights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, it didn't have to be.

      Please use proper grammar when insulting another's intelligence.

  7. MPAA sues Boeing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So how long before "viewed on Laptop" becomes "recorded on laptop" ?

    Man, this is going to be real headache for MPAA, having to refer 5 different country copyright laws, if the plane flies over different countries(Look at the Singapore Airline Routes) during the entire unauthorized recording process.

    On the other hand anything that creates havoc for MPAA... this cannot be a bad thing, right ?

    1. Re:MPAA sues Boeing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How long before people sue Boeing for the fried testicle damage caused by being forced to put laptops on your lap ?

    2. Re:MPAA sues Boeing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't rtfa, but I assume they're keeping tray-tables...

  8. Only 5 Mb/s? by tongariro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Streaming a channel using high compression video and audio codec at CIF resolution will get the data rate down to about 500 Kb/s. Assuming that every bit is used for streaming, that will be 10 channels maximum to be shared between those among the 300 passengers who has the laptop/PDA/phone.

    I can see it now, air rage over bandwidth hogs. :-)

    1. Re:Only 5 Mb/s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article and the review clearly state that there will be four channels for now. Not to mention the plane receiver will probably just multicast instead of giving everyone a direct connection.

    2. Re:Only 5 Mb/s? by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the TV will be broadcast or multicast, not a dedicated stream per seat. Thus the 4 station limit.

  9. What programming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wonder if they'll have the new "Airport Security Bloopers" show where the security guards fondle or sexually assault (depends on your POV) passengers, pin granny down for a body cavity search, operate the usual drug and stolen luggage rings, and put "practice" bombs on international flights after finding them.

  10. 2 Things by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Does Boeing Run Linux?

    2) Ummm... don't we already have those nice LCD screens on the back of seats (or folded to the side) on most 747s already? How is this an innovation in anyway? Wouldn't u rather just use the already supplied screen, as opposed to bring out your laptop and stuff? -1 Redundant, n/t

    1. Re:2 Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The seat back screens are most commonly found on the Boeing 777, which follows many of the same trans-continental routes as the 74

    2. Re:2 Things by Coolnat2004 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, last plane I was on (United Airlines) had a 5" LCD on the back of each seat, with a bunch of music channels and several TV channels, however I do not think that the channels were being streamed from the actual stations -- A lot of them said "This special presentation during your ?United Airlines flight", so it could just be one recording that they play on every flight on that day.

    3. Re:2 Things by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      > Ummm... don't we already have those nice LCD
      > screens on the back of seats (or folded to the side) on
      > most 747s already?

      It depends on the airline. But generally, the longer the flight and the newer the plane, the more likely it is to have an entertainment system in each seat. Most 777's have them.

      The 747-200 has been out for a long time and maybe have no entertainment at all. The newer 747-400 can usually be found with systems though. A lot of the DC-10's were upgraded with entertainment systems, and subsequently had them removed after some faulty wiring was blamed for a fire.

      SeatGuru.com has the per-airline and per-model details you're looking for.

    4. Re:2 Things by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      1) Does Boeing Run Linux?

      Actually, they run a lot of it. It is in the cabins, and in the cockpit (none critical).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:2 Things by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're not live. Next time you take a flight, pay special attention to the equipment area up front as you're getting on the plane. You'll probably pass by a big rack of VCRs (!) that handle all of the on-board TV programming. You can also tell that it's done by VCRs by seeing the distinctive static pattern whenever they pause the thing for announcements and the like.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    6. Re:2 Things by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I doubt this service is going to be Linux based.

      iServices from Apple

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:2 Things by Coolnat2004 · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. I do remember the static when they brought up the blue screen during announcements!

  11. I can see it now.... by pjdepasq · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This sounds like a good idea, until passengers end up watching live TV coverage of the next 9/11 and then start hunting in the plane they are riding in for assumed "terrorists" causing a riot in-flight.

    We really should think about having less of this technology for the passengars in the air. I'd rather fly without people around me watching TV or doing AIM on their laptops from 35K feet.

    We should force folks to read a damned book and keep the plane(s) quiet.

    1. Re:I can see it now.... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      This sounds like a good idea, until passengers end up watching live TV coverage of the next 9/11 and then start hunting in the plane they are riding in for assumed "terrorists" causing a riot in-flight.
      Of course this is violation of the Terms of Service so you are protected:

      # # Interference with Flight Crew: Do not Disclose any Content that would intimidate a flight crew member or flight attendant aboard an aircraft, interfere with the performance of the duties of the flight crew member or flight attendant or lessen the ability of the flight crew member or flight attendant to perform those duties. #

      Interference with Airplane Operations: Do not Disclose any Content, knowing the information to be false, about an alleged attempt being made or to be made to hijack, bomb or interfere with the operations of an aircraft.
      http://www.connexionbyboeing.com/index.cfm?p=cbb.t ermsofuse&l=en.US&ec=

    2. Re:I can see it now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather fly without people around me watching TV or doing AIM on their laptops from 35K feet.

      Wow. Screw you. You sound like a jerk.

    3. Re:I can see it now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a good idea, until passengers end up watching live TV coverage of the next 9/11 and then start hunting in the plane they are riding in for assumed "terrorists" causing a riot in-flight.

      To be the first to state the obvious, something like this could have prevented the second and third planes from hitting.

      We really should think about having less of this technology for the passengars in the air. I'd rather fly without people around me watching TV or doing AIM on their laptops from 35K feet.

      We should force folks to read a damned book and keep the plane(s) quiet.


      That's not nice.

    4. Re:I can see it now.... by dswensen · · Score: 3, Funny

      This sounds like a good idea, until passengers end up watching live TV coverage of the next 9/11 and then start hunting in the plane they are riding in for assumed "terrorists" causing a riot in-flight.

      Oh, we won't need something as serious as all that to get passengers seeking frantic in-flight vengeance. A simple screening of Kangaroo Jack ought to do the trick.

  12. 5 Mbps, 4 channels? by nxtr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like the de facto HDTV standard that allows for either one HD signal or four SD signals through multicasting.

  13. TV? by bfields · · Score: 4, Funny
    The service entered commercial use earlier this year and provides a 5 megabits per second shared downstream and 1 mbps shared upstream connection to suitably equipped aircraft. You'll be able to view up to four channels of live TV over your laptop.

    5 megabits downstream and 1mbps upstream, and we get.... TV?

    Great.

    --Bruce Fields

  14. I fail to find this that cool by drgath159 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Boeing hasn't announced the names of the channels that will be available but they'll be international news and financial news channels, he says."

    Booooooring. If you have a laptop, why the hell would you watch StockMarketTV? Watch a DVD or hell... play some scorched earth. I love my PDA when I take flights cause I just load a few DVD rips on my SD card and have enough juice and content to watch for about 8 hours.

    Can airlines ever think of anything other than cheesy novelty features. Does anyone actually use the phones built into the seat? No. Use that high speed connection to give us internet!

    1. Re:I fail to find this that cool by Osty · · Score: 1

      Booooooring. If you have a laptop, why the hell would you watch StockMarketTV? Watch a DVD or hell... play some scorched earth. I love my PDA when I take flights cause I just load a few DVD rips on my SD card and have enough juice and content to watch for about 8 hours.

      How often do you fly? Once every few months? Once a year? Less than that? I expect that this is initially targetted to business travellers (read: people who care about financial and stock market news), because many of them fly weekly or monthly (if not daily, even). I'm sure they'll eventually have a "special" channel showing non-business related stuff (like holiday crap, since that's when a large number of non-business folks fly), but for now they're targetting their frequent customers. Makes (business) sense to me.

    2. Re:I fail to find this that cool by kimba · · Score: 1

      I fly on average every few weeks intercontinentally and the LAST thing I want is finance news. Its bad enough when the only English language channels I can get in hotels is CNN International and Bloomberg.

      Give us anything other than finance news. If you are a trader, what are you going to do, call in buy orders when you are over the middle of the Pacific? If you were interested in doing some trading at 37000ft, wouldn't you be using the WiFi access that comes with Conexion to access some trading website, rather than watching TV to learn about it?

    3. Re:I fail to find this that cool by drgath159 · · Score: 1

      If business commuters are the target, and laptops are required for this TV, that still doesn't answer my question of why not use this bandwidth for internet? I'm thinking the person who carries a laptop onboard would rather have internet than TV, no? Yes. There is more money to be made by starting a TV network that you control the advertisments, that's the only reason for this. It's not beneficial or cool, it is just another gimmick.

    4. Re:I fail to find this that cool by kimba · · Score: 1

      Connexion already provides Internet. This is an extra service on top of that.

    5. Re:I fail to find this that cool by drgath159 · · Score: 1

      Ah hah... see, now we're talkin'

    6. Re:I fail to find this that cool by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I once looked up the charges for the phone on an international flight. US$10/minute. You could operate a Bell 206 helicopter for less than that rate.

    7. Re:I fail to find this that cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Connexion service already provides a high speed connection to the internet on suitably equipped aircraft.

  15. Jetblue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not copy Jetblue's idea of using Directv to provide tv to the plane. That way, at least in the US, the bandwith can be used for internet traffic. Other wise the 5mbps will get used very qucikly.

    1. Re:Jetblue by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact you won't have to bring a laptop thru security if you just want it for inflight amusement. Plus this way the screaming kids all get something to watch. This makes the inseat tvs priceless.

  16. Limitations by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dont think this is very practical. Planes are limited in the power supplied to the seats. Many modern and future laptops draw more power than the plane supplies (or at least the airline allows). Most planes restrict you to 75 watts. So unless you want to use your battery (which has its own limits) you are restricted to how long you can view this. Many airlines also make you remove your battery before you can use power from the plane.

    Secondly, does anyone really need live TV via their laptop - it would seem using installed lcd displays is a whole lot easier.

    1. Re:Limitations by Fruny · · Score: 1
      Secondly, does anyone really need live TV via their laptop - it would seem using installed lcd displays is a whole lot easier.


      Well, if they are going to give you internet access in the first place, that way they save on the lcd display. The question now is, if all you want is 'plain' internet access, are they going to charge you extra for the live TV 'service' anyway?
    2. Re:Limitations by NMBob · · Score: 1

      Who the heck even has enough room to open up their laptop without risking the display getting crushed when the seat ahead of you leans back?

      Also, how many flights have you been on where they couldn't even keep the VCRs running?

    3. Re:Limitations by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      How will they implement interrupting your viewing pleasure at the height of the show so that the pilot can tell you the weather at 35,000 feet?

    4. Re:Limitations by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      How will they implement interrupting your listening pleasure from your walkman at the best song so the pilot can tell you the weather at 35,000 feet? Oh noes!

    5. Re:Limitations by Technician · · Score: 1

      Many airlines also make you remove your battery before you can use power from the plane.


      So what do they do for the laptops that will not run without a battery? My wife's old Dell Win ME laptop will not turn on without a battery.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:Limitations by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      NET SEND

    7. Re:Limitations by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      My PowerBook's power adapter is rated for 60W max, and I believe the computer itself draws an average of maybe 20W when it's running. (The battery is 50Wh, and I get 2-3 hours on a charge.) I know that Apple machines tend to be a bit thriftier on power than PCs, but I'd be surprised if a normal PC laptop couldn't get by just fine on 75W. Should I be surprised?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    8. Re:Limitations by bwy · · Score: 1

      At least if you have an iBook, you can get up to 6 hours battery life. For my purposes, this is usually enough, when I factor out takeoffs, landings, time spent sleeping, eating, and reading or some other low-tech time consumption method.

      Of course, I've also never been a person who can watch movies continuously, one after the other after the other.

    9. Re:Limitations by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My thinkpad with a mobile (speedsteppin') P3 has a 120W-max draw power supply, but it puts out max 16V@3.36A or 53.76A. (one sincerely hopes it's not that inefficient.) My battery is rated 10.8V/5.4AH nominal, so that's just over 60WH and it lasts about 2 hours at roughly 650 (out of 850) MHz. My PC laptop should get along fine with 75W, but others may not be as low-power...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. What about 120v ac? by c0dedude · · Score: 1

    Laptop power would be nice on overseas flights, 2 hours battery life sucks. That's something I'd pay up to ~$30 US for.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:What about 120v ac? by man_ls · · Score: 2, Informative

      Inverters can be had for about $30 (after MIR) although, for today's power-hungry laptops, my $30 inverter is strong enough to charge the battery while the laptop is shut off, but overdraws when the thing is actually turned on.

      Inverter will either plug direct into the plane's +12vDC socket, or use an adapter (about $10) to get a standard +12vDC car-style socket from the plane's socket.

    2. Re:What about 120v ac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You're gonna plug an inverter into the 12V DC connection to give a 120V AC source for the laptop charger to convert to 12V DC. That's efficient.

      Why not get one of the dozens of available DC chargers for laptops?

      And while you're at it, get a decent laptop, not a spaceheater that requires 140W to charge.

    3. Re:What about 120v ac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lufthansa have real genuine power plugs in First and Business. No adaptors necessary. You can plug any 110/220v laptop power plug into it.

    4. Re:What about 120v ac? by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Where does one find these mythical 12v DC sockets in an airplane? I have travelled pretty regularly inside the US for work (coach, of course-- my company is cheap) and have yet to ever spot an outlet of any sort, on any plane, on any airline. Hell, I've been toying with trying to see how much current I could coax out of the headphone jack, but I doubt it's worth doing.

    5. Re:What about 120v ac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should try American Airlines. They have extra leg room in coach, enough so I can type on my laptop (assuming there isn't a jerk in front of me). They also have laptop power on most of their planes. You do need to look at the seat maps and change your booking to get a row with power, but it's not to hard for a geek to handle the website. I've paid about 10% extra for fly on American. The leg room alone is worth it.

  18. MPAA sues [people who say stupid stuff] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So how long before "viewed on Laptop" becomes "recorded on laptop" ?"

    How's that any different than "computer with a TV tuner"?

    "On the other hand anything that creates havoc for MPAA... this cannot be a bad thing, right ?"

    You people are really stretching things to demonize people aren't you?

    1. Re:MPAA sues [people who say stupid stuff] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How's that any different than "computer with a TV tuner"?

      Probably isn't. So ?

      You people are really stretching things to demonize people aren't you?

      Come on!!! This is the MPAA we are talking about. The task is redundant :P

      Hmmm, will any such copying in-flight come under any juridiction at all actually ?

  19. Blogging potential by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

    How long before someone live-blogs their flight to wherever? And how pathetic would that be?

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  20. SONG already has this - and more... by datastalker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Song has a partnership with Dish Network, and provides 24 channels of TV to the screen in the headrest in front of you. They also provide trivia, music (broadcast and create your own playlist (for a fee)), as well as movies (for a fee), and games (for a fee). The fees for the pay-per stuff are reasonable, but there's enough free (trivia and 24 channels) stuff to keep you busy the entire flight.

  21. The Greed Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the Greed Factor?
    They are going to have to charge you something to let you use YOUR laptop.
    I bet it will only be allowed in first class, where all the vitamin D deficient hang out.

    1. Re:The Greed Factor by geomon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They are going to have to charge you something to let you use YOUR laptop.

      My ISP charges me for service at home.

      Why should the airlines be obliged to give it away for free?

      Do you equate greed with running a profitable company?

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:The Greed Factor by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      I patronize the local coffee shop which has free wireless, and cheaper,m BETTER coffee then starbucks.

      It is possible.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:The Greed Factor by geomon · · Score: 1

      I patronize the local coffee shop which has free wireless, and cheaper,m BETTER coffee then starbucks.

      Free market priciples at work. I have no problem with that.

      But you wireless isn't free in the sense that they have worked the fractional cost of operating their wireless service into the price of a cup of coffee. It only appears to be free because it is not explicitly printed on your receipt.

      But you knew that already.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    4. Re:The Greed Factor by Bobobob314 · · Score: 0

      your ISP does not charge you for being in your house, a plane is a different matter.

    5. Re:The Greed Factor by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      But you wireless isn't free in the sense that they have worked the fractional cost of operating their wireless service into the price of a cup of coffee. It only appears to be free because it is not explicitly printed on your receipt.

      Of course I knew that. But I dont pay to walk on the floor do I? You know someone has to shine that fucker EVERY night. Its called infrastructure costs. Not ever cleaning the floor would surely keep customers OUT of the store. Buying 50$ a month for dsl and a linksys router brings a few INTO the store. Not exactly free, but not exactly not free. Yes, I run a small business.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    6. Re:The Greed Factor by screenrc · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Using the very same logic of your post, we
      are now free to claim that the "free" Wi-fi
      service that the airline provides is already
      included in the airplane ticket.


      I don't have a problem for the airline being
      greedy or for the passanger being greedy: it
      is market forces at work, where everyone tries
      to get the most out of the deal. "Greedy" and
      "profitable" is one and the same, there is little
      or no distinction between them.

    7. Re:The Greed Factor by geomon · · Score: 1

      But I dont pay to walk on the floor do I?

      Yes, you do. In fact you answered you own question in the rest of your comments.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    8. Re:The Greed Factor by geomon · · Score: 1

      your ISP does not charge you for being in your house

      No, the bank does that.

      Nothing is truly free.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  22. wont be long.. by priestx · · Score: 0

    till some one puts linux on it :)

    --
    "To be is to do." -Socrates
    "To do is to be." -Jean-Paul Sartre
    "Do-be-do-be-do." -Frank Sinatra
  23. get a plane power adapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On overseas flights, virtually every big-time airline has power at your seat in business class and many in coach.

    You plug in your laptop and run for the entire flight. I did so on the way to and back from Taiwan 2 years ago.

    But please don't let on that you'd pay extra for it when it is already included as part of your ticket.

    The socket on the planes provides +12V or something close to it. The socket was originally also going to be installed in cars, but they seem to have gone for more cigarette lighter sockets instead.

  24. MPAA sues [people who say stupid stuff]-II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Probably isn't. So ?"

    Ask the OP. He seems to think it's a big deal.

    "Come on!!! This is the MPAA we are talking about. The task is redundant :P"

    Maybe, but you guys aren't helping your image any.

    "Hmmm, will any such copying in-flight come under any juridiction at all actually ?"

    It's a private carrier. That's all the jurisdiction needed.

    1. Re:MPAA sues [people who say stupid stuff]-II by geomon · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but you guys aren't helping your image any.

      And posting on /. is a way to improve your image?

      Consider parsing that sentence carefully before you answer.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  25. But will they ... by Coyote67 · · Score: 1

    offer any programs about calm hindu cows?

    1. Re:But will they ... by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious... are there Hindu Cows? And if so, do the Cows in Texas believe that all Hindu Cows will go to hell about their different beliefs, and misunderstood MONO-theism? What about them thar Mormon cows?....

  26. Thank god...Water Landing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now I won't miss Adult Swim while I'm taking my flights to Europe and back."

    Remember your seat doubles as a flotation device.

  27. Service isn't widespread enough for wifi as is by Buran · · Score: 1

    This service was announced sometime in 2000 or so and should have been far more pervasive than it is now. Wifi Internet access in the air was supposed to have been fairly easy to get, but you can still only get it on a few airlines (like Lufthansa) and you have to be going on pretty long trips (like overseas) to even have the option of getting it.

    Before we start adding more stuff like TV (why do we need that, anyway, when aircraft are often equipped these days with seatback LCD screens?) ... give us more flights (shorter-duration and on more airlines) that have the wifi option.

    More typical corporate foot-dragging here, and more PR fluff pieces for something that no one really has access to.

  28. Uhoh? I can see the rental charges now by Zaphod_Beebleburp · · Score: 1

    What is the current rate for headphone rental on airlines? Last time I flew it was $5 US (Unless you're sneaky and use your own with an adapter).

    I can forsee Boeing coming up with some crazy adapter that you can plug into the armrest and charge you $10, $15, $20 for it. At least we'll eventually be able to thank Radio Shack for selling the same adapter for $2 under a different name.

    You don't honestly think that they are going to retrofit their entire fleet and not charging anything for the convenience do you?

    1. Re:Uhoh? I can see the rental charges now by wasted · · Score: 3, Informative

      What is the current rate for headphone rental on airlines?

      American sells you a headset for $5, and encourages you to reuse it on your next flight. It was $2 last month, and $1 in March. Their seats have the same adapter as most personal stereos, and they allow you to bring your own.

    2. Re:Uhoh? I can see the rental charges now by evilviper · · Score: 1
      they allow you to bring your own.

      Actually, I think that would read better as: they can't force you not to bring your own.

      Airlines, in my experience, are as cheap as they can possibly be. They run scams (like $10 for airplane-only headphones) as long as they can, until people catch-on and it starts costing them business. I'm sure they'd be much more underhanded if a good deal of their sales didn't depend on repeat business.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Uhoh? I can see the rental charges now by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Thats not the only thing thats changing with American. I personally won't be flying them anymore. Not only are they jacking headphone prices, but their meal prices are RIDICULOUS.

      And the thing that REALLY pushed me over the edge on my last flight? No pillows. When I asked, the stewardess said they phased them out, and blankets were gone as of the 15th.

      I know the airlines are hurting for cash...but that is bullshit. They are EXTREMELY cheap, and one of the few things that makes those very uncomfortable seats manageable.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Uhoh? I can see the rental charges now by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      They took away the pillows so the terrorists will have it rough on US airlines, they might think twice before pulling the same stunt again.

    5. Re:Uhoh? I can see the rental charges now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to *PAY* for a pair of headphones on a flight? What planet are you flying on? This must be a US thing as I have never in 12 years of flying through the far-east, the pacific and in europe ever had to pay for headphones.

      Actually, the hands-down best inflight entertainment systems have got to be on Emirates and perhaps Qatar Airways (on-demand video in economy..). In fact, recently most of the Middle-Eastern Airlines make other carriers look like a bit of a joke in terms of service.

    6. Re:Uhoh? I can see the rental charges now by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Delta was $2 last month...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  29. Sovereignty... by fbartho · · Score: 2, Informative

    The passengers on the flight are subject to the laws of the territory it departed from until the flight lands... Meaning though the flight needs permission to overfly a country, that country doesn't get a say about the things the passengers are doing until the flight lands...

    --
    Gravity Sucks
    1. Re:Sovereignty... by hughk · · Score: 1

      For ships, it is the country where the vessel is registered. As much of aviation law is based on maritime law, I can't see this being different.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  30. Why Bother? JetBlue has TV. by bjbest · · Score: 4, Informative

    JetBlue advertises that they offer 36 channels of DirecTV. Screen at every seat. For free. Right now. No need to bring your own equipment.

  31. Re:hmmm by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    no kidding, I love flying because I can relax and READ A BOOK! Really, with 2 kids at home it's a rare time that I can get a book in, flights are my favorite place for them. now with my iPod I can have some Coltrane with my read too.

    but phones, laptops emails? eeekkk! let me have some time to myself; sometimes I'm just unreachable, get over it.

    CB

  32. This is... stupid by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

    4 channels is not what most people are going to want to watch. Has anyone considered taking a DVD with them? If you really need the news, go to CNN's website. Or, if you want to kill time very efficiently, load HL 2 up on your laptop (and bring a mouse).

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
  33. Nah... by dethl · · Score: 1

    But they'll have a program of a monkey running around a stage in a sweat-drenched shirt screaming "Developers! Developers!"

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  34. Internet access. by DustyShadow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd much rather have internet access on my laptop while I fly instead of 4 crappy tv channels.

  35. MPAA sues [people who say stupid stuff]-III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And posting on /. is a way to improve your image?

    Consider parsing that sentence carefully before you answer."

    I'm not the one coming up with outlandish speculation that's getting moderated to the level that uninvolved third-parties might see.

  36. Not to mention the Airlines pricing this service.. by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of the large airlines in the USA have a really difficult time dealing with onboard services and prices. Several of the biggies started charging for their poor quality meals. Pretty much every USA airline has a very poor excuse for first class (especially when compared to foreign airlines). Customer service is more than just a few listed items on some cutesy poster by the ticket counter.

    So I'm wondering how these same airlines are going to implement and charge for this new service. Just because Boeing is offering it, doesn't mean that every airline is going to automatically buy and install these systems and not charge the passengers!

    If American Airlines can't figure out how to serve a *large* dish of ice cream in first class, then I don't see how they're going to find the value in onboard streaming data and video.

  37. Worse yet: everyone in coach USING their laptops! by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh great, now everyone's going to pull out their laptops while en route!

    When I fly in economy/coach class, I invariably spend at least one leg of my flight sitting beside somone who insists on using his 15+ inch notebook computer! Now, even if the seat in front of him is in it's fully upright position, there still isn't quite enough room to open the lid to a comfortable 110-degree angle. And because of the compact nature of coach class, the front (trackpad) edge of the notebook is only a few inches away from his chest... so there's not enough room for his arms, forcing him to jut out his elbows a good 8 inches in each direction so he can comfortably use the keyboard and trackpad.

    PLEASE PEOPLE! Use your PDA in economy class. If you must use a notebook, get a 12" or smaller model. It's not just uncomfortable for you, it's uncomfortable for anyone sitting beside you.

  38. Laptop battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care about the in-flight tv, but it would be nice to be able to plug in my laptop so I can watch a dvd or something without worrying about the battery life. Internet access would be nice too.

  39. Coincidence by ThesQuid · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just happen to be in an ANA flight and they happen to have the Connexion service, and it rocks! Getting 28kb/sec on my torrent now. Perhaps the RIAA will sue Boeing?

  40. I'll believe it when I see it. by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    I'll believe it when I see it.

    Some airlines "get it" and have realized that their customers find value in free onboard services. JetBlue is a young "no-name" airline with a strong following because of their upbeat attitude and nice in-cabin entertainment offerings.

    Other airlines have divisions that "get it", such as Delta's SONG airline. (I don't really agree with the way they pimp candy bars and sandwiches though).

    But there are still so many airlines that have a really hard time grasping the concept that their customers have brains and like reasonable entertainment. I have a strong distaste for Southwest, they generally either treat me like crap or they try to be comedians. Continental, American, and United are far more professional, but they're deaf and blind. Why only offer in flight entertainment to overseas and only certain domestic flights? Why is your first class section so poorly managed. Those of us who pay for first (be it with money or upgrades with frequent flyer miles) expect a little better service and a larger variety of ammenties. Northwest is another airline I dislike. Why do they insist on hiring crabby old grandmas to be their flight attendents? I guess it fits their white and gray interior color scheme. But if you have white surfaces, KEEP THEM CLEAN, otherwise just use the dark beige and orange surfaces that Southwest uses to hide the dirt!!!

    Rant Rant Rant. Airlines in the USA just don't get it. I really doubt they'll invest in Boeing's new entertainment systems. And even if they do, they'll just cripple it with strange usage restrictions and/or heavy fees. After all, these same airlines are starting to think they should charge us as much as $10 for a 3-day-old deli sandwich, no-name chips, and a piece of fruit. My local grocery store would sell me the same bundle of the same "quality" for $2.

    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have a strong distaste for Southwest, they generally either treat me like crap or they try to be comedians." And later going on to say, "Why is your first class section so poorly managed."

      You know, maybe you think Southwest is trash because you're so used to your silly little first-class section. Personally, I've flown first-class, coach, and even been in the middle (i.e. Southwest). Let me tell you this, out of all the airlines I've flown, Southwest ranks among one of the best and most comfortable that I have ever flown. Yeah, they only give you peanuts and the worlds smallest apple(TM), and they're kind of skimpy, but so fucking what? What exactly is keeping you from bringing your own food? Right--nothing. Are you complaning because you don't get your real silver fork and plastic knife?

      Oh, and your little fable about Southwest using dark colors to hide dirt just boldly points out your extreme arrogance. Give me a break; if Southwest was as bad and "dirty" as you made it out to be, they wouldn't have been the only airline in 2003 to make a profit.

      Think before you speak--it'll go a long way.

    2. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by Buran · · Score: 1

      I'd LOVE to fly JetBlue or Song ... if they served St. Louis. Southwest is pretty decent and does come here, but typically, the companies that I *WANT* to patronize don't give a damn about my area. They need to get a clue that because they have a clue in OTHER areas ... there are people that would give them money for their services! But no, instead we're stuck with crap like American, who bought TWA a few years ago and promised no layoffs or other screwings.

      Now here we are with most of the flight schedule gone, the local airport just about gutted, TWA's staff all fired/laid-off/etc. ... and me refusing to give those fucking liars a red cent of my money, as they sure as hell haven't proven themselves worthy of getting it.

    3. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      It's late and I've been typing fast, so perhaps I wasn't very clear.

      I too have flown both classes and on many airlines. When I've flown first class it has been on vacation with my girlfriend and we paid for the upgrades with our frequent flyer miles. I normally fly coach, and I normally shop for the best deal I can find. I'm one of those asses that often brings his own food. I usually read and listed to MP3s via my tiny little flash based player. I leave my laptop closed up. To me, an airliner is not much more than a glorified bus with wings. But I do think the customer service is severly lacking. I've found British Airways to be a *MUCH* more friendly, accomidating, and pleasently surprising airline.

      If I had to rank my experiences with the airlines, I would put Southwest somewhere in the middle. They're run by some smart people and have made some very smart moves, but they're no JetBlue. I didn't mean to say that SW is a "dirty" airline. But their interior color scheme sure looks a lot cleaner than the wide open spances of white and gray you see on Northwest's planes. Their use of leather on all seats also makes it much easier to clean. It was a smart choice on their part.

      My whole point is that while there is only so much you can do to improve the experience of flying in a little aluminum tube, I really think the airlines could do more to make it a pleasent experience.

      I personally wish there was a way to blend the service of JetBlue with the comfort of the Avro RJ85 planes that Mesaba flys for Northwest's "AirLink" regional network. Unlike the 17-18" inch wide seats most Boeing, Airbus, and Embraer airliners use in coach, the Avro has 20" seats, plus a little more headroom. Impossible, I know, but I can dream.

  41. CNN Airport Network by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Insightful

    **ANYTHING** has to be more interesting than the CNN Airport Network station you see in airport terminals.

  42. Re:Why Bother? JetBlue has TV. by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Song and JetBlue are great. Unless you want to fly to Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Minneapolis, Toronto, Montreal, Anchorage, Honolulu, Tokyo, London, Paris, or Berlin...

  43. Song and JetBlue are great, except... by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Song and JetBlue are great. Unless you want to fly to Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Minneapolis, Toronto, Montreal, Anchorage, Honolulu, Tokyo, London, Paris, or Berlin...

    (And really, if SONG can offer Dish Network and games, why can't the rest of Delta Airlines??)

  44. what about this to attract customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they seem to be a bit desperate to attract new customers aren't they? what about this for ideas for an airline: flights that leave on time when advertised, arrived on time when advertised, preferably at the destination advertised, which ideally should also be the destination of your luggages (which should arrive, say, within the same week as you do, unlost, unstollen, and intact); now that would be an airline with which I'd fly...

    but then I am also a guy who'd like to find a cell phone that makes it possible to make or receive a phone call, and be able to understand the person at the other end of the call, and without cameras, mp3 players, video games and other crap that burns the batteries in half an hour...

    oh well...

    1. Re:what about this to attract customers by bluGill · · Score: 1

      They would love to. However the airlines do not control the tower, the FCC does. Any controller who gets mad at one airline can easily make planes late without it being obvious. Luggage is mostly controlled by the airport. Oh, and when you become an experienced traveler you will start to hope they lose your luggage on the trip home so you don't have to take it through customs!

      Then there is the all inclusive weather. The location of the jet stream can make a large difference, and while general trends are easy to perdict, we can't know in advance enough details to really get it right.

      If you look close, the airlines with the best on time ratings have just put more room in the schedule. They are not doing anything to make the planes arrive on time other than give the plane more time to arrive. (Note that this means planes that serve snowy/icy areas are more likely to be one time because more room is allowed)

  45. live tv concerns by darkitecture · · Score: 0


    As long as they still have some semblance of content control, I'm okay with it. Although I'm a big anti-censorship sort of person, there's a certain comfort I derive from knowing that all the entertainment provided in-flight won't be disruptive.

    That is, I don't expect to see a film with a plane crash scene. I don't expect to see a kid playing AfterBurner or MS Flight Sim and crashing his plane. And I certainly don't expect to flick over to the news channel and see the latest news on an airliner that's just crashed only a few moments ago.

    Obviously Boeing still seems to have control over what content the channels are going to provide, but let's hope they don't just pipe in a live CNN feed, even with a 30 second delay. The last thing I want is to be on a plane with a hundred passengers in a panic because they just saw footage of a plane crash in like, Kreplakistan, from a helicopter circling a smoking black smudge on the side of a mountain.

    1. Re:live tv concerns by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      They have no control over the kid problem. If they're going to allow computers I sure as hell wouldn't want them telling me I can't play game X. As long as I'm not viewing pornography I don't think it's their place to say what I can and can't play. And if they think it is I'll be certain to patron another company.

    2. Re:live tv concerns by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but you sound like a totally selfish, non-caring individual with those statements - basically, what you are saying is that it doesn't matter that several hundred people have died in a plane crash somewhere provided that you don't get to hear about it while you're flying.

      Do you have many friends?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  46. It almost happened: by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    How long before someone live-blogs their flight to wherever? And how pathetic would that be?
    It almost happened:
    http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=07831

    The last time I had a layover in the Denver airport I was tempted to use my digital camera and the free wifi access to blog.

  47. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    Meal service isn't all that important to me. I'd just like there to be one airline where the plane arrives ON TIME! At least a 90% ontime rating, anyway. Some weather delays are inevitable, but the current situation is killing domestic aviation. Business travelers will drive if possible because they know that the flight will take about as long once they account for the flight delays and the getting to the airport 3 hours in advance to wait in line for airport insecurity.

  48. Re:Worse yet: everyone in coach USING their laptop by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
    PLEASE PEOPLE! Use your PDA in economy class. If you must use a notebook, get a 12" or smaller model.

    Fucker... we're flying coach cuz we spent our money on that 17" 'portable' computer.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  49. I don't need my stinkin tv by Dano+Watt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would I need to watch TV on my laptop when it's 80 gig drive holds hours of porn?

  50. cut that bandwidth!! by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WTF? You can drastically cut the bandwidth needed by storing the station logos and advertising locally on the aircraft. Even better, since most TV is repetitive, you could generate it 'on the fly' (ha ha).

    "Buy our product! Oooh yeah! It's really great! Woo!"

    "You're watching Boeing-o-vision! Parp parp parp Boeing telly BOEING TELLY Boeing Telly parpity parp"

    "And now, the news"

    "News Time! News Time! Squeak! Parp! Toot! News Time!"

    "Britney has/hasn't had plastic surgery. The war against terror continues. More news later."

    "News Time! News Time! Squeak! Parp! Toot! News Time!"

    "You're watching Boeing-o-vision! Parp parp parp Boeing telly BOEING TELLY Boeing Telly parpity parp"

    "Buy our product! Oooh yeah! It's really great! Woo!"

    "No, buy our product instead! Oooh yeah! It's really great and better than the other stuff! Woo!"

    "You stink, buy our deoderent!"

    "you suck as a parent unless you buy your kid our plastic crap!"

    "You're watching Boeing-o-vision! Parp parp parp Boeing telly BOEING TELLY Boeing Telly parpity parp"

    "And now, I Love Lucy, followed by the news"
    ...etc for fricken hours at $20 an hour to the captive audience.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  51. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by liangzai · · Score: 1

    However they choose to price this service, I hope they only charge those who actually use the service (mostly dumb-founded Americans who constantly watch TV in the kitchen, bathroom, bedroom and living room). I never watch TV.

    I also wonder if they are going to broadcast the same old crap as they broadcast everywhere else. I guess there won't be any adult channels... with some fresh asian pornos to boot, a plane trip could actually be a joy!

  52. What about the satellites? by tloh · · Score: 1

    I suppose this is a bit off topic, But I'm extremely curios about the satellites providing this service. How many of those birds are up there to deliver all this bandwith? I know next to nothing about Sat Comm, but I imagine (due to launch costs and insurance etc.) satellites are expensive to operate. and that cost is passed on to the bandwidth endusers. Wasn't this the reason satellite phone (the ones with giant antennae) are only used sparingly by those in the most remote locations? Is it even a remote possibility that Boeing gets more than they bargain for and all this network access saturate their capacity?

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  53. Article is wrong / Mistake about bandwidth by enoraM · · Score: 2, Funny

    actually it's 5 mbps upstream and 1 mbps downstream, since we are referring a connection of an airplane and the ground.

  54. Oh please.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste of bandwidth. I bet they're going to ask for a fortune when you want a share of the remaing couple of kilobits.

  55. Up/down by LupeSpywalper · · Score: 0

    Since it's planes we are talking about I guess downstream is actually upstream and vice versa, only upside down in a reverse kind of way.

  56. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Several of the biggies started charging for their poor quality meals.

    As long as they pass the saving on to me, this is not something I have a problem with. Especially on short distance routes. Why is it that an airline seems to be obliged to provide food for a 2 hour flight whereas I've been on a much longer train journey without needing to eat at all.

    So I'm wondering how these same airlines are going to implement and charge for this new service. Just because Boeing is offering it, doesn't mean that every airline is going to automatically buy and install these systems and not charge the passengers!

    They're going to be courting the frequent travellers. Some people are willing to pay a few dollars more for a little more to do on a flight, or failing that they'll at least switch if they know that airline A offers TV on board and Airline B doesn't.

    If American Airlines can't figure out how to serve a *large* dish of ice cream in first class, then I don't see how they're going to find the value in onboard streaming data and video.

    Airline caterers have some terminology. "Doable on ground" and "doable on board". Planes have all sorts of problems, like the space taken up with refrigeration, and the power needed for it.

  57. Re:Worse yet: everyone in coach USING their laptop by ChreexLe · · Score: 1

    pizza: If you must use a notebook, get a 12" or smaller model. It's not just uncomfortable for you, it's uncomfortable for anyone sitting beside you.

    monk: Fucker... we're flying coach cuz we spent our money on that 17" 'portable' computer.

    Yes. And if someone was poking me in the side with their elbows for a 1-12 hour flight I would certainly say something...

    ...to the person poking me

    --
    -- haha i know it's not funny but i said it so i'm gonna pretend it's funny --
  58. String.replace("TV","advertising") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    lets be clear about what TV has become, the product is YOU content is more an inconvience
    the airline just want you to watch their advertising stream because if you are watching a DVD on your laptop then they dont get the eyballs watching their crap
    TV is a joke thats why DVD sales are massive and movie houses are clammering to get product placement deals, at what point do we say enough is enough (cough p2p)

  59. Apple’s Connexion to Boeing -- What PCWorld M by applextrent · · Score: 0, Troll

    Over at Apple-X.net, our senior investigative journalist had an article about Apple's connection to Connexion and a possible new iService. After seeing PCWorld cover the topic, we decided to run the story now. Check it out: "Apple's Connexion to Boeing: OS X Tiger's QuickTime Could Reach More than 3 Billion Users a Year!" --Trent L. CEO of Apple-X.net

  60. Re:Why Bother? JetBlue has TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why this isn't more common, if only to keep passengers calm as flying becomes more and more stressful. TV is certainly a better pacifier than those tiny bottles of whiskey...

  61. Counter Intuitive by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

    The terms "down stream" and "up stream" seem counter intuitive for the first time ever. At 30,000 feet I think I want the bulk of my bandwidth comming up!

    --
    SPAM
    1. Re:Counter Intuitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The satellite is a big higher "up" than 30,000 feet.

  62. bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not much damned use when most a/c don't have power to cattle-class seats and adaptors for inflight power cost so much.

    Most long haul flights even in economy class from Europe to the Pacific and Asia have seatback screens with video on-demand or a good selection of channels anyway. The boeing initiative seems a bit of a waste of time really...

    1. Re:bah by dalpeh · · Score: 1

      Don't foget space. If you are not very careful, the guy in front of you leans back a destroys your display. If they really want to do well, they should just allow tv through the monitor already in place on the backs of the seats. Why make me break out my laptop.

      --
      forgivness is easier to get than permission
  63. Commercials in the air!!! by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait. A standard 22 minute TV comedy will take 45 minutes in the air after watching 23 minutes of commercials.

    Thanks... but no thanks. I'll just stick to a DVD.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  64. Damn booklights keep me awake.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and so do eyeshades.

  65. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    As well they should. If you're only going a few 100 miles the drive would be easier [or train/bus]. Planes are really good for things like transatlantic and cross continent [e.g. Ottawa to California].

    Where this obsession with flying somewhere you can drive in 2 hours came from I can only guess...

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  66. Because shitty service isn't enough by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Let's charge people oh, about a dollar a minute to watch tv on the plane because making them line up like it's the last plane out of Saigon, treating them like they're criminals and pretty much pulling their on time schedule out of their ass and charging more to go to Memphis TN than to go to Moscow really isn't enough.

    I hope every airline goes broke in 05.

  67. Re:Worse yet: everyone in coach USING their laptop by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've done a lot of flying this year, and some people not only don't care about their neighbors, they actively try to push you out of your damned seat. I finally got agressive myself, shoving back twice as hard, and not giving an inch. While I hate pressing the flesh (literally), there is sometimes simply no other alternative. So when some obnoxious thug tries to steal my seat, I just say HELL NO.

    Americans are Fat Alberts. Airline seats are for armless anorexics. But for these scumbags, I don't think it would matter if they were in first class, they would still be hogs.

  68. Re:Why Bother? JetBlue has TV. by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the big airlines keep up their "the only people who hate the customer more than we do is the TSA" approach to customer service, the little guys who don't actually suck might just end up taking over.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  69. I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to be on a plane that's tilted or constantly turning just to keep the antenna pointed at the sattellite.

  70. That's not the real problem, though... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    How about just "keep your damn arms in your own seat?" I don't care if you bring a 15" or 17" laptop with you, as long as you're willing to deal with the fact that you don't get to type comfortably, and that there will be no "elbow easement" into my ribcage to accomodate you.

  71. 8@!#$@#! by slapout · · Score: 1

    If people in a moving plane can it that kind of bandwidth, why can't the cable company get a cable line/modem run to my house!!!

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  72. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by Xiaran · · Score: 1

    Wow. I just had a business idea. I agree that driving/bussing those short journies is a good idea. The main problem I have with coaches(not so muc hwith trains) is that its a pain to get any work done(try using a laptop in that cramped seat). Why not start up a business coach services. With internet connection etc... Id use it.

  73. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you... but as a 6'1" dude I can hardly sit in the seat without my knees digging into the seat ahead of me let alone open a laptop.

    That goes for planes, trains, and automobiles [well buses, I can use my laptop in my mid-size car just fine... not while driving...].

    My understanding is that public transportation is meant to make money and not comfort. So concepts such as "humane leg room" is just ludicrous. I can understand city buses being cramped but 8 hr flights overseas or 9 hour bus rides south are literally painful to the point I get "touchy".

    I've yelled at my share of passengers that feel the need to push their seat back [into my legs more], annoying loud kids, etc after a few hours of pain...

    As for flights the way you make them interesting is occupying the passengers mind. e.g. put real music/shows on the units instead of "CBSWatch".

    First off, they use the same tape. Ever fly twice in a week? Ever watch the same 8 hrs of movies/CVSWatch? I have.

    Second, christian country or jazz make selection not.

    Third, if I want a fucking drink I'll ask. Quit pestering me! [though that's policy and not personal... I know].

    Fourth, to the person ahead of me, don't move your seat back if you don't like my knee cap digging into your lower back. Biatch.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  74. This begs a question.... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I decide to sleep and with my laptop record the stream, be it live tv or movies, are they mine, will I be arrested for 'Stealing' copyrighted materials?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    1. Re:This begs a question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it raises the question; it doesn't beg the question.

  75. Will my Tivo Work? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Live TV huh? well if nothing good is on I'll just use my Tivo then.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  76. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by therion · · Score: 1

    Consumers in the US demand cheaper fares and care less about additional onboard services.

    Domestic first class is about a bigger seat.

    If you want big bowls of ice cream, eat them at home. Don't increase my ticket cost for that stuff.

  77. Airplanes with beds by otisg · · Score: 1

    For a lot of people long-distance flights represent, like subways/tubes/undergrounds/metros, the rare opportunity to sit down, relax, maybe read a book.

    I'd rather airlines don't buy into the TV service, and instead offer more comfortable chairs or even beds for long-haul flights. Or at least give customers the choice. Some will pay more for a TV, some will pay more for a comfortable chair or bed.

    --
    Simpy
  78. This is not a new idea... by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Back around 1998 or so, when I was still at Boeing, the Commercial Avionics department had built, and was experimenting with, a prototype system that would provide Dish Network service to every seat.

    It was pretty amazing stuff. For the antenna, they had a rectangular slab about five feet by three that contained the electronic equivalent of hundreds of individual "dish" antennas in a phased array. The idea was to give each seat the equivalent of its own dish so that each passenger could be watching a different channel.

    This monstrosity was designed to be mounted on the top of the fuselage, about mid-body. It was aimed electronically, based on latitude/longitude info gathered from the ADIRU (Air Data Inertial Reference Unit), a 'black box' that contained (among other things) an inertial navigation computer.

    The idea was to have a six-inch LCD active-matrix panel in each seat back, with the audio piped over one of the existing channels in the aircraft's audio entertainment system.

    The entire system was a marvel of engineering, and I consider myself fortunate enough to have watched the prototype undergoing testing. Unfortunately, I don't think it ever made it into production -- the costs were just too high.

    Now, though, perhaps the idea will be revived...?

    Keep the peace(es).

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:This is not a new idea... by Blrfl · · Score: 1

      It was revived.

      A scaled-down two-receiver version is installed in both VC-25s that fly the President and two of the four C-32s that cart the First Lady, VP, Secretaries of State and Defense and other muckety-mucks around. This one gets DirecTV when flying in the U.S. and a number of free channels on similar systems in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.

    2. Re:This is not a new idea... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      How is this different from the DirectTV service that JetBlue planes receive?

    3. Re:This is not a new idea... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      Interesting... The very fact that you mention that tells me that the units, or something very similar to them, did indeed make it into production.

      Thanks for the heads-up. I'll try to dig up some details (I'm curious now...)

      Keep the peace(es).

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

  79. Great... by sootman · · Score: 1

    my favorite show is on at 8pm eastern & pacific, 7pm central & mountain... how will I *possibly* schedule my flight to make sure I see it?

    (If I'm redundant, save your mod points... I am browisng at +5 and don't feel like reading the thread lower to see if someone else made this joke already.)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  80. Many PC laptops draw a LOT of power by alispguru · · Score: 1

    I know that Apple machines tend to be a bit thriftier on power than PCs, but I'd be surprised if a normal PC laptop couldn't get by just fine on 75W. Should I be surprised?

    No, sadly. I have a RadioShack brick car power inverter (140W continuous, 400W for seconds). This inverter can run two iBooks with no trouble. It cuts out if I connect one Toshiba 6300 to it with the battery in - the machine boots and runs until XP gets up enough to start running power management and charging the battery, then the inverter overloads. I can charge the battery with the computer off, or run the computer with the battery out, but not both at once.
    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  81. TV at a dollar an hour by filipvh · · Score: 0

    Or something like that - the airlines always seem to charge to the max for onboard communications services.
    This is a nice idea if it was, say, free, to offset the discomfort of having to be on the plane in the first place, but I'll bet access to this server will cost a fair bit...

  82. Re:Worse yet: everyone in coach USING their laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 15" laptop works just fine in coach. Thank you very much. Of course, I only use it in coach on a decent airline. One that doesn't pack you in like cattle. Instead of buying a PDA, just spend a little extra and fly a better airline. It's no secret that some have more room than others.

  83. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    Yea, if I'm sitting in front of you, I'm going to sit straight up for an entire 8 hour flight just so you can have some more leg room. Right. If you need that much space, fork over the money for a first class seat. I'm about 2 inches shorter than you and I fit into a coach seat just fine, even though it is a little too tight for comfort. But that's the way coach seats are. It's not like sitting in your La-z-boy recliner at home. You can't just slouch back and take up all the room you want. Who are you to tell someone they can't put their seat back?

  84. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by dbacher · · Score: 1

    The main reason that this was obliged was for people who can't get a direct flight.

    It used to be that our corprate policies had me taking two connecting flights. While 2 hours might not be a long time, 6 hours could be, and often there was only 5 or 10 minutes to get between the planes, so grabbing something to eat wasn't really an option.

    --
    If your code is acting bloated, and is running rather slow, it's likely and predicted that some loops you will unroll.
  85. Why would anyone want to do this? by Mighty+LoPan · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but when I bring a laptop on a plane, it's to avoid having to watch the airline TV. Isn't this a step in the wrong direction?

  86. Does this mean I can game at 30k feet? by TerraFORM · · Score: 1

    If so, that'd be a nice way to kill time...

  87. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    You have a point, and I see no reason not to offer food as an option, but I think many people would prefer a cheaper flight. Those that want food can pay the extra.

  88. ETOPS by tengwar · · Score: 1
    Extended range twin operations - also known as "engines refuse to operate, please swim"

    Sorry, had to be said!

    1. Re:ETOPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do you you rearrage the words so the don't fit the acronym anymore?

      etops=Extended Twin engine OPerationS
      or humerously
      etops=Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim

    2. Re:ETOPS by tengwar · · Score: 1

      Because the acronym really does stand for "extended range twin operations" - see for example this. CAA is UK equivalent of FAA in USA. No idea why they don't include the "R" in the acronym.

  89. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Fine, put the seat back. Just deal with my knees in the seat.

    And FYI I don't slouch on them. Not enough room to slouch.

    Asshat.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  90. Re:Not to mention the Airlines pricing this servic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The competition http://www.frontierairlines.com/ charges five bucks for about a dozen channels on their Airbus fleet (more than Boeing is offering here). Bring your own headphones; the ones they give you aren't great sounding and won't adjust to fit oversized geek crania. No, that doesn't get you free service: you're stuck on the GPS map channel until you pay. Which helps you answer the inevitable "Are we there yet?" from your offspring.