First they came for the insurance workers, but I did not speak up for I was not an insurance worker, Then they came for the drivers, but O did not speak up for I was not a driver.....
"John has a grey moustache" "Aunt Emma is not feeling well" Please let me know if these are just remarks or if they are messages to a group of people to start doing whatever I tell them to do.
I hope Google Search finds this and they adapt their websites accordingly.
I HATE it when I go to a country or even in mu own country and they ignore the fact that my browers has a prefered language. They just enforce the language that is spken there and they get it wrong ALL THE TIME.
I live in Belgium. We have three official languages. We have sevral official political entities that might or light not are somewhat according to the language.
But e.g. brussels is official bi-lingual, so they will have it wrong 50% of the time. It also hosts some European buildings; so again more langages.
And the brower has it set what language I want. That way I do not NEED to select a language manually. Stoopid American Google.
Their customers want it, so they will get it. And I am not taling about the several billion people. They are not the customer, they are the product.
What will happen is first nothin, next a logo of FB in a corner and next an ad of whatever their customer wants to add to whatever.
In the beginning this will be done zith an overlay, later it will be encoded. They will see to it that only those with adds are seen and not text or anythig else.
A new and better FB will rise that has none of these things as it will be text based and the whole process will be repeated.
Also not that these things are true for groups of people, not about individuals.A doctor who investigates old people also noted that it is remarkable that of all the people she interviewed all had a very uplifiting and positive viuw on life.
She only interviews people who are older than 100. The first person they investigated was my great aunt who was the oldest person in the world at that moment.
She gave her body to science with the specific intructions that it should be used for others and as many as possible to learn. In a way, she open sourced her body.
In Belgium if you have one, you are pretty golden as it is the company that has to pay a serious sum and it is only for higher ups, so not if you work as a normal worker. Because if they put it in, they will have to pay you and you can still work anywhere you desire.
When I changed jobs, that was the first they removed, because I was not going to the competition and if they would not have revoked it, they would have had to pay me.
In the majority of the cases, if it is in there, you can still work anywhere you desire, but you get the monies as well.
Do not listen to me, listen to a specialized lawyer. This is specialized stuff and the average lawyer will know nothing about it and will think YOU need to pay, where it is the company that needs to pay you for limiting you on your life choices, like where you want to work.
If you have enough machines running that you do not need to pay the electricity for, it becomes profitable. So you use the network to spam and the processor to bitcoin. You have access to the machine, why would you NOT do it?
If you talk about harvesting and other preparation of food, that is not a social problem. If you talk about distribution and starving, that is a social problem. The problem is not that there is not enough food, the problem is that the distribution is not done correctly. e.g. a country is starving part of the people that live there. or: In one country we throw away food, while in another there is not enough.
So here you stand with the dual party system. You can select between Trump and Clinton. If Trump wins, nothing will happen, because why would they do that. If Clinton wins, they probably still will do nothing. There will be a lot of "Liar, liar, pants on fire." and it will change absolutely nothing.
While the press keeps themselves occupied with this, politicians will do what is really important to them, serving their customers, the companies.
I have to ask what you need the Smart part of the TV for. When I got mine, I looked at it and saw I could do nothing I was not already able to do. Conecting to the local network for pics, music and movies? XBMC is able to do that. Connect to the online streaming services? XBMC is able to do that, although I rather use a browser for YouTube.
I could see nothing that I could not do better (and personalised) with connecting a PC to it.I do not have a Raspberry Pi as I do not need it, but I am sure that would be just as good, if not gooder.
There are 1.6 billion Muslims. They must not be very good muslims, if they don't start killing the rest right now. Or perhaps it is people and not the religion that kills, like guns.
That tipping is how it should be everywhere, including in restaurants. I live in Brussels and go to a small piwwa place. I NEVER tip and it is not expected to do so. Instead they offer me a free drink at the end, so I will be a return customer that will spend more money with them. Money they use to pay wages and taxes and what not.
From what I have seen when I was in the sates during 2 weeks, service is not better or worse and prices where a lot higher than in Belgium.
I worked at a store and we had an offer that said Buy X and get Y for free. Some smart people just removed X from their basked and thus got Y for free. For us that was a loss. But we sold it for that price, so it was a deal and we had to take the loss.
In Europe, as long as it is not too obvious (e.g. a BMW for EUR 100 instead of 100.000 will not work) the advertised price will be the price you pay. And that price includes the price on the invoice in our case.
I would say they should take their loss and learn from the experiece. From what I read it is a legal sale.
I think there is. At least the influence of language is there. e.g. for many a search down is done with / and a search up with ? and for people who use a qwerty this is pretty obvious, as it is on the same key. The / is at the bottom and the ? is at the top. So you have a key that means search and you can go up or down according to what is shown on the key.
If you work with a different keyboard, this becomes less obvious. on azerty-BE they are not on the same key and both are on the top, so there is no link to know why it is done that way. And understanding is always nice.
And that was just an example. Using [] means I need to use the right ALT key. Same for tick and back tick. or {}. This is not unpossible, but it is a LOT easier to do on a querty.
What I imagine has happened is that they start programming a language, look at the keyboard and think "What is the best key to use here?" and then take one that has not yet been used and which one can be accessed easily? On a different keyboard the result would have been different. e.g. a search could have been as they are not only on the same key, but even point to where you are going.
This is one stupid question and can be used as an example of a stupid question.
No, it us unpossible. You can NEVER solve a social problem with a technical solution. And no gun control is NOT a solution (and I am all for gun control, which is different from forbidding them). He would be able to do it.
And having MORE guns would eliminate the mass shottings, but will end killing more people. But that we do not see as those are not as important.
You will not see 100 news articles about 1 person being killed, you will only see 1 about the 50 shot by a lunatic.
They do not. They are a plot device for a writer to use. And he can interpret them as he sees fit. That includes killing all of humanity, if he sees a way to do that or whatever he likes to please the reader.
The fact that people get hurt (in the stories) thanks to or despite of the laws is the whole purpose of it, as it drives the story. If the laws were perfect, there would have been no books, no stories and no people talking about these fictional laws as if they were real.
Slashdot Mirror
First they came for the insurance workers, but I did not speak up for I was not an insurance worker, ....
Then they came for the drivers, but O did not speak up for I was not a driver.
How many cars do you now see driving around empty? Car sharing does not remove cars from the road, they remove them from the parking.
As your example indicated, cars will be driving around empty and that might add to traffic.
Vote an Austrian in a foreign country in time of economic stress would be a good thing. What is the worst that could happen?
... as long as it is black.(*)
So as long as you do what they tell you to do, you are free to do that and otherwise they will force you to do so.
(*)Yes, I know it is not correct.
"John has a grey moustache" "Aunt Emma is not feeling well"
Please let me know if these are just remarks or if they are messages to a group of people to start doing whatever I tell them to do.
I hope Google Search finds this and they adapt their websites accordingly.
I HATE it when I go to a country or even in mu own country and they ignore the fact that my browers has a prefered language. They just enforce the language that is spken there and they get it wrong ALL THE TIME.
I live in Belgium. We have three official languages. We have sevral official political entities that might or light not are somewhat according to the language.
But e.g. brussels is official bi-lingual, so they will have it wrong 50% of the time. It also hosts some European buildings; so again more langages.
And the brower has it set what language I want. That way I do not NEED to select a language manually. Stoopid American Google.
So what do you make at CitiGroup? Thanks.
Their customers want it, so they will get it. And I am not taling about the several billion people. They are not the customer, they are the product.
What will happen is first nothin, next a logo of FB in a corner and next an ad of whatever their customer wants to add to whatever.
In the beginning this will be done zith an overlay, later it will be encoded. They will see to it that only those with adds are seen and not text or anythig else.
A new and better FB will rise that has none of these things as it will be text based and the whole process will be repeated.
Also not that these things are true for groups of people, not about individuals.A doctor who investigates old people also noted that it is remarkable that of all the people she interviewed all had a very uplifiting and positive viuw on life.
She only interviews people who are older than 100. The first person they investigated was my great aunt who was the oldest person in the world at that moment.
She gave her body to science with the specific intructions that it should be used for others and as many as possible to learn. In a way, she open sourced her body.
In Belgium if you have one, you are pretty golden as it is the company that has to pay a serious sum and it is only for higher ups, so not if you work as a normal worker.
Because if they put it in, they will have to pay you and you can still work anywhere you desire.
When I changed jobs, that was the first they removed, because I was not going to the competition and if they would not have revoked it, they would have had to pay me.
In the majority of the cases, if it is in there, you can still work anywhere you desire, but you get the monies as well.
Do not listen to me, listen to a specialized lawyer. This is specialized stuff and the average lawyer will know nothing about it and will think YOU need to pay, where it is the company that needs to pay you for limiting you on your life choices, like where you want to work.
If you have enough machines running that you do not need to pay the electricity for, it becomes profitable.
So you use the network to spam and the processor to bitcoin. You have access to the machine, why would you NOT do it?
European law disagrees with you.
If you talk about harvesting and other preparation of food, that is not a social problem. If you talk about distribution and starving, that is a social problem. The problem is not that there is not enough food, the problem is that the distribution is not done correctly. e.g. a country is starving part of the people that live there.
or: In one country we throw away food, while in another there is not enough.
So here you stand with the dual party system. You can select between Trump and Clinton. If Trump wins, nothing will happen, because why would they do that. If Clinton wins, they probably still will do nothing. There will be a lot of "Liar, liar, pants on fire." and it will change absolutely nothing.
While the press keeps themselves occupied with this, politicians will do what is really important to them, serving their customers, the companies.
I have to ask what you need the Smart part of the TV for. When I got mine, I looked at it and saw I could do nothing I was not already able to do.
Conecting to the local network for pics, music and movies? XBMC is able to do that. Connect to the online streaming services? XBMC is able to do that, although I rather use a browser for YouTube.
I could see nothing that I could not do better (and personalised) with connecting a PC to it.I do not have a Raspberry Pi as I do not need it, but I am sure that would be just as good, if not gooder.
There are 1.6 billion Muslims. They must not be very good muslims, if they don't start killing the rest right now.
Or perhaps it is people and not the religion that kills, like guns.
I guess you are talking about Greenland that was named that way for marketing purposes.
You mean like they waited almost a day and only said a day after 9/11 they would be invading Iraq?
I willingly posted it and I willingly delete it as well. Why I put it up and take it down? Because it is my data and I do with it as I please.
Why I put it there in the first place? Because I wanted it to be visible at that moment. Now I do not want to have it visible anymore.
That tipping is how it should be everywhere, including in restaurants.
I live in Brussels and go to a small piwwa place. I NEVER tip and it is not expected to do so. Instead they offer me a free drink at the end, so I will be a return customer that will spend more money with them. Money they use to pay wages and taxes and what not.
From what I have seen when I was in the sates during 2 weeks, service is not better or worse and prices where a lot higher than in Belgium.
I worked at a store and we had an offer that said Buy X and get Y for free. Some smart people just removed X from their basked and thus got Y for free. For us that was a loss. But we sold it for that price, so it was a deal and we had to take the loss.
In Europe, as long as it is not too obvious (e.g. a BMW for EUR 100 instead of 100.000 will not work) the advertised price will be the price you pay. And that price includes the price on the invoice in our case.
I would say they should take their loss and learn from the experiece. From what I read it is a legal sale.
I think there is. At least the influence of language is there. e.g. for many a search down is done with / and a search up with ? and for people who use a qwerty this is pretty obvious, as it is on the same key. The / is at the bottom and the ? is at the top.
So you have a key that means search and you can go up or down according to what is shown on the key.
If you work with a different keyboard, this becomes less obvious. on azerty-BE they are not on the same key and both are on the top, so there is no link to know why it is done that way. And understanding is always nice.
And that was just an example. Using [] means I need to use the right ALT key. Same for tick and back tick. or {}. This is not unpossible, but it is a LOT easier to do on a querty.
What I imagine has happened is that they start programming a language, look at the keyboard and think "What is the best key to use here?" and then take one that has not yet been used and which one can be accessed easily? On a different keyboard the result would have been different. e.g. a search could have been as they are not only on the same key, but even point to where you are going.
This is one stupid question and can be used as an example of a stupid question.
No, it us unpossible. You can NEVER solve a social problem with a technical solution. And no gun control is NOT a solution (and I am all for gun control, which is different from forbidding them). He would be able to do it.
And having MORE guns would eliminate the mass shottings, but will end killing more people. But that we do not see as those are not as important.
You will not see 100 news articles about 1 person being killed, you will only see 1 about the 50 shot by a lunatic.
They do not. They are a plot device for a writer to use. And he can interpret them as he sees fit. That includes killing all of humanity, if he sees a way to do that or whatever he likes to please the reader.
The fact that people get hurt (in the stories) thanks to or despite of the laws is the whole purpose of it, as it drives the story. If the laws were perfect, there would have been no books, no stories and no people talking about these fictional laws as if they were real.
That is what Churchill did with the Enigma. Even though it cost the lives of many English in the short term.