I vote we tag this awesome article "AWESOMEBAR" I agree.. and why the heck did they chose such a boring project code name? Weave? They blew the opportunity to use a neat-o project name: Project A.W.S.O.M.-O!
OTOH, I have given up powerpoint altogether -- it's safer to have open office presentations + OOo installer on a CD than to have a powerpoint presentation and hope they have the right version of MS office. I might be missing something, but why can't you just put the free PowerPoint Viewer on the CD along with your PowerPoint presentation? Wouldn't it be nicer (to them) to install the 2 MB PowerPoint Viewer on "their" computer than whatever needs to be installed to view OOo presentation files? (OTOH: I wouldn't be surprised if there were simple "viewers" available for OOo presentations.)
control the air
now if they could only control pollution... I didn't see it mentioned in this story's article, but other articles have mentioned that part of China's "rain manipulation" plan is "cleaning the air" before the Olympics start. Not surprisingly, some scientists have doubts. From an AP article ("China to Force Rain Ahead of Olympics"):
The meteorologists say they can force rain in the days before the Olympics, through a process known as cloud-seeding, to clean the air and ensure clear skies.
The forced rain could also help clean Beijing's polluted air, said Wang Jianjie, another meteorologist with the bureau.
Beijing's air pollution is among Asia's worst. Officials have shuttered several chemical and steel plants on the city's edge, and many polluters will shut down -- or cut back -- during the Olympics. But the city also has 2.9 million registered vehicles, and the number is expected to reach 3.3 million by the Olympics, a 13 percent increase.
NBC has the entire season 4 of The Office online, watchable in full screen, with traditional TV-like ads interrupting the shows. Of course, nobody likes ads, but it's worth it to me
I'd rather pay $2 on iTunes, get to keep it and have no commercials.. Last I heard, iTunes doesn't offer season 4 of The Office. Did Apple and NBC recently come to an agreement?
When Microsoft turns off the activation servers, that basically REALLY means the end of WinXP... or is there a chance, any chance, that Microsoft will release a super-secret "unlock all" patch in 2014 that will allow XP to be activated. I am pretty sure the answer is NO, but I can still hope. According to Microsoft Norway's Product Activation FAQ:
Will Microsoft use activation to force me to upgrade? In other words, will Microsoft ever stop giving out activation codes for any of the products that require activation?
No, Microsoft will not use activation as a tool to force people to upgrade. Activation is merely an anti-piracy tool, nothing else.
Microsoft will also support the activation of Windows XP throughout its life and will likely provide an update that turns activation off at the end of the product's lifecycle so users would no longer be required to activate the product.
I cannot find similar information on Microsoft's USA site. However, I'd still say it's likely, but not a certainty.
Maybe Mac users compare the MacBook Air to non-Mac subnotebooks because some Mac users want some of the hardware features found in other subnotebooks that the MacBook Air lacks (e.g. optical drive, gigabit ethernet, more USB ports, user replacable battery, memory card slots), even if it means sacrificing some the Air's form factor (but not weight). I think they compare them because other notebook makers have proven that you can include these features in a subnotebook, but Mac users have no choice but to move up to the 5+ pound MacBook or 15+ inch MacBook Pro.
I guess what I'm trying to say is: they compare because they think Apple can do better (or offer more choice) in this category. Another thing some Mac users complain about: no Mac desktop that's not a huge dual-processor workstation and doesn't have a built-in display.
I wish, I wish I was a fish. And that we could buy computers without an OS if we chose to. Sure you can. You can buy Dell n Series computers without an OS installed, but with an obligatory copy of FreeDOS (not preinstalled). You're not really expected to install FreeDOS, but for some reason (maybe legal or contractual) Dell doesn't want to sell PCs without a bundled OS, so they bundle (but don't install) an OS that you're not expected to install.
I saw that Dell has a small business line of PC's that they claim to ship free of all that bloatware. I dont remember the name of that product line. But I liked the fact that you didnt have to select it as an option, it was a standard feature. It's their super-cheap Vostro line of desktops and laptops for small business, which were introduced Summer 2007. Vostro hardware is nearly identical to the new Inspiron desktops and laptops introduced at the same time, but are "business black" instead of silver.
"The Vostro branded products feature no trialware and simple to use tools that address top-of-mind problems such as data back-up, PC performance and health, and specialized networking support for customers without dedicated IT staff."
Of course, some buyers probably think Dell's "support tools" is "bloatware," but I guess that's what you have to accept when you buy a PC with support and warranty.
Not everybody is a student with access to cheap educational pricing. Also, how many licenses do you buy if you have several computers? Technically, you need a license for every computer; so what do households with 2 or more computers have to pay MS for valid licenses? Since OO works perfectly fine for most things (especially short reports for school) I'm not disagreeing with your point (or agreeing with the GP), but a single retail license of the $120 "Home and Student" version of MS Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote) allows installation on up to 3 computers per household.
This version is limited to non-commercial use, but you mentioned "households with 2 or more computers" and "short reports for school," so I thought this was worth mentioning just in case you didn't know. If you don't need the other popular (mostly business-related) apps (like Outlook and Access), then I think it's a decent deal. Of course, its price is not as good as OpenOffice.org's.
I have been extremely happy with OOo ever since 2.0, even MSO2003 users have been emailing me their docs because they get a docx and they can't do anything with it. After "fixing" their docs, do you tell them about the Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats? Or are their system admins too incompetent and/or tight-assed to install it?
For me, "Low End" means that while it doesn't have the latest and greatest, it IS fully up to date as far as socket types, FSB speeds, and RAM speeds are concerned. In other words, that there is some upgradability built into it so I can hold onto it longer and upgrade a few times before it's completely outmoded.
I recently spent some time at Newegg pricing out a new rig.
Motherboard ~ $150 (at least. Unless you want to get a motherboard that won't be upgradable because it's using a 1 generation old socket.)
CPU ~ $200 - 300 (core 2 duo's run around $200, quads around $300)
RAM ~ $250 (for 2 gigs of average quality RAM in the proper speed. A minimum for running VM's and gaming)
Graphics card ~ $300 (for any Nvidia 8x00 card, although this may have dropped a bit with the release mentioned in TFA)
Your version of "low end" looks like an upper-mid-range gaming rig to me, especially the $250 for RAM and $300 for a current-generation graphics card.
If you're willing to use an AMD platform again, motherboards using the new AMD 780G chipset (socket AM2+ for Phenom, PCI Express 2.0, HyperTransport 3.0, RAID 0/1/10, integrated Radeon HD 2400 based graphics, HDMI) start at $80 ($70 after rebate) at Newegg.
For now, a $61 Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (65nm with VT support) should be a very nice temporary upgrade from your Athlon 64 3500+. I'd wait for the post-TLB versions of Phenom to ship before going quad-core, but Phenom prices (currently around $200) should be significantly lower than Core 2 Quad since Intel still shows an absolute performance advantage for this generation.
I don't get how you got $250 for 2 gigs of "average quality RAM in the proper speed" because a pair of 1GB DDR2 800 sticks start at around $40 for the "value" stuff (including Patriot and Kingston) and around $75 for "enthusiast-grade" Corsair XMS. If DDR2 800 is not fast enough, does a low-end gaming/VT rig really need more than those sub-$90 DDR2 1066 kits?
I know integrated low-end Radeon HD graphics isn't for "gamers," but note that it is based on the current Radeon architecture (Radeon HD 2400), so it should be much better than your GeForce 5600LE for now. Also, I don't think you can get more upgradable than a PCI Express 2.0 x16 slot.
Of course, don't buy a new rig unless you need it. You seem to have other things in your life that are more important. On the other hand, a new rig can help some busy gamers keep their sanity.;-)
Actually the Radeon line did not start at 7000. The first Radeon (R100-based) was called simply that: "ATI Radeon". Later there was a "Radeon 32" and "Radeon 64". Straying off topic here, but I thought the Radeon 7000 (aka Radeon VE) was a misleading rip-off product. Remember, NVIDIA released the first mainstream card with hardware transform and lighting (T&L) and named it "GeForce." ATI responded a little later by releasing their hardware T&L product, named "Radeon." Later, NVIDIA released the first "reasonably priced" hardware T&L card called "GeForce 2MX." ATI responded with the Radeon 7000/VE, but this product did not feature hardware T&L.
Other misleading GPU names:
Radeon 9000/9200 - DirectX 8 GPUs despite the model numbers starting with "9."
GeForce 4MX - Based on the GeForce 2 architecture.
Radeon X300/X600 - Based on the previous 9500-9800 architecture, not the new X700-X800 architecture.
Radeon HD 3000 series - Same architecture as the Radeon HD 2000 series.
GeForce 9000 series - Same architecture as the GeForce 8000 series.
My company is standardized on Firefox for all web browsing and intranet apps. Our PCs are not necessarily cutting edge technology filled with copious amounts of RAM. The average speed is 1GHz and 512Mb RAM running XP.
You do realize that Opera works wonderfully on PCs with specs even lower than that, right? Guess it doesn't help you much now, but you should be kicking yourself for the past. I wouldn't be surprised if the GP did consider Opera, but still chose Firefox despite its inefficient use of resources. I'm an Opera man myself, but I wouldn't be surprised if many sites that a typical company browses (e.g. some banking/financial sites) aren't fully functional in Opera, but are fully functional in Firefox (and IE6/7, of course).
Opera may be great, efficient, and standards-compliant (I'm typing this comment in Opera), but Opera seems to have, at most, a 1.07% worldwide usage share (it could be as low as 0.55%). Mozilla/Firefox seems to have at least 14% and maybe as high as 28%. Many web developers make sure their sites work in Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari first, then add Opera if they can get around to it.
Heck, I want to use Opera for all of the sites I visit on my home Windows PC, but I open Internet Explorer every day for those darned sites (I can't quit them) that work much better in IE than Opera. I'm sure most companies would rather use the Internet Explorer alternative that works with all of the sites they use (Firefox). I'm sure a company doesn't want to use two browsers (Opera plus another), when they can "standardize" on one.
Another thing that could effect the adoption rate (but perhaps not for business buyers) is the price cuts for some retail versions of Vista with SP1. In the U.S., the Home Premium Upgrade version with SP1 will be $95 on Amazon.com and the Ultimate Upgrade version will be $195. Price cuts haven't been announced for any OEM versions (which I assume many Slashdot users buy).
Using my many years of reading Slashdot as a gauge, the enthusiasm for the Android handsets, and lack thereof for the iPhone, that are evident on this site lead me to believe that Android will flop and the iPhone will take over the mobile market. Large-scale market trends always seem to defy the common wisdom brokered by the denizens of this site. Unless you keep track of "Slashdot predictions" and tally the "hits" and "misses," I think selective memory (and maybe confirmation bias) is probably clouding your beliefs. The "misses" (e.g. "No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.") are much more memorable (and funny) than the "hits." Heck, what's so memorable about a correct Slashdot prediction?
Of course, I'm not making a prediction. Just a hunch, based on self-selected observations. My take means nothing, ultimately. Damn. I should have read the end of your comment before typing the first part of my reply. Let's just say I'm expanding on the end of your comment.
I can't find the numbers handy, but I seem to remember that when you looked at *laptops* apple shoots up a bit in the rankings According to iSuppli's response to an Ars Technica journal entry, their numbers for "PC rankings" include laptops and desktops.
Slashdot comments often forget to differentiate between "worldwide" market share and "U.S." market share. That iSuppli report refers to "worldwide" market share:
For just Q4 2007, Apple had a 2.9% share of the global market.
For the entire year 2007, Apple has a 2.8% share of the global market.
Apple's Q4 sales in 2007 were 39.3% higher than Q4 2006. Apple's whole-year 2007 sales were 33.6% higher than 2006. However, those impressive-sounding gains don't seem as impressive when Apple had such a small slice of the market to begin with.
The Mac Observer's news article about this report says "Apple's Macintosh market share in the U.S. has been climbing and is at about 8 percent," which is a pretty big chunk for a single PC manufacturer, but maybe not so big for a "platform." The Mac Observer doesn't say where they got that 8% number (it wasn't from that iSuppli report).
Also, after Nokia's recent $90 price drop, the N810's price ($390) is now "in the ballpark" of these cheap ultraportables (the N800 remains at around $230 for now). The N810 adds a slide-out thumb keyboard and GPS receiver to the N800, and several minor changes to the hardware.
Also, ECS has a sub-$500 Eee PC competitor coming, but it's probably too early in production to include in the CNET article. The ECS's key features: built-in HSDPA card, looks (from photos) slightly larger than Eee PC (but still ultraportable), MacBook-like keyboard. I think it "looks" better than the ultraportables in the CNET article, but I think I'd trust the MSI brand over ECS (or even ASUS).
Zepplin is on iTunes, as of last year. Zeppelin is also on Amazon.com, for those that prefer their lossy compressed music in LAME MP3 format. Unlike AC/DC (Verizon Wireless) and the Beatles (iTunes), Led Zeppelin did give one digital download store exclusive rights to their catalog (assuming this Beatles story is true).
VC1 is kind of like Silverlight--invented by MSFT becasue they wanted to be in control of something, even though H.264 was already there and some might say is superior to VC1 (IIRC H.264 can produce video of the same quality with a slightly lower bandwidth requirement). In any case, when it takes 10 to 20 MbPS (or more) to stream at HD quality Id have to say it is a stretch to say this HD support could be very useful to "low bandwidth servers". I'm not an expert on video codecs, but I'm pretty sure VC-1 has much lower CPU/GPU requirements than H.264. I'm not convinced VC-1 was necessary for Blu-ray and HD DVD (maybe the VC-1 encoding tools were more mature), but I think VC-1 will allow many more current computer users to enjoy high resolution video.
An Anandtech article from a while back showed that a Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.66 GHz) was needed to play back X-Men III in H.264-encoded Blu-ray. Of course, internet video won't have such high bitrates or deal with AACS, but the processing requirements of high resolution H.264 still seems pretty hefty. The vast majority of CPUs in homes will be less powerful than the E6700 for some time. Integrated Intel GPUs, which don't assist H.264 acceleration yet, still dominate the market.
You need to convert them for the resale value. It's going to be hard to sell your HD-DVD movies at a decent price, so you should go through the steps in TFA and convert them to BluRay discs and sell them. They'd even go for a high price, if they didn't have a BluRay release to begin with. Am I reading your comment correctly? Are you saying sell the Blu-ray copies of the HD DVD movies? Since the RIAA proved they can successfully sue a P2P "sharer" for hundreds of thousands of dollars, I think the MPAA will sue a Blu-ray copier/seller for... ONE BIIILLLLLION DOLLARS!
Heck, I have no respect for the MPAA and I think it's a travesty the way they've screwed over HD DVD early adopters. However, I think the worst I'd do is "share" Blu-ray copies with friends or, at worst, get paid back for the cost of the Blu-ray media (a bottle of wine would do).
I need something that doesn't suck security-wise (*cough* Outlook Express), I'm not disagreeing with your comment, but the free, supposedly more secure successor to Outlook Express (for Windows XP) and Windows Mail (Vista) has been released by Microsoft: Windows Live Mail (more info here). I haven't used it yet, but it looks like a significant improvement over Outlook Express and a smaller improvement over Windows Mail. It's definitely not as full-featured as Thunderbird, but it's a must-upgrade for all those users who've gotten used to the Outlook Express interface.
So when we point out the inadequacies of current email clients, our criticisms of Outlook Express should be updated to criticisms of Windows Live Mail.
There is no such thing as a well built Toshiba. Are you sure that all Toshiba models (e.g. Portege, Tecra, Satellite) are shoddy? The GP specifically mentioned Apple's "Pro" notebook models (not non-pro MacBooks or iBooks), Lenovo's ThinkPads (not Lenovo's 3000 Family), and "well built" Toshibas. I assume Toshiba's made-in-Japan Tecra business notebooks are built better than their consumer-grade Satellites.
Warren Buffett saw it back in the early 90s when he said he wouldn't invest in Microsoft, because he didn't see a profitable business model (long term...Buffett's method). Warren Buffett didn't invest in Microsoft because he didn't understand how the business model could be profitable long term (because he didn't understand technology). In the early 90s, Buffett didn't invest in any tech companies and missed out on all the growth (but he did just fine).
I thought this was one of the most well-known trivia bits about his friendship with Bill Gates. Google "warren buffett microsoft understand" and you'll get a zillion links.
Also, Microsoft has a long way to fall before I'd call them "desperate."
I don't know about that. I go to a lot of places in the UK that are in the middle of nowhere, but I can still get 3G signal. The United States (9,826,630 km^2) is 40x the size of the United Kingdom (244,820 km^2). The population of the UK (246/km^2) is 8x more dense than the US (31/km^2).
I'm not saying that's a good excuse for the US's poor 3G coverage, but I think "middle of nowhere" has a different meaning the US.
At the bottom of the linked page I saw "Page 1 of 25" and I gave up. Bad submitter! Bad! Bad! I know you were probably joking, but Slashdot comments have taught me the non-obvious way to get a single-page view of Tom's Hardware articles:
If clicking that link directly results in a redirect to the multi-page version (for some reason Opera is doing this for me), then copy-and-paste that address directly into the address bar.
Slashdot Mirror
Anyhoo, I think Window/TiVo/PlaysForSure users can still pay $2 on Amazon Unbox, get to keep it and have no commercials.
(OTOH: Who the frick wants to keep episodes of The Office?)
- Will Microsoft use activation to force me to upgrade? In other words, will Microsoft ever stop giving out activation codes for any of the products that require activation?
I cannot find similar information on Microsoft's USA site. However, I'd still say it's likely, but not a certainty.No, Microsoft will not use activation as a tool to force people to upgrade. Activation is merely an anti-piracy tool, nothing else.
Microsoft will also support the activation of Windows XP throughout its life and will likely provide an update that turns activation off at the end of the product's lifecycle so users would no longer be required to activate the product.
I guess what I'm trying to say is: they compare because they think Apple can do better (or offer more choice) in this category. Another thing some Mac users complain about: no Mac desktop that's not a huge dual-processor workstation and doesn't have a built-in display.
- Inspiron n Series desktops for home and home office
- Vostro and OptiPlex n Series desktops for business
- Latitude n Series laptops for business
I wouldn't be surprised if other PC makers sold some computers (most likely business models) without an OS.The press release for the Vostro introduction described the "no trialware" feature:
- "The Vostro branded products feature no trialware and simple to use tools that address top-of-mind problems such as data back-up, PC performance and health, and specialized networking support for customers without dedicated IT staff."
Of course, some buyers probably think Dell's "support tools" is "bloatware," but I guess that's what you have to accept when you buy a PC with support and warranty.This version is limited to non-commercial use, but you mentioned "households with 2 or more computers" and "short reports for school," so I thought this was worth mentioning just in case you didn't know. If you don't need the other popular (mostly business-related) apps (like Outlook and Access), then I think it's a decent deal. Of course, its price is not as good as OpenOffice.org's.
I recently spent some time at Newegg pricing out a new rig.
Motherboard ~ $150 (at least. Unless you want to get a motherboard that won't be upgradable because it's using a 1 generation old socket.)
Your version of "low end" looks like an upper-mid-range gaming rig to me, especially the $250 for RAM and $300 for a current-generation graphics card.CPU ~ $200 - 300 (core 2 duo's run around $200, quads around $300)
RAM ~ $250 (for 2 gigs of average quality RAM in the proper speed. A minimum for running VM's and gaming)
Graphics card ~ $300 (for any Nvidia 8x00 card, although this may have dropped a bit with the release mentioned in TFA)
If you're willing to use an AMD platform again, motherboards using the new AMD 780G chipset (socket AM2+ for Phenom, PCI Express 2.0, HyperTransport 3.0, RAID 0/1/10, integrated Radeon HD 2400 based graphics, HDMI) start at $80 ($70 after rebate) at Newegg.
For now, a $61 Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (65nm with VT support) should be a very nice temporary upgrade from your Athlon 64 3500+. I'd wait for the post-TLB versions of Phenom to ship before going quad-core, but Phenom prices (currently around $200) should be significantly lower than Core 2 Quad since Intel still shows an absolute performance advantage for this generation.
I don't get how you got $250 for 2 gigs of "average quality RAM in the proper speed" because a pair of 1GB DDR2 800 sticks start at around $40 for the "value" stuff (including Patriot and Kingston) and around $75 for "enthusiast-grade" Corsair XMS. If DDR2 800 is not fast enough, does a low-end gaming/VT rig really need more than those sub-$90 DDR2 1066 kits?
I know integrated low-end Radeon HD graphics isn't for "gamers," but note that it is based on the current Radeon architecture (Radeon HD 2400), so it should be much better than your GeForce 5600LE for now. Also, I don't think you can get more upgradable than a PCI Express 2.0 x16 slot.
Of course, don't buy a new rig unless you need it. You seem to have other things in your life that are more important. On the other hand, a new rig can help some busy gamers keep their sanity. ;-)
Other misleading GPU names:
- Radeon 9000/9200 - DirectX 8 GPUs despite the model numbers starting with "9."
- GeForce 4MX - Based on the GeForce 2 architecture.
- Radeon X300/X600 - Based on the previous 9500-9800 architecture, not the new X700-X800 architecture.
- Radeon HD 3000 series - Same architecture as the Radeon HD 2000 series.
- GeForce 9000 series - Same architecture as the GeForce 8000 series.
I shouldn't know all this. I need to get a life.Opera may be great, efficient, and standards-compliant (I'm typing this comment in Opera), but Opera seems to have, at most, a 1.07% worldwide usage share (it could be as low as 0.55%). Mozilla/Firefox seems to have at least 14% and maybe as high as 28%. Many web developers make sure their sites work in Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari first, then add Opera if they can get around to it.
Heck, I want to use Opera for all of the sites I visit on my home Windows PC, but I open Internet Explorer every day for those darned sites (I can't quit them) that work much better in IE than Opera. I'm sure most companies would rather use the Internet Explorer alternative that works with all of the sites they use (Firefox). I'm sure a company doesn't want to use two browsers (Opera plus another), when they can "standardize" on one.
Another thing that could effect the adoption rate (but perhaps not for business buyers) is the price cuts for some retail versions of Vista with SP1. In the U.S., the Home Premium Upgrade version with SP1 will be $95 on Amazon.com and the Ultimate Upgrade version will be $195. Price cuts haven't been announced for any OEM versions (which I assume many Slashdot users buy).
Slashdot comments often forget to differentiate between "worldwide" market share and "U.S." market share. That iSuppli report refers to "worldwide" market share:
- For just Q4 2007, Apple had a 2.9% share of the global market.
- For the entire year 2007, Apple has a 2.8% share of the global market.
Apple's Q4 sales in 2007 were 39.3% higher than Q4 2006. Apple's whole-year 2007 sales were 33.6% higher than 2006. However, those impressive-sounding gains don't seem as impressive when Apple had such a small slice of the market to begin with.The Mac Observer's news article about this report says "Apple's Macintosh market share in the U.S. has been climbing and is at about 8 percent," which is a pretty big chunk for a single PC manufacturer, but maybe not so big for a "platform." The Mac Observer doesn't say where they got that 8% number (it wasn't from that iSuppli report).
Also, ECS has a sub-$500 Eee PC competitor coming, but it's probably too early in production to include in the CNET article. The ECS's key features: built-in HSDPA card, looks (from photos) slightly larger than Eee PC (but still ultraportable), MacBook-like keyboard. I think it "looks" better than the ultraportables in the CNET article, but I think I'd trust the MSI brand over ECS (or even ASUS).
An Anandtech article from a while back showed that a Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.66 GHz) was needed to play back X-Men III in H.264-encoded Blu-ray. Of course, internet video won't have such high bitrates or deal with AACS, but the processing requirements of high resolution H.264 still seems pretty hefty. The vast majority of CPUs in homes will be less powerful than the E6700 for some time. Integrated Intel GPUs, which don't assist H.264 acceleration yet, still dominate the market.
Heck, I have no respect for the MPAA and I think it's a travesty the way they've screwed over HD DVD early adopters. However, I think the worst I'd do is "share" Blu-ray copies with friends or, at worst, get paid back for the cost of the Blu-ray media (a bottle of wine would do).
So when we point out the inadequacies of current email clients, our criticisms of Outlook Express should be updated to criticisms of Windows Live Mail.
I thought this was one of the most well-known trivia bits about his friendship with Bill Gates. Google "warren buffett microsoft understand" and you'll get a zillion links.
Also, Microsoft has a long way to fall before I'd call them "desperate."
I'm not saying that's a good excuse for the US's poor 3G coverage, but I think "middle of nowhere" has a different meaning the US.
- http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/08/intel_skulltrail_part_3/print.html
If clicking that link directly results in a redirect to the multi-page version (for some reason Opera is doing this for me), then copy-and-paste that address directly into the address bar.