Just who the hell are "Micro-Soft"? The company is called "Microsoft". Just look at their website at http://www.microsoft.com/ (not http://www.micro-soft.com/) to verify this. This is even worse than the MicroSoft people, and arguably worse than M$, as at least they're trying to make some sort of (childish) point, and you're just being dumb.
Useful?! You can't do anything without it. You can't study graphics without maths. You can't study 3d graphics and simulation without quite advanced maths. You can't study audio without maths. You can't study just about anything in computer science without maths.
Only a Mickey Mouse comp sci course would not require maths to quite a high standard.
"Graphics can't get that much better than they are in current games."
People thought the same when Wolfenstein 3d came out!
If you honestly believe that graphics can't get much better than Doom III, you are just another short sighted idiot. In five years time look back at this post and you will see what I mean.
Just look at some of the screenshots on doom3.com. Look at one without a monster or gun in it and try to imagine a photograph looking like that. The last time I checked the real world didn't have curves formed from a sequence of small straight lines (http://www.doom3.com/images/screenshots/03.jpg, the cryo pipes on the left), just for one small example.
If they only made two episodes a year, as you have said (you said they're paid 250k a year, 125k per episode, so two episodes a year), and there have been 329 episodes, that must mean that they have been making episodes for 164 years, or since 1840.
Do you accept you have made a mistake and that you are an idiot?
They produce episodes at the rate of one a week, but the total time for production is six months.
READ THE FUCKING PATENT. It's not enough just to be translucent. It has to allow stuff like becoming transparent to user input over time as well.
Just who the hell are "Micro-Soft"? The company is called "Microsoft". Just look at their website at http://www.microsoft.com/ (not http://www.micro-soft.com/) to verify this. This is even worse than the MicroSoft people, and arguably worse than M$, as at least they're trying to make some sort of (childish) point, and you're just being dumb.
"THere's [sic] definitely this pervasive attitude that animation is the domain of children only in America."
Bullshit! Simpsons. Futurama. Family Guy. South Park. Stressed Eric. 2D TV.
You mean "you're right", not "your right", retard.
Way _too_ tired to notice.
Get a fucking clue, fuck wad. Doom III _is_ single player centric, just like Quake II was.
You might want to learn to program in English before you try another language. All your #defines have the two parameters the wrong way round.
Of course it's MS look and feel, they're MS programs.
"And one cannot be judged more than once for the same crime."
That's not universal.
32 bits only allows 4 GB of RAM, which will be a real problem soon. 64 bits would allow 16777216 TBs.
It's not funny, as that exact joke was in the story itself.
Story said "Mrs Potatohead giving Mr. Potato head", and the poster just repeated that joke. Hilarious.
How is it a scam to offer a product for sale?
Sorry? A "dumass"? What's that?
"It's" is a contraction of "it is". The apostrophe in this case shows a contraction.
. html
See http://www.comcul.ucalgary.ca/Web/efwr/apostrophe
"The rule to remember is simple: it's = it is or it has (otherwise, write its)"
I'm awaiting your apology for calling me a dumbass for a grammatical error that I did not make.
I'm British. I say maths, short for math(ematic)s. Get over it, yank. It's our language.
You don't sound like a computer scientist. You sound like just another code monkey. Computer _scientists_ need maths.
Useful?! You can't do anything without it. You can't study graphics without maths. You can't study 3d graphics and simulation without quite advanced maths. You can't study audio without maths. You can't study just about anything in computer science without maths.
Only a Mickey Mouse comp sci course would not require maths to quite a high standard.
"Graphics can't get that much better than they are in current games."
People thought the same when Wolfenstein 3d came out!
If you honestly believe that graphics can't get much better than Doom III, you are just another short sighted idiot. In five years time look back at this post and you will see what I mean.
Just look at some of the screenshots on doom3.com. Look at one without a monster or gun in it and try to imagine a photograph looking like that. The last time I checked the real world didn't have curves formed from a sequence of small straight lines (http://www.doom3.com/images/screenshots/03.jpg, the cryo pipes on the left), just for one small example.
I assure you that graphics will improve.
"the fact that game graphics can't get that much more realistic"
I remember people saying that Wolfenstein was photo realistic.
So you're just another twit who likes to pretend that he knows Latin. Sad. Very sad.
You sir, are an idiot.
If they only made two episodes a year, as you have said (you said they're paid 250k a year, 125k per episode, so two episodes a year), and there have been 329 episodes, that must mean that they have been making episodes for 164 years, or since 1840.
Do you accept you have made a mistake and that you are an idiot?
They produce episodes at the rate of one a week, but the total time for production is six months.
So what?
"They don't deserve punishment... [points hands as guns] ...the deserve gun-ishment"
There's no tax on radio sets.
What do you mean "smooth (i.e.) slow transitions, discrete pixels".
If the transition between pixels is smooth, then they're not very discrete, are they.