The only time an actual ruling needs to be passed is if the students can't come to an agreement. This is very rare and will usually only happen 1 in 2000 games or so. We don't need to RDIF tag all of our 16000+ tournament pieces just so that 1 in 2000 games someone who knows nothing about chess can make an accurate ruling. We'll just bring over an expert in those cases.
As an expert, what is the most difficult ruling you have ever had to make? I'm not a chess expert but I can't imagine any situation that would actually require an expert to resolve, as opposed to somebody who just read the rules and played a couple of games once.
Are those petabytes compressed or uncompressed and if compressed, at what quality? Would they keep the recordings real-time accessible or on backup media? Petabytes of uncompressed telephone-grade audio would boil down to less than one backup tape a day easily.
GP implies stopping the drugs was the direct cause for the relapse. The CNN article states the child was initially "functionally cured" a few months after stopping the drugs. The facts us readers know, indicate neither correlation nor causation between stopping drugs and the relapse.
Which is why there is a growing movement of scientists who promote publishing failed research results. Scientists, out of anybody, should know that failure is when you learn the most.
I've tried knockout.js and I really like the style of programming; I just haven't found any practical use for it beyond very basic single-page web apps which would be just as easy to do without MVVM.
I think GP meant "random" as in the seeded random values a computer generates; i.e. all over the place and unpredictable for a human but completely identical every time.
A normal person is a person who's good at some things and bad at others. 99.99% of programmers, including myself, are normal people who are good at the things required to be a programmer and bad at others (like social things, perhaps?).
TFA is some self-righteous bullshit. Imagine if a garbage collector wrote a blog about "the insufferable unequality in his profession because it takes somebody with rare talents such as muscle-power and the ability to withstand excruciating smells, excluding all the normal people". We'd call that guy an arrogant prick. What is the difference?
Get of your high horse, mr. Edwards. Unless you are one of these Jonathan Edwards's, you're just a normal person like pretty much the entire rest of humanity.
On the other hand, there are people happily paying to go into a sensory deprevation tank. It's all about context. If you choose the sensory deprevation, it's relaxation, if you're put into the same situation, it's boredom.
Is it your feeling that SAS is "stifling any real innovation" or do you have examples of projects that are impossible with SAS but possible with Python or R? Do those example projects actually help the bottom line of the company or are they just "cooler"?
If you can think of examples that have clear financial benefits to the company, you have a solid business case already. If there are no such examples or other factors negate the benefits, then the company has nothing to gain by switching and should not switch.
Short answer; if you're asking on Slashdot for reasons to switch from product X to product Y, you probably have no real reason to switch.
Assuming the data was in some attachment (of could have been easily put in an attachment), how about just encrypting the attachment if it contains information so incredibly sensitive that it warrants a court order if it ever leaks out.
You don't need PGP, IMAP or any specific OS, just a small bit of common sense.
"By contrast, Google faces little more than the minor inconvenience of intercepting a single email - an email that was indisputably sent in error," it added.
Losing a few thousand dollar is little more than a minor inconvenience for GS. So how about it GS... send me a few thousand dollars.
Google is abso-fucking-lutely right to require a court order. If they don't, it'll just open the flood gates for other companies and people to "retract" damaging e-mails. The news here isn't that Google required proper legal procedures before violating it's users rights, it's that GS sends highly sensitive data by e-mail.
Just because an issue was quickly resolved doesn't make it a non-story.
If Goldman Sachs uses the insecure SMTP protocol to transmit highly sensitive unencrypted data, they deserve the reputation damage (and a security audit).
What "Authors have right to be paid for their work" means is that if other people want to use the result of their work, the authors can ask payment in return.
Ofcourse you fully understand what was meant, but thought treating another person like a moron would make you feel superior. Enjoy your fuzzy feelings.
How accurate does Cardboard track head movement? Note that head displays have been done many times before over the past decades. The problem has always been motion sickness inducing head tracking, never the display technology.
Slashdot Mirror
5 reams of carbon copy paper contains much less information than a single USB stick.
This is security by volume.
The only time an actual ruling needs to be passed is if the students can't come to an agreement. This is very rare and will usually only happen 1 in 2000 games or so. We don't need to RDIF tag all of our 16000+ tournament pieces just so that 1 in 2000 games someone who knows nothing about chess can make an accurate ruling. We'll just bring over an expert in those cases.
As an expert, what is the most difficult ruling you have ever had to make?
I'm not a chess expert but I can't imagine any situation that would actually require an expert to resolve, as opposed to somebody who just read the rules and played a couple of games once.
Are those petabytes compressed or uncompressed and if compressed, at what quality?
Would they keep the recordings real-time accessible or on backup media?
Petabytes of uncompressed telephone-grade audio would boil down to less than one backup tape a day easily.
GP implies stopping the drugs was the direct cause for the relapse.
The CNN article states the child was initially "functionally cured" a few months after stopping the drugs.
The facts us readers know, indicate neither correlation nor causation between stopping drugs and the relapse.
Which is why there is a growing movement of scientists who promote publishing failed research results.
Scientists, out of anybody, should know that failure is when you learn the most.
Name me any language without bad parts.
I've used several dozen languages so far; every single one of them had bad parts.
I've tried knockout.js and I really like the style of programming; I just haven't found any practical use for it beyond very basic single-page web apps which would be just as easy to do without MVVM.
I think GP meant "random" as in the seeded random values a computer generates; i.e. all over the place and unpredictable for a human but completely identical every time.
A normal person is a person who's good at some things and bad at others.
99.99% of programmers, including myself, are normal people who are good at the things required to be a programmer and bad at others (like social things, perhaps?).
TFA is some self-righteous bullshit. Imagine if a garbage collector wrote a blog about "the insufferable unequality in his profession because it takes somebody with rare talents such as muscle-power and the ability to withstand excruciating smells, excluding all the normal people". We'd call that guy an arrogant prick. What is the difference?
Get of your high horse, mr. Edwards. Unless you are one of these Jonathan Edwards's, you're just a normal person like pretty much the entire rest of humanity.
It's hard to take your anti-school stance seriously while you keep misspelling "you".
How could a criminal use SSNs anyway?
What types of scam/hack/crime would be possible?
How can a company be a threat to an ISP's DMCA safe harbor status without actual court decisions to back up their copyright infringement claims?
On the other hand, there are people happily paying to go into a sensory deprevation tank.
It's all about context. If you choose the sensory deprevation, it's relaxation, if you're put into the same situation, it's boredom.
What about Bingo?
Bingo involves the physical act of moving your hand to tick the scorecard, and there's a clear, objective winner.
+1 insightful. Wish I hadn't already commented.
Three words in reply to the "real sports are all segregated by sex" argument: "Mixed doubles tennis".
How about rock-paper-scissors?
[X] physical skills involved
[X] some kind of scoring system
[X] objectively declare winner
Ticks all your boxes!
Is it your feeling that SAS is "stifling any real innovation" or do you have examples of projects that are impossible with SAS but possible with Python or R?
Do those example projects actually help the bottom line of the company or are they just "cooler"?
If you can think of examples that have clear financial benefits to the company, you have a solid business case already.
If there are no such examples or other factors negate the benefits, then the company has nothing to gain by switching and should not switch.
Short answer; if you're asking on Slashdot for reasons to switch from product X to product Y, you probably have no real reason to switch.
Assuming the data was in some attachment (of could have been easily put in an attachment), how about just encrypting the attachment if it contains information so incredibly sensitive that it warrants a court order if it ever leaks out.
You don't need PGP, IMAP or any specific OS, just a small bit of common sense.
"By contrast, Google faces little more than the minor inconvenience of intercepting a single email - an email that was indisputably sent in error," it added.
Losing a few thousand dollar is little more than a minor inconvenience for GS.
So how about it GS... send me a few thousand dollars.
Google is abso-fucking-lutely right to require a court order. If they don't, it'll just open the flood gates for other companies and people to "retract" damaging e-mails. The news here isn't that Google required proper legal procedures before violating it's users rights, it's that GS sends highly sensitive data by e-mail.
Just because an issue was quickly resolved doesn't make it a non-story.
If Goldman Sachs uses the insecure SMTP protocol to transmit highly sensitive unencrypted data, they deserve the reputation damage (and a security audit).
FTFY
That's chap-tard, you insensetive clod-tard.
Ask yourself. "is any of what I said an argument or am I trying to let the reader do my work?"
Now we're in agreement on that, do you see how wrong you are?
I guess you majored in "pedantry", with honors.
What "Authors have right to be paid for their work" means is that if other people want to use the result of their work, the authors can ask payment in return.
Ofcourse you fully understand what was meant, but thought treating another person like a moron would make you feel superior. Enjoy your fuzzy feelings.
How accurate does Cardboard track head movement?
Note that head displays have been done many times before over the past decades.
The problem has always been motion sickness inducing head tracking, never the display technology.