Slashdot Mirror


User: Flatline_hun

Flatline_hun's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
53
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 53

  1. Re:This is not "old" technology... on Self-Adapting Traffic Lights · · Score: 0

    Wow, another futurama fan. 86 the chump stuff, J-man!

  2. Re:HaHa NASA on The Threat From Life on Mars · · Score: 0

    - Sorry Fry, But Scientists renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke.
    - What's it called now?
    - Urectum.

  3. I wonder.. on The Threat From Life on Mars · · Score: 0

    why two similar moderated so differently. Come on, get some priorities!
    Well... (Score:-1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 05, @03:16PM (#11001003)
    I for one welcome our incurable bacteria that we have no cure for. Or something.


    I for one.. (Score:5, Funny) by themadphysicist (813419) Alter Relationship on Sunday December 05, @03:18PM (#11001012)
    ..welcome our new bacterial overlords!

  4. Re:i have to say it.. on The Threat From Life on Mars · · Score: 0

    Man, that was actually funny for me...

  5. Re:Yay! on Scientists Give Human Organs to Lamb · · Score: 0

    Where are the ", for one" and "new" parts?

  6. Re:Good Times on Tin Foil Passports? · · Score: 0

    As well as picture viruses. (or virii? which one is correct?)

  7. Re:Someone has to say it on Math Whiz Breaks Calculation Record · · Score: 0

    Imagine a rings cluster of Gert MittBeowulf!!

  8. Re:Originality on China to Have Over 100 Eyes in the Sky · · Score: -1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those, heh

  9. Re:Netscape backed by firefox?? on Netscape Reborn? · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Score: -1 redundant :)

  10. Re:Bah on Netscape Reborn? · · Score: 0

    OMG, necroscape is born? I almost see the headlines: NecroScape, the new undead browser has born^h^h^h^hrisen... You can't kill this [again]!

  11. Re:slashdotted04 on Gates v. Jobs, continued... · · Score: 0

    I must be new around here... :)

  12. Re:slashdotted04 on Gates v. Jobs, continued... · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just in case someone doesn't know: http://www.bugmenot.com/

  13. Re:The catch is.. on Gmail Adds POP3 To Email Accounts · · Score: 0

    Thanks man, I just got mine few hours ago!

  14. Re:What now? on Novell Pulls Out Their Ace Against SCO · · Score: 1, Funny

    EDLIN! The most unbloathed editor!

  15. Re:The catch is.. on Gmail Adds POP3 To Email Accounts · · Score: 0

    Can I get some to flatline (at) vipmail.hu? Thanks!

  16. Re:The catch is.. on Gmail Adds POP3 To Email Accounts · · Score: 0

    Six chewbacca defenses?

  17. Re:The catch is.. on Gmail Adds POP3 To Email Accounts · · Score: 0

    Is it a chewbacca defense? it DOESN'T MAKE SENSE? By the way: I have no gmail yet, and nobody sends me an invite. it DOESN'T MAKE SENSE!

  18. erm on New Rules Make Domain Hijacking Easier · · Score: 0

    ICANN't make rules...

  19. Re:Guess they needed it on Considering Watercooling Your PC? · · Score: 0

    Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.573; ASP.NET Version:1.1.4322.573

  20. Re:Ahh yes on Iceland and USA Feel the Copyright Industry's Wrath · · Score: 1

    100 percent agreed.

  21. In SOVIET RUSSIA on Xybernaut Patents Collar Computer · · Score: -1, Troll

    ...you get shot if you dare to imagine a beowulf cluster of collar computers, you insensitive clod!

  22. Re:Dr. Torok? on 1 Terabyte Optical Storage Disks · · Score: 1

    "Török" is a hungarian name, you insensitive clod!

  23. I hope MPEG decoding not affected... on Public Exploit For Windows JPEG Bug · · Score: 1

    ...or else I can't enjoy downloaded ..khm.. educational .. clips at the workplace.

  24. Re:Don't do it! on Marine Finds Duct Tape on Mars · · Score: 1

    "So basically I think it's great game design. It greatly enhances the feeling of insecurity and vulnerability."

    Oh, I do understand now why windows is also great!

  25. Re:During the early days... on Attention Bonds Gain Momentum · · Score: 1

    "...legitimate senders of bulk email will be able to build or buy the systems required to respond to challenges automatically.
    And spammers won't?"

    They will, too. The difference between them and legitimate senders are:
    - leg. senders are willing to pay for the mail to reach their targets. even a $0.5 bond is less then cost of sending real life spam.
    Spammers are NOT willing to pay $0.5 per spam.

    And if they are... they can spam me as hard as they are able. With a daily $250 income i could give up my job.