Says Bjarne Stroustrup, the inventor of the language, and nearly anyone who's ever worked on or implemented the spec.
Whether it seems OK to you or not, the fact that you're not only doing something they did not envision (which is cool), you're doing something they specifically don't think their constructs should be used for. Performance is not the only consideration, although putting exceptions in your loops can certainly have an effect on how much a compiler can optimize the loop or function calls it contains. Code clarity is something to think about, and anyone whose been in the computer industry for any amount of time (should) know(s) that going against the designer's vision is a bad idea unless you really know what you're doing, or are bug hunting.
Not to say there couldn't be a situation where it would make sense... but I haven't seen one sense.
You wouldn't know unless you tested it. Bit flip errors are most likely to do nothing really noticeable, but that could be a pretty big deal. You're inexperienced.
As far as I'm aware there was no bill to allow laptop searches, it was a court decision that searching a laptop is the same as searching your luggage, etc., which is already legal.
By that logic, of course, the laptop searches should already have had the same accountability as luggage searches. If the luggage searches had no accountability, then there's no reason this new bill should apply only to laptops; the same protection should apply to luggage as well.
We interpreted the measurements wrong. The Bible's changed over time. God came down from Heaven and shrunk the elephants. God made the inside like TARDIS.
They believe in an omnipotent being. There's nothing you can possibly argue about.
5 years ago I spent $60 a month for 256kb up/5Mb down. Now I pay $60 a month for 1Mb up/15Mb down. That's a factor of 3 in 5 years. 5 years before that... well, I didn't pay for Internet in 1998, but you'd be lucky to pay $60 a month for 768mb down. So, in my experience it's been a factor of 3 every five years for... well, only two samples, but that's all we've really got as far as consumer Internet service goes.
Unless they've continuously been making less money for the last ten years, bandwidth is costing them less at the same rate.
I believe the plan is, this is fine now so nobody gripes. Same as it ever was, I don't notice the cap so there's effectively no cap, right?
In 5 years, 250GB will be used up in a week. Now they're saving money, and charging you if you want any more. The thing is, that 250GB cap has been there forever. Same as it ever was, right?
Fact is, very few high-level jobs let you work 40 hours a week. Just the way it is. You're right on one point though, there are certainly no worries about overtime.
Slashdot Mirror
Says Bjarne Stroustrup, the inventor of the language, and nearly anyone who's ever worked on or implemented the spec.
Whether it seems OK to you or not, the fact that you're not only doing something they did not envision (which is cool), you're doing something they specifically don't think their constructs should be used for. Performance is not the only consideration, although putting exceptions in your loops can certainly have an effect on how much a compiler can optimize the loop or function calls it contains. Code clarity is something to think about, and anyone whose been in the computer industry for any amount of time (should) know(s) that going against the designer's vision is a bad idea unless you really know what you're doing, or are bug hunting.
Not to say there couldn't be a situation where it would make sense ... but I haven't seen one sense.
For modern languages, the use of exceptions is recommended.
Yeah. What? No.
Nah, but it does mean it's tough to caught ;)
Wife. Whatever. She sucks.
Your mother is, quite simply, a horrible person.
Jesus, man, what are you on?
Ia! Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
This is the first comment that even comes close to answering the question. Mod up!
Oh, hey republicans...
...
...
...
...
BOO!
Hahahahaha.
You wouldn't know unless you tested it. Bit flip errors are most likely to do nothing really noticeable, but that could be a pretty big deal. You're inexperienced.
As far as I'm aware there was no bill to allow laptop searches, it was a court decision that searching a laptop is the same as searching your luggage, etc., which is already legal.
By that logic, of course, the laptop searches should already have had the same accountability as luggage searches. If the luggage searches had no accountability, then there's no reason this new bill should apply only to laptops; the same protection should apply to luggage as well.
How da fuck did I do that. Also suck my dick.
(#24992811)
Prime factors:
3 2776979
UID.
fail
Sweet Christ, you managed to not only be wrong, but at the same time un-ironically use an awful 4chan meme to do it.
We interpreted the measurements wrong. The Bible's changed over time. God came down from Heaven and shrunk the elephants. God made the inside like TARDIS.
They believe in an omnipotent being. There's nothing you can possibly argue about.
Yeah, nothing helps make sarcasm funnier like explicitly stating that it's sarcasm.
Yup, we're both retarded.
Er, yeah. A lobster'd be the exact opposite of the point I was trying to make, huh?
5 years ago I spent $60 a month for 256kb up/5Mb down. Now I pay $60 a month for 1Mb up/15Mb down. That's a factor of 3 in 5 years. 5 years before that ... well, I didn't pay for Internet in 1998, but you'd be lucky to pay $60 a month for 768mb down. So, in my experience it's been a factor of 3 every five years for ... well, only two samples, but that's all we've really got as far as consumer Internet service goes.
Unless they've continuously been making less money for the last ten years, bandwidth is costing them less at the same rate.
Nope, the cap is 250GB, so 3,333 hours before overhead. Also, a day is 24 hours around here, so it'd be 139 days.
Don't see what's not right in front of your face, do you?
Boiling a lobster works the same way.
I believe the plan is, this is fine now so nobody gripes. Same as it ever was, I don't notice the cap so there's effectively no cap, right?
In 5 years, 250GB will be used up in a week. Now they're saving money, and charging you if you want any more. The thing is, that 250GB cap has been there forever. Same as it ever was, right?
Nah, if you're running qmail, just put a .qmail-something in your homedir containing the address to forward it to:
Say you have:
someguy@example.com
~/.qmail-fart:
someguy@example.com
Makes this address forward to someguy@example.com:
someguy-fart@example.com
Yup, that's my Linux background now!
BOSCO
Obviously you don't know many attorneys.
Fact is, very few high-level jobs let you work 40 hours a week. Just the way it is. You're right on one point though, there are certainly no worries about overtime.