I am sure that if I asked for 10 million (Hey, I am not greedy) and somebody just gave it to me (DM me for my details), should you not blame the person who gave it?
Same here, I think. Blame the politician (and the people who voted for him) who gave the money.
China are as much IP thieves as anybody who ever broke a copyright law. Their idea of the time of copyright is 0 years instead of eternity and more for the US. Just like the US used to do in the past.
And as there was no risk to national security, he was not right to call that in to block it. That means the blocking of the company is not right.
Just because you shot a convicted terrorist by accident does not mean it isn't manslaughter and wrong. BOTH parties can be wrong.
Sure,but many people have been conditioned to use google.com or bing.com as their place to see other websites. I have seen people typing google.com in the default bing.com page, so they can enter the URL in google for our OWN website. I wish I was kidding.
To me this sounds like a bad iddea. I already hardly sleep because of the bussing sound my girfriend makes at night. I would not want a compressor in the bedroom. Although it might be very effective for her.
I believe many people did not vote for Trump as much as they voted against the political establishment. They would have voted for that guy with a boot on his head if he would have run, no matter the party.
Do business without governement intervention? Try selling beer to 18 year old adults and see how that works out. Hey, you are a business, right? Free to conduct their service without governement intervention, right? So you can not decide to do buiness with anybody you like or desire. The opposite is just as true. I can order a wedding cake, even if I am not even going to get married. You can not say "No wedding cake for you" regardless if I am going to get married or not.
I know plenty of stores that can not decline doing business with another one, just because. If the service is publicly available, you can not just say no without a reason.
I have worked in Belgium where one of the customers was an extreme right group. We did not like it, yet we where not able to do anything as long as they where legal. And that is a good thing.
Now if they somehow did something wrong, by all means, cancel the account. However I do not see any evidence of that happening here. And if it where the case, some idiot going on a rampage should not be the deciding factor. My question then would be: why did they still have the account? Either they did something wrong and should have already had their accounts canceled or they did nothing wrong and should not have their accounts canceled, regardless if people got shot or not.
Well, they say that the fatality is certain. So it becomes a moral dilemma. We must assume both are of the same age, gender and what not. Not a school of children vs an single adult. So you need to go to the next item on the list. Will you endager others by action and/or non action. Assuming there are no other people to be harmed (otherwise this would be included in the question.), besides either one of these, you could look at the financial impact.
Driving into a pedestrian will be less expensive in damage (just the car) than driving the car into a wall (car+wall) to save the pedestrian.
Nobody talks about subsadies. It is like how they removed roamingh costs in Europe. "You are not allowed to charge roamning costs and are not allowed to increase prices because you lost romaing costs and the max price for a SMS is X amount." so somthing like "You MUST bring high speed Internet to everybody who is connedcted to the electrical grid, otherwise you lose your licence to do business" is not such a bad idea. Not saying that it should be exacly like that. It could be even "Everybody home or business".
And when that is done, you go to the rest as well as increase the minimal speed.
So 400 Billion was not enough. You need to give more. Give that per state, per provider. If you don't, you are a communist for wanting the governement to implement regulations and enforce the law. (Yeah, I am also not sure how that is related, but it is, mmmkay?)
First the Americans need to understand the difference between a Union and a Guild. From what I see, the US Unions are unions by name only. They are a guild.
The difference is that a guild protects the jobs and a union protects the workers (Or both have that intention at least). In Europe we have had Guilds for a while. Look at any main marketplace in many cities in Europe and you will see that the most lavish houses where on the great market and where build by guilds. They protected the nakers, the bitchers and so on. Not a member of the Guild? Not allowed to sell or make things in the city. Stopped being a baker? Sorry, nobody to speak for you.
Have an invention that makes your job obsolete> They will fight as hard as possible to either stop that invention or keep you occupied, even if you are redundant in that job.
A Union is something diffreent. They will look at the people and see that they have a job. Might not be the job they had before, but still. From somebody in Belgium: I have been a UNion member for (I think) 10 to 15 years. I became a member the day I lost my job. Not because they would do anything about keeping my job, but because they made it easier to get my unemployment benefit. Almost no paperwork for me.
The Unions fought for the unemployment benefit. And let it sink in: you can be a member of a Union if you are unemployed. And I can become a member of almost any union. There are some unions that are specific for secors, others are general. I have been a member of the same union and can be a member, regardless of what my job is, or even if I have a job.
Say my company downsizes (Have seen that several times) the unions can step in and negotioate not only what the objective bases are who to let go. They can also negotiate the saevreance pay. That way I got one year 7 months , went to a company for a year and got 5 moths there. That was not even due to the unions. It was the companies that offered that much, because it was cheaper than negotiating with the unions.
And the reason I say uinins, is because there are many. And every company that has more than 50 people will have union representatives.
Yet you can join a union even if you work at a smaller company. You can also decide NOT to join a union. It is completely up to you when and if you join or leave. No person in the company will care. (Union representatives are an exception) Seriously, nobody will care. Not your cowworker, not your managere, not the CEO.
And thanks to these unions, I have 34 days of paid holiday, a 13th month, paid sickdays, maternety and paternity leave and no overtime.
Does that mean they can not fire me because I am in a Union? No. The fact that I am in a union is irrelevant. They can still fire me. If I steal, they can fire me on the spot. No benefits for me after that. They can also fire me because whatever reasons. Howvere they would need to do a payout of several months. And the longer you work somewhere, the more they need to pay.
So understand that there is a difference between a guild and a union. A guild is a bad idea. A union is a good one.
Slashdot Mirror
That is called a temp job.
People started listening to you.
If the app has the abilty to connect to a printer, so I can print it to scan and send to my email, you have a customer.
How about neither?
Sure, but thedutch eat their fries with mayonaise, so do they actually know what good food tatses like?
My ex proves the opposite.
I assume you where talking about prostitutes.
I am sure that if I asked for 10 million (Hey, I am not greedy) and somebody just gave it to me (DM me for my details), should you not blame the person who gave it?
Same here, I think. Blame the politician (and the people who voted for him) who gave the money.
China are as much IP thieves as anybody who ever broke a copyright law. Their idea of the time of copyright is 0 years instead of eternity and more for the US.
Just like the US used to do in the past.
And as there was no risk to national security, he was not right to call that in to block it. That means the blocking of the company is not right.
Just because you shot a convicted terrorist by accident does not mean it isn't manslaughter and wrong. BOTH parties can be wrong.
Or they install Debian on it, like I did. I bought a Xhromebook because of the price and I have a maxhine at home.
No need to buy the latest and fastest.
Sure,but many people have been conditioned to use google.com or bing.com as their place to see other websites. I have seen people typing google.com in the default bing.com page, so they can enter the URL in google for our OWN website.
I wish I was kidding.
Didn't make it? They developed the "Rocket fails" so it worked as intended. Big win, if you ask me.
No idea why they would develop "Rocket fails". I am not Chinese.
To me this sounds like a bad iddea. I already hardly sleep because of the bussing sound my girfriend makes at night. I would not want a compressor in the bedroom.
Although it might be very effective for her.
I believe many people did not vote for Trump as much as they voted against the political establishment. They would have voted for that guy with a boot on his head if he would have run, no matter the party.
"Do not smoke a cigars, like I do. It is unhealthy and you will die sooner if you do."
Mmm. Not that hard, so I am not sure what your point is.
I am a blond man, you incensitive clod.
And politic ideas are not two dimentional left to right.
Do business without governement intervention? Try selling beer to 18 year old adults and see how that works out. Hey, you are a business, right? Free to conduct their service without governement intervention, right?
So you can not decide to do buiness with anybody you like or desire. The opposite is just as true. I can order a wedding cake, even if I am not even going to get married. You can not say "No wedding cake for you" regardless if I am going to get married or not.
I know plenty of stores that can not decline doing business with another one, just because. If the service is publicly available, you can not just say no without a reason.
I have worked in Belgium where one of the customers was an extreme right group. We did not like it, yet we where not able to do anything as long as they where legal. And that is a good thing.
Now if they somehow did something wrong, by all means, cancel the account. However I do not see any evidence of that happening here. And if it where the case, some idiot going on a rampage should not be the deciding factor. My question then would be: why did they still have the account?
Either they did something wrong and should have already had their accounts canceled or they did nothing wrong and should not have their accounts canceled, regardless if people got shot or not.
Well, they say that the fatality is certain. So it becomes a moral dilemma. We must assume both are of the same age, gender and what not. Not a school of children vs an single adult. So you need to go to the next item on the list. Will you endager others by action and/or non action. Assuming there are no other people to be harmed (otherwise this would be included in the question.), besides either one of these, you could look at the financial impact.
Driving into a pedestrian will be less expensive in damage (just the car) than driving the car into a wall (car+wall) to save the pedestrian.
Nobody talks about subsadies. It is like how they removed roamingh costs in Europe. "You are not allowed to charge roamning costs and are not allowed to increase prices because you lost romaing costs and the max price for a SMS is X amount." so somthing like "You MUST bring high speed Internet to everybody who is connedcted to the electrical grid, otherwise you lose your licence to do business" is not such a bad idea. Not saying that it should be exacly like that. It could be even "Everybody home or business".
And when that is done, you go to the rest as well as increase the minimal speed.
So 400 Billion was not enough. You need to give more. Give that per state, per provider. If you don't, you are a communist for wanting the governement to implement regulations and enforce the law. (Yeah, I am also not sure how that is related, but it is, mmmkay?)
First the Americans need to understand the difference between a Union and a Guild. From what I see, the US Unions are unions by name only. They are a guild.
The difference is that a guild protects the jobs and a union protects the workers (Or both have that intention at least). In Europe we have had Guilds for a while. Look at any main marketplace in many cities in Europe and you will see that the most lavish houses where on the great market and where build by guilds. They protected the nakers, the bitchers and so on.
Not a member of the Guild? Not allowed to sell or make things in the city. Stopped being a baker? Sorry, nobody to speak for you.
Have an invention that makes your job obsolete> They will fight as hard as possible to either stop that invention or keep you occupied, even if you are redundant in that job.
A Union is something diffreent. They will look at the people and see that they have a job. Might not be the job they had before, but still. From somebody in Belgium:
I have been a UNion member for (I think) 10 to 15 years. I became a member the day I lost my job. Not because they would do anything about keeping my job, but because they made it easier to get my unemployment benefit. Almost no paperwork for me.
The Unions fought for the unemployment benefit. And let it sink in: you can be a member of a Union if you are unemployed.
And I can become a member of almost any union. There are some unions that are specific for secors, others are general. I have been a member of the same union and can be a member, regardless of what my job is, or even if I have a job.
Say my company downsizes (Have seen that several times) the unions can step in and negotioate not only what the objective bases are who to let go. They can also negotiate the saevreance pay. That way I got one year 7 months , went to a company for a year and got 5 moths there. That was not even due to the unions. It was the companies that offered that much, because it was cheaper than negotiating with the unions.
And the reason I say uinins, is because there are many. And every company that has more than 50 people will have union representatives.
Yet you can join a union even if you work at a smaller company. You can also decide NOT to join a union. It is completely up to you when and if you join or leave. No person in the company will care. (Union representatives are an exception) Seriously, nobody will care. Not your cowworker, not your managere, not the CEO.
And thanks to these unions, I have 34 days of paid holiday, a 13th month, paid sickdays, maternety and paternity leave and no overtime.
Does that mean they can not fire me because I am in a Union? No. The fact that I am in a union is irrelevant. They can still fire me. If I steal, they can fire me on the spot. No benefits for me after that. They can also fire me because whatever reasons. Howvere they would need to do a payout of several months. And the longer you work somewhere, the more they need to pay.
So understand that there is a difference between a guild and a union. A guild is a bad idea. A union is a good one.
I asume you mean Suse. Suze is either a drink or you are thinking of Suze Randall. That is something completely different.
Why, so you can give power to another company? Why not SUSE, not owned by Novell anymore.
Fot number one it is the passenger. There are more passengers than jaywalkers, as jaywalking only exist in one country.
I read the article and none of them I recognise as "Media outlets". From what I have seen they are more like blogging sites.
Hey, I have a website. Give me 5000USD and I post something for you without saying where it came from.