As is? No service packs for windows? *hopes this is not the case, but just in case, *pukes up some vital organ**
I'm sure i've seen a java ssh client, that you use in your browser.. But they probably except their rules and ban things like that because of the inherent risks.
Couldn't you just sumggle in a copy of putty on a floppy? Copy over telnet.exe, see if they even know the difference.
NOTE: I "told" you what to do as an educational means of explanition, and am in NO WAY WHATSOEVER responsible for resulting actions and/or consequences.
I don't recall that tidbit at all, but as with all things, is possible.. Early shuttle only flew with two crew members,all that is needed. A set of two ejection seats is far easier to manage then a set of 7 or 8. Might have been just no SPACE to put seven ejection systems in the cockpit of that thing.
Ahh, stupid memory is failing; Don't the extranious crew members launch and reenter on one of the lower decks?
Well. from what I understand, yes, big flat foam falls softly. BUT, it was also covered in ice. Ice is hard and heavy, remember? And it didn't just fall, Columbia hit it on launch, not at rest. By that time, it was going UP at quite the speed, while the big flat foam thing, wanting to float gently, was going slowly, and then BLAMMO, they colide.
So... Beware running into large foam at high speeds.
You're right. It won't be added to 10.4 . I wouldn't like to run 10.4 either. I'd much rather be using 10.4.X where X equals $CURRENT . I'm sure 10.4.X will have Q2DX sooner or later. Even if it's LATER, it will be fine. Why? Because it works now. If it's fixed later, YAY, otherwise, it still works as is.
If designed to do so, the idea of a detachable cabin + even just a parachute, or even better/any ejection systems. They've used ejection systems in the space program before, on gemini. But that had to do with the fuel system, or something... More tidbits I forget.
Few things: Look at the ejection systems on a (semi or above) modern fighter jet.
There is such a device known as a zero-zero, which can eject safely at low speed, (above zero) and low height (above zero). They also can make one that can eject at any attitude. I don't recall if anyone has put these things into one unit, but it doesn't seem to be a leap of faith to do so.
As for the G forces: the shuttle launches at about 4 G's. BFD. They are astronauts! This is what they do... Train for the conditions of their job. They aren't going to put the "make seat leave plane" lever on the other side of the cockpit, it's someplace where G forces don't make that much of a difference.
Uh-oh/KABOOM!!! difference is why you use some type of very redundent sensor system to watch for an Uh-oh type of event, and take care of things.
All that said, no, the shuttle doesn't carry ejection systems in the traditional sense. That one is just bad design. The shuttles abort modes are mainly focused on a main engine failure, which would not be something catastrophic such as a reentry failure or a SRB going whacko and burning through the side of the main tank.
As has been said, with anything, it is hard to predict the unpredictable.
PS: noting what you said at the end about jumping into a plume of flame... Yes, very bad. Best thing you could do/design at that point would be something that even if the main structure fails, the peices can survive to a lower/safer altitude and THEN jump for it.
No I can't say that i have been in a spot to be needing components like that, and even if i were,i'm not as handy with precision soldering as some others...
But the (original) point I was trying to make, I guess, was since Apple is known mostly for selling PC's (in the original sense of the term, not IBM compatibles as it means now), and selling them as a package, OS, monitor, some software, etc, if intel ever had also, versus their obvious CPU's, network cards, assorted bridges and controlers, not even counting their non-PC stuff.
And who is to say that anyone is less slashdotible then another? I don't like stupid people, granted, but elitism is just as bad in its own way. They make block buttons for a reason,;)
In case english is non-native to you, as I suspect from your.be website, "vandalism" has no silent E on the end of it... Don't want to commit any accidental grammatical vandalisme, do we?:-D
Your alphabet soup sounds close enough for this hour. (I concure very much with your sleeplessness.)
All I know about it, is that when the ipod-linux port was started, it was somewhat difficult due to some unknown customizations/hacks that the cpu uses... It's some type of a dual-core setup, one dedicated to decoding audio, the other for UI things. Linux ARM code ran on it just fine, but the hardware needed both pieces to do its job right.
That said, that was then, and not now, and things may have changed... I seem to recall that the newly denamed photo's have a more powerful cpu in them.
No no no... How about "BILL GATES BEHEADED.avi.exe"? Those who don't know much about Billy would just say, "Hey, free violence." and those that DO know about him, they'd probably click before thinking that they should check that thing for a virus...
Slashdot Mirror
they make IQ in Farenheit and Celsius now?
a nine year old?! *hits with a fish*
As is? No service packs for windows? *hopes this is not the case, but just in case, *pukes up some vital organ**
I'm sure i've seen a java ssh client, that you use in your browser.. But they probably except their rules and ban things like that because of the inherent risks.
Couldn't you just sumggle in a copy of putty on a floppy? Copy over telnet.exe, see if they even know the difference.
NOTE: I "told" you what to do as an educational means of explanition, and am in NO WAY WHATSOEVER responsible for resulting actions and/or consequences.
*grumble* goddamn GIMME generation...
J
Note to self: When in florida, only steal shitpot cars.
I don't recall that tidbit at all, but as with all things, is possible.. Early shuttle only flew with two crew members,all that is needed. A set of two ejection seats is far easier to manage then a set of 7 or 8. Might have been just no SPACE to put seven ejection systems in the cockpit of that thing.
Ahh, stupid memory is failing; Don't the extranious crew members launch and reenter on one of the lower decks?
Well. from what I understand, yes, big flat foam falls softly. BUT, it was also covered in ice. Ice is hard and heavy, remember? And it didn't just fall, Columbia hit it on launch, not at rest. By that time, it was going UP at quite the speed, while the big flat foam thing, wanting to float gently, was going slowly, and then BLAMMO, they colide.
So... Beware running into large foam at high speeds.
You're right. It won't be added to 10.4 . I wouldn't like to run 10.4 either. I'd much rather be using 10.4.X where X equals $CURRENT . I'm sure 10.4.X will have Q2DX sooner or later. Even if it's LATER, it will be fine. Why? Because it works now. If it's fixed later, YAY, otherwise, it still works as is.
You're right, i'd known but forgoten that tidbit.
If designed to do so, the idea of a detachable cabin + even just a parachute, or even better/any ejection systems. They've used ejection systems in the space program before, on gemini. But that had to do with the fuel system, or something... More tidbits I forget.
hundreds of thousands of people?
Few things: Look at the ejection systems on a (semi or above) modern fighter jet.
There is such a device known as a zero-zero, which can eject safely at low speed, (above zero) and low height (above zero). They also can make one that can eject at any attitude. I don't recall if anyone has put these things into one unit, but it doesn't seem to be a leap of faith to do so.
As for the G forces: the shuttle launches at about 4 G's. BFD. They are astronauts! This is what they do... Train for the conditions of their job. They aren't going to put the "make seat leave plane" lever on the other side of the cockpit, it's someplace where G forces don't make that much of a difference.
Uh-oh/KABOOM!!! difference is why you use some type of very redundent sensor system to watch for an Uh-oh type of event, and take care of things.
All that said, no, the shuttle doesn't carry ejection systems in the traditional sense. That one is just bad design. The shuttles abort modes are mainly focused on a main engine failure, which would not be something catastrophic such as a reentry failure or a SRB going whacko and burning through the side of the main tank.
As has been said, with anything, it is hard to predict the unpredictable.
PS: noting what you said at the end about jumping into a plume of flame... Yes, very bad. Best thing you could do/design at that point would be something that even if the main structure fails, the peices can survive to a lower/safer altitude and THEN jump for it.
No I can't say that i have been in a spot to be needing components like that, and even if i were,i'm not as handy with precision soldering as some others...
;)
But the (original) point I was trying to make, I guess, was since Apple is known mostly for selling PC's (in the original sense of the term, not IBM compatibles as it means now), and selling them as a package, OS, monitor, some software, etc, if intel ever had also, versus their obvious CPU's, network cards, assorted bridges and controlers, not even counting their non-PC stuff.
And who is to say that anyone is less slashdotible then another? I don't like stupid people, granted, but elitism is just as bad in its own way. They make block buttons for a reason,
well, there are those. The problem is the time difference... The Shuffles just came out, but the intel whateveritis's are fairly old, if i remember...
Either way, I should have said "whole-system", computer, os, etc., vs just components of a system.
Did intel ever make a complete product?
Now i'm curious, would be interesting trivia if they did.
Otherwise you'd be comparing Apples to Strippers. Both good. Both for lusting after. Just. Not. The. Same.
If I were an exterminator, i'd be more worried about cockroach anti-personel fragmentation mines.
In case english is non-native to you, as I suspect from your .be website, "vandalism" has no silent E on the end of it... Don't want to commit any accidental grammatical vandalisme, do we? :-D
Your alphabet soup sounds close enough for this hour. (I concure very much with your sleeplessness.)
All I know about it, is that when the ipod-linux port was started, it was somewhat difficult due to some unknown customizations/hacks that the cpu uses... It's some type of a dual-core setup, one dedicated to decoding audio, the other for UI things. Linux ARM code ran on it just fine, but the hardware needed both pieces to do its job right.
That said, that was then, and not now, and things may have changed... I seem to recall that the newly denamed photo's have a more powerful cpu in them.
IANAP/CPUS (Programer/CPU Specialist)
Don't you mean a third CPU? The critter already is a SMP device... The only one I own, somehow.
Dude: We've been over this a million times; Next version is 4.10. End. Of. Story. QED
It may be what he deserved, but it did not make his point any less truthful.
So sayth the careful observing college student.
What do they do when Archive.org tries to index itself?
Somehow, "Rock the chemical bath trays" doesn't have the same ring as "Rock the Chasbah"...
Papaer? No *wonder* it was cheaper... You buy TV's from Magnetbox, Panaphonics and Sorny, doncha? ;-)
What kind of content are you using with that ogg wrapper? You know it won't play on an iPod, don't cha?
Sure, that's just what they want you to think...
No no no... How about "BILL GATES BEHEADED.avi.exe"? Those who don't know much about Billy would just say, "Hey, free violence." and those that DO know about him, they'd probably click before thinking that they should check that thing for a virus...