Any kid will happily goto Disneyland, it's an easy way to hide you're "victim". Tell her as long as she shuts up and says she's your daughter/sister/whatever and doesn't tell anyone what you're doing to her, no one would be any wiser. It's also a great place to bribe kids and keep them happy.. can't blame Disney for making a place kids want to goto..
I'm not trying to defend kiddy fiddlers here but..
Bein attracted to children ISN'T a problem. The girl next door to me is 14 and VERY hot (I'm in the UK she's legal in two years). I'll freely admit (on Slashdot), I've looked at her chest as she walked past, didn't get caught and got a little giggle out of it at best. Is this a problem? Does that make me a child molester?
Alot of people are attracted to underage girls (usually catholic school girls is the best example), this is perfectly acceptable and does no one ANY harm. They wank thinking of a little girl rather than some 18 year old bomb shell air brushed to fuck.
The problem comes when they act upon it against the consent of the child. The same applies to everything sexual. If you don't act upon it, it's not a problem. Hell you could go as far as to steal a pair of her panties and it still wouldn't be a major problem(as long as it didnt go any further and you weren't caught ( I know in my time I've nabbed a few pairs of panties from very hot friends/friends mothers, it's nothing too bad).
The problem comes when you add together the mindset of a rapist and an attraction to children.
Oh I love how well these photos are edited. Not only can you make out the body but if you look close enough you can make out the facial features to some degree. I put together a very very quick "rough outline". Nice to see this is s good photoshop and just not ghost porn
Alot of detail can be lost. Shadows and such play a very important part in the layout of the room, so if the little girl is slightly orange from a sunset then the room's windows can be placed accurately acordingly. Light sources and a date would be really useful for pinning it down to more than "this hotel"
It's all fine and dandy doing this sort of thing but theres also many sites which sell themselvs as "Child super model" sites and feature little girls (preteen) in bikinis and panties. Quite often with camel toes and such, right now they are legal (as is buying a nudist video filmed at a 9 year old girl's birthday party!), as long as it isn't sexual then you can have any number of naked children in a photo.
Now I'm not trying to go "OMG KILL IT WITH FIRE!" here, but I think the law needs to be refined a bit to take this exploit out of it. I don't want it to become illegal to have a picture of your family nude (Hell my aunt has some of me and my cousin in the bath completely naked she brings out at "big" birthdays to embrass us both), but these sites are clearly ment to whack off too, it's plain disturbing yet totally legal.
You'd become numb to it. I used to be disturbed all the time on some image boards, but the more I looked the less disturbed I got. Slowly it faded into nothingness, you just become cold to the whole thing and shrug it off.
A year ago before I found 4chan I would of ran a mile if I saw a naked child, the one time some retard posted a naked underage girl picture on the site I didn't freak or anything. I reported it to a mod and "modded it down" in the 4chan system (Sage), it was deleted within 3 minutes of being reported. Still something which I don't wish to see again.
I guess the officer would do the same thing after a while. At first he'd probably find it slightly erotic (a naked person posing sexually no matter the agem if in your gender is usually a slight turn on in some form), but after seeing the end result (her being rapedor whatever). He would of just shut out that side of him and most of his humanity. I'd also guess the first place he edited would be the vagina..
I know this is going to lose me major karma and such but I don't care.
Anyone else want to see the originals (of course HEAVILY edited to hide the child's face and nudity, just an outline would do). Or another photo like this before and after. I do alot of photoshopping and I have to guess what's behind something I want to remove, surely the police couldn't get this so accurate they could pinpoint a place (taking into account Disney land would change their sheets obviously).
If this is the polices latest weapon next time I take a picture I'm making sure I'm in it just incase they decide to photoshop me into it because I'm not there..
May I ask why you're using IE to view slashdot rather then Firefox/Opera/Mozilla/your other options? I'm sorry to say but unless you can give me a really good reason to be using IE for general browsng (as IE is), I think your opinion might not be so..... equal to all sides. I can't think of a single friend I have who uses IE the second they try firefox, except one who is a MS fanboy, who after a couple of months tried again and used plug ins to make it run how he wanted and was much happier with it and now feels the same way about IE as the rest of us (fuck it and it's fans).
I think this applies to everyone and we should all be worried. With the US Mentality of "your with us or against us!" you HAVE to support them. even if you want them all to fuck off and die, you can't say it out loud and sleep soundly at night. after starting two wars (I'm from the UK, so yes we helped...) and having a guy with more self confidence then sense in charge I'd rather keep my anti-yank opinions away from him in the political forum.
Maybe someone should teach Bush that there isn't only "us" and "them". Because mentality like that slowly chips away at "us" untill everyone is "them" and you're in a padded room going "THE VOICES TELL ME THEY ARE GOING TO BOMB US! THEY WILL BOMB US AND WE MUST GET THEM FIRST! IF WE DONT WE'LL ALL DIE! QUICK NUKE THEM ALL!"
2.5 million is HUGE numbers. In the UK thats like a 3rd of the population. I might hate enterprise but Jesus christ give it a break with figures that high.
No one wants them, why the hell "must" everything now require an ID? The ONLY time an ID card should be present is if you're using a public terminal or information which needs to be kept secret is around. Other wise I don't want the spammers to know my name, address and other things.
Keep ID cards to where they are needed to prove who you are, other wise leave me alone. If you need to know who I'am then I will tell you, all you need to know online is I can type and my user ID is [whatever site I'm on's username].
I'm in the UK and a well known Gundam fanboy (my name is based on Gundam and FMA). Bandai have totally given upon Gundam in Europe and now you can get very little but import manga from Amazon and DVDs which wont play on all DVD players (region crap). So I have to fansub the series, but I do go out of my way to buy all the Gundam models and mangas I want, or even don't want in some cases. Bandai and Sunrise earn more money through Gunpla (Gundam models) then they do through DVD sales. So clearly I'm putting my money back into the series through "alternative" ways. Many people work the same way as I do.
the problem starts when you get sued. Win or lose it costs you money, plus it looks bad for you to get sued because people will think you did something wrong even if you didn't
So maybe they dont pay out but lawyers cost more then 2 extra words on a box.
Blame America for this. With the current lawsuit culture from the US spreading doctors etc. get commisioned b companies to find this out so they can put a warning on the box. Personally I've been gaming since I was 4 (and today I just turned 19) and my thumbs have no problems, if anything they are better then most peoples
I watch click online every week due to being up about 3am when it airs on BBC 24 repeat wise. I'd say the show is aimed at "Joe Sixpack" at very very best. They did a feature on Mozilla and then a week later it hit the 1 million or whatever it was download mark. They pretty much claimed they made it happen.
The host is at best someguy ment to look smart, he clearly has no real intrest in any of the technology and it all boils down to "hey look at this new... thing!"
I also saw the first part of the interview and I have to say it sounded and looked like one long advert. Bill gates sat there with about 50 Windows boxs around him and countless over MS products easily visible. Then he went on to say how "inovative" MS is and how they will change the whole household.
Personally I'd take anything said in this interview with two grains of salt (rather then the usual one) and even then that's a push.
Re:Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!
on
Piezo-Acoustic iPod Hack
·
· Score: -1, Troll
Does the iPod need more security? no Does it crash alot? no Does it run perfectly fine? yes!
Could you please stop being silly and instead try and do something worth while. We're still looking for a cancer cure, aids cure and countless other things we need today. Even if you're not smart enough to work on that sort of thing, you could always do charity work or earn extra money to donate.
Ironicly doesn't the book it's self say that most the stuff in the HHGG is infact completely and utterly wrong? Versions changing details on things only proves the point and makes it intresting.
Slashdot Mirror
looking at the editing job.. it probably is... any chance of a link to the news story for the toplessism? :D
Any kid will happily goto Disneyland, it's an easy way to hide you're "victim". Tell her as long as she shuts up and says she's your daughter/sister/whatever and doesn't tell anyone what you're doing to her, no one would be any wiser. It's also a great place to bribe kids and keep them happy.. can't blame Disney for making a place kids want to goto..
I'm not trying to defend kiddy fiddlers here but..
Bein attracted to children ISN'T a problem. The girl next door to me is 14 and VERY hot (I'm in the UK she's legal in two years). I'll freely admit (on Slashdot), I've looked at her chest as she walked past, didn't get caught and got a little giggle out of it at best. Is this a problem? Does that make me a child molester?
Alot of people are attracted to underage girls (usually catholic school girls is the best example), this is perfectly acceptable and does no one ANY harm. They wank thinking of a little girl rather than some 18 year old bomb shell air brushed to fuck.
The problem comes when they act upon it against the consent of the child. The same applies to everything sexual. If you don't act upon it, it's not a problem. Hell you could go as far as to steal a pair of her panties and it still wouldn't be a major problem(as long as it didnt go any further and you weren't caught ( I know in my time I've nabbed a few pairs of panties from very hot friends/friends mothers, it's nothing too bad).
The problem comes when you add together the mindset of a rapist and an attraction to children.
Oh I love how well these photos are edited. Not only can you make out the body but if you look close enough you can make out the facial features to some degree. I put together a very very quick "rough outline". Nice to see this is s good photoshop and just not ghost porn
http://www.boomspeed.com/akito/bededited.jpg
Alot of detail can be lost. Shadows and such play a very important part in the layout of the room, so if the little girl is slightly orange from a sunset then the room's windows can be placed accurately acordingly. Light sources and a date would be really useful for pinning it down to more than "this hotel"
It's all fine and dandy doing this sort of thing but theres also many sites which sell themselvs as "Child super model" sites and feature little girls (preteen) in bikinis and panties. Quite often with camel toes and such, right now they are legal (as is buying a nudist video filmed at a 9 year old girl's birthday party!), as long as it isn't sexual then you can have any number of naked children in a photo.
Now I'm not trying to go "OMG KILL IT WITH FIRE!" here, but I think the law needs to be refined a bit to take this exploit out of it. I don't want it to become illegal to have a picture of your family nude (Hell my aunt has some of me and my cousin in the bath completely naked she brings out at "big" birthdays to embrass us both), but these sites are clearly ment to whack off too, it's plain disturbing yet totally legal.
You'd become numb to it. I used to be disturbed all the time on some image boards, but the more I looked the less disturbed I got. Slowly it faded into nothingness, you just become cold to the whole thing and shrug it off.
A year ago before I found 4chan I would of ran a mile if I saw a naked child, the one time some retard posted a naked underage girl picture on the site I didn't freak or anything. I reported it to a mod and "modded it down" in the 4chan system (Sage), it was deleted within 3 minutes of being reported. Still something which I don't wish to see again.
I guess the officer would do the same thing after a while. At first he'd probably find it slightly erotic (a naked person posing sexually no matter the agem if in your gender is usually a slight turn on in some form), but after seeing the end result (her being rapedor whatever). He would of just shut out that side of him and most of his humanity. I'd also guess the first place he edited would be the vagina..
yea I've seen that but that only seems to work on large similar areas, life isn't like that.
I know this is going to lose me major karma and such but I don't care.
Anyone else want to see the originals (of course HEAVILY edited to hide the child's face and nudity, just an outline would do). Or another photo like this before and after. I do alot of photoshopping and I have to guess what's behind something I want to remove, surely the police couldn't get this so accurate they could pinpoint a place (taking into account Disney land would change their sheets obviously).
If this is the polices latest weapon next time I take a picture I'm making sure I'm in it just incase they decide to photoshop me into it because I'm not there..
or I convert people to firefox and they see it's clearly superior. I admit IE is needed but when it isnt needed why would he/she sue it?
May I ask why you're using IE to view slashdot rather then Firefox/Opera/Mozilla/your other options? I'm sorry to say but unless you can give me a really good reason to be using IE for general browsng (as IE is), I think your opinion might not be so..... equal to all sides. I can't think of a single friend I have who uses IE the second they try firefox, except one who is a MS fanboy, who after a couple of months tried again and used plug ins to make it run how he wanted and was much happier with it and now feels the same way about IE as the rest of us (fuck it and it's fans).
Knowing Rockstar if they see this there may well be a mission about it put in jokingly.
I think this applies to everyone and we should all be worried. With the US Mentality of "your with us or against us!" you HAVE to support them. even if you want them all to fuck off and die, you can't say it out loud and sleep soundly at night. after starting two wars (I'm from the UK, so yes we helped...) and having a guy with more self confidence then sense in charge I'd rather keep my anti-yank opinions away from him in the political forum.
Maybe someone should teach Bush that there isn't only "us" and "them". Because mentality like that slowly chips away at "us" untill everyone is "them" and you're in a padded room going "THE VOICES TELL ME THEY ARE GOING TO BOMB US! THEY WILL BOMB US AND WE MUST GET THEM FIRST! IF WE DONT WE'LL ALL DIE! QUICK NUKE THEM ALL!"
sorry I made a mistake, I missed an 0 off while reading it, shouldn't read slashdot at 2am I guess.
.>
But yea still 2.5 million people is bloody impressive. Eastenders would be proud of that these days
2.5 million is HUGE numbers. In the UK thats like a 3rd of the population. I might hate enterprise but Jesus christ give it a break with figures that high.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=Daddy's%20birt hday%20&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wi
I see no porn
Unique means "original". Not "Wiki with a moderation system similar to Slashdots".
No one wants them, why the hell "must" everything now require an ID? The ONLY time an ID card should be present is if you're using a public terminal or information which needs to be kept secret is around. Other wise I don't want the spammers to know my name, address and other things.
Keep ID cards to where they are needed to prove who you are, other wise leave me alone. If you need to know who I'am then I will tell you, all you need to know online is I can type and my user ID is [whatever site I'm on's username].
I'm in the UK and a well known Gundam fanboy (my name is based on Gundam and FMA). Bandai have totally given upon Gundam in Europe and now you can get very little but import manga from Amazon and DVDs which wont play on all DVD players (region crap). So I have to fansub the series, but I do go out of my way to buy all the Gundam models and mangas I want, or even don't want in some cases. Bandai and Sunrise earn more money through Gunpla (Gundam models) then they do through DVD sales. So clearly I'm putting my money back into the series through "alternative" ways. Many people work the same way as I do.
the problem starts when you get sued. Win or lose it costs you money, plus it looks bad for you to get sued because people will think you did something wrong even if you didn't
So maybe they dont pay out but lawyers cost more then 2 extra words on a box.
Blame America for this. With the current lawsuit culture from the US spreading doctors etc. get commisioned b companies to find this out so they can put a warning on the box. Personally I've been gaming since I was 4 (and today I just turned 19) and my thumbs have no problems, if anything they are better then most peoples
I watch click online every week due to being up about 3am when it airs on BBC 24 repeat wise. I'd say the show is aimed at "Joe Sixpack" at very very best. They did a feature on Mozilla and then a week later it hit the 1 million or whatever it was download mark. They pretty much claimed they made it happen.
The host is at best someguy ment to look smart, he clearly has no real intrest in any of the technology and it all boils down to "hey look at this new... thing!"
I also saw the first part of the interview and I have to say it sounded and looked like one long advert. Bill gates sat there with about 50 Windows boxs around him and countless over MS products easily visible. Then he went on to say how "inovative" MS is and how they will change the whole household.
Personally I'd take anything said in this interview with two grains of salt (rather then the usual one) and even then that's a push.
lol, a 12 year old Linux fanboy. How cute!
Does the iPod need more security? no
Does it crash alot? no
Does it run perfectly fine? yes!
Could you please stop being silly and instead try and do something worth while. We're still looking for a cancer cure, aids cure and countless other things we need today. Even if you're not smart enough to work on that sort of thing, you could always do charity work or earn extra money to donate.
Ironicly doesn't the book it's self say that most the stuff in the HHGG is infact completely and utterly wrong? Versions changing details on things only proves the point and makes it intresting.