You went to a Marxist school teaching Marxism in Germany? Was that before or after Concentration Camp Kindergarten? All the Russians went to the Stalin school and know Stalin's Communism better than anyone else.
You have to be a troll, because nobody can be that mentally deficient.
You are absolutely inventing statements because "tax" is the only cure I have stated. You are not considering that tax can be used for punishment and forced manipulation. Carbon Tax is the only cure proposed by the UN, the US, the UK, Australia, Germany, etc.. etc.. ad nauseam. There is no plan as to where the money goes, and there are no projects slated for the tax if it's forced in to being. The tax is purely for behavioral modification purposes, punish those who use energy. (You can Google "Carbon Tax" and find plenty of information.)
The left right paradigm adopted for propaganda goes that there are only 2 sides. Those that want a tax on Carbon to stop/reduce Carbon production and those other loonies who don't believe that Global warming exists labelled "conservatives" by media. Which obviously misses the biggest camp of dissenters who say that a behavior modification tax will not fix the problem and will only benefit a few very wealthy people who collect said tax.
The tactics being used to control the narratives are as old as human history. The 3 books I mentioned all discuss public manipulation. The reasons a behavior tax won't work are quite obvious (China pays what to whom? How about Vietnam? Sudan? and how to they grow without energy alternatives exactly?)
Sorry you don't remember the 70s and the massive campaigns for CFC free aerosols and removal of Styrofoam. You can still go read articles from just about every paper and magazine that was out at the time.
What cure was discussed by me? Don't invent words I never wrote, read what is there. GP stated Conservatives and funding, two words which have a pretty strong connotation behind them. I responded that the proposal given thus far by _Governments_ has been "TAX THE POPULACE". They have given no plan outside of tax, and that is both Liberals or Conservatives. People bleat the false mantra of "conservatives don't believe in global warming" because that is what they are told, even though the real thing people don't believe in is that tax will fix a damn thing.
Go back to the 70s, and most people were fine to pay extra for CFC free products and cardboard over Styrofoam. The extra money took pollutants out of the environment, all was good with that. The Government did not come out and say people need to pay tax because "pollution", there was an investment and plan to change things. Compared to the proposed plan by the UN and all of the Governments involved, which is simply to pay a tax for carbon.
Hahaha, that is some funny shit. So Everyone in Australia must know more about crime than anyone else. Anyone in Greece must know more about Plato and Aristotle than anyone else. As a German you must know more about how to kill a Jew than anyone else too right? You simply brilliant! (not)
No, claiming that one group or another group believes X despite the idiocy of believing X is moronic. X is generally a bullshit piece of rhetoric put out by people holding power to gain more power. The Hegelian dialectic is not new, in fact when Hegel wrote it down it was not new, he just did a fine job of explaining the methodology to manipulate the public.
It is NOT a conservative or liberal argument, it's an argument by globalists who want control. Fear, fear, fear, fear, fear, but the Government will save you if you just give up all your rights. What do you get? To be a slaves to the corporations who get permission to buy some of what those same corporations sell.
The proposed cure for Global warming is to massively tax the populace. No plans to clean up, no infrastructure to replace what gets lost in massive taxes, but a few people sure as hell get richer.
If I lost you, read it again with Plato's "The Republic", and again with Quigley's "Tragedy and Hope", and again with "Propaganda" by Bernays, and eventually it will make sense. The blue prints and story have been out there for over 25 centuries, you should be angry that you don't see it.
Sure, we'll see where that goes, especially given how hard to swallow some of those claims are. How would they even know who a Bernie voter was? They can't ask. They can't require. These are bizarre claims from Bernie or Bust supporters, and those claims don't seem very credible until we get some real, hard proof. It doesn't pass the sniff test.
Age is the easiest thing for poll workers to target, and poll workers were given those exact instructions (that lawsuit and report came out on the same day as primaries). I understand that people prefer blindness to cognitive dissonance most of the time, but hell.. if you are going to argue at least do some basic homework. Nobody gets smarter by reading ignorance, and nobody gets better by typing it either.
As to "bizarre" claims you are attempting to claim that people proven to lie and collude to benefit a particular candidate are somehow altruistic with this one type of cheating. 9 out of 1o times they are dishonest, but this one time they were honest, they told us so and they even said "I swear". I find your position to be bizarre, and as with your lack of knowledge on the pool worker report based in complete ignorance.
The Democratic Party's biggest problem (ugh, one of its many big problems, I suppose) is that it doesn't have a group of credible challengers.
I really hope nobody is that surprised that the pool has been so corrupt for decades that now they can't find anything that can live in the pool. There are, and were other choices, but the Democratic Party said "no". They are happy with the corruption and don't care because it's the people sucking on the worst of the toxins.
The Republicans are not "that" much different, except again that when the people started closing the well they decided to let in a new stream. Hell, most of the hardcore Republicans are still pissed about it and continue to try to dam up the stream.
The people are on to the game, and the more the media and entrenched cronies fabricate claims the more sure a Trump win. They don't get it, and neither do many of the die hard "party" people.
I did not pretend anything, I was simply clarifying facts since it appeared that GP made a false claim. I still can't comprehend what they really intended to say, so have to take the ACs translation of it as correct.
Speaking of pretending though, your doubts about the impact of cheating really mean nothing, as you start with a fabricated claim. California had several lawsuits being filed for voter fraud, with poll workers instructed to give Bernie voters invalid ballots among other allegations. That is one of numerous cases of voter fraud being reported, cases filed, and investigations opened. If the field was never level, the only person allowed to run against her was an open Socialist, and we have proof of corruption and collaboration within the party to stack the deck, you must be completely batshit crazy to believe that she won more votes.
Trump won despite the party not wanting him because the people were allowed to speak. Plenty of things with Trump to have complaints about, but the democratic process is surely not one of them.
As the local Radio station said this morning: "The Republican party nominated the only candidate that has a chance of losing to Hillary. The Democrats nominated the only person who has a chance of losing against Trump." It has been a very fun and historical process to watch, and I think it's going to get much better.
I think your translator broke right after your started your second sentence. The Republican candidate did not win by coin toss, they won by popular vote. People don't like that very much, but that is a fact. The Democratic candidate won by coin toss, drawing cards, collusion within the Democratic party and it's insiders, and collusion with media. Again, that is factual.
I generally don't have Presidential candidates robo-calling, I have people at Congress/Senate or State level pestering me. Note that TFA says specifically "political" calls, not just "presidential candidates".
I subscribe intentionally to the do not call list with all my numbers. Some political hack calls me I simply won't vote for them. I have a good memory for people that show me no respect or courtesy so will go out of my way to vote for their opponents.
The power of the Boycott works for Politicians too!
Lurl.me was used on Twitter and other social media platforms for the dissemination of pro-revolution messages in the Middle East.
They were not just listening. Try again keeping my quote in mind when reading the FULL context of the article, not the parts you want to cherry pick as acceptable behavior. I know it's hard, confirmation bias is easy.
So the Russian Government funding programs to trick UK citizens into reading propaganda is fine, and me simply stating that they should not do this is "censorship".
You are either a troll or a shill, because nobody that stupid can type in sentence/paragraph form.
People attempting to simplify everything as positive and negative are a huge part of the problem. The world is not, nor will it ever be, purely good or evil.
Having high moral standards is not always easy. Your morality to you is easy, but your morality differs from the rest of society by at least a little, and probably much more than you think.
The leaked information shows the edge of the map, not the map. Look at political turmoil world wide, not just in what is convenient. Look at oppression world wide, not just the edge of the map. This is not some specific high tech attack that takes huge funding and technical skills. It's easy and cheap, and only requires the desire to influence other Governments.
Here, the UK is called out for influencing other Governments. If you believe it was only in those two countries you are a fool, sorry.
By the way people in the US, isn't this the same thing people are claiming Russia is doing and we are so offended by it? Spitting in the wind often leaves your face messy.
Small claims was exactly what I was thinking. Divorce courts regularly have Lawyers, and are helpful in mediating things like child custody, child support, alimony, and splitting wealth.
There are no courts in the US that require lawyers except perhaps as you mentioned, arguing before a Supreme Court. A person may not be considered competent by a judge and given a Lawyer, but it's rarely necessary. AFAIK you can be a litigator in any court case and not be a Lawyer, but there are rules regarding it (must have a Lawyer present?). Meaning the person pretending to be a Lawyer would have been fine except for the impersonation. It's been a while since I considered law school so that may not be the case in all courts, States, etc..
2. Bad actors exist and the internet allows them to hide things so that users select things they normally would not.
3. Bad actors are often inside of what most people consider "reputable" companies.
4. Morality is hard and the bad actors in charge of stuff tend to push for lots number 2 (I had to skip "1" for the irony).
You knew all this stuff already, or should have. We have a justice system which is supposed to handle companies breaching moral code, or what we call law. The problem is obviously how to make things visible to the user, which given the desires of HTML and JavaScript won't happen. setAttribute("type", "hidden"); has valid purposes as well as nefarious. Such is the nature of tools. I guess secondarily the punishment for bad actors may not fit the crime, but again we have a justice system for that.
Has historically little to do with the artists. We have trials recorded from a couple hundred years ago where companies buying copyrights (often artists were required to transfer ownership just to publish a book) wanted extended duration for Copyright and increases in penalties. Meanwhile, the artists giving up the copyright were left broke and their families received nothing from their works.
IMHO a long ago fix would have been to remove the ability of Copyright ownership by a company and make them to people only. Larger productions can have multiple owners.
Now queue the media to run front page stories claiming the same "YOU ARE A RAPIST" line.
If you see no problem with this you are playing with much less than a full deck. Chances are, you do see the problem but it fits your confirmation bias so pretend it does not matter. (You could also just be a troll)
There is always a reason, though not always obvious. Tor is now shit, because the good people were chased away. Notice that there are no criminal charges anywhere, just allegations and accusations repeated over and over on any media outlet that would print it. Lead developer gone, whole new board being elected, one should be rather suspicious.
Now for the tin foil hat: A whole lot of money and effort goes into taking over a project like Tor, and as we saw with the Snowden NSA leaks it is a global exploitation at least after the fact. China, the US, the UK, and just about everyone else suddenly has no problem finding people on Tor networks. All of those same groups can claim ignorance when the cat jumps out of the bag.
Sometimes it's not easy to see who benefits and a clear goal. That is when you need to look around to see why you are being distracted.
Sure, there are some trends which are pretty well known during the 2 weeks of National conventions. Generally the Rs go up during theirs and the Ds go up during theirs. Ds have not gone up at all, and I don't expect they will. Sanders threw his whole revolution under the Hillary bus, and she backed over it a few times. Hiring Wassermann-Schultz was the most idiotic move possible for Hillary to make on Monday, and what did Hillary do? This added to a massive decline which was already in progress.
FWIW I'm not a Trump supporter either. I would rather have had Paul or Carson. Neither perfect, but both real conservatives who believe in the Constitution. The Republican party messed up big time, trying to put in a phony puppet in Bush and then panicking when the people didn't play along. They don't have who they want, but they can at least recover. The RNC actually supported the people's choice despite him not being a true Republican. That was a smart move given the climate.
The Democratic party and Hillary are still train wrecks in progress. It's actually just as fun to watch as the Republican side was. The difference is that Hillary was not wanted by anyone except for Hillary and the Party. Unlike her Husband Hillary sucks at faking it. The Democratic party didn't care and put her up anyway, cheating and lying as much as needed to get her wedged in. The people are pissed, and that is the theme of this whole election cycle (for both parties).
It's funny to keep listening to the paid for media claim that Sanders people are all going to vote Hillary. Not one group I have read or talked to will vote for her. She is the reason people supported Bernie to begin with, people are tired of the corrupt politicians working for the mega wealthy. Trump may be wealthy, but he's the smaller enemy on the field. The best hope the Ds have is that all the Bernie supporters stay home. Many are so disenfranchised that they will, but others are so pissed off they will vote for Trump.
Slashdot Mirror
Posted by "OrangeTide (124937)", is that you Donald?
Sorry, couldn't resist.
You went to a Marxist school teaching Marxism in Germany? Was that before or after Concentration Camp Kindergarten? All the Russians went to the Stalin school and know Stalin's Communism better than anyone else.
You have to be a troll, because nobody can be that mentally deficient.
You are absolutely inventing statements because "tax" is the only cure I have stated. You are not considering that tax can be used for punishment and forced manipulation. Carbon Tax is the only cure proposed by the UN, the US, the UK, Australia, Germany, etc.. etc.. ad nauseam. There is no plan as to where the money goes, and there are no projects slated for the tax if it's forced in to being. The tax is purely for behavioral modification purposes, punish those who use energy. (You can Google "Carbon Tax" and find plenty of information.)
The left right paradigm adopted for propaganda goes that there are only 2 sides. Those that want a tax on Carbon to stop/reduce Carbon production and those other loonies who don't believe that Global warming exists labelled "conservatives" by media. Which obviously misses the biggest camp of dissenters who say that a behavior modification tax will not fix the problem and will only benefit a few very wealthy people who collect said tax.
The tactics being used to control the narratives are as old as human history. The 3 books I mentioned all discuss public manipulation. The reasons a behavior tax won't work are quite obvious (China pays what to whom? How about Vietnam? Sudan? and how to they grow without energy alternatives exactly?)
Sorry you don't remember the 70s and the massive campaigns for CFC free aerosols and removal of Styrofoam. You can still go read articles from just about every paper and magazine that was out at the time.
What cure was discussed by me? Don't invent words I never wrote, read what is there. GP stated Conservatives and funding, two words which have a pretty strong connotation behind them. I responded that the proposal given thus far by _Governments_ has been "TAX THE POPULACE". They have given no plan outside of tax, and that is both Liberals or Conservatives. People bleat the false mantra of "conservatives don't believe in global warming" because that is what they are told, even though the real thing people don't believe in is that tax will fix a damn thing.
Go back to the 70s, and most people were fine to pay extra for CFC free products and cardboard over Styrofoam. The extra money took pollutants out of the environment, all was good with that. The Government did not come out and say people need to pay tax because "pollution", there was an investment and plan to change things. Compared to the proposed plan by the UN and all of the Governments involved, which is simply to pay a tax for carbon.
Hahaha, that is some funny shit. So Everyone in Australia must know more about crime than anyone else. Anyone in Greece must know more about Plato and Aristotle than anyone else. As a German you must know more about how to kill a Jew than anyone else too right? You simply brilliant! (not)
No, but claiming funding stops because "conservative" or "liberal" is a sham.
No, claiming that one group or another group believes X despite the idiocy of believing X is moronic. X is generally a bullshit piece of rhetoric put out by people holding power to gain more power. The Hegelian dialectic is not new, in fact when Hegel wrote it down it was not new, he just did a fine job of explaining the methodology to manipulate the public.
It is NOT a conservative or liberal argument, it's an argument by globalists who want control. Fear, fear, fear, fear, fear, but the Government will save you if you just give up all your rights. What do you get? To be a slaves to the corporations who get permission to buy some of what those same corporations sell.
The proposed cure for Global warming is to massively tax the populace. No plans to clean up, no infrastructure to replace what gets lost in massive taxes, but a few people sure as hell get richer.
If I lost you, read it again with Plato's "The Republic", and again with Quigley's "Tragedy and Hope", and again with "Propaganda" by Bernays, and eventually it will make sense. The blue prints and story have been out there for over 25 centuries, you should be angry that you don't see it.
Think!
Sure, we'll see where that goes, especially given how hard to swallow some of those claims are. How would they even know who a Bernie voter was? They can't ask. They can't require. These are bizarre claims from Bernie or Bust supporters, and those claims don't seem very credible until we get some real, hard proof. It doesn't pass the sniff test.
Age is the easiest thing for poll workers to target, and poll workers were given those exact instructions (that lawsuit and report came out on the same day as primaries). I understand that people prefer blindness to cognitive dissonance most of the time, but hell.. if you are going to argue at least do some basic homework. Nobody gets smarter by reading ignorance, and nobody gets better by typing it either.
As to "bizarre" claims you are attempting to claim that people proven to lie and collude to benefit a particular candidate are somehow altruistic with this one type of cheating. 9 out of 1o times they are dishonest, but this one time they were honest, they told us so and they even said "I swear". I find your position to be bizarre, and as with your lack of knowledge on the pool worker report based in complete ignorance.
The Democratic Party's biggest problem (ugh, one of its many big problems, I suppose) is that it doesn't have a group of credible challengers.
I really hope nobody is that surprised that the pool has been so corrupt for decades that now they can't find anything that can live in the pool. There are, and were other choices, but the Democratic Party said "no". They are happy with the corruption and don't care because it's the people sucking on the worst of the toxins.
The Republicans are not "that" much different, except again that when the people started closing the well they decided to let in a new stream. Hell, most of the hardcore Republicans are still pissed about it and continue to try to dam up the stream.
The people are on to the game, and the more the media and entrenched cronies fabricate claims the more sure a Trump win. They don't get it, and neither do many of the die hard "party" people.
Someone learned what a fallacy was and now claims everything is a fallacy.
I did not pretend anything, I was simply clarifying facts since it appeared that GP made a false claim. I still can't comprehend what they really intended to say, so have to take the ACs translation of it as correct.
Speaking of pretending though, your doubts about the impact of cheating really mean nothing, as you start with a fabricated claim. California had several lawsuits being filed for voter fraud, with poll workers instructed to give Bernie voters invalid ballots among other allegations. That is one of numerous cases of voter fraud being reported, cases filed, and investigations opened. If the field was never level, the only person allowed to run against her was an open Socialist, and we have proof of corruption and collaboration within the party to stack the deck, you must be completely batshit crazy to believe that she won more votes.
Trump won despite the party not wanting him because the people were allowed to speak. Plenty of things with Trump to have complaints about, but the democratic process is surely not one of them.
As the local Radio station said this morning: "The Republican party nominated the only candidate that has a chance of losing to Hillary. The Democrats nominated the only person who has a chance of losing against Trump." It has been a very fun and historical process to watch, and I think it's going to get much better.
I think your translator broke right after your started your second sentence. The Republican candidate did not win by coin toss, they won by popular vote. People don't like that very much, but that is a fact. The Democratic candidate won by coin toss, drawing cards, collusion within the Democratic party and it's insiders, and collusion with media. Again, that is factual.
I generally don't have Presidential candidates robo-calling, I have people at Congress/Senate or State level pestering me. Note that TFA says specifically "political" calls, not just "presidential candidates".
Not a challenge. It simply changes to "who has pissed me off more".
I subscribe intentionally to the do not call list with all my numbers. Some political hack calls me I simply won't vote for them. I have a good memory for people that show me no respect or courtesy so will go out of my way to vote for their opponents.
The power of the Boycott works for Politicians too!
Lurl.me was used on Twitter and other social media platforms for the dissemination of pro-revolution messages in the Middle East.
They were not just listening. Try again keeping my quote in mind when reading the FULL context of the article, not the parts you want to cherry pick as acceptable behavior. I know it's hard, confirmation bias is easy.
So the Russian Government funding programs to trick UK citizens into reading propaganda is fine, and me simply stating that they should not do this is "censorship".
You are either a troll or a shill, because nobody that stupid can type in sentence/paragraph form.
People attempting to simplify everything as positive and negative are a huge part of the problem. The world is not, nor will it ever be, purely good or evil.
Having high moral standards is not always easy. Your morality to you is easy, but your morality differs from the rest of society by at least a little, and probably much more than you think.
The leaked information shows the edge of the map, not the map. Look at political turmoil world wide, not just in what is convenient. Look at oppression world wide, not just the edge of the map. This is not some specific high tech attack that takes huge funding and technical skills. It's easy and cheap, and only requires the desire to influence other Governments.
Here, the UK is called out for influencing other Governments. If you believe it was only in those two countries you are a fool, sorry.
By the way people in the US, isn't this the same thing people are claiming Russia is doing and we are so offended by it? Spitting in the wind often leaves your face messy.
Small claims was exactly what I was thinking. Divorce courts regularly have Lawyers, and are helpful in mediating things like child custody, child support, alimony, and splitting wealth.
There are no courts in the US that require lawyers except perhaps as you mentioned, arguing before a Supreme Court. A person may not be considered competent by a judge and given a Lawyer, but it's rarely necessary. AFAIK you can be a litigator in any court case and not be a Lawyer, but there are rules regarding it (must have a Lawyer present?). Meaning the person pretending to be a Lawyer would have been fine except for the impersonation. It's been a while since I considered law school so that may not be the case in all courts, States, etc..
2. Bad actors exist and the internet allows them to hide things so that users select things they normally would not.
3. Bad actors are often inside of what most people consider "reputable" companies.
4. Morality is hard and the bad actors in charge of stuff tend to push for lots number 2 (I had to skip "1" for the irony).
You knew all this stuff already, or should have. We have a justice system which is supposed to handle companies breaching moral code, or what we call law. The problem is obviously how to make things visible to the user, which given the desires of HTML and JavaScript won't happen. setAttribute("type", "hidden"); has valid purposes as well as nefarious. Such is the nature of tools. I guess secondarily the punishment for bad actors may not fit the crime, but again we have a justice system for that.
They can't have their cake and eat it too.
Actually Apple and most other massive companies in the US have been doing exactly that.
The average person however, gets fed a strict diet of cake of a different kind.
Has historically little to do with the artists. We have trials recorded from a couple hundred years ago where companies buying copyrights (often artists were required to transfer ownership just to publish a book) wanted extended duration for Copyright and increases in penalties. Meanwhile, the artists giving up the copyright were left broke and their families received nothing from their works.
IMHO a long ago fix would have been to remove the ability of Copyright ownership by a company and make them to people only. Larger productions can have multiple owners.
YOU ARE A RAPIST!
Now queue the media to run front page stories claiming the same "YOU ARE A RAPIST" line.
If you see no problem with this you are playing with much less than a full deck. Chances are, you do see the problem but it fits your confirmation bias so pretend it does not matter. (You could also just be a troll)
There is always a reason, though not always obvious. Tor is now shit, because the good people were chased away. Notice that there are no criminal charges anywhere, just allegations and accusations repeated over and over on any media outlet that would print it. Lead developer gone, whole new board being elected, one should be rather suspicious.
Now for the tin foil hat: A whole lot of money and effort goes into taking over a project like Tor, and as we saw with the Snowden NSA leaks it is a global exploitation at least after the fact. China, the US, the UK, and just about everyone else suddenly has no problem finding people on Tor networks. All of those same groups can claim ignorance when the cat jumps out of the bag.
Sometimes it's not easy to see who benefits and a clear goal. That is when you need to look around to see why you are being distracted.
Sure, there are some trends which are pretty well known during the 2 weeks of National conventions. Generally the Rs go up during theirs and the Ds go up during theirs. Ds have not gone up at all, and I don't expect they will. Sanders threw his whole revolution under the Hillary bus, and she backed over it a few times. Hiring Wassermann-Schultz was the most idiotic move possible for Hillary to make on Monday, and what did Hillary do? This added to a massive decline which was already in progress.
FWIW I'm not a Trump supporter either. I would rather have had Paul or Carson. Neither perfect, but both real conservatives who believe in the Constitution. The Republican party messed up big time, trying to put in a phony puppet in Bush and then panicking when the people didn't play along. They don't have who they want, but they can at least recover. The RNC actually supported the people's choice despite him not being a true Republican. That was a smart move given the climate.
The Democratic party and Hillary are still train wrecks in progress. It's actually just as fun to watch as the Republican side was. The difference is that Hillary was not wanted by anyone except for Hillary and the Party. Unlike her Husband Hillary sucks at faking it. The Democratic party didn't care and put her up anyway, cheating and lying as much as needed to get her wedged in. The people are pissed, and that is the theme of this whole election cycle (for both parties).
It's funny to keep listening to the paid for media claim that Sanders people are all going to vote Hillary. Not one group I have read or talked to will vote for her. She is the reason people supported Bernie to begin with, people are tired of the corrupt politicians working for the mega wealthy. Trump may be wealthy, but he's the smaller enemy on the field. The best hope the Ds have is that all the Bernie supporters stay home. Many are so disenfranchised that they will, but others are so pissed off they will vote for Trump.