Slashdot Mirror


A Worm's Worm

Carnildo writes "There's a new worm out, according to the Register, but one with a twist. This one, called 'Dabber', infects computers by exploiting a security hole in the Sasser worm."

345 comments

  1. Ugh... by c0dedude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jeez, they never fully test these worms before release. No wonder they'd have security issues.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Ugh... by irokitt · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is why every worm should be released under the GPL. Then independant worm enthusiasts can verify the security of worm code and contribute patches and improvements to the author.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Ugh... by dealsites · · Score: 5, Funny

      I imagine that most of these virus writers are not formally educated in programming, but able to hack together code snippets they find on the web. It's a wonder some of them work as well as they do. I doubt they do peer review or use a CVS to manage their code.

      --
      New deal processing engine online: http://www.dealsites.net/livedeals.html

    3. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most virii are rather small in code size compared to a typical project using CVS or similar tools. That means a single person can easily manage and oversight the code.

    4. Re:Ugh... by inertialmatrix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "most of these virus writers are not formally educated in programming, but able to hack together code snippets they find on the web. It's a wonder some of them work..."

      heh.. sure, right. God knows that unless you have a masters in CS your only chance to program something like code red, blaster, or sasser is by hacking "together code snippets [you] find on the web" Christ, 3 years into a CS major, and aside from the calculus I have yet to make any large leaps in knowledge over what I already knew several years ago.

      Maybe that's what grad school is for?

    5. Re:Ugh... by dealsites · · Score: 1

      That is true... I guess I had the term "script kiddies" in my head and assumed that these were pre-college programmers. I'm getting a little older now, but I assume that they are probably teaching programming in high-school now. Does anyone know what grade the first introductory programming classes are now offered in?

      --
      New deal processing engine online: http://www.dealsites.net/livedeals.html

    6. Re:Ugh... by taped2thedesk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of schools used to offer as a electives in high school, but thanks to constant budget cuts, the "leave every child behind" act, etc, many have had to drop these classes. Pretty sad.

    7. Re:Ugh... by drskrud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's something that really depends on the school. I remember my elementary school would have a class that consisted of Logo Writer / Microworlds that I took in the first grade...

      My former high school offered a Visual Basic course in grade 10... but that's VB.

      However, there's a lot one can learn by teaching themselves from a book, and I think that's where a lot of the talented young programmers get their starts. It may be that writing annoying viruses and worms are just some kid's way of testing and/or proving the knowledge s/he's gained. But I'd like to think that usually the smarter ones find more meaningful applications of their skills.

    8. Re:Ugh... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      The best a high school can muster in terms of programming classes might be BASIC. That's about as good as it gets.

    9. Re:Ugh... by inertialmatrix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hrmmm... I think the first programming class I took in school was during 4th grade. I think it was LOGO, and then that summer my school started a computer camp that focused on BASIC.

      But still... it is just getting younger and younger. During the summer my University hosts several computer camps, and I see 7,8, 9 and 10 year old kids programming in C ++ and other OO programming languages.

      Crazy indeed

    10. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Uni do you attend?

    11. Re:Ugh... by httptech · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is already happening. Agobot is a GPLed malware project. Although it's not quite a worm, it can spread unattended once given the command to do so. Plenty of people are contributing to it (although some of them have been arrested in the past few days) and the feature list is quickly growing.

    12. Re:Ugh... by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      Actually we had classes on C++ at my school.

    13. Re:Ugh... by Pikhq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean, like my little EZcompile (a frontend to the Linux compiling process) project that I've been working on while learning Tcl/Tk?

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    14. Re:Ugh... by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      My high school offers 2 courses. The applied science dept has c++ class. The math dept has a java class.

    15. Re:Ugh... by bstone · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know what grade the first introductory programming classes are now offered in?

      Not sure about now, but my first programming class was taught after school as an elective option by our math teacher in 10th grade ... that was in 1965.

      I assume now, kids can start earlier than that.

    16. Re:Ugh... by Rallion · · Score: 1

      At my HS, you used to be able to take a class in C++ in 10th grade, though most would take it in 11th. Now it's Java, of course.

    17. Re:Ugh... by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I imagine that many of these virus writers are professionals, well-paid by their spammer employers.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    18. Re:Ugh... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      In our school at least I believe it was 3rd I first heard about basic. Although it was extracurricular. I don't believe it became an actual during school class per say until 5th grade (basic and C/C++), of course in all fairness we didn't have CLASSES before 5th grade, we had A classroom and A teacher.

    19. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Indeed, fact is stranger than fiction!

    20. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they tested, they foud the Windows exploits the worm just fine. [me ducks]

    21. Re:Ugh... by spectral · · Score: 1

      Any class handling advanced placement CS better have offered Pascal and C++ and currently offer Java, because those are the three languages the test has been in.

    22. Re:Ugh... by jesser · · Score: 5, Funny

      So if I'm infected, I can demand a copy of the source code?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    23. Re:Ugh... by pyite · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I was a sophomore, my school was just starting to offer AP Computer Science A (C++) to juniors and seniors. I petitioned and got in the class. Out of roughly forty students only I and one other student got a 5 on the exam. Due to the obvious lack of preparation of most of the kids entering the course, I encouraged my teacher to try to start an intro. class. Surprisingly, he listened, and even listened to my language recommendation of Scheme. That summer he went to a Scheme teacher's workshop type thing geared to starting coures in Scheme. Sure enough, the following fall, a semester course called Introduction to Computer Programming was being taught using Scheme to grades 10 and above. High schools can be decent places to learn coding, if you have faculty that is motivated to teach it. I even managed to start a chapter of the American Computer Science League in my school. That kind of failed since we were all seniors who were far past giving a damn. It was still a good idea though.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    24. Re:Ugh... by XryanX · · Score: 1

      I took "Computer Programming I" in 9th grade. It was all really basic VB stuff, like making currency converters. Everyone played Unreal Tournament over the LAN instead of working, and then I'd do the work in 20 minutes, save to a disc, and pass the disc around for $5 a pop. Another high school across town used to offer the first two semesters of the Cisco networking courses.

    25. Re:Ugh... by k12linux · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... so developers have to remain anonymous less they end up on FBI/policy "hot-lists"?

      If so, what's to keep someone from sneaking a back door into the project?

    26. Re:Ugh... by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny
      Also I took independant studys in c for a extra year.

      In place of English class, apparently.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    27. Re:Ugh... by lommer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a very serious suggestion, namely that Agobot, once it infects a host, should patch the host, remove spyware, and remove other virii, and then propogate itself a maximum of 10 times (to conserve bandwidth). Though you are still doing unauthorized stuff to other peoples' computers, if you're gonna make a virus, you may as well make it beneficial. Maybe that way fewe people would get arrested...

      Given that it's a GPL project, I can't imagine that it would be too hard to find a few dedicated coders who would be willing to work on such a fork.

    28. Re:Ugh... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Of course, and its a sad comment on the state of computing today that this is a unique case. Human viruses are thoughtfully provided with their source code - exceeding even the requirements of the GPL - so they can be compiled by your cells.

      Yay for Free Software! (Achoo!)

    29. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of blaming your incompetence on the higher education, why don't you blame it on your school or even yourself. I found that four years at my school have been highly beneficial. Any high school kid may be able to write a program, but can they develop a project?

    30. Re:Ugh... by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the GPL automatically makes the program in question "good". The maintainer of the code would still reject any patches that made his/her program different than the original vision of the program. Just because it's GPL doesn't mean squat.

    31. Re:Ugh... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I did a few years of programming at high-school.
      Specificly, I did a bit of pascal then some VB later on.

    32. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Instead of blaming your incompetence on the higher education, why don't you blame it on your school or even yourself. I found that four years at my school have been highly beneficial. Any high school kid may be able to write a program, but can they develop a project?"

      Maybe you need to relax a bit. I finished a double major in EE and CS just last semester; I must agree that for many people an undergraduate degree in CS is not all that helpful in terms of programming knowledge - at least for some of the more gifted high school kids that program in OO languages as a hobby. Although it varies greatly between schools, often times an undergrad computer science program ends up being a very general overview. of a very vast field of study. However, it _does_ prepare you for graduate studies by giving you a strong base in math/theory.

      I honestly don't know how you think that the parent is incompetent for simply pointing out that he already commanded a strong background in programming prior to studying at the University. I think he mentioned that he attends UCSD - hardly a school that would foster incompetence in its students.

      And as to whether a high school "kid" would be able to develop a project?? I honestly don't know the answer to that, but I do know that some Indian grad from IIT Delhi would be able to develop a project.. and he could do it for $60 a day.

      Maybe you ought to get off your high horse.
      cheers

    33. Re:Ugh... by inertialmatrix · · Score: 1

      UCSD!

      HUZZAH

    34. Re:Ugh... by foobario · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Maybe that's what grad school is for?

      No, but the remainder of your undergraduate education will benefit if you continue to hope that this is true.

      Every year in my EE and CS programs I figured that 'next year' would be the year I'd really learn something useful, but that day never arrived. Nonetheless I managed to graduate, get a high-paying job, and get laid off 20 months ago after 3 years of 15 hour days. Now I think about taking classes at the community college, welding maybe, but I just can't get up the energy to do it.

      You see, you are wrong in assuming that calculus is the only thing you've learned so far. You've also learned The Secret a year earlier than most people.

      You know those tests they do on rats, where they put them in a maze, and if they do the wrong thing they get an electric shock, but if they do the right thing they get the cheese?

      The Secret is this:

      You are the rat.
      The electric shock is *always* on.
      ***There Is No Cheese***.

    35. Re:Ugh... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      the virus in the FA could have done that, but of course the author had to be an asshat and put more badness in instead of just nuking the other viruses... We need a computer equivalent of that anti-HIV virus I saw on ./ last night.

    36. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing that we can all be thankful for - only one team of virus writers is putting in mouse support.

      Microsoft.

    37. Re:Ugh... by Sv1ad · · Score: 1

      In news today, Sasser Worm creator sues creator of Dabber Worm for breach of copyright.

    38. Re:Ugh... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny.

      I learned lots of useful things in undergrad. I use them roughly 7-9 hours a day, doing a job I actually enjoy.

      And I got an EE degree. Maybe it's because I'm not a programmer.

      Maybe you just worked for a shitty company? (And before you get pissy about it, I work for a Fortune 100 company - it ain't just small company's that can be decent to work for.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    39. Re:Ugh... by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You should try my personal favourite software licence:

      Copyright (c) yyyy, The Author and Contributors. All rights reserved until yyyy when this work will enter the Public Domain.

      Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
      • Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
      • Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. Any redistribution of the software or derived work in binary form must be accompanied by an offer of the source code, to be valid until the lapse of copyright on the work in question. In case of default on this offer, any affected party may use reasonable force to obtain the source code.
      • The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
      • Modifications on such a scale that they are deemed by applicable local laws to constitute a whole new work are exempt from this licence.
      THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    40. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, where you have the finest laws money can buy, that would be pretty much a given.

    41. Re:Ugh... by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Welchia perhaps? It doesn't remove spyware and was designed to remove just one worm but that's kind of what you're on about I think.

      I ran into Welchia.B the other day which went after MyDoom (SCO) and downloaded 5 patches or so from MS and installed them on the system. Trouble is, that it's still a worm - nobody wants it on their system - it took me a couple hours to identify and remove it then get Windows running again.

      Welchia.B was trying to run four different exploits on remote IPs - I sniffed all the traffic it was generating - trying to exploit up to a hundred IPs a second at one point. Max of 10 times to conserve bandwidth...? It has to find the other PCs first.

      The patches it downloaded screwed up the XP installation badly, so a reinstall over the top brought it back. I don't want worms that try and fix other worms (get Avast or AVG etc instead).

    42. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The maintainer of the code would still reject any patches...

      Yes, hence a fork

    43. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't listen to this guy. He wasn't smart enough to realise the things he was being taught, and now he's bitter because his employers figured him out, and he isn't good enough to get another job.

    44. Re:Ugh... by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      If you've only taken math through calculus I'd say that is your problem.

      Discrete mathematics, asymptotic notation, linear algebra, and mathematical modeling all prove useful to me on a daily basis. As to more "CSy" type classes the work I had to do with UML and software design (rather than just shake the requirements up and hope a working prototype falls out) comes immediately to mind.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    45. Re:Ugh... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      It's not necessary to learn programming at school, by the time I took my class in computers (highschool, 1987-88) I was very frustrated by my teachers total lack of what was to me basic computer knowledge (yet the other teachers all thought she was some kinda computer genuis, I outa tell you some of the dumb things she did, like storing 5.25 floppies in sleeves taped to the sides of the monitors).
      By that time I'd managed learn basic, 6510 machine language (not real assembler, at best I had access to opcode memonics, but since I had to type in the program in basic from a magazine myself I pretty much had most of them memorized anyway), had spent four years as a regualar on severa local bbs's. Repaired a floppy disk drive using a repair manual (commodore 1541). Coded my implementation of Conways Life (with user changeable rules, graphics, and other settings). 80-90% out of books/magazines and taking apart other peoples programs and changing them till I knew how they worked.
      I'm not trying to brag or anything just caught in nostalgia, I really miss the old bbs days, taking my turn posting to the discusions/debates till 3 am, meeting everyone at the roller ring (including one guy who looked like someones yoga teacher, could outskate any 3 of us, AND rebuilt 70's mini computers for fun).
      Been using the same handle/nick almost the whole time.
      Anyway, it's quite possible many viruses are done by self taught programmers. many of them seem that way considering how often they do things that make it hard/impossible to achive thier apparent goals.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    46. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is already happening. Agobot is a GPLed malware project. Although it's not quite a worm, it can spread unattended once given the command to do so. Plenty of people are contributing to it (although some of them have been arrested in the past few days) and the feature list is quickly growing.

      I guess this brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "the GPL is viral in nature..." ;-)

    47. Re:Ugh... by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't put restrictions on Public Domain.

      If it's in the public domain, then anyone can do anything they want with it - you are revoking all ownership so have no more right to impose restrictions such as copyright notices than the guy down the street does.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    48. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody with simple knowledge of programming can code stuff to destroy.
      I really despise these subjects like the failure that they are.
      If you can't do something to construct, don't do it.
      Writing virus is a lame way of expressing your knowledge about programming.
      In fact, I think than most CS professionals wouldn't never write (or never release on the wild) a virus, because of a simple thing: ethic.

    49. Re:Ugh... by loconet · · Score: 1

      You just described what most micky mouse programming shops are like now a days.

      --
      [alk]
    50. Re:Ugh... by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 3, Informative

      But he is not saying it is in the public domain. He is saying that from year YYYY until year YYYY(+X) he owns the copyright and can make demands as such. Once YYYY(+X), it becomes public domain and then, as such, can be done with as pleased. Until then, the demands as to copyright notice are his to make.

    51. Re:Ugh... by mabinogi · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are correct, and I am a moron.

      Next time I'll read all of the comment, not just random words ;)

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    52. Re:Ugh... by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 1

      You had best be careful of this one- I hear that if you get infected, you'll be getting a letter from old Darl asking for $699. Better keep you virus definitions up to date, or this one could get expensive!

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.

      :wq!

    53. Re:Ugh... by fermion · · Score: 1
      It is a bit more complicated than that. There is plenty of room for electives. However there are several issues that make it complicated for a student to participate in electives.

      First, many things that were electives are now mandatory. The obvious course is keyboarding. This is required. A kid who went to a good jr. high school will already have this course. For others, this fills the one elective slot available in the 9th grade.

      Second, a significant number of kids fail courses in the 9th grade. Some students can and will make up the course in summer school. Others will make up the course in 10th grade. Which of course will tend to kill elective opportunities there.

      Third, many will opt for work study in 12th grade. This limits the number of of hours available for non-core courses in the other grades.

      So it does little good for a school to offer electives if an insufficient number of students can take advantage of those courses. My high school did offer many electives. My high school also tended to remove students that were not make satisfactory academic progress.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    54. Re:Ugh... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      ***There Is No Cheese***.

      Or did somebody just move it?

    55. Re:Ugh... by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say it's crazy. Dude, come on, C++ OO programming at 7? That's a little hard to believe unless you're a genius. At 7 you don't have the concepts needed to do advanced programming. Heck, most kids only learn to read at 6 or 7, and this is the bright kids. You can't say he's been alive for 7 years now, and C++ can be mastered in 2 years, so he should be a guru by now. It just doesn't work that way, you need to accumulate knowledge and develop the mind in a certain way.

      Logo at 6 or 7 I can believe. Basic between 8 and 10, likewise. C++ and OO from 12 up, fine. But C++ and OO at 7, I don't believe.

      I'm not saying that kids aren't bright enough. Yeah, a kid of 5 can be pretty damn bright, and they have logic. But they don't have the analitical thinking and the power of abstraction. You have to train for that and you will achieve along with other various concepts about computing and math and logic and a lot more. You can't just pound abstract thinking into a 7yr old, that's why Logo teaching uses the little leaping frog stories. Also, they can't teach themselves, like another commenter said, they have to be taught, they don't have the critical mass of knowledge that will allow a person to evolve by itself in a certain field.

      I'm a fairly bright person. I learned Basic at 10, it was taught to me, and let me tell you, in the beginning half the time it was like floating through a haze, doing things intuitively rather than knowingly, with only glimpses of the abstractions behind it all. Took me another 3 or 4 years to finally get the hang of this whole programming thing and to gradually develope appropriate patterns of thought that eventually allowed me to move to C and other languages.

      I'm not exactly Einstein, granted. Perhaps a gifted kid, with high IQ and talent for programming (some don't have it, no matter how smart they are), properly instructed in a proper learning curve (Logo, Basic, C) can make faster progress from a younger age. But let's not get crazy.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    56. Re:Ugh... by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AVG? Now why would anyone in their right mind run a perfectly good program that likes to dissable/cripple/delete other perfectly good programs? Here's a few examples of how the AVG programmers think: example 1- Problem: worms/virii that use built-in IRC clients or exploit IRC as a propegation medium. Solution: mIRC.exe is a virus. delete. example 2- Problem: a few worms exist that install and run the distributed.net client software on infected computers. Solution: Dnet-*.exe is a virus. delete. Yeah. I think ill take my chances with an NAT gateway and a strict policy of not downloading ANYFUCKINGTHING that isn't from a source i trust and/or contains executable code.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    57. Re:Ugh... by Surye · · Score: 1

      Someone has a serious misunderstanding of the benefits of GPL. You can submit patches to projects of any licence and the maintainer can keep or reject them. This is not GPL specific. How ever, on the note of GPL benefits, I believe he said fork .

    58. Re:Ugh... by Pionar · · Score: 1

      I CALL SHENANIGANS!

      No one can be this stupid in 2 consecutive posts! The word is apathetic, dude, but it doesn't matter since you don't care.

    59. Re:Ugh... by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

      ...or you could use your education to get a job in education to take other people's money for nothing.

      Welding is a natural choice for a programmer; after spending countless hours frying the eyes staring at low-grade monitors it only makes sense to spend the rest of your life staring at a retina-frying arc.

      Seriously, if you ever go that route make sure you work in a well ventilated shop. Welding can release some nasty gases.

      All the best in the new career hunt.

    60. Re:Ugh... by xsadar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow!!! I never would have imagined that so many Slashdot readers were morons with such very poor senses of humor!!! (No offense meant for the intelligent readers with good senses of humor.) I can't believe so many people rated asj318's post interesting, which works, but funny would have fit better. And thankyou mabinogi for explaining half of the joke you didn't understand. And thankyou Anarke for explaining the other half of the joke (which you clearly didn't understand either), but you made one mistake: there was no "(+X)" in the original post.

      --
      The only thing I know is that I don't know anything; and I'm not even sure about that.
    61. Re:Ugh... by lostchicken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All binaries come with "source code", machine code. It's a language that most of us don't use, but it's still a language. My CPU uses this "source code" to create a different set of instructions that are executed by the core of the CPU. You can read the machine code and see what the app is doing. DNA and RNA are pretty much just machine code for cells.

      --
      -twb
    62. Re:Ugh... by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

      Right. I'll trust you on that... I don't use AVG to be honest, Avast if I have to install one. I was merely using it as an example of one of the few free virus scanners out there. Thanks for the warning anyway! :-)

      We've traditionally sold Norton, but in the last couple years

      Unfortunately, it isn't me who downloads these things... customers. I do exactly the same as you - it's all you can do on the user side, but try telling a member of the public that!

    63. Re:Ugh... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I learned lots of useful things in undergrad. I use them roughly 7-9 hours a day, doing a job I actually enjoy.

      it ain't just small company's that can be decent to work for.

      Apparently, proper pluralization wasn't one of those useful things you learned.

      I got an EE degree too; I don't use much from my undergrad classes at all, except at home when I work on my electronics hobby projects. Most of the corporate EE positions seem to involve VHDL or Verilog programming. I do a little of both, and a lot of C++. In school, I didn't take any C++, and only one summer class in VHDL. I haven't done any calculus since I was a junior. I also work in a Fortune 100 company, BTW; and it's decent to work for, but it certainly doesn't use much that I learned in college.

    64. Re:Ugh... by foobario · · Score: 1

      Possibly... or perhaps I was the top of my class, educated myself so well that college turned out to be little more than rote recitation, secured a good position in a competitive field and then did my job so well that my managers dumped the unclaimed workload from the first 5 rounds of layoffs onto me... which I managed to maintain for a couple of years, quickly rising through the engineering heirarchy, before getting totally burnt out on the whole deal and calling it quits. And I still get contract offers from my previous employers, which I politely turn down, because I figured out that cubicle-dwelling was too soul-numbing for me and I'd rather be unemployed than work on meaningless projects.

      Seriously, Coward, I thought *I* was the bitter one.

    65. Re:Ugh... by jesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The interesting thing is that by saying "All rights reserved until yyyy when this work will enter the Public Domain", the license prevents the work from being affected by retroactive copyright extension.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    66. Re:Ugh... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on these claims.

      I use AVG 6 Free Edition and mIRC. I don't use dnet anymore, so i can't say on this one, but i have never had a false alarm from AVG. I have however seen plenty of them with Norton (which came preinstalled on my last 2 notebooks...damn Acer and Compaq), so i deleted norton and put on AVG.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    67. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      before getting totally burnt out on the whole deal and calling it quits

      Really? I thought you said you were laid off??

      And you musta been *real* high up the ranks to still be in a cubicle!

    68. Re:Ugh... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, I'm usually very careful about that sort of thing. It just happened to slip this once. As usual, calling someone out on their grammar is a jackass thing to do.

      I do no VHDL and no Verilog right now, though learning Verilog would have its uses for me. Never took a course in it yet, though.

      I do control systems design. It uses the 3 controls courses I took, some of the signals courses I took, both of my DSP courses, and a few other things very heavily. In addition, since it's controls design for ASICs, I do need to reference a little bit of my semiconductors and digital logic courses. I use C to program embedded hardware to emulate our ASICs sometimes, but that's about it for programming.

      Find the right position. There are plenty of people I work with who spend a lot of their time doing circuit analysis for analog circuits, using transistor equations and shit like that. If your company is mainly doing VHDL/Verilog/C++, and you don't want to, find a new company.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    69. Re:Ugh... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, I'm usually very careful about that sort of thing. It just happened to slip this once. As usual, calling someone out on their grammar is a jackass thing to do.

      Sorry, given the context of the message I couldn't resist. I don't normally bother people about that, since I think we all do it at least once. I was hoping for a "funny" mod, but oh well...

    70. Re:Ugh... by foobario · · Score: 1

      >And you musta been *real* high up the ranks to still be in a cubicle!

      Wow... you really live in a fantasy world. At Tektronix, an Engineer VII with 30 years of experience and 100 patents to their name works in a cubicle. 95% of the engineers and computer programmers in the country work in cubicles. Or did you think Dilbert was the only one?

      Don't worry, though, you'll find out all of this shit when you finally get out of school, my Anonymous little pissant Coward friend.

    71. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so did you get laid off like you originally said or did you oh-so-mightily quit?

    72. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not only that, but:
      Any redistribution of the software or derived work in binary form must be accompanied by an offer of the source code, to be valid until the lapse of copyright on the work in question. In case of default on this offer, any affected party may use reasonable force to obtain the source code.
    73. Re:Ugh... by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      No, but had you taken a math course instead of "Rapier like Wit 101" you would have realized that YYYY was the starting year and the lapse between the starting year and the ending year was X, hence the ending year would be YYYY+X.

      By the way, i thought jokes were s'posed to be funny. Maybe that is why I didn't get it.

    74. Re:Ugh... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Just because 7 year olds are programming in an object-oriented language doesn't mean they're doing much more than writing "Hello, world!" It is quite possible to write many programs in an OO language and not know a thing about OO'n.

      The point is not to teach them object inheritance from the start but to get them started with a familiar base that they can build upon rather than have them throw out most of everything they've learned about one language and cast them into a new one.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    75. Re:Ugh... by foobario · · Score: 1

      When the sixth round of layoffs came around and they told me they were adding the orphaned workload to mine (as they had in each of the previous five rounds), I'd just worked 9 months without a Saturday or Sunday off, so I volunteered to help them keep budget costs low buy subtracting my paycheck as well. No 'mightily' about it... it was a very solemn occasion, not something lightly taken when more than half of the engineers and programmers I went to uni with are unemployed, but I really don't think I'd be alive right now if I'd tried to keep up that workload. Everyone thought volunteering for a layoff in this climate was crazy, but when it finally happened everyone congratulated me... I'm like that jump-to-conclusions guy in "Office Space", who got hit by the truck: "You know, I was like you once..."

      After I was gone my manager said that I was cursed with actually being able to do my job; the company has some guys that have been there from the beginning, and they usually don't listen to you much until you've been around a decade or so, and when the older engineers heard me say that it was impossible, they thought it was the usual mushy-head newbie whine... sadly, I only gained the respect of these guys upon my leaving the company, when they took a deeper look at what was going on. Of course, my manager was supposed to buffer and translate these interactions from the start to make sure everyone was on the same page, but he was the one lying to everyone about how the project was coming along just fine, and most of my reports never got higher than his desk. (To give him his due, he was caught in different strata of the same bullshit... but then again it was his job to mediate between engineering and marketing and upper management, and he was telling three different stories, so fuck him, actually. They laid him off a couple of months after I left.)

      So contrary to rant #1, it wasn't that I didn't learn the engineering... the thing I didn't learn was what I was supposed to do when marketing presold a product that was *provably physically impossible* in the first month, yet management, not wanting to admit to their bosses that they'd hosed it up, asked me to 'see what I could do'... I did some damn fine engineering, made just enough progress to prove that the original zero-engineering-input design was in fact impossible, then designed the best solution that didn't violate any laws of physics. Markagement declared it 'done', i.e. told the customer that the original design was working fine, and told me that there were $N millions riding on the successful completion of the original design, which, as I had said, (and finally managed to prove to markagement in the last few weeks of work, with big color Powerpoint slides so they'd understand me), was impossible.

      Final analysis: my engineering design work was rated on the level of people that had been there years more than me. My ability to deal with politics and marketing and various other real-world stuff is lacking where it exists at all. I don't have a problem with that... it took going through that job to figure out that the things I enjoy about engineering really only make up about 10% of the job. So: build an evil laboratory in the basement, work on my own engineering projects, volunteer time with FIRST and the local science museum, and ponder what comes next.

      It won't be a cubicle, I know that for sure.

      So - sorry if something frozzled you in the first post (I'm assuming an identity-continuous Anonymous Coward here), but now that the whole autobiography is in print perhaps you can see where I was (and am) coming from. My experience with three different companies in 6 years, conveniently divided into small, medium, and large, showed me that the best environment for me (as someone who wants to design circuits and write code) is somewhere smaller than 'small company'. Contract work in the evil laboratory in the basement sounds about right, perhaps working with one or two like-minded people and one or two other-minded people so

    76. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for sharing this with me.

      Sorry for being ratty earlier, you see I'm currently sitting my finals for a BSc hons (probably a bachelors in the US) in Computer Science, and the thought that it ain't worth too much wasn't what I wanted to hear at the time ;-)

      But I guess I must thank you for telling me your experience, at least I will go into industry armed with a little more knowledge and perhaps less naivety.

  2. I've had enough by KevinKnSC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Worm writers have got to start taking security more seriously.

    1. Re:I've had enough by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, at least Microsoft worm writers. I'm sure Linux and Mac worms are much more secure. :-)

      --
      What?
    2. Re:I've had enough by End11 · · Score: 1

      But there is so little selection!

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    3. Re:I've had enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I always thought Linux was about choice.

    4. Re:I've had enough by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? The Mac OSX guys haven't figured out how to write a virus yet let alone a worm.

  3. all new low by ResQuad · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is an all new low. Now virus programmers will have to make their virus's better so they dont get infected by another virus.

    I think everyone should go ultra secure, the best firewall ever... Disconnect from the net. It would make this all alot easier on us.

    1. Re:all new low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you start. We'll all disconnect after you do. And while you're disconnected, learn some grammar. alot? dont?

    2. Re:all new low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now virus programmers will have to make their virus's better so they dont get infected by another virus.

      Maybe they can just run Norton AntiVirus - oh wait...

    3. Re:all new low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      learn some grammar. alot? dont?

      That would be spelling. Grammar it ain't.

    4. Re:all new low by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Peopel managed to get their computers infected withotu havign net access.. so nogo there.

  4. A security hole in a virus? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1, Funny

    Christ, doesn't anyone do any qc these days?

  5. Sasser exploit by dresgarcia · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its a shame that its come to the point where a worm will exploit another worm to screw stuff up. I am so glad I moved to linux.

    1. Re:Sasser exploit by boarder8925 · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Its a shame that its come to the point where a worm will exploit another worm to screw stuff up. I am so glad I moved to linux.
      What about OS X?
    2. Re:Sasser exploit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X makes me drool. so pretty... and it has a shell... 8-)
      however, I'm still a linux zealot at heart.

    3. Re:Sasser exploit by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      Its a shame that its come to the point where a worm will exploit another worm to screw stuff up. I am so glad I moved to linux.

      What about OS X?

      You've got yours too.

      Ok, it's a trojan, not a worm, but no system is 100% secure.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
  6. geez by killerface · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know this seems at first to be really creative . But think he/she is just riding on sassers coattails

    1. Re:geez by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, Blaster and Sasser seemed at first to be really creative. But think he/she is just riding on Windows coattails.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:geez by hawado · · Score: 1

      You know at first Oracle seemed at first to be really creative. But think he/she is just riding on killers coattails.

      --
      Feed my eyes...
  7. planned by name773 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    did the sasser writer make it expandable on purpose? this isn't the first time a thing like this has happened.

    1. Re:planned by NorwBlue · · Score: 1

      No can't have been planned. The writer of sasser proved that he knew enough about programming to that. Even microsoft got sued for doing that, and at x a license he would have been ruined.(hint:explorer plugin thingy)

    2. Re:planned by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      sure it could have been planned...

      Coming soon....
      http://www.sasser-plugins.com

    3. Re:planned by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      quite a few worms leave an open ftp or telnet-to-commandline server open behind them.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  8. Re:Clever by osu-neko · · Score: 1

    Yes. Normally, I think virus writers are just scum, but I have mixed feelings about this one. This is just so damned cute...

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  9. This is why... by boffy_b · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...we need to stop relying on thrid-party worms, we need Micro-Soft certified worms to ensure our securtity....

    --
    Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.
    1. Re:This is why... by wmspringer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean like IE? I've certainly had enough programs try to get me to install that on my computer..

    2. Re:This is why... by sweet+cunny+muffin · · Score: 0

      Just who the hell are "Micro-Soft"? The company is called "Microsoft". Just look at their website at http://www.microsoft.com/ (not http://www.micro-soft.com/) to verify this. This is even worse than the MicroSoft people, and arguably worse than M$, as at least they're trying to make some sort of (childish) point, and you're just being dumb.

    3. Re:This is why... by boffy_b · · Score: 1

      1. They were called Micro-Soft back in the day. 2. I have a fetish for over-using hyphens. 3. Count to 10 and breathe.

      --
      Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.
    4. Re:This is why... by duffel · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...we need to stop relying on thrid-party worms, we need Micro-Soft certified worms to ensure our securtity....
      You mean like IE? I've certainly had enough programs try to get me to install that on my computer..
      Wouldn't that be a trojan horse rather than a worm? Worms are more like those automatic updates, burrowing into your system... Although that program that downloads them would be more like a trojan horse, and the downloading of updates the payload...

      Yes, that's it! Windows is a trojan horse designed to sneek windows updates onto your computer!

      Tremble before my mighty logic!
    5. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And be able to patch our worms with new & improved code from Windows Update. Wish RHN could do something like that for us cheapskates who won't pay the price for a full-fledged window to have our worms in... :(

    6. Re:This is why... by writermike · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...we need to stop relying on thrid-party worms, we need Micro-Soft certified worms to ensure our securtity....

      Heh.

      The Virus you're about to install has not passed Windows Logo testing to verify its compatibility with Windows XP.

      Continue Anyway.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    7. Re:This is why... by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You just can't bring yourself to use the ever-hilarious "M$" because of the implied kiddy factor but you need to show you're part of the "in crowd" by mangling the name some other way. It just hurts to type "Microsoft", doesn't it. You start typing "Micr.." and then your fingers tremble. Your vision becomes blurry. The pain... oh, the pain... concentrate! type... uhhhnnnggg... "..o-Soft" Ahhhhh... OK, breathe. Again, breathe. That's it.

      Blessed GNU! For a moment there you thought this was it: this was the end. But no, leetness prevails and much karma is had.

    8. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought thats what windows update was?

    9. Re:This is why... by bigberk · · Score: 1
    10. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They were called Micro-Soft back in the day

      No, the logo said that. The company name was not written that way, and it was never the correct casing of the legal name.

      I have a fetish for over-using hyphens

      Let's correct your post then:

      ...we-need-to-stop-relying-on-thrid-party worms-,-we-need-Micro Soft-certified-worms-to-ensure-our-securtity....
      There. Looks more "fetish"-ish to me. Doesn't it?

      Thanks for the chuckles!

    11. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that spot in their logo where the "S" takes a little divot out of the "O" also looks like a half-hearted hint at a hyphen. Maybe you should write a note to Bill Gates about this and tear him a new one, too.

    12. Re:This is why... by dedazo · · Score: 1
      1. Psycho-analize Slashbots for $4.50 a pop
      2. ???
      3. Profit!
      Thank you, I'll be here all week.
      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    13. Re:This is why... by fanatic · · Score: 1
      we need Micro-Soft certified worms

      Already got them - they're called Windows.

      --
      "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
  10. Spyware and others by r.jimenezz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just thought about this... With the huge number of machines out there "infected" by spyware, adware and similar programs (and many of them without their users even knowing), how long will it be until a worm is written that exploits a vulnerability in one of these programs?

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
    1. Re:Spyware and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're misunderstanding. These are Windows viruses, so they're already exploiting the spyware/adware programs of which you speak.

    2. Re:Spyware and others by MrRuslan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Something like a rear entry into bonzi buddies behind?

    3. Re:Spyware and others by clambake · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just thought about this... With the huge number of machines out there "infected" by spyware, adware and similar programs (and many of them without their users even knowing), how long will it be until a worm is written that exploits a vulnerability in one of these programs?

      Gimme a sec.

    4. Re:Spyware and others by joshp · · Score: 0

      If someone wasent writhing one thay are now.

      JP

    5. Re:Spyware and others by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting idea: If someone writes a worm that exploits a flaw in a spyware, would be spyware company be legally responsible for the damage? Even if not, the resulting uproar could bring much needed attention to spywares.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    6. Re:Spyware and others by KoolDude · · Score: 1


      Just thought about this... With the huge number of machines out there "infected" by spyware, adware and similar programs (and many of them without their users even knowing), how long will it be until a worm is written that exploits a vulnerability in one of these programs?

      Not anytime soon. All worm writers are busy exploiting vulnerabilities in Windows itself. Of course, that's if you consider Windows itself is not a spyware.

      --
      getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
    7. Re:Spyware and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      many of the nasty adware/spyware out there disables your security settings and opens backdoors. We were having problems with adware overwriting content at one of the dot coms I worked at and I seriously considered using the disabled security to write a remover for the adware.

      It was decided that it wasn't worth it since once we knew a machine was infected with some adware, all bets are off to the stability of the machine.

      Code which might work perfectly in QA would likely cause crashes in the wild due to multiple infections. So we went with the detect and warn rather than the using backdoors to fix.

    8. Re:Spyware and others by geek4ever · · Score: 0

      I hearby declare this the worst play on words ever. Even if that damnable monkey does deserve a good orifice(sp?) inspection.

      --


      Karma: Bad. Mostly because the only moderators that notice me are conservatives.
    9. Re:Spyware and others by pben · · Score: 1

      Microsoft isn't held legally responsable for flaws in their OS or Web server. Symantec hasn't been held legally responsible for flaws in the Norton firewall product. I am afraid that too many Windows users would not even notice a worm taking over a spyware program. They seem to put up with the popups and loss of bandwith without cleaning up their act. A worm might even improve their internet experience if it stops some of the popups. The only people that would yell would be the spyware companies.

    10. Re:Spyware and others by nukey56 · · Score: 3, Informative
      As an antivirus tech at one of the bigger anti-virus companies, I can say that I see this all the time. Real simple example:
      1. Hacker breaks into adware web server, replaces lots_of_banners_here.html with omg_olol_teh_hax.html
      2. said adware gets on a user's computer
      3. said adware tries to get its banner ads, and BAM, user now has redlof.A


      Given this isn't exactly a code-level exploit, though it is annoying enough that I sent two people to the reformat docters today because of it. Antivirus installed on the system beforehand, too.
    11. Re:Spyware and others by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm just waiting for someone to root Gator's..oops - sorry Claria's download servers and replace "precisiontime.exe" and so on with trojaned alternatives.

      In fact.. thinking about it what's to stop me capturing requests for this crap on my proxies and redirecting them to an exe that removes gator? Hmm...

    12. Re:Spyware and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what's to stop me capturing requests for this crap on my proxies and redirecting them to an exe that removes gator?

      What's to stop you? The time and effort required to develop such a system.

      So stop trying to impress us with your half-baked ideas?

      Thanks.

      PS - You're an idiot.

    13. Re:Spyware and others by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      What's to stop you? The time and effort required to develop such a system.

      uh.. you mean like simply install squirm over a squid proxy and write a regex expression to rewrite a requests for precisiontime.exe et al and replace them with something that removes gator? Like that you mean?

      So stop trying to impress us with your half-baked ideas?

      Just because you are obviously so narrow minded, uncreative and incompetant to be able to solve problems do NOT assume the rest of us are.

      PS - You're an idiot.

      PS you are a fucking moron and a coward.

      Thanks.

  11. Is not the first time it happens by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the Nimda worm exploited vulnerabilities created by CodeRed a few years ago.

    1. Re:Is not the first time it happens by grunthos · · Score: 5, Informative
      No, they both exploited the same holes in IIS.

      Perhaps you are thinking of Welchia which exploited IIS but also removed Blaster.

      --

      My son's 5th grade teacher actually assigned them "write a limerick about a planet". I'm not kidding.
    2. Re:Is not the first time it happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it did use the WebDav vuln in IIS, it mostly relied on the DCOM RPC vuln that blaster used to get it. and it didn't remove blaster, it just patches the DCOM RPC vuln that it used to get in.

  12. Same for my mac by eroyce · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ah yes, the wonderful life of Linux and Mac.

    1. Re:Same for my mac by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny

      In computing are the windows the ones with worms, not the apples.

    2. Re:Same for my mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, to stick with tradition, these should be called termites. Who do you think you are, suggesting windows can have worms, upsetting the delicate balance of the oh-so-perfect english language?

    3. Re:Same for my mac by ozone_sniffer · · Score: 1

      Nor the penguins.

  13. Antivirus! by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Dabber then installs itself and deletes the registry keys of Sasser and other viruses. It creates a backdoor on infected machines on TCP port 9898 allowing hackers to download additional code, which might be far more malicious than Dabber itself."

    sounds like its doing some antivirus while its at it. Good!

    Just be sure to block off 9898.
    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:Antivirus! by r.jimenezz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      sounds like its doing some antivirus while its at it. Good!

      Nah, let's not fool ourselves. This is probably just so that you can run a Sasser removal tool, find nothing and feel yourself at ease thinking your machine is clean :(

      --
      The revolution will not be televised.
    2. Re:Antivirus! by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you really think those infected with sasser will know how to block off a TCP port, much less what TCP is?

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    3. Re:Antivirus! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah, kinda like a dictator being replaced by one that's even worse. i can just feel the revolution on my harddisk taking place...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    4. Re:Antivirus! by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

      A TCP port is any port through which they ship the illegal drug TCP, of course. Everyone knows that.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Antivirus! by veg_all · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.

      May I suggest a more effective method?

      --
      grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
    6. Re:Antivirus! by PetWolverine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.


      I want to see what you'll change it to once I post this.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  14. Plug-in by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now worms come with hooks for third party plug-in's?

    1. Re:Plug-in by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, for quite a while.

      Quite a bit of modern worms in this or that way provide just a generic backdoor to the infected machine without performing any extra malice. Some of them just open oprts, some trick firewalls and actively "call home", which usually happens to be some random IRC server on some compromised machine (IRC seems to be preferred method for the virii writers for controlling worms, which just act as bots on the channel). Then the virii can upload a spamming software, a DDoS attack plugin, a keystroke logger, a file transfer thing, a tunneling/relay program to mask an attack, or whatever the twisted minds come up with.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:Plug-in by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as a matter of fact, they support the random playing of MP3s, producing some form of visualizatiions and gibberish on the screen, talking to other people's computers by entering before knocking, and displaying hostile messages on people's screens.

      I'm sure they'll allow for MORE functionality to cripple computers with! :)

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    3. Re:Plug-in by molnarcs · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Some of them just open oprts, some trick firewalls and actively "call home", which usually happens to"

      The word you were looking for was pr0ts..

    4. Re:Plug-in by clacke · · Score: 1

      Why "virii"? It's not like the singular is "virius".

    5. Re:Plug-in by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to uncomment that long-dormant "#alias mkae make" from my .cshrc

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    6. Re:Plug-in by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      thar's the basic l33tsp33ch for plural of virus.
      you know, mp3z, warez, isoz, moviez, crackz, pazzwordz, virii, XXX. Found on every 1337 site.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    7. Re:Plug-in by molnarcs · · Score: 1
      I think it's time to uncomment that long-dormant "#alias mkae make" from my .cshrc

      You do that, and I'll delete that long-dormant toor account from /etc/passwd ;)

  15. So, naturalists observe, a flea... by jbuhler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hath smaller fleas that on him prey;
    And these have smaller still to bite 'em;
    And so proceed ad infinitum.

    - Swift

    1. Re:So, naturalists observe, a flea... by descil · · Score: 1

      Odd...

      someone quoted this to me just today while explaining why stochastic processes supposedly do not interrupt determinism.

    2. Re:So, naturalists observe, a flea... by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      one million of monkeys given enough time will want to talk about poem they've just written
      sources mixed ;)

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    3. Re:So, naturalists observe, a flea... by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

      I thought the ditty was:

      Big fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite them,
      and little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum.

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
  16. kinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bit of an oxymoron from a biosciences perspective...

  17. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would that make the security flaw a ::cough:: "Wormhole"?

    1. Re:um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somone mod this guy up. this one had me in the milk out the nose hold.

    2. Re:um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude! You need to be drinking milk for that to happen!

  18. what Microsoft is thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    maybe we should make a virus that causes everyone to hit up Windows Update and maybe we'll be alright.

    1. Re:what Microsoft is thinking by Bryan_W · · Score: 1

      That's what blaster did...oh you didn't mean it that way...

    2. Re:what Microsoft is thinking by reanjr · · Score: 1

      That actually wouldn't be a bad idea for someone to write. Maybe just a worm that propogated itself and then turned on windows Auto Updates on all the infected machines. Also could periodically check windows update but this would probably be a lot more difficult to do.

    3. Re:what Microsoft is thinking by arkhan_jg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This was already tried with Welchia/nachi.

      It scanned for machines with the RPC blaster vulnerability or a webdav vulnerability, infected them, and then downloaded the RPC patch from windows update and installed. Next time the machine rebooted, you were secure. It also had a self kill on 1st jan 2004.

      The perfect anti-worm, yes? Except it was very aggressive with the ping scanning, and a few infected machines on a network could end up cripping it. Add to that, if a machine got infected with nachi, yet windows update wasn't directly available (login proxy for example) then the amount of bandwidth consumed could be huge. From the ISP's point of view, welchia was a worse worm than blaster. From the managers point of view, at least it was obvious if someone had blaster. With welchia, if you didn't have competent inhouse IT staff (and an awful lot of small companies don't) it was hard to find why your network was running rather slow.

      In response to just turning on autoupdate, corporates often don't use windows update, but SUS or ghost or the like to roll out patches - once they've been fully tested. Don't forget, microsoft patches regularly break other applicatons. LSASS (sasser) update, for example:

      "According to the article problem may arise on Windows 2000 operating systems if any of three drivers (ipsecw2k.sys, imcide.sys, dlttape.sys) are loaded. People might experience lockups at boot time, the inability to log on, or 100% CPU utilization."

      Antiworms are a possible solution, but as with this new one leaving a big backdoor, so far they've been as bad as the virus they supplant. What they should do, at most, is a popup every time you logon saying you are infected with virus bob, list the symptoms, and tell them they have to go to this location to get the patch and the removal tool.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  19. It's ok... SP1 is coming soon by licamell · · Score: 5, Funny

    The author in response to the news announce that he will be releasing Service Pack 1 within the next week. Make sure to set up your computer to get updates automatically from update.sasser.com.

    1. Re:It's ok... SP1 is coming soon by int2str · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope, the Sasser author is going to Jail (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/47205 - sorry, in german).
      SP1 will be a while ;)

    2. Re:It's ok... SP1 is coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nope, the Sasser author is going to Jail

      I think you misunderstood the post. Here's a handy link to help explain it.

    3. Re:It's ok... SP1 is coming soon by nihilistcanada · · Score: 1

      Well what about all the users using the VLK version of SASSER? Are they going to be denied the update? Doesn't SasserSoft care about all the unpatched SASSER worms out there degrading the net enviornment for the legitimate SASSER user?

    4. Re:It's ok... SP1 is coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author in response to the news announce that he will be releasing Service Pack 1 within the next week. Make sure to set up your computer to get updates automatically from update.sasser.com.

      Actually, I hear that SP2 is on it's way too, although you may want to give it a skip - I've heard that it breaks some applications.

    5. Re:It's ok... SP1 is coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "befinde sich wieder auf freiem Fuß"

      I 'm quite convinced that this means that he isn't going to jail :)

  20. Just like the Anti-HIV Virus! by Cyberherbalist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was something on /. the other day about a team of biologists who built a virus based on HIV, that goes out to destroy HIV ability to turn to AIDS. Apparently, the Dabber developer took a page from that book --- in a twisted sort of way.

    --
    "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance."
    1. Re:Just like the Anti-HIV Virus! by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Image a computer virus that kills all other viruses on one's machine, then spreads itself to other machines, then deletes itself.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  21. Conspiracy Theory by tenton · · Score: 1

    This proves it, Microsoft is behind Sasser. ^_^

  22. Not the same thing by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 2, Informative

    That used the backdoor left by the other virus, not a flaw in the virus itself.

  23. MS is on it... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-014
    Security Update for Microsoft Windows (93212)

    Issued: May 14, 2004
    Updated: May 14, 2004
    Version: 1.0

    Summary
    Who should read this document: Customers who use the Sasser worm

    Impact of vulnerability: Remote Code Execution

    Maximum Severity Rating: Critical

    Recommendation: Customers running the Sasser worm should apply the update immediately to be protected from Dabber.

    Security Update Replacement: This bulletin replaces several prior security updates. See the frequently asked questions (FAQ) section of this bulletin for the complete list.

    Caveats: The security update is for Windows 2000, XP Pro and Home, and Windows 2003 server platforms. As a prerequisite, the security update requires your system be infected with Sasser.

    To download the Sasser worm, please open Outlook Express or Outlook 2000/XP and execute any attachements you have recieved from unknown senders. If you are not using Sasser you do not need to install this update.

    Once installed your system will be immune from being infected with Dabber which exploits a flaw in the widely popular Sasser worm.

    Tested Software and Security Update Download Locations:

    Affected Software:

    Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 2, Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 3, and Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 - Download the update

    Microsoft Windows XP and Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1 - Download the update

    Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Service Pack 1 - Download the update

    Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003 - Download the update

    Microsoft Windows Server(TM) 2003 - Download the update

    Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64-Bit Edition - Download the update

    1. Re:MS is on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo, but you missed on one detail.

      To download the Sasser worm, please open Outlook Express or Outlook 2000/XP and execute any attachements you have recieved from unknown senders.

      Sasser exploits a buffer overflow, not naive/stupid email users. Trend Micro page:
      This worm is known to exploit the Windows LSASS vulnerability, which is a buffer overrun that allows remote code execution and enables an attacker to gain full control of the affected system.

  24. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by ozamosi · · Score: 0, Funny

    it's the worm that gets exploited.

  25. This is *almost* a wonderful thing by Gribflex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dabber than installs itself and deletes the registry keys of Sasser and other viruses.

    This is fantastic! It is a virus, that infects only virus infected machines, and then removes all other virii. What a great solution to rapidly spreading worms.

    If users are too lazy or ignorant (in the nice sense of the word) to patch their systems, then just relase another virus to do it for them.

    Except that...

    It [then] creates a backdoor on infected machines on TCP port 9898 allowing hackers to download additional code...

    They just couldn't stop at doing a good thing, could they...

    1. Re:This is *almost* a wonderful thing by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      This is only half way joking but microsoft knows some user dont update for whatever reason be it lazieness or ignorance.now what if they write a "virus" similar to this that patches the system for newly found critical remote hole and then destroys itself after a certian amount of time.I know it's not legal or anything but it's just an idea.

    2. Re:This is *almost* a wonderful thing by descil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing about an infected system is that it's absolutely NO GOOD to anybody except the person who's infected it. So when you infect a machine, you want to make sure it's a CLEAN machine, so that you can use it. There's nothing benevolent about destroying the OTHER invading forces so that you can own the land.

    3. Re:This is *almost* a wonderful thing by Reivec · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are missing a big point here. The worms effect us all in a much more annoying way. Internet traffic clogging up my connection speed. Why do I care if stupid people can't use their computer? If there was an "Anti-Worm" it would still cause tons of traffic scanning the networks and even if it helped infected people, I don't give a damn. They were too stupid and didn't protect their systems or use something besides windows, not my fault. So basically in my book, the cure would be just as bad as the problem.

    4. Re:This is *almost* a wonderful thing by alonsoac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This was never about doing a good thing. It's plain competition. Any decent worm should be able to remove all other worms and viruses from the system in order to have complete control over it. I bet this will only get more common.

      Then again it should be easy to release this new work without the code that opens the backdoor so that it only does the removal part?

    5. Re:This is *almost* a wonderful thing by xRelisH · · Score: 1

      I always thought it would be interesting if there existed such a thing. a "helper" worm, something will exploit a backdoor left open by a malicious worm, and perform cleaning, transmit itself to machines that are suspect of being infected and then remove itself.

      Is such a "helpful" worm feasable? I can see how something like this could technically work, but Im thinking someone might catch it along the way, and decide to exploit it.

    6. Re:This is *almost* a wonderful thing by skasingularity · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think this has been discussed before on slashdot, is it a good idea to write worms to take out worms?

      There are a few problems with this, the main one being noone is taking responsibility for protecting their own machines. Another problem is that with people accepting certain worms to clean their computer, it would open up a (hate to say it, no pun intended) whole new can of worms. Some people would think "my computer has spyware on it, a worm is attacking me that says it will clean it up, ok!" Script kiddies would jump at a new header for e-mail viruses and such...

    7. Re:This is *almost* a wonderful thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a very bad idea. See the post after yours. If worms start automatically cleaning up, people will never they were infected and will never take corrective action in future. Out of sight, out of mind. MS will love it because their users will never know how bad their products are. Bad news for the rest of us because MS users will never learn to take care of themselves.

  26. Seems Like by MrRuslan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the windows RPC implimintation and the LSASS share some similar quilities with worms and back doors, One has to wonder how much more of windows has the same charictaristics of a virus.

  27. A Quick Fix by magefile · · Score: 3, Funny
    Everyone:
    • if you have windows, type, "format C:"
    • if you have linux, or Mac OSX, type "su if you have a pre-OSX Mac, get someone to translate the above commands for you
    That'll take care of the folks who don't patch or use a firewall or AV. I figure anyone smart enough to do that won't run the commands ... and anyone running a different OS won't have virus issues anyway (and will probably be smart enough to firewall, too!).
    1. Re:A Quick Fix by whiteranger99x · · Score: 2, Funny
      That'll take care of the folks who don't patch or use a firewall or AV.

      Dude, you forgot the following steps:
      • Unplug the computer from the walls
      • Detach peripherials from computer
      • Put computer back in box
      • Ship it back out

      Why? BECAUSE YOU'RE TOO FUCKING STUPID TO USE A COMPUTER!!! ;)
      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    2. Re:A Quick Fix by rjshields · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you have windows, type, "format C:"

      Why yes, I have windows. I even have doors too. I typed "format C:" like you said but I just got a message saying "the page cannot be displayed".

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  28. This is doubly ironic! by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:This is doubly ironic! by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      the jews are gonna be upset about losing those bagels....

  29. Not really surprising by cemaco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the last few years, the guys who write this stuff have become more and more like gangs. In the real world, gangs compete for terf. That includes undermining each other whenever possible.

  30. Remind Anyone of Blaster by erikharrison · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gosh, this whole mess looks just like Blaster from down here in the trenches.

    I'm tech support for Tremendously Large ISP. From down here this looks just like Blaster did. Customers calling in complaining that their machine is restarting without their consent. And now someone has a follow up virus that attacks the virus - as some may recall there was a Blaster variant that patched systems AGAINST Blaster. This was terrible - if you got this variant inside a corporate network not only would your bandwidth use skyrocket, but since NAT tends to fubar Windows Update, the variant never managed to patch a system. God that was hell . . .

    It's almost enough to make you want to write a virus in revenge . . .

    1. Re:Remind Anyone of Blaster by B1ackDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be interested to see what would happen if someone were to write one that would actually really mess up a machine, make it unusable. The repercussions would be huge, but more than that it would get something done either in the way of a huge code audit (with everyone from Microsoft to OSS looking very carefully at their stuff) or of some other possibly policy change - that would ruin the game for them. I bet thats why they're not doing it too, they know the greater public would finally have to find a way to protect themselves, and then the jig would be up. If only...

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    2. Re:Remind Anyone of Blaster by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I think that this goes to show that virus wirters are not lunatics out to do severe damage. Instead, they either write viruses to allow them
      -to send spam (paid), or
      -to sniff passwords (malicious), or
      -to get M$ off their asses and patching code (stupid, but well intentioned), or
      -to show their worth (needs penis enhancement, but too poor to buy a SUV), or
      -to be able to DDoS a website (mostly bad)

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:Remind Anyone of Blaster by Dejohn · · Score: 1

      If a worm actually destroyed it's target in a short period of time, it would be unable to spread to very many machines. Some worm coders have attempted to solve this problem by waiting until a certain date(s) to actually fire, but many/most infected machines are usually contained by then (seems that deadlines make people update their virus defs and patches). Now if a worm could spread in complete stealth until it's destruction date...

    4. Re:Remind Anyone of Blaster by k12linux · · Score: 1

      A virus writer's goal is typically to spread the infection as far and wide as possible. Lately, it appears, the goal is to create as many zombie spam-relays as possible. Neither of these goals are served well by toasting the systems that are infected.

      It wouldn't be hard for a virus to make the changes needed to cause a system to blue screen immediately on bootup. That makes me think that the virus writers simply don't want that to happen.

      Of course, if the goal were to cost corporations and schools billions of dollars, a virus could be set up to spread for a week, then disable the PC. Sure it might cause a mad scramble to patch every vulnerable system, but that in itself would be a huge labor expense.

      The real virus to fear, however, is the one written BEFORE MS releasees a patch. If a virus writer finds some other flaw and writes a virus to exploit it, it would spread like wildfire. The latest viruses spread like mad and a patch had been available. Imagine if no patch had been available and one didn't come out until the virus had been spreading for a couple of weeks.

  31. Re:Clever by beakerMeep · · Score: 4, Funny
    oh the irony.

    a post with the title "clever" and the text "very clever" in a story about a "worm's worm" moderated as "redundant".

    It's like rain on a rainy day.

    --
    meep
  32. How is this different... by burtonator · · Score: 0, Troll

    than all the worms that have been infecting the the Windows worm that has been infecting computers for years.

    Last time I checked that stupid Windows worm has infected nearly every damn computer on the planet.

    I agree that these stupid worm writers (Microsoft) need to improve their security so that they don't become hosts to yet more worms.

    1. Re:How is this different... by burtonator · · Score: 1

      That's not a troll... mod that up as FUNNY. You guys need a sense of humor! :)

  33. Patch? by durtbag · · Score: 5, Funny

    So where do I doenload the patch so my Sasser isn't vulnerable?

    --
    itadakimasu
    1. Re:Patch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Sigh... by ike6116 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I told you not to try Sasser, it's a gateway worm! IT LEADS TO HARDER, MORE DANGEROUS WORMS!

    --

    Are you secure enough in your masculinity to run 'man touch'?
    1. Re:Sigh... by edalytical · · Score: 1

      Ha, my brother and his friends actually used to do something called Sassafras, kind of similar. Anyway, Sassafras I believe is derived from a root and is hallucinogenic.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    2. Re:Sigh... by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      Sassafras is the name of a small tree as well as its roots. used to be used for rootbeer.

  35. It's amazing the harm one person can do... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...with some software with the ability to self-replicate. God help the rest of the universe when life finally manages to get off this planet.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:It's amazing the harm one person can do... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      The post...
      God help the rest of the universe when life finally manages to get off this planet...

      ... and the sig
      There is no God

      I guess universe is doomed, then.

      Did you intend that to be as ironic as it sounds?

    2. Re:It's amazing the harm one person can do... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Instead of "There is no God" my sig should be "'God' is just a grammatical construction" but that doesn't work as well.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  36. DMCA violation? by David+Hume · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jeez, they never fully test these worms before release. No wonder they'd have security issues.


    I wonder if the author of the author of Dabber has violated the DMCA by circumventing a copyright protection system -- i.e., the code to the Sasser worm.

    More specifically, I wonder if the author of Sasser can sue the author of Dabber for statutory damages of up to "$2,500 per act of circumvention." ;)

    1. Re:DMCA violation? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You jest, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was possible. Don't forget, this is the country where a buglar can sue his victims if he breaks his leg while breaking into their house and win.

    2. Re:DMCA violation? by Jahf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a little difference ... if you want to use a burglar analogy, then use the analogy of a burglar stealing property from another burglar that stole it from the owners.

      Both are illegal, both are prosecutable, but the "victim" burglar can't sue for loss of property from the 2nd burglar because the property belongs to the original owner.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    3. Re:DMCA violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can the original owner sue both his burglar and his burglar's burglar?

    4. Re:DMCA violation? by k12linux · · Score: 1

      Probably not since the original can't claim losses... unless maybe their spammer overlord is paying per infection. Then maybe they can use the DMCA and order all users with infected PCs to remove the offending worm from their system... or else!

    5. Re:DMCA violation? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      DMCA don't need someone to claim losses.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    6. Re:DMCA violation? by kramer · · Score: 1

      Insightful? My ass the post's insightful. Posts that repeat urban legends without any references are never insightful.

      I suppose, your comment is technically correct: a burglar can certainly sue his victim. Anyone can sue for damn near anything, but if you don't have a case under the law you're going to get your ass laughed out of court. Your implication, however, that a burglar would win such a case seems exceptionally questionable.

      Then again, I could be wrong -- it's been known to happen. If someone would like to cite an actual case where this has happened and not been overturned on appeal I'd love to hear it. Don't change the scenario either -- I don't want to hear about burglars injured by booby traps.

    7. Re:DMCA violation? by vspazv · · Score: 1

      You need to go a step further and have the sasser author sue the antivirus companites for decompiling his code. Then he can use the money to pay for his legal bills.

    8. Re:DMCA violation? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      I wonder if the author of Sasser can sue the author of Dabber

      I'd imagine that the author of Sasser would have to provide convincing proof that he wrote Sasser before any judge award damages. Of course, he'd then have any number of anti-terrorist agencies fighting for a slice of his hide and he'd be lucky if he ever got to spend the money...

    9. Re:DMCA violation? by gantrep · · Score: 1

      I concurr that this is bullshit. You have to make sure your sidewalk outside your house is safe from ice, etc for people to walk on, and if you don't and someone injures themself, you could be sued, but I have no legal responsibility to make sure the inside of my house is safe for uninvited public pasage.If someone finds real legal precedent stating otherwise, I'll eat my hat.

    10. Re:DMCA violation? by Clockwork000 · · Score: 0

      Im pretty sure this happened somewhere near where I live, here in Connecticut. I believe it was 5 years ago. Some guy was breaking into a school by climbing on to the roof and into a vent. Except he fell through a glass skylight and was severly injured. Even though he admitted to planning to break in, he won a settlement.

      --
      get em girls. daddy needs new shoes.
    11. Re:DMCA violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. Afaik, Sasser was written by a german script kiddie, which probably means the case would be tried before a german court where the DMCA isn't. In order to get any money there, he'd have to prove that Dabber caused damage to him (i.e. prove that he lost revenues due to Dabber), which I doubt is feasible. Heh.

    12. Re:DMCA violation? by huchida · · Score: 1
      I suppose, your comment is technically correct: a burglar can certainly sue his victim. Anyone can sue for damn near anything, but if you don't have a case under the law you're going to get your ass laughed out of court. Your implication, however, that a burglar would win such a case seems exceptionally questionable.

      Check "overlawyered.com" for a sense of what does and doesn't happen regarding criminals suing their victims. It does happen quite often, and while they usually don't win it does occasionally happen. Of course, you also have to remember that prisoners have a lot of time on their hands to file nuisance suits, there's no penalty to them if they lose and whatever happens, every day in court is a day they don't have to spend in jail.

      I should also note, most successful suits are against victiims or the police for using excessive force, not because the burglar tripped and fell. (As far as I can tell, and I didn't dig that deep on Google, there have been a few high-profile suits-- one in the U.K.-- where the burglar sued for injuries sustained breaking in, but I can't find a case where they actually won.) There have been cases won where a victim has shot or beaten an unarmed (or less-armed) intruder.

    13. Re:DMCA violation? by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Probably not in the case of physical property as what the owner can sue for is loss (which was caused by the initial burgle) and possibly for damages if caused during the burgle.

      Only if the 2nd burglar used the property in a manner to additionally damage the owner (perhaps the first burglar stole personal information, and the 2nd used said information to steal the owner's identity).

      PS. My .sig would say IANAL if I hadn't used all of the characters already.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    14. Re:DMCA violation? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      Two problems with your example:

      1. It was a place designed for public use so the standard for safety might be differnt than for a private home (I know ,he was on the roof but still).

      2. He got a settlement, which doesn't give us any information about whether he had a case at all (the school might have thought it was less expensive to settle than to litigate it long enough to get it thrown out of court). Note that it doesn't say that he had one and it doesn't say he didn't have one.

      So it is useless as a counterexample showing that it is not a urban legend.

      I wonder which came first, the urban legend or the movie "Liar, Liar" (where Jim Carey's character says that he would have been able to win more money for the burglar than in the example given in the movie).

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    15. Re:DMCA violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's also useless in the point of being a urban legend dismissal cause it does'nt place it on a sertain place/time/whatever. even more it uses the hallmarks of a urban ledgend "Im pretty sure this happened somewhere near where I live".

      btw i've heard that legend before 1997 (Liar,Liar) in Sweden about "the strange legal system in the us where EVERYBODY sues everybody"...

  37. Exploit available on packetstorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The mentioned code, which is used in Dabber, can be found at http://packetstormsecurity.nl/0405-exploits/sasser ftpd.c

  38. Re:I wonder if it is from Russia? by Doppleganger · · Score: 1, Troll

    But do you still infect it if you walk without rythm?

  39. I'm reminded of the quote... by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    ...from History of the World Part one:

    "Look how low we have become! Beggars! Begging from beggars!"

  40. my dog by yodaj007 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Does this mean my dogs heart-worms have heart-worms? The idea of recursively-defined worms frightens me for some reason.

    --
    These aren't the sigs you're looking for.
  41. IE users: don't click above links! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    While this is really funny, IE users should be warned that clicking the albinoblacksheep.com links can cause multiple spawning windows.

    I know, I am an idiot, but I thought the flash demo might be funny also. The post was funny, but the web site was not.

    1. Re:IE users: don't click above links! by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      Ah sorry... I had the google tool bar running so I didn't see that it had any popups.... appologies to all.

    2. Re:IE users: don't click above links! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Hmmph, NT4 and all I got was a blank screen.
      (of course I've got most all the run-viruses stuff turned off;)

  42. Actually sounds like somebody trying to fix things by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is an all new low. Now virus programmers will have to make their virus's better so they dont get infected by another virus.

    Actually, this sounds like somebody trying to make a disinfectant worm. Look at the description:

    - It only infects infected systems, using a flaw in the previous infection.

    - It cleans out the infection of the worm that it exploited, and several others.

    It does open a new backdoor. But while that might be preparation for some future malicious action, it might also have been the author leaving himself a way to fix things if his initial worm got out with a destructive bug. (Of course it could be the worm cleaning up signs of previous infections in order to hide itself and thus head off other cleanups.)

    I wouldn't be surprised to see, on further analysis, that it does other antimalware things (like fix the flaw the other worms used).

    (Not to say that it IS somebody trying to fight virus with virus. But it might be interesting if it turns out that it is.)

    I think everyone should go ultra secure, the best firewall ever... Disconnect from the net. It would make this all alot easier on us.

    Which is exactly what the military does with some of its really secure stuff.

    Now if we can just get the Microsoft users to emulate them. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  43. OS Popularity? by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The tired argument is that Mac OS X and Linux are too unpopular to build worms and viruses for - but apparently it's worth writing worms just for Windows machines infected by a single strain of worm.

    Does this situation imply that the sum total of Sasser-infected machines outnumber Macs and Linux boxes?

    1. Re:OS Popularity? by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1
      Considering the number of Windows computers that are
      • Already riddled by malware
      • Connected directly to the internet with no firewall
      • Used by people who have no clue how to remove a worm
      • Who also continue to open every untrusted attachement they get
      • Used by people with computer IQ's far below room temperature in Celsius
      You might just be suprised. I have a feeling that I'm only half-joking.

      ---
    2. Re:OS Popularity? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You'd be amazed how quickly a Winbox can get hit by malware. I just had to disinfect my parents' computer, and here's what happened:

      Over the last couple days, Google Toolbar lost effectiveness, and popups were coming up on sites like Microsoft and Google (spyware, anyone?) I booted it, and got a PCCillin warning saying "VBS_Freelink" was detected. Scan, and nothing. I hit it with Spybot, and it finds a small amount of spyware, some from the Kodak camera software. I then try to diagnose the virus, and get Avast. Still nothing. I go to get AdAware, and I'm getting popups EVERY PAGE LOAD. I remembered I had an old copy of Opera on there, and fired it up to download AdAware and do the search for solutions. AdAware found ~250 items (!), one of which appeared to be a DLL of the virus that started the chain of problems... (on reboot, I got an error message from the virus that a DLL was missing, and PCCillin didn't give the warning, even though I had done a signature update)

    3. Re:OS Popularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but there are more people using Sasser than Linux at this point.

    4. Re:OS Popularity? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.

      On the other hand, though, I'd be utterly amazed if worm writers don't take apart existing worms when preparing to write a new one. Learn from what has gone before and all that. I'd expect that what's happened is not just that Sasser is so widespread that someone decided to exploit it, but that someone was studying it, noticed the exploit, and went for a quick and easy route to write a new worm.

    5. Re:OS Popularity? by warm+sushi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, the fact is that Sasser JUST PLAIN WORKS, whereas Linux is a nightmare to install. Furthermore, Sasser is ready for the desktop. Joe Sixpack understands Sasser because it's just like all the other worms etc etc...

    6. Re:OS Popularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > Does this situation imply that the sum total of Sasser-infected machines outnumber Macs and Linux boxes?

      Why would that be surprising? If the installer base of Linux is 8% vs 80% Windows. Then only 10% of the Windows machines have to be affected to get an equal installer base. Ditto for the Mac.

    7. Re:OS Popularity? by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      What?

      No one bothered to include the "Apache" example of Popular != Attacked?

      There are more factors involved than just popularity.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
  44. Linux Spreading! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Most of my friends didn't try Linux until I told them about my own success stories and satisfaction.

    So Linux's spreading is clearly due to flaws in the users. (tongue in cheek)

  45. Add it to nmap! by JThundley · · Score: 5, Informative

    Add the sasser FTP server to your nmap-services file. I run Gentoo, mines in /usr/share/nmap.

    Add this line:
    sasser 5554/tcp # Sasser worm FTP server

    This way when you do a port scan of a host, you can tell if they've been infected with sasser :)

    1. Re:Add it to nmap! by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      And with an impaired copy of Dabber you can disinfect it for them.

    2. Re:Add it to nmap! by menscher · · Score: 1

      Port 5554 is also used by SGI's "Embedded Support Partner" on IRIX boxes. The easy way to tell which it is would be to connect and see if you get the 200 OK banner from sasser.

  46. Hilarious by ildon · · Score: 1

    This is quite literally the funniest thing I've ever read on slashdot.

  47. The virus author must have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read this article. The beautiful thing about science is how a single discovery can effects on many different systems.

  48. Just goes to show you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only use worms that are Microsoft Security Hole Certified!

  49. We're lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider ourselves lucky. As fast as this worm/virus writers are going, it wouldn't surprise me one day they decide to go badder, and start doing some damage. Come on, how long until a scr1p7 kiddie modifies code to start deleting stuff?

    -P@

  50. Where's the foot ? by Ploum · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the foot icon for the humor section would be very appropriated to this news :-)

    It's really funny...

  51. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A beowulf cluster of these!

  52. Adding it to virus defs? by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

    Anti-virus vendors are in the process of developing signature updates to automatically detect and remove the worm

    Only the slashdot crowd could find the humor in the above quote from the article.

  53. Now THAT really is interesting by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That's a great question, I wonder if Sasser is really as widespread as the entire install base of OS X.

    A friend was asking for a laptop reccomendation for a kid going off to college - I said an iBook at the kid would not have to be cleaning stuff off it all time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. It's sad... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    McAfee has a free tool named Stinger that can remove Sasser and various other worms, yet people don't bother to download (only 770kb) it can scan their computers.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    1. Re:It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      easy, some people have gotten use to windows rebooting all the time anyways. so it just does it more frequently this week.

      i know at our office we had a server that was rebooting and no one knew it. people called up saying they couldn't get the web pages. but by the time they dialed and told us which site, it finished rebooting, tech support would try it, it worked so then started troubleshooting the other end.

      on a different topic
      Creature Attack
      yes this is a 'click link' game if you post your links (to different games) i'll click on them for you too.

    2. Re:It's sad... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I recently worked on a laptop injected with Sasser. The user thought that maybe the problems that he was experiencing was cause by Sasser,but he didn't bother to do anything about it.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  56. you could at least provide the link! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
  57. It's easy to think that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fun to imagine dark genius types at the helm of the Evilware Industry, but it simply isn't the case. Spammers and 'Mafia'-types who might have anything to gain from such tools simply won't pay anybody ("all money belongs to me!"), so nobody capable will work for them.

    Good Coders(tm) are never arrected for creating these things, and that's not because they are too clever to be caught...it's because the malware is ALWAYS created by some clueless zit-faced 15-year-old wannabe 1337 h4x0rZ using a VB virus-by-numbers toolkit he got from a friend's really 1337 older brother. You only have to examine the luserish-quality of the coding to see that.

  58. Wow, This sounds familiar by vespazzari · · Score: 1

    I just read last night in the science section about a virus being used to fight AIDS by latching on to the HIV virus and preventing it from turning it into AIDS. I didnt understand it all that well but it does sound like this virus is doing much the same thing.

    --
    "Alcohol, cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" -Homer Simpson
  59. good virus vs bad virus? by zlel · · Score: 1

    You know, just as those guys managed to figure a virus to fight HIV, MS shouldn't have announced the vulnerability but written a worm to fix the hole... then the world needn't know how much more vulnerable Windows can get... too bad the tech team there don't seem as great as their marketing team....

  60. We've been down this road before by bladesjester · · Score: 1

    we had the same basic thing with the cheese worm. someone made it to fix the li0n worm, but it ended up causing its own problems because it pummeled the living daylights out of networks while trying to propogate

    --
    Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    1. Re:We've been down this road before by k12linux · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Or the nachi/a worm which tried to remove msblast then download and install the patch for the hole from MS.

      It was a misguided attempt to stop msblast but it caused a lot of problems itself. We never had a problem with msblast but nachi essentially shut down a couple of our routers and cost us plenty in man-hours to clean up.

      I doubt that Dabber is the same deal though. If it were you would expect it to have an expiration date.

  61. Geek jokes by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Funny


    Program code so advanced it travels through worm holes!

    *rimshot*

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:Geek jokes by hrbrmstr · · Score: 1

      Ouch.

      Good one.

      --
      Mind the gap...
  62. Where can I get a patch? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1, Funny

    Have the authors of Sasser released a patch to fix this vulnerability yet? I checked sasserupdate.com and nothing's been posted yet.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    1. Re:Where can I get a patch? by dezeal · · Score: 1

      It seems the authors of Sasser have taken sasserupdate.com offline to help stop the expected DoS attacks.

  63. Fun! by Ketnar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sort of reminds me when I wrote a counter-bug to combat an email worm that had infested an office building I was contracting to. Worked through the ever-so-lovely 'You don't have to really click the attachment for it to go off on you' bug in an older version of outlook.

    It sat and watched a users inbox for the big bug at the time and pretty much acted like a counteragent, the instant they showed up, it nuked them off the machine (inbox and all) and undid whatver they managed to do.

    Send one copy to everybody in the office, and instantly watch outgoing network mail traffic DROP back down to normal levels and my phone stop ringing.

    I seem to recall distinctly 'forgetting' to mail it to key people, however.. *cough* :)

    Would be a real shame if some of the geek-prowess around the OSS world were to start doing such counter-bugs. Alot of these backdoors, trojans, and whatnot, have gaping flaws in them because..well, guess. :P

    Just think:
    Infect > Disinfect > Patch > Scan nearby machines (proceed life cycle)> Local Self-remove

    Could be the next revolution. Don't bother patching or downloading, we bring the cure to YOU.. :)

    --
    My new top secret key -> C>N|KB
    1. Re:Fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be the next revolution. Don't bother patching or downloading, we bring the cure to YOU.. :)

      Sounds like a Russian worm to me.

    2. Re:Fun! by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Problem being if your worm killer , kills windows box and you're sued for damages, so nopes not gonna happen, at least legally.

  64. parent +1 informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously, good link

  65. Phages? by Wtcher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it reminds me of the phage/bacteriophage, actually. If I recall, those viruses kill bacteria(judging from the name...) by infecting them.

    This goes on to remind me of that recent anti-HIV virus that's been in the news.

    --
    ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
  66. Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This worm is self-distributed under terms of GNU GPL but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. The author, as mentioned in the subject of this copyright, is NOT RESPONSIBLE for any damages caused.

  67. Re:Actually sounds like somebody trying to fix thi by Atmchicago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like our new potential AIDS cure.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. creativity foo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    None of them live up to the Original Morris Internet Worm. It infected multiple operating systems running on different hardware platforms. Combined they constituted an even greater portion of the Internet than Windows NT4 to XP command today (I'm not including Windows Server 2003 since it isn't vulnerable to Sasser). It also originated the techniques of automatically exploiting remote vulnerabilities to spread without human intervention across a network.

    This was a unique idea at the time, and spawned not only the modern worms that copy that model, but also formed the basis for many science fiction stories, including well known ones like SkyNet in the Terminator, and the rampant AI in Bungie's Marathon.

  70. Is this a beginning of a new virus era....? by standing_still · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this a beginning of a new virus era? I can see virus programmers making holes in their code on purpose just to release a second virus to take advantage of it. virus 'a' is programmed with a hole - virus 'b' takes advantage of it! A fine case of hit them when they are down!

    1. Re:Is this a beginning of a new virus era....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really not a new or originally idea. Right now most of it is just spyware, but there is always the potential for more damage.

  71. BLASPHEMY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Computer Science Education is about producing scientists not programmers who can develop a product. You should be banished to Devry.

    UNCLEAN!!!!! UNCLEAN!!!!!

  72. MOD AC UP!!!! +5 FUNNY by inertialmatrix · · Score: 1

    Heh, I completely agree.. I was just pointing out that in terms of programming knowledge; the last three years as a CS major have been a little lacking. Granted, I still have at least 3 semesters left.. but still, the majority of my study has been in math, not C++.

    Computer Science Education is about producing scientists not programmers who can develop a product. You should be banished to Devry. UNCLEAN!!!!! UNCLEAN!!!!!
    AC, you cracked me up!!

  73. Funny ass post... Damn, I'm still laughing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QUOTE:

    "You know those tests they do on rats, where they put them in a maze, and if they do the wrong thing they get an electric shock, but if they do the right thing they get the cheese? The Secret is this: You are the rat. The electric shock is *always* on. ***There Is No Cheese***."


    wow. I can't see.. eyes still watering.

  74. McAfee, Symantec and AVG by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

    would never pay people to release a computer virus or worm. After all, what good would that do them? They are in the business of getting rid of such problems. Why, I would bet that no one would be happier if worms and viruses (viri?) completely disappeared. :-)

    1. Re:McAfee, Symantec and AVG by MarkMcLeod · · Score: 0

      - John Thompson (Symantec CEO) sits in his office writing worm variants A through Z.

      - Poses as 14yr old l33t hax0r in chatroom. Shares worm source with some kid with axe to grind against world.

      - Kid sends out worm, gets caught.

      - Norton sells a couple thousand copies of its Antivirus software when a new batch of people get fed up with they're pc's turning into poo. Stock goes up. Big fat check for Mr. Thompson!

      Conspiracy.

      http://news.morningstar.com/news/DJ/M04/D28/200404 281909DOWJONESDJONLINE001680.html - Worm Numbers Up = Cash Money Yo.

  75. Why not? by r_j_prahad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if you try to be the good guy doing beneficial stuff like that, it'll still get you just as arrested, just as photographed, and just as incarcerated under existing law as if you had done the typical evil stuff.

    If the outcome is gonna be the same, might as well be an asshole.

    1. Re:Why not? by CBravo · · Score: 1

      that really depends on your ethics. Would you do good if noone could observe it, or is it a social layer to improve ones standing? I've seen both.

      --
      nosig today
    2. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you do good if noone could observe it, or is it a social layer to improve ones standing? I've seen both.

      You've seen what people do when no one could observe it? Or just when you think they don't know they're being watched?

    3. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you do good if noone could observe it, or is it a social layer to improve ones standing? I've seen both.

      Anonymous charitable donations are very common. That in itself proves that the urge to do good is not purely a social thing, although there are obviously a lot of counter-examples (*cough*Bill&MelindaGatesFoundation*cough*).

    4. Re:Why not? by dlt074 · · Score: 0

      well if you are here in the US, you will have a trial by jury.

      if the jury thinks your harmless or did a good thing, they will let you off!

      if they think your a prick and will do evil things again, they will convict you!

      always do the right thing. sometimes the right thing happens to be illegal, and you will get arrested, that does not mean you will be convicted.

    5. Re:Why not? by CBravo · · Score: 1

      Smartass ;-), I've seen my own behaviour for starters... Maybe it should have stated: "if noone would normally observe it". Second fact is that there are often side-effects which are observable.

      --
      nosig today
  76. Re:Clever by ashot · · Score: 2, Funny

    if only it had been moderated redundant twice..

    --
    -ashot
  77. aloha ! by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 1

    that sounds Sassy !

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  78. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the enemy of my enemy is my friend

  79. Reminds me of a poem by mamba-mamba · · Score: 2, Funny

    This reminds me of a poem I heard when I was a kid. I'm not sure who the original author is.

    Every flea has a flea
    on his back to bite him.
    And on that flea another flea
    so ad infinitum.

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    1. Re:Reminds me of a poem by torako · · Score: 1

      That would be Swift.

    2. Re:Reminds me of a poem by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      Ah, makes sense.

      Thanks.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  80. Already happening. by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Some spyware looks for the existance of other adware and takes over that adware's ad lookup, forcing both pieces to serve the spyware's ads.

  81. i would to... by unknown51a · · Score: 0

    Write a virus that kills viruses, imagine it, a virus that decompiles the code of the virus to analyse it and find new ways to destroy viruses and remain undetected. The virus could randomly change its own size (file size) and name in an attempt to remain undetected.

    This might lead to the evoltuion of it though.

    --
    I had an imaginary sig once, he said I was a loser and ran off.
  82. Re:I'm not "apologist" anything by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey cut this guy some slack.. it ain't easy timing first posts anymore like the old days. Plus, I did it for his clan. He's a soldier and that's why Slashdot has threshold levels. I happen to enjoy first posts and I always browse at -1 Oldest first. I suggest you do too. Funny people, these guys, particularly those gay negros.

  83. I dropped Comp Sci by KalvinB · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After two years I've given up on it. I spent two years studying philosophy and didn't bother trying to get a degree for the same reason I'm switching majors now (secondary education). I got ahead of my math classes. I've always been ahead of the programming classes. And I can't stand physics (which I'm done with finally).

    The fact is that if you challenge yourself you can learn everything you'd learn in college on your own for a lot less money. In the field of technology you have to be able to teach yourself anyway or you'll find you've become obsolete.

    I switched to education because I think it'd be a more entertaining and fulfilling career than sitting behind a computer all day.

    "Maybe that's what grad school is for?"

    Save your money. If you want to learn how to program just buy the books and come up with projects.

    The reason I know as many languages as I do is because I'm always coming up with ideas. I then figure out what language would be best to implement it and learn the language.

    You're better off specializing in an area (like math or physics) and then learning how to program on the side so you can utilize that skill in your profession. You don't need a comp sci degree to write modeling programs for a chemistry application. You need a chemistry degree so you understand what the program needs to do. In programming knowing what you need to do is 90% of it. The other 10% can be learned as you build the program.

    Think about it. Little kids can program. It's really not that hard. But little kids don't know enough about chemistry to use their programming skills to write chemistry programs.

    If you don't understand chemistry nobody really cares if you can do magic in C++ because you don't have the knowledge to make your programs do what a chemistry program needs to do.

    It's the same reason the FBI doesn't care if you were on a police force. An FBI agent needs to know things you can't learn being in the police force. And what you need to learn in the police force can easily be taught to you by the FBI.

    Ben

    1. Re:I dropped Comp Sci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same reason the FBI doesn't care if you were on a police force.

      Worst. Analogy. Ever.

  84. You might be surprised by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    Granted, you don't need a degree but to find the original exploit takes quite a bit of knowledge of system internals, probably quite a bit of time with a kernel debugger like SoftIce and a fair amount of persistence.

    The calculus isn't needed though. Those are just gateway classes to see how serious you are.

  85. No sympathy to the victims by tokachu(k) · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...and no sympathy to the kids who release them. The vulnerability was shown well before the worm's release.

    The fact is, this worm released relies on another worm that causes the computer to randomly shut down. Unlike the LSASS service, there is very little stability, therefore making it highly unlikely that a computer infected with the former worm will be hit by the latter.

  86. Re:Actually sounds like somebody trying to fix thi by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    Which is exactly what the military does with some of its really secure stuff.

    My company has done a little work for a couple of UK governmental departments, and they do exactly this too. I can't go into details (and don't really know all that much), but they have some very strict rules about what can and cannot be connected to the internet, and what can and cannot access their secure network. For example, one particular feature required a data feed from a third party.

    It actually made deployment and testing of the website we were developing a bit of a pain at times, as we could only access it from a secured room, which had no access to the rest of our network (and which itself was accessed by swipe card and pin code)

  87. Re:Actually sounds like somebody trying to fix thi by Zebidiah · · Score: 0
    It does open a new backdoor. But while that might be preparation for some future malicious action, it might also have been the author leaving himself a way to fix things if his initial worm got out with a destructive bug. (Of course it could be the worm cleaning up signs of previous infections in order to hide itself and thus head off other cleanups.)

    The trouble that I have with this scenario is that other virus writers could use this backdoor. Because of this, I think it is malware.

  88. Virus + GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "the GPL is viral in nature..." ;-)

  89. Sorry, I have to.... by eofpi · · Score: 1

    Boo for Free Germware! (Achoo!)

    --
    Y'know, you blow up one sun and suddenly everyone expects you to walk on water.
    1. Re:Sorry, I have to.... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Great, spam on slashdot. And explointing people being beheaded even, have you no shame?

      Obviously not.

  90. And yet... by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 1

    They want us to donate for a lousy job?! I want my $1.50 back.

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
  91. security hole? by jazzer · · Score: 1

    I don't know if security hole is the appropriate term for this. Wouldn't that suggest the author of the sasser worm had implemented security into the worm?

  92. Good or Bad by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

    Although this is a bad thing to happen, parhaps it could be used to our advantage. Example:
    We reverse engineer the worm to find the security hole, and then, rather than doing damage, just run the worm to warn the user that they have Sasser, check to see if it has given the worm to anyone else (i'm not sure how sasser works, so finding who the virus has infected is left as an excercise to the reader (firewall logs maybe?)). The user could be warned with an immediate message box, or a change to the registry key that shows the legal information on startup. And it would have to clean up after itself (deleting itself), and have a very small filesize, as not to clog bandwidth. QoS/ToS could be used so that the rest of the users programs are not interfered with. It is important that the program is GPLed to make sure it is stable. With the number of people with Sasser, beta testers shouldn't be hard to find.
    It is *CRITICAL* that it doesn't interfere with Windows, since after all, you don't gain anything by fucking up people's systems, and it IS easier to get rid of Sasser than it is to reinstall windows. Maybe it should put a text file on the desktop if you are that cautious about chcanging the registry. I think I'm the same as many people in that i think a text file on my desktop is better than realising over a week i have a virus on every computer on my network, and that my developers haven't been telling me that their distributed compilation program is running slowly, and also my web server is running at 10% speed. Back when I was in primary school, there was only an IT guy there 2 days a week, and when we got Nimda.....since then my caffiene intake has doubles, i have never used a microsoft web server, and am currently in the process of moving to linux.

    Back there stability didn't matter much. I could tell. 90% of the computers used Windows 98. The IT coordinator regretted moving his main computer to windows 2000. You have never experienced anything so close to hell as a network using only 10Base-T fully infected with a worm like Nimda.

    My sympathies to anyone with Sasser.

  93. Missing Mod Option by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

    Where is:

    n+1: Recursive
    --
    Move Sig. For great justice.
  94. Live CD Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where Can I get one of these, so I can try Sasser without installing it on my harddisk? If there's one that installs /home on a pen drive I can have an infected desktop wherever I go. Now that would be cool.

  95. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  96. Um, "There is no spoon?" by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    "There is only fork!"

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  97. Nothing new. by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    Code Red II used one of the backdoors CR used.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.