Slashdot Mirror


My Job Went To India

Josh Skillings writes "The author, Chad Fowler, draws upon his experiences as a software engineer, a team leader over a group of Indian developers, and as a jazz musician, to describe 52 ways or tips that will help you to become a more valuable employee. These tips are described in two or three pages each, and are usually illustrated by a practical example or story. The tips are well thought-out, well-explained and make sense. Chad draws upon the open source movement as well, highlighting ways that contributing to and learning from open source can improve your career. These tips gave me greater respect and appreciation for the open source movement in general." Read on for the rest of Josh's review. My Job Went To India (and All I Got was This Lousy Book) author Chad Fowler pages 185 publisher The Pragmatic Bookshelf rating 8 reviewer Josh Skillings ISBN 0-9766940-1-8 summary Offers 52 ways you can keep your software engineering job, or grow yourself into an even better job. Chad encourages the you to think of your career as life cycle of a product, and as such divides the 52 tips into the four areas of "Choosing Your Market", "Invest in your Product", "Execute", and "Market", and then two extra groups called, "Maintaining Your Edge", and "If you Can't Beat 'Em". This grouping works surprisingly well and provides an overarching context that makes sense. Many of the tips have specific calls to action at the end, which are useful if you don't already have ideas on how to apply the tip.

For example, under "Choosing Your Market", tip #7 "Don't Put Your Eggs In Someone Else's Basket", Chad encourages you to refrain from learning vendor-specific technologies that can disappear with the vendor, and then calls you to action by suggesting you write a small project in a technology that competes with the technology you are used to using. This will help you understand why the technology exists to start with and what opens your horizons for what might be coming next.

Under the section "Investing in your Product", tip #14 called "Practice, Practice, Practice", Chad offers suggestions on how software engineers can get even better by specific kinds of focused practice. The action items at the end of the section suggests practicing "Code Katas" katas similar to martial artists, but instead in code and in different languages.

With 52 tips, this book has a lot of tips, a tip for every week of the year, but you should expect to spend much longer than a week on most of them. A few of the tips you are probably doing already, but many of them you aren't. Some of the tips are fairly straight forward and easy to put in to practice. You could spend your entire life attempting and never achieve some of the other tips, such as tip #39, "Release Your Code." The ultimate goal of this tip is to be able to say in a job interview, "Oh, are you running Nifty++? I can help you with that- I wrote it." Chances are this scenario won't ever happen to you, but by working towards this goal in the ways the book outlines, you will definitely become a better, more valuable software engineer. Many of the tips will make you a better person in general, regardless of your career, such as tip #28, "Learn How To Fail", where Chad emphasizes how to fail gracefully and the rewards that can be learned from failure. This wide range of time, difficult, and application of the tips gives you something to work on today, next week, and next year.

The title of the book is silly. Yes, it was catchy enough for me to notice in the bookstore, with the red cover and the homeless (software engineer?) holding a sign, "Will Code For Food". So from that point of view, the cover worked. However, unless you've read the book, you might think it's as campy as the cover and wonder if it is somehow anti-Indian. I think a better title would be along the lines of "How to Get Any Job You Want", since if you can master all of these tips, you'll be the best there ever was.

While I didn't expect any specific technical advice, I would have liked some. I understand that an author needs to be sensitive to how fast technology changes, however just one tip with a warning: "This information is my opinion on April 11, 2007 and will probably change tomorrow". And then describes about how Subversion is a great tool, Python is a great language to learn, and learning design patterns can make your life easier, would have been appreciated. A tip like this would help you to understand the author a bit better and further encourage you to learn more.

If you want to improve yourself and you can accept advice, this book is for you. You will find things you can do better and skills you've never considered. Like some of the other Pragmatic Programmer books, I will never be able to master everything in this book, so I'll be reading this book again and again, trying to get better every time. Don't let the cover put you off, this is a great book.

You can purchase My Job Went To India (and All I Got was This Lousy Book) from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

396 comments

  1. They took my job by ilovesymbian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They took my job; they took my job; they took my job.

    The American companies are to blame, it has nothing to do with America or India. If Dell, HP, GE outsource to India, don't buy their products anymore. Simple as that. But don't blame the poor people over there trying to make a living with what the CEO of Dell does.

    Anyway, Python is a great tool, yeah.

    1. Re:They took my job by forgoil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, start your own company and show what you can do, let it become a battle on your turf, make it about software and products, not about bottom lines and the bosses fancy yacht and head count. The US was built by entrepreneurs, it's time to start building again!

      Same goes for anyone else in any other country where a crap company outsources your job or your mates jobs from a company you helped build. Start up your own company, it's the best way to 1. get back 2. do things your way.

    2. Re:They took my job by nakajoe · · Score: 1

      No kidding--we can't expect companies NOT to use cheaper labor when we as consumers line around the block to save a few bucks. I'm not saying outsourcing is all bad, but we as consumers are the ultimate cause of it all.

    3. Re:They took my job by halofan_sd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      well, why is it a virtue to buy "Made in America" products? I would rather have my money go to a third world country where people really need it, than have it go to some spoiled Americans that think they deserved to be paid $40 an hour.

    4. Re:They took my job by Rakishi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So are you an total isolationist or do you want foreign companies to simply bury US ones (by providing products at half the cost)?

    5. Re:They took my job by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There is only one way to solve this. Everyone get into a pile and get gay!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Did you even read the summary? The book's not actually about outsourced jobs - it's about making yourself a valuable software employee.

    7. Re:They took my job by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      So you are saying kill off all the American companies, so no American has a job. America cannot thrive alone anymore if we try we will get killed. I would suggest reading Tom Freemans The World is Flat. But even the Mighty GE would die if it didn't outsource. Royal Dutch Phillips, Roles Royce, there are pleanty of companies ready to get GE market. And many of these countries will not allow GE in unless they have local people work for them. Say for every 2 programmer outsourced there makes an opening for 1 software manager/designer, now here is where it gets weird, the developer over times develops a design that will require 4 programmers which will be outsource however after that large job is done it will break into smaller teams thus creating demand for an other software manager/designer and continue on.

      So what if there are more jobs outsourced, there will be more demand for better jobs here.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:They took my job by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1, Funny

      There is only one way to solve this. Everyone get into a pile and get gay!

      Maybe if you can convince the Indians to do this and get your own women off the birth control, your grandchildren might have jobs. You, personally... well, you're pretty much shit out of luck....

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    9. Re:They took my job by Butisol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How naive can you get? As if entrepreneurial talent grows on trees or can be evoked by Anthony Robbins. As if people aren't at certain points in their life where such risk is unacceptable. As if financing a venture is as simple as breaking open a piggy bank. Yes, America provides some modicum of equality of opportunity, but it's disgustingly condescending to pretend that everyone has the necessary resources or latent talent (or capacity to develop such talent) to pursue those opportunities. If only the poor would just get off their asses and work, eh old boy? The "If you don't like it, just start up a business" line of thinking is just a roundabout way of blaming the victim, and a blanketed insult to boot.

    10. Re:They took my job by scamper_22 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      On the contrary... blame Americans.

      We all know the result of a rising third world: we get a lower standard of living.
      Now this is a long process and it is taking time.

      The reality is, India wouldn't be so competitive if people in America didn't have this concept of an ever increasing standard of living (as if that is possible). We all weigh ourselves based on the work of others. Most of what we pay goes to the wages of others. We've only enjoyed material wealth recently because we can pay overseas people nothing.

      If the fast food worker is paid 25K/year, then the teacher must be paid 50K/yeah, then the engineer must be paid 100K/yeah, then the doctor must be paid 300K/year...

      If you want your engineering job to be competitive... there are 2 ways:
      1. decrease the value of the dollar (kills savings, investment)
      2. have a universal pay cut.

      If the fast food worker is paid 15K/year, then the teacher paid 30k,, then the engineer paid 60K ... suddenly it is no more costly. And believe me, rent and housing would drop as well, as would the cost of all services (medical...). Only goods imported would appear more costly.

      That WILL be the end result of all this. A more equitable payscale globally. Unfortunately, trying to get this done when dealing with things that are not the free market (unions, public sector workers...) is tougher. This is really the dilemma western nations face.

      If we don't act, you're going to see a lack of skilled labor. Why?
      Well, why would a skilled young person go into engineering if they can make more money as a teacher or a nurse or a bus driver. Trust me, this is happening now in Canada. Teacher salaries are creeping into the 80-90K range. This only hinders competitiveness more and accelerates the transfer of skilled labor to such places. The only skilled profession intelligent young westerners want to get into now is healthcare (doctors...) due the guaranteed high payoff.

      so don't blame the companies. Don't blame India. Westerners are digging their own grave by refusing to acknowledge reality.

      No longer can you have the cushy job while the Asians build your railways and the Mexicans farm your food.

    11. Re:They took my job by maxume · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rather than reading The World is Flat, have someone hit you over the head with it. The experience will be equally revelatory, but in the end, less painful.

      (Anybody who thinks that the United States can somehow maintain a lead (in education, ability, know-how, etc) over the top 20% of Indians and Chinese is delusional, that 20% is more people than live in the U.S. The U.S. will compete and succeed just fine, but the idea that it will be the center of enterprise in this century that it was last century is not supported by reality)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:They took my job by genner · · Score: 1

      Also, start your own company and show what you can do,

      Of course you won't be able to compete with the companies that do outsource their jobs since their prices are lower than yours.

    13. Re:They took my job by onto_dry_land · · Score: 1

      Huh? Why should we not buy from them? Because they make the U.S. richer through providing cheaper products or because they make India richer through buying services from them?

    14. Re:They took my job by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      If [companies] outsource to India, don't buy their products anymore

      You won't find any products in which outsourcing played no role in production/marketing/etc.. Basically, you just suggested we boycott everything. Good luck leading that revolution, my naive friend.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    15. Re:They took my job by kellyb9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Dell, HP, GE outsource to India, don't buy their products anymore.

      You're going to hurt the people working over there FAR sooner then you're ever going to hurt Dell, HP, or GE.

    16. Re:They took my job by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah... and it sounds like by the time you are through that you
      might as well just go into business for yourself, throw off the
      shackles of corporate America and take home a bigger part of the
      value of your labor.

      If you've got to start thinking/acting like a small businessman
      in order to hold onto your w-2 job then you might as well BE a
      small businessman.

      Those kinds of skills are FAR more valuable outside the cubicle.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    17. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's all there is to it? Wow! I'll come up with a great idea that isn't already out there (very easy), come up with the starter money (I have a few extra tens of thousands $ and rich friends), and I'm sure my marriage will survive me being buried in my startup 16 hours a day. Plus, everyone's dream is running a business, right?

    18. Re:They took my job by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is exactly right. If you have to gain all these other "soft skills" or business skills in order to just be a regular software engineer, then why keep working for someone else? One of the main reasons for being an employee is because it's (supposed to be) both easier and safer than striking out on your own. Instead of long hours and having to wear many hats, you can just concentrate on your own skill, and leave the business stuff to the people who specialize in that. Anyone familiar with the idea of specialized labor should understand this. The downside is (supposed to be) your pay is lower than it could potentially be by owning and operating your own business.

      If today's corporations want their regular rank-and-file employees to wear many hats, be multi-talented, and have a lot of business skills, then they're simply not doing their own jobs correctly.

    19. Re:They took my job by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They did not take your job. You lost your job.

      The difference is significant.

      Why is your prior role now filled by one (or two or three) people in India/China/Nigeria/Brasil?

      Because you did not provide enough value to the company to justify your salary.

      Life is unfair. Deal with it.

      On a related note, *if* you are really worth the extra cash, then you should be able to figure out how to use your skills to demonstrate that to your employer... and on the plus side, you will be contributing more to the economy and society. Otherwise, suck it up... it's time to face the reality that being an American doesn't mean you never have to compete with foreign labor.

      One other thing -- if you are going to complain and suggest a boycott of outsourcing companies, I suggest you make sure not to buy any goods made offshore either. Have fun paying for locally made clothes, consumer products, and food. Offshoring of labor, while difficult to deal with when it's *your* job on the line, has led to a vast increase in our American quality of life, based upon the variety and price of consumer goods available. You need to take the bad with the good, and if you were personally affected, I'm sorry, but that's the price of globalization.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    20. Re:They took my job by AmaDaden · · Score: 4, Informative

      I read it. He does talk about outsourcing a lot in the book. However he talks about it like it's the weather, not with an agenda. "yes it sucks but here are things you can do to better your self to avoid this happening to you." The author was actually a programmer that had to spend a lot of time in India hiring people that would be doing out sourced work for his company. So there are also several stories about things that he found to be different (not better or worse but different) about India and Indian programmers.

      The focus of the book is definitely becoming a better programmer but out sourcing is used to show what a business needs and wants in a programmer.

    21. Re:They took my job by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Says you - outsourcing isn't the magic bullet it appears to be. It cuts down on quality and response time while not always saving money - looks like a perfect opportunity for an entrepreneur.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    22. Re:They took my job by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      The American companies are to blame,

      this is important. its NOT the guys in india who are really at fault. its the american companies who are choosing to outsource.

      put the blame where it belongs. congress (for allowing tax incentives for offshoring) and the ceo's/corp mgmt are the faulted ones, here.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    23. Re:They took my job by onto_dry_land · · Score: 1

      Why should you put blame anywhere? Outsourcing is a good thing. It means people can work on things that they do best, and everyone becomes richer. Seriously, what are you complaining about?

    24. Re:They took my job by Bombula · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the world is also 'flat' and without barriers to trade there is nothing to stop companies going to wherever labor is cheapest. The only thing that offsets using the cheapest labor available are other costs - costs like materials and transportation - but those costs really only apply if you're making a product. If, for example, you make cellphones, the decision to relocate production to China means weighing the cost of getting materials to China and then shipping the cellphones back to stores in the US against the savings of using cheap Chinese labor. If labor is cheap enough, it will offset the other costs. Fine. But with software and other services there ARE no additional costs, so it never makes financial sense NOT to relocate to where labor is cheap.

      There is basically nothing anyone can do about this except wait until a) the cost of labor rises in developing countries (not likely until standards of living rise, which will be decades at least) or b) the cost of labor here at home falls - along with standard of living - to a competitive price.

      Guess which is already happening, and happening fast...

      Viva La Globalization - The Great Equalizer, that reduces everyone's standard of living to the lowest common denominator, as billions fight tooth and nail for jobs offered by fewer and fewer large corporations owned by the tiny rich elite who own everything! Yeah baby!

      --
      A-Bomb
    25. Re:They took my job by jlarocco · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What exactly are you whining about? True, some people can't just drop everything and start a business. Sucks to be them. For everybody else the OP has a good point.

    26. Re:They took my job by Wansu · · Score: 1

        I'm not saying outsourcing is all bad, but we as consumers are the ultimate cause of it all.

      In many cases, the decision to outsource is made by the retailer. The substitution is made without choice being presented to the consumer and likely without all the cost saving being passed onto the consumer.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    27. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They took er JERRRRRBS!

      There, fixed that for you.

    28. Re:They took my job by P51mus · · Score: 0

      But with software and other services there ARE no additional costs, so it never makes financial sense NOT to relocate to where labor is cheap.

      There ARE additional costs involved in outsourcing software.

      Mainly, it involves dealing with a language barrier, and dealing with people working in a vastly different time zone than the people managing them are. The costs of these are not zero, and companies will limit their outsourcing or not do it because of them. At least, I know of several game companies that do so.

    29. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks to be them.

      Great reply. Spoken like a true 5 year old. So what is your point anyway? For people that can do it he has a good point? That is like saying flooding isn't a problem for people who can fly. Well, DUH.

    30. Re:They took my job by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Or you could always differentiate yourself on quality and service levels?

    31. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a company that uses 50% of our work force in India. I did it because the US work force was so freaking arrogant, at least the ones I had working for me. The other 50% of US workers I keep because they are good. The other workers I slowly fired after poor work. I will hands down say that US workers that work are easily 10x the value I would save in India, but I cannot find them!

    32. Re:They took my job by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Of course you won't be able to compete with the companies that do outsource their jobs since their prices are lower than yours.

      Not necesarily...I knew someone who had a small in-house computer hardware business. His prices weren't the cheapest. But he had more than one person tell him they'd rather deal with his company because they didn't have to struggle to understand someone speaking broken English.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    33. Re:They took my job by certron · · Score: 1

      Since you played the "free market" card, mentioning unions specifically, I would like to add "corporate welfare" to the list and note that union membership is at historically low levels, consisting of only 12.5% of wage and salaried workers nationwide, with only 5 states breaking 20% in 2005, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers.

      Just wanted to add a little balance / bias to your argument. The dilemma is certainly real, but the problem isn't always the fault of the workers that management is choosing to offshore their laborforce.

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    34. Re:They took my job by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is nonsense. Jobs do not move overseas on an individual basis that would allow a single developer to demonstrate anything to his employer that would change anything.

      Because you're not just competing with foreign labor. You're competing with foreign economies. Indian programmers don't work for less because they're more industrious or less greedy. They do it because they can maintain a relatively high standard of living for far less than an American developer can.

      It's not as if the American has a choice in the matter either. The qualifications demanded by employers here just to get your foot in the door include a college degree that costs $40,000 to acquire, and that's on the cheap side, plus at least four years of time; probably longer. There has to be adequate compensation to make the investment worthwhile. If they even make a comparable demand on their foreign outsourcing, it's far cheaper.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    35. Re:They took my job by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yeah - you move the already cheap grunt job offshore, then have to hire a more expensive manager to oversee the offshored work. Or to explain domain terms. Or to write the highly detailed specifications necessary for the offshore workers to implement the solution. And another to do the (necessarily local) testing and QA for the customer. And so on...

    36. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hope you're next

    37. Re:They took my job by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      Oh I'd agree that unions could be a productive force. For example, in Sweden there is no minimum wage. Wages are just agreed upon. Then again, they also privatized their pension system realizing it wasn't sustainable :) In China, WalMart is unionized.

      The problem is the kind of union culture you have. Sadly, in America we do not have a Swedish union culture. We follow the anglo-saxon/French union structure.

      It is very confrontational with management. It is why France has one of the lowest unionization rates in the world. Only some privileged sectors are unionized (public sector, transportation...) and they hold the country hostage. It's why polls reveal the average young person in France only has one goal (to work for the public sector). This is what's happening in these countries.

      Yes, I don't care whose fault it is... managements or unions. The reality is that when the company is not doing well... neither does well.

    38. Re:They took my job by stubob · · Score: 1

      Anything not supported by reality can still be supported by the government.

      --
      Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
    39. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, you need to check your facts.

      "that 20% is more people than live in the U.S. "

      As of July 2007, the US Population is 301,139,947, while the Indian population is 1,129,866,154. 20% of the indian population is three quarters of the US population, so less that the US population.

      Second, just because India has a large pool of resources than the US doesn't mean that they will automatically have better ideas or technology. Don't forget that a large portion of india is still incredibly poor and developing, and they don't have access to higher education. The top 20% of Indians may not all have access to higher education.

      Third, there's also the question of quality of education. Not everyone is a self-thought genius, so for the rest of us who have to study under a mentor, the quality of education counts. The US has some outstanding universities, and while India's schools aren't exactly crap, it's still not clear if they're better. In other words, the top students in India may not be in the same league as the top students in the US.

      Disclaimer: I'm not an American, so don't accuse me of nationalism. I'm just trying to present an alternative view on US competitiveness.

    40. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious- why do you hate America so much, and when are you leaving?

    41. Re:They took my job by dave562 · · Score: 1
      The blame comes in when two people can do something equally well, but one person's time costs a whole lot less than the other's. Or in some situations where one person can do something extremely well, and the other person can do it well enough. The person who does it extremely well might cost more, but the company can get by with well enough so the extremely qualified person gets screwed.

      In other words, it isn't as simple as "Let the best person do the job."

    42. Re:They took my job by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is very true, the corporate types call it market saturation.

      You only need so many plumbers, electricians, etc etc etc.

      At some tipping point it just drives wages down
      as the larger supply competes for smaller demand.

      Production lines world wide will continue to be made more robotic,
      and scaled down on workers, Wal-mart should be renamed China-mart.

      The population keeps going up, Less jobs, but more ppl.

      Ppl who have a house and kids cannot venture out boldy and
      start a company unless they have a product that some other
      company will not jump on and leverage them out of business.

      Some get bought, but most just get beat into submission
      by the big Corporates who don't always play fair.

      As bad as things are, they are poised to get a lot worse.

      http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article4563171.ece

      The war with Iran/Russia is coming, and we race head long like
      a bunch of nationalistic monkeys who think its a sport event.

      It will not be as cheap as Iraq was at 3+ trillion dollars
      on projected cost, sooooo cccchhheeeeaaaappppp.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html

      That is some real Mc Lovin right there.

      Hold onto your hat Dorothy we are in for a bumpy ride in Oz.

      The russians have an opinion on how this is going to go too:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Yamantaw

      They don't carry bombs on those old bombers:

      http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/kh-101.htm

      They carry KH-555's, upgraded stealth cruise missiles with
      200 - 500 kilo-ton warheads.

      They have made visits to Cuba to check the Infrastructure,
      and have plans for a back up base with Chavez.

      http://www.india-defence.com/reports/3929

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    43. Re:They took my job by maxume · · Score: 1

      You are misreading (perhaps I was unclear). 20% * (population of China + population of India) > population of U.S.

      It doesn't really matter. If there are 100 million extraordinarily productive people in the U.S. (there are not), you only need to educate and elevate 5% of the population of India and China to match them. The point is not that India and China are going to crush the U.S., the point is that there are so many people in those countries that the U.S. can not reasonably expect to out innovate them, especially in terms of the 20th century (where a wide range of factors conspired to make the U.S. a center of economic activity).

      Add in that it is usually much easier to transfer knowledge than it is to create it, and the notion of maintaining a lead similar to the one that existed 10 years ago just doesn't hold up.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    44. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except we don't have that 80% living in dirty shanty towns dragging everything else down.

    45. Re:They took my job by onto_dry_land · · Score: 1

      Could you explain more what the problem is? If someone else can do the same job cheaper it is good for the company, for the U.S. in general, for the cheaper person, and for his country in general if that person gets to do it, and the expensive person does something else. The only one that gets affected negatively is the person who was denied that specific job, but the other effects more than enough makes up for it. He would be much worse off if everyone was given the same special treatment that he is demanding.

      If a company makes a bad business decision and hires someone who does not perform well enough, people in that company and their shareholders might blame them, but why should a random person on Slashdot do the same? If the business decision was good and the cheaper person really did do the job well enough, than that too would be good for the company, its shareholders and customers, U.S., the poor people of the world and the world in general. What is the problem?

    46. Re:They took my job by lena_10326 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're missing something. If 100 developers lose their job, and 2 or 3 are encouraged to become successful by starting new businesses, then those companies will be hiring a significant portion of the remaining unemployed developers. They will also become corporate leaders with first hand knowledge of how it feels to lose your job due to out-sourcing.

      Not every developer is capable of accomplishing this, but all you need is a few successful ones. The advice, although not pertinent to everyone, is still good advice.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    47. Re:They took my job by dave562 · · Score: 1
      The problem is that the loss of the job leads to a loss of spending power here in America. The American with the job was paying his rent/mortgage in America. He was buying gas in America. He was buying clothes and groceries and television sets and all sorts of other products that required interacting with and paying other Americans for.

      The problem is that you need to broaden your perspective on the large scale effects of job loss in America.

    48. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for the South Park reference :o)

      not sure how many others got it tho...

    49. Re:They took my job by onto_dry_land · · Score: 1

      That sounds like the broken window fallacy. Getting the same stuff cheaper is always better.

      I assume you realize that it's not one full time job that is optimized away. In order for India to do work for the U.S. the U.S. needs to do work in return. The point of outsourcing is that the U.S. needs to do less for India in return for the job than if the did everything within the border, and India needs to do less for the U.S. than if it did whatever the U.S. is doing in return inside their border. Everyone is better off. And of course, people won't just sit idle and work less when they can get the same goods for less work, just as people did not stop working when machines could do some of the same jobs as humans. In practice, it's more stuff for the same or slightly less amount of work, not the same amount of stuff for less work.

    50. Re:They took my job by orasio · · Score: 1

      Well, I see your point, and kind of agree for the most part.
      The thing is that the article talks about the US. In the US you are _supposed_ to provide for yourself, and any other support from society is supposed to be heretic. This is the _efficient_ way of running a country.

      (I know it's not like that in practice, but the mainstream idea seems to go like that)

    51. Re:They took my job by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      (Anybody who thinks that the United States can somehow maintain a lead (in education, ability, know-how, etc) over the top 20% of Indians and Chinese is delusional, that 20% is more people than live in the U.S. The U.S. will compete and succeed just fine, but the idea that it will be the center of enterprise in this century that it was last century is not supported by reality)

      Considering the fact that enrollment in engineering schools is plummeting, and chinese and indian engineers are, more and more, preferring to go back home instead of stay here, I seriously question the idea that the U.S. will compete and succeed "just fine". I think we're in for some very hard times ahead.

    52. Re:They took my job by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      So what is your point anyway? For people that can do it he has a good point? That is like saying flooding isn't a problem for people who can fly.

      So what was the GP's point, anyway? Starting a business won't work for people who can't start one? Well, DUH.

    53. Re:They took my job by Znork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Less jobs, but more ppl.

      The entire purpose of the economy and the whole creation of wealth relies on that; it takes less work to accomplish the same thing. That's a good thing. Making things labour intensive aren't an end in itself.

      Of course, during earlier eras of increased productivity, such as when going from an agrarian to industrial society, we also cut down on working hours. These days it appears more popular to drive the working part of the population to burnout while they get to support the non-working population. All while whining about 'disappearing jobs'.

    54. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment Grishnakh is the smartest effing thing I've ever heard come from anyone on Slashdot...

      Congrats! lol. ;)

    55. Re:They took my job by 2short · · Score: 1

      "If only the poor would just get off their asses and work, eh old boy? The "If you don't like it, just start up a business" line of thinking is just a roundabout way of blaming the victim, and a blanketed insult to boot."

      What victim? Someone even poorer did get off their ass and did the job for less money.

    56. Re:They took my job by 2short · · Score: 1


      It's true, thanks to globalization, you no longer get quite as much advantage based on the arbitrary coordinates of your birth. I feel really bad for you, but, well, actually, no I don't.

      Seems unlikely it will reduce "eveyone's" standard of living; I mean, yours, sure, but the guy who got your job is probably not complaining.

    57. Re:They took my job by sgt_doom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well said, my good fellow Butisol, well said.

      Having gone that entrepreneurial route from time to time, and having found moderate success to extreme disappointment, I concur; but mostly, this book represents more of the mindless -- and I emphasize MINDLESS, drivel which is foisted upon the masses.

      It is along the same lines as all that other "human resources" garbage on how to score a job, or to put it more succinctly, along the lines of those two fellows who happen upon a man-eating grizzly bear, and one ties his running shoes to escape while his friend is eaten by the grizzly, etc. (You all know that anecdote I'm referring to.)

      The point being, the corporates don't give a rat's ass about how valuable an employee you make yourself into, and anyone who falls for that tooth fairy fantasy crapola is a complete moron.

      Labor arbitrage, as the plutocratic jackasses refer to it, will be with us as long as the sheeple allow it.

      In times past in America, as in the present time in other countries and societies, the citizenry became fed up with the power elites, rebelled and righteously kicked ass.

      Unless we do the same, unless one thousand Jimmy Hoffa's take to the streets and act against the corporate overlords, everything is just so much B.S.

      The only thing the corporations know how to do is offshore workers' jobs, import foreign replacement workers, and issue junk bonds.

      End of weekly rant.....

    58. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just start a business" is a moronic way to try to write people off. It's like if you were an unpopular geek in school and someone came up to you and said "just become a football player". Both are ridiculous assertions on how to "fix" things.

      Imagine a world where everyone owns their own business. How is that any different from today? We are all basically in business for ourselves right now. So it really wouldn't fix anything.

    59. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless we do the same, unless one thousand Jimmy Hoffa's take to the streets and act against the corporate overlords, everything is just so much B.S.

      If you can block a job site, get a work permit pulled, create a picket line and harass scabs, or hide in the murky ranks of a state-licensed career (e.g., teaching, doctors), then and only then will your Hoffa-esqu dreams have any applicability. When code is outsourced and the scabs don't need to cross paths with Local#41, then you don't have a leg on which to stand. My advice is to focus your revolution on benefiting from international trade and not always being the victim. Demand to be able to import meds at one fourth the cost. Do buy your crap from "Made in China" at half the price (assuming quality is sufficient to your needs). Outsource your job search to India (if needed or if an advancement is desired). Demand that our trade and budget deficits end: balance that budget, demand native fossil and/or alternative energy sources. We don't do anything because our politicians live via expedience and expedience for them is staying elected regardless the long-term financial consequences. At least the corporations do have to be accountable with their spreadsheet. If the USA was a stock, our ass would be freddie-mac slammed.

    60. Re:They took my job by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Idealism is so cute.

      You really think you can compete at, say, $30/hour (or $150/hour, if consulting) with people in India earning 1/4 of that? Or in China, at 1/10 that?

      Business in the real-world is all about the bottom-line; it's all about who can get X done faster and cheaper. Quality? No business really gives a shit about quality; the proliferation of horrible code (and languages like VB and Perl) exemplify this fact. Management is selfish and short-term oriented; long-term solutions don't help the manager whose job plan in a given organization doesn't involve sticking-around longer than 18-60 months.

      Sure you do things your way. But you won't be doing much your way, because you're more expensive than your overseas counterpart. In the long-run, your wages (and the wages of richer countries) will stagnate, while those in developing countries (like India) will rise, reducing the income disparity of people in those countries, and gradually making you more-competitive on price relative to foreign competition. But, as J.M. Keynes told us, we will all be dead by the time that long-run in which that state of comparative advantage can reasonably be claimed to have occurred.

      Welcome to the global economy. Now, return to the back of the Starbucks barista employment line...

    61. Re:They took my job by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Considering the fact that enrollment in engineering schools is plummeting

      No shit: hard work, long study hours, low starting pay, no social life, no pussy until late 20's-early30's... Who in their right mind would want to become an engineer unless you really really love the field?

      and chinese and indian engineers are, more and more, preferring to go back home instead of stay here,

      Well, since the work visas usually run out within a day, I think there are enough Chinese/Indians that still want to stick around.

      I seriously question the idea that the U.S. will compete and succeed "just fine"

      Depends on what we do. We (still) got a very real advantage right now. If we play our cards right (which is not very likely), America could remain at the top. The way things are going right now, however, I am betting on Canada.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    62. Re:They took my job by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      "Just start a business" is a moronic way to try to write people off. It's like if you were an unpopular geek in school and someone came up to you and said "just become a football player". Both are ridiculous assertions on how to "fix" things.

      Those assertions are only ridiculouse if you're afraid to work hard and be patient. With an attitude like that you're always going to get the short end of the stick because you're afraid to even try changing your position.

    63. Re:They took my job by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Considering the fact that enrollment in engineering schools is plummeting

      No shit: hard work, long study hours, low starting pay, no social life, no pussy until late 20's-early30's... Who in their right mind would want to become an engineer unless you really really love the field?

      Actually that's not all true. Engineers are noted for getting pretty high starting salaries compared to a lot of other jobs right out of college. A fresh engineer can expect to get $55k and up these days, right out of school. I just read an article a few days ago about how engineering starting salaries had just increased 13% in the last few years, because of the lack of supply.

      However, what they don't tell you about is salary compression. While engineers start out pretty high, the raises are few and far between, and the maximum salary is pretty low unless you go into management. An engineer with 25 years of experience doesn't get that much more than one with 3 years. Plus, many times, the only way to get decent raises is to quit and find another job. Loyalty to one company is NOT rewarded.

      Depends on what we do. We (still) got a very real advantage right now. If we play our cards right (which is not very likely), America could remain at the top. The way things are going right now, however, I am betting on Canada.

      I agree, we probably won't play our cards right. We've been making a lot of stupid mistakes in the past decade, and with the Presidential candidates we've chosen, things aren't looking good. I'm curious: what's your take on Canada? Do you think it'll be a good place for software engineers to migrate to in the future? One big worry I have with Canada is that its economy is pretty closely tied to the USA's: a vast majority of its exports go to the USA. Of course, one big export is oil, and even if the US drops off on its need for oil (due to an unprecedented economic disaster), demand for it from the East isn't going to dry up soon.

    64. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, Shawn Penn stole my woman (Robin Wright).
      Next, Brad Pitt comes along and takes Angelina away from me.
      Now some Indian guys are after my job...

      WTF kinda bullshit is that?

    65. Re:They took my job by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      > but it's disgustingly condescending to pretend that everyone has the necessary resources or latent talent (or capacity to develop such talent) to pursue those opportunities.

      And it's disgustingly condescending to pretend that those without the necessary resources or latent talent have anything special that a guy in Bangalore does not. Globalization makes the playing field bigger and now people compete with others on the other side of the world. The top talent in America, Europe and India will do fine. The deadbeats everywhere will do less fine.

      Exactly how is this worse than American/European deadbeats doing well and the top talent in India having no chance?

      And yes, I am posting this from bangalore!

    66. Re:They took my job by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      In actuality, it's more "Drive the working (in desirable, productive jobs) to burnout, while the non-high-end-employable) strive to support themselves, while competing for undesirable work which pays under a living wage, often at multiple places for unsustainable hours.

      The welfare queen never fucking existed. Welfare doesn't pay enough to support a single person, and adding family makes it worse. Jobs are harder to find, and those that exist primarily pay under what is required to sustain life at a reasonable standard of living. If you look at inflation-adjusted salaries, we're working more hours and making less (on average), while basic necessities like food and rent are proportionately more expensive. And, there are models in the past for what we're currently suffering from: it's the fucking Gilded Age. We've reversed all of the economic reforms that came out of the great depression, and we're set up for another event like it.

      Also, less jobs and more people isn't a good goal. More people working at important/satisfying work is. Less jobs and more people is the setting of Brave New World.

    67. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we must learn how to 'manipulate' and 'use' people (developers,managers,customers etc)

    68. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is not the companies to be blamed but the government that taxes you and your company much more than other governments

    69. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jlarocco,

      It is obvious you are young and/or naive. You have little experience with the real world.

      I've been involved with start-ups and involved with sports from grade school through NCAA div I. I fully grok what it takes to be a success in both. It aint some dreamy magical experience.

    70. Re:They took my job by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Unless we do the same, unless one thousand Jimmy Hoffa's take to the streets and act against the corporate overlords, everything is just so much B.S.

      Besides the AC's excellent points regarding how easy it is to move programming job off-shore, labor unions have a bad reputation in the US, from mob infiltration, to the creation of the Union Mentality (I can't change that light bulb, it's the electrician's job.), stifling work rules that make it impossible to fire incompetent workers, and (before Right To Work) the political power to say to people, "you must join a Union in order to get a job".

      What you need to do is find some Indian Jimmy Hoffas. Don't waste your time on Chinese Jimmy Hoffas...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    71. Re:They took my job by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      I still don't see how it is nonsense. Notice that there was an *if* in my statement... that is, *if* the individual is worth the extra pay.

      The average developer, quite simply, is not worth what he is being paid, relative to the cost of developers overseas. It's economic reality, and as long as people are unwilling to accept it, they will continue to be left jobless when their role is offshored.

      It's not as if the American has a choice in the matter either. The qualifications demanded by employers here just to get your foot in the door include a college degree that costs $40,000 to acquire, and that's on the cheap side, plus at least four years of time; probably longer. There has to be adequate compensation to make the investment worthwhile. If they even make a comparable demand on their foreign outsourcing, it's far cheaper.

      There's a lot to disagree with here. Americans don't have a choice in the matter? That's ridiculous. There are other fields, other professions. No one is forcing them to develop code for a lviing at gunpoint. There does not have to be adequate compensation to make the investment worthwhile. I would say that anyone in the US who goes to college to learn to code is making a bad investment. There is no guarantee that an educational investment will be worthwhile.

      In short, what is "fair" is not the economic reality we face. So it is better to adapt to the reality, than to keep hoping that some mystical force will keep the US's inflated wages in place.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    72. Re:They took my job by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Hope you're next

      Been through it twice, pal. Once I was caught off-guard and unprepared... Second time I came out of it with a promotion and a raise.

      I learned from the experience... I only wish I had paid attention to the trends enough to have been prepared the first time.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    73. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really pretty easy to start your own business as long as you think small. It for example is very easy to start a small consulting company (especially for technically inclined people). Other small time jobs I can think of just off the top of my head are rental property investment (or just become a part time agent), and selling collectible stuff or jewlery on ebay. And if any of those grows into something that can be full time employment then so much the better. If you lose your job then you may be pushed into growing it yourself because you have a lot more spare time on your hands. Basically putting all of your eggs in one basket is not a good idea in the first place.

    74. Re:They took my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. jlarocco has no idea what he/she is talking about.

    75. Re:They took my job by douji · · Score: 1

      yeah right. when you start a startup, i don't think you would want to hire the people who can't keep their jobs. But, maybe you can hire away good talent and open up spots at other companies.... which kinda achieves the same goals.

    76. Re:They took my job by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      The reality of the existence of unions in the US - and perhaps elsewhere - was that the element of organized crime -- or very tough actions on the part of a number of workers - was most necessary given the thug tactics of the plutocrats.

      Recall Rockefeller's chain gangs? The origin behind the national guard and the armory system in every state in America? (To be used to put down labor strikes, etc.)

      Unionism has an excellent reputation among thinking people in the USA - only the mental lightweights accept the propaganda perpetrated by the National Association of Manufactures (crucial trivia fact: first present and one of its founding members - the great-grandfather of George Weasel Bush).

      Also, as anyone knowledgeable about world economics realizes, those countries with the highest union participation also rank the highest in standard of living - just check into the Scandanavian countries. And after thirty years of the most background economics, i.e., the disassembling of the American economy, unionism is highly welcomed by the many in the US.

      While I respect the Indian laws against retail chains and the like, they were under British dominion for over 400 years - something Americans find most appalling. I wouldn't bet the farm on the Indians, especiall not after having worked with Punjabi programmers who do the silliest things....

    77. Re:They took my job by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      when you start a startup, i don't think you would want to hire the people who can't keep their jobs

      Doesn't matter. So the startups hire the better lot of developers. They'll have to leave their jobs to take the offer leaving new openings with the other companies. The lesser ones will fill the voids left by good developers jumping ship.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    78. Re:They took my job by Znork · · Score: 1

      Jobs are harder to find

      Yep; perhaps it would be better to 'share' the available work rather than 'share' the income generated. Cut down working hours across the board to increase (divided) demand and lower the burden on welfare systems. There's an overhead cost for employing people, but then again, I'd suggest that productivity per hour might actually increase for lowered hours... not to mention other benefits like making it easier to sustain longer working lives.

      More people working at important/satisfying work is.

      Satisfying work isn't necessarily paid work tho; another future alternative is the Iain Banks Culture version of development, where basically production is so automated that whatever 'jobs' humans have could as well be considered 'hobbies' or 'interests'. Important, sometimes, but mainly satisfying.

    79. Re:They took my job by cs668 · · Score: 1

      The quality factor is interesting in software. I've always thought that the business measures of quality don't apply very easily.

      In business I say a project was successful if it was on time, on budget, and does what it is supposed to do.

      With software you can meet these criteria and under the hood have the worst mess ever. None of the business decision makers will know how inelegant and unmaintainable the product is.

      But, when it takes 6 months to add the next feature that you should have been able to add in 6 days you feel the impact.

      Problem is how to demonstrate the value of that "quality" elegant code to the business as a differentiator before they have experienced it.

    80. Re:They took my job by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      I know studies have found the four day workweek to produce better productivity than the five day, and likewise for a six hour day. Humans are just not made for 8-hour sustained focus.

      As for Iain Banks, sure, but outside of science fiction, we're not liable to see that soon. And I question whether it would be a good idea: after all, spending all of your time on hobbies seems like it would be destructive to your sense of meaning/value, a little. But it connects to what I was saying; namely that unemploying people isn't ever the goal: it's shifting things so that people can work a reasonable work-week, have enough to live, and so that as many people can be working interesting/quality jobs as possible, preferably that have some potential lasting result value. Less burger-flippers, more science. Or, even, less burger-flippers, more chefs.

    81. Re:They took my job by pcutilisateur · · Score: 1

      My biggest grip with off-shoring is their inability to communicate with us in English -- (Mind you my English is not that perfect). For example when I was going to buy a laptop I called HP and I was transfer to someone from India. I asked him regarding reflective screen & matte lcd. I didn't get a good answer, and it's shame because I would right there bought a Business Notebook from HP. Also, it's hard not to get emotional when you see your friend, and relative losing jobs because they will not work as a slave.

    82. Re:They took my job by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Unionism has an excellent reputation among thinking people in the USA

      IOW, people who think like you? Socialist "intellectuals" who give University education a bad name?

      Also, as anyone knowledgeable about world economics realizes, those countries with the highest union participation also rank the highest in standard of living

      The Scandinavian countries are small, ethnically and culturally uniform countries that have a strong tradition (probably enforced by the high latitudes and short growing season where you've got to work your ass off, or you die in the winter) for hard work and necessitated cooperation. It's *easy* to have a high standard of living in a place like that.

      unionism is highly welcomed by the many in the US.

      Says who?

      (In case you think I'm blindly anti-Union, not true. My mother, staunch Republican and evangelical Christian, was shop steward at her Post Office for 20 years, and my sister (also Republican Christian) and cousins are also teachers, and therefore Union. But that also gives them, and therefore me, the ability to see the problems with American unionism.)

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    83. Re:They took my job by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      "Right To Work" = Right to be fired on a whim.

      I live in a "Right To Work" state, and we have one of the lowest per-capita incomes in the nation, while the housing costs have risen to parity with the coastal cities. That trend is universal.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    84. Re:They took my job by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      it's called: "Across the world" the cost of living is much lower, the standard of living is much lower, the labor standards are much lower, the safety standards are much lower.

      What happens "Across the world" is what westerners like to call human rights violations, whether it be physical oppression or labor rights issues.

      That's the labor equivalent of predatory pricing or dumping, which are both illegal worldwide.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    85. Re:They took my job by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      I still don't see how it is nonsense. Notice that there was an *if* in my statement... that is, *if* the individual is worth the extra pay.

      What you don't get is that the individual has nothing at all to do with it.

      The average developer, quite simply, is not worth what he is being paid, relative to the cost of developers overseas. It's economic reality, and as long as people are unwilling to accept it, they will continue to be left jobless when their role is offshored.

      More nonsense. An American developer cannot work for what an overseas worker is being paid and still support himself or a family, not given the realities of the American economy and not have a second or third job. You do realize we're talking about an annual salary of less than $10,000, right? In the US, no one can work for that kind of money no matter what they do.

      There's a lot to disagree with here. Americans don't have a choice in the matter? That's ridiculous. There are other fields, other professions. No one is forcing them to develop code for a lviing at gunpoint. There does not have to be adequate compensation to make the investment worthwhile. I would say that anyone in the US who goes to college to learn to code is making a bad investment. There is no guarantee that an educational investment will be worthwhile.

      You can't be this obtuse naturally. No one goes to college to learn to code. The subject almost doesn't matter. A bachelor degree (in whatever major; often not computer science) is a requirement. You can't demand that cost of entry, as virtually all employers do, and then pay someone less than $10,000 a year in the US.

      In short, what is "fair" is not the economic reality we face. So it is better to adapt to the reality, than to keep hoping that some mystical force will keep the US's inflated wages in place.

      If the wages of US software developers are inflated, then the entire US economy is. Which may well be the case, but it's absurd on any kind of scale to say that a software developer is worth less than, say, a bagger at a grocery store. But that's exactly what you're saying.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  2. Too late... by LoaTao · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... MY job went to India.

    --
    The smartest man in the whole, wide world really don't know that much. - Mose Allison
    1. Re:Too late... by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!

      ...which was made in China.

    3. Re:Too late... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      You forgot the link.

    4. Re:Too late... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I get all my shirts the old fashioned way...

      Sleeping with CowboyNeal

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    5. Re:Too late... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      ...and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!

      ...which was made in China.

      You complain about the lead in it now but it'll come in handy for shielding when the bombs start dropping.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:Too late... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      My job making lousy t-shirts went to China, you insensitive clod!

  3. Isn't this old? by colmore · · Score: 3, Informative

    This book was published three years ago. It's a little late for a review of a topical work like this.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:Isn't this old? by intrico · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, I actually read this book a couple of years ago and I believe it was fairly new at the time. The information in it is still very relevant though, as this book is not specific to any particular technology, but rather it is a career advice book. It basically gives practical, solid advice about how to stay relevant in IT in the long run. If you've worked in various capacities and companies in IT, you will probably recognize that much of the advice mirrors the habits of people you've worked with that have avoided the layoffs and/or got the coveted promotions.

    2. Re:Isn't this old? by colmore · · Score: 1

      If the book is general how-not-to-get-fired advice, then I could see it still being relevant. However, if that's the case, then shame on the nativist scare mongering title. If the job is going then it's either no longer a needed job or it's going *somewhere*. It's unhealthy to demonize developing economies like that.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    3. Re:Isn't this old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'm a little tired of only seeing reviews of newly Published books. Many reviews are not really reviews but are an ad for the book. A review of a book that has been out for a while is less likely to be a phony marketing effort (IMHO).

    4. Re:Isn't this old? by Jansingal · · Score: 1

      yeah, i just noticed that, 3 years old.

    5. Re:Isn't this old? by Jansingal · · Score: 1

      or it could still be a phony marketing effort in order to drumm up sales for an older book whose sales have dwindled.

    6. Re:Isn't this old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The authors running out of money, so he wrote a review... maybe?

    7. Re:Isn't this old? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 0, Troll

      By slashdot standards, this is breaking news.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Isn't this old? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      If the book is general how-not-to-get-fired advice, then I could see it still being relevant. However, if that's the case, then shame on the nativist scare mongering title. If the job is going then it's either no longer a needed job or it's going *somewhere*. It's unhealthy to demonize developing economies like that.

      "developing economies" have no labor standards and often human rights issues.

      They do to the labor markets what dumpers and predatory pricers do to commodity markets. There's a reason those latter two practices are illegal in pretty much any nation with a semblance of a government.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  4. Okay.... by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Chad encourages you to refrain from learning vendor-specific technologies that can disappear with the vendor

    Yeah, but it pays really well when you know something that's hot i.e. the latest fad product (that's ALWAYS called a "new technology"). Just save your money and be prepared to jump to the next big thing.

    "Learn How To Fail", where Chad emphasizes how to fail gracefully and the rewards that can be learned from failure.

    Failure. The trouble is if you fail big, you're labeled as a failure and you're fucked for a very long time. And folks just love to kick a guy when he's down. Then you become older, wiser, and fucking bitter at the goddamn machine!

    I have to go. The cafe is throwing me, my cats, and my shopping cart out.

    1. Re:Okay.... by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

      you're labeled as a failure and you're fucked for a very long time

      Aren't those two things universally exclusive? Unless you're a hooker, in which case both would apply.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    2. Re:Okay.... by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of that scene from Fun with Dick and Jane (the remake), where he goes in for an interview with thousands of other people, and gets pulled to the front of the line just so everyone at the company can laugh at him.

    3. Re:Okay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's important to know how to fail. Everyone fails at one point. Each time you do, you should gain something more than the bitter taste of defeat. Ultimetly this will not make you a winner, but you'll never mess up big time.

    4. Re:Okay.... by thermian · · Score: 1

      I would say that if you come up against failure too many times, its time to move to a different area of IT.

      Personally I find its generally safer to be the one creating new technology then one of the coders who use that technology, even if it is much harder to do. That way if things go sour you are at least better prepared, in terms of skills, to transfer to a new job or area.

      If all you do is follow the 'don't re-invent the wheel' philosophy, or use code to do complex tasks that other people have written, then I'm afraid you aren't as useful as someone who would work for a fraction of your pay in India, tough.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    5. Re:Okay.... by corbettw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chad encourages you to refrain from learning vendor-specific technologies that can disappear with the vendor.

      Then Chad is hopelessly naive about what it takes to get a job in IT. If you apply for a job that requires experience with Websphere, and your resume only has Tomcat, JBoss, SunOne, and Weblogic, you will not be called in for an interview. It doesn't matter that they're all N-tier frameworks designed to work with Java, you don't have the specific skill needed, so unless the hiring manager is clueful AND does all of the initial resume screening himself instead of letting HR do it, you won't ever get that job.

      Face it, there are a lot of idiots in IT management who only know the names of the vendors, and don't even understand what the technologies do. You have to list those vendors on your resume if you ever want to get a job, being vague about working with N-tier architectures just won't cut it in today's environment.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    6. Re:Okay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you fail at hooking.

      Ha! Slashdot must be psychic. My CAPTCHA was "tricking"

    7. Re:Okay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're labeled as a failure and you're fucked for a very long time

      Aren't those two things universally exclusive? Unless you're a hooker, in which case both would apply.

      Or you are an inmate. In which case you're not even getting paid. Double failure.

    8. Re:Okay.... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Unless you fail at hooking.

      I know you're joking, but I really did know a woman once (not in the Biblical sense) who claimed that she'd tried becoming a streetwalker and failed at it. I never asked why, although I sometimes wondered. She wasn't a raving beauty, but she wasn't what you'd call "bad looking," either.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:Okay.... by Taulin · · Score: 1
      Totally agree. The problem is, even most 'skilled' interviewers don't know how to read skills and relevant experience.

      What gets me even more, is most companies only care about your 'corporate' experience. I have one side project that is actually pulling in revenue, but in a past interview, the interviewer showed no interest despite it being in the language and architecture they were requiring. Since I wasn't being payed while producing it, it didn't matter. This happened with several of the interviews also, so it wasn't just that one company.

    10. Re:Okay.... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Face it, there are a lot of idiots in IT management who only know the names of the vendors, and don't even understand what the technologies do.

      There are also a lot of clueless fuggheads in HR. If you write a job description that says, "It would be nice if the candidate knew .NET and Java," these ID10Ts will put down, "Mist have .NET and Java," and you'll never see some very qualified applicants who'd be more than willing to learn what you need and grow into the position, you only get people who already know the technologies and are looking to learn something new that you're not offering.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    11. Re:Okay.... by cpradip · · Score: 1

      Perfect .. Totally agree!!!

    12. Re:Okay.... by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      Yes, unfortunately, a fair number of HR people responsible for hiring can be replaced by "grep -iR [skill] resumes/". Sad, but true.

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    13. Re:Okay.... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Ultimately though, I've found you can sidestep this sort of idiocy by working for smaller companies; these companies generally have a bigger slice of the revenue pie to share so it ends up about equalizing in pay, while still giving you the benefit of working for someone competent in their field (enough to start and maintain a successful business, anyway).

      Same thing goes for freelancing, which is an excellent way of doing part time work for full time rates (though beware, you are in effect running your own business here, so be professional).

      In my current gig, I could probably learn most of the new stuff that is necessary for each job on the fly and be fine. And that is another thing about being a successful tech worker: you must, must be willing to try new things, all the time. Otherwise, you'll be as outdated and worthless in a year or two as that computer you're storing in your basement.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    14. Re:Okay.... by Twisp · · Score: 1
      From the review:

      Chad encourages you to refrain from learning vendor-specific technologies that can disappear with the vendor, and then calls you to action by suggesting you write a small project in a technology that competes with the technology you are used to using.

      The action items at the end of the section suggests practicing "Code Katas" katas similar to martial artists, but instead in code and in different languages.

      Maybe I'm just reading into it, but it does sound like the reviewer is contradicting himself when comparing the quotes I just posted to the 'refrain from learning vendor-specific technologies' one the parent included.

      Considering that the author worked as a programmer and also hired programmers, I give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume the reviewer phrased things poorly. I suspect that instead of the 'refraining from learning vendor specific technologies' the author advocates 'refraining from specializing in vendor specific technologies. After all, it's hard to code in competing technologies if you don't learn them. And, if you do work on these small projects on your own, you will be able to honestly tell a potential employer 'Yes I have worked with ______ technology' and then offer a sample.

      Maybe the author is indeed the one contradicting himself, but I do agree the overall (and I consider obvious) premise of improving yourself to increase your value to your employer. While I'm sure I could find think of plenty of ways to increase my skills on my own, or find advice for free online, I'm still intrigued enough that I added the book to my Amazon wishlist.

  5. I know I know by eclectro · · Score: 1

    Tip #54: Write a book about blogging using some of that poetry you wrote after a party back in the nineties. Someone will buy it.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  6. At least for software developers by unity100 · · Score: 1

    or consultants, or technical writers, or anyone who can work remotely without a strict government issued license :

    Get to elance and similar services, and work for yourself. eventually you will be able to make a name, and afterwards you will be able to make money.

    AND you can compete with indians. true, they can give out $3/hour for software projects. but, remember, what you pay is what you get. you'll find that there are a lot of people who know that regardless of india or vietnam, you should not be having software done for 3/hour. these people know whether a rate given for a work is rational or not. when bidding for projects of people like these, indian houses that shell out $3 bids are at disadvantage.

    it can be done. sometimes it can be hard, until you make a name for yourself. but when you make a name for yourself, you will have continual clients that contact you outside of these services, and youll find that you rarely ever go bid on projects anymore.

    well. take a shot at it yourself. its not as if anyone is barring you from doing it, unless you have exclusive items in your contract preventing such work.

    1. Re:At least for software developers by xaxa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      when bidding for projects of people like these, indian houses that shell out $3 bids are at disadvantage.

      Why don't they raise their prices then? If it's just the too-good-to-be-true quote.

      I know someone who realised western companies weren't comfortable paying only $10/night for quality hotels in Eastern Europe (this was a few years ago, I forget the actual numbers). He bought a small hotel business in a capital city, translated the website to English and bumped up the price to $100/night -- now the hotel is full of western businessmen and tourists, but the hotel doesn't cost much more to run.

    2. Re:At least for software developers by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 4, Informative

      We outsourced to India ... and are now scrapping and rewriting in-house ....

      The code works but ... trying to change anything with the time differences involved is a nightmare, it does not matter who they are just where they are ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    3. Re:At least for software developers by BusinessHut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto. Although we used developers from another country. It seems that US companies are outsourcing because it's the popular thing to do. Our outsourced "developers" cost the same or MORE than US ones. Add in the communication issues such as time, culture, and language, and I don't understand what my company was thinking. Eventually, our outsourcing was also scrapped in favor of redoing the project in-house. This decision had mostly to do with the fact that what they sent technically worked, but there were no standards or best practices. Everything was just hacked in on the fly and I basically had to rewrite everything as it came in anyway. Even though they "already did QA." Right.

    4. Re:At least for software developers by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with outsourcing in general is that you change the business
      relationship between what used to be internal customers and internal
      providers to one where you've got some outside company with interests
      that are probably completely different than your own.

      You're no longer a cohesive team. Those other people will not necessarily
      pull together for you anymore. They will have their own bosses and their
      own sucess metrics.

      Your relationship will be defined by a contract that is designed to
      prevent you from abusing them too much. Processes will have to be
      formalized far better. Changes will be far more tightly controlled.

      Depending on the project, it may be dramatically more expensive to
      outsource (like something with insane dev schedules).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:At least for software developers by unity100 · · Score: 1

      they do raise their prices. you'd be surprised how many indian companies actually bid closer to europe or u.s. rates. but, almost everyone converges on the reasonable internet rates. ie, noone bids $80/hour. but there are many who bid $30/hour.

      yes, a very low price actually generates suspicion.

    6. Re:At least for software developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trying to change anything with the time differences involved is a nightmare,

      Clearly, your job needs to be outsourced to India as well.. then there will be no time differences.

    7. Re:At least for software developers by unity100 · · Score: 1

      what you describe is practically the general profile of a '$3/hour' job.

      to cut costs they use ready snippets, old code, mashups. dont think of future of the code they are producing.

      but, there are those who need that service too. it depends on needs. serious businesses should seek out serious outsourcing. its no different from any other field of business actually.

    8. Re:At least for software developers by unity100 · · Score: 1

      not quite.

      as with everything, you should be in a buyer beware mood. just going out outsourcing to any applicable candidate company is no good. you should research them, do test runs with them and see what ethics and approach they have. its no different from establishing a long duration business relationship.

    9. Re:At least for software developers by funaho · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I noticed in my experiences with code written by outsourced coders was that while it worked, it just wasn't that good. They knew the LANGUAGE, but they didn't know how to PROGRAM. Not very well, anyway.

      While working with the outsourced coders for a client of a managed hosting company I was sent a 250-line SQL query (for MySQL, no less) and asked why the query was running so slow. It was a mess. The guy obviously didn't understand SQL or database design and was using brute force to get the data.

    10. Re:At least for software developers by toriver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Copy-and-paste-oriented Programming" is what you get for $3.

      Then again I have encountered expensive Oracle developers doing much the same...

    11. Re:At least for software developers by unity100 · · Score: 1

      quite so.

      actually everyone does that for generic tasks.

    12. Re:At least for software developers by chickenandporn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're exactly right -- there's some (sic) whining about experience having no value, but this is the value of experience: not only knowing the syntax, but knowing in-depth about a language.

      Unless you've worked to maintain code over a very long term, often you don't know the impact of poor coding, or have the insight from that to fix your final deliverable. At the same time, work cannot be outsourced to body-houses based on maintainability, only on functionality at time of payment.

      Experience only generates deliverables that are comparatively better in the long-term, but you need to be an employee, rather than an outsource-body, to leverage the benefit of ease-of-maintenance.

      The act of shopping by price alone gets you software that will require more work to maintain. Iterative shopping means that you'll get repeated slap-together quick-jobs to get paid. resulting code quality can only degrade, but how can we truly make that known?

    13. Re:At least for software developers by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the internet is a great equalizer for keeping pay for freelancers reasonable, at least on some of the freelancing websites. It's also how I learned I was not getting paid nearly enough in my old job. ;^)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    14. Re:At least for software developers by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yes QUITE.

      Interacting with your own people in house will always be different than dealing with an outside company.

      It's unavoidable. You have different goals that are potentially in conflict.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  7. Re:First arrival by Jansingal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The best thing to do if you are in IT now, try to get out.
    If you have kids, or know people you care about. DON'T let them go into IT, or major in it in university.

  8. Doesn't OSS Make it Worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm not against OSS per se, but I'm skeptical that an individual contributing to an OSS project is a good idea. It's one thing for IBM to invest in Linux (for example). If you invest in Linux, you're effectively donating money to for-profit organizations like IBM and Red Hat. This seems to go *against* your self interest of keeping a healthy job pool for software developers. Sure, read and study OSS, but don't lower your own value by working for free.

    1. Re:Doesn't OSS Make it Worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to a musician who is trying to get his music played on the radio. "Don't give away your product for free, make people find you". If they follow your advice, they'll starve. People in creative jobs need to give away a sample of their work before people will buy.

      The reason you want to be part of an OSS project is so you can say, "here's my code" and have it be independently verifiable. Also, if it's a product that company X needs, they will hunt you down for jobs and advice when they need it.

    2. Re:Doesn't OSS Make it Worse? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you a Microsoft astroturfer? You sure sound like one.

      OSS increases the total size of the market, providing more jobs for software engineers. The only companies OSS is bad for is software companies like MS, that have a business model built on proprietary software.

      Personally, I work at a semiconductor company developing Linux kernel code to support our products. If OSS didn't exist, we would either have to contract outside companies to develop firmware for us, which would be inefficient and very expensive, making our product probably not viable in the marketplace. Quite likely, many, many products simply wouldn't exist without the presence of OSS.

      Imagine a world where almost everyone was illiterate, because a few ivory towers held all the dictionaries and books about written language, and only allowed people to see these books for a high fee. There wouldn't be any writers/authors out there, and all the other industries that rely on written communication simply wouldn't exist. Having access to these tools for free or cheap (remember, education is free in most developed countries) makes the size of the overall market much larger. It's the same way for OSS. Unfortunately, there's some companies like MS who don't like this state of affairs, and want to keep everything secret and under their control.

    3. Re:Doesn't OSS Make it Worse? by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're kidding, right? If you work on the right projects, they can't keep you from using the product for free, and things like this tend to grow exponentially. When you've got a program that runs a game, suddenly you need a good AI, which will be made so that it's a plugin rather than native. When you've got good AI's going, you find that a web client would be appreciated for that game, so you make one. It just keeps going on and on, all the while you're writing code that can be seen by everyone, and if a company starts supporting the code you're writing, there's a good chance that you'll get hired by that company.

      Growing the market is only good. Without Linux and Open Source, I know over 100 developers who wouldn't have their current jobs.

    4. Re:Doesn't OSS Make it Worse? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I'm not against OSS per se, but I'm skeptical that an individual contributing to an OSS project is a good idea. It's one thing for IBM to invest in Linux (for example). If you invest in Linux, you're effectively donating money to for-profit organizations like IBM and Red Hat. This seems to go *against* your self interest of keeping a healthy job pool for software developers. Sure, read and study OSS, but don't lower your own value by working for free.

      Contributing to an OSS project isn't for the money. It's the recognition or street cred. Imagine you're a hiring interviewer at Google. Software engineer #1 comes in the door and you ask him "what have you written?" He says "oh, a bunch of EJBs for an internal corporate app at a bank I used to work at." Software engineer #2 comes in the door and you ask him the same question. He says "oh, a bunch of EJBs for an internal corporate app at a bank I used to work at, and I also wrote Gnifty, an open-source project on Sourceforge ."

      Which one are you going to hire? You don't have to make a great open source project that everyone has heard of before, but get some of your code out there and it gives you desirability++ because it says a couple of things about you:

      1. You don't just code from 9 to 5, you actually do it in your spare time as a hobby, making you a better developer.
      2. Your code is out there and they can review it to see how good you are (this might be a bad thing if your code is sloppy).

      Those 2 things alone are things that will get you hired by a good company over your average guy that just codes for a living.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    5. Re:Doesn't OSS Make it Worse? by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As somebody that hires developers - and has been doing so for 10+ years, there is a point but not much of one.

      Work on a large open-source project might be an indication that a developer can work with others well. Work on a solitare open-source project is an indication often of a huge ego and complete inability to work with others. Not only that, but it strongly suggests the candidate eats, sleeps and codes and has no life away from the keyboard.

      If you are looking for a "coding god" and this person comes along the ego might be tolerable because of the work output. In a team environment this sort of person is a disaster.

  9. No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey boss, be sure to take your malaria shots before you go!

    What irks me is that they've been trying to offshore computer works for 50 years with mixed results. What the real problem is that they keep asking for more guest workers (who can't change jobs [easily], who aren't citizens, who can't form unions, and restricted to certain employment). Is it our government's role to provide subsidies for wealthy companies and stifle small business? If we're going to have immigrant workers, why can't they use the usual immigration process and not H-1B non-immigrant guest worker policies?

    It's a management vision problem, not an American worker productivity problem.

    1. Re:No big deal by vk2 · · Score: 1

      Dude - this is pure capitalism at work. Try before your buy. If a H1B candidate is good enough we dole out the green card application. So what is the problem? In fact, H1B program is more profitable to everyone involved (Except off course those who complain about it). The guest worker gets better salary. The employing company gets an above average candidate (assuming someone throughly interviewed the candidate before H1B sponsorship) - The government gets to collect taxes for Medicare/social security which they don't have to worry about repaying as the candidate is "guest worker" and is assumed to go back home after 6 years. If he stays back on green card the government gets to collect taxes life long and pay nothing as nothing will be left to pay when the green card holder retires. And one of the best reasons - The job stays in US - all the money rolls back into the US economy which is a good thing. Oh.!! and before someone complains about a citizen being denied the job opportunity - please ask him/her check the DOL website and local newspaper for the job posting, they are there before anyone is sponsored for H1B.

      --
      No Sig for you.!
    2. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW Do you know that H1B has a sub quota for foreign students with a US degree? Not all H1B's are useless underpaid slaves. Among them you will find briliant students from MIT, Harvard, etc. It will be only bad for the US if the H1B program is closed.

      Look up science research done in the last 2-3 decades, see how many of them are asian/foreign, etc.

      IMO the underpaid workers _must_ go. Companies who underpay should be blacklisted immediately by DOL.

    3. Re:No big deal by humil8d · · Score: 1

      Microsoft would collapse without H1B indentured servants.

    4. Re:No big deal by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      It's a little silly to be restricting the arrival of H1B-qualified workers. They're highly educated and highly motivated individuals. Their presence would only improve the productivity of the American economy(and they pay taxes like everyone else too). They're a bit different than random immigrants that may have no education or skills. H1Bs are the kind of people we want in our country.

      An example of the foolishness of turning away intelligent and productive immigrants:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsien_Hsue-shen

    5. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My heart bleeds for those fresh-out-of-college kids slaving away for $90,000/year (average). Clearly they deserve so much more.

    6. Re:No big deal by panda+cakes · · Score: 1

      If we're going to have immigrant workers, why can't they use the usual immigration process and not H-1B non-immigrant guest worker policies?

      There is no "usual immigration process", there are few ways to become a US citizen but they are usually unavailable for a professional (marriage, asylum, DV lottery).

    7. Re:No big deal by panda+cakes · · Score: 1

      It's not as silly as you think - uneducated and unskilled immigrants will vote DNC most likely, religious groups will vote what they told by their leaders. H1Bs when become citizens will probably have somewhat different political views than preferred immigrants.

  10. I'm sorry... by lantastik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but if your job went to India, you're expendable. Learn some new skills, get better at what you do, etc. The company I work for now is 70% India, 30% US. They trimmed the fat and sent the cheap labor to India.

    If you haven't learned by now that you need to stand out from the crowd with an invaluable skill, your job is going to keep going to India.

    1. Re:I'm sorry... by cdpage · · Score: 1

      that's true... but that doesn't explain customer service. it might be cheaper to out source that, but they will never do as good a job as we can right here.

    2. Re:I'm sorry... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...but if your job went to India, you're expendable. Learn some new skills, get better at what you do, etc.

      what an insensitive BS answer!

      I'm an expert in my field, I have over 20 yrs doing what I do (netmgt) and yet companies are not respecting actual field experience anymore - they prefer to cheap-out EVERY TIME ;(

      there is nothing I can do about it. 'get better' at what I do? I'm already a leader in my company, for this technology.

      actually, my job didn't go to india. it went to 'eastern europe' (country name withheld). the labor is MUCH cheaper there but I'm not at all convinced they have better experience or understanding of the field. it was PURELY for cost reasons.

      when its for cost reasons, there is nothing an employee can do. can I live on the same pay rate that east europe can live on? surely, I can't (I live in the US).

      no matter how you cut it, its unfair and its NOT the employee's fault. grow up and you'll see this - and stop blaming US workers, its NOT our fault most of the time. its the bean counters.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:I'm sorry... by HyperQuantum · · Score: 1

      if your job went to India, you're expendable. Learn some new skills, get better at what you do, etc.

      Good point.

      If you haven't learned by now that you need to stand out from the crowd with an invaluable skill, your job is going to keep going to India.

      Any idea what skill(s) is(/are) invaluable?

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    4. Re:I'm sorry... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Any idea what skill(s) is(/are) invaluable?

      I know this sounds crazy, but you could... I dunno, check the job listings to see what companies are actually hiring for. They sometimes even tell you the wage scale!

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:I'm sorry... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Redundant

      your post got mod'd insightful?

      amazing. your whole post was 'stop whining'. what a content-free post!

      I'm a principle engineer with a few decades of field experience. I'm far from entry-level yet you tell me to 'grow up'?

      how am I to compete with a cost of living in a nearly 3rd world country? even if I'm the best contributor in my field, if the bean counters are swayed by cost and cost alone, this is a losing battle.

      clearly you have not lived this experience. YOU grow up and then you'll see it, first hand.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:I'm sorry... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Great advice. Now if everyone listens to you and learns to "stand out from the crowd" we are all back in the same crowd.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    7. Re:I'm sorry... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Do you mean the listings where they want people with 20 years of Java experience, 15 years of Python experience, etc?

    8. Re:I'm sorry... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      amazing. your whole post was 'stop whining'. what a content-free post!

      No, the content was "stop whining" AND "value is not based on what you think it ought to be".

      I'm a principle engineer with a few decades of field experience. I'm far from entry-level yet you tell me to 'grow up'?

      Damn straight. Apparently you have a mistaken notion that the world owes you something for having a "few decades" of experience. I'm sure the buggy-whip makers with decades of experience were pissed off when they were no longer able to make as much money.

      even if I'm the best contributor in my field, if the bean counters are swayed by cost and cost alone, this is a losing battle.

      If you're the best contributor in your field, and that's not enough for someone to pay you what *YOU* think you're worth, then -- shock -- do something else that's more valuable. The world changes. Adapt or perish.

      clearly you have not lived this experience. YOU grow up and then you'll see it, first hand.

      You're right, I haven't lived this experience -- primarily because I've adapted my working knowledge to the world as it has changed (If I was still doing what I was doing 20 years ago, I'd be making peanuts). But if, for some reason, I found myself left high and dry because my particular niche wasn't as valuable, I assure you I wouldn't be blaming the "bean counters". I would be looking at the market to see what *was* making money. In fact, I typically do that anyway.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    9. Re:I'm sorry... by rocker_wannabe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow! The "tough love" is really touching!

      It obvious that you're still a relatively young person or at least someone who doesn't have many responsibilities outside of work. I would print out and frame your response so when the really hard times come in your life, and they ALWAYS do, you'll understand why no one around you seems to care.

      --
      "Meaningless!, Meaningless!" says the Teacher. "Utterly meaningless!"
    10. Re:I'm sorry... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      bean counters are over rated. consider this, maxwell house, foldgers, big name coffee started in coffee houses in the 20s or so, yet bean counters figured they could use cheaper beans to make more profit, and today we have starbucks etc tons of coffee houses that specialize in making premium coffee's even though coffee drinking has gone down in this generation? why because bean counters were heeded and once strong brands of coffee became el cheapo, so new coffee houses founded by coffee drinkers came back to life.

    11. Re:I'm sorry... by Intelista · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean it's always the employee's responsibility? Yes, it is. That's the way the world is structured: if you don't like the way the world treats you, you can't expect the it to change to suit you. But that doesn't mean the employee has necessarily done anything wrong. It's not actually guaranteed that the opportunity you want is available: it is only a truism that good opportunities exist. You just take it for granted for the sake of your own sanity.

      All in all, this is why contemporary and Christian morality asks that we look out for others a bit and not just ourselves. But it is still not technically someone's responsibility to look out for us.

      --
      And then there were none.
    12. Re:I'm sorry... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      It obvious that you're still a relatively young person or at least someone who doesn't have many responsibilities outside of work.

      Wrong. I'm 43 years old, have worked for many companies, have started many companies (in fact, I was fired from my own start-up after we got V.C. funding, leaving me with a family and no job). I have a wife, two kids, and a large mortgage to support. Believe me, I understand being screwed and I understand "not fair". I just don't whine about it, and I just do what is necessary to support my life. Life is not fair.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    13. Re:I'm sorry... by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      His post was bad, but your two are worse. I've had a job outsourced, and I've laughed at how dumb management was to do it. If you're really a leader in your field, then you can move to another company or start one of your own. You can compete with eastern european countries in ways that aren't cost, like being in the same building and speaking the same language natively. I don't care if the indian on the other side of the line has spoken English since they were 8, it's fucking hard to talk to them.

      It is unfair, but life isn't fair and you're going to have to deal with it. The bean counters who are swayed by cost and cost alone are making mistakes, and that opens the field up for someone else to step in and not make the mistakes. Instead of focusing on the part of your life that you have no control over, focus on the part that you do and take control that way. So, to reiterate the GP, grow up.

    14. Re:I'm sorry... by bjourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, it is your attitude.

      When you are shopping, do you always buy the cheapest clothes, vegetables, meat, shampoo, magazines, etc? No you don't, and neither does the "bean counters." In fact, they are real persons with real emotions, you know. They try to take rational decisions in the best interest of the company. If they were bean counters, they would count beans, and you would be a bean counted. Is that the value you place on your work?

      Kalvin Klein isn't worried that people will stop buying his 200$ shirts just because 5$ shirts works just fine. He is perfectly capable of projecting an image making consumers spend 195$ more and believing that it was worth it. Your job is the same. Your price tag is 10x of theirs, can you have them believe that it is worth it? Can the Indians be on site within an hour? Can they write legible English documentation? Can they talk about a problem of strategic importance over a lunch with the boss? Can they chit-chat about the game during coffee breaks?

      You say that you are "the best contributor in my field," does anyone but Slashdot readers know that? If not, then you have no one but yourself to blame.

    15. Re:I'm sorry... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean it's always the employee's responsibility? Yes, it is.

      Yes, that's probably a better way to put it. The point (as you state as well) is that the world doesn't owe anybody anything. I think everyone knows on a surface level that "life isn't fair", but few really understand at a deep-down level that *LIFE* *ISN'T* *FAIR* and that you have to hope for the best, but plan for the worst. I think everyone has to get slapped in the face by life a few times before they really understand it.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    16. Re:I'm sorry... by rocker_wannabe · · Score: 1

      Your ability to not let bitterness or self-pity immobilize you is commendable. It's the "smack down" that I have a problem with. IMHO, it shows a lack of compassion. Nobody gets to be an engineer without a certain amount of "mental fortitude" and grit. If they want to vent a bit on Slashdot, why should that irritate you? Do you think you're helping someone by telling them to "stop whining!"?

      I also have a problem with people who don't want to give up their SUV but I'm assuming your joking about that because it's in your sig.

      --
      "Meaningless!, Meaningless!" says the Teacher. "Utterly meaningless!"
    17. Re:I'm sorry... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest with ourselves here. People do need to keep their skills up-to-date and not rely on their past achievements and sit on their laurels and expect to collect the big paychecks for simply being the guy who has done the same job as the junior staff, only longer.

      That said, experience is experience. Many companies only see experience as meaning "more expensive". While certain segments of management at least pay lip service to experience, many want to turn coding in particular into an assembly line function. That works until you realize the people who you are now relying on have no experience with the solutions to problems that only crop up after years of working on the same things. Developers who actually have to listen to support engineers and SAs curse them regularly for their short-sightedness sometimes get over those bad habits. All of that brings real value to a product and its why we should pay for experience.

      The "get some skills, grandpa" argument is entirely valid... to a point. There are plenty of people who think that longevity and mere survival in an organization entitles one to extra pay. This is the sort of mindset that justifies the bean counters who want to outsource, but don't get taken in by that reasoning. Experience has real tangible value and needs to be fostered in an intelligent way, not ignored.

      Finally, this all ignores the fact that we need people who work on obsolescent systems for the very reason that outsourcing is happening... cost. The very same management that wants to reduce personnel costs also does not want to pay for the newest technology deployments. That means that people still have to work on COBOL and mainframes and all of that. What do you do with people who you need on these tasks... until you don't? Companies have it easy, they just discard the old-timers, but how do those people justify trying to become Java programmers when they don't even currently work on systems that can run Java? And more importantly, how do they get experience that even remotely begins to allow them to work at a level in the newer technology that they had in the older one?

    18. Re:I'm sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not joking about SUV, his whole philosophy is, "I got mine, everybody else can go Hell."

    19. Re:I'm sorry... by Tikkun · · Score: 1

      when its for cost reasons, there is nothing an employee can do. can I live on the same pay rate that east europe can live on? surely, I can't (I live in the US).

      Life isn't fair, you can't have the moon on a stick, no you cannot have a pony and if you eat lots of chocolate cake every day you may get fat (unless you happen to have a great metabolism, which also isn't fair).

      No one forces you to buy anything. Likewise a company shouldn't be forced to buy your labor if they don't think it's worth the money.

    20. Re:I'm sorry... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      It's the "smack down" that I have a problem with. IMHO, it shows a lack of compassion.

      My post was probably a little harsh, but you have to admit he was pretty aggressive with his "it's everyone's fault but mine" attitude. One of my pet peeves is with "entitlement" attitudes, and I suppose his expectation that society owed him something for his "decades of experience" set me off. On a personal level, I sympathize with anyone caught off-guard by circumstances, but casting blame everywhere is not the way a mature adult ought to be behave.

      I also have a problem with people who don't want to give up their SUV but I'm assuming your joking about that because it's in your sig.

      Oh no, I'm dead serious about that. The solution to our various problems is new technology, not pain and suffering by rolling back our standard of living.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    21. Re:I'm sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't realy understand why it would be fair if you have a job and the poor bastard in eastern europe is unemployed.

    22. Re:I'm sorry... by Adocso · · Score: 1

      I'm forced to disagree, it is not the bean counters' fault. It is expensive to keep people in developed nations - not just salary and benefits, but taxes and office space too. A company attempting to stay competitive in a global economy does what it needs to do in order to exist. The only thing that surprises me about the movement of positions is how riled people get about it. I don't hear "You're selling in WHAT country??? You b@st@ards!" If the country is a market for products, why not the reverse? These stop being exclusively American jobs in a global economy. As to being an expert in your field, perhaps you have too much loyalty if all that you say is true. If you're that good, there's a shortage of network techs, you could move.

    23. Re:I'm sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I've been reading Slashdot for years and this is the first post I've been compelled to make.

      I'm an expert in my field, I have over 20 yrs doing what I do (netmgt) and yet companies are not respecting actual field experience anymore - they prefer to cheap-out EVERY TIME ;(

      Boo hoo. So a business makes a decision to employ someone at 20% of the cost who is capable of doing 80% quality on the job. Sounds like good business sense to me.

      Two things can happen:

      - This outsourced job done to 80% quality has a few quirks, a bit of extra downtime, and costs a bit more to maintain over its lifetime. From a total cost point of view, it still makes sense.

      -The business critically depends on this technology as a core part of their services to customers. Uptime is paramount and design quality is important to minimise future maintenance costs. If this company chooses the 80% outsourced solution, they quality of the service they provide to their customer will decrease and they will lose out to competitors with a more robust technology solution. In this case it makes more sense to go with the experienced yet expensive solution. Another sound business decision.

      Quality is not everything. Why make a car chassis out of titanium when the engine will fail in 15 years?

      Its a business decision about costs. Sometimes the cheap and nasty solution will be good enough. If the technology solution does not directly provide income for the business, then in many cases it will be hard to justify paying for a slightly better solution at a 400% markup over the cheaper service.

      Dont try and fight globalisation/capitalism , because a.) no one will care, and b.) its not going away any time soon. Instead be smart about it and find ways to distinguish yourself from the competition.

    24. Re:I'm sorry... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      It obvious that you're still a relatively young person

      I was about to say that (I'm mid 40's and not at all 'young' anymore, at least in 'software years') and I've noticed a major shift in MY own thinking from my 20somthing years to my 40something years. I'm almost embarassed to admit it, but then again, I'm a bit more life-experienced now and I 'get it'. I didn't get it when I was younger and I also said 'fuck em!' to a lot of issues that didn't directly affect me.

      its very true that when you are young and first starting out, you feel 'invinceable'. I sure as hell did. my health was great, I was stronger, faster and could work WAY more hours non-stop than I could now. my quality was lower than it was now (simply due to not 'logging as many hours' as I have now) but my energy level was much higher and I was willing to donate all my evenings and weekends to the company.

      now I'm starting to look for a better balance (kinda late but better late than never) and rising health care costs are a REAL issue as is the cost of housing and raising a family.

      when someone incredibly insensitive says 'learn better skills, then!' I pretty much know where that person is at, development-wise. and I also chuckle a bit to myself since I know they'll be eating their words just like I did.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    25. Re:I'm sorry... by bigmacd24 · · Score: 1

      Can you live for the same cost of living as your eastern european counterparts? You can probably get pretty close. Move into a dormicile housing, don't own a car, eat simple meals (meat once or twice a week). Your cost of living will drop dramatically, your standard of living will still be pretty high, you live in one of the wealthiest nations in the world, your roads are well paved, you have beautiful public parks, great libraries, (if your in canada socialized medicine). Rice+Beans+rent=Pretty cheap living, cheaper still if you have the capital to buy a house. Free tip for programers, You can compete with outsourced labour costs, just at the expense of your decedent lifestyle!

    26. Re:I'm sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to our various problems is new technology, not pain and suffering by rolling back our standard of living.

      You've just ruined any credibility you might have had on any issue.

    27. Re:I'm sorry... by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      > clearly you have not lived this experience. YOU grow up and then you'll see it, first hand.

      What I see first hand is good jobs going to Outer Ring Road and a bunch of people far away whining because they did not bring as much to the table as the extra they cost. But I guess everyone here should go back to poverty so that the less able in other lands can keep their birthright.

    28. Re:I'm sorry... by nitin.sahai · · Score: 0, Troll

      I agree, Life is not fair. I am an Indian and I too would have been pissed off if I were you. Personally I too am against outsourcing as I don't think that it would lead us anywhere in long run. All it does is bring jobs and money to our huge population but since it ain't production thingy.... this is not real development imho and won't make us superpower as the world claims we will be in very near future. In fact .... talking about from personal experiences, when I came to jobs scenario. I was surprised to see that only because I hail from a very reputed Indian college, I am being paid almost double than my colleagues who even have several years of experience. I feel bad for them but then life is not fair.... learn to deal with it .... whichever side of the spectrum of fairness you are.

    29. Re:I'm sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blame the government that taxed your country far more than those in eastern europe hnece they can work at lower cost

    30. Re:I'm sorry... by rocker_wannabe · · Score: 1

      I find that engineers generally are responsible and highly adaptable people. Once they've vented and realized that the world changed and/or they've changed, they find some way to make ends meet. The ones, like me, that are hamstrung by spouses that are risk-adverse, still manage to land on their feet. Starting my own software company is just not an option for me if I still want to be married next week. I'm currently managing an eBay store for the owner of a brick-and-mortar store. That's about the extent of the risk I can take right now.

      I'm hoping someone will write a book called "Growing Old in the USA" that chronicles how people have adapted to our frenetic pace of life as they age. I've seen the ones that hang tough and keep putting in the long hours and/or extensive travel and it's not a pretty sight. The rest of their family generally loses when that "balance" you mentioned is not maintained. Plus their health usually suffers. I want to hear about the ones that chucked it all and started an Alpaca farm in Washington.

      --
      "Meaningless!, Meaningless!" says the Teacher. "Utterly meaningless!"
    31. Re:I'm sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK, corrupt politicos seem to have encouraged the 'moral hazard' that bean counters have bought into, buy touting a 'skills shortage' and making it extremely easy for companies to offshore. Why is it moral hazard? because it is a dumb move that, ultimately will not save money.

      Sympathy to you, man. IT, of all careers, has been smacked because the drop in communication costs. It will recover and take its place among other engineering disciplines. Meanwhile we have to take it like men, huh.

    32. Re:I'm sorry... by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine always says that everybody should be shot and thrown in a river once in their lives. If people can get over the fact that life isn't fair and deal with the situation as it presents itself, they get out of the river and survive. If they can't, they don't.

      It certainly would make for a more interesting world.

  11. You become more valuable by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    by having multiple trades. Don't be so specialized.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:You become more valuable by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Too hasty with the "Submit"

      I was replaced by a machine. Well, guess who fixed the machine? With a nice raise besides. Can't get paid to fly airplanes? Sure can to fix 'em. With all sorts of phony pretexts to take them up for a "test" flight. Just replaced a nav light. Gotta take it up to make sure it doesn't shake loose.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:You become more valuable by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Outsourced aircraft maintenance is a booming business. You better start practicing "Do you want fries with that?".

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:You become more valuable by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      That's mostly an issue with the airlines. And the "outsourcing" is just to a contractor, which is still usually domestic. But where's a guy going to take his Bonanza? The big problem with the pirate nations that rule the world is that when a job goes to India, you can't follow it. When those economic borders came down for the big boys, we should have torn them down completely for the rest of us, also. We should assert the same rights for ourselves that we have given them. It's high time that we do just that.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:You become more valuable by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Outsourced aircraft maintenance is a booming business.

      I guess that explains recent news.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  12. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they stop outsourcing in the last 3 years, or are you saying that the tips on skill development are no longer valid?

    Just curious.

  13. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what would you suggest Obi Wan? Maybe Medicine? Law? Literature? Give some alternatives.

  14. No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by Black-Man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe the author should stop by where I work. He can talk to the people they are hiring *back* after the off-shore company ripped us off for millions giving us crap code which was basically unsupportable written by the "experts".

    1. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by guruevi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lol, that's their own fault. The managers probably said: "code me something that does x" instead of "code me something that we can support" or the sales person offered: we can do your coding project for USD XXXXX which appeared cheaper than what they were paying for the local coders. The long term cost of course, they didn't plan for.

      I had something similar happen at one of the companies I used to work for a while ago (precision measurement instruments for industrial processes). They outsourced their lab and prototyping to China as to profit from the cheap scientists. As soon as the branch in China got hold of the blueprints of quite some high tech products (5 and up digit retail value) the whole department literally vanished. Nothing was heard from them for a while until somebody went over just to see an empty building with the offices. All original equipment was still there, the people had started their own little company selling the same product for a lot less down the road, they took all the contacts and copies of plans with them.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by CharlieG · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not meant for you, but your bosses

      Outsourceing your "product" is just plain stupid. If you're in the electronics business, don't outsource your electronics design. If your in the software business, don't outsource software. If you build electronics, and the PC program that interfaces with it is a "it's nice to have", but isn't "the product", go ahead, have someone else write the software. If they take it, it doesn't kill you.

      Figure that ANYTHING you outsource will be in your competitors hands - if that is going to hurt you, don't do it. So, lets say you are NOT an accounting company. It won't kill you to outsource your payroll, etc.

      Sigh
      You would think management would think about "what makes US special as a company", and keep that in house, but they seem to look to the next quarter, or at most, next fiscal year

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    3. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are quite right. There should be a chapter(s) on off-shore. In 1995 the company I worked for brought in some off-shore people to learn our systems. Then they went back and started up. My boss denied me a raise that year, 4 weeks later I left and haven't looked back. Not only did the operations hear close, the lack of a usable product(s) from the off-shore operations almost bankrupted them, and may yet.

      My second bout with this was more recent. But is quickly shaping up towards the same outcome. They wanted me back, so I asked for a raise. They were thinking more like India wages in North America. Needless to say, I said no. Besides, who needs the problems of a disorganized business, 2-3 years behind in a business critical venture that is costing them a fortune, to work for managers that don't factor in performance, contributions, dependability, track record and ethical work habits before RIFing you.

      I don't feel sorry for companies outsourcing that find they get ripped off.

    4. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem with your thinking is this: management does NOT think "what makes US special as a company". They think, "WHO makes us special as a company". And they point to themselves. They think they, the management, is what makes the company so special, and so irreplaceable. Of course, their reality comes crashing down when someone else takes their design plans and sells a clone product for 1/5 the cost on Ebay. But these management types are slick (remember, they're sociopaths, so this comes naturally to them); when this happens, they just take off and go to another company, convince the board of directors they're worth tens of millions of dollars, and get hired on to drive that company into the ground like the one before.

    5. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing if all the company had was "imaginary property" then they didn't have anything to begin with, now did they?

      Sorry, but it works both ways. If folks in the US and Europe get all our movies and music for free because "IP is dead", then basing a company on something that can be easily reproduced or reverse-engineered is just handing the folks with lower labor costs money.

      Either there is value in IP or there isn't. Either it is a good thing that is it shared freely and has no value or it isn't.

      China, India and most of that part of the world are just fine with the "sharing" idea. Of course, that is because they aren't investing any time in R & D work.

    6. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      they are hiring *back* after the off-shore company ripped us off for millions giving us crap code which was basically unsupportable written by the "experts".

      They were probably told to "learn American culture" to better relate to their clients. Sounds like they learned well ;-)
             

    7. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by thogard · · Score: 1

      The management types fall for Ray Kroc type of thinking where Mc Donald's isn't in the hamburger business, they are in the real estate business.

    8. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to be a moron to think you can trust some unknown people in another country (one known for having/enforcing no IP laws) with your blueprints.

      Sounds like they got what they deserved on all levels.

    9. Re:No Chapter On The "Failed Off-Shoring"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Coward here.

      I heard of a company that outscourced a telephone help line to Pakistan. The first time a man called in saying that he was feeling suicidal, the staff got all excited and wantet to know what his jacket size was.

      But seriously, the primary and secondary education system in India in Math and Science is excellent. People are industrious and serious. They could have a truely booming economy if they wern't hopelessly budened down by a socialist political system. The same could be said of China, Indonesia, and a host of other third world powers. Of course at the rate popularity for socialism is growing in this country, I'm sure it won't be long before we will be joining them. Indeed, China may surpass our GDP by 2050.

  15. Interview questions by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    So many job descriptions are written by HR reps who only list off names of various software packages, and only go by a checklist when reviewing candidates.

    If someone asks me "Do you know TechnoBuzz software?" my factual answer would be "I haven't used it before, but I'd love to/willing to/confident I can learn it."

    What's a better answer to give an HR rep who doesn't know the technology?

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:Interview questions by 0racle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You give the same answer you give to someone who asks "are you a god?"

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Interview questions by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

      Someone mod 0racle up, because I can't!

      --
      You never expect irony, do you?
      Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
      @iyfwrestling
    3. Re:Interview questions by corbettw · · Score: 1

      What's a better answer to give an HR rep who doesn't know the technology?

      "Yes, I know that quite well." Do you seriously think an HR drone is going to know enough to challenge that response?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:Interview questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone asks you if you're a god, you say "yes!"

    5. Re:Interview questions by toriver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your mod points were offshored? Here, have a (Belgian-owned) Bud.

    6. Re:Interview questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just have to watch out for the 60ft stay puffed marshmellow man that roams the office..

    7. Re:Interview questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes?

      Which, coincidentally, is the same answer I give when people ask me, "Are you a liar?"

    8. Re:Interview questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a pumpkin?

  16. Maybe if Americans worked and did not whine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    From experience in the industry, I can contract Tata Consulting, and obtain well commented, thoroughly tested code module for a project for less than 20% the cost of an employed developer here. Bonus is that there are fewer employees needed, which saves immensely on overhead. Plus with payroll taxes the way they are, the IRS almost pays companies to offshore.

    Why attempt to hire people here who claim to have programming experience, even with degrees, when one can get code written arguably by the best people on the globe for far less?

    Pretty much all my company needs is a guy to run a build for QA and another person to be the InstallShield monkey to ensure the program deploys.

    1. Re:Maybe if Americans worked and did not whine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "From experience in the industry, I can contract Tata Consulting, and obtain well commented, thoroughly tested code module for a project for less than 20% the cost of an employed developer here. Bonus is that there are fewer employees needed, which saves immensely on overhead."

      1. I was just working for a company where I heard the "on shore" representatives for a large "offshore" Indian firm made excuses and explain to the project leaders in the US why they shouldn't be thrown off the account. At least once every week or 2, somebody offshore would screw something up. Another issue was the time difference. I waited almost a week before an offshore engineer called me back about creating some test data for me. I resigned from the company a week later, before I even got the data created. More than 2 weeks, just to get some test data from another system that the offshore guys controlled? And very poor communication the entire time. That pretty much killed any savings, since I was billing a lot of money to wait around, and the delay caused other people that were testing ( paid consultants like me) to be behind as well.

      "Plus with payroll taxes the way they are, the IRS almost pays companies to offshore"

      2. The IRS doesn't gain anything by off-shoring and people not paying payroll taxes. The only "losers" are the tax payers in the US, because we have to pay higher taxes to make up for the money going offshore. Maybe its a little less work for the IRS, but I doubt they care - since there are millions more other people working other jobs in the US. And any savings is probably eaten up by the INS having to handle all the H1B's floating around.

      "Why attempt to hire people here who claim to have programming experience, even with degrees, when one can get code written arguably by the best people on the globe for far less?"

      3. There are no "best" people in the globe. There are awesome software engineers from every country. And there are crap coders in every country. This statement almost sounds racist...

      "Pretty much all my company needs is a guy to run a build for QA and another person to be the InstallShield monkey to ensure the program deploys."

      4. Then I don't think your software is very complex or sophisticated. A lot of complex software requires consultants and engineers just to install and configure it. SAP is an example. Another example is a lot of the logistics and warehouse control software packages.

      They have predicted that all jobs would be offshored since the 1990's when I started coding. Yet, over and over again, companies bring the work back again. Why? Because it doesn't matter where you send the code. Unless someone decent is coding, it will be crap. And only so many people in the world have the desire, talent, and ability to create good software. And a good bit of the best Indian talent is already working in the US.

      At least until Emperor Palpatine creates an army of clones that can write good code without complaining about it.... :)

    2. Re:Maybe if Americans worked and did not whine? by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      from my expirience in the "Industry" I can confidently say that you can contract at Tata and get a bunch of barely english speaking people that would have a hard time passing the turing test. Then you can waste expensive western man power to clean up the mess. Instructing these guys is like programming except that they tend to have forgotten the next day ... That's one of the reasons offshoring is even being rolled back these days. I wonder what domain your product is for but would guess it's a very easy to specify problem with a technically unchallenging solution that works standalone so no integration tasks would be necessary. That would indeed be software you'd get done well in India ...

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
  17. four words by syrinx · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Get a security clearance".

    Those jobs aren't going to India.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:four words by antique+future · · Score: 1

      They may not go to India, but I heard Dubai does quite a bit with security...

    2. Re:four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Drop out of high school and get a security clearance. :D The easy way is to take contracts in war zones.

    3. Re:four words by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      If only it were that easy (perhaps it is better that it isn't easy given all of the Chinese spying going on these days). One cannot apply independently for a security clearance. You must have a sponsor who is doing secret government work and is willing to sponsor your application and pay (thousands or even tens of thousands depending upon the level of clearance) to process the application (the money goes to pay for teams of government investigators to track down and interview everyone you ever knew in addition to all of the standard paperwork that goes with any regular background investigation). Naturally, US companies (being cheap as they are) would rather hire someone who already has an active clearance so that they don't have to pay thousands of dollars and sponsor you to get one (they will only do that as a last resort and most engineers simply are not that valuable to them). Hence, whenever defense contractors appear at job fairs they only want to talk to you if you already have a security clearance and you cannot just go out and get one for yourself even if you are willing to pay the fees so it is a chicken and egg problem. The only other way is to come out of the military or government job with a clearance still active (in which case the government paid for all of the background investigations). These jobs may not be going to India, but you have to be lucky and be in the right place at the right time to get the security clearance in the first place.

    4. Re:four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      They are going to Puerto Rico.

      Seriously. ;(

    5. Re:four words by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Where do you go to school?

      My friends and I who became defense contractor employees (since left for NASA) have had no problem getting jobs and getting clearances. I had a job within 3 months of graduation - and that's because I wasn't looking very hard, I was actually doing the graduate research assistanceship thing, just keeping my eyes open when I got a referral from a friend-of-a-friend.

      Actually, they are so backed up in granting security clearances, you get your interim clearance within a few months, but your actual clearance will take a year to grant, and that's presuming they don't have to do an extensive background check (no funnies in your background check). My secret clearance 3 years ago took over a year to process, my brothers' secret 2 years ago took almost as long.

      In fact the local college will sponsor security clearances if you are working on a project for a professor as a GRA in collaboration with the Army, etc.

      I live in Huntsville, AL.

    6. Re:four words by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      When a contractor lands a big contract, there will typically be a ramp-up as they hire people do do the work. This gives you a window of opportunity, since there won't be enough already cleared people out there looking for a job like there are to replace normal turnover. And once you've gotten your clearance, the high barrier to entry problem you mention works in your favor, since you're a more attractive candidate than someone they have to sponsor and wait and hope is granted theirs.

    7. Re:four words by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

      Those jobs aren't going to India

      ...yet. Some are going to Europe, though.

    8. Re:four words by Rhys · · Score: 1

      You don't even strictly need a security clearance. Even something as low-end as ITAR (aka: "US Citizens Only"*) can't reliably be shipped off.

      *: An oversimplification, but accurate in most cases.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    9. Re:four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm an anarchist with anti-American ideals. I hear that the government discriminates against people like me. What can I do?

    10. Re:four words by CodeBuster · · Score: 1
      Did you get the initial clearance as part of your graduate research assistanceship thing? If so, then the research grants probably covered the cost (I presume that you personally didn't get the bill)? Then, once you have that covered you can get into the private sector defense contractors much more easily (Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrup, etc) since they are definitely hiring competent people who already have clearances (defense is big business these days, what with the never ending war on terror and such). I did not say that private defense companies will not under any circumstances sponsor new clearances, merely that they are very reluctant to do so if they can possibly avoid it (since it costs extra $$$).

      In fact the local college will sponsor security clearances if you are working on a project for a professor as a GRA in collaboration with the Army, etc.

      Alright, but again your school has to be involved in these projects and you have to know the professor or get to know him and then become involved with his research work. That opportunity is not always available to everyone, even if one is qualified and wants to work in defense (I wasn't personally interested in a defense job, but some of my friends in college were).

    11. Re:four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Get a security clearance".

      Those jobs aren't going to India.

      It won't be long. My sister is getting laid off from Western Union, where there are a great deal of security measures in place (since you're mostly dealing with the transfer of money). They're sending all the jobs to a facility in Mexico, where most that security is gone. The union has actually discussed trying to get the government to force Western Union to keep the jobs here for security reasons but they haven't had any luck.

    12. Re:four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem is getting the clearance. Employers don't want to hire you unless you already have it, and you can't get one unless you need it for your new job.

      A somewhat easier strategy is to get a job where US citizenship is required.

    13. Re:four words by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is a problem with that. You can't just get a security clearance.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      four more:

      "Leave soul at home"

    15. Re:four words by drspliff · · Score: 1

      I'm a known to be a socialist and an anti-capitalist, I have friends who've been jailed for computer-security related issues and for one reason or another have popped up in several (local & foreign) investigations.

      Of course, I have a perfectly clean record, but I'm not sure I could deal with the disappointment of being rejected for security clearance.

    16. Re:four words by everphilski · · Score: 1

      My secret clearance was covered by a small company of about ~ 200 employees out of Huntsville, AL, contracting direct with the Army, not one of the big players you mention. And this is not uncommon, at least down here - there are companies from 5-500 employees contracting directly with the Army/NASA for services, and anything missile or defense related, of course, is Secret.

      But I know people who have done it all ways, starting at school or through bigger companies, etc. That was my point - at least here, the security clearances don't seem to be an issue, that's why I was curious where you resided, because your experiances run contrary to mine, and friends I graduated with. We all got jobs in the defense sector very quickly after graduation. Even now in this so-called "recession", many companies I know of and have experience with are hiring, in defense and NASA... they can't find enough employees. Too many retirees, not enough college grads, it's a good time to be in aerospace.

      Right now I work at NASA and my clearance is actually suspended, I don't need it for the work I do (very little at NASA is secret), but it's on file in case I need it in the future, reactivating is a lot cheaper (and quicker, since the primary background check is complete) than starting over.

  18. They took our by AP31R0N · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Jerbs!

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  19. First line of the review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The very first sentence of this book review has a grammatical error. I'm not sure how the author, the reviewer, and the editor feel about this because there are good editorial services for cheap in India, Ireland, England.

  20. It's that "Giant Sucking Sound" Ross Perot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warned us about.

    Globalization sucks...

    It's our government that is to blame.

  21. Inflation in India by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    12%

    An indian software engineer can earn about 400,000 rupees ($10k)at the moment. In 10 years that will match the west, but long before then the difference will be too marginal to make it worth offshoring.
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Inflation in India by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about India's economic situation, but at first glance it sounds like this is going to cause a huge amount of economic stratification.

      Does anyone have any more information on this?

    2. Re:Inflation in India by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

      at 12% inflation the 10K to reach the US average salary will take a few more than 10 year. As the Inflation rate in the US does go up. Assuming that the India inflation rate stays at 12% and the US tries to maintain the 2.5% it will take about 25 years before the average wages converge. Do you think the long term average

      --
      My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    3. Re:Inflation in India by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Does anyone have any more information on this?

      Google?

      http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5ggi-3eKTfO0Ql_PmTCiLws1Y689w

       

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:Inflation in India by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

      12% is the average inflation in India. You're assuming that everyone's wages are increasing by the average value. Highly sought after people will be able to demand more and their wages will inflate faster.

      e.g. 30% wage inflation.

      http://www.infoworld.com/archives/emailPrint.jsp?R=printThis&A=/article/07/05/29/riya-wage-inflation-sinks_1.html

       

      --
      Deleted
    5. Re:Inflation in India by KnightBlade · · Score: 1

      most of them get 250,000 rupees roughly $6000 a yr. I don't see how that will match the US salary even in 20 years! US programmers make that in a month!

    6. Re:Inflation in India by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

      That for the link and information. It is interesting to note. I have my annual review with our director about wages... his mind set is the wages increase should always be at the rate of inflation plus a maximum of 1%. Hence now 10 years into the company and wage are about 10-20% below the industry standards and the turn over rate is about 10% of the company a month! We have all tired to tell him the wages needs to be adjusted but he is just not buying into it.

      --
      My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    7. Re:Inflation in India by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      An indian software engineer can earn about 400,000 rupees ($10k)at the moment. In 10 years that will match the west, but long before then the difference will be too marginal to make it worth offshoring.

      But other countries are happy to take their place as IT sweatshops. South-Africa is an example. It has a large English-speaking population and low-wages: the fuel of IT outsourcing. The baby-ex-soviet countries are also a growing source.
         

    8. Re:Inflation in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      400,000 rupees is closer to 9,000 USD. But for the sake of argument let's go with $10,000. At 12% interest that will work out to $31,000 in 10 years. The average salary for a software engineer in the US is roughly $60,000-80,000. As someone else mentioned, wages in the US will increase as well. With an average 2.5% increase in the US it will take around 25 years to converge.

    9. Re:Inflation in India by pfbram · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean much to us. Tell us what it costs to own a home in various parts of India. Without the income:cost-of-living ratio, the one figure is basically worthless.

    10. Re:Inflation in India by nitin.sahai · · Score: 1

      Our economy is very bad ..... GDP is very good though and future is promising but believe me we can't match you guys in respect of earnings for at least a generation. There's a huge talent pool here owing to population and and recently good educational policies of govt. which makes huge workforce (skilled) hence cheap labor. Thus the outsourcing makes both of us happy .... you get your work done in less cost and we get jobs (unless we steal your job :( )

    11. Re:Inflation in India by jimicus · · Score: 1

      12%

      An indian software engineer can earn about 400,000 rupees ($10k)at the moment. In 10 years that will match the west, but long before then the difference will be too marginal to make it worth offshoring.

      Then they'll start offshoring to some other country.

  22. Confucius say by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Confucius say "Job is like a woman. Smartest programmer in world cannot keep job from leaving if it wants to."

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Confucius say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wouldn't this be more appropriate:

      Confucious say "Job is like woman. You have neither."

  23. Survivors by slashdapper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Learning new software, programming languages, code-katas or whatever is NOT going to help.
    Indians have access to the internet too, you know.
    They can learn all this new stuff and provide the same service cheaper.

    Some random points:
    (1) People who code, administer or test will not survive. If you write/fix any kind of code or scripts or do any kind of testing at least once a day your job is in danger.

    (2) People who are unable to create something from nothing will not survive. If you need a well-defined set of requirements and design before you can do your work, your job is in danger. If you need someone else to take some vague problem from the customer/boss and come up with a solution that you can implement, your job is in danger. If, however, you invent solutions, you will be fine.

    (3) People with inability to solve problems will not survive. This goes to general smartness/intelligence. If you are the kind who can use a cool-head and solve most of problems (job-related or not) through a combination of steps such as keeping a cool head, knowing what to do, who to approach etc, you will be fine. Many problems are tough but you would be surprised to see many people give up before they even take a stab at the easy ones.

    As an example: Here is a problem given to you by a customer: "Size the work effort that you personally will require to install DB2 on my AS400 box"

    Bad answer: We are a C++ coding shop. We dont do DB2 admin. We dont know how to size this.
    Good answer: 6 months (cuz we have to learn all the shit first)

    (4) People who will survive are those who can talk to customers to elicit business requirements, design tecnhnical solutions and coordinate project activities - not people who know how to change a config file to get Linux to play mp3 files.

    (5) Good-looking people who can talk with management and customers in a confident non-geeky way in perfect English will survive.

    (6) If you can relate well with people and can get them to do favors for you, you will survive. If you are the type of person who ends up leading meetings and discussions, you will survive.

    (7) If your job is in IT but deals with some kind of calculation involving dollars at least once a day, you will survive.

    1. Re:Survivors by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      (4) People who will survive are those who can talk to customers to elicit business requirements, design tecnhnical solutions and coordinate project activities - not people who know how to change a config file to get Linux to play mp3 files.

      (5) Good-looking people who can talk with management and customers in a confident non-geeky way in perfect English will survive.

      (6) If you can relate well with people and can get them to do favors for you, you will survive. If you are the type of person who ends up leading meetings and discussions, you will survive.

      (7) If your job is in IT but deals with some kind of calculation involving dollars at least once a day, you will survive.

      And people wonder why no one is interested in going into engineering any more. People who fit these requirements are not generally interested in engineering (they go straight into management), and people who make good engineers won't fit these requirements, and see that the industry no longer wants them, so they look for work in other industries.

      As for #6, that doesn't even make sense. If the people who DON'T lead meetings are not going to survive, then who's going to attend these meetings? Meetings generally don't work well when everyone is trying to do the leading. Same can be said for a company's general operations. Remember the old adage about "too many chefs in the kitchen". US companies are not going to survive if they think they're going to make a lot of money by just sitting around, leading meetings, and having all the real work done in other countries by contractors. It doesn't take much for the contractors to just start their own companies doing the same work and competing with the overpriced US company, who now has no one who can actually do any work of value. US companies may pull this off in the short term, while the foreigners all learn the skills necessary to compete with the US companies, but eventually it's going to collapse: the US companies are going to go bankrupt, foreign companies will become the new HP, Dell, IBM, etc., and the US, having shed all its manufacturing ability, will have no economy left and will probably have to return to agriculture. Since that won't employ many people (ag is highly automated now), we're going to have people starving in the streets, and very likely a very bloody revolution since so many people have firearms here.

    2. Re:Survivors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      extra extra - all coders, adminstrators and testers are dead ! ! read it here first.

      Billy...are you writing a script? Pack up your stuff...you're gone boy.

      I wish the good ole days were back, when we had a whole dept of people who could not solve problems. Man those were the days.

      My boss asked me to estimate how long it would take to build an inhouse custom CRM application, I told him 6 months, being the head of Janitorial services, I figure I can pick up what I need to know quick - and survive!

      Before we take on any customers here, we have them talk to every employee, one on one rap session. If the conversation goes sideways, we fire the employee immediately - we do NOT fire the customer. We are relentless in this principle.

      In my job interview, the guy played some Jimi Hendrix and was all like "Can you dig it?" and I was like..."Are YOU experienced?"...Then I said, let me ask you something, you mind watching my coffee while I take a piss?

      They were impressed. They knew, this guy gets stuff done. There is nothing I wouldnt do for this man, I mean, reasonably speaking.

      At my company, all meetings are single person only - the guy leading, we outsourced the rest.

      Software industry in NAmerica is restricted to the financial industry only, everything else is mandated by Legion of Justice, that it must be in Asia Minor, Baltic, or surrounding regions.

    3. Re:Survivors by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      "They can learn all this new stuff and provide the same service cheaper."

      At some point there will be a "Management Revelation" that cheaper != better. Currently it looks that we get the same output from offshore for less money because the vast majority of people onshore spend their whole day:

      1. Covering their Ass.
      2. Making someone else look bad.
      3. Trying to get out of work, while somehow appearing more important.
      4. Posting in forums on the internet...

      While the offshore staff actually works.

      So the choice is, follow the same office-politics status quo that has been around for a half century, or do actual work and provide actual value for your company. You'll still be "right sized" but you won't be in the unemployment line. And when common sense does break out and "You get what you pay for" becomes the new mantra, you'll be sitting pretty.

      Of course we'll all just end up working for different departments of the Peoples Global Republic of Wal-Mart, but you don't have to be a douche on the way there.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    4. Re:Survivors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but you pulled all of that shit out of your ass. Your so-called anecdote-based points are pretty much worth what we paid for them: nothing.

    5. Re:Survivors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Size the work effort that you personally will require to install DB2 on my AS400 box

      Zero, it's part of the operating system.

    6. Re:Survivors by wrencherd · · Score: 1

      (5) Good-looking people who can talk with management and customers in a confident non-geeky way in perfect English will survive.

      If you don't think that any/a lot of Indians are good-looking then you need to run "Ayesha Takia" through images.google.com asap. Many Indians are British-educated as well, so it's likely that their command of English likely is at least as good as that of Chad Fowler and his editor at The Practical Bookshelf.

    7. Re:Survivors by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People who code, administer or test will not survive.

      Wrong. Pure and simple. People who code badly, administer inflexibly or test poorly won't survive, but that's always been the case. People outsource, realise it's not actually as good, then insource again. I keep hearing about these jobs disappearing but every time I've been even remotely in danger of being outsourced I've learnt new skills and moved to a coding job that was more secure.

      People who are unable to create something from nothing will not survive. If you need a well-defined set of requirements and design before you can do your work, your job is in danger. If you need someone else to take some vague problem from the customer/boss and come up with a solution that you can implement, your job is in danger. If, however, you invent solutions, you will be fine.

      You're not describing "creating something from nothing". You're discribing being a good analyst/programmer (with some emphasis on the analysis part). If you code like a monkey you won't survive, nor should you. However most good designs aren't innovative. Most businesses do very similar things - capture data, store data, retrieve it and display it, consolidate and report on it. A good understanding of how things work in business in general is more important than the ability to innovate.

      People with inability to solve problems will not survive.

      This is the same as your last point. No they won't survive. Nor should they.

      Good answer: 6 months (cuz we have to learn all the shit first)

      If you're competing on that basis you won't survive either. There are people in outsourcing companies that either know the technologies you need to learn, or will claim to know them even if they don't. However if you can convince the company that learning a new skill set is going to be beneficial in he long term on multiple projects you're a step closer to being more viable. Better still if you can provide a compelling argument that you should do the job using a skillset you already have, the idea of outsourcing the work becomes less attractive.

      People who will survive are those who can talk to customers to elicit business requirements, design tecnhnical solutions and coordinate project activities - not people who know how to change a config file to get Linux to play mp3 files.

      Nope. People who survive will know how to do BOTH.

      Good-looking people who can talk with management and customers in a confident non-geeky way in perfect English will survive.

      Perfect English is not a requirement. English that is easy to understand, and difficult to confuse is. Good-looking is only a requirement if your job is going to require communication outside the company because that's when it's important. However most managers will hire a glue eating geek that doesn't shower if his job has limited scope and exposure. They will however prefer someone with basic hygeine that doesn't look like crap as they're more versatile. You don't need to be on magazine covers or have the elocution of a British royal. Just dress well, take care of the basics and put on some cologne.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:Survivors by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      As for #6, that doesn't even make sense. If the people who DON'T lead meetings are not going to survive, then who's going to attend these meetings? Meetings generally don't work well when everyone is trying to do the leading. Same can be said for a company's general operations. Remember the old adage about "too many chefs in the kitchen". US companies are not going to survive if they think they're going to make a lot of money by just sitting around, leading meetings, and having all the real work done in other countries by contractors

      The parent post was not telling you want is needed for US companies to survive. He was telling you what you need to do to keep an IT job in the current climate. Current US coprate hiring practices do not have anything to do with acquiring the skills they need to survive. Eventually Darwin will catch up and hiring practices will change. Unfortuantely the typical corporation can last longer without income than the typical employee can.

    9. Re:Survivors by ultranova · · Score: 1

      and the US, having shed all its manufacturing ability, will have no economy left and will probably have to return to agriculture. Since that won't employ many people (ag is highly automated now), we're going to have people starving in the streets, and very likely a very bloody revolution since so many people have firearms here.

      Actually, what will probably happen is that the US turns to the left - to socialism - as that allows feeding the unemployed population.

      Of course, that high-tech agriculture needs money to run, so if the US truly goes bankrupt, it will be back to toiling the soil with your bare hands, dissolution of cities, etc. Such is the price of free market in a world where you can be outcompeted. I wonder if libertarian trolls will still keep on piping then.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  24. Foreign Companies will bury US ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have over 20 years of software development experience in the U.S. I am not working in that field anymore.

    One of those big U.S. based multi-nationals laid me off. I have found myself in another engineering field (not software).
    My current employer is happy to pay a good salary while I learn this new business. I have now worked there longer than
    most of my jobs in the IT world.

    When I apply for software jobs, it is all I can do to get people to return my calls. I have to followup
    over and over to get to the next step in the interview process. I say, who needs it.

    I am turning my back on IT. They only seem to want to pay for 2-5 years of experience. If you have 10 or more years,
    they don't want you. They want energetic and cheap. They want to keep making the mistakes that were made 5 years ago.

    I think the current technical job market will dissuade people from entering the IT field in the first place. The work
    is hard to do in the first place, and they are going to cast you aside eventually.

    Indian companies will have an advantage because they will not need to manage projects across so many timezones. They
    will have lots of people coming out of college with lots of jobs for them. U.S. based companies will only be able to
    find the people they need at the price they want to pay overseas. They will continue to use their money to train
    armies of software developers many timezones away.

    Over time, these non-U.S. companies will master the rest of the business and bury the US-based ones. Free trade or
    protectionist stance will not affect this outcome.

    My advice to current U.S. IT workers: don't get too deep into debt and plan a backup career.

  25. Tuition benefit by MetricT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is overlooked by too many people. I'm a physicist/computer guy by training, but I decided to broaden my employability a bit. I used my employer's tuition discount to take some business classes at the local community college, enjoyed them, and went on to earn a MBA at Vanderbilt at nights/weekends. I've started taking pre-med classes at the community college partly for fun, but also because Nashville is a major medical town and I suspect it will increase my employability even more.

    I get a 70% discount on a 3 hour class. At the local community college, that works out to ~$300 per class including the textbook. That's $900 a year. That's a no-brainer in my book. I've never bought an asset, never owned a stock, never owned a mutual fund, that has a higher rate of return than my brain.

    While I don't think my job is going to India anytime soon, you can't be sure about tomorrow, and why wait until tomorrow when you can do something about it *today*. Most people ignore their tuition benefit. I'm sure most people fail to fund their 401K to the company match too; that's not the company's fault. Take control.

    1. Re:Tuition benefit by handreach · · Score: 1

      I agree it's good to equip yourself with broad skills, but I doubt it will always pay out in the end. One side-effect is that you won't be expert at any of them.

    2. Re:Tuition benefit by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      It won't always pay out but like many things it's at worst a safety net to essentially lower your risk in the future.
      Saving money for a rainy day also doesn't pay out unless a rainy day does come in which case it's nearly priceless.

      If you can be an expert in a single field your whole bloody life than you'll likely make more money. If on the other hand you suddenly become obsolete then you'll probably be lucky to get minimum wage. If the chances of that happening are high enough than in the end you'll come out ahead more often than not by diversifying.

      That said if you're good then you can probably make money by leveraging your knowledge of multiple areas. You do become an expert in fact however not an expert of a single field but rather an expert in combining the two fields.

    3. Re:Tuition benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MBA's are a dime a dozen.

      You can go get a job with all the other MBA's working at Sun Microsystems and drive the stock price even lower.

  26. Wahhh wahhh wahhh by kipin · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'm sure monks in the 15th century complained about the printing press taking their jobs and reducing their relevancy as well.

    It's call progress. It's going to happen whether you like it or not. Step on board, re-invent your skill set, or get out of the way because someone else is willing to do what you aren't.

    And if you don't want to get out of the way, well that's fine too. You will soon find everyone around you passing you by as you continue to complain about the loss of your job.

    --
    If I can not smoke in heaven, then I shall not go. -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:Wahhh wahhh wahhh by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between small scale job losses, and the kind of wide scale gutting of the middle class that will make sure nobody is left to pay for the things America produces. We are a luxury economy, we produce so effectively that half the country does a job that is completely frivolous. What happens when only 5% of the country can afford those luxuries?

      At the same time, we have a massive trade deficit, which doesn't even include the imported labor, and with investor confidence that kept the dollar artificially high shattered, the dollar is only going to continue to fall until that deficit is eliminated.

      So yeah, on a individual level, not such a big deal, and I fail to see why I should care more about a US worker than one in India, but the country is fucked.

      Get out while you can. Don't move anywhere the US is likely to bomb in its death throws.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go learn Portuguese.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  27. 52 tips to become a better employee by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Play poker for a living.

  28. Thah took are Jehrbs!!!! by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    ob South Park :-)

    Quick, everyone have gay sex...

    filthy goobacks.

  29. Re:Survivors - bad example.... by gabrieltss · · Score: 2, Informative

    "As an example: Here is a problem given to you by a customer: "Size the work effort that you personally will require to install DB2 on my AS400 box""

    DB2 is already installed on your AS/400 box by default - it's part of the OS.
      This would show me the customer is a DULT and doesn't know anything about the system they bought/use.

    (I'm a former AS/400 operator/Administrator/RPG developer - Turned Java programmer).

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  30. Re:First arrival by proc_tarry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's really sad that what our country needs most to remain competitive in the future is more young people learning science and engineering. But because of the effects of globalization our advice to them is to avoid these fields.

    It's pretty simple really:
    Nationalism = what's best for us, at the cost of everyone else
    Globalism = what's best for the world, at the cost of the least efficient (in this case us)

  31. so they outsource jazz musicians to India too? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's all fault of John McLaughlin!

    1. Re:so they outsource jazz musicians to India too? by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      If you want a more literal outsourcing of playing jazz parts to India, don't forget this excellent Miles Davis inspired CD compilation.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
  32. Invaluable employee... there is no such thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been outsourced out of two jobs. (So far.) In one case more than a thousand IT people were laid off; in my department 10 veteran programmers were replaced with two very nervous Indian kids with a combined total of six months' experience in the product. Does that make sense? It makes perfect sense if you understand this: outsourcing is about cutting costs, period. Yes, quality went to hell. But quality is very difficult to measure, and the people hurt by the sudden sharp drop in service were far, far below the CIO. The very same CIO that can walk into the CEO's office with a PowerPoint showing how he's removed the, um, "fat" from his organization.

    Yes, you are an invaluable employee and they won't dare get rid of you... but only if your CIO
    has the vision and brains to defend your salary and benefits based on the true ROI of your work. If he or she is out to cut costs, then you can be replaced. It does not matter if the people replacing you aren't as qualified or wonderful as you. They cost less, programmer A = programmer B, don't let the doorknob etc, etc.

  33. Re:First arrival by Jansingal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    sad but true. thank you that idiot george bush

  34. Perceived value != Real worth by bjourne · · Score: 1

    The author is plain wrong. Learning new languages and tools improves your skills, yes. But that won't reduce the risk of your job getting outsourced or increase your salary. It is all about perception. Someone is valuing and someone decides whose jobs are getting outsourced. What that person, or group of persons, think is your value to the company is the only thing that matters. You might be the best employee at the company working with a team of incompetents that takes all your glory, then it doesn't matter how many languages you know or how many open source projects you have released.

    Value your yourself highly and don't be afraid to let others see it. That's the best tip I know for being successful.

  35. The keys to keeping your job in the global economy by Dex5791 · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Agree to work for 75% of market rate or less Step 2: Always get to work early Step 3: Do lots of important stuff Step 4: Leave late in the evening Step 5: Never ask for a raise

  36. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest law. Once you pass the bar, you have a meal ticket for life, and almost assuredly a six digit salary in a few years, possibly seven depending on region.

    To boot, you work 8 hours a day, five days a week, no worries about overtime.

    Attorneys get respect by Joe Sixpack. The tech field sadly gets nothing but contempt.

  37. Re:First arrival by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Learn Spanish and get a masters license in some skilled trade.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  38. Re:First arrival by CogDissident · · Score: 1

    It isn't IT that is the field to avoid, but to avoid grunt work in IT. There will always be a need for on-site staff for databases and computers. The part that gets outsourced overseas is always the programming. The actual database and business-rule customization of the programs still stays in the US.

  39. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the OP:

    Chad draws upon the open source movement as well, highlighting ways that contributing to and learning from open source can improve your chances of having your job go to India .

    There, fixed that for ya.

  40. You're not looking at this systemically by OneIfByLan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I entirely agree that individually you need to be as valuable as possible. That's why all the CCNPs I know are working to finish their CCIEs and the CCIEs are working on their Juniper/Avaya certs. All of this is on top of their technical degrees.

    The problem is that you and your "invaluable" skills really aren't being taken into account. It doesn't matter if firing you would cripple the company because we're typically thinking 90 days at a time. If you replace a $150K CCIE with a $20K wanna-be, then you as a manager can claim a $130K dollar "savings." Hooray for you, here's your bonus.

    When that $20K wonder takes all of your customers down -- and here's the beauty part -- you aren't blamed for it. No one is currently drawing the line between your $130K savings and the customers that walked with their millions of dollars.

    The really scary part? I frequently work on municipal, hospital and 911 systems. Infrastructure disasters here can cost lives. I've watched the cheap guys take down emergency systems, and I tried not to think about the calls that were getting dropped as I fought to get them back online. I push the frantic calls for help out of my mind, because if I let my imagination run with what an unanswered 911 call could mean...

    The cheap guy's response as I berated him for putting lives at risk? Basically, what do I care? It's not my country.

    Every one of the guys I know are putting in 60-hours weeks routinely. Hours like that mean divorces. They mean early heart attacks. They mean neglected children left to raise themselves. They mean broken homes with the societal carnage that goes with it.

    It's the classic tragedy of the commons. The people who lead our country are insulated from the carnage associated with gutting our workforce. In the meantime, my country is falling apart. I've got a CS degree from a prestigious college, a CCIE, and a decade of international experience and even I am feeling the heat. I weep for those not as lucky as I.

    We're gutting our middle class. We just are, and if you don't see it, it's probably because you're young. I hear your "Well, it's not a problem if you're the best of the best" bravado, and I wonder what you propose to do with the other 99% percent of the population, because they're not just going to just disappear.

    I was downtown during the LA Riots of '92. Rodney King and Daryl Gates might have been the spark that set it off, but that riot burned on the fuel of unemployed people. Last time I was in LA, more than a decade later, the damage still hadn't been repaired.

    I'd really prefer not to see that happen on a country-wide scale. But me and the other gray-hairs are worried, especially the people I know out in LA. We're getting that "vibe" again.

    Things are stretched beyond breaking. Our teachers have flat-out given up. Our cops are showing the sort of violent and unstable behavior you would expect from PTSD. The wave of earnest enlistees that flooded the military after 9/11 have become the sort of weary jaded bastards that could put the most burned-out Vietnam Vet to shame.

    We are, for the first time in history, routinely using mercenaries in almost every level of our military and law enforcement. I'm seeing military families, families with generations of service, hang up their uniforms and forbid their children from serving.

    Our hospitals are literally allowing people to die from neglect in the ER. Our bridges are falling down. Our electrical grid is one snapped breaker from going dark.

    Katrina should have been our moment of clarity. The fact that it so clearly wasn't scares me to death.

    But you go ahead, and keep humming that "I'm the best, I'm the best, I'm the best" mantra. Keep closing your eyes as tight as you can and shut your ears tighter. Find a good teddy bear, because the old man, the old man has seen all this before.

    I'm terrified of where this train is going.

    1. Re:You're not looking at this systemically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're gutting our middle class. We just are, and if you don't see it, it's probably because you're young. I hear your "Well, it's not a problem if you're the best of the best" bravado, and I wonder what you propose to do with the other 99% percent of the population, because they're not just going to just disappear.

      He's not thinking about the other 99% of the population, it's not the MEist generation's problem.

    2. Re:You're not looking at this systemically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for the record, and this isn't for you, this is for the other /.ers, there are some of us youngsters that see this as well. The problem, imho, is not capitalism, is not communism, its that people are gaming the system. I think all the bad things on the internet give us insight into the fact that all systems, regardless of how well thought-out can be gamed. That is what is happening. The bean counters should not be running the business - the employees should be. I would even argue that Bill Gates has gamed the system quite well, his current wealth can testify to that.

      In short, the problem isn't the current system, the problem is the assholes screw the people who aren't assholes; the nice guys generally finish last.

    3. Re:You're not looking at this systemically by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      But you go ahead, and keep humming that "I'm the best, I'm the best, I'm the best" mantra. Keep closing your eyes as tight as you can and shut your ears tighter. Find a good teddy bear, because the old man, the old man has seen all this before.

      What astounds me is that there are people who will genuinely reply that your post amounts to nothing more than faggy hippie whining. I'm amazed at how so many people on the right end up identifying with their subjugators.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:You're not looking at this systemically by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I have to really thank you for this post.

      I'm not "yet" involved with seeing lots of outsourcing, but your description of how business decisions are made, are to my mind, very well put. Underlying this, is a sort of elitist detachment. A sense that "everyone brought it on themselves."

      I think that ethical behavior, and sticking by employees as valuable assets, is actually the best thing to do and makes financial sense. And if it doesn't -- life is short, do you really need to sacrifice people to make a little more money?

      But there is no downside to being short-sighted and greedy.

      Does anyone know of any software, that they actually want and admire, that is being done by some outsourced company? Anecdotally, most of us can name a few of our least favorite companies, who we only use because we have no choice, and a large contingent of their business is outsourced with no regard to accountability.

      I personally think its harder to find a smart engineer, than it is a greedy businessman to replace an executive. If it weren't a club - they'd be outsourcing the board of directors at most companies.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    5. Re:You're not looking at this systemically by WhiteHorse-The+Origi · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of the post. Well said. I think it's best for us just to move to the sidelines and let everyone else duke it out. Put your energy into something you care about. Let them have their outsourced and pirated goods. I strictly use open source now and contribute as much as I can. It appears to be having an effect.
      This is a race to the bottom, and the bottom is zero(free software). The sooner good people switch, the sooner the Microsofts will fall. Just refuse to work on any projects with that crap. Stop paying for a CCIE CCNA etc because you're dumping money into the very companies that are outsourcing.
      Funk that CISCO crap... BSD baby!! Wooo!!

  41. It's easy to say that. by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 1

    One day, no matter how much training you get or how well you do your job or even how productive you are, your life and career will be shaken up. With globalization and technology, things change fast and in directions that you will never anticipate. The guys that survive are the "people" people - not the die -hard techies. Looking back, I really wish I knew that and I really wish I wasn't so goddamn arrogant to think that people and networking skills weren't necessary because I mistakenly thought that technical ability mattered above all.

  42. Re:First arrival by my_left_nut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd say it would depend on what stage of your career you are in, and what responsibilities you either have or think you might end up having.

    If you are in your early 20s, and want to have a family, or own a house definitely change to something that will help you 20 years from now when you are in your 40s. Given the globalization issues, I wouldn't recommend putting all your eggs into any job that could be done through an internet pipe.

    I'm in my late 40s, the mortgage is over halfway paid off, and there's no kids to worry about. Worse case is that I lose my permanent position job (for whatever reason), and have to take a pay cut, or do temporary consulting at bargain rates.

    I chose IT 25 years ago because I knew it would afford me a nice standard of living, that at least for the foreseeable future there likely would be a job that would pay enough to cover the kind of house I wanted to live in, and leave a little extra for vacations, emergencies, retirement, weddings, etc. It worked out, but I wouldn't recommend it for someone starting their career today. It's definitely a sad state of affairs.

    I'd say that one could learn to do something that you can't outsource, like nursing - but even that isn't guaranteed. Many of those jobs are being "insourced" - that is people from developing countries are being hired here at a lower rate than what us locals are willing to bear.

    I guess the best bet (if you don't want to deal with the uncertainty of working for yourself) is for whatever you decide to do, to find a job working for a small company that has a good business model. One, which as part of its culture, tries to keep money local -including the money that it pays to its employees. One that really doesn't have the resources to outsource or sponsor people for insourcing.

  43. Re:First arrival by Wister285 · · Score: 0

    Off-shoring seems to be just a bunch of FUD designed by the few that have lost their jobs as well as fear-mongering isolationists. In the book What Color is Your Parachute?, it is said that we appear to have only lost 500,000 jobs out of the total 143,700,000 jobs that we have. That is 0.348%. That is so small, it really doesn't matter. With all of the horror stories you hear of off-shoring, it almost seems like it's going to be a matter of time before people realize that is isn't all that it is made out to be.

    If you lost your job, I'm sorry that it happened, but it shouldn't be too hard if you are at least a decent worker and are able to not be totally asocial. Go read What Color is Your Parachute? if you need help. It's a great book.

  44. That would be a good trick by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

    however just one tip with a warning: "This information is my opinion on April 11, 2007 and will probably change tomorrow"

    That would be a good trick, considering the book was published in September, 2005.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  45. Re:First arrival by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Grunt work? Setting up and administering systems is "grunt work" in my book. Programming requires far more skill and expertise.

    This is basically like if the auto industry collapsed in America (which looks likely, judging by GM's and Ford's current performance). No one would want to be an automotive or mechanical engineer, because there'd be no jobs for them unless they moved to Japan, Germany, India, or China. However, there will still be jobs as mechanics, since all the foreign-made cars will need service here. I'm not trying to denigrate mechanics (it's similar to an electronics technician in the electrical world, who has to know a lot about what he's working on, even though he didn't design it), but being an automotive engineer and designing cars is generally preferable to being a mechanic and fixing cars, and also requires more education, and pays better.

  46. Re:First arrival by Xonstantine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget to blame the Shrub for the eventual decay of the earth's orbit until it is consumed by the sun.

  47. Re:First arrival by Xonstantine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The idea that programming is mere grunt work or that programmers can be commoditized is one reason why so many software projects and products are utter crap.

    Also, with the advent of server virtualization and data center consolidation and aggregation, those system engineer jobs may not be so safe and plentiful onshore in a few years, especially when so much administration can be done remotely. Maybe the CAT5E cable monkeys can unionize to protect their wages.

  48. Re: There go the Slashdotter "outsourcing" whining by sundarvenkata · · Score: 1

    Before the slashdot crowd turns akin to angry villagers wielding pitchforks, let us just put things in perspective. Money *IS A GOOD* tool although it may not be the *ONLY GOOD* tool. However it is a darn good yardstick to bring the best in everyone (which is why capitalism has worked so well for this country over all these years). If you feel that you lost your job to a fellow "Starvin Marvin" in India, there is a good chance that there is at least *one thing* that is wrong with you. I agree that *outsourcing* is not the best thing since sliced bread. All these outsourcing-bets-on-quantity-not-quality rants aside, not all outsourcing sucks balls. However if you want to prove otherwise, show your company that how outsourcing will not be a good strategical choice, how communication gap could be a stumbling block in the progress of the company, why you cannot find Haskell programmers in India....

  49. Probably more valuable than what I got by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    When my job was sent to India, we got two 1-hour group sessions with a job coach, who had absolutely no experience in our field or what we were experiencing, and who admitted up front that he usually does sessions a minimum of 8 hours long.

    I will say that his resume style ideas seem to have been good advice, if nothing else.

    But I think I'd have rather had a book like this, were that it had existed.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  50. Re:First arrival by triathlon4life · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know of very few programmers who can effectively administer.

    I know of very few administrators who can effecively "code"

    Okay, next topic.

  51. Re:First arrival by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't count on that. With technologies like HP's Integrated Lights Out and Dell's Remote Access Console boards the only thing I can't do today from anywhere in the world is actually put a server in a rack. With things like Virtual Desktop Initiatives, there's no need for on-site techs, either. Give every user a smart terminal and a phone number to call for issues. If something happens to the terminal itself, the user can swap it themselves with one of the dozen spares you keep in the closet. The only folks who have nothing to fear from outsourcing for the immediate future are the rack and cable monkeys, but even they can be gotten rid of by simply moving your whole data center to India. Of course, in order to provide 24/7 support, they'd then have to have support folks in the US to do stuff during the Indian "night". :)

    --
    Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
    http://www.workorspoon.com
  52. Re:First arrival by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Informative

    Obviously you don't know many attorneys.

    Fact is, very few high-level jobs let you work 40 hours a week. Just the way it is. You're right on one point though, there are certainly no worries about overtime.

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  53. Do you love programming by stbill79 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's really the question?

    Cause the fact of the matter is that whether you specifically keep your job or not is not really the point. Instead, potential IT workers need to realize that wages will be pushed down across the board.

    If you love the job, then you've got a choice - do what you like even in a job market that does not compensate you fairly (relative to other industries where your brain will get you far), or get out now and start concentrating on an industry that will not be marganilized as much - think law, finance, etc.

    If, on the other hand, you can tolerate programming, but are not necessarily passionate about it, and are more concerned about making good money, having a more prestigious job, less risk - probably less brain intensive than software developing - get the hell out of the industry now! You will be miserable competing with third world wages while doing a pretty tough job.

    A few years out of college and I'm learning myself - I worked my ass off in engineering school for five years. The guys that had Fridays off (business school) and did about 5 hours of homework a week are making the same as me. Their most complex assignments use Excel, while mine require far more intelligence, experience, and energy. I'm very confident in the belief that, even though far less people could do what I do compared to the amount that could do what they do, our salaries do not differ due to the offshoring/H1B visa probs.

    In the end, you'll just get pissed off doing more work than everyone else, while getting paid the same (or less), having a position that is constantly being threatened by management to be 'outsourced,' and absolutely earning no respect.

    Just my .02

    1. Re:Do you love programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mind it so much, because as a programmer for almost 15 years (with a B.S. CSci) I simply know I'm better than them. Furthermore, I could probably start my own company tomorrow if necessity required it. Here's my assignment to YOU. Get to know someone who works the blue-collar industries, maybe a plumber, electrician, etc. and ask him whether he works his tail off, works free overtime, etc. You'll find out that he doesn't. He passes his extra work/trouble directly onto his customer. IT has degenerated into a sissy industry, with script kiddies, people bending over backwards, wages going down, requirements going up. I'm certainly not going to steer my kids into this profession. Maybe plumbing or electrician work. I may yet go there myself.

  54. Mod parent up! by jlowery · · Score: 1

    Short-term cost benefits are exactly what's driving the industry. Long-term failures are never attributed to the instigator of offshoring. In fact, the long-term failures necessite further cost reductions, and further layoffs.

    Sooner than they think, the third-world wannabes will become has-beens themselves. Africa is still a vast, unexplored region of cheap labor. In large corporations, head count per dollar is what's visible, and cost-cutting will win out over touchy-feely (and fungible) quality and schedule considerations for a long time to come yet.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
    1. Re:Mod parent up! by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 0, Troll

      I always thought we should outsource our call centers to the middle east. Give the terrorists something productive to do :-)

    2. Re:Mod parent up! by level4 · · Score: 1

      500 million people, an entire subcontinent, all terrorists, huh?

      Your ignorance is sickening.

      --
      Let my new 7-digit UID be a lesson to all - write down your passwords.
    3. Re:Mod parent up! by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your illogic is sickening.

      Your statement does not need to be true for mine to be. Dumbass!

  55. I can't prevent my job from being outsourced by Rastl · · Score: 1

    Gee, I didn't realize I had the ability to decide if my job gets outsourced or not. Somehow I always thought the beancounters in corner offices made that decision. How silly of me.

    This advice is of some use in keeping yourself marketable in case you become unemployed but there's nothing the individual employee can do if the decision is made. Trying to give that impression is just, well, wrong.

    And why is outsourcing any different from downsizing, rightsourcing, consolidation, 'tightening our belts' or any other justification they use to reduce the labor force at a company? Yes, I realize they're still paying for the product but in terms of the employees affected it's the same result. You're shown the door.

    Yet another author trying to sell books with those trigger words. "Oh noes! My job may be outsourced! How convenient that this book is available to tell me how to prevent that!"

    Yawn. Pass.

  56. Re:First arrival by the+kostya · · Score: 1

    The only folks who have nothing to fear from outsourcing for the immediate future are the rack and cable monkeys, but even they can be gotten rid of by simply moving your whole data center to India. Of course, in order to provide 24/7 support, they'd then have to have support folks in the US to do stuff during the Indian "night". :)

    They can pay someone to cover the night shift. Labor is cheep enough there that they can have 3 squads of admins.

  57. Outsource providers - you get what you deserve by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just been my experience, but the projects I've seen utilizing outsource developers have been almost universally bad. The foreign outsource providers have a small core here, but the heavy lifting is done in India or Pakistan. The work I've seen with my own eyes has been pretty crappy, though YMMV. The sales guys and project managers are usually pretty good, but the coding quality can vary widely. When I say "vary widely" I really mean it can range from average to horrible. The funny thing is, when I point out coding issues, places where they didn't follow good design or where they did something really badly, the project manager runs back around to our CEO and whines that I'm being xenophobic. But I despise poorly constructed and commented code regardless of its national origin.

    If you're looking for .NET or Windows development, some of that work is adequate. But just that. The domestic contract providers are more consistent in the quality they deliver and you don't have to fight the language barrier, but their overhead is so high. I can't imagine, as easy as it is to fire people these days, that paying that overhead can be worth it.

    After getting into a position to make those decisions, my opinion is companies going low-cost outsource deserve what they get. Unfortunately, most companies are going to care more about the up front costs instead of either the build quality or time to market. And that gets worse in bigger companies, especially if there's a merger or acquisition going on. PM's can find their local dev's cut loose and get saddled with an outsource developer. That would suck.

    If you're worried about your job, the only job security you'll ever have is if you run your own company. I did that for a while. Ironically, that led to this job. Move up by moving out really does work. For sure you're never going to get anywhere stuck in a cubicle.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  58. Re:First arrival by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funeral. Home. Director. (or Owner if you can get the seed capital together).

    http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos011.htm

    Median annual earnings for wage and salary funeral directors were $49,620 in May 2006. The middle 50 percent earned between $37,200 and $65,260. The lowest 10 percent earned less than $28,410 and the top 10 percent earned more than $91,800.

    Salaries of funeral directors depend on the number of years of experience in funeral service, the number of services performed, the number of facilities operated, the area of the country, and the director's level of formal education. Funeral directors in large cities usually earn more than their counterparts in small towns and rural areas.

    There will always be people dying......

    Layne

  59. Eggs and Baskets... by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a touchy subject for everyone, I'm sure. However, you have to admit there's some good nuggets of advice in there.

    My background is in systems administration and engineering. We're not as bad off as software developers...yet. But I do know the day will come when it will be deemed too expensive to hire anyone but the best from my field locally too. Right or wrong, short-sighted or not, no one can compete with the greater numbers of lower-paid workers in other parts of the world. Look at what happened to manufacturing -- that's coming for almost every non-management job in the US and Europe. It's a done deal, we let it happen, and now we have to work with the resulting landscape.

    So, if you want to stay employed, you have a couple of choices.

    • You could get out of the IT field and into something else, technical or non-technical. This country desperately needs good math and science teachers, for example.
    • You could go into management. It's stable, and you'll never be out of work if you can do the whole politics thing. (Not my bag though -- to me, IT project management is all about meetings, conference calls and bugging people you don't control to get things done.)
    • You could constantly improve your skills and become a true expert at what you do. That's one of the things the review of the book is advocating, and I think it's critical.

    I freely admit that I'm not a big fan of outsourcing...projects take way too long because of the language barrier, incomplete requirements, and the difficulty of coordinating efforts. BUT...it's here. Instead of fighting and complaining about it, work within the system you're given. Become really good at what you do. Study. Keep learning outside of your skill set. Get yourself a reputation for being a problem solver.

    Why do I say this? One of the tips was to never put your eggs in one basket. That's excellent advice. I'm constantly learning outside of my specialty because I know Microsoft isn't going to be the king forever.

    Anyone who's tried hiring people lately knows that the field is still full of people who truly don't understand things beyond the narrow scope of duties they have. These are the "eggs in one basket people" and the most likely to be replaced if they are deemed too expensive. I would much rather hire a natural troubleshooter and problem solver who can figure out the details of a system after reading the manuals and playing a little. The innate ability has to be there. Everything else is teachable.

    Some specialization is good too. You have to balance the need to be a good generalist with having a current, in-depth subset of your skills that you can market. Look at all the OpenVMS and IBM mainframe consultants out there. They print their own paychecks going from one weird specialist project to the other. Along the way, they pick up skills.

    In summary, stay educated to stay employed. Never assume your job situation won't change, and be ready for anything.

  60. Well, if they would actually *DO* the job ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    I recently had a problem with dbx on a AIX system. Yes, from the "Theater of the Hard to Believe", but even the modest dbx didn't work. Our support folks opened up a ticket. Since I had, in a former life, done some kernel development for AIX, I wrote to the folks in Austin. The answer:

    "This is supported by IBM India now ... good luck with debugging with printf"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  61. Re:First arrival by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

    So you're saying that the people who complain about outsourcing are can't get jobs because they're not decent workers or they act like Napoleon Dynamite? I wish that were true...

  62. Re:First arrival by florescent_beige · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And what would you suggest Obi Wan? Maybe Medicine? Law? Literature? Give some alternatives.

    For anyone with aptitude in math and physics and who is always trying to figure out how stuff works, you could consider getting into the field of aircraft structural engineering.

    I manage the structural engineering group at a medium-sized Canadian company. Yesterday we tried to offer an experienced guy a $75/hour contract job and he politely declined. We can't afford him. He is contracting because he wants to and has several other offers. With bonuses and OT he would have grossed around $200K per year and it wasn't enough.

    I have two Indian subcontractors working for me with another on the way. We do that not because of the cost but because it's so hard to find good people in this field. I have working for me one Indian/Canaidan girl, a French/Canadian guy, a plain vanilla Canaidan guy, the two Indians, a Moroccan, a Brit, and a Venezuelan guy working for me. Americans don't seem to be on the market because they are all sucked up by US defence companies that like US citizens for security reasons.

    The labour market is tight right now. It is cyclic but I have to admit I haven't seen any unemployment amongst my peers in 20 years, the last rough spot being the late 70's/early 80's.

    Here's how you get into it. A bachelors in mechanical or aerospace engineering is basic. Most people have a Masters, try to orient that toward materials or structural analysis. A thesis on composites would be good. The education is hard, you have to think of it on the same level as getting a medical degree. Suffer through it if you have to.

    Develop an interest in manual analysis with a pencil. I get lots of resumes from people that can make finite element meshes and run NASTRAN, what I want is people who know what a piece of structure should look like and why and you get that ability from just sitting and thinking about things and reading the bible "Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures" by E.H. Bruhn. That book is 40 years old and anyone who knows it forward and backward can get their $200K job.

    Then get a job with a large prime like Boeing for 5 years. Think of that like your internship. At the end of that you can start contracting, or move jobs to push your salary up. I would recommend contracting, not just for the money but for the contacts you make. It's a small world in this business and if you know the people you can always get a job.

    So if you are 18 now, you are looking at a plan that will get you in a really good place when you are 30. Not many people want seem to have the stomach for that kind of commitment, but it'll pay off, I promise. And, all along the way you get to work on pretty cool stuff.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  63. Your services are DESPERATELY needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to lead and participate in the efforts to clean up shitty Indian code that comes back. The garbage code that these monkeys turn over almost always needs a major refactoring after they've had their paws on it for a while; hell, you could make a comfortable living in the US specializing in nothing but cleaning up cut-and-paste code and duplicate classes. Sure, it's not glorious work, but it'll pay the bills and it's better than standing around whining about your job getting shipped overseas.

    If you're such a crappy coder that these guys in India fresh out of an "In 21 Days" book can replace you by writing the hideous software they do, you're not bringing much value to your employer in the first place.

  64. How about some basics by caywen · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to: Work hard, be smart, learn, and respect others? I tend to think these things are 90% of being successful, and the other 10% are the kinds of tactics the author lays out. I haven't seen people pull their former coworkers into a company because they decided to learn XYZ. Chances are, XYZ programmers are not in short supply. It's the other qualities that make one a pleasure to work with productively that trumps everything else.

  65. The best way to stay employed in the 21st century by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Lean to say "you want fries with that?", "Hey buddy, can you spare some change?", "Hey, that's my shopping cart!".

    Pretty empty under the overpass tonight.

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  66. Outsource Hysteria by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I'd say the outsource hysteria is almost over from my vantage point. And if it is not, and still considered the next best thing to sliced bread by competitors - all the better. Meanwhile I'm recommending to my customers to 'outsource' to sourceforge.net.
    "This indian crew ABC can do X for Y Euros less." - "Well, you can get Z, which has all X needs plus some extra features for free. Or at least a 5 minute download. It's called 'Open Source'". "Oh, really? That's cool."

    Ever wondered why there's hardly any outsourcing complaints in the web developement field? That's the reason. At the quality and price I delivered in my last PHP project I was competing with eastern europe. And I won both ways. 85% of the work is finished by a download of the correct package and 3 hours of setup by an experienced developer on site. Nothing more to outsource there. Once the diversification in desktops and servers has merged into OSS/*nix, I presume it will be that way for most scenarios. All else will be high profile specialist work anyway.

    My 2 eurocents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  67. Re:First arrival by tattood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Attorneys get respect by Joe Sixpack. The tech field sadly gets nothing but contempt.

    I think you got that backwards. How many lawyer jokes are there compared to IT worker jokes?

    --
    WTB [sig], PST!!!
  68. Not all about money by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    I would suggest law. Once you pass the bar, you have a meal ticket for life...

    Provided that you can live with yourself. The usual goal in life is to be happy and while money may help it is rarely sufficient by itself.

  69. Garbage in garbage out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive generally found that the portions of code that are outsourced to India are the grunt work.
    Usually the stuff no one else wants to work on, almost always with little to no documentation or design direction.

    And remember also, that those Indian companies are thinking of the bottom line too. They don't hire the best of the best programmers to write your outsourced code, they hire the cheapest people they can find.

    If you expect 100 first year grads to produce a masterpiece for you with no direction or mentoring... well.. ya.. that doesn't happen here so why would it happen there.

    You don't have to look far anywhere in the world to find low bid contractors that produce garbage work.

    Being flexible to change is really the only broad advice anyone could give.

    Corporate IT firms usually have trouble working with the medium + small business range. But individual contractors can make a killing there.

  70. Anti-Indian? by Venik · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why would I wonder if it's "anti-Indian"? Who da hell cares? India is the primary source of underqualified IT labor. If anything, we should thank India's colleges for giving IT offshoring a bad name.

  71. If you can't out-code them... by LKM · · Score: 1

    Also, start your own company and show what you can do,

    Of course you won't be able to compete with the companies that do outsource their jobs since their prices are lower than yours.

    They will be able to out-code you, but it's not like you have no advantages. For example, you can concentrate on specialized markets. If a company is big enough to outsource, you don't want to be in the same market. Target niches that aren't served by larger companies. Or write Mac software, Mac users are willing to spend money on well-designed software, and many larger companies don't care about the Mac market because it's too small.

    You can out-design them. You're on your home turf. You know the language. You know the people who will use your software. The outsourcing company will write the code per the spec; you can write the code your customers actually want. Run usability test. Hire a graphics artist to make your application attractive.

    There are many ways how you and two or three friends can compete with a few dozen indian programmers. Don't try to out-code them. Play to your own strengths.

    You probably won't get rich, but it's certainly possible to make a good living writing code, even if you aren't living in India.

  72. Re:First arrival by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anything that we can do here, they can do there.

    And most often for less.

    They made buying generic drugs illegal here, they made
    going to Canada for your drugs illegal.

    Protect the corporate profits, not the citizens.

    Saw an old man boarding a bus on TV saying he was a criminal
    and grinning. They go as a busloads to Canada to get
    their 'illegal' Meds so they don't die because they are poor.

    It is pathetic.

    We have billion dollar bail outs of banks, and ppl are thrown
    out of their homes.

    Why no bail out for the home owners ? Protecting Cash Inc. again.

    I'd say a job that requires a Security Clearance, or the
    person needs to speak very clear English. That doesn't
    equal many jobs for the average person though.

    Everything else is fair game for being offshored, outsourced,
    near sourced, Alphabet VISA'd, or worked by border jumpers.

    Things like the L1 Visa have 'unlimited' caps on them, and
    H1-B has been raised to huge levels per year.

    Once the VISA workers live here, they get a guest VISA
    for Mom, Dad, Brother, Sister, etc etc etc.

    The person with the guest VISA never goes home and you meet
    him at the local fast food place serving you food, or quickie
    mart selling you your gas, etc etc etc.

    This game is going to continue until they can reduce wages
    on any and all jobs to the point the Corporate Whores are
    happy with their level of profits.

    In case you have not noticed they always want more...

    You do the math...

    The race for the Bottom is on ! Who is the winner ?

    Not the Sled Dog ....and that is the working class.

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  73. Re:First arrival by tattood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does that book say what industry those jobs were in? I'd be willing to bet that most of them are in the IT, high tech or software development industries. The point of this article was in relation to IT and software development, not all jobs. Sure the people who's jobs can't easily be off shored (Doctors, Lawyers, teachers) don't have anything to worry about, but for those who's job may be subject to off shoring, this book might be useful.

    --
    WTB [sig], PST!!!
  74. Re:First arrival by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your listening to corporate Propaganda again.

    The H1-b workers ALONE have exceeded your tiny 500k number.

    Do some research before you post.

    The Alphabet list of VISA's are listed here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_visas#Select_List_of_the_Various_Types_of_Visas

    Sell your Corporate Whore Bull$hit somewhere else.

    The truth is the truth, no amount of bull$hit is going
    to cover it up.

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  75. Self-Inflicted Gunshot Wounds by Carcass666 · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, pure coding jobs in the "Western world" are going away. The "cheap code" genie is out of the bottle.

    • There is such a low expectation on quality for code these days (thanks M$) that a lot of management can assume that project will be delayed and most likely have bugs. There are a lot of reasons for this (changes in project specs, using cheap coders, buggy OS's and toolkits); but there is not a perceived value anymore in having in-house development (Infoworld just had an article on this)
    • We have fought to keep useless certifications from the programming world. Because of this, one programming peep looks about the same as another to the HR dept and the people who budget programming labor
    • There is a lot of really good, free (as in beer) code - operating systems, office suites, etc. While this has done little to wedge M$ out of their desktop monopoly, it does contribute to the opinion (admittedly held by the ignorant) that coding can be had on the cheap.

    I think the "salvation" of those of is with programming and systems experience is to leverage our skills in leadership positions where we enable companies to do more outsourcing with successful outcomes. Would I like to be paid to code all day? Absolutely. But I don't think that's realistic when somebody claims that they can do the same job for less than half of what I make. The survivors, the pointy-hair bosses and consultants, stay around because they market their ability to get things accomplished. Our best hope for survival as senior developers is to sell upper management that we are their best chance to successfully use the inexpensive labor they are so desperate to hire.

  76. Re:First arrival by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    The only folks who have nothing to fear from outsourcing for the immediate future are the rack and cable monkeys, but even they can be gotten rid of by simply moving your whole data center to India.

    Good luck with that during one of the indian summer power outages.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  77. Re:First arrival by Wister285 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fair enough. My only two responses to that would be how many of those 500,000 are call center jobs? Also, a lot of IT jobs simply can't be farmed out because of security controls.

    My point is more though that there are plenty of jobs out there, but you might need to do more than just throw your resume out there and demand employment. I also think that the disadvantages of off-shoring are becoming much, much more apparent now and it is not going to be as attractive as it once was.

  78. Re:Survivors - bad example.... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    This would show me the customer is a DULT and doesn't know anything about the system they bought/use.

    But those who call their customers DULTs won't survive! Even if it's true.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  79. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    To boot, you work 8 hours a day, five days a week, no worries about overtime.

    *Boggles* You've obviously never been a lawyer.

    (just as an example, many of the prestigious law firms want you to bill at least 2,000 hours in a year only to be eligible for a bonus - that's over 38 hours per week assuming you don't take any vacation, and that's purely billable hours, so expect to be working a LOT more than that)

  80. Re:First arrival by afabbro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Median annual earnings for wage and salary funeral directors were $49,620 in May 2006. The middle 50 percent earned between $37,200 and $65,260. The lowest 10 percent earned less than $28,410 and the top 10 percent earned more than $91,800.

    Have fun trying to live on $50K in any major or minor city in the USA, particularly if you want to have a family.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  81. Re:First arrival by afabbro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Grunt work? Setting up and administering systems is "grunt work" in my book. Programming requires far more skill and expertise.

    He's here all week. Tip your waitresses.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  82. Re:First arrival by afabbro · · Score: 1

    Your listening to corporate Propaganda again....Do some research before you post...Sell your Corporate Whore Bull$hit somewhere else...The truth is the truth, no amount of bull$hit is going to cover it up.

    Well, there you have it.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  83. Re:First arrival by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to blame the Shrub for the eventual decay of the earth's orbit until it is consumed by the sun.

    That's actually Cheney's fault.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  84. Re:The best way to stay employed in the 21st centu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way things are going I might be joining you under the overpass.

  85. Re:First arrival by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Develop an interest in manual analysis with a pencil. I get lots of resumes from people that can make finite element meshes and run NASTRAN, what I want is people who know what a piece of structure should look like and why and you get that ability from just sitting and thinking about things and reading the bible "Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures" by E.H. Bruhn. That book is 40 years old and anyone who knows it forward and backward can get their $200K job.

    Amazing how aeronautical engineering texts seem to stay the same - one om the ones I used was in a Smithsonian display. My structures prof was one of the best I had - he taught you to understand and visualize the affects of the various forces acting on a structure; not the use of rote calculations; as well as the proper way to use a plumbers wrench to calibrate train and pressure gauges. As he put it "Mother nature doesn't give a damn about your calculations..." forces. Doc Bailey was a real character.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  86. Re:First arrival by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have fun trying to live on $50K in any major or minor city in the USA, particularly if you want to have a family.

    Are you kidding? You must live in San Francisco or something.

    You can afford a home living in Houston making $35k/yr. Making $50k/yr in San Antonio is living like a king. If you're not living in NY, DC, or the West Coast, $50k/yr isn't bad.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  87. Re:First arrival by Ascoo · · Score: 1

    (just as an example, many of the prestigious law firms want you to bill at least 2,000 hours in a year only to be eligible for a bonus - that's over 38 hours per week assuming you don't take any vacation, and that's purely billable hours, so expect to be working a LOT more than that)

    Isn't 2000 hours a year normally the minimum for any job to be considered full time? 2000 hours / 50 weeks (2 weeks for vacation + holidays) is 40 hours a week (which is 8 hour days x 5 days/week). Granted I can't remember the last time I (science field) or anyone else I know (science and engineering fields) has worked only 40 hours a week, but.... 2000 hours a year doesn't seem like much of a requirement.

  88. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there's all the money to be made selling spare parts on the black market too!

  89. Re:First arrival by Ascoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have fun trying to live on $50K in any major or minor city in the USA, particularly if you want to have a family.

    Actually I live in NYC (Manhattan) with a wife and kid making less than $50K. It can be done, but don't expect to live the lap of luxury, or eat out, or have a car, or ... It's surely not "fun" but it beats not having anything.

  90. Of course not by Brain-Fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If today's corporations want their regular rank-and-file employees to wear many hats, be multi-talented, and have a lot of business skills, then they're simply not doing their own jobs correctly.

    When you are one of the major players in a monopoly or cartel-controlled industry, you can get away with that kind of sloth. All you really have to worry about is using your leverage in the market to make sure that when your employees leave and start their own business, they fail.

  91. A fundamental asymetry of offshoring by pfbram · · Score: 1

    The crux of the problem is that Fortune-500's can lower their greatest expenses: dodge corporate income taxes and hire developing world/sweatshop labor. But none of us can offshore OUR single greatest expense: housing. With the real estate bubble still going on, those of us trapped in the US will need to (a) pay a First World real estate bill (including leasing business space, etc. if you're self-employed) and (b) compete with the big companies that can take advantage of Free Trade, off-shoring, etc. to minimize their costs. Bottom-line, I'd go self-employed tomorrow if I felt I could make ends meet. This isn't just an IT problem. Stripmalls have been built within 10 minutes of my home, 2-3 years ago -- and have been vacant ever since. The owners of the property, clearly, can afford to sit on it forever. They don't need to lower their lease in order to get small business tenants. They are part of a non-local economy, probably a large development/holding corporation (possibly even foreign). I heard from a neighbor that in addition to business leasing costs, some of the owners also demand a percentage of profits. There's just no competing sometimes -- the market isn't exactly free (sometimes it's a racket). Although I've been a programmer (B.S. CSci) for more than a decade, I've had second thoughts about this industry. If I should lose my job, I'd probably change careers altogether. Something that can't be easily off-shored.

  92. Outsourcing is (relatively) good! by Baldrson · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Its better to lose a job to an Indian living in India than to an Indian living elsewhere.

    Ultimately, land is all "we" have and we shouldn't be giving it up to others without either a fight or a frontier to which we can escape.

    1. Re:Outsourcing is (relatively) good! by pfbram · · Score: 1

      Well, we have given it up. Most real equity, despite 500 years of colonization in North America, probably belongs to the government or banks (foreign and domestic). I'm hoping that Citibank, Rothschilds, JP Morgan, etc. responsible for the housing bubble in most western countries (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housing_bubble) will go over to India, shoot their real estate into the stratosphere so that a programmer over there needs to spend $275K for that starter home, and the off-shoring game will be over. But there's one problem with my theory. After India, I suspect Africa will be the next market for cheap programmers...

    2. Re:Outsourcing is (relatively) good! by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      What you don't get is that the land barons are flesh and blood creatures like the rest of us. When they start messing with our flesh and blood, which is what they are doing by getting the government to subsidize their property rights at the expense of our families -- with our ability to raise children...

      Ultimately, they depend on the government for their property rights and the government depends on the people, despite the strenuous efforts of those currently residing in Washington, D.C.

  93. The missing tip: Fix the broken laws. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Remove the loopholes that enable offshoring, and ensure that businesses cannot exit the US when faced with regulation.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  94. They took our jobs! by mreggen · · Score: 1
  95. ...followed by a completely incompetent answer. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    "This is supported by IBM India now ... good luck with debugging with printf"

    ...who probably know less about it than the Western counterpart.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  96. No, that's the government's title. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If you're worried about your job, the only job security you'll ever have is if work for the government

    Fixed that for you. Businesses do not have "divine right" over an indefinite area. Nor should they have it over the government, or any citizen who wishes to object.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  97. Stockholm Syndrome by OneIfByLan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you stop and look around at what's happening, it terrifies you. So you quit looking and try to kill or at least discredit the messenger.

    The last time I was in an emergency room I was escorting someone with uncontrolled bleeding. I had done my boy scout best, but I am not a medic. It was a three-hour wait while the orderlies joked about how much weed they were planning to smoke that weekend. When I asked for a doctor, they referred me to a security guard. I mentioned the incident to my doctor at my next visit. She winced and said "Yeah, we avoid that place like the plague when we can." It's the largest, best-funded hospital in the area.

    The last time I asked a cop for directions in a strange city -- wearing business casual clothes, mind you -- he placed his hand on his weapon and told me in rude terms he wasn't a tour guide. I'd like to think he was just a random jackass, but the attitude smelled like he was trying to bluff through insecurity and fear.

    The last time I went on a business trip, I watched a TSA agent browbeat and threaten a small clumsy woman with incarceration if she didn't take her shoes off faster. When I spoke to his supervisor, he called over an armed officer in uniform and threatened to arrest me. The supervisor caved and apologized when I pointed out the surveillance camera recording the incident.

    My kids' teachers have that vacant look of learned helplessness in their eyes. They were idealists once. It's been beaten out of them.

    There's a major elevated highway in my city. It's been basically condemned and it's still in use. When it falls, there's a large number of buildings and thoroughfares that it will take with it. Everybody knows. No one can do anything. I try to avoid it when I can.

    Forget McCain and Obama. We need a seance with Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Lincoln and both Roosevelts, Teddy and Frank. I honestly think it would take all six to get us out of this mess, after they kicked all of our respective asses for letting it get this bad.

    1. Re:Stockholm Syndrome by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Forget McCain and Obama. We need a seance with Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Lincoln and both Roosevelts, Teddy and Frank. I honestly think it would take all six to get us out of this mess, after they kicked all of our respective asses for letting it get this bad.

      Since that ain't a practical solution, what the hell can we do? The books I've been reading paint a grim picture if we look at this in a historical perspective. You can draw direct parallels between states and business in this regard. There will be some great combination of winning factors that will create an empire. The Dutch had masterful use of wind power, both on the land and sea. Their trading empire was world-spanning and awe-inspiring. But as their riches grew, they became more enamored with finance than the work of the merchant. Their system failed in favor of the Brits who ushered in the Industrial Revolution. 4/5ths of the world's coal production combined with efficient production of steel, steam engines to make all of that more efficient, it was a self-reenforcing cycle of success. But the Brits never really grew beyond the family firm, the enthusiastic tinkerers. The Americans and Germans applied scientific rigor and tremendous capital resources for labs and experimentation and were able to take the revolution to the next level. The Brits became enamored with finance, could not fathom how to upgrade their industrial infrastructure which had gone from world-leading to antiquated in two generations, there just wasn't the political will and foresight. Americans pushed to develop oil and easily stepped into the power vacuum created by the collapse of the British Empire after two world wars. And now America is at the end of empire.

      I swear, it's like a Greek tragic hero, the qualities that lead to the hero's greatness also sew the seeds of his own destruction. We build up this incredible, unsustainable society based on oil and are now incapable of seeing a way to a different future. Our leaders are more interested in looting what's left for profit and dashing before the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.

      With all the forces arrayed against us, I don't see how one man can make a real difference. I'd like to think Obama means well but he's got the Democratic enablers backing up Bush, fucking Nancy Pelosi screeching that impeachment is off the table, blocking real investigation into Bush's corruption because any close scrutiny would reveal Democrats fighting with Republicans for the right to fondle his balls.

      And now we have Bush and his idiots trying to restart the Cold War, trying to play nuclear Russian roulette with the Russians. What. The. Fuck.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:Stockholm Syndrome by OneIfByLan · · Score: 1

      Cheer Up, JollyReaper. We've been through worse than this.

      Right now we're fat, slow and stupid. That's bad. People like to point fingers at Bush, but Bush is just a symptom, not a cause. Any people dumb enough to almost elect Bush deserve to have him as president.

      The good news is we're basically bears. We've been fat, slow and stupid before. The good news is we can afford to be fat, slow and stupid. We're not Japan. We don't HAVE to trade with the outside world. We can feed ourselves, clothe ourselves, and get by on the oil we have. We can roll the clock back to a lifestyle of a century ago and get by.

      We'll have disasters, of course. Haymarket riots all over again. We'll burn a few of our cities down in frustration. People will die, but it's happened before. We lost, what, 25,000 people at Gettysburg alone?

      We may be headed into another great depression.
      I actually believe we're going to have a "soft" second American revolution, something a little stronger than the New Deal. We're going to default on the national debt. We're struggling to make the interest payments alone, and all it's going to take is one populist to say "Why are we sending the Chinese all our money?"

      Like any bankruptcy that came from idiocy, we'll learn and emerge stronger on the other side. There will be domestic riots and mayhem. We'll learn to refrain from foreign adventures unless there's no choice. When people learn to demand more from their government, we'll get it.

      When the misery is bad enough, people will learn. I just think we may have to redo the 1890s and the 1930s to make that happen.

      But I'd prefer not to.

  98. Re:First arrival by GBuddha · · Score: 1

    There will always be people dying......

    However, due to advances in medical science, the average life expectancy is going up, hence the rate at which people are dying will go down unless the growth in the birth rate + immigration balance it out.

  99. It's called removing things like Taft-Hartley. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    There are ways of doing it, but they require the mass rejection of business as an untouchable entity and the acceptance of business as a responsible member of the local community. That means that they incur some inescapable penalty that they avoid or pay.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  100. Easy Peasy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's bomb india. problem solved.

  101. :The keys to keeping your job in the economy by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    6. Remove the stranglehold that business has on the government.
    7. Ensure that what happened in 1980 leaves in 2009.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  102. No need to buy it... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    The Microsoft Library has a copy. Although it is currently checked out.

  103. I read this book a while back by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

    Despite the funny title, it's not that useful. The author says a lot of blatantly obvious stuff, and much of it seems to be stuff he's *thought about* that might work, not stuff he actually *did himself*. So to save you time here's the conclusion: Don't try and compete with India on price. Find an area you can specialize in where they absolutely need you on site or its a bleeding edge tech that's yet to appear in India. Emphasize quality: At $50 p/h you are still a better deal than a $10 p/h coder in a distant land if you are going to do a better job. I've a buddy who outsources his coders - he has a few good one he keeps - but he says most of them are a complete waste of time even talking to. Even with the ones he keeps he knows when they slack off he can tell but there's nothing he can do - he doesn't want to say anything that'll upset them because at that distance he has very little control. Despite all that he still uses them, but he does get very tired of the drawbacks.

  104. Re:First arrival by azakem · · Score: 1

    I would suggest law. Once you pass the bar, you have a meal ticket for life, and almost assuredly a six digit salary in a few years, possibly seven depending on region.

    To boot, you work 8 hours a day, five days a week, no worries about overtime.

    Can't... resist... feeding... troll...

    12*6 = 40?

  105. Re:First arrival by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even with life expectancy going up, people will eventually die......

    The "baby boomer" group is hitting retirement age / dying age. Even if they live longer, there are lots of them.
    The population growth is about 1.0%....but that is COMPOUNDING.
    The death rate in 2007 was about 83 per 10,000. In cities with populations approaching 1M, that's 8300 per year.
    The birth rate in 2007 was about 142 per 10,000. Almost twice as many people being born as dying.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States

    And it will be hard to outsource the job of funeral director to another country.

    "I'm sorry ma'am, but your husband's remains were shipped SmartPost and won't be available for viewing for another two weeks. Please accept our condolences."

    Layne

  106. Re: There go the Slashdotter "outsourcing" whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capitalism? The US Fortune-500 pretty much outsourced to China. Last I checked, that's a communist labor pool. We're well beyond the left/right, liberal/conservative, capitalist/socialist set of dualisms. This is "extraordinary money" vs. the individual.

  107. Re:The keys to keeping your job in the global econ by pfbram · · Score: 1

    That's interesting -- actually advocating a spiral to the bottom. I'd frankly rather get the pink slip, change careers into something that makes better cash and tell my supervisor what he can do with a substandard wage.

  108. Tip #53: *Be* valuable... by hotfireball · · Score: 1

    No matter you say, really valuable engineers that can invent things, design em and code, are always respected everywhere. No matter where you come from, even you are Sibarian white bear, but you can create OS kernel yourself from the scratch, you still will be very highly payed and very-very wanted.

  109. Re:First arrival by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Actually a socialized health care would save corporations billions. IT's not about money, it's about a stupid ideology that's making us the laughing stock of the world.

    And generic drugs are legal. I don't ahve a clue why you think otherwise.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  110. Re:First arrival by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well lawyers can't bill for every single hour they spend in the office. They do try though.

  111. You can't stop outsourcing by level4 · · Score: 1

    In a past life I was IT Manager at a couple of places. I have first-hand experience of an outsourcing event or two, so here's my observations.

    1. Low quality is an absolute myth

    I don't know where people get the idea that as a rule, all outsourced code is poor quality. That is absolute rubbish in my view.

    A company I worked for was building a new system for in-house document handling (it was a legal firm, docs are the lifeblood). At the time I had no idea who to hire, we couldn't do it in-house, so we devised a test - we'd hire 3 or 4 outsource/consulting agencies to do a small task, then hire the one we liked the most. I'm not really a programming god but I do know good code when I see it so I took part in the process.

    Two results were of such low quality we threw them out immediately. One of them was *local* and charged a lot of money for the privilege.

    Of the other two, the results were pretty good - the best results were more expensive but still less than half the price of the incompetent local consulting company. We took a vote and unanimously agreed to hire them.

    2. Set yourself up properly

    Their setup was that they had a local guy who knew his stuff. He'd communicate with us, the clients, and act as local liason. He'd deal with the remote staff - I can't even remember where they were - and make sure everything was cool, all the time.

    His service was *invaluable* and you can bet he made a lot of money. I would seriously recommend a lot of people who are afraid of losing their jobs to foreign outsourcing companies start thinking about setting themselves up as intermediataries for SMB like that guy did. You will make a fortune.

    As someone hiring an outsourcing team, I do not want to be on the phone to india/estonia/whereever. I don't want to organise everything. I want to talk to someone local, who knows the team, knows what they need to do a good job, will be my point of contact, and will see that I'm happy - and he should pass on most of the savings from the outsourcing but is welcome to keep a fair cut for himself. *Be that guy*. Hell, if I was going to change careers tomorrow, I'd be doing that.

    Outsourcing consultant, guys. Say it. Embrace the enemy. You sure as hell cannot beat them, so join them.

    You think you know good code from bad? Put that in the brochure. Sell yourself. You want to improve the world with good code? You can improve it a lot more if you leverage against an entire team! Pissed off at not being a manager yet? *Make yourself a manager* !

    3. This is completely unstoppable

    30 years ago, my country had a thriving textiles industry. Now, you'd be lucky to find a single textiles factory per state. No-one cried for the t-shirt machine operators, and no-one made an effort to "buy local" and save the local manufacturing jobs. It was inevitable. But the t-shirts are still designed here.

    20 years ago when I was in High School my bus ride took me past a factory that made actual computers. Obviously it is now closed, everything is made in East Asia. No-one paid triple the cost to buy local ... but it's still designed in the west.

    10 years ago you could make serious money just knowing HTML. That didn't last long did it?

    My point is things change. The jobs float up, nothing is set in stone. To be honest I am surprised programming is still so manual and low-level - maybe in another 10 years the whole programming field worldwide will be decimated by a decent system of code that writes code.

    Who will people complain to then?

    Half the programming jobs today exist only because there's no truly good open source modular code-sharing system. Come on you know it's true. Thousands of people are re-inventing the wheel even as we speak. There's nothing inherently wrong with cut and pasting code if it's *good* and it *fits* and it *works*. It's all just a matter of time.

    Things change. They will not stop changing because you fail to adapt. Tough love, some other commentors mentioned? No

    --
    Let my new 7-digit UID be a lesson to all - write down your passwords.
  112. Re:First arrival by 2short · · Score: 2, Informative

    Every time incomes come up, people say stupid stuff like that, because everyone is convinced it's impossible to live on any less than their own actually generous income.

    Median Household Income, New York City, 2007: $46K

    Half the households in NYC live on less than that.

  113. Re:First arrival by megaditto · · Score: 1

    In case you have not noticed they always want more...

    And you want less? (a simple yes or no would suffice)

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  114. Re:First arrival by megaditto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do some research before you post.

    The Alphabet list of Chemical Elements is listed here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_elements_by_name

    The truth is the truth, no amount of bull$hit is going
    to cover it up.

    (now, where is my Informative mod?)

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  115. 2 weeks of vacation? by zurtle · · Score: 1

    Remind me to never work in the US. We get four weeks minimum.

    Shocking dude. EU + Australia/NZ for the win.

    --
    Couldn't stand the weather
  116. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And generic drugs are legal. I don't ahve a clue why you think otherwise.

    Perhaps GP mispoke. There are plenty of drugs you cannot import because they are not FDA approved. It can be difficult importing items that are FDA approved but were previously exported on the understanding - implied or explicit - that they not be sold in the US. Often a drug is sold overseas at greatly reduced price to the US price. Sure we may get a discount on DVDs and CDs, but if you need 'scripts to live, then the latest Spiderman flick isn't tops on your budget.

    Actually a socialized health care would save corporations billions.

    Maybe. *shrug*. Corporations really shouldn't be providing this for employers any more than they should be providing houses or other essentials you don't want tied to your job. When you negotiate a mortgage, you can get a fixed rate for 30 years. Thirty fucking years! Health care via your employer has no such assurance. They change the plan, you lose your favorite doctor. You lose your job, you lose your plan (eventually) or pay out the ass for it. I'm 100% opposed to socialized medicine but I am 110% opposed to the status quo. It makes it hard to choose.

  117. Re:First arrival by oiron · · Score: 1

    Not a troll - just lawyer material, i guess...

  118. The 1 advice that beats these 52 is: by panda+cakes · · Score: 1

    Don't work in IT. If you want to code or do stuff with computers there are plenty of jobs in businesses selling actual software. Pay may not be as good but definitely better than collecting unemployment checks or what else do you do when your job goes to India. This industry is outsourcing-proof. If outsources could compete they would be pushing their own software instead of giving it to their US clients so those could sell at take most of the profit. Your skills don't become obsolete - if you knew C++ 20 years ago it's still the same old C++ (with a lot of new stuff you could learn and use for another 20 years). Algorithms, math - still all the same, we might be able to use more of them but the old knowledge has not gone away. You won't be in a hurry to learn the newest and bestest technology every few months - we have new C++ standard coming sometimes in next 2-3 years and it will probably take another couple of years for compilers to catch up and even then nobody will fire you for not knowing it. The only catch is that you need to be able to actually engineer some software, fancy certifications and knowledge of most recent buzzwords won't make you any money. Nowadays we see people trying to come in from IT and they look really pitiful on the interviews knowing less about programming than a bright first year CS student. As the things going now business people will eventually realize that it's still cheaper to pay $20K to Indian guys who can learn all the needed buzzwords just as well as you and $50K to an Indian manager who speaks fine English and translates for 30 buzzword guys than to pay for their own IT division with 50 people at $150K a piece.

  119. Re:First arrival by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

    I think you got that backwards. How many lawyer jokes are there compared to IT worker jokes?

    Tinkering with computers isn't even thought of as a real job to a sufficient extent to make a joke out of it.

    Lawyers are considered evil, but to be taken seriously. It's like Nazi Germany versus Liechtenstein.

  120. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funeral. Home. Director.

    Die, be a homemaker, or be a manager? Only the last of those is likely to lead to a salary. Or perhaps you just need to work on your punctuation. This isn't MySpace.

  121. Pure RACISM.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a best example to show nobody sees anyone equal... I think that if u have balls to show that u can provide the same service for the same cost then do it...otherwise dont blame anyone. Or Blame the company.

  122. Shouldn't have violated the Prime Directive by Tyrannicalposter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't have violated the Prime Directive. "The Prime Directive dictates that there can be no interference with the internal affairs of other civilizations" If we didn't give them our "advanced" technology, we wouldn't have this problem.

  123. Re:Survivors - bad example.... by jrumney · · Score: 1

    This would show me the customer is a DULT and doesn't know anything about the system they bought/use.

    Which is exactly why you can get away with a quote of 6 months to install a piece of off the shelf software. The world is full of companies who bought some piece of software for no other reason than the CEO's brother in law had good things to say about it over a game of golf. Successful companies like Accenture are built off the opportunities these suckers present.

  124. Re:First arrival by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    The H1-b workers ALONE have exceeded your tiny 500k number.

    You assume that every H1-B worker is a job lost for a US citizen. This is essentially the same logic that RIAA uses to claim losses from piracy, and it is just as wrong.

  125. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many skilled people but
    it takes several years to get into the field and noone wants to invest into their education that's why so few actually take the risks. And you know - when you have nowhere to live taking a debt to pay for your education is a very huge risk most people not ready to take

    Are you ready to pay for their education ?

  126. Re:First arrival by Jansingal · · Score: 1

    the shrub?

  127. Re:First arrival by Jansingal · · Score: 1

    Quoting 'What Color is Your Parachute?' about job statistics is like quoting Sex and the city about relationships. 'What Color is Your Parachute?' is NOT a book based on trends or anything close to statistics. you clearly have not a clue.

  128. Re:First arrival by Jansingal · · Score: 1

    very well said, thankx.

  129. Re:First arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the shrub?

    Common left-wing slang for George W. Bush. Usually used by the same people who blame him for everything under the sun, commonly including things that he has no control over.

  130. What does Dell or Apple sell? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of an ODM? One company is estimated to be designing and making about 33 percent of the notebook market, on behalf of clients like Dell, Apple etc.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

    1. Re:What does Dell or Apple sell? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      For most part, PC Mfg is a commodity business - one is the same as another. What those companies sell is support/service and on price, which is how it is in a commodity marketplace. So, although they are selling you a computer, what differentiates between brand A and B is price and service

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  131. Re:First arrival by Wister285 · · Score: 1

    All I know is that I present numbers and everyone else here presents anecdotes about how the IT industry is imploding. It's not. There are tons of jobs out there. You have to just be willing to do what it takes to get them. Too many people have this sense of entitlement as if companies are going to be knocking on doors to find people. That's not the way it works.

  132. lousy workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're all aware that most of Windows code are outsourced to India. those people are lousy workers and they smell too.

    no wonder Windows keeps BSODing!

  133. no by unity100 · · Score: 1

    not quite.

    what you call as 'in-house' is a long term business relationship thats just inside a company's roof. (sometimes even not under the same roof). an outsourcing is no different. IF you do it properly, as a long term relationship.

    some of you people have the tendency of taking outsourcing as a "on a need basis, one shot go" type of relationship. it isnt.

    it doesnt differ zit from any kind of business relationship since the dawn of trade - you have to choose carefully, you have to choose a reliable source to do business with, you have to choose according to your needs, and also, buyer beware.

    i want to stress reliable. this is the key to any business relationship, not only outsourcing.

    in any reliable business relationship you'll find that the interaction between companies over a long duration of time start to resemble what you call in-house business relationships under one company's roof.

  134. Re:Survivors - bad example.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I second this. Another reason it is a bad example, this machine is about lowest bang for buck on seat. And has moved wholesale over to India as a result.

    (I'm too am a former AS/400 operator/Administrator/RPG developer - turned XXXXX programmer)

  135. or... by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    ...your employer can't tell that you would do a much better job than the outsourced workers until it's too late.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  136. Smartest programmer in world darn well can by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Smartest programmer in world works for his own darn self.

    1. Re:Smartest programmer in world darn well can by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Confucius say "Man who is self-employed has tightwad asshole for boss."

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!