Slashdot Mirror


Gmail Adds 5 Second Send Rule

theatrecade was one of a few folks to note that Google Labs has added the five-second rule to email. Once upon a time this rule only applied to delicious foodstuffs dropped on the floor, but at long last you can change your mind on that email to your boss or ex. We shall see peace in our lifetimes.

281 comments

  1. This may be the by Theoboley · · Score: 1

    Best thing ever, Or you could type up that nasty email in notepad, and keep it forever to review when you feel like giving the ultimate F*ck you to you boss or whoever.

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    1. Re:This may be the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only this guy had this new feature. Then again, maybe not.

    2. Re:This may be the by Slumdog · · Score: 1

      If only this guy had this new feature. Then again, maybe not.

      he did mention "deep regret", a feeling hard to shake off in 5 seconds. Anger however, is another issue.

    3. Re:This may be the by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Now, if only Slashdot had that feature... Imagine having the option of deleting (or editing) a post for some 10-15 seconds

      Bah, silly me... Slashdot still doesn't support accented characters!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:This may be the by novakyu · · Score: 1

      You mean like Digg?

      14. How can I delete a comment I made?

      You can delete your comment within the 5-minute editing window after your comment was initially posted to the site. Click 'edit comment' and then click on the 'delete' link in the bottom right corner of the comment edit window.

      Slashdot has gotten worse these years, but at least it's better than Digg—it doesn't crash my Konqueror every other story with its Javascripts.

  2. That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This sounds inherently stupid. How many people send an e-mail, just to think: "oh no!" 2 - 4 seconds later.

    1. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suffer from decision anxiety you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:That makes no sense by telchine · · Score: 5, Funny

      I used to work for a company where The Managing Director frequently used to send (usually offensive) emails to the wrong people by accident. His usual error was to insult someone behind their back and accidentally include them in the cc field!

      Whenever this happened, he used to come hurtling down the stairs and rip out the Ethernet cable from the mail server in an attempt to stop the mail going out!

      At first I thought he was trying to outrun the electron charge as it traversed through the network cabling, but it turns out that at some point in the past, someone had reconfigured the mail server to delay all mail by 30 seconds, just so he had time to rip out the Ethernet cable in an emergency!

    3. Re:That makes no sense by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It happens more often than you think. I've had plenty of times when I've clicked send and almost instantaneously realized I had a mistake in the email. This will save me from having to immediately reply to my own email to make that correction, thus looking like a fool (I have plenty of other ways to make myself look like a fool, thank you very much).

      Now, if they could just add a feature that held any emails sent after 2am for 12 hours, aka the "sober up first" rule, thus preventing me from waking up after a bender thinking, "oh crap, did I really send that email confessing my true feelings to that girl I had a crush on in high school but hadn't talked to in 15 years?", life would be just great.

    4. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you sure?

    5. Re:That makes no sense by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whenever this happened, he used to come hurtling down the stairs and rip out the Ethernet cable from the mail server in an attempt to stop the mail going out!

      At first I thought he was trying to outrun the electron charge as it traversed through the network cabling, but it turns out that at some point in the past, someone had reconfigured the mail server to delay all mail by 30 seconds, just so he had time to rip out the Ethernet cable in an emergency!

      It occurs to me that if you laid the Ethernet cable for the mail server across those stairs you could allow him to accomplish his goal of preventing the mail from going out while providing endless amounts of humor for the rest of the office ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:That makes no sense by Hordeking · · Score: 2, Funny

      This sounds inherently stupid. How many people send an e-mail, just to think: "oh no!" 2 - 4 seconds later.

      A lot. I've had this happen. It happens no /. to.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    7. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean Mail Goggles?

    8. Re:That makes no sense by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      I get that.. And I remember a lot more errors in posts before the mandatory /. Preview button

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    9. Re:That makes no sense by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      did I really send that email confessing my true feelings to that girl I had a crush on in high school but hadn't talked to in 15 years?"

      Yes, you did. Now cut it out before I get a restraining order ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:That makes no sense by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Now, if they could just add a feature that held any emails sent after 2am for 12 hours, aka the "sober up first" rule, thus preventing me from waking up after a bender thinking, "oh crap, did I really send that email confessing my true feelings to that girl I had a crush on in high school but hadn't talked to in 15 years?", life would be just great.

      I thought Slashdot already had an article on this feature. It's called Mail Goggles. It won't stop you from sending the email, but it may slow you down.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    11. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This sounds inherently stupid. How many people send an e-mail, just to think: "oh no!" 2 - 4 seconds later.

      You have fallen victim to marketing hype.

      What this "feature" does is place your sendmail into a pending outbound que, which has limited size. Thus, its primary effect is to restrict your ability to spam/flood email out of the gmail servers.

      The 'undo send' option is just for show.

    12. Re:That makes no sense by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought Slashdot already had an article on this feature. It's called Mail Goggles. It won't stop you from sending the email, but it may slow you down.

      Unfortunately, I have a Masters Degree in Drunken Calculus, so that feature won't help me :(

    13. Re:That makes no sense by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I think their Gmail Goggles option that makes you do maths before sending an Email is a better idea as not only does it make sure you are compos mentis but also it's slightly educational (or at least keeps the grey matter on it's toes)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    14. Re:That makes no sense by discord5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That reminds me of a company I used to work for. A woman there, usually very kind and agreeable, was fed up with one of her contacts feeding her a lot of excuses why he wasn't able to make a deadline for the 3rd time. She thought she forwarded a nice e-mail to her manager containing some very choice words expressing her opinion that matter.

      Oh how quickly that send button was smashed without carefully verifying who was in the To field, only to discover that instead of forward she had pressed reply to all. When the deed was done and the mailserver had delivered her incredibly inflammatory experiment in vocabulary she stood at my desk nearly in tears asking me if I could stop her mail from reaching its destination.

      Alas, it had reached its destination, and there was nothing to do but push the "retract message" button in Outlook, which is about as useful as the mail that usually precedes it.

      Surprisingly though, that person never missed a deadline again.

    15. Re:That makes no sense by digitalunity · · Score: 3, Funny

      My old mail server was setup to queue mail from 9 PM to 8 AM. This was to prevent me from emailing after drinking at the bar.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    16. Re:That makes no sense by Malevolyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      A lot. I've had this happen. It happens no /. to.

      Like the times when one typos a two letter word.

      --
      Your ad here.
    17. Re:That makes no sense by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      Mail Goggles tries to prevent drunken emailing. This feature delays mail from sending for five seconds.

      --
      Your ad here.
    18. Re:That makes no sense by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is no such condition as "decision anxiety".

      You must choose either Cognitive dissonance OR Multipotentiality

    19. Re:That makes no sense by 222 · · Score: 1

      In my experience, you're better off confessing. Even if it never amounts to anything, who wants to keep something like that bottled up inside?

      It sounds like you need to drink more than you need an improved email system :- P

    20. Re:That makes no sense by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      Measure twice, cut once. Seriously now, don't send stuff out you're not prepared to send! Maybe instead of a 5 second send rule they should just add an annoying "Are you SURE you want to send this message?" verification box. 5 seconds isn't enough to doublecheck a message... they should maybe let you queue it up for 5 minutes which would be more useful.

    21. Re:That makes no sense by Tiger4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We use Outlook/Exchange. It had a message recall button, but the function wasn't enabled. Which meant about once a week you could see a message with a followup THAT ASKED THE READER if the previous message could be recalled. Even if you said yes (after reading the mistaken message of course) the bad message did not disappear.

      This worked great a flag for screwed up mail to be read first. Thanks Microsoft!

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    22. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to install some sort of breathalyzer interlock device on my computer. Over 0.10, it won't send. A lower threshold would be used for emails to my ex-wife and boss.

    23. Re:That makes no sense by jebrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Drunken Calculus...wasn't that a Jackie Chan movie?

    24. Re:That makes no sense by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      If it were mandatory, that may be the case... but as it's optional, it wouldn't really be so effective at what you're suggesting.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    25. Re:That makes no sense by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Now, if they could just add a feature that held any emails sent after 2am for 12 hours, aka the "sober up first" rule, thus preventing me from waking up after a bender thinking, "oh crap, did I really send that email confessing my true feelings to that girl I had a crush on in high school but hadn't talked to in 15 years?", life would be just great.

      Just don't turn the PC on when you get home at 3am. Once I worked that one out, I had much better mornings after -- mostly because I'd not spent an hour (or more) messing about on the web after returning home late, and was asleep by 3.15 rather than 4.45.

    26. Re:That makes no sense by loutr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many people send an e-mail, just to think: "oh no!" 2 - 4 seconds later.

      Sometimes when I want to type an "A" I end up hitting TAB (french keyboard). If I'm at the end of a word, and I'm not paying attention to what's on screen, I'll hit space while the focus is on the "Send" button, and the email will be sent.

    27. Re:That makes no sense by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

      waht button/?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    28. Re:That makes no sense by sorak · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a company where The Managing Director frequently used to send (usually offensive) emails to the wrong people by accident. His usual error was to insult someone behind their back and accidentally include them in the cc field!

      Whenever this happened, he used to come hurtling down the stairs and rip out the Ethernet cable from the mail server in an attempt to stop the mail going out!

      At first I thought he was trying to outrun the electron charge as it traversed through the network cabling, but it turns out that at some point in the past, someone had reconfigured the mail server to delay all mail by 30 seconds, just so he had time to rip out the Ethernet cable in an emergency!

      So, what part of Dilbert's company did you work in? How incompetent was this managing director?

    29. Re:That makes no sense by bwhaley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I primarily use Thunderbird for work email. There is an option to confirm before sending (much in the manner of Vista's UAC "Are you sure?" windows) that most people disable. I leave it enabled and find myself saying "no, I'm not sure" at least once per week.

      --
      "I either want less corruption, or more chance
      to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    30. Re:That makes no sense by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      A lot. I've had this happen. It happens no /. to.

      Like the times when one typos a two letter word.

      It took 13 minutes to notice that? The speeling Nazis are getting slower and slower these days...

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    31. Re:That makes no sense by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the grammar Nazis are using single-bit parity, because there are actually two mistakes and noone noticed that.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    32. Re:That makes no sense by mstroeck · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, turn on? I stopped turning off my home computers around the time CD-ROM drives became popular.

    33. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such condition as "decision anxiety".

      You must choose either Cognitive dissonance OR Multipotentiality

      I DON'T have to CHOOSE anything!!

    34. Re:That makes no sense by TurboNed · · Score: 1

      *pointedly ignores "noone."*

    35. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the other just isn't funny...

    36. Re:That makes no sense by Locklin · · Score: 4, Funny

      How many times did you come running into work in your boxers with a major hangover at 7:59am screaming UNPLUG THE MAIL SERVER! UNPLUG THE MAIL SERVER!?

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    37. Re:That makes no sense by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      How many times have you hit "Submit" on Slashdot, and immediately spotted some typo?

    38. Re:That makes no sense by Thornburg · · Score: 1

      Now, if they could just add a feature that held any emails sent after 2am for 12 hours, aka the "sober up first" rule, thus preventing me from waking up after a bender thinking, "oh crap, did I really send that email confessing my true feelings to that girl I had a crush on in high school but hadn't talked to in 15 years?", life would be just great.

      I thought Slashdot already had an article on this feature. It's called Mail Goggles. It won't stop you from sending the email, but it may slow you down.

      I missed that one... this is a very interesting idea, because not only would it slow you down if you are in some way (chemically, perhaps?) impaired, but it would also help if you are overly emotional, as doing math will activate other side of your brain, and you might be able to make a more rational decision or observation.

    39. Re:That makes no sense by edittard · · Score: 1

      My personal blind spot is forgetting to attach the attachments.

      If I do remember to attach the attachments, then it's odds on that I won't be able to resist making one last change. So I'll detach it, edit it, and forget to re-attach it again.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    40. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps you could stop making a habit of voluntarily reducing your judgment to that of an 8-year-old. Seriously, why is that behavior considered acceptable?!

    41. Re:That makes no sense by MrMarket · · Score: 1

      This sounds inherently stupid. How many people send an e-mail, just to think: "oh no!" 2 - 4 seconds later.

      *Sheepishly raises hand* Those darned reply and reply all buttons are too close together and graphically and semantically. Someone needs to come up with a term for "reply all" that does not have the word: "reply" in it.

      I'm also have an itchy trigger finger -- often hitting send/submit hot keys before finishing the messa

    42. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you still have made a choice!

    43. Re:That makes no sense by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That's a great story. It sounds like that manager had more problems than an itchy "send" finger. I suspect he could benefit from some anger management training.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    44. Re:That makes no sense by ClosedEyesSeeing · · Score: 1

      Could possibly have Aboulia.

    45. Re:That makes no sense by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Google labs has that covered too. They try to detect if you mention any attachments in the mail but don't have anything attached.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    46. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "oh crap, did I really send that email confessing my true feelings to that girl I had a crush on in high school but hadn't talked to in 15 years?"

      I did this. We are getting married in July.

    47. Re:That makes no sense by Arslan+ibn+Da'ud · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, I have a Masters Degree in Drunken Calculus, so that feature won't help me :(

      Yes. As long as you know not to mix drinking and deriving.

      <ducks>

      --

      Practice Kind Randomness and Beautiful Acts of Nonsense.

    48. Re:That makes no sense by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Or pancreatic cancer.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    49. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go green, shitbird.

    50. Re:That makes no sense by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "Noony".

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    51. Re:That makes no sense by dzfoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Outbound qué?

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    52. Re:That makes no sense by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      I always everything before sneding.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    53. Re:That makes no sense by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      You mean you've never clicked send, only to realize a tenth of a second later that you forgot to attach that file you're supposed to send, the same file that's the entire purpose of the e-mail?

      Lucky.

    54. Re:That makes no sense by Shikaku · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're going in so many tangents we may as well be a derivative.

    55. Re:That makes no sense by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1, Informative

      I like my solution better - I don't drink alcohol at all.

    56. Re:That makes no sense by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I may be feeding the troll here, but cold booting a computer can, for some machines, use more power than leaving it in a power-saving sleep mode that wakes up when you shake the mouse. So... in that case, leaving the computer on is going green :P

    57. Re:That makes no sense by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      > I like my solution better - I don't drink alcohol at all.

      Same here.

      To continue on-topic, I did once attempt to send an email to a friend explaining to her that she was the Girl of My Dreams, etc, etc. Luckily or not, my modem that night failed to connect to the upstream UUCP connection (this was in 1989 or 1990) and the email didn't get sent. When I noticed this the next morning, I chickened out and did away with the unsent message. Looking back, it probably would have been for the better if it had actually gotten sent. Sigh. :-(

    58. Re:That makes no sense by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Happens to me all the time. Usually just after I've hit 'submit' on the preview.

      For some reason I find myself entirely incapable of spotting typos in previews of my comments.

    59. Re:That makes no sense by celardore · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a time when a colleague and I in the same department had handed in our notice, he was off work that afternoon, and I was stuck with the manager. She kept going on about this, that, the other etc and telling me how to live my life basically. I was so annoyed, I thought I'd drop my mate an email describing the situation. I intended to send it to his gmail, but the autocomplete tricked me - I sent it to his work email. I realised immediately after I pressed send, so this feature could have been useful then. The manager was monitering his email as was the policy when someone was out of the office. Her face dropped, and I could tell it had upset her. I was just lucky that a) I was leaving soon anyway, and b) not said anything overly offensive. :)

    60. Re:That makes no sense by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I've made a special effort to not learn the hotkeys for 'send' and 'submit' in e-mail programs and forums. Saves a lot of trouble.

    61. Re:That makes no sense by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I have witnessed similar incidents where it's an internal email and there's a chance of getting it off the server before it's collected, but no email incident has ever been as funny to me as an old fashioned letter a director once sent from a place I worked. Nothing special about it except that he missed the 'o' out of County Hall.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    62. Re:That makes no sense by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      I use the "are you sure you want to delete this file?" dialogue box in a similar way. If I actually want to delete a file, then I've got into the habit of pressing delete and then return pretty much in one keystroke, and it means if I accidentally hit delete, the file doesn't go.

      Downside is if the computer's running really slowly, the return can be picked up before the dialogue box opens, so it opens the file I'm trying to delete. Also, I need to stop pressing ctrl+alt+left to switch desktop, then pressing backspace to delete some text without letting go of ctrl and alt first. >.

    63. Re:That makes no sense by One+Brave+Prune · · Score: 0

      Summed up very nicely.

    64. Re:That makes no sense by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      They kinda' do. Well, its not quite a 12 hour delay, but it does make an attempt to make sure you know what you're doing:

      Google Drunk Goggles

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    65. Re:That makes no sense by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      I just wish they had a feature that would keep me from being very redundant. . . . :)

      That's what I get for opening a slashdot discussion in a new tab hours ago and reading it now (thinking no one else had read/replied to it in the meantime!).

      **Hangs head in slashdot shame. . . .

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    66. Re:That makes no sense by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      No good, various inept GUI designers have given the average luser a hairtrigger "hit OK" response to dialog boxes--usually faster than they can read them.

      --
      $ make available
    67. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW a better slashname might be:
      An Ominous Cow Herd... makes more sense....

      Cheers

    68. Re:That makes no sense by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I never got the recall feature.

      "This user would like to recall this message". Usually seen after I had already read the message in general.

      And as you say - The recalled message goes nowhere.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    69. Re:That makes no sense by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alas, it had reached its destination, and there was nothing to do but push the "retract message" button in Outlook, which is about as useful as the mail that usually precedes it.

      The option to retract messages as implemented in Outlook isn't a bad idea, really, but I still hate it for the false impression it creates. I've seen it happen enough that some user becomes familiar with the feature and then comes under the impression that it actually allows them to rescind email messages at will, regardless of the circumstances. I've even had a couple users get angry with me-- as though I had the email server configured incorrectly-- because, after having sent the message over the Internet to some random person, the "Recall this message" feature didn't actually prevent the recipient from reading it.

    70. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That works only for people who can't do arithmetic while drunk. Curse my unique superpower!

    71. Re:That makes no sense by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      This sounds inherently stupid. How many people send an e-mail, just to think: "oh no!" 2 - 4 seconds later.

      Probably more than you imagine. But, yeah, I agree, nonetheless, that it's a stupid idea. Forgotten attachment detection? Lifesaver. This? Silly, and unlikely to help anyone. I suspect anyone who COULD use it will either: a) not know about such things anyway; or b) want to take back an email within five seconds so infrequently that it takes more than five seconds to remember it's available.

      Which makes me idly wonder what the real purpose could be, if not to really help people. Reduce load on servers somehow? 5-second filtering, kind of like the seconds of delay on so-called "live tv" used to prevent cursing etc.? Hmm.

    72. Re:That makes no sense by moreati · · Score: 1

      Really. This humour is so formulaic.

    73. Re:That makes no sense by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      No, it's the title of the next James Bond.

    74. Re:That makes no sense by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      There may be an infinitesimal amount of humour in there...

    75. Re:That makes no sense by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      I win. I always hibernate my machines. I even taught the designers at my achingly ethical workplace how to hibernate their macs (it's even less intuitive than in Vista).

    76. Re:That makes no sense by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      the "are you sure you want to delete this file?" dialogue box

      Boy, I hate that dialogue box. There's already a recyle bin. Why not add an extra "Are you sure you want me to show you the message asking if you really want to delete this?" dialogue, too?

    77. Re:That makes no sense by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      Just where it's meant to be.

    78. Re:That makes no sense by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      The recall feature in Novell Groupwise was a double edged sword. It actually worked silently, so if the user hadn't opened it already, they never knew it existed.

      Personally I thought it was a dangerous feature, but it did save a few staff members some embarrassment. Although the change to Exchange/Outlook returned that embarrassment, especially when she sent the entire Office (instead of just the receptionist with the account having a similar name as the distribution list) some quite raunchy pictures of some strapping lads. It wasn't easy explaining that the feature she had grown accustomed to no long worked as expected. Many tears followed!

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    79. Re:That makes no sense by Hucko · · Score: 1

      No, it should read back to you what you have written. I'm working at setting up my computer to do just that for everything according to XKCD's specifications.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    80. Re:That makes no sense by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha hehe I go a msg to this effect the other day, but I had no idea about what they are talking about. I'm not a Outlook user as I move around a fair bit and haven't been given a laptop. I just thought they were tossers.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    81. Re:That makes no sense by Hucko · · Score: 1

      include ...

      Is society really that destitute that the collective subjects incapable of remember/imagine a colloquial or synonym for words above and beyond 4 characters? Abysmal. Whats a 7 letter synonym for 'of'?

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    82. Re:That makes no sense by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      This is why I configure my mail client to hold my emails for about a minute, unless it has a specific flag on it. This also allows me to hit send, realise I wanted to add something else to the email and edit it before it goes out.

    83. Re:That makes no sense by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I don't sober up that quickly.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    84. Re:That makes no sense by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      So what if it upsets her, that's what she gets for snooping on other peoples mail.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    85. Re:That makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really that hard to use the "Drafts" folder?

    86. Re:That makes no sense by Camann · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is integral to keeping discrete thoughts to yourself. When you're at your limit, it can be hard to weigh multivariable issues from which social and professional problems could be the product.

      --
      I can't believe you don't know what a Hasemalphaginnojinglanaporphomism is.
  3. You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by sohmc · · Score: 4, Funny

    I understand the rationale on this but the hold time needs to be much longer...like 12 hours for it to be effective.

    Or it should be combined with the beer goggles add-on.

    Either way, this won't stop my ex-girlfriend from drunk-calling me...

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
    1. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by noundi · · Score: 5, Funny

      12 hours? That seems a bit rough. The whole point is to maintain the perks of emailing, such as speed.

      But you're right, this won't stop your ex-girlfriend from drunk-calling me either...

      --
      I am the lawn!
    2. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      This would still be handy, there's been plenty of occasions where I've fired off an e-mail and after the window closes I still have the after-image of the text fresh in my mind...and that's when I see the typo/missing attachment.

      I even send a correction less than a minute later, but when I hit send/receive and the message goes out, I simultaneously get an e-mail back pointing out my mistake.

    3. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mail Goggles" by Jon P is available in Google Labs features in GMail. Gives you math problems to solve of your chosen difficulty during your chosen schedule.

      If you mean beer goggles literally, images in the e-mails aren't shown unless you click the link to show images anyways.
      That would be an interesting idea though, to have some kind of image filter to superimpose a brown bag over the head in images.

      Even so, what does that have to do with your ex-gf calling you, wouldn't beer goggles make you more enticing in your pictures?
      The brown bag over your head wouldn't help either, making it seem as if you may have more than you actually have.

    4. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Right, I'm pretty sure that's what this feature is for -- correcting the mistakes you inevitably notice just as you hit Send. (Of course, a little discipline about doing a final proof-read would have nearly the same effect.)

      In particular if you hit Reply to All when you mean Reply, this is meant to let you recover; I don't guess any amount of proof-reading would help with that.

      I think TFS misses the point when it talks about "changing your mind" in that 5-second window. YMMV.

    5. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a GMail feature for this, "Mail Goggles":

      Google strives to make the world's information useful. Mail you send late night on the weekends may be useful but you may regret it the next morning. Solve some simple math problems and you're good to go. Otherwise, get a good night's sleep and try again in the morning. After enabling this feature, you can adjust the schedule in the "General" settings page.

    6. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by JustinKSU · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if you close the browser if the message still sends? In other words, is it a client-side wait, or a server-side wait for an AJAX cancel message?

    7. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it should be combined with the beer goggles add-on...

      http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-in-labs-stop-sending-mail-you-later.html

    8. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot of hype...the real time lag is more like 3.5 seconds if that !

    9. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you're right, this won't stop your ex-girlfriend from drunk-calling me either...

      I don't mind her drunk dialing you guys, but I sure wish she'd stop waking me up in the middle of the night to borrow my damm cell phone.

    10. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got burrrrrrned by noundi

    11. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Proofreading the recipient list would help with that ;)

    12. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by rpmayhem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Calls from an ex-girlfriend? You guys get calls from a girl? But we're on Slashdot. ...Oh, wait, I get it. It's a joke!

    13. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Google is that stupid, but there might be practical reasons for making it client side...?

      --
      $ make available
    14. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      if you hit Reply to All when you mean Reply

      I have the opposite problem. I am on a mailing list which is pretty smart about not sending duplicates. But on a fairly regular basis I forget to "reply all" and have to re-send the mail to the entire list, inevitably resulting in the first recipient complaining about getting two copies of my mail. (Damn, I thought this story was going to turn out to be more interesting. Maybe I ought not to send it.)

    15. Re:You don't get sober in 5 seconds! by SPJ911 · · Score: 1

      This is silly. The minute they make it idiot proof, someone else will come up with a better idiot. What ever happned to paying attention? I agree with the suggestion that you address the email LAST.

  4. My Idea by potpie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My idea for preventing the submission of blank e-mails or e-mails lacking that attachment you were going to remember:

    put the recipient address field below the message field

    would that be helpful for anyone besides me? y/n

    --
    Esoteric reference.
    1. Re:My Idea by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      what's a point? I never type in the email address, I always seem to do REPLY-TO

    2. Re:My Idea by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      That's not a terrible idea. There have been a number of times that I've sent an email with the body of text saying "here's the report you asked for" and forgot to attach it. which made me feel like an idiot.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    3. Re:My Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot!!

    4. Re:My Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, Slashdot doesn't have a five-second rule!

    5. Re:My Idea by dfm3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It could be handy for those times when you _accidentally_ hit the send button instead of some other UI button, as has happened to me before.

      Thunderbird for one places the address book button right next to the send button (at least on my system) and I've never bothered to change it. Same thing with the dropdown box that lets you choose which address you want to send your email from, which has caused me to send at least one blank email from my personal address to a colleague.

    6. Re:My Idea by Knuckles · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not a terrible idea. There have been a number of times that I've sent an email with the body of text saying "here's the report you asked for" and forgot to attach it. which made me feel like an idiot.

      Gnome's Evolution optionally warns you if your email contains words like "attachment" (it also seems to apply other heuristics), but no attached file exists. Works surprisingly well.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    7. Re:My Idea by growse · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a Gmail labs plugin that alerts you if you write the word 'attach' in the email and then don't attach anything. Useful.

      --
      There is nothing interesting going on at my blog
    8. Re:My Idea by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      KMail and gmail have missing attachment detectors.

    9. Re:My Idea by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      So does gmail,

      but it hasn't helped me a single time yet.

      as the GP's message is generally how mine would go.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    10. Re:My Idea by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      There's a Gmail labs plugin that alerts you if you write the word 'attach' in the email and then don't attach anything useful.

      Fixed that for me.

      Unrelated I know, but is anyone else currently experiencing problems with Gmail? I can't seem to send any mail.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:My Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Email clients have been doing that for many years, not just the abysmal Evo.

    12. Re:My Idea by xaxa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some mail clients (well, KMail) scans the message body for words like "attached". If it finds one, and there's no attachment, it pops up a warning like "Did you mean to add an attachment?". Excellent feature, it's just a shame it's so slow to use IMAP with GMail.

    13. Re:My Idea by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Email clients have been doing that for many years, not just the abysmal Evo.

      Yeah well, the GP's doesn't, so shoot me.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    14. Re:My Idea by MadKeithV · · Score: 1
      I read that as:

      There's a Gmail labs plugin that alerts you if you write the word 'attach' in the email and then don't attach anything useful.

      For a minute I was impressed. I mean, no more "Save the bonsai kittens!" forwards!

    15. Re:My Idea by Evildonald · · Score: 1

      Get off your bum and write the Greasemonkey script for it then!

    16. Re:My Idea by interested+pyro · · Score: 0

      google now has a lab that looks for words like "attachment" and stuff and reminds you! i recently modded a breathalyzer to freeze the screen for 2 hours if my BAC is too high!

    17. Re:My Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      You'd have to go a bit further to prevent the accidental sending of messages when using the Reply function.

    18. Re:My Idea by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      A great idea. And to fix the useless subject lines in Slashdot comments, the subject field should appear below the text body field.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    19. Re:My Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why the word "nottach" was coined. That way you can send another email that says: "I nottached the file, so I'm sending it now."

    20. Re:My Idea by f1vlad · · Score: 1

      I absolutely use exactly same thing you just described :) just move email address from TO: field to BODY:. Because there were few times I accidentally clicked "Send". As far as this 5 second thing, I wish in your prefs you could extend that time margin from 5 second to more.

      --
      o_O
    21. Re:My Idea by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      I know your hotkey would be different, but with Outlook, I press alt+s now to send emails, as the setup is similar.

      My blank email percentage has gone way down.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    22. Re:My Idea by dzfoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait five seconds.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    23. Re:My Idea by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      A couple of times a week, I've had email refuse to authenticate me. I use IMAP + ThunderBird, and it keeps asking for my password repeatedly. Usually it takes less than 5 minutes for things to go back to normal.

    24. Re:My Idea by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      IMAP works just fine on Gmail - at least, it does if you're on 15Mbps fiber like I am ;)

    25. Re:My Idea by xaxa · · Score: 1

      IMAP works just fine on Gmail - at least, it does if you're on 15Mbps fiber like I am ;)

      I have a decent connection, but unfortunately, KMail goes through all the IMAP folders in some strange order and takes a second to synchronise each one. Inbox is one of the last to sync. It's quicker to load Firefox.

    26. Re:My Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. I always fill in the recipient address last if I'm writing a long email, that way I don't accidentally send a half-written or incomplete email.

    27. Re:My Idea by noidentity · · Score: 1
      My solution:

      Fill the recipient field last

    28. Re:My Idea by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      So if you are prone to forgetting attachments, maybe you should make use of the feature and use different wording in your email.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    29. Re:My Idea by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Probably because solutions that involve thinking are not the best solution to thoughtlessness.

      You may as well say "don't be such a dumbass and remember to attach files", but here I am, as dumb an ass as ever, and the e-mails go without the attachment.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    30. Re:My Idea by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Dunno. Sometimes it is difficult to remember a certain thing, but remembering another thing is easy. It might just be that you easily forget to press the attachment button prior to sending, but that you can easily get used to not writing "here's the report", but "find the report attached" or something. Just a thought.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    31. Re:My Idea by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      It'd be nice if Microsuck would include this in their new version of office, or implement an update for the existing ones

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    32. Re:My Idea by bgarcia · · Score: 1

      I need a plugin that looks for the word "link" in an email that does not contain a link.

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    33. Re:My Idea by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      I tailor the message to the audience, so writing the message and then remembering I need to CC the Legal department & therefore should revise my entire message is going to be pretty annoying.

      1) decide audience
      2) craft message

  5. "One of the few" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "one of a few folks to note"

    You mean, along with everyone who read it on The Register last friday.

  6. 5 seconds isn't long enough by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some people can barely react in that time. Although I can appreciate that a pop-up should not last longer, would a settable delay of 1-10 minutes really kill the medium? Perhaps with a "Send now" option on pending emails for urgent communication.

    1. Re:5 seconds isn't long enough by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some people can barely react in that time

      Yeah, but most of the people who can't react in <5 seconds are on the roadways in Florida, not behind a computer screen ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:5 seconds isn't long enough by patro · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there is some technical limitation, so they set this 5 second limit.

      Storing the pending mail on the client side with Javascript would explain it. The mail can be delayed for 5 seconds safely there before sending. It's not likely anything bad happens in that particular 5 seconds.

      If the mail does get to the server side then it is not clear why they used only a 5 second delay which is far too short. It could be a killer feature with a delay of, say, 5 minutes.

    3. Re:5 seconds isn't long enough by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 1

      ...Perhaps with a "Send now" option on pending emails for urgent communication.

      Then many people would mechanically click "Send Now" before realizing they screwed up.

      --
      The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
    4. Re:5 seconds isn't long enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are behind computer screens in Florida as well. Just trust me on this one.

    5. Re:5 seconds isn't long enough by JCY2K · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. I just sent an email that it took me 20 seconds or more to realize had a small typo. I don't see why it would be all that difficult to let the user pick the delay...

    6. Re:5 seconds isn't long enough by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      It wouln't be in the compose view. You'd have to go in sent mail and it would be on each line of a pending email.

  7. Mail Goggles by modestgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They've also had a Mail Goggles feature for a while. It makes you do some simple math problem to determine if you're sober enough to send the email. This might be useful for those who drunk mail now instead of drunk dial. http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-in-labs-stop-sending-mail-you-later.html

    1. Re:Mail Goggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Goggles?

    2. Re:Mail Goggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They do nothing!

    3. Re:Mail Goggles by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      What if you're not bright enough to do the simple math problem?

    4. Re:Mail Goggles by theturtlemoves · · Score: 2

      Then you're not bright enough to send an email.

      --
      Empires grow and crumble, and the Turtle Moves. Gods come and go, and still the Turtle Moves. The Turtle Moves.
    5. Re:Mail Goggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. No more emails from ShieldW0lf the Dickhead.

    6. Re:Mail Goggles by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      What about those who are so bright they can do the problem drunk? It should have levels.

  8. Good Idea, but by olddotter · · Score: 1

    Thats a good idea, but is 5 seconds really long enough to go "DOH!"?

    1. Re:Good Idea, but by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      If we use that clip where Homer says "D'oh!" a lot of times, 5 seconds is enough for approximately 12 "D'oh!"'s.

    2. Re:Good Idea, but by Mushdot · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but it's certainly enough time to stop the mail and add another 'FUCK YOU' to the end.

  9. ooh baby... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

    a/s/l?

    I want you to tweak my nipples with a grapefruit spoon.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Ooh baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by Red Flayer (890720) on Thursday March 26, @09:33AM (#27341027) Journal

      by Red Flayer (890720) on Thursday March 26, @09:35AM (#27341071) Journal

      Sorry sis, you're in trouble regardless.

    2. Re:ooh baby... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I hope you realize that you are going to get a -1 troll or a +5 funny. There will be no middle ground with your comment ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Ooh baby... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Sorry sis, you're in trouble regardless.

      Sis? I'm a man, baby.

      And even if I was a girl, I'd actually be a 40-year-old man.

      FYI the 2 minute delays was the "slow down cowboy" period for posting a successive message.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Ooh baby... by discord5 · · Score: 1

      FYI the 2 minute delays was the "slow down cowboy" period for posting a successive message.

      For some reason "Slow down cowboy" were the exact words in my mind when I read the part of your initial message going:

      I want you to tweak my nipples with a grapefruit spoon.

    5. Re:Ooh baby... by British · · Score: 1

      FYI the 2 minute delays was the "slow down cowboy" period for posting a successive message.

      And it was easily the stupidest feature of the slashcode ever incorporated. For legit users(ie non-trolls) it punished fast readers & fast typists. I utterly despised that feature. It's like a reverse dead man switch(which dead man switches are all over the place on the web).

    6. Re:ooh baby... by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 1

      I hope you realize that you are going to get a -1 troll or a +5 funny. There will be no middle ground with your comment ;)

      Unless we use quantum mechanics. Then he could be both.

      He could as well end up with a +5 troll, but I'm uncertain about that.

      --
      The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
    7. Re:Ooh baby... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the plus side, it does prevent crapflooding, which is a big problem on some forums.

      And from some of the posters here, I think there would be unintentional as well as intentional crapfloods.

      I'll gladly put up with 'slow down cowboy' in lieu of crapfloods... it avoids inflation of mod points in order to deal with them.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:ooh baby... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      He could as well end up with a +5 troll, but I'm uncertain about that.

      AFAIK, that's no longer possible.

      It's been tried, but the + moderation will change the label from troll to whatever label is used for the + mod... and if (underrated) is used to mod the post up, the troll label disappears.

      Last time I saw a high net positive mod (+4 or +5) with a troll label was at least 4-5 years ago.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    9. Re:ooh baby... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Just a couple of days ago I tossed someone an 'Underrated' mod, when I thought he had been unfairly moderated Troll. The result was "2, Troll" - at least, I'm fairly sure that's what I saw. I could be wrong.

  10. Omega13 by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    {Galaxy Quest}
    (Paraphrased)
    "What's the Omega 13?"
    "Opinions vary. Some think it's a doomsday device. But I think it rolls back time."
    "What do you mean?"
    "13 seconds is enough time to fix one costly mistake"

    {/Galaxy Guest}

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    1. Re:Omega13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love that movie and this was the first thing I thought about as well. I would like to see the icon for the mail feature with big blue button with wings and a woooshing sound when activated.

  11. Ooh baby... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oops, wrong channel.

    Dammit. When is slashdot going to implement the five second rule?

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  12. 5 seconds is enough by pzs · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use Thunderbird, which has an "are you sure you want to send?" confirmation by default. Since I use the ctrl-return hot key to send, I usually just blast through this message so at one stage, I switched it off.

    However, I found that in the half second between pressing ctrl-return and return to confirm, my brain was actually doing some checking to make sure I should send that message.

    I sent a reply to a whole message board asking for more information about a job - not a disaster, but not what I had intended. I realised almost as soon as I had hit the button, but I'd switched off the confirmation by this point. I rapidly switched it back on. Since then, I've noticed quite a few occasions on which I've hit ctrl-return and then realised I should tweak my message in some way before I send it.

    In conclusion: 5 seconds may not seem like a lot, but it could make all the difference.

    1. Re:5 seconds is enough by legirons · · Score: 1

      Since I use the ctrl-return hot key to send...

      That being the one huge cause of accidental emails.

      Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Enter. Oops, didn't take your finger off ctrl early enough, and the email is sent!

  13. 5 seconds won't be enough by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Generally, if you are stupid enough to send a flaming email to your boss without a serious desire to quit that predates your immediate rage, 5 seconds won't be enough. For every boss that is so bad they'd make a saint froth at the mouth like someone with Tourrette's, there are 20 cases where the employee who does that is just being an immature douchebag. For those people, 5 seconds won't be anywhere near enough time to come to the realization that they just shot their employment in the back of the head, and personally, I say good riddance in this economy. My wife works for a real fiend, and even she is still glad that she has her job.

    1. Re:5 seconds won't be enough by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are other reasons why you'd want to recall a message sent to your boss.

      Say, you forgot to attach the required document. Or you realized you made a typo in dollar amount. Or you forgot to copy someone important on the message (and because of CYA or whatever, your boss needs to see that you cc:ed the person).

      At least once a month I send an email I wish I could recall, because I would have liked to have made a small change... and instead I end up sending a followup email, which is just unwieldy and annoying.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:5 seconds won't be enough by thisissilly · · Score: 1

      Rather than an email "recall" or "delete" command, I think an "amend" function could be useful. For instance, if an email was properly signed with the right key, it could amend/update a previously sent (similarly signed) email, while maintaining a revision history.

      Need to make a small change (adding a forgotten attachment, for instance): no problem. Need to make a big change (e.g., removing your 2 am drunken rant), and manage to send it before the recipient has read the original? Better hope the recipient doesn't click on the "previous versions" button.

    3. Re:5 seconds won't be enough by azgard · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would also welcome a longer interval, from 15 minutes up to an hour. It could also be good if you could, after another smaller interval, just force waiting e-mail to send immediately.

      It would be good to have a head cooled off sometimes.

    4. Re:5 seconds won't be enough by bbgeek · · Score: 1

      I configure postfix to queue all mail, and only send it with "sendmail -q". I run a script that checks the queue, and once all mail in the queue has been there for at least 5 minutes, it sends it along. Of course, I can do it by hand, too.

      I end up cancelling an email about once a day, which allows me to go add that missing attachment, fix the CC list, etc. etc.

    5. Re:5 seconds won't be enough by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Thinking would be another great alternative.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  14. Biology... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    How long does it take an Adrenaline to come down on your system. Enough to stop the fight or flight instinct. That mean time should be the proper period plus some response time.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Biology... by jnetsurfer · · Score: 1

      RIght because we all have a flight or fight response to most email we send... (sarcasm). Actually the adrenaline would be triggered *after* you realize you just made a mistake.

  15. Great by CSHARP123 · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great feature. It has happened to me lots of time. Forget to add an attachment or forget to add an other statement or something and you remember about that as soon as you sent it This way it helps quite a lot of folks like me. But 5 seconds is a shot time I hope they up it to 10 seconds to give slow responders like me to turn around and stop the damn send.

    1. Re:Great by IAmGarethAdams · · Score: 2, Informative

      The setting in question can be changed to 0, 5 or 10 seconds, but defaults to 5 if you turn the feature on. See your Labs area in GMail for more details

  16. I could use that by v1 · · Score: 1

    I know more than once I've fired off an email (or made a post in say...a forum somewhere, ahem...) and twitched a second later saying NO thats NOT what I meant to do!

    For example, 30 seconds ago I accidentally modded a comment here Offtopic when I intended to mod it Insightful. So here I am doing the next best thing to Undo... posting to undo my errant moderation. Guess slashdot could use some Undo too eh? Too bad there's no similar trick for email.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:I could use that by jfim · · Score: 1

      If you use Outlook and Exchange, there is a message recall feature. Of course, for those who don't, we just get an annoying two line email saying "Foo would like to recall message blah". Even funnier is that in French, the word they use for recall can mean either of recall or highlight/remind.

      It took me a while to understand why some senders always wanted to remind me of some silly email.

  17. Remember AOL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    On AOL, you could un-send mail after any amount of time as long as:

    the recipient was also an eol user.
    they hadn't yet opened the email.

    Saved my butt more than a few times.

    1. Re:Remember AOL? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      Emphasis mine:

      On AOL, you could un-send mail after any amount of time as long as:

      the recipient was also an eol user.

      EOL user? God, I wish end-of-life was the status of AOL users back then... the internet would be a much happoer place by now.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Remember AOL? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yup, AOL did this.
      And Google is copying AOL, and being heralded as innovating, etc.

  18. This isn't new? by CHatRPI · · Score: 1

    Didn't AOL have a feature like this a while back? Not that I ever used AOL *cough*

  19. Oops... sorry, you fail. by nwanua · · Score: 2, Informative

    A popup. How lame, lazy, and dangerous: (I realize it's an optional setting)

    - First, it's NOT undo... this is a delay tactic. A real undo would have the system hold the mail in your "outbox" for a user customizable time, from where you can snatch it, but only when you need to.

    - Second, you now have to wait, EVERY time you send an email. Because "email regret" happens only now and then, it's likely to get turned off. Back to square one.

    - Third, if there ever was a "Send now" button, you'll get so customized to pressing it, that you're again back to square one.

    I appreciate the effort, but this gets an F. Please, head back to the labs, make something really sensible (i.e. not lame), and try again.

  20. RFC by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    why not promote that Outlook-"Please dear mailserver, delete my last email"-Follow-Up (don't know how it's called there) to a real RFC?

    --
    bickerdyke
    1. Re:RFC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there is a way to make that work on unsigned (as in criptographically signed) messages, since a third party can easily intercept an unencripted message and then send a "Please dear mailserver, delete my last email" pray to the webserver.

      With signed messages could work.

      (posting anon. since I moderated)

    2. Re:RFC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not promote that Outlook-"Please dear mailserver, delete my last email"-Follow-Up (don't know how it's called there) to a real RFC?

      Just like the news cancel feature that is disabled in many, if not most, news servers because of improper usage?

  21. Someone predicted this by Slashidiot · · Score: 1

    A spanish blog I read blogged about this... three years ago. And it is freakish that he posted a screenshot of how this should look like, and Google have implemented this in that exact way.

    --
    Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
  22. All of this has happened before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is in no way a new idea, it is just that they refinished it and expanded the capability.

    While AOL may be reviled as the internet-on-training-wheels, they did have some interesting ideas. In this case, the "unsend" mail feature that allowed the user to pull-back email that hadn't been read yet. Granted, it only worked within their system and it helped that they owned the mailboxes and servers, but the concept is far from new.

    Google has done nothing more that take the concept and add a delay. Nothing innovative here, move along.

  23. I could use it by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    The other day I felt so generous that I sent an email telling someone that I would pay 2,000, 000, million billion US dollars to anyone who would help me get my dead father's money out of Nigeria.

    A second later I thought "you know I could just keep the money myself", but it was too late. Keep looking, you might be the lucky one getting my email.

    1. Re:I could use it by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      2,000, 000, million billion US dollars

      That's, what, 200 â these days?

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    2. Re:I could use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Will you also send pictures of you with a loaf of bread on your head, a pineapple in your rectum and a cucumber in your mouth? Just in case the recipient happens to be a pastor and requires that you perform the investiture ceremony to join the church before the transaction can be made...

    3. Re:I could use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      `200 Ã'
      gj dickface

    4. Re:I could use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, I admire you! Despite sending out an offer that you now regret, I infer from your final comment that you would still honour my response should it arrive in my inbox.

      Normally I would discard such requests but since you sound so upstanding I think could trust you. I'm keeping an eye out for your message...

    5. Re:I could use it by yanyan · · Score: 1

      I'll be sure to keep on the lookout for that email. Meanwhile, are you the one who keeps sending me email about my small penis?

  24. Try changing habits instead by Mascot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another solution is to always sit back and read through the entire message (and recipient list) before hitting send.

    I mean that quite literally. Remove hands from keyboard, sit back and just read.

    That habit has saved me a lot of trouble in the past.

    1. Re:Try changing habits instead by pzs · · Score: 1

      I suppose so. Still, like many people I send a lot of Emails. I have to weigh the time it takes me to be quite this careful against the damage that the one-bad-one-in-a-hundred does to me.

    2. Re:Try changing habits instead by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      In addition, I'd also say that if you're the type to write impulsive hatemail flames (like I did last night in my journal ;), you could try something I used to do: the 1 hour rule.

      Go ahead, type your message, but do not click send, instead save it as a draft. After 1 hour (hopefully you've calmed down by then ;), you decide if you still want to send it as is or not. If you do, go into the drafts folder and send it, otherwise delete or tweak the message.

      Unfortunately, Slashdot does not have a drafts folder. :(

    3. Re:Try changing habits instead by Mascot · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with applying a little common sense and doing it when it matters.

      At the one end of the scale there's intra-project chatter. At the other end there's customer correspondence that might come back to bite you later during contracts negotiation.

      Usually I find a read-through to be well worth the time though. It takes hardly any time at all for short mails, and the longer ones tend to warrant the time expenditure.

    4. Re:Try changing habits instead by Mascot · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. I've left mail unsent overnight before. On other occasions I've had someone else read through it before sending.

    5. Re:Try changing habits instead by harry666t · · Score: 1

      I was about to write that that's what I always do, but then I reflected and decided not to.

    6. Re:Try changing habits instead by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      "I have to weigh the time it takes me to be quite this careful against the damage that the one-bad-one-in-a-hundred does to me."

      Seriously? The few seconds it takes you to sit back and read through your email one more time is going to cost what? a few minutes at most? Are that many of your emails that time sensitive? I realize there are pushy customers who want everything yesterday. We all have those. But in my experience, it's those customers especially who warrant a few extra seconds of "wrap-my-head-around-wtf-i'm-saying" time.

    7. Re:Try changing habits instead by iworm · · Score: 1

      Indeed take it a step further. Whenever I write a slightly "contentious" email, I park it in Drafts. However damn brilliant I think it is, I force a pause while I go have a coffee/walk/piss/whatever.

      Then I come back, read it again, probably tweak it, and *then* send.

    8. Re:Try changing habits instead by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      A few seconds to re-read my email? Clearly, you've never read one of my emails. Reading one is like embarking on an Antarctic voyage - you better be prepared for a considerable time investment. Each email is crafted with loving care; each word and phrase is selected carefully and softly caressed onto the virtual page. It takes much more than a few seconds to re-read and edit one of my emails. :)

      That extra 5 seconds on top of any editing might just save someone's life some day, or at least a penguin's life.

    9. Re:Try changing habits instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hard to get in the habit of reading editable fields - they're for typing into

      so...

          HOW ABOUT AN E-MAIL PREVIEW BUTTON?

      additional bonus: you would see it from the point of view of your recipient, who won't be looking at it as an edit-box either... if they're using gmail, you won't have to guess what your to: and subject: fields will look like above your body field, you can see it for yourself...

    10. Re:Try changing habits instead by AlpineR · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is that I do reread my messages before sending/posting them and 80% of the time I catch an error. Then if I go to lunch and come back I catch another error. And if I leave it overnight and come back I catch yet another error. The good news is I am asymptotically approaching perfection.

    11. Re:Try changing habits instead by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      It takes much more than a few seconds to re-read and edit one of my emails. :)

      So a five second delay would be useful because.....

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    12. Re:Try changing habits instead by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Your comment was actually the point of my post (I was being a bit sarcastic). The 5 second delay isn't very useful. It would be useful on occasion, but in general the best thing to do is edit your emails.

      I do like the 5 second email delay though.

  25. CNN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really guys? You're linking to the CNN article instead of the official gmail blog's article? What, Al Jazeera didn't have an article up for this, too?

    http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/new-in-labs-undo-send.html

  26. May be a confirmation box is good enough by sam0737 · · Score: 1

    most of the times the ctrl-enter confirmation box of thunderbird saves me some typo or whatsoever minor mistake.

  27. Amazing by Dan+East · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's good to see Slashdot reporting on technological achievements of this magnitude. I can't wait to hear the next GUI tweak for some other application. Perhaps the repositioning of a button, or a change in the font size of some GUI element will be next.

    Truly advancements of this sort can only be achieved by a think tank of the best minds Google could recruit from top universities.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Amazing by BobReturns · · Score: 1

      I hear there're some new firefox themes out this week ;)

    2. Re:Amazing by Evildonald · · Score: 1

      and what have YOU done lately, hotshot?

  28. One Minute Rule by SterlingSylver · · Score: 2, Informative

    I personally added a "Delay Sending by One Minute" rule into Outlook at work. It saves me a lot of embarassment when I hit send without adding my attachments (happens a lot). I wouldn't mind a similar gmail holding pen.

  29. In WoW terms by torrija · · Score: 1

    so 5 seconds after you send an email you start regenerating mana.

    --
    I hate signatures
  30. I hate you all by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    I hate you all and I think you all will never appreciate VI in half as deep a level as I do. Yeah? Go to Windows hell for all I care. Yeah?

    No, wait, I didn't really mean that. Yeah? I wanted to say how much I love you guys. Yeah? And how much I think you connect with me on a VI level. Yeah?

    Dear /., could we have a 5 seconds rule here as well? Yeah? Also, could all my foes and freaks get a 5000 second rule? Pleeeeeaaaase? Yeah?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  31. Labs required! by pha95mlb · · Score: 1

    You have to enable this feature in GMail Labs before it works.

    1. Re:Labs required! by bdenton42 · · Score: 1

      And for some reason Labs isn't even an option on my screen. It's one of those weird things that shows up sometimes and doesn't most of the time.

      They should just enable it by default. Even better they (and all other mail servers on the planet) should enforce a 5 second rule to slow down spammers. Maybe even 30 seconds.

  32. Real purpose is to retract an early "Send" hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To those who are claiming that 5 seconds is not enough to regret hitting Send, that's not the purpose of the function. It's aimed at the times in which you are in the middle of writing the message and accidentally hit the Send (maybe while trying to hit Save).

  33. I started using that immediately by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    I am a big Google Labs user. I think they have a few really excellent little toys. Then there are others that are rubbish, but I like to focus on the good things in life :)

    Anyhow, the 5 second delay is just perfect for me. I am an emotional person, I admit. I have often sent an e-mail and regretted it the next second. 5 seconds sounds about right for me to change my mind.

    Another labs I use is the "notify of missing attachment". That's pure gold - basically, if I mention attachments in my e-mail, but don't provide it/them, I am notified when I try to send the e-mail.

    Now, if they only added the option "reply or resend with full text (NO quoted text hiding)", that would be wonderful.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  34. confirmation is better by hey · · Score: 1

    It would be better if it showed you the mail you can just written and asked you to confirm.
    Like Slashdot comments. Perhaps a delay so people can't automatically click on confirm.

  35. Easy to avoid by PMBjornerud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not a terrible idea. There have been a number of times that I've sent an email with the body of text saying "here's the report you asked for" and forgot to attach it. which made me feel like an idiot.

    You can avoid that from happening ever again. And it's very simple:

    Before you write any sentence mentioning an attachment, attach the file first.

    Same goes for important mail. When writing a job application, finish the email first, then add the recipient address last.

    --
    I lost my sig.
    1. Re:Easy to avoid by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Good advice. The technique I use when executing interactive commands that could have Really Bad Repercussions if I've made a mistake, is to put an extra character at the start of the command, so even if I accidentally hit Enter without doublechecking what I've typed, the command won't execute. After I'm sure I'm not about to cause the end of the world, I go back and remove the extra character and execute the command.

  36. For GUI stories, please by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    refer to the Apple section, you can find it on the left.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:For GUI stories, please by dfm3 · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it that the next version of Apple Mail, known as Apple Mail Wheel, will have only one interface button. Click once to reply, twice to reply all, hold for one second to forward, hold twice for one second each to compose a new message, click once and hold to open the address book.

  37. It's the Whoops Button by qazwart · · Score: 1

    This is for those times when you accidentally hit the send button before you've finish

    1. Re:It's the Whoops Button by qazwart · · Score: 1

      Sorry... Hit send too soon.

      This is for those times when you accidentally hit the send button before you've finished your email. How many times you've gotten an email message that was incomplete. Then a few seconds later got another one that starts out "Whoops! I hit the send too soon."

  38. How I prevent 'email accidents' by irp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Whenever I replies to/writes a sensitive or important email, I clear the To/Cc fields, completely, and only add the addresses just before I'm sending. ... This, of course, should be after I've proofread it several times, and preferable waited a day :-)

    Works in all email clients!

    1. Re:How I prevent 'email accidents' by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah? And how does it prevent you from writing the wrong address in the "To" field?

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  39. Outlook already has this ... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    I always thought it was just because Outlook was slow, someone should have told me it was a feature.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  40. You don't have a small child. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    You must not have a small child. I get a lot of /sending before the sentence is done/ problems due to my daughter hitting the send button for me.

    Having small children requires a lot of quick responses to unexpected events. Yesterday, while I innocently sat coding, my daughter gave me a gooey handful of cat poop she found somewhere. After a quick exercise in emergency bathing my wife and I cleaned/searched the house and were unable to figure out where she managed to find this special gift at. The joys of parenthood.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:You don't have a small child. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it was cat poop?

      I know of one particular three-year-old who decided to use the heating duct in the floor as a toilet (after taking off the vent cover)...

    2. Re:You don't have a small child. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you can just put strychnine in her food and that will stop happening.

    3. Re:You don't have a small child. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      At one point I was at a summer program for gifted high school students.

      Despite this, somehow one of the students missed the dorm toilet by:
      1 stall door
      1 large bathroom
      1 bathroom door

      To this day the identity of said student is not known, only the identity of the student unfortunate enough to discover the incident barefoot.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:You don't have a small child. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you can just put strychnine in her food and that will stop happening.

      Yes, but the cat will still crap in that clandestine location.

  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  42. For the lazy in the crowd by coryking · · Score: 1

    Mind explaining this rule a bit? I'm sure I could figure it out, but it would be sweet to have it documented for the world.

  43. Depends on the email by coryking · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I always thought of "previews" and stuff as a cop-out way to avoid the trouble of implementing a 30-minute edit feature.

    In theory, I could preview the post I'm about to make, but in truth, I'll just blast right through it.

    Besides, previews and "reading the entire email before sending" doesn't catch the same kinds of errors as reading it after a minute or so. After you forget about writing it, your brain can spot mistakes easier.

    But yeah, for the super-ultra-important email? Read it once through. Anything else? Honestly they are going to skim the email just as quickly...nobody reads more than a few sentences of most emails anyway.

  44. Bingo! by coryking · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rule number one of electronic communication: never send any while angry. Always calm down first.

    1. Re:Bingo! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Rule number one of any communication: never send any while angry. Always calm down first.

      Generalized, still true.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Bingo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, or switch to non-electronic communication, like molotov cocktail.

    3. Re:Bingo! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Don't send email from the local pub.

      There is a reason I don't have a blackberry.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  45. More importantly, a feature for cell-phone texting by ACAx1985 · · Score: 1

    Google, develop something for my iPhone that makes me solve a series of differential equations before I'm allowed to send out a text message after 11PM.

    Please.

    Or maybe just.. "Hold your iPhone level for 60 seconds if you would like to send this message."

    That'd solve 95% of my relationship problems.

  46. The Real Purpose by BabyDuckHat · · Score: 1

    I suspect this feature has less to do with preventing embarrassing messages and more to do with making it more "expensive" to send spam.

    1. Re:The Real Purpose by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      I thought so too, but it appears to be optional. I would imagine that spammers will disable this feature.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  47. were assuming stupidity by nimbius · · Score: 1

    has a metered, five second latency before realization..if years of maintaining mailservers have taught me anything its that users will routinely do the strangest and most irresponsible things in an email and expect you to magic it better. is this actual innovation?? have they run out of things better to do?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  48. Seems like a job for Clippy! by realisticradical · · Score: 3, Funny

    You seem to be writing an inflammatory email. Should I help make sure it doesn't go to your boss?

    Or

    You seem to be writing a drunken email to your ex-girlfriend. Are you sure you want to do this?

    1. Re:Seems like a job for Clippy! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You seem to be writing a drunken email to your ex-girlfriend. Are you sure you want to do this?

      Would you like me to display a list of local escort services, it will be easier and cheaper.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Seems like a job for Clippy! by freya_bacchus · · Score: 1

      You seem to be writing to the government. Should I make it more offensive?

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity!
  49. Re:More importantly, a feature for cell-phone text by Thornburg · · Score: 1

    Google, develop something for my iPhone that makes me solve a series of differential equations before I'm allowed to send out a text message after 11PM.

    Please.

    Or maybe just.. "Hold your iPhone level for 60 seconds if you would like to send this message."

    That'd solve 95% of my relationship problems.

    You get so drunk you can't find a table, or even the floor?

  50. Custom times by Cyberfed · · Score: 0

    Not a bad idea,I like the idea of unsend too. Why not make the delay a user setting, that way you can configure your own time frame?

  51. Wow, that brings back memories by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I remember several years ago a call in the middle of the night. A manager had stayed late to write a crushing, inflammatory performance review and had accidentally sent it to the whole company.

    I mean that literally -- he sent it to every single person with an email account from the CEO to the janitors -- several thousand people. Bad naming choice for a key mail alias.

    This was back in the days when email was a lot more primitive, so we really did have a chance in hell of scrubbing all the mail servers before start of business day, but it took us most of the night. And I did get one or two night-owls say the next day "I thought I saw a really interesting email, but then it suddenly vanished".

    This particular manager got off easy -- I don't think we could have accomplished the scrub in this day and age. What I learned from this is to look my emails over once more before sending, including address fields and subject line. It takes only a few seconds and improves the quality of communication. Side note -- If only people would read what they just wrote before hitting "send"... If I'm writing something controversial, I finish the text and let it sit while I get a cup of coffee or perform some unrelated task. There's always time to press "send" later if I still feel that way.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Wow, that brings back memories by WAG24601G · · Score: 1

      Similar story:

      In college, the entire freshman class of several hundred was subscribed to an email list to which anybody could submit (whatever the original benefit was supposed to be, it quickly drowned in the blantant misuse).

      On one particularly horrific occasion, the Student Affairs office wrote a very detailed email to a student's parent about the student's repeated misconduct and likely consequences. Then they proceeded to accidentally send it to the freshman list. Five minutes later we all received a second email with profuse apologies, imploring us not to open the previous message. OOPS!

      --
      Everything is easy when you don't understand the problem.
  52. this is old by ca111a · · Score: 1

    Now, if they add a "send 5 seconds *before* I hit Send" rule, that will be a real innovation!

  53. the old days with sendmail by heroine · · Score: 1

    In the old days before before spanhaus, you could send mail with your own personal sendmail server. It delayed it 15 minutes so if U changed your mind you could kill sendmail & delete the queue. Of course Goog stock is worth a lot more than sendmail stock so yeah, the official first 5 second rule would be now.

    1. Re:the old days with sendmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the old days before before spanhaus, you could send mail with your own personal sendmail server.

      You still can--you just have to relay all mail through your ISP's mail server.

  54. Groupwise has had this forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Groupwise has had this feature for so long, I can't remember when they didn't have it.

    If the person hasn't read the email, you can pull it back out of their inbox.

    This feature has saved more people then you can possibly imagine.

  55. At least that would stop people who think that by CyberKnet · · Score: 5, Funny

    it is cool to start a thought in the subject field, and finish it in the body field.

    Good grief how I hate that. It can completely change the meaning of a post.

    --
    Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  56. How about configurable from 5 sec to 15 min? by danheretic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eudora and Thunderbird have had this for some time. Probably Outlook too, not like I touch that thing.

  57. Hmmm... by EspressoFreak · · Score: 1

    what happened to all the stuff we learned in school about proof reading?

    1. Re:Hmmm... by ndavis · · Score: 1

      what happened to all the stuff we learned in school about proof reading?

      Proof reading its easier to just not make missteaks.

  58. Re:Oops... sorry, you fail. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

    Why would you turn it off if you're the one that turned it on in the first place specifically to use it? This is, after all, an opt-in experimental feature that you have to deliberately enable.

  59. However did come up with that rule... by andi75 · · Score: 1

    "Once upon a time this rule only applied to delicious foodstuffs dropped on the floor..."

    Whoever did come up with that rule wasn't a parent.

    1. Re:However did come up with that rule... by ancientt · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Maybe not.

      I don't think I've ever been a germiphobe, but after having kids and seeing what they survived putting in their mouths, I'm a lot less worried about accidentally ingesting something. I still try to avoid the gross bits, and I try to avoid swapping germs with anyone who doesn't volunteer, but I put a lot less effort into generally avoiding them than I used to.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
  60. In the interest of full disclosure ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
    In the interest of full disclosure, allow me to fix this paragraph from the article so that it actually makes sense ...

    "Jon Perlow, a Gmail engineer, introduced the practical idea of "Mail Goggles" to help users, including himself, stop sending "mail you later regret." Perlow created the function last fall when he found himself sending messages to an ex-girlfriend -- late at night , drunk off his ass and stoned out of his mind -- asking to get back together."

    There ... that's better.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  61. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have pancreatic cancer, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:Oblig by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Sorry Mr. Jobs, I meant no offence, really! I love my iPod and will buy another one, I swear. Please don't hit me!

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  62. Re:More importantly, a feature for cell-phone text by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

    By 11PM?

  63. Too slooooooooow by fly1ngtux · · Score: 1

    This happened loooooooooooooooooong (one or two weeks) back. /. is seeing it now?

  64. Not enough time by tekshogun · · Score: 1

    Five seconds, clearly, is not enough