I like neither and am happily using Windowmaker despite the fact that people say it isn't a windowsmanager/deskmananager/whatever. It nicely shows what I need in the place that I need it.
Almost all the things that people see as an advantage in GNOME or KDE are things that I do not want. Luckily there is a choice. I use KDE programs and GNOME programs and others as well. My distro lets me select if I want one, the other, XFCE or with a bit more clicking all or none or something else altogether.
So to me it is easy. Windowmaker to put the programs where they need to be and then any GUI program
The majority of the 'fellow artists' play covers. Even most of the real 'artists' do not play their own songs. We are talking copyrights, so that is the importand part. Do not infringe on copyrights by copying songs. Real musiscians make their own music and see that they can keep their fans close. So close, no matter how far couldn't be much more from the heart.Forever trusting who we are and nothing else matters. Never opened myself this way,Life is ours, we live it our way.All these words I don't just say and nothing else matters. Trust I seek and I find in you. Every day for us something new. Open mind for a different view and nothing else matters. Never cared for what they do. Never cared for what they know but I know.
So close, no matter how far couldn't be much more from the heart. Forever trusting who we are and nothing else matters. Never cared for what they do Never cared for what they know but I know.
Never opened myself this way. Life is ours, we live it our way All these words I don't just say. Trust I seek and I find in you.Every day for us, something new. Open mind for a different view and nothing else matters
never cared for what they say never cared for games they play never cared for what they do never cared for what they know and I know
So close, no matter how far Couldn't be much more from the heart Forever trusting who we are No, nothing else matters
The Pirate Bay is in the business of spreading.torrent files. Some like to do that via VPN, so that is what they provide. Others would like to do it via Facebook, so that is what they provide. They also do it via a website.
Why would they NOT spread torrents via means that the people desire. You want and they can bring it, why not? Serious, why not? The content they deliver is legal as far as they are concerned.
I am sure facebook enables you to put pictures on their as well. I am sure you could even put copyrighted pictures on it. So why did that not cause an outcry?
Can remember the reference, but it was a recent article.
Let us look at this. You wrote Can where it should have been Can't so you are not in your 60s. (Vocabulary and such). You don't know where it was from, so you are not in your 35s. Hence you must be in your 20s.
What if I decide that I played the game enough and I want to give or sell it to somebody else? Must I give them my email account as well? Or what if I decide to give it to by kid/brother/wife/dog so he can start using it on his/her/its PC?
And what if I buy a new PC after I changed providers, so I don't have my old email address anymore?
It manages my rights digitally, so it is just a different kind of Digital Rights Management. Perhaps they have forgotten what DRM stand for?
I'm constantly surprised by these frequent accounts of computers which take forever and a day to start up. It's not that I disbelieve them, but what exactly are these programs doing which takes such an incredible amount of time before they become useful?
My desktop needs to be downloaded as it is not on my machine, but kept remotely IN ANOTHER COUNTRY. OK, that is Europe so for Americans that would mean distance wise in another state. And we DO have a small server room which could do the task easily.
There are some other basic errors in the configuration as well. To get 100% logged in, I need to log in several times in several systems. LDAP? Whats that?
There are many other things that could be done to streamline the log in process. They are now working on a process of turning the PC off automagically and on again, so that PCs don't run at night. The fact that PCs will be turned on even if the employer is on a 3 week holiday is irrelevant.
The majority of the machines only does web, telnet to an AS400 and printing. Yet still they insist on running Windows. If they REALLY wanted to save money, they would install Linux on them. That is several thousand machines right there.
Shutting down should not be something that you need to wait for. Closing the programs can be done in about a minute and then you do 'shutdown' and leave. Wether that takes 10 minutes or an hour should be irrelevant.
Starting up is another story. It takes me about 15-20 minutes before I am completely started. First it takes ten to just start up my PC including the autostart of some programs including Citrix. Citrix itself takes at least another 10 minutes and there I have to manually start the programs I need for the day, as I am unable to launch the automagically.
Yet they want me to turn of my PC each day. if starting up would take a standard 5 minutes, I have no problem in coming in earlier. If it takes 20 minutes THEY will be paying for it.
So I just turn off my monitor and let my PC running. Well my main PC. My secondary PC that I often need directly when business starts takes 30-45 minutes to start. That means if they turn it off and I need to change a setting, a complete department will be without work for 45 minutes.
Yes, I do understand that this is a technical issue and it could easily be solved. I am not the person to do that.
First the RIAA should not be able to retrieve the addresses directly from the provider. Privacy and such. Second the provider does not know what is legal and what is not. IANAL defence and such. So the RIAA can only directly ask for removal after a court order. And I mean first an official request and only later if the person repeats it, an official lawsuit.
What the RIAA can do is send a letter to the provider. That provider can then be so nice as to say that they have received this letter and if the person does something that is not legal to please stop doing this as it is against their AUP.
That is where it stops. All the rest should be going through the courts where the courts must make a serious difference between people who just share and people who make money of it.
But then that would require the RIAA to think and comprehend.
They don't have advertising for users in other countries, so they need to pay.
Not completely true. There is income and expenditure. As long as your income is higher then your expenses, things are OK.
On one side you have the expenses to your provider. On the other side you have the income of advertisement.
To make the difference bigger in their advantage they can do two things. See that the first is lower or see that the second is higher. They selected to do the first.
By doing this by country, they also made the possibility to do the second much harder to achieve.
In Belgium the income from cameras is given to the cities and must be used to increase traffic safety. If they do not do that, they don't get the money. There are cities who do have a right on a big amount and decide not to use it.
As far as I know nothing goes to whomever installs the camera's, except the cost of installing them.
the official idea is to have no income from them. Many of them don't have any film and often not even a camera in them. You just don't know which ones as they are changed from time to time.
I would believe if there would be proof of tampering with the lights, it would mean no tickets would need to be payed and heads would role.
Unfortunatly they do not do this with parking tickets which they have outsiourced and caused a lot of trouble due to the fact that an external company needs to know your address to be able to send you the ticket. This is a breach in the privacy laws.
The reason they are able to even ask an external company to do so it that they do not say it is a ticket, but rather something like a 'lease of parking space' which costs you e.g. 25EUR for 4 hours. When you pay at the meter you get a reduction. Should be outlawed I think.
Slashdot is ideal for the Streisant effect. What he might hope for is that many others will copy the data and even if he decides not to defend it, the data will be somewhere else.
Slashdot Mirror
Thanks for this. I will see that I can update the Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol
I hate this day when all people who are never funny try to be on a specific day. The pranks seldom reach the level of the average 8 year old.
If you have a great prank then do it. Do not wait for a specific date. If you think "wouldn't it be funny if ..." the answer is always no.
Oh well, at least it keeps me at work one day of the year as none of the /. stories are of any interest.
The reason you shared copyrighted material is irrelevant. You are not allowed to do that.
That said, they should have given you a proper warning that they received a claim and then wait for the court order IF you would not take it down.
No results found for "Chris Rock quote You're supposed to take care of your kids".
http://tinyurl.com/cxj84j
I like neither and am happily using Windowmaker despite the fact that people say it isn't a windowsmanager/deskmananager/whatever. It nicely shows what I need in the place that I need it.
Almost all the things that people see as an advantage in GNOME or KDE are things that I do not want. Luckily there is a choice. I use KDE programs and GNOME programs and others as well. My distro lets me select if I want one, the other, XFCE or with a bit more clicking all or none or something else altogether.
So to me it is easy. Windowmaker to put the programs where they need to be and then any GUI program
The majority of the 'fellow artists' play covers. Even most of the real 'artists' do not play their own songs. We are talking copyrights, so that is the importand part. Do not infringe on copyrights by copying songs.
Real musiscians make their own music and see that they can keep their fans close.
So close, no matter how far couldn't be much more from the heart.Forever trusting who we are and nothing else matters.
Never opened myself this way,Life is ours, we live it our way.All these words I don't just say and nothing else matters.
Trust I seek and I find in you. Every day for us something new. Open mind for a different view and nothing else matters.
Never cared for what they do. Never cared for what they know but I know.
So close, no matter how far couldn't be much more from the heart. Forever trusting who we are and nothing else matters.
Never cared for what they do Never cared for what they know but I know.
Never opened myself this way. Life is ours, we live it our way All these words I don't just say.
Trust I seek and I find in you.Every day for us, something new. Open mind for a different view and nothing else matters
never cared for what they say
never cared for games they play
never cared for what they do
never cared for what they know
and I know
So close, no matter how far
Couldn't be much more from the heart
Forever trusting who we are
No, nothing else matters
The Pirate Bay is in the business of spreading .torrent files. Some like to do that via VPN, so that is what they provide. Others would like to do it via Facebook, so that is what they provide. They also do it via a website.
Why would they NOT spread torrents via means that the people desire. You want and they can bring it, why not? Serious, why not? The content they deliver is legal as far as they are concerned.
I am sure facebook enables you to put pictures on their as well. I am sure you could even put copyrighted pictures on it. So why did that not cause an outcry?
I don't think he missed anything.
You make it sound as if it is a bad thing that the kid hits its head. It isn't. Making mistakes is an essential part of learning.
The difference between kids and adults it that kids are not afraid to make mistakes; adults generally are. This is not good or bad. It just is.
Let us look at this. You wrote Can where it should have been Can't so you are not in your 60s. (Vocabulary and such).
You don't know where it was from, so you are not in your 35s.
Hence you must be in your 20s.
What if I decide that I played the game enough and I want to give or sell it to somebody else? Must I give them my email account as well? Or what if I decide to give it to by kid/brother/wife/dog so he can start using it on his/her/its PC?
And what if I buy a new PC after I changed providers, so I don't have my old email address anymore?
It manages my rights digitally, so it is just a different kind of Digital Rights Management. Perhaps they have forgotten what DRM stand for?
waht button/?
It is not that they use LDAP wrong. It is that they don't use it at all.
My desktop needs to be downloaded as it is not on my machine, but kept remotely IN ANOTHER COUNTRY. OK, that is Europe so for Americans that would mean distance wise in another state. And we DO have a small server room which could do the task easily.
There are some other basic errors in the configuration as well. To get 100% logged in, I need to log in several times in several systems. LDAP? Whats that?
There are many other things that could be done to streamline the log in process. They are now working on a process of turning the PC off automagically and on again, so that PCs don't run at night. The fact that PCs will be turned on even if the employer is on a 3 week holiday is irrelevant.
The majority of the machines only does web, telnet to an AS400 and printing. Yet still they insist on running Windows. If they REALLY wanted to save money, they would install Linux on them. That is several thousand machines right there.
reminds me of the joke "Seal walks into a club."
Also what is it with these Peta campaigns? If I wear fur, they will keep showing naked ladies? Sounds counterproductive to me.
Shutting down should not be something that you need to wait for. Closing the programs can be done in about a minute and then you do 'shutdown' and leave. Wether that takes 10 minutes or an hour should be irrelevant.
Starting up is another story. It takes me about 15-20 minutes before I am completely started. First it takes ten to just start up my PC including the autostart of some programs including Citrix. Citrix itself takes at least another 10 minutes and there I have to manually start the programs I need for the day, as I am unable to launch the automagically.
Yet they want me to turn of my PC each day. if starting up would take a standard 5 minutes, I have no problem in coming in earlier. If it takes 20 minutes THEY will be paying for it.
So I just turn off my monitor and let my PC running. Well my main PC. My secondary PC that I often need directly when business starts takes 30-45 minutes to start. That means if they turn it off and I need to change a setting, a complete department will be without work for 45 minutes.
Yes, I do understand that this is a technical issue and it could easily be solved. I am not the person to do that.
Technical paper from google? The answer on how they do it is right here: http://mail.google.com/mail/help/paper/more.html
If they need much more, I have some AOL disks laying around that they can use.
In Soviet America sites block you.
(I am glad I can't moderate myself, as I would have no idea wether this is troll, funny or insightfull. Oh well. I have way too much karma anyway.)
Knowing the humor that Linus has, it could be himself.
First the RIAA should not be able to retrieve the addresses directly from the provider. Privacy and such.
Second the provider does not know what is legal and what is not. IANAL defence and such.
So the RIAA can only directly ask for removal after a court order. And I mean first an official request and only later if the person repeats it, an official lawsuit.
What the RIAA can do is send a letter to the provider. That provider can then be so nice as to say that they have received this letter and if the person does something that is not legal to please stop doing this as it is against their AUP.
That is where it stops. All the rest should be going through the courts where the courts must make a serious difference between people who just share and people who make money of it.
But then that would require the RIAA to think and comprehend.
Not completely true. There is income and expenditure.
As long as your income is higher then your expenses, things are OK.
On one side you have the expenses to your provider.
On the other side you have the income of advertisement.
To make the difference bigger in their advantage they can do two things. See that the first is lower or see that the second is higher. They selected to do the first.
By doing this by country, they also made the possibility to do the second much harder to achieve.
And if you don't know what music is out there, you can go to last.fm to, oh wait ...
In Belgium the income from cameras is given to the cities and must be used to increase traffic safety. If they do not do that, they don't get the money. There are cities who do have a right on a big amount and decide not to use it.
As far as I know nothing goes to whomever installs the camera's, except the cost of installing them.
the official idea is to have no income from them. Many of them don't have any film and often not even a camera in them. You just don't know which ones as they are changed from time to time.
I would believe if there would be proof of tampering with the lights, it would mean no tickets would need to be payed and heads would role.
Unfortunatly they do not do this with parking tickets which they have outsiourced and caused a lot of trouble due to the fact that an external company needs to know your address to be able to send you the ticket. This is a breach in the privacy laws.
The reason they are able to even ask an external company to do so it that they do not say it is a ticket, but rather something like a 'lease of parking space' which costs you e.g. 25EUR for 4 hours. When you pay at the meter you get a reduction. Should be outlawed I think.
Slashdot is ideal for the Streisant effect. What he might hope for is that many others will copy the data and even if he decides not to defend it, the data will be somewhere else.