Slashdot Mirror


User: Lorenzarius

Lorenzarius's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
11
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 11

  1. Re:Awesome! on Upgraded Hubble To Be 90 Times As Powerful · · Score: 1

    That second to last "Horsehead Nebula" photo (http://www.sidewalk-astronomy-club.com/img/horsehead-nebula.jpg) is actually a photo of the Eagle Nebula.

  2. Re:Spoiled It on Is There Such a Thing As Absolute Hot? · · Score: 1

    There is no system cooler than absolute zero. But there IS negative temperature, which is actually hotter than the same system having a positive temperature.

  3. Re:How about somebody taking on the problem of ... on Want to Take On An Open/Unsolved Problem? · · Score: 1

    Einstein's Nobel Prize was actually awarded for his work on the photoelectric effect, not Brownian motion.

  4. Re:Why? on IAU Proposes 3 New Planets · · Score: 1

    I concur, why not just leave the word "planet" as a historical and cultural term. Now they are trying to create a scientific definition for it and all people are like "omg new planets!!11!"...

  5. No need to take this Baidu encyclopedia seriously on Self-Censoring 'Chinese Wikipedia' Launched · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Chinese version of Wikipedia has only 67k articles for several years of development, however this Baidu encyclopedia already has more articles than that within several days. Why is that? It is because Baidu doesn't care about copyrights. According to their user agreement/disclaimer (which is only available in Chinese), the content will be released under GFDL and/or CC-SA 2.5 (which are incompatible) and at the same time all copyrights are reserved by Baidu. In fact there are a bunch of other contradictions within the same document. On the other hand, its users also doesn't care about copyrights too, because many of the articles are just copied from all the sites around the web.

    Therefore we don't have to take this Baidu encyclopedia seriously, because even Baidu doesn't take this encyclopedia seriously. They launch this project just to create cohesion within its users.

    <conspiracy>However there is one more interesting thing about this Baidu encyclopedia: Baidu as a search engine raises to prominence in China after Google is blocked. And if you don't know already, the Chinese Wikipedia (actually all the wikimedia projects) is blocked in China. Coincidence?</conspiracy>

  6. Re:Feces on Wiki to Help Solve Millennium Problems? · · Score: 2, Informative
  7. Re:Not impressive yet on A Real Transformer? · · Score: 3, Funny

    True, we all know the machines cannot be trusted.

  8. Re:Him him him... on Panel Confirms S. Korean Cloning Fraud · · Score: 1

    Errr now you're confusing matters, isn't family name the same as surname? And actually Hwang is the surname and Woo-suk is the given name (first name). So in Korea (and in China, Japan and Vietname), he is called Hwang Woo-suk. And Woo-suk Hwang is the Anglicized version.

  9. Re:Can't reference Wikipedia because it changes on Wikipedia's Accuracy Compared to Britannica · · Score: 1

    Well actually they already do have such a link on every article: It's in the toolbox to the left (Cite this article).

  10. Re:Can't reference Wikipedia because it changes on Wikipedia's Accuracy Compared to Britannica · · Score: 5, Informative

    The current version of an article is changing, but a particular past version is static. If you really need to reference Wikipedia, you can go to the page history page and choose one of the version. They actually have a page on citing Wikipedia.

  11. Re:'gain a relative economical advantage'.. on Kyoto Protocol Comes Into Force · · Score: 2, Informative

    From this official document (pdf) on the status of ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, India, China and Brazil has all ratified/approved Kyoto, am I missing something here?