Earlier GNOMES and KDEs imitated Windows. One thing Windows did right was the Taskbar. It is, in all seriousness, an extremely good metaphor. It separates the acts of launching programs from managing which ones are running, because, dammit, those are different things.
I agree with the first part. I utterly disagree with the second part.
The taskbar contains only one entry for programs (in general). I have made my own (with XFCE) and have them sore ted by type of program. I also do not need the rest of the taskbar. I do not close or minimize programs. I have multiple desktops. Some with one program full screen, some with several next to each other. The programs are there when I login. That is also the reason I dont want any icons on my desktop. I can't get to them anyway as there are programs running.
The police arrests more African Americans and more of them are convicted. These are known facts. The reasons behind it are interpreted different by different people and not a There is no reason to have this data connected with their picture or even their name.
What is wrong here is that the data of innocent people should be theirs to control
I would go further and say that the data of GUILTY people should also be theirs to control.
I understand that when you are doing time, you will loose some rights for the period that you are doing time. Putting things in public will enhance your punishment beyond that time and will make it harder for people to get their shit back together.
But then with private prisons, why would that be an issue?
So your basic position is that governments should be able to do whatever they want, and individual citizens should never be helped to do anything the government doesn't like?
Hey, it works for the Americans, so why should it not in other countries?
The machines are longer online, so they had more time of being infected. They will be less likely to have users who are tech savy and want to run the latest. As they are less tech savy, they will know less on how to protect themselves.
To have remote access and that is the easiest way to do it. A leased line would be better.
The reason to have it remotely is the same reason why access to some banks is done off premises. If there is a hostile situation, you still have control of those doors.
The National Bank in Antwerp has a two-door entry. The second door only opens when the first door is closed. The person to control the door is not on site. So if he sees that I want to enter and he does not want me to, he can't be physically be forced to do so.
I also assume that there is not one person who controls that door and there will be protocols as what to do in what situation.
getting access to the person onsite might be possible. Offsite is a whole different layer.
Locks can be picked. Keys can be duplicated or stolen . Guards can be bribed to do so. To use them you need to be on the premises In some situations not a real nice option.
Electronic should give a logfile of who did what and when. I can add several layers of security into it. e.g. Level one guard can't open XYZ between 20:00 and 06:00 and 10:00 and 15:00.
If it werenâ(TM)t for them you would be speaking German now. (Yes, I am aware of the Muhlenberg Vote)
Re:Joe Sixpack isn't even using his 1080p right
on
Beyond HDTV
·
· Score: 1
My last CRT was 1600x1200, My first LCD was 1920x1200. Now I buy 1920x1080 because of the price. I would love to buy the 2560x1600, but at this moment I just can't afford it.
1920x1200 is around 500EUR. 1920x1080 is around 200EUR. So for the same price I can have 2 monitors and still have money left. 2560x1600 is around 1200EUR.
So if you think that the resolution is half, then I think that half does not mean what you think it means.1
In the US they do not need one. They have direct access to the towers already. In other countries they already have this.
Remember the specifics that Bin Laden did not use cell phones? The reason this was mentioned was because if he had, they would have been faster in finding him. And how would they have done that? By using what they already have.
This all from the standard 'news' places, so basically a reading of the press releases.
So not only do I think they have it, I know they have it and they told us so.
There is always Apple, Google, your government, your little sister, your parents, your neighbors. There are a lot of people and companies you can hate.
Hate is an emotional thing, not a rational one. It takes away the ability to be objective and that is the reason why it is a bad thing.
I know plenty of people who hate Germans, solely on what they heard they did and this includes people who were born now. I know people who hate all Americans and those who hate Jews or progress or pollution or anything that you can come up with.
It is the people who dislike or disagree with things that are able to do the changes. People that hate don't..
And that is why hate is a bad thing. So you are right in saying not having anything to hate is a good thing. However to be able to do that, you must remove the hate, not the object of your hate. Because then it will be replaced with something else to hate.
The result of the test STILL had little girls favoring dollies with bright colors, and boys favoring machines and soldier type toys, even when very carefully imposed gender neutrality parenting was in effect, even from very young ages. This is somewhat reinforced by more modern research into the physiological differences between male and female nervous systems.
Some background information that explains this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/dec/16/play Ona program I saw (probably BBC) they showed once what happened when they let a person play with a kid. Different people where told that the kid was male or female. What happend was that the adult was picking the toys to let the kid play with.
So conditioning of the gender specific toys is done by the adults. I and this is done from pre-birth on. Blue for boys. Pink for girls. And not only the parents will have influence on this. Grandma buying the toys for the kid will be an influence as well.
I personally do not think this is a bad thing. It worked for thousands (or 6.000 if you wish) of years, so why change? Just to be PC?
They will have looked at it from a financial point of view. Probably a wrong one, but still. How many people did not buy the game? X How many people did not pirate? Y
For them as long as Y is smaller then X they might think it is a win for them.
If rocks hitting your rear passenger window is a problem then this might not be for you. So how often does this has happened to you or anybody you know?
Slashdot Mirror
I agree with the first part. I utterly disagree with the second part.
The taskbar contains only one entry for programs (in general). I have made my own (with XFCE) and have them sore
ted by type of program.
I also do not need the rest of the taskbar. I do not close or minimize programs. I have multiple desktops. Some with one program full screen, some with several next to each other. The programs are there when I login. That is also the reason I dont want any icons on my desktop. I can't get to them anyway as there are programs running.
The police arrests more African Americans and more of them are convicted. These are known facts. The reasons behind it are interpreted different by different people and not a
There is no reason to have this data connected with their picture or even their name.
I would go further and say that the data of GUILTY people should also be theirs to control.
I understand that when you are doing time, you will loose some rights for the period that you are doing time. Putting things in public will enhance your punishment beyond that time and will make it harder for people to get their shit back together.
But then with private prisons, why would that be an issue?
Yeah,the only reason that things are hacked is because there are enough sold. Nothing is ever done because it is possible.
(Relax, it is called sarcasm.)
They could be used together in advertising: You get up to the average in speed with ISP-R-us.
Hey, it works for the Americans, so why should it not in other countries?
The machines are longer online, so they had more time of being infected. They will be less likely to have users who are tech savy and want to run the latest. As they are less tech savy, they will know less on how to protect themselves.
One alternative is not to get those sales or do those buys. That is what I do.
I know, radical thinking.
To have remote access and that is the easiest way to do it. A leased line would be better.
The reason to have it remotely is the same reason why access to some banks is done off premises. If there is a hostile situation, you still have control of those doors.
The National Bank in Antwerp has a two-door entry. The second door only opens when the first door is closed. The person to control the door is not on site. So if he sees that I want to enter and he does not want me to, he can't be physically be forced to do so.
I also assume that there is not one person who controls that door and there will be protocols as what to do in what situation.
getting access to the person onsite might be possible. Offsite is a whole different layer.
Locks can be picked. Keys can be duplicated or stolen . Guards can be bribed to do so. To use them you need to be on the premises
In some situations not a real nice option.
Electronic should give a logfile of who did what and when. I can add several layers of security into it. e.g. Level one guard can't open XYZ between 20:00 and 06:00 and 10:00 and 15:00.
Spending more then it is bringing in? Sounds very American to me. Living the dream on credit.
If it werenâ(TM)t for them you would be speaking German now. (Yes, I am aware of the Muhlenberg Vote)
My last CRT was 1600x1200, My first LCD was 1920x1200. Now I buy 1920x1080 because of the price.
I would love to buy the 2560x1600, but at this moment I just can't afford it.
1920x1200 is around 500EUR. 1920x1080 is around 200EUR. So for the same price I can have 2 monitors and still have money left.
2560x1600 is around 1200EUR.
So if you think that the resolution is half, then I think that half does not mean what you think it means.1
In the US they do not need one. They have direct access to the towers already. In other countries they already have this.
Remember the specifics that Bin Laden did not use cell phones? The reason this was mentioned was because if he had, they would have been faster in finding him. And how would they have done that? By using what they already have.
This all from the standard 'news' places, so basically a reading of the press releases.
So not only do I think they have it, I know they have it and they told us so.
You start with hating and that is a bad thing.
There is always Apple, Google, your government, your little sister, your parents, your neighbors.
There are a lot of people and companies you can hate.
Hate is an emotional thing, not a rational one. It takes away the ability to be objective and that is the reason why it is a bad thing.
I know plenty of people who hate Germans, solely on what they heard they did and this includes people who were born now. I know people who hate all Americans and those who hate Jews or progress or pollution or anything that you can come up with.
It is the people who dislike or disagree with things that are able to do the changes. People that hate don't..
And that is why hate is a bad thing. So you are right in saying not having anything to hate is a good thing. However to be able to do that, you must remove the hate, not the object of your hate. Because then it will be replaced with something else to hate.
(.)(.)
Some words to be able to post
Some background information that explains this.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/dec/16/play
Ona program I saw (probably BBC) they showed once what happened when they let a person play with a kid. Different people where told that the kid was male or female. What happend was that the adult was picking the toys to let the kid play with.
So conditioning of the gender specific toys is done by the adults. I and this is done from pre-birth on. Blue for boys. Pink for girls. And not only the parents will have influence on this. Grandma buying the toys for the kid will be an influence as well.
I personally do not think this is a bad thing. It worked for thousands (or 6.000 if you wish) of years, so why change? Just to be PC?
I am not a MAC user! ;-)
I have the conclusion of yet another study:
Studies cause cancer in rats.
Not only the price difference. Also the times I actually want to listen to high quality music.
Most of the times music is just there in the background.
And the quality I have now is the same as I had 30 years ago for a MUCH lower price.
They will have looked at it from a financial point of view. Probably a wrong one, but still.
How many people did not buy the game? X
How many people did not pirate? Y
For them as long as Y is smaller then X they might think it is a win for them.
So you are saying that people who have larger sinuses will move to hot climates to live there?
This is still /. SO instead of all the bad ideas for some social reason, why not look at the technical issues.
The distance measured does not change while the car is moving.
If rocks hitting your rear passenger window is a problem then this might not be for you. So how often does this has happened to you or anybody you know?
I would be worried by people STEALING my window.
I can't point you to an alternative. Yet I rather NOT do any transactions then using Paypal. If this means that I miss out on a lot, so be it.
Unfortunately the majority of people do not care about anything and are afraid to take a real stance.