Slashdot Mirror


China to Use Silver Iodide & Dry Ice to Control the Weather

eldavojohn writes "While we made light of it before, the MIT Review is taking a serious look at China's plans to prevent rain over their open 91,000 seat arena for The Olympics. From the article: 'China's national weather-engineering program is also the world's largest, with approximately 1,500 weather modification professionals directing 30 aircraft and their crews, as well as 37,000 part-time workers — mostly peasant farmers — who are on call to blast away at clouds with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers.' They plan on demonstrating their ability to control the weather to the rest of the world, and expanding on their abilities in the future."

387 comments

  1. Hmmm... by Evil+Al · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Ngarrang · · Score: 3, Funny

      Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong? I love this plan! I am happy to be a part of it!
      --
      Bearded Dragon
    2. Re:Hmmm... by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 5, Funny

      Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong? Halo with planes. gotta watch the olympics now.

      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    3. Re:Hmmm... by teknopurge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong? Revolution.
    4. Re:Hmmm... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      They hit their better-educated brother in the (non-combat) plane?

    5. Re:Hmmm... by quietus7 · · Score: 1

      Am i the only one disappointed that there will be no Cobra Commander-style "weather ray" that looks like an observatory with a laser sticking out of it? Maybe that is phase 2?

    6. Re:Hmmm... by grayNOISEeffect · · Score: 1

      Peasant farmers with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers can only mean one thing... INVASION!

    7. Re:Hmmm... by beckerist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wrong though?

    8. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Posting anon, to avoid karma whoring): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0231627/

    9. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many of those rocket launchers and planes are in / over Tibet these days.

    10. Re:Hmmm... by anexkahn · · Score: 1

      We all know how scared clouds are of rocket launchers!

      --
      Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
    11. Re:Hmmm... by Curze · · Score: 0

      Halo with planes. gotta watch the olympics now. It is pronouced 'Haro' you insensitive clod!
  2. And all they need... by AioKits · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is four nosecones from 1960s nuclear weapon technology! HA! I knew it! *hide*

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:And all they need... by TheHorse13 · · Score: 1

      Well at least I will have a use for all the fine items made in China that have large amounts of lead in them.

    2. Re:And all they need... by AioKits · · Score: 1

      Well at least I will have a use for all the fine items made in China that have large amounts of lead in them. Don't forget those aqua beads with the 'free' gamma hydroxybutyrate! I think they're defective tho, I've been eating these beads like crazy and still no action for me.
      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    3. Re:And all they need... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to eat them with other people. Eating them alone just gives you a headache and sore hands.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  3. Wyoming Tested This by dsginter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wyoming has done similar tests (click "listen now").

    --
    More
    1. Re:Wyoming Tested This by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wyoming has done similar tests (click "listen now").

      Very true, but one thing to consider:

      91,000 seats at this stadium.
      37,000 workers for weather control
      Probably another 5000 general workers in and around the stadium (at a minimum)

      133,000 people in the 'effect' area.

      Now consider that Wyoming is a very large state, and only has a population of 493,782.

      To me, that seems like a rather large concentration of people who will be exposed to this.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:Wyoming Tested This by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yea, but in Wyoming, farmers with anti-aircraft guns are called "gun enthusiasts" and they're REALLY firing them off because they're bored. I mean, have you ever driven through Wyoming? I'll tell you, by the time you're to the other side of it, you want to fire off a gun or two just for the excitement.

    3. Re:Wyoming Tested This by spydabyte · · Score: 1

      Well if you're going to mutate a population, you might as well do it right. What fun would it be if there were only 1 X-Men from Wyoming? That only makes for some kind of Ripley's Believe It or Not, not really worldwide news worthy...

    4. Re:Wyoming Tested This by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      So has Britain.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    5. Re:Wyoming Tested This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did drive through Wyoming, and I did fire a few guns off. It was exciting, all the blood and sirens and screaming. Wyoming is FUN!

      PS. What's the quickest way is it to Mexico?

    6. Re:Wyoming Tested This by PRC+Banker · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the other Dengxiaoping style army of capitalists that will be there to collect and refine it!

      --
      Oh.
  4. More money!? by Dakman · · Score: 1

    So overall how much have the chinese spent on the 2008 summer olympics? Seriously.

    1. Re:More money!? by magarity · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So overall how much have the chinese spent on the 2008 summer olympics?
       
      Around $2 billion, which is less than a week's trade imbalance with the US. So don't worry, they can afford it easily. Where were the last 10 things made that you bought recently?

    2. Re:More money!? by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      A smoothie, assembled in the USA... made of fruit probably from China.

    3. Re:More money!? by a_ghostwheel · · Score: 1

      And where smoothie assembly line was made?

    4. Re:More money!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does a Chinese mail-order bride count?

    5. Re:More money!? by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      And where smoothie assembly line was made? In heaven?
    6. Re:More money!? by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      Just bought a Wahl hair clipper. Made in the USA, baby! Woo!

      Just filled up my car with fuel. Straight from my own state (ND), baby! Woo!

      Just bought a MacBook for my wife. Straight from Shanghai, baby! Woo! Oh, wait.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    7. Re:More money!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Oh well, at least the MacBook was designed in California.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:More money!? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Not unless it was some really "unusual" fruit like lychee or longrien (don't have an english name so that's a vaguely romanized spelling of the chinese pronunciation) or something like that. If it was the standard banana, kiwi, strawberry, or other it more likely came from central/south america, unless of course you live in europe. Then it still might have come from there, but probably other places in europe as well.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    9. Re:More money!? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, designed in California...by drunken Chinamen!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  5. All part of the master plan by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Step 1 -- Weather Controlling machines
    Step 2 -- sharks with lasers
    Step 3 -- Global domination!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:All part of the master plan by mckniffen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Step 4 -- ?????
      Step 5 -- Profit!!!

      --
      Communism, its a party!
    2. Re:All part of the master plan by Wavebreak · · Score: 1, Funny

      It kinda boggles my mind that this got modded 'insightful'.

      --
      Nobody expects the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
    3. Re:All part of the master plan by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      It kinda boggles my mind that this got modded 'insightful'. I dunno, but something tells me you might want to ask this guy. He's even managed to hide all his posts!
    4. Re:All part of the master plan by lazy+genes · · Score: 1

      Part 1 Seed clouds with soap make a slow steady sudsy rain(Wash cycle). Part 2 Make it Down pour (rinse cycle). Part 3 Make it hot dry and windy (drying cycle). part 4 Profit

  6. Also from the article... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Following the announcement in 2001 that the 2008 Games had been awarded to Beijing, the government of the People's Republic initiated $40 billion of new construction there, bringing 120,000 Chinese migrant workers into the city (at about $130 each a month) and triggering a five-year steel shortage worldwide. [...] the Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates that 1.5 million of Beijing's natives will have been displaced from their homes by government edict when the Olympics finally begins. This preemptory modernization is of a piece with China's scale, its 1.32 billion population, and the authoritarian control exerted by its Communist central government, which nowadays is dominated by technocrats and engineers who favor mega-projects like the world's largest dam (the Three Gorges dam over the Yangtze River), its highest railway (the Qinghai-Tibet line), and even its biggest Ferris wheel (in Beijing, opening in 2009).

    Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.

    I'm sure someone will try...which just proves that China's subtle information campaigns to attempt to make the world think that everything is rosy or somehow justified are working like a charm.

    1. Re:Also from the article... by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at it from our individualistic perspective, it seems like abused.

      On the other hand, from a Chinese collectivist, 'end's justify the means' perspective, why does it matter if 1.5 million drones are relocated?

    2. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.


      sure, just as soon as someone justify evicting 30 or more families to build a mall or walmart.

      That happens almost every 6 months in the USA, People lose their homes and farms for building a walmart or mall or something else for a private company all with the blessings and help of the local government that pull a "eminent domain" rabbit out of their hats and give the families peanuts for their home and land.

      Just because it's on a larger scale, (and probably would happen in the USA if the olympics were to be in LA, Hey East LA, everyone get out, we're going to demolish you for a pretty olympic complex that will be useless in 5 years.)

      China is doing what the fuckers in the USA have been doing for decades.

    3. Re:Also from the article... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 3, Funny

      If necessary (which I doubt), they'd use the fact that the Olympics are bringing great pride to China, and it is an honor to have our house bulldozed for our nation. And anyone who talks back is a Western sympathizer, and gets a ride in the van to FarAwayLand, after which their house is bulldozed anyway

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't say evicted. They could quite easily have been moved to one of the many new building projects. How about getting real facts before making up your own conclusions?

    5. Re:Also from the article... by tgd · · Score: 5, Informative

      For what its worth, Atlanta did the same thing in 1996. The whole Olympic Centennial Park area, all the new stadiums, etc were all built in former slums occupied by people who were strangely no longer in Atlanta after.

    6. Re:Also from the article... by Freeside1 · · Score: 0

      I don't have any articles to cite, but I think they're being evicted (temporarily, I hope, if I'm right), because of the pollution caused from those citizens going to and from work.

    7. Re:Also from the article... by tjstork · · Score: 0

      In America we would justify it by saying they were poor blacks.

      And, where would this take place today?

      --
      This is my sig.
    8. Re:Also from the article... by ionix5891 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      never mind the Chinese, we westerners dis one better (shame on us)

      > try justify (switch on FOX news and wait a minute and you will get all sorts of justifications) killing half a million people in Iraq in last few years...

    9. Re:Also from the article... by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, justify evicting one. Then justify evicting 100. Then pay the other 1,499,900 people enough that they don't complain.

      Just Kidding. It's crazy. COHRE(the source for the estimate) does pretty much seem to hate the Olympics though:

      http://www.cohre.org/view_page.php?page_id=268

      Are you planning on not watching the Olympics and stepping up efforts not to buy products from China? Beyond that, there is approximately fuck all that citizens of other countries can do about it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:Also from the article... by Bombula · · Score: 1
      While I share the general sense of outrage at China's heavy-handed government oppression, including grotesque overspending on ill-conceived megaprojects that largely benefit a small number of high-placed stakeholders (three Gorges Damn, the Olympics) at the expense of the public good, I'm not sure that - at least in America - we're not living in a glass house. Let me rephrase the above to show why:

      I share the general sense of outrage at the US's under-handed government oppression, including grotesque overspending on ill-conceived megaprojects that largely benefit a small number of high-placed stakeholders (The Iraq War, Prescription Drug Act) at the expense of the public good.

      --
      A-Bomb
    11. Re:Also from the article... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      > Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.

      By the numbers YOU quoted, that's 1/10th of 1% of their population.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    12. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America it would never happen, nor has anything like that ever happened.

    13. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      New Orleans.

    14. Re:Also from the article... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uhhh, New Orleans?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    15. Re:Also from the article... by tjstork · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, New Orleans?

      That's more of a case of white people not helping black people out, than it is a case of white people forcibly evicting black people. As it is, the USA has put more money into that city as of late than most of the rest of the world's cities have ever received in the aftermath of a natural disaster. And, to top it all off, New Orleans should now be getting a share of the gulf oil money.

      --
      This is my sig.
    16. Re:Also from the article... by somersault · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. If that were true then wouldn't they have to evict everyone from all major cities and industrial areas?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Also from the article... by Wavebreak · · Score: 0

      How is the percentage relevant? One and a half million people are one and a half million people, regardless of how big or small a fraction they might be of some semi-arbitrary set.

      --
      Nobody expects the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
    18. Re:Also from the article... by mweather · · Score: 1

      "As it is, the USA has put more money into that city as of late than most of the rest of the world's cities have ever received in the aftermath of a natural disaster" Yeah, it's called gentrification.

    19. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at it from our individualistic perspective, it seems like abused. On the other hand, from a Chinese collectivist, 'end's justify the means' perspective, why does it matter if 1.5 million drones are relocated?

      I think you have a strange perspective here. Capitalism is far more heartless and those who hate communism never mind when capitalism treats millions of people as drones. How many people were relocated for the Atlanta Olympics? There's far less difference between China and the US that most people believe. The main difference is wealth, not ideology.

    20. Re:Also from the article... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      While I share the general sense of outrage at China's heavy-handed government oppression, including grotesque overspending on ill-conceived megaprojects that largely benefit a small number of high-placed stakeholders (three Gorges Damn, the Olympics) at the expense of the public good, I'm not sure that - at least in America - we're not living in a glass house. Let me rephrase the above to show why:

      The difference between America and China is that you are free to speak your criticisms of the American Government without fear of punishment from said Government.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    21. Re:Also from the article... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Are you planning on not watching the Olympics and stepping up efforts not to buy products from China? Beyond that, there is approximately fuck all that citizens of other countries can do about it. Olympics? Maybe, not sure yet.
      Products from China? I do avoid, whenever possible. Especially with my kids' toys and food products. Found that there is a lot of decent convenience foods we import into the states from Canada. Those chicken dinosaurs from CA are waaaay better too (I actually like them).
      -nB
      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    22. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics. How about this: it's Kelo v. City of New London... only moreso.
    23. Re:Also from the article... by d3ac0n · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, New Orleans was a case of corrupt black city officials not properly utilizing the monies granted to them via the federal government.

      They had all the money they needed to properly shore up the levees against a Cat 5 hurricane. What did they do with it? Pocketed MOST of it, and used a token amount to build a FOUNTAIN. "White racism" had NOTHING to do with it.

      Let's all stop trying to paint corruption by blacks against blacks as somehow the white man's fault. Particularly in NO, where people "of color" have had control of the majority of the upper government positions for the better portion of the last 30 years. The loss of black people's homes in New Orleans is due to the corruption of BLACK city and county officials (Jim "School Bus" Nagin being the primary culprit.)

      However, you ARE correct that NO has had PILES of money thrown at it since the hurricane. Of course, depending on who is put into office down there, it may just end up back in some politician's pocket.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    24. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    25. Re:Also from the article... by Jimmy_B · · Score: 5, Informative

      "... The Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates that 1.5 million of Beijing's natives will have been displaced from their homes by government edict when the Olympics finally begins." Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.
      Please cite your sources. I tracked down your source, the Center on Housing Rights and Evictions Violator Award - Beijing. From that same article, however,

      The main areas in which evictions have been carried out within the Municipality of Beijing during the period between 2000 and 2007 are neighbourhoods in the four central districts of the capital where overcrowding and old or dangerous housing is common; namely Dongcheng, Xicheng, Chongwen and Xuanwu. Large-scale evictions have also been carried out in several Chengzhongcun (literally, villages in the city), poor informal settlements comprising housing that has not been approved for construction, does not comply with building codes and typically is not properly serviced.
      They aren't evicting people to clear space for new development, they're evicting people from unsafe, overcrowded shanties. Sounds like they should've demolished those buildings a long time ago, but they're just getting around to it now because they don't want the rest of the world to see how bad they were.
    26. Re:Also from the article... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Meet patriotic act.

      Care to point out the part of the Patriot Act that would authorize the Government to jail me if I protested our policies towards some repressed/conquered ethic group (say Native Americans)?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:Also from the article... by quietus7 · · Score: 1

      I'm always fascinated when i read blatant racism under the guise of pragmatism.

    28. Re:Also from the article... by daspriest · · Score: 1

      Maybe not on that large a scale, but evictions for corporate interests definitely happens in the US. Just look at the lawsuits that were fought over eminent domain abuses.

    29. Re:Also from the article... by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone would argue with you there, but it still doesn't excuse the abuse of power. So to put up a strawman like that is essentially being an apologist.

    30. Re:Also from the article... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      You remember that student loan or that high paying job you didn't get perhaps because your file was flagged? That part.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    31. Re:Also from the article... by Ossadagowah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I already plan to boycott the Olympics because China, which has occupied Tibet and terrorized the citizenry of a sovereign nation and exiled their leader, has no business hosting the world's representation of cooperative spirit shared in friendship and peace.

      --
      anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
    32. Re:Also from the article... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Not to the Chinese they aren't. Remember, it's a country where slave labor and forced abortions are the norm (and the sad part is, I am not actually trolling here!)

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    33. Re:Also from the article... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You remember that student loan

      Please, point out legislation that authorizes the Government to deny student loans to those engaged in legitimate acts of protest. There's a lot that's unfair with the student loan system in this country (like losing them for being convicted of something as stupid as marijuana possession) but I'm really interested to see someone actually point out some legislation that permits them to be denied to someone solely for speaking out against the Government.

      or that high paying job you didn't get

      Unless that high paying job was with the Government then I really don't see your point -- a private employer is free to refuse to hire you for just about any reason.

      perhaps because your file was flagged?

      Which 'file' are we talking about?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    34. Re:Also from the article... by wattrlz · · Score: 1
      The needs of 0.1% of the population usually must submit to the needs of the nation.

      I've heard stories that there was a time it wasn't unheard for whole Chinese communities to simply evaporate overnight. Granted I've seen no evidence (and would really appreciate it if someone could steer me towards some hint hint) but, this sounds like an acceptable alternative.

    35. Re:Also from the article... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      On a much smaller scale, but I was specifically thinking about the building of interstates between Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA.

      The route that went through the poor, primarily black areas (I95) had very little need for justification at all. The area that went through the richer white areas (I476 "The blue route") were bogged down ffor decades.

      I grant that the complete destruction of the poor black neighborhoods happened long enough ago that it does not really count as "today" by any measure, but it is what I was thinking of.

      The Atlanta olympics would be a much better point of comparison, but I am not from there and am too lazy to check how it went.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    36. Re:Also from the article... by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I'm always fascinated when i read blatant racism under the guise of pragmatism

      Well, "Chocolate City Mayor" didn't do anyone any favors, for sure. But, at the same time, Bush should have stepped up to the plate and saved the people.

      --
      This is my sig.
    37. Re:Also from the article... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think anyone would argue with you there, but it still doesn't excuse the abuse of power. So to put up a strawman like that is essentially being an apologist.

      I'm not being an apologist. I'm horrified at some of the actions undertaken by my Government in recent years. But anybody with any sense of objectivity can see that it's not nearly as bad as what's going on in China right now. Or Pakistan. Or Burma. Our people aren't jailed if they speak out against Government policy towards an oppressed/conquered racial group. Our opposition leaders aren't being assassinated. Our Supreme Court isn't under house arrest.

      I will speak out against human rights abuses by any Government, including my own. This idea that we don't have the right to point out abuses in other countries because our own isn't 100% perfect benefits nobody besides the oppressive nations of the World.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    38. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you morons actually do exist. Yes, the United States, Britain, Canada, etc, have sent their troops over to Iraq and are mindlessly killing and blowing up civilians in the once peaceful, utopia known as Iraq.

      Right. Brainwashed left nuts are as bad as brainwashed right nuts.

    39. Re:Also from the article... by NathanWoodruff · · Score: 0, Informative

      I have lived in the Atlanta area since 1976. I worked in the downtown area of Atlanta from 1983 to 1997. I worked at the Gold Dome Capital building, the Federal Reserve Bank and I even worked for ACOG/IBM on the 6th floor of the Apparel Mart downtown Atlanta for the Olympics.

      Several months leading up to the 1996 games, it was true that the Atlanta police were rounding up the homeless. But, the city was also paying to move them to shelters/YMCA. Although they did displace occupants of the downtown area, I would fathom an educational guestimate that it was less than 5,000 people. Far less than the 1.5 million people of China.

      Once the Olympics were over in Atlanta, and the city quit paying for the shelters, the homeless did return.

      The only thing that has changed since then, is better policing of the downtown Atlanta area and upholding the loitering laws in place since the early 70's.

      I've been to Centennial Park in the last year at night and actually felt safe to walk around. I didn't feel like that in the late 80's with a class at Georgia State University ending at 10pm and having to walk from there to the Five Points Marta Station.

      I wonder what is going to happen to the 1.5 million people after the Olympics in China is over.

      Nathan

    40. Re:Also from the article... by Wavebreak · · Score: 0

      And? You don't judge a government by their standards. What the Chinese government might think of those one and a half million people shouldn't affect how you view their actions against them.

      --
      Nobody expects the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
    41. Re:Also from the article... by lrohrer · · Score: 1

      I was a contractor in Atlanta -- living in a hotel. We were kicked out for the Olympics too. Sure we found a hotel 20 miles away. It was only a minor inconvenience.

    42. Re:Also from the article... by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Informative

      sure, just as soon as someone justify evicting 30 or more families to build a mall or walmart. You do have a point here, but I think you're exaggerating some figures and it's hurting your argument. You claim "30 or more families" are "evict[ed]" from their homes every six months to build a Wal-Mart or a mall. Somehow I doubt this is true for a number of reasons.

      First, the "big box" stores like Wal-Mart, Target, Home Depot, etc. try to find unoccupied land when they can because it's cheaper. Sure, in urbanized areas that's difficult or impossible, which is why their second choice is demolishing/renovating older shopping centers, warehouses, and so forth. There's several of these going on within ten miles of my home right now. Again, this is cheaper (and easier on the PR) than going after residential areas. The absolute last choice is a residential area because it's more expensive, more time consuming, and -- as you've noted in your argument -- it pisses people off sometimes.

      Second, I question your use of the term "evict." Evict means they're forcibly parted from their property. This does happen from time to time, and when it does it makes news. There have been documented cases of eminent domain abuse centered around these types of stores, and you're quite right to complain about them. That is your argument: the encroachment on private property rights by local city zoning councils (which are after sales tax dollars) and the businesses they "work" for (who want your sales dollars and pay politicians with campaign contributions). You hurt yourself, though, by claiming it happens "almost every 6 months" to 30 families. The aforementioned abuses are inexcusable, but they are much rarer than you claim.

      Third, you attempt to draw some equivalence between China displacing 1.5M people and our eminent domain abuses. That is a poor analogy for many reasons, not the least of which is that the Chinese have much more limited property rights than Americans do to begin with. Also, using your very own numbers, you claim 30 families are uprooted every six months in the U.S., and you claim it's been going on "for decades." By my calculations on your numbers (numbers I disagree with, BTW), the "fuckers in the USA" displace a maximum of 60 families a year. Assuming 3 people constitutes a family, that's 180 people per year. At this rate it would take over eight thousand years for the "fuckers in the USA" to displace 1.5M people, something the Chinese are doing in far less than a decade. Even that number pales when compared to the relocation required for the Three Gorges Dam project. Yet you seem to have a problem determining the difference in scale, morally equivocating one to the other.

      Like I said, your argument against eminent domain abuses are quite valid, but your exaggeration and hyperbole degenerates your argument into frothing at the mouth. What we're doing with eminent domain abuse in this country is bad, but what's going on in places like China is much, much worse...so much so that it really diminishes the more egregious abuse by trying to link it with the lesser abuse.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    43. Re:Also from the article... by gasmasher · · Score: 1

      If your property is purchased through eminent domain you have the right to fair market value which is the highest amount a purchaser would pay to a willing seller. You don't have to whimp out and take the 'peanuts'. Work a little for your rights and get some realistic comps for the area or make your arguments at the hearing. If you don't agree with the outcome of the hearing you have the right to appeal. It is only in the movies that the government goes on a rampage stealing land from little old widows.

    44. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "As it is, the USA has put more money into that city as of late than most of the rest of the world's cities have ever received in the aftermath of a natural disaster" Yeah, it's called gentrification.

      If by "gentrification" you mean trying to build million dollar mansions on the lots where all the fifty-thousand dollar homes fell over, then bitching and whining like Trent "Why isn't my home fixed yet?!" Lott about how you can't find carpenters to work for below prevailing wage when they can't afford a place to sleep after a hard day's work, then yeah, exactly.

    45. Re:Also from the article... by belligerent0001 · · Score: 1

      Hey! it's hard to sleep in a cardboard box with all of that construction going on right outside your newspaper blanket!

      --
      "...a civilian some of the time, a soldier part of the time and a patriot all of the time." -Brig. Gen. James Drain
    46. Re:Also from the article... by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

      so the difference is that in the US, thanks to institutionalized denial and a largely biased media, criticism can be safely ignored. In times in the past when protests were viewed as not being safe to ignore the US government acted in essentially the same way as that of china.

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
    47. Re:Also from the article... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      The difference between America and China is that you are free to speak your criticisms of the American Government without fear of punishment from said Government.

      Phew! Well that makes it all better then. No problems here, I can talk about it!

    48. Re:Also from the article... by webrunner · · Score: 1

      Nothing that happened in New Orleans really had anything to do with where everyone's ancestors are from. If you were in New Orleans you got fucked by a hurricane. Black or white. And it doesn't matter whether so and so up the chain of aid was black or white. A corrupt official is a corrupt official. The only color that really mattered to them was green.

      --
      ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
    49. Re:Also from the article... by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Right on, bro!

      It is a complete and utter disgrace what the US federal government did to the state of Louisiana after Katerina.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    50. Re:Also from the article... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.

      I'm sure someone will try...which just proves that China's subtle information campaigns to attempt to make the world think that everything is rosy or somehow justified are working like a charm.


      Um, easy. They weren't evicted. They were displaced due to higher paying government jobs at the capital for the next 4-6 years.

      If D.C. was going on a building spree and handing out thousands of jobs for around $100K each, would you complain that people from the neighboring communities have been displaced to D.C. at the government's whim?

    51. Re:Also from the article... by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      Well, your point is valid... You just need to work on not sounding belligerent and racist so people will listen.

    52. Re:Also from the article... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      For what its worth, Atlanta did the same thing in 1996. The whole Olympic Centennial Park area, all the new stadiums, etc were all built in former slums occupied by people who were strangely no longer in Atlanta after.

      I heard about that. The local police instead of arresting some one for public intox where driving them to the local bus stations and handing them a $50 ticket to neighboring cities. It sounds like a great way to export your homeless problem to others.

    53. Re:Also from the article... by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      It appears that we could go round and round about this ad nauseum. Perhaps I missed the implication of the US being in a glass house meaning that somehow we can't or don't have the right to point out the abuse of others, with which I wholeheartedly disagree. I saw that more in line of speaking to the superiority complex that we can have when criticizing others. But in the end I think we agree . . . abuse of power is bad no matter where it happens, which is everywhere it seems. I don't happen to be a moral relativist about it, more bad is still bad, and just becuase we might not be on the extreme end of it does in no way make it more acceptable.

    54. Re:Also from the article... by Akita24 · · Score: 1

      They have lots and lost of money and make damn near everything anyone in the West wears or uses. They don't have to justify shit to insignificant peons like you and me. For reference see every other nation / group / person with too much money / power ever in history. *sigh*

    55. Re:Also from the article... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Read my other reply in this discussion. I've never suggested that criticism of the US can be ignored or dismissed. In fact I have spoken out against current policies of my Government (torture of prisoners being high on the list) alongside past injustices (internment of Japanese-Americans during WW2).

      What I am suggesting is that the people who think the United States is in the same league as China get some perspective and consider recent events in China, Pakistan, Burma, or Saudi Arabia before they make sweeping generalizations that equate the United States with the aforementioned countries.

      In times in the past when protests were viewed as not being safe to ignore the US government acted in essentially the same way as that of china.

      The US Government? The Kent State shootings were conducted by the Ohio National Guard, operating under State (not Federal) authority. And while I find them abhorrent and won't defend them at all, I fail to see the relevance to a discussion about China. Do black marks in American history somehow excuse the actions of the Chinese Government? Do we need to be 100% perfect to point out injustice in the World?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    56. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people are drone, not humans, then they have no individual rights; killing drones is no worse than relocating drones. The problem is that the parent and grandparent are running "what if" scenarios without the evidence needed to place their arguments into reality.

      My personal hunch is that if there are riots and protests in Chinese rural areas about land, then the urban dwellers are likely to be discontent about relocation. Listening to and reading interviews of the workers building the Olympic buildings, it is clear that they are primarily rural workers trying to make a buck for their families--not drones working solely to build a great China; my hunch is that the relocated 1.5 million also place building a great China lower than other personal, individual familial desires.

      My personal hunch is that the Chinese collectivists of the parent are the Chinese bureaucrats who are giving top-down orders in an effort to make an impressive Olympic venue in the cheapest way possible. Here, the problem is that the leaders see little problem with the relocation, and that their vision is impossibly collectivist because the relocation does not require personal sacrifices from most of the leaders (other than the time needed to take, through embezzlement, the money set aside for compensating a portion of the relocated families.)

      But, the real kicker is that there are some numbers. One account states 15,000 people were relocated, and, out of those 15,000, about 6,000 households volunteered to move. The government wasn't dealing with a bunch of state-loving drones: the government had to compensate those who volunteered, and reportedly arrested or forcibly relocated a majority of those who they relocated. Even in this best-case scenario (15,000 relocated, 6,000 voluntary), it is difficult to show that even a majority of the relocated acted in a collectivist fashion. Compare the number of voluntary moves (6,000 according to Chinese state statistics) to NGO relocation estimates ranging from 75,000 to 500,000 (2005) to 1.5 million, and it becomes clear that leaders are using claims of "doing good for the state" to shield a desire to increase their personal stake in the world by building, in the cheapest way possible, an artificial showcase exhibition.

    57. Re:Also from the article... by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 1

      I've been in Beijing about 5 months ago.

      From what I've seen by cruising through the city the Chinese are building skyscrapers by the hundreds. (at least for a Dutchy they look like skyscrapers ;-))

      No matter in what part of town I was, all I could see was construction site after construction site of huge apartment buildings being erected. It was pretty mind boggling to see. I have no idea if those homes would be enough to house 1.5 million people but I am pretty sure they can relocate a *very* large portion of the evicted people.

      --
      Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
    58. Re:Also from the article... by afedaken · · Score: 1

      The area that went through the richer white areas (I476 "The blue route") were bogged down for decades. The only difference there was that the white suburbanite residents of the blue route's purposed route could afford lawyers. And they STILL got a damned pittance for their properties compared to market value.

      (Disclosure: I'm a Springfield (DELCO) PA resident.)
      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
    59. Re:Also from the article... by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you there is no excuse for government abuse of power or political suppression, violent or otherwise, anywhere. In recognizing our own mistakes recent and historical and saying it was wrong when we did it it's equally wrong for you to do it now. in doing so we remove the argument that the US exercises a double standard in world affairs and lends credibility to our statements. "Don't do what I have done" holds more weight with everyone than "do as I say" with the entire world recognizing the unspoken "not as I do".

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
    60. Re:Also from the article... by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Check out the Trans Texas Corridor, it is going to displace thousands of people, farms, and ranches. This hits close to home, as my parents 5 year old home sits in the middle of the proposed right of way for the run from Lerado to Houston.

      http://ttc.keeptexasmoving.com/pdfs/projects/i69/deis/preferred_and_reasonablecorridors_w_sections_11x17_index.pdf

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    61. Re:Also from the article... by NotBorg · · Score: 1

      "We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile."

      "You will be assimilated."

      "Have a nice day"
      I'm not sure about that last one.
      --
      I want this account deleted.
    62. Re:Also from the article... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Good point, but even so there's a problem if the evictees don't have anywhere to go.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    63. Re:Also from the article... by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

      They aren't evicting people to clear space for new development, they're evicting people from unsafe, overcrowded shanties.

      Poh-tay-toh, Poh-tah-toh. Sounds like political double-speak and spin-control to me.

      --
      Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
    64. Re:Also from the article... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics."

      The Olympics is no longer a big deal to us, but it is a huge opportunity for China. 1.5 million people is a lot to us, not so to them.
      They way to modernize such a large country at a rapid pace is by force. Note how far China has come since 1948.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    65. Re:Also from the article... by matt120930 · · Score: 1

      1.5 million is way off. It's about 15% of the urban population of Beijing. Does Olympics really need that much land? Maybe NGOs like to exaggerate situations to get attentions.

    66. Re:Also from the article... by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      last I checked the presidents job was not to organize disaster recovery efforts. This was a failure of many things, of which you could theoretically place some blame on bush, but its certainly not a lot of the blame. The local & state governments hold more blame, then FEMA, then the federal government but the first and foremost issue was dumb fucks not evacuating like they were told to. Also, the situation was exacerbated after the fact by the same dumb fucks doing silly shit like shooting at the rescue choppers.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    67. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.


      Someone please try to justify evicting an entire government as well as killing 150-500 thousand of its people for oil under the invented lie of threat of WMDs.

      Kinda puts it in perspective...
    68. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it's on a larger scale, (and probably would happen in the USA if the olympics were to be in LA, Hey East LA, everyone get out, we're going to demolish you for a pretty olympic complex that will be useless in 5 years.)
      The difference is that the people in LA deserve it. :P
  7. It's raining bullets by 8400_RPM · · Score: 1

    "7,113 anti-aircraft guns "

    Nice. Instead of raining water, it will rain lead. Good thinking china.

    1. Re:It's raining bullets by AioKits · · Score: 3, Funny

      "7,113 anti-aircraft guns "

      Nice. Instead of raining water, it will rain lead. Good thinking china.

      First it rains.
      Then it rains bullets.
      Then it rains rockets.
      Then it rains assorted aircraft parts.
      Finally, much to the sha-grin of the Weather Girls, it's raining men!
      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    2. Re:It's raining bullets by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did anyone tell them the animals in the clouds are not real?...

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    3. Re:It's raining bullets by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, they're "cloud seeding" in Tibet?

  8. ICTWCU by frik85 · · Score: 1

    In China the Weather controls you ...

    --
    My favourite operating system is ReactOS; binary compatible to WinNT series :P
  9. Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Chinese government wants to use the Olympics to inject a dose of normalcy into their demeanor, but there is nothing normal about purposely and continually funding a genocide despite the requests and demands of every other nation in the world.

    1. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Funding a genocide? Paying for the Iraq war is not funding a genocide. Oh, you mean something else like companies buying stuff from Uganda, Zaire, Rwanda, Cambodia etc etc at various times only this time it is Sudan. Foreign involvent and investment in Sudan might actually be helping the place and blaming China for what is going on there is like blaming street crime on McDonalds - completely irrelevant and blaming those who cannot control the situation. The Chinese trade with absolutely everybody just as the USA used to do in the days of the League of Nations when sanctions were tried then.

    2. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Chinese government gives the Sudanese government weapons in exchange for oil. The Sudanese government uses those weapons to slaughter civilians in the Darfur region. A representative of the government has actually stating that they delayed a peace agreement to end the north-south civil war in order to make sure they had a "lasting solution in Darfur" (ie, to make sure the region could not recover).

      Saying "Foreign involvement and investment in Sudan might actually be helping the place" is ridiculous. It's like saying that you can send 10,000 pounds of cereal to a corrupt African government and actually expect them to pass the food on to their starving citizens. The reason their citizens are starving is precisely because of government corruption and interference. Those people are never going to see the food if you give it to their government.

      Likewise, expecting a government that is actively slaughtering its people to somehow pass on any of their profits to those same people is ludicrous. The companies you reference are doing business with the government, not with the country's population, and certainly not with any resident of the Darfur region.

    3. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by CookieOfFortune · · Score: 1

      But it's ok that the US has been doing all that for the past 30 years?

    4. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      "But it's ok that the US has been doing all that for the past 30 years?"

      The existence of one evil never justifies the existence of another. But we were talking about China...

    5. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Most people would blame the Sudanese government or individuals within it instead or go on a rant about the lack of morality in the arms trade in general. It really has very little to do with China just as Lockheed in Florida don't go about blowing up Lebanese ambulances even if their missiles do it after being resold a couple of times. You are falling victim to idiots that are just looking for an excuse to stir up trouble with China just because of the Olympics. Tibet is enough for this instead of blaming China for the actions of some evil bastards in Sudan.

    6. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by dbIII · · Score: 1

      But it's ok that the US has been doing all that for the past 30 years?

      Most likely that will be seen by the poster above as China's fault now because China is lending the USA money that ends up going to the US arms manufacturing industry. The above poster defined their argument as being about China so logical comparisons or pointing out that Sudanese are actually doing this will be dissmissed as irrelevant. The very subject "Genocide Olympics" would in sane english usage imply that atrocities would occur at the Olympic Games. However it is not sane english usage but advertising doubleplusgood newspeak designed to mislead - most likely in anger instead of being a cold calculating bastard.

      When did this "any irrelevant means to get to the ends" stuff start to become popular? Blame the Chinese for their own evil and not somebody elses.

    7. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      Every country is obviously against military intervention to stop the genocide. The only alternative left is sanctions against the Sudanese government. China is supplying them with the helicopters they use to raid villages at night and mow down everyone. The government-paid thugs then ride in and gang rape the women and children before slaughtering them. It is ludicrous to ignore that they are the primary weapon source for the genocide as they go on this "one world, one dream" bullshit-fest they call the Olympics. China's hosting of the Olympics is of much less concern than their support of the genocide.

    8. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by dbIII · · Score: 1
      1 allows 2 which allows 3 which allows 4 which allows 5. Condition 1 is not equal to condition 5 because there is a vast amount of other stuff going on so 1 has nearly nothing to do with 5. Pretending that it is for even the best reasons is still misleading and dishonest. It doesn't change things if you are being misleading and dishonest for kiddies getting killed in horrible ways. Horrible things are happening but implying Chinese athletes are doing it is not going to fix it. You don't stop this sort of thing just by refusing to talk to people.

      Nice way off topic emotional manipulation there - you have a promising future in the advertising industry selling cigarettes to kiddies.

    9. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's nice that you've laid it down in a logical way, but you have simply avoided responding to my post. It's simple. People don't want the genocide to occur. But everyone's government is unwilling to take on the Sudanese government because China will retaliate, and nobody wants to upset China. The only thing let after military intervention is ruled out is economic sanctions - pressuring companies to pull out of contracts with Sudan. Labeling it the "Genocide Olympics" is simply a method of pressuring China to pull out of contracts with Sudan as well. Nobody is "pretending" as you say. Nobody is trying to be "dishonest". It is simply the reality of the options that are left to employ. Economic sanctions are a commonly used tactic to apply pressure to governments to amend their ways.

      "you have a promising future in the advertising industry selling cigarettes to kiddies."

      Care to explain what you mean, or were you just rambling for effect?

  10. US Air Force Secrets by Missing_dc · · Score: 1

    Why don't we sell them the technology our own Air Force has been using to disperse clouds? Its been a little while since I read about it, but as I recall, we have been chemically seeding clouds under the guise of "dumping" super-expensive jet fuel. The clouds dissapate rather quickly. Of coourse it makes better sense for the Chinese to WANT rain between now and the Olympic Games, in an effort to clean their air.

    so
    1. seed the clouds, make it rain,
    2. use the jet fuel to dissipate the clouds
    3. Profit??

    --
    How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    1. Re:US Air Force Secrets by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Read TFA. This IS cloud seeding, they just never refer to it by that name.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:US Air Force Secrets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1. seed the clouds, make it rain,

      You have this wrong, it should be as follows:

      1. Call Pacman Jones, make it rain

    3. Re:US Air Force Secrets by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      Wait wait wait... isn't there a relatively harmless dance one could do to make it rain?

  11. control the air by Tim4444 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    now if they could only control pollution...

    1. Re:control the air by MrMacman2u · · Score: 1

      Or over-population...

      --
      This signature is lame.
    2. Re:control the air by kpoole55 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised we haven't seen more of the environmental and global warming backlash over this since they're increasing both the amount of free heavy metals and carbon dioxide in the air with these programs.

    3. Re:control the air by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only white nations cause pollution, don't you know anything?

      --
      If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    4. Re:control the air by imunfair · · Score: 1

      Actually they're trying. I remembered reading about the rooftop gardens they were implementing a few years ago. I didn't realize at the time that they were for the olympics, but I googled and found a few articles about them.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7911618/
      http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/01/beijing_to_plan.php

  12. Global Warming? by kamnet · · Score: 1

    Just call China. Problem solved. Next.

    --
    I like /.
  13. Best olympics.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since 1936

  14. shooting at the clouds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Those Chinese are going to be seriously disappointed when they discover that all their bullets and rockets just pass right through the clouds. "This is some magical, mystical force that flies in the air and is impervious to our bullets!" But I guess if they've played enough Super Mario Bros they might think there are hidden blocks in the clouds and the only way to find out is to keep shooting at it (until they find the super-size mushrooms).

    1. Re:shooting at the clouds? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

      *woosh*

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  15. A time-tested technology by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here, back when out country was called USSR the Party would order the same thing done to prevent rain over the Red Square during the military parades that took place on major holidays, like November 7th (Anniversary of October Revolution) or may 9th (Russian V-Day).

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    1. Re:A time-tested technology by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      Moscow mayor still does the same thing every single year for all holidays and special events.

  16. And wouldn't you know ... by daveime · · Score: 2, Funny

    .... most of the clouds happen to be over Tibet.

  17. Isn't silver bad for you???? by madhatter256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't Silver Iodide bad for you, specifically your skin? I know there's this concoction (that has silver) that if you take too much of it turns your skin blue and is irreversible.

    If china pumps a ton of this stuff out, this will obviously get into the drinking water and then the athletes will drink that water as well as the local citizens and so you get blue skinned Chinese and athletes!

    I think the US, UK, and its allies should boycott the Olympics. Of course I'd like our country to show China that democracy is way better than communism like we did to the Russians back in the hey-day, but China has smog (high levels of mercury and lead than any smog city in the world) and now silver iodide in their drinking water. I wouldn't want our strapping young athletes to end up with lungs like that of a smoker and have asthma attacks.

    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!
    1. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Ambvai · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about silver iodide, but I know that silver nitrate (AgNO3) stains a dark color, but it's only superficial (in that it'll fade as your skin cycles off). On the other hand, this may cause a sudden crash in the popularity of the Blue Man Group if this comes through... Regarding the smog though, I've heard from numerous people (probably all quoting the same source though) that to alleviate the problem of pollution, China is halting the most pollutive factories in/around the city for 1 to 3 months before the Olympics.

    2. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Sirch · · Score: 1

      Dude - are you a Smurfist?

    3. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by snarfies · · Score: 1

      The spectators won't have to drink that, not at all. Instead, all tools involved will buy small bottles of water at $3 a pop (or the equivelent in yuan).

    4. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      Bad for you? The Chinese government seems to think it's ok...do you have a problem with the Chinese government?

      So China...wanna buy some Agent Orange? I hear it's great for clearing brush before construction jobs...and perfectly safe!

    5. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're thinking of Colloidal Silver.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloidal_silver

      It causes a condition called Argyria, which turns the skin permanently blueish-gray.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyria

      I'm not sure if other silver-based chemicals also have the same effect or not.

      Check out this dude who took too much of the stuff:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XV0I6Q70Yw

      ---

      In soviet china, every cloud has a silver lining. Weather they like it or not!

    6. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

      Isn't Silver Iodide bad for you, specifically your skin? I know there's this concoction (that has silver) that if you take too much of it turns your skin blue and is irreversible.

      If china pumps a ton of this stuff out, this will obviously get into the drinking water and then the athletes will drink that water as well as the local citizens and so you get blue skinned Chinese and athletes! Is this what you're referring to? That guy drank and rubbed "colloidal silver" on his skin which turned it skin blue over time. Here is a more recent article about him.
      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    7. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Bah! You obviously have no idea about color theory!
      Surely everyone knows if you mix yellow skinned chinese with blue-skin-causing-silver-matter, you get green chinese!

    8. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      If china pumps a ton of this stuff out, this will obviously get into the drinking water and then the athletes will drink that water as well as the local citizens and so you get blue skinned Chinese and athletes!


      They're probably tired of being referred to as The Yellow Menace.
    9. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by djtachyon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know there's this concoction (that has silver)... You are thinking of Colloidal Silver. Silver is a natural antibiotic and quite a lot of it can be drank daily. A topical form, Silver Sulfadiazine, is often prescribed for severe burns.

      ...that if you take too much of it turns your skin blue and is irreversible. The condition of drinking way too much of this is called Argyria.
      --
      "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
    10. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "concoction" is colloidal silver and the condition is called argyria.

    11. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about silver iodide, but colloidal silver, which is what people take to fight bacteria ( I'm making no implied claims about it's efficacy ), is not harmful. You can take too much of it, and since it never leaves your cells, you do get colored blue, but there are no health consequences from it ( benefit claims notwithstanding. )

      The libertarian candidate for Senator from Montana on the last go around took too much before Y2K, and he's as blue as his suit jacket! IMHO, didn't help the libertarian party's 'image' problem. They ran the blue guy for senator? What, did he beat out the guy with three arms?

      If silver were bad for your skin, they wouldn't make jewelry out of it.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    12. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're thinking of silver nitrate. A buddy of mine spilled some on his hand. Took about 3 weeks for it to come out.

      I think what they're looking at doing is identifying clouds with potential to rain on the olympics, and hitting them early with silver iodide to induce them to rain out before they get there. It has a crystal structure similar to ice, so it can induce freezing in clouds.

      Also, it is not soluble in water (well highly insoluble), nor is it very toxic. It rates a 2 on the NFPA 704 Blue scale

    13. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      Well, any soluble compound of silver could produce agyria, if consumed in sufficient amounts. Other than stopping vampires and werewolves, I'm not sure about the benefits of drinking the stuff. Topical applications may be effective.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    14. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      I know we've been pushing China to be more "green", but I think something was lost in the translation.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    15. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by djtachyon · · Score: 1

      I actually take a teaspoon or so daily of colloidal silver whenever I have a sore throat. You can get it at about any health food store. IIRC, it takes around a cup or more a day to induce Agyria.

      --
      "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
    16. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by ridgecritter · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking of argyria, which is a condition in which excess silver ions in the blood precipitate as nanoparticles in tissues served by the blood - including, of course, the skin, which turns a nice greyish-blue color. This can occur due to occupational exposure to silver or through excess consumption of silver dietary supplements. AFAIK, argyria doesn't impair the health of its victims, at least in the case of supplements. Most people stop taking silver when their friends start asking about countermeasures against zombies. Also, AFAIK, the color shift is not reversible.

    17. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new Chinese Smurf Decathlete Overlords!

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    18. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self: bring bottled water.

    19. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I think the US, UK, and its allies should boycott the Olympics. Can we boycott the 2012 olympics and stop wasting millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on it too please?
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    20. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      They already started traffic controls last year, according to my wife's cousin who lives in Beijing. Based on license plate numbers of your vehicle you can only drive certain days. It's made a significant difference already, according to her. Will it be good enough for the rest of the world to find Beijing acceptable? I don't know, but it's certainly better than it was 2 years ago. I won't be heading there until after the olympics, but I'm looking forward to the trip nonetheless.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    21. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Of course I'd like our country to show China that democracy is way better than communism like we did to the Russians back in the hey-day

      I think you mean capitalism is way better than communism.

      Democracy is the basis for government in which the population votes for all government actions, and would compare to things like Republics, Dictatorships etc...

      Communism is a basis for economy where there is no ownership and society will just produce the right amount of goods and services for itself, and would be compared to socialism and capitalism.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    22. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that make their skin green?

    23. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      Isn't the point that the silver halides are supposed to react with something in the atmosphere and not just kinda sit there policing the world's smoggerists or sumthin? This is alarmism silver-wise in the same way as anyone trying to get oxygen banned because of its nasty role in those oxides of Thallium and Polonium etc.

      Silver per se is just antiseptic and shiny when you polish it, surely? My (purely fictitious) pool guy tells me that they use it in pool filters so that the kiddies don't come down with the lurgi. And he has a purely fictitious tan which is in no way blue.

      Unlike mine, as I live in the UK and our temperate climate ensures a lovely pale blue complexion all-year-long.

    24. Re:Isn't silver bad for you???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Silver Iodide bad for you, specifically your skin? I know there's this concoction (that has silver) that if you take too much of it turns your skin blue and is irreversible.

      If china pumps a ton of this stuff out, this will obviously get into the drinking water and then the athletes will drink that water as well as the local citizens and so you get blue skinned Chinese and athletes!
      Drink tap water? In China?! Surely you jest. Even the natives don't do that.
  18. Good lord.... by Himring · · Score: 1

    who are on call to blast away at clouds with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers.'

    Isn't this from a spongebob episode, where plankton tried, yet again, to conquer the world?

    "Die cursed, usurper clouds! Die!!!"

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  19. One Big Butterfly by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    What you don't know is that the Chinese official who came up with this idea, his name translates as 'big butterfly'. When he flaps his wings in the considerable land mass of China, who knows what happens to the weather in Florida...

  20. Well, isn't that convenient... by gravyface · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...who are on call to blast away at NATO warpl^H^H^Hclouds with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers


    Let's just hope the farmers load the shells from the wooden boxes with the clouds on them, not the skull and crossbones, during the Olympics.
    --
    body massage!
  21. Where's the tag by esocid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Where's the tag by WilyCoder · · Score: 4, Funny

      whatcouldpossiblygoWONG

  22. What does China gain from hosting these? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I wonder, is what China (in particular, the Chinese gov't) gains from hosting the Olympics. It costs money. It's hard on the citizens. It pisses off the citizens, and casts the government in a bad light. All the things they're doing to their citizens in preparation are not in a spotlight for the rest of the world, which also casts the government in a bad light.

    So my question is, other than saying "we hosted the olympics in 2009", what benefit is it to them to do so? I'd think that they'd get more respect for having the games hosting in another country, and then having a winning Olympic team.

    1. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      So my question is, other than saying "we hosted the olympics in 2009", what benefit is it to them to do so? They could say "We hosted the Olympics in 2008!".
    2. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you look at a list of countries that have hosted the olympic games in modern times, you'll notice that it consists of industrialised nations. By hosting the olympic games, China wants to show the world that they are now a member of the club.

    3. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      Maybe the question is: "What does the world gain from having China host the Olympics?"

    4. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Money? And lots of it, I'm sure. Just think of the taxes collected on every penny spent there: airfare, travel, meals, lodgings, souvenirs, equipment, entertainment, and so forth. The Olympics is a giant event with money being poured into all the infrastructure surrounding it.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    5. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Not so sure about that. I just moved out of BC, Canada recently, but the way things were going the outpouring of $$$ was wayyy beyond budget, and the incoming was going to have a hard time catching up. Similarly, Greece suffered greatly under the cost of hosting the olympics.

      May some are going to make money from it: travel agencies, advertisers, etc, but I think the profit is relegated to a limited number of pockets, and I'm not so sure that the gov't pockets (aka the taxpayers) will be one of them, except for those that are going to benefit from a few "greased palms"

    6. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by dcollins · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They gain honor, prestige, and recognition. And if you think those are less important than money... well, there's your cultural divide, right there in a nutshell.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    7. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Not so sure about that. I just moved out of BC, Canada recently, but the way things were going the outpouring of $$$ was wayyy beyond budget, and the incoming was going to have a hard time catching up. Similarly, Greece suffered greatly under the cost of hosting the olympics.

      Few Olympics are profitable. I only know of two in the last few decades that didn't end up costing the taxpayers money, the 1984 summer games in Los Angeles and the 2002 winter games in Salt Lake City. There may have been others, but not many.

      However, lots of places that host the Olympics end up making a profit in the longer term.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by jotok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. Then we would simply accuse the Chinese of genetically engineering athletes (or at least socially engineering them, which is for some reason worse in my mind). That's basically what everyone said about Yao Ming, remember?

      Basically, they can't win for losing. Here are some examples of what the average Westerner thinks of China and the Chinese:

      1. There are a lot of them, and living conditions universally suck (but they don't know it because the Great Firewall won't let them go to those sites)
      2. They pretty much read agitprop all day about crushing enemies of the people, or about doing Taiwan a favor and "reunifying" them, or something.
      3. Most have jobs staffing assembly lines, gleefully turning out ridiculously unsafe products made of things like pure arsenic or asbestos. This includes food products. All of these products are cheap knockoffs of existing products designed in the West (especially the food products)
      4. The rest are goldfarmers or farmers, regular type (i.e., "peasants")
      5. The government universally treats its citizens like crap, unless you are some sort of apparatchik (witness: evictions for the Olympics).

      The Olympics is China's big chance, on the eve of them becoming a superpower, to dispell all of these ridiculous ideas. So far they are not doing especially well, probably because there is a nugget of truth in all of those outlandish preconceptions. They really need some kind of positive media coverage, especially since we're running out of Jackie Chan.

      If they do pull it off, then they look good to the world (which up until now has been ambivalent/suspicious but not as angry as they are with, say, the USA). It would mean that they would have an easier time becoming a superpower and extending their influence. I think their mileage is going to vary, the exposure will be good but they're not going to get away with ANYTHING thanks to the internet.

    9. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by Spellvexit · · Score: 3, Informative

      I pretty much agree that the Olympics are going to be a huge expenditure with few tangible results, but I find it pretty unsurprising China is so gung-ho about this. In my opinion, hosting the Olympic games satisfies several agendas:

      • It's great for mianzi ("face"). Saving face, losing face, gaining face is a big deal in China. I used to think it wasn't that big of a deal and that it was really just another term for what Westerners go through, but it's got a surprising force in China. Even in Taiwan, which I would think is more westernized, I encountered behavior based primarily on face that defied common sense. It's not uncommon to ask for directions and get the completely wrong answer, not because that person was mistaken, but because they didn't want to tell you "I don't know." Winning in an Olympic event is big for China, but being the master of ceremony has to be even more prestigious. Add the home court advantage, and it's win-win!
      • It also fits China's massive industrialization and modernization agenda. The Three Gorges Dam and the intense infrastructure development in the west are just a couple of these large scale projects. Modernizing for the Olympics works well in Bejing: they've been purging the hutong (small residential collectives) for a while now, and under the flag of the Olympics, they can step up this agenda for an ostensibly noble cause. On a more positive note, it gives the government a good opportunity to make inroads against pollution. I visited a few years ago, and I was surprised at how clean the bus emissions were, given Beijing's dire pollution reputation.
      • In relation to the above, Bejing is a huge and marvelous city and is the symbol of the Chinese government. While Shanghai and Hong Kong may retain some of the glitter of being cities of international trade, there is no other city in China like Beijing, which blends culture, government, and military in such a peculiarly balanced way. Beijing means authority, and hosting the Olympics only adds to this majesty.
      • Finally, China strives for unity as much as it shuns dissent. The Olympics are a fantastic pretense for this. It makes the nation look strong as a whole, tells places like Taiwan "see what you're missing?", distracts the populace from idle mischief. In some ways, there's nothing wrong with this -- what's a little national pride? But in China, national pride often seems to be a bit more engineered than in Western countries, and the Olympics is no exception.

      I don't mean to be overly cynical about the whole affair -- I had several Chinese friends who were ecstatic when it was announced that China would host the Olympics, and I'm happy for them. But in response to the original post, the Olympics often seem to be huge expenditures that may or may not pay off. Not to be unfair to developing nations, but... why do we constantly have to build new stadiums to accommodate the Olympics? Can't we just use the old ones we built, and focus more on the games and less on the "boom and bust" economics of building the infrastructure every 4 years?

      --
      The moon may be smaller than the earth, but it's much farther away!
    10. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have a trite list of what the average you thinks of westerners?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Do you have a trite list of what the average you thinks of westerners? Yes, but it's tattooed on my massive penis. Hold on, while I sort through these things... Complete works of William Shakespeare, no ... Pics of Paris Hilton getting out of a limo, no ... . Oh! Here we are: An Outsider's View of Western Civilization, Vol. I: "(1) Supersize Me!"; (2) ...
    12. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Few Olympics are profitable. I only know of two in the last few decades that didn't end up costing the taxpayers money,

      Last I heard the olympics were not about money. I thought it was about the promotion of peace, love, and brotherhood through the spirit of competition, or some such bullshit. Not that I give a flying rats ass about any of that, but it's what I heard. Personally I get more excited about a new router manual than I do the olympics.

      I used to get excited about womens gymnastics when I was younger. But now what they define as a "woman" and what I define as one don't match.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    13. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speak for yourself!


      Pedobear approves of Women's Gymnastics.

    14. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by AnotherSteve · · Score: 1

      Yer a troll. A troll with a bad accent. Chinese has equivalents to R and L sounds in English. It is Japanese that you are mocking so poorly - to make the sound represented by the letter R in Japanese, you have to put the tongue right in the middle of where you put the tongue to make R or L sounds in English, so it is quite difficult for native Japanese speakers to get them differentiated.

      --
      Information wants to be $1.98/lb.
    15. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      In fact the Beijing accent of Mandarin puts "R" sounds at the end of many words even where there isn't one. Similar I guess to north-eastern american's who drop R sounds at the end of words.

    16. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by shwa · · Score: 1

      Money, no. Human rights, yes.
      Maybe that's my cultural divide.

      --
      Carpet pissers did this? Well Dude, we just don't know.
    17. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Japanese has no L, only has the R sound. So he's doing a reverse Japanese accent or something.

      Partially On Topic: Is it only me that hears 'weather control' adds station and pictures duels where hands are removed?

    18. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Do they though? That was my point. If China comes out looking bad because of all the other issues that are brought to light during the olympics (as well as issues created by hosting them, such as displaced citizens), who is going to be showering them with "honor and prestige?"

    19. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese has equivalents to R and L sounds in English.

      That exac'ry wha' I terring you. When you speaka Engrish, you get them . . . uuuhh, how you say? . . . backwads. In Enrish, you maka "l" sound, sound as in "lutabega", where in Chinese, we maka r sound, as in "Roosereaf". Again, in Engrish, you maka "r" sound, as in "rorripop", but we maka "l" sound, as in "letard".

      Legardress, you missing point. China become velly, velly powe'ful. China become #1 nation. Roundeye no standa chance as rong as union wo'kers keep demanding mo' money. Amelican companies outsou'ce wo'k to China. Make China lich, powe'ful nation.

      Confucius say - "You no rikey?? Fuck you!!"
    20. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's one thing people in China value more than honor, it's money.

  23. Will Anyone Waste Time Watching The Olympics? by Skeetskeetskeet · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't even want to see how the media is going to paint China as this "mystical, magical land", when in reality it is a polluted cesspool of human rights violations, forced abortions, population control, poison in their products that are shipped to this nation. The forced smiles alone on their hand-picked robot citizens that will be obviously ordered to mill around Olympic Village and say wonderful things about China will be enough to make me hurl on my flat screen.

    --
    Yeah, my karma sucks....but so do the mods.
    1. Re:Will Anyone Waste Time Watching The Olympics? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      The forced smiles alone on their hand-picked robot citizens that will be obviously ordered to mill around Olympic Village and say wonderful things about China will be enough to make me hurl on my flat screen. Yes the flat screen, which almost beyond any doubt was infact manufactured there...
      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Will Anyone Waste Time Watching The Olympics? by wonnage · · Score: 1

      And you're typing this on your computer made in China, hurling on your flatscreen made in China, while licking the cheeto crust off your fat fingers (somewhere along the line that processed cheese touched China). You're fairly delusional.

    3. Re:Will Anyone Waste Time Watching The Olympics? by Skeetskeetskeet · · Score: 0

      I don't like Cheetos..and as for my laptop, yeah, it's probably made in China, but the OS is made in Redmond, USA.....that's close to China...

      --
      Yeah, my karma sucks....but so do the mods.
  24. missing tag: whatcouldpossibleygowrong by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    Dumping that much crap in the atmosphere won't Fuck The Planet Up (tm) but if it leads to what is implied in the description, that China will look to other weather mods, and given they have well over a billion people to do it, I would be Deeply Apprehensive that it would be any kind of a "good Thing".

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:missing tag: whatcouldpossibleygowrong by MrMacman2u · · Score: 1

      Well, with the Chinese modding the weather using the methods described I, personally, can't wait for the first time nature decides to post a weather "Troll"! Amusement abound!

      --
      This signature is lame.
    2. Re:missing tag: whatcouldpossibleygowrong by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I see nothing that could go wrong with this. What could a country downwind, who ends up having all the moisture wrung out of the clouds by the country upwind, possibly complain about? I'm sure they perfectly understand all of the ramifications of this. No need to worry.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:missing tag: whatcouldpossibleygowrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problems is, you're an imbecile and no one care about your opinion.

      Especially when it's a redundant, ignorant troll like that one was.

      I mean, do assholes like you even TRY to read the comments before you vomit your idiocy on the screen? A half dozen other morons vomited their identical idiocy before you did, and yet there you are spewing it all over.

      That takes a special kind of arrogant stupidity.

  25. WWAGD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would Al Gore do? This is just one on many current problems in this world. There are so many unknown issues with the weather patterns right now. This is just going to complicate things even more. I feel the world needs to initiate a major pollution reform way before manually changing weather conditions. Of course everyone loves a sunny day but that isn't something we should control. My favorite past time is roller blading on a nice 70-degree day but I'm not about to ask someone to force the weather to be that way. You need to have patience. I invented the roller blade and had a work prototype. I showed a few people because I was impatient. Someone of course stole the patent and they are now rich beyond their wildest dreams. Wait for good weather, don't force it. We will all have plenty of days to roller blade. Btw, if anyone knows the person who stole my patent I would greatly appreciate any information. God bless.

  26. Opening Acts by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 1

    Damn, so does that mean John Fogerty won't be doing the opening act?

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
  27. whatcouldpossiblygowrong? by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

    when you shoot iodine into clouds from below and shower them with liquid nitrogen and other chemicals from above above a full Olympic size stadium

  28. Cloud seeding works about as well as ... by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cloud seeding works about as well as a polygraph but with a bit more of a scientific basis behind it that makes people think it might just work this time. They can no more control the weather than we can read minds so it's not worth the sensationalist headline.

    1. Re:Cloud seeding works about as well as ... by phat_cartman · · Score: 1

      I knew you were going to say that.

  29. Blue skinned? by mitchdl · · Score: 1

    "Isn't Silver Iodide bad for you, specifically your skin? I know there's this concoction (that has silver) that if you take too much of it turns your skin blue and is irreversible. If china pumps a ton of this stuff out, this will obviously get into the drinking water and then the athletes will drink that water as well as the local citizens and so you get blue skinned Chinese and athletes!" Well I hope they're also planning on figuring out how to keep Gargamel from ruining this year's games.
  30. China weather control open, US CLOSED! by harshmanrob · · Score: 0, Troll

    What I find interesting is the Chinese are open with their weather control program while US claims weather control is not possible and denies they have a program. Then I look up and see CHEMTRAILS hammering Cleveland whenever we have a sunny day (which is like 60 days out of the entire year!)

    Just a thought...

    1. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Dude chemtrails? You are so clueless. The US government has nothing to do with Chemtrails. At least not the US government you know about.
      Everybody knows that the Aerospace industry, Oil companies, and by extension the Airlines are controlled by the Masons. They are the ones that from the Shadow government with the Greys that are doing the Chemtrail tests. And yes Cleveland is a major target of the tests. Why else do you think they put the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame there!
      Please get your facts right and stop just making stuff up.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by PolarBearFire · · Score: 1

      Where does the US claim weather control was not possible?

    3. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Lets say YOU are in charge of a secret government program to try and control the weather. If you needed to conduct these tests would you:

      A. Fly planes and dump chemicals over Cleveland, Ohio. Where any joe sixpack can look up and see the results.
      B. Fly planes in one of the vast territories in which the human population is so sparse that you could walk in a straight line for days before even encountering a road? Or, barring that, the Pacific Ocean?

      Extra Credit!!!!

      For what nefarious purpose is the US government conspiring to control the sunny days in Cleveland?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    4. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

      They don't like the Browns?

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    5. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by harshmanrob · · Score: 1, Troll

      People...this was supposed to be a joke. Is slashdot full of neocon fucktards like digg.com is? I mean god damn. Although, I must commend each and every one of you coming to the defense of the establishment and proven what tools you people actually are.

      Down with America and those Tibetans demanding freedom. If they did not want to be part of China, then maybe they should have fought them a little harder.

    6. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone's been listening to too much triv...

    7. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, government controlling sunny days in Cleveland. Maybe next they can induce lightning strikes in central florida.

    8. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      For what nefarious purpose is the US government conspiring to control the sunny days in Cleveland?

      I'm not saying I particularly believe any particular theory, but there are several. Many of them are pretty wacko. Here's my favorites:

      1. If we didn't add to cloud cover, global warming would have cooked us all already.
      2. The clouds are RF lenses for HAARP, helping to focus massive RF signals being used for some nefarious purposes like creating earthquakes.
      3. The U.S. Government is inoculating us against bioweapons, which is why people get (provably) more sick after heavy chemtrail-laying activity.

      Now that we've gotten that step out of the way, let's talk about Chemtrails for a moment. The allegations about Chemtrails that pretty much all Chemtrail-conspiracy buffs agree on are:

      1. Something dangerous is being sprayed on us without our consent
      2. Chemtrail-laying activity is more or less worldwide

      I watched a documentary on chemtrails because they're interesting and because I can see them. What's more, I can watch a jet come by and leave a chemtrail, a jet go by a little later with just an ordinary contrail (which fades within two minutes, and usually within one) and then another one go by a little later and lay another chemtrail. They're not dumping fuel or anything, because they're not landing and because they usually do it across the visible sky. On other occasions I have been able to watch them turn the system on and off. I live in Lake County, California, where there are relatively few people and a lot of drugs, so anything going on here can easily be explained away. I recently spoke with a neighbor of a friend of mine who was over at his house giving him a guitar lesson. He told me about having stood on the shore of the lake and watching a plane make a pass every ten minutes; it wasn't provably the same plane but that sort of flight activity is highly unusual in this area. The jet would go by and lay a trail, which would look like an ordinary cloud in just a few minutes after it had drifted a bit (it was a fairly high wind day.)

      Anyway, I'm still undecided on chemtrails, but continue to be interested. Certainly what I have seen supports the idea that it's happening, though not any of the theories really. My favorite theory is that it is indeed just cloud seeding, and that anything more unusual trapped by any of these chemtrail enthusiasts is natural and just not something we've found previously. I mean, the fungus growing in the guy's air filter on the chemtrail documentary looks like stuff I've seen in the back of my closet under some old socks... But then that leaves the question, why all the secrecy? Why was some element of the German government secretly cloud seeding? Very strange stuff. Or put another way, there's no such thing as a bad coincidence.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. simpler solution? by frission · · Score: 1

    why not a retractable glass dome? w/ all the $ they're expending on controlling the weather, I think they could have built and paid for (many times over) a retractable glass dome on the arena. if(!rain) keep_open; else close_glass_dome;

  32. Messing with climate oscillations by esocid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see this going well with the climate oscillations, particularly the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the El Nino Southern Oscillation. This could cause massively destructive monsoons in the South East Pacific and flooding in South America in about a year. People still want to screw with mother nature regardless of the dangers that it poses.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Messing with climate oscillations by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      People still want to screw with mother nature regardless of the dangers that it poses.

      Hey I'm as leery of screwing with Mother Nature as the next guy, but let's not forget that Mother Nature was dangerous way before we had the technology to "screw with" her and will remain so regardless of any technological advances that we may make.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Messing with climate oscillations by Coraon · · Score: 1

      Trust me, as a pagan I can insure you, screw with mother nature, and she will screw you back.

      --
      -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    3. Re:Messing with climate oscillations by knightri · · Score: 0

      Screwing with the ENSO will effect more just those localities. Indirectly, this will create warmer winters for us here in the Eastern part of North America, which as a snow lover, would just plain suck. However, I do not think the scale of the Chinese project could change any global weather pattern.

      --
      'Or else pizza is going to order out for you'
  33. Isn't that like ... dangerous? by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    "Below, one member of China's army of part-time rainmakers mans an anti-aircraft gun to show the international media how he will shoot silver iodide into passing clouds."

    I'm traveling by boat to the Olympics.

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
  34. Slum improvement by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    If their housing is improved from a slum to something solid then there is nothing to worry about.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  35. WX as a tool of warfare by ColdBoot · · Score: 1

    I can see it coming. China will master the use of weather as a strategic tool of warfare. Forget nuke - Categor 5 hurricanes incoming!

    1. Re:WX as a tool of warfare by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      So China has a weather control device. Next week Russia shows their Iron Curtain and the UK their Chronosphere.

    2. Re:WX as a tool of warfare by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Wait 'till France shows off their Psychic Dominators!

    3. Re:WX as a tool of warfare by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but if they're not careful, Prokor Zakarov will send his terraformer pods to lower some mountains, and increase the rainfall.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  36. Nobody expects..... by Zorbane · · Score: 0

    Nobody expects the Moral Equivalence Brigade!!!

  37. Outside communist China... by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    ...weather controls YOU!

  38. Oblig by Sczi · · Score: 1

    What is known is that it was the humans who scorched the sky.
    Go China!

  39. Arming the peasents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the idea of them turning over "7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers" to "mostly peasent farmers".

  40. At last.... by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that Polaroid has stopped making photographic films, I was wondering what we were going to do with all those spare silver halides short of flooding the world markets with goth jewellery.

    Now I can sleep happy knowing that the Chinese are going to be spraying them into the atmosphere. I'm not a chemist, but as someone with an interest in photography, I predict a negative effect on our climate which may take some time to develop but will take a whole lot of sodium thiosulfate to fix!

    1. Re:At last.... by Dhar · · Score: 1

      Too bad there's no moderation "+1, Punny". Bra-vo!

      -g.

    2. Re:At last.... by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      Cheers for that, but there is a (vague and itsyrcall flippant) point to this: we've got a rake of sulfur and sodium already (atmosphere and sea). Who's for scooping up dead seabirds and mechanically recovering their stomachs, then flogging them on to the likes of Blood And Roses (my fave goths - old story) for stuff to hold their trousers up with?

      It's a'raining silver, hallelujah, it's raining silver. Am I on my own here, in the same way as the guy that was asking for "any good Hafnium stocks" was a few months ago? /* ;-) */

  41. This Reminds Me by Phoenix666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    of three anecdotes about China and the environment.

    The first was from the Lonely Planet's China guide, wherein one of the contributors said he was an avid jogger who moved to Beijing. Upon discovering the poor air quality, he decided it was better for his health to stop jogging.

    The second was the funny and sad story of the fate of songbirds in Beijing. Apparently, Chairman Mao hated them. So he commanded all the citizens of the city to go outside and bang on pots and pans. The birds, scared by the racket, flew around and around until they dropped dead out of the sky from exhaustion. Subsequently, the insect population soared without the birds to keep them in check.

    A reasonable person might have concluded that they should bring back the birds and restore equilibrium, but not Mao. He then decreed that since insects were breeding in the grass and vegetation in the capitol, that everyone should turn out and uproot all the plants and soak the trees down with DDT (a practice which continues to this day, in fact). Then, with no ground-level vegetation around, the city began to experience vexing dust storms.

    The Chinese Communist Party efficiently proclaimed it a consequence of being downwind from the massive Soviet industrial complexes in Siberia.

    The third anecdote involves the Three Gorges Dam. When the it looked like the CCP would put the plans into action, scientists and experts from around the world unanimously proclaimed it a Bad Idea. It would wipe out endangered species. It would erase one of the two greatest cultural and scenic features of China: the Three Gorges are somewhat analogous to the Grand Canyon and have inspired Chinese poets and artists for thousands of years. It would prove ineffective in generating power over the long run due to the rapid silting up of the reservoir. It would dislocate millions of people pushed out by the rising waters. It would create a potential disaster for the people living downstream (including Shanghai, one of the most densely populated cities in the world), because the dam itself was built across several faults.

    But the CCP went ahead, because nature and man must be subsumed beneath the needs of the proletariat. Now it turns out, once the reservoir is filling, that all those concerns were true. For instance, the increased weight of water in the reservoir above the fault lines has accelerated the number of temblors. Also, with restricted water flow, regions downstream are experiencing drought (an unexpected consequence). And with the reduced water flow, pollution has become more concentrated and caused public health problems. And the last unexpected consequence is that the increased water levels in the reservoir have triggered all kinds of landslides.

    In short, China's approach to the environment is nothing short of a disaster. And unhappily for them, the effects of the disaster are immediately felt and born by the rank-and-file Chinese, given the high population density. Yet because of the totalitarian presence of the CCP and its totalizing ideology and propaganda, the country and its people are unable to efficiently evaluate proposals and effectively respond to problems.

    It's sad, because the Chinese are an incredibly inventive and resourceful group. They've given so much to the world. One wonders what they could achieve in a free and open society. But alas, they have, at least for the time being, chosen to handicap themselves with a system that turns all their genius to idiocy.

    The rest of us should observe, and take notes for our own societies.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:This Reminds Me by DarthTeufel · · Score: 1

      So... the end effect is that a couple hundred thousand out of a BILLION are hurt... .05% - Is that even six sigma?

    2. Re:This Reminds Me by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      "One wonders what they could achieve in a free and open society. But alas, they have, at least for the time being, chosen to handicap themselves with a system that turns all their genius to idiocy. The rest of us should observe, and take notes for our own societies."

      Note taken! ('Apparently it doesn't matter what kind of society we choose.')

    3. Re:This Reminds Me by swillden · · Score: 1

      So... the end effect is that a couple hundred thousand out of a BILLION are hurt... .05% - Is that even six sigma?

      Six sigma is .00034%. Out of two billion that would be 231.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:This Reminds Me by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      In short, China's approach to the environment is nothing short of a disaster.

      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'.
    5. Re:This Reminds Me by kabocox · · Score: 1

      In short, China's approach to the environment is nothing short of a disaster. And unhappily for them, the effects of the disaster are immediately felt and born by the rank-and-file Chinese, given the high population density. Yet because of the totalitarian presence of the CCP and its totalizing ideology and propaganda, the country and its people are unable to efficiently evaluate proposals and effectively respond to problems.

      It's sad, because the Chinese are an incredibly inventive and resourceful group. They've given so much to the world. One wonders what they could achieve in a free and open society. But alas, they have, at least for the time being, chosen to handicap themselves with a system that turns all their genius to idiocy.


      I just have to say that the modern Chinese communist peasant is freaking amazing to put up and live through what they have to. I guess if I actually think about it; all communists have to be amazing to have lived through Stalin or Mao. We've only got to put up with Bushs or Clitons.

    6. Re:This Reminds Me by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      200-odd years ago, a relative handful of colonists decided that they could no longer tolerate their Government, so they waged a revolutionary war and the U.S. was born. There are over 1 billion Chinese. It's really hard to feel sorry for the abuses of their government against them when they allow it. I don't care what the army is equipped with. There's no way they could stop 10 or 20 million of their own citizens from taking control of the government.

    7. Re:This Reminds Me by fliptout · · Score: 1

      I don't follow how a lack of ground vegitation inside Beijing will prevent dust storms blowing in from the Gobi desert.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    8. Re:This Reminds Me by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      200-odd years ago, a relative handful of colonists decided that they could no longer tolerate their Government, so they waged a revolutionary war and the U.S. was born. There are over 350 million Americans. It's really hard to feel sorry for the abuses of their government against them when they allow it. I don't care what the army is equipped with. There's no way they could stop 10 or 20 million of their own citizens from taking control of the government.

      See, it's just not that easy. Do you think, for example, that the revolution would have worked had America been a few hundred miles from England, rather than across an ocean? Let alone that Chinese society simply doesn't have the history and social elements that allow, seriously, for that sort of action. Not yet, at least.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:This Reminds Me by BendingSpoons · · Score: 1

      Huh? Are you saying that the Four Pests Campaign and the Three Gorges dam project didn't actually happen? Or that modern history doesn't support the assertion that the Chinese have an appalling environmental record?

      No one - not even the Chinese government - is saying that the Chinese are doing a swell job with the environment. They acknowledge that they're screwing up the planet. They simply argue that they're entitled to walk the same path to economic growth that we did.

      --
      For all we know the moon may be as conscious as a poet or a realtor, and extremely weary of its monotonous round. - HLM
    10. Re:This Reminds Me by jandersen · · Score: 1

      If you are going to tell anecdotes, at least try to make them marginally believable. To take them one at a time:

      Air pollution - the big cities do have a smog problem; big cities often have, and it is not long ago that most big cities in the West did too - as some still have. Where we in the west for a long time simply denied that it was caused by man, the Chinses at least recognise the problem and say that they intend to solve it. IOW, they have learned from our mistakes to a certain extent, quite contrary to the morale of your stories.

      Dust problem in Beijing: Well, what do you expect when a city lies on the edge of one of the world's big deserts: the Gobi? And of course it doesn't make it better that the world's deserts are expanding as a consequence of climate change. As for the series of events you describe, I would have thought anyone could see through them; that is, if they tried. "Banging on pot and pans" should effectively scare birds away forever? It might work in the short term - for a few hours at most. If the "songbirds" have disappeared from Beijing (where is the evidence, by the way?) it must have other causes. As for fighting insect plagues by removing all plants - how does that hang together? China was at the time, and still is, a country that depends heavily on agriculture - are you suggesting they went out and uprooted all plants? Which would necessarily have to include wheat, cabbage etc etc. to have any effect on the insects - as I said, you are talking rubbish. The DDT part sounds half likely - after all that was what we all did at the time. I remember how garden programmes on TV would recommend using loads of the stuff because "it is completely harmless to humans"; yes, thank you very much.

      Three Gorges Dam: China has some of the world's best engineers - they knew from the beginning that the dam would be problematic, but in their view the benefits would outweigh the problems. They were wrong, and they seem to realise that now, as would any sensible and responsible person in charge. The big question is of course - what can they do about it now? I think you would agree that nobody would dismiss a multibillion dollar project lightly with an "Oops, sorry folks"; you have to think carefully before proceeding and try to find the best way forward.

      And with these feeble stories it is that you try to argue that the Chinese government are a bunch of bumbling idiots whose approach to things is completely out of touch with reality. So how do you explain that they are one of the fastest growing economies in the world? Hardly the work of morons, I'd say. And their attitude to environmental problems is very far removed from what you describe - for one thing, they have a huge tree-planting programme in North China which they hope can help ameliorate the dust problem; not without reason, I might add - this is a proven technique that has been used all over the world.

      You are of course entitled to your opinion, and it may be valid to critisize China for many things. But if you blurt out this kind of nonsense, you will not only not be taken serious, you will also harm your side of the argument. This is like the hysterical anti-drugs campaigns we have seen from time to time; if people hear warnings against drugs that are obviously and pathetically wrong, then the young will think "Is that really the best argument against drugs they can come up with? Can't be all that dangerous, then" - and the effect will be quite the opposite of what was intended.

    11. Re:This Reminds Me by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Huh? Are you saying that the Four Pests Campaign and the Three Gorges dam project didn't actually happen? Or that modern history doesn't support the assertion that the Chinese have an appalling environmental record?

      Nope. I'm merely objecting to a wordy and pointless method of saying what he did.
    12. Re:This Reminds Me by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As requested, documentation:

      RE: killing the birds:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_sparrow_campaign

      "It was decided that all the peasants in China should bang pots and pans and run around to make the sparrows fly away in fear."

      Eye witness account of Great Sparrow Campaign:

      http://zonaeuropa.com/20061130_1.htm

      "As I recalled, my fellow students and I climbed onto some tall trees on the side of the road and banged our gongs, drums, washbasins and anything else that can make loud noises. The sparrows were forced to keep flying until they dropped dead from fatigue."

      Beijing is not right next to the Gobi Desert, but it is downwind from it when the winds shift that way in the Spring. The rest of the year, it's not. But Beijing at any other time of the year, on a windy day the atmospheric effect is like being in a dust storm.

      RE: Air quality in Beijing

      http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:HjyJWuowpeUJ:www.usembassy-china.org.cn/sandt/estnews0915.htm+beijing+air+quality+ranking&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=21&gl=us

      "Beijing ranked second-worst out of 47 Chinese cities in a 1999 SEPA air pollution ranking "

      RE: Concerns with the Three Gorges:

      (from 2001)
      http://www.arch.mcgill.ca/prof/sijpkes/arch374/winter2001/dbiggs/three.html

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Gorges_Dam

      For good measure, a couple links on deforestation in China:

      http://www.library.utoronto.ca/pcs/state/chinaeco/forest.htm
      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19203227

      China's government is not comprised of idiots, but their ideologically-driven policies and lack of free and open discussion in a robust civil society lead to actions and results that are adverse to their own interests at a rate greater than that in countries that do have the ability to contest government policy.

      The point of my post was that in China under the CCP, there is a history of trampling the environment for the sake of, previously, Mao's mass campaigns, and now, for the sake of rampant economic development. There is also a concommitant pattern of wildly over-engineering the environment when common sense would do. It is within that context that the story about cloud-seeding resonated.

      So the post was a bit of a hip-shot. The above links and many more could have been initially provided, but it's Slashdot and the tone of the post was meant to be wry and few, even on this site, want to wade through a dissertation in response to every article. Thus, the comments were couched under the term, "anecdote."

      But as an East Asian studies scholar who's lived there for significant swathes of time over the past 18 years, the comments were not pulled entirely out of thin air. Even a casual visitor to Japan can observe that many products have humorous names or sayings in English on them, such as Calpis Water or Poccari Sweat. Most people do not demand academic citation upon hearing about such a thing--they accept them for what they are: anecdotes.

      It was in that spirit that the stories were relayed.

      --
      Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    13. Re:This Reminds Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average Chinese is just too stupid and uneducated to see there's an alternative, just like the proles in 1984. It's gonna go on forever until they eliminated themselves or the west have finally resolved to enslave these unworthy people.

    14. Re:This Reminds Me by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In short, China's approach to the environment is nothing short of a disaster. And unhappily for them, the effects of the disaster are immediately felt and born by the rank-and-file Chinese, given the high population density. Yet because of the totalitarian presence of the CCP and its totalizing ideology and propaganda, the country and its people are unable to efficiently evaluate proposals and effectively respond to problems.

      That's nothing. The effects of China putting up coal plants just as fast as they can are felt around the world. There's more Chinese pollution in Los Angeles today than local stuff. Before China got started, the air pollution controls we placed on LA were actually helping (roadside emissions checkpoints and all) and you could, you know, see at least halfway across the city most days.

      The rest of us should observe, and take notes for our own societies.

      The rest of us should do what we can to help China unfuck itself "before it's too late".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:This Reminds Me by jandersen · · Score: 1
      To quote from your first post:

      The second was the funny and sad story of the fate of songbirds in Beijing. Apparently, Chairman Mao hated them. I would hardly call sparrows "songbirds", not would you, I suspect, but by calling them songbirds, you play on people's ideas about nightingales and reed-warblers to make it seem like Mao Zedong hated something innocent and beautiful, and by extension, everything similar. That's a cheap trick, mate. And to be entirely accurate, he didn't "hate them", he, and his advisers, came to the conclusion that sparrows were problematic pests that should be eradicated. Based on our current understanding of eco-systems that was a bad idea, but at that time it was not that alien. I remember from my childhood (in Denmark) that sparrows were regarded as just as bad as mice or worse for grain production.

      Further, in your posting you claim that the Chinese simply tried to scare them off by making a lot of noise, which of course is silly, whereas what they actually did (as explained in the Wikipedia article) was much more effective: they destroyed their nesting places; cruel, perhaps, but not silly.

      So you are an East Asia studies scholar, and you seem to suggest that you have been to Japan. Have you ever lived in Beijing or any other place in China? Spoken to ordinary people (as opposed to university students)? I have lived there, I still visit regularly (at least twice a year) and I have friends and family in the country. In my opinion your posting was simply either ill-informed or ill-willed propaganda. Being a scholar, as you say, means that you could have voiced a balanced and thoughtful criticism, but you chose to jeer instead.
    16. Re:This Reminds Me by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have lived and studied in both Japan and China. In Beijing and Harbin, to be specific, at Capital Normal University and Harbin Institute of Technology. I speak Mandarin and Japanese and hold a Master's in Social Science (with a concentration on East Asian studies) from the University of Chicago. While in China, I also travelled and worked extensively with an ExIm factor, which bundles smaller accounts to meet lending minimums; I have spoken to a great many Chinese from all walks of life.

      That said, my particular scholarly focus at the time was on contemporary efforts in China to syncretize two opposite Western epistemologies, Communism and Capitalism, on top of a substrata of traditional Chinese/Confucian values, not on an exhaustive study of Mao's follies. Frankly, I was not interested in a detailed study of Mao's actions (beyond the theoretical re-positioning of Communism in China from an urban proletariat to a rural peasantry and that's implications for my work), because even an intermediate acquaintance with the circumstances of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution aroused quite enough depression and revulsion.

      But what I did hear often from my Chinese professors and middle-aged people who lived through the Maoist era were their personal experiences. One was a history professor who, as a young student in Beijing, was forced to go work at a lumber operation in Heilongjiang Province. To make their quotas he had to stand at the front entrance to the mill while they brought in a load of logs, took it out the back entrance, and circled back to the front to count it again. Was he lying? Did he misremember the details? Perhaps. But it being a story not terribly at odds with what I had read myself I took his word for it.

      In such vein I heard and related the story about the songbirds, which I heard in that formulation on more than one occasion. That's why when I related it here, I called it an "anecdote," that is, something I heard but did not have scholarly knowledge of. Was the songbird part and Mao hating them urban legend or misremembered by my interlocutors? OK, maybe--I can't say with authority because I'm not an expert on the Great Sparrow Campaign. However, if you bothered to read the 2nd link I provided you it did say that autopsies were done on the sparrows and they were found to have died from cardiac arrest, ie. fear. So the story I heard about the campaign may have suffered exaggeration and thematic drift over time and re-telling, but there seem to be kernels of truth in it.

      Was my original post too glib? OK, fair enough. But consider the venue--this is Slashdot and not an academic journal. The requirements of documentation are quite different. If that is not clear to you, then, as the Slashdot saying goes, "you must be new here."

      But from the tone of your replies it seems the tripwire here is an injured sense of pan-Han nationalist pride that often obtains in the Chinese diaspora, which is lamentable but understandable when coming from someone who actually is Han, but which is arcane when it comes from those who are not. Submitting apologia for Chairman Mao could originate from almost no other place. Mao was directly responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of Chinese and the wanton destruction of countless, priceless items and sites resplendent with cultural heritage and achievement accumulated over thousands of years. The Long March, the anti-Japanese struggle, and victory over the Nationalists do not negate that. He has earned the scorn of history.

      China is a complex and multi-layered place. There are tensions (North/South, urban/agrarian, elite/peasant, etc.) that run like fault lines across the country. There are seams of innovation that have produced marvelous technology, science, art, literature, and philosophy. It has been the scene of human achievement and great atrocities. Knowing that context is necessary, but I assert that affecting neutrality upon a given data set once its members are complete is disingenu

      --
      Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  42. Equally valid perspectives by microbox · · Score: 1

    Looking at it from our individualistic perspective, it seems like abused.

    On the other hand, from a Chinese collectivist, 'end's justify the means' perspective, why does it matter if 1.5 million drones are relocated?


    For some reason people don't own up to one perspective being better or worse than the other. This mediocrity in critical thinking presumably greases the wheels, so I'm not saying it's a bad thing.

    However... the Chinese perspective is equally valid if, and only if, conflict is an equally valid activity as harmony.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  43. Just goes to show... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    That China truly likes to control things....be it people or weather.

    1. Re:Just goes to show... by Hic+sunt+leones · · Score: 1

      Shocking! A government that truly likes to control things! AMAZING! Someone please give this individual a medal for stating the bleeding obvious!

      Seriously, find me a government that doesn't.

      --
      ~~~hsl~~~
    2. Re:Just goes to show... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      If I could...I would...

      Perhaps I should have used "excessively even for government...likes to control things".

      "China makes California look like a free state!"

  44. "Weather modification professionals???" by Hasai · · Score: 2, Funny

    What "weather modification professionals?" Just where have you ever heard of anyone having a booming business of "modifying" the weather, outside of the funny papers?

    The Red Chinese are looking more like bludgeoning buffoons every day.
    .

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

    1. Re:"Weather modification professionals???" by lbgator · · Score: 3, Informative

      We call it something different, but there is a lot of money spent on "cloud seeding" in the USA every year. There is some debate over whether or not it is effective, but apparently the Chinese aren't the only "bludgeoning buffoons" around here.

  45. Rocket Launchers!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the idea is to replace the clouds with smoke and shrapnel? Nice. It certainly sounds like a good idea to me.

  46. Proof that it works by plopez · · Score: 1

    There isn't a lot. In fact it is often used during droughts when air moisture is often at a minimum, making such an approach useless as there is no water to harvest.

    The only people who claim it really works are the rainmakers themselves.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  47. Re:Hmmm...Here We Go Again by St.Anne · · Score: 5, Funny

    "China must resolutely crush the Rain/Weather forces' conspiracy and sabotaging activities," The People's Daily, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC), said in a hard-hitting commentary on Saturday as Beijing poured in thousands of Chinese troops to assert control in the restive Olympic regions of the country.

    China alleged that the violent weather activities were "masterminded" by the Mother Nature "clique" with the "vicious intention" of undermining the Olympics and splitting China. Mother Nature has denied the charge, and said she is ready for a dialogue with Beijing.

  48. Bush failed in New Orleans. by tjstork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, New Orleans was a case of corrupt black city officials not properly utilizing the monies granted to them via the federal government.

    I'm a long time Bush supporter and I have to concede that I was very disappointed with the way that he handled Katrina. Let me put it this way. If I was President, I'd have had an army in there on day one, stopping at every Home Depot on the way to pick up stuff to build with and sending the bills to Congress. I'd have had generators in there and the water out. That didn't take place. It doesn't mean that he's racist, as the original poster states, and nor does it absolve the local residents from their own admittedly corrupt local government, but, by the same token, when a man is drowning, you don't sit there and yell at him for not following proper safety regulations on the boat. You pull him out.

    I wanted to see Bush with the megaphone in downtown New Orleans, the same way as he was on top of the WTC rubble. I thought that moment in September in NYC so long ago was Bush about as good as a President could get, and by contrast, the Bush we got for Katrina flew over the region in Air Force one, delegated the disaster to a low level functionary that wound up failing at the job, and then, to top it all off, gave us some vague excuses about seperation of federal powers and the posse commitatas act. The guy was already breaking the law doing wiretaps without a court order, so, if you are going to argue the President can bend the rules to protect the American people, then he should have bent them in New Orleans.

    I mean, if Bush could muster the national purpose to turn an attack by a rogue group into an invasion of not one, but TWO countries, certainly going against the spirit of our own signing of the UN Treaty, then, he could have bent a few rules, and been that figurehead again, and mounted a national effort to rebuild New Orleans. The man had an opportunity to become a living legend, and he blew it, and America is lesser for it.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      You have never lived or dealt with a flood (from a river not a leaking house water pipe). You can pump all the water out possible but if you do not fix where the water is getting in, you will be pumping that water out for ever. In this case the levees were broken and needed to be fixed before the water could be pumped out. Getting in there and fixing the pumps only to have them run 24/7 making no headway until the levees were fixed is a bad idea. Remember that NO is below sea level. One must fix the levees/dikes to keep the water back before you can pump out the water.

      Most cities below sea level are supposed to have a plan in place for disasters. Do you think that Holland ha no plan in case a disk starts to leak or it breaks? The biggest mistake the federal government made was not inspecting things on its own. Then informing NO (or any other city or state) that it has to fix/repair/upgrade the levee/bridge/dam/etc. Or no federal money for you until you do. That would actually give those states incentive to keep it's infer structure in good working order.

    2. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Darby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm a long time Bush supporter

      Have you seriously considered taking the only possible course open to you to gain a scrap of integrity and put a bullet in your cowardly, deluded traitor's brain?

    3. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I mean, if Bush could muster the national purpose to turn an attack by a rogue group into an invasion of not one, but TWO countries, certainly going against the spirit of our own signing of the UN Treaty, then, he could have bent a few rules, and been that figurehead again, and mounted a national effort to rebuild New Orleans.
      Sure, he could, but he shouldn't have to. 9/11 was a failure of the military and intelligence agencies - a federal government responsibility. New Orleans was a failure of the municipality, or, at worst a state responsibility. It was deffinitely a case of the people reaping the fruits of their indifference - if they had bothered to elect a good mayor, and properly fund their police force, the whole situation would have turned out a lot different. The federal government should have never needed to step in, except to provide limited support as requested by the state and municipality.
    4. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      Have you seriously considered taking the only possible course open to you to gain a scrap of integrity and put a bullet in your cowardly, deluded traitor's brain?

      I think actually that you should be building a statue to my genius, and worshipping me. I would be pleased if you named your children all after me, but, if you only could name one after me, than you might still be eligible for my blessings.

      --
      This is my sig.
    5. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered that people think you're a joke?

      Welcome to America, we have choices here. Try a different country if that bothers you.

    6. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by q-the-impaler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Someone get this guy a cookie! Additionally, NO wasn't the only Katrina victim, but only conspiracy theories make the news.

      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
    7. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a douchebag.

    8. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      My biggest question to people espouse your position is "why should the rest of the country foot the bill for New Orleans?"

      Seriously, the city should never have been built in the first place, being below sea level, on the damn coast, is just a stupid place to settle. Pouring millions of dollars into a bad idea doesn't make it a better idea, it just makes it a more wasteful bad idea.

      I'm all for helping people rebuild their lives. I think they should be paid whatever they lost, by the insurance companies, and then asked politely to move somewhere else. The government owes no responsibility to fix everything for every poor sucker that can't get over their "family history here" and bullshit like that. You've been given a reasonable amount (for most people-not all, certainly) of support for the last 2 years in order to make your life better. Staying where the economy is crap, and you're doomed to repeat the same problems within the next 10-20 years because we can't stop hurricanes, is no longer the rest of the tax-paying citizens' fault.

      Yes the situation was handled badly, at many different levels. Yes, people continue to struggle, but I'm tired of hearing about people asking for continued handouts. If it sucks so bad, find some other place to make a better life for yourself, and don't complain about people not helping you enough. We have been helping, some of us directly, for two years, and we can't put everyone else on hold to continue supporting a lost cause. At some point you have to take responsibility for yourself.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    9. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I wanted to see Bush with the megaphone in downtown New Orleans, the same way as he was on top of the WTC rubble.

      Want it, sure. Expect it, no. Why? First, he assumed the people under him would do their jobs at least semi-competently. When that assumption was proved wrong... well, he had egg on his face, but the assumption should have been valid had he not screwed around with FEMA and foolishly put it under his Department of Homeland Insecurity. Second, there was no potential to use the tragedy for political gains. With 9/11, he saw it as an opportunity to pull his approval ratings out of the basement by scaring the American public into thinking that we all had to accept borderline tyranny to prevent such a situation from occurring again. When a human causes a disaster, it's easy to do that. When nature causes it, it's a lot harder since nothing can prevent it other than building adequate infrastructure and not building on flood plains. The only thing he could have justified with Katrina would have been a huge tax hike. Wrong party for that. :-D

      Bush did exactly what I'd have expected---he sized up how much political capital he could get out of it, concluded that the South would always be firmly in the Republican camp because of the religious right, and therefore felt no need to further support the people who put him in power. I hope the people of the South see this for what it is and vote Democrat (or better yet, Independent) in the next presidential election....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      Second, there was no potential to use the tragedy for political gain
      Bush did exactly what I'd have expected---he sized up how much political capital he could get out of it, concluded that the South would always be firmly in the Republican camp because of the religious right

      Well, no, because, of two reasons.

      1) The opportunities for political gains were enormous. If Republicans could get 20% of the black vote, instead of 5%, that's enough to consistently win a general election.
      2) The south as a whole may tend to vote Republican, but, at a statewide level, Louisiana is a Democratic bastion. They may go for Republican presidents, but there's a long family tradition of southern democratic governors and representatives from that state. Only David Vitter broke that mold there, but, then he had to go and get himself a hookah!

      I hope the people of the South see this for what it is and vote Democrat (or better yet, Independent) in the next presidential election....

      Well, there's more to it than God in the south that keeps the south in the Republican columns. There is an aweful lot of manufacturing in the south that used to be in the north, because Republicans broke the northern unions so that those jobs could move to the south. AS it is, Republican economic policies under the Bush administration have actually benefited those states that tended to vote for him. Mining states in the west are making out, because the price of commodities is high. In some states they are re-opening gold mines or drilling for new gold largely because of high gold prices. Similarly, high oil prices might hurt us in the urban areas, but if you are living in oil country like hmm, Texas, you could be making out rather well for the first time in 30 years. And, if you are doing export manufacturing, you can be making out rather well. And, as much as you might bemoan the price of corn products, if you are in a corn state or really, any farming state, the higher food prices could be a godsend for a family that, during the 90s, had the best option of selling out the farm cheap to tract housing developers.

      --
      This is my sig.
    11. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Darby · · Score: 1


      I think actually that you should be building a statue to my genius, and worshipping me.


      If you want that, you first need to demonstrate some sort of worth. The fact is that all you've demonstrated is cowardice, idiocy and treason.
      There is no other possible set of qualities you could possess that would cause you to be a Bush supporter long time or short time.

      Try using facts next time and stay within the bounds of reality.

      Or just do the only decent thing left to you after the massive damage you've willfully aided and kill yourself.

    12. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peer pressure is tough, eh?

    13. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by tjstork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Try using facts next time and stay within the bounds of reality....There is no other possible set of qualities you could possess that would cause you to be a Bush supporter long time or short time....Or just do the only decent thing left to you after the massive damage you've willfully aided and kill yourself.

      The reality is, you need to be building a statue to me. I'd like mine in marble please. You don't have to start right away though. I allow you to finish, right after you finish carving George Bush's face into Mt. Rushmore. I'm trying to think, now, should we call Bush, Bush the GREAT, or Bush the WONDERFUL champion. I just don't know. Lot's of big decisions to make.

      --
      This is my sig.
    14. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, you could argue that since the leevees that failed were built by the Army Corps of Engineers, the federal government did have at least some of the share of blame.

    15. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if you are a member of the working class (as most Bush supporters certainly are) isn't supporting Bush more or less the same thing as putting a bullet in your head? (Or if not in your own head, your grandchildren's heads?)

    16. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, General Stork.

      After all, marshaling an army is super easy. We've all done it in Civilization IV. Being that the US Army spends all of it's time training for raiding Home Depots on the way to NOLA, this could have all been done rikey tic. Shame on Bush for actually slowing them all down.

      And of course, it's a shame we haven't rebuilt all those homes in the exact same precarious flood zone. Certainly it won't happen again. Next time we can just get China to alter the weather.

    17. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      I just gave birth to a lil brown baby 5 mins ago, I think naming it in your honour would have been very appropriate, sadly I flushed him before he could be named, but the next one, I promise will be named after you.

    18. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure the Director of FEMA is a low level official. Though I do agree with the rest of your post. I have argued numerous times not to confuse incompetence with racism.

    19. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Embrionic · · Score: 1

      "The man had an opportunity to become a living legend"

      Believe me, this won't be an issue. We'll be speaking about Bush for many years to come.. just not the way you would hope.

    20. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      We'll be speaking about Bush for many years to come.. just not the way you would hope

      If Obama and Co start a trade war, then Bush's misgivings will seem like the chump change and people will miss the guy. If Iraq remains "tied" to the USA and starts to pump a mountain of oil, then Bush will seem like a God.

      --
      This is my sig.
    21. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Lookamoi, Lookamoooiii) - Now I have one word to say to you (Kim) - "Malibu".

    22. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Also, you've got a lot of warm-climate indifference in the quality of how stuff is built. The same storm in New England would have broken some windows and flooded some living rooms, but it wouldn't have washed away any houses.

      Of course, building on flood plain is just plain stupid to start with.

      This little cartoon says it all: http://nmallory.exit-23.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/fema.jpg

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    23. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Embrionic · · Score: 1

      "If Obama and Co start a trade war, then Bush's misgivings will seem like the chump change and people will miss the guy. If Iraq remains "tied" to the USA and starts to pump a mountain of oil, then Bush will seem like a God."

      We invade a sovereign nation for oil and you think Bush would seem like a God? Absolutely pitiful.

    24. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      We invade a sovereign nation for oil and you think Bush would seem like a God? Absolutely pitiful

      If gas in the USA were 30 cents a gallon, people would be making statues to the guy.

      --
      This is my sig.
  49. Eminent Domain by cenonce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In ATL, the citizens at least could use the 5th Amendment's taking clause to get just compensation for any property lost to the government.

    I had to look, but China does surprisingly have a version of the "eminent domain" clause in their Constitution - See #6 of "Amendment Fourth" down the page. Note it doesn't say "just compensation"... it just says they can take private property, and pay you something for it. Somehow I don't think, unless you are a Communist party big-wig, that value is decided by an impartial tribunal in a court of law.

    1. Re:Eminent Domain by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Eminent domain should be used for public works projects, like roads, schools, etc....not the for-profit ventures of private entities.

    2. Re:Eminent Domain by cenonce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, you're right, but the Supreme Court has unfortunately said otherwise.

    3. Re:Eminent Domain by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but in a communist system, isn't it the government's property to begin with anyway ?

      I realize there are many different definitions and implementations of communism. But I was under the impression that property rights were virtually non-existent in pretty much all of them.

    4. Re:Eminent Domain by STrinity · · Score: 1

      The apartment owners could get compensation from the government. Renters, not so much.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    5. Re:Eminent Domain by Woundweavr · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the SCotUS didn't say 'should' they said 'could'. I still disagree with their ruling but they left it up to the elected officials on whether it was wise to do so.

    6. Re:Eminent Domain by elBart0 · · Score: 1

      Eminent domain should be used for public works projects, like roads, schools, etc....not the for-profit ventures of private entities. Are you familiar with the case of New London and eminent domain? The Supreme Court seems to think differently than you (and I).
      Kelo v. City of New London
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:Eminent Domain by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      As I have lived in China for a few years, these evictions with inadequate compensations do happen. However, the severity of the cases depend greatly where it occurs. Sometimes the old area was so bad and you wish someone will come to ask for your house in exchange for a new one. For example, my mom inherited an old house in the city of Guangzhou; about 10 years ago, the area was demolish, rebuilt and my mom get a condo of the same size. You can't ask for a single-house anymore but the values probably go up as the neighborhood is anew. Generally, in the city, you will see people keep adding illegal extensions to their houses in the old neighborhoods because they know the compensation is based on the footages and even though those extensions have no permits, they can still make more claims.

      In the suburb villages, unvalued compensations by corrupted officials have happened often, especially a few years back, and it is the main causes of protests in China. BTW protests are allowed in China as long as it is not too large or involve political topic -- and it works probably as often as protests in the US.

    8. Re:Eminent Domain by argmanah · · Score: 1

      I had to look, but China does surprisingly have a version of the "eminent domain" clause in their Constitution - See #6 of "Amendment Fourth" down the page. Note it doesn't say "just compensation"... it just says they can take private property, and pay you something for it. Somehow I don't think, unless you are a Communist party big-wig, that value is decided by an impartial tribunal in a court of law.

      That's unfounded. While I'm sure that this provision has been abused, from my personal experience the people I've known in China to be displaced due to eminent domain ended up in comparable (or better) housing. Location-wise it was generally less convenient, but they made an effort not to leave people homeless. Besides, in China they don't really own their own land anyways, the government does. You purchase the "exclusive, transferable, right to use the land".

      Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying the system is better than our system here. I'm not saying it shouldn't be changed. But it's not really fair to assume the worst case. Most of the time the system works as intended. The big difference is that when the power does get abused, the people there get screwed worse and have less recourse.
      --
      Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
    9. Re:Eminent Domain by Raenex · · Score: 1

      BTW protests are allowed in China as long as it is not too large or involve political topic Not involving a "political topic" is kind of an oxymoron. Though I get what you are saying, some things are protestable, others aren't.
    10. Re:Eminent Domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't allowed to own their houses anyway, so there's nothing to compensate for. They are only allowed to lease them from the government. So all they are doing is revoking the leases, and to hell with the people who lived there. It's a worthwhile sacrifice to make the leaders of the Chinese government look good to the leaders of other governments. I mean ... for the greater good.

    11. Re:Eminent Domain by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      In ATL, the citizens at least could use the 5th Amendment's taking clause to get just compensation for any property lost to the government.

      Better than that. In ATL, if you decide to sue the government over the proposed compensation, and are awarded any higher amount, the government picks up all costs (including lawyer fees.) Because of that, you tend to get pretty fair valuations.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  50. Silicon Valley's weather modification program by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Santa Clara County, California used to have a weather modification program. It's Silicon Valley now, but it used to be a prime agricultural area; it has great topsoil. But it doesn't get quite enough rain.

    So, for about thirty years, when rain clouds were passing over but it wasn't raining, the call went out to all the silver-iodide stations to start up their generators. These were basically oil burners that put out a smoke column with silver iodide in it.

    It helped a little, enough to be statistically significant, but it wasn't spectacular. Beijing is putting in about 100x the effort to cover about 1/10 the area of the Santa Clare Valley effort, so they might get a useful effect.

  51. Actually, this is used a lot. by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here in colorado, the lower part of the state has been using Silver Iodide for several years (basically, since the monster drought). This year they had to stop it because they were at 163% of normal. Was it the Silver? Do not know. But where it is not used, the amount is just slightly above 100%. So, it is possible that it is working. Now, what is needed is for us to build more resevoirs or start re-injecting back into the ground, rather than letting our water run off to other states.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  52. No, they will not by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    China has lots of rain in this area. They idea is make the rain happen west of the area. That way, the sky is dry as it moves over the crowd. In addition,the amount of silver iodide is a trivial amount.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:No, they will not by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not just build a stadium with a roof?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:No, they will not by OnlineAlias · · Score: 2, Funny


      DOH!

    3. Re:No, they will not by MenTaLguY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hubris.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    4. Re:No, they will not by CowboyNealOption · · Score: 1

      Because they chose the obviously simpler, cheaper method of controlling the weather instead.

  53. Just build a dome over the stadium by headchem · · Score: 1

    I know it can be done. I saw one on television. But rocket launchers work, too.

  54. Don't mind my butterfly farm. by Shinmizu · · Score: 2, Funny

    And while they're working hard to control the weather, I'll just amuse myself over here by starting a large butterfly farm.

  55. Missile Command : Cloud Edition by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Shooting rockets for clouds before they reach the stadium? Sounds like an exciting video game pitch.

    Oh my God, this cloud is coming right for us! Quick, return it to its maker with that ground-air missile! Blast, I missed it, it's going too fast!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  56. The interesting part by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is that China has their yuan tied to the dollar (while the dollar has gone done by 33 - 50% against nearly all money, it has gone done less than 10% against the yuan. EU Euro is rising in strength and China is starting to really push their wares into there. In a short time, EU, Canada, and even Australia is about to run up monster deficits against China. It is already growing. Quickly. And I doubt that China will open up their money.

    But I also suspect that EU (and perhaps the west) will use issue of CO2 as a means of changing a lot. In particular a simple carbon tax will solve a lot of their problem.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:The interesting part by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      But I also suspect that EU (and perhaps the west) will use issue of CO2 as a means of changing a lot. In particular a simple carbon tax will solve a lot of their problem. That, and censorship. I'm not sure if it was covered on Slashdot, but the EU is proposing to regard any form of internet censorship as a trade barrier. If this happens then they can impose import tariffs on goods from China for as long as the Great Firewall exists, which seems like quite a neat legal hack.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:The interesting part by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Actually, the yuan hasn't been directly linked to the dollar since 2005. It's now linked to a group of currencies, of which the dollar remains a big part. The exchange between yuan and dollar has been hitting record highs for the Chinese, but then, so has pretty much every other currency...

    3. Re:The interesting part by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, they put it in a basket and adjust according what they want. They say that it is tied to a group of money, but NO formula can be found. More importantly, as the dollar drops, and all over money's increase, only the yuan as appreciated as little as it has. So no, it is total BS to say that it is not tied to the dollar. If was even remotely free, then china would publish the formula and you would see that the yuan being double to triple the current value. They keep it low for export reasons. But I think that when EU decides to go after "Carbon emitters" and the network firewalls, I believe that the rest of the west will join in. In fact, they really have no choice but to do so. Free enterprise requires freedom throughout. When a money is artificially controlled, then it is not free enterprise.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  57. Re:Hmmm...Here We Go Again by The_Wilschon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least now John Fogerty will have an answer to his question.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  58. against perfect storms by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I always said that if a few fighter planes were to launch multiple warheads into a storm, (hurricane or tornado) that they could actually destroy enough of the deadly force that it could
    make the storm dissipate, however, the American gov. seems to love to rebuild all the time, and would not interfere in such disasters even if it were preventable. Too many jobs would be lost.

    I truly applaud the Chinese for showing us up, now that the populace will know such things are quite capable, they might make enough stink to force some sort of action next time a class 5 hurricane hits Miami, or a class 5 tornado hits Texas etc.

    I wonder if they were to be able to dissipate the clouds too to avoid flash flooding by dispersing the clouds over a wider area, instead of allowing it to accumulate all in 1 small place, causing these floods

  59. Not Songbirds Sparrows. by Irvu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What you refer to is the Great Sparrow Campaign which was an attempt to combat a severe grain shortage in China by exterminating airborne and landborne pests that consumed or fouled the grain. Like most large-scale attempts to restructure nature this one failed with ugly ugly consequences. In this case, absent birds to eat them the locust population exploded killing the grain.

    Interestingly enough just at the same time that China was facing this massive grain shortage Russia called in, loans that it had outstanding demanding grain and other food in payment. Rather than Default the communists forced the loans to be paid but that ended whatever positive relationship the two countries had. All through the 80's when people talked of a "Communist Conspiracy" they ignored the fact that after that little stunt the Chinese hated the Russians.

    One possible consequence of cloud seeding may be hinted at in this Guardian article RAF Rainmakers 'caused 1952 flood' Let's hope that isn't the case.

  60. I say... by asterix404 · · Score: 1

    I think if the weather doesn't do exactly what china wants over the Olympic games they should impose a huge crack down on the weather, and state in many press conferences condemning the weather for "Going against what is best for the motherland." Also they should totally blame the Dalli Lama for instigating the weather to be "unresponsive to the needs of the greater community at large."

  61. You should have seen the waterways by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    of Eastern Europe during the grand old days of Communism...

    you were not allowed to walk along some of them

    you also were greeted with scenes that would best reserved to hollywood sci fi

    Communism abuses both the people and the land... while the ideal may not the reality was far harsher than most people are willing to believe

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  62. Depends what happend to those 1.5M people by JSBiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What does the phrase "1.5 million natives have been displaced from their homes" mean, in this case specifically? There is no fundamental human right to a *specific piece of property*. If those 1.5 million people were moved into comparable (or possibly even *better*) housing elsewhere in the city or in a city/town of their choice, or at least compensated with sufficient funds to purchase comparable housing, then I don't see a problem with it (we do the same thing in the US - it's called "Eminent Domain"). If those people were just thrown out on the street, or put into ghettos, that would be a violation of human rights. But, national governments need the power to re-allocate land use. Otherwise, there'd be *nowhere* for anyone to ever host the Olympics.

    Sometimes, to build an airport, railroad, or public venue (such as a Stadium), you gotta move some people. That's just life. The important thing is how you accomplish that moving. It's possible to move 1.5 million people in a way that deals fairly with those people and doesn't make them homeless. I don't know if that is the case in this particular situation, but you have not offered any evidence that this is *not* the case.

  63. Silver Futures by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Looks like it's time to be buying silver futures. With all that silver iodide going up in smoke (so to speak), and given the size of China's consumption of any resource, silver supplies are going to be far tighter in the future than they are now.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  64. Problem already solved in North America by realisticradical · · Score: 1
    Here in the Americas we already have a solution to bad weather at our sporting events. It's called the domed stadium.

    Crazy concept, we take and cover the stadium with a roof ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrodome ) that way the rain stays out. We even have some with the ability to be open when it's sunny and closed when it's not ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Centre ).

    This whole weather control thing sounds a lot like a stunt run by a snake-water salesman.

  65. I think we all know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong?
    Me Chinese,
    Me play joke,
    Me put silver iodide in your coke.
  66. You failed at life by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    "I'm a long time Bush supporter

    Have you seriously considered taking the only possible course open to you to gain a scrap of integrity and put a bullet in your cowardly, deluded traitor's brain?

    --
    Lorn shot first."

    Hey look a loser Star Wars fanboy with a stupid political opinion.

    Get back to me when you move out of your mom's basement.

    Of course, now is when you respond with an attack because I told you to. So respond and attack me, I'm ordering you to.

    1. Re:You failed at life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look a loser Star Wars fanboy with a stupid political opinion.
      Whoa - great comeback, dude!! I guess you really showed him who's boss.

      Of course, now is when you respond with an attack because I told you to. So respond and attack me, I'm ordering you to.
      What, is this some sort of childish attempt to try to pretend you're controlling Darby? Grow the fuck up, you whiney little faggot bitch.

      You want to play childish games? Good, cuz I'm taking control now. You respond to me, like the little bitch you are!! Yeah, you can pretend that you never checked for replies to your message, but I know you'll read this. Out of fear, I expect that's the course of action you'll take. You'll go on pretending that you didn't just get bitch-slapped by an Anonymous Coward. Or, you can reply, like I ordered you to, cuz you're a little bitch that has to do everything I say.

      So what are you - a scaredy cat, or are you a little bitch?
  67. They always used to say... by wumingzi · · Score: 1

    "In Beijing, not even the rain falls by chance."

    (A reference to being in the center of the empire and all the palace intrigues that come with it).

    Now it's actually true!

  68. Agreed - MOD GRANDPARENT DOWN by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Sprinkled with racist content = Troll

    Just used my last mod point, dammit.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  69. like USA in 1950s: engineering solves everything by peter303 · · Score: 1

    NOT!
    USA used to think we could innovate our way out of all our problems both technical and social. Chinese hasnt learned limits yet.

  70. The number 8 as in 8/8/8 by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So my question is, other than saying "we hosted the olympics in 2009", what benefit is it to them to do so?

    Assuming you meant to say "2008" rather than "2009", I can only give you a partial answer. More specifically as to why it has to be 2008.

    In Chinese culture, as well as other Asian cultures that share that heritage, the number 8 is a very lucky number and is also associated with prosperity. This belief is also applied into dates. The olympics is scheduled to start on August 8, 2008, or in number representation 8/8/8. I recall back in August 8th of 1988 (8/8/88), many Asian people where I lived (San Gabriel Valley, California which is otherwise known as the new LA Chinatown) bought up many lotto and lottery tickets.

    I would imagine this number thing is so central in their beliefs such that the Chinese govt must really want to display prosperity.

    1. Re:The number 8 as in 8/8/8 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "...bought up many lotto and lottery tickets."

      SO what did they all buy with there new massive wealth? oh wait. I'm sure they lost because they failed to appease dead people.

      Will they look at the history of there not actually being any exceptional luck happening? no, they will make a pathetic excuse. Or manipulate the number and tell you why it wasn't really '8'.

      Wait...2008/8 is 251. 2+ 5 + 1 = 8. double lucky! I'm selling my house to buy lottery tickets.
      8 18 28 38 48 58

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The number 8 as in 8/8/8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall back in August 8th of 1988 (8/8/88), many Asian people where I lived (San Gabriel Valley, California which is otherwise known as the new LA Chinatown) bought up many lotto and lottery tickets.

      Cultural mores don't make this any less disheartening

    3. Re:The number 8 as in 8/8/8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While what you say about the number 8 is true, it's also disingenuous. China would be glad for the Olympics any year, and they also made a bid for the Olympics in 2004 - the IOC places them second, to Australia. Four is associated with Death in Chinese culture, in exactly the same way Eight is associated with Luck - and China would have been happy to have had the Olympics then, just as they'd bid for the 2012 Olympics if they hadn't won for 2008's (12 doesn't mean shit). Because the Olympics happen to be taking place in the summer of 2008, they're being scheduled on 8/8/8 - but claiming that that's the reason for hosting the Olympics, or somehow central to their reason for getting the Olympics, is simply not true.

  71. Atlanta displacement 2% of China's by clay_buster · · Score: 1

    Just to put some perspective on this. Fulton County's entire population in 1996 was only 750,000. Anti-olympic sites list 30,000 displaced by the Atlanta olympics. That is 1/50th the number affected in China.

  72. Re:Hmmm...Here We Go Again by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Little do they know... It is really the west, with its mechanical carbon dioxide generators that create the "strange" weather. We even have them making their own.. And now they produce more than we do. HAHAHAHA!

    --
    What?
  73. CO2? by Thought1 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who noticed that they're using Dry Ice? Why aren't all of the environmentalists screaming that China's deliberately releasing large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere? Isn't this what's supposed to be causing global warming?

    1. Re:CO2? by stratjakt · · Score: 0

      Haven't you been paying attention to Kyoto, etc?

      It only causes global warming when the its released into the atmosphere from US soil, or the release is caused by an American.

      Everyone else gets a free pass, and less advanced nations should be entitled to free US dollars to help them release CO2 at current american levels..

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  74. Re:Sad, funny, History repeating itself by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the 50's Mao had some ideas about what enemies to fight (and mobilize the population against).

    "the country's biggest four evils - rats, flies, mosquitoes and sparrows? "

    Read the article (those of you who don't know this important bit of history so we don't repeat it)

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3371659.stm

    which ended in disaster and famine. Well now its the weather. Too bad the weather in one part of the world effects all other parts, the butterfly effect.

    Between genetic engineering on the "oh it will be alright, we have taken into consideration all the possible consequenses" and massive weather modification (for some games). I think we have made great evolutionary progress towards total survival and total good life for everone forever, don't you?

  75. So What? by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    If you don't /own/ the property, why /should/ you receive any compensation?

    I've sold rental properties with tenants in them before. It's my property. I give notice as stipulated in the agreed contract, they leave, I sell. The previous tenants don't get any of the money.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:So What? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      I've sold rental properties with tenants in them before. It's my property. I give notice as stipulated in the agreed contract, they leave, I sell.
      There's the rub. When the government exercises eminent domain, they don't have to honor the lease. They can just tell you they want the property, give you a check, and kick people out with as little notice as they wish.
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    2. Re:So What? by maillemaker · · Score: 1

      We typically allow 90 days, I think.

      I think it's unlikely any government agency will move faster than that.

      --
      A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  76. Like always - the rich benefit. by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    The Olympics are great for all the corporate entities that belly up to the government trough for contracts to work on all the various projects.

    It is pork at its finest.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  77. Chinese constitution by f97tosc · · Score: 1

    I had to look, but China does surprisingly have a version of the "eminent domain" clause in their Constitution - See #6 of "Amendment Fourth" down the page
    Although, China has been known, from time to time, not to follow its constitution to the letter. Read on to Article 35:

    "Citizens of the People's Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration."
    1. Re:Chinese constitution by cenonce · · Score: 1

      Of course, the definition of "citizen" has proven to be quite selective. Just ask the Tibetans...

  78. Cloud seeding has been used in Alberta too by WebCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    South-central Alberta (between Calgary and Red Deer in Western Canada) is known to be one of the worlds more severe "hail belts". Hail has been responsible for hundreds of millions in damage, ranging from crops and houses (penetrating shingles and shakes to the point of damaging the cladding underneath, as well as causing flooding) to automobiles and airplanes (a hail storm in the Calgary area caused a cargo flight to Minneapolis to abort its ascent when tennis-ball-sized hailstones destroyed the cockpit windscreen of the Boeing 727 jet).

    For the past dozen years, the government has regularly seeded clouds in its hail damage mitigation programme. As a Calgary resident I can say that it has noticeably reduced the frequency and intensity of hail storms, and has probably contributed to millions of dollars in savings in disaster relief and insurance claims.

    Given that this is not only an old practice, but one that occurs frequently around the world, I don't see where the news-worthiness or controversy is in China's application of cloud seeding to divert precipitation from Beijing during Olympic events, aside from the mildly amusing reason behind the project.

    1. Re:Cloud seeding has been used in Alberta too by ozeki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all the concern about Global Warming, as anyone ever included in the Warming models, mans attempt at controlling the weather. I know where I live if the clouds are gone and it isn't raining we get a little hotter.

    2. Re:Cloud seeding has been used in Alberta too by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know where I live if the clouds are gone and it isn't raining we get a little hotter.

      The quantities and dispersion of chemicals involved in cloud seeding are infinitesimally small in comparison to the amounts of CO2 and CH4 released into the atmosphere, both from natural and man-made sources. Humans no doubt have an impact on climate, however I don't think we've even come close to mastering CONTROL of the climate on a global scale. Cloud seeding is quite localised and doesn't really work precisely enough to give *total* control of weather.

      Anyways the effect of cloud cover on temperature varies with geography, seasons and time of day. Clouds can act as thermal isolation in either direction; at midday in the summer an overcast sky can block incoming sunlight and cool things down. However in the winter, or at night, or at other locales, clouds may INCREASE the actual or apparent temperature as they trap heat from leaving an area. Where I live in the winter, a clear, cloudless sky at mid-day usually happens when it is very very COLD (whereas, during a chinook when winter days are warmest there is always a "chinook arch" cloud formation), so I don't think you can associate the presence or absence of clouds with expected temperature.

      In any case, cloud seeding doesn't seem to reduce cloud cover significantly. It seems to merely divert the occurrence of precipitation, making the inevitable happen a bit earlier. Some US states have tried to use it to make chronically dry areas get more rainfall that normally falls areas further downwind. In Alberta it is used to induce precipitation before hailstones can form. Hail is when water vapour adheres to small particles and is carried by wind currents to freezing altitudes, where it falls again and collects more moisture before being blown back up again, and cloud seeding makes the water vapour form larger droplets sooner so it falls before it can be caught in the hail-forming cycle. Presumably in Beijing they want to induce rainfall before a system reaches the city.

      Nobody has figured out how to stop rain that is already happening, or to create a storm system; we can only trigger rain to happen sooner. I cannot see how this has a significant impact on global temperatures and weather patterns.

    3. Re:Cloud seeding has been used in Alberta too by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      South-central Alberta (between Calgary and Red Deer in Western Canada) is known to be one of the worlds more severe "hail belts".

      Here's a photo taken shortly after a violent hailstorm in Calgary a couple of years ago:

      http://opti-grab.ca/images/hail_calgary_august_2006.jpg

      I also have video of it, think I should post the link?

    4. Re:Cloud seeding has been used in Alberta too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, thaNx

  79. For what it's worth... by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

    ...a lot of Americans seem to think you can destroy a hurricane by nuking it out of the atmosphere. Needless to say, that would go pretty terribly wrong (radioactive concerns aside, in this country we obey the laws of thermodynamics, and adding energy to remove energy isn't compatible).

    It costs a lot of money to try to deal with nature, and comparatively less to clean up its effects.

  80. Have to see the weather before you can modify it by lakshmanok · · Score: 2, Informative

    The way weather modification works (if it ever does: the jury's out on that one) is to find rain-bearing clouds and seed them so that the rain or hail falls somewhere other than where it would have normally fallen. The first thing, then, is to detect precipitation aloft. Pretty much the only way to do that is with weather radars -- satellite data is usually too coarse and not collected often enough.

    Does Beijing have a weather radar? Good thing you asked. The Chinese government recently bought a S-band weather radar so that they could use it for the Beijing Olympic games. Unfortunately, being communists (see: East Germany), they decided that the best place to install the radar was in the middle of the city so that it could be admired by the proletariat.

    Why is this funny? Because:

    (a) weather radars have a "cone of silence". The radar is on the ground and has to see up high with a relatively flat beam. This means that for around 30km around the radar, it doesn't see squat. In other words, much of Beijing is in the cone of silence of the "Beijing" radar. (For comparision, the weather radar that covers Dallas in at Dallas/Fort Worth airport, far enough away from the two cities to get a good view of the weather over both of them).

    (b) Most storms that hit Beijing move from West to East (as it does in most of the Northern Hemisphere). And to the west of Beijing are ... mountains. Which radar can not see through. And many of the storms do initiate over those hills.

    Bottom line? It's going to be hard to see the storms coming. Let alone modify the weather.

    Disclaimer: my views, not my employer's.

  81. I assume you know LA has had the Olympics? by hassanchop · · Score: 1
    And none of the things you claim would happen actually happened.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_Summer_Olympics#Los_Angeles_as_host_city

    In fact (and to my very great surprise) that particular Olympics was particularly frugal. For example

    The Olympic Velodrome and the Olympic Swim Stadium, funded largely by the 7-Eleven and McDonald's corporations respectively, were the only two new venues constructed specifically for the L.A. Games.


  82. Re:Have to see the weather before you can modify i by philspear · · Score: 1

    with almost 40,000 people working on it and so many guns, they might be planning on shooting down all the clouds. Heck, with that many people, they could almost just stand in a big group on top of the mountain range and all blow really hard to make the clouds go away.

    Disclaimer: You're right, that wouldn't work at all, I'm sorry.

  83. I'd like to see a source for this by hassanchop · · Score: 1
    Can you source this please, because I really don't think it's accurate.

    When the government exercises eminent domain, they don't have to honor the lease. They can just tell you they want the property, give you a check, and kick people out with as little notice as they wish.


    In my state at least that would be incorrect, can you show me where the courts have ruled otherwise? I follow eminent domain rulings and I am not aware of any that have the result you claim.
  84. LOL you responded AC, that's even more sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Whoa - great comeback, dude!! I guess you really showed MEwho's boss."

    We both know it's the OP, that cunt Darby, I'm conversing with. You're even more pathetic for pretending otherwise. And I notice that you don't deny the truth of my comeback, you fucking basement dwelling twat.

    "So what are you - a scaredy cat, or are you a little bitch?"

    Neither, we're not related.

    Thanks for replying like I told you to, it's nice to have someone I own totally.

    You are now ordered to attack me personally again.

  85. Hmm by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    The weather is larger and more powerful then you can imagine.
    That we can impact storms of such size in a meaningful way is irrational.
    I doubt conventional explosives would make a difference...nukes(like a 9Mt sort) might but that would seem like a really bad idea...You know casting an extremely dangerous weapon into an extremely dangerous storm...no matter what Sci-fi's movie of the month might declare.

  86. Here's your facts by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Try using facts next time and stay within the bounds of reality.

    Or just do the only decent thing left to you after the massive damage you've willfully aided and kill yourself.

    --
    Lorn shot first."

    The FACT is that you're a loser Star Wars fanboy who attacked me after I pointed out what a useless piece of shit you are.

    Now, go ahead and log out to personally attack me as an AC again, you danced when I ordered you to before and I'd like a replay.

    1. Re:Here's your facts by Darby · · Score: 1


      Lorn shot first."

      The FACT is that you're a loser Star Wars fanboy who attacked me after I pointed out what a useless piece of shit you are.


      That's amusing.

      I don't remember a Lorn in Star Wars. And I didn't attack you. Heck, I don't believe I've ever even said anything to you.
      Maybe you just don't even have a clue what you're talking about?

      Yep, much more likely.

  87. Does the enironment have a preset kill limit? by RexDevious · · Score: 1

    If there's one area where China excels - it's in overpopulation. Perhaps their plan is to send "wave after wave of short-term thinkers" against problems until the preset kill limit is reached and their ideas start working?

    Don't laugh. Taken to it's ultimate conclusion, this approach *would* actually work. I look forward to seeing both the remaining survivors congratulating each other on their success.

  88. You just get more and more pathetic by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 0, Troll

    "I don't remember a Lorn in Star Wars. "

    But you do remember the "who shot first" crap. Or are you going to lie and say that's not what you're referencing?

    "And I didn't attack you."

    You're a liar. It's pretty fucking pathetic that you even try this, but it says a lot about your character. that you think anyone would believe you and so you attempt it is incredibly funny, it really proves you have no dignity self worth at all.

    And thanks for doing what I told you, that's twice I've made you dance for my pleasure.

    Dance again, you amuse me you pathetic little whore.

  89. Re:Hmmm...Here We Go Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not funny!!! We are going to stop global warming with new light bulbs and hybrid cars. Do not make fun of our Chinese comrads for using a differing method to take full control of the climate in China. You should understand that if we can control the entire global climate with light bulbs and cars they can surely control a tiny part of it with Chinese cultural, scientific, and spiritual, methods.

  90. It's all a plot to get Rain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly they only invited Rain http://k-popped.com/2008/01/korean-singer-rain-to-sing-beijing-2008.html to sing the Olympic song in order to get their evil clutches on him.

    Shooting him with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers might be overkill though .. he's not fscking Rambo you know.

  91. butterfly effect by blue_teeth · · Score: 1

    Read this for knowing butterfly effect http://www.bleeding-obvious.co.uk/butterfly/butterfly.htm Cheers

    1. Re:butterfly effect by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Actually, (from wikipedia)

      "), although the term "butterfly effect" itself is related to the work of Edward Lorenz. In 1961, Lorenz was using a numerical computer model to rerun a weather prediction, when, as a shortcut on a number in the sequence, he entered the decimal .506 instead of entering the full .506127 the computer would hold. The result was a completely different weather scenario.[2] Lorenz published his findings in a 1963 paper for the New York Academy of Sciences noting that "One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a seagull's wings could change the course of weather forever." Later speeches and papers by Lorenz used the more poetic butterfly. According to Lorenz, upon failing to provide a title for a talk he was to present at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1972, Philip Merilees concocted Does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas as a title.
      "

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

      Within a chaotic system like the weather system. Which is what I was talking about. Given the computer simulation for weather. Apparently the story is that a weather simulation was interrupted and they had to re-enter the data from a certain point from printouts to re-intialize the simulation, but left of the low order digits to save time. The difference in the inputs was very small. In the above example I think they were only showing the rhs of the number added and I think it was a whole series of numbers entered but a very small difference from the numbers printed out. As I remember, the simulation started up with the weather patterns looking much the same but diverged quickly and eventually the weather was very different. They had started not from the end apparently so they could compare results to see that the re-initiallized simulation was the same.

      The point here is that weather is a chaotic system and that a small change now can have a marked change in the weather in a very short period of time. Look at our weather pedictions which only now go out about a week and even in a few days can be very different. Partly because we do not collect enough information, partly because our simulations are incomplete, but also because weather systems are inherently chaotic and we could never simulate that away from the system.

      So my cautionary tail stands, weather is chaotic, mass weather control will alter weather not just in China, we do not know what that kind of wholesale weather modification will do, China has in the past done large (not always insightful, or informed) envirionment modification projects. I think this is a bad idea and that we (the world and the Chinese in specific) should learn from our past mistakes. The other thing we should avoid is concentration of power and an autocratic and authoritarian indiviual or group in control as that tends to exacerbate the situation (Iraq is a case in point).

    2. Re:butterfly effect by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Oh another pathelogical example was the story (from the Silent Spring or another book like that) that told of the story of unintended consequences not unlike the point about the butterfly effect,

      where an area decided to kill all the wolves in a area

      The deer poplulation increased and the rutting deer destroyed trees by scraping antlers against the bark of trees.

      The trees died and the beaver that had thrived in the area and had build many dams on a river in the valley, left because they did not have the food or wood they needed.

      after a few years of no beavers and the beavers did not repair their dams. One broke which
      washed out the next one, which washed out the next. And the town in the valley was destroyed by the flood.

      Not a butterfly causing an earthquake which I think is not that likely but stupid actions most often bring about stupid consequences.

    3. Re:butterfly effect by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      So my cautionary tail stands, ... Oh, I see. At first I thought you were a bit paranoid for bringing genetic engineering into this, but apparently you have first-hand experience.
      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    4. Re:butterfly effect by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Sometimes really bad ideas are pretty easy to see, when there is some background, research or anecdotal evidence to support that gut feeling of common sense being violated then it gives me pause to think that maybe what looks like shit and smells like shit, maybe you shouldn't taste it.

      Don't you think.

    5. Re:butterfly effect by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Oh another pathelogical example was the story (from the Silent Spring or another book like that) It's not in "Silent Spring". Seriously, I doubt it's in any other book because it sounds very much like a bizarre conflation of two separate stories in "Silent Spring". One about wolves and deer, one about beaver, ending in a disaster that I can find no reference to anywhere except in an episode of South Park
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  92. I guess you're not a scaredy cat . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contrary to your belief, I'm not Darby. He did choose to post elsewhere in this thread, under his UID, personally attacking others, so he's certainly not afraid of losing karma for his point of view. So, if I was Darby, why would I have chosen to respond to you as an A/C? Surely not for fear of being modded down for an offtopic discussion, right? Of course, there is no way to prove to you I'm not Darby, but that's ok - you just go ahead and believe what you want. I'm not going to put that much effort into caring.

    Now, I think you'll agree that there is nothing in this post indicative of a personal attack, as was ordered of me. No name calling. No argumentative reply. You see, some of us don't have to follow orders.

    Oh, and I guess, by process of elimination my question has been answered. Look at the bright side - at least now I know your not a scaredy cat.

    Now, just to show that I still pwn you, as I always have, I command you - reply to me.

    P.S. - As I've been typing up my reply, I've been checking the thread. LOL!! I find it rather amusing that now I have both of you arguing amongst each other over my reply!! HA!! It kind of reminiscent of Sal the Stockbroker's Chinese Confusion phone call, though I guess if you never listened to Howard Stern you wouldn't have a clue what that is, and I don't have the time to explain it to you. Just trust me, it's rather amusing. Anyway, I told you Darby wasn't afraid to reply to you using his UID.

  93. FEMA by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    New Orleans was a failure of the municipality, or, at worst a state responsibility. It was deffinitely a case of the people reaping the fruits of their indifference - if they had bothered to elect a good mayor, and properly fund their police force, the whole situation would have turned out a lot different. The federal government should have never needed to step in, except to provide limited support as requested by the state and municipality.

    What does the "F" in FEMA stand for?

    1. Re:FEMA by q-the-impaler · · Score: 1

      The "F" in FEMA does not stand for "Bail your ass out". FEMA provides the management structure to support the systems that are already in place. If you really expect the federal government to micromanage the response to a natural disaster, then your name might be Mayor Ray Nagin.

      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  94. "Clean the air" is secondary objective of rain by MojoStan · · Score: 1

    control the air

    now if they could only control pollution... I didn't see it mentioned in this story's article, but other articles have mentioned that part of China's "rain manipulation" plan is "cleaning the air" before the Olympics start. Not surprisingly, some scientists have doubts. From an AP article ("China to Force Rain Ahead of Olympics"):
    • The meteorologists say they can force rain in the days before the Olympics, through a process known as cloud-seeding, to clean the air and ensure clear skies.
    • The forced rain could also help clean Beijing's polluted air, said Wang Jianjie, another meteorologist with the bureau.
    • Beijing's air pollution is among Asia's worst. Officials have shuttered several chemical and steel plants on the city's edge, and many polluters will shut down -- or cut back -- during the Olympics. But the city also has 2.9 million registered vehicles, and the number is expected to reach 3.3 million by the Olympics, a 13 percent increase.
    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  95. In other news... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    ...Free flights to the Olympics will be offered to Tibetan monks.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  96. Might be easier by Monsuco · · Score: 1

    Just to use an indoor stadium.

  97. Control the weather? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <sarcasm>
    They can't even control those upstarts in Tibet.
    </sarcasm>

  98. Next up: crop contamination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me crazy, but silver iodide doesn't sound like something I'd want shot in the air above the local farmland in vast quantities, especially when it is destined to be rained out onto the ground.

  99. Slashdot News....Stranger than fiction by lowy · · Score: 1

    If they succeed will China's announcement ring with the same national pride as it did in this video?:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ4K0hHin9s&feature=user

  100. HAHA controling the weather..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They cant even control the smog... But ya shoot more crap into the atmosphere...

  101. About the boycott SPAM by dbIII · · Score: 1

    but you have simply avoided responding to my post

    Your comments have nothing to do with the Olympics and not really anything to do with China and are thus misleading. Done.

    Labeling it the "Genocide Olympics" is simply a method of pressuring China to pull out of contracts with Sudan as well

    Admitted lies are usually considered dishonest - It doesn't matter if the intentions are good. This sort of stuff may be common in advertising but dodgy tactics like that have no place in a reasonable discussion. Consider where all this came from - cloud seeding in China linked to evil bastards killing kiddies in Sudan? Meanwhile you cheapen the word "Genocide" to refer to being from the same country as an arms dealer. I do not think very weak linkages supported by the "for the children" excuse and calling up the ghost of millions of Armenians and Jews is the sort of comment I really want to see except when that's what people are talking about. Unfortunately you all remind me of those loonies that say something bad about China at every opportunity because they want to bring the "good old days" of the cold war back.

    You do realise that even though it is for a good enough purpose to justify lying about that it's still SPAM - messages to advertise a view just coming in unasked with nothing to do with anything else? Cloud seeding in China has nothing to do with Sudan.

  102. Re:Hmmm...Here We Go Again by LS · · Score: 1

    I recognize that your post is in jest, but the interesting thing is that the translation you are mocking is that provided by CNN regarding the Tibet story, which is very innacurate. CNN and other American media sources have a tendency (intentional?) to make translations of those who have negative relations with the States sounds as if they are anachronistic despots or uneducated baboons. I can tell you as a speaker of Chinese that this was an unfair translation, and other media sources (including French) have much more natural sounding translations. Propaganda techniques can be quite subtle...

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  103. ORLY? by GentlemanRogue · · Score: 1

    The headline should be "China to Use Silver Iodide & Dry Ice to Modify the Weather", since "Control" implies that they actually know what the outcome will be (fat friggin' chance o' that). Anybody know the Chinese translation of "hubris"? I'm laying 2:1 odds that these idiots wind up creating a tornado somewhere...

    --
    you really expect me to be able to express my opinion of what's so fucked up in this world in 120 characters or less?
  104. It is not off-topic; it is about China and the upcoming Olympics, just not specifically about cloud-seeding. At worst it's partially off-topic.

    As for your appeal to emotion in the claim that I am cheapening a word; I guess you would also claim that the support Mussolini provided to Hitler was not support for genocide, or that Hitler was not directly responsible for genocide because his subordinates were the ones who actually committed the murders. Where do you draw the line of responsibility? (not a rhetorical question; I'm asking you where you personally would draw the line in cases like these.)

    "Unfortunately you all remind me of those loonies that say something bad about China at every opportunity because they want to bring the "good old days" of the cold war back."

    That's a fine piece of hyperbole. It could win awards in a... hyperbole... contest.

  105. Weather Control Device Detected by Gravemind123 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else having flashbacks to Red Alert 2?

  106. This is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go along with the rest of the west and put in a carbon tax. Once that is started, China will change dramatically. So will most of the large polluters. And yes, that includes America, but also large parts of EU.

  107. And I guess you're my bitch Darby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Contrary to your belief, I'm not Darby"

    Yes you are liar.m But I'm not the guy YOU replied to.

    "Of course, there is no way to prove to you I'm not Darby,"

    Because you are Darby liar. No one believes you.

    "Now, just to show that I am still pwned by you, as I always have been, I have replied."

    FYP.

    And, since you replied first Darby, after he insisted, that makes you his bitch. Now, when you reply because I've ordered you to, you'll be my bitch too.

    "I find it rather amusing that now I have both of you arguing amongst each other over my reply!!"

    Why would you find it amusing that we know you're Darby and you're lying?

    So, Darby, again we catch you lying, and you reply EXACTLY LIKE WE TOLD YOU TO.

    Do it again.

  108. I have an easier and more realistic solution by Torontoman · · Score: 1

    A ROOF! If you want to get complicated - make it a retractible roof.

  109. Re: by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Glad you brought up Mussolini's support because I can now bring up a very similar example to your call for a boycot. Take it one step past there and you have the League of Nations Sanctions on Mussolini being broken by the USA. That is where China is now, they will trade with anybody no matter what others say just like the USA of the 1930's. This however is not genocide and has nothing to do with the Olympics no matter how bad you think trading like that is.

    Good to see that Sudan is not offtopic on an article about rain in China. Please go easier on us mere mortals that do not see a convoluted web of connections between two things as saying they are exactly the same as each other.