2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
...
b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License.
They don't have to give it to everyone, but they do have to license it to everyone.
For a song, this means basing the fingerprint on the music's acoustical properties, rather than on the ones and zeros that make up a given digital file.
I like the efficiency...you only need one fingerprint to recognize 90% of the RIAA's products.
When you copy something, and give it to someone else without the copyright holder's permission, that's copyright infringement. (and that isn't theft either.)
With a headsplitting roar, the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal charges towards you.
>put towel on head The Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal is completely bewildered. It is so dim it thinks that if you can't see it, it can't see you. You have a few seconds before it realises its mistake.
>carve my name into sandstone You chip away with the stone. It's not your best writing, what with your mounting sense of panic and a towel wrapped around your head. However, it suffices...
Just as the Beast is trying to work out where you've disappeared to, it suddenly sees your name freshly carved on its memorial of remembrance. Mystery solved. It realises it must have already eaten you in a fit of absent-mindedness. (Its mind is very very small and quite frequently absent.) It decides to give up the rest of its afternoon to the twin arts of digestion and contemplation. It settles down for a snooze.
Hold on there, large companies are MORE likely to try to get free time.
which is exactly why they shouldn't be allowed to.
The big company will try all sorts of things to get you to charge less, work for free, accept longer for payment, etc. Plus you go through 7 layers of management to get approval to be paid. And if you say "we have a contract that says..." they'll say "we have a lawyer who says..."
That's not a big company, that's an abusive company. If I provide a service and get paid in scams and legal threats, I'm never working for them again.
Telnet has always been safer as an exposed service, if for no other reason than its simplicity. SSH has a lot more code in it, maintains way too much control over the system, does complex internal processing on all data sent to it, has a nastier protocol...while telnet just sets up a virtual terminal and sends you on to system's login prompt.
Apparently the creators thought "secure" only has to mean "encrypted"; it obviously doesn't say anything about the program's design.
Slashdot Mirror
I care.
They don't have to give it to everyone, but they do have to license it to everyone.
Strangely enough, night time in Washington looks exactly like a color bar test signal.
Common misconception.
Dear God, look at that GUI. Jef Raskin is spinning in his grave.
So...it's identical to just looking at the cop?
Oh wait.
Creating pseudo-random numbers that hash to the same value != making any arbitrary document hash to the same value.
I like the efficiency...you only need one fingerprint to recognize 90% of the RIAA's products.
When you copy something, and give it to someone else without the copyright holder's permission, that's copyright infringement. (and that isn't theft either.)
Aha! But Google has two submit buttons!
which is exactly why they shouldn't be allowed to.
The big company will try all sorts of things to get you to charge less, work for free, accept longer for payment, etc. Plus you go through 7 layers of management to get approval to be paid. And if you say "we have a contract that says..." they'll say "we have a lawyer who says..."
That's not a big company, that's an abusive company. If I provide a service and get paid in scams and legal threats, I'm never working for them again.
No, it's more like putting a sign in your window that says "Slash your tires if you love Jesus."
Guilty until proven innocent, eh? I don't think so.
You can build planets? How much?
The best thing about a monolithic advertising group - only one address to filter. (*.googlesyndication.com)
As well they should. I'm certainly not going to trust a page that lets outsiders place [annoying] content into my "secure" session.
You'd have to talk to MPEG about that. And it's a superior format (except for, I presume, some licensing issues), so I'm not sure why they'd want to.
That hardly counts as moving the mount though.
Titan isn't in "the" world.
Telnet has always been safer as an exposed service, if for no other reason than its simplicity. SSH has a lot more code in it, maintains way too much control over the system, does complex internal processing on all data sent to it, has a nastier protocol...while telnet just sets up a virtual terminal and sends you on to system's login prompt. Apparently the creators thought "secure" only has to mean "encrypted"; it obviously doesn't say anything about the program's design.
I'd just unmount it, then update its fstab entry to the new location.
Elvis has left the planet.
OmniWeb is just as "integrated" as Safari is. (Unless you meant OmniWeb 4, which has serious problems supporting modern web pages.)