Slashdot Mirror


More Light Shed on Project David

Sun writes "Flexbeta.net received from Specops Labs screenshots "proving" that project David (previously covered here) is a real thing. The demo.... Office 2000 install. This is something both Wine and CrossOver Office know how to do for quite some time. In a discussion on wine-devel some people noticed evidence inside the screenshots that project David is a CrossOver Office ripoff."

213 comments

  1. Which Kind of Ripoff? by mfh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could this project be based on the leaked MS code, or is it really a CrossOver Office ripoff? I can't tell, but Mike McCormack could.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Koguma · · Score: 0

      Well it ain't MS leaked code. That leaked code is just fringe crap, nothing real hardcore and juicy. Ie. no core dll's or kernel source so won't help with compatibility much.

    2. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by mm0mm · · Score: 3, Insightful
      well, this is something known in SE Asia as art of counterfeit. have you seen Rolex (or something that looks like Rolex) made in SE Asia? at least they know that if they *rip off* anything from MS, they'll be in big trouble. so they took the refined open source project apart and made it look like theirs.

      what bothers me though, is that they have this very (north) American-looking site to attract investors, despite the progress of *their* project. this so-called project exists purely to collect as much investors' money as possible without actually developing something. now they say they have screenshots. but guess what,
      The screenshots were taken by SpecOps Labs staff; Flexbeta does not have actual access to the Winbridge application.
      hmm... how convenient.

      this company somehow reminds me of this startup a few years ago, claiming that their then-upcoming operating system would become alternative for Windows and run windows applications without any glitch. after trials and errors (as well as marketing hypes), they changed their promise, as they couldn't make their OS fully compatible with all windows applications. the name of the new operating system was "Lindows."

      Lindows survived, but I don't think this wine/xover rip off will survive, as they don't seem to have anything to sell but too-good-to-be-true claims. teach them what GPL means and protects if they still want to fiddle with OSS.
    3. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Funny

      From the screenshot, linked to by parent poster....

      The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.

      How about we switch to something more up to date?

      The quick versatile penguin jumped over the broken windows.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    4. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by 0xB00F · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...the stupid and shameless kind? :) It *is* wine. Look at the screen shots. The wine directory on the filesystem tree, the references to wine files on the lst icons... You'd think they would be smart enough to hide evidence of a rip-off since they were smart enough to change the titles on the wine windows.

      These specops guys seem to be just VC phishing. The things they say on their buzzword-laden website reads investment scam all the way.

    5. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not unless you add some words, at least one containing an x, since the setence "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog" contains all 26 letters of the alphabet.

    6. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is `s' not in your alphabet?

      The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog would be better...

    7. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The quick versatile penguin jumped over the broken windows.

      You didn't use x, y, or z for starters.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke. If you thought he was being serious, I suggest you go get a sense of humor installed.

    9. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Where's the s?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    10. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny
      The quick versatile penguin jumped over the broken windows.

      You're missing "fxyz". How about:

      The very quick penguin Tux smashed the fubar Windoze jail.
      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    11. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      The canonical version uses the word "jumps" not "jumped" ("e" and "d" appearing elsewhere in the sentence).

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teach them what GPL means

      Wine is LGPL.

    13. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by PGillingwater · · Score: 4, Funny

      OK, here's a better one. It's an instruction to one's butler to prepare the alchoholic beverages for a picnic:

      "Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs."

      Notice it's shorter than the stupid story about two animals.

      --
      Paul Gillingwater
      MBA, CISSP, CISM
    14. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A joke is usually funnier when the teller is clever enough to get it right.

    15. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by caseih · · Score: 1

      Not only is it a ripoff of WINE, in their FAQs on their site they claim that WINE has too many problems to be viable as since WINE implements the win32 API that it makes all of Linux unstable. Somehow their mythical David project was supposed to do it the right way and not have any the problems that Wine had.

    16. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by MadChicken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My two more efficient favorites:

      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
      Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    17. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, talking about Pangrams.

      My favourite is "Bright vixens jump; dozy fowl quack."

    18. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quick versatile penguin jumped over the broken windows (xyz).

    19. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs."

      Maybe this is an Austrlianism, but taken out of context, that would make a pr0n movie that even I couldn't bear to watch ;)

    20. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by DebianRcksLindowsLie · · Score: 1

      Lindows is STILL baiting and switching. Their "free" trial is really $14.95 a month. They are snake oil salesmen as you pointed out. They also claimed to have a Tablet PC working (never materialized), "the first AOL PC," (that resulted in a cease and desist order from AOL because they just used Netscape), and many more. Now they are going IPO and it's going to put a BAD mark on Linux.

      Lindows has survived, but only on lies and untruths. Remember MSFreePC.com? Took money and EVAPORATED. Then they changed their name AGAIN. Lindoz, Lindows.com, Lin---s, Lindash, Linspire - they are just LINSIPID.

      I hope someone can make use of all the money Robertson threw at WINE trying to make it work though. Linux will triumph despite all their used car salesmanship!

    21. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs." Either that or some bizzare pr0n

    22. Re:Which Kind of Ripoff? by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm missing something, that phrase doesn't contain any 's' letters.

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
  2. Ow... my eyes... by sploo22 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't believe it. They used GIFs for the screenshots. Somebody needs to knock some sense into these people. This does not reflect well on their computer literacy.

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    1. Re:Ow... my eyes... by hey · · Score: 0

      Better than JPEGs which are often used.
      Of course, PNG is the best.

    2. Re:Ow... my eyes... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1, Informative

      er?

      gifs are lossless, and the patents expired. They are now free as in speech and jpegs are not apropriate for screencaps

      pngs are cool and all, but wig out some proprietry browsers

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:Ow... my eyes... by Doomrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't believe it. They used GIFs for the screenshots. Somebody needs to knock some sense into these people. This does not reflect well on their computer literacy.

      Computer literacy doesn't mean "zealous revolution against all things that have been deemed uncool by the mindless nerd culture", understand?

    4. Re:Ow... my eyes... by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying GIFs are uncool, I'm saying that in this instance they're ugly.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    5. Re:Ow... my eyes... by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0

      PNG is not widely supported by browsers.

    6. Re:Ow... my eyes... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I never realized I had to be a frilly designer in order to be computer literate. I suppose if I watched trading spaces everyday I'd probably be a computer whiz...

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    7. Re:Ow... my eyes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Computer literacy doesn't mean "zealous revolution against all things that have been deemed uncool by the mindless nerd culture", understand?"

      Not if you define "computer literate" as "able to use all 7 buttons on the internet explorer toolbar"

    8. Re:Ow... my eyes... by landaker · · Score: 1

      PNG is not widely supported by browsers.

      Riiiight. The only browser that doesn't support them is lynx.

    9. Re:Ow... my eyes... by BenjyD · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, here's one reason to use PNG:

      [bdr@arthurdent Documents]$ ls -l
      total 172 -rw-rw-r-- 1 bdr bdr 97056 May 9 15:07 office_install1.gif
      -rw-rw-r-- 1 bdr bdr 75041 May 9 15:07 office_install1.png

      A 25% size decrease for the same quality is pretty good.

    10. Re:Ow... my eyes... by rowdent · · Score: 1

      Only transparency wigs out IE; PNGs are implemented otherwise.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    11. Re:Ow... my eyes... by aWalrus · · Score: 1, Informative

      PNG transparency (its Alpha channel) is what is not widely supported. Most browsers display non-transparent PNG's well.

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
  3. Show me something recent... by harikiri · · Score: 3, Informative

    Show me the latest versions of popular Windows apps (office, outlook, powerpoint) being installed and running - and I'll be more impressed.. And give a real copy to a review site to test - just not that girl over at osnews.com! ;)

    At present, why would anyone use this instead of Crossover Office? Well... whenever they release it, that is.

    --
    Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
    1. Re:Show me something recent... by linuxci · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well I'm running office XP under crossover office just fine. I'm not sure if there's any later version of office out now but that works for me and is more recent than 2000.

      Other things that work fine for me in crossover is MSIE 6 (well to IE's limited ability anyway), Media Player and Trillian.

      However, all my needs these days are really met by Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice - so I use crossover very few times.

      However if I did need to use the complex features of MS Office that are not yet in OpenOffice I'd definitely recommend Crossover

    2. Re:Show me something recent... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      I have crossover office, and it has always tended to mess up my menus in KDE. I think it also has effected other KDE look and feel settings though I don't know how.

      --
      I do security
    3. Re:Show me something recent... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems a little ironic that the screenshots presented show-off all the best features of Windows applications.

      Just about to agree to the EULA of Microsoft Office

      Windows needs to be restarted to continue this installation

      MS-Word asking you to register

      Tell me again, why do we not use OpenOffice?

    4. Re:Show me something recent... by ian+mills · · Score: 2, Informative

      Office 2003 is out, and does not even install in Crossover or Wine. link

    5. Re:Show me something recent... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      At my place of work, we have trouble with formulas inserted into word documents. Seems word crashes in equation editor in random circumstances both on RH9 and Fedora Core 1.

    6. Re:Show me something recent... by pr0c · · Score: 1

      A company that already own licenses for Microsoft office and wants to migrate to Linux is a good reason. Why waste a license you already own?

      People who need Microsoft Access for little db projects do not need Postgres, mySQL or Firebird, it is just overkill and requires far more knowledge than lets say a secretary should need to do his or her job; there is not any good replacement for Microsoft access. Access is fills the gap when a spreadsheet is not good enough and spending ANY time or money on a front-end to a real DB is unnecessary.

      OO lacks an email client, evolution does the job fine but not everyone agrees.

      I am not saying that these reasons apply to everyone... I know offhand a lot of businesses need and want Access; Linux has no suitable replacement. Most anti-office people will say use and make your own front end, yeah... great plan... I will waste hours of time doing that instead of spending 10 minutes on a simple Access DB, that really impresses the boss.

      In many cases, OpenOffice is more than sufficient, especially in the home, that is definitely true! I think the key to more migration is a Access replacement. Access works great for many little databases for one or two users, reports and queries and as a front end. I somewhat remember a GNU hosted db project but they had a long way to go.

    7. Re:Show me something recent... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay, I don't mind the joke becoming a debate, but if it does, can I ask about this one:

      "[OpenOffice.org] lacks an email client, evolution does the job fine but not everyone agrees"

      Now, everyone says this, I hear it all the time, and it makes no sense. Is there someone here who could explain

      Why does an office suite need an email client?

      No, really. Why? I mean, I've used email for years and I've used office-suites for years, and I've never even once had the urge to say "send this document by email" from a spreadsheet menu. And as yet, my email client has never had any problems with handling spreadsheet attachments in whatever's the default application, no integration required.

      In fact, I'd prefer not to have office software integrated with email, because when you send email, you have to stop and think about what the recipient might want, what's the best file format to use, and how best to reduce the size of the attachment, nevermind double-checking you're not sending something confidential in the file headers.

      But people are always on the OpenOffice support lists wishing that it had an email client. Why?

      Surely it's a barrier to using new software? If OpenOffice.org had an email client, you'd have to swap email clients as well as office suites to use it. Maybe you like the email client you've already got. Maybe it would cost a lot to change email clients.

      It's not as if I don't have these tools available. At work I have Outlook and OfficeXP (please don't send viruses, my company probably couldn't handle them). But I've never once used the two together in any way more complex than double-clicking an attachment and the operating system will decide which program to use. I use these programs all the time, and you'd be hard pressed to find some way in which they "integrate". In fact, Visio looks more integrated with MS-Office, and it's not even a microsoft product until recently.

      What is it? Is it just convenient to buy them at the same time? Do people actually use the "Save and email this file" menu? Can you preview emailed spreadsheet attachments in a tiny little Excel window? Is there some sort of email collaboration feature that I haven't seen but would change my life if it worked?

      What is it about email clients that people want them to be part of an office suite?

    8. Re:Show me something recent... by pr0c · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really do not understand the desire to have an email client like this either. It appears to me that in general, most users do not benefit from an intergrated email client in any fasion. One influence however would be marketing, the people who buy software get a pitch about everything being intergrated. Maybe there is a thought that you are getting one piece of software to do email, word processing, spreadsheets, databases, .... as opposed to getting a piece of software for each. To them managing one program (even though in reality it is multiple programs just the same) is easier than 4. Who knows..

    9. Re:Show me something recent... by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      I'm kicking myself for replying to the Quick Brown Fox thread above. You deserved some positive moderation for this one, and I blew it.

      Personally, I still can't even see why a calendar/task list and an e-mail client belong in the same package...

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    10. Re:Show me something recent... by nzkbuk · · Score: 1

      Not to mention M$ has tried this with using word as the default editor for outlook.

      You want to send a short email but it takes 5-10 mins by the time you start your email client, start word (to write the email) and then close it all later. Not to mention the memory footprint.

    11. Re:Show me something recent... by circusnews · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At the risk of being moderated a troll...

      I think that Outlook is a tool that has not really been replicated in the OSS community. Yes, you can point to Evolution, yes, you can point to 20 or so utilities that between them do the same things, but it's not the same. For people who live on Outlook, whoes daily buisness and productivity is built around Outlook, these tools that are so often pointed to are just not an answer that works. If I had to switch between even just 5 tools to get done what I used to do in Outlook in my last job, my productivity would have dropped to unaceptable levels.

      Like it or not, with Outlook Microsoft built a product that works for a lot of people, that helps people get real work done. Could it be done better? I think that it could, but it would take a major OSS undertaking to do. One that would have to start by looking beyond the obvious, and into what keeps people using Outlook.t

    12. Re:Show me something recent... by OldJohnno · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you implying Outlook is like emacs for Windows?

    13. Re:Show me something recent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. As much as there are valid arguements against M$ products, they do perform. Sure, they suck down memory and CPU resources like a hoover, but they are geared toward production. The cost of buying new hardware is an acceptable business practice. Embarking on a new way of doing things (read: open source) is a "risk" that many CEOs, CFOs, etc. will not take. If I didn't have a background in computers I would feel the same. "Minimize the risks, pay what we have to, but don't take on additional risks."

    14. Re:Show me something recent... by Harry8 · · Score: 1
    15. Re:Show me something recent... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      At work I use the email button in Excel quite a lot, you can choose either to send the entire worksheet as an attachment, or the current page in the body of an email.

      I find this slightly quicker than launching an email program, composing a new email and finding the spreadsheet to send as an attachment, but it's not a big issue.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Show me something recent... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Pretty words... so how about some examples as to what these glorious features are, that you would need 20... or did you say 5?... seperate utilities to use?

    17. Re:Show me something recent... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      was it just me, or was that a completely unfounded blanket statement?

    18. Re:Show me something recent... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


      I agree with the Office + Email = ??? equation, but I have to point out that Email + Calendar actually makes good sense. At least in an office setting, where meeting announcements are sent via email. Being able to simply "accept" the meeting invitation and have it automatically scheduled into your calendar is very handy. Probably more handy for some, than others, of course.

      But it must impress some people, as evident by that fact that companies still purchase the Lotus Notes suite. =P As far as I can tell, that's about the *only* useful feature in this crap software that was forced upon us.

    19. Re:Show me something recent... by circusnews · · Score: 1
      was it just me, or was that a completely unfounded blanket statement?

      No, your right, that was a completely unfounded blanket statement. Even if I were to answer it (and I would do so in great detail if I thought it had a snowballs chance in hell of making a difrence), the responce would likely be just more of the same.

      But, since I am a bit of a glutton, here is a brief example from a realestate law office:

      Client calls up (system brings up customer record via CID/PBX link, or manual search)

      Select matter (closing)

      Select correct forms for this clients closing (can be 10 or more multipage forms)

      Fill in details of each form automatically from client records in this matter

      Fill in any needed information that is not in the clients record (and add it to the record)

      Submit each form to correct people in the correct mannor (email, fax, web form, registered mail, courier, etc)

      Schedule closing with the broker, lawyer, client and banks lawyer

      Add property to the list for a title search

      Submit billing form to billing software based on work done this phone call

      Oh, and you work in a high volume envornment, so you only have 8 minutes to get this all done (including licking the envelopes). With Outlook set up for this enviornment, it could be done in 3-4 minutes flat. This is not the only example, its just one of many. Like it or not, this is why outlook survives and thrives. Evolution won't do this. It might be possible to do with a host of database tools, but again, how many OSS tools would we need to do exactly the same thing? And how long would it take the 19 year old secretary (who usually only lasts 18 months) to do with the OSS tools that are avalible? If it's longer than 8 minutes, Outlook stays.

    20. Re:Show me something recent... by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      I suppose, but how often is that *really* used? I think I've used it once, despite enduring Outlook since it's introduction.

      I used to work with Lotus Notes though. I loved it, though it wasn't about either e-mail nor calendaring. It was awesome for unstructured data + replication + RAD.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    21. Re:Show me something recent... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "was it just me, or was that a completely unfounded blanket statement?"

      Just a standard anti-OSS troll, of the "If you ran a fortune-500 company like I do, you'd understand" variant, normally written by someone who the closest they got to a business environment was playing with crayons in their dad's office, and never seem to elaborate on why big companies "need" something that apparently they have no real use for. But then again, maybe if I were the CTO of a Fortune-500 like every kid on slashdot claims to be, rather than just someone who uses Outlook all the time at work, then I'd understand...

    22. Re:Show me something recent... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It's just you. It was a challenge to support the argument. (Yes, I see that the poster responded). I'm not a linux zealot, but I dislike Microsoft shills just as much.

  4. I dunno much about it but seems to me... by rokzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... if it's open source it'll be easy to spot a rip-off, if it's CrossOver-style proprietary then what's the point - just use CrossOver anyway!

    1. Re:I dunno much about it but seems to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The people at SCO are experts at identifying rip-offs. Ask them for help?

    2. Re:I dunno much about it but seems to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I did. They said it clearly contains code ripped off from sys V, and are preparing lawsuits againt them, the Crossover people, the Wine people, and Microsoft.

      The good news though is that you'll be able to buy a license to use Windows compatable operating systems for $699 per seat very soon.

    3. Re:I dunno much about it but seems to me... by arekq · · Score: 1
      Agree. At least CodeWeavers does contribute code back to wine.

      These guys seem shady. It feels like they want to hide the fact that their product is based on wine/CrossOver.

    4. Re:I dunno much about it but seems to me... by dashersey · · Score: 1
      Oh great, that's what we need. More people in the alt-to-microsoft community wasting energy suing each other.

      Bill couldn't ask for a better lease on the status quo....

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages; all alike.
  5. Purloined code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    that in the picture http://www.flexbeta.net/images/david/winbridge_ins tall.gif the second line in winbridge.lst is /etc/wine... There are more clues that this project David is just a (possibly repackaged) Wine. the second line in winbridge.lst is /etc/wine...

    1. Re:Purloined code by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      It includes the actual program /usr/bin/wine too.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    2. Re:Purloined code by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, this is almost certain proof that it's WINE-derived. If you look at the list of files that are shown in winbridge.lst icon, then we have (with my guesses in brackets):

      /etc/rc.d/init
      /etc/wine
      /usr/bin/notep[ad.exe]
      /usr/bin/progm[an.exe]
      /usr/bin/reged[it.exe]
      /usr/bin/regsv[r32.exe]
      /usr/bin/unins[tall.exe]
      /usr/bin/wcmd
      /usr/bin/wine
      /usr/bin/wine-[???]
      /usr/bin/wine-[???]

      If that's not a WINE ripoff I can't imagine what else it is.

    3. Re:Purloined code by ttldkns · · Score: 3, Insightful

      http://www.flexbeta.net/images/david/office_instal l1.gif

      in this one a subdirectory of their home directory is wine-20040408.

      they could at least have made an effort.

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    4. Re:Purloined code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you look at the list of files that are shown in winbridge.lst icon

      It's embarrasingly easy to switch off the text file previews in Konqueror - are these 'David' people really that incompetent? They should at least give us a challenge... :-)

    5. Re:Purloined code by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      Maybe they aren't out to fool anyone? Maybe they just don't want to use the "win" term openly? Remember lindows?

    6. Re:Purloined code by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Post-GPLing. This is, I believe, copyright infringement.

    7. Re:Purloined code by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      I believe that with Project David they never hid the fact that it was WINE based. What makes this project *special* is that these guys found the "missing link", so to speak, that would allow WINE to work flawlessly with any Windows program. So, they started with WINE, and modified and added to it and hit on something new. Personally, I couldn't care about running Windows stuff on Linux....it kinda defeats the purpose

    8. Re:Purloined code by arekq · · Score: 1
      I disagree. Take a look at: http://www.inq7.net/inf/2004/apr/26/inf_4-1.htm
      "According to Peter Valdes, chief technology officer of SpecOps, David uses a "new approach" in simulating the Windows environment in a Linux-powered system."
      If they are using wine, it wouldn't be a "new approach in simulating the Windows environment", would it?
      "As of 2002, SpecOps said that the WINE project remained in the hands of developers, and out of reach of Windows users. The project also inherited the flaws inherent in the Windows system so early adopters experienced system crashes and performance problems."
      They suggests that wine "inherited the flaws inherent in the Windows system", and theirs doesn't?
      "According to SpecOps's technical executives, David used reverse engineering to create a "Windows Subsystem Simulation Environment" to allow Windows applications to run "natively" on the Linux operating system."
      Note the "David used reverse engineering" part. So it's either: 1) they implement the system from the ground up, or 2) they try to take credit for the wine developers' work.
    9. Re:Purloined code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only copyright infringement if they distribute the binary without the source or an offer to distribute the source. As they don't seem to be distributing anything but screenshots yet, there is no basis for claiming copyright infringement.

    10. Re:Purloined code by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a proprietary software venture, though.

  6. hmm by Manip · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Thing is, shots such as these can be faked in a number of ways.. there was nobody there actually watching this and no real-time video. I am not very impressed. Even if it is real it will not be open source so nobody will use it anyway. :)

    1. Re:hmm by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The thing is, they didn't even fake the screenshots well enough to hide the fact they've ripped off WINE and/or Crossover Office. Does that say something about their competance?

    2. Re:hmm by davidle · · Score: 1

      Who the hell modded this a troll? The fact that we have only seen dubious screenshots is a valid point.

  7. Warning - Link in parent is a Goatse troll.... by twoslice · · Score: 0, Troll

    There should be a mod called Goatse troll, not just troll...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Warning - Link in parent is a Goatse troll.... by _KiTA_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Well, knowing what it was, I decided to open it anyway just to see how well Firefox's popup blocker works.

      Lets just say, it still needs work.

      Oh, and the idiots at peoplesprimary.com need to be DDoSed, just because they're shitheads who deserve a $3000 bandwidth bill. :)

      Oh, and am I wrong, or does this
      if (typeof clipboardData != 'undefined') {
      var content = clipboardData.getData("Text");
      document.forms["cl ip"].elements["content"].value = content;
      }
      document.forms["clip"].submit();
      mean they're trying to get your browser to send them the contents of your clipboard? After disabling javascript I peeked at their little website, and that's what was in there.
  8. Pitch for venture capital by evil_one666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the specops website is a pretty blatant pitch for venture capital, and not intended to give information to end users. Has an definate air of dodginess...

    1. Re: Pitch for venture capital by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > the specops website is a pretty blatant pitch for venture capital, and not intended to give information to end users. Has an definate air of dodginess...

      At least they're not pitching for IP lawyers...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Pitch for venture capital by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Their market strategy page
      Objectives

      By the end of the first 12 months of operation:
      Develop a client base of 75 White Box System Builders and 1 Major Strategic OEM
      Sell and Ship 30,000+ copies of the DAVID Middleware
      Generate a gross revenue of US$ 1,000,000.00

      And the Contacts page gives one address only:
      PHILIPPINES
      Summit One Office Tower
      530 Shaw Blvd.
      Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila 150

    3. Re:Pitch for venture capital by killerface · · Score: 1

      We will let you run windows apps ... FOR 1 MILLION DOLLARS (pinky to lips akward silence and out)

    4. Re:Pitch for venture capital by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      the specops website is a pretty blatant pitch for venture capital, and not intended to give information to end users. Has an definate air of dodginess...

      The site is amateurish, obviously intended for non-tech savvy wanna-be investors. Everything about the site says "template", and not even a very good implementation (note the drop-shadow problems with the menu tabs, for one).

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  9. It looks like a ripoff of wine to me. by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    Many people have bitched about the controls on windows applications not using the KDE/Gnome themes. If I was to create this type of middleware application, I would have looked into a way to make this windows apps draw the controls with the linux gui theme. Installing an application that works on wine, does not prove anything.

    1. Re:It looks like a ripoff of wine to me. by polyp2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would have looked into a way to make this windows apps draw the controls with the linux gui theme.

      I wonder just how difficult that would be. A good chunk of the controls are basically pixmaps there would be some constraints as to dimensions and possibly palette issues. But since we have a partially complete native implemetation of the windows API in wine I cant imagine that it would be that much of a mammoth task to intercept API calls and/or use an alternative pixmaps. The wine project are probably more concerned about achieving compatibility at the moment than anything else. None the less I wouldnt mind seeing something along these lines also.

      nick...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:It looks like a ripoff of wine to me. by krumms · · Score: 1

      But since we have a partially complete native implemetation of the windows API in wine I cant imagine that it would be that much of a mammoth task to intercept API calls and/or use an alternative pixmaps.

      I've not looked at the Wine source so don't take what I say as gospel, but my guess would be they just map GDI calls to Xwindows/Xlib stuff. So if Windows draws all its controls using nothing but primitives (very possible, even likely) you might be SOL.

      I agree it would be cool, though.

    3. Re:It looks like a ripoff of wine to me. by arkanes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most (I can't conclusively say all) of the common controls are indeed drawn using primitives. You could possibly trap the theme API available in XP to redirect calls to a native theme engine, but that would be a tremendous amount of work (and might not work period).

    4. Re:It looks like a ripoff of wine to me. by wasabii · · Score: 1

      I believe Wine has there own implementation of the controls anyways. These are things which are in shared DLLs which do not need to come from Windows, because wine has a built in implementation... so, it doesn't seem that hard.

    5. Re:It looks like a ripoff of wine to me. by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 1

      Maybe there is some hope over at the novell/ximian/mono front: http://www.go-mono.com/winforms.html In terms of integrating visually with the desktop, we are hoping to contribute to the Wine project a mechanism to make it use the Gtk+ themes on X11 and Cocoa on MacOS to render the widgets, and get the native look and feel on each of these platforms.

      --
      Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
  10. Show me the code by highwindarea · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Screenshots are great and all, but I'm still a bit sceptical. As soon as they say "Buy David now for $49.95. With our %100 compatibility, kick us if it doesn't work guarantee" I'll take it seriously.

    --
    I think this internet thing sounds like a good idea
  11. Re: More light shed on Project David by manavendra · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The screenshots indicate it is just another MS look and feel "insipired" open-source project..

    *sigh

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  12. true by nycsubway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It may be a ripoff, but where can I download it? I'd like to see the source code. If I can install Pagemaker 7 in linux, I will be very happy.

  13. Not really a rip-off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look at it as Offshore Outsourcing, FOSS style.

  14. this image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This image mentioned in the article clearly shows lines that reference /usr/bin/wine in the winbridge.lst preview icon.

    Combined with the link you give, if this is not a complete ripoff then they are at least building on the wine base code in some way.

    1. Re:this image by Hamled · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the winbridge CD includes Office -specific scripts and configuration files, which raises questions about it's useability for other Windows applications (assuming that it's more than just a ripoff of CrossOver Office).

  15. Great! by icekillis · · Score: 0

    This is great! The only thing left, is for them to figure out how I'm going to PAY for office separately!

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $425? That's to much.

      Cheaper, please.

  16. Re: More light shed on Project David by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post indicates that you're totally clueless about the topic at hand. What open source project? "Project David" is supposed to be some super-sekrit Win32 layer for running Windows application on Linux, just like Wine but this one is supposed to be perfect in every way. Of course the fucking screenshots in the article look like a Microsoft application; it's Microsoft Office 2000. You fucking dolt.

  17. What I find odd from the screenshots... by Henk+Poley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is that the directories seen in the homedir view changed quite remarkably. The installation directories (sources, specops) are not there, and some wine-20040408 dir shows up in Konqueror. Just as if it is a totaly different user or something.

    Ah well, 'even if' this is a fake, but at least it put some attention on Wine (and derivatives) in the sense that 'they can run Microsoft Office for ages already'.

    1. Re:What I find odd from the screenshots... by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      I looked at that. What's most interesting though, is that in the two screenshots brought into question showing the wine directories, you're exactly right.

      The Home Directory in Konquerer changes COMPLETELY. At first it contains Desktop, and two directories, then in the next shot, it contains neither of the two directories, and a number of other ones.

      Something is fishy here.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
  18. Re:Ow... my eyes... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean legal literacy, not computer literacy.

    Gif-type compression is ideal for screenshots unless you happen to have a true color jpeg image in the background. That said, it would have been LEGALLY smarter to use png compression so they don't get roped into these last minute GIF legal manuevers.

    Seening how they're a bunch of nobodies with no money, though, they probably would cost more to just start a suit than their total assets are worth.

  19. Discovered? by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 5, Funny
    SpecOpS Labs recently made an extraordinary discovery involving the Microsoft Windows OS. Our discovery has enabled us to develop a breakthrough software program that we have codenamed David.

    Yup, I discovered it too. It's right here.

    1. Re:Discovered? by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      I too discovered an incredible thing about the Microsoft Windows OS, it's right here!

  20. The evidence by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For those who can't get to wine-devel's mailing list: Look at this pic for the words /etc/wine and /usr /bin/wine in the previews of one of the files.

    this pic for references to an install of wine.

    Finally, for those who know lots about these things, on this picture notice how the on the right and bottom of the page the scroll bar and status bar are clipped. This is a bug in crossover office but is fixed in the latest wine, so they appear to have basically made a crossover varient and not even bothered merging the latest release of the offical wine in. poor.

    --
    Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    1. Re:The evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? The parent poster just plagairized an e-mail from Wine's maintainer.

  21. Re: More light shed on Project David by sweet+cunny+muffin · · Score: 1

    Of course it's MS look and feel, they're MS programs.

  22. Re:Not the way to go, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    $ nc tinyurl.co.uk http
    HEAD /bqkp HTTP/1.1
    Host: tinyurl.co.uk

    HTTP/1.1 302 Found
    Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:09:25 GMT
    Server: Adsar
    Accept-Ranges: bytes
    Location: http://s94590508.onlinehome.us/dongs.shtml
    Vary: Accept-Encoding
    Connection: close
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
  23. Twice wrong by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. GIFs aren't lossless, they're limited to 8-bit indexed colour.
    2. The patents haven't expired everywhere yet.

    Better to use a technology never patented: PNG.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Twice wrong by hexene · · Score: 2, Informative

      GIFs aren't lossless, they're limited to 8-bit indexed colour.

      GIFs are lossless. The 8-bit colour restriction is an issue, but it can be used to store and retrieve an 8-bit colour image without losing any detail.

      The LZW patent expired in the US on 20 June 2003, but Unisys still assert that it exists in other countries (the UK, Canada, France, Italy, Germany and Japan).

    2. Re:Twice wrong by hey · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How can you say "GIFs aren't lossless, they're limited to 8-bit indexed colour." If you are trying to save an image with more than 256 colors... some color info will be lost. So its lossy of color!

    3. Re:Twice wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "GIFs aren't lossless" is a double negative which really means "GIF's are lossy" (when saving over 256 colors). You're getting angry at him even though you're saying the same thing.

    4. Re:Twice wrong by Crizp · · Score: 1

      GIF: Lossless, because they were designed for 256-color images. Any image with more colors that are saved as GIFs are (AFAIK) dithered in the image processing software and saved with a selective 256-color palette - the format itself is lossless, it's just an old, bad design :)

      JPEG: Lossy, and here the JPEG compression itself degrades the image (again, AFAIK)

      PNG: great format, but HUGE files in PNG-24, so it's not the best to use for photos etc... screenshots are good though.

      I'd like to stress the point that I'm not an image format guru in any way (as can be seen from this post as it's bound to be erronous) but the above is what I've understood from how the formats work...

    5. Re:Twice wrong by arekq · · Score: 1
      No, I don't think this is the proper way to define a format lossy/loseless.

      A better way would be whether repeated loading and saving of the same file accumulate losses?

      If you take a GIF file, load it, and save it. It will not lose any color.
      This is not true for JPEG.

    6. Re:Twice wrong by arekq · · Score: 1
      PNG: great format, but HUGE files in PNG-24, so it's not the best to use for photos etc... screenshots are good though.

      I think this is not a fair statement.

      PNG is not worse than other lossless formats in terms of file size.

      JPEG is excellent in applications where cost is the priority (e.g, web: bandwidth, consumer DC: storage).

      However, for applications where accuracy is more important, a lossless format should be used. An example is photo editing. If a lossy format is used, the final picture will likely have lots of artifacts.

      Professional class digital cameras does use/support lossless formats.

    7. Re:Twice wrong by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Apart from patent issues, there are better and more obvious reasons to use PNGs: the filesize is smaller for all but the smallest GIFs.

    8. Re:Twice wrong by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      So after you discard the bulk of the color detail, what little remains can be compressed losslessly. Good thinking. Everyone knows that color images only come in 8 bit indexed format after all.

    9. Re:Twice wrong by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      That's because all the "losing" has already taken place. Degradation over cycles is not a requirement for a format to be lossy. If you take an image and convert it to GIF, then convert it back, if the result is not identical then the process is lossy. For some images this will be lossless but for true-color images it almost never is. Images are never acquired in 8 bit indexed format, so GIF is most definitely lossy.

    10. Re:Twice wrong by mibus · · Score: 1

      By these arguments though, any format can be considered lossy because it doesn't support, say, 128-bit colour. Or 256-bit, etc.

      You wouldn't say that saving a DVD as PNG sequences is lossy because the soundtrack isn't stored... it's not what that format is for! You have to remove or ignore that data before you save.

    11. Re:Twice wrong by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      ...but if the format is not the native format that your data uses then it is important. Since GIF is an image format it gets compared to JPG, TIFF, PNG, etc. In that context, many images are true color and GIF cannot preserve their detail. Unlike your example, this application is what GIF is for.

      An 8 bit integer is a lossless image format, too. You just have to strip out any information that doesn't fit into 0-255. Seems like the same argument to me.

      People once argued that DVD's couldn't possibly be as good as laserdisc because laserdisc was lossless. Of course, laserdisc was a lossless version of composite video, the worst video format in existence, while DVD was a lossy format of component video with potentially much higher overall bandwidth. You won't find many laserdisc lovers making those claims now since it's so clearly absurd. Laserdisc is a lossy format just as GIF is. If all we ever had was composite video, or 8 bit indexed color, laserdisc and GIF would be fine.

      And yes, I would say PNG is lossy in that context. It's just a silly context. When someone does the operation you describe, they split the streams to preserve the audio so the overall operation isn't lossy.

    12. Re:Twice wrong by arekq · · Score: 1
      These are two different concepts: a format that doesn't have the feature you need, and a format that is lossy.

      Different formats support different number of features. Therefore, when you convert from one to the other, it's normal that you need to strip or make up some information. (for example, layers, paths, alpha channels, DPI, comments, thumbnail, etc.)

      A lossy format is a different concept. It takes out information in order to reduce file size, so even the format is not changed , you still lose information.

    13. Re:Twice wrong by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      ...and if GIF always came with the mandatory disclaimer "can't support true color images" then I might feel different.

      People don't view image formats as offering "a variety of features". Monochrome, pseudocolor, and 16, 24, or 48 bit true color are not just different features of image formats. Saying that GIF is lossless but just "doesn't have the feature you need" is damage control. If you convert and image to GIF and back and in all cases the result is identical to the original, then it would be lossless. This is clearly not the case and it has nothing to do with "missing features". It has to do with the limited color coding space that GIF requires. Most of GIF's compactness comes from its lossy color compression after all. That's how they get away with lossless compression on what's left.

  24. Why this might be really evil by clusterix · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it is just a repackaging of wine, the worst thing is the investments they claim to have received. They haven't done anything to actually help wine yet, and if that money is real, it could have been invested in one of the real wine contributing companies. These guys will probably just run away with the money in the end if they are this bad at faking things.

    1. Re:Why this might be really evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These theoretical investors were interested in investing in a proprietary compatability framework for the Win32 API on Linux. They weren't interested in donating money to WineHQ. They might have been interested in investing in CrossOver Office, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

  25. Crossover by quinkin · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's a crossover ripoff. See the wine mailing list (notes evidence of crossover bugs in the screen shots).

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  26. my name! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think people named David everywhere should join together and be insulted!

    They not only rip off a decent product (crossover), but they rip off my name!

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:my name! by David+McBride · · Score: 3, Funny

      Typical. First Darl at SCO, and now this.

    2. Re:my name! by Motor · · Score: 1

      Can't you get the leaders of clan McBride to have a word with Darl. He's really letting your side down.

      --
      We all know that crap is king
      Give us dirty laundry!
  27. So what if it is? by polyp2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dont really see a problem with this being a repackaged Wine. Provided that the company comply with the licensing terms, and that any changes to the source are given back to the community. More heads working on the wine project can only be a beneficial wherever they come from.

    However, if they are going to be all take take take and no giving back to the community then I do see a problem with it.

    Nick...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:So what if it is? by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 1

      After looking at their site, I would find it hard to believe that they have any intentions of giving anything back. I didn't see any mention of the wine project, just their "discovery".

    2. Re:So what if it is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If (contrary to their screenshots) they use pre-GPL wine they don't need to give anything back. And what's wrong with that? That's freedom.

    3. Re:So what if it is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the screenshots they are either damn stupid or they dont feel the need to hide anything (since it is so evident that it is wine based). If thats the case then maybe their intentions arent evil ...

  28. Not able to check by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

    As noted by other posters, this David may be a wine ripoff. I checked their web site and, interestingly, their "technology overview" and pretty much every other link that may be informative in this respect is "temporarily disabled". Something tells me that temporary may be permanent here :)

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
  29. What I want to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is this thing running under windows.

  30. straightforward evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    look at the simple and obvious point here.... they go from "planning" to a beta release in less than a week. any coder can figure out it is going to take a LOT more than a week to hit on any code worth using with a project of this scope and magnitude.

  31. Re:Not the way to go, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can stick your fucking blog up your gigantic asshole Bob. Quit posting your "what I di last summer" pictures you gigantic anal homo.

  32. Wine modules like Transgaming. (WineX) by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why can't Specops make plugins for wine, like WineX from transgaming?
    Transgaming doesn't release their source code for the copyrighted pieces, but they do release modifications to wine.

    I don't see a problem, other than they don't mention they use wine. Of couse maybe there is a readme.txt that has all the wine information. It's not released yet. ;)

    Though if it is Wine, its not really true virtualization like they claim. Damn, too much guessing, without seeing the code.

    1. Re:Wine modules like Transgaming. (WineX) by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      That's incorrect. TransGaming have released a few patches but the bulk of their work is proprietary - WineX is based on a fork of Wine from back when it was X11 licensed.

    2. Re:Wine modules like Transgaming. (WineX) by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Transgaming doesn't release their source code for the copyrighted pieces, but they do release modifications to wine.

      Thats what I said!

    3. Re:Wine modules like Transgaming. (WineX) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transgaming doesn't release their source code for the copyrighted pieces, but they do release modifications to wine.

      Um... the whole of wine is copyrighted, unless they released some of it into the public domain while my back was turned. I think you meant that they don't release their source code for the proprietary pieces. There's a very, very, very important difference.

  33. That's the new way to start a company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In the "security software" world, do you have any idea how many companies are selling snort on a box as an IDS, often charging a few grand for it. Or nessus on a box or nmap with a GUI? It's the hot area and everyone is trying to rip off open source.

    No different here, they wrap it with some bullshit stories and crap though. Not to beat a dead horse but this is exactly why you GPL your software.

    1. Re:That's the new way to start a company by jd142 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, that is the problem with open source. If the companies are also releasing the code to the purchasers, then the companies aren't violating or "ripping off" the open source apps.

      What these companies are doing, in theory, is providing the support and services that Free/Open Source/Libre software supporters have always said is the way to make money.

      So while you may see it as "ripping off" open source, these companies are doing exactly what the developers intended when they released their software under that kind of license: some very knowledgeable people can get the source and compile it themselves and do all the troubleshooting or someone who just wants a product that works and a support number to call when it doesn't can pay for the packaged solutions.

    2. Re:That's the new way to start a company by crossconnects · · Score: 1

      the problem is that these people are not releasing the code back to the community, or even acknowleging the community that created the technology, except as a marketing target, or worse as a theoretical marketing target for fundraising purposes.

      --
      no big sig
    3. Re:That's the new way to start a company by jak163 · · Score: 2, Funny
      or someone who just wants a product that works and a support number to call when it doesn't


      Yah, there's the rub. Trying to get Lotus Notes to work under Wine has been the most time consuming computer activity (outside of teaching myself BASIC) I have ever undertaken in my life, and I still can't print.

    4. Re:That's the new way to start a company by jd142 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the problem is that these people are not releasing the code back to the community

      Depending on the license (and the original poster was vague about this) there's no obligation to release source code back to the community under any conditions. Under the GPL, the company is only required to release source to the people it sells the software to. If I buy a copy of the GPL'ed Neat-O Keen Software from Acme, Acme is under to release the source to you. It must give me the source if I ask for it, but there's nothing that says you get a copy of it. If Acme makes changes to the code and uses it only internally, it is under no legal obligation to release that code to you. And I think, but am not sure, that if Acme makes changes to the code, and I buy it from them, they only have to give me the code, not you. I can still release the code back, but Acme is under no obligation to.

      Under other kinds of licenses, Acme can make all the changes it wants, sell it to me and still be under no legal obligation to give me the code it changed.

      even acknowleging the community that created the technology, except as a marketing target, or worse as a theoretical marketing target for fundraising purposes

      Acme must include all copyright notices in the code and compiled binaries, but it is under no legal obligation to include references to the copyright holders in it's advertising. Remember, that's part of what the fuss about XFree 4.4.

      You may not like it, you may think it is immoral, but it isn't illegal. When you release your code, you may want to think about that when choosing a license.

    5. Re:That's the new way to start a company by firewrought · · Score: 1
      If the companies are also releasing the code to the purchasers, then the companies aren't violating or "ripping off" the open source apps.

      If you're just re-branding an open source app, that's somewhat lame, even if you are respecting the license agreement. Legal dues aside, the are still some social dues to be paid.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    6. Re:That's the new way to start a company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If teaching yourself basic was the hardest thing you've ever done with a computer, you have a long, long way to go before you can legitimately complain about that kind of stuff on /.

  34. SCO expertise by darkonc · · Score: 1
    The people at SCO are experts at identifying rip-offs. Ask them for help?

    I think that what you really want, is somebody who's an expert at correctly identifying rip-offs.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  35. It is another MFS conspiracy by OldHawk777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How Y'all folks been doing,

    I've been visiting different places.

    Could/Would Microsoft use a company outside the USA DMCA RIAA ... to act as a subversive/proxy agent to disrupt/claim/... part of the open-source territory? Is MS Gates trying to globally contain the spread of "Open Source and Democracy" with strategic special interest planning/positioning outside the USA?

    Could be ..., but I am just not sure of anything like this foolish unlikely conspiracy of Microsoft's interest in Globalization for Capitalism in direct opposition to Democracy (anti-exploitation representation).

    Has any one ..., I think SpecOps/SoftLabs website maybe managed/developed by pITstop?
    Yahoo!ed pITstop microsoft Philippines
    Googled pITstop microsoft Philippines

    OldHawk777

    May God Bless and Thank Dummy Rummy and his mythical guzzling buddy George for all the atrocities they bring US. Today same as yesterday (four years ago), I would vote for Bill Gates if it would keep/get GWB and clown-crew out of Washington permanently.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
    1. Re:It is another MFS conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Could/Would your writing be any worse? How can anyone possibly be this stupid/dumb?

    2. Re:It is another MFS conspiracy by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      He was dumb enough to subscribe to Slashdot, that should tell you a lot!

    3. Re:It is another MFS conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo! You forgot your tinfoil hat and crack pipe at my place the other day. You can pick them up any time.

    4. Re:It is another MFS conspiracy by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

      Dang, I thought it was just droll troll or off-color off-topic.

      I guess it was just bad and offensive humor.

      FORGIVE ME OH LORD!

      I will assume your forgiveness ... (yes, double meaning).

      THANKS for your eloquent reply and I hope you have fun next time.

      OldHawk777

      --
      Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
    5. Re:It is another MFS conspiracy by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

      Dear AC,

      PLEASE be more creative and entertaining next time.

      Dang, I thought it was just droll troll or off-color off-topic.

      I guess it was just bad and offensive humor.

      FORGIVE ME OH LORD!

      I will assume your forgiveness ... (yes, double meaning).

      THANKS for your eloquent reply and I hope you have fun next time.

      (intentional repeat)

      OldHawk777

      --
      Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  36. The name "David" - Biblical reference? by CdBee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    David is known to many as the Biblical character to slew Goliath, putting the Philistines into retreat and making David a favourite of the Hebrew people, who would one day be their king.

    Following this, David was repeatedly attacked by the leaders of the Hebrew people for being too strong.

    "For a while, David found himself in the rather bizarre situation of fighting Saul's enemies and fleeing Saul at the same time." - quoted from keyway.ca

    No, I'm no sort of religious propagandist, it's just amusing how well this rings when read as an analysis of commercial software vendors targeting the OSS community.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  37. Not a GPL violation -- YET by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    At least they're not pitching for IP lawyers...

    They may need some. If what we're seeing her is accurate, then the only thing that's stopping them from being GPL violators is the fact that they haven't distributed anything yet.

    When they do that, they'll need IP lawyers (not that it'll do them much good). At the very least they'll need lawyers to sign the out of court settlement with the wine/crossover people.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  38. Photoshop by Uruviel · · Score: 1

    I'd sure like to see Adobe Photoshop running on Linux...

    1. Re:Photoshop by Flak · · Score: 1

      Install Crossover. It's been stable for like a year or more.

    2. Re:Photoshop by datadriven · · Score: 1

      I run version 6 on wine on a daily basis. A few annoyances, but it works.

    3. Re:Photoshop by Noltar · · Score: 1

      I run Photoshop 7 in Wine 20031212 without a problem. There is also apparent work to get the functionality back into newer releases of wine.

    4. Re:Photoshop by Matriark+TerVel · · Score: 1

      Here's a little screenshot I took on my friend's box, showing PS7 running under wine.

      --
      Let the dead rise!
  39. beh by XO · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note to self/all:

    WINE cannot run the Windows Installer.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:beh by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      WINE cannot run the Windows Installer.

      So maybe they actually are doing something new then. Have they ever said that they were not using Wine as a base?

    2. Re:beh by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      If you mean MSI then it most certainly can. If you mean the installer for Windows the OS then of course it cannot - you aren't meant to install Windows itself into Wine.

    3. Re:beh by teval · · Score: 1

      It does actually, and quite well. Only a few bugs here and there. Try a newer version of wine.

  40. Re:That's the new way to start a company by theft by OldHawk777 · · Score: 0

    With OSS you must include all sources the code with the hackers' names.

    If this was not done it is theft of property (I think) under GPL and other OSS copyrights.

    OldHawk777

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  41. Re: Dept of Home-LAN Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If BG takes office, how long till the RIAA, BSA, NSA, FBI and CIA all merge, and Hatch is promoted to Secretary of Media Defense :)

  42. Re:That's the new way to start a company by theft by jd142 · · Score: 1

    Very true, for FLOSS licesnes, but not all. There was no suggestion in post I was replying to that the source was not released. If it was released, then there's no violation. If it was not released, then there was. But the original poster's complaint was that reselling open source software as a bundled product on a computer was ripping off the creators. That's only true if the software is being distributed in way that violates the FLOSS license.

  43. Re:Engrish by Sun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dear Mr. A. Coward,

    My native language is Hebrew. How many languages can you convey a message in so that people can understand, with or without grammar mistakes?

    Sincerely,
    Shachar

    P.s.
    http://www.shemesh.biz/sun.html for what my name means, as well as some clue about how much different languages can differ.

  44. You get no sympathy from me by skyhawker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Regards,
    .... Bob

    --

    The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
    -- Scotty.
  45. Ripoff...? by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    Proof that this is not a Wine "rip-off." Remember folks, this is what the GPL is for -- legal derivative works. It would have been immoral maybe if they had hidden the fact that it was Wine derived, but it's quite obvious they are not trying to hide it.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
    1. Re:Ripoff...? by arekq · · Score: 1

      It's not as obvious as you think. Here is my comments in another thread.

    2. Re:Ripoff...? by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see. Well, not that I think this is what they are doing, but if I were doing this, I would start with the Wine source (Assuming the LGPL was acceptable for what I wanted to do) and remove bits of Wine as I reverse engineered the replacements. Perhaps? But not likely, considering what has been presented before and since.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
  46. GPL vs Corprate by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    This is why the GPL is important.
    A very old (and often employed) business plan

    1. Steal existing work (Say public domain code) clame as own.
    2. Market....
    3. If original hasn't been devistated by the hype. Sue.
    3a. They can't sue back if it's public domain. No proffit motive to defend. Chances are they'll give it up.
    3b. If they don't give up use the fact that your the only one with a clame of ownership.
    After all the original author gave up all rights you have every right to clame it.
    (Finders keepers)

    4. Proffit.
    5. Let it go stagnent and die.
    It's not like you put any work into it.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
    1. Re:GPL vs Corprate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very much pro-GPL, so this is definitely not intended to provoke a license war but the BSD/X11/MIT style licenses will essentially protect you in the same way. At least thats the current commonly accepted legal theory! Neither have been contested much in court.

    2. Re:GPL vs Corprate by teval · · Score: 1

      Wine is not GPLed, it's under the LGPL. http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.html There's a big difference between the two licenses.

  47. They got the "quick brown fox" wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Word screenshot, they used the phrase "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog", which is wrong. The correct phrase is "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog", and contains all the letters in the English alphabet. Their phrase misses the letter S.

  48. I emailed Specops.... by TheRealJFM · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since no one else did, I sent this when the first slashdot article appeared. I got a reply recently.

    To sum up the email, they will use LGPL, and release a demo code around May when the website will be re-opened.

    The program is based on some already existing open source software. So yes, it probably uses wine.

    So will it turn up?

    This was the response:

    The availability of the commercial version of Project David is before the
    end of this year. We do encourage the open source movement and we will
    comply with the GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. We will be posting
    developments and availability of our demo code through our Website
    http://www.specopslabs.com which will be reopened before the end of May.
    Through our website, we will be announcing how you can secure a licensed
    copy of Project David when it becomes commercially available before the end
    of this year. For existing MS Windows users, it will be available via
    download. For users buying a new PC, we are working with PC manufacturers,
    System Whitebox Builders and OEM's on having this pre-loaded when the PC is
    ordered as a Linux desktop/server

    As the final pricing of the commercial version of DAVID is still being
    finalized, the combined pricing of David with the Linux distribution of your
    choice will be significantly lower than securing a license for the desktop
    proprietary Operating Systems in the market today. We are a firm believer in
    having Linux on the desktop and will price the product accordingly to make
    the commercial issues more compelling.

    Below are some additional information on Project David. [SNIP!]

    The only things I didn't already know from the articles that have appeared are that:

    "Our Linux/Win Bridge software is one of multiple
    components [Including LGPL stuff like wine?], which comprise our OS platform. In the future we will release
    another component, which is a set of tools that will encourage developers to
    write native Linux applications."

    "The David software is a joint development effort between De La Salle
    University and SpecOpS Labs. Our Chief Technical Officer is Mr. Peter
    Valdez. As you may know Mr. Valdez is the founder of Tivoli Systems, which
    is now a multi billion-dollar flagship product of IBM."

    "The code for our Windows/Linux Bridge is a hybrid of code, including our own
    proprietary code, and code from several open source projects."

    --
    Joseph Farthing
    http://josephfarthing.com
  49. Office 2000 is almost 5 years old... by dylan95 · · Score: 1

    How about running something a little more recent, like Office XP or Office 2003...

    I'd be really impressed to see it running Office for Longhorn.

    1. Re:Office 2000 is almost 5 years old... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      But a lot of businesses still use Windows 2000 and Office 2000. While they still work adequately, there's no incentive to upgrade to XP, especially as you would probably need to upgrade all the company's machines at the same time.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  50. Wow! I want to invest now! by Avenel · · Score: 1

    Based on its fundamental discovery about the architecture of systems-level middleware, SpecOpS Labs has simply outdistanced all other players in the field. From this, our partners and stakeholders will not only realize handsome financial gain, but share in the ultimate entrepreneurial dream of changing the shape of the IT industry to come.

  51. Re:That's the new way to start a company by theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's MIT-era wine they don't have to release anything. Slashbots need to slow the fuck down before their heads implode. They (by in large) contribute next to nothing of value to the "open source movement," but they sure as Hell have a mighty sense of entitlement.

  52. Mr. Jock, TV Quiz Ph.D., bags few lynx. by Sunlighter · · Score: 1

    I got this one from Richard Lederer. It uses each letter exactly once. It cant be beaten.

    --
    Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
    1. Re:Mr. Jock, TV Quiz Ph.D., bags few lynx. by PGillingwater · · Score: 1

      Not bad, but I disqualify it on the ground that it uses two contractions and two acronyms. :-)

      --
      Paul Gillingwater
      MBA, CISSP, CISM
  53. then perhaps you'll have sympathy for... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    ....all the Dicks out there

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  54. Forgot the "s"! by Bifurcati · · Score: 1
    Actually, it's got to be

    The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

    That shortens it by one letter, and includes the missing "s"!

  55. Re: Mr Jock, TV Quiz Ph.D., bags few lynx. by gidds · · Score: 2, Funny
    How about:
    Veldt jynx grimps waqf zho buck.
    Like yours, it uses each letter exactly once. Unlike yours, every word is a valid (if archaic) full English word, and it makes grammatical sense; but unlike mine, yours was understandable :)

    (I think it means something about an unlucky grassland annoying a certain type of cattle belonging to a mosque. There're more here.)

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  56. Somebody should visit that address... by MarsF · · Score: 2, Insightful



    ... with a digital camera. I wonder what their offices look like? I'm sure we would all love to know.

    Remember [H]ard|OCP's expose "Behind the Infinium Phantom Console"? Perhaps someone needs to perform some similar detective work in this case as well.

    1. Re:Somebody should visit that address... by Myen · · Score: 1

      Ah, but Google tells that they actually are registered:

      page, Google Cache (because it didn't want to load for me for some reason) - that was the first result too.

      I would recommend against spamming those addresses, or even calling that phone number - we don't want to hurt innocent unrelated people. The e-mail address may even be some contact from some under company, since it's at a different domain and all.


      Information on ejobz.net, Inc. would be interesting though.

    2. Re:Somebody should visit that address... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      net.sg remarks: Network Issues : noc@pacific.net.sg mnt-by: PIPL-NOC-AP changed: operations@pacific.net.sg 20030920 status: ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE source: APNIC person: Edy Lie address: 10 Anson Road #24-09 International Plaza address: Singapore 079903 phone: +65-98759599 fax-no: +65-98759599 e-mail: email@edylie.net nic-hdl: EL8-AP mnt-by: PIPL-NOC-AP changed: operations@pacific.net.sg 20030918 source: APNIC

  57. Alternative to David/Wine by sashang · · Score: 1

    I've found an alternative that allows windows programs to run natively. Check it out here

    1. Re:Alternative to David/Wine by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's still in beta too. Hogs resources and runs like crap.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  58. Code reuse is a good thing by LibrePensador · · Score: 1

    What is all this non-sense about wine being ripped off? Code reuse is the essence of free software.

    More developers means more eyes and less bugs. I am glad to see that there will be competition on the supported wine app space. This should keep the crossover-office guys on their toes, right Jeremy?

    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
  59. Re:Engrish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT.

    Shalom.

    Signed,
    Bignose American whose taxes are sent to your country as "aid".

  60. pwnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My native language is Hebrew. How many languages can you convey a message in so that people can understand, with or without grammar mistakes?

    Meanie, meanie, tickle... Up yours, Sun.

    (How many languages can you pun in simultaneously, beyatch?)

  61. OpenOffice isn't ready yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the reason why OpenOffice is not sufficient a replacement for MS-Office is that it can't exchange Excel and Powerpoint documents well.

    I have never ever seen any Powerpoint presentation that would display properly in OpenOffice and when I prepared presentations using OpenOffice, just about everybody I sent it to complained that it wouldn't display properly in Powerpoint. If you need to exchange presentation documents with customers or if you get powerpoint presentations from external sources, then there is no way around using Powerpoint. OpenOffice doesn't cut it (yet).

    The situation with Excel is a little better, but if you are using some of the more sophisticated features of Excel, then again, you will find that OpenOffice can't cope with the documents. Again, if you get Excel documents from external sources, for many documents there is no way around using Excel. Again, OpenOffice doesn't cut it (yet).

    Not that I am saying MS-Office is better, but for most people who exchange documents with others in their jobs, they don't really have an alternative because Micro$oft controls the document formats.

    I wish that one of these days we will see an anti-trust case against Micro$oft that doesn't miss the point so badly as the ones we have seen in the US and EU, ie. whether or not to bundle a browser/media-player etc etc etc

    The trust busters need to grow up and learn that the only remedy they should be seeking is to prevent Micro$oft from using proprietary document formats. Document formats for things like wordprocessing, spreadsheets and presentations should be standardised and every company with a market share over 50% should automatically be obliged by anti-trust law to comply with those (non-proprietary) standard formats or else automatically have their non-compliant product banned.

    I'd think that it would take less than one year to break Micro$soft's monopoly if such a regime was in force. On the other hand, any anti-trust initiative that doesn't address document formats is doomed from the very start to fail.

  62. Re:Engrish by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    I think the parent had a legitimate point; if you are presenting informaiton in Language X, it is entirely reasonable to expect it to be grammatically correct.

    I don't speak Hebrew (for instance, so if I wanted to put up a website in Hebrew I would be courteous enough to get a Hebrew translator to ensure it was correct.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  63. hmmm by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    inetnum: 203.81.46.160 - 203.81.46.191
    netname: SOL-ONE-SG
    descr: SOL ONE
    country: SG
    admin-c: EL8-AP
    tech-c: EL8-AP
    remarks: Spam and Security: abuse@pacific.

    slashdot moaned about the "junk" char's, so i'l split this in to a couple of posts

  64. Reply: Dept of Home-LAN Security? by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    THANKS for the understanding of my obtuse and facetious sycophantic humor of MS Gates skills and abilities.

    [good one for "Home-LAN"] Home-LAN security by MS and Intel will develop new Home-LAN Scrutiny for Home-Land Security policy/law enforcement at home.

    The never ending conspiracies ....

    OldHawk777

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?