Indeed. If you do A = B + C, where A is the new technology, and B and C are existing technologies, then the operation "+" should be sufficiently advanced for the patent on A to be approved.
what you're seeing is that when a company becomes dominant, its dominance precludes it from dominating the next thing. It's almost like a natural law of business.
You mean like how Google, after it dominated search, didn't dominate web-based e-mail, and online videos?
Why do you think that processors have remained at roughly the same clock speed lately? It's because NSA has been using ever increasing areas of our CPUs for surveillance purposes.
When you're affronted with terror or high emotion, "pipe breathe" and within half a minute, you're in the zone, able to think and react with calm precision to high-stress situations.
This sounds interesting. Do you have any links on this?
A completely different approach would be, for example, to hold those who make statements accountable for them. And this should apply to advertisements as well. And even to "indirect" statements like (publicly) pointing to a research paper.
Slashdot Mirror
By not printing the worthless tickets, they were acting in the interest of the environment. Good for them!
Who needs a 98 inch screen, when you can have a 360 degrees view on an Oculus Rift?
No hostage here !
Indeed. The original argument is like saying: my bakery is keeping my loaf of bread hostage until I pay for it.
There are many projects that look similar on the surface, but aren't technically as sound as this project.
If you don't agree, then please provide counter-examples :)
You must be one of those executive types thinking all programmers should work for free.
Overfishing. Combined with the fact that sharks have to eat something.
Another Earth (2011)
Quite an interesting movie.
No worries people, because drivers will soon become obsolete anyway...
Indeed. If you do A = B + C, where A is the new technology, and B and C are existing technologies, then the operation "+" should be sufficiently advanced for the patent on A to be approved.
And here I thought that they would be making trucks filled with concrete and with big nozzles attached that could print houses, roads and bridges...
This guy was trying a new editor named "vi", but didn't know how to properly exit it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I don't understand the "defusing" of a kitten by a laser pointer...
Didn't Feyman once say:
If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics.
When Linux was first introduced, your response was probably: sigh, another operating system. I've been using Windows for over 10 years now.
what you're seeing is that when a company becomes dominant, its dominance precludes it from dominating the next thing. It's almost like a natural law of business.
You mean like how Google, after it dominated search, didn't dominate web-based e-mail, and online videos?
But entropy could go asymptotically to zero as time goes to minus infinity.
So I still do not see the problem.
Of course, the distro should include a copy of all versions of IE, to test your website on.
You seem to be under the impression that https is secure.
http://blog.cryptographyengine...
Why do you think that processors have remained at roughly the same clock speed lately?
It's because NSA has been using ever increasing areas of our CPUs for surveillance purposes.
Can we change the Slashdot-icon for Google into the panopticon?
https://magemistress.files.wor...
When you're affronted with terror or high emotion, "pipe breathe" and within half a minute, you're in the zone, able to think and react with calm precision to high-stress situations.
This sounds interesting.
Do you have any links on this?
Didn't RTFA, but still wondering: does this mean quantum encryption can be beaten by adding a "weight scale" to the transmission link?
"decimal places" should have been "significant digits".
Turns out the parent post was only accurate to within its first 44 characters.
But why emit energy if you can use it?
This is only one line of thinking.
A completely different approach would be, for example, to hold those who make statements accountable for them.
And this should apply to advertisements as well. And even to "indirect" statements like (publicly) pointing to a research paper.