apparently it is because you got it wrong. they found the threat to be serious enough to investigate but not credible enough to be actionable.
let me explain the difference.
If i report that doug has threatened to murder me, well murder is a serious crime and people who threaten it sometimes end up murdering those they threaten.
so the police found the threat serious enough to investigate but when they found that doug is my neighbor's chicken, the threat of murder wasn't credible.
because the threat wasn't credible they did not pursue prosecution.
hope that helps show the difference between brianna crying wolf and that being serious enough for the FBI to investigate and her being batshit crazy and/or full of shit and justly the FBI deeming her maniacal rantings not credible.
"Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America.
if you are going to quote someone, it is standard to provide ellipses when it is a partial quote, then people know there is more to the quote than just the words you decided to cut.
example:
"that's why im never going to be popular" - Macdude
also the article is pretty infammitory, the facts are presented correctly and succinctly , but there is no pause for insensitive naming of sexual preferences.
there is a whole thing about her transition, how she used to do a college comic as a man and then transitioned to a woman, and as a woman admitted that the college comics written by her as a man were in fact her.
even the characters in her game are the same exact characters (she drew them for the comics) in the comic, same name, same style, same characters.
Here's a tip. men also respond better when you take their concerns seriously
My concerns:
1) football
2) bacon
3) a warm place to shit
4) internet porn
I'm good, thanks. I don't need anyone to take my "concerns" seriously. Now excuse me because I have to get back to the Titans-Jaguars game. The commercial's about to end.
"Of course, hardcore pirates aren't always easily encouraged to part with their cash, so Spotify needed an equivalent to the no-cost approach of many torrent sites. " this statement confuses me, if pirates are making money then why would an equivalent be a no-cost?
the answer of course is because pirates don't make money, sharing content isn't about making money but having the content how they want it and usually for free.
this is what fixed the issue when it happened to me on a laptop with win10.
all other suggestions here did nothing, once i tried to reconnect to the wifi AP it would get a self assigned IP address.
funny timing too because i had just upgraded my internet modem and was recreating my wifi AP so i spent some time verifying other devices did not have this problem (one of them was a win 7 desktop).
because now there are two things that aren't ok, which means there are many things that ARE ok and AREN'T ok, and no way to know the difference for all people.
i doubt he is trying to sound progressive, i don't think he is trying at all, sadly the left has disintegrated into this whiny pale image of the right with the same tactics (name calling, put downs, finger wagging) and it just makes them seem weak and ineffectual.
they had the numbers and the millennials and were too up their own butts thinking they had the election in the bag to even go and vote. lol
no they weren't. maybe as immigrant farmworkers but the majority of people in the area before it even became "silicon valley" was white. i should know. i was born here and have lived here my whole life.
unless you are talking about before california was annexed from mexico.
every taco bell in east side san jose. they are all mexican, only the cashier will speak broken english, and anyone who is not mexican who applies for a job will be ignored.
unless everyone likes the changes that are made in the next two years, since we voted republicans into every section of public office AND they will get to confirm the new justices.
or keep kidding yourself that the country wants to vote differently than they just did.
Slashdot Mirror
apparently it is because you got it wrong. they found the threat to be serious enough to investigate but not credible enough to be actionable.
let me explain the difference.
If i report that doug has threatened to murder me, well murder is a serious crime and people who threaten it sometimes end up murdering those they threaten.
so the police found the threat serious enough to investigate but when they found that doug is my neighbor's chicken, the threat of murder wasn't credible.
because the threat wasn't credible they did not pursue prosecution.
hope that helps show the difference between brianna crying wolf and that being serious enough for the FBI to investigate and her being batshit crazy and/or full of shit and justly the FBI deeming her maniacal rantings not credible.
then neither is comcast internet a monopoly because you can get time warner instead.
although they provide the same service options and charge the same exact price, they are technically not monopolies.
i don't see what the difference is otherwise.
"Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America.
if you are going to quote someone, it is standard to provide ellipses when it is a partial quote, then people know there is more to the quote than just the words you decided to cut.
example:
"that's why im never going to be popular" - Macdude
it's sad because it's completely believable.
also the article is pretty infammitory, the facts are presented correctly and succinctly , but there is no pause for insensitive naming of sexual preferences.
there is a whole thing about her transition, how she used to do a college comic as a man and then transitioned to a woman, and as a woman admitted that the college comics written by her as a man were in fact her.
even the characters in her game are the same exact characters (she drew them for the comics) in the comic, same name, same style, same characters.
i googled brianna wu college comic and found it
https://encyclopediadramatica....
makes a pretty clear cut case that she was a he.
(sorry if i messed up the pronouns or was insensitive and such, it confuses me going back and forth between genders when describing someone.)
shhh, facts aren't allowed in the gamergate discussion, just like in gamergate.
you know that "anonymous coward" isn't the same guy posting over and over right?
My concerns:
1) football
2) bacon
3) a warm place to shit
4) internet porn
I'm good, thanks. I don't need anyone to take my "concerns" seriously. Now excuse me because I have to get back to the Titans-Jaguars game. The commercial's about to end.
FTFY
"Of course, hardcore pirates aren't always easily encouraged to part with their cash, so Spotify needed an equivalent to the no-cost approach of many torrent sites. "
this statement confuses me, if pirates are making money then why would an equivalent be a no-cost?
the answer of course is because pirates don't make money, sharing content isn't about making money but having the content how they want it and usually for free.
so you're saying their argument was right since people will now be marrying animate objects?
this is what fixed the issue when it happened to me on a laptop with win10.
all other suggestions here did nothing, once i tried to reconnect to the wifi AP it would get a self assigned IP address.
funny timing too because i had just upgraded my internet modem and was recreating my wifi AP so i spent some time verifying other devices did not have this problem (one of them was a win 7 desktop).
swag is common at events like this. (aka free stuff to help entice people to come to things that are otherwise usually very droll)
because now there are two things that aren't ok, which means there are many things that ARE ok and AREN'T ok, and no way to know the difference for all people.
i don't understand why that is so hard a concept.
who gets naked to go to the bathroom?
if someone tells you they are going to rape you to death, to your face, that's assault - a criminal offence, call the police.
did you feed them french fries?
probably more like a roast duck than roast chicken.
making one phone is 250$ if you divide the cost of a million phones against the total cost.
apple is certainly not doing it the other way around.
i doubt he is trying to sound progressive, i don't think he is trying at all, sadly the left has disintegrated into this whiny pale image of the right with the same tactics (name calling, put downs, finger wagging) and it just makes them seem weak and ineffectual.
they had the numbers and the millennials and were too up their own butts thinking they had the election in the bag to even go and vote. lol
well if someone made a subreddit then it must exist.
shit i guess that means i can make women do what i want if i follow the redpill! awesome!
actual evidence would be great.
no they weren't. maybe as immigrant farmworkers but the majority of people in the area before it even became "silicon valley" was white. i should know. i was born here and have lived here my whole life.
unless you are talking about before california was annexed from mexico.
every taco bell in east side san jose. they are all mexican, only the cashier will speak broken english, and anyone who is not mexican who applies for a job will be ignored.
maybe because 100% of women are birthgivers, yet no one complains about men not being included in this demographic.
i think your percentage is wrong as is the insistence that whatever the percentage of male CEOs has anything to do with discrimination.
unless everyone likes the changes that are made in the next two years, since we voted republicans into every section of public office AND they will get to confirm the new justices.
or keep kidding yourself that the country wants to vote differently than they just did.