Or online. As I have no idea of the size of the IAIAO and he wants it to use for photo editing under Windows, I assume he needs something like http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop... Otherwise he could just use GIMP and ImageMagick under any Linux machine. I use a HP Chromebook that runs https://github.com/dnschneid/c... so I have both Linux an Chrome.
Crouton apparently stands for for ChRomium Os Universal chrooT envirONment...or something like that. Only two disadvantages I found: Not possible to ssh to it. Not possible to mount NFS.
Google already stated that the loss im performance was minimal. In fact they said negligible impact on performance followed by a YMMV. That means it is nowhere near the 5%. Remember that is is google who might have a bit more than 2000 servers worldwide.
So first measure how much impact it is. Could be that the typing you did was more expensive than the loss in performance over a year, Or perhaps 5% is way to low for your situation and it is more at 50%.
The problem is that the federal law would be even allowing LESS competition because reasons. Don't believe me? The F in FCC does not stand for Fuckin'.
Never knew that flooding the land was a way to get rid of the swamp.
On long flights I prefer window seats for the reason you said. On the short flights I prefer the aisle seat. Just a bit more place to stretch your legs. On longer seats you have more legroom than on short flights. When you fly say 2 hours, I will not be able to sleep anyway. And standing up is more a nice change than that it is a hinder.
In fact just booked a flight for two people and booked aisle seats at the emergency exit. That increased the price form 30EUR to 40EUR. Bilbao-Brussels with Brussels Airlines. 2 hour flight.
Well, he already told Putin some top secret details about spies and told the public that he was allowed to do so. So he confirmed that he did it. I doubt anything would be a real scandal.
He would just say "I fucking telegraph the fuck I like, now fuck off."
We are beyond people denying what they did to safe face. Even the NSA and CIA and FBI tell you they do what we think they are doing and don't care.
As long as there are no consequences, why lie? "Yes mommy, I took a cookie when you told me not to." If mommy doesn't do anything, I will take as many as I like.
The time that people trusted each other online is a very long time ago. Even before the Internet went seriously public, there where virusses that existed on floppies.
And there is no excuses to have no security for anything after 2000. But security costs time and thus money in development. Most people (including developers and programmers) have no real clue as to what security is. Most of the security is still build around blame-shifting. As long as they develop something secure, like changing the password every 10 minutes and they follow the current procedures, it is secure.
No thought goes into it if these things really mean security, just if they mean liability.
"Hey, somebody put an infected USB drive in the system. That is against company policy that we wrote, so the fact the system is now hacked is not our problem."
It is like trying to sell a car that can't handle the moose test. Do not blame the driver for not wanting to hit a moose. Do not blame the moose for standing on the road. Design a car that does not topple over with abrupt steering.
If you are into piracy, scat is not the misicform you should be looking for. Not even on their SFW part. (Yes, that exists. Look at the first few films. CornHub is like ponies on/.)
It is called lobying. Do they want to cut out the other middleman, the lobyists? Normally the public should be the middleman. Fun times for the few years they pretended that that actually worked.
And here I am moaning that I have to pay 5EUR extra for the train when I go to Brussels airport. There are still taxis and shuttles for those who want to. Amazing what you can get done when you look for whom you have/lack public transport.
3 December 2003 â" Three former senior figures in the Rwandan media were convicted today by the United Nations war crimes tribunal and sentenced to lengthy jail terms for inciting their compatriots to kill ethnic Tutsis during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
Three judges of the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), sitting in Arusha, Tanzania, announced the convictions and sentences for Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza and Hassan Ngeze in what has been dubbed âoethe media case.â
The three men were convicted of genocide, incitement to genocide, conspiracy, crimes against humanity, extermination and persecution. According to media reports, about 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were murdered in Rwanda between April and the middle of 1994.
The ICTR said the convictions were the first of their kind since the Allied Tribunal at Nuremberg at 1946 sentenced Nazi publisher Julius Streicher to death for his anti-semitic publication Der Stürmer.
In a broadcast on RTLM â" which became known to some Rwandans as âoeRadio Macheteâ â" in April 1994, Mr. Nahimana described a âoewar of media, words, newspapers and radio stationsâ to complement a war with bullets, according to the ICTR.
The presiding judge in the media case, Judge Navanethem Pillay, told Mr. Nahimana that he was fully aware of the power of radio to âoedisseminate hatred and violenceâ¦Without a firearm, machete or any physical weapon, you caused the death of thousands of innocent civilians.â
The judges also said Kangura targeted Tutsis for persecution by regularly stereotyping them as liars, thieves or killers, and depicting Tutsi women as femme fatales who could not be trusted. One Kangura publication labelled any Hutu man who married a Tutsi woman as a traitor.
In a statement released by the ICTR, the judges said they found that the three men âoeused the institutions they controlled and coordinated their efforts towards the common goal: the destruction of the Tutsi population.â They said their broadcasts and publications did not fall under the protection of the right to freedom of expression.
Obviously caution is needed. I am sure they understand the part where yelling fire in a theater is not always dangerous and might save lives and has nothing to do with free speech.
There is also a difference between telling that somebody is an idiot and telling that you should be killed, because they are an idiot.
Because people like to moan. When I am with friends we seldom talk about the fact how great our job is. No matter how great it is. We now talk how much better previous jobs where, eve though we moaned how terrible things where.
That said, people also do not understand the difference between private and public. Next to that they are forced to use their real name and ID on sites like Facebook and do the same with site like Google.
When I was 15 or so, long before the Intertubes, I already had discussions about privacy and the pros and cons of anonymity. Talking with a lot of Germans and a wall reminded me of what was possible.
Before I bought my first modem, I already understood therefore the reason to have nick on the Interwebs. I already understood that EVERYTHING I say online will be linked to me somehow, if people really want to. I understood that it would be there forever. Knowing people who selected the wrong side in WW2 made me aware that things do not go away and people will always take things out of context.
My dad was not allowed to join the Hitler Jugend and he was pissed at the time. Could have haunted him years later if he had. Makes you think as to what might be ok now can be very wrong in the future.
So the reason for doing it is a combination of not being correctly informed (If it is that many people, the problem is not the people), being conditioned to use your own name and human nature.
Because people buy and sell it. For them it is just another 4 letters. They do not care if they trade stock, porkbelly, camels, christmas trees or bitcoin. All they are interested in is enough trading. Or did you thing Wall Street (and others) are some altruic government entity?
In Europa they start working on making bank transfers faster. They worked on it in 20000, but then.... terrorism. The Americans needed to know my transfers, so the transfer needed to go past a database they could read.
As the banks are not the asking ones, nobody really cared. Technically it is pretty easy to do. We just need people willing to push the banks to do it by a specific day. E.g 1 year from now, so it will be done in 2.
They knew they were buying winning tickets and you say should know that they cannot do that? And how do you make a difference between those that knew and those that dit not?
What is interesting is that real chance would make it possible to happen, just like any other combination for all the tickets.
And if the taxpayer agrees with the profits, they should agree with the losses as well. So yess, they should honor the tickets. It is not the buyers fault they have shitty quality control.
I used to play on a macine and noticed that as long as I played for amounts below X I would win. Not my problem they had a shitty algorithm. Same goes here.
And frankly, weight and volume are an even uglier mess in customary.
And then there is the relation between them. 1L of water is 10cmx10cm and is 1KG (Yes, I know) Something different like salt water
The relation between these 3 measurements is easy in Metric. I also follow some YouTube woodworkers channels and often they curse on the metric system as well. Things that would be so easy in Metric become complicated and needs recalculation several time and they end up by just winging it a bit.
What amazes me is how long we are already fighting this. And once it is gone, we will never be able to get it back.
Here an article about it : https://www.dailykos.com/story... Not so much the content is interesting, but the date. December 26th, 2010. twothousand-fucking-ten. And even if it won't happen now and the next two precidency terms are Dems, the one after that will be Rep again and they will go for it again. They only need to succeed once. We can never fail.
So I am actually a bit happy to see those articles. It means there is still a bit of hope.
Slashdot Mirror
Or online. As I have no idea of the size of the IAIAO and he wants it to use for photo editing under Windows, I assume he needs something like http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop...
Otherwise he could just use GIMP and ImageMagick under any Linux machine. I use a HP Chromebook that runs https://github.com/dnschneid/c... so I have both Linux an Chrome.
Crouton apparently stands for for ChRomium Os Universal chrooT envirONment ...or something like that. Only two disadvantages I found: Not possible to ssh to it. Not possible to mount NFS.
It is just that with you it is never pressed and with her it always. is. Got it.
Google already stated that the loss im performance was minimal. In fact they said negligible impact on performance followed by a YMMV. That means it is nowhere near the 5%. Remember that is is google who might have a bit more than 2000 servers worldwide.
So first measure how much impact it is. Could be that the typing you did was more expensive than the loss in performance over a year, Or perhaps 5% is way to low for your situation and it is more at 50%.
The problem is that the federal law would be even allowing LESS competition because reasons. Don't believe me? The F in FCC does not stand for Fuckin'.
Never knew that flooding the land was a way to get rid of the swamp.
On long flights I prefer window seats for the reason you said. On the short flights I prefer the aisle seat. Just a bit more place to stretch your legs. On longer seats you have more legroom than on short flights.
When you fly say 2 hours, I will not be able to sleep anyway. And standing up is more a nice change than that it is a hinder.
In fact just booked a flight for two people and booked aisle seats at the emergency exit. That increased the price form 30EUR to 40EUR. Bilbao-Brussels with Brussels Airlines. 2 hour flight.
Well, he already told Putin some top secret details about spies and told the public that he was allowed to do so. So he confirmed that he did it.
I doubt anything would be a real scandal.
He would just say "I fucking telegraph the fuck I like, now fuck off."
We are beyond people denying what they did to safe face. Even the NSA and CIA and FBI tell you they do what we think they are doing and don't care.
As long as there are no consequences, why lie? "Yes mommy, I took a cookie when you told me not to." If mommy doesn't do anything, I will take as many as I like.
The time that people trusted each other online is a very long time ago. Even before the Internet went seriously public, there where virusses that existed on floppies.
And there is no excuses to have no security for anything after 2000. But security costs time and thus money in development. Most people (including developers and programmers) have no real clue as to what security is. Most of the security is still build around blame-shifting. As long as they develop something secure, like changing the password every 10 minutes and they follow the current procedures, it is secure.
No thought goes into it if these things really mean security, just if they mean liability.
"Hey, somebody put an infected USB drive in the system. That is against company policy that we wrote, so the fact the system is now hacked is not our problem."
It is like trying to sell a car that can't handle the moose test. Do not blame the driver for not wanting to hit a moose. Do not blame the moose for standing on the road. Design a car that does not topple over with abrupt steering.
I never had an interest, because I like privacy. Why should I give that up to a company?
If you are into piracy, scat is not the misicform you should be looking for. Not even on their SFW part. (Yes, that exists. Look at the first few films. CornHub is like ponies on/.)
It is called lobying. Do they want to cut out the other middleman, the lobyists?
Normally the public should be the middleman. Fun times for the few years they pretended that that actually worked.
Well, ...., uh, here it is.
Taxed pay for the war. War is bad. So not paying taxes reduces the war. So not paying taxes is good.
Bit of a stretch. Still better than the "Fuck you! I do not give a fuck!" that they are probably actually want to say.
And here I am moaning that I have to pay 5EUR extra for the train when I go to Brussels airport. There are still taxis and shuttles for those who want to.
Amazing what you can get done when you look for whom you have/lack public transport.
https://www.schwebebahn.de/ges... Monorail from more than 100 years ago. Still operates and more than 65.000 users per day.
More info about build and accidents on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and the German page has even more details.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
More than 100 years old. 65.000 per day https://www.schwebebahn.de/ges...
The UN disagrees http://www.un.org/apps/news/st...
The UN clearly thinks so : http://www.un.org/apps/news/st...
3 December 2003 â" Three former senior figures in the Rwandan media were convicted today by the United Nations war crimes tribunal and sentenced to lengthy jail terms for inciting their compatriots to kill ethnic Tutsis during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
Three judges of the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), sitting in Arusha, Tanzania, announced the convictions and sentences for Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza and Hassan Ngeze in what has been dubbed âoethe media case.â
The three men were convicted of genocide, incitement to genocide, conspiracy, crimes against humanity, extermination and persecution. According to media reports, about 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were murdered in Rwanda between April and the middle of 1994.
The ICTR said the convictions were the first of their kind since the Allied Tribunal at Nuremberg at 1946 sentenced Nazi publisher Julius Streicher to death for his anti-semitic publication Der Stürmer.
Mr. Nahimana, founder and ideologist of the Radio Télévision does Mille Coulines (RTLM), and Mr. Ngeze, chief editor of Kangura newspaper, were sentenced to life in prison. Mr. Barayagwiza, a high-ranking board member at RTLM and the founder of the Coalition for the Defence of Republic (CDR), a political party, received a 35-year jail term. He boycotted his trial.
In a broadcast on RTLM â" which became known to some Rwandans as âoeRadio Macheteâ â" in April 1994, Mr. Nahimana described a âoewar of media, words, newspapers and radio stationsâ to complement a war with bullets, according to the ICTR.
The presiding judge in the media case, Judge Navanethem Pillay, told Mr. Nahimana that he was fully aware of the power of radio to âoedisseminate hatred and violenceâ¦Without a firearm, machete or any physical weapon, you caused the death of thousands of innocent civilians.â
The judges also said Kangura targeted Tutsis for persecution by regularly stereotyping them as liars, thieves or killers, and depicting Tutsi women as femme fatales who could not be trusted. One Kangura publication labelled any Hutu man who married a Tutsi woman as a traitor.
In a statement released by the ICTR, the judges said they found that the three men âoeused the institutions they controlled and coordinated their efforts towards the common goal: the destruction of the Tutsi population.â They said their broadcasts and publications did not fall under the protection of the right to freedom of expression.
Obviously caution is needed. I am sure they understand the part where yelling fire in a theater is not always dangerous and might save lives and has nothing to do with free speech.
There is also a difference between telling that somebody is an idiot and telling that you should be killed, because they are an idiot.
Because people like to moan. When I am with friends we seldom talk about the fact how great our job is. No matter how great it is. We now talk how much better previous jobs where, eve though we moaned how terrible things where.
That said, people also do not understand the difference between private and public. Next to that they are forced to use their real name and ID on sites like Facebook and do the same with site like Google.
When I was 15 or so, long before the Intertubes, I already had discussions about privacy and the pros and cons of anonymity. Talking with a lot of Germans and a wall reminded me of what was possible.
Before I bought my first modem, I already understood therefore the reason to have nick on the Interwebs. I already understood that EVERYTHING I say online will be linked to me somehow, if people really want to. I understood that it would be there forever. Knowing people who selected the wrong side in WW2 made me aware that things do not go away and people will always take things out of context.
My dad was not allowed to join the Hitler Jugend and he was pissed at the time. Could have haunted him years later if he had. Makes you think as to what might be ok now can be very wrong in the future.
So the reason for doing it is a combination of not being correctly informed (If it is that many people, the problem is not the people), being conditioned to use your own name and human nature.
Because people buy and sell it. For them it is just another 4 letters. They do not care if they trade stock, porkbelly, camels, christmas trees or bitcoin. All they are interested in is enough trading.
Or did you thing Wall Street (and others) are some altruic government entity?
In Europa they start working on making bank transfers faster. They worked on it in 20000, but then .... terrorism.
The Americans needed to know my transfers, so the transfer needed to go past a database they could read.
As the banks are not the asking ones, nobody really cared. Technically it is pretty easy to do. We just need people willing to push the banks to do it by a specific day. E.g 1 year from now, so it will be done in 2.
11. Get of my lawn.
They knew they were buying winning tickets and you say should know that they cannot do that? And how do you make a difference between those that knew and those that dit not?
What is interesting is that real chance would make it possible to happen, just like any other combination for all the tickets.
And if the taxpayer agrees with the profits, they should agree with the losses as well. So yess, they should honor the tickets. It is not the buyers fault they have shitty quality control.
I used to play on a macine and noticed that as long as I played for amounts below X I would win. Not my problem they had a shitty algorithm.
Same goes here.
And then there is the relation between them.
1L of water is 10cmx10cm and is 1KG (Yes, I know)
Something different like salt water
The relation between these 3 measurements is easy in Metric. I also follow some YouTube woodworkers channels and often they curse on the metric system as well. Things that would be so easy in Metric become complicated and needs recalculation several time and they end up by just winging it a bit.
And then there are companies that use the common word Word. Word, yo!
What amazes me is how long we are already fighting this. And once it is gone, we will never be able to get it back.
Here an article about it : https://www.dailykos.com/story...
Not so much the content is interesting, but the date. December 26th, 2010. twothousand-fucking-ten. And even if it won't happen now and the next two precidency terms are Dems, the one after that will be Rep again and they will go for it again. They only need to succeed once. We can never fail.
So I am actually a bit happy to see those articles. It means there is still a bit of hope.