It it really doesn't fucking matter what you think. You're not a scientist. You're not a researcher. You're not tasked with understanding climate change and the drivers of climate change.
FYI the weather channel are not climate scientists. Just ass-holes that want to make a buck by playing on people's fears.
Actually they have jackass. When you develop a model, you need to be able to predict current and past events. Then to be useful, you need to be able to predict events that current models do not. You can fuck off and die now...
"Using a recently developed index of severe winter weather, we show that the occurrence of severe winter weather in the United States is significantly related to anomalies in pan-Arctic geopotential heights and temperatures" https://www.nature.com/article...
It often explains what's missing from a headline and summary....
"This technical report analyzes how ultrasound could have..."
So it's not surprising you came up with a result that supports that conclusion. It would be more convincing if you were looking for something else and then came up with that conclusion, when you eliminated other explanations.
Ummm, you mean compare it BEFORE they showed up....or to other areas that don't have it. Yeah those tenant advocacy organizations are just real bastards for wanting this study...
"This report was commissioned by the Hotel Trades Council, AFL-CIO, and is cosponsored by a
number of New York City community, housing and tenant advocacy organizations, including:
New York Communities For Change,
Housing Conservation Coordinators,
Goddard Riverside Law Project,
St. Nick’s Alliance,
Cooper Square Committee,
Mobilization for Justice (formerly MFY Legal Services),
" Not only has iTunes been outdated for years in terms of its interface and functionality, but Apple clearly aims to move to a streaming model of music selling."
"Chaslot explains that the algorithm never stays the same. It is constantly changing the weight it gives to different signals: the viewing patterns of a user, for example, or the length of time a video is watched before someone clicks away. "
"The engineers he worked with were responsible for continuously experimenting with new formulas that would increase advertising revenues by extending the amount of time people watched videos."
So basically it doesn't care what the content is, just that people are watching it, hence it recommends it. Yeah real threat to Democracy....
"Economists have been puzzled in recent years by the so-called “productivity paradox,” the fact that the digital revolution of the past four decades hasn’t resulted in big gains in output per worker as happened with earlier technological upheaval. Many developed economies have actually seen productivity stagnate or decline."
"Microsoft identifies a number of possible reasons for this negative impact, including: workers who are too distracted by a constant influx of e-mails, Slack messages, Trello notifications, texts, Tweets – not to mention viral cat videos – to concentrate for sustained periods; workers who aren’t properly trained to use the new technology effectively; tech that isn’t adequately supported by the business, forcing workers to lose time because “the computers are down;” and workers who suffer burnout because, with mobile devices and at-home-working, they feel tethered to the job around-the-clock."
Did you see web browsing in there? Did you read the part about distracted by constant interruptions or the bit about lack of training. Jackass.
The carbon foot print of the Military Industrial Complex. Odds are, they're the BIGGEST contributor to climate change. So you get them to slim down, god knows they need to go on a diet, you can keep your egg, bacon and sausage sandwich.
"Your stated position parrots the same debunked arguments espoused by your predecessors, all of whom ignored the widespread and vocal consensus of cryptographers."
"Eliminating these vulnerabilities is a mammoth task, and experts are unified in their opinion that introducing deliberate vulnerabilities would likely create catastrophic unintended consequences that could debilitate software functionality and security entirely."
"I would like to learn more about how you arrived at and justify this ill-informed policy proposal. Please provide me with a list of the cryptographers with whom you’ve personally discussed this topic since our July 2017 meeting and specifically identify those experts who advised you that companies can feasibly design government access features into their products without weakening cybersecurity. "
Slashdot Mirror
It it really doesn't fucking matter what you think. You're not a scientist. You're not a researcher. You're not tasked with understanding climate change and the drivers of climate change.
FYI the weather channel are not climate scientists. Just ass-holes that want to make a buck by playing on people's fears.
Actually they have jackass. When you develop a model, you need to be able to predict current and past events. Then to be useful, you need to be able to predict events that current models do not. You can fuck off and die now...
You mean like to correlation between cholesterol and heart disease....
RTFA:
"Using a recently developed index of severe winter weather, we show that the occurrence of severe winter weather in the United States is significantly related to anomalies in pan-Arctic geopotential heights and temperatures" https://www.nature.com/article...
It often explains what's missing from a headline and summary....
"This technical report analyzes how ultrasound could have..."
So it's not surprising you came up with a result that supports that conclusion. It would be more convincing if you were looking for something else and then came up with that conclusion, when you eliminated other explanations.
Why China was involved is curious thing...
LMOL yeah the cubans have something the NSA does not know about....think about that for a second....
I guess Airbnb hired a troll firm to "correct the record". Didn't know David Brock branched out.
No be mad at ass-hole like you that willingly ignore the problem and pretend it's something else. Again, fuck off and die.
RTFA moron:
"Airbnb was raising rents and taking housing off the rental market."
But yeah keep thinking it's about hotels. Ass-hole.
Oooo another fucking troll who doesn't understand "market demand" - fuck off Potsy...
Ummm, you mean compare it BEFORE they showed up....or to other areas that don't have it. Yeah those tenant advocacy organizations are just real bastards for wanting this study...
"This report was commissioned by the Hotel Trades Council, AFL-CIO, and is cosponsored by a number of New York City community, housing and tenant advocacy organizations, including:
New York Communities For Change,
Housing Conservation Coordinators,
Goddard Riverside Law Project,
St. Nick’s Alliance,
Cooper Square Committee,
Mobilization for Justice (formerly MFY Legal Services),
West Side Neighborhood Association, and
the Hell’s Kitchen Neighborhood Association
Please fuck off and die. You understand the problem, you are just intentionally trolling. So again, fuck off and die.
Airbnb was a solution in search of a problem. You didn't need them to rent your property, Potsy....
RTFA:
" Not only has iTunes been outdated for years in terms of its interface and functionality, but Apple clearly aims to move to a streaming model of music selling."
There's nothing free about capitalism.
Clearly unconstitutional as it violates the first amendment.
Between the haves and have-nots...might want to remember that when someone taking brides from wall street says they're not bought...
FTA:
"Chaslot explains that the algorithm never stays the same. It is constantly changing the weight it gives to different signals: the viewing patterns of a user, for example, or the length of time a video is watched before someone clicks away. "
"The engineers he worked with were responsible for continuously experimenting with new formulas that would increase advertising revenues by extending the amount of time people watched videos."
So basically it doesn't care what the content is, just that people are watching it, hence it recommends it. Yeah real threat to Democracy....
Protecting us from Democracy...
Somebody didn't read the article.
"Economists have been puzzled in recent years by the so-called “productivity paradox,” the fact that the digital revolution of the past four decades hasn’t resulted in big gains in output per worker as happened with earlier technological upheaval. Many developed economies have actually seen productivity stagnate or decline."
"Microsoft identifies a number of possible reasons for this negative impact, including: workers who are too distracted by a constant influx of e-mails, Slack messages, Trello notifications, texts, Tweets – not to mention viral cat videos – to concentrate for sustained periods; workers who aren’t properly trained to use the new technology effectively; tech that isn’t adequately supported by the business, forcing workers to lose time because “the computers are down;” and workers who suffer burnout because, with mobile devices and at-home-working, they feel tethered to the job around-the-clock."
Did you see web browsing in there? Did you read the part about distracted by constant interruptions or the bit about lack of training. Jackass.
They have? Really Potsy. Even though the NFL for years had denied CTE and even covered it up?
Fuck off.
FTA:
"AOM’s royalty free model will spread to other business segments as well."
And there we have the point Leonardo Chiariglione labored to make. He could have simply said - no one will get paid with royalty free codecs.
To which the consumer would say: tough titties.
This is not a problem that needs a solution.
The carbon foot print of the Military Industrial Complex. Odds are, they're the BIGGEST contributor to climate change. So you get them to slim down, god knows they need to go on a diet, you can keep your egg, bacon and sausage sandwich.
Actually it's a matter of fact.
"Your stated position parrots the same debunked arguments espoused by your predecessors, all of whom ignored the widespread and vocal consensus of cryptographers."
"Eliminating these vulnerabilities is a mammoth task, and experts are unified in their opinion that introducing deliberate vulnerabilities would likely create catastrophic unintended consequences that could debilitate software functionality and security entirely."
"I would like to learn more about how you arrived at and justify this ill-informed policy proposal. Please provide me with a list of the cryptographers with whom you’ve personally discussed this topic since our July 2017 meeting and specifically identify those experts who advised you that companies can feasibly design government access features into their products without weakening cybersecurity. "
You can fuck off now moron...
Troll bot could use some grammar lessons.