If you are ever detained by Federal Authorities you should acquiesce to any request for a search of your person or property, but you can make it conditional. For instance you could say, "you can search my property but only if your search through the front of my underpants lasts at least fifteen minutes and is done by that nice looking agent over there." IANAL.
I think that the first legal risk that the Microsoft Corporation should worry about is the risk of pursuing anti-competitive business practices. Their historic success at monopolizing personal computing software has not escaped anyone's attention and we know that it isn't all because of their stellar products.
It sounds like the expansion of the internet is making these search engines use alot more hardware and energy to make all of the content searchable. If only we could automate methods of removing some of the cruft from being included in the search domain then the whole process would be more efficient. I'm mostly referring to the seemingly endless amount of automatically generated content and just plain bizarre content that searches always turn up.
Regardless, the issue isn't interference with Avionics and communication, but the implications it would have on the cell network with one handset being able to reach (interfere with) hundreds of towers at one time.
I see. That makes sense. And also I didn't even think about the obvious point everyone has brought up about not wanting to be on the airplane with a bunch of yakity yacks.
I think that I read that most communication with air traffic control is done at very long wavelength, low frequencies because they have traditionally thought to propagate better than high frequency communications. And cell phones use microwave or shorter frequencies, I think. But maybe some devices in the airplane use high frequencies for short distance communications, but I doubt it.
Intel was unavailable for comment. AMD, however, claimed to be well aware of the problem and to be already designing processors capable of working beyond the limits of Einsteinian mathematics - with a negative temporal displacement facility built in.
I'd say that it's probably a joke. This seems a little goofy to me. IANAE or anyone else important, though.
actually that's how TeXMacs works and it's super fast to do it that way. But I couldn't pick up the macros as easily for OO's EE. It was fairly straightforward for TeXMacs.
Even though it's carcinogenic, I recommend asbestos. It's one of the best thermal insulators known and if you don't rip your walls open you'll never breath it in.
Microsoft Word on Mac with a super dual core intel has an irritating delay. I can type significantly faster than it can display. This is problematic because I work past errors because the don't display until I'm sometimes a few words down. I am guessing MS word is faster on its native Windows. But the point is, even in the 21st century here, typesetting programs are still slow. Who'd athunkit.
Slashdot Mirror
If you are ever detained by Federal Authorities you should acquiesce to any request for a search of your person or property, but you can make it conditional. For instance you could say, "you can search my property but only if your search through the front of my underpants lasts at least fifteen minutes and is done by that nice looking agent over there."
IANAL.
I'm not sure that I want to see seven foot tall wieners running around NASA.
I think that the first legal risk that the Microsoft Corporation should worry about is the risk of pursuing anti-competitive business practices. Their historic success at monopolizing personal computing software has not escaped anyone's attention and we know that it isn't all because of their stellar products.
It sounds like the expansion of the internet is making these search engines use alot more hardware and energy to make all of the content searchable. If only we could automate methods of removing some of the cruft from being included in the search domain then the whole process would be more efficient. I'm mostly referring to the seemingly endless amount of automatically generated content and just plain bizarre content that searches always turn up.
One of the things that it screams at people is
"How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?"
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/06/21 12258&from=rss There are other slashdot stories about this incident. I probably should have put the link in original post.
lol
err..
I think I could win against a bunch of 7 foot tall wieners at the poker table.
I think I could win against a punch of 7 foot tall wieners at the poker table.
I see. That makes sense. And also I didn't even think about the obvious point everyone has brought up about not wanting to be on the airplane with a bunch of yakity yacks.
I think that I read that most communication with air traffic control is done at very long wavelength, low frequencies because they have traditionally thought to propagate better than high frequency communications. And cell phones use microwave or shorter frequencies, I think. But maybe some devices in the airplane use high frequencies for short distance communications, but I doubt it.
I claim the patent on the use of a fork and a spoon. Now you're all stuck using sporks!
is that what you do after you see too much of Uhura in one episode?
I laughed, but I must admit that I don't actually get it.
So there is some truth to the story. I sorta thought that there might be, and some others musing here did also.
I'm too dumb to figure out if this is an April fools joke or not.
I think that it's a trap.
actually that's how TeXMacs works and it's super fast to do it that way. But I couldn't pick up the macros as easily for OO's EE. It was fairly straightforward for TeXMacs.
That is good information. If I payed for Office 2004 will I get a free upgrade to the Universal binary? Or will I have to buy Office again?
Even though it's carcinogenic, I recommend asbestos. It's one of the best thermal insulators known and if you don't rip your walls open you'll never breath it in.
Microsoft Word on Mac with a super dual core intel has an irritating delay. I can type significantly faster than it can display. This is problematic because I work past errors because the don't display until I'm sometimes a few words down. I am guessing MS word is faster on its native Windows. But the point is, even in the 21st century here, typesetting programs are still slow. Who'd athunkit.