Slashdot Mirror


Fansubbers Under Fire

CNet is running a story about new developments in the fansubbing world. The article provides some background, and then discusses Media Factory's recent letters to fansubbers demanding removal of their shows. Historically the studios have turned a blind eye towards the work of the fansubbers, and the assumption has always been they they secretly approve since the fans work is amazing market research. I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on the work of fansubbers, so I hope that this isn't the beginning of the end.

972 comments

  1. No Story by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Troll

    "We decided we should still promote the series," said Nolan, whose group is continuing its translations. "If we receive a letter ourselves, then we'll stop."

    See, this is the kind of attitude that's so pervasive in the psuedo-piracy community (not TECHNICALLY pirates because they're not making money, but they're effectively engaging in "non profit piracy"). "Oh, even though it's not our content and we have no right legally or morally to take somebody else's work and give it away for free, we're just PROMOTING it".

    Newsflash: you're not PROMOTING it, you're helping other people STEAL it.

    If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese. It's fun and easy if you're not an idiot, and you can do it while you're at work if you have headphones and a cd-rom drive.

    I hope Media Factory nails these guys to the wall. I'm tired of them creating barriers to legitimate online distribution by distributing stolen copies of other people's content. Maybe if folks would stop STEALING things online, movie and music distributors would be a little less wary of wading into the digital pool to test the waters. After all, who's going to buy a new release online for $5 when they can get it a week early for free?

    The facts here are simple. You can't just take other peoples things and do whatever you want with them. It's not legal, it's not right.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:No Story by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Newsflash: you're not PROMOTING it, you're helping other people STEAL it.

      I've got another newsflash for you, copyright infringement != stealing.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:No Story by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Captain Obvious. Now, care to argue/refute his points?

      --
      Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    3. Re:No Story by nkh · · Score: 2

      If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese.

      No, I just want my japanese cartoons with subtitles. The problem is only 5% of all new cartoons are officially released on DVD in Europe, what can we do for the 95% left?

    4. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually if there is no US distribution partner Fansubbing falls into an interesting grey area. This is becasue in the US derivative work (such as a translation) fall under the original copyright. However the last time I read an explanation of it Japanese copyright law recognizes derivative work separately from the original. Thus if there is a US distributor the more restrictive US laws apply. If there is no US presence presumably the Japanese law is the only consideration.

    5. Re:No Story by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      > Thank you, Captain Obvious. Now, care to argue/refute his points?

      No, because I agree. But copyright infringement isn't theft, and I'm tired of dumbasses who try to mutate the meme just by incesantly repeating it.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    6. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really up to Japan probably since the US (and many many other countries) are bound by the same international agreement on enforcing each other's copyrights. So unless Japan complains to the US I don't see much of a problem.

    7. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese. It's fun and easy if you're not an idiot, and you can do it while you're at work if you have headphones and a cd-rom drive.

      Different people have different aptitudes for learning languages. What might be easy for you is quite difficult for others.

      While I might be flattering myself to think that I am not, in fact, an idiot, I have attempted to learn Japanese in the past. I failed. Utterly. I have also failed to learn other languages besides my native English. Whatever meager talents I possess lie elsewhere, I'm afraid.

      The attacks on other parts of your posts are continuing apace, however I merely wished to caution you regarding judging the effort required by others to accomplish a task based on your own efforts to do the same. In other words, just because it's easy for you, don't assume it's easy for anyone else.

    8. Re:No Story by kentaromiura · · Score: 1, Informative

      no, for example, in Italy some of Japanese production wouldn't be translate and sell because someone decide that he can't earn from that.

      so,if a fan of a manga, would take it and make a subtitle for it,why not?

      you must know that a subbers stop immediately if a series it's buy from a factory or a TV!

      --
      GCS/T/O -d+ -p c++++(++) l+++ u++ e+ m+@ s+/+ n+(--) h* f++(+++) !g w(+) t r+(++) y?
    9. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a high reading comprehension level?

    10. Re:No Story by gallen1234 · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, although the assertion is often phrased poorly. You aren't stealing the product, you're stealing part of the profit that the producer would have made were it not for your illegal activity.

    11. Re:No Story by ichimunki · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese.

      And then what? Watch them as they're broadcast in Japanese on local TV here in the States? Good luck! Even if you live in heavy Japanese settled areas you are unlikely to find much Japanese language programming. Fansubs usually come out as the shows are being broadcast in Japan. Fansubbers then do a lot of hard work to provide their own translations of these shows.

      Finally, the entire anime fan community has a strong "buy a licensed version" ethos. If the Japanese companies who make these shows were to release subtitled versions of the shows online for a reasonable fee I suspect that fansubbing would screech to a halt (so I don't get what you're talking about with fansubbers "creating barriers to legitimate online distribution" there is no current legitimate online distribution--if there were, there would be no need for fansubs). I think the typical fansub viewer would prefer the original audio with subtitles over any English remake of the dialog anyway.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    12. Re:No Story by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not yet... Give it time. With the US government in the hands of big business, I fully expect to see copyright infringment criminalized within the next few years... They'll probably be using the death penalty in a decade...

      Now onto the subject of this debate:

      I was a fairly active fansubber in the late 90s, but had to give it up because of time constraints (and because I got tired of poor-quality translations). I never digisubbed (old school SVHS subbing), but I still download stuff today and watch it.

      I don't think the fansubbing is all bad, as it does provide a decent method of previewing series without shelling out $15-20 to buy DVDs that you might not like. And there's still far more anime produced in Japan than will ever be released in North America. Some series are too short to be cost-effective, and some just aren't suitable for distributers here.

      That said, the trend of distributing full-resolution subs with high quality video and audio encoding is pretty dangerous. If the video was 1/2 res or lower, and audio was MP3 at less than 128kbps, then it wouldn't be of sufficient quality for people to archive/keep when DVDs are released. Sure you could watch it, but you'd definately prefer having the real thing.

      I was doing a fair bit of encoding/releasing of JPOP concert material, but I'd make sure the video and audio quality was highly-compressed enough to "encourage" people to buy the original DVDs. I'd never release direct copies of the VOBs, even to my friends online.

      In the end, it will be better for the fansubbers to find a way to help work with industry (and most reputable subbers WILL terminate their subbing of series when studios either announce acquisition of a series, or when they actively start distributing it).

      And don't kid yourself that this is just a north american thing. There's a booming anime fansubbing industry in other asian countries as well (Korea for instance).

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    13. Re:No Story by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >You aren't stealing the product, you're stealing part of the profit that the producer would have made were it not for your illegal activity.

      That's bullshit, if only for the fact that more people will purchase your product for free than for X dollars. It is doubly so in this particular case (where things are on the net in peer to peer networks) because the ones that infringe the copyright don't make money off it, so they aren't stealing shit, much less "profit".

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    14. Re:No Story by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese. It's fun and easy if you're not an idiot, and you can do it while you're at work if you have headphones and a cd-rom drive."

      This is a very naive comment. Even if you do know the language, importing the DVDs from Japan is incredibly expensive. (It's not like everyone in the world has access to Japanese network TV!) It's not uncommon to have two episodes to a DVD that costs US$50 before any kind of shipping or customs fees. The profit margins must be incredible here, because the price per episode on the US discs is perhaps one quarter of that.

      Don't believe me? Take a look at the popular series, Witch Hunter Robin. The Japanese release is thirteen discs long @ 5000 yen (USD 48) per two episode disc. The official legal US release (not to be confused with the many Hong Kong bootlegs) has an MSRP of US$30 per four episode disc, and you can get it for closer to $20 if you shop around. This is a very typical case. The R2 discs cost even more after factoring in shipping from Japan.

      So is learning Japanese easy and fun? Maybe. If you feel like learning the 2000+ JLPT level 1 kanji, each with multiple pronounciations and a specific stroke order. But paying for the discs is NOT easy and fun. While this does not legitimise fansubs in any way, it does show that your argument for abandoning fansubs for learning Japanese is poorly conceived.

    15. Re:No Story by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Stop arguineg semantics and use terms that both sides agree on. "Stealing" and "Theft" are loaded terms which is why people object to them.

    16. Re:No Story by clambake · · Score: 1

      See, this is the kind of attitude that's so pervasive in the psuedo-piracy community (not TECHNICALLY pirates because they're not making money, but they're effectively engaging in "non profit piracy"). "Oh, even though it's not our content and we have no right legally or morally to take somebody else's work and give it away for free, we're just PROMOTING it".

      Newsflash: you're not PROMOTING it, you're helping other people STEAL it.


      It's not infringement if it isn't for sale *anywhere*...

    17. Re:No Story by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 0

      "If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese."

      thats the ticket, but people are too lazy to go out and do that.

    18. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the fact that more people will purchase your product for free than for X dollars.

      At First Citiwide Change Bank, We just make change

      We will work with the customer to give that customer the change that he or she needs. If you come to us with a twenty-dollar bill, we can give you two tens, we can give you four fives - we can give you a ten and two fives. We will work with you.

      How do we make a profit? Volume.

    19. Re:No Story by tha_mink · · Score: 1

      >You aren't stealing the product, you're stealing part of the profit that the producer would have made were it not for your illegal activity.

      That's bullshit, if only for the fact that more people will purchase your product for free than for X dollars. It is doubly so in this particular case (where things are on the net in peer to peer networks) because the ones that infringe the copyright don't make money off it, so they aren't stealing shit, much less "profit".


      Your stance is bullshit.

      Yes, it is stealing. Just because they are not selling the result of their illegal activities, it's still stealing. If you steal my bicycle and use it to ride to work or to have fun on the mountain, you still stole it. It doesn't matter if you actually sell, or make profit from it...you are still stealing from me.

      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    20. Re:No Story by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Most of the fansub releases hit the net within a week or two of when the original show airs in Japan. That is long before it is commercially available in any region. For shows that are imported to the US, the lag time between Japanese release and US release has dropped sharply.

      One might wait for a year or so after the show airs, and then wait a month between volumes. But what is the point when you can get it almost in real time?

      I suspect it would be more useful for Japanese companies to work out formal deals with (fan- or otherwise) subbers and sell advertising in the torrent versions of the shows. A tweaked video format with DRM built-in could track distribution breadth or stop people from skipping the commercials.

      In that respect, I agree that the ideal would be legitimate online distribution that produces income for the creator of the series, but lawsuits are neither an effective nor elegant way to get there.

    21. Re:No Story by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >If you steal my bicycle

      Then I've taken a physical product from you and stopped you from using it, I haven't copied it. The only way I can "steal" the profit from you is to go, gun in hand, to your office and steal your money, take the physical bank notes away from you and into my pocket. This isn't about copyright infringement being detrimental or not, it's about it being theft, and by the defitinion of theft it isn't.

      The guy who sells CDs with a bootleg of a film is benefitting from copyright infringement. The other guy who breaks into a warehouse and steals a whole bunch of CDs or DVDs to then sell them is benefiting from theft. They're both illegal, but they're not the same. Pretty fucking simple isn't it.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    22. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      copyright infringment IS THEFT because compensation does not come from sales it comes from distribution. Artists are paid extra for sales but they are also paid EVERY time a show is aired. You are airing the show, even for personal use, without their consent and without any sort of fair use argument it can be said that you are stealing their income. Regardless of if you woudl purchase the show or not, or watch it via some legitimate means, you viewing the show denies them income.

      Then again, with your zealotry so apparent I can only assuem that if you employer doesn't pay you it woudl nto be stealign as you never had the money to start with and you may or may not have done all that work anyway.

    23. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I've got a new favorite one-trick pony!

    24. Re:No Story by daniil · · Score: 5, Funny
      Dear Sir,

      We kindly ask you to repost your comment without using that many "ironic" parentheses.

      Cordially,

      "Committee" for "Proper" "Sentence" "Construction"

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    25. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Newsflash assholes, it is theft. Your semantic games do not change reality. You are BREAKING THE LAW.

      (Bunch of useless crap removed)

      If you had bothered to read you'd have seen that I've never said it's not breaking the law, in fact I have acknowledged already that it's illegal. So that's a straw man that will never bother us again, because you sure beat the crap out of it. Well done.

    26. Re:No Story by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      We kindly ask you to repost your comment without using that many "ironic" parentheses.

      I admit my guilt in full and will report to the nearest parentheses rehabilitation center forthwith.

    27. Re:No Story by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately it is.

      I agree it shouldn't be. Actually, what I'd like is for copyright to have certain responsibilities associated with it for the copyright holder, one of which is that if you own the copyright, you must make copies available for sale at a fair price. A fair price might include the cost of getting a projectionist to sit for two hours and transfer the entire thing into a Mac, and then spend another few hours turning it into an MPEG2, finally burning it as a crude DVD-R (which means the end cost to the user may total a few hundred dollars), but it should at least be available.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    28. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's not infringement if it isn't for sale *anywhere*...

      Uh, actually, yes it is. Even if it isn't for sale anywhere.

    29. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only true if the infringer sells the product.

    30. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the reason you are being challenged on your comment is that most of the "copyright infringers" usually start with this point on their way to a broader rationalization of their illegal activity. It usually goes, copyright infringement is not theft. And since the copyright laws are unjust (enrich corporations, too long, etc) and it is not immoral (as it would be if it was theft), then it is ok to break the unjust law. And since you are not actually taking something physical, you are not depriving anyone of actual property - victimless crime and all that.

      Those of us who see it for what it is - illegal activity that ends up giving an excuse to corporations trying to push more laws and DRM - want to make sure it is clearly understood that this activity is illegal. Thus, we use a common word that the general public understands - theft.

      The general public glazes over rather quickly when I try to explain the legalities of the illegal activities of both copyright infringers or those involved in corporate accounting schemes such as Enron discussed above. Thus - it is easier to get the general point across by using a term that the general public understands - theft. Theft is not just a legal definition - it carries with it among many people a moral and social definition. The executives at Enron may not have legally 'stolen' anything, but in a social and moral context, they are nothing more or less than common thieves.

      So we are left to wonder - what is your point? That copyright infringement is not theft? Congratulations - semantic point made, captain dictionary. But now what? Are you just being a definition nazi or did you have something this was leading to?

      I'd guess the later, which is why most of us will continue to refer to it as theft - because that is the easiest way to make sure that the general public, more ignorant friends, whoever - understand that they are breaking the law when they download a song. If they don't like that, or they object to Disney getting perpetual rights to intellectual property, then they may want to get a little more engaged in politics.

    31. Re:No Story by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese.

      It's not a matter of "before". Many shows and movies are never translated. There is no legal way to aquire them, and "learn Japanese" isn't an answer and you know it.

      Every fansubber I've ever dealt with has stopped providing tapes as soon as the title is going to become available (e.g. when Disney signed with Studio Gibli for all the Miyazaki films like Princess Mononoke all the fansubs for Miyazaki films vanished). Yet there is still no way for me to get a legal subtitled version of Nausicaa, so I'm keeping my fansub. If Disney releases it, I'll buy it.

      Realize that fansubbing was going on in ernest at a time before the general anime craze in the U.S. This was back before you could find a whole aisle of anime at Fry's and Best Buy. This was when a video store's "japanimation" section consisted of Akira and a couple random episodes of Sailor Moon.

      Copying isn't stealing. When the owner of the material isn't even trying to sell it to you, then there isn't even the hypothetical loss of revenue argument. To then call that STEALING is just being a SYCOPHANT.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    32. Re:No Story by Flyph · · Score: 1

      The story clearly states that Fan Subbing hasn't hurt their main dvd sales on the "must-have" dvds. the problem arises with their other tiered material. So what they're really saying is that... the mid to low level stories they are releasing aren't selling as well as they originally hoped. It's like saying Alexander didn't do as well as the studios hoped because it was being fansubbed in Japan. The reason they aren't selling well is because it sucked. Make a quality story and it will sell. But yeah.. it's still technically illegal, even though fan subs of shows are much better than the translated crap they release on cartoon network.

    33. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >the reason you are being challenged on your comment is that most of the "copyright infringers" usually start with this point on their way to a broader rationalization of their illegal activity.

      But I am not, so why do you keep going on about it?

      >Are you just being a definition nazi or did you have something this was leading to?

      In a similar vein of what you are proposing, referring to it as "theft" is a means to an end, and that end, if we are to belive the **AAs, is that they own the music/movies/entertainment even after you bought it, fair right uses be damned. And also, because of its connotations, it's being used to emotinally push for tighter legislation that tramples all over those fair use rights I want to keep, up to and including actually owning the stuff I pay for. So no, I don't agree that calling things wrongly to scare your ignorant friends is a good thing, because that has direct implications on what *I* can do with the things *I* bought.

      And all those discussions can be more easily avoided if we call things with their proper names.

    34. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      going to buy a new release online for $5 when they can get it a week early for free?

      I don't know? Why don't the companies release "on time" (read: skip the week of shoving the film prints up their ass in an attempt to outdo the legendary goatse.cx icon before shipping the film out)? I guess actually selling things instead of shelving things would disrupt the flow of energy through hollywood and cause California to finally break off and sink into the sea (cue music: The Engulfed Cathedral)

    35. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where are all the parentheses?

    36. Re:No Story by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "quotation marks." (Parentheses are rarely ironic.)

    37. Re:No Story by westlake · · Score: 1
      But copyright infringement isn't theft, and I'm tired of dumbasses who try to mutate the meme just by incesantly repeating it.

      The theft of intangibles has become part of the language, ordinary usage, and cannot be extracted from it now. It has also become part of the law, as in the NET Act (No Electronic Theft Act) of 1997.

      When you are sentenced under Title 18 of the federal code, it doesn't matter much whether the judge calls copyright infringement theft or calls it applesauce, it still means you will be doing hard time.

    38. Re:No Story by beebware · · Score: 1

      I know TVNihon started fansubbing PGSM around Jan 2004, but mid-Feb I was hooked, by June I had a holiday in Japan booked (didn't even consider a holiday in Japan before hand!) and by the end of September, I had 8 DVD in Japanese (that I can't understand) and a soft toy relating to the series. I've also tried to buy the rest of the series via UK stores (HMV, for instance, actually sells the series in the JP stores) - but no one will actually get them for me!

      I very much doubt this series will be official dubbed or subbed or even released outside of JP - but I want it and, as shown, am willing to pay for it. But no one will let me buy it here in the UK and I can't really justify a 1.5k (UKP) flight to JP just to buy a couple of DVDs... :(

    39. Re:No Story by ryusen · · Score: 1

      Criminalized copyright infringement? You have heard of the Pirate act right? It's there... As for fansubs.. if it were not for these guys.. the US translation studios would not enjoy half the success they do now. These fans built the industry for them. They built the fan base.

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    40. Re:No Story by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I've had good luck ordering CDs and manga from amazon.co.jp. Considerably less expensive than a trip to Japan. Of course, if your Japanese isn't that great it can be a bit unnerving trying to work through all the screens to make an order. I found babelfish.altavista.com very helpful, just be ready for a lot of "All Your Base" kind of reading.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    41. Re:No Story by daniil · · Score: 1

      Well, call me pink and paint me an idiot. Or vice versa. Feathers optional.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    42. Re:No Story by aichpvee · · Score: 0
      At best you are "stealing" a theoretical profit that the publisher would have theoretically made if not for you downloading it. There is no hard evidence that this is actually true, and quite a bit of evidence that it is not.

      Remember, this sort of thing is only illegal because these mega corporations think that somehow everyone will suddenly pay for things if it is the only option for them to get it, and they have the lobbying power to push the legislation.

      Laws are neither "right" or "wrong", they are just the laws (which seems so obvious despite so many here no seeming to get it), most of them no longer made with the best interest of actual people in mind. In the case of IP laws it just seems a little bit silly for an industry that is making record profits EVERY year to whine so much and then sue 12yo girls for thousands of dollars.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    43. Re:No Story by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • It's not a matter of "before". Many shows and movies are never translated. There is no legal way to aquire them, and "learn Japanese" isn't an answer and you know it.
      Very true, and for some shows they're such a niche product that there's not even a Japanese release, leaving fansubs about the only way to find them. Take for instance the show Mizuiro Jidai (called Blue-Green Years by The Technogirls who fansub it). Until 2002 there was no release of the show at all. At that point finally a DVD box set was released in Japan. Prior to that there was no VHS, no LD, nothing. If you wanted to see the show in the US it was fansubs or nothing at all. (Sadly the release's video quality is so bad the fansubs look better, but that's another issue.)

      I can learn Japanese all I want, in fact I'm working on it and I watch most of the new anime series raw as they come out in Japan. I still have to download raw encodes of them since I have no way to get a legit copy of them here in the US. For some of these shows I'm quite positive I'll never see an US release.

      Hell, although ADV has licensed and released most of Sailor Moon, there's an entire season of the show that's still not licensed, and due to some potential controversial issues (gender changing characters for one) it's likely it never will be. Those Sailor Moon fans wanting to see the final season (Sailor Stars) have no choice but to find fansubs of it. Frankly I'm not sure you can buy copies of it in Japan since it's an older series and releases have a much shorter shelf life in Japan.

      Those espousing "learn Japanese so you can stay legit" are either clueless as to the realities of the anime world, or it makes them feel somehow morally superior to spout this stuff off.

    44. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The moderation on the parent comment
      Moderation -1
      30% Troll
      30% Flamebait
      30% Underrated

      is the reason I don't take Slashdot seriously anymore. Apart from the questionable arithmetic, I think Clay Shirky said it best:

      WR Byat did group theory with nuerotics -- discovered that neurotics were working as a group to defeat therapy. He couldn't resolve whether this was a group activity or individual activity. ...
      How Byat defined the behaviours that defeated the therapy: ...
      * Vilification of external enemies... Creates cohesion. Members who are most paranoid are best at identifying enemies.
      * Veneration of a religious symbol. Go into a Tolkein newsgroup and diss Two Towers -- see what happens. Even though it's supposed to be about discussing Tolkein, they'll just flame you, because you're interfering with the religious text.


      How does it feel to become exactly what you claim to hate? Of course I'm not expecting sincere answers here, just rude one-liners and snappy comebacks.

    45. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet there is still no way for me to get a legal subtitled version of Nausicaa, so I'm keeping my fansub. If Disney releases it, I'll buy it.


      I do believe you when you say "if $LICENSE_HOLDER releases it, I'll buy it." since I, myself, regularly operate by this same principle.

      However, there IS a legal DVD of Nausicaa with English-language subtitles: The IVL Entertainment's R3 release. That is, if importing it still is legal, and if region-free DVD players are still legal...

    46. Re:No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You: We misused a word deliberately to agitate people who do not understand the issue.

      Opponent: Copyright infringement is not theft.

      You: Congratulations - semantic point made, captain dictionary. But now what?

      I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

    47. Re:No Story by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      However, there IS a legal DVD of Nausicaa with English-language subtitles: The IVL Entertainment's R3 release. That is, if importing it still is legal, and if region-free DVD players are still legal...

      They're legal... and I use Xine with DeCSS, so I don't think it matters much anyway. ;)

      Although this is interesting... In my google search to try to find "IVL entertainment nausicaa", I found instead that apparently Disney is going to be releasing nausicaa on DVD this month.

      Sweet! Especially because my fansub is in VHS format, and I fear for its longevity.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    48. Re:No Story by dosius · · Score: 1

      TV-Nihon... *twitches to death at the sound of that name*

      They started in October 2003. (I also subbed a few eps myself - started up a major brouhaha that, one year later, is still going strong. KingRanger is one guy with a major 'tude.)

      I think Bandai won't let any American companies near PGSM... or Seramyu for that matter...

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    49. Re:No Story by dosius · · Score: 1

      ADV's license is up. So's part of Geneon's. I took advantage of that to fix up some major errors in some of the subs.

      Sailor Stars will be getting an R2 release, but you'll have to wait awhile. They're going series by series and just started releasing S.

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    50. Re:No Story by handslikesnakes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right. If my employer didn't pay me it wouldn't be stealing - it would be breach of contract.

      Copyright infringement isn't stealing for the same reason that murder isn't rape.

    51. Re:No Story by Cyberherbalist · · Score: 1
      Members who are most paranoid are best at identifying enemies.

      Sweet!

      --
      "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance."
    52. Re:No Story by karstux · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that fansubs are infinitely more practical to handle than DVDs. A series just takes 2-4GB of hard disk space, and allows me to watch the whole thing without ever fumbling with the disks (and risking scratches in the process).

      Since fansub quality is, for all practical purposes, indistinguishable from DVD, and the translations are often even better than their commercial counterparts, I actually prefer fansubs these days. (Note: this doesn't mean that I don't have many of the series I like sitting on my shelves... mostly unwatched.)

      Pirating takes (obviously) less money, less effort, and delivers a superior product compared to buying them in a shop. IMHO, that's the real threat of fansubs.

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
    53. Re:No Story by clambake · · Score: 1

      I guess what I meant was, ethically, there is nothing wrong with it.

    54. Re: No Story by dakirw · · Score: 1

      ... due to some potential controversial issues (gender changing characters for one)...

      Actually if gender changing is a big issue, why is Ranma 1/2 a big hit? It has not just gender changing, but species changing as well! Shampoo or Ryoga, anyone?

    55. Re: No Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you can't AIR Ranma 1/2... cartoon network even put "we're looking for suggestions for a new series, and PLEASE NO RANMA" as a card on Adult Swim.

      DVDs are one thing broadcast is another. You could DVD the finale of SM. You would have a very hard time getting a non-PPV broadcast.

    56. Re:No Story by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Finally, the entire anime fan community has a strong "buy a licensed version" ethos."

      Is this true? All I know is myself, and I wouldn't even know about Video Girl Ai, let alone be waiting for Viz to publish the next English graphic novel, had I not read a complete fan translation of the manga on the web.

      The pathetic part (on my part) is that it wasn't even the comic, just the translated text. There are a few scenes that suddenly make sense to me now that I have pictures. :)

    57. Re: No Story by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • Actually if gender changing is a big issue, why is Ranma 1/2 a big hit? It has not just gender changing, but species changing as well! Shampoo or Ryoga, anyone?
      It's a bit different than Ranma 1/2's, in Ranma it's treated as just a comedy device for the most part. Also as the AC pointed out, even Cartoon Network won't air Ranma. The gender changing in Sailor Stars is different, the Sailor Stars are guys normally, but when they transform they're girls. There are some issues with the main girls getting crushes on their guy forms which I'm sure any potential licensor worries about. Additionally the main character, Usagi, spends most of the last two episodes naked. It's not gratuitous or anything, and fits the story, but it's there.

      The main problem is even releasing it on DVD is risky because the rest of the series has been associated as kid friendly in the market. Even labeling this properly wouldn't help, some dumbass parent wouldn't read the ratings/warnings, would buy it for their kids, then see some of the above and sue. Frankly I can't really blame the companies for not wanting to touch Sailor Stars for US release, we're far too sue happy. (And if you don't think the above issues would cause concern, don't forget that recently some anti-gay advocacy group went nuts and claimed Spongebob Squarepants is gay and promotes homosexuality as acceptable (their words there, not mine, had to paraphrase since I don't have the article handy). Imagine how those idiots would react to characters who change from male to female and have females in love with them in male form. It'd get ugly fast.)

    58. Re:No Story by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey, Kartsux, what the fuck is it with all you sausage-fingered dildos who always bitch about scratching their CDs and DVDs anytime copy protection is mentioned? I have 200 DVDs, and the only ones to ever get damaged had exteremly rare accidents happen to them. Same goes for audio CDs and CD-ROM discs. Why the fuck can't you asshats get some co-ordination when away from your beloved keyboaard and mouse I hear you shitheads rant about in every console gaming article and just TAKE CARE OF YOU FUCKING POSESSIONS!!!!! P.S. Optical discs can be repaired, you fucknaught!

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    59. Re:No Story by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      So in other words its too expensive for you to buy it so you don't want to?? sounds like a good plan to me, unfortunately it is illegal. But its your choice to do it so I'm not gonna get into that. Just remember getting the money to legitimately buy what you want isn't supposed to be easy and fun, its called work by most people.

      as always, if a market has prices that are high enough, a black market will always emerge. Its a general rule of economics. Just as you can break the law though, these companies can eforce their rights under the laws of today.

      But I really find problems with your last paragraph. You are saying things that, while true on the surface, don't reflect the meaning you are conveying. Yes, to get a 100% on the JLPT 1 test, you need to learn approximately 1960 kanji(jyouyou kanji).
      but just to let you know, most japanese people don't know all the kanji or all the pronounciations, or how to right them all correctly. I've met Japanese people in college who were writing relatively simple Kanji incorrectly and not realizing it. but these people seem to be able to understand anime. In actuality if you want to watch anime, you will probably only know about 400 kanji by the time you can begin to understand it and maybe 600 or so by the time it just starts to make sense. This of course takes a lot of effort but then you can watch whatever you want.

      I suggest it actually, you might learn something. all those people who say the fan subs are more accurate than the studios, they aren't. I've found numerous problems with translations after only 1 year of studying, in both of them. What most people call errors are actually problems with Japanese not being nearly as exact of a language. words have multiple meanings and in different situations, mean very differnt things to different people. thats how stylized the language is.

      I met people from europe who learned japanese by buying a dictionary and manga and a basic grammar book and just kept with it for 3 or 4 years. Its not easy, but it can be very fun. It has been and still is for me. I actually now look forward to when I have enough free time to learn a couple more kanji and some more words.

    60. Re:No Story by -brazil- · · Score: 1
      Part of the problem is that fansubs are infinitely more practical to handle than DVDs. A series just takes 2-4GB of hard disk space, and allows me to watch the whole thing without ever fumbling with the disks (and risking scratches in the process).


      That's ridiculous. If you have any life, you rarely have the time to watch more than what a single DVD holds in one sitting. And changing a DVD poses no risk of scratches unless you handle it extremely carelessly.


      Since fansub quality is, for all practical purposes, indistinguishable from DVD


      No surround sound with AVIs last time I looked, and most fansubs still have visible compression artifacts, unlike most DVDs.


      and the translations are often even better than their commercial counterparts,


      BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


      Let me guess: you don't know Japanese worth squat, do you?

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    61. Re:No Story by karstux · · Score: 1

      Let's stay civil here, okay? No need for insinuations and insults.

      Scratches are an inherent risk in an unprotected optical medium. Personally, I haven't scratched a disc yet either, but it doesn't take more than a bit of bad luck to end up with a damaged disc.

      Also, if the movie is tied to the medium, its lifespan is limited by that as well. Say I want to re-watch an anime in 20 years from now... only having to discover that the DVD data layer has oxidated beyond readability.

      Not a problem with hard drives, if you back up and migrate to new drives once in a while.

      You're right about surround sound. Personally, I don't need it, as I don't have the equipment, but it might be an issue for those that do.

      Visual quality is of course highly subjective, I for one can't distinguish a good XViD encode from an MPEG2 file several times its size.

      "Let me guess: you don't know Japanese worth squat, do you?"
      Well, apart from 1.5 years worth of univerity-level japanese, no, why? Seriously, fansubs often seem to be more close to the original meaning, resulting in sometimes slightly awkward english. But I prefer it that way, as a learning tool, too. YMMV.

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
    62. Re:No Story by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Is it true? Well, maybe not so much as I made it sound. Most fansub groups do remove shows that get licensed (just an announcement of a license is enough). Obviously those of us watching fansubs aren't going to buy DVDs for every show we ever watched a fansub of unless we *liked* the show. From a practical standpoint (in my experience) the quality of authentic DVDs is just plain higher than fansubs and bootlegs anyway, so a serious fan is going to want the real thing on that basis alone. If money is a concern one can always buy used DVDs off amazon.com, borrow from the library, and rent the videos from a shop. Assuming that's much of a price break or that the local library or video shop even has anime.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    63. Re: No Story by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The gender changing in Sailor Stars is different, the Sailor Stars are guys normally, but when they transform they're girls.

      The gender changing in Ranma 1/2 is different, Ranma is a guy normally, but when he transforms he's a girl.

      Hint: SMStars is unpublished not because they change gender (because seriously, the dubbers have already demonstrated a willingness to voice against gender), but because they wear fetish-inspired black-leather bondage harnessess.

      those idiots would react to characters who change from male to female and have females in love with them in male form.

      In that case there is the excuse that magic is involved, marking the situation strongly as unbelievable fantasy. They'd be more offended by an actual plausible non-hetreosexual relationship, like say, oh, two girls falling in love and moving in together. Maybe on of them could be a violinist, and the other an automobiler...

      For comparison, notice that the Sugartime episode of Postcards From Buster is in a lot more trouble than Spongebob.

    64. Re:No Story by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      In actuality if you want to watch anime, you will probably only know about 400 kanji by the time you can begin to understand it and maybe 600 or so by the time it just starts to make sense.

      That's doesn't make sense... to watch anime, you need to understand about ZERO kanji. (Unless you're Chinese and already know the characters) Understanding spoken Japanese can be tremendously easier than learning to read/write it. Especially within the somewhat restrictive genres of most anime programs.

      And since most anime is aimed at children, they frequently put little hiragana next to the kanji to make it easier (in the unlikely event that you really do need to read something).

    65. Re:No Story by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      A series just takes 2-4GB of hard disk space, and allows me to watch the whole thing without ever fumbling with the disks (and risking scratches in the process).

      Ripping a DVD to disc is quick and painless. (You can even include multiple audio tracks and soft-subtitles). Then you've got it on your HD and a optical backup! (That scheme would work better if DVDs had a higher episode count so less space was wasted...)

    66. Re:No Story by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      I was saying this with a couple of assumptions, mainly that if you are studying Japanese at what most people consider a reasonable rate(the speed most regular college programs go at) your understanding of hte spoken language will be that good aroudn the time you have finished studying 400 kanji.

      forgive that being unclear. As you said, you could learn only the spoken language and get more than good enough to understand anime.

    67. Re:No Story by alc6379 · · Score: 1

      Would it be considered "ironic" that he used the wrong "word" to describe the "mistake" that the parent made?

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
  2. What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For everyone else asking that question, they apparently translate foreign movies and make English subtitles.

    1. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And usually much better than the watered down American tranlation companies like FUNIMATION!

    2. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by AnotherEscobar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kind of a critical fact, thanks.

      The only reason I came to the article was to brush up on my vocabulary. I thought for sure my kid was going to make a reference to 'fansubber' one day soon and i'd appear to be more out of touch than I actually am.

      And here I immediately thought it was like a 'fluffer' or something.

    3. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by keyne9 · · Score: 1

      If you break it down, fansubber is:

      fan: by fans (obvious)
      subber: subtitler

      Thus, Fan-Subtitled. Very unofficial and often with quirks and discrepancies in translation and quality.

    4. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Kunnis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fansubbers go through and put subtitles on anime captured from Japanese TV. Usually the group captures it off of TV, then someone will translate it, pass it off to someone else for checking, then the subtitles are timed, then encoded, and finally distributed via newgroups or bittorrent. Most groups try to do a whole series, and most series are usually 26+ episodes long. IMHO the translations are better then the commercial ones, and sometimes the only way you can get the uncut series. Most of these groups do these translations weekly, and often they have half the series translated and their release dates are only a few weeks after their showing on TV in Japan. The commercial translations are only available at least a year or two after it's been out in Japan. Inu Yasha, which is very popular on Cartoon Network, was on its 3rd or 4th season in Japan before they started showing it here in the US.

    5. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mostly this refers to people who translate anime not yet available outside of its home country. They typically include notices in the movie saying that if/when the anime gets released here, buy the set and stop distributing the files.

      A lot of anime gets released here because of its popularity in the fansub world.

    6. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by monkey_jam · · Score: 2, Funny

      yarrrrrrr! Avast ye, ye scurvy Fansubber! I be dubbing this film with me own words! YARRRRR!

    7. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only reason I came to the article was to brush up on my vocabulary. I thought for sure my kid was going to make a reference to 'fansubber' one day soon and i'd appear to be more out of touch than I actually am.

      Yeah, it'll be useful for us parents when the FBI comes knocking on the door with a warrant for the seizure of computer equipment for illegal distribution of fansub materials... at least we'll have some idea what our kids are accused of...

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    8. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by jdray · · Score: 1

      Um, thanks, but I don't think that we are, as a collective, quite so stupid that we couldn't figure that out based on the GP. Of course, if people are reading this through a translator, it could get ugly, so maybe your explanation is warranted. It's early yet, so I'll just troll until the caffeine comes online.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    9. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know that's the first thing I wondered... I had to actually read the article to find out what the hell they were talking about... ...and then discovered that I didn't care. ;)

    10. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Elledan · · Score: 4, Informative

      It can be argued, of course, that fansubs exists for a good reason, namely that those lucky enough to live in Japan can watch those shows on TV, without necessarily having to buy the DVD, whereas poor suckers like the rest of us are expected to wait for those series to be released in our respective countries.

      If TV broadcasts weren't limited to a single country (in most cases), and only a single language was spoken in the entire world, then those companies would have a point. At the moment it are (mostly) just fans wanting to see the anime series which are currently being broadcast without having to wait a year or (much) longer and pay _extra_ for the DVD (on top of the costs for cable TV).

      I can understand Japanese, I like anime, but I don't want to buy the DVD(s) of every single series I watch. I'm, however, prepared to pay a couple of euros extra per month for the priviledge to receive the major Japanese TV-channels on my TV here in Europe. Which includes the latest (anime) series.

      --
      Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
    11. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      I thought it was related to furries. Glad to clear that up.

    12. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except, you know, without the quality control and in lower quality.

    13. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Kunnis · · Score: 2, Informative

      And in reply to my own post... a side issue. There's some series they chop up, so the video for the English and Japanese are diffrent. If I want the origonal uncut Japanese I have to buy one set, and if I want the dubbed version (a friend of mine hates watching subs because he can't read that fast) I have to buy another ENTIRE SET! ARRGH!

    14. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by rworne · · Score: 1

      Some of the fansubs I've seen released recently are high-quality rips from Japanese DVDs, digital satellite feeds, or HDTV sources. Subtitles are spot-on accurate too.

      Yeah, some of them are crap quality - mainly very old titles that are only available on analog (VHS) sources, but you take what you can get.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    15. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only one of the first sentences of the article had defined it. Oh wait...
      If only there were icons on slashdot to clue people in on what category the story fit into. Oh wait...

    16. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, outside poor copies (which are increasingly a thing of the past) I've found fansubs to be of significantly better quality then the offical releases that eventually replace them.

      Unless it's a top series, studios often have the bad habbit of producing hack jobs with poor translations, bad editing/timing, etc etc.

    17. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Except, you know, without the quality control and in lower quality.

      That's easy - don't bother with Hecto subs.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    18. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by po_boy · · Score: 1
      The only reason I came to the article was to brush up on my vocabulary.

      I used to do that. Now, I go over here. I'm not sure which one is more accurate and authoritative, though.
    19. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by trippcook · · Score: 3, Informative

      The majority of these groups stop subbing as soon as someone buys the rights to distribute the anime in whatever countries the fansubbers work in (US, for example). Nowadays, with anime a much larger business than it used to be, series are being licensed for US and European distribution much faster. In the old days, it was typical for a show to run all 26 episodes, then be licensed a year or so after it had finished on Japanese TV. Now, companies can spot a hit quickly, often licensing shows while STILL airing in Japan. There have been numerous shows that I watched fansubbed, only to have the series be licensed a few episodes in. By then, I was hooked on the show, and I gladly purchased the DVDs when they became available. I don't know what the legality is of it all, but I was told (back in the pre-internet fansub days of tape-trading) that it was actually LEGAL under Japanese law, so long as no one had licensed the show in the country it was being subbed in (and so long as the country didn't have someone legally broadcasting the original Japanese show). Is that true, or is that an anime club urban legend? Or maybe it was true then and isn't anymore.

    20. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In addition to all of this, it is important to note that fansubbers often produce better quality "subs" than the professionals. While the translations run the whole gamut of quality, I love how some groups go the extra mile and provide cultural footnotes that you can read, and translations of writing that appears on the screen. Many commercial products don't do that.

      In addition, I would just like to take this post to give a warning to the anime industry.

      Take a lesson from market behavior with the RIAA and MPAA. Don't bite the hand that feeds you, or not only will the fansubbers stop buying anime (I'm willing to bet fansubbers are also the anime company's most profitable customers) from you, but they'll just spend their effort on subbing licensed material to piss you off. As it is now, there's a pretty good agreement where we basically get to sub things that aren't licensed in the states, and they back off. They send notices out to the sites that do host licensed stuff, but that will be done no matter what, and there's no way to get rid of these people.

      As it stands right now, the VAST majority of the anime community respects the wishes of the anime companies, and we understand that we have a symbiotic relationship. They need our money to keep producing anime, we need their anime to get our fix. Very dumb move on behalf of this company to change that "agreement" just in search of higher profits. Write fansubbing off as a marketing expense and collaborate with some of the better groups instead, like Anbu or AONE or Seichi. Work with their translators, and get market insight from the fansubbers who have WAY more experience dealing with the desires of fans than the actual anime companies do.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    21. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I think is the Kursk, or maybe the San Francisco...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    22. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the catalyst for the takedown letters the article was talking about was fansubs of anime that wasn't shown on Japanese TV. What caused Media Factory to take exception was the distribution of "Akane Maniacs", a straight-to-DVD release in Japan, that was nontheless being distributed free over the Internet.

    23. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by PetrusMagnusII · · Score: 1

      you can get FujiTV on satalite in the USA.. But, last time I checked, all of the real good mini-series are on TV-Tokyo.. but maybe you can get that too. I don't have cable in Japan, and am not really one for anime, so I couldn't tell you waht channel you want.. but if i go back to the states, i want to get fuji tv for sure.. i like their variety shows..

    24. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 0

      This is a common problem with slashdot articles. They assume that since it's a site for geeks, that all geeks have exactly the same interests and therefore will know all the lingo of every sub-interest. If it was something about TCP/IP, or about Java, or C++, then yeah, you can assume everyone will know what it is. But if it's about a specific subset of geek interest, like fans subtitling animation that only was ever released in Japan, then people might not know the lingo and a simple few words of description would be helpful. A simple parenthetical phrase would be helpful, like "fansubbers (fans who make their own english subtitled versions of movies and TV, as opposed to the subtitles being done by someone getting paid for it as part of an official release.)"

      And this annoyed me even though I personally already knew what "fansub" meant.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    25. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      HECTO? Wow man, you are an old timer. Did you know that fansubs are online these days? :) Next you'll be warning us about Artic Fansubs.

      Most modern groups spend a lot of time on quality control, and the end result is pretty comperable to the professional releases (sometimes better, sometimes worse). The only ones you have to watch out for are the speed subbers, who try to get a show translated and out on the next the next DAY after it airs in Japan. Fortunatly, these groups are easy to spot because they tend to have a bunch of new shows out that the other groups don't have yet (IE, they're on foobar-120 while everyone else is releasing foobar-119).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    26. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      There is one slight problem though: TV is paid for with commercials. Fansubs don't have the commercials, and even if they did they wouldn't translate those too, and even if they did they would be advertising targetted at Japan, selling products that are only in that market, so the ads have no effectiveness on people outside Japan.

      (However, I would love to see the ads, just because Japaneese ads are so oddball and surreal.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    27. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Fansubs generally suck, pretty loose translations.. No need for them.

      Leave it to the pros.

      All Your Base Are Belong To US
      You have no chance to survive... make your time!

      - ZiG Biatch!

      I mean geez how the fuck hard is it translate into Engrish. :)

    28. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      Actually its not so much a cable, sat, or tv thing (screw those blood suckers) but those making the shows need to start making them available for download either with commercials included or for a subscription fee or even a per episode purchase. On demabd cable or even streaming is not the future of mass media, the download is. The sooner they wake up and realize this they can stop pissing away their profits paying the giant media companies and all the lawyers who send out the threats to someone in another country who happens to not want to wait the better part of a decade to see their favorite show.

    29. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      You saw that Sony was so worried about their IP that they didn't release a MP3 Player.
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/21/011722 1&from=rss

      I wish that Japanese media companies would become an example, but it's unlikely they will do so until someone (like Apple??) shows them the way.

      If there was a legal AND reasonably cheap way to download them, coupled with some deterring action (the carrot and the stick), people would probably switch.

      Rant: not like RIAA which is all about bullying without providing an alternative (there's not a single legal way to buy an MP3 in my country, and I don't want to pay for a CD for just one song)

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    30. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Buran · · Score: 1

      For the hearing-impaired (like me) relatively low-quality captioning (like live-style captioning which is delayed, scrolls by instead of just popping up, etc) is better than NO captioning.

      I am not an anime fan but I always approved of what the fansub groups were doing -- if I ever chose to become a fan, the shows were more accessible to me.

      I am a 'subtitle snob' not out of choice but out of necessity. I wonder if the studios ever thought of THAT. Providing subtitled versions would literally make their work available to thousands more people (the number of individuals who MUST use captioning or subitles to watch television or movies is not small -- and that's in the US alone.)

    31. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Buran · · Score: 1

      But when they get the rights, do they provide subtitles? If they don't, this doesn't help me -- as per my comment earlier in this discussion, I'm hearing-impaired. If I were to watch a series that was distributed this way (I'm not into anime, so I don't) and used the subtitles, then I went out and bought a DVD because the subtitled versions went away -- and the DVD wasn't subtitled -- boy, would I be upset ... I'd probably start specifically telling people I know NOT to buy from that studio, ever.

    32. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In addition to all of this, it is important to note that fansubbers often produce better quality "subs" than the professionals.

      That's one of the major reasons why I watch them.

      While the translations run the whole gamut of quality, I love how some groups go the extra mile and provide cultural footnotes that you can read, and translations of writing that appears on the screen. Many commercial products don't do that.

      Almost no commercial products do that. Speaking as someone who does ADR writing on anime (essentially I provide a dubbing script from a rough translation), I have to agree wholeheartedly. If something comes up culturally that can't be easily translated, I'm expected to gloss over it or find a way to dumb it down so it fits in the mouth flaps. The dubbed versions are really the lowest common denominator. Moreover, they sometimes use the translation scripts (not the final dubbing scripts) for the subtitling, providing poor translation and poor English.

      Hm, I'm really getting psyched up about my work, here.

    33. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      Makes 100% sense.

      US TV show DVDs sell because the shows were/are popular, and people want to get their favorites to watch over and over again (you know, because you just can't get enough Friends reruns through syndication ;). If I'd never seen an episode of "Curb Your Enthusiasm", I wouldn't know that its one of my favorite shows, and I wouldn't want to drop the bucks on the DVD sets.

      There's a frikken ton of Anime out there. I get overwhelmed walking down the Anime aisle at Fry's. There's just so much of it, and I have no idea what is what, since I've never seen probably 99.999% of it. I told someone "this is a new genre for me". He asked "what genre?", to which I replied, "uhhh... Anime? ;)"

      In that sense, the fansubs are filling that gap. Its an inexpensive way to explore the vast collection of Anime that is out there, and get a feel for what you like. It exposes us (where us == all people not in Japan) to much, much more than what is available at video stores. Its incredible market research for the studios.

      It seems to me that the fansubs are being fairly responsible with the shows they distribute, taking down shows when asked. If they include a disclaimer, as the parent post says (I haven't seen any fansub videos yet), that's even better.

      Do the studios ever use the translations done by the fansubs? I've been watching "Get Backers", and there's some phrases that just aren't right. I get the meaning, and even with no knowledge of Japanese, I can see how the translation went wrong. A thesaurus would do them a world of good, too; they say "trump card" like 15 times an episode.

      Before today, when I discovered fansubbing (thank's to the first (ranked) poster giving the definition, since the submitter and editors are useless), I was thinking of re-dubbing with fixed translations. It seemed like the logical thing to do, given that my conversational American English is probably better than that of the average Japanese translator (although, to me, the broken translations are part of the anime charm).

      I'm having a hard time finding the link, but a couple of years ago some people were recording and distributing their own DVD commentaries that you could playback while watching the movie, and hear what that person thought of the film, getting another viewer's perspective instead of the director's (and a hell of a run-on sentence).

      Perhaps the fansubs could do (or perhaps they do already) something similar, distributing alternate audio soundtracks to play in sync with the DVD once they are released here. That seems to be totally legal, could improve translation quality, and would seem to encourage more people to actually purchase the discs. Seems like a win for everyone.

      I'm curious: Have any studios ever used fansub translations on their DVDs?

      --
      blog
    34. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Every anime DVD I've ever purchased, rented, or borrowed had options for subtitles (often in more languages that just english) as well as options for which audio track to listen to (the original japanese, the english dub, or perhaps another language dub). so you could listen in japanese (to get the voices that were originally picked to portray the characters) and read in english, or listen in english with english subtitles, or no subtitles, or subtitles i whichever other language they're offered it.

      However, given the choice between a well-done fansub and the majority of anime DVDs, the fansubs are generally, in my opinion, more fun to watch. The poorly-done fansubs or the fandubs, on the other hand, are generally much worse than the DVDs. This is also discounting the (sometimes large, while sometimes unnoticeable) difference in image quality.

      Err. also, if you have the choice between the DVD and the fansub, then the fansub is probably (definitely) illegal.

    35. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many (most?) commercial DVDs have both subs and a dub, and although the translations are often really bad (the better fansubbers do a much better job), that does offer an option for people who buy DVDs and are hearing impaired. Usually the default is to use the English audio with no subs.

    36. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I brushed up on my collection of humorus phrases when watching a Van Damme vid ("In Hell") here in Japan.

      Van Damme, trying to prevent the murder of his wife by some killer, was yelling that his wife was in danger.

      The subtitle read:

      "My wife is DANGEROUS!"

      I am sure the sub was to be read as:

      "My wife is in DANGER!"

      ===

      While not a subtitle, there a bad translation of a Kill Bill DVD's movie-end title floating around...

      "Kill Bell"

      is at the end of the DVD. And, in the beginning, silhouettes bob and weave, reminiscent of MSFT3000.

      Perhaps if the whole DVD region encoding scheme were to be stricken or banished, and movies released world-wide to many regions versus by region code (1), then piracy and shoddy translations would be reduced, maybe a lot. (Disclaimer, I at one time had only ONE non-paid DVD in my collection and it was not US-produced (and when I get the chance I WILL pay for a retail copy of it when I get the money), but ALL my others in my personal collection are paid-for, usually from Fry's Electronics or as Blockbuster or Hollywood or mom-and-pop video rental stores' used video sell-offs , and I have over the years spent HUNDREDS on over 50 DVDs and maybe 80 or more VHS cassettes (Over the past 3 years or so my foreign film uptake has increased, due to the poor scripts domestically produced by hw.). (2)

      (Note 1.)
      (Yes, yes, I know digital projectors run in the $100k + range, and that celluloid seems to carry better depth but with pain of on-screen scratches and blobs from time to time, and that film reels cost a lot in weight and material, thereby limiting their distribution depth at any given time. And, I realize that the whole sketchy/dodgy region encoding is intented to squeeze from markets the maximum profit for the movie industry, despite the blatant incubation of a piracy market...)

      (Note 2)
      But, most of the non-purchased vids I watched in but didn't purchased were not worthy of my money, or time, and I am not averse to sampling a vid before going out and actually paying for it. ALL sellers and producers of movies and films should be required to permit a renter or customer preview access of the first and last 20 seconds of EACH chapter, plus 10 seconds to 30 seconds of the middle of EACH chapter before buying and being unable to return it. AND, the cover artists, if they can be called that, should be by law banned from using glitzy, glamorous art which substitutes for fake or atrocious props. I once bought a movie that advertised an Abrams M-1 tank, an AH-64 Apache helo, and I think a CH-53 and the "tank" in the shitty movie turned out to a shell, a box, with a fake interior, and a non-tank chair, big enough to serve as a small bedroom, and was so horrible I despise the people who conned the financiers and the idiots who financed it, as well as groan at myself every time I think of that worthless waste of celluloid. The only tenuous excuse was that some people might have gotten paid to work, but probably not much went to the lower-level set workerss... )

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    37. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      On Dish Network, you can get a channel called TV JAPAN. Aparrantly it consists of a bunch of NHK shows.

      http://www.dishnetwork.com/content/programming/int ernational/packages/indexalacarte.asp?languageType =Japanese

      $25/month, just for that one channel.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    38. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, is there going to be a sub vs dub debate on /.? The problem with fansubs is the unevenness of quality from group to group and even from within the groups. Some people have taken the position that all dubs are evil and all fansubs are saintly. Almost all of them can't speak a lick of Japanese beyond the few phrases they are able to discern from watching fansubs. None of them will acknowledge that any dub can be well done and "accurate" in their translations. They often cite attempts to match lip movements with words in dubbing as a fault.

    39. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by ikegami · · Score: 1

      To "translate foreign movies and make English subtitles" is simply to sub. To fansub is to do this noncommerically. It implies the distribution (for free) of the subbed material.

    40. Re:What the hell is a fansubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know something useful about the Korean "pay for download" system? I had the impression that it is very similar to what Acer500 is proposing. Of course, Korea -is- a world leader in broadband availability.

  3. biting the hand that feeds them. by TomRitchford · · Score: 4, Funny

    have they learned nothing from the collapse of the record industry?

    1. Re:biting the hand that feeds them. by moyix · · Score: 1

      by TomRitchford (177931) on Tuesday February 01, @10:23AM

      Shouldn't that read:

      by TomRitchford (177931) in The Mysterious Future

      ?

    2. Re:biting the hand that feeds them. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you are, but it's already Wednesday where I am ^_^.

    3. Re:biting the hand that feeds them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doh :) I was trying to make a joke about how if he was stating the downfall of the recording industry, he must be from the mysterious future...

      (posting anon so as not to clutter the thread)

  4. "Fansubbing" FTA by grub · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article (assuming you're like me in wondering what "fansubbing" is):
    "[fansubbers] take Japanese cartoons, translate and subtitle them in English, and release them freely on the Net."
    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:"Fansubbing" FTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[fansubbers] take Japanese cartoons, translate and subtitle them in English, and release them freely on the Net."

      That's the way it is today. When I first encountered fansubs about 14 years ago, it wasn't practical to distribute them on the net. In my case, I supplied new blank tapes to a friend I met in Usenet, and got copies of the fansubs in return. At the time, there was practically no anime being brought in commercially, dubbed or subbed - it was fansubs or nothing.

      It was through fansubs that I learned to appreciate watching a film with it's native language track and subtitling. Sure, dubbing is "easier" to watch, but it's just not the same as the original. The voices and intonations are just as important as the words.

  5. The problem is much larger than this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are entire communities of fansubbing writers.

  6. Yeah, file swapping is bad by Cambrant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's illegal, it's wrong, and it's certainly not good for you. If you're rich because of what's being shared.

    1. Re:Yeah, file swapping is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're being a jackass, no one makes money off of fansubs. often you will even find encoded directly into the video words to the effect: "not for sale, auction or rent, please discontinue distribution after title is licensed." is it illegal to watch TV? if there's anything ironic in what i'm writing it's because of your complete lack of communication skills. what's bad is mouthing off about something you obviously know very little about.

    2. Re:Yeah, file swapping is bad by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      If you're rich because of what's being shared

      What? What happens if you're rich becauseo f what's being shared?

      The economy will collapse?

      You'll be less rich?

      The forces of Skeletor will invade your home and send you to the dungeons?

      I'm sure that this could have been an insightful post but you didn't finish your

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    3. Re:Yeah, file swapping is bad by Cambrant · · Score: 1

      Except that you didn't read my post properly. What I said was that the only people bitching about file sharing being bad are the ones making money from what's being shared. Such as greedy musicians, film-companies, etc. Pirates usually don't make any money from their piracy, and lots of pirates buy what's freely available to them, because they want inlays in albums and boxes for their films.

    4. Re:Yeah, file swapping is bad by JustJon · · Score: 1
      Such as greedy musicians, film-companies, etc.

      Yeah! How dare they want to make money, feed their families, afford shelter, etc.!

  7. You sound like a thief yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese. It's fun and easy if you're not an idiot, and you can do it while you're at work if you have headphones and a cd-rom drive.

    Why are you encouraging people to steal their employer's time and resources for a personal, non-work hobby?

    1. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why are you encouraging people to steal their employer's time and resources for a personal, non-work hobby?

      Said the AC at work!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Arminator · · Score: 1
      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 01, @10:24AM
      Why are you encouraging people to steal their employer's time and resources for a personal, non-work hobby?

      I sure hope you posted this at home on your free day. Otherwise see me in my office ASAP.

      Sincerely,
      Your Boss.
    3. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because sometimes they don't even bring the cartoons to america, imagine here in Brazil or Argentina or any other periferic country. The cartoon just won't arrive without the fansubs.
      If FullMetal Alchemist is ever released on DVD here in Brazil, it's obvious I'm gonna buy it.
      Some quality is good too.

    4. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is this quote from? Was it in the original story? Of course, on a site where 1984 references are made all the time, I wouldn't be surprised at editors changing stories without leaving a trace.

    5. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      True. You should be learning Chinese, so you'll have a useful skill and be able to talk to your new, well-educated, overlords in a few years.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    6. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Otter · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ummmm, maybe I'm an idiot myself (and yet I still managed to pick up decent Japanese -- QED!) but who are you quoting?

      I'm curious about who this savant is for whom learning Japanese is "easy if you're not an idiot". Is it the same guy as the one who informed me a few weeks ago that developing the RSA algorithm should "take a CS sophomore 30 minutes"?

    7. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Bah. If they're well-educated, they can speak English.

    8. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by elendril · · Score: 1

      You are being paid to perform your job and not to devote all your time and energy to your employer.

      If you can do your job while performing your hobby, it's hardly stealing: on the contrary, it's a fine suggestion.

    9. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by William_Lee · · Score: 1

      Your employer might disagree with you. Most employers look at it as buying your time during working hours to do with you as they see fit.

      There are very few who look kindly on paying people to pursue outside interests during working hours.

      If your boss considers it a fine suggestion, you're luckier than most.

    10. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by siegesama · · Score: 1

      Try to hold more than one idea for a "bad thing" in your head at a time.

      • Taking an object from somebody without their permission: Theft
      • Learning Japanese while at work: Misuse of company time/Breach of Contract
      • Copying and distributing music you don't own rights to: Copyright infringement
      • Violence or threat of violence to further political agendas: terrorism
      • Posting a comment like yours: trolling
      • Responding to a comment like yours: being trolled
      • An obvious troll getting 5, Insightful: priceless

      I know it's hard to keep track of all the names for the things you dislike, but it's really for the best if you'd try.

      --
      what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
    11. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Because when their job gets outsourced as it will anyway, they can speak the language of our new business overlords.

      Being able to speak Japanese means you'll be able to speak the language of all the companies which still actually make stuff. Could be useful for getting a new job.

      (this post is only half joking)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    12. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Violence or threat of violence to further political agendas: terrorism

      Sorry, that one's been changed. It's now defined as disagreeing with the current administration's policies.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    13. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by siegesama · · Score: 1

      You know what Stuart? I like you. You're not like the other people, here in the trailer park.

      --
      what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
    14. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first post in this article suggested learning Japanese instead of getting fansubs of stuff that isn't in English, here.

      I think the parent just didn't hit the right button.

    15. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by blankman · · Score: 1

      If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese.

      Okay. So now I understand Japanese. But the Japanese cartoon hasn't been released where I live, in English or Japanese or anything else. So tell me again how learning Japanese meant I wouldn't have to download an unofficial copy?

    16. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      He knows it's true, because Hattori Hanzo said so!

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    17. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      They were apparently replying to this post

    18. Re:You sound like a thief yourself by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      importing, damn expensive, but legal in all senses of the word. note that 50 $ a dvd is standard price in japan for anything that isn't a complete F grade production, and those are usualy around 20 or 25

  8. Typical fansub anime movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    Young Girl: Oh no! A man with mirrored sun glasses!
    Evil Man: Ha ha ha ha ha!
    Young Girl: What are you doing? What's in that suitcase?
    Evil Man: Ha ha ha ha ha! I have my Rapectopus in this suitcase!
    Young Girl: NOOOOOOOOO!
    Evil Man: Ha ha ha ha ha! Now I will release my tentacled monster! He will delve freely into your nether-regions! Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

    1. Re:Typical fansub anime movie by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Although hentai is fansubbed, I would theorize that hentai is the sort of thing which doesn't really need to be fansubbed.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  9. Turning a blind eye? by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Historically the studios have turned a blind eye towards the work of the fansubbers, and the assumption has always been they they secretly approve since the fans work is amazing market research.
    No, historically, honest fansubbers have discontinued work and pulled masters on series that have been commercially released in the language the fansubbers were subbing to.

    Whether it's theft of service, or theft of property, it's still theft.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    1. Re:Turning a blind eye? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      and it's not like they've been very public about the fansubs either, they're distributed largely like any other xvids on the net.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Whether it's theft of service, or theft of property, it's still theft.

      Here we go again... no you cannot "steal" information because information does not have the required physical attributes to be "stolen". Anime is not "service" either because service requires a physical action to be performed for you by someone. And by using the word "theft" in this context you merely showed yourself to be a propagandist for people who believe one can "own thoughts and ideas".

      In other words you have no clue what you are talking about but you do have a knee jerk reaction that clearly identifies you as a worshipper of greed.

    3. Re:Turning a blind eye? by ZeroConcept · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Whether it's theft of service, or theft of property, it's still theft."

      It's called copyright infringement.

    4. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      copyright infringement != theft

    5. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether it's theft of service, or theft of property, it's still theft.

      It's only theft if the current laws define it so (which, in the case of IP, they do not...they define it as copyright infringement).

      If we pass laws that make the unpaid distribution of intellectual works legal, then poof, it is no longer copyright infringement, nor is it theft. Contrary to the beliefs of many under-educated but well-intentioned capitalists, there ARE business models that can be built around such laws, and turn a decent profit.

    6. Re:Turning a blind eye? by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Regardless of definitions of theft, it's going against the wishes of the copyright holder.

      And that is, quite bluntly, wrong. No matter the arguments put forward that fansubbing an anime and releasing it online is letting it reach a wider audience, is doing better translation work by the fans who know the series/creator's work well, or is making up for a copyright holder not allowing distribution in the country you live in, it's wrong.

      If you don't consider it wrong, then it's not wrong for Microsoft, Apple or Sun to decide that they can copy the entire Linux kernel, modify it for their own purposes and make it into a proprietary Winux or iLinux for example... because they believe it can then reach a wider audience, or be written by paid coders, or make up for the copyright holder (those who wrote GPL code) not allowing distribution in a proprietary form.

      But I expect it's more a case of double standards, that fansubbing will still go on and violating the copyrights of those who created it, and being done in part by people who insist their own copyright is respected with the code they release.

      --
      RST
    7. Re:Turning a blind eye? by hplasm · · Score: 0
      But I expect it's more a case of double standards, that fansubbing will still go on and violating the copyrights of those who created it, and being done in part by people who insist their own copyright is respected with the code they release.

      So the fansubbers are coders, too? Hmmm..... not everyone can or does program, you know. Even on /.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    8. Re:Turning a blind eye? by gowen · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      honest fansubbers have discontinued work and pulled masters on series that have been commercially released
      Do they then go around and gather in all the copies they illegally distributed?

      No? Then that's shutting the stable door after the horse has already gone, isn't it?
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    9. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Regardless of definitions of theft, it's going against the wishes of the copyright holder.

      Some "copyright holders" wish you to pay for mere thinking about of their "product". By not doing so you are going against their wishes. And that is, quite bluntly, wrong.

      If you don't consider it wrong, then it's not wrong for Microsoft, Apple or Sun to decide that they can copy the entire Linux kernel, modify it for their own purposes and make it into a proprietary Winux or iLinux for example... because they believe it can then reach a wider audience, or be written by paid coders, or make up for the copyright holder (those who wrote GPL code) not allowing distribution in a proprietary form.

      This is a first rate strawman. People who understand this know that GPL is merely a defensive mechanism constructed to thwart the proponents of "intellectual property" by cleverly turning their own legal system on them. If no copyrights existed, neither would GPL and there would be no issue with Sun incorporating our code into thiers, because the resulting code ... would be free for anyone to share (even though being closed) and thus Sun would have absolutely no incentive to close it in the first place i.e. they would be hardware company and all the software would by necessity be cooperative, licenceless, Open Source.

    10. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how is it possible for an actor to "steal the show."

      Joking aside, the use of the verb to steal to describe the taking of things that are intangible is not new. You've always been able to steal ideas. You've always been able to steal someone's affection for someone else. To suggest that the concept of theft being applied to intangibles is a new phenomenon is to blatantly disregard the facts.

      Stop trying to redefine words to suit your purposes. Doing so is intellectually dishonest.

    11. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      The use of the verb to steal to describe the taking of things that are intangible is not new. You've always been able to steal ideas. You've always been able to steal someone's affection for someone else. To suggest that the concept of theft being applied to intangibles is a new phenomenon is to blatantly disregard the facts.

      No such thing is being suggested. What is happening is a new usage of word "steal" to refer to financial loss and thus criminal activity akin to car theft.

      Stop trying to redefine words to suit your purposes. Doing so is intellectually dishonest.

      Not noticing the above and then trying to call me "dishonest" is somewhat stretching it... but then again I am talking to an AC, am I not?

    12. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      no you cannot "steal" information because information does not have the required physical attributes to be "stolen".
      Physical attributes are not required.
      Definition: v. stole, (stl) stolen, (stln) stealing, steals v. tr. 1. To take (the property of another) without right or permission.
      Information (or in this case, a work of art) is property. It is a creation. Contracts define its ownership. Artists are paid to make it.
      Anime is not "service" either because service requires a physical action to be performed for you by someone.
      Someone created it. Someone spent their time, energy, and money to produce it for my enjoyment.
      And by using the word "theft" in this context you merely showed yourself to be a propagandist for people who believe one can "own thoughts and ideas".
      Someday, when you have thoughts of your own, you will understand the concept of 'ownership.' Thoughts of your own, get it?
      In other words you have no clue what you are talking about but you do have a knee jerk reaction that clearly identifies you as a worshipper of greed.
      One day you'll have kids (or maybe at least a hamster) to feed and clothe and you'll understand what work is. I'm not greedy, I just like to eat, and sleep inside. Hot showers are nice, too. One day your parents will stop supplying all of that for you.
      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    13. Re:Turning a blind eye? by cybersaga · · Score: 0

      I may be wrong, but if there is no one producing it in your country, then doesn't that mean that there isn't a copyright for it in your country.

    14. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not 'Winux', it's WinX... Damn you, Balmer! you keep confusing people!

    15. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Macadamizer · · Score: 1

      Great post, but you apparently broke /. rule number something or other: information wants to be free! It can't be property!

      Remember, this is /. You can't steal somthing intangible. You can't own ideas or concepts. Intellectual Property, especially patents, have never, ever done anything other than hinder creativity (I suppose we would have flying cars and cities under the sea and daily trips to the moon already if it wasn't for the damn patent system). If you make too much money ("too much" defined as some multiple of how much money the poster or AC has or projects he or she will have when he someday graduates from school and gets a job), then it is morally okay to not have to pay them for what you want (at least, as long as it is intangible). If you are a company, and you don't change your business plan to please the pirates, you don't care about your "customers."

      --

      "That's not even wrong..." -- Wolfgang Pauli
    16. Re:Turning a blind eye? by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Regardless of definitions of theft, it's going against the wishes of the copyright holder. [...] And that is, quite bluntly, wrong.

      No, the technical term for that is "illegal". Copyright is a legal device that we use to encourage the creation and dissemination of creative works. It is limited in both scope and duration. Those limits have varied widely over the years and are under heavy pressure to change again.

      There is no universally acknowledged moral right for somebody who comes up with an idea to simultaneously share it with other people and still control it utterly. Merely asserting otherwise only polarizes discussion on an already difficult topic.

      If you'd actually like to help move the discussion forward, try saying things like, "I think it's wrong."

    17. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Information (or in this case, a work of art) is property.

      Sigh. No it is not. Unless you define "property" as vibrations of air molecules. "Property" is a physical object which can have a controlling person "the owner". Once the owner is deprived of the object by someone, that act is called "stealing". If someone were to look at your chair and then duplicate it in his house using his own materials, according to you he "stole" it. And dont even bother go the "revenue depravation" route because that is even more illogical then treating shapes and vibrations as "property".

      Someone created it. Someone spent their time, energy, and money to produce it for my enjoyment.

      I seriously have to get myself a set of responses to this never ending drivel to cut and paste here. The fact that someone "created" something does not constitute grounds for demanding payment. I spent time typing this reply in... cough up the money, you are reading it, are you not? I too spent time, energy and money (my internet service + my PC) for your "enjoyment"!

      Thoughts of your own, get it?

      Great! And what if I think a thought that someone thought before me! Oh shit! That means someone owns that thought and I am, as a part of my mind and soul is, someone else's property? Bubba, you gotta think (think, get it?) these things through before spouting them.

      One day you'll have kids (or maybe at least a hamster) to feed and clothe and you'll understand what work is. I'm not greedy, I just like to eat, and sleep inside. Hot showers are nice, too. One day your parents will stop supplying all of that for you.

      Nice set of assumptions here, so sorry to dissapoint, I am probably older then you. But fun aside, if you are seriously believing this nonsese, consider this: for most of human history, people like Plato, Aristotle, DaVinci, Newton, Shakespeare, Mozart, Bethoven etc etc created sicence and art without needing any of the "intellectual property" scams. In fact they all did it, as scientists and artists do for the love of discovery and art. In a properly functioning society, sicentists get paid by public academia and private research grants and their work is for all to enjoy free of charge. But more importantly, their work is used freely by other scientists to further our understanding of things. Artists are funded by art patrons, be it concert goers or art foundations. And they do not care, because no artist creates for the money, or else he is not an artist. This whole idea of "intellectual property" is for people and by the poeple who only understand one thing: greed. And there is a million of other aspects like compromises to the free-market model, corporate anti-competetive welfare, detremental effects on arts and science and ultimately a need to introduce a police-state in order to "protect" the "intellectual property" to consider here. But all you can go on about is hamsters and "think of the children!".

    18. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent time typing this reply in... cough up the money, you are reading it, are you not? I too spent time, energy and money (my internet service + my PC) for your "enjoyment"!

      If you had a big ass warning that said

      "IF YOU READ THIS YOU OWE ME $1" and I read it anway, I woudl hope you would hope you coudl see the distinction.

      Now, if those $1's were your sole source of income, I woudl understand if you got pissed, and righfully so, if I then copied you post and distributed it freely.

      You're pretty much a mental deficient but I come to expect that from slashbots.

    19. Re:Turning a blind eye? by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      The wishes of copyright holders - that all information transfer mechanisms used by all embed licensed DRM schemes to which they control the key in concert with hardware manufacturers - is, "quite bluntly, wrong." Society is a balance, the view your'e expousing is totalitarian.

    20. Re:Turning a blind eye? by AEton · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right, if by "your country" you mean "a place that's not a signatory to the Berne Convention or a similar international copyright treaty of its ilk".

      Wikipedia has a good and concise summary of some of the history of the Berne Convention (though not its mechanics).

      If you're looking for places to obtain fansubs essentially in compliance with the law, you might try this handy table.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    21. Re:Turning a blind eye? by QMO · · Score: 1

      Is that greed as in, "I could go to the store and buy it legally, or change the law, or move to another place where I like the law, but I think I'll just copy instead." Maybe that's sloth, not greed.

      Perhaps the greed is in, "I didn't write the script, draw the pictures, or create the music, but I'm entitled to them anyway.?"

      Or maybe it's just delusions of grandeur, like, "Foo can't be owned. I'm entitled to foo because I could create foo just as well. Anyone can. I just don't happen to feel like it today."

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    22. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here we go again... no you cannot "steal" information because information does not have the required physical attributes to be "stolen".


      This is what you said. I said that physical attributes are irrelevent because the word steal has long been used to refer to the act of appropriating something that belongs to another without permission where appropriate, something, and belong are assumed to take on their most general meanings.

      As such there's nothing wrong with calling copyright infringement stealing as this is consistent with the traditional meaning of the word as it applies to intangibles.
    23. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Is that greed as in, "I could go to the store and buy it legally, or change the law, or move to another place where I like the law, but I think I'll just copy instead." Maybe that's sloth, not greed.

      Fighting insane laws is a long process which begins with convincing people of their wrongness, this is where were at. You assumed that I actually do the copying habitually, which I do not. There is a difference betwen a moral and phillosophical stance and a desire to watch inane animations or imbecillic TV programs.

      Perhaps the greed is in, "I didn't write the script, draw the pictures, or create the music, but I'm entitled to them anyway.?"

      That has nothing to do with "entitlement" and everything to do with the nature of information. Since it is physically impossible to make information into "private property", from there it flows that it is also impossible to trade it in the same manner as you can trade pieces of coal. Thus instead of turning the argument on its head and speaking of "entiltement" we should be discussing how to make sure that true artists are able to express themselves and thus expand our civilization while they are provided with necessities of life and recognition they deserve.

      Or maybe it's just delusions of grandeur, like, "Foo can't be owned. I'm entitled to foo because I could create foo just as well. Anyone can. I just don't happen to feel like it today."

      Again you are trying to turn the core argument I am making into something it is not, as in "everyone can create art of equal caliber". I speak nothing of the kind, I am concerned exclusively with the unfitness of information to be "private property".

    24. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He means that given the size of the overlap between anime fans and people in the computer industry, he's guessing that there are probably some coders who are involved in fansubbing.

    25. Re:Turning a blind eye? by QMO · · Score: 1

      I don't make money from copyrights, patents, or trade secrets (a counterexample of your assertion of the impossibility of private property that is information), but I still support them, at least as they've been for the past few years.

      I'll risk an analogy here:
      If you are a plaintiff in a court, would you trust a judge that gets rewarded if defandants win more often?

      From that analogy, and your implied admission that you profit by copyright law violations (if not habitually), I hope that you can understand why I won't give your opinion the credibility you likely feel it deserves.

      Similarly, neither can I fully trust the opinons of people that make money by selling copyrighted works.

      If you can find someone that doesn't EVER profit by breaking copyright laws (or plan to), but still thinks it's ok, point me at them. I'd like to hear what they have say.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    26. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      If you can find someone that doesn't EVER profit by breaking copyright laws (or plan to), but still thinks it's ok, point me at them. I'd like to hear what they have say.

      I do not wish to offend, but that is a cop-out. It is extremely unlikely that people not involved directly in the fray would be anywhere near as interested and passionate about it. That is like saying that China should have decided if the American British Colonies should be granted independence, since the opinions of the British, the Revolutionaries and some other Europeans were suspect because they all had a dog in the fight.

      Rather then being a courtoom polemic, this is a battle and those who will muster better armies will win it, and "only" the future of humanity is at stake. You may wait for your impeccable impartial arbiter for a looooong time and when he comes, the dust will be long settled over the battlefield.

    27. Re:Turning a blind eye? by m50d · · Score: 1

      No, it's not wrong for MS to do that. I don't mind giving up copyright on Linux etc provided it works both ways. Really, I don't. I don't mind them copying linux if they'll let me copy windows. And I don't mind if you ignore the copyrights on the code I've written, as long as you don't complain when I do the same to you.

      --
      I am trolling
    28. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, most of these whinny posts are about people justifying their greed, their obtaining of massive amounts of music/movies/game/etc, and getting it out compensating those who produce the stuff.

      Plus the don't think of how much this stuff costs, and the likely hood of them similar quality stuff being released for free. It cost money to produce stuff like the Anime you freeloaders enjoy, and these companies have good reason to protect their IP.

      If you really don't like the concept of IP, then you better get use to not having any Anime produced, or at least the quality you are use to. For example, it cost a lot to make high quality games like Doom3 and Half-Life 2. Most of the fan/non-company produced stuff, that ISN'T A MOD, barley even gets past Half-Life1 quality. Even if they do manage so, they are so far and few between.

      Same thing applied to Anime, you are not going to see anything on quality of what you are downloading and ejoying today if there is no financial incentive for these companies or anyone to produce it.

    29. Re:Turning a blind eye? by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

      Last time ...

      In fansub, there is no copyright yet on the translated anime, except for the one that is valid in Japan only.

      No copyright=> no copyright infrigment...

      got it ?

      --
      It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    30. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      In fansub, there is no copyright yet on the translated anime, except for the one that is valid in Japan only.

      Are you in cryonic suspension or something?

      What you claim was only true from between 1984 and 1987. The very first long-forgotten VHS fansubs were indeed legal, but I suspect that more than 50% of today's fansub-viewers weren't even born before Japanese copyrights started extending to the USA.

    31. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      Yippee, I have always hoped to run into you again. :^)

      I seriously have to get myself a set of responses to this never ending drivel to cut and paste here.

      That would certainly help people identify your rhetorical flaws more quickly.

      The fact that someone "created" something does not constitute grounds for demanding payment. I spent time typing this reply in... cough up the money, you are reading it, are you not? I too spent time, energy and money (my internet service + my PC) for your "enjoyment"!

      Context matters. If you provided your opinions on a pay-to-play blog you would be justified in expecting compensation. Since you provided it in a free forum, you have no justifiable claim to compensation. The act of creating something doesn't imply grounds for compensation in-and-of itself, but any binding agreements attached to the act of making it available to others would, if they contained terms of compensation.

      These binding agreements may be laws, contracts or simply handshakes. I suppose it's reasonable to refuse to participate in any such binding agreement, if one accepts the consequences of ones actions.

      Great! And what if I think a thought that someone thought before me! Oh shit! That means someone owns that thought and I am, as a part of my mind and soul is, someone else's property?

      This argument ignores the fundemental difference between "thoughts" and "intellectual property"; thoughts are intangible and personal while intellectual property is the tangible (visually, audibly, or tactilely) extemporaneous expression of a thought or idea accompanied by a verifiable and legally recognized claim to "first art". Your thoughts can not be verified by anyone, and are not tangible until you express them, so no one can own any part of them.

      But fun aside, if you are seriously believing this nonsese, consider this: for most of human history, people like Plato, Aristotle, DaVinci, Newton, Shakespeare, Mozart, Bethoven etc etc created sicence and art without needing any of the "intellectual property" scams. In fact they all did it, as scientists and artists do for the love of discovery and art. In a properly functioning society, sicentists get paid by public academia and private research grants and their work is for all to enjoy free of charge

      This argument that there was a time in history where knowledge and art were altruisticly pursued and benevolently supported is not historically accurate. Newton, according to several bios I've read, "flagrantly abused" his position as president of the Royal Society to claim priority in disputes with fellow scientists. His unarguably significant scientific achievements were born of a drive for status. Shakespeare's productions were for-profit ventures that provided him significant wealth. Mozart and Beethoven, for whom commisioned works and box office receipts were their bread and butter, lived and died largely in poverty. Some bios opine that poverty hastened their deaths.

      In your properly functioning society, how is public academia funded? How about the private grants? Where do the art patrons and foundations get their money?

    32. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      This argument ignores the fundemental difference between "thoughts" and "intellectual property"; thoughts are intangible and personal while intellectual property is the tangible (visually, audibly, or tactilely) extemporaneous expression of a thought or idea accompanied by a verifiable and legally recognized claim to "first art". Your thoughts can not be verified by anyone, and are not tangible until you express them, so no one can own any part of them.

      Oh for Pete's sake, why dont you throw in a few "time-space-fluxes" and "consciousness-matter methaphysical transforms" into your definition. It would make it sound more scientific and might fool more poeple who are not paying attention. I am tired today so I will just point out some of the larger of the countless holes in your "argument". If your definition pertains only to "expressions" then the information itself is not part of it? If it is then thoughts, being certainly a form of information would apply. Say I listen to a song and then perform it myself exactly the same as the original (lets pretend I can sing that good). Is the song now being "xtemporaneous expression of my thought" mine? Are only the "expressions" "intellectual property"? As in vibrations of air molecules? Not the information that they correspond to? The magnetic fields that cause the speaker membranes to move? All of these "belong" to the "author"? What about then the information that is used to drive these systems? Is it his? The pattern itself? Which pattern? Can I encode it into a series of integer numbers? Is it still his? What about into a series of knots tied on strings? Or dots on paper? And just for a taste of grand insanity down the road: when I do "buy" the "expression", does that mean that I am entitled to any format of media and information encoding of it, because I bought the "expression"? This is endless.

      In your properly functioning society, how is public academia funded? How about the private grants? Where do the art patrons and foundations get their money?

      They get them from all the same sources as they always did: taxation and private donations. The fundamental difference, which you failed to grasp, is that in that system it is possible to pay for art and science without having to have "DRM enforcing" anal probes installed in all citizens.

      Newton..born of a drive for status

      Yes he was a fame seeking jerk. So? He would still do science because he loved it even if he could not get to boss others around.

      Shakespeare ...significant wealth

      And he did that without the need for "intellectual property". I have no problem with people charging entrance to theaters and other methods of payment for physical access to live performances. Besides, he was just shrewd, and getting wealthy was just a bonus that came nicely along with what he loved to do and would do regardless: write plays.

      Mozart and Beethoven, for whom commisioned works and box office receipts were their bread and butter, lived and died largely in poverty

      Which has far more to do with the general misery of the societies they lived in then any sort of discussion on "intellectual property".

    33. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      Oh for Pete's sake, why dont you throw in a few "time-space-fluxes" and "consciousness-matter methaphysical transforms" into your definition.

      I'm sorry if the big words confused you. I'll simplify. In order for one's "thought" to become one's "intellectual property", one must do *both* of the following:

      1) Manifest this thought in a way other's can detect it using one or more of their five senses; and

      2) Claim "first art" in a verifiable and legally-defined way.

      Again, *both* conditions must be met to turn a thought into intellectual property. Otherwise, it's either just one's thought or idea.

      I am tired today so I will just point out some of the larger of the countless holes in your "argument".

      I think you'd have better luck falling into a hole than consciously finding one in this argument. So far you haven't actually succeeded at doing either.

      If your definition pertains only to "expressions" then the information itself is not part of it?

      I don't know why you picked out the word expression to go on an on about...as you alone pointed out, there were plenty of others to choose from.

      And, no. Information, by itself, doesn't constitute intellectual property. It must be manifested somehow, and it must be verifiably original to become intellectual property.

      If it is then thoughts, being certainly a form of information would apply.

      Nope. Review the definition again. There's no basis of originality to the VAST majority of all human thought. An almost infinitely small number of people seek any claim of originality for some meager number of their thoughts.

      Say I listen to a song and then perform it myself exactly the same as the original (lets pretend I can sing that good). Is the song now being "xtemporaneous expression of my thought" mine? Are only the "expressions" "intellectual property"?

      Well, if you heard the song then someone else manifested it first. Either they've claimed first art (verifiably & legally), so you have no claim of intellectual property, or they have not claimed first art. If the latter is true, under the law you may attempt and could possibly succeed at claiming intellectual property rights. That would be shady, unethical and immoral, but the law, ethics, and morality are not always in lockstep agreement.

      Are only the "expressions" "intellectual property"? As in vibrations of air molecules? Not the information that they correspond to?...This is endless.

      No one can verify the specific movement of specific air molecules at a specific time. So no, vibrations of air don't count as IP. But...we can record the audible "sounds" generated by those molecular movements, and that record can be used to make a verifiable claim to originality. If no one can verifiably demonstrate prior art, then the claim will stand. As you can see, verifiability, is as key to claiming IP as the information or expression thereof.

      Without it, there can be no claim. You can scream "I made air vibrate in a unique way at [time/place]" or "I created magnetic fields that drove speakers that made air vibrate in a unique way at [time/place]" or *whatever*, until you're dead and bloated, but if there's no record of it, no one will much care.

      They get them from all the same sources as they always did: taxation and private donations. The fundamental difference, which you failed to grasp, is that in that system it is possible to pay for art and science without having to have "DRM enforcing" anal probes installed in all citizens.

      Businesses everywhere, be they corporations or privately-owned, rely on copyrights, patents, trademarks, and servicemarks to generate revenue. Wages and taxes are paid from revenue. Without income revenue, you have no donations from business. Without income revenue you have no wages. Without wages you have no private donations. Without income revenue you have no tax revenue. If you turn the faucet off, no water will come out the other end of the hose. Money doesn't exist in a vacuum.

    34. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      1) Manifest this thought in a way other's can detect it using one or more of their five senses; and

      2) Claim "first art" in a verifiable and legally-defined way.

      All right. I will ignore your first neat "definition" of The Grand Sum Of All Actions Of Humanity For All Time Including Audible Flatulence for the moment and focus on the second:

      Ahem... "first art"?! Could you care to explain this? What do you mean by this exactly? First how? No part of it (I will for the moment ignore definition of "art") was ever present in the universe before? Some portion of it? What precisely does your (I suspect made-on-the-spot) term "first art" refer to in this context?

      I don't know why you picked out the word expression to go on an on about...

      From your own definition: "while intellectual property is the tangible (visually, audibly, or tactilely) extemporaneous expression ..."

      I only respond to your assertions. Unlike you, I happen to be in a rather comfortable position of not having to make anything up, in addition to having wee little things like laws of physics on my side.

      And, no. Information, by itself, doesn't constitute intellectual property. It must be manifested somehow, and it must be verifiably original to become intellectual property.

      Goodey, we are getting more precise. So if information is not the "intellectual property", what is the problem then with duplication of the information itself? Is it ok to make a copy of the information and just the representation is forbidden? Original? What is the threshold of originality required? 100% of the "physical manifestation" as compared to all the others? 50%? 10%? How do you measure it? The only measure known to me is information contents (i.e. comparing bits of data) but you just rejected that. Be specific.

      There's no basis of originality to the VAST majority of all human thought. An almost infinitely small number of people seek any claim of originality for some meager number of their thoughts.

      Not until you manage to come up with a way to measure "originality" in an unambiguous and scientifically verifiable way. Otherwise your claim is just a wild assumption to be taken on faith.

      Either they've claimed first art (verifiably & legally), so you have no claim of intellectual property

      We will come back to this as soon as you define "first art" that is "verifiable".

      we can record the audible "sounds" generated by those molecular movements

      No we can merely translate the energy of air molecules into other forms of energy and use it to alter structure of some storage medium. "Sound waves in air" and "ordered motions of air molecules" are physically equivalent. One is actually defined as the other. "Sound" is defined as a sensory perception caused by vibrations of a bone in our inner ear, caused by the said "Sound waves". Note that other types of medium are possible such as water and solid materials, all capable of having their molecules vibrate in an ordered way. So you claim that we record the neural impulses from the inner ear receptors to determine originality! I am all ears(!) to hear more about this marvelous new way of veryfing the "IP"! And all without use of information science because as you just explained, IP is not the same as information! Marvelous!

      Businesses everywhere, be they corporations or privately-owned, rely on copyrights, patents, trademarks, and servicemarks to generate revenue. Wages and taxes are paid from revenue. Without income revenue, you have no donations from business. Without income revenue you have no wages. Without wages you have no private donations. Without income revenue you have no tax revenue. If you turn the faucet off, no water will come out the other end of the hose. Money doesn't exist in a vacuum.

      Thank you Captain Obvious for these truly insightful and enlightening discoveries. Now only if you kindly could explain what any of this

    35. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      "refer to the act of appropriating something"

      Yes like "to steal the show", I assume the show "belonged" to someone else at a time ... The word "steal" was used only in reference to physical objects in the context of criminal activity and to other things in the context of jovial, joking expression. Until the media corporations and their appologists came along that is.

    36. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      All right. I will ignore your first neat "definition" ... and focus on the second:

      That would be nonsensical and stupid, but I suppose you've got to wear the shoes that fit. I didn't change the meaning at all, I just dumbed down the wording because you whined about it. They're equivalent and interchangeable.

      Ahem... "first art"?! Could you care to explain this? What do you mean by this exactly? First how? No part of it (I will for the moment ignore definition of "art") was ever present in the universe before?..

      By "claiming first art" I mean "asserting claim of original work in accordance with applicable laws." The literal definition of art as "creative work" isn't remotely relavent to this discussion. In addition, the claimed work need not even be factually original, so "First how?" doesn't matter. For example: If you are the tenth person to manifest some given work, and none of the first nine people stated a claim of originality, then you could reasonably and successfuly claim the work yourself. However, in a case where you're the second person to manifest some given work and the first person has claimed it, if you attempt to claim originality, you would fail, and the other person would prevail. Clear enough?

      From your own definition: ... I only respond to your assertions.

      I merely wondered what it was about that particular word, of the many in my definition, set you off on such bizarre tangents...

      Unlike you, I happen to be in a rather comfortable position of not having to make anything up, in addition to having wee little things like laws of physics on my side.

      You provide me with more than enough fallacy and folly to address without having to make things up. And the laws of physics are on no one's side of this discussion...

      if information is not the "intellectual property"

      No. What I said, clearly, was that "information *BY ITSELF*" is not IP. Information needs to be accompanied by a stated claim of originality, provisional to applicable laws.

      what is the problem then with duplication of the information itself? Is it ok to make a copy of the information and just the representation is forbidden?

      If the information IS NOT someone else's IP (i.e. information accompanied by a valid claim of originality) then duplicaion is not a "problem". If the information IS someone's IP, and they acquiesce or permit duplication, it is not a "problem". If the information IS someone's IP, and they don't permit duplication, then duplication is a violation of applicable law, and problematic to whatever degree the involved parties care.

      Original? What is the threshold of originality required? 100% of the "physical manifestation" as compared to all the others? 50%? 10%? How do you measure it? The only measure known to me is information contents (i.e. comparing bits of data) but you just rejected that. Be specific.

      If we all agree to be bound by rule of law, then this threshold can be arbitrated or litigated,on case by case basis or as a whole, by applicable governing bodies. We both live in nations where we are bound by rule of law, so this applies to both of us. Of course, we could choose to ignore this binding agreement if we accept the consequences of that choice.

      I agree that comparing data, including the information and the accompanying claim(s) of originality, is a fair way to arbitrate disputed originality.

      Not until you manage to come up with a way to measure "originality" in an unambiguous and scientifically verifiable way.

      See the immediately previous point. Originality need not be measured scientifically if parties agree to be bound by law.

      Otherwise your claim is just a wild assumption to be taken on faith.

      I was merely asserting that only a minute number of thoughts throughout human history are original. For every "Here's what I'll call the wheel" thought

    37. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      That would be nonsensical and stupid, but I suppose you've got to wear the shoes that fit. I didn't change the meaning at all, I just dumbed down the wording because you whined about it. They're equivalent and interchangeable.

      You provided 2 sub-definitions to be taken together taken as one to define your version of "intellectual property". I focused on point #2. I am not sure what your ranting about "nonsensical and stupid" refers to other then to your own ideas.

      By "claiming first art" I mean "asserting claim of original work in accordance with applicable laws." The literal definition of art as "creative work" isn't remotely relavent to this discussion. In addition, the claimed work need not even be factually original, so "First how?" doesn't matter. For example: If you are the tenth person to manifest some given work, and none of the first nine people stated a claim of originality, then you could reasonably and successfuly claim the work yourself. However, in a case where you're the second person to manifest some given work and the first person has claimed it, if you attempt to claim originality, you would fail, and the other person would prevail. Clear enough?

      You make me laugh. Not only this is a muddled mumbo jumbo consisting of: if the first dude didnt claim it and if the ninth one did then its the ninth who "owns" it... owns fucking what?! The whole point of me asking you to define "first art" was not for you to go into some circular definition of what does it mean to be a first person in a queue. What you did not define in even the most vague of ways is how do you distinguish one piece of "art" that someone claimed dibs on from another! You can have 25 people in line, all claiming the some thing, and each of them has it in 25 different colors! Is it 25 pieces of unique art? 1 in 25 colors? Are they all owners of "first art"? Is only the first one? What about of each of those thing has different scale? Some pieces shuffled around? Etc. In other words, your entire rant is based on a non-definition of "first art" that you arbitrarily concocted out of thin air. Unless you come up with a way to determine what is and what is not "first art" in a scientific and verifiable way your whole argument is not worth the web page space it occupies and only serves to appologise for a system where the one who has more lawyers gets to claim your arbitrarily defined, unverifiable, subjective, "first art". On a second thought, this is the point of "Intellectual Property" law, to create a morass of nonsensical, mutually-contradictory definitions which can be exploited to corporate advantage...

      information *BY ITSELF*" is not IP... If the information IS NOT someone else's IP

      I am sorry. You probably do not realize such nuances of logic, and so I must break the bad news to you: you can't have it both ways. Either the information is the IP or it is not. It can be a "component" of IP, which you seem to suggest (information+legal claim), but in that case it can be freely copied as it is a mere component, akin to sand used to make a statue (the statue being your "IP"). So unless the information, on its own, is the "property" that can be "stolen", the game is basically over as far as information is concerned, and you might as well drop it from your discussion and come up with some other way of putting shackles on us all.

      If we all agree to be bound by rule of law, then this threshold can be arbitrated or litigated,on case by case basis or as a whole, by applicable governing bodies. We both live in nations where we are bound by rule of law, so this applies to both of us. Of course, we could choose to ignore this binding agreement if we accept the consequences of that choice

      I agree that comparing data, including the information and the accompanying claim(s) of originality, is a fair way to arbitrate disputed originality.

      Nice try. Comparing data is woefully insufficient to determine "originality". It is a trap I set for you

    38. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      Okay, to continue...and since you couldn't hold your wad until I completed my response I'll include my retort to your most recent reply here too. In all fairness, I accept responsibility for the loss of sync, since due to time constraints I haven't been very good about posting quickly.

      We will come back to this as soon as you define "first art" that is "verifiable".

      I've define first art well enough by now, and I'm using verifiable within its standard definition, look it up if required.

      No we can merely translate the energy of air molecules into other forms of energy and use it to alter structure of some storage medium. "Sound waves in air" and "ordered motions of air molecules" are physically equivalent. One is actually defined as the other. "Sound" is defined as a sensory perception caused by vibrations of a bone in our inner ear, caused by the said "Sound waves". Note that other types of medium are possible such as water and solid materials, all capable of having their molecules vibrate in an ordered way.

      Wow. My "big word" first definition of IP has nothing on this. You win the "let's derail a discussion by vomiting irrelevant minutia on a simple idea" award hands waaay down. I couldn't even begin to compete with this zen mastery.

      My point was you could use a standard audio recording, if appropriate, as part of your evidentiary trail in claiming originality of a thought or idea. The physics of how energy acts in conjunction with physical entities to create such a recording is indeed interesting, but entirely moot in this context.

      So you claim that we record the neural impulses from the inner ear receptors to determine originality!..Marvelous!

      What a clumsy strawman! I did nothing of the sort. Obviously, I was just giving an example of possible evidentiary material for justifying a claim of originality. Mind you, such a recording must be dated and otherwise documented to be a complete claim.

      ... Now only if you kindly could explain what any of this has to do with funding arts or academia through grants and patronage instead of direct revenue ...

      My point was pretty fucking obvious. If you destroy the underpinnings of our current ecomonic model there will be no direct revenue or income for supporting patronage. Like it or not, our current economy is reliant on branding, trademarks, servicemarks, and similar methods of protecting product and service differentiation.

      would suggest a particular emphasis on the impossiblity of conducting any business prior to introduction of "copyrights, patents, trademarks, and servicemarks" and how the whole of human kind lived in ... since it appears that you are suggesting that no commerce could have occured prior to that and no wages could have been paid.

      The world has moved on from feudal and agrarian economies where productivity and distribution was low and slow. Prior to the industrial revolution, product differentiation was not a factor since economies were largely local. If you went to the general store to buy corn, that corn was locally grown and was in a big bin labeled "corn". There was no branding and no need for it, because local demand was usually equivalent to local production, and even if they were askew, there was little to be done, because long distance distribution was a pretty difficult task.

      As the Industrial revolution increased productivity and distribution speed, the concept of branding came hand in hand to fill a need to separate Paul's widgets from Peter's widgets. In an every-increasing global market, branding and advertising to differentiate became the norm. Companies had to have methods to protect their brands, products and services from being copied by competitors, and so IP law was born. In case it's not explicit enough for you yet, brands are IP, and are as essential to companies everywhere for market success. Without legal backign to protect

    39. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      I've define first art well enough by now, and I'm using verifiable within its standard definition, look it up if required.

      Nothing of the sort. All you have provided is misdirections, vague hints, ambiguous excuses worthy of a crook running for an office, innuendo and fancy footwork, delightful examples of which follow..

      My point was pretty fucking obvious. If you destroy the underpinnings of our current ecomonic model there will be no direct revenue or income for supporting patronage. Like it or not, our current economy is reliant on branding, trademarks, servicemarks, and similar methods of protecting product and service differentiation.

      No, your point was fucking stupid. Only a small fraction (the least beneficial to society) of our economy depends on "branding, trademarks, servicemarks, and similar methods of" connivery. Not only did I present you with irrefutable evidence that healthy economic systems not dependent on this crap are possible (as they were in operation for millenia) but the legal monopolies created by these aberrate laws are staunchly anti-free market since they represent extra-systemic interference by governmental bodies. If you are serious about it, we can discuss in detail the anti-free market action of these ill-conceived laws. The system I described is not only proven to work (by our history) but also avoids these market-distorting pitfalls. And I wont even get into the disasters that await us if the "intellectual property" robber-barrons and their apologists (that means you) succeed in totally devouring Western legal systems. Also there exist other methods dealing with ensuring athenticity of products which do not involve any sort of "intellectual property" bullshit.

      If you went to the general store to buy corn, that corn was locally grown and was in a big bin labeled "corn". There was no branding and no need for it, because local demand was usually equivalent to local production, and even if they were askew, there was little to be done, because long distance distribution was a pretty difficult task.

      This example does not provide any imperative for "branding" of any sort.

      As the Industrial revolution increased productivity and distribution speed, the concept of branding came hand in hand to fill a need to separate Paul's widgets from Peter's widgets.

      By "branding" you seem to refer to simple attribution. Inventing new words in order to screw the legal system up is a classic example of the sort of activities "IP" proponents are up to.

      In an every-increasing global market, branding and advertising to differentiate became the norm.

      Again you speak of atribution of products. I grant you that making sure that "widget A" came indeed from company "A" and not someone predending to be "A" is important. But that has nothing to do whatsoever with any sort of "intellectual property". Attribution and determination of authenticity were with us since times immemorial. "branding" crookery wasnt. Note here, that "branding" represents one of the lowest and most useless elements of modern capitalist societies, whereby various psychological manipulation gimmicks, lies, misrepresentations and all sorts of other slime is used to make sheeple buy severely overpriced and frequently inferior products, usually made by 3rd parties and sold under falsified attribution. In direct contradiction to free market theories of capitalism.

      Companies had to have methods to protect their brands, products and services from being copied by competitors, and so IP law was born.

      Nothing of the sort. The only requirement in existance is that a product can be certified as authentically made by a company. The "IP" law was born when some crooks realized that by pretending to protect their companies from "unfair" competition they can create anti-competetive interference by governments. Thus controls of not only determination of authenticity (justified) but of "ownership" of concepts and ideas (completely unju

    40. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      All you have provided is misdirections, vague hints, ambiguous excuses worthy of a crook running for an office, innuendo and fancy footwork

      Laughable. I've done nothing but dismiss one contextually-orphaned strawman after another. You're welcome to keep sending me more fodder though, if you like.

      Only a small fraction (the least beneficial to society) of our economy depends on "branding, trademarks, servicemarks, and similar methods of" connivery ...

      And who determines relative "social benefit"? And, very specifically, tell me what this other largest fraction of our economy is that doesn't use IP in some way?

      Not only did I present you with irrefutable evidence that healthy economic systems not dependent on this crap are possible (as they were in operation for millenia) ...

      Yep. And then I returned that evidence to its contextual origin, and explained how we have moved on from that era into a new one. And?

      but the legal monopolies created by these aberrate laws are staunchly anti-free market since they represent extra-systemic interference by governmental bodies.

      You mean the temporary monopolies granted to those who invested their creative and economic resources into creating something original to market? If you were more pragmatic, and argued that IP rights should be tightly limited to foster long term competition, we'd find common ground.

      If you are serious about it, we can discuss in detail the anti-free market action of these ill-conceived laws.

      Since discussing things with you is so is such a monumental pain, I'll pass. Thanks though.

      The system I described is not only proven to work (by our history) but also avoids these market-distorting pitfalls.

      You haven't described jack shit. You keep asserting "We could do without IP, because it's been done before" without acknowledging little things like the Industrial Revolution and its affect on how products are produced and distributed. You haven't once said, "This is how it would work now..."

      And I wont even get into the disasters that await us if the "intellectual property" robber-barrons and their apologists (that means you) succeed in totally devouring Western legal systems.

      Typical of your "Assert and Dodge" rhetorical style.

      This example does not provide any imperative for "branding" of any sort.

      Exactly my point!! It's an example of your beloved pre-Industrial Revolution economy where low productivity and slow distribution meant differentiation was largely irrelevant. That was very clear in the paragraph you quoted back to me. Good grief, I'm becoming more and more convinced you have a learning disability that prevents you from keeping anything you read in context.

      By "branding" you seem to refer to simple attribution. Inventing new words in order to screw the legal system up is a classic example of the sort of activities "IP" proponents are up to.

      Er, the word comes from the practice of branding livestock (property), but no matter. I'm referring to branding in the classical sense of a company distinguishing their product in the marketplace from competing products by using trademarked, servicemarked, and copyrighted names, logos, and sales collateral and advertising, e.g. using IP constructs.

      I grant you that making sure that "widget A" came indeed from company "A" and not someone predending to be "A" is important ... The only requirement in existance is that a product can be certified as authentically made by a company ... Protection of authenticity (i.e. attribution) of products is the only thing required of a free market in this context.

      There we have it! Argument over, and I win. You can't have it both ways. Either Company A may say, "Hey! That's our product (in design and/or manifestation) and Company B is marketing our product

    41. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      [Various witty repartes skipped]

      Since this disussion is all over the map (and I am getting tired of it), I will make the following simplification. We will discuss the economic implications and social effects of "intellectual property" as soon as you demonstrate that a) it exists, b) it can be used in a "reasonable" manner in a courtroom and c) that your definition of "reasonable" is not synonymous with application of legal shaft into everyone's anal cavities, which I will define narrowly as "factual evidence is irrelevant to winning or losing the case in vast majority of cases, i.e. the results are arbitrary or random". I will return to all of these questions of economic mechanisms, social justice, motivation of innovation, etc. and provide you with replies to all your points in that regard as soon as we have this rather fundamental hurdle cleared. Note that should you succeed, you will have scored an important victory, i.e. I would have admitted the existence of a valid concept of "intellectual property".

      I will make one exception though, since I cannot leave you claiming "victory" somewhat prematurely, unanswered.

      There we have it! Argument over, and I win. You can't have it both ways. Either Company A may say, "Hey! That's our product (in design and/or manifestation) and Company B is marketing our product and even our brand!" or they don't.

      Nothing of the kind. The only thing in question is athenticity of a product. Authenticity (or attribution in this context) is simply achieved by determining the origin of an item. This requires no "intellectual property" or "ownership of an idea" of a product whatsoever. Simply we are discussing something like: one potato came from Orville's farm and the other one didn't. Note that neither the potato itself not Orville person are "intellectual property", nor is the name "Orville" (being a name of hundreds of other people and farm animals). No measure of originality is required. If instead of potatos we were looking at TV sets, one only has to determine if a TV set was originally shipped from a factory of company A to determine that company A made it. Again this has nothing whatsoever with ant sort of "ownership of ideas" aka "intellectual property". A specific situation whereby a company B manufacturers a 100% copy of the TV set made by company A is valid and acceptable (as with potatos) and the only thing of concern to the consumer is if the set was indeed made by A or B or someone else. Again, mere shipping records are sufficient to determine that. This of course is in a normal capitalist system whereby products, rather then shapes, designs, ideas, names and farts are subject of trade. Again all of this is moot if you cannot demonstrate validity of "IP" in simple practical terms as our little Q&A session will quickly demonstrate.

      So, you've previously argued that there is no scientifically valid, unarbitrary method to differentiate original works. Now, you're saying that authenticity is the only important thing. Tell me, How do you authenticate origination without determining originality? Can you? Can't you? Please, oh wise and consistent one, please tell me.

      As I explained, no test for originality is required to determine the attribution of products, thus their authenticity. Since products (as oposed to "intellectual property" nonsense) are physical, one can simply trace their origin via examinig their shipment history.

      But now back to our empirical test:

      Questions:

      I am not sure of your reply format, I assume you are trying to predict my responses, in mostly incorrect way. I will omit your guesses and only supply answers to the questions posed.

      Q1: Were you serving the content to an audience that could assumably include a RIAA representative or agent? Or did the RIAA blackhat the data off of a non-serving host protected by minimally due diligant security?

      The contents was located on my computer. It was "pointed to" by a web server, also running on my comput

    42. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      Let me first say that I'm getting worn out by this discussion too, and in that sense I very much welcome the simplification. However, on another level, I can't help but feel that this is a blatant attempt to dodge some very specific questions I've posed to you. Anyway rather than let you unilaterally frame the remaining discussion I have a brief expansion on your TV example:

      A specific situation whereby a company B manufacturers a 100% copy of the TV set made by company A is valid and acceptable (as with potatos) and the only thing of concern to the consumer is if the set was indeed made by A or B or someone else. Again, mere shipping records are sufficient to determine that.

      Okay. Let's say that Company A is DBA "Acme Electronics" and Company B is DBA "Acme Electronics". In your economic model this would be a perfectly valid practice, since company names are ideas and can be duplicated without "stealing" physical property. Let's also say Company A's and Company B's logos and sales collateral are 100% identical. Again, a perfectly valid business practice since logos, ads, fliers, etc are all 100% duplicable without "stealing" physical property. Finally, let's say that Company A did the actual R&D to create the TV and Company B acquired the design and material to make the 100% copy at no meaningful cost (much like downloading and then serving a copyrighted song online.) Let's say Company A charges $500 for this TV (creating enough profit margin to succeed but not enough to exploit consumers) and Company B charges $50 or nothing, since their costs are trivial.

      Tell me again how Joe Consumer is served by this model? How does he realistically tell he's buying a "Company A" or "Company B" TV? Better yet, since from his prespective everything is 100% identical (except for cost) tell me why it would matter to him?

      It's not all about the consumer side of the equation either. What return does Company A get for their R&D investment? A "warm fuzzy" doesn't keep anyone employed. Even if Joe Consumer were good-hearted enough to pay a 90-100% premium to Company A to reward their R&D effort, he would have to do a lot of due dilligence to figure out who was who because everything but some addresses are identical. Most times, Joe Consumer will not pay that premium anyway because good hearts fall prey to frugal souls quite often.

      Tell me these answers and I will be happy to continue with yours.

    43. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Okay. Let's say that Company A is DBA "Acme Electronics" and Company B is DBA "Acme Electronics". In your economic model this would be a perfectly valid practice, since company names are ideas and can be duplicated without "stealing" physical property. Let's also say Company A's and Company B's logos and sales collateral are 100% identical. Again, a perfectly valid business practice since logos, ads, fliers, etc are all 100% duplicable without "stealing" physical property.

      That would not be possible. While duplication of all of those things is perfectly all-right, the impersonation of Company A by company B is not. Nothing to do with intellectual property. Therefore the company B would have to truthfully identify itself as such. That does not prevent them from copying all they want, but it forces them to make (minor) changes that uniquely identify them. This is the traditional, pre-"intellectual property" system. In my example of Orville and his potatoes, even if "Orville" is not any sort of intellectual property, one would expect that if another "Orville" showed up from the next village, he would have to identify himself as such. As in "Orville from The Sticks" etc. This is the only way to make sure that the consumer has full knowledge as to the source of the given product he purchased. Again, no "intellectual property" of any sort is present.

      Finally, let's say that Company A did the actual R&D to create the TV and Company B acquired the design and material to make the 100% copy at no meaningful cost (much like downloading and then serving a copyrighted song online.)

      The "acquisition" of the design can be achieved in many ways, such as industrial espionage or reverse-engineering. The materials have to be bought on market at the same price company A pays. Note that art and science are not "products" and are not relevant here. Even if the time to do so is a fraction of the original design time, the following self-regulatory mechanism is embedded in a free market: the time to "duplicate" a product is proportional to its complexity and degree of innovation. That is if company B wishes to reproduce a plastic spoon made by company A, all they have to do is to purchase an injection-molding machine and spend half a day making a die. Still, even then, marketing channel has to be established and employees hired/trained. On the other hand if the object is a complex piece of electronics, not only the reverse-engineered design has to be tested and its weaknesses discovered (remember, company B is responsible for its products even if they duplicated the design), complex production lines established, employees trained on the new design, literature published, marketing channels established etc. Also note that companies will try to establish anti-industrial espionage measures to slow this process down further.

      Let's say Company A charges $500 for this TV (creating enough profit margin to succeed but not enough to exploit consumers) and Company B charges $50 or nothing, since their costs are trivial.

      You made several invalid assumptions here. Firstly, for all the sane (as in non-"pure IP") products in the marketplace, the company A's R&D is trivial compared to the cost of the manufacturing, distribution, service etc. Following is the fact that most of the hard parts of research are done by scientists at academia and company's A engineers were merely taking advantage of that. Their new design was a mere incremental improvement on hundreds of prior ones (which they obtained freely), using basic science (also obtained freely) from the academia. Thus the difference between prices of the two sets is more like $500 to $489. Does that put the company A at a disadvantage? Yes and no. Yes if the company A wishes to maintain profits from an increasingly aging design. Not if the company A actually wants to compete in a free market.

      Let me illustrate this in a more general setting using something akin to game theory. We have two players, A and B (our companie

    44. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      I must start by saying that with this post you have earned my respect, for two reasons.

      First, you have convinced me, not yet to agree with your position, but to respect its viability. I grant you some fair points, but I still disagree with you on some key issues.

      Second, I very much appreciate and respect the tone of your post. We, in our current and previous discussions, have dipped to pretty infantile levels of personal animosity over a difference of positions on IP. That's just not a good way to advocate for something, even if we are passionate about it.

      Now, I'm willing to lay down my pen-sword and walk away from this discussion with a better understanding and respect for you and your position. However, because a promise is a promise, I will--at your option--continue to walk through your example. Let me know if you'd like to continue.

    45. Re:Turning a blind eye? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      I must start by saying that with this post you have earned my respect, for two reasons. First, you have convinced me, not yet to agree with your position, but to respect its viability. I grant you some fair points, but I still disagree with you on some key issues.

      I am glad that I was able to explain my point in a way that was convincing. This issue is very difficult to discuss because of the fact that historically some decisions were made which looked common-sense on the surface and remained unquestioned until they became a fixture of our culture. Then some people have worked extremely hard to abuse that situation by propagandizing measures to worsen it further for their own benefit. Doubly unfortunate is the fact that these same people happened to be operators of American (and Western in general) media and gatekeepers of our culture. That is why the opinions of people on the issue are so hotly contested. It is difficult for anyone (myself included) to question something which appears "obvious" or "common sense". I did spend quite a bit of time researching this issue recently, but that happened only after I became aware of the frightening possibilities and disastrous effects of "IP" after a series of coincidental observations over the duration of my rather longish career finally connected in a moment of "Eureka!" a few years ago.

      Second, I very much appreciate and respect the tone of your post. We, in our current and previous discussions, have dipped to pretty infantile levels of personal animosity over a difference of positions on IP. That's just not a good way to advocate for something, even if we are passionate about it.

      This actually is a common situation when positions of people discussing something are so far apart that each side can only imagine the other as having a screw loose. I have been guilty of this as anybody and so my natural tendency to try to make light of depressing (to me) things combined with doubts about the other person's seriousness tends to produce my various attempts at biting satire.

      Now, I'm willing to lay down my pen-sword and walk away from this discussion with a better understanding and respect for you and your position. However, because a promise is a promise, I will--at your option--continue to walk through your example. Let me know if you'd like to continue.

      Since we were able to make some progress in other ways, I will skip my planned "reductio ad absurdum" exposé of the fallacy of "information as intellectual-property" and I will simply demonstrate how the trap I laid for you was supposed to work so that you might hopefully appreciate the way in which that concept is utterly unworkable for any reasonable person.

      In my example, I had myself distributing a large number of files with weakly encrypted file names in format of "Titney Spears-CD1-track-7 5-12-31.mp3" (the encryption was silly ROT-13). The file names were the weakest spot of the scheme but they were merely a technical choice I made to make the demonstration simpler. I will come back to them later. The format is "[some-song-or-art] N1-N2-N3.[file type]". The N1,N2,N3 are integers from say 1-200 each. On the same web page, I had a list of 200 URLs pointing to locations away from my site, containing publicly available files under "free-for-all" public licenses. Now consider this: If any so called "Intellectual Property" is equivalent to information (even if additional documentation such as a Deed is required) then that "IP" is subject to laws of information theory, which in itself is a sub-set of mathematics. From which follows an observation that any "IP" can be represented as binary data (as per information theory). For convenience I will treat that "IP" as a series of integer numbers corresponding to their binary representation. A series of integer numbers, can be represented as a single, large, integer number. For example, one can simply concatenate the numbers (signal levels of each digital sample for example) end-to-end and end up with just such a nu

    46. Re:Turning a blind eye? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      ... as I hopefully demonstrated beyond any doubt.

      Well, not beyond any doubt, but you've given me some *serious* food for thought. Interesting!

      I hope this little diatribe of mine was helpful in understanding my position on this.

      Very much so. Later, then...

  10. Ahh! by daveschroeder · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So apparently it's ok to take others' work that doesn't belong to you, and, perhaps because you've put a little work into it yourself, and don't fundamentally agree with regional releases, it can be rationalized that it must be "ok" to use and release it for free! And then when a content owner does come along and actually take notice (because if they didn't notice before, certainly that means it was tacitly approved of, even though you didn't ask permission, because certainly *everyone* must be aware of your phenomenal work!), you'll come up with further reasonings why you don't have to respond to the letter or spirit of their request!

    I understand perfectly now, thanks!

    1. Re:Ahh! by hymie3 · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. Are they releasing the video *with* the subtitles, or just the subtitles? If it's just the subtitles, I don't see what the diference between that and babelfish of a transcript....

    2. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not quite, they take TV recordings of animes that aren't available in the destination country, sub them, and release them onto the net, kind of like haveing a japanese freind send you this weeks episode with a resume of what goes on.

      As soon as someone in the destination country starts producing (or even state that they intend to start producing) the anime in question, it disapears without trace from the web.

      The idea is to get to see footage that will probably never be translated (and in most cases isn't, especially into non english languages, France here), not to kill off the japenese film industry.

      I've got loads at home, but I also have a lot of Mangas, DVD's etc that I acquired after they were (finally) released. FYI a 4 year wait isn't uncommun.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    3. Re:Ahh! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most fansub groups cease distribution of a given series as soon as it's licensed for production in the US. The point is that until it's licensed there is *no* english translation. Hard to argue that you're costing a company sales when they arent providing that product.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are the shows shown in Japan? If they're broadcast over the air, I see no problem with non-profit "tape" trading. Whether that tape is physical or just a representation of bits. Lest you consider borrowing a friends tape is considered illegal?

      I do, however, distinguish a difference between distributing shows broadcast over the air and cable/satellite. One is a paid, subscription service, the other is not. Meaning the one that's available publicly, free of charge, I have no quams about time-shifting it whenever I want.

      ps. You're kinda an ass.

    5. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 1, Insightful
      kind of like haveing a japanese freind send you this weeks episode with a resume of what goes on.
      Or, more accurately, kind of like having a japanese friends who bootlegs the episodes, adds a brief summary, and then illegally re-distributes them to every interested anime fan in North America.

      In summary:

      Redistribution to one person -- likely to be ignored by copyright owners.

      Redistribution to the entire fucking planet -- likely draw a certain amount of attention.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    6. Re:Ahh! by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1
      Well, I like the fansub versions of the Hikaru No Go manga a great deal better than the western wash crap they're selling at barnes and noble...

      I think fansubs are here to stay. I'd much rather purchase the fansub translated Hikaru No Go anime than the westernwash they're likely to come out with in the near future. It'll be gross.

      Fortunately, I already have them all on my xbox.

      --
      Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    7. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 0, Troll
      Hard to argue that you're costing a company sales when they arent providing that product.
      How's this :
      Once the product is released and groups cease redistribution, there is a disincentive among those who have previously downloaded it, to but the official release.
      Gosh. It turns out that that's not hard to argue at all.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    8. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish you lot would just calm down a bit, it's not like you're whiter than white either, and I can't see you're problem if you're not even interested in anime.

      And stop thinking that world=USA, there are lots of us in other parts of the world, and, as I stated earlier, most of the time we _never_ _ever_ get a legal release (Case in point, 9/10 of the fansub's I've watched haven't been released under any form where I live, let alone translated), so it's not like the shareholders are loosing money on this.

      In short: Fansubs disapear as soon as a legal distrbution method appears, and in most cases the legal version doesn't appear at all, so there's nto much to complaine about.

      David

      P.S: Before you start moaning that more legal releases would appear but for fansubbing, remember that their probably wouldn't be anything like the number of manga/anime available today had it not been for the free publicity that the fansubbers provided.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    9. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which goes to show how much more revenue they could make if they released worldwide in a timely manner.

    10. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hard to argue that you're costing a company sales when they arent providing that product.

      Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales.

      Back in the good-ole days of VHS fansubbing in the 1980s, that was an unlikely event. But today, if an anime has any substantial appeal to Americans, it'll certainly get an international DVD release inside of two years. (Indeed, anime companies are making the USA market a critical part of their business plans. Some anime, like Big-O, has been renewed for new episodes solely on the strength of USA viewership)

      For some kinds of show, that isn't true: there are genres whose international appeal is to tiny to support a translated release, and there are also high-profit kids' shows (like Pokemon*) where the audience won't be interested in reading subtitles (especially on TV).

      But for many things that get fansubbed today, neither of those excuses works. Prehaps the strongest example is "Ghost In The Shell", an expensive scifi action series that's still being broadcast in Japan, and which already has DVD and televised releases in the USA. Even back in pre-production 3 years ago, this was a tremendously famous series, and it was obvious there would be a major world-wide market. Yet fansubbers went ahead, set their VCRs, and FTPed raws and subs around the world.

      * In the case of childrens' shows, there is a further motivation for the producers to condone fansubbing: the shows themselves are usually "toyetic", existing primarily as 22-minute advertisements for toys and branded merchanise. A vendor can hardly argue against free ad time...

    11. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      it's not like you're whiter than white either,
      No, but when I break the law, I don't try and justify it to the world with some spurious "moral principle" and astonishingly bad analogies.

      These things do not belong to you. You did not create them. They are not yours to redistribute, either legally or morally.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    12. Re:Ahh! by Firehawke · · Score: 4, Informative

      This has been going on for 20 years, and in fact was largely ignored by the anime companies until recently because there was an unspoken agreement over stopping subbing when a license was available.

      This was fine for those in the US, but led to a lot of disgruntled European fans who were waiting years beyond the extensive wait for a US release for their own. So, the dispute ended up being about subs continuing after domestic (US) release-- companies like ADV argue that sub distribution should stop after a US release, and European sub groups disagree.

      Then add in the pirate groups that were doing their own things outright.

      It's been a grey-area issue for a very long time, and is hindered additionally by the fact that the anime release companies in the US pay attention to sub groups to find out what people *want*.

    13. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      This has been going on for 20 years, and in fact was largely ignored by the anime companies
      But thats a matter of scale. 20 years ago, a very small group of people were doing this -- few had the means, few had an interest in Anime and fewer still had the contacts. Now, everyone and his brother has a DVD burner, certain elements of Anime are mainstream (or almost so), and the uptake of the Internet means *anyone* can download the stuff from P2P networks.

      What was once a small, ignorable, minority have suddenly got to be a considerably larger problem.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    14. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you're qualified to speak on the morals of fansubbing, or anything else for that matter. For example, to me, when someone is an obvious corporate butt-boy, it's perfectly moral to push them in front of a bus.

    15. Re:Ahh! by Spleener12 · · Score: 1

      Actually, for some groups the line is when the show is licensed, for others the line is when they actually start releasing the show in the US.

    16. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 1

      Oh, do grow up, you silly little boy.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    17. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cry NAZI HOLOCUST!!

      I'm being oppressed. It is my god given right to distribute other peoples work without compensating them!!!!

    18. Re:Ahh! by Spleener12 · · Score: 1

      Unless you want to see it dubbed, in which case you are stuck with buying the official release, especially since 99% of all anime you find on your local bittorrent site is subbed regardless (RARR GODDAMNED DUB-HATING HIPPIES!)

    19. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      I presume that you have no isues with the reste since you're down to that.

      Anyhow, lol to the AC, and don't you think Pay 2 think is going a bit far here?

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    20. Re:Ahh! by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      You mean, other than correctly pointing out that this is an example of ignoring the copyright of the author, grabbing the author's work unnotified, and sending it to the whole world. Yes, it's the whole world, because once it's on the net, it's always available on the net.

      Other than pointing out the fallacious arguments given to justified the practice, he not qualified?

      If you mean something concrete, please explain. Otherwise, it looks like he's completely qualified and all you've got is a lame ad hominum attack.

    21. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales."

      Maybe. Or maybe the fansubs generate more interest for the eventual release.

      The real question for me is why the fansubbers (a new word for me, admittedly) rely on this nebulous notion of "tacit approval" to justify their actions, rather than actually asking permission. They must not want to know.

    22. Re:Ahh! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 3, Informative

      Manga are not subtitled. A translated manga is either a "scanslation" (fan-made, from a blend of 'scan' and 'translation' -- manga are scanned and then translated) or "dual language" (release by Japanese companies for the readership to study English).

    23. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are also high-profit kids' shows (like Pokemon*) where the audience won't be interested in reading subtitles (especially on TV).
      How does anyone know that for sure? Why doesn't someone just once TRY showing a kid's anime subtitled and see how it does, instead of just asuming all kids are to stupid to read?

    24. Re:Ahh! by rzbx · · Score: 1

      "Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales."

      Prove it!

      You can not prove this. Nor can I disprove it. But I do hope you considered the many many other factors that contribute to future sales of any product. Do not be so quick to make arguments, especially based on so many assumptions.

      --
      Question everything.
    25. Re:Ahh! by Paul+McMahon · · Score: 2, Informative

      As soon as someone in the destination country starts producing (or even state that they intend to start producing) the anime in question, it disapears without trace from the web.

      Not quite. The fansubbing groups will often remove the series from their site, but the episodes certainly don't disapear. Many of them are still distributed after licencing by sites like http://www.boxtorrents.com/.

    26. Re:Ahh! by curtisk · · Score: 1
      Most fansub groups cease distribution of a given series as soon as it's licensed for production in the US.

      Yes, because somehow, the fansub group has complete dominion over the internet and with a wave of its hand can stop all file trading.

      Hard to argue that you're costing a company sales when they arent providing that product.

      *Announcement* New torrents available online of all major US film releases (with swahili subtitles), no problem!!!! Just remember to get rid of them (or buy it again if you purchased a fansub DVD instead of downloading) once the studio makes the official version. No Problems!

      They are bootlegs, regardless of the attempts at justification or the "honor system" that repeatedly gets mentioned. Fans have had it easy and some free rides for a long time, looks like that party may be ending....

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    27. Re:Ahh! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative
      The real question for me is why the fansubbers (a new word for me, admittedly) rely on this nebulous notion of "tacit approval" to justify their actions, rather than actually asking permission. They must not want to know.

      They would never get official permission. Official permission would limit the copyright holder's ability to stop "real piracy", as the distinction would be negligible.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    28. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! America was founded upon this principle, quite literally. The US would still be a third world nation if not for printing out the great works of Europe, unauthorized, by the ream in the 1700's -- including unauthorized translation of French work.

      Kind of ironic, I think.

    29. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And stop thinking that world=USA, there are lots of us in other parts of the world, and, as I stated earlier, most of the time we _never_ _ever_ get a legal release (Case in point, 9/10 of the fansub's I've watched haven't been released under any form where I live, let alone translated), so it's not like the shareholders are loosing money on this.

      You're obviously wrong - they must be loosing money on this, unless they've found lawyers that work for free.

      Or did you mean "losing money from fansubbers" instead of "loosing money on the subject of fansubbers"? Since loosing would mean "letting go of" or, perhaps, "spending."

      I wish you lot would just calm down a bit, it's not like you're whiter than white either, and I can't see you're problem if you're not even interested in anime.

      Of course, I can't see you are problem with them going after fansubbers, since fansubbing is clearly illegal. I may speed slightly, but I don't bitch and moan when I get a ticket. I pay it and move on with my life. (And continue to speed slightly - like 5-10 MPH over.)

      It's not like this is a moral debate, the law says "you can't do that" and people did that and now the law is saying "you have to pay a penalty for doing that." You may disagree with the law - but tough. It's the law. You don't get to break it and ignore the consequences just because you disagree with it. If you want to cry "civil disobedience" remember that the other half is paying the penalty for it when it comes due.

    30. Re:Ahh! by Valegor · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing this "as soon as it is released in the target company it dissapears from the web". Does anyone actually believe this? Do a search for Inuyasha, Witch Hunter Robin, or any of the others that cartoon network currently show. They are still very much online both in subbed form and in the new translated form. Everyone that I know who downloads Anime gives me the same speach about only downloading it because they can't get it in the US, and then when thier show comes to the US they certainly don't buy DVDs of them. The most common reason given, "Why would I buy it I have it on my computer?"

    31. Re:Ahh! by hyphz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The
      > company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the
      > USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut
      > into their future sales.

      Yup. That's why NO film company has ever released a DVD of a film that's already been out on VHS. It wouldn't sell, would it?

      That's why LucasArts only ever released one single, perfect VHS version of Star Wars. After all, who'd pay for the same thing again?

      That's why in the UK, where one of the most common cable channels is UKTV Gold which shows nothing but repeats of classic Britcomedies, the BBC don't sell DVDs or VHSs of Red Dwarf or Fawlty Towers since anyone who wants them will already have taped them, right? (Note: Both series have been released, twice on each format..)

    32. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      You can not prove this.

      No, I just proved it. By example.

      NeoSkandranon claimed it was "hard to argue". I produced a cogent argument in less than 8 seconds of effort, which demonstrates conclusively that it's easy to argue.

      Furthermore, if I had to prove not only that the argument was easy to write, but that it's substance is correct, the New York times this weekend interviewed people who download anime heavily, in preference to buying DVDs (that article is already in another slashdot story)

    33. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's why NO film company has ever released a DVD of a film that's already been out on VHS.

      Congratulations, you've almost reached the intellectual achievement of George W. Bush. Maybe you too can become President someday!

      Your logic makes as much sense as claiming that a bullet can't kill someone, because some soldiers have been known to shoot an enemy even though he already shot him just seconds ago.

    34. Re:Ahh! by remmelt · · Score: 1

      NeoSkandranon claimed it was "hard to argue". I produced a cogent argument in less than 8 seconds of effort, which demonstrates conclusively that it's easy to argue.

      I assume all crows are black.
      I have never seen a white crow.

      When I do see a white one, all of a sudden all crows are white.

    35. Re:Ahh! by rworne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell that to Sony and whoever else has an interest in that new Appleseed movie. Full torrents and subtitles were available at least as far back as November-December 2004.

      Sorta puts a dent in a commercial theater release this month, doesn't it?

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    36. Re:Ahh! by remmelt · · Score: 1

      But today, if an anime has any substantial appeal to Americans, it'll certainly get an international DVD release inside of two years.

      How do you think the American public knows of these anime? Do you think the fansubs help? Do you think that that's the exact same reason the distributors have let them go so far?

      For now I will stop shooting holes in your story.
      Have a nice day!

    37. Re:Ahh! by ibman · · Score: 1
      I think the grandparent was referring to the fact that the original anime distributors aren't releasing a product with English subtitles *simultaneously* with the Japanese release. If the distributors did that, then you could harp on the otakus for not buying the DVDs after their release. Well, you could argue that the otakus should have the patience to wait the necessary time before the DVDs are released. And how likely is it that the anime that they watch will be released on DVD, let alone with an English version. Quitely these days, no matter how badly the original idea was conceived or how many times it's already been previously released on DVD (read: Star Wars). By that time, the us distributors will have cut episodes, edit scenes, change names, etc, but that's an aside.
      Companies worry that the easy prerelease availability of fansub versions means that the otaku class has already seen their products, and no longer need to buy anything but the must-haves.
      The must-haves are must-haves for a reason. Just because the anime exists doesn't mean fans are *required* to buy the DVDs. Aren't companies supposed to add features that make the DVD worth having, like 20 hrs worth of audio commentaries and 50 commercials of products branded by the characters of the said anime?
    38. Re:Ahh! by ccharles · · Score: 1
      every interested anime fan in North America
      And stop thinking that world=USA

      Please also stop thinking that North America = USA.
    39. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      AC: Why doesn't someone just once TRY showing a kid's anime subtitled and see how it does, instead of just asuming all kids are to stupid to read?

      You're right, there are probably some kids that are interested enough in a show to watch it subtitled. (You could even claim to their parents that it's educational, because it provides a tiny fraction of foreign-language education).

      However, childrens' cartoons means television, and television in the USA means English (or Spanish, on special channels). No broadcaster will put on a show their audience can't auditorally comprehend, at least in the next 10 years.

    40. Re:Ahh! by hyphz · · Score: 1

      > Your logic makes as much sense as claiming
      > that a bullet can't kill someone, because some
      > soldiers have been known to shoot an enemy
      > even though he already shot him just seconds
      > ago.

      No, that doesn't make sense. Yes, a bullet can kill someone; but yes, it's also possible for someone to get shot and not die. However, if the first bullet doesn't kill the enemy, it's of no benefit to the army to shoot him again; he doesn't become super-dead or anything like that. Furthermore, the enemy doesn't want to be shot.

      The analogy breaks down on those final two points. Yes, an earlier version may satisfy a consumer's desire for the media, or it may not. However, if the customer winds up consuming two copies, that's good for the industry (because they get twice the money, or, if the first copy was a fansub, they get money where they otherwise would not have done so) and typically the consumer *does* want to buy the media (and yes, some of them even want to support the production companies)

      This occurs particularly with 'geek media'. Why else would Star Wars geeks collect the entire set of Star Wars VHS versions? And anime are definately geek media.

      Again, it's perfectly possible to make a profit out of media which most people have already seen. Ask Lucas. And if you doubt their wisdom, look at the size of your company (or most anime companies) compared to Lucas.

    41. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just anime.

      Godzilla movies and Japanese/Hong Kong action movies get the same treatment. I've got a couple of Godzilla fansubs.

    42. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      How do you think the American public knows of these anime?

      A little thing called the internets. You might have heard of it.

      Oh, and let me shoot that one back at you: "How do you think the American public knows of these fansubs?" People who know they like anime can go searching for fansubs. People who might like anime, but haven't heard of it, won't learn of it from fansubs... they won't stumble onto a distribution place unless a friend points it out to them- and in that case, the friend could just as easily lend a (legal) DVD.

      (Or, you could argue that a person randomly downloading from Kazaa might stumble on anime that way. But in that case, it could just as well be a DVD rip with subtitles, and not a fansub job)

      For now I will stop shooting holes in your story.

      You haven't contradicted me at all, yet. I already stipulated that, starting in the 1980s, fansubbers nourished the audience for anime in the USA. But that was a long time ago- even if fansubbers were a jumpstart to international anime viewership, the commercial engine is running on its own by now. US fans can see the same promotional materials the Japanese viewers do.

    43. Re:Ahh! by Threni · · Score: 1

      What our friends have on their computer doesn't address the question of whether or not it disappears from the net. If your friends are breaking the law by sharing (that is, illegally distributing) files then that's an issue for them and the relevant law enforcement authority. Presumably genuine fans wouldn't want to harm the companies that they are fans of. Anyone who continues to "share" the files once they're released in that territory is acting illegally, and in many peoples opinion immorally.

    44. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      When I do see a white one, all of a sudden all crows are white.

      Well, if you're that stupid, then you've got some major cognitive problems, I guess. (Apparently very similar to how the USA's president can only discern things in black-or-white, ignoring the possibility of grays or mixtures)

      Or, where you trying to make a silly analogy against my argument? That might work if I had claimed fansubs totally annihilate any chance of anime companies profiting in the USA.

      Good thing I didn't say that, then. What we did say is they reduce the revenue potential. And they do.

      The profit damage of fansubs isn't 100%, but it isn't 0% either. It's somewhere in between, which means I'm right.

    45. Re:Ahh! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Maybe. Or maybe the fansubs generate more interest for the eventual release.
      If you RTFA, you'll note that they cover this. Apparently sales for everything except the really big-name series are either flat or decreasing. Although it's not cut-and-dried proof that fansubs cut into sales, it's at least interesting that it seems so coincide with the dramatic increase of online fansub distribution over the last couple years.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    46. Re:Ahh! by Valegor · · Score: 1

      As I said, go search for this material now and you will find it. It does not dissapear from the net. You can still get it from fansites all over. Many of the people I am refering to started downloading because they saw the episodes on cartoon network. The material is certainly still out there and easily available. Those that provide the material to download to begin with whether it is available in the territory or not are also acting illegally. Whether they are acting more morally then those that are sharing it after the fact is irrelevent to whether the act is legal or not.

    47. Re:Ahh! by rzbx · · Score: 1

      "Good thing I didn't say that, then. What we did say is they reduce the revenue potential. And they do.

      The profit damage of fansubs isn't 100%, but it isn't 0% either. It's somewhere in between, which means I'm right."

      Still so sure of yourself I see. You are not correct. Simple. You have no proof, you simply have data.

      You replied to my earlier comment and said "No, I just proved it. By example." Minna Kirai, you do not understand what a proof is. Here is a simple argument. The exposure provided by the "fansubs" created a market that would have been more difficult to enter otherwise and most likely cost far more to create. Perhaps you have no knowledge of pirates in the world of ideas. Maybe you don't understand that most industries of art, entertainment, music, etc. grew from a much less legally controlled atmosphere.

      So perhaps the companies were smart in exploiting the free form of advertising, and then when they thought the time was right, legally supress the pirates and create a for profit economy market in the U.S.. But I will never go outright and say this argument is right and that I have proved it. I will simply look for more data, more knowledge, more critical thinking, more arguments, more of everything to build a more solid argument that is not based on bias, but truth.

      --
      Question everything.
    48. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1
      if the first copy was a fansub, they get money where they otherwise would not have done so) a

      Wrong. This is simple 2x2 combinatorics, but you listed only 3 of the 4 outcomes... and "If a consumer acquires two" is a ludicrous starting point anyhow.

      Again, it's perfectly possible to make a profit out of media which most people have already seen.

      Is it? Well, good for me that I never claimed fansubs completely and utterly obilterate any possibility of making even $1 of profit. Since I only said that they reduce the profit potential, and not entirely destroy it, I'm in the clear. My specific words were "cut into sales".

      You're employing George W. Bush-style logic:
      1. Pretend that an issue has only 2 sides, 0% or 100%.
      2. Find one counterexample to demonstrate that 100% isn't true.
      3. Then claim that since the actual rate isn't exaclty 100%, it's exactly 0%, and that everyone who said it was 2% or 15% or something are wrong (not to mention 7i%)

      This technique is quite similar to "strawmanning".

      Again, it's perfectly possible to make a profit out of media which most people have already seen. Ask Lucas.

      Stop with the Lucas example. It's hardly relevant. He re-released Star Wars after twenty years, by which time the old VHS copies were just about disintegrating.
      Furthermore, he introduced substantial all-new content.
      Furthermore, it wasn't legal for owners of those VHS tapes to give copies to new viewers who've been born in those 20 years. (Whereas with anime fansubs, re-distributing copies of a fansub is every bit as legal as it was to acquire initially- that is, 0% legal)
      Furthermore, suppose that Lucas hadn't made any VHS release of Star Wars before the DVDs came out- the DVD sales would probably have been higher if they weren't competing against existing VHS.

      Comparing fragile physical media to infintely perfectly replicable digital files doesn't work. Nor does comparing a remastered, enhanced version of a generation-defining cinematic masterpiece with a 26-episode plot-driven shojo love story.
    49. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales."

      Prove it!

      There are titles that are co-produced with US dollars. Namely, take a look at several Geneon titles such as Ai yori Aoshi and Koi Kaze. Even in the broadcast and Japanese DVD (R2) versions, the list of producers include Geneon Entertainment USA. Now why would they help fund a show if they didn't plan on selling in their home country?

    50. Re:Ahh! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      ...and typically the consumer *does* want to buy the media (and yes, some of them even want to support the production companies)
      In the article, they mention that sales of not-as-mainstream anime are struggling. Which is exactly what would be expected if people are downloading the fansubs of everything, and then only buying or renting the blockbusters.
      Again, it's perfectly possible to make a profit out of media which most people have already seen. Ask Lucas. And if you doubt their wisdom, look at the size of your company (or most anime companies) compared to Lucas.
      I wasn't aware that making illegal copies of Star Wars was encouraged by the creators. If you really wanted the anime companies to take a leaf out of Lucas' book, they'd start filing lawsuits instead of sending letters.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    51. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      Everything hinges on what out-there means: if the subbing groupe didn't pull the series, then you've got a point, OTOH, if out there = KaZa, [eaiou]Mule, or standered film torrent sites, then you might as well blame DVD producers for makeing DVDs that someone will rip and put on the web...

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    52. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean, other than correctly pointing out that this is an example of ignoring the copyright of the author, grabbing the author's work unnotified, and sending it to the whole world. Yes, it's the whole world, because once it's on the net, it's always available on the net.

      In the USA, copyright law has 4 rules that determine whether an infringement has taken place. The most important one is the question of monetary damages. Now, since fansubbers only work on works that are unlicensed in a particular country and ceasae distribution once a work is licensed, I can't see how you would argue for damages.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    53. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      My apologies, I do understand that North America also containes Mexico and Canada, I just got carried away...

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    54. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales.

      Until the fansubbers were well established and started getting US distribution licenses (ADV films was started by fansubbers), the studio had no interest in US distribution. They didn't even know that it was a market.

      But for many things that get fansubbed today, neither of those excuses works. Prehaps the strongest example is "Ghost In The Shell", an expensive scifi action series that's still being broadcast in Japan, and which already has DVD and televised releases in the USA. Even back in pre-production 3 years ago, this was a tremendously famous series, and it was obvious there would be a major world-wide market. Yet fansubbers went ahead, set their VCRs, and FTPed raws and subs around the world.

      So, one example of fansubbers not acting solely in the interest of an animation studio suddenly proves your point (whatever that is)? They were acting according to the existing agreement - subtitle and distribute until the work is licensed. They aren't just trying to promote anime to the general public - they are trying to get at something that isn't widely available, which any collector can understand.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    55. Re:Ahh! by Valegor · · Score: 1

      Out there mean available. Torrent sites, fansites, forums, FTP sites, and any other method of publishing applies. It does not really matter if the person who originally subbed it takes it off thier website or not. They have created and distributed the material. They are thus responsible for that material. Argueing otherwise would be like saying that whoever originally posted the star wars kid video removed it and thus it has vanished "without trace"(a phrase used by many people in this debate to describe what has happened to anime that has been released). Look I don't care if you download or not. If you want to download the stuff then do it, but don't think that you are being any more moral than those that do so after it has been released in your territory.

    56. Re:Ahh! by chaoaretasty · · Score: 1

      Actually many people have more incentive becaue they know it's a good series, and feel a moral obligation to get them, my DVD collection is mostly anime that I'd already downloaded (Evangelion currently on its 2nd round of purchases too).

    57. Re:Ahh! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales.

      Wrong. In fact it is the opposite. The fansubs provide free publicity among interest groups so that when it is released, the sales are greater than if there had been no fansubs.

    58. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any idea what you're talking about? Are you an anime fan? By "everyone you know" does that mean a few people, a lot, hundreds, 1000's?? I know several dozen people who download anime. All of them buy their favorites when they become available. I don't know anyone who doesn't. We are not the rare ones.
      The shows you mentioned that can be seen on Cartoon Network were all immensely popular fansubs. Did you watch them? Did you enjoy them? Are you going to go out and but the DVD's? Do you know if the storylines are the same as they were when they aired in Japan? Cartoon Network probably made their decision to air them partly, if not mostly, on their popularity as fansubs.
      Your friends probably don't rush out and buy all the anime that is licensed in the US that is shown on Cartoon network because why should they? Do you buy every DVD of every show that you watch because it comes out on DVD? Probably not. Only the shows that you really like and don't want to wait for them to be shown on t.v. again(if ever). Same with anime. Some shows you really love and have to have them, and some shows you can see once and be happy with that.
      The price of anime in US is outrageous. Paying those prices for a series (sometimes 10 or even more DVD's long) you may only watch once is just stupid. They put 3 or 4 episodes on a DVD, charge 25.00 - 30.00 a piece and want you to keep coming back for more. Only if you really can't live without that series are you willing to do that. The only way most people can tell if they are going to really love a series is to watch the fansubs first. Just because you know a few people who don't rush out and spend ridiculous amounts of money on series that are available to watch on t.v. for free doesn't mean all anime fans who watch fansubs are trying to get something for nothing.
      We love anime. Don't you get it? We buy what we love and watch the rest. Just like everyone else in the world.
      Also, I prefer to watch anime in the original language, and until recently, now that digital fansubs have become popular, we had to watch very poor quality VHS copies of copies to be able to do that. Even now DVD's available here(US) are of very poor quality when it comes to the subtitles. They are usually "Americanized" and the entire storyline is changed to the point that it might as well be a completly different anime. THe dubbing is almost always extremely awful. I would think the Japanese creators would be more upset over what the release companies do to their works than the faithful way fansubbers treat them.

    59. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1
      Minna Kirai, you do not understand what a proof is

      Rzbx, you do not even understand what's going on. I already explained this twice, so here's your 3rd and final chance to pick it up:
      1. 1. NeoSkandranon said "It's hard to argue fansubs hurt sales".

      2. 2. In 8 seconds of work, I wrote a single sentence which argued that fansubs hurt sales.
        3. Anything I can do in just 8 seconds is easy.
        4. Therefore, NeoSkandranon was wrong. I have personally and scientifically proved that it is not hard to argue fansubs hurt sales

      Since you're confused, you think the truth of an argument is the same thing as the ease with which I composed it. What I have unimpeachibly proved is that the argument is easy to make. Whether the argument is right or wrong is an entirely separate question from how easy it is to state (and one that I'll address below, albeit incompletely).

      Here is a simple argument. The exposure provided by the "fansubs" created a market that would have been more difficult to enter otherwise and most likely cost far more to create. Perhaps you have no knowledge of pirates in the world of ideas

      Yes, that is indeed a simple argument. It's also a different argument, and its truth or falsehood is independent of the veracity of the earlier claim. We can consider this one too, if you insist (although I don't feel like getting into it here and now).

      I will say a few words on the central argument, though: "Do fansubs reduce the profits of anime companies?"

      Fact: Fansubbers don't only write subtitle files, they also normally overlay them onto raw video and distribute the whole thing as a package.
      Fact: Fansubbers don't stop at 30% or 50% or 75% through a series, they tend to go right to the end. (A quick search just showed me that fansubbers have just released their 129th episode of a popular series about an elastic pirate)
      Fact: Even if a fansub group "halts distribution" of a series that has been licensed, they cannot get it off of Kazaa and bittorrent.
      Fact: Anime is highly popular in the USA today. Book chains like Barnes & Noble have shelves of manga, 5 anime series are broadcast on Fox and Cartoon Network every day, and websites like animeondvd.com, animenfo.com, animefu.com, and almost every anime*.com you could name are providing a solid stream of consumer hype.
      Fact: A lot of televised anime is story-driven, with plot twists and linearity.
      Fact: A lot of televised anime is produced inexpensively, with graphic quality that's adequate, but not outstanding.

      Taking all those facts together, it appears that the amount by which fansubs increase revenue by building up anticipation is less than the amount by which they reduce it by undercutting sales of already-viewed episodes. Can I absolutely prove that? Of course not. I also can't prove that more than 75% of USAins drink alcohol socially, or even that George W. Bush is the national president! (For all I know, he's died in the past 15 seconds) But with availible facts in hand, the most sensible conclusion is that fansubs hurt profits.

      A final note: If fansubbers would restrain themselves to only doing the first 3 episodes, or 25% of a series (whichever is less), then the argument that they're only working to build up demand for an eventual USA release would have a lot more credibility.
    60. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop thinking that world=USA, there are lots of us in other parts of the world, and, as I stated earlier, most of the time we _never_ _ever_ get a legal release.

      Good news! Amazon.com ship legal English anime DVDs all over the world. And region-free DVD players are legal in most places.

      P.S: Before you start moaning that more legal releases would appear but for fansubbing, remember that their probably wouldn't be anything like the number of manga/anime available today had it not been for the free publicity that the fansubbers provided.

      Times change. Fansubbing obscure titles arguably does help them by boosting people's awareness. Fansubbing the latest Pokemon movie merely decreases the profitability of that title when the inevitable official release comes along.

      Your argument is suspiciously similar to an American saying that because America is only independent because some patriots shot at British soldiers, it is therefore a good thing when American troops kill British troops in "friendly fire" incidents...

    61. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 1
      Actually many people have more incentive becaue they know it's a good series, and feel a moral obligation to get them
      I'm sure many people do feel like that, especially the hard core fans. But I'd bet you dollars to donuts that many more people don't. Of course, many of those wouldn't have bought it anyway, but no-one really knows the ratio of these three groups.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    62. Re:Ahh! by chaoaretasty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah but there are two problems with so over simplifying this:

      1. A far greater number of anime series are being released.

      If 5% of anime is the expected big hit variety and 20 series are released in a year, and a fan can buy maybe 4 series a year, there will be 1 smash hit, which he will buy, with the other 3 purchases spread over maybe 10 of the mediocre series.

      Anime becomes more popular, and 200 series get released. There are now 10 big series, the fan can't even buy all of these, let alone the mediocre ones.

      2. American companies are getting better at picking the really good series.

      With the market as competetive as it is, picking a good series is a lot more important, in the old days any anime was better than no anime. Not only are there the Japanese viewing figures to take into account but fansubs are important too. Regardless of your opinion if overall they do more good or bad, they do create a fanbase for the series before anyone has even liscenced it, an active English fanbase shows that it's a series that will do well. An anecdote from Newtype USA with some American company director was that thanks to fansubs Naruto has become the most expensive anime to liscence because everyone knows it will be a massive hit.

      So because of this, not only are there more releases, which means more hit series, but also a higher percentage of hit series.

      The reason the mediocre anime sells badly is because no one has the money to even consider them. Most of the purchases are likely to be people who have come to love the series because of the fansubs.

    63. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1


      Wrong. In fact it is the opposite. The fansubs provide free publicity among interest groups so that when it is released, the sales are greater than if there had been no fansubs.


      Wrong. As I already explained with the excellent example of "Ghost In The Shell", the days when anime was a low-profile niche interest have long since passed. The very idea that Ghost In The Shell was brought to DVD and TV in the USA because it was fansubbed is laughable on the face.

      Probably it was true once that fansubbing build up audience demand for later legal releases. But it's time to move on up into the 21st century: anime awareness is as high as it's going to get. Fansubs no longer make any meaningful increase in awareness, since there's no where left to grow. The only effect they have left is satisfying demand, partly from viewers who won't care enough to buy the DVDs later.

    64. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the USA, copyright law has 4 rules that determine whether an infringement has taken place. The most important one is the question of monetary damages. Now, since fansubbers only work on works that are unlicensed in a particular country and ceasae distribution once a work is licensed, I can't see how you would argue for damages.

      Consider the following scenario:

      1. Company A releases a new anime series in the USA. 10,000 Americans are interested in the series; it was not fansubbed, so none of them have seen it already. Company A sells DVDs to 10,000 American fans.

      2. Company B releases a new anime series in the USA. 10,000 Americans are interested in the series; 90% of them have already seen it through fansubs. Assuming that 50% of fans buy DVDs for series they've already watched (yeah, right), company B will sell DVDs to 5,500 American fans.

      Company B has therefore sold 4,500 fewer DVDs than company A, and the difference is accounted for almost entirely by the existence of fansubs for company B's series.

      See how the damage done by fansubs has already been done before the series is licensed? It is irrelevant that the fansubbers cease distribution. In the scenario above, the mere fact that a fansub has EVER existed causes the profitability of a series to fall by 45%.

      Now, I pulled those numbers out of my ass. I have no idea what the real figures are. But I hope you now have some idea of how you can argue for financial damage being caused by fansubs.

    65. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      I can't say that I whole hartedly agree, I'd compare it more to the guy who posted the Starwars kid movie taking the flic down and publishing a message sating that the joke had gone too far and requesting that others did the same (The equivalent of the request to stop distribution asap when the stuff get's liscenced that you find imprinted on all fansubs), but I'm prepared to leave it at that, and after all, it's a mater of opinion, no more, no less (the morals I mean, the Legal is for others to decide, not us).

      Good evening

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    66. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was going to buy every anime DVD released in the United States. I've since decided not to buy anything I can download for free right now.

      I'm proof that the companies' potential market has been reduced by exactly one person. Neener.

    67. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the fansubbers were well established and started getting US distribution licenses (ADV films was started by fansubbers), the studio had no interest in US distribution. They didn't even know that it was a market.

      That is the past. In the present, the US market is well established. Is there any evidence that fansubs are still having that beneficial effect? The ADV representative quoted in the article suggests quite the opposite.

      Arguing that fansubbing is okay because it helped establish the anime market in the USA is like arguing that slavery is okay because it helped establish the US economy. What was acceptable in the past is not necessary acceptable now. What was beneficial in the past is not necessarily beneficial now.

      So, one example of fansubbers not acting solely in the interest of an animation studio suddenly proves your point (whatever that is)? . . . They aren't just trying to promote anime to the general public - they are trying to get at something that isn't widely available, which any collector can understand.

      His point is that fansubbers are no longer the only way to get at anime. There are now legitimate ways. And the legitimate ways are only marginally less convenient. Therefore, fansubs are no longer wholly beneficial.

      The point of the GiTS example is that GiTS:SAC was certain to get a US release. It was licensed before the series had finished airing in Japan. Yet, something Minna Kirai forgot to mention, is that fansubbers not only started subbing it anyway - they finished subbing it. That's right - they carried on releasing new fansubs after the show had been licensed.

      Fansubbing isn't about fans trying desperately to get their hands on something they have no other way to get any more. Now it's about greedy people wanting everything NOW and wanting everything FREE. It was never legal; now it isn't even moral. And people like you defending even the most indefensible aspects of it with strawmen and ad hominem attacks on anyone who has the nerve to point out its flaws do nobody any favours.

    68. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Until the fansubbers were well established and started getting US distribution licenses (ADV films was started by fansubbers), the studio had no interest in US distribution.

      True, but irrelevant. Whether or not fansubs helped to increase anime's popularity back in 1993 before Dragonball and Sailormoon where televised in the USA doesn't effect whether or not they help the industry at all today.

      And to any honest observer, it should be an easy question: anime DVDs are in so many Blockbusters, anime episodes are on Cartoon Network each night, anime websites review new shows in Japan the day they air: anime-awareness in the English-speaking world is as high as it's going to go. There is no longer any need for fansubbers to promote demand, the authorized corporate advertisers and independent media can do this fine on their own.

      So, one example of fansubbers not acting solely in the interest of an animation studio suddenly proves your point

      Yes, it does. Even though I really could have many more than 1 example. You need to understand how absolute arguments work: when I say a rate is non-zero, and others claim the rate is zero, then I'm the one who proves herself right with only one example. Proving the negative is a lot harder!

      your point (whatever that is)?

      You can go back and read it if you like. But since you're too lazy, I'll reproduce it here: "It's easy to argue that fansubs reduce the sales of eventual anime releases in the USA"

      They were acting according to the existing agreement

      No they weren't. There was no "agreement" there, since by definition, an "agreement" is the fruit of discussion between at least two groups. The fansubber's code ("Don't distribute once it's been licensed") was something fansubbers created on their own, without consultation with anime companies, in the hopes of making themselves less attractive towards litigation.

      They aren't just trying to promote anime to the general public

      Quite true- and that's why fansubs hurt sales. The only way one can argue that fansubs help sales is to say they promote awareness leading to more paying customers later.

      - they are trying to get at something that isn't widely available, which any collector can understand.

      Which shows that they're hurting sales, at least by a tiny amount. After all, some small percentage of the viewers of fansubs might instead buy the $70 Japanese-only DVDs and then hire a translator for their own local use.

      they are trying to get at something that isn't widely available

      Hey, the 20th century called- they want their global-media attitudes back! The very suggestion that anime isn't widely available to viewers in the USA is ludicrous. Only a small fraction of fansub distribution goes to shows that aren't a absolute lock to get a legal USA release within 2 years.

      Maybe there do exist some shows with zero commercial potential in the USA, which are yet popular enough to attract a fansubber or two. But, just because some few fansubbers aren't harmful doesn't absolve all of them.

    69. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Your scenarios is contrived and ridiculous. Without fansubbers, no anime would be released in the USA. In the case you have described, perhaps 300 of your 10,000 would have already seen it. there's also the question of how many of those 10,000 were turned on to anime by fansubbers - you may be complaining about your losses (150 sales) while ignoring your gains (half of your base heard about this anime thing from a friend or saw some subtitled stuff at a neighbor's house).

      Now that I've addressed your points, address mine: how does an American company choose what to license? Leaving aside the 22 minute toy commercials, don't you think they'd check to see which series are popular with american audiences? They can also look at the japanese ratings, but the fansubbers are better from a marketing perspective: popular fansub stuff is likely to be successful. Getting rid of fansubbers may be like shooting yourself in the head.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    70. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      Think about this:

      Company A spouts out 10 anime series (we'll leave crappy translation/dubbing out of the equation here), 8 flop, 2 do moderatly well (thanks to some die hards), company A decides that anime isn't worth it and stops.

      Company B looks at what works with the subbers, and brings out 2 series (we'll assume that 50% buy, like you said), so realises that anime could be a good idea, brings out 2 more, same success. etc...

      Conclusion: Company A and Company B have had the same amount of cash influcx, but company A spent 5 times more getting it. Company B continues to bring out anime, and everyone wins: The company: free market research, the public: good quality material they wouldn't have gotten otherwise, the subbers: the increase in interest means more feedback and more help.

      Don't get me started on the state the anime scene in the West would be like without the subbing groups.

      Daivd

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    71. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 1
      In the USA, copyright law has 4 rules that determine whether an infringement has taken place. The most important one is the question of monetary damages.
      That is simply not the case. The question of monetary damages has a major determination on the penalty for infringemnet but not on the fact of whether infringement has occured.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    72. Re:Ahh! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Like I said, it's not positive proof. It's just an indication that fansub may not neccesarily lead to increased sales, like so many people claim. When that forms a large part of people's rationale for fansubs -- and other forms of copyright infringement -- putting their hands over their ears and saying "LA LA LA I'M RIGHT YOU'RE WRONG" isn't going to cut it. (I'm not saying you're among those, so don't take it the wrong way.)

      Also, I wasn't talking about the mediocre series in my post. Rather, I was talking about good series that aren't as mainstream. Nobody cares if the latest "magic girl with giant vampire robots" series tanks. However, the danger, especially with American viewers forming a larger and more essential part of the market, is that those less-popular gems will be shoved aside for more of big stuff. Remember when anime was a fringe thing? Fansubs may start killing off the fringes.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    73. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 1

      I see where you got confused now. You're thinking of the 4 principles that goven Fair Use. It's true, if you're not doing it for profit, you've got a better chance of pleading "fair use", but it is nowhere near as set in stone as you make out. In fact, if you don't make any of the other three criteria, it is extremely unlikely that free, unlicensed redistribution would be considered Fair Use.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    74. Re:Ahh! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The point is that the fansub groups pull the material the instant it is available. Frankly, even if fansubbers didn't exist you would find that material on the net. There is always a scumbag somewhere that is going to rip the DVD and put it on the net. Also, all of the reputable bittorrent sites and even most usenet posters are very good at pulling material when it is licensed (or at least stop posting it in the Usenet case). There is a lot of infrastructure built up in the fansub community to watch for when a company announces a title and pulling it from the net. The AnimeOnDVD Grand High Licensing List is a good example of this.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    75. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good news, I can't afford that! I don't have more than 20-50 euro/month to spend on DVDs, I want to get as many as I can for that, at least more than 1. DVDs are available starting from 12 euro in shops, but mostly shit and certainly no anime or classic movies.

    76. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Which shows that they're hurting sales, at least by a tiny amount. After all, some small percentage of the viewers of fansubs might instead buy the $70 Japanese-only DVDs and then hire a translator for their own local use.

      Since we're apparently talking about an American company, then no, that isn't hurting sales. If the guys who produce that niche anime want to complain, then let them. Companies like ADV have no standing.

      Hey, the 20th century called- they want their global-media attitudes back! The very suggestion that anime isn't widely available to viewers in the USA is ludicrous. Only a small fraction of fansub distribution goes to shows that aren't a absolute lock to get a legal USA release within 2 years.

      By that logic, since any asshole can go buy a Porsche Boxster (or, God forbid, a Cayenne), then all Porsches must be available? Good luck with that non-federalized 959.

      Some anime isn't widely available, and most of the rest isn't at blockbuster. Once you develop an interest in the stuff that isn't US distro, you get to run over to Japan and buy some DVDs at $40/ea + $20s/h, then you get to find a region switchable DVD player, which isn't easy to get, as US media companies are big on chopping the world into 6 pieces, so they've attempted to convince people that such things are illegal. Global media my ass - call me when Disney releases region 0 stuff and the UK stops complaining about 'grey' DVD imports.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    77. Re:Ahh! by Valegor · · Score: 1

      What would you consider a "reputable" bittorrent site?

    78. Re:Ahh! by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been in the fansub community for years now. One thing I've learned is that it is impossible to determine what stuff will get licensed (The US doesn't get anywhere close to 100% of the stuff released in Japan) in the States. For instance, Super Milk Chan is showing on TV. I would have never expected that. On the other side of the coin, no American company has (thus far) made a peep about Naruto, and it is up to episode 119 and is basically a shoe-in for the Amerian audience.

      Anime companies of course have a policy of not releasing any information on series they are interested in acquiring, so Fansubbers have effectively NO information to go on. So what is a Fansub group to do? Just sub what you find interesting and stop if the series gets picked up.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    79. Re:Ahh! by himitsu · · Score: 1

      Just BTW here, American distribution companies charge $25 for 4 25 minute episodes on DVD with the English dubbed. They charge $30 for that same DVD with subtitles. This has gotten better recently, where both subs and dub track are inculded, but personally I don't want to pay extra money for their half-assed translation.

      I got into anime because I study Japanese language, and I used to watch it as listening practice. I can say that most of the American releases have sub-par translation and pander to the non-native speaker. Instead of keeping a word that has no direct translation in Japanese (like Gestalt for german) studios like ADV Films make the closest english translation they can. [example Keroro Gunsou = Sergeant Frog, but to american studios = Sergeant Toad.] That sounds like a small thing, but 26 episodes of listening to some studio garbage up a show is irritating.

      Personally, I use sites like animesuki.com to stay ahead of the American liscensing curve. Just because someone in the US offers a badly done copy of something from another country doesn't mean I have to choose to buy it.

    80. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Without fansubbers, no anime would be released in the USA.

      If you believe something so stupid, it's understandable how you can come to stupid conclusions.

      I just wish I could see you on television, telling a reporter with a straight face: "Ghost In The Shell: SAC would never have been released in the USA unless fansubbers had released it on the internet first. Even though there was enormous global demand from the first time the pre-production was even announced, there would've been no USA DVD or TV releases without fansubs blazing the trail".

      Because that's a subset of what you just claimed....

    81. Re:Ahh! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Wrong. As I already explained with the excellent example of "Ghost In The Shell", the days when anime was a low-profile niche interest have long since passed.

      You can explain all you like, but you are still wrong. Fansubs are unauthorized advertisements. Before, they wanted and needed them, as you admit. Now, they may or may not need them as much. You assert to know the truth, and that no one else knows the truth. So, not only are you wrong, but you are being an asshole about it.

    82. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      ...the commercial engine is running on its own by _now_. (my emphasis added)

      The point is that:
      a) The commercial engin would never have even turned over had it not been for the fansubs (all the anime* domaines were created out of the hype the fansubs created) and

      b) If the fansubs disapear, all the anime* sites you can imagin wouldn't suffice (there's a limit to the number of times you can read that volume 4 isn't out, but that you could still re-buy volume 3, that you have coincidently read 5 times already, if you want.).

      Case in point, I'm currently buying a series called 'Full Metal Panic'. volume 3 has been out for 3-4 monthes, and no news of volume 4. Why am I going to the trouble of buying them? because I got hooked on the anime thanks to the fansubs (whilst I'm at it: get a move on with the DVD of the anime, there are a lot of people who are impatient here ;-)). I'm also considereing buying the Naruto series for the same reasons (jpgs just don't cut it).

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    83. Re:Ahh! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. It's being released in what? 4 markets? The fans who downloaded the thing are going to the theatre to see it (unless it sucks really bad, I havn't seen it myself).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    84. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Since we're apparently talking about an American company,

      Since you apparently invent alleged context out of thin air, it's painful for me to continue talking with you.

      By that logic, since any asshole can go buy a Porsche Boxster (or, God forbid, a Cayenne), then all Porsches must be available?

      Um no, neither that sentence, nor the rest of your post, has any approximate resembelance to logic or rationality. Most importantly, you seem oblivious of the fact that non-absolute positions (which acknowledge grey areas, like mine) are inherently stronger than absolutist ones.

      However, I am very curious about one thing:
      Once you develop an interest in the stuff that isn't US distro, you get to run over to Japan and buy some DVDs at $40/ea + $20s/h

      What might some of those titles be? And no ancient stuff, please- give me names from this decade.

      Looking at the program listings for the USA's Cartoon Network, I see several anime upcoming: Cowboy Bebob, Inu Yasha, Lost Exile, Wolf's Rain, Ghost In The Shell (I presume that anything they broadcast will also have DVD sales shortly).

      And, a quick trip to a bittorrent site tells me that each of those is still accessible as fansubs. (And also that fansubs are distributed intermingled with DVD-rips of commercially-subtitled USA releases). Can you dispute that evidence? Because it's really all I need to show harm.

      For the last time: the existence of occasional non-harmful fansubbers doesn't negate all the others.

    85. Re:Ahh! by himitsu · · Score: 1

      You understand that Stand Alone Complex was a big budget show that followed the release of a theatrically movie, right?

      How many other anime movies were released nationally in theatres in the US? All I can think of are Studio Ghibli movies, Akira, and GITS.

      What about a show like FLCL? A 6 episode side project of a big studio (Gainax) that doesn't really make any sense in English to begin with. It somehow got dubbed and aired on Adult Swim, and without the fan sub community it would have been left on the wayside like any other low budget show.

    86. Re:Ahh! by arose · · Score: 1
      You could even claim to their parents that it's educational, because it provides a tiny fraction of foreign-language education
      Don't forget reading exercise.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    87. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      You assert to know the truth, and that no one else knows the truth.

      Nope. While I do happen do know the truth, many other people do as well. This includes not only 100% of the legal anime companies, and the governments and police departments of both the USA and Japan, but also many fansubbers. In fact, I even think that YOU know the truth!

      My suspicion is that you know this, but prefer to deny it, so you can go on enjoying fansubs without pangs of guilt.

      So, not only are you wrong, but you are being an asshole about it.

      You've got a lot to learn about how insults work. I won't explain it to you, though- that'd kill the delicious irony.

    88. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      One thing I've learned is that it is impossible to determine what stuff will get licensed

      But both your examples support the position that stuff is quite likely to be licensed if there is much attractiveness.

      So what is a Fansub group to do?

      How about, obey federal laws? Just a thought!

      Or, alternatively, they could make an honest guess about whether something will be licensed. For example, is there any real doubt that Fox Kids will eventually show Naruto? Not really, but fansubbers happily go along pretending that it's not totally obvious.

      And, regarding Naruto, if it does get licensed, will anyone really be able to argue that the acquisition was promoted at all by the fansubs? That concept even fails the "say it with a straight face" test. Cartoon Network is aware of the show and merchanidising opportunities.

      Even if they used popularity of fansubs to measure demand, 2-4 episodes would be enough for that purpose. Fansubbers who keep working to episode 50 and beyond must understand that the point of diminishing returns for "free advertisement" has long since passed.

    89. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      ...the commercial engine is running on its own by _now_. (my emphasis added)

      No. You cannot honestly add emphasis there, since that was my entire point! Repeating someone with underbars doesn't add anything.

      The point is that: a) The commercial engin would never have even turned over had it not been for the fansubs

      Nope. The question is whether or not fansubbing is helpful or harmful to anime companies, and your point (a) is irrelevant to this question.

      b) If the fansubs disapear, all the anime* sites you can imagin wouldn't suffice

      That's simply false.

      Why am I going to the trouble of buying them? because I got hooked on the anime thanks to the fansubs

      That does not compute. You can't possibly be buying discs just because you're hooked- if that were the case, then you could download fansubs, and be satisfied.

      You must also have a level of guilt or emotional obiligation to pay for something you already have. That's commendable if true, but such generosity should not be assumed in the public at large.

    90. Re:Ahh! by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales.

      Not necessarily, I can tell you of about 10 series I'm waiting for a US release of so I can buy them and own a high quality copy as well as the DVD extras. I've already seen them fansubbed, but I'm still planning to buy. In fact it's unlikely I would have bought these if I hadn't seen them first. Anime DVDs are still too expensive for just impulse buys ($30 a DVD is still pretty common for new releases.)

      • Some anime, like Big-O, has been renewed for new episodes solely on the strength of USA viewership)

      Big O's a unique example, it was much more popular in the US than in Japan. The popularity of it here in the US finally led to more of it being produced, but it was produced mainly for the US market. The small group of fans of the show in Japan got an unexpected bonus thanks to the US fans in that case. These type of things are also quite rare. Big O's the only one I know of where more episodes were made because of popularity in the US. ADV has helped pay for the production of some series, but they did that without fan input.

      • But for many things that get fansubbed today, neither of those excuses works. Prehaps the strongest example is "Ghost In The Shell", an expensive scifi action series that's still being broadcast in Japan, and which already has DVD and televised releases in the USA. Even back in pre-production 3 years ago, this was a tremendously famous series, and it was obvious there would be a major world-wide market. Yet fansubbers went ahead, set their VCRs, and FTPed raws and subs around the world.

      Ghost in the Shell's another quirky one, the original movie was much more popular outside of Japan than in it. (Not just US, but worldwide.) You're either confused or misunderstanding the TV series here as well. There are two TV series based on Ghost in the Shell. The first, called Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex, originally aired starting in 2002 and has long since completed it's 26 episode run. A second TV series called Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex 2nd Gig started airing in January of 2004, it appears to be finishing up it's 26 episode run this month. As of now, only three volumes of the original TV series have been released in the US. The second series has had no release. Of the two movies, both have been released in the US, the first by Manga Entertainment several years ago, and the second by Dreamworks in 2004 (I believe it was 2004, not sure on the exact date of that.)

      Knowing it would eventually be released is a silly condemnation of those who fansubbed it. Even though it's insanely popular here, there was no guarantee it would indeed be released. It very well could have been the case that the Japanese owner would want more for the rights to it than any company would feel it was worth. This has happened in the past with other series in fact (For example, the Ah! Megami-sama/Oh My Goddess! movie rights came with the stipulation that the mini-goddess TV series, which is not very well liked, had to go with it and be released. Fans had to wait several years before a company felt it was worth it to take the license). Beyond that, we can see from this one series, one that is in fact quite popular in the US, that it took 2 years for the TV series to start being released in the US. This is a big reason why fansubs take place as well. It also does help sales, not that that makes it legal, but it is true.

      • For some kinds of show, that isn't true: there are genres whose international appeal is to tiny to support a translated release, and there are also high-profit kids' shows (like Pokemon*) where the audience won't be interested in reading subtitles (especially on TV).

      This kind of argument hurts fans of these series. First you assume only children would be interested in Pokemon. Secondly

    91. Re:Ahh! by himitsu · · Score: 1

      Is your proposal that a fan subbing group:
      1) find a show like Naruto
      2) sub two episodes as advertisement to Americans
      3) wait an unknown amount of time (sometimes forever) until a studio liscenses that anime in the US
      4) buy DVDS, while the show has already ended in Japan years ago
      ??
      I am unwilling to wait for content in the US because a company hasn't decided to be gracious enough to let me buy it here. Also, I would be more willing to buy the fan-subbed versions of anime in the US if they were liscensed but I don't want to be forced to choose between pirated fan-subs and US releases with botched translations, though I am in that situation.

    92. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paraphrase:
      stupid stupid stupid stupid... I hope I'm not trolling.

      Target acquired. Hemos, heat up the branding iron! We have another virgin ass for the big black "T"

    93. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      just wish I could see you on television, telling a reporter with a straight face: "Ghost In The Shell: SAC would never have been released in the USA unless fansubbers had released it on the internet first.

      Sure, but I'd say it like this: 'Ghost in The Shell would have never been released, nor would Princess Mononoke, had it not been for the work of fansubbers making Anime in general accessible to Americans over then past 20 years'. You should be so stupid.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    94. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Most importantly, you seem oblivious of the fact that non-absolute positions (which acknowledge grey areas, like mine) are inherently stronger than absolutist ones.

      I mentioned niche anime titles being hard to get and you responded by mentioning that anime in general is available, as if it were something you buy by the ton. The porsche thing was just an analogy.

      What might some of those titles be? And no ancient stuff, please- give me names from this decade.

      Here's some of my R2 stuff. Some of it has since been released in the US.

      • Miyu integral set
      • Seraphim Call
      • EVA: Air and Heart
      • Blood
      • Kaze Makase: Tsukikage Ran
      • SeiKai no Monsho season 1-3
      I don't watch cartoon network any more - after seeing them butcher Tenchi, I decided to stick to DVDs.
      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    95. Re:Ahh! by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't know who you are in real life, but you're a stooge and an idiot.

    96. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one I had heard was '12 jews, 13 opinions'. I suppose we could make one for Democrats too.

    97. Re:Ahh! by rworne · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's four markets. But if the reception is particularly good, it may see a wider release.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    98. Re:Ahh! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My suspicion is that you know this, but prefer to deny it, so you can go on enjoying fansubs without pangs of guilt.

      I've never seen a fansub. So, like usual, you are not only egotistical and whiney, but wrong. Now, why don't you go crawl under your rock and quit bugging the rest of us who are capable of independent thought and rational logic.

    99. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      Actually, I buy for the same reason I buy DVDs: for the extras: you never get everything on a sub (or a scan).

      As for my profound motives, I commend your knoladge of social psychologie, I am not able to say to what extent discordance plays a role, but it probably does :-).

      And as for it being true for the public at large, I think (or like to think, take it as you wish) that the subbers and big fans do the same. As for the kazaa bunch, that's another question: but would they have bought them eitherway?

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    100. Re:Ahh! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Rather, I was talking about good series that aren't as mainstream. Nobody cares if the latest "magic girl with giant vampire robots" series tanks.

      Dammit, as a fan of all things magical girl, I care. Hell, I rejoiced when Bandai released Fancy Lala despite it not even reaching 1000 votes on Animeigo's "what should we license next" poll.

      However, the danger, especially with American viewers forming a larger and more essential part of the market, is that those less-popular gems will be shoved aside for more of big stuff. Remember when anime was a fringe thing? Fansubs may start killing off the fringes.

      In all seriousness, I think this is true. Take for instance Kokoro Toshokan, despite the fact that its a colorful, cute show (despite the fact that "nothing happens" for the first three episodes, its a good show with a great ending, and a really great manga to boot), the US companies probably have it in the "all 5 people who cared probably downloaded it already" do-not-license it pile.

      That's a pretty extreme example (apparently lots of people couldn't make it past the first three episodes). There are lots of other shows that have some appeal but the industry appears to believe that everyone who wants it has downloaded it and won't buy it (and who can blame them).

      I'll just continue to sit here and wish for someone to release R1 dvds of Kanon, Kokoro Toshokan, and Kingyo chuuihou.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    101. Re:Ahh! by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course it would have been released here. I mean, Nadia was released here; Disney just called it Atlantis.

    102. Re:Ahh! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Which shows that they're hurting sales, at least by a tiny amount. After all, some small percentage of the viewers of fansubs might instead buy the $70 Japanese-only DVDs and then hire a translator for their own local use.

      YOu state categorically that "they" are hurting sales because someone MIGHT do something?

      A is true because B might be true? I'm not sure I follow the logic there.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    103. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But for many things that get fansubbed today, neither of those excuses works. Prehaps the strongest example is "Ghost In The Shell", an expensive scifi action series that's still being broadcast in Japan, and which already has DVD and televised releases in the USA. Even back in pre-production 3 years ago, this was a tremendously famous series, and it was obvious there would be a major world-wide market. Yet fansubbers went ahead, set their VCRs, and FTPed raws and subs around the world."

      And when they finally came out on DVD in America the fans are likely to pick up the legit, high-quality DVDs.

    104. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, I can tell you of about 10 series I'm waiting for a US release of so I can buy them and own a high quality copy as well as the DVD extras.

      Like many of the responses I've got today, providing one counterexample where something didn't happen doesn't in any way prove that it can NEVER happen. It's hard to prove a negative, and tossing out example after example won't make it easier.

      In fact it's unlikely I would have bought these if I hadn't seen them first.

      IF that's true, and IF there are enough other people like that to make a substantial boost to sales, then fansubs are still not needed. The producers can easily authorize the release of 1-3 subtitled episodes on the internet as a way to promote and gauge interest.

      These type of things are also quite rare. Big O's the only one I know of where more episodes were made because of popularity in the US.

      They're not rare anymore. In fact they're planned up front, rather than as surprises after the first run ends, so you won't hear about it as much anymore. Regardless, fansubbers did release copies of Big-O's 2nd season.

      ADV has helped pay for the production of some series, but they did that without fan input.

      No. ADV pays attention to fan input for almost everything they decide to release. Or are you accusing them of being complete fools who can't even think to troll a few message-boards to keep the pulse of the audience?

      You're either confused or misunderstanding the TV series here as well. There are two TV series based on Ghost in the Shell.

      Or maybe I didn't want to launch into meaningless digressions into trivialities of Japanese trademark law. (I could go off about Trigun versus Trigun Maximum, for example, if anybody actually cared about details like that). I'm not confused at all. If you think I'm wrong, then you might not know exactly what "series" is defined as. ("series, n. things that come out one after another")

      Knowing it would eventually be released is a silly condemnation of those who fansubbed it. Even though it's insanely popular here, there was no guarantee it would indeed be released.

      It isn't silly at all. I can hardly imagine what combination of ignorance and stupidity would be needed to render a person unable to predict that GITS-SAC would have a USA DVD release after watching just one raw episode.

      First you assume only children would be interested in Pokemon.

      No. I assume they're all the audience that matters, or greater than 98%. I'm sure there are even some adults in Japan who watch Pokemon, and from an economic standpoint, they're freeloaders, since the advertising supporting the broadcast is irrelevant to their buying habits.

    105. Re:Ahh! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Big O's a unique example, it was much more popular in the US than in Japan. The popularity of it here in the US finally led to more of it being produced, but it was produced mainly for the US market.

      Big O is not a unique example, its not even the first. Bubble Gum Crisis 2040 is another, as are any number of Pioneer USA (now Geneon USA) funded/supported titles, ADV funded titles (Kaleidostar, BGC2040), Manga Ent's Dead Leaves, etc.

      Carry on ;)

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    106. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      had it not been for the work of fansubbers making Anime in general accessible to Americans over then past 20 years'

      And since the events of 20 years ago have zero bearing on whether or not today's internet fansub releases are helpful or harmful, you haven't answered the question at all. (Since you're not paying attention, I remind you that my starting post already acknowledged that 20 years ago fansubs promoted international anime appreciation, but the industry doesn't need that kind of help today)

      PS. It is a spelling error to capitalize "Anime" when it isn't at the beginning of a sentence. (Unless you're talking about an actual person or character named "Anime", which has happened, although it's very rare)

    107. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a fansub.

      Ah, my mistake then. I assumed you had some clue what you were talking about. Instead, it turns out that you're just arguing from a position of complete ignorance.

      I, on the other hand, was involved in VHS/post-office fansubbing since back when a 1200bps modem was considered an impressive upgrade. So even if I don't have uncontestable facts to prove my case, I am coming from a position of some experience. (If you want a little more authority, chat with the storekeeper at one of the dedicated anime-shops in Manhattan or Boston. Ask her if internet fansubs are cutting into business!)

      Maybe if you walked around a college dorm hall and compare how many students download fansubs versus actually buying legal DVDs, you could learn something. My position isn't a secret; it's pretty self-evident when you get in with the target population.

    108. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless it sucks really bad, I havn't seen it myself)

      I've seen it, and it does suck. It's only a little better than the previous Appleseed movie, which means pretty bad. Stick to the manga if you must. Or if you watch the 2004 Appleseed movei, then fast-forward through the talking and just watch the 6 fight scenes.

    109. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The question of monetary damages has a major determination on the penalty for infringemnet but not on the fact of whether infringement has occured.

      Wrong. She was referring to the Fair Use rules. Copying a work MIGHT be noninfringing depending on 4 factors, one of which is financial/economic impact. (The others are things like quantity of work copied, etc. In fact, if fansubbers had a rule that they'd only do the first 1 or 2 episodes of any series, then they'd come a lot closer to legal Fair Use, since they only copied a small fraction of the total show)

    110. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Is your proposal that a fan subbing group:

      No. I propose that fansubbers either:
      a) Pick shows that don't look like they'll get an official international release.
      b) Don't talk like you're not hurting the profits of anime companies, because you are.

      It doesn't take a genius to make good guesses about whether a show is destined for a USA release. For some stuff like Super Milk Chan and Hikaru No Go, it's understandable to mistakenly assume they won't be licensed. Anyone can make honest errors.

      But when the series is about a pair of busty cyborg catgirls battling vampires in space, then fansubbers shouldn't pretend they're somehow "helping the company with free promotion" when they upload the 26th and final episode to #anime-rips.

    111. Re:Ahh! by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Back in the good-ole days of VHS fansubbing in the 1980s, that was an unlikely event. But today, if an anime has any substantial appeal to Americans, it'll certainly get an international DVD release inside of two years. (Indeed, anime companies are making the USA market a critical part of their business plans. Some anime, like Big-O, has been renewed for new episodes solely on the strength of USA viewership)

      So... in order expand the market of anime there must be an existing viewer base before it's released in order to justify the expence of making DVDs. In other words there must be people already watching unreleased material in a country to help make it popular in that country in order to get it in that country.

      To me it sounds like they either need to market this material in a new way... for example sub one episode of each series and release a disc in order to get an idea what is desire... or depend on subpirates.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    112. Re:Ahh! by dbIII · · Score: 1
      most of the time we _never_ _ever_ get a legal release
      It's the only way we'll ever get to see live action sailor moon.
    113. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should he obey federal law whwn a few posts back you admitted to being just as much of a criminal.

      Does FOX kids have rights to Naruto?

      WAIT if figured it out, your fucking Trish Ledoux. It explains the arrogance of a once fansubber and the holier then thou, know it all, above the law views.

      Everyone google usenet for Trish is a bitch in rec.arts.anime to see a fansubber turn commercial player savagely rip into a fansubber who wanted to get hired by a US company.

    114. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to rain on your fun, but bootleggers are a different animal then fansubbers.
      Bootlegger are the guys who show up at sci-fi conventions and local comic shops selling pirate VHS (I guess DVD now) tapes for $25-50 for copies of stuff they pay no license for.

    115. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you studied economics, you'd learn that demand isn't the kind of thing that, once created, lasts forever. Without continued help from fansubbers, the anime industry 20 years from now would bring 'Ghost In The Shell 12: Unending Monotany' to the 100 TV's and DVD players of the people who were still interested. No studio is going to be able to make money without knowing what people want, so with the high cost of failure, they would do what the movie industry does in the face of rising production costs: infinite sequels of a proven name brand. These companies have made money by stealing market research from fansubbers, they need continued research to keep their own costs low. Your own model is anti-growth.

    116. Re:Ahh! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      'Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales."

      Bzzzt. Wrong answer. This is the same as saying that a downloaded song equals a lost sale.

      There is no guarantee of future sales.

      If anything, fansubbing works like free advertising. People download the show, and buy the DVD when it comes out. Sure, plenty don't, but those people were never going to buy it anyway. Same thing with music downloads. They're finding that the increase in music downloading has led to an increase in cd sales since people are able to sample whats out there and find out about new artists that way.

      Same thing with anime. If anything, I say we send the anime company's a bill for all the free advertising us fansubbers do for them.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    117. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      AC: If you studied economics, you'd learn that demand isn't the kind of thing that, once created, lasts forever.

      In fact, I have studied economics, and that's why I know you're wrong. The following claim flies in the face of normal Adam Smithian capitalist theory:

      Without continued help from fansubbers, the anime industry 20 years from now would bring 'Ghost In The Shell 12:

      That would only happen if corporations mysteriously stopped pursuing revenue in known markets. Supposing, for the sake of argument, that fansubs were somehow abolished, and further suppose that this actually lead to a decreased USA demand for anime.

      In that unlikely occasion, any sane corporation will make up for the lost publicity by cheap additional measures. For an easy fix, they could release the first 10-20% of the episodes as free online samples. (Even allowing them to be freely distributed in unmodified form, so they don't even have to pay for bandwidth).

      These companies have made money by stealing market research from fansubbers, they need continued research to keep their own costs low

      That one is so funny, I don't even have to bother refuting it. (Hint: If it were true, then the original Japanese domestic anime industry would've never existed)

    118. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt. Wrong answer. This is the same as saying that a downloaded song equals a lost sale.

      Bzzt. Yet again, someone takes their intellectual cues from George W. Bush.

      Downloading a song doesn't EQUAL a lost sale on a 1:1 ratio. It does create a small, but non-zero chance that a person who would've bought a song will stick with the MP3.

      Driving my car 10 kph above the speed limit doesn't EQUAL turning a small child into a bloody explosion. But it does create a small chance that innocent people will die needlessly.

      If anything, fansubbing works like free advertising.

      No. That's denying the possibility of people watching a fansub once, and enjoying the show, but having no desire to see it again (nor enough guilt to go pay $30 for something they've already got in hand).

      Any reasonable person must admit that fansubbing has both a positive side (more publicity) and negative (undercuts sales). The only question is which of those has a greater total dollar effect and outweighs the other. This is something that's impossible to scientifically prove, because you can't really survey people about illegal activities and expect honest answers.

      However, in my own experience, it looks very clear that the time when fansubs were a financial plus for the anime industry have long since passed (I'd say the switch happened between 1993 and 1997, although arguably it was as far back as 1988). The dual growths of the Internet and the international anime market are the reasons for this change.

      The idea that anime companies (like, oh, Sony) couldn't get cheap advertising and market research to exceed whatever they get from fansubbers is simply absurd.

      I'd imagine one my attempt to rebut me by asking why haven't anime companies worked harder to quash fansubbers, if they're harmful to them? The answer is the same reason that Fox TV isn't going after P2p "The Simpsons" traders: because they simply haven't got around to it yet. (a study just found that Simpsons is the #1 show on P2p, followed by "Family Guy" and "Friends"). In the case of trading native USA TV, the fact that it's harmful is inescapable, as there is no possible way to interpret it as helpful free advertising. Its just a case of corporations being slow to react to changing environment conditions. Once a couple lawsuits set a strong precedent, expect the threat letters to fly quickly.

    119. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      In that unlikely occasion, any sane corporation will make up for the lost publicity by cheap additional measures. For an easy fix, they could release the first 10-20% of the episodes as free online samples. (Even allowing them to be freely distributed in unmodified form, so they don't even have to pay for bandwidth).

      Point of order: please demonstrate that corporations are interested in a free market or are even sane. Counterexamples: RIAA, MPAA, Disney all by itself.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    120. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get me started on the state the anime scene in the West would be like without the subbing groups.

      No, please do get started. Seen Kino's Journey? Not a single "mainstream" fansub group did, and it turned out to be a very enjoyable show, and fairly popular as well. Seen Haibane (partially paid for by Pioneer USA), Dead Leaves (paid for by Manga Entertainment), or Kaleido Star (paid for by ADV)? Even if fansubs mysteriously dried up, the market has reached a point where fansubs don't matter anymore. ADV and Geneon know the market well enough to practically put together their own anime studio and do it themselves. Fansubs aren't needed anymore by anyone but people who either don't want to pay or are too impatient to wait through a con season for announcements.

      Face it, fansubbing groups in the US are going the way of the buggy whip maker and american programmers.

    121. Re:Ahh! by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

      I have to agree that fansubs don't "disappear from the web" entirely. There are people who download fansubs with no intention of supporting the anime industry. However, don't lump all people together. Many of us do buy the DVDs - to the tune of thousands of dollars over a few years.

      Everyone that I know who downloads Anime gives me the same speach about only downloading it because they can't get it in the US, and then when thier show comes to the US they certainly don't buy DVDs of them.

      This says more about everyone you know than about fansubbing. Obviously I am not one of the people you know, but I believe I am representative of those people that respect both what fansubbers are doing and what the companies who license the series are doing.

      I watched Witch Hunter Robin about halfway through via fansubs and now own the DVD box set. Even though Naruto has way more than 26 episodes, I know I'll have those box sets on my shelf eventually because I've watched the fansubs. In fact, I have over five shelves of anime - of which about 1/3 were watched first as fansubs. What about fansubs I choose not to buy? Those are the ones I watch a couple episodes of and delete.

      "Why would I buy it I have it on my computer?"

      Again, this says more about who you know. Those who chose to fansub and those who respect the tradition would never ask that. We accept that once a company has licensed the material to distribute in the U.S. the fansubs will stop being made. In fact, that licensing gives us someone to write to encouraging the quick release of the anime series here - which is primarily what we want.

      You can quickly tell which camp someone belongs to by their reaction to the series getting licensed after a few episodes. Do they start following ADV, Geneon, or the other publisher's website for release dates? Or do they frantically search for a new source with illegal updates?

      --
      I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    122. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the fansubbers were well established and started getting US distribution licenses (ADV films was started by fansubbers), the studio had no interest in US distribution.

      True, but irrelevant. Whether or not fansubs helped to increase anime's popularity back in 1993 before Dragonball and Sailormoon where televised in the USA doesn't effect whether or not they help the industry at all today.


      Fansubs don't hurt major kids things like dragonball and pokemon because the target audience (99% of the money) doesnt FS.

      They don't hurt very special interest (aka stuff that flops) stuff because it will never be released in the first place.

      Damage to things like GitsSac seems pretty neglible. It's running on TV, and the DVDs are selling. I'm sure you can find people who dl'd the FS 2 years ago and aren't watching CN now or getting the DVDs. I'm also sure they're the vast minority. GitsSac is something that will be big with 'hard core' fans and more causal ones as well.

      They might hurt stuff that's in the 'in between' market, and they do open up a source of content for pirates that distro after licenses are announced. However, pirates aren't exactly hard to find regardless of fan translations, so the extra content source is rarely important.

    123. Re:Ahh! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      While I agree that it is hard to quantify what exactly the net gain/loss of fansubbing is, perhaps I can provide some insight into the "free advertising" since I am in advertising/marketing.

      There is something called viral marketing, which you can't just pay for with "cheap advertising". It is VERY effective (possibly the most effective form of advertising), and when done the right way, free. Currently that is what fansubbing acts as, and as such, it is classified as free advertising.

      I won't be a hypocrite though and say that I buy everything I download. In fact, I'm one of those people who almost never buy anime (mainly due to lack of funds, I would prefer to buy it though). However, I can't even count on two hands how many people have bought anime as a direct result of a recommendation from me. So instead of seeing it as losing my one sale, they should see it as a net gain.

      The way things are going with the evolution of media and the net, people have decided they don't like paying for things without knowing what they're getting. People want to sample the product, and fansubbing provides that at no cost to the anime companies. Again, they should consider themselves lucky we're on their side.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    124. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Point of order: please demonstrate that corporations are interested in a free market

      Irrelevant. Corporations are not in fact pro-free-market. All they are is greedy, and want to continue making money. For a corporation, "sane" = "greedy".

      Claiming that fansubs increase corporate profits is wrong... but even if they did, corps could release their own freebie subtitled samplers to get the same advertising effect.

    125. Re:Ahh! by downlo · · Score: 1
      Hard to argue that you're costing a company sales when they arent providing that product

      Precisely. Combine this with the fact that most anime that is released in japan, is done so with out any consideration to a NA audience. It has only been recently that NA companies have provided funds to get an anime made (Dead Leaves & Big O 2nd).

      I guess Media Factory is trying to be proactive, stopping fansubers, while trying to draw attention from NA distro companys. Its no big deal really since, Media Factorys animes are so-so.

    126. Re:Ahh! by himitsu · · Score: 1

      Actually I see your logic but I don't agree with your system.

      I propose that Japanese studios take a hands-on approach in the US and release the shows here themselves. As long as I'm making utopian systems I should go the whole way and say that Japanese studios should make agreements with the fansub community and pay small royalties to the group that subbed the anime in the US, in exchange for using their high-quality subs. They could release online and I would be able to download any show I wanted right after it aired using my Gigabit ethernet connection. ^_^

      But since all that doesn't exist (and wouldn't work anyway) I'm stuck in regards to what anime I do buy. I live in America, where 0% of Japanese animation is produced. But since a company that dubs and badly translates a show sells a copy of that here, people seem to think that I'm compelled to buy that copy no matter what. ADVFilms doesn't make anime. They liscense a product that has already been created, modify it slightly (modifications I don't care for: dubbing) and they sell it for an unreasonably high price (yes, in Japan some DVDs are 2 epis and $40, but that's not the norm, and since it's on TV there no one is compelled to buy every set).

      I think that buying anime here is a waste because you are giving more support to the US dubbing community than the Japanese stidio that made the content to begin with. I will admit that IANAL and I don't know what the profit breakdown for liscensing rights are in these agreements though.

      This is a similar issue to what is being faced in the American television show market. If I Tivo and burn a show like '24' that was broadcast publically on an 'antenna' station like Fox why am I somehow a worse consumer than if I were to buy the special DVD editions? Since it was shown freely (plus advertisements, yada yada) what makes it wrong for me to make a copy for myself? Anime is also shown on television, just on televisions too far away for mine to see.

    127. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding Naruto:

      The reason it is not licensed yet by an American company is that the Japanese animators are asking for an insane amount of money for distrobution rights, based on it's popularity. In Naruto's case, it seems to be too popular.

    128. Re:Ahh! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, was involved in VHS/post-office fansubbing

      Ah, so it was fine for you to do it, but no one else should be allowed. That places you firmly in the hypocrite camp. But isn't that one of the ad hominems you tossed my way?

    129. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Claiming that fan subs increase corporate profits is wrong...

      Actually, I think what some people in this thread were trying to point out is that fan subs helped open up larger markets. (To which I believe you agree.)

      In the same way people like myself may download a new series and buy the ones we like as soon as they are released a year or so later. Now granted that I might have eventually bought it anyway, there still is the fact that I would be paying more to the distributors earlier before the prices start dropping. I know I and most of my friends that are into anime only really buy anime they have seen or know that it is a good series (that being someone we know personally has stated it's a good series, having seen it) with the exception of the bargain bin items that are just too cheap to pass up (so far I haven't killed that habit with some of the stuff I've bought).

      At the same time I've downloaded an episode or two of a series that was released for a while (I'm not that big of an anime geek to know all the good series and there are a few popular series that I just don't like) and have ended up buying quite a few that otherwise I would not have. I'm not the type to really rent dvds mostly because after 2-3 rentals you can just buy the dvd. I do like the program that one company was running (was it ADV? I can't remember) that you could buy the first episode and get a discount if you bought the full dvd or a sampler disc that had the first episode of four different series. I bought 3 of the four series on that one disc I got. Apparently that works pretty well but I've only seen that one disc available bundled with a box set.

      The thing is there are people who won't buy stuff period. Then there are people that will. From my perspective and those I've seen around me, distributors end up making a lot more money by allowing fan subbing to exist, even if it isn't legal. And yes, there is a good chance that others would not pay. But how likely were those people going to buy something anyway? Odds are there are at least just as many who would not have as those that would. Anyway... just my $.02

    130. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I think that buying anime here is a waste because you are giving more support to the US dubbing community than the Japanese stidio that made the content to begin with.

      True, a fansub-viewer who mails $5/ep to the original producers should feel beyond-reproach. It's really unfortunate that the only plausible way to legally acquire most anime shows is to buy DVDs, which represent a 95% expentiture in dubbing and mastering services that provide zero value to a viewer who knows how to read.

      And it's also quite unfortunate that although watching an episode off TV and P2p cost the viewer a similar amount (zero dollars in both cases, but wasted time skipping ads or searching websites depending).

      Talk about utopian solutions: in the best case, there would be no "daily TV" at all. Every movie or series episode would immediately come up for paid download as soon as it's finished, and the price would automatically drop as time goes by. (Advertisers could still purchase those shows for sponsored broadcast, but without excluding a la carte viewers). Or, a group of people in a large theater could each pay that money to view it together on a big screen.

      Quick math: the upcoming Superbowl will have 150,000,000 viewers (50% of the USA), and a spot costs $5,000,000 for 60 sec. That's $0.04/viewer/minute. Normal (non-sports) TV has a ratio of 1 ad minute per 6 content minutes. So say one 22 minute show earns just $0.14/viewer. (I suspect my numbers are far off because viewers pay more attention to ads during the Superbowl than any other program, so the rates are probably higher than just viewer headcount would support. But I don't know the ad rates for typical TV)

      That's all the income a TV company gets, so if you were directly paying for TV, instead of it being ad-supported, it'd be under $1/show (possibly under $0.15/show, as I just calculated). The enormous gap between $0.15/show and $6/show for typical DVD price suggests there is a large marketplace opportunity in that gap for the first company that discovers a way to directly bill viewers for programming.

      (Possibly, that way could be more philsophical than technical, although presently the DRM movement is trying to use a combination of laws + technology, when moralistic acceptance and/or "misdemeanorism" could be a better strategy)

    131. Re:Ahh! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Well you asked for a list of titles not available in the US yet available in Japan (& since we are talkign about fansubs I'll add in only ones with fansubs)... Oh & 'only from this decade' will have to include things from 95 on to make a complete decade... Oh & I checked Amazon and a few other anime DVD carrying sites, just to make sure none have been released yet...

      Rizerumain
      Maria-sama ga miteru
      Rozen Maiden
      Alexander Senki
      Yokohama Kaidashi Kikou
      Kokoro Library
      Whistle (btw never try searching store websites for 'Whistle' bad bad idea)
      Melody Of Oblivion

      I could go on, but I've spent almost an hour now just verifying whether or not they are currently available... I never even got through more than 50 entries on my favorite fansub torrent site either (& right now their is more OST's & 'Manga' than anime on it)... & yes some of it is available now in the US, but the site I use allows anyone that's a member to upload anything... So it's not like they ask people to post things that are already published... In fact their are rules against posting such things, not that the few SysOps have an easy time sifting through it all to check either...

      I hope you understand my point, alot of things still aren't available from a licensed agent of the japanese companies producing anime which implies their is still a rather large market for fansubs for things that may or may not ever come here...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    132. Re:Ahh! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      All they are is greedy, and want to continue making money. For a corporation, "sane" = "greedy".

      Gee, that's my point - company after company allows it's lust for cash to kill its revenue stream. They get good returns for a few quarters, then crumple. You call that sane?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    133. Re:Ahh! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Sigh...

      "Like many of the responses I've got today, providing one counterexample where something didn't happen doesn't in any way prove that it can NEVER happen. It's hard to prove a negative, and tossing out example after example won't make it easier."

      Go ahead fell whatever way you want decide we are trying to 'prove something', we aren't trying to do that... We are giving clear examples were fansubs have been a huge help to any possibel future sales, which don't seem to be in a hurry to happen from the lack of support from Anime Distributors... Visit an Anime Convention sometime and listen to the fans, most find out what looks good from looking at fansubs available online these days due to the limits on what gets released by the big companies... Now most are glad for the big companies, but some things will just never get carried by the big players regardless of fan desires for them... This is the big niche for Fansubs...

      "IF that's true, and IF there are enough other people like that to make a substantial boost to sales, then fansubs are still not needed. The producers can easily authorize the release of 1-3 subtitled episodes on the internet as a way to promote and gauge interest."

      Your rather thick headed has anyone ever told you that? The distributors don't care to do that... Their subs are half-assed anyways and they've been more interested in creating dubs than subs for years... DVD's brought out the easy option for them to hold off on subs entirely to instead complete Dub work before releasing the OVA/Movie/Series beign carried over... Let me repeat that: They don't care about subs. Why is that important? Because it's what alot of fans prefer... I remember nearly a decade ago when soem companies decided they didn't need subs of certain series (this was the VHS era and all VHS was either sub or dub) the complaints forced them to release both in alot fo cases which they really really didn't want to do... They weren't all that thrilled with DVD early on either...

      "They're not rare anymore. In fact they're planned up front, rather than as surprises after the first run ends, so you won't hear about it as much anymore. Regardless, fansubbers did release copies of Big-O's 2nd season."

      Ok I'm calling you out on this, where is the proof you are correct here? Except Big O I can't recall a series that has been a bigger hit state-side than in Japan to the same degree... Even Pokemon and the numerous card dueling shows are planned ahead of time for japan and then US release and the interest is fairly equal...

      "No. ADV pays attention to fan input for almost everything they decide to release. Or are you accusing them of being complete fools who can't even think to troll a few message-boards to keep the pulse of the audience?"

      Maybe the other poster won't, but I will... Have you looked at what they are releasing currently? It sure as heck looks pretty half-assed to me... Having said that I should also say I'm on a Aniem COnvention staff and we've had some dealings with ADV that give me insider info and I'm still saying that. I'm not saying they are completely dumb, but their rather single minded lately and practically myopic about what to release... I'm not sure about what they've licensed for their Anime Network as I can't get that channel currently to see what they actually play, but their DVD releases have bene fairly lackluster as of late...

      "Or maybe I didn't want to launch into meaningless digressions into trivialities of Japanese trademark law. (I could go off about Trigun versus Trigun Maximum, for example, if anybody actually cared about details like that). I'm not confused at all. If you think I'm wrong, then you might not know exactly what "series" is defined as. ("series, n. things that come out one after another")"

      Except that in a good number of past cases differing seasons of the same series (ie YUA! Season 1, YUA! season 2) and or differing additions to the same title (ie Macross Plus, Macross 7, Macross 0) have in fact been license

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    134. Re:Ahh! by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 1

      They don't quite disappear completely. In the summer of 2003 I downloaded the complete run of Berzerk, which had been available in R1 for a while already, from a P2P network. I wanted to see the show, no video stores in Calgary that rented it (all 4 of them) had the whole set, usally Volume 1 was missing. With how spread out the city of Calgary is, it would take two hours each way on transit to get to some of the stores and back. I would have bought it, but $50.00 CDN plus tax for three or four episodes of a show I wasn't sure if I would like was a bit prohibitive, so I started with the first two episodes, got hooked, and DL'd the whole thing. I will buy the Hong Kong release of the boxset soon, for $60.00 CDN, but if I hadn't dl'ed it to begin with, I never would have seen it. Unfortunately, with how expensive anime DVDs are here in the great butt-fucked north thanks to bad distribution deals made by companies who see us as too small to bother with (arguably correct), anime is too damned expensive for anyone who is'nt independently wealthy to collect. Other examples: Akira 2-disc set (Non-metal box version) $79.99 Escaflowne T.V. series: $60.00 per three episode DVD Trigun T.V. Series: $55.00 per volume (3 ep.) Due to this, most of the people I know end up buying Region 0 bootlegs in Chinatown, or they download. I am not saying it's right, but this is why fansubbing has taken hold for a lot of people.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    135. Re:Ahh! by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 1

      I think that may be as rare as Military Inteligence, Responsible Government and Canadian Democracy.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    136. Re:Ahh! by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 1

      Or should we just re-educate the world that AC posters are TOO dumb to write?

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    137. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nope. That's actually an easy argument: The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales."

      Somehow, I doubt that Doraemon(released in 1979) will ever be licensed here. I mean...it was realeased 26 years ago. Since I have watched it fansubbed, I now will be giving money to the studio that created it by buying the cute merchandise.

    138. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > World would've be a (slightly) better place if people would live by some simple rules like this.

      World would be better still if you would have used proper grammer in your post.

      > (I hope I'm not trolling in anybody's eyes).

      Wishful thinking!

    139. Re:Ahh! by rzbx · · Score: 1

      Earlier you said.

      "The profit damage of fansubs isn't 100%, but it isn't 0% either. It's somewhere in between, which means I'm right."

      then

      "But today, if an anime has any substantial appeal to Americans, it'll certainly get an international DVD release inside of two years."

      Now consider if fansubs did not exist. Two years for a DVD release. How well do most people remember 2 years ago? Then there is the simple people factor. We are social, this is an issue when discussing this topic. How about when you said

      "Fact: A lot of televised anime is story-driven, with plot twists and linearity."

      So if someone was exposed to one show, they might consider watching another. How many would not have watched if it was in a foreign language only? This is another consideration in arguments for an event in profit prediction. In reality this was your argument. It about predicting profit and trying to prove that you were correct. Which one can not at all verify, because it happened. We do not know how many people became exposed due to fansubs and how this would have impacted their customer base.

      You can argue all you want, and I do not wish to stop you. It is the statement

      "...so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales."
      and then
      "No, I just proved it. By example."

      that I would like to point out.

      There were many other statements after that, which I'm going to go into. I hope that this time I have finally cleared things up. You were pressing hard on your argument to the point of ignoring what my message was. I was not debating your argument, but your presentation. You also failed to provide anything substantial to back up your original argument. In fact, your statement:

      "But today, if an anime has any substantial appeal to Americans, it'll certainly get an international DVD release inside of two years."

      appears to be very bad for your argument.

      "if an anime has any substantial appeal to Americans", is a big if behind another what if fansubs did not exist question.

      "two years", people forget, people find other available media, people find a new favorite show/etc.

      I personally do not know much about anime. But I received little data to see the connections in your argument. As much value as small facts like "anime is story-driven" provide to the argument, they are not enough for at least me.

      --
      Question everything.
    140. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      US!=World, this is a global phenomen, and apart from the US, fansubs are the only way to get most stuff.

      And, before you start, the biggest Manga hits were first translated on the subs, and just because they missed one or two doesn't mean that they are useless, the studios miss 10 or 20 regularly.

      Oh, and

      The greed of modern corporations really makes me sick, talk about having your cake and eating it.

      This like MS only careing about piracy when they have the market, and then calling everyone theives.

      The market wouldn't existe if it weren't for the subbers and now, the studios are attacking the source of their success for a few (virtual) dollars.

      Talk about biting the hand that feeds you

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    141. Re:Ahh! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      sorry, should have been some rant tags in there, that'll teache me not to preview... :-(

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    142. Re:Ahh! by gowen · · Score: 1
      She was referring to the Fair Use rules
      Then she misinterpreted them. Merely meeting one of the criteria is, in general, not sufficient for an infringement to be considered Fair Use.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    143. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      You can argue all you want, and I do not wish to stop you. It is the statement

      I already explained that completely three times now, and won't do it again. You don't only not understand WHY I proved it- but you also don't even know WHAT I proved. You can't even manage to correctly reprint the statement in question!

      I personally do not know much about anime. But I received little data to see the connections in your argument.

      I really must learn to let these admissions of ineptitude stand on their own. The sembelance of coherency in your first posts has long-since evaporated.

    144. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Ah, so it was fine for you to do it, but no one else should be allowed.

      Back in the day, the "Fansubber's Code" was actually legal. Japan hadn't signed the Berne Convention yet, so their copyrights were not protected internationally.

      That places you firmly in the hypocrite camp.

      No it doesn't. As I've already explained 11 times on this thread, in the past fansubbing was helpful (or at least nonharmful) to the companies producing anime, because there was truely no American market to speak of. That situation ended at least 10 years ago.

      As I've also already explained a few times (although other posters have gone into it more explicitly), "illegal" is not identical to "immoral" or "wrong". Everyone breaks a few laws each day (speed limits if you have a car, etc), and its not a real problem. People can recognize when an illegality has a genuine negative effect, and when it's frivolous.

      That places you firmly in the hypocrite camp. But isn't that one of the ad hominems you tossed my way?

      No, I never wrote anything resembling that. What I called you is an "ignoramus".

    145. Re:Ahh! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I find Animesuki to be very upstanding. I've never seen a licensed series on there.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    146. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I hope you understand my point, alot of things still aren't available from a licensed agent of the japanese companies producing anime which implies their is still a rather large market for fansubs for things that may or may not ever come here...

      So yet again, someone has pointed out that not all fansubs are harmful. And once again, it doesn't change the fact that the majority of fansubs (by volume of distribution) are zero-day translations of sure-fire titles like GITS, Witch Hunter Robin, and One Piece.

      on my favorite fansub torrent site either (& right now their is more OST's & 'Manga' than anime on it)

      Ok, so you admit right there that the fansub site is mostly used for OST, which is even less ethical. It's exactly as bad as trading MP3s of American-made music, as the ameliatory excuses of fansubs don't apply: there is no need to translate/localize it, there is no such thing as a "Region 2" CD player, and companies like CDJapan or Amazon.co.jp are ready and willing to legally sell you any of that.

    147. Re:Ahh! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Gee, that's my point - company after company allows it's lust for cash to kill its revenue stream.

      Ok, I really can't keep on going with someone who proudly demonstrates a total ignorance of even the Dow Jones Industrial Average. That would be insanity!

    148. Re:Ahh! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Ok you are just really hopeless... Do you actually read everything I type or just pick and choose what you want to look at?

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    149. Re:Ahh! by rzbx · · Score: 1

      I believe there has been far too much miscommunication between you and I. A few last words of advise. Be careful how you present your opinions/arguments/facts , how you come to conclusions, and your choice of words. It seems almost as if your trying to make it more difficult to understand what you are saying. You also appear to have a bad habit of pointing out every flaw of someones post, beating them to death with it, and treating them like complete idiots (or inferiors). I should point out, I could easily do the same to each and every statement of yours. Instead, I will say that your a little too caught up in your world, your words, and your meaning. If you find a mistake, point it out, but don't harass people about it. Everyone makes mistakes, but your forgetting about your own. Also, time is a factor.

      Much earlier someone stated that one can not easily argue one is costing a company sales. This is present tense. You then suddenly jumped to future tense and argued "will cut into their future sales".

      You completely misunderstood that parent poster. Parent was in present tense, you were in future tense. Are things a little clearer now? I do not mean to be harsh about this, but I'm trying to help here. Your typing too quickly. Reread at least once, if not more, before posting.

      --
      Question everything.
    150. Re:Ahh! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      The company WILL someday soon sell its DVDs in the USA, so distributing fansubs earlier will cut into their future sales.

      That is also an easy argument. Fansubbing is the only way that many anime shows get exposure outside of Japan. If you take that away, there will be much less interest in the show in other markets. Of course, an importer could always bring shows over and do their own marketing -- but without some kind of fan base, that is a huge risk.

      And personally, I would rather see unadultered anime with quality subtitles, than some crappy dub with content that's likely been modified to mesh better with the "local culture."

    151. Re:Ahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fansubbers are basically providing a free google translation service and the equivilent of international tv broadcasting.

      Think about it... almost no-one buys expensive-multi-disc dvd box sets of tv programmes without having watched them first on tv (usually for free). All the fansubbers are doing is the equivilent of that.

      The only isssue becomes when they are still released after the dvd is available, but that is tricky as the dvds often don't get releases outside the USA and the internet is international.

      I don't think there would be ANY of the market for anime dvds that there is in the US if it wasn't for fansubbers... but with video quality and distribution (p2p) getting better and easier it is understandable that the firms are getting worried.

      But they should be careful that they don't indescriminately target all their fans like the music industry, as they don't have any other way to get the knowledge of most of their products out there.

  11. Grrrr... by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...for two reasons.

    (1) "Anxious times in the cartoon underground." Nothing like the term "cartoon" to once again give people inaccurate impressions of the entire anime world. I expect better from CNET.

    (2) I will not buy DVDs blind, nor will I watch anime dubbed. I require at least a sampling before I plunk $ down on discs. Fansubs meet this requirement and have determined every single one of my anime purchases, with the exceptions of those series that came out before fansubbing really existed.

    1. Re:Grrrr... by grub · · Score: 1


      Nothing like the term "cartoon" to once again give people inaccurate impressions of the entire anime world.

      Maybe I don't "get" anime, but the only Japanese cartoon I found remotely interesting was Metropolis (Metoroporisu) other than that it's all been boring as hell to me.

      To each his own, though.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Grrrr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nothing like the term "cartoon" to once again give people inaccurate impressions of the entire anime world."

      Yeah... should have said "tentacle-sex circle-jerk world"...

    3. Re:Grrrr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      (1) "Anxious times in the cartoon underground." Nothing like the term "cartoon" to once again give people inaccurate impressions of the entire anime world. I expect better from CNET.

      Anime are Japanese cartoons. Just because it involves tentacle rape of a teenager doesn't mean it's not a cartoon.

    4. Re:Grrrr... by aduthie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (2) I will not buy DVDs blind, nor will I watch anime dubbed. I require at least a sampling before I plunk $ down on discs. Fansubs meet this requirement and have determined every single one of my anime purchases, with the exceptions of those series that came out before fansubbing really existed.

      Which would include RoboTech (dubbed), Speed Racer (likewise) and what else? I remember watching fansubs in 1992, when most of them were the work of lone American ex-patriots living in Japan, buying anime laserdiscs, and adding subtitles with Toast.

      I will say that the studios could use help with their subtitles. After accidentally watching part of the Cowboy Bebop series with both subtitles and English dubbing, I realized the subtitles were horrifically bad translations -- they appeared to be just literal translations, with no regard for making sense in English and sounding like real dialog. I ended up watching the rest of the series dubbed. (The same can not be said of Princess Mononoke and its lousy American actors trying to do voiceover work.)

    5. Re:Grrrr... by Mant · · Score: 1

      It is a cartoon.

      It's like people getting upset about people not calling large comics "graphic novels".

      If you don't like the way people think of cartoons, don't start saying anime aren't cartoons becuase they cover different ground, start pointing out how much ground cartoons can cover.

      I doubt the general public view of anime is much better than cartoon. One is seen kiddie stuff vs perverted/violent Japanese stuff. I'm not sure that is a better stereotype.

    6. Re:Grrrr... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      A few dubs are very good. Cowboy Bebop is the classic example of a very good dub.

      Most dubs suck. If I must choose between a badly voice-acted "professional" dub and a literally translated fansub, I'll take the sub every time. I trust a fan to at least try to convey the original meaning, and the original voices are preserved.

    7. Re:Grrrr... by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I don't agree, the dub sucks.
      I've never encountered a dub which doesn't suck, and I consume at least 8h of anime every week.

      Down with dubs up with subs!

    8. Re:Grrrr... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      but the only Japanese cartoon

      Metropolis was not a CARicature tune. It also was an inferior effort (even the century-old original was better).

    9. Re:Grrrr... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I realized the subtitles were horrifically bad translations

      You have no way of knowing that. (Unless you speak Japanese to make a real comparison with the original).

      and sounding like real dialog.

      Since subtitles are non-auditory, they by definition do not "sound" like anything. And they shouldn't. They're meant for you to get the literal meaning, nothing more.

    10. Re:Grrrr... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Bebop is the classic example of a very good dub.

      No it isn't. My ears were bleeding after only 20 seconds of Teddy Bomber...

      It's not only that they did a bad job, but they were working under impossible constraints. One simply cannot construct believable English dialog between two tough-guy bounty hunters who call each other "Spike" and "Jet"... it just doesn't work. To Japanese ears, those words are meaningless sounds appropriate for foreign names- but in English, they are nouns from the dictionary, and it comes off silly to use them as given names.

    11. Re:Grrrr... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      , with the exceptions of those series that came out before fansubbing really existed.

      Which would include RoboTech (dubbed),

      I don't think Robotech counts as merely "dubbed". Harmony Gold took what was a rather random "giant fighting robots" series with no real cohesive story, and editted it into a trilogy of fairly solid story arcs, which required pretty much tossing out the original dialogue entirely. The original japanese Macross series never seemed to have any continuity other than the same characters reappearing to fight each other.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Grrrr... by Ours · · Score: 1

      I agree so much with you on the second point. Were I live, a 2 episode DVD of manga costs twice as much as your average holywood movie. If you take in account that a anime season is usually aroung 24 episodes, that makes a lot of money to put down. I'm very glad to get a good preview of a anime show and put the money down once it finally reaches the stores.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    13. Re:Grrrr... by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 1
      As I expected: Bring up anime and you get the obligatory fanboy yelling at the top of his lungs, "OMG anime isn't a cartoon!" as though *his* favorite art form is somehow a holy grail of perfection that cannot be tainted by generalizations.

      Anime actually shares much in common with American animation. You have the occasional sophisticated movie or television show for adults, true, and some of the shows for kids are original, but the rest (the vast majority in fact) is bland, derivitive, and usually created to sell merchandise.

      As an example: Did you ever notice how nearly *every* manga/anime artist uses pretty much the exact same style of drawing? Or for every Lodoss War or Cowboy Bebop that springs up there's ten anime franchises that fall into the "bland, derivitive category?

      No, anime is not any more special than any other form of animation - or any other form of art, for that matter. You're fooling yourself if you think otherwise.

      --
      Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
    14. Re:Grrrr... by jonhuang · · Score: 1
      I used to call japanese cartoons.. "anime." But then I became really good friends with several japanese international students. They called them "cartoons."


      They also wanted to know why I called their cartoons "anime," to which I had no good response.

    15. Re:Grrrr... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      Add a third reason, this happened over a month ago and is old news in the anime world. I'm quite surprised that Cnet's doing an article on it now, although I wouldn't have been surprised if they'd done it when, or soon after, it happened. Basically, by now this is no longer a concern. Various groups made their decisions, and nothing else has happened. It appeared that Media Factory was concerned about the distribution of just a few titles, mostly Kimi ga Nozomu Eien and Akane Maniax (an OVA offshoot from KimiNozu, both based off an H game.) I suppose it's a really slow news day at Cnet HQ so they decided to write up a story going on two months old that's been resolved. Either that or they're trying to hype a new angle on the "MPAA/RIAA sue _______" stories. Also the article conveniently overlooks the fact that many companies are slowly putting out their back catalogs on DVD. Many people who already have VHS or LD versions won't bother to upgrade to DVDs.

      Frankly I'm not surprised that anime DVD sales are remaining flat. I know that there is far more put out now that I want than I'll ever be able to afford. For many series I wait for a box release so I can get it cheaper, I'm sure other fans do the same. As they're seeing only the most popular titles will sell well in that scenario. Average popularity titles will sell less, but box set sales will probably be higher than for higher popularity titles.

      Basically I think the real problem for US anime distributers is they've been too successful and pushed the market too fast. Right now the market hasn't caught up with the output.

    16. Re:Grrrr... by aduthie · · Score: 1

      Reading like good dialog then...

      I disagree that subtitles are there just to convey literal meaning -- that's the difference between a workable translation and a good one. A good translation carries the nuance of the original meaning in addition to the literal story conveyed. If I were wrong, then there'd be no reason to translate any poem -- any beautiful literature for that matter -- into any other language, because the beauty will always be lost in a literal translation.

    17. Re:Grrrr... by mink · · Score: 1

      Metropolis != Metropolis.

      IT was not a remake of the old silent classic, it may have goten a few elements. IMO it stole much more from the writings of Asimove. Specifically the subplot with the detective and the robot detective.

      I also dont see you putting out a superior effort so maybe you might want to climb down from the mountain there and be less of an asshole in every post. I think that AC might have pegged you right as being TL.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    18. Re:Grrrr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manga=comic books printed on paper.
      Anime=video

    19. Re:Grrrr... by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 1

      It's not a comic book, Mom, It's a GRAPHIC NOVEL!

    20. Re:Grrrr... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      One simply cannot construct believable English dialog between two tough-guy bounty hunters who call each other "Spike" and "Jet"

      Must not be a Buffy fan, eh?

  12. Poor Translations by Vordak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, if companies like Funimation would actually translate the real words instead of making most of them childish, then people might wait until the anime is released to the US because the translations are correct. It is amazing to compare the translations these big corporations do, compared to the real script.

    1. Re:Poor Translations by BabyDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aargh, FUNimation. May they forever burn in HFIL.

    2. Re:Poor Translations by Taladar · · Score: 1

      I don't watch Anime but English books, movies and series translated to german are constantly of such a bad quality that I refuse to read/watch them. The only exception are books actually translated by people working in the same field as the original author but even those are far from excellent quality.

      Adequate Translation seems to be something big companies often forget in their budgets for localized content.

    3. Re:Poor Translations by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, I can only speak from my dragonball DVD, it has two subtitles. One "English" that is a transcript of the english dub, One "Japanese" still in English, but with what I believe is a fairly accurate sub. It is certainly quite far from the other one. I do believe FUNimation was the perp in question here.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Poor Translations by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The funny thing is, I personally prefer fansub over officially licensed subtitles in many cases because the fansubbed works are better. The fansubbers (those who don't skimp on quality) are better because:

      1. They provide subtitles that are more "fun" (they can get more creative because their jobs don't depend on it being professionally done). This applies very often to the swearing in the dialogue.

      2. They are more thorough. For example, many fansubs go through the extra length of providing extra notes - something the professionally done official licensed versions almost never do. I truly appreciate these, because it helps explain a lot of cultural idiosyncracies.

      3. They use better fonts. I've watched many licensed anime and compared the fonts with those of the fansubs. The most common font used is just damned ugly.

      4. Better timeliness, of course.

      5. Keep up to date with earthquakes in Japan. Often, I've seen earthquake notifications flash across the screens of the anime in the middle...I kind of miss those in the licensed anime.

      The only area that licensed anime is better is dubbing. But only barely so, because they have professional equipment and voice actors/actresses to do it. Unfortunately, it sounds like they only have 3 actresses and 2 actors for all anime titles because they all sound the same.

      In general, I like the fansubs better and appreciate their efforts a lot more. I wish the professionally done ones can learn from the fansubbers. I wish some of them would consider paying fansubbers for their versions (with some modifications, of course).

    5. Re:Poor Translations by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Ya, my daughter watches this stuff with the subtitles turned on. I've listened and wondered why didn't the transaltors just follow the subtitles. The knowledge level of listner for this stuff in the u.s. is a lot more sophisticated then the translation.

      I'm curious, how are the folks from japan losing money? This stuff is on TV, if anything, knowing its on TV makes downloading less of a distribution factor. Or am I missing something here?

    6. Re:Poor Translations by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      This AC isn't completely off. There's a certain feeling attached with "cartoons" over here, and even anime what with the Pokemon / kiddy anime* phenomenon. Many adults simply don't take them seriously. *kiddy anime including those which have been so dumbed down for the "sensitive" audience over here that most only kids watch them

    7. Re:Poor Translations by birder · · Score: 1

      Many Anime series run on TV sometimes just for one season (26 episode story arc). The companies then release them on DVD normally in 3-4 episodes per disc at a high price (ed. ripp-off). Popular shows might see the rights bought up for English versions. Either way, it's probably more an issue of having their shows traded around before they got around to selling the DVDs to the public including people not residing in Japan.

    8. Re:Poor Translations by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      Anyone know if that's what happened to the last "Ghost in the Shell" movie? I bought the CD after watching the download a few times. In an early scene, in which the detectives go to an 'autopsy' of a robot 'doll', the download represents the location as the manufacturering plant, the official movie release as a police coroner. The only thing the two subs have in common is moving cartoon lips.

    9. Re:Poor Translations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. They use better fonts. I've watched many licensed anime and compared the fonts with those of the fansubs. The most common font used is just damned ugly.

      I wonder how much the fansubbers paid for their licenses to use those fonts or if they're ripping them off too.

      Also, for the record, cursive fonts are not better than block fonts.

    10. Re:Poor Translations by almightyjustin · · Score: 1
      IIRC typefaces are not copyrightable under US law, although the digital font files themselves (.ttf etc) are.

      Also, I've seen plenty of horrible typography in fansubs too. At least the boring standard DVD font is easy to read.

      --

      Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

    11. Re:Poor Translations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funimation has actually done a very good job with Full Metal Alchemist. It kind of surprised me.

    12. Re:Poor Translations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fansubbers tend to be much less accurate, however. For one thing they almost always aren't professional translators, but much worse is that they don't have access to the original scripts used for the show.

    13. Re:Poor Translations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The real script is often in another language entirely.

    14. Re:Poor Translations by pikakilla · · Score: 1
      1. They provide subtitles that are more "fun" (they can get more creative because their jobs don't depend on it being professionally done). This applies very often to the swearing in the dialogue.


      Watch Trigun, Kthx.


      2. They are more thorough. For example, many fansubs go through the extra length of providing extra notes - something the professionally done official licensed versions almost never do. I truly appreciate these, because it helps explain a lot of cultural idiosyncracies.


      Yeah, they do. Check the inserts of the dvd cases. They always have SOMETHING there that explains the cultural differences/meanings. They just dont place it inside the video like subbers have to. Plus the dvd format makes it so the companies cannot make typesetted signs without hardsubbing, and that would create one hell of an uproar (Rahxephon ep1 op)


      3. They use better fonts. I've watched many licensed anime and compared the fonts with those of the fansubs. The most common font used is just damned ugly.


      This is not the fault of the licensors. DVD format prohibits any other font than the crappy arial font that you see used. Either way, pretty fonts/styling tend to distract from the episode


      1. They provide subtitles that are more "fun" (they can get more creative because their jobs don't depend on it being professionally done). This applies very often to the swearing in the dialogue.


      This completely depends on the group. All the faster groups sacrifice quality for speed (mainly lacking edits). When I have compared official dvd releases to group releases (A-Keep/Aone) the lines in the dvd made more sense where the lines in the subbed episodes appeared rushed and unpolished. The professional people are able to spend more time and polish the rough edges to make the episode flow perfectly. For example, the translator may translate a line as "The fire rage created ball flew from timmy's hand" and the editor may just edit the line as "the rage created fireball flew from timmy's hand" when the professionals make the line "The fireball flew from timmy's enraged hand" It is the subtle aspects like that that seperate the professionals from the speedsubbers. They can't sit back for a week and edit an episode less they lose their speedsuber status and all the leechers to go with it.


      The only area that licensed anime is better is dubbing. But only barely so, because they have professional equipment and voice actors/actresses to do it. Unfortunately, it sounds like they only have 3 actresses and 2 actors for all anime titles because they all sound the same.


      Fans dont dub. period. The only dubbing that is done is parody dubs. The amount of work that is required for a dub is insane and it is impossible for a group to do a decent job dubbing and get the series out in any reasonable timeframe.


      Liscenced anime is better on many fronts. For one, they have the actual source so you get very crisp high quality dvd's. No matter how good the encoder, you cannot make a twice mpeg4 compressed tv cap look anything like a dvd source.

    15. Re:Poor Translations by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Lip flap. Dubbing is written and acted to (attempt to) match the way the characters lips move. They dont really bother with this in japan.

      --

      no .sig
    16. Re:Poor Translations by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Fans *mostly* don't dub. There is a Sailr Moon fandub going on. Yes, gah, I know.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  13. CmdrTaco supports Piracy? by REBloomfield · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on the work of fansubbers

    Isn't this a really bad idea, considering this is a major news outlet and your day job? Could OSDN be considered to be condoning piracy?

    1. Re:CmdrTaco supports Piracy? by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Do you say that actually _buying_ DVDs is considered piracy too?! That explains it all, then. : )

  14. There's no sympathy in corporateville... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The ultimate goal of large content providers is to create a world where they take you money each and every time you view their content. NO EXCEPTIONS!

    No doubt some people go too far in their fansubbing, but on the other hand it is very rare indeed that a corporation will be or even can be reasonable (think of how their stockholders would react to a corporation allowing unauthorized copying of their content). That is why the law must provide the balance. If you think that there ought to be a reasonableness to this kind of thing the I recommend that you make your feelings known. Support the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

    One thing I know for sure, if we do nothing then eventually we will live in a world where you have to pay every time you read your kid a bedtime story.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to both white-collar crime and corporate abuse of the social contract is metalworkers and construction workers with heavy tools. Nobody splits hairs legally when they're being beaten up with a crowbar.

    2. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      The EFF is a noble effort, but a futile one. Donate that money to the Freenet guys instead, and maybe they can make the damn thing usable.

    3. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by OgGreeb · · Score: 1
      "The ultimate goal of large content providers is to create a world where they take your money
      each and every time you view their content. NO EXCEPTIONS!"

      The parent posting is on target, but I'd like to add this observation from seeing the same thing happen in the Simpsons world.

      The producers of content depend on the imaginations of consumers to embrace their product, whether it be anime or Simpsons episodes.

      success == profit == consumer enthusiasm
      == consumer desire to share/contribute back/develop a community of like-minded consumers
      .

      Unless the content producers understand that it's not a zero-sum game and accept the nature of this relationship and integrate consumers into their product, they won't make as much money as they otherwise could, and we'll continue to see these battles and everyone involved will feel unappreciated and abused.

      --
      -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
    4. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 1
      One thing I know for sure, if we do nothing then eventually we will live in a world where you have to pay every time you read your kid a bedtime story.

      It is then that I will make up bedtime stories. If you like I'll write them down and send them to you, for free! Some people still do things because they love to, they have hobbies that involve things other than watching TV.

    5. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh... and by blanace you mean "get their stuff for free."

      I love these kinds of posts, that do *sooo* much *good* for the image of the EFF.

    6. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call an anime distributer a 'large content provider.'

    7. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by danila · · Score: 1

      The ultimate goal of large content providers is to create a world where they take you money each and every time you view their content. NO EXCEPTIONS!

      How about taking your money each and every time you buy an unrelated product, such as a CD-burner or a computer? That would be nice as well. :) I think I know an even better scenario - how about we all send all our money to the large content providers (of course, after Bill Gates takes his cut)?

      Thankfully, there are other "corporations" that are just as bent on getting "respect" or "fun" or even some "dinero" out of running pirate groups. These can be as tough as the corporations or even tougher. So I guess there might still be some stories for your kid. :) Of course, fansubbers are usually not as tough, because they have too much respect for the producers and some different notions about what is appropriate. Still, don't despair.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    8. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      If they were smart they'd realize the increase in sales revenue will come not from making you pay each time you view their content, but giving you incentive to actually want to buy their content such as um...I don't know...giving people a sample through fansubbing groups...

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't say that it counts as "their content" until they actually licence the series. Until then, it would seem to be up for grabs. Plenty of fansub groups adhere to this rule, although a great many don't (and for that, I'm sometimes grateful. Heh.)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    10. Re:There's no sympathy in corporateville... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ultimate goal of large content providers is to create a world where they take you money each and every time you view their content. NO EXCEPTIONS!

      For a sufficiently fuzzy definition of "large", of course.

  15. Whoa, whoa... by ceeam · · Score: 1

    From the TFA: "It is technically illegal. When we announce a title, if there is a site that is distributing fansubs, then we contract them and ask them to remove it". Have you ever seen the notes on your anime "Please delete this stuff when it is officially released in your area. [Or something similar to it]" That's basically about it. And nothing is wrong with it. If everything is done in the proper (friendly) manner, what's the problem? Let's not blow the fire, guys ^_^

    1. Re:Whoa, whoa... by DJProtoss · · Score: 1

      >Have you ever seen the notes on your anime "Please >delete this stuff when it is officially released in >your area" Actually yes. iirc it was an animefin release. Can't remember the show though.

      --
      "Success is based on knowing how far to go in going too far"
    2. Re:Whoa, whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and have you seen the sites/other internet places that offer full programs/games/ect, and say "This is 100% legal, you much delete the stuff within 24 hours. If you liked what you used, support them by buying the stuff.[Or something similar to it]" What's the problem? *Cough*

      Come on, I have read enough comments from people who do download fansubs that they have no intent to remove the stuff or buy it when it is officially released. They also spend the time bitching about because the EVIL company, lets say Geneon, licensed, let say Samurai Champloo, fansub group ABC stopped subbing, removed their torrents, and they can't download the show for free anymore. Then they ask for other torrents sites that still have it, and comment about how they hope group XYZ still continues to fansub it so that they can continue to get their free fix.

      Like others have said, Fansubs have outlived their good use.

  16. cartoon, schmartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get over it already. If it's drawn it's a cartoon. You must be one of those arty-farty types.

    1. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Yes, in the same sense as opera is a kind of rap.

    2. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by wed128 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. That doesn't make sense.

      Anime are cartoons.
      Bugs bunny is also featured in cartoons.

      Opera is music
      Rap is music

      You see where i'm going here?

    3. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by WillerZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anime films/series are cartoons in the same sense that 8 mile was a kind of musical.

      Just because it was a different style of music didn't make it a different thing, and just because an anime is (sometimes) animated with more care or in a different style doesn't mean it isn't a cartoon.

      Phil

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    4. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by hawk · · Score: 0, Troll

      >Rap is music

      You had me until right here. :)

      hawk

    5. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Despite your musical taste, rap is still generally considered music. I never went so far as to listen to it, by the way.

    6. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by diamondsw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nobody is saying you're wrong in a technical sense. What the poster was getting at is the word "cartoon" carries a very specific tone and set of boundaries in the US (which is where I'm from, at any rate). Here, the word "cartoon" means, something animated for the kids - high-frame-rate, low quality, simple platitudes, etc. Something you grow out of.

      Anime, on the other hand, encompasses a much larger set of genres and audiences. Anime is designed for everyone from kids (and God, do we know that, thank you Pokemon) to teens and adults. Anime even has sub-genres - definite sci-fi series, comedy series, westerns, horror, etc. What was the last time you saw a horror "cartoon"?

      Most of all, though, anime has much more interesting subject matter - stuff that makes you think. The characters are not one-dimensional, and are not all designed for gags as they are in 99% of "cartoons". The storylines are well written and continuous, and characters develop and change. Depending on the series, the nature of family, friendship, religion, or even reality itself is challenged. And when you're tired of all of that, yes, there's plenty of comedy and "low humor" as well.

      This is why anime fans get upset when you call it a "cartoon". Yes, it is a cartoon. But calling it such implies it is much, much narrower and vapid than it deserves.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    7. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by artemis67 · · Score: 1
      Bugs Bunny sang Opera
      Some Anime has Rap

      ...no wait, I'm completely confued now... ummm, what was the point again?

    8. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      a different style doesn't mean it isn't a cartoon.

      Language purists know that "cartoon" means "Cariature tune", and is only one of many kinds of animation. For example, the actor Jim Carey is often described as behaving "cartoonishly"- and it doesn't mean he was drawn on paper. The word "cartoon" has connotations of a flippant attitude and a lightweight storyline, aspects universal to American-produced "cartoons", but not nearly as prevalent in anime.

      Because the USA has gone for so many decades without producing any popular animations which weren't also cartoons, speakers today are unable to find words aside from "cartoon" to refer to non-photographic animations.

      (Of course, those are the same people who know that "decimate" means to destroy only 10% of the subject, and that a tsunami isn't a tradegy, because tradegies are always the victim's own fault...)

    9. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by kevruse · · Score: 1

      >rate). Here, the word "cartoon" means, something animated for the kids - high-frame-rate, low >quality, simple platitudes, etc. Something you grow out of.

      Wait a second. When are are supposed to out grow cartoons?

    10. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by chavelin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, not al anime is a cartoon. From the webster online dictionary, a cartoon is a "a drawing intended as satire, caricature, or humor". Not all anime is intended to be that way. Some of them are drawn realistically. Would you consider the paintings of Da Vinci cartoons? Of course not. The same applies to lots of anime shows and movies. And since anime is a medium rather than a genre, it would be better to call it animation.

      Just my two cents.

    11. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Would you consider the paintings of Da Vinci cartoons?

      Leonardo may well have made cartoons (see the first definition at Webster) for things like The Last Supper.

    12. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by danaris · · Score: 1

      (Of course, those are the same people who know that "decimate" means to destroy only 10% of the subject, and that a tsunami isn't a tradegy, because tradegies are always the victim's own fault...)

      Actually, I'd say (without going to a dictionary, 'cause I'm lazy), that "decimate" means "to destroy all but 10% of its original size (or population, or whatever)". So, basically the other way around.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    13. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      Most of all, though, anime has much more interesting subject matter - stuff that makes you think. The characters are not one-dimensional, and are not all designed for gags as they are in 99% of "cartoons".
      I've seen some decent anime. I've seen some crap anime. A lot of people think Ghost in the Shell is interesting and thought-provoking. I thought it was interminably dull. One of the things that makes most anime fans' opinions seem suspect to most people who aren't fans (but are open-minded) is that anime fans seem to think that anime is somehow excluded from Sturgeon's Law -- whereas I can assure you it is not.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    14. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite.

      Anime is animation.
      Bugs Bunny is animation.

      Bugs Bunny is also a cartoon, but cartoon != animation.

      Opera is music.
      Rap is music.
      Sesame street music is music.

      However, opera and rap are not -children's- music.
      Cartoons are intended for kids. Anime (and other animation) does not have to be.

    15. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd say (without going to a dictionary, 'cause I'm lazy), that "decimate" means "to destroy all but 10% of its original size

      Well yeah, you'd say that. And you'd be wrong. Because I do own a dictionary, and it does mean to kill exactly 1/10th. In fact, Roman legions were threatened that if they retreated from battle, the general would walk down the line and stab every 10th man to "decimate" the unit.

    16. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by wed128 · · Score: 1

      "Kill teh Wabbit Kill Teh Wabbit" - E. Fudd

      Ah, The Classics

    17. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Trick · · Score: 1

      A couple picked nits:

      The same link you provided also gives these definitions for "cartoon" right after the one you quoted:

      animated cartoon: n. a motion picture made from a series of drawings simulating motion by means of slight progressive changes in the drawings

      Sound more like anime now?

      Second nit: It drives me nuts when people refer to a dictionary as "Webster's," as if that conveyed any kind of authority whatsoever. There are about a gazillion different "Webster's" dictionaries, from many different publishers. The quality of them varies from very good to total garbage.

      The link you provided isn't for "the" Webster's dictionary. It's the Miriam-Webster Online Dictionary, just one of way too many "Webster's."

    18. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, there's a lot of crap. Even of the licensed anime - which is a small subset - a lot is crap. Some of it is subjective (Eva tends to divide people, as do things like GITS and Akira, or even Cowboy Bebop), some of it is not (ever had the misfortune to see the "Street Fighter" anime?).

      The "99%" was referred to character designs. Even in something like Ghost in the Shell, the characters are much more fleshed out than in a tranditional American cartoon, where they are almost always the personification of a single trait. Bart is a troublemaker, Lisa is smart, Homer is dumb, Bugs is a wiseass, etc.

      Now, sometimes anime has similar characters. People might argue that in Evangelion, Shinji is whiny, Asuka is a bitch, and Rei is non-existant. However, in an anime they usually have backstory, development - it will go into why people are the way they are (the whole point of Eva was character development, not the "big robots"). In an anime, actions almost always have consequences and effects, and characters have to balance difficult decisions. It's not all funny entertainment, unlike the vast majority of "cartoons".

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    19. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by mink · · Score: 1

      Anime as seen on the store shelves in the USA is sort of exempt from Sturgeons law.

      The reason I say that is because what ends up being licensed here tends to be popular stuff and often filtered through the lense of fandom. While this will never prevent a crap but popular show from making it over here, it does keep out a lot of the crap. Sadly we also keep out a certain percentage of the non crap.

      Still our good to crap ratio is far higher them Japans IMO.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    20. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 0

      Actually, I disagree. If Evangelion *WASN'T* about the robots, but actually about the character development, then why are the evas featured... in nearly every episode? Nah, Evangelion is about stuff blowing up and robots stomping on things, the character development comes in secondary. What makes people think that it's the primary focus is the last 2 episodes when their budget ran out and they had to resort to 2x20 minute episodes with talking, reused frames, and a slide show of stuff drawn with crayons. A masterpiece it is not, but it definately is entertaining (sans the last 2 episodes)

    21. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anime, on the other hand, encompasses a much larger set of genres and audiences. Anime is designed for everyone from kids (and God, do we know that, thank you Pokemon) to teens and adults. Anime even has sub-genres - definite sci-fi series, comedy series, westerns, horror, etc. What was the last time you saw a horror "cartoon"?

      I guess you hadn't seen Adam Sandler's Eight Crazy Nights.

    22. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain the rest of Gainax's and Hideki Anno's carreer. Good luck with the Eva movie as well...

      If you think it's about the robots, you haven't really watched it yet.

    23. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      If Evangelion *WASN'T* about the robots, but actually about the character development, then why are the evas featured...

      If you count, it's a 24 episode series where they are attacked by monsters 12 times, so there is a "robot fight" in only half the episodes. If it was really all about the evas, then it wouldn't have gone through to the last 30 seconds of the first episode before Shinji even gets inside the cockpit.

      Furthermore, this is a spoiler, but only one episode of Evangelion featured a robot. It was called "Jet Alone", and it's nuclear reactor was unsafe. There were no robots anyplace else... although there were things that looked like robots, so confusion is understandable.

    24. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you and I seem to have completely opposite philosophies about what makes something crap. You seem to think that the public vote is enough to ensure that you see the creme-de-la-creme. I, on the other hand, think that the vote of the unwashed masses -- particularly "fans" -- is sure to bring you only the lowest common denominator, nine times out of ten.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    25. Re:cartoon, schmartoon by mink · · Score: 1

      You completely misunderstand what I was saying (this appears to be the new /. norm). I never said all the anime brought over here was the creme-de-la-creme. I said since there is some pre filtering we get a better good to crap ratio.

      Having seen some of the crap we dont get over here, I can say we are lucky that fandom and the licensing companies filter it to an extent.

      Yah we dont get a lot of good stuff that should be here, and yah sometimes we get crap. I never said it was perfect. I just said we get a better good to crap ratio.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  17. Suggestion for fansubbers by scifience · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can understand both sides of this issue. But assuming that the trend of the distributors cracking down on fansubbers continues, why not have the fansubbers just release their subtitles with no video?

    This would allow the die-hard fans to either purchase a legitimate non-English DVD and apply the subtitles themselves (there is lots of software to do this available). This would, in theory, remove the legal burden from the fansubbers since they would no longer be distributing the actual video.

    Everyone wins in this case: the anime fans would get to watch the series earlier than they would if they waited for a true English release, the fansubbers continue doing what they do, and the studio/distributor still gets their money from the sale of the DVD.

    I know that many anime fans often prefer the fansub to a commercial subtitling because the fansubbers often include translations of on-screen items, not just dialog, so you can figure out if those kanji in the window are significant to the plot of if they are just decoration.

    1. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      It'd still be illegal, but it would probably drop below the radar, anyway. What you describe is my preferred method for dealing with the language barrier and the current obscenely long copyright terms that make waiting for titles to enter the public domain impossible.

    2. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

      You forgot something. Where are they going to easily obtain the video? As well as Scenes become cut or edited to compensate for material or dubbing purposes(which they should have stopped by now).

      --
      ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    3. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by scifience · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.amazon.co.jp/
      http://www.yesasia.com/

      To name just a couple. I order all the time from both sites.

    4. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      What you are suggesting is already done for video games. I know that all of the Square Enix games take a good year or two to make it to the US. In that time, there are plenty of translation docs on the web. Sure, it isn't like on-screen subtitiles, but it also makes it easier to learn Japanese. You can try to watch it without your translation print-out and then see if you got the translations correct.

      Also - a side note for those who don't know Japanese: Kanji is not "Japanese Characters". Kanji is "Chinese Characters used by the Japanese as a sort of fancy text". I learned Chinese first, so I am picky about the difference.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    5. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand both sides of this issue. But assuming that the trend of the distributors cracking down on fansubbers continues, why not have the fansubbers just release their subtitles with no video?

      This would allow the die-hard fans to either purchase a legitimate non-English DVD and apply the subtitles themselves (there is lots of software to do this available). This would, in theory, remove the legal burden from the fansubbers since they would no longer be distributing the actual video.


      That's a nice idea, and it handles the legal issues quite well. It's just too bad that it wouldn't work. Because the non-English DVDs cost far, far more than the English DVDs do. Even the most rabid fan would quickly meet finanical suicide to do as you suggest (unless they were quite well off indeed).

      No, the main reason that this company, among others, is trying to stamp out fansubbing is that they know fansubbers provide their potential customers with a preview of the show, and the company knows their shows suck. As others have pointed out, fansubbing does let fans know which shows are worth buying, but it also lets them discover which ones aren't worth buying.

      Companies want anime fans to know next to nothing about the shows as the fan stands in front of the anime aisle, trying to decide what series to take a chance on next. Random choice is the only way some of these DVDs are going to sell at all, and informed consumers don't make random choices.

    6. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you are suggesting that instead of simply violating copyright you want anime fans to illigally import a non region 1 dvd and then violate the DMCA using terrorist tools that will crack that region coding or worse yet use a dangerous non-region dvd player?

      What kind of sick being are you????

      there is absolutely no legal way to watch a dvd from japan here in the states.

      you must violate federal law and commit a felony to watch something you purchased.

      If you dont like it, Canada has some sane laws, I suggest moving there or another sane country.

      just wait for the next round of make everything illegal from the democrats. because you know a republican will not get voted in next term.

      the dems brought us the DMCA (Thanks clinton maybe if you weren't getting a hummer when you were reading the bills you were signing into law we might have avoided it.) and they will bring us more crap that punishes the poor ($150,000 a year is poor) and reward the rich.

    7. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by IndiJ · · Score: 1
      Everyone wins in this case

      Tell that to ADV.

      The Japanese distributors would probably dance on tables if this became the norm, but it would all but destroy any chance of non-Japanese releases making any money.

      Personally, I'd pay for a fansub before an subtitled official North American release any day (but fansubs are always free). The fansub translation is usually far, far, superior - often with nuances preserved and cultural differences explained. The usually even translate the song lyrics. Hell, the one I watched most recently, for a show called Mai-HiME, even colourized the speech of different characters differently so each had their own unique colour.

      This is apples and oranges. There is no comparison in the quality of fansubs to the subtitling done by English-language distributors. I buy the DVDs, but by then I have already picked up all the finer nuances from the fansubbed version. Media Factory is shooting themselves in the foot with an RPG. If fansubs weren't available, frankly I'd not bother. It would sure save me a lot of money on DVDs, wall scrolls, action figures, books, games,...

      --
      It's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.
    8. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but isn't this a bit near-sighted attitude ? An informed customer is imo likely to overall spend more money on anime (for example) if he's had the oppotunity to sample a lot of anime and come to really appreciate it.
      On the other hand, the guy having to make "random" (critics DO exist too) choice is more likely to remain a casual viewer and not likely to buy more than the obvious blockbusters.

    9. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      there is absolutely no legal way to watch a dvd from japan here in the states.

      Does the DMCA outlaw importing Region 2 DVD players?

    10. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
      why not have the fansubbers just release their subtitles with no video?

      Because of the other problem with fansubs... when raw scripts are released, the bootleggers in Hong Kong will happily use them to make pirate DVDs. You can easily tell which bootlegs didn't use fansubber scripts, because they're badly translated into "Engrish".

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    11. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by hyphz · · Score: 1

      > there is absolutely no legal way to watch a
      > dvd from japan here in the states.

      So don't. Get it on laserdisc. Japan's big on them.

    12. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by James+Ojaste · · Score: 1
      "This would allow the die-hard fans to either purchase a legitimate non-English DVD and apply the subtitles themselves (there is lots of software to do this available)."
      There are a few problems with this. The minor ones first:
      1. DVD region coding; most DVD-ROM drivers only allow a certain number of toggles between regions. Having to buy a separate DVD-ROM for anime is possible, but an annoying workaround.
      2. Most anime fans have no idea where to get or how to use subtitling software. It'd have to become far more prolific and user-proof for it to catch on.
      The big problem that I have with this idea is: most of the anime I watch isn't from DVDs, it's from the original broadcast. Literally, a show will get broadcast for the first time, fansubbed and distributed within a couple of days. Some of these shows will never make it to DVD.
    13. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Kagami001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "there is absolutely no legal way to watch a dvd from japan here in the states."

      This is false.

      For starters, personal import of works with foreign copyrights is not only legal, but is specicially excepted from the laws regarding rights of sale and distribution in the U.S. (the text of the law makes a specific example of a tourist bringing back copyrighted works from a vacation as being just fine) The impact on academia of forbidding import of foreign works would be rather dramtic.

      Second, you don't need to crack the region coding -- you just need a region 2 device. In my case, for example, I have an older DVD-ROM drive that I have set to region 1, and new one that is set to region 2. No cracking involved.

      Third, the above presumes that all Japanese DVDs are automatically region 2 limited, which while common, is not universal and is up to individual publishers -- although I do think that deliberately region coding a disc is equivalent to telling people in other regions, "We don't want your money."

    14. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      why not have the fansubbers just release their subtitles with no video? This would allow the die-hard fans to either purchase a legitimate non-English DVD and apply the subtitles themselves

      Current state of affairs: Hmm, I hear such-and-such is a good anime, but it's not available here yet. I think I'll download a couple fansub episodes to see if it's any good. If I like it, I can preorder the region 1 release when it's announced, and if I don't, I can delete it and try something else.

      Proposed alternative: Hmm, I hear such-and-such is a good anime, but it's not available here yet. I think I'll pay $75+ for a disc with only 50 minutes of content (which I've never seen before) to import it from Japan. Then I'll rip it to my computer, download a translated subtitle track, add the new subtitles with some software, burn a disc with the added subtitles, and watch it. If I like it, I can preorder the region 1 release when it's announced (or just import the whole series for a mere $500 - $1000) and if I don't I can just repeat this process with other series till I find something that better suits my tastes, or go completely broke.

    15. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Kanji is "Chinese Characters used by the Japanese as a sort of fancy text"

      Let me get this straight -- you are equating kanji with italics???

      Or even further, that is like saying the English alphabet is Phoenician characters used by Australians as a sort of fancy text -- Kanji are pretty much necessary.

    16. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by tepples · · Score: 1

      although I do think that deliberately region coding a disc is equivalent to telling people in other regions, "We don't want your money."

      Or it could be that the owner of a work licensed for use in a larger work (e.g. a song used in an anime) has sold the exclusive rights under copyright for some other territory (e.g. the USA) to some other publisher.

    17. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by pikakilla · · Score: 2, Informative
      While in theory this is a good idea (This has been talked about actively in fansub circles), in practice it will cause as much harm as good.


      The problem is you assume that the people who get the R2 dvd's (region 2 -- japan) and soft/hardsub the work will just keep the files for themselves. What will happen is the "0d4y$ubb3rz" will hardsub the script to an avi and release it under their groups name.


      This also makes the HKDVD folks lives easier. Instead of using bablefish, they can just get the script via a torrent.


      Nothing will change if what you suggest happens. Only the people who translate/time/edit the script will get royally shafted.

    18. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by pikakilla · · Score: 1
      No, it will not be illegal. It is illegal to distribute modified works without the permission of the original author; however, there is nothing illegal with releasing a translated script for free (so long as the translation rights have not been bought out in the country that you currently live in) and subbing it for your own use. It is called Fair Use.

      If you released the video though... you are kinda sol :P P.S. IANAL, but this is how it has been explained to me.

    19. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

      1. Groups like to get credit for their work. If you released a simple text file anyone could change it and say its their own. If its a video, stripping the subtitles and timing is enough to discourage most people.

      2. Getting ahold of raws (non-subbed video) may prove to be difficult, and would surely be far more expensive than buyin' stuff released in your country (wich is often already expensive enough) .

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
    20. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by screwdriver_j · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Absulutely not acceptable solution. You force me to buy DVD with every anime I want to see (maybe just once). Do you think I buy every movie I watch in the cinema? The whole problem with US and Europe distributors is in fact that from core anime fans point of view they are simple not needed and could simply cease to exist. Official translations are usually made different way because they are targeting other group of people (kids or parents looking for some stuff for kids). Distributors cut out every piece of japanise culture and replace it with some local stuff. Lets imagine they do it more friendly for anime freaks. But what for? Why would anyone pay for translation that is available for free thanks to free fansubing groups? Why would anyone pay the costs of distribution itself if cost-free distribution network is already here? I believe many fans of anime and manga would gladly pay some fee to japanese producers. But not a single cent for distributors because their added value is worth nothing. My suggestion is different - let's make a network where I pay 30-70USD fee monthly for a right to download and watch any anime I want. Producers can share money depending on popularity of downloads. We can make several products of this type, for example for 30USD you get access to all anime older then 2 years and for 70 you get them all. The idea might look strange at first and there is a lot of technical issues to solve but I think it's a good direction.

    21. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      No. I am equating Kanji with a fancy or formal substitution for common Japanese. I don't know of a single Kanji character that does not have a multi-character substitution in Japanese. Kanji just says it in one character and, to many Japanese, is preferred for signage. If you want to be as literal as possible, every Kanji character I've seen is directly borrowed from the Chinese, but does not necessarily retain the Chinese meaning.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    22. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be forgetting that DVDs are region-encoded, and therefore Japanese DVDs cannot we watched on DVD players sold in the Americas or Europe unless those DVD players have aftermarket modifications... other than that, if there are timecodes on the DVD, the technology to synch external subtitles to the DVD should be trivial.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    23. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      Translation rights belong to the original copyright holder to begin with by default -- that's who they are "bought out" from. :)

    24. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by pikakilla · · Score: 1

      But it is not illegal for a person to buy a r2 dvd and place subs on it. It is, however, illegal to distribute video + translation (which is what the companies buy -- the distrobution rights in the united states for subbing and/or dubbing (for point, funimation was not able to sub DBZ because pioneer owned the sub rights for the united states. Recently the rights have lapsed and funimation acquired the rights to sub)), but that does bring up a good point on whether distributing just the script is legal or not. A copyright lawyer would have to clear that aspect up.

    25. Re:Suggestion for fansubbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that Europe is region 2. W00T!

  18. [tt] Re:No Story by daniil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Newsflash: it's still illegal.

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:[tt] Re:No Story by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      > Newsflash: it's still illegal.

      I never said it wasn't, so thanks for the non-sequitur. Care to try again?

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:[tt] Re:No Story by daniil · · Score: 1
      I never said it wasn't

      Good. I'm sick and tired of people claiming that copyright infringement isn't illegal just because they think it shouldn't be.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
  19. Folk Mine by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I wish some Hollywood studio would finally exercise their IP muscle to stop these endless new verses of "Kumbayaa". Seriously, though, when do old songs/characters/stories become the folk "tradition" from which Hollywood mines its most popular and lucrative properties, prevalidated in their market?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Folk Mine by rich_r · · Score: 1

      As soon as they come out of copyright. At the moment, that means never...

    2. Re:Folk Mine by Mant · · Score: 1

      When they are no longer copyrighted. Since if you go back copyright gets shorter, it soon becomes apparent that the rate at which things get into the public domain slows down a lot, from periods like 7 years, to whatever it is now (life+70?)

      So character likes Dracula, Frankenstein, Holmes, the Three Musketeers are all out of copyright, and can be used. It's ironic that Disney used out of copyright stories for so much of their animation, yet now push so hard to keep extending copyrights.

      Of course, things can fall out of copyright, and also out of the public view and just be forgotten. Also things end up in the public consciousness before they fall out of copyright. People feel it is public domain, even though it isn't. So Disney threatens schools who paint Mickey Mouse on their playground (IIRC they let them in the end).

    3. Re:Folk Mine by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's ironic that Disney used out of copyright stories for so much of their animation, yet now push so hard to keep extending copyrights.

      And watch this bite Disney in the ass, as Disney has had trouble coming up with original stories after having run out of famous PD stories to retell. How well have Disney's animated films not produced by Pixar fared in theaters lately?

      In addition, given some footnotes to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Eldred v. Ashcroft, I'm not entirely sure that the Court will let Congress use "harmonization" with Mexico as an excuse for extending copyrights a third time in a row in the late 2010s.

    4. Re:Folk Mine by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You are making the distinction between the legal "public domain" and "copyright controlled". I'm talking about the cultural distinction between "folk" art and property. Most everyone knows that new pop brands are products, but after awhile, even terms like "kleenex" or "scotch tape" become folk terms, regardless of protection in perpetuity like trademark, or the trends in copyright. So the question is how the law should reflect a sustainable culture with tremendous momentum, or what conflicts are inevitable when the law ignores the culture it regulates.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  20. Rethink that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Isn't this a really bad idea, considering this is a major news outlet and your day job? Could OSDN be considered to be condoning piracy?

    I'm pretty sure he means that he's purchased legit DVDs based on viewing the fansubbers' work beforehand. As I have.

  21. Fansubs are very important by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know I have bought many DVDs because I got the fansubs, and they were good.

    I'd be rather apprehencive about buying a $70 set of some show I would have never heard of if it weren't for fansubs.

    Besides, once the series' get liscensed, the torrent is removed and the file is taken off the tracker listing.

    And most people go buy the DVD.

    Like the OP said, fansubbing makes for incredible market research.

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
    1. Re:Fansubs are very important by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure most people buy the DVD. There is a lot of ignorance out there and a lot of people assume that fansubs are legal and complain when a title gets licensed.

      $70 is also kind of low for a set. A regular 24 or so episode show is usually going to run to 5-7 discs, at $30 retail, which can usually be picked up for about $18 each online, and your total is $100 or more.

      Compared to a US Television show that is quite a bit of money for a single season, but you also have to take into account the fact that a US TV show has already made its money back and an Anime release has to make costs and profit on DVD sales alone for the most part.

  22. Been downloading series off fansubs for years. by thrgardinad · · Score: 1

    I have always know that companies thought it was fine to fansub new releases of japanese anime as long as they stop and remove the content once it was licensed in north america. It frusterates me that this would disappear, it can take along time for series to be released on DVD, and even longer to be shown on TV. With fansubs I can get a new episode from a series usually within a week and at good quality and clear translation from the effort that fansubs do for free.

    1. Re:Been downloading series off fansubs for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you admit to committing piracy, and it's ok with you as long as it's not the american movie industry that gets ripped off. How small minded.

    2. Re:Been downloading series off fansubs for years. by thrgardinad · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I believe and know its bad to pirate stuff, but I do all of it anyways. I buy Anime series I like when they are finally out on DVD anyways, but most of the time the subs and dubs are horribly translated by companies in the USA, they leave out a lot of Japanese culture items, because an average american wouldn't know what it ment. Most fansubs will stick to Japanese themes and culture items in the translation. Also I like seeing anime that hasn't been censored on TV.

  23. Why all the bashing? by Baorc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get it, why are you all bashing the fansubbers? It's like taping an tv episode for a friend in a forein country and translating it for them. I don't think language should be a barrier to determine what is piracy and what isn't. I mean, anyone can watch tv for free and tape it, hell record it if you like on an HD. So I don't see how it's wrong in any way, unless of course it's licensed in the country you live in, which in this case is most likely the states.

    So again, how is this different from doing it with US shows and giving it to a friend in Europe who doesn't want to wait forever to receive it on their network, and while you are at it, translate it for them?

    1. Re:Why all the bashing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get me wrong here, I support fansubs and I really like to watch them, but it's really not that simple. Many Anime TV shows in Japan are broadcasted on private pay-per-view TV stations. So you can't say it's just taping a public program. Technically it really is illegal - it's just that nobody cared before.

    2. Re:Why all the bashing? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It is legal to make personal copies, but the distribution and making derivative works without permission is generally illegal.

    3. Re:Why all the bashing? by Peldor · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I told the RIAA all my Napster songs were just for my girlfriend in Canada and the lawyers went away.

    4. Re:Why all the bashing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taping an episode and lending to a friend is fine. But standing on the street handing out millions of copies (a.k.a. distribute on internet) isn't.

      And secondly, it would seem that you don't pay the cable bill because as I recall, TV isn't free to watch.

  24. I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Kagami001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually feel a lot more comfortable with people who engage in indiscriminate copyright violation than I do those who specifically single out Japanese copyrights as somehow "not counting" -- Japanese works as not being "official" until they're published in some more important country like the U.S.

    1. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I think it's a pretty reasonable view, personally. The titles may never be released at all, and one way to prove that people want to watch them is to release fansubs. When they are released, the official release is often crap. The subtitles in particular are usually full of mistakes and even translation errors that *I* get - and I do not, repeat do not speak Japanese as my only exposure to Japanese has been through Anime. However, it's easy to recognize when the audio track says onee-san and the subtitles show the character's name that the subtitles are stupid. (I want a translation, not a reinterpretation.)

      When a series that I love comes out on DVD, I buy it even if I have fansubbed copies, at least as soon as I have the money. In the interim, since it's from broadcast television, I'm not watching anything that I couldn't probably watch and record for myself if I had satellite television so I could get Japanese stations. I'm just receiving it in a useful format with subtitles so I can understand it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Kagami001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The titles may never be released at all"

      This is exactly what I am talking about. To you, "released" means "released in the United States." You didn't even think about that when you wrote it, did you? The titles ARE "released," just not where you live. If you were merely promoting distributing translated text files to be used with Japanese DVDs, I'd be on your side (despite the illegality of distributing an unauthorized translation of the script). But instead you act as if the videos sold in Japan somehow "don't count" as being "released" at all!

      What really bugs me about all this is that it punishes the little guy the most. If you aren't a big Japanese corporation that can do international publishing, screw you. Your copyrights don't count. Making a small-budget OVA? Even if you make it available for international mail-order, no one would ever think of buying it -- after all it's not "licensed" (= sold by a big company in the United States) and thus your international copyrights are void, according to "fans."

    3. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Strawmen are easy to disagree with like that.

      Most fansubbers do not think Japanese copyrights are invalid, and I suspect most would be insulted by the idea that the US is that much more important than Japan. However, they do think it is a lesser evil to service a demand for timely English-translated anime than to hope that the anime is eventually licensed by a high-quality US distributor.

      This is the same situation as music and movies, but with significant value-add by the copyright infringers that enables them to reach market they do. I would gladly pay several dollars to download a (non-redistributable) subbed episode in anime series that I follow (about the same that it costs in the US on DVD). That greatly reduces my cost to explore new series, compared to the usual DVD release style. Unfortunately, the copyright holders do not offer anything like that.

    4. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      Then why not distribute just text files and not video? There are numerous softwares available to display synchronized text files with a separate video file or during DVD playback.

      Or, at the very least, if it is truely that important to see a television show as soon as possible after the initial broadcast, shouldn't they cease video distribution upon the initial video sale release, regardless of which country those videos are sold in? (Presumably Japan would be first.) Since at that point, you can just order it from Amazon Japan and such.

      Why is the availability of the video itself in the United States so ethically imporant to distributing that video to the entire world?

    5. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The vast majority of people aren't going to buy it without subtitles or dubbing, period. They're really not losing any sales because people aren't just distributing subtitle files. International publishing does not have to be an expensive proposition - putting the stuff in retail stores is, but there's no reason that you can't sell over the net. Because of the inherent fandom of anime, this is a working model for this type of media. (After all, the supposed lost sales from fansubs are transferred over the net themselves.)

      I'm not going to order DVDs I can't understand from some store that might or might not send me anything, and against which I have no recourse unless I spend enough money for someone to care. A DVD doesn't qualify.

      I did think about it when I wrote it, but since I was talking about American distribution I assumed other people would understand where I was coming from. I'll try not to make that same mistake again.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not really the case in the sub groups I have run across. I have seen a few smaller companies who released their product in Japan only, but WITH English subtitles. The groups who were likely to have subbed the product refused to because they already had subs.

      I think in general "released" means "released with English subs".

    7. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by chialea · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I've never downloaded anything of this sort, but your arguments seem a little weak.

      >Then why not distribute just text files and not video? There are numerous softwares available to display synchronized text files with a separate video file or during DVD playback.

      How can I load this software into my DVD player? It sounds very useful.

      > Since at that point, you can just order it from Amazon Japan and such.

      What are you supposed to do with those DVDs, precisely? Are they region coded?

      Lea

    8. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      That's a shame. I guess I'm just an idealist. I like to think of the internet as bringing people together, weakening borders, and eliminating some of the necessity for big media companies and middle-men publishers. Your distrust of foreign merchants is, well, foreign to me. :) I use international mail order all the time, although there are also domestic direct-import stores in many countries as well. At the point you are simply declaring "I'm not going to..." there's not much more to be said, though. *shrug*

      My original post stands as written. I probably shouldn't have sidetracked it. The idea that violating Japanese copyrights is for some reason perfectly OK, but violating American copyrights is bad has a nationalistic if not racist tone with which I would not want to be associated with.

    9. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you mean DVD player computer software or a stand alone player. For computer software, I am thinking of utilities like this: http://www.darkwet.net/dvdsubber/about.asp

      Since you obviously need a computer to download and make use of the fansub video files, and all modern codecs require greater CPU power than DVD decoding, the worst one might have to do to take advantage of these files on a machine that could already play downloaded fansub files is to buy a DVD drive.

      In regards to DVD region coding on Japanese DVDs, the answer to that question is unfortunately most of the time yes, and that irritates me to no end, because on the one hand I want to recommend people do what I'm talking about above, but on the other hand, at the point that the publishers themselves are deliberately discouraging people from buying them with region lockouts, it's hard to feel sorry for them when people download them instead.

      Region coding still doesn't change my general distaste for the "Japanese copyrights don't count" philosophy. If it were "region restricted work copyrights are only valid in those regions" I might find myself sympathizing with that. :)

    10. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Translations of a copyrighted work are derived works of the original. Creation of derived works is a transferable right reserved to the original work's author. There is very little legal difference between distributing the original video with subtitles and distributing the subtitles separately. The big punitive damages from RIAA lawsuits apply also to separately distributed fansubs.

      Setting that aside, I have not seen any of these "numerous softwares" that you describe. The authors would tend to run afoul of contributory infringement claims, since the only real use is to allow that kind of unlicensed derivative work.

      Ignoring that: DVD regions.

      But why make consumers work and pay more to get English subtitles for a long-delayed import DVD? A lot of people love these shows enough to do high-quality translations with peer recognition as their only compensation. Better business sense would be for anime creators to work with, rather than persecute, the fansubbers.

      US companies -- mostly distribution cartels and corporate copyright owners -- finally realized how they could make money from Internet distribution, and now we have services like iTunes. Video, including anime, will probably have its day soon. I expect fansubbing to dry up once that happens.

    11. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      Re: unauthorized translation distribution

      Ah, yeah, obviously, it being copyright infringement doesn't change. (Actually, I just told someone else that same thing in another post someone else made about those sub-overlay programs. :)

      I just think it's considerably closer to the spirit of what I thought would be the main purpose for unauthorized translation to exist at all -- an unfortunate, underground, "necessary evil" to deal with the fact that the length of copyright terms is so obscenely long now that waiting until works fall into the public domain to translate them takes longer than the lifetime of the people who want to see them, and having countless works be forever linguistically inaccessible to people just seems like such a horrible, pointless waste. Something to be done in as low-key a manner as possible. Something you wish was unnecessary. Not something to brag about.

      At the point that fansubbers are bothering to come up with any kind of rationalization or codes of ethics at all, surely the method that comes the closest to the experience one would have if one didn't need a translation makes the most sense?

      I think a lot of fansubbers way of thinking about distribution ethics is very narrow and ethno-centric. How do fansubbers feel about a Japanese-fluent speaker in Brazil downloading all of his Japanese entertainment because there will never be a Brazillian release? Is it the location that matters? Or is it the language? I'm fluent in Japanese, but my nationality is American. Where do I fit in? Are Japanese fluent people ethically obligated to buy Japanese works rather than acquire unauthorized copies of them, regardless of where they are located? Is someone in Japan who does not speak Japanese entitled to download videos rather than renting them? Are Japanese fluent speakers in Japan the only ones on the planet that are expected to fund these globally distributed (by fansubbers) video releases? That's a small group of people funding entertainment for the whole planet, if that's the case. No wonder videos in Japan are expensive. :)

      Like I said originally -- it's the ethno-centric use of the words "released" and "licensed" and "official" that bother me, as if the Japanese release was "unofficial." It would be bad enough if the discussion was limited to Americans, but the fansub situation is now such that the status of a U.S. release apparently defines the ethical status of Japanese copyrights for "fans" across the entire globe -- the actual creators are insignificant; the U.S. middle-men are what matter. Isn't that kind of odd?

      I guess I want to ask the fansubbers, what do they say to a Japanese resident who asks, "Why should I pay for these if you aren't?" While there are a few children's shows that really are supported by advertising, all of those late-night shows are supported by video and merchandising sales. And obviously direct-to-video releases are, not to mention pay-per-view and premium cable shows. The only reason the entire fansub community gets to enjoy what they enjoy is that the Japanese fan population is playing chump for the entire world. If I were a fan, I'd be embarrassed to be associated with that.

      Mind you, as I've said elsewhere, despite feeling that way, it's hard to defend companies that put region restrictions on things in a deliberate effort to decrease sales...

    12. Re:I've never been a fan of fansub "ethics." by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If someone airs something on TV in the US and announces they're not releasing it on video it's reasonable to download and share it. If someone in Japan wants to watch something that's only going to be out in English, and someone is willing to do a fansub, more power to them - it's not the fact that it's not a U.S. copyright that makes it okay to me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. target demographics? by adamgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    forgive my ignorance about fansubbind/anime/etc.. my questions are those of a complete layman (but a layman who works in the entertainment/film industry).

    most of these are JP-only cartoons that are dubbed/titled in english (presumably for american or EU audiences on the net).. i fail to see how this really affects the target demographic that the cartoons were released for. I'm not saying it's 100% okay to take someone else's work and give it away for free (modified or not).. as it isn't yours.. but certainly there are shades of gray in every avenue.. and i have to imagine that giving away a retitled work to an audience that would have never had a chance to see it anyway (as it plays on tv in another country), when the original work probably played for free in japan anyway (on tv) seems a little more "gray" than it does "black."

    we release commercial products, and certainly i dont want anyone to give them away for free, but if i found out someone had DIVX ripped my latest DVD release and subtitled it in japanese, it wouldnt exactly break my heart. in fact, i'd probably be excited, because if we had any sort of widespread downloading success in japan, those people [who dubbed my videos] would actually just be growing a potential market for me.. whereby someday we could release a native japanese version and sell 10x as many units because we are now that much more of a household name in japan.

    not saying you're wrong, just saying it's not as cut and dried as you imagine it to be (imo).

    1. Re:target demographics? by modecx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shit, I think they aught to hire the good fan-subbers to sub whatever japanese-only works are out there so the studio can then turn around and make a DVD for that work in whatever particular market.

      This would do two things: 1) Put an end to the piracy of their shows overnight. The only reason the fan-subbers are doing this is there's a demand for these shows in other languages, and this is the ONLY way to fill that demand. Many anime fans would plop down hard cash, IF they could get their grubby mitts on it in the first place. 2) Actually earn money for the studio in a market they never intended, and legit money for the subbers--and that would have the effect that the good subbers get more work, and the fans get better subs.

      'Course that's too easy of a solution for any corporation.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:target demographics? by arose · · Score: 1

      But theyt still will only be released to the big markets. Short of ordering from the internet (expensive) I'm still left out.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    3. Re:target demographics? by zev1983 · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'd also like to add the not so obvious to people that don't actually watch allot of subbed anime. That is, english subtitles are actually in proper english. Allot of times the fansubbed version has better translations than the official translations. I never found out why this is, but the amateurs have the pros patently beat on this allot of the time.

    4. Re:target demographics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more literal translation is not always a more accurate translation, and is even less likely to be a better translation. I'm one of those people who likes my subtitles to be in proper English, and I find the fansubbers' habits like keeping the Japanese name extensions (-san, -chan etc) annoying.

    5. Re:target demographics? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Well seeing as how I'm a big aniem fan and I always seem to be forced to find fansubs because the most popular japanese anime takes 5 years (5 years!) to come to the US, I'll answer some of your questions...

      "JP-only cartoons that are dubbed/titled in english"
      Actually as the name implies they are 'subbed' (subtitled) in english by groups of fansubbers (people who donate time and resources for their anime hobby)... I'm also tempted to start the royal 'their not cartoons!' argument as well, btu I'll hold my tongue for now...

      "we release commercial products, and certainly i dont want anyone to give them away for free, but if i found out someone had DIVX ripped my latest DVD release and subtitled it in japanese, it wouldnt exactly break my heart. in fact, i'd probably be excited, because if we had any sort of widespread downloading success in japan, those people [who dubbed my videos] would actually just be growing a potential market for me"
      The problem is the US anime distributors like ADV more than the japanese companies who have for years treated it just as you suggest. Now I shoudl start by saying I own alot of stuff done by ADV, but some of their choices I'd rahter were quite diferent... Peopel like myself don't tend to really want english dubs first of all, which is what the most time and money gets spent on... If they stuck to subs rather than dubs most likely they could release just as fast as fansubbers do (months not years). Now naturally english dubs appeal to a broader market (my parents still wonder why I watch 'cartoons' with subtitles for instance where as they thought 'Spirited Away' was an ok 'cartoon' and fairly entertaining). The problem is they treat us all as one market, I'd prefer an 'early' subbed release and a followup english dub release to getting them both years later. The other big problem (more so lately) is they pick and choose a handful of title to bring over, and I might think they are mostly crap (lately I've thought that of ADV's choices because I haven't wanted to watch any of them). I'd rather be able to pick and choose from the whole selection...

      I have to say the choices of the companies and the appeal for their content is higher than the english distributors can take equal to a market for fansubs which they helped creat and now frankly they have to live with it...

      History sidenote alot of early anime distributors were fansub groups that decided to go 'legit' like ADV... Their are alot that you won't find anymore as well, because they didn't get enough titles the public wanted or didn't get them to market fast enough...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    6. Re:target demographics? by modecx · · Score: 1

      Exactly.. I'm not a super-big fan of anime myself (I've watched a few titles), but I understand that the amatuers often beat the studio people in the accuracy of translation.

      They're missing out on a pretty big market, I think; and not just among the rabid anime freaks. I imagine some of the market would spill out into the mainstream. Sometimes it takes just 0.05% of a market to make a big difference on your bottom line.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    7. Re:target demographics? by staeiou · · Score: 0

      if i found out someone had DIVX ripped my latest DVD release and subtitled it in japanese, it wouldnt exactly break my heart. in fact, i'd probably be excited, because if we had any sort of widespread downloading success in japan

      Theoretical possibility: This actually happens, and your product becomes the hottest thing ever in Japan. Everybody has watched it. You tell this to your boss/owner of the work, and he gets excited too. He picks up the phone and asks you how many additional copies the presses need to run.

      What do you tell him? The 20 million viewers that you just gained didn't pay a cent for it? That if you did translate and release the copy, no one would buy it because they already have it? Or do you just mumble that it has been put up for free and start looking for a new job?

    8. Re:target demographics? by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      we release commercial products, and certainly i dont want anyone to give them away for free, but if i found out someone had DIVX ripped my latest DVD release and subtitled it in japanese, it wouldnt exactly break my heart. in fact, i'd probably be excited, because if we had any sort of widespread downloading success in japan, those people [who dubbed my videos] would actually just be growing a potential market for me.. whereby someday we could release a native japanese version and sell 10x as many units because we are now that much more of a household name in japan.
      Maybe, but it's tricky. If you let it go on too long, if the idea of downloading locally-translated versions of your products gets too entrenched. Then, by the time you actually get around to releasing your own official version, maybe nobody will want to buy it? They'll just keep getting the locally-produced equivalent for free and ignore your official releases, because of the price point. You'll have to crack down on the bootlegs sooner or later, especially if the video is ripped from your own DVDs and the quality is no worse than the "real thing" anyway.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:target demographics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well dubbing is virtually non-existant among fan works. Subbing (short for subtitling) is common, however when I use my bittorrent client's country locator plug-in, I see that about 20% of the IP addresses are located in Japan, so it does affect the base target demographic. Also, Americans are also often a target demographic as many of them are officially translated and sold in the US. Often times by the time they're released, the fansubbers have already translated most of their works. "We're distributing it for those who can't buy it" is a common defence that is neither accurate nor able to stand in court.

  26. NOT fansubbing unreleased material by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 3, Informative

    My opinion as a very minor fansubber (and this is held by various large fansubbing sites I'm not going to link from slashdot) is that it is fine to fansub until some American company announces they have aquired the licence to an anime, at which point you stop.

    These people appear to be continuing to distribute and subtitle anime after this has happened. In some cases it looks like they are continuing to distribute a fansub after an anime is released.

    Personally I think just as bad as downloading an actual pirated copy of an anime. Of course I do do that. But I know it's pirating and don't try to pretend it's anything else.

    These companies don't appear to be going after fansubbers who are fansubbing things which haven't had, and probably won't get, an American release.

    --
    Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    1. Re:NOT fansubbing unreleased material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And what good would an American release do to me? I've bought couple R1 dvds which I can't even play legally due to frigging region codes. So nowadays I buy manga.

      As a fansubber (over 200 released episodes) I know that many if not most fansubbers are not from America, so why should we care about US licenses? There're entire groups that sub in English (since it's currently de-facto language) but don't have even a single native English-speaker.

      IMO it's just stupid to multi-fansub (as in having multiple groups doing their own versions) new popular series which will definaetly be licensed. Instead doing old forgotten series which will never be licensed would be better use of quite limited resources. OTOH this just hobby for most people so they tend to do whatever they like.

      And currently companies are doing about right thing. While it's their interest to guard their rights/series, suing fansubbers would cause many to quit, but others would just go underground like warez/etc has done. There already are couple groups like LMF (doing gits 2nd gig) and Spoon (doing FMA/tactics) which are underground due to licensed series.

    2. Re:NOT fansubbing unreleased material by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      But I know it's pirating and don't try to pretend it's anything else.

      Uh no, it's not pirating. The definition of piracy, both legally and in common use, is a violent crime committed on or near the ocean.

      It's incredibly rare for the Japanese mafia to intercept a container ship and steal crates of anime DVDs. But if they do, and you buy one of them, then and only then can you consider yourself a pirate.

    3. Re:NOT fansubbing unreleased material by Hyperspac · · Score: 0

      I always wondered my major fansub'ed groups don't work with a distributere and offer them a product more or less ready to market? I would think that translation is one of the larger hurdles for a foreign release, if you've already done that couldn't you get it released that much faster, and possible fund your future projects?

  27. I haven't bought DVDs because of fansubbing by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    I have bought several anime DVDs. I was going to guy the GITS:SAC series. Then I saw how much it was and that it wasn't all out yet. So I downloaded it. I guess I could have Tivo'd it off CN instead, but it is more convinient to have on my laptop.

  28. The border between illegal and immoral. by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most fansubbing groups operate on morality vs. legality.

    They will sub, and release, a series until there is a company that picks it up and says "we are going to do this". And then they drop it. At which point, most drop all sources for all episodes both future and already released. This is why studios don't have a problem with most groups. It doesn't dilute the market enough to bother with.

    I don't consider this practice immoral. However, given the current state of copyright laws, it is illegal. Doing fansubs, or DLing them is an at-risk practice for all parties involved.

    Much like driving 5MPH over the speed limit, or doing a rolling stop at a stop sign. Illegal and immoral do not always coincide.

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
    1. Re:The border between illegal and immoral. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Hah. If you're going to bother splitting it up that way, then of course it's illegal. It's an undeniable fact. It's also undeniable that it was the intention of the legislators that it be illegal... they didn't write a sloppy law without realizing the implications.

      When people talk about illegality here, they're really meaning "should/shouldn't be illegal", in addition to the fact of it's illegality. Maybe they're thrifty with their words, or just in a hurry to type out their opinions.

      No matter what, though, it's clear that legislators both make things illegal when they shouldn't, and when they don't believe that they are doing so (unless making off-brand printer cartridges really was meant to be illegal by the DMCA). Corporations also like to push and stretch these laws to acquire rights that the laws probably don't mean for them to have.

      Summary: All you jackasses screaming "but it's illegal!" can go fuck yourselves. That I haven't murdered you yet has nothing to do with it being illegal, it's because I think it is wrong. But if you want me to become a strict legalist, well, I guess I should start looking for a murder loophole....

    2. Re:The border between illegal and immoral. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Increasingly, digital "fansubs" have crossed the line. Titles that are certainly licenced are being released anyway, even if the US company in the credits, which is a de-facto announcement. There are some groups that have continued releasing new episodes even after an official announcement, and they still distribute the older episodes too. This is despite the old fansub "ethic" where an announcement means they halt their work.

    3. Re:The border between illegal and immoral. by mibus · · Score: 1
      or doing a rolling stop at a stop sign.

      From dictionary.com:
      Stop:
      v. intr.

      1. To cease moving, progressing, acting, or operating; come to a halt
      A "rolling" stop eh? :-P
    4. Re:The border between illegal and immoral. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a +5 informative for stating that morality does not equal legality. What sad times we live in.

  29. Okay, just step back... by Faust7 · · Score: 0

    They're cartoons, you fucking cretin. Nothing more.

    Thank you for that insightful reply. In the public consciousness, the term "cartoon" denotes shows along the lines of Spongebob Squarepants or Invader Zim - shows that are a far cry from the likes of Gasaraki, Ghost in the Shell, Patlabor, or Evangelion. They're more adequately serviced by the term "Japanese animation," or "anime," or just something other than "cartoon," which does not do the anime realm justice at all.

    1. Re:Okay, just step back... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Just pray that no one tries to start publicly associating Anime with Hentai. I have often thought about coming up with a skit involving this, but I sure as hell hope that it never actually hapens.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Okay, just step back... by rokzy · · Score: 1

      you have no sympathy from me.

      if you're going to be elitist about your show not being a cartoon, with the assumption that cartoons are "for kids", then I hope people continually deny your wishes and piss you off.

      before people like YOU started associating cartoons with kids stuff, they had a lot more respect. for example political cartoonists.

      you say "cartoon" doesn't do justice to anime. well I say fuck you - most anime doesn't do justice to the cartoons of old.

    3. Re:Okay, just step back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead of "grown men playing with cartoon dolls" you prefer "cultured adults admiring their action figures based on Japanese animation"?

      Does is crush you that society is so ignorant that it doesn't see the genuis of your ways, or are you just in such denial that you're an adult who watches cartoons and you don't have the balls to admit it.

    4. Re:Okay, just step back... by William_Lee · · Score: 1

      I think the 'anime' elitists around here need to start taking themselves a little less seriously... To get offended because someone is calling their precious anime a cartoon is laughable even by /. standards. Cartoons represent a broad category spanning a broad range of topics and quality, and like it or not anime is part of it. I wouldn't call 'Batman Beyond' anime, but it is one hell of a cartoon IMO. Calling it one doesn't diminish it's worth. People need to get over themselves; for the love of Bog, we're talking about cartoons!

  30. Bought countless fansubs on DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if that is what the author means here he may burn in hell, selling fansubs is the real STEALING! Most of fansub sellers are stealing the work of the fansubbers to make profit of them and with selling them they destroy the fansubbing scene! Everyone buying fansubs is supposed to rot in hell!

    1. Re:Bought countless fansubs on DVD? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      I think he means his purchasing decision was based on the fansub, not the actual DVD.

  31. Vote with your Dollar by BarryNorton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're an honest user of these communities' work, react by not buying the licenses of those series where the studios don't let you see fansubs as preview.

    If fansubbers' argument that they actually promote purchase of the English-language license is true then the Japanese studios will soon back off when their offerings are less competitive because American licensees' profits are lower.

    1. Re:Vote with your Dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...react by not buying the licenses of those series ...

      Um, why then do that advertise "OWN IT TODAY"???

      so the advertisment is LYING???

      Where are the truth in advertising laws?

      i want to see "BUY your limited and revokable license today!" on the advertisments.

      make those fuckers tell the truth to the public for once.

    2. Re:Vote with your Dollar by BaseSequence · · Score: 1

      Or they'll just say, "Look--our profits are down. See, the fansubbers are killing our market."

    3. Re:Vote with your Dollar by Shano · · Score: 1

      Why? Media Factory are well within their rights. When I first heard about this, my immediate reaction was to boycott their products as well. But fansubbing is technically illegal (although tolerated), and if a company isn't happy with fansub distribution, they're entitled to stop it.

      One point that doesn't seem to have been brought up: since digisubbing has become popular, fansubs are no longer restricted to the English-speaking world. They are also available to Japanese fans, often at DVD quality. Even though it isn't the fansubbers' intention, they are making new anime available for free in Japan, as well as elsewhere.

      If other companies follow Media Factory's lead, and the fansubbers' argument is correct, then nobody needs to boycott anything: sales will drop on their own. Otherwise, you're just skewing the figures.

    4. Re:Vote with your Dollar by hendridm · · Score: 1
      If you're an honest user of these communities' work, react by not buying the licenses of those series where the studios don't let you see fansubs as preview.

      Oh yeah, that's working in the music industry. I boycott big music for whatever reason (DRM, available media, content, whatever) and they release a press release through CNN about how piracy is affecting their bottom line. Some republican politician gets an executive summary and decides piracy needs to be legislated so it doesn't harm his/her campaign contributors. Next thing you know, watching anime not released in your country will be a terrorist activity worthy of a year in prison for each offense.

    5. Re:Vote with your Dollar by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      They're within their rights, but it's incorrect to talk about the Law as if fansubbing is criminal (i.e. illegal in itself) - this part of Civil Law (at least I think this is the case in the US as well as UK) exists to allow them to exercise their rights... but (just as do OSS authors), they can also choose not to. If they could be made to see that it's in their interests (indeed it was believed that several studios did see this) not to exercise those rights, then no one is in breach of any law.

      I agree that if the argument is sound, no explicit boycotting needs to take place for sales to fall... but there's surely nothing wrong with giving that dynamic system a nudge!

    6. Re:Vote with your Dollar by hyphz · · Score: 1

      > One point that doesn't seem to have been
      > brought up: since digisubbing has become
      > popular, fansubs are no longer restricted to
      > the English-speaking world. They are also
      > available to Japanese fans, often at DVD
      > quality. Even though it isn't the fansubbers'
      > intention, they are making new anime available
      > for free in Japan, as well as elsewhere.

      Ummm... it was available for free in Japan anyway, via being watched on TV.

    7. Re:Vote with your Dollar by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      Very true - most of the series fansubbed by the legitimate groups are broadcast...

    8. Re:Vote with your Dollar by Shano · · Score: 1

      In most cases, yes. But it's also common for series to be rereleased as DVD rips later, once the Japanese DVDs are released. This is higher quality than the TV release. Also, extra material from the DVDs is also sometimes released (see, for example, Maria-sama ga Miteru).

      Fansubs are also released of OVA series, which by their very nature are not broadcast on TV.

    9. Re:Vote with your Dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already been speaking with my dollar.
      I currently own over 400 Anime DVDs. I can honestly say that almost EACH and EVERY ONE of them was purchased due to my being able to "evaluate" the content of the series either on TV or from the Internet.

      Figuring that the average ANime DVD at Media Play runs between $20 and $30...that's over $8000 I've spent on material I love.

      In all that time, there have been only seven that I would willingly use for skeet shooting, and those were one-shot movies that SUCKED, but I had no way of knowing that before purchase.

      It sounds like the American distribution channels would like you to believe their advertising without making your own judgement. They want your $$$...period.
      My question (as I have not RTFA) is, are the Japanese distributors complaining, or only the American ones?

    10. Re:Vote with your Dollar by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      I've already been speaking with my dollar. I currently own over 400 Anime DVDs.
      Your vote in favour of fansubs hasn't registered - for all the American licensees, never mind the Japanese originators, know you would have bought those anyway...
    11. Re:Vote with your Dollar by izomiac · · Score: 1

      I'd guess that this would happen anyway. How many people are actually going to pay $30+ dollars for a DVD of a series they haven't heard of/don't know anything about? It's not like many Americans know which shows were popular on Japaneese television.

    12. Re:Vote with your Dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the Japanese studios will soon back off when their offerings are less competitive because American licensees' profits are lower."

      or... they will just blame the declining sales on piracy and start suing every fansubber and downloader, just like the RIAA, MPAA.

    13. Re:Vote with your Dollar by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      No, there are geographical, political and economic gaps there that make the situation very different (less direct)...

  32. Faults On All Sides by EXTomar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Media Factory should have been less blunt since as mentioned the "dirty little secret" about digisubs is that companies actively use this as a marketing tool to know what is hot and what is not. They get a lot more feedback through watching fan activity than they ever did in those "reader response cards" and web site mechanisms. Even so, I can't blame Media Factory for wanting to protect their investments. They took the time and money to create shows to market in the Japan and the US and are irked to see their work handed out freely. Although they could have handled in a more friendly fashion the fact is that they asked these groups to stop and it is in their right to do so. They should have handled it with a gentle handle instead of the blunt instrument of psuedo-legal issuing of offical letters.

    The fansubing groups need to get off their high horse and honor the request. In the past, "fansub ethics" have always said "honor the request of the creators" reguardless of reason. As much as these guys think they are "promoting the show by sharing" they continue to ignore the reason they are asked to stop which is that there is a seedy element in fandom that just wants cheap shows to watch.

    Both sides should just acknowledg each other and walk away from this situation cleanly instead of fuming and dwelling on it. The system works best when it runs silent not when red flags and warning bells go off.

    1. Re:Faults On All Sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the "dirty little secret" is wearing thin. Great titles still sell like crazy partly due to the fansubbing environment getting the word out about how great a show it is.

      The problem is that anime is now getting popular enough that the anime companies are hitting the 90% rule - 90% of everything (even anime) is crap. And the fansub environment is killing the market for the not-so-great shows. Shows that were great but maybe ended badly, leaving the people watching the show thinking "gee, that ending sucked, maybe I won't buy it" or shows that looked pretty but sucked all the way through: "that was fun to watch but I'd never buy this crap".

      Aside from this reducing the popularity of a given show, it also throws off the numbers since all these viewers would never buy the show, undoing the whole concept of using fansubbing to gauge interest in the show and spreading the word, which will perhaps ultimately lead to the demise of the current round of fansubbers, who will hopefully regroup to deal in the lost gems (goldfish warning!) rather than the latest and greatest license-fodder, and perhaps more companies releasing 1-2 episodes for free online to get interest.

  33. A good example by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those who may not be familiar with such translations:

    In A.D. 2101
    War was beginning.
    Captain: What happen ?
    Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb
    Operator: We get signal
    Captain: What !
    Operator: Main screen turn on
    Captain: It's You !!
    Cats: How are you gentlemen !!
    Cats: All your base are belong to us
    Cats: You are on the way to destruction
    Captain: What you say !!
    Cats: You have no chance to survive make your time
    Cats: HA HA HA HA ....
    Captain: Take off every 'zig'
    Captain: You know what you doing
    Captain: Move 'zig'
    Captain: For great justice

    1. Re:A good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Umm, actually, that was a "professional" translation, not a fansub.

    2. Re:A good example by jacklebot · · Score: 1

      That was the point. Good fansubing means companies have to actually try when doing their own translations. Without fan subs, I doubt any anime being released right now would have any better translations to them than this, or Dragonball Z. In fact, Dragonball Z DVDs have with them subtitles only because of fansubers and their followers complaining about Funimation's crappy dubbing. Fansubbing is an integral part of anime distribution. It is nothing like Napster ver. 1, as some of you want to think.

    3. Re:A good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scary thought...

    4. Re:A good example by Leffe · · Score: 1

      It's not a translation either, it's the original text written directly in engrish, possibly from some internal script.

    5. Re:A good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... this is the fansub.

    6. Re:A good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh it's a translation at some point since it wasn't developed by English-speaking people.

    7. Re:A good example by zeromemory · · Score: 1

      Umm, actually, that was a "professional" translation, not a fansub.

      I think you missed the irony.

    8. Re:A good example by lrucker · · Score: 1
      OK, here's a fansub:

      I'm going to kill you!

      and a "professional" dub

      I'm going to send you to the Shadow Realm!

  34. Titles not otherwise available? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    If one is a diehard anime fan, like the 'subbers are, then this seems like a great way on the surface to introduce anime titles to a large audience.

    Suppose you reverse the situation and take some obscure English Language cartoons and have a Japanese translator 'sub them and distribute them for money in the Japanese Islands.

    Obviously the subbers in either situation would have entered the packaging-and-distribution-for-money business, without any payment to the original production company. And, *wink wink*, that's all OK here because the Editor-in-chief is one of the biggest consumers of this type of media.

    Wouldn't it make more sense to send some money to the studios and have them produce more cool anime instead of seeing someone else make money purely on the distribution of their work?

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by bi_boy · · Score: 1

      Suppose you reverse the situation and take some obscure English Language cartoons and have a Japanese translator 'sub them and distribute them for money in the Japanese Islands.

      Yeah that does sound bad... except that fansub groups don't distribute for money, they distribute for free. You may be confusing the many Hong Kong outfits which are known to take a fansub groups release, put them on DVD, and then sell them. Back before net distribution was feasible fansub groups would distribute via VHS, and yes they would charge. For the tape, and the shipping, that was it. The object of a fansub group is to distribute anime that is not licensed State-side, instead of having to wait what is now months, or what used to be easily years (before anime was "in") before a studio would pick the anime for "professional" translation and distribution.

      Fansubbing is not about making money. It's about translating and distributing anime to folks who don't speak Japanese and want to see it when it comes out instead of hoping, often in vain, for a state-side distribution company to pick up the rights to it a few years down the road after its release.

      --
      Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
    2. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are saying that no one wants to work for free? What if their stuff really is not that good and you really would not watch it? I would not want to pay for Scooby Doo if I lived in Japan.

    3. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That would make more sense if it worked that way. However, you don't pay for fansubs unless you are a clueless bozo who can't find them. The only exception is after the title is distributed, because all the original distribution sites will drop their torrents (other sites, on the other hand, may not) when the series is licensed for U.S. distribution - that's right, not when it's released, but just when it's licensed. A few groups definitely do keep subbing after something is licensed, like Spoon doing Full Metal Alchemist... Though there is really no faith that the subbing on FMA is going to be anything other than crap, because the series deals with some pretty gnarly stuff (sorry, grew up in central cali) and typically speaking shows like that don't get translated properly. That, however, is just an excuse. Fansubbers do not try to make money, and they typically halt dist specifically to avoid taking any sales away. You can't say that you lost sales until you're willing to say that you're going to distribute in a market.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

      You still pay for fansubs in terms of bandwidth, storage, and burning. You could chalk that up to fan/hobby overhead to obtain movies. Same with the translation and subtitling. It is all a part of the hobby and does not seem to count as a cost. It is still a cost and there must be some price point at which people would actually pay for these movies.

      You can have lost sales due to a barrier to entry into a market. In this case the barrier to entry is several factors. Easily accessed available fansubber titles is one problem. Lack of distribution is another. Retail markup combined with currency conversion is another BIG problem. Many titles cost YEN3000-4000 in the Islands (Roughly exchanges for US$30-$40). That can be prohibitively expensive where the typical DVD price point is less than $20. Then add shipping and possible customs duties.

      My personal opinion is that the Anime studios should leverage the Fansubbers as U.S. distributors, with a full catalog store instead of P2P downloads lurking in the ether. Surely there must be one or two 'subbers that want to go big time and fill a market void.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    5. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by dead+sun · · Score: 2, Informative
      You don't seem to understand the premise of fansubbing if you think there's money involved. These are groups of people who dedicate their time to translation for nothing other than doing it. The fansubbers aren't in the packaging and distribution for money business, they're in the this is my hobby mode.

      There are people that sell fansubs on ebay or where ever else. These are not, in the vast majority of cases, the fansubbers themselves. Many sub groups put things like "Not for sale, rent, or auction. Please stop distribution when licensed." up in the opening or the little middle sequence. People who sell fansubs are widely regarded as the scum of the earth.

      The argument for letting these groups operate is twofold. First, they do so with content not licensed in the US, so no US licensee is harmed. I don't know what cross-country copyright agreements have to say, but stateside nobody has rights to publish it when fansubbers do their work. Second, they selflessly promote anime. There've been a number of fansubs I've seen with better quality control in the subs than the later official releases. They don't make money. They let people who won't just randomly buy a DVD with no knowledge of the content get a feel for what they want to buy. Dropping $20 for three episodes is easier when you know it's something you'll watch a few times rather than watch once and quit out of disgust.

      Anime DVDs make up about half my DVD collection, which is by no means small. The total sum of anime DVDs I've bought without seeing at least one episode prior: 0. Anecdotal evidence? Sure, but I know a rather large group of people, in person, who do exactly the same.

      There are arguments against allowing it as well, but if any media company thinks anime would be where it is in the US today without letting the fans run rampant, well, they're crazy. The people watching fansubs are the same people introducing anime to friends and family with a religious zeal. Given the article even speaks of them as "cartoons" like they're for kids or something should give a better picture of the initial resistance that's now being overcome.

      --
      If not now, when?
    6. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      In my experience the average anime DVD is $24.99 retail. You can sometimes get them cheaper off the net but not always. $25 for four episodes is pretty damned steep. Also, they've already made most of the money on the Japanese market, and all they have to do for the American market is dub, subtitle and repackage. You might say dubbing is expensive, but I don't see how, because they pretty much always do a shit job. (Even the "better" dubbed shows like cowboy bebop are usually pretty funky.)

      Yes, it would make a LOT of sense for the Japanese companies to use fansubbers to do the subs, and sell subbed-only DVDs. They could sell them for less than they go for in the store and still make more money because the effort to them would be nil.

      This is actually how I envision the future of physical content distribution; people selling software and media out of the trunk of their car (so to speak) legally. You can burn it on the spot and give people what they want right away, never worrying about back stock again. Putting the fansubbers into the chain only makes sense. You could even sell the video and subs together, but pay the copyright holder and the subber (after all, fansubs subtitle files are copyrighted material) separately. Of course, most companies won't want to sell piecemeal like that, because they want final control over the product, so for the most part it will just be running off copies from a disc image.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

      I understand the hobbyist fansubbers, and appreciate the time and energy they take to create an audience where one might not otherwise exist. I certainly like Anime, ever since realizing that these were animated features in which protagonists could be killed.

      But separating what the fansubbers and sellers do is difficult. Fansubbers are filling a void that regular distributors fill with "screeners". But these copies are supposed to be used promote regular retail distribution. However, they are being distributed to the world at large. And then the sellers come in to capitalize on the market void. There are many people without bandwidth or means and turn to a seller to obtain a copy.

      As I posted in another response, some Fansubbers should form a corporation and enter into a distribution agreement with Anime studios to become a distributor.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    8. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

      As I stated in a response to a different poster, separating what the fansubbers and sellers do is difficult. Fansubbers are filling a void that regular distributors fill with "screeners". But these copies are supposed to be used promote regular retail distribution. However, they are being distributed to the world at large. And then the sellers come in to capitalize on the market void. There are many people without bandwidth or means and turn to a seller to obtain a copy. And it is not just outfits in Hong Kong, Korea, or Malaysia creating DVDs. There are people in the U.S. doing this too.

      And, as I posted in another response, my opinion is that some Fansubbers should form a for-profit corporation and enter into a distribution agreement with Anime studios to become a distributor. And who would not like to be paid to pursue their hobby? They would only have to carry minimal inventories if they ran a catalog store. Couple the online store with a review mag, and see what kind of money there really is in the business.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    9. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      As I posted in another response, some Fansubbers should form a corporation and enter into a distribution agreement with Anime studios to become a distributor.

      That's an interesting proposition, but I think it misses the point of both why and how the fansubbers operate. Entering a distribution agreement with the Japanese studios, unless I'm totally off base, would involve licensing the work. The studios, who may turn a blind eye to the underground, aren't going to want to hand over their work for nothing. It sets a bad precedent for business. Leaving the underground alone ensures they can keep lucrative licenses in the US while getting their fill of promotion in a less than authorized way. Why this studio, who has a purchasable winner with Genshiken I might add, wants to keep people from being exposed so they can line up for their releases is a question many are asking.

      So, if fansubbers need cash to license, they become a normal distribution channel, trying to recoup costs. They're already sinking money into the necessities of doing what they do for free, an expensive license just isn't going to happen from a dozen college kids putting off their homework. That kind of capital requires investors, which means free distribution is out. Promotion of the genre and exposure to what's available in Japan but not the US is their primary goal.

      As for seperation of fansubbers and sellers, it's easy. Any seller that sells for a single cent more than media and shipping costs is exploiting the fansubbers and tarnishing what it is they're doing. Ebaying a vcd set falls into that unless it's a dutch auction to cover shipping plus the $1 for the CD-Rs. But that doesn't happen. Further, almost anybody who's hooked enough to be buying fansubs is probably spending enough that they could get a moderate speed line themselves. And since the sellers tend to sell sets, the anime is often licensed, again going against the MO of fansubbers.

      --
      If not now, when?
    10. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe you are correct that once you enter a distribution agreement with a studio, it would involve licensing. But that cost can be negotiated. It could be prohibitively expensive to distribute top selling titles. But to enter a low volume agreement could be in reach of a group of Fansubbers. Maybe it would support the hobby, maybe it would be a money pit, maybe it would be a cash cow. But that is a business risk, and my opinion is that someone who understands it and loves it should take that risk.

      Allowing the underground to operate is already handing over their work for nothing. I fail to see how the studios can count on a profitable market to open up where freely available movies are already present.

      I disagree that there is not money being made either by fansubbers exploiting the studios or sellers exploiting the fansubbers. Check out A Guide to buying cheap Anime to see one guy's point of view.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    11. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      You're not going to see Japanese companies doing this because the economics are all wrong. Frankly, we're getting a huge break with our anime here in North America. In Japan, they pay double or more what we do for the same shows on DVD, minus translations. I see no reason why a Japanese company would want to step in to lower the price of our DVDs further.

    12. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe due to economies of scale - if you make it cheaper more people will buy it. I know a lot of people who download and don't pay because the price of an episode is so high. Clearly, suing people is one way to get money out of them, but doesn't make them buy product and change their ways en masse, so maybe they should try something new - competitive pricing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      But that is a business risk, and my opinion is that someone who understands it and loves it should take that risk.

      And maybe some fansubbers will go on to take that risk at some point. But fansubbers aren't doing it for the money. They aren't doing it for business reasons. From what I gather they care more about sharing their experience than the business end of anything. They buy the DVDs of works they dub to keep the studios bringing anime to the US. That's fanatacism, not business.

      Allowing the underground to operate is already handing over their work for nothing. I fail to see how the studios can count on a profitable market to open up where freely available movies are already present.

      There's implicit "rules" to the underground that at least the people doing the subbing tend to follow. Allowing the underground to operate within these parameters has not hurt them in the past. And you know, who'd think there'd be a market for the Friends series DVDs or Seinfeld or any of that crap. Clearly it ran on TV for free before DVD distribution and people could tape it. How can the publishers expect any sort of market when people already have had free access to the show? It's a terrible argument. If it were a good argument either nobody would release DVDs of past TV shows or everybody would laugh at their poor business sense.

      Where you fail to see a predictable market from free distribution, I fail to see a market at all without it. The media companies haven't been that successful in selling new consumers of their animations. Spirited Away, an amazing recent work, internationally recognized, was still dismissed by many, many people in the US as a cartoon. Anime isn't mainstream enough to get even a half hour free airwave spot on a weekend. At least retail stores welcome the high margin DVDs, but still only the limited stock of what's licensed here. The people who want more anime, uncut stuff that may be too "risky" to market to the US, the ones who want a TV channel of subs not dubs, they are the ones pushing anime on others. The media companies may be the drug lords, but apart from the underground they're without an effective pusher.

      But maybe this is just a case of turning a blind eye until the scene is big enough to not need the pushers. Maybe we're reaching the point where they feel it's no longer making anime more popular, but cutting into sales that may occur in the future.

      Oh, and your link is prefaced with:

      Before we begin, I should make one thing absolutely clear: while this is a guide to getting anime for free or very little, I in no way condone piracy of any sort. I own all of Kare Kano fansubbed, but I'm the first in line to get the domestic DVDs, and the same goes with Furi Kuri and a number of other titles. People invest years and millions of dollars to make anime, and the least we can do is give them a few bucks. Never, ever get fansubs of a show that is licensed in The West. I don't care how much of a penniless college student you are, hell is a very hot place, and I think that you'd rather be out 30 bucks for a DVD then burning there for all of eternity. That being said, there are a lot of shows that are not licensed for distribution in North America, or where ever you are, and those shows are fare game.

      Doesn't sound like he's too keen on not purchasing what you like when available. Then he goes on to explain how to get stuff. We already know it's being done. That's what we're discussing. The fact that some sellers exploit the fansubbers and the clueless buyers remains, but downloading anime online there's no money passed normally. If anything he's encouraging an audience to find what they like and then shell out a few bucks when it's licensed.

      --
      If not now, when?
    14. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

      But fansubbers aren't doing it for the money. They aren't doing it for business reasons. From what I gather they care more about sharing their experience than the business end of anything. They buy the DVDs of works they dub to keep the studios bringing anime to the US. That's fanatacism, not business.

      I respectfully disagree. As I responded to another poster, It is possible to take the high road and provided subtitled Anime for your friends as a hobby. Not every Fansubber is taking the high road.

      There's implicit "rules" to the underground that at least the people doing the subbing tend to follow. Allowing the underground to operate within these parameters has not hurt them in the past.

      My opinion is that statement is unsubstantiated. There is a market for which product could be distributed, that is already stocked with freely available versions.

      And you know, who'd think there'd be a market for the Friends series DVDs or Seinfeld or any of that crap. Clearly it ran on TV for free before DVD distribution and people could tape it. How can the publishers expect any sort of market when people already have had free access to the show? It's a terrible argument. If it were a good argument either nobody would release DVDs of past TV shows or everybody would laugh at their poor business sense.

      You cannot call network TV broadcasts free (as in Free Beer). A 30 minute crap Friends episode actually contains 8 minutes of advertisements and promos on broadcast TV. The other reason that is not a valid comparison is that streaming media and DVDs are viewed at your convenience. A taped/Tivo'ed TV episode is more convenient than the live broadcast, but not as convenient as a DVD.

      We can agree to disagree on the potential market dynamics. But you have to understand that the market for network TV shows is not the same market segment for Anime. Who could have predicted in the 1980's that by the late 90's you could purchase over 100 of the most popular Anime feature titles at Best Buy or Suncoast? Comparison to p*rn title availability might be closer to the market dynamics within which Anime distribution operates. (I am not comparing content necessarily, although there is plenty of "Pornime").

      And yes, the author claims to be taking the high road. That was not my point for the link, he describes the market in more detail that I could hope to.

      Thanks for the nice response.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    15. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      I respectfully disagree. As I responded to another poster, It is possible to take the high road and provided subtitled Anime for your friends as a hobby. Not every Fansubber is taking the high road.

      Perhaps I have a biased perspective, but I've not found one anime available that can be purchased but not freely downloaded. There certainly exists some population selling the fansubbers efforts, but anything available is available freely, usually by multiple groups. There are some old, really rare things, but those aren't even purchasable. People with those want other rare things in trade.

      Because of that, I've not run into any fansubbers who actually charge for what they do. Scratch that, I've never paid more than five seconds attention to them. I'd be silly to expect none exist, but I can only wonder if they make enough from it to make it anything less than a hobby with slightly lower losses. Put another way, I don't know why somebody would pay for an illigitimate sub over a free illigitimate sub, knowing neither is going to contribute to the media companies actually producing the anime. I expect they prey on those who don't know what's going on.

      My opinion is that statement is unsubstantiated. There is a market for which product could be distributed, that is already stocked with freely available versions. ... You cannot call network TV broadcasts free (as in Free Beer). A 30 minute crap Friends episode actually contains 8 minutes of advertisements and promos on broadcast TV.

      But I do view them the same way. So there's 8 minutes of periodic interruption. It still doesn't cost a dime to the viewer. Somebody with the show taped can easily fast forward, or, if it matters because they really like the episode, take the time to edit out the commercials. All it takes is two VCRs and 20 minutes. If a tape isn't convenient, computers these days have made it easy enough for anybody so inclined to move video onto their computer with maybe a $40 device.

      Further, TV episodes have been available online for quite some time now. DVD sets of TV shows are still being released. That's one to one the same as downloading anime. It's less complicated than taping and moving to a computer for arbitrary playback but with the same benefits. TV shows are what I consider free to the end user.

      All of that isn't to mention that there is an associated bandwidth cost to downloading anime. If bathroom breaks and snack runs during TV ads get to be considered a cost, bandwidth has to be moreso. Personally, I count it as an incidental cost, like ads, not to be added to the score. But either way both are in the same ballpark for cost.

      We can agree to disagree on the potential market dynamics. But you have to understand that the market for network TV shows is not the same market segment for Anime.

      I can see the difference at the present point in time. Give it time is all the response I can make, but I obviously can't make promises. The current older generation of the US still sees animation as a genre and not as a medium. They don't think there's a way an animated "cartoon" could tell a story to anybody but kids.

      This is changing. Movies like The Incredibles and Shrek show it can reach both. I'd argue The Incredibles was focused far more on adults than kids. Anime is something that Japanese businessmen watch. While it is their culture's to own, it shows that it has the potential to reach network TV levels. Animation, particularly in anime style, will become an accepted and possibly widespread medium, whereas porn really cannot.

      With the upcoming generations and how much anime is starting to grow in the US, it should make its move eventually. Right now Cartoon Network has opened up some time. I hear there's an exclusively anime channel on some pay for tv service. It's just a difference in views on animation being a genre or a medium for the time being. If you've watched any serious anime you should know which one is the truth.

      If anything, the anime compani

      --
      If not now, when?
    16. Re:Titles not otherwise available? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

      I understand your points about Free and Free. From my perspective, I have very little free time to search and download, even with a high speed connection. (So then what's all this time on Slashdot ;-) right? ). And that high speed connection costs plenty too. Most days, time is a precious commodity. (Check my posting record. ) So to me, I am going without most Anime, and for those I do have time to see, I will buy real copies. The time spent to find, download, classify, store and recall is wasted, if I could just click and order. At a certain price point, there is no way I would watch the free version if I could buy the real one. I am middle middle class and not snooty. But every 15 minutes is worth a certain amount of money to me.

      I feel the same way about time wasting in broadcast TV. Right now I watch one broadcast show per week tape delayed. Taping and finding the episode later, adding labels or notes also takes time. Yes, you can fast forward through commercials, but that is work too. Watching a professionally prepared DVD is much more relaxing. Since I feel that you and I disagree on what level of hassle we are willing to accept, we'll just have to leave it where it stands now.

      If the anime business wants to achieve anything more than porn star relevancy, they should keep a blind eye for a while longer. Once they've grown further, they'd do better to bring costs down, import speeds up, and widen selection than to threaten the underground. There's already a willingness to pay on many people's parts once it arrives, as evidenced by the growing retail selection. The real fans just don't have enough

      That is the problem in a nutshell. We want more now. I agree that threatening Fansubbers is a cop-out. The real answer is that the Anime studios have to pull their own weight in the United States. They are getting a free lunch with translations by fans. They should figure out a way to supply the demand and capitalize on the huge opportunity in what is assumed to be a niche.

      I agree that Americans do have a taste for adult animation. While not Anime, shows like The Simpsons, Futurama, Family Guy, and even the ancient Wait 'til your Father gets home, Flintstones and Jetsons, have all set the stage to enjoy animated adult comedy at least. The cultural differences are what makes Anime interesting. And not everyone can appreciate that different point of view. And while Anime has made great strides, it is going to be a long time before you see American businessmen buying graphic novels for the commuter train with the same frequency Japanese businessmen purchase manga.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
  35. The fansubbers dropped Media Factory's series by dethl · · Score: 2

    as soon as that letter went out. Animesuki stopped even stopped showing torrents. I hope Media Factory understands that by cutting off the fansubbers, they'll have an unknown success if they attempt to licence their current series to the US. The fansubbers are one of the best ways to gague how a new series will do here and in the rest of the world.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    1. Re:The fansubbers dropped Media Factory's series by genner · · Score: 2, Informative

      LIES!!!! Their site is still functional.

    2. Re:The fansubbers dropped Media Factory's series by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Animesuki usually (always?) drops torrents as soon as they become aware of a series being licensed?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:The fansubbers dropped Media Factory's series by Ykant · · Score: 1
      I defy you to find a Media Factory series on that site. Did you read the parent post before rushing off to call the guy a liar?

      AnimeSuki statement on Media Factory

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
  36. OK FIRST OF ALL by SimianOverlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You make no sense at all your post is littered with so many errors it is difficult to count them up!! I am one of the people you are calling thieves and I run a small website which is involved in fansubbing Goriko No Porkio which is >herebr br

    I wouldnt do this if the original cartoons were available in english because i speak english better than japanese despite being a japanese native. If they made them available i would buy them so they arent supplying a product so how am I stealing this my friend??!!!

    and as for learning japanese, I already know japanese as does everyperson who fansubs, or they couldn't do it, so it is just irrelevant! back to the drawing board, and apologise.

    I do also share music but I buy the albums when I have enough money, so noone loses anyway you are one of these accountants who are so straightlaced they can't see past to the spirit of the laws rather than the actual wording. your crazy interpretation would fail in a court of the law!!
    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    1. Re:OK FIRST OF ALL by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      lol

      Dude, you bit.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  37. "It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1, Insightful
    It would be like a TV episode *IF* these fansubbers weren't sticking them on bittorrent and letting thousands upon thousands of people download them.

    I fail to see what the issue is here. These people know what they're doing is illegal.

    End of story.

    1. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not illegal.

      It helps the industry tremendously.

      Being a digital format doesn't make it wrong.

      No one is losing money. If anything, they are making TONS more than they would have otherwise.

      Fansubbing is why any anime at all is sold in the US. Without fansubbing, ADV and Bandai do not exist.

      Thank you, drive through.

    2. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It would be like a TV episode *IF* these fansubbers weren't sticking them on bittorrent and letting thousands upon thousands of people download them.

      Right, and that would be different from getting a honking big antenna and watching the stuff from Japan directly how exactly?

      What they are doing is acting as a network of relays for a TV signal and they even add value by putting subtitles on with no commercial expectations.

      I fail to see what the issue is here.

      Yes you fail to see implications of these attempts by contents "producers" to create "right to read" society indeed.

      End of story.

      Sanctimonious jerk, are you?

    3. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by richieb · · Score: 1
      It would be like a TV episode *IF* these fansubbers weren't sticking them on bittorrent and letting thousands upon thousands of people download them.

      Some people have a lot of friends... :)

      I fail to see what the issue is here. These people know what they're doing is illegal.

      Illegal does not necessarily mean right. These actions could be interpreted as "fair use", especially if the translations are not available otherwise. The copyright owners want too much control.

      It is not clear from the evidence that the makers would make more money without the fansubers...

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    4. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      So you're telling me that copying, modifying and redistributing someone else's copyrighted work ISN'T illegal?

      Get your head out of your ass, troll.

    5. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      Illegal does not necessarily mean right. These actions could be interpreted as "fair use", especially if the translations are not available otherwise. The copyright owners want too much control.

      It's not fair use if the original copyright owner has no intention of distributing an item in the US.

      Just because the furries absolutely need to see the latest episode of "Japanese Anal Monkies meet the Fox Costume 5" or whatever it's called, does NOT give them ANY right to see it.

      Seriously, though: I understand what they're doing and why they're doing it, but regardless of their intentions, it's still not legal in the least. And no court in this nation would support what they were doing if the copyright holders decided to persue litigation.

    6. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      Right, and that would be different from getting a honking big antenna and watching the stuff from Japan directly how exactly?

      Do you think you have a right to see something that's distributed in Japan-only?

      You don't.

      What they are doing is acting as a network of relays for a TV signal and they even add value by putting subtitles on with no commercial expectations.

      While you may be right, that doesn't dismiss any sort of copyright violations that occur while 'relaying' (you call it relaying, I call it redistribution).

      Yes you fail to see implications of these attempts by contents "producers" to create "right to read" society indeed.

      Please see above comment about not having any rights to see something that isn't intended for a US audience.

      Sanctimonious jerk, are you? Perhaps, but that still doesn't make me wrong.

    7. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by richieb · · Score: 1
      Seriously, though: I understand what they're doing and why they're doing it, but regardless of their intentions, it's still not legal in the least. And no court in this nation would support what they were doing if the copyright holders decided to persue litigation.

      Are you saying that the copyright owner has the right to forbid who can see their creation?

      I don't think this is the intention of copyrights.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    8. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Control of distribution of their work is precisely the intention of copyrights. What the fuck do you think they're for?

    9. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      Are you saying that the copyright owner has the right to forbid who can see their creation?

      No, but the owner has the right to limit the distribution of said material.

      Perhaps you've heard the following phrase whenever you watch a professional sporting event in America:
      "Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution or retransmission... blah blah blah"

      These people are reproducing and redistributing something without the express consent of the copyright holder.

      It doesn't get ANY clearer than that.

    10. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Do you think you have a right to see something that's distributed in Japan-only?

      Actually, since I believe that there is no such thing as "intellectual property" I do indeed believe that anyone has that right. But you clearly are a corporatist and believe that you can demand that people do not try to use electronic signals which you consider your right to beam through their hosues and even bodies. In other words your greed is more important than other people's freedom. A term "sanctimonious greedy asshole" springs to mind.

      You don't.

      See above, Mr. I Can Tell Others What They Cannot Do Because That Makes Me Rich.

      Please see above comment about not having any rights to see something that isn't intended for a US audience.

      See above indeed. In short, you believe that that "intellectual property" and all the associated "ownership of information" is the Brave New World and we better get in line or your buddies will put a smackdown on us. I believe it is an immoral depravity by greed-worshipping con men and consider it my civic duty to fight it and its proponents everywhere.

    11. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      "Actually, since I believe that there is no such thing as "intellectual property" I do indeed believe that anyone has that right. But you clearly are a corporatist and believe that you can demand that people do not try to use electronic signals which you consider your right to beam through their hosues and even bodies. In other words your greed is more important than other people's freedom. A term "sanctimonious greedy asshole" springs to mind."

      Hilarious. Oh how you've hit the hammer right on the head. You have discovered my deep dark secret. I secretly LOVE the corporations.

      Moron. You know nothing about me. I never once said I agree with them. I just stated that the laws are quite concrete when it comes to what they're doing.

      But if you sincerely believe that all information needs to be free (I assume that you've watched Hackers one time too many), please feel free to post your full name and address so the corporations can contact you and you can exercise your "civic duty to fight [them]".

      You sure do live up to your username!

    12. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Baorc · · Score: 1

      What you fail to see as well is the availability for the material. Just as in Canada where the supreme court judge ruled long ago that _downloading_ music was like making photocopies of a book at a library. So for example, this here is taking a photocopy let's say of a book, and then adding notes for readers. This is all just technical and political speaking to work around issues. So it could pass. Where the illegal/legal line is crossed, as the judge rules, is advertising, if you advertise you have it and want to distribute it, then its illegal. Otherwise, it's not your fault ;) of course this was used for p2p file sharing apps like kazaa, and since I'm from Canada, I suppose this is why I see it this way.

    13. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      While it was difficult to read your unformatted paragraph, I understand your point.

      I'm Canadian, too; albeit currently living in the US.

      What's different here is that these people aren't just copying a piece of work... they're editing it to add something (re-production) and redistributing it. That's a lot different that straight copying.

      Hell, if that were the case, and they were just sending copies of the cartoon in plain Japanese, it would be different.

      But these people are clearly doing something that they know on paper is wrong.

    14. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      I never once said I agree with them. I just stated that the laws are quite concrete when it comes to what they're doing.

      You explictely stated that it is not people's "right". A right is something above a legal system de jeur and thus is something one considers a crucial element of his/her outlook on the world. That is what identifies you as a corporatist even though you are trying to backpedal furiously now. Perheaps you are in denial or just worshiping greed subconciously, hoping to "make it big" sometime soon?

      But if you sincerely believe that all information needs to be free (I assume that you've watched Hackers one time too many), please feel free to post your full name and address so the corporations can contact you and you can exercise your "civic duty to fight [them]".

      Your assumption is incorrect, but consistent with your apparent deferrence to movie studios as the only possible source of ideas for people. And as to my name, it is known to the corporations but as there is a wee little legal "misunderstanding" about to happen, between me and them it is only wise to control where from one's writings appear in court. Thus I shall remain incognito here, verry sorry about that.

    15. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying regardless of whatever the legal system says, that everyone has the right to see everything produced ever?

    16. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So were black people when they fought for rights. Poor Rosa Parks, but she knew on paper that sitting in the back of that bus was wrong, didn't she? When they said "GET TO THE BACK OF THE BUS, NIGGER!", she knew, right?

    17. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      Apparently.

      And big surprise our pal won't publish his name and address.

      I guess behind all the big talk about how he feels the need to take on the man he's really scared about what they could do to him.

      All talk, no action.

    18. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      While I agree partially with both of you, I feel the need to point out that you are being hypocritical by stating that all information needs to be free, but yet your name does not need to be free.

      So information needs to be free if it means you get to download fansubbed anime, but it does not need to be free if it will help someone prosecute/sue you.

    19. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if I want.

    20. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      "You explictely stated that it is not people's "right". A right is something above a legal system de jeur and thus is something one considers a crucial element of his/her outlook on the world." So because I don't feel that we have the right to view anything we want anytime we want, that makes me a corporatist?

      So be it.

      Still waiting for that name and address, though, Captain Courageous.

    21. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      This has got to be one of the stupidest replies I think I've ever seen here on /.

      Congrats.

    22. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      So you're saying regardless of whatever the legal system says, that everyone has the right to see everything produced ever?

      Yes, that is our right as it always was for all of the recorded history until a cabal of greedy men concocted their new "laws".

    23. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      While I agree partially with both of you, I feel the need to point out that you are being hypocritical by stating that all information needs to be free, but yet your name does not need to be free.

      I do not claim that "information needs to be free" as in roaming freely through the universe, I merely claim that "information cannot be property" and thus cannot be exchanged for monetary consideration. That is not altering other characteristics of information. For example, unlike physical property, information can exist in a state of "being unknown" or "being secret". That is I can keep a secret thought, to which you dont have access based on your lack of access to the information storage medium. There is nothing wrong with secrecy in regards to information but that is not what we are discussing here.

      So information needs to be free if it means you get to download fansubbed anime, but it does not need to be free if it will help someone prosecute/sue you.

      See above.

    24. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. Yeah. If I create something I have every right to show it wo who I want and not show it to who I don't.

    25. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      So because I don't feel that we have the right to view anything we want anytime we want, that makes me a corporatist?

      Yes it does, and worse, since you now claim that we are to reject thoughts and images that appear before our eyes based on someones demands for money, thus calling for self-censoring control of thoughts, it makes you a proponent of creation of an Orwellian style society for the benefit of corporations.

      Still waiting for that name and address, though, Captain Courageous.

      No less courageuos then most people here, you perheaps did notice that very few of them, yourself included (pot, meet kettle), are brandishing their personal information. There are good reasons for that.

    26. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      "since you now claim that we are to reject thoughts and images that appear before our eyes based on someones demands for money..."

      I claimed no such thing. Nice attempt to twist what I said, though. There is a big difference between "thoughts and images that appear before our eyes" and ACTIVELY seeking to view said thoughts and images. "...you perheaps did notice that very few of them, yourself included (pot, meet kettle), are brandishing their personal information."

      Hey genius. My personal information is CLEARLY displayed, if you had ANY clue as to what my username meant. It takes less than 5 seconds to get my full name, address and telephone number.

      Try harder.

    27. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Uh huh. Yeah. If I create something I have every right to show it wo who I want and not show it to who I don't.

      Sure you do. But if you were about to stand on a rooftop and show it to all passers by and then shout "those who did not pay close your eyes" it would make you a deranged and insane person. But that is precisely what the media companies do, they broadcast the images and then demand that those who they deem not worthy, do not turn on their receivers or computers. Furthermore, if you showed your creation to someone and allowed him to photograph it and he then proceeded to show the photo to someone else, do you now claim that a photo of your creation is yours too? Your right only extends as far as physical access to your creation for viewing. As soon as you broadcast its image through any publically accessible medium, your right vanishes because you no longer control the physical access.

    28. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      "As soon as you broadcast its image through any publically accessible medium, your right vanishes because you no longer control the physical access."

      Oy vey. I don't know how you came up with these delusional ideas, but right certainly does not vanish.

      By your argument, it would be perfectly legal to copy any piece of software because the company that sold it released it on CD/DVD.

      You have the right to view it, but not to redistribute it or modify it, which is the crux of the issue; regardless of what your personal feelings are on the issue. The law is quite clear.

    29. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      So your answer to my original question is no then.

    30. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      "thoughts and images that appear before our eyes" and ACTIVELY seeking to view said thoughts and images

      No there is not, all our lifes are spent "actively" seeking experiences, and all we do is process thoughts and images. Some of which you claim to be forbidden until payment rendered. My point stands

      Hey genius. My personal information is CLEARLY displayed, if you had ANY clue as to what my username meant. It takes less than 5 seconds to get my full name, address and telephone number.

      Oh dear, you mean to tell me that you somehow attained the universal and exclusive control of the word VE3ECM? Slashdot does not have even your email address listed and Google shows a horde of posts by parties unknown under the id of VE3ECM with unverifiable credentials... is that what you meant? Or are we to be playing a cryptographer to figure out what the sequence means? Besides as I explained, I have reasons for not boasting my name here just as valid as most other people.

    31. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      "No there is not, all our lifes are spent "actively" seeking experiences, and all we do is process thoughts and images. Some of which you claim to be forbidden until payment rendered. My point stands"

      Some of them ARE forbidden until payment is rendered, regardless of the delusional world you live in.

      Or do you purport to be able to walk into a movie theater, baseball game, etc and watch the show without paying? If so, please share how you do that.

      "Oh dear, you mean to tell me that you somehow attained the universal and exclusive control of the word VE3ECM?"

      First off, it's not a word. Secondly, actually, yes. I do control the right to the callsign VE3ECM for the rest of my life, as far as the callsign goes. Like I said, if you knew what my username meant, you'd be able to find my full info in mere seconds.

      You have reasons for not boasting your name? True. Cowardice is the main one.

    32. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      By your argument, it would be perfectly legal to copy any piece of software because the company that sold it released it on CD/DVD.

      That is correct. It is merely a logical consequence of nature of information.

      You have the right to view it, but not to redistribute it or modify it, which is the crux of the issue; regardless of what your personal feelings are on the issue. The law is quite clear.

      The laws and morally justified rights are two different things. There were times when "law" would make one person "property" of another. Laws are drafted by men, sometimes by evil men with ulterior motives or just well meaning men with no clue about the consequences. If you want to argue what is the state of law, it is sufficient to point out that if the current laws are taken to their logical conclusion, the only way to enforce their consistency is to expand them until a "Right To Read", total police-state exists to enforce the "information as property" model. Needless to say general-purpose computers and Open Source would have to be banned.

    33. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      So your answer to my original question is no then.

      I do not understand what you are getting at, it seems that your question was: Do I have absolute, all-encompassing rights to all things even most remotely related to my "creation", trumping all other rights of all other people, including all their freedoms, until the end of time?

      In which case the answer is indeed no.

    34. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Or do you purport to be able to walk into a movie theater, baseball game, etc and watch the show without paying? If so, please share how you do that.

      That is not the experience but the physical location that is restricted. Next.

      VE3ECM for the rest of my life, as far as the callsign goes

      Since you explained what it means, I concede that your personal info is known.

      Cowardice is the main one.

      I call it wisdom but you are welcome to your own definition.

    35. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      No, you do not have the right to see, read, listen to or whatever every single thing created.

    36. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      "That is not the experience but the physical location that is restricted. Next."

      By limiting access to something based on geographic location the copyright holder has effectively restricted the physical location.

      Nice try, though.

    37. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      No, you do not have the right to see, read, listen to or whatever every single thing created.

      In which case you do not have right to exist, since you just neatly defined the totality of our experiences as members of society. Everything related to civilization, starting at times immemorial, is like that. In fact we would not be here if it were the way you seem to think it should work because you will be still paying per-copy fee to the inventor of the "wheel" (he has absolute and never ending rights to his creation, which he passed onto his heirs, no?).

    38. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      By limiting access to something based on geographic location the copyright holder has effectively restricted the physical location.

      Whoa there! You mean to tell me that a building with doors, locks, guards built on a parcel of land into which your body must physically make a trip is the same as someone standing up and saying "You there! 2031 miles to the West! Behind that hill! Close your eyes or I will sue you!"

      And you are calling me dellusional?

      To explore this amusing insanity further, do you purport that the light particles bouncing off the stadium during a game are property of the NFL? To the end of time? What if I were to sit in a house I own next door with a telescope? In orbit? On Mars? Hmm?

    39. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1

      You deserve a medal for your ability to twist words.

    40. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      You deserve a medal for your ability to twist words.

      Let me look into this in detail...

      You said: By limiting access to something based on geographic location the copyright holder has effectively restricted the physical location.

      From which I concluded that you consider a mere mental desire to limit access to be equal to physical restriction, since the only means at the disposal of Japanese TV is saying that they do not wish their transmissions to be picked up elsewhere. The electromagnetic radiation has the uncanny habit of not giving a flying fuck as to what self-righteous people want and just travels according to laws of physics. It even has the hutzpa to ignore their profit motive, why that ungrateful etheral bastard! And so I question you on this tidbit, and you respond with something to the effect of "You twisted my words!" Well then, please rephrase it in such a way that its meaning is unambiguous and do thwart my twisted ways, by all means!

      P.S. I would like to point out to you that it is not my ability to twist things (although I am flattered that you think so highly of me) but the tangled web of illogic, which you began to weave as soon as you fell into the trap of trying to treat information as "private property" capable of being "stolen", which presents to me more and more opportunities to point out glaring absurdity as you struggle more and more desperately in its grip.

    41. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      "The electromagnetic radiation has the uncanny habit of not giving a flying fuck as to what self-righteous people want and just travels according to laws of physics."

      You moron. The issue has nothing to do with transmissions over the air. If you can stick a dish or antenna in the air and grab the signals, then watch away!

      The issue is taking said transmissions and REBROADCASTING them. In this case, over the internet.

      The only absurdity here is your inability to grasp that very simple concept.

      In fact, it is so simple to grasp that one can only conclude that you are arguing this point only for the sake of trolling.

    42. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      The issue is taking said transmissions and REBROADCASTING them. In this case, over the internet.

      Dear me! That changes everything! You mean the elctromagnetic waves were actually ... oh my ... wait for it ... amplified in the receiver! And then, I am not sure if the terror of it will not kill me, someone dared to superimpose more waves encoding English text on top of existing ones!! Oh the horror!! And then in a fit of total devilry they let the amplified waves escape their equipment! And probably Satan himself, personally, transformed the waves into their numeric equivalent and stored them on a computer which allowed them to travel over another medium! Will the horrors never end!?

      Just for curiosity sake, where in this process did the evil deed occur? At the point of internal amplification in the reciever? The amplified waves leaving it? Digitization? The numeric data leaving the computer? How is that different from the amplified analog waves leaving the receiver? If I were to provide means of supplying sub-titles independently so people can use their own receivers and superimpose them there, would I be doing equally evil deed? Are they all "thieves" then for receiving and amplifying the signal within their own receivers? Hmm? Sorry man, you cant get out of this jam no matter how you try.

      grasp that very simple concept

      Elecromagnetic radiation can be amplified and digitized with proper equipment. Yes it would seem rather simple, what was that you were saying?

      In fact, it is so simple to grasp that one can only conclude that you are arguing this point only for the sake of trolling.

      Careful here, I could accuse you of the same thing and I do have physics on my side!

    43. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      I must say, it's been quite a while since I've come in contact with someone as manic as you.

      Please seek help. Immediately.

    44. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if it's not available without going trough a lot of hassle and money.

    45. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      I must say, it's been quite a while since I've come in contact with someone as manic as you. Please seek help. Immediately.

      A message of "I surrender my utterly undefensible position but I can't think of a face-saving way to do it so I will just pretend my opponent is somehow illegitmate" received and accepted.

      I wish you Good Luck and please do try to remember that some things which are widely accepted as "obvious" without any thought might actually be nothing of the kind and instead due to someone's usurping agenda and large propaganda budget. "Intellectual Property" is a shining example of this.

    46. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well done! IgnoramusMaximus, seriously, your argument was awesome. Keep up the good work! Kudos!

    47. Re:"It's like taping an [sic] tv episode..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and that would be different from getting a honking big antenna and watching the stuff from Japan directly how exactly?

      Do you think you have a right to see something that's distributed in Japan-only?

      You don't.


      Actually, you do. If you broadcast an unencrypted television program, anyone who wants to listen to that signal is allowed to pick it up. NBC et al would love to charge people for receiving it, but they can't. They make their money on commercials instead.

      Your countries laws may be different, but in the US if you've got a nice big sat in the yard, no one is going to show up with bracelets :)

  38. An interesting problem by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Myself, I've used fansubbers in the past.

    My daughter (age 6) had what I call a "Disney princess image" issue. Thanks to the Disney cartoons, she let me know one day that "Princesses don't fight - they just wait for the prince to rescue them".

    I didn't like that idea.

    So I found other things for her to watch, like "Magic Knight Rayearth" (cute little girls fight with swords against monsters), "Kiki's Delivery Service", "Angelic Layer" (cute little girls with robot dolls that fight each other into submission), and so on.

    One of those is a (formerly) fansubbed series called "Stellvia of the Universe", which features a girl attending school in a space station, dealing with the ins and outs of school life. Shima (the main character) is a geek girl, and my daughter and I got a kick out of her (mis) adventures.

    The only problem was that Daddy had to be there since she's not a fast enough reader (hey, she's only six ;) ) to read all the subtitles. Which was OK, but now that the series is coming out on DVD in the US with dubbing I don't have to be there every minute. So I'll start buying the whole series as it comes out so she can watch it without me.

    But we've started on other fansub works, like the "Ah! My Goddess!" series now running in Japan. We sit together, I read the subtitles and do the voices for her, and she's started picking up a little Japanese. When the series reaches the US I'll still buy them.

    At the same time, I respect the animation studios who might not want their work fansubbed. In those cases, I'd recommend the fansubbers could create external subtitle files (I believe these are idx files that work with VLC or MPlayer), and people could be encouraged to rip their own DVD's to AVI files with special instructions, like "Use Handbrake at X rate blah, blah, blah".

    This way, animation studios could still sell DVD's, funsubbers and fans like myself could still get "previews" of a sort. It would be better if the studios would work with the fansubbers and sell the movies online for cheap (say, $3 an episode in a nice XVID format or some such, $1 to the fansubbers and $2 to the production company), since thanks to them I'm going to wind up spending about $150 in DVD's that I would not have otherwise.

    Guess we'll wait and see what happens. I'm sure there are people out there who only watch the fansubs and never buy the DVD, but as the article mentions, there may be a few if the "middle area" (the ones people watch on fansubs but have no intention of buying ) animes that lose sales as a result. (Which is why I think the "buy fansubbed for $3" would be a better result for everyone involved.

    1. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good daddy.

    2. Re:An interesting problem by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      The other thing the studio's would have to do, is put up a foreign orders site. The US isn't the only country benefitting from fansubs, and over here we have to wait even longer for them to come out.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    3. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or you could take her outside so she can be fit and strong and teach her to save herself instead of watching lots of tv.

    4. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Like a jedi warror!

    5. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could not be an assuming ass who believes that the parent doesn't do normal "Dad" stuff.

      Just because someone mentions something they do doesn't mean they do it all the time.

    6. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the same time, I respect the animation studios who might not want their work fansubbed. In those cases, I'd recommend the fansubbers could create external subtitle files (I believe these are idx files that work with VLC or MPlayer), and people could be encouraged to rip their own DVD's to AVI files with special instructions, like "Use Handbrake at X rate blah, blah, blah".

      Does no one here understand copyright? That's still blatantly illegal. I can't take your post and translate it into French and then give it out. You have the copyright on it.

      In order to translate something, you must get the rights from the copyright holder. Otherwise, it's blatantly illegal.

      The people saying fansubbing is a grey area are wrong. It's not grey. It's illegal, period. There's no question. 100% illegal, even if it isn't being actively distributed or there's no US release. Fansubbers don't have the rights to distribute the video/audio content, and they still don't have the rights to distribute subtitles based off the copyrighted work.

    7. Re:An interesting problem by ShadyG · · Score: 1
      My daughter (age 6) had what I call a "Disney princess image" issue. Thanks to the Disney cartoons, she let me know one day that "Princesses don't fight - they just wait for the prince to rescue them".

      I didn't like that idea.

      So I found other things for her to watch, like "Magic Knight Rayearth" (cute little girls fight with swords against monsters), "Kiki's Delivery Service"...
      ...so now she says "Witches don't fight -- they just deliver baked goods to unappreciative little brats."
    8. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she let me know one day that "Princesses don't fight - they just wait for the prince to rescue them".

      "Magic Knight Rayearth" (cute little girls fight with swords against monsters), "Kiki's Delivery Service", "Angelic Layer" (cute little girls with robot dolls that fight each other into submission), and so on.

      Not trying to tell you how to raise your kid, but there's one common theme running through all of those - fighting. Did you ever consider that not fighting at all would be better than all of those? And besides, what's the difference between having a prince fight for them and having a robot fight for them?

    9. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever consider that not fighting at all would be better than all of those?
      Did you ever consider that intelligent, brave, goodwilled people fight for what they believe in? Grandparent seems to understand, and his daughter is lucky for that.

      And besides, what's the difference between having a prince fight for them and having a robot fight for them?
      What's the difference between letting someone else solve your problems and using yourself a machine to solve your problems?

    10. Re:An interesting problem by 69sofine · · Score: 1

      But we've started on other fansub works, like the "Ah! My Goddess!" series now running in Japan. We sit together, I read the subtitles and do the voices for her, and she's started picking up a little Japanese. When the series reaches the US I'll still buy them.

      checking amazon
      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 05LB8E/qid=1107281122/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-5050 034-0973503?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846

      they've been out since 1997 on dvd....
      but good luck finding them in stores havent' seen them in years at like suncoast media play best buys shops. SUPPORT USA ANIME COMPANIES!

    11. Re:An interesting problem by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      That's the old OVA(straight to video). There's a new series that is currently being aired on TV.

    12. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the OVA. There is also a new TV series that hasn't been licensed.

    13. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's interesting, but why do they have to be fansubs? You said yourself that your daughter has trouble reading the subtitles - wouldn't it be better to show her older series, that already have English-language dubs, so that she can understand them more easily? There's lots of good anime that's already out in the US; why do you need to watch the latest releases?

    14. Re:An interesting problem by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Not trying to tell you how to raise your kid, but there's one common theme running through all of those - fighting.

      Um... yeah. I must have missed that bit where Kiki smacked down the forest girl with her broomstick before gorging herself on the entrails of the unfriendly crows. And how she used dark magic to dismember the policeman who tried to bring her to book for obstructing traffic.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    15. Re:An interesting problem by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or you could take her outside so she can be fit and strong and teach her to save herself instead of watching lots of tv.

      Farm work builds strength and stamina, and once she's strong enough then there's good money to be made killing kidnappers down at the lake. With that you can fund plenty of schooling in magic, fencing, fighting and dance (yes, dance - good for her coordination, not to mention social attributes). Careful about the Sin rating, unless you want her to go on to become queen of the underworld. Don't bother trying to put her on diets, it only hurts her attitude and hitpoints, and you don't get that much bonus from the kinky outfits anyway.

      (I know this is a pretty geeky sort of place, but will anyone get this?)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    16. Re:An interesting problem by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      I am quite sure the parent is refering to this non-OVA series:
      Aa! Megami-sama[Japanese Site]
      Ah! My Goddess (TV)[English Site]

    17. Re:An interesting problem by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Princess Maker.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    18. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (I know this is a pretty geeky sort of place, but will anyone get this?)
      Aargh! Suddenly I realize I haven't played Princess Maker II for years. Horrible.
    19. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the new AMG on a pay channel? That is one of the problems with fansubs these days, people providing access to shows that one would normally have to pay to see. From what I read online it seems that people in Japan are using these fansubs to avoid paying for the TV channels, as well as buying the dvds.

      That is probably one of the reasons these Japanese companies are now doing preemptive strikes on fansubers doing series that haven't been licenced.

      And it isn't like people wont go out of their way to avoid paying $X for a fansub. They want it for free, and will do whatever it takes to get it.

    20. Re:An interesting problem by 69sofine · · Score: 1

      man and i though I keep up with the anime info.. I'm so gonna check them out thanks ! for the link

    21. Re:An interesting problem by archen · · Score: 1

      Ughh... I wasn't feeling very geeky until I saw your post thanks -_-;

      but on the other hand if you can build up your daughter enough to kill the god of war, go for it.

    22. Re:An interesting problem by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight:

      If I buy the DVD from Japan for my own personal use, my friends and I couldn't get together to translate it? We couldn't say "Oh, this is what they're saying"?

      The second I buy the DVD, I can do what I damn well please with it as long as I don't try to sell copies on my own, and if that includes having a group provide translation services for me, I don't see where there's anything even the almighty Copyright could do to stop it.

    23. Re:An interesting problem by monopole · · Score: 1

      Not only do the fighting characters fight for good and noble causes, many of the characters don't fight at all.

      In Stellvia of the Universe the threat of the supernova shockwave leads to the 'Great Mission' in which all of humanity unites to save the solar system from the 'Second Wave' of supernova debris. War is such a distant memory that many people are unclear on the concept. Our heroine (and her girlfriends) prevail and saves the earth and later the solar system via superior programing, piloting, systems integration and telefactoring skills. Now that's a geek godess.

      In Ah! My Goddess the godesses never strictly fight but rather have to finesse the various problems that they face,even when the structure of reality is on the line as in the movie.

      I'd also reccomend Ground Defense Force Mao Chan in which little girls incapacitate really cute aliens (with a blindingly funny subtext of intraservice rivalry). Or You're Under Arrest the Movie in which our heroines defeat the terrorists without a shot fired (including one battle in which they defeat armed terrorists with a paintball arsenal and some quick thinking).

      Even fighting shows involving girls such as the excellent 'Sakura Wars' and 'Inuyasha' focus much more on personal interaction.

      In addition, good Anime involving strong women tend to focus on teamwork, friendship, loyalty, perserverance aganst all odds and fairness. In addition, the shows promote a balanced view in which nominal villains are misunderstood and often co-opted into the good fight.

    24. Re:An interesting problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if you buy the DVD from Japan and all sat around and translated it, that'd be fine.

      The instant you start copying that and giving it out to others you breach fair use, and start violating copyright.

      Not too complicated. You can translate it for yourself, but you can't distribute that translation. You don't have to sell a copy for it to be illegal. Distributing the copy is sufficient.

  39. Re:Goddamn by BaldGhoti · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I thought this was a "news for nerds" site.

    --
    [insert witty sig here]
  40. TV Series by Cyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    So - I watch a few fansubbed anime tv series. Most notably - every Wednesday night (or so) "Naruto" is fansubbed and torrented. It had aired hours before in Japan, on broadcast television. A group of fansubbers was kind enough to translate the spoken Japanese to a pretty good English equivalent - and encode it up in a convenient movie format.

    This content is not, and perhaps will not, ever be available to me otherwise. Yes - I've a general interest in learning Japanese. No - it won't be enough anytime soon (if ever) to be able to enjoy these shows without translations.

    When series are licensed by companies, the fansubbers (generally) shut down [or at least have the decency to go 'underground' - where I don't care to follow] - this is pretty much how I know something has been licensed, and I suck it up and deal.

    So, legally - morally - etc. What are peoples opinions? Am I a bad evil man?

    I don't think so. Dattebayo!

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    1. Re:TV Series by firebus · · Score: 1

      naruto will be available soon. almost certainly this year. and the fansubs are a large part of the push to get a legal version released. it's clear that the demand is huge.

    2. Re:TV Series by killmenow · · Score: 1

      This is what I don't get about it. It's quite often the fansub activity that the original content producers use to guage popularity and whether or not it makes sense to release a series abroad or not.

      If Naruto had not garnered the huge following that it has, how motivated would the makers be to license it in North America?

    3. Re:TV Series by Otik2 · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought two years ago. Back when it first started airing it was popular and seemed like the sort of thing American companies would love to license. But con after con went by without anyone picking it up, and now two years later no one has. I still think it will be licensed; it just surprises me they didn't do it long ago.

    4. Re:TV Series by genner · · Score: 1
      Dattebayo!

      I can only shurdder at any offical US attempts to translate this word.

    5. Re:TV Series by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      Its huge popularity with fansubbers is probably what's made it take forever to get licensed. The Japanese license holder certainly knows how quickly the show is fansubbed in the US, and how popular it is.

      Thus, they know it's going to be extremely popular in the US when it's finally on TV and DVD.

      That means they know they can charge an arm and a leg for the US license. Same reason ADV didn't get the Evangelion movies: the series was so popular, Gainax wanted an obscene amount of money for the movies. Manga Entertainment coughed up more money than ADV would. I'm just guessing that pretty much every US distributor is in a protracted bidding war to get the rights to the series. Maybe the Japanese license holder is also holding out for simultaneous merchandising rights or they want assurances the series will be picked up in whole and won't be picked up by a butcher, like One Piece.

    6. Re:TV Series by ureshii_akuma · · Score: 1

      As successful as Naruto is as a kids show in Japan (not quite Pokemon levels, but on the level of Inu Yasha), I'd say that the makers would be quite motivated to license it in North America.

      In fact, having had an opportunity to speak with a manager for overseas liscensing at Studio Pierrot (the studio that creates Naruto), one of the major reasons for the long wait is Naruto is such a hot property they wanted to make sure they got as good a deal as they could, for as much money as they could, including TV airing in addition to DVD release. Naruto is, and has been for a while, a given for release over here.

      Now, I do believe there are shows, one can still argue, where fansubs help with demand. But these are primarily magical girl or adult dramas, not shows that appeal to the 12 - 16 year old boy crowd ^_^

    7. Re:TV Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I a bad evil man?

      Because you are a narutard, yes.

  41. Wow, take a note from the RIAA & MPAA by dj_tsd · · Score: 1

    Let's go after the fans!!! That way NO ONE will buy our crap! They all be pirates, yarr! If your business is failing, DON'T BLAME YOUR CLIENTS.

  42. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He got it right, the commercial english translations are quite often terrible. They dumb things down to cater to people who aren't interested in the first place.

    The people who actually like these types of anime often like it *because* of the original plot, not some lame hacked up version.

    1. Re:mod parent up by antime · · Score: 1

      Most fansubs are still infinitely worse. Illiterate geeks who know neither the language they're translating from nor the language they're translating to, instead taking every opportunity to show off their shallow knowledge of Japanese culture in the form of a screenful of text explaining some obscure, completely irrelevant detail while completely missing the original's references to western culture.

    2. Re:mod parent up by Riddlefox · · Score: 2, Informative
      That is true, but the one anime series that I actually follow is Initial D. The official DVD's have horrible translations. In the original manga, the main character is a tofu delivery boy. In the official DVD's, they made him a pizza boy! Much of the DVD's translations are quite off.

      There are a few groups doing fansubs of the Initial D Fourth Stage episodes. They vary in quality, but generally, they are excellent. Sometimes, some of the more technical car terms don't make it through, but generally, they do. In short, I prefer the fansubs to the official DVD's.. which is a pretty sad state of affairs.

  43. Complaint text by flatface · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dumped this from a PDF file Lunar Anime received. Most of those in the fansubbing community know that we respect US licenses, so we're also respecting MFI's request. Please note that Lunar is only doing KgNE from that list.

    --

    Name of sender:
    FUKUI Kensaku
    fukui@kottolaw.com
    Admitted in Japan and New York

    TELEPHONE:(813)5766-8980
    FACSIMILE: (813)5466-1107

    KOTTO DORI LAW OFFICE
    MINAMI AOYAMA POINT 1ST FLR.
    18-5, MINAMI AOYAMA 5-CHOME
    MINATO-KU, TOKYO 107-0062 JAPAN

    December 7, 2004

    LUNARANIME.ORG
    [removed address]

    Re: Copyright Infringement on Web Site

    Dear Madame/Sir,

    I am a legal counsel of Media Factory, Inc. and writing this letter in that capacity.

    Media Factory, Inc. ("MFI") is one of Japanese major animation film producers and owns or jointly owns with other companies copyrights and trademarks regarding various Japanese anime films including the following works ("Works"):

    Gankutsuou
    Rahxephon
    Genshiken
    Kimi ga nozomu Eien

    Recently, MFI found that certain unauthorized copies of the Works are uploaded to the following web site(s) considered to be managed by you ("your web site") and/or that users are induced on or through your web site to certain web sites containing such unauthorized copies. Such unauthorized copies may be downloaded by users in many countries including Japan from such web sites without charge. We believe that a large number of unauthorized copies have already been flowed out through such web sites.

    www.lunaranime.org

    Needless to say, unauthorized copying and upload and distribution of such copies are serious copyright infringement. Absolutely no money goes to creators and anime producers of the Works from such illegal distribution.

    I hereby request you to cease and terminate said upload and/or inducement immediately and erase all the copies of the Works under your possession. Please confirm the termination and erasure in writing to my contact address set forth as above within ten (10) business days of your receipt of this letter either by mail or facsimile.

    In case we cannot confirm said termination and erasure within such period, we will need to consider commencing necessary legal action.

    This letter is sent without prejudice to any of MFI's rights or remedies. Sincerely,

    FUKUI Kensaku Attorney at law

    1. Re:Complaint text by gatekeep · · Score: 1

      FUKUI Kensaku Attorney at law Wow, I guess Japanese lawyers don't mess around!

    2. Re:Complaint text by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Such unauthorized copies may be downloaded by users in many countries including Japan from such web sites without charge.

      This seems like a key issue. Companies that might be willing to turn a blind eye toward people exchanging videotapes in a foreign country may feel very different when those episodes are available over the internet where they might potentially erode sales in their home market.

    3. Re:Complaint text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is a common way to show which name is the family name. Japanese name order is opposite that of the US; family name comes first. This can cause some confusion, since some people will rearrange their name order to suit the customs of the message's destination country. Some people don't. Putting it in all caps solves the problem.

    4. Re:Complaint text by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Gankutsuou, Rahxephon, Genshiken, Kimi ga nozomu Eien"

      Oh well, least its nothing good thats being taken down (well, Kimi ga nozomu Eien was decent, but they finished subbing it LONG ago).

      "FUKUI Kensaku Attorney at law"

      Now if only I could think of a way to mock this lawyer...

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  44. My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple. Don't buy content from those manufacturers.

    Buy the fckin's discs used or borrow them from a friend.

  45. Videos with subtitles... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    ..in general, fansubs are made because there is no official english version. You can occasionally get separate subtext files too (some come as video + subtext file), but for the most part they come together.

    Like elsewhere, the shows are typically aired long before they appear on DVD (even foreign DVD). So the only means of getting the video, unless you happen to be in that country, is to download a copy. Think of it as the usual "I download Stargate because it's not available here" with a translation to boot.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Videos with subtitles... by Dullin · · Score: 1

      Actually, having subtitles seperate from the video asn't been seen in a long time. The fact is that other fansubbing groups would take the subtitles and claim them their own and so it was decided to just paste it over the video.

    2. Re:Videos with subtitles... by hymie3 · · Score: 1

      That was very helpful. Thanks.

    3. Re:Videos with subtitles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the fansubbers were annoyed at other fansubbers infringing on their IP, so they "solved" that by infringing on the studios. And now they're upset that the studio doesn't like it either.

    4. Re:Videos with subtitles... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Firstly, it's still very easy to get hold of timed scripts. There are whole websites devoted to them. Google is your friend.

      Secondly, in legal terms there is no real difference between distributing the script as text and distributing a subtitled video file: both involve distributing an unauthorised translation of a copyright work (the script), and therefore both are equally illegal and infringe equally on the studios' IP.

    5. Re:Videos with subtitles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure whether it's really "equally illegal" to infringe on one thing (script) as two (script and video) but I'm sure you can get more damages out of someone distributing your video with subtitles than just the subtitles alone. Distributing the script alone is almost guaranteed to increase sales of the original video. Distributing both is more likely to do the reverse.

    6. Re:Videos with subtitles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are entire sites full of scripts. The groups that care about other's stealing their scipts are generally just the newer ones that are full of themselves and want to compete being the 100th group to sub Naruto or whatever.

      When ADV took forever to release the Nadesico movie (and butchered the US release of the TV series by painting over the computer screens, etc.) I just went a dl'd the script, bought the Japanese DVD release, and watched it that way.

    7. Re:Videos with subtitles... by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that IP law is either very conservative or outdated (pre-dating the Internet), and does not allow for things such as fansubs, while it does allow for the right to mock(sorry, can't find the English word).

      I've believed for some time that IP law should be revised in view of the new developments, and it is, but too slowly and/or badly advised (I have to say that while I'm a layman, my father is a leading expert in IP. We never agreed :-)

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    8. Re:Videos with subtitles... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Secondly, in legal terms there is no real difference between distributing the script as text and distributing a subtitled video file: both involve distributing an unauthorised translation of a copyright work

      No, there is a legal difference (and not just that the studio is far less likely to sue someone who only passes out scripts).

      Subtitle files might (and I don't know for sure) actually fall under Fair Use. There are 4 legal criteria, and two of them are: "What portion of the original work is copied?" (answer: Very little, because subtitles are a tiny amount of data, byte-wise) and "How does the copy effect the market for the original?" (answer: the subtitles actually increase the chance someone will buy a Japanese-only DVD and read along)

      So it might even be the case that subtitles are legal Fair Use. (Or maybe not...for example, if it turns out that they don't encourage people to buy import DVDs, but instead of just download raw video from somewhere else, then the economic impact becomes negative again)

  46. Re:Huh? by scifience · · Score: 1

    Hello, it's Slashdot, you should know already!

  47. Ironic... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Like Windows, it's all allowed because it opens up a previous non-existing market. The SOP for video distribution in the west at the time was: Nobody but kids will buy "cartoon shows" so why should make a US release? Once the market becomes real though, that vector into the market becomes "evil" and must be stopped. Now that the market is tightly controlled so we can be forced to purchase shoddy subtitled DVDs of Ghost in the Shell 2 and thousands upon thousands of versions of Dragonball Z (both censored and uncensored) These uppity fansubbers are getting in the way of REAL business. (Like forcing them to FIX Ghost in the Shell 2 or that Manga does a lousy job of DVD transfers)

    Futher ironic because Fansubbers have a "code of ethics" in that if a title gets picked up for distribution in the west, they stop distributing it.

    They only need to look at Sci-Fi's success with Battlestar Galactica (which has been bittorrented everywhere from the UK where it was shown over the fall). Guess what. It's STILL popular and still has more viewers than any other show on the Sci-Fi channel AND beats Enterprise. (And the Uber geeks have already seen it.)

    The moral of the story is: People like stuff that doesn't suck. And they'll pay to see it again and again.

  48. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cartoon underground!

  49. IP Nazis by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Yet more hijinks from the Intellectual property mafia. I mean, here is a group of people, providing translation services for free, and what does the company do? It sues them!

    Any half way wise business person would have made some kind of partnership with fansubbing groups already. Selling digital content is also an obvious step for a niche market such as this, where it is too expensive to sell physical media to a relatively small audience(ref iTunes). However, instead of taking the sane and profitable alternative, these companies instead waste, possibly thousands of dollars, filing cease and desist letter and doing legal research and other such bull. It's getting to the point where if someone who hasn't paid for your product has seen, even a segement of it, then some form of copyright theft has taken place. Companies seem to treat their intellectual property as sacrosant these days, with absolutely no consideration whatsoever for any distrobution method that isn't single physical copy.

    Are the fansubbers infringing copyright? By subtitling, no. By releasing the video on the net? Probobly yes. Are they performing a service for which there is a demand? Yes! So here we have at least one example of copyright law retarding economic development. Not that this makes it fully OK. Just an example of how the IP Nazis may not be as good for the economy as previously thought.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:IP Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look! Some fans of my book series translated it into 19 languages and they're giving it away on the net with the English version included too! Thanks guys, you're really helping me not make money. Could you imagine that some companies would actually try to sue you for that?

  50. Knee-Jerk Reaction by Seeth42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who appreciates anime, I can say from first hand experience that it's probably not the Fansubbers fault that the fan base is growing but sales are flat - especially in the mid-quality series.

    After finding the fansub community, I can say that it's a GREAT resource for several things: checking out the latest and greatest coming out of Japan, finding obscure series that will probably *NEVER* see the light of day in the U.S.. An added bonus is that when a series comes out in the U.S that I've already seen, I can either purchase them on DVD if I think they're worth my hard-earned dollar, or pass if I think it's garbage. Additionally I ALWAYS make it a point to recommend lesser-known but well-done series to my other anime fan friends.

    I think that the flat sales that the companies are concerned with is a sign that their consumer base is getting smarter with their purchases. I know I hate buying something on DVD that looks really cool to find out that it's a single 30 minute episode - especially after shelling out $20-$30. As the medium becomes more commonplace, I expect that this trend will continue.

  51. Purpose of Copyright by Baldur_of_Asgard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Under U.S. Law, the purpose of Copyright is to promote the arts and sciences by giving a means by which creators of intellectual property can be paid for their work.

    Therefore, while fansubbing might be technically illegal, if we wish to determine the ethics of it we need to look at the question of whether it promotes the art or stifles it, and whether it enhances revenue or diminishes it.

    From the article, it would appear that fansubbing has both promoted the art and enhanced revenue for the creators - but the market may now be reaching a point where in some cases fansubbing may (possibly) diminish revenue. It still seems to be contributing to the promotion of the arts, however.

    Therefore, when considering the ethics of the situtation (as opposed to mere legality), there is only one thing to consider: does fansubbing diminish the revenues of the creators or their assignees? The fact that most fansubbers remove their material when a commercial conflict comes up shows good faith on their part, but that may be insufficient. In any case, the development of the U.S. market for anime may have changed the equation, so that what was formerly ethical (though not technically legal) may no longer be ethical.

    Even that, of course, is in doubt. There is a good deal of reason to believe that the free sharing of material has helped commercial distributors far more than it has hurt them.

    Baldur

    1. Re:Purpose of Copyright by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Being a big fan of anime myself (and having the US DVDs to prove it), I am a big downloader of the fansubs that are not out in the US yet. Once a series comes out in the US, I put it on my "to buy" list. I have dropped $1k in a day (when I go to buy) to purchase the DVDs. For the others I know that do not have the level of disposable income I do, the still buy, but are more selective. Most of the stuff they download they will never buy (but do buy some, just not as much). And the ones that have never bought, I don't think they will ever buy. So it basically comes down to this: Those who buy, buy because they have seen the series. Those who don't buy, wouldn't buy it anyway, even if fansubing were to stop.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  52. Unlicensed anime only by bi_boy · · Score: 1

    "[fansubbers] take Japanese cartoons, translate and subtitle them in English, and release them freely on the Net."

    To expand more accurately on that, fansubbers take unlicensed/undistributed (outside of Japan) anime movies/series', translate and subtitle them in English and release them freely onto the net until that anime is licensed/distributed by a publisher (ADV, Manga, Pioneer, Central Park Media, etc) at which point they halt translation/distribution of said anime movie/series.

    --
    Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
    1. Re:Unlicensed anime only by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      To expand more accurately on that

      No, you are being less accurate. While many fansubbers abide by such a code, not all of them do, and it's dishonest to claim otherwise.

      at which point they halt translation/distribution

      That bit is especially misleading. The function of fansubbers is (obviously) to create subtitles. Distribution isn't their forte; P2p systems can already keep spreading the files around better than their own servers ever could. They have no way to withdraw the file after release.

      The fansubbers who released Ghost In The Shell epsidoes, for example, knew full well that the series would be licensed for USA distribution extremely quickly, and also that removing episodes from their own servers would in no way slow the distribution once it had started.

      The "fansubber's code" is a way to pretend lawfullness. Decades ago, when anime releases to outside Japan were rare, it was plausible for them to claim to be distributing something that viewers could get in no other way. Today, the anime market is international, and they can't keep on pretending that "Lost Exile" and "Wolf's Rain" aren't in negotations with Cartoon Network from before they even air in Japan.

  53. All the big stars do it by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fansnubbing is nothing new, why just the other day I got snubbed by some kind of Hollywood star and I'm not going to sue him or demand that he say hello to me or anything. Why bother?

  54. Translation at work by sxmjmae · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was at an Anime showing conference where they had a showing of a newly unauthorized translated show.
    At the end of the showing the presented introduced an executive from the company that made/released the show. The presenter indicated he was there so they could negotiate the rights to translate the show we just saw into English.

    After a couple of years I saw the English version of that very same show appear on the shelves of the local video store. Since I was so impressed with the first English version I saw a few years before I snapped it up. Sadly the translation was perverted by the executives' involvement. The original translation I saw done by the fans was a much better interpretation of the dialogue.

    I think that some fans are so fanatical they do a way better job then a company employed translator. For example look at some assembly manual that have been translated from another language into English. It is clear to tell that English is not the first language and the translation is not done with the passion a true fan can accomplish.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    1. Re:Translation at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, the ADV Azumanga Daioh subs weren't that bad.

  55. Fansubbers MADE the anime market. by GryMor · · Score: 1

    I have purchased official DVDs with english subtitles of every anime I had fansubs of shortly after its initial release with english subtitles. Fansubs are the ONLY reason there is a viable anime market in the United States at this time, they are the meat and gravy of college anime clubs and can easily generate the base market needed to make the cost of licensing and subbing an obscure title worthwhile. Cracking down on fansubbers, before a license has been picked up for US distribution is insane. After it's been picked up, there shouldn't be any fansubs of the show available from any reputable fansubber so feel free to slaughter the basterds who continue to distribute it after you have announced some sort of licensing or plan to release a subtitled version. On a side note, it may be worthwhile in some cases to hire the fansubbers to do the subbing, I wish they had done so for Fushugi Yuugi, the fansub was better quality all around, that they didn't is lamentable but is still not an excuse for not downgrading to the comercial sub.

    Alternatively, try the Baen model and see if it works as well for anime as it does for books.

    --
    Realities just a bunch of bits.
  56. It's growing too big by Sunspire · · Score: 1

    It's so easy to get fansubs these days with BitTorrent, the fansubbing scene is really nothing like it was only a few years ago.

    When a popular series like Naruto has a new release, within a week there will be 100,000-200,000 downloads just from the group that is first to release it (Dattebayo). Add the other popular groups in like Anbu and you're looking at 200,000-300,000 downloads a week. Clearly the demand and distribution capacity is huge, a double feature episode will move over 80 terabyte of data easily in a little more over a week. I can understand the companies starting to get nervous.

    Another large problem is that when a series does get licensed, whereas previously this was seen as a good thing today it will be met with extreme hostility from the users who are used to getting their anime fix for free. I pity the company that dares license Naruto before it's completed its run in Japan.

    I see only one solution. The companies theselves must provide a service to rival the fansubbers. The animation houses themselves could microcharge for the episodes online. With simultaneous TV/net releases I do see a large portion of the current fansub base supporting such an effort. It could pave the way for other TV series moving towards online distribution, in my opinion it's only a matter of time and who will do it first.

    --
    It's like deja vu all over again.
    1. Re:It's growing too big by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      As usual the producers of the content are fools - here's a huge market to exploit, but they're complaining about it instead.

      Personally I'd have paid a decent chunk of cash to a Japanese studio for the right to download GITS-SAC episodes as soon as they were aired (and 2G now). Not possible. Is it wrong to download it since I couldn't get it legally? Probably, but seriously what-freaking-ever, that's never going to stop people. The studios can choose to make money from the demand, or not. Currently they choose not to.

    2. Re:It's growing too big by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      They also choose to butcher some series (Card Captors, based of off Card Captor Sakura was a complete screw up) and use bad voice actors (same series, add in Magic Knights Rayearth as well) and (sometimes, not always) bad subbing.

      I personally only watch it subed now so I could care less about the english dub. But for the Love of God WHY CAN'T THEY MAKE A DECENT SUB! I have come across ones where they completely butcher the translation to make it easy to understand! I want it to be close to the original, (preferably with a foot note explanation if necessary) in the Subs. When will they learn that Dubs are for the noobs (that don't buy much) and the subs are for the Otakus that are their core market?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  57. Re:No Story [tt] by Taladar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So you say that somehow the companies are losing profits from fans releasing a series in a country where no legal/official release will ever occur?

  58. Economic Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Excellent point, we have an economic problem that was never discussed in 5 semesters of class. That is: "What is the price point at which someone will buy a product instead of paying someone else to steal it?"

  59. Distinctions by SeanDuggan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While you're technically correct in what you're saying, I'd respectfully disagree with your point. Had I not been exposed to fansubs of anime, I probably would still be among those people who see it as all tentacle monsters, giant robots, and crappy animation. Fansubs allow for a wider dissemination of the work and traditionally, the companies have not had a problem with it. Still, it does employ the copyrighted work being distributed. What would be better, in my opinion, would be to have some way of being able to load "extension subtitles" or the like into a DVD. If you start looking into the fan translations of manga, you'll find that the better groups don't publish scanned pages of the work, but rather listed the dialogue by page number and panel. The reader uses them side-by-side to read the work. In many ways, this is even better than the usual translation job, as it keeps the right-to-left scheme intact (ever run into one of those mangas where the characters are all left-handed? That's sloppy page-flipping for you) as well as preserving the original background art where there's writing.

    Personally, I think the greatest benefit of these fan translations is that it keeps the companies relatively honest. Fans already know the dialogue can be competently translated, so there's less excuse for poor dictionary-switch translatings or covering up harder dialogue with protected laughter that has nothing to do with the movement of character mouths. Heck, a few companies have made use of fan translations when doing their subtitling.

    That said, with the company's request, they should immediately shut down translations of that company's work. *wry grin* It will likely mean lower sales due to decreased publicity, but that's that company's perogative. We must respect that.

    ^_^ So glad you understand now.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Distinctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be better, in my opinion, would be to have some way of being able to load "extension subtitles" or the like into a DVD.

      Still illegal. You can't translate someone else's work and then distribute it. You have to contact the publisher for translation rights. After all, you're just copying the content from one language to another. Fansubbing is illegal, period.

    2. Re:Distinctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, I don't know the term, but I recall there are "extension subtitles" that you can download for DVDs.

      The thing is they can claim this all they want, but they are really not going to do this nor buy the JPN DVDs. They will instead bitch about the price, low episode count, it not being on dvd yet, etc, and say they are justified just downloading the divx version.

      Isn't surprising, same complaining happens when current titles get licensed, and the fansubers drop that license. They hate it when their free ride gets cut off before they all of the show's episodes.

      All this is about making excuses, and justifying why they should download the stuff without paying for it.

    3. Re:Distinctions by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      What the companies didn't have a problem with was probably that there were so few people downloading the fansubs is that it didn't matter.

      What has most likely happened is that it's gotten to the point now where if the company were to do it itself then it would be a viable and profitable business market.

      Either way, something needs to be understood. If a company does not punish you for doing something, that doesn't mean it approves of what you're doing. The article says fansubbers "believed" distributors didn't mind. That's great, I believe I'm the greatest person on Earth, and I continue this belief by not asking anyone.

      I don't understand how you can say they'd see "lower sales" when everyone claims fansubbing takes place because there are no sales, hence the need. Now that the company is making the move to sell subtitled media, fansubbers should stop illegally pirated material and *support* what they watch by buying it.

      Part of the problem is fansubbers see their work as some great contribution to the company. They're "promoting" their companies media by illegally distributing a copyright. That's great. That's like promoting SIGARMS by unloading a P228 in a public area.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    4. Re:Distinctions by chaoaretasty · · Score: 1

      THe complaining is the waiting not the free ride. Naruto is on ep 119 in fansubs now, even if DVD releases start today it'd be years before they come close to catching up. NB, this is not a comment on the legality issue nor justification, but a correction of an assumption.

    5. Re:Distinctions by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Informative
      • In many ways, this is even better than the usual translation job, as it keeps the right-to-left scheme intact (ever run into one of those mangas where the characters are all left-handed? That's sloppy page-flipping for you) as well as preserving the original background art where there's writing.
      I take it you're not really big into manga nowadays? A few years back, Tokyopop started a change in the industry with their "100% Authentic Manga" line. All titles remain unflipped, no names are changed, and honorifics are kept in most cases. Since then pretty much the entire US manga industry has followed suit. Even Viz threw in the towel and is now reissuing titles in an unflipped format, and at a new size, that matches the Tokyopop size. (Which, coincedentally, is pretty much the same size as most Japanese manga releases.) Doubleday books entere the Manga market last year and they have also kept the unflipped format. They also include extensive translation notes (although they oddly fail to include notes about some things you'd think they would) and explanations of honorifics. They even leave sound effect text intact, placing the English translations of them close by the Japanese characters.

      As to scanslations vs. commercial releases, some companies are starting to make the fan scanslations look better by cutting corners. Viz is the one example I can really give of this, check out February's edition of Shonen Jump Magazine which is put out by them. They've stopped being careful with text bubbles, now you can see they've placed white boxes over the old bubbles with the English text in them. Frankly most fan scanslations do better work than this. That I actually paid for the magazine and found such shoddy work in it is really annoying. It's even more annoying that until this issue they actually did a g ood job with the editing, now they've apparently stopped. Translations also seem worse this time, with many things Americanized that there was no reason for. We're talking about things that seem horribly out of place, not changing obscure cultural references to something Americans can more easily understand.

    6. Re:Distinctions by NanoGriever · · Score: 1
      Personally, I think the greatest benefit of these fan translations is that it keeps the companies relatively honest. Fans already know the dialogue can be competently translated, so there's less excuse for poor dictionary-switch translatings or covering up harder dialogue with protected laughter that has nothing to do with the movement of character mouths. Heck, a few companies have made use of fan translations when doing their subtitling.
      I agree with your suggestion that fansubbers are keeping the companies "honest." A few years back, there weren't as many commercial DVD releases as it is today, and ADV was one of a handful of companies doing it. I tell you what, ADV was one of the most hated companies for the fans, because they did a piss poor job with the translations and butchered many good series. (and let's not talk about the dub...) To ADV's credit, in the last couple of years they have gotten quite a bit better, although they still aren't as good as Geneon or Funimation. One has to think some of the fansubbers' quality work has something to do with this, on top of competition from other companies.
  60. But Media Factory is a JAPANESE company. by Trunks · · Score: 1
    My opinion as a very minor fansubber (and this is held by various large fansubbing sites I'm not going to link from slashdot) is that it is fine to fansub until some American company announces they have aquired the licence to an anime, at which point you stop.

    [snip]

    These companies don't appear to be going after fansubbers who are fansubbing things which haven't had, and probably won't get, an American release.

    In this case with Media Factory, it's the original Japanese company behind the anime requesting fansubs getting pulled, and many of their titles aren't licensed and may never get picked up by an American distributor either since they're pretty niche such as Kimi Ga Nozomu Eien.
    --
    This post sponsored by Ninja Burger. "
    1. Re:But Media Factory is a JAPANESE company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kiminozo is niche!? It's currently rated #2 on the Animenfo top 200!

    2. Re:But Media Factory is a JAPANESE company. by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      umm Rahxephon is already released in US.
      Rahxephon ADV Films Announced: 7/05/2002 Released: 03/25/2003

      Courtesy of http://www.animeondvd.com/licenselist/

      Gankutsuou is a new series (about halfway through its first and only season) with high ratings. It WILL be licensed. It's a retelling of the Count of the Monte Cristo.. certainly not niche there.

      Kimi Ga Nozomu Eien has received a lot of awards among the non-Japanese anime community. Guess what, licensers look at the popularity of fansubs, and it will be picked up. Check out anidb if you don't believe me about its popularity, probably biggest interactive DB on net for anime (~20000 EP's). 8.57 (1324 votes) for Kimi, for comparison Cowboy Bebop (an extremely popular series released in US and on TV) is 8.73 (1922 votes)

      Two more site-plugs while I'm at it
      Kyle's edit list
      AnimeNewsNetwork Anime Encyclopedia

  61. *sigh* by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    if you're going to be elitist about your show not being a cartoon, with the assumption that cartoons are "for kids",

    You might try reading my post more carefully. I never said that anime didn't fit the technical definition, I said that the term "cartoon" is misleading because in the public's eye it carries lots of childish connotations that are simply inaccurate when looking at the anime world as a whole. In this case, impression takes precedence over the exact definition.

  62. Re:That's a good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead and borrow it. Just make sure you give me my idea back after you are done with it.

    I hate loaning out ideas and then not having the people return them.

  63. I TOLD you so. by Shining+Celebi · · Score: 1

    Good. You have no idea how annoying many fansubbers are. They consider themselves morally superior to all other pirates, because they only sub and download unlicensed anime, which they generally claim is legal (ignoring all evidence to the contrary, of course.)Maybe this will help beat into their heads what they are doing is still illegal. That said, I don't think it's wrong. It's not like the Japanese are losing a huge market and massive revenue and little Japanese schoolgirls are starving in the streets, having to sell their panties for money (oh, wait...) I'll save you from the endless, oft-repeated attack in IP law, though. -Celebi

  64. Companies don't get it by Particle010 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Companies worry that the easy prerelease availability of fansub versions means that the otaku class has already seen their products, and no longer need to buy anything but the must-haves."

    Perhaps they companies don't understand that this is how it's SUPPOSED to work. I'm not going to shell out $250+ for a series and find out that I don't like it. Fansubbing gives me the option to see it as a whole and buy that which I really like. And just for the record, I have a WALL of anime that looks like Suncoast.

    There's also the issue of market saturation VS. otaku and the "casual buyer".

    If someone told me that I'd have to shell out $500 to find out if I'd like Babylon5 or not, I'd tell them to shove it!

    --
    "Not the Earth!!! That's where I keep all my stuff!!!" - The Tick
  65. So It's OK to release US Movies if I Subtitle Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what you are saying, is that it's OK to release US movies on Internet Torrents as long as I subtitle them in, say Swedish, and ask them to be deleted after they are released in Swedish subtitled format?

    And that would go for any other language as well?

  66. Anime in North America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost all Anime never makes it to North American Television, and when it does - it is dubbed.... BADLY. They specifically pick Anime series that are designed for children as the executives are stuck in the mindset that Anime = Cartoon.

    I prefer watching my anime(or any movies for that matter) in it's original language with english subtitles. Almost all of the series that I watch have no other option than to download the fansub as even if I decide to *wait* for the official english version... there's no guarantee that one will ever be made!

  67. Fansubs are accessible from Japan by Kagami001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It bears mentioning that when you put these video files up on the net, they are just as accessible to people in the domestic Japanese market as anywhere else. I would tend to imagine that is of some concern, especially in the case of those late-night niche series that make all their money off video and merchandise sales, rather than advertising, like Kimi ga Nozomu Eien. They would need to approach foreign sites distributing video files just as much as they would approach Japanese ones.

    1. Re:Fansubs are accessible from Japan by Shining+Celebi · · Score: 1

      Fansubbers usually get their "raw" files (unsubbed Japanese episodes) from Japanese pirates anyway. Many, many fansubs are created from a TV rip of an episode.

    2. Re:Fansubs are accessible from Japan by Zarxrax · · Score: 1

      Its far easier for the Japanese to just download the raw versions. They are readily accessible and can be downloaded usually an hour or 2 within airing.

      The Japanese HATE files that are corrupted with subtitles all over them. Why would they want something like that when they can get the cleaner, better looking version a lot sooner?

    3. Re:Fansubs are accessible from Japan by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      depends on how much they like having subtitles on their screen. I know that I hate watching things in a language I can understand with subtitles on the screen. It's disracting rather than helpful.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    4. Re:Fansubs are accessible from Japan by almightyjustin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can definitely vouch for the fact that English fansubs circulate among Japanese users, I've downloaded some with Japanese filenames from Japanese P2P users. I would imagine that the big central fansub torrent sites are more convenient to get stuff from than messing with WinMX/Winny, especially if the subbing group uses OGM or something similar so the subs can be turned off.

      --

      Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

  68. you misunderstand by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most fansubers that I know of are distributed in the US. (That is not to say all, I just don't know of many) The fansubing setup is based around the fact that until the series are liscensed in the US, there is no distributor and no one has a copyright on it (look at Tolkien and Paperback copies of LotR as an example).

    As for Japanese works as not being "official" until they're published in some more important country like the U.S. It's just that there is no copyright in those contries on those works until they are Licensed. Not I say License and Not Publish. Once a series has been Licensed in the US the ethical ones stop translating and releasing the series.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:you misunderstand by Kagami001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's completely false. The United States and Japan are both Berne Convention member countries. Japanese works are protected under international copyright law which the U.S. recognizes.

      On top of that, distributing on the internet = distributing to the whole world (including Japan). Why is U.S. licensing so much more ethically significant than any other country's?

      I could see someone justifying the idea of distributing TV shows that are not for sale in any form anywhere yet (i.e. Japanese DVD release is not out yet) -- in the exact same manner as justifying distributing a new episode of a U.S. TV to the worldwide internet -- which, incidentally, would not apply to OVAs, but I don't see how whether a Japanese show is sold in the U.S. or not determines whether it is OK to make copies of it for all human beings on the planet. It comes off sounding like the U.S. is the arbiter of world copyrights.

    2. Re:you misunderstand by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      It's just that there is no copyright in those contries on those works until they are Licensed. Not I say License and Not Publish.

      Apparently you live in Iran- because that's the only country where the law is still like that (and that also has electricity, I mean)

      Everyplace else scrapped those old laws by 1987. Taiwan was the last holdout, but even it changed over in 2002. Now copyright from one country applies on almost the whole world.

  69. Re:Goddamn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might I suggest you leave immediately and go somewhere you belong, like a Monster Truck Rally Afficionado forum, for instance?

  70. Sorry to rain crap on your parade... by Gruneun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter how much additional style or substance is added to it, anime still qualifies as an animated cartoon. Apparently, CNET is aware that they are speaking to a general audience that is not as refined in their... well, cartoon-watching.

    1. Re:Sorry to rain crap on your parade... by jacklebot · · Score: 1

      Do not use cartoon to describe anime. There is a huge difference between most anime and what we Americans think of when we hear cartoon.

    2. Re:Sorry to rain crap on your parade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I've been an otaku for the last twelve years of my life, I helped found Wisconsin's only Anime Convention (NoBrandCon), and let me tell you... ...they're cartoons.

      It's a particular type of cartoon, but it's a cartoon none the less. Stop being afraid of a word.

    3. Re:Sorry to rain crap on your parade... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      Animation is a technique, not a genre.

      Take it up with Miyazaki, Pixar, Dreamworks SKG, Tim Burton, Aardman Animations (Wallace and Gromit), Tool, Tarantino, and anyone who's ever used CG in a movie.

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    4. Re:Sorry to rain crap on your parade... by izomiac · · Score: 1

      I always considered cartoons a type of animation, not the definition of it. Nobody calls computer generated scenes in live-action movies cartoons.

    5. Re:Sorry to rain crap on your parade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big difference between what otaku think of as anime and what Americans think of as cartoons.

      There is not much difference between what Americans think of as cartoons and what Japanese think of as anime - ever been to Japan?

    6. Re:Sorry to rain crap on your parade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, (Anime) directly translates as "cartoons" Either that, or my 4 years in japan have been all for naught... ~Nick

  71. In other words . . . by hawk · · Score: 0

    Flagrant, organized, and large scale willful copyrignt infringement.

    hawk

    1. Re:In other words . . . by Heftklammerdosierer! · · Score: 1

      It's too bad you couldn't pay for much of what they release, even if you wanted to.

    2. Re:In other words . . . by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is also a great deal of parody in the fansub (and fandub) world, which is explicitly not copyright infringement. So be careful not to mix the two.

      Some of the best fansub work I have seen is hysterically funny.

      OTOH, there are a number of anime films/series I have seen which were fansubbed (or fandubbed) accurately, which I never would have understood without them. (Dirty pair, tank police, bubblegum crisis - all loooong before I ever saw the 'official' subs/dubs.)

      What's even more interesting is that a source (of unknown reliability) at a television studio told me that when Sailor Moon was licensed for broadcast in the U.S., the "translator" didn't speak a word of Japanese. Therefore the entire first season was "translated" simply by watching the visuals and trying to come up with a storyline to match.

    3. Re:In other words . . . by pthisis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Flagrant, organized, and large scale willful copyrignt infringement

      Just a historical note...

      In many coutries, if a local translation wasn't made in a reasonable time frame (reasonable varying from country to country) then anyone was allowed to make a translation. As soon as the foreign copyright holder decided to make a local translation, the unauthorized translator had to stop making new copies of their translated version.

      The Berne convention banned this exception in Article 8:
      "Authors of literary and artistic works protected by this Convention shall enjoy the exclusive right of making and of authorizing the translation of their works throughout the term of protection of their rights in the original works."

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    4. Re:In other words . . . by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Flagrant, organized, and large scale willful copyrignt infringement.

      Free offshore (from Japan to 'gai'-land) marketing and product modification, coupled with a total and complete lack of business ability to profit from these free services given to them.

    5. Re:In other words . . . by arose · · Score: 1

      Much better organized than official chanels at that. Or in my case there are almost no official channels for anime at all. I have only seen Spirited Away on DVD and that had Russian and Estonian subtitles only, Latvian in a two channel "speakover" version. I refuse to pay for such crap, the low print quality on the label was quite suspicious too... The only things on Latvian TV I know of are Bayblade and Yu-Gi-Oh (both crappy anime just to sell toys if you didn't know) and they are localized in the same "speakover" manner -- bad dubs are much more preferable than that...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    6. Re:In other words . . . by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Yep. It has always been copyright infringement. Of course the fact that it was benefiting the Japanese companies greatly was not overlooked (at least until recently).

      The problem now is that fansubs have moved off of the VHS-tapes-copied-and-mailed model to the distribute-it-on-the-internet model. This means that even people in Japan can download the shows off of the net and watch them without commercials. What's worse, is that Japan used to have a thriving OAV industry (direct to video releases), but now all OAVs show up on the internet very quickly and people aren't buying them anymore. Well, they're also really expensive and the Japanese economy is not doing so hot in general, but we assume that the outrageous prices have nothing to do with it for some reason.

      Basically, this is one of those cases where the whole concept of Copywrite was actually hurting the companies (and they knew it) so they turned a blind eye to the activity in the early days. Later on, when the situation started to get muddled (are they helping more than they are hurting?) we started getting into arguments like this.

      When companies realize that strict enforcement of Copyright is harmful, they often come out way ahead. Just look at what bootlegging has done for the music industry for another example. It's just another case of having to choose between doing the right thing and following the law to the letter.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:In other words . . . by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Informative
      • What's even more interesting is that a source (of unknown reliability) at a television studio told me that when Sailor Moon was licensed for broadcast in the U.S., the "translator" didn't speak a word of Japanese. Therefore the entire first season was "translated" simply by watching the visuals and trying to come up with a storyline to match.
      I'm pretty sure that's not the actual case, as some elements of the story that aren't totally obvious just from visuals managed to make it into the dub. However, Sailor Moon (dubbed by DiC) had the dubious distinction of being considered the worst dubbing butchery of an anime series for many years. For the first season alone they took the two parter finale episodes and trimmed them down into one. They cut out all references to the sacrifices of the Sailor Senshi (Scouts in the dub) as well, making it appear no one died. (Everyone died in the original version.) The result was a butchery like you wouldn't believe, a two part finale that was incredibly touching and moving was cheap and hammy. Fans were royally outraged.

      Sailor Moon lost the title for worst butchered dub when WB and Nelvana put out Card Captors (based off of Card Captor Sakura). Character personalities were changed, episode order was rearranged to try to make the male character appear to be the main character (he's not, the original title gives it away, Sakura always was the main character) and the new OP theme, well, it almost makes the ears bleed. It took dub butchery to new lows and was (rightfully) lambasted for the implicit sexism of trying to make the main character no longer be female. The dub did not do well. To be fair, the changes were apparently all demanded by WB. Nelvana gave in to fan pressure and put out an uncut, subtitle-only (no dub) version on DVD as well. It was actually well done, so that appeased most fans and it sold (and still sells) well.

      Incidentally, Sailor Moon never got an uncut release until many years later. DiC had nothing to do with it though, ADV got the rights and put it out. They also got the rights to the 3rd & 4th seasons and had them dubbed as well. They were aired on Cartoon Network. The 5th and final season still has not been licensed and released in the US and likely never will be.

    8. Re:In other words . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is due at least in part to inflated DVD prices. It hurts to spend $25 or $30 for a DVD when you can get the same thing off the internet for free (and often better, since fansubbers are less likely to censor the anime they translate).

      As for Japan's declining DVD sales, I'm surprised it took this long. DVDs are even more expensive in Japan than in the U.S. A single disc I was looking at cost $60! No wonder the Japanese fans are getting their anime off the internet--it's foolish to expect anyone to pay $60 for three episodes out of a 51-episode series. (Fullmetal Alchemist, in this case)

    9. Re:In other words . . . by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Flagrant, organized, and large scale willful copyrignt infringement.

      Yup, and in this case the world is a better place because of it. Funny, that.

      Definitely room for major improvement in current copyright law.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

  72. What are you? a moron? by DeadMilkman · · Score: 1

    If you honestly believe the Subtitled community is the majority of the DVD buyers BOY ARE YOU OUTTA TOUCH WITH FANDOM! Hell our anime CLUB is 90% dub lovers who occasionaly stand subtitles! They have preferred on more than one occaion watching FANDUBS over FANSUBS (this is a group of 50+ at a university.) ADV would be perfectly happy and making bookoo bucks like they always have since the Japanese do not have the actors/expertese available to make a english version themselves. And if you honestly think the Fansubs are more accurate I dare you to name the series released in the last 5 years that is true on. Yes they might not have honorifics, but plenty of the Japanese companys REQUIRE them to be removed in hopes of gaining a TV broadcast. Remember rule #1 in anime: Nobody screws up anime better than the Japanese. Nobody.

  73. I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on the w by CKW · · Score: 0

    > I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on the work of fansubbers,

    WHAT THE FUCK!! Don't you know *anything* about this stuff? The fansub groups explicity do not want that to happen, because that is exactly what causes the companies to need to crack down, idiots like you buying illegal copies.

    Fansub groups and most anime fans will even go so far as to STOP distributing the fansubs when a given show becomes available commercially in their market. They understand how vital it is that the producers of the content get to profit from their work.

  74. Dubbing sucks, anyways by alc6379 · · Score: 1
    My wife's a big fan of anime. By extension, I've picked up a taste for it.

    Has anyone else noticed that the voice acting they use for the American versions of most Anime is HORRIBLE? There's always some guy talking in a throaty voice, one guy that sounds debonair, one guy that sounds like a big oaf, and then there's always some guy that has some kind of british accent. That's not how the Japanese sounds!

    Even when I buy anime on DVD, I still end up watching it in the original Japanese with subtitles, because the English that it ends up being produced in is so horrible. I can stand poor translation, but just don't couple it with poor voice acting.

    --
    I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    1. Re:Dubbing sucks, anyways by Entrope · · Score: 1

      To some extent, the original Japanese seiyuu use silly voices, since anime is mostly targeted at kids and teens. Kansai-ben corresponds pretty well to a US Western dialect and accent. American characters in anime tend to have accents as bad as "flied lice" Asian characters in older US movies. That being said, your essential point is correct: US voice acting dubs tend to be more steretyped and less professional than the Japanese.

  75. Re:No Story [tt] by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 3, Funny
    So you say that somehow the companies are losing profits from fans releasing a series in a country where no legal/official release will ever occur?

    Why of course! They are "losing" money everytime when you merely think about their sacred, divine "intellectual property" "product". If you were a good citizen of the corporate republic, you would have immediately run and "bought" the "product" because by thinking about it, you are "experiencing" in part the "joy" of the "product" and thus "depriving" its "creator" of his justly deserved "revenue".

    P.S. Don't forget to buy individual copies for each time you plan to "experience" it, think of the poor starving "content producers"! Think of the children!

  76. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...most of the people who have heard me talk about it walk off with the "whatever, you are a fucking idiot" attitude

    I wonder why? Do you suppose there might be a reason?

  77. Re:wow by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 0

    figures someone would reply as AC with that shit.

  78. Fansubbing DISNEY to SWAHILI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!

    I'm going to start fansubbing all Disney titles to Swahili, and distribute them on the internet freely to everybody, and tell people to stop distributing my copies once Disney releases a Swahili version of all their work.

    Anybody wanna join my fansub team? Any people skilled in Swahili around?

  79. You just made a fundimental error by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    "...Japanese translator 'sub them and distribute them for money in the Japanese Islands..."

    Your error is clear. Fan subtitlers DO NOT make money off their work. Any money charged, if ever, is done to cover the cost of reproduction, and during the days of video tapes these charges were done not by the subtitler but by the people who did the copies and made them available.

    Combine this with the consistant efforts to purge licensed materials out of the system, and the persecution of fan subtitlers becomes even more absurd. They didn't make any money, while creating a pre-primed market for the title when it is released in the new language, IF EVER.

    And what's all this anglo-centric crap anyway? Am I the only person in the world who has seen fan-subs in French, Spanish and Russian? Oh of course, the companies don't care about fan-subtitles in those other languages, because of the size of the American market. So it is about money grubbing, not about fan-subtitling itself.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    1. Re:You just made a fundimental error by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter much if they made money or not. The person who made the work should control the work. Sure would be nice to have a GPL for video that would cover this.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:You just made a fundimental error by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

      Sure would be nice to have a GPL for video that would cover this.

      Sure. The LGPL, the Free Document License, the Creative Commons, the BSD license, the Public Domain, all exist and are used for non-software materials.

      Unfortunately the media companies are afraid because they don't understand how to utilize the fan-sub system, exactly like they didn't understand how to utilize Napster.

      Here are tools that marketing companies cannot compare to no matter how many billions are spent on "surveys" and "focus groups". Napster and fan-sub teams are demographic gold mines for what types, styles, titles, artists, are popular, where, when and with who. No guessing, and the data is cheap or free.

      That some few people will abuse the system to keep from paying for any title is a given, there are always "free riders" in any situation of actual freedom and liberty of action. Only in a police state is the job of the police easy.

      What enforcement does is suck up huge quantities of resources while at the same time creating an environment of general ill will and disrespect for the rules enforced. Prohibition always does. And prohibition demonstrably costs "society" more than the "problem" did that the prohibition was supposed to solve.

      Bob-

      --
      The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    3. Re:You just made a fundimental error by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Almost forgot to remind you that April 15th is approaching fast. Have you made preparations to file your tax return?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  80. Suggestion by DeadMilkman · · Score: 1

    When she hits 16... Show her Revolutionary Girl Utena... Its the story of a girl who decides she doesn't want to grow up to be a princess...she wants to grow up to be a prince! (she wants to do the saving) Note the story gets dark.

    1. Re:Suggestion by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      It's on my list. I'm just waiting so she doesn't get weird ideas about brother/sister relationships....

    2. Re:Suggestion by The+G+Man · · Score: 1

      In that case, don't show her Angel Sanctuary. Remember, kids, incest bad!

      --

      Quoth the zombie, braaaaaaaains
  81. Re:No Story [tt] by daniil · · Score: 1
    No, i never said that.

    Besides, you're completely missing the point. While making profit is important to every company, it's not really the issue here. These companies aren't doing this about lost profits -- they're doing this because they hold rights over these cartoons and they intend to keep it that way. They want to have control over what is released and when.

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
  82. The reason behind that by DeadMilkman · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone never told you, but the Japanese firms do NOT BREAK EVEN ON TV ADS...they BREAK EVEN on the DVD sells.....They HAVE to be priced that high to BREAK EVEN on a production.

    1. Re:The reason behind that by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      Everything in Japan is expensive. DVDs. CDs. Housing. Fruits and vegetables. Their economic system is based on a system of lots of middlemen that all take a cut, sort of like accepted inefficiencies so more people can have jobs at the expense of higher prices.

      I challenge you to find any hard data showing that Japanese television producers need DVD sales to break even. And I also challenge you to do it in properly constructed sentences without the childish insertion of sections all in caps.

  83. Staying in business by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    The ultimate goal of large content providers is to create a world where they take you money each and every time you view their content. NO EXCEPTIONS!

    Well, all big content providers are, without exception, evil. So your thesis works perfectly.

    But seriously, the goal of the large content providers is to make money. Public companies have to do that. They can't do things out of largesse, because they're not legally structured to operate in that fashion. They are structured to make money for shareholders.

    Giving things away for free can be justified as part of a long-term profitmaking strategy (witness Internet Explorer among other examples). But the problem for content developers is that when perfect copies of content can be made, even ONE copy of a song or a movie could become copied again and again until it spreads worldwide. If your company sells content for a living, this is not an abstract question - this is about life or death for your company.

    It is life or death because the content providers haven't yet figured out that while copying technology has been perfected in the digital age, that doesn't mean that they can't make money in other ways. The iTunes Music Store is one example of a way in which content providers are slowly learning that other options can be created.

    Because of the advances in technology that allow perfect copies to be made, it's easy to say that the big content providers are evil scumbags who want to milk us for every penny. I would argue instead that they are a cartel that has grown fat an happy on an antiquated business model. They have to be prodded into realizing that the times have changed, and that their business model needs to change accordingly.

    I agree with you wholeheartedly that the law must provide the balance. Numerous cases surrounding P2P and copyright issues have boiled up in recent years, but while P2P decisions from the courts have been somewhat encouraging of late, the copyright problem is only getting worse.

    Corporations will act in their self-interest, and it is up to the people to ensure that corporations act for society, not the other way around.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Staying in business by hyphz · · Score: 1

      > Giving things away for free can be justified
      > as part of a long-term profitmaking strategy
      > (witness Internet Explorer among other
      > examples). But the problem for content
      > developers is that when perfect copies of
      > content can be made, even ONE copy of a song
      > or a movie could become copied again and again
      > until it spreads worldwide. If your company
      > sells content for a living, this is not an
      > abstract question - this is about life or
      > death for your company.

      Um, no it isn't.

      Let's look at some British comedies as an example. Let's look at Fawlty Towers. It's only 12 episodes long - tiny compared to most Anime series (36 episodes).

      It has been released on VHS once and then DVD [i]three[/i] times, is repeated occasionally on terrestrial channels and is regularly repeated on UKTV Gold.

      How about Only Fools and Horses? That's been out on VHS at least [i]twice[/i] and DVD once more, in spite again of it being regularly repeated every Christmas and on every night on cable channels.

      And, of course, how many VHS and DVD releases of [i]Star Wars[/i] have there been?

      There's only one rational explanation for this: people are indeed happy to pay money for new versions of media they've already seen. And if we accept that, it seems perfectly logical to assert that they're [i]more[/i] likely to do it if they got the first viewing for free (less total spend for same result), not less.

      How is watching a fansub and then deciding to buying a DVD any different to seeing the anime on TV and taping it, and then later buying the studio's DVD, other than the geography/race issue?

  84. Pioneer did it right with Tenchi Muyo by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    When Pioneer produced Tenchi Muyo in both Japanese and English at the same time, they created one of the few "Anime" titles that I actually enjoyed dubbed in English.

    If the Japanese production companies want to make money off of the English language market, I am very happy if they do so. However, until they license their product in English, the only thing my looking at a fan-subtitled work does is produce a greater market for when they finally do release their title, If Ever.

    I'll be looking into who it is making all the noise, and make sure not to buy their products in the future.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  85. What about unlicensed anime by Necronian · · Score: 1

    From what I understand in the artical a fansubbing group was still distributing an anime that was licensed by an American(?) distributor. What about anime not controlled by American companies? Wouldn't unlicensed anime be regulated by laws of the country the controlling company was based (japan)? What are the japanese laws on copyright? Overall I think the /. blurb was misleading and the artical poorly written. Could someone explain what the problem is? We already knew it was illegal to distrubte licensed anime, what about the episode of Naruto that I am going to watch tomorrow?

  86. Flooded market? by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if this has anything to do with the market being a little more "flooded" than usual. In that case it would compare well to the MPAA...


    Fansubbers release subtitled versions of anime online. Fans download. More downloads/activity = more popularity. Anime companies use popularity to determine US sales.

    Now, anime has caught on more in the USA. Anime factories want to release more anime, faster, and with less regard to quality. What previously sold well due to predetermined popularity will now sell by volume. But those that don't want to watch crap can download the fansubs and determine that it is, in fact, crap and not worth buying.

    It's like theatre movies and shelved music. The good (or at least, popular) stuff is selling more than ever, but people are better prepared against the crud. Industry wants to sell both, so they fight against the evils of "piracy"

  87. ideal vs. reality by wh173b0y · · Score: 1

    The problem is, it's not perfect. I can attest to the fact that people do not go out of thier way to snap cd's and dvd's containing fansubbed anime. So the process is messy. And although i have seen anime torrents vanish from the web without a trace, high quality fansubs remain on the web for people to download at their leasiure, and then keep. Also with the quality of todays fansubs, why buy DVDs? In fact i may have 18gb of fansubbed anime sitting in my bag right now...or not.

    However consider the amount of money that they make becuase of the fanbase that the fansubs established. Then compare that to the amount they loose becuase of copies that float around the web. I think that fansubs do them a favor.

  88. Re:I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on th by Kufat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think he meant he bought official commercial releases after having seen the fansubs.

  89. [nt] MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  90. So to sum up your comment... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    "It's not the language. It's expensive, and if you won't pay you should take it for free."

    What you're saying has nothing to do with the language. You might as well say "Why the hell buy the DVD at full price (Jap price)? Wait until it's in the bargain bin (US price), that's cheaper. But pirating it (aka getting the fansub) is cheaper still, so I'm doing that insted".

    If you really can't afford it, get a job. Even McDonalds or mowing your neighbors lawn, if you're younger than that. They set the price, not you. You have no right to dictate what others should charge for their products. Just because working to earn the money to pay for it isn't "easy and fun" is not enough.

    Imagine at pay day you came to your employer and said "I'd like my $5000 please." "Your work last month was only worth $2000 to me." "What? Give me my $5000" "Oh, you won't accept $2000. I'll just take your work for free then." Basicly, that's what you're doing whenever you use that excuse. They've done a job, set a price - then you come along and just take it because it was "too expensive".

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  91. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fansubbers should use some sort of DRM license that would allow them to pull playback rights once officially licensed versions are released.

  92. Ghost in the Shell by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    The only Japanese anime I even care about anymore is Ghost in the Shell. The first season was excellent, and I watched every episode that came out. When it was brought to the US, something happened to their voices. They becames pussies. I've heard of parallels with DragonBall Z and other anime being "pusserized" with voice actors unable to catch the emotion of the characters in their voices.

    Ironically, it upsets me more to have a bad voice actor than the fact the anime is in another language. If they could overcome this obstacle, and the time issue (bringing these episodes over to the US within a month), then I might not use fansubs anymore. Until then, I would hope they'd be honored that someone like me enjoys a series so much he is willing to watch it in another language and still buy it when it finally comes over to the US.

  93. Re:wow by hyphz · · Score: 1

    The critical point you're missing here is that:

    If it wasn't for fansubs, the US anime market would never have existed.

    Because fansubs were what started it. Most of the early Anime companies were actually fansub groups who decided to go legit. And almost every Anime otaku I know has upgraded their fansubs to legitimate versions when the release has come out.

    So, big whoop. Their series won't be heard about until much later, most Anime fans will wait to see the DVDs at a convention or something before shelling out hard cash, some otaku will get hacked off and boycott the commercial releases just because of the suit, and firms who haven't done such things will get all the club and convention airtime TMF are missing out on. It's hard to think how they could have shot themselves in the foot much more comprehensively, other than maybe suing Anime societies for running unauthorised screenings to multiple people.

    I also wonder if 'selective enforcement' claims could start bouncing around given that the same distributors turn a blind eye to the creation of derivative works within Japan, such as doujin manga featuring characters identical to those in released series.

  94. You miss read what he said by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on the work of fansubbers, WHAT THE FUCK!! Don't you know *anything* about this stuff? The fansub groups explicity do not want that to happen, because that is exactly what causes the companies to need to crack down, idiots like you buying illegal copies.

    To me, what he said was that he bought DVDs based on what he saw from the fansubers. As in, watch fansub, go buy official release on DVD. Not, watch fansub, buy DVD that was made using fansub.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  95. A touchy situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ackowledge that there is the possibility of fansubs diminishing the sales of anime here in the States, particularly as the market for anime expands beyond the 'hard core'.

    However:

    I don't fall into the normal demographic for anime fandom by any stretch (being middle aged, married, with children.) Fansubs introduced my wife and I to anime, and are a big part of the reasons we continue to purchase the titles.

    We spend between $500-$1000 a year on anime DVD's now (1 purchase per month is our house hold rule.)

    Would we stop buying now if fansubs disappeared? Probably not at this point, but at $100 a purchase in some cases, it sure helps to be able to watch part of the series.Without fansubs we would probably buy less and stick to the bigger titles that we could find lots of reviews about.

  96. fansubbing has long outlived it's usefullness by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

    fan subbing is pointless now, most groups fan sub the most popular shows, which are often licensed internationally before they air (or was funded by an American anime company) and are released in english a year or 2 after they air in Japan. This is why most of the good fan subbers have gotten out of it (and moved on to legit jobs in the industry) and we are left with a pack of kids that barely know Japanese (and English) making up translations (for example translating 'Mafia kidnapped young kids' as 'Mass Naked Child Events')

    Considering the amount of places available to try anime for cheep or free (netflix, more and more going on TV etc) fansubbers should go the way of the dino.

    Besides its just cartoons, you can pretty much follow it knowing zilch Japanese. I know about 5 words in Japanese and don't have a problem following raw (aka untranslated) anime.

    1. Re:fansubbing has long outlived it's usefullness by hyphz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > fan subbing is pointless now, most groups fan
      > sub the most popular shows, which are often
      > licensed internationally before they air (or
      > was funded by an American anime company)

      Bear in mind, though, that many of these shows only get popular after being fansubbed.

      Also, popular shows may not be licensed because of other issues. For example, Naruto. Madly popular, and if it was any other show it'd have been licensed already.. but who seriously is going to want to license a show with 100+ episodes where a single plot point can take up 10 of them? It's based on the soap opera model and who the heck wants to put them on DVD?

      Given that the standard US DVD is 4 episodes, nobody'd pay for one of them. (And if you say "they would if it wasn't for fansubs", no they wouldn't: at best they'd buy one, feel ripped off after watching Naruto standing on a bridge talking to Zabuza for an entire DVD, and never buy another one.)

    2. Re:fansubbing has long outlived it's usefullness by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      >Bear in mind, though, that many of these shows only get popular after being fansubbed.

      Yeah in the 90 that was true, it's not true anymore. Most shows are licensed (or at least optioned) before they first air... many of the popular shows for fansubbers (like stand alone complex, full metal alchemist etc) are going to be hits without fansubbing.

      As for Naruto that crap isn't worth the time it takes to download, I can understand why no one would want to pay for DVD's :). I'm sure it will find a home on TV and they will release season long box sets.

  97. mutate the meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the one trying to change the way people use the word theft, not the other post.

    Copyright violation is theft. Why? Simply because everyone else says it is. That's how words get definitions in the English language, through usage.

    But what of the "if it's theft, how come the person still has theirs?" canard? Well, that's true they still have theirs, but that's not relevant. You never heard of stuff like "Michael Jordan stole his moves from Dr. J"? If Michael Jordan stole those moves, how come Dr. J still has them? How about "Good artists create, great artists steal"? Did the artists who said this really mean stealing objects? Or stealing ideas?

    No, it isn't a word definition. So more likely you don't like copyright ingringement being called theft or stealing simply because you don't like to be called a thief. Well, too bad, if the shoe fits, wear it.

    Elvis Costello, someone who actually did create works had no problem calling himself a thief:
    'Every pop musician is a thief and a magpie. I have an emotional affinity for certain styles, but none of them belong to me.'

    Maybe it's time for you to get over your hangups instead of trying to change the world to suit them?

    1. Re:mutate the meme? by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >Copyright violation is theft. Why? Simply because everyone else says it is. That's how words get definitions in the English language, through usage.

      In this case we're talking about the "stealing" in their legal sense (remember? they all talk about this being "illegal", look it up). The legal definition of theft is different from copyright infringement. Yet you're trying to confuse this by talking about the colloquial use of a word. Does it mean that something "good" will always have a taste similar to sugar because it can be referred to as something "sweet"?

      >Maybe it's time for you to get over your hangups instead of trying to change the world to suit them?

      Maybe it's time for you to get a fucking clue? Just a suggestion, mister AC.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:mutate the meme? by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Would you take Witholding(sp?) of Payment?

      Also, see metaphor.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    3. Re:mutate the meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a stupid argument.

      By this logic you employer would not be stealing from you if he never paid you.

      Sneaking into a movie theatre would not be stealing.

      Using your credit cards without your consent would not be theft.

      The list goes on. The harsh reality of the matter (other then your obvious mental retardation) is that denying someone something is theft.

    4. Re:mutate the meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >By this logic you employer would not be stealing from you if he never paid you.

      He'd be breaching my contract, which says he's going to pay me every month.

      >Sneaking into a movie theatre would not be stealing.

      Theft of service is rather different than copyright infringement. In one you use the resources of someone else for your benefit, on the other you copy something and distribute it with your own resources.

      >Using your credit cards without your consent would not be theft.

      Look up "Fraud".

      >other then your obvious mental retardation

      Stop talking to yourself.

    5. Re:mutate the meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop talking to yourself.

      Excuse me. You on infringing on my X-Wifes patent. I think you have to get her permission and possibly pay her royalties BEFORE YOU ACT LIKE A COMPLETE FUCKIGN RETARD!!!!!

    6. Re:mutate the meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a compelling argument, it obviously refutes everything I've written so far! Way to go!

    7. Re:mutate the meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks.

      I'm glad you finally came around you fucktard.

    8. Re:mutate the meme? by RoofPig · · Score: 1
      Incidentally, I emailed the US copyright office about this a month or so back.

      >>> 01/17/05 12:17 AM >>>

      A friend and I had a debate recently about copyright infringement vs. stealing. One of us believes that, from a legal standpoint, copyright infringement is not the same thing as stealing, while the other disagrees. Any insight you could offer would be greatly appreciated.

      Question submitted at 00:17 on 1/17/05.
      And their reply...
      Pretty much means the same thing. The use of material by others without permission can be called infringement. One sounds more polite than the other.

      Copyright Office
      Library of Congress
      101 Independence Ave SE
      Washington DC 20559
      (202) 707-3000
      www.copyright.gov
      I don't know if it's their official stance or just this one guy's opinion but it seems worth considering anyways.
    9. Re:mutate the meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you'd like feminists to redefine the word "rape" for you to include morning-after regrets. Then any woman could claim "rape" if she felt like it, even after 100% consensual sex.

      Words mean things, dipshit. Especially legal terms like "theft".

    10. Re:mutate the meme? by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard the expression "They KILLED the other team out there today"? Does that mean that a mass murder occurred on a football field, or is it simply a figure of speech?

      Similarly, "steal" can be used as such a figure of speech. Weren't you ever about to say something, which someone else came up with and said the exact same thing, and said "Man, that guy stole my line!" Is he genuinely guilty of theft, just because your use of that word is a common colloquialism?

      The danger here is that it could be seen that copyright infringement -is- theft. It is not. It's copyright infringement. It might be argued that "piracy" is a proper term for this as well if it is done for profit, but theft, quite simply, is not. Theft means to take a tangible good or sum of money from another person without their permission. It does not mean to make a copy of something.

      Use of a word over and over in a certain way might create a -slang- expression for that word, but it doesn't change the -real- meaning of a word, any more then using the seemingly popular expression "my dog" for a friend will turn them into a four-legged canine. Similarly, calling copyright infringement theft over and over does not make it so. But it can result in inaccurate -perceptions- that it is, and that's why grandparent objects (correctly) to the mischaracterization of fansubbing.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  98. Re:What are you? a moron? by jaymz666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Super Milk Chan

  99. Faulty Assumptions by DeadMilkman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many of you are making faulty assumptions comparing the Japanese and American markets:

    #1 Did you know the Japanese productions do not "Break Even" until DVD sales/rentals...THAT is why they are priced so high. TV does not break even on a show...it helps market it for sales/rental so that it will break even later.

    1a. This means if you fansub, you are contributing AGAINST a production breaking even.
    1b. If you torrent this is even worse as the last tracker I kept stats on over 40% of the traffic was non-US (~30%+ asian)...AKA the very rental/sales market that pays for productions!

    #2 Fansub translations are better than commercial.

    LOL! I've met the translators they get their material from!...At best they are above average AMATUER translators...many write scripts that are so bad they have to go through the projects english speakers to make sense.

    Take this in comparison to professional level translators that run the finish product past the Japanese firm in many cases and have access to the ORIGINAL CREATOR. If there are differences, guess what, alot of the times its on purpose as someone WANTED IT THAT WAY from the Japan firm!

    Example: series: FLCL fansub name: FuriKuri. REAL NAME: FoolyCooly Thanks to the R to L slur in Japanese this was told to SynchPoint by the CREATOR, the CREATOR told the fansubbers on more than one instance (at a con) THEY WERE WRONG. (ex: Name: Alice = Arisu or occasionaly Arise)

    Never forget the #1 rule in Anime:
    NOBODY screws up anime more than the Japanese!

    1. Re:Faulty Assumptions by tensider · · Score: 1

      If the company's business model is structured so that, after broadcast release with commercials, syndication, home-region dvd release and merchandising/video game tie-ins, the company still hasn't made a profit on the show -- then they need to check their business model. If the current model requires charging $30 for 4 episodes per disc by the time it reaches foreign markets, somebody has not charged enough earlier in the chain.

    2. Re:Faulty Assumptions by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      If the company's business model is structured so that ... the company still hasn't made a profit on the show -- then they need to check their business model.

      That's another strawman. Even if a company is still making a profit, it doesn't prove that fansubs aren't reducing their total profits.

      That's equivalent to stealing Bill Gate's car because he can easily afford more.

  100. Fansubers by jdarr5000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I personaly purchased or at least started to purchase nearly every anime title that I enjoyed and felt it is worth it. Being that I felt that the creators deserived my hard earned cash in some format. Theres some titles that are in "licenceing hell" that I want to end up buying the leagl region 2 dvds. To say thanks to the producer of said title.
    If I didn't have fansubbs I would probaly be forced to use the sad excuse for a rental system that exists for some genres. It has gotten better over the years for the rental market. Overall I see the legal problems with fansubs and see the great usefullness of them for the american distribters. Alot of time fansubs are used to gauge how well the fans are liking a title or genre. Also if said title is worth charging tons for the licence. Right now the sleeper genres are for the most part the genres that fansubers avoid for the most part which is the sports anime and the likes. This is pure opionion on my part.

    --
    I am your lord jdarr bow bow down and pled to me and give me your anime and computer parts.
  101. Re:I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they meant that the fansubs encouraged them to buy the DVD's. Not that they bought DVD's full of fansubs.

  102. Re:What are you? a moron? by jaymz666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One Piece.

  103. Ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whoever is modding this as informative is just retarded. It was obviously a joke and poking fun at the quality of many fansub translations.

    1. Re:Ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it was right off. I always download fansubs for the films I purchase from Asia (mostly Hong Kong/China), as they are consistently of much higher quality than the professional subs on the dvds.

    2. Re:Ok. by danila · · Score: 1

      This is natural. If you do it for your own satisfaction, you would not stop working until the result is great.

      Harry Potter books were translated into Russian by some pathetic losers. A large group of fans started a distributed project to make a better translation and distribute it online for free. Of course, the translation was much better. Of course, the Russian publisher and that bitch Rowling were pissed off. Of course, they sent a C&D.

      If you are translating for money, there is little reason to spend too much time to do a great job. If you are translating for free, there is no reason to spend any time at all, unless the result is great.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    3. Re:Ok. by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1


      This is natural. If you do it for your own satisfaction, you would not stop working until the result is great.


      Wrong. Many people actually achieve satisfaction through high speeds. There are genuine zero day fansubbers who record a show at 19:00, subtitle it, and start the upload at 23:15. Multiple groups may race to be the first to release a top show.

    4. Re:Ok. by danila · · Score: 1

      Well, in any case they beat the official translators - either in speed, in quality or in both.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  104. Re:What are you? a moron? by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 1

    FMA, actually, any release by anime1 before their main subber quit 2 months ago.

  105. Hard work by Otik2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The most telling thing to me is that fansubbers sub series because they enjoy them, not because they want to try to earn money off them. It seems like most commercial releases just do elaborate dubs and stick on a few trailers for other series. But as the article mentions, they don't put the effort into it that fansubbers do. There's no painstakingly yet beautifully done karaoke, no pretty and easy-to-read color-changing fonts, no translations for all the onscreen signs or Japanse jokes. And most commercial releases have a fair number of grammatical errors in their subtitles, which personally annoys me. I understand that things like these probably don't both most of their audience, which is why they don't do them, but it would be nice to see a US studio put as much effort into their releases as fansubbers do. If you really love a series, it shows.

    1. Re:Hard work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      no pretty and easy-to-read color-changing fonts
      I think you just defined oxymoron.

      The one and only thing I hate about fansubs is the incessant need to use wild designer fonts that are completely illegible. Oh, and the fact that the translation quality is often extremely poor.

    2. Re:Hard work by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      By "color changing fonts" he meant fonts that if the part they were on top of gets light, the font gets dark, and vice versa so you can always read the font. This is a wonderful feature and makes reading easier. The designer fonts are a different thing and make reading harder, they are rarly used by the "good" anime groups without cause. (Cause being something like translating an extremly obscure Kanji, intentionaly showing that it would be hard for a Japanese person to read and looks antiquated or otherwise odd.)

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  106. Box sales VS. single sales by Ender77 · · Score: 1

    A trend that may be influencing bad sales could be that companies are forcing people to buy individial dvd's instead of letting people buy the *complete* box set. I ONLY buy complete box sets because it is cheaper than paying for each individual DVD.

  107. Don't let those fans get too close... by cliffiecee · · Score: 1

    What bugs me about Media Factory's actions is what also bugs me about the general crackdown on fan sites, fanfiction, etc.- it amounts to a form of thought crime.

    I understand the goal of all entertainment producers is to make content which thousands- millions- of people will enjoy. They want us to fall in love with their shows/books/movies, buy all the merchandise- dolls, shirts, DVD special editions, etc.- to become fans of their product/content.

    But they don't want us to think about what they create. We can't speculate (publicly) about what our favorite character would do in a particular situation. We can't include a picture of our favorite anime babe on a website. In this case, we can't even translate their product to a different language, potentially opening up a new market for them, with no financial gain on the fan's part.

    Maybe, deep down, they fear us; our ability to see implications in their story that they didn't (The Matrix), to mix two pieces of their music together and come up with someting unexpected (Gray Album); to do simple things (like translating) that they can't.

  108. Tongue-in-Cheek Warning by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    I was too lazy to get to the parent post, so I'm replying to yours. I'm sorry.

    Japanese is most certainly not fun and easy.

  109. They should just ask permission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they are really so confident they are doing no wrong, and maybe even doing the copyright holders a service, why don't the fansubbers simply ask the copyright holders for permission? Could it be that they are afraid of getting an answer they don't want to hear?

  110. Open letter from an otaku by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dear Japanese Anime companies:

    I've been watching anime since about 10 years ago. Before the internet era, all we could do was renting some limited anime at very specialized stores. It's very scarse. We would meet and gather money to rent (or even buy) one.

    However, with the internet, we've been able to know the most recent japanese releases. Of shows that would take 3 or even more years to be officially released in the US.

    Please allow me to ask this question: What use is making a perfectly legal show if nobody outside your country is going to see it? Where will you get the reviews, if people won't understand a thing of what's being said? Who will buy your series? But most important, did you plan to earn money thru exportation of the series you're producing?

    Maybe you don't want to accept it, but in a certain sense, you owe us. Both the fans and the fansubbers. We're otakus, too. We respect you and appreciate your wonderful work. But please, don't take away from us this thing that we love so much... if you do, the direct consequence is that we'll have to stop watching anime (not because we don't want it, but because we won't be able to see it at all) and stay with the mainstream imports that are no good.

    Anime is not widely distributed in other countries apart from the US - like in Latin America. You can see there only the most popular shows like Pokèmon, or Yu Gi Oh. These shows are garbage to the true Otakus. We want the good shows, like Evangelion, Saber Marionette, Cowboy Bebop, Detective Academy... most of us wouldn't have even heard of them if it wasn't for the fansubs.

    There is another thing to consider. The "popular" shows that go on open TV usually have more than 100 episodes, and are transmitted daily. But the small shows that have an average of 25 episodes, have very little chance of appearing in open TV. What to say of OVA's? 8, 6, even 3 chapters?

    In Mexico the common idea of Anime is a lot of guys fighting with superpowers. That's their idea because that's what they've seen of Anime. Here there are many people with very limited resources. We barely have money for cable TV, much less for satellite TV where the specialized anime channels are.

    Please. Don't kill the worldwide Anime community.

    Sincerely,
    your fans.

    1. Re:Open letter from an otaku by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      Latin America has lots of good shows air on TV and was showing them before anime was common on TV in America. Why do you think so much anime comes with Spanish dubs (including saber marionette j which I believe was shown in Latin/south America on TV?)

    2. Re:Open letter from an otaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you knew what the true definition of the word "otaku" was, you wouldn't call yourself one.

    3. Re:Open letter from an otaku by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      /me points at site label, "News for Nerds."

    4. Re:Open letter from an otaku by saiha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it means "your house", what a strange thing to call yourself ;)

  111. Intl. Copyright law forces ignoring of fansubs by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 0

    I've been a pretty big fan of anime, and the main reason I've always assumed that they ignore fansubs is that international copyright law is a sticky issue. Japanese companies going after American fansubbers could create some problems. It's the same reason the RIAA and MPAA don't go after people who release US movies overseas before their domestic release date. By pulling their fansubs once a domestic release has been announced, fansubbers can somewhat protect themselves once the animation in question has US laws protecting it.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  112. Cowboy Bebop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I know nothing about anime, but as a jazz buff, this title seems really absurd. It conjurs up images of Gene Autry and Roy Rogers trying to run through "Groovin' High", or maybe Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie jamming on "Deep In The Heart of Texas".

    1. Re:Cowboy Bebop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much of the soundtrack is jazz, and much of the shows has undertones of jazz. As jazz is other types of music, so Spike is to other people.

      There's one particular scene where a spaceship is started up at the same time as some jazzy background music, and you can't tell whether the sounds are part of the music or the sound effects for the ship. It's really an interesting show to watch. Everything in it is very deliberate, although you have to see it a few times to get a sense of why something that appears frivolous was done a certain way.

      Really good anime is like a really good novel: either one stands as actual art on its own. The world didn't just stop making Shakepeares, Hemingways, and Poes; they're still at work, doing some really amazing things.

  113. Bootlegs, not fansubs, are hurting the companies. by Belisarivs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Haven't these companies noticed the massive amount of bootlegs/imports coming in from Hong Kong? I can pay $120 - $200 for a series from the legitimate publisher, or $30 for an import/bootleg that is nearly the same quality, but on fewer discs. It's not like sites that sell this stuff are hard to locate either, led alone the amounts you find on eBay.

    I think piracy is cutting into the market a heck of a lot more than fansubs. I'm amazed that so many of the sites continue to operate, seemingly within the US as well.

  114. What about the UK by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm in the UK and a well known Gundam fanboy (my name is based on Gundam and FMA). Bandai have totally given upon Gundam in Europe and now you can get very little but import manga from Amazon and DVDs which wont play on all DVD players (region crap). So I have to fansub the series, but I do go out of my way to buy all the Gundam models and mangas I want, or even don't want in some cases. Bandai and Sunrise earn more money through Gunpla (Gundam models) then they do through DVD sales. So clearly I'm putting my money back into the series through "alternative" ways. Many people work the same way as I do.

    --
    I like muppets.
  115. Distributing subtitles by kRutOn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It appears that the controversy here is over copyright infringement when the "fansubbing group" releases an entire video with their translated subtitles attached to them. While I agree this is copyright infringement, I would also like to point out that, according to the Berne Convention Article 8, translating copyrighted works is the exclusive right of the copyright holder.

    8.0 Authors of literary and artistic works protected by this Convention shall enjoy the exclusive right of making and of authorizing the translation of their works throughout the term of protection of their rights in the original works.

    I would love to hear of any legal precedent that says that this doesn't apply in the case of translating Japanese audio to English text.

    1. Re:Distributing subtitles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to the Berne Convention Article 8, translating copyrighted works is the exclusive right of the copyright holder.

      Out of the entire Berne convention, this is the ONE article that I can't stand. It single-handedly destroys access to works by the blind, the deaf, or just people who don't speak the same language as the author.

      Look at the tens/hundreds of thousands of books published worldwide. How many are released in braille? Unabridged audiobook form? The market simply isn't there for a company to publish large print french texts, so the hundred or so people who need them are shut out.

  116. The fansubbing process by darkgray · · Score: 5, Informative
    I used to be a fansubber, before I went back to the university in order to learn Japanese properly. At the time I wrote a guide for curious people, describing the process our group went through for subtitling an episode.

    URL is http://www.lolikon.org/guide.html

    I'd also like to point out that fansubs are likely to spread the Japanese culture a lot more than any dubbed-and-slashed US versions released. Granted, this may not be an amazing thing for American companies looking for quick profits on a new frontier, but I believe Japan as a nation will benefit in the end.

    1. Re:The fansubbing process by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Thank you for telling us what "fansubbing" is, since the editor and submitter didn't seem to think it important.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  117. the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fansubbers make subtitles for series that are not released in countries outside of Japan. Generally fansubbers stop making new releases for a series when the international rights are sold, and some stop in the negotiation period before rights are officially sold. Ultimately everyone wins.

    The problem is that lately a few fansubbing groups are ignoring this custom and continuing to make their oun releases reguardless of whether or not an 'official' version is being distributed. This is what is ticking off the american subtitling/distributing businesses, and rightfully so.

  118. Difficult fit for U.S.A by vhold · · Score: 1

    Naruto could go down as one of the most ruined, but probably still successful, licenses ever if it comes to the US.

    It has too much potential kid appeal, and is probably way too expensive of a license, to just dub and put on late night adult swim unedited with all the blood, bone injuries, perverted characters, etc.

    1. Re:Difficult fit for U.S.A by Halthar · · Score: 1

      Much as I would like to disagree you are probably right about it getting ruined.

      I really hope that when it does get picked up (I believe it will) some fansub group somewhere will still do it justice with high quality fansubs. I will still, of course, purchase any releases of it here in the US to show my support for the show, but I really don't want to deal with poorly done kid friendly subtitles or dubs for this show.

    2. Re:Difficult fit for U.S.A by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      They'd probably edit out all the gore and show it back to back with Dragon Ball Z. A big TV executive would probably think that the storyline had too much kiddie appeal but all that gore would have to go. Bleh. I hope they don't rape the series like that...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Difficult fit for U.S.A by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Here's a wacky suggestion. Why not instead just send money (preferably converted to yen) to the publishing house along with a typed up order form for all the fan subbings you d/led. If for example the asking price is $150 in the US, pay them around $148-$149 (ie, subtract the cost of the DVDs used to archive the fansubs).

      Of course, I assume they already legally exclusively licensed the content to the US publisher, so the money really isn't buying a legal right to possess the fansubs. But, it's the idea of showing support that's important, right? So, what better support than to cut out the middleman, who's doing a crappy job, and paying the whole sum of money to those who deserve the money most? The best way of doing this, of course, would be if fansub groups were to just license a series themselves and they could choose how to collect the money to pay for said license.

      I'm not sure if this would actually be better, though, since one of the best parts about fansubbing now is the competition between fansub groups, especially if the translation is done horribly by one group. Of course, that could just mean that the Japanese houses could offer the licenses *after* all subbing has been done to the most successful group, for which they could decide how to pay for the license. Then people could directly support the fansubbers *and* the Japanese publishers/animators instead of using questionable US publishers.

      I'm just not sure that enough people would be willing to actually pay for fansubs just to get them shipped on DVD (even with extras) to make it work. US publishers seem to be better at distribution, if not quality. You'd think capitalism would have resolved this by now to create a merger of fansubbers with US publishers.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  119. Sigh.. I wish slashdot had a -1, Wrong mod. by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    Under the Berne convention, everything copyrightable is copyrighted by default. You don't have to include a (c) either. The copyright is equally valid in all signing countries, which is ~100 nations, and all of the important ones. This post is copyrighted in the US and Japan. So is yours. It's as simple as that.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Sigh.. I wish slashdot had a -1, Wrong mod. by starman97 · · Score: 1

      Under the Berne convention, everything copyrightable is copyrighted by default. You don't have to include a (c) either. The copyright is equally valid in all signing countries, which is ~100 nations, and all of the important ones. This post is copyrighted in the US and Japan. So is yours. It's as simple as that.

      Kjella

      There.. I just 'stole' your post..

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  120. Legal question by SBGLinux · · Score: 1

    I was always told that anime that was licienced in the US didn't have a US copyright so it was perfectly legal to do fansubs until it was copyrighted in America of at least in a manner that is respected by US copyright law. Now can anyone tell me if this is actualy true?

    1. Re:Legal question by Kagami001 · · Score: 1

      Untrue. The U.S. and numerous other countries, including Japan, are part of an agreement that recognizes each others copyrights from and in all participating countries.

      Can probably find multiple references to it in this thread if you search for "Berne Convention." Googling for that might be good, too. :)

    2. Re:Legal question by SBGLinux · · Score: 1

      thank you, will do

  121. Re:wow by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Actualy, I beg to differ. Of all the series I own, I only bought one before having seen the fan sub of it. Simply put, I don't feel like putting money into something which is often hit or miss as the series goes on before having seen whether it keeps my interest. Especialy at a rate of ~25-30 a DVD. Aside from that one series, every other one I own was bought after I had decided that I enjoyed the series after watching the fan subs.

    So as far as this customer is concerned, the fan subs are the only thing convincing me to buy these products.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  122. Distribution for money still happening by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    There are redundant threads in this article about this particular statement and what it means: "I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on the work of fansubbers, so I hope that this isn't the beginning of the end. "

    My interpretation was that CmdrTaco had purchased the work done by fansubbers. And if that was the case SOMEONE made money. Check out A guide to getting cheap Anime and and then try to explain to me this is not still going on with DVDs. It is not like being out of the days of video tapes is a vast revolution people no longer making copies for profit.

    It may be that you have never read a cease and desist letter written by French, Spanish and Russian lawyers. It does not mean they do not exist. ;-)

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:Distribution for money still happening by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Then you read wrong. It's pretty obvious he means he's bought countless DVDs, from licensed distributors, as fansubs as discussed in the article are not sold for profit, or at all.

  123. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 0

    It would be like a TV episode *IF* these fansubbers weren't sticking them on bittorrent and letting thousands upon thousands of people download them.

    Thousands of people from other countries with LITERALLY NO ACCESS to the series in question.

    At least you should do a little research and stop bashing something you have no F'ing idea what it's about. Tell me. How much money do the japanese companies lose, if a person sees their anime in a country that they wouldn't sell to, anyway?

    I have an anime friend from the Filipines, another from Guatemala. And I live in Mexico. The very scarse Anime DVD's are twice as expensive (in dollars) than DVD's bought in the US. Not to mention the extremely high price the dollar has around. Let's say an anime DVD costs you $60 bucks. Well, here it costs about $120. Take the money parity, and it would be about $360. ONE DVD.

    And that's in the BIG CITIES of Mexico. Outside them, the _ONLY_ way to have access to Anime is thru satellite TV or thru downloaded fansubs.

    I hate the ignorance of americans like you, who keep thinking that your country englobes all the world, and anything beyond your borders is some fuzzy grey area. Hellooooo, the internet is not only about the U.S.!

    I don't know which country is more isolated from the world. Japan, with the language barrier, or the U.S., with the cultural and censorship barrier.

  124. Was this really a surprise to anyone, though? by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At the very core, what the fansubbers are doing amounts to charitable work for a for-profit organization. At some point that company is going to step in and assert their ownership over their works, lest they fall into the public domain.

    Look at the logical cocnclusion of fansubbing:

    - Japanese company creates anime feature
    - Fans subtitle it and redistribute it on the internet
    - A large fanbase for the company's works grows outside of Japan
    - Company responds to consumer demand by releasing officially dubbed versions
    - Company has to shut down the fansubbers because of the direct competition

    Honestly, success for the fansubbers (raising awareness of the feature) means that the company will have to pursue legal action against the fansubbers.

    1. Re:Was this really a surprise to anyone, though? by abbamouse · · Score: 1

      There is no duty to assert copyright. Things don't just "fall into the public domain" in the US. Now, trademarks must be asserted or they lose protection (Xerox, aspirin are examples of the issue) but there is no parallel legal duty to defend your copyright. Anything short of explicit authorization to distribute means distribution is illegal, and creation alone implies copyright since the US ratified the Berne Convention (i.e. you don't even need to say "all rights reserved" any more). The only exceptions for the public are "fair use" and the first-sale doctrine. These companies do not have to enforce their rights now; they could choose to selectively enforce those rights against commercial profiteers if they wished.

      --
      Make cheese not war 8:)
  125. zOMG loli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gb2/l

  126. Is it only for anime? by arhar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So is this 'fansubbing' thing only for Anime? Are there fansubbings of regular movies? Because if there aren't, it would be a great idea. Hmmm... there's a lot of great Russian movies that I would love my American friends to see. *lightbulb*

    1. Re:Is it only for anime? by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

      Yes there is. But very little work is done in that filed. Most movies from asian origin end up translated sooner or later, and often quite soon. An example of a fansubbed movie is Sex is Zero by Miyuki-fansubs. There are, however, alot of fansubs for Japanese, Korean, Chinese and even Thai Dramas. These are series, often of 10~11 episodes (though sometimes +60 ) wich are very very popular. To mention a few titles: Kimi wa Petto Good Luck Summer Snow Beautiful Life These are nothin' like the shows produced in the western world, so they're interesting to watch. Its like comparing Britcom with US-made sitcoms. Very very different. http://www.d-addicts.com/forum/index.php try searching there if you're interested in it. Inevitably, the fansubbing effort will depend on the amount of people interested. You need ALOT of fans, some able fans, and momentum. Its will inevitably have a slow start, but once it picks it'll grow fast as hell. Just look at the anime-fansubbing community, and more recently the dorama-fansubbing community. After 2000 they had an explosive growth...

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
    2. Re:Is it only for anime? by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

      Yes there is. But very little work is done in that filed. Most movies from asian origin end up translated sooner or later, and often quite soon.

      An example of a fansubbed movie is Sex is Zero by Miyuki-fansubs.

      There are, however, alot of fansubs for Japanese, Korean, Chinese and even Thai Dramas. These are series, often of 10~11 episodes (though sometimes +60 ) wich are very very popular. To mention a few titles:

      Kimi wa Petto
      Good Luck
      Summer Snow
      Beautiful Life

      These are nothin' like the shows produced in the western world, so they're interesting to watch. Its like comparing Britcom with US-made sitcoms. Very very different.

      http://www.d-addicts.com/forum/index.php

      try searching there if you're interested in it.

      Inevitably, the fansubbing effort will depend on the amount of people interested. You need ALOT of fans, some able fans, and momentum. Its will inevitably have a slow start, but once it picks it'll grow fast as hell. Just look at the anime-fansubbing community, and more recently the dorama-fansubbing community. After 2000 they had an explosive growth...

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
  127. GARRRR! Re:NOT fansubbing unreleased material by b1scuit · · Score: 1

    Sweet pink jesus batman! It IS something else. It's not piracy, it's copyright infringement. I'm guessing there were no boats involved, no? Guys with peglegs and bad teeth? Ah. Not piracy, copyright infringement. You know, if more judges chuckled and called lawyers silly when they made this mistake, it would be a good sign.

    That is all, no other nitpicks. :)

  128. Possible solution by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Implement the "pay-per-download" scheme on fansubs. In other words, LICENSE the anime (as non-exclusive) to fansubs, asking for a specific donation per download.

    It works for the music industry. Why not anime? The difference would be that, instead of doing business with rich men, they'd be doing business with their fanbase.

    1. Re:Possible solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had enough money to license the anime, they would be a big company...

  129. the legal procedure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There actually is a legal procedure in the US for gaining the legal right to produce and distribute a translation to a work that cannot/will not be translated by the origional author. I am pretty sure that most fansubbers don't go through that procedure.

  130. Subtleties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There are several subtleties to the fansubbing debate. The "legal" one is that, in general, respectable fansubbers only work on series that have no official distributer in the US - that is to say, the only way to get them is to buy DVD's from Japan. There are also a number of "orphaned" series that were aired years (sometimes decades) ago, and the financial incentive of bringing them to the US is small. Therefore, the anime-watching community has no recourse *other* than buying DVD's from Japan...or getting the fansubbed versoins.

    The second aspect is quality. That's right - quality. Having compared fansubs and "officially" subtitled version, I can say with confidence that fansub groups do an amazing job, and, in general, the quality of their work is *much* higher than those of the official translators. And this is not hard to see - fansubbers are doing it for love, so they try very hard to convey the shades of meaning, and even provide cultural explanatory notes to some aspects of the translation. You just don't get that on an official DVD (especially, for those who have read the article, ADV's). The official distributer wants to make money, so slapping the subtitles together makes sense.

    But, you will argue, what about the English dub - they had to put money into that.... That's true. The problem is that your average anime fan would rather stare at goatsex.se for 8 hours than listen to 1/2 hour of English dubs. To put it bluntly, dubs are horrible. They are sometimes less horrible that others, but overall, they are impossible to listen to once you've heard the Japanese. The reason for this is that Japanese anime is voiced by professional voice actors called "seiyuu". They go to schools to train to be voice actors. Many seiyuu become celebrities, and having a good "voice cast" can be an important promotion point for a given series. No equivalent exists in the English voice acting community, or at the very least, the really good peopl are not doing work on anime. Consider - recent Disney shows have used voice talents from famous Hollywood actors - for, literally, the "voice" recognition aspect. This does not mean that those screen actors are qualified to convey emotions and feelings using just their voice.

    Thus, aside from the legality and relative permanence of storage, official anime DVD's don't have much going for them. True fans prefer the Japanese audio anyway, and the fansubbers do a beter job with the translations.

    The problem here is similar to the rest of the copyright debate - greedy people who put out trash, and then use legal action to force people to give them money (ok, ok, no one is holding a gun to your head, but they certainly make it so that the only legal way to have the product you want is to go through their crap)

  131. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
    You moron.

    You DON'T GET IT. You don't have some unwritten RIGHT to see something that the copyright holder didn't intend you to see.

    You want to see it? Get on a plane, go to Japan, buy them.

    You can't afford to go there or buy them? Oh dear me. Heaven forbid.

    Do I cry my eyes out because I can't afford a BMW, but, man, I really really deserve one!

    (Also, I'm not American, so strike out on that one, tiger.)

    "Outside them, the _ONLY_ way to have access to Anime is thru satellite TV..."

    There you go. You have a legal way to access Anime. You just negated any argument you had. You can't afford it? TOO FUCKING BAD.

    "Hellooooo, the internet is not only about the U.S.!"

    Hellooooo, this isn't really about the internet, captain genius.

    "At least you should do a little research and stop bashing something you have no F'ing idea what it's about. Tell me. How much money do the japanese companies lose, if a person sees their anime in a country that they wouldn't sell to, anyway?"

    It's not about the money, brainiac. It's about the OWNER of the content having the right to distribute what THEY OWN in whatever manner they choose.

    I'm really sorry it's hard for you to get your fix of cartoon women getting raped by alien tentacles, but you're not in the right.

  132. It's for this reason... by NewOrleansNed · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... that quite a few fansub groups no longer have a website or an IRC channel. They simply sub the files and distribute them to a few trusted individuals.

    Once they're distributed, they're virtually impossible to eliminate because they're sent over bittorrent, usenet, p2p networks, and online storage services like Streamload. There are still tons of copies of Ranma 1/2 encoded in old Realplayer files floating around.

    I would imagine that in the long run, the companies' crackdown on these groups is going to make the groups change their stances from simply subbing until US licensing to subbing until completion regardless of the licensing. The companies might be right in their defenses of their abilities to distribute their products, but Americans don't have the ability to watch a show to completion and then decide they want to purchase the DVD like the Japanese do (OVAs not withstanding).

  133. They'd have three targets by tepples · · Score: 1

    This would allow the die-hard fans to either purchase a legitimate non-English DVD and apply the subtitles themselves (there is lots of software to do this available)

    If fansubbers started distributing their subtitles in .lrc format or some other text-based subtitle format, then the anti-fansub anime distributors would have three targets to go after:

    1. the sites that distribute .lrc files, claiming that the translation is a derivative work of the original film,
    2. the sites that host the "lots of software" to apply subtitles, citing the CSS encryption on the Japanese releases and 17 USC 1201 and foreign counterparts that prohibit distributing software designed to circumvent such encryption, and
    3. the sites that sell large quantities of Region 2 discs to shipping addresses outside Region 2, beyond the strict limits of the exceptions in 17 USC 602 and foreign counterparts.
  134. fansnubber - huh? by nikkoslack · · Score: 1
    "Son, I don't understand a word you just said."
    Chicken Farmer - Napoleon Dynamite.
  135. Shifted role of fansubs (from a retired subber) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a retired fansubber, from a pre-digital group called Lupin Gang Anime.

    When I was fansubbing (1997-ish to 2001-ish), the purpose of fansubbing was to rescue obscure works of anime that had fallen through the cracks. They were works that, for one reason or another, had never been licensed overseas, and didn't seem likely (at the time) to be licensed. For example, I subtitled half of Zeta Gundam, "safe" at the time because Bandai refused to license any Gundam works to anybody, and my partner subtitled the Lupin III TV series, "safe" because it was very old and very long. Both have, of course, since been licensed - who knew? But the idea, in part, was also to encourage others to actually go out and buy the import LDs so that they could run their own subs at home.

    Then came the digisubbers, and the situation quickly degenerated into "k-rad 0-day anime warez." People grab rips of TV shows and begin subtitling them the day after they were first aired. There's no chance of anyone buying the import DVDs - they haven't been published. Its just a big ego contest to get the latest stuff out quicker than anyone else. This, while litterally HUNDREDS of great works from the past four decades remain in undeserved obscurity. Anyone subbing Ashita no Joe? Fang of the Sun Dougram? No...?

    So of COURSE the studios are getting upset. They are not even being given the CHANCE to sell their products before they are plastered across the internet. At least the old-school fansubbers sold them a few extra LDs...

    1. Re:Shifted role of fansubs (from a retired subber) by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

      I am so very sorry to disapoint you.

      1. Alot of us are not too fond of some of the old stuff out there. Its not from our generation, and was not made for our generation. That said, I'll say that I do like some not-so-recent stuff, as well as some old works as well (Kodomo no Omocha, Kimagure Orange Road, to mention just two).

      2. There ARE groups fansubbing some not-so-popular and old works. Lemme show you some.

      Ashita no Joe by "Anime Suuxe-den"
      3000 Leagues in Search of Mother
      aka Haha wo Tazunete Sanzen Ri by "Live-eviL"
      Magical Angel Creamy Mami by "Live-EviL"
      Magical Fairy Persia by "Live-Evil"
      Yawara by "Live-eviL"
      Rokushin Gattai GodMars by "Anime-Classic"
      Sekushi Commando Gaiden: Sugoiyo! Masaru-san (various groups)
      Ginga: Nagareboshi Gin (aka Fang of the Sun Dougram) by "Anime Suuxe-den"

      And yes... alot of people DO buy the stuff after watching them. I know quite a few people that do buy alot of stuff and curiously enough are major leechers of anime. Unfortunately, in my country very little ever gets licensed, and what is is usually very expensive so they end up importing from the US and some European countries...

      I sincerely doubt some of the older shows out there that have recently been licensed would ever have been licensed if they had not proven their worth by their popularity as fansubs.

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
    2. Re:Shifted role of fansubs (from a retired subber) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone subbing Ashita no Joe?

      Yes.

  136. Example: Ghost in the Shell by ButtNutt · · Score: 0

    A personal example I can site is Ghost in the Shell. I got all of the fansub anime (which is not available here AFAIK) and because of my heightened interest saw the movie Innocence. They would not have gotten my money had I not been "brought up to speed" by the fansub. I have also contributed to their pockets by buying the hardcopy they produced. I think it is another example of not taking advantage of the "new marketing" My 2c

  137. Bad American Dubbing by evilmousse · · Score: 1

    not just a way of doing business *coughcough*ADV*cough*, but also a cult-classic compilation of some of the kind of bullshit dubbing children of the 70s&80s should be nostalgic for, featuring how-they-lied-o-vision, and gems like the flintstones hawking winston cigarettes and a black & white porky pig saying "son of a bitch".

    sadly, this animeCon favorite has yet to be encoded for the net, but several other fims by Corn Pone Flicks are available, most notably "star wars, by george lucas, age 9" made using nearly every starwars toy you ever had.

    I'd say more to degrade american dubbers and praise volunteer fansubbers (especially the copyright-conscious ones), but I think the rest of the comments on this article have it covered nicely.

    as goku said when his best friend from childhood was gutted then detonated before his eyes... "darn!!" @_@

  138. Theft isn't the only crime in existence by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Not stealing" does not imply "not illegal". Running a red light is a crime, but it's not theft. Likewise, infringement of copyright under U.S. federal law is a crime, but it's not theft[1]. I liken copyright infringement more to trespass than to anything else.

    [1] I single out federal law because it governs copyright disputes in the vast majority of cases, but a few states do still have something similar to copyright infringement as part of their theft statutes.

    1. Re:Theft isn't the only crime in existence by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Still not a fair comparison, running red lights can be hazardous to others, which is the sole reason for the law. Standard downloading of various media is not harmful to others, and this law is ONLY in place to allow near full control of media to their respective corporate peddlers.

    2. Re:Theft isn't the only crime in existence by tepples · · Score: 1

      Standard downloading of various media is not harmful to others, and this law is ONLY in place to allow near full control of media to their respective corporate peddlers.

      Likewise, standard walking on various land is not harmful to others, and the law against trespass is ONLY in place to allow near full control of plots of land to their respective corporate land sharks.

    3. Re:Theft isn't the only crime in existence by jakel2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Touche... now let us expand on that. Now a land owner has a large piece of land in a high foot traffic area. The owner is charging people a fee to walk through his land, say the average cost of a DVD, we can even say their is more paths that might be more difficult for lesser costs. For those people walking through without paying a fee, the owner issues them a subpoena for let us say $1,000.00 per time they trespass on the owners property. Now should the owner be able to blindly issue subpoenas at will?

      To be more accurate the "Land Owner" isn't really a owner at all, but more of a renter to rent the land for the sole purpose of charging a fee to the "Walkers", in turn the now termed "Renter" charges the "Walker" and pays the "Actual Owners" a very small percentage of the fees collected.

      Now since it is a high traffic area and the "Renter" does control a large portion of the land what is stopping the "Renter" in abusing the "Walkers" with higher fees and nearly shooting anyone who does otherwise, meanwhile bitching and complaining that the "Walkers" who have decided not to pay are causing lose in revenue.

      To sum it up the laws are providing more power to the already powerful organization, now since absolute power corrupts absolutely what is stopping the organization from abusing their power?

      Meanwhile a guys beats his wife to near death and gets a night in jail and a stern warning. Hmm... doesn't sound right does it?

  139. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    What you say is equivalent to crying that you cannot afford a DVD, so you should have a right to download it for free.

    If the person in question has the internet and a mailing address, they most certainly have access to legit DVDs which are available for purchase online. You do admit that they are prohibitively expensive, and I will give you that. However, you continue on, making your case that a person has a right to watch anything they want to irrespective of if they have the money to pay for it or not. I don't believe you have made a case that this is so. This is equivalent to saying people should have free admission to a movie that is not sold out. The theaters do not lose seat sales, yet would you argue that you have a right to be in there for free? Yes, a right. Because you are essentially arguing this. You didn't take anything from them, unless you want to complain about costing them about .000001 peso for the extra air conditioning expenses because your body was there.

  140. from ANBU, a group that actually cares about this by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 2, Informative

    ANBU is an anime fansubbing group I hold in high regard for the quality of their work. This is what they have to say about the legality of fansubs...

    What are the legalities behind fansubbing?

    This section pertains to information regarding licensed works and their legality. ANBU is a fan subtitling group, not endorsed or affiliated to any company or author. As a result, ANBU is subject to various laws and restrictions imposed by several International and U.S. Codes. Furthermore, ANBU respects the wishes and license of American companies. This is why ANBU has a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to licensed materials. All such materials must cease distribution as soon as the license has been made official and public. Fansubs in themselves are illegal, testing our luck when a work has been licensed in our country is asking for trouble.

    Many emails come to us saying that, "I am not in the United States, so send us the fansubs." This is not possible. As several members of our fansub group reside in the United States, as well as our web server - we are subject to the laws of the country we reside in. Furthermore, as our website is hosted in the United States, it can be seen as facilitating and encouraging such distribution, and we would be held fully responsible.

    If you enjoy our fansubs, and would like to continue to see us produce more, you would not ask us to participate in any endeavor that would endanger any of our staff and cause any litigation to occur as a result of our free service to the community.

    In a more detailed note, we will outline several of the laws regarding this topic for your perusal.

    17 USC Title 17 (U.S. Copyright Code)

    17.1.106 (paraphrased): The owner of a copyright has the exclusive right to do and authorize the following:

    1) Reproduce the work in copies

    2) Prepare derivative works

    "...the fair use of a copyrighted work, (...) for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."

    This means that only the owner/creator has the right to reproduce (copy or distribute) any of their works. It also includes 'derivative' works which means, anything made from the original is also covered under this. Essentially this means that Fansubs, which are a derivative of the original work, cannot be distributed without the exclusive consent of the copyright owner. Derivative works can also include screenshots, movie clips, and music videos using the works.

    Many people try to state that fansubbing is included under 'fair use', however it is very specific as to what constitutes 'fair use' and translations are not.

    Berne Convention Article 2 - Literary and Artistic Works Covered

    2.1 The expression "literary and artistic works" shall include every production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain, whatever may be the mode or form of its expression, such as books, pamphlets and other writings; lectures, addresses, sermons and other works of the same nature; dramatic or dramatico-musical works; choreographic works and entertainments in dumb show; musical compositions with or without words; cinematographic works to which are assimilated works expressed by a process analogous to cinematography; works of drawing, painting, architecture, sculpture, engraving and lithography; photographic works to which are assimilated works expressed by a process analogous to photography; works of applied art; illustrations, maps, plans, sketches and three-dimensional works relative to geography, topography, architecture or science.

    2.6 The works mentioned in this article shall enjoy protection in all countries of the Union. This protection shall operate for the benefit of the author and his successors in title.

    This essentially states that the work of an author in any nation who signed the convention, is protected in every nation under the convention. See below for an ent

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
  141. Fansubbing...Copyright or First amendment right? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    It would seem to me that there is a lot of grey area when translating a copyrighted work into another language. Two people can translate a work and come out with completely different verbage. This fact alone lends to the idea that a translation is an expressive art form on its own as it is part individual interpretation [read: opinion] and as I have observed, complete editorial [read: spoofing]. While an original publisher might have issue with their work being used in this way, I'd have to say that it's pretty common that MOST publishers feel that way whether it's a traditional spoof or editorial work, a good/bad review or ... something like this.

    I think there are some First Amendment rights that should be considered here.

    Publishers are responsible for the quality and consistency of their product and wherever possible, to avoid consumer confusion with regards to something said in a fansub that might be offensive or otherwise stir up problems for that company. In that sense, a publisher acting in this way would be preventing potential problems or even keeping them from repeating themselves as I am certain they have already occurred.

    Copyright holders are always held to the position of "defend it or lose it" regardless of how frivolous the case may be. A classic example is the spoofing the "priceless" credit card commercials which has been over-done a thousand times over. They are simply doing what they are responsible for doing and it's really a shame that the law is applied in this way and I think it would be safe to assume that a great many people on the plaintiff side would rather not prosecute in any way at all realizing the benefit of fansubbing and that it's bad business to sue your fans and customers.

    A solution might be in providing the fans some means of officiating their work... maybe this too is a bad idea but I think it can be agreed by all parties that it's bad to alienate your fans and especially in the relatively small niche of anime fans.

  142. Semi-solution for fansubbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If fansubbing is under fire, you're having the same problem as every other warez scene had before. The semi-solution is to go underground of course;) This is just what every other warez scene did years ago..

    1. Re:Semi-solution for fansubbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is to cease subbing from these companies. Anime is popular today thanks to fansubbers. If these companies want to keep their works in the dark, there's no point helping them advertise.

  143. CowBe Dub... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    The reason why the CowBe dub is so good is because it is written well. The person who wrote the ADR script did their homework, the dialogue has the feel of a good Film Noir from the '40s.

    If it weren't for the boneheaded move of hiring Billy-Bob Thornton to do the voice of the Shinto priest, the dub of "Princess Mononoke" would have been perfect. Again, it's the result of a good writer doing the ADR script. Neil Gaiman in this case. An interesting exercise is to watch the dub version of "Mononoke" while reading Miyazaki's literally translated words. Gaiman spins a good epic tale, Miyazaki's words are like poetry.

    Another dub I have a soft spot in my heart for is the first Streamline dub of "My Neighbor Totoro." Jerry Beck directed the ADR session. Some of the folks who later went on to become part of the voice cast for "Ren & Stimpy," including Cheryl Chase whose greatest fame is for the character Angelica from "Rugrats." I personally can't wait to see the subbed version of "Totoro" for the first time...I'd like to see how close the Streamline dub was to the original. (I suspect not even close.)

    As far as the fansub issues go, I bought the whole legitimate R1 Geneon set of "Haibane Renmei" on the strength of the fansubs. It's a masterpiece, and I could tell it was even through the occasionally awkward sub job. However, the fansubbers did get some things right that Geneon's translators didn't quite convey. "Black Seal," for some reason, sounds better to my ears than "Sin-bound" for the condition that poor Reki and Rakka shared. However, "Passover" and "Year-Passing Festival" have different connotations for someone raised Jewish. This was an example where the fansubbers' choices of translation went horribly wrong.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  144. All your fansubbers are belong to us. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    This is the first I've heard of "fansubbing". I wonder if the translations are accurate.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:All your fansubbers are belong to us. by arose · · Score: 1

      Usually more accurate then the "pro" translation of Zero Wing.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:All your fansubbers are belong to us. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Well, I was thinking, it would be more fun to make up your own dialog.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
  145. Re:cartoon? you are failing to make the real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    distinction....

    cartoons (us style) are animation.
    anime (japanese, korean) is animation.
    cgi-graphics (final fantasy movie) is animation.

    right track, wrong catagory

  146. Re:Distribution for No, I resmoney still happening by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    No, I respectfully disagree. I did not read wrong. It is either deliberately or mistakenly ambiguous. It is not obvious from that sentence that he has bought countless of his DVDs from licensed distributors. Only by giving him the benefit of the doubt can you come to that conclusion.

    CmdrTaco by his own admission is a major Anime fan. He has a "hand" in AnimeFu, to say the least, as you might know. Do you think it would be smart to place bets as to the source every one of the Anime features in his collection?

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  147. That's Good by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Disney sets a completely incorrect expectation about life, which will often be shattered later. Not to mention the fact that exposing her to Japanese is good. It's a beautiful language. I wish my parents had kept up with my exposure to the language after the Air Force rotated us out of Okinawa. Now I'm going to have to learn it from scratch again.

    I'd like to see the studios pay the fansubbers and include their translations on the DVD under a menu option like "English fansub version" or something. It's usually a more literal translation to Japanese and I prefer to watch my anime in Japanese with subtitles anyway (Could you guess ;-)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  148. Get alife by ZioPino · · Score: 1

    That people want to watch that crap is bad enough. You're telling me that in addition to waste their lives on lame Japanese cartoons they also "invest" time in traslating them? No wander our society is in the crapper. After they get the subpoena they should get a hint and get a life.

  149. Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a browser, duh...

  150. Re:Distribution for No, I resmoney still happening by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

    The fact that Fansubs don't cost money is where you missed the point and probably why you took the meaning you did.

  151. FUKUI Kensaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuk U... a perfect name for an attorney.

  152. Stupidity != Evil by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    There's only one rational explanation for this: people are indeed happy to pay money for new versions of media they've already seen. And if we accept that, it seems perfectly logical to assert that they're [i]more[/i] likely to do it if they got the first viewing for free (less total spend for same result), not less.

    I agree with you. One of my points was that content companies *think* they need to protect all of their content with an iron grip simply because they don't understand that their old assumptions are no longer valid. My larger point was that this just makes them stupid, not evil.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  153. Limited Monopoly by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
    The copyright is a artifical, social contract where we give the creator of new art a limited monopoly as a reward for creating the art in the first place. The intent is that this reward will incent this artist or other artists to create more art.

    There is no natural moral wrong in copying. One does not destroy the original art work by copying it and hence does no harm to the holder of the original. We've created a moral wrong by setting up this social contract, where as a society we will give the artist certain rights if they create more art.

    What we've lost sight of is that this social contract is for the benefit of society as a whole, not the artist. If the artist is not willing to distribute the works (by taking advantage of the copyright) then they are breaking their half the of contract.

    Perhaps copyrights need to be modified so that if the art is not distributed any longer, or in a particular region, the copyright holder loses the copyright protection in that region.

    The Disney "it's going in the vault" advertising campaign drives me crazy. We gave you a copyright for a reason, and it wasn't to screw us over with availability.

  154. We'll agree to disagree by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    Once again I respectfully disagree about missing the point. The P2P costs money in terms of bandwidth. There are Fansubbers out there with varying degrees of ethics on the subject. There is a lot of money out there to be made. My opinion is that it is not all free and good. How about if we agree that one could take the high road and sub their own Anime as a hobby to show their friends? But we should also agree that not everyone is taking the high road? Fair enough?

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  155. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you go. You have a legal way to access Anime. You just negated any argument you had. You can't afford it? TOO FUCKING BAD.

    Oh but you can, so it's not YOUR problem, right? Sure, blame the victims.

    Do I cry my eyes out because I can't afford a BMW, but, man, I really really deserve one!

    Anime isn't a BMW. Of course, If you want to compare that with stupid hollywood productions, 99% lead and sex, 1% content, well I'd say Anime is a Cadillac instead. But I'm talking about a work of art, that everybody should have access to it because, NOT of its monetary value, but because art should be enjoyed by everyone. The Mona Lisa is in the Louvre, safe from being stolen, but EVERYONE can see it for a small fee.

    I'm willing to pay fee to the producers of anime - not the millionaire middlemen who, like the RIAA, just squeeze all the money they can get from their customers to get another BMW in their collection.

    I just want the middleman out. If they want to put ads into the anime I want to see, I DON'T CARE.

    And FYI, I'm NOT into hentai. Hey that makes me wonder. How do _YOU_ get access to anime? If you weren't into it you wouldn't know about all that tentacle stuff. You hypocrite.

    Just because I have internet access and an e-mail doesn't make me a millionaire who can afford all the uber-imported-and-over-inflated anime.

    Signed as AC. I won't waste my Karma replying your empty arguments.

  156. What a STUPID, STUPID post. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    Newsflash: you're not PROMOTING it, you're helping other people STEAL it.

    Yeah. God damn those pirates.
    Anything that doesn't cost money and contains others' intellectual property must be THEFT..

    If you want Japanese cartoons before they're released in English, learn Japanese.

    Yeah, I'll get right on that. How do you say "haha yeah right" in Japanese?

    you can do it while you're at work if you have headphones and a cd-rom drive ...and, apparently, nothing to do at work.

    Maybe if folks would stop STEALING things online, movie and music distributors would be a little less wary of wading into the digital pool to test the waters. After all, who's going to buy a new release online for $5 when they can get it a week early for free?

    Oh for God's sake, people, stop trotting out this tired old horse and beating it every time something even remotely resembling copyright infringement shows up on Slashdot.

    This is so wildly different from mp3 and movie piracy that I'm ashamed I'm even replying to this inane post. Your points are stupid. Your insight is weak. You have no idea what you're talking about and you are pissing in the pool of rational discourse with this absurdity. Please reformulate your ideas into something cogent and sensical and I'll try and reply in kind.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  157. doesn't hurt and they know it... by x40sw0n · · Score: 1
    They are just baring their teeth because the MPAA has been talking to them. Seriously, most of the big studios know that they have many freinds in the fansubber market. They know that when they finally do release Naruto in the states it will make a an a$$-ton of money (which I can only assume is why it hasn't been released here yet, they can't get enough money for it yet). I don't know about you but the largest most popular torrent ever has been listed as Naruto, every week like clockwork. Because not one episode has been licensed for use in north america. not one. 119 episodes later. how many anime fans do you know in the us that haven't heard of naruto? not many i would wager. how many will buy it on dvd regardless of the high quality fansubs out there? most. because the point is anime fans are fan(boys/girls) fanboys (girls) will spend inordinate amounts of money on anything to do with anime if it is good. it is an evolutionary thing. good stuff survives (thrives) crap dies.

    -In Absentia

  158. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have some unwritten RIGHT to see something that the copyright holder didn't intend you to see.

    (completely aside from the fansubbing issue) What gives the copyright holder the RIGHT to restrict who they "intend" to see their product? If someone is willing to pay for the product, what right do copyright holders have to use region coding, encryption, or even language itself as a barrier to that transaction? Why are copyright holders allowed to use their monopoly power to discriminate?

  159. Damn Lawyers by Jiggily · · Score: 1

    Lawyer: So what did you do today son?
    Son: I down loaded some Fansubbers material.
    Lawyer: What are Fansubbers?
    Son: [insert explanation here]
    Lawyer: To Arms! We Must Sue these vile pirates!

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for the are subtle and quick to anger.
  160. Fansubbing DOES NOT EQUAL anime! by shidoshi · · Score: 1

    Anime may be one of the more popular genres of product that is fansubbed, but fansubbing is NOT strictly an anime thing. Fansubbing is also done to a host of other products, many of which would never, ever reach other countries.

    For example, most of the fansubbed video that I watch are Japanese TV dramas. Stuff like Muko Dono, Gokusen, Koukou Kyoushi, etc. This kind of stuff - at least at this point - is never going to make it to an English-speaking market. The few times that it does - for example, the first (and maybe second) series of Trick was released in a few cities in California - it never then hits video or DVD.

    In the case of Japanese drama, yes, it still isn't 100% legal, but as the stuff is not going to come out here anyway, I won't feel immoral for downloading and watching the stuff. If companies were willing to translated the stuff on DVD and release it here, I'd purchase it in a heartbeat. If the Japanese companies were to join the growing trend of Japanese DVDs that have English subs, I'd pay the money for a legit version in a heartbeat.

    However, stuff like Japanese drama, or just regular Japanese TV shows, or TV shows from any country that are never going to make it to us English-language-speakers, I see no harm in the fansub community getting a hold of them and giving them a wider audience.

    If you are using fansubs in place of purchasing equal legit product, or if fansubs are still around once the product hits the market, or if fansubs are done for something that is a sure release in the English market, THEN I think there's a problem.

  161. Well...maybe a matter of degree by danaris · · Score: 1

    Though I certainly agree that the parent was making an outrageous comparison (and generally being a troll), at the most basic level, the AC has a point. Those who fansub--and, to a lesser degree, those who download fansubs--know that the law says that you're not allowed to do that. They disagree with the law--after all, who the heck is it hurting?--so they disregard it. Though the type of law is clearly very different, and far less oppressive, a case can certainly be made that there's some civil disobedience going on here.

    The big difference I see, and the part that gets really contentious, is that in this case it all boils down to money. The big companies want to be able to make more money, we don't think we should have to spend as much money. This makes the issue seem much more petty.

    But if the big companies get their way, and no one challenges them, then we may end up with something far worse than high prices for DVDs.

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  162. Mysterious Cities of Gold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how this is going to affect the Fansubbing of several anime series like the Mysterious Cities of Gold that are no longer available in the US.

    Speaking of MCoG, does anyone know who owns the rights to it, it was owned by a company that was started by Jean Chalopin, D.I.C., but, the company was purchased by Disney a while back.

    If Disney owns the rights, I wonder if they will sue anyone distributing copies.

    If anyone does know, do please reply.

  163. Cybercrime by westlake · · Score: 1
    I fully expect to see copyright infringment criminalized within the next few years...

    Copyright infringement was criminalized quite a few years back. Cybercrime

  164. Ah, but that's where your wrong! Rap isn't music. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Labels went with classifying it as music because it would have been a hard sell as poetry readings.

  165. cuts both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh! I see now. It's perfectly ok for a distribution company to let fansubbers do free market research for them, as well as essentially creating a market for their product, greatly reducing the need for costly advertising. After all, with a several year lag time, and more costly DVD's to reflect the actual price of research done, these companies would *certainly* make more money. Theft is ok for corporations, just not consumers.

    I understand perfectly now, thanks.

  166. Semantics... by HopeOS · · Score: 2, Informative
    The dictionary says you're wrong...
    cartoon Pronunciation Key (kär-tn) n.

    ....1.
    ........1. A drawing depicting a humorous situation, often accompanied by a caption.
    ........2. A drawing representing current public figures or issues symbolically and often satirically: a political cartoon.
    ....2. A preliminary sketch similar in size to the work, such as a fresco, that is to be copied from it.
    ....3. An animated cartoon.
    ....4. A comic strip.
    ....5. A ridiculously oversimplified or stereotypical representation: criticized the actor's portrayal of Jefferson as a historically inaccurate cartoon.

    v. cartooned, cartooning, cartoons
    v. tr.

    ....To draw a humorous or satirical representation of; caricature.

    v. intr.
    ....To make humorous or satirical drawings.
    Notice the predominant theme of humor and satire. Notice also that a cartoon can be animated. This does not mean that all animations are cartoons. If they are not humorous, they are not cartoons, by definition.

    By your mistaken logic, the evening news is a situational comedy because it's on television. Those that agree are either making a statement about the news or do not understand what they are saying. If you have something against Japanese animation, speak your mind. Using the wrong word just makes you sound foolish.

    -Hope
    1. Re:Semantics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, you fucking dork.
      it's a goddamn cartoon.

  167. IOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, why exactly is he wrong?

    You didn't say anything about his points!

  168. My Opinion by dmarx · · Score: 1

    I don't see what's wrong with getting a fansub of anime that's not avaiable in the US. The company is not losing sales, because I would not buy the anime in question if there were no subs, even if the Japanese DVDs were free.

    --
    "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
  169. Your analogy doesn't match your argument. by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

    Anime are animation.
    (Some) cartoons are animation.

    Anime and cartoons are neither mutually exclusive nor equal.

    If your analogy reflected your previous statements correctly it would say:

    Opera is rap.
    Snoop dog is also featured in rap.

    This obviously incorrect, since, even if there are rap operas, not all operas are rap.

    Of course this is all pointless anyway, because we're both arguing by (differing) definition.

    I think the point of the original post is that cartoon implies (at least where I am) animation for children such as Warner Bros. shorts, whereas anime is for a much wider, less specific audience. Calling anime "cartoons" gives the impression that anime is for children.

    I believe this bothers some people for two reasons: 1. They are insecure in their own adulthood and feel that calling anime "cartoon" reflects poorly on them personally. 2. They feel it works to turn away people who might otherwise become interested in anime if not for the perception that anime is also for children. (Which is bad for them because it means a smaller market therefore less frequent, more expensive releases.)

  170. View from an ex-fansubber by ErMaC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I realized I'm joining the discussion a whole 3 hours late which means no one will probably read this comment, but what the hell...

    First, a little history:
    I used to fansub shows starting about five years ago, but my roots in online fansubbing go back even farther, to 1997. I was one of the three groups (although I guess I was really only one person) who pioneered online distribution of fansubs in the first place, back when RealPlayer G2 had just come out and Cable modems and DSL were just first available. I used to take VHS fansub tapes, encode them to RM, and make them available on my website. If you run across old Sailor Moon RM files, or Macross 7, or later on any of the Fumei Anime encodes, that was me.

    Then DivX and broadband changed everything, and the whole online scene exploded. Now, you had people in Japan ripping raws from TV in high quality (beginning with Noir and Vandread, they were the real breakout series for Digital Fansubbing, or digisubbing) and groups translating and reencoding these raws, you no longer had to wait for an old-school tape fansubber to translate it and distro tapes. It was revolutionary.

    But about that time I started to see where things were headed, and I got out of fansubbing more than two years ago because I came to realize that the modern fansubbing scene is nothing more than the next warez scene. Everything turned into speed, speed, speed, and became less about quality and the love of anime and more about online prick-waving contests about which group was cooler and got their releases out faster. I grew out of that crap when I was 16, thanks.

    Today's market no longer needs fansubbing. Fansubbing was important back when shows might never get brought over to the US, or releases might not occur for another 4 years (like ADV and Excel Saga, for instance), but today the domestic anime companies get their product out in reasonable timeframes (it's no 1 week wait time, but that's for obvious reasons), produce good product (if they don't they hear about it forever, ask ADV about Eva Vol 1 sometime), and do a bang-up job of trying to get the whole phenomenon out to new people.

    Anything good that gets aired on Japanese TV will be licensed in the US, period. Everything that's being produced in Japan now is licensed before it airs, so this crap about US companies looking to fansubbers for direction is bunk. All fansubbing is these days is whole-sale piracy on the one hand and another silly adolescent online rat race on the other. When you have "release" groups, distro groups (read torrent sites), and all of these things have three letter abbreviations, you know it's just the new warez scene.

    That's why I got out. The last show I enjoyed subbing was Kokoro Toshokan, because I knew it would never get brought here (indeed, it still hasn't after three years). That was what fansubbing was about. Today's scene is a terrible perversion of the ideals of fansubbers of old.

    --
    "I want to get more into theory, because everything works in theory." -John Cash
    1. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      In general, I agree with everything you say, but I will give you the standard, dare I say, counter-argument:

      Macross 7.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Some shows still never make it and some of those shows are good! I constantly find new shows as fansubs that the US distrobutors haven't mentioned and no one is yet talking about... How many releases have all the US companies put out this year? How many Anime series have come out this year? If you answered that they are equal you are stupider than you look already. We see a handful of the releases japan sees, some good, some bad... But we never see more than that handful of the total without fansubs...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    3. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by archen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      modern fansubbing scene is nothing more than the next warez scene.

      Yeah, I have to agree there. My girlfriend a few years a go was into Fushigi Yugi and fan subbers were fighting over who was going to do it - when the translation was imminent anyway. Then there was the race to sub the Ah My Goddess movie - seriously, how would that NOT be picked up?

      I think the biggest problem is the anime fan/fansubber has changed. There's tons of obscure pretty cool anime out there that has yet to be translated, but no fansubbers are picking them up. It's like they only go after commercially viable anime. Which is a shame really, because fansubs were always special to me - like I was watching something that was too oddball for Americans. Seems to me fan subbers also used to have a more fun attitude when doing their projects too, that shows through in the differences between older and more modern subs as well.

      Anyway I wouldn't say the market no longer needs fansubbing, it needs what fansubbing USED to be, not what it is today.

    4. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In case you havnt noticed, macross 7 STILL ISNT OUT IN THE US.

      You make some good points, but in no case is everything that comes out in japan being lisenced. Generally only the good stuff. :)

      Some people like crappy obscure anime, so fansubs still have a place.

      I dont put much effort into downloading these days, except maybe to sample an episode or two to see if i like the show enough to purchase.

    5. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by edbulldog · · Score: 1

      Sure, US. What about the rest of the world? The fact that is released under a reasonable amount of time in your country doesn't mean it's going to be even released in another. On the other hand... 29 dollars for three episodes? There are people who just can't earn that much money in a month with a regular job. Remember, US salaries > Most of the world salaries.

    6. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by frinkillo · · Score: 1
      Anything good that gets aired on Japanese TV will be licensed in the US, period.
      Hello? US != World. Period.
    7. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I dunno - Nadesico, and Wedding peach are any indication. Both were licensed in the US, but it took over 6 years for Nadesico (and they butchered the graphics) and just under 10 for Wedding Peach - which was a really good release. I've never seen a fansub take that long to make. I remember Orange Road - we were watching that in the 80's. Animeigo only released it on DVD recently - there's more than a 20 year gap there.

      Nadesico was one of the most watched anime series in Japan when it came out - still took them forever to release in the US. I've been in fan subbing as well - in fact I worked on the Wedding Peach fansub. It was pretty short lived, but we did most of the first season - I still have the laser disks. I was actually suprised it was even released in the US - way to wierd. But I bought all the dvd's anyhow :).

    8. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      ---Then there was the race to sub the Ah My Goddess movie - seriously, how would that NOT be picked up?

      I actually was friends with the original encoder (not IRC 'friends', mind you). I pre-viewed in the most crappy quality, the 0-day 399.97 MB divx ;-) file. Yes, I "pirated".

      When it came out over here, I had it pre-bought. I got it the 1'st day here in America.

      I watched it in Japanese surround, Eng-subs.. And then applied the subs from the theater capture and had what I thought, in general, better subbing quality.

      They got their 30$, I saw it 3 times. When it came out in theaters in Japan, when it came to a theater here where I live (Saw with my girlfriend, she loved it too), and I bought it.

      --
    9. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by monopole · · Score: 1

      Three words: G-On Riders
      Hell will freeze over before a dub occurs of that one.

      Also there is the Atricities of dubbing, compare Kiki's Delivery service with the dub script or worse yet the Fox dub of Totoro

    10. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by ErMaC · · Score: 1

      Macross 7 aired years and years ago. My point was anything airing NOW that's good is already licensed. Older shows getting licensed is much more uncertain, and I have no problem with people going back and subbing Princess Army or Captain Harlock, and such.

      --
      "I want to get more into theory, because everything works in theory." -John Cash
    11. Re:View from an ex-fansubber by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Oh, definately. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: As long as the studios don't get greedy, DVD is an almost ridiculous bargain.

      Just the other day, I paid $173 CDN, after taxes, for the Love Hina Perfect Collection. The entire series, the two movies, and the OVA. I worked it out whilst waiting for me wife and kids in a bookstore, and it wound up being 17 cents per minute worth of material.

      That's pretty damn good, as far as I'm concerned. If my wife and I go see a movie, $12.50 per ticket, 90 minute movie, we're talking 27 cents/minute.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  171. Anime digestion ruins Anime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's important to note fansubbers don't digest Anime for little kids to consume. The dubs are lame enough, but cutting scenes and rewriting plots are unacceptable, and it ruins the Anime.

    Not all Anime are cartoons for kids, but that doesn't stop some licensed hacks digesting excellent pieces of work, or dumbing it down to kiddies.

    Just more reasons why fansubs are superior to licensed hacks.

    1. Re:Anime digestion ruins Anime by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is this chief difference in culture:
      In Japan, making something animated does not automatically mean you were trying to make a kid's show, or if it is adult, that it has to be a comedy like The Simpsons or Family Guy. In the USa, the public kinda does have that assumption.

      The importers chief mistake is in assuming that animation and seriousness can never mix. Of course, the annoying thing is that the importers of this material are themselves responsible for continuing to perpetuate this mistaken assumption on the part of the US audience.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  172. IOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incorrect. See Wikipedia.

  173. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are you aware of the frequent occurrences of the mass naked child events within the country?"

    I wouldn't necessarily say that the amateurs have the pros beat.

  174. Who's biting who's hand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're actually feeding each other and biting each other, as it's a mutual exchange (money for goods) and screwing each other.

  175. Re:Genshiken by starman97 · · Score: 1

    I can see the others,
    but Genshiken?
    AFAIK there's only the 12 episodes and the subject is hardcore Otaku culture. How many people are going to even understand it outside of japan.

    Non-Otaku that is..
    After all, it didnt even make it for a full season there. It has it's moments, but now way is anyone going to pay $7-10 an episode for it, which is what the typical DVD set costs here in the US.

    --
    Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  176. Re:I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on th by CKW · · Score: 1

    OOOooooohhhhh, that makes a heck of a lot more sense :) Thanks for pointing that out, both you and Ironsides.

    Yes, definitely, fansubs are pretty much equivalent to free global advertising.

  177. Re:Genshiken by flatface · · Score: 1
    That's not the issue here. Although it's one of my favourite series, it has a low chance of being licensed in R1. What MFI's issue is (apparently), is that it's freely accessable by the Japanese audience.

    And you think R1 anime DVD prices are bad? R2 (Japanese) anime DVDs normally have 2 episodes per disc.

  178. paying per-copy fee to the inventor of the "wheel" by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    In fact we would not be here if it were the way you seem to think it should work because you will be still paying per-copy fee to the inventor of the "wheel" (he has absolute and never ending rights to his creation, which he passed onto his heirs, no?).

    Obviously you have not priced a set of "Goodyear" tires lately... ;-)

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  179. Actually,... by Gruneun · · Score: 1
    Actually, Webster's defines "animated cartoon" as:
    a motion picture made from a series of drawings simulating motion by means of slight progressive changes in the drawings

    Further, dictionary.com lists "animated cartoon" as:
    A motion picture or television film consisting of a photographed series of drawings, objects, or computer graphics that simulates motion by recording very slight, continuous changes in the images, frame by frame.

    Now, go back and re-read my post. Anime still qualifies. Try again.
  180. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
    The simple answer is that the law gives them that right.

    Is that fair? Maybe. Maybe not. But your only recourse (save that of illegal behaviours) is to petition the lawmakers to change said laws.

  181. Fansubbing explained by acidrain69 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fansubbers typically choose anime that is released in Japan, but has not been liscened for distribution in other countries yet.

    Fansubbing has been around for quite a while, and traditionally it was done using VHS equipment. My experience with the fansubbing community has vastly changed in the last few years due to changing video compression capabilities. VHS fansubbing usually was associated with poor quality, where you would be getting 2nd, 3rd, and even lower generation tapes. The first fansubbed anime I ever got on the internet was in the .VIV frmat (vivo). We will not further speak it's name here. Other formats have come and gone, most everything is done in divx or ogg/xvid format now. Quality is very high. I think this may have something to do with the crackdown.

    The legality was questionable to begin with. You have a huge industry in japan, with a negligable market in the US. They used to overlook it because they do not sell in the US. Things have changed, and now more and more anime is making it's way over here. So now you have a situation where it isn't illegal to copy the anime and sub it for the US, it will be if the anime ever gets liscensed for distro in the US. It becomes more and more of a problem the more mainstream anime gets.

    As always, wikipedia beats me to it. More or less what I have said above.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  182. No fansubs = No free advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing that is not taken into account is the free promotion. For myself I normaly will not buy a movie or series until I've seen it, since most series are not run on us televison the ways to watch new and upcoming Anime is though fansubs. I started watching fansubs in High School, back when you send a VHS tape and self addressed stamped mailer(and no cash) to a fansub redistrobuter and each video on thier list of "stock" had diffrent grades and quality. I atteneded anime conventions mostly to see other fansubs of series I had never heard of. The wackey thing is I buy and have bought things I have and have seen on fansub. The reason for me is it generated an intrest in the product. I replaced my fansubs of Visions of Escaflowne, Neon Genesis Evangelion(bought 2 1/2 times 1 VHS set, 1 DVD set and some of the special edition rereliced volumes), Bakuretsu Hunters, Thouse Who Hunt Elves, Martian Successor Nadesico, and many others with the offical US DVDs. Certinly not because it was cheaper, but I wanted to support the creators and have a better quality version of the series.
    Yes, a few consumers will be satified with the fansub but these are the same type of people that are more than happy with the quality of a taped from broadcast televion verses a DVD of a movie. Often times, in my experances, the fansubs have glitches or are not of the best image quality, while the divx versions are much better than the old tape swap it's still far from DVD quality.
    I have to say, if there were no fansubs I would not buy nearly as much anime as I do. The next big series I'm personaly waiting for it's US relice is Naruto, where my intrest in it formed from a random fansub I downloaded.
    Advertising dollers spent by the creator to get consumers attention $0, consumers intrested in buying an over 110 episode series with movie tie in Priceless.

  183. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/petition/bribe

  184. My thoughts on fansubbing back in August by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

    http://animefreak.ath.cx:9000/index.php/2004/08/16 /fansubbers-today/

    People need to spend more time seeing how it was done in the past. Fansubbers today have NO talent.

  185. Re:It would be like a TV episode *IF*... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    If the person in question has the internet and a mailing address, they most certainly have access to legit DVDs which are available for purchase online. You do admit that they are prohibitively expensive, and I will give you that. However, you continue on, making your case that a person has a right to watch anything they want to irrespective of if they have the money to pay for it or not.
    I'm not a native english speaker, but "prohibitively" does not goes well with "access" for me.
  186. I may as well post the article here... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Ten years ago, it would have never been thought of to see anime plentiful in stores like HMV (a music and video store chain in the Commonwealth), the video department of Best Buy, or to see entire companies acquiring rights to anime on a monthly basis and releasing professional copies every single month. Of course now, it is reality and many of us spend oodles of money buying anime on DVD and enjoying it on a daily basis.

    What has also changed is fansubbing. Years ago, you would have had to go on the Internet to see who was distributing what, mail them a VHS tape, and then wait a few weeks for a copy of whatever series you wanted. It was a slow process and I remember a few times having to do that in order to get copies of certain titles.

    These days, it's as simple as going to a website, finding a torrent, and then download the series. With hard drives becoming larger and cheaper, broadband Internet access being provided to millions of people around the world, and with write-able DVDs providing gigabytes of space on a single disc, it's really easy to download anime today without having to worry about space or time.

    The process has changed too. Today, anime fansubbers have people working in Japan ripping digital television feeds, encoding them for use on computer, have them sent to Japan, and then the fansubbers go to work at it, having it done in a period of a few days.

    Beforehand, most would have had to wait for the laserdisc to come available, and then it would be translated by hand, timed, then the script would be checked before the master copy was made on to a SVHS or VHS tape.

    The huge difference here besides speed is the fact that ten years ago, the fansubbers themselves knew each other by face and lived rather close-by in most cases, whereas today most of the fansubbers live on six different points of the planet instead of six kilometres from each other.

    However, fansubbers today lack class.

    If you paid attention to what I said two paragraphs ago, fansubbers ten years ago would have had to wait for a laserdisc to come available in Japan before being able to do their work. That would have meant having to pay for a copy, which would mean that at the very least the fansubbers were paying for a copy of the series.

    The huge difference here is that fansubbers do not pay for a copy of the anime they subtitle. In fact, unlike their former analogue counterparts, all their work is done in digital means, and there is very little loss to quality of the video when they release their works.

    Ever looked at a fansub VHS copy of your favourite series and then seen it on DVD or a master VHS copy? Do you notice that the quality is VASTLY different? Do you notice that the translation is generally better?

    Compare a fansub copy of Mahoromatic to the same episode on DVD. Notice how the image quality is similar? Notice how the sound is somewhat similar?

    Fansubbers today think they're doing the right thing by promoting a series and of course, at the same time throw their dicks around when they're the first to release a certain series. They plaster their names all over the series during the openings as if they're involved with the anime series itself, when in fact they're not.

    Their idea of having their releases with the best quality what so ever does not make themselves look all that great when you take a sober look at things. The incentive years ago was that you'd get a copy of the series on VHS from a fansub group, then once a copy was licensed, you'd record over your fansub copy and then buy the legitimate product.

    I have met many friends who do not do that. They collect anime on nothing but recordable CDs and DVDs. And it cannot just be my friends, as I know numerous of people out there do not buy the DVDs once they're licensed and still continue to watch the series via their fan subbed copies.

    To make matters worse, fansubbers today are all kids. Just like kids, they squabble over stupid little things and get into a

  187. Whats the big deal? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    They arn't pissed off about the translating they're pissed off about the distribution of the videos? Why not just release the translations (which are much smaller and easier to share anyway) and let people get the video which ever way they want? Also all this crap about linking needs to stop, linking should not be illegal.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  188. Re:Genshiken by starman97 · · Score: 1

    But it's shown on TV in Japan, so it really
    is freely available. Any local otaku who might
    have ever bought this has already taped it or can
    get it from thier otaku friends (they travel in packs, you know..)

    Re: DVD prices, they are the real reason why anime doesnt sell, who's going to pay $120 for a 1/2 season show? Or $500 for something like Full Metal Alchemist that went to 54 eps? Or the $1000+ that LoGH would command?

    The only hope for sales in that price range is to people who have seen the entire fansubbed series and want the high quality DVDs.
    I've never bought any Anime series that I've not seen in it's entirety fansubbed. That includes OVAs as well, although some of them I saw in the theater first. (and wish the DVD was as good, but they dont compare to film)

    --
    Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  189. Fansubbers retain the sponsors' names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's also important to note is fansubbers retain the sponsors' names in their distributions. Although most of these names are Japanese, some are English names.

    Anime-Kraze's fansub of Area88, for example, included the untranslated ads for Area88 t-shirts and DVD offerings; moreover, the Kousetsu Hyaku Monogatari (One Hundred Stories) series had mentions of DVD offerings.

  190. Nothing by Leveler+of+Nations · · Score: 1

    First my Music.
    Then my Movies.
    Now my Anime.

    Is nothing sacred?

    --
    Ughnnnnerrrrahhhhh.
  191. Not a grey area at all by ChrisPee · · Score: 1
    Creating subtitles for an AV stream is, and always was legal. Distributing the original video is illegal, and will remain so.

    There are websites (such as Kloofy's) that distibute subtitle files *only*. These are usually formatted text files read by media player software. These sites leave acquisition of the source video up to you. This is probably the best solution for all parties concerned.

  192. Sounds Like by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    They are making a fuss because of what the U.S. is doing to them over I.P.

    IT would be absurd to release this stuff for free if you have to pay for it from other people.

    I suggest people in other countried get on with our "piracy"... their silly conflict doesn't concern us.

  193. Some history of the situation, plus links by Vrejakti · · Score: 1

    It began with http://www.animesuki.com/Animesuki receiving http://www.animesuki.com/doc.php/legal/mediafactor y.html a legal notice from Media Factory. Animesuki quickly responded by removing the material in question, while the fansub groups proving the material continued producing it. (Animesuki is a tracker, much like http://www.torrentspy.com/) http://www.wannabefansubs.net/ has continued producing episodes of School Rumble (which is owned by Media Factory). Now just recently their site has gone offline. I'm still wondering what happened. Any insights anyone?

  194. Piracy is copyright infringement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracy 3: the unauthorized use of another's production, invention, or conception especially in infringement of a copyright.

    1. Re:Piracy is copyright infringement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The noun coward has one meaning:
      Meaning #1: a person who shows fear or timidity

  195. An idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like they're should be a way to do the subtitles as a media player plugin that could overlay them in sync over the original Japanese DVD. That way the subbers could still do their work without having to distribute the copyrighted works. Has anything like this ever been tried?

  196. Uh huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like that is going to happen.

    Has it occurred to you that a lot of people downloading the fansubs for free don't really use them as previews, and never intend to buy the DVDs?

    Besides, times have change now that fansubs are becoming less necessary. Compared to the past, titles are being licensed quicker, more shows are being picked up, you get more eps with DVDs, and companies have a good idea of what shows are going to be popular. As for the "try it before you buy it," you can rent the stuff at a local anime shop or use an online dvd service, and more of the hot titles are being broadcasted on cable/satellite TV. There are also various sites that provide reviews of series/dvds.

    1. Re:Uh huh... by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      Did you not see that both paragraphs began 'if'?

      As for being able to 'try before you buy' by renting from an anime store or an online DVD service, this might be possible in the US (and then only major cities for the former), but is not in UK (where fansubs still have a major following).

  197. That's modern society for you by jasonditz · · Score: 1

    Anything that someone else could extract a little enjoyment out of will get you sued.

  198. You Chose to Omit: by HopeOS · · Score: 1
    Your logic is faulty. You have cited "animated cartoon" -- a cartoon that has been animated. Since the topic of discussion is Japanese animation, not cartoons, you're barking up the wrong tree. Specifically, you chose to omit the second citation which defeats your argument, namely:
    n : a film made by photographing a series of cartoon drawings to give the illusion of movement when projected in rapid sequence [syn: cartoon]
    If you use the logic you've demonstrated so far, all books are comic books, and anything comprised of a sequence of still images to simulate motion is a cartoon -- like television and movies. Needless to say, I'm not impressed.

    So it stands: there are cartoons. Some cartoons are animated. Logically, it does not follow that all animations are cartoons. When you get to college, consider taking a course in logic as it applies to set theory. It's an easy A.

    -Hope
    1. Re:You Chose to Omit: by Blackwulf · · Score: 1

      I took logic and college, and the dictioanry definitions are not seen as AND, they are seen as OR.

      Look at the term "gay" for instance, it has two definitions at dictionary.com:

      1. Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex.
      2. Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry.

      By your logic, someone who meets definition 1 but not 2 is not gay, same the other way around.

      The good thing is, most people that I know who work in anime fandom fully acknowledge that they are cartoons that come from Japan. In fact, my friend who lives in Japan explained to me that the word anime in fact MEANS CARTOON in Japanese. Disney movies are considered "anime" in Japan. It's good that there's only a small subset of those who proclaim that they're "too old to watch cartoons" but since this cartoon doesn't have funny bits "it's not a cartoon."

    2. Re:You Chose to Omit: by Gruneun · · Score: 1

      Nice try at a lame dig, Hope, but the logic course I took in college was an easy A (that would be the one I took for my Bachelor's, not my Master's).

      Here's the breakdown:

      Anime is an animated series of drawings. That makes it a cartoon. If you truly believe that humor is a required attribute, you should consider the humor the rest of the world finds when you try to pass it off as somehow superior because it has a kid with tiny monsters in his pocket, instead of a coyote chasing a bird.

    3. Re:You Chose to Omit: by HopeOS · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a lame dig -- you have your set theory wrong. You have however established that this is not due to lack of exposure to the theory.

      Anime is an animated series of drawings. correct.

      This makes it a cartoon. incorrect. If this were true, then 3D architectural walk-throughs would also be cartoons, and we know that is incorrect.

      The definition of a cartoon is a humorous or satirical drawing. Comics and political cartoons meet this criteria as well.

      An animated series of drawings does not sufficiently encompass this set. More exactly, there exists a set that is not humorous or satirical and is an animated series of drawings. This is the set of Japanese animation that is not a cartoon.

      As for the comment about Pokemon, it is humor targeted at children. I don't see how this has any relevence to your argument. Pokemon is a cartoon. It's also anime. That does not make all anime cartoons.

      -Hope

  199. I prefer fansubs to official subs by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

    I prefer watching fansubs to official releases.

    Why?

    Because fansubs are usually fairly litteral translations, so i get the original menaning even though the english sentences might be a little awkward.

    Professional subbers on the other hand seem to think "What would an american say in this situation?", which is completely wrong since, in most cases, the charachter is japanese.

    And yes, I am learning japanese but it will take some time before I can decode the longer sentences in real-time.

  200. U.S. Laws by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    A good point, and one often overlooked; the assumption usually made is that US Laws == Universal Laws, and this is a dangerous (and seriously questionable) assumption.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    1. Re:U.S. Laws by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      We're not talking about U.S. laws here. The overriding standard in this case is the Berne Convention, to which both Japan and the United States are signatories (along with 94 other countries). Here, it really is a "Universal Law".

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
  201. Fansubbing is Good. by vkevlar · · Score: 1
    There are too many shows that I like that are not being brought over from Japan, either quickly, or at all.

    Extreme example: Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam. My favorite anime, bar none. Time from release (1985) to US release? Nineteen *years*.

    It's a case of "without anime clubs / fansubbing, I would never have gotten to see what has become my favorite show."
    Anime clubs, and later, fansubbers, allow a broader spectrum of shows to make the leap from Japan to other countries than the for-profit corporations did, and still do.
    That said, please note that I signed up for the preorder of Z Gundam, the first day it was announced, and waited through all the delays in order to buy it.

    This brings up my second point; the US release from commercial companies are often altered, unfavorably.

    In the case of Zeta Gundam, the opening and closing themes have been removed, and replaced with incidental music from the series, and sound effects have been inserted at "appropriate" moments during the title sequences. This is quite a jarring change, and should have been mentioned by the releasing company, at the very least.

    So, anyhow, fansubbing is frequently the only way to get unaltered episodes of shows from Japan.

  202. Works in theory by danaris · · Score: 1

    Your theory of official translations being better than fan translations doesn't really hold true in practice, at least in my experience.

    I know a good deal of Japanese--learned from both college and anime--and I can almost always tell when a sub isn't saying what the speakers are saying. I've seen this far more often in licensed productions than I have in fansubs. Furthermore, the licensed subtitled DVDs I've seen invariably use the blocky, boring, yellow or green "default DVD subtitle font". It looks pretty ugly. On the other hand, some fansubs I've seen are truly masterful. For instance, the new (as in, only 3-4 episodes are yet out in Japan) Aa! Megamisama! series now airing in Japan is being fansubbed by AnimeOne (I think...might have the name wrong), and they are able to put in:

    • Credits for themselves mixed in with the regular credits in exactly the same font and color
    • Karaoke notation in the form of falling feathers that fade gently away when they touch the subs, as well as other words that appear and fade out beautifully for the backup singers
    • Subtitles for on-screen text that is in the same color and style as the on-screen text, and so well positioned and moved about that it looks like it belongs there
    • And more that just shows the amount of care the people put into these
    It's always very clear from the quality of the translation, the culture notes, and the subs that fansubbers are doing this for the love of it, and the "professional" subbers are just doing their job, and trying to save as much money for their company as possible.

    Try watching some of the "amateur" subs before you lambast them next time. You might be surprised.

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    1. Re:Works in theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't agree with the parent on the translation issues, I don't agree with you either on the subtitle level. The reason why DVD subtitles look terrible compared to fansub titles is the difference between the technical standards of SSA/ASS(What fansubbers use) and the DVD subtitle spec. There is no way to create the same sort of effects that fansubbers do on a DVD without hardcoding them. That would mean that the companies that license would have to release two versions. One dub+softsub and another harcoded sub. It really doesn't make so much sense to do it that way.

  203. Fools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Japanese TV executives should be taken out and horsewhipped. Not by the fansubbers who they are insulting, but by their company's shareholders. They are refusing to cash in on a goldmine.

    This is what happens for a fansub: 1) the episode is played on Japanese TV. 2) someone in Japan records that episode, and either transmits it over the internet to a fansub group, or simply makes it available on a bittorrent so anyone in the world can download the raw version. 3) Fansub group translates the dialog, creates the subtitle file, merges raw version and subtitles to create fansub version -- usually within a week or so. 4) Makes fansub version available on bittorrent, or IRC bot, or whatever.

    If you visit the official Japanese websites of these shows before the show is broadcast, you'll see that they have plenty of character art already produced. This prior investment in artwork is critical.

    Given the VAST demand in North America and the rest of the world for English-subtitled anime shows, what the Japanese TV execs and producers should be doing is: 1) create the show as per usual and show it on Japanese TV like they always do. 2) A day or two BEFORE the show is aired, provide the show to the English-and-Japanese-speaking anime nut they hired who will work for peanuts just for the chance to live in Tokyo, and let him translate it. 3) Subtitle the show from the translation. 4) Transmit it over the internet to a facility in North American (and anywhere else there's enough demand). Include a DVD cover that was produced by your art department from the character artwork they've already created! 5) Have the facility all ready to produce DVD-R copies of the episode, with English subtitles and official DVD cover, on demand, for $7 a disc plus shipping. Perhaps put two episodes on a DVD, and sell 'em every other week.

    They only burn a DVD and print off a cover when they sell it.

    Provide a fast, official, fairly cheap, legal alternative to fansubbers, and beat the fansubbers on speed to market, and you can make a hell of a lot of dough. And, as all the "special new release of Lord of the Rings with more comments from the best boy and third director" show, people will still buy the later deluxe version DVDs with fancy artbox for the series they really like.

    No, this won't shut down the fansubbers completely, because there's always someone who won't buy no matter what, but then you're not getting their money anyway. This is a fantastic revenue possibility, and the only reason I'm posting this instead of trying to set it up myself is that I speak no Japanese, have no capital, and I know the Japanese TV execs are just too damn stupid to go for it anyway.

  204. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I wonder how many slashdoters who are at work are going to get busted for clicking that link when someone checks their logs.

  205. The reason for the letters by Dracil · · Score: 1

    A certain fansub group released fansubs of the Akane Maniax OVA just days before the DVD was to be released in Japan, inciting the ire of the company and leading to the letters. Of course, the real problem are not the fansubbers. It's the horde of Japanese P2Pers using programs such as Share and Winny. I mean after all, if fansubbers can't get access to the RAW files (unsubbed episodes), they can't sub it now can they?

  206. anyone read the cease and desist letter? by DMJC-L · · Score: 0

    The letter clearly listed Rahxephon as one of the shows, now Rahxephon has been on dvd in australia for ages now (years) and we get most stuff after america and I think after Europe. They're nailing a pirate group not a legit fansubbing group.

    1. Re:anyone read the cease and desist letter? by Mukashi · · Score: 1

      A quick point of fact. The letter listed Rahxephon, however only the Rahxephon TV series and Movie have been licensed for English Language distribution. None of these were available on AnimeSuki. The Rahxephon OVA however, which was not licensed, was. Following AnimeSuki's compliance with MediaFactory's request, it has now been removed from the AnimeSuki listings.

  207. article says it all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've bought countless DVDs based entirely on the work of fansubbers ...And the infinite amount of money flowing into the anime industry is evidence of this massive purchase. I hear the industry (as a collective unit) has recently bought Japan, and intends to ship it to Mars (the radiation will be necessary to make tentacle demons a reality)

    The problem isn't *you*. The problem is that, collectively, enough fans use fansubs in place of DVDs for 2nd tier shows, that it's killing the small guys in the industry.

    Soon, we'll only have ADV, Funimation, Bandai and Geneon. And 3 of those 4 have formed business alliances with one another.. It's quickly forming the same sort of monopolistic field that /.'ers hate so much. ;p

  208. Fansubbers stopped flying "below the radar" by TheOldCrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When a Japanese animation company notices one or more of their works showing up on tapes or dvds from and unknown source, and the show has all sorts of glitzy animated karaoke titles, font-and-color matched text, still frames of a 'subber group logo, etc. they don't say, "oh, a fansub," they say "what _company_ did this?!" That is when Gonzo / Bandai / Geneon / Bones / Gainax / Aniplex et al start the legal ball rolling because when the result looks commercial, and the authors of the bootleg work are going to be treated as if they were an infringing company. The fact it is an informal group of fans isn't going to lessen their ire: it is about the look of the finished product that concerns them, and whether the authors "have more heart/love" in their effort than an official release is irrelevant. Thus things like the Media Factory C&D.

    Fansubbing was _almost_ dead around 1998 as domestic (USA) releases were ramping up to the point that the time lag between Japanese TV broadcast and US store-shelf purchase of the same show continued to shrink. Then came desktop video encoding, and the "digisub" was (re)born. Better capture hardware, better encoder schemes, better titling software and most of all--cheap, widespread broadband. Now a show is digitized as it is shown on TVT or WOWOW, etc and sent to a subber group in a matter of perhaps an hour. Subber groups, like Las Vegas hotels, vie constantly for one-upmanship thus you get the incredibly lavish animated title fonts, twirly song lyric titles, fade-in/outs etc. the results of which mean a fansub torrent of a given show will exist from 1 to 5 days after the original Japanese broadcast. Unfortunately the translation tends to be rather weak, but if the colloquialisms created by the groups are "hip" enough, people will accept them and think they're spot-on.

    Then came bittorrent, and you have achieved the current position of digisubs. The problem the companies and their licensees now observe is loss of potential sales. Furthermore, when a show is popular enough, fansubber "morality" goes out the window in favor of the screaming masses who "want their anime now dammit!" Take the show Full Metal Alchemist, the most popular show of 2004. It was licensed for US distribution about halfway through the 51-episode run, and while 1 or 2 sub groups ceased subbing it, a dozen more jumped into place to take up the slack. Yes, some of these groups are outside the US, but the point illustrated is popularity vs. morality. It is going to happen again, too, with a show called "Bleach." ONE episode of FMA typically got *30,000* leechers, from ONE TORRENT! It is numbers like these that concern the animation companies and their licensees, and that is why the legal engine is going to start rolling--hard--on folks again.

  209. Still Incorrect. by HopeOS · · Score: 1

    A cartoon is by definition humorous. Ghost in the Shell is not humorous. Grave of the Fireflies is not humorous. Pokemon is intended to be humorous. Pokemon is a cartoon, the other two are not.

    You have confused the term cartoon with animated 2D drawing. This is incorrect. There are animated 2D cartoons. Not all cartoons are animated. Not all animations are cartoons.

    Really, this is very simple.

    -Hope

    1. Re:Still Incorrect. by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Not all animations are cartoons.

      Still, one must understand why Americans get this wrong- because in the USA, 100% of animation is either humourous (South Park), or targeted at children, or usually both.

      In America, there's a separate term for non-humorous adult animation (like Aeon Flux): off the air.

  210. Re:No Story [tt] by PriceIke · · Score: 1

    One of the best posts I've seen on this (constantly and mercilessly rehashed) topic.

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  211. MOD PARENT UP by dhowells · · Score: 1

    Really though. For Christ's sake guys, Troll? Flamebait? The guy's expressing a perfectly legitimate opinion on the legality of the issue which happens to co-incine with the industry attitude towards it. I can't see a problem with that.

    And I don't care if the guy is considered a regular "Troll" or not, the point is valid, it should be "+n Interesting" even if you don't agree with it.

    Grow up.

    --
    use Blunt::Instrument;
  212. A fansubber's point-of-view by tenverras · · Score: 1

    Alright, I don't know why this is suddenly hitting the news now, as we've been under fire from companies many times. I used to - I retired just two days ago due to lack of time - fansub with the group Anime-Kraze. Usually as a part of the quality check team, but I've also done editing and timing from time to time. We've had companies come in to our IRC channel on a few occasions and either ask us to stop or threaten us with a Cease and Desist order. Heck, Bandai came in once and asked that we stop subbing and distrubting various anime series that they had just aquired the license to. Now, unlike some groups we do respect the companies enough to stop at the first request, and this request required us to stop about 3 series, and stop distrubting another 5 or 6. While, yes, what we technically isn't legal, and is a grey area as to whether or not it is illegal, the fact that we do this provides immense interest and advertising for the series that these companies wish to license. And while some people may be content with the versions we create, there are far more poeple who will buy a series based upon their experience with the fansub editions. I, myself, have bought 5 boxsets and about another 30 dvds based on this; for both the series that I helped to fansuba dn the series I've watched by other groups. Truth be told, while the companies don't offically support us, and have the right to request that we stop providing fansubs to something that they hold the copyrights in this region, they unofficially are in favour of our endevours. It allows the general public a fair preview to something that they may not be inclined to watch otherwise, as well as encouraging them to buy it once it is available. I know that over half of the series and anime dvds I have bought I wouldn't have had I not seen a fansub version. I wouldn't be able to justify the price, nor would I likely have exposure to it since not many retailers around my area carry a large stock of anime. I purchase most of my anime online for just this reason. Our coming underfire is nothing new, and will continue to be part of the work we do. This is partially because of some of the worse groups, some of you may have heard of a group called Anime-Junkies, well do anything and everything AND refuse to stop subbing it when the license owner asks. There are a lot of groups out there that take pride in their work, us at Anime-Kraze included. We put a lot of time and effort into our work, and most of the time it comes out just as professional if not better. We screen our versions three or four times before we release it, to make sure that there are no errors present, in either the video or subtitles. Since I started fansubbing I've noticed numerous errors in commercially available anime, errors that we made sure were not present in our works. So, if anyone tells you that all groups are only about speed and not pride in their work, they are mistaken. That's just a stereotype placed upon us by the reputation of the groups notorious for it. Point in case, our "coming underfire" is nothing more than a publicity stunt. It draws attention to the fact that we exist, giving the masses access to some of the best marketing for their product, while at the same time keeping us in line. If you want to look into it a little yourselves, do a search on google for these groups: Anime-Kraze, Anime-Keep, Anime-Empire, Anime-one, Anbu. There are many more out there, but these, I have found, to be some of the best out there. Ps: For those of you who may believe that we would rather you watch our versions over those commercially available, we actually encourage you to buy the shows you like and support the companies that create this wonderful shows. Without your support, companies like Production IG(best known for their Ghost in the Shell series), Gonzo(Kiddy Grade, Last Exile), Bones, Xebec, etc... wouldn't be able to continue providing such works for your enjoyment.

  213. not really... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    There's no fighting in Kiki's Delivery Service. There is drama and tension and the heroine overcomes some obstacles, but there is no fighting.

    In Angelic Layer, the fighting is more like sport fighting than actual fighting. The fighting is between robot dolls controlled by the girls to determine who is a better robot controller. Much of the details in the fights are about how differences in size of opponents influence optimal fighting tactics.

    In Magic Knights Rayearth, the girls are transported to a alternate universe, given magical powers, and asked to rescue a princess or something. So they are doing something somewhat noble. The ending has a strange twist if I recall correctly.

    Fighting isn't a bad thing, by the way. Fighting to defend your life or your family from someone who doesn't believe in pacifism is never wrong. And fighting in entertainment is just for fun, so don't take it so seriously.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  214. the Japanese... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    The Japanese will tend to download the raws (no subtitles) rather than the fansubs that have English subtitles all over the place (often including obscuring the opening theme with karaoke lyrics).

    The Japanese companies also complain about Japanese fans buying Region 1 DVD's because they're cheaper and often have more episodes per disc than the Japanese Region 2 releases of the same show.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  215. Word Origin by HopeOS · · Score: 1

    You are correct in the interpretation of the OR rather than AND; however, this does not further the opposing argument. Any of the following are considered cartoons according to Webster.

    1. a preparatory design, drawing, or painting (as for a fresco)

    This is a simplification of a drawing for planning purposes.

    OR
    2 a : a drawing intended as satire, caricature, or humor b : COMIC STRIP

    Here we see the traditional definition including satire and humor and the additional item of caricature.

    OR
    3 : ANIMATED CARTOON

    This is entirely self-referential. An animated cartoon may be referred to as a cartoon. That's nice, but it does not tell us anything about the nature of cartoons, only that animated cartoons exist, which we know.

    OR
    4 : a ludicrously simplistic, unrealistic, or one-dimensional portrayal or version (the film's villain is an entertaining cartoon).

    Again, we see the satirical angle, particularly with respect to political and dark humor. Humor does not have to be funny.

    So, that leaves zero definitions that imply that all animation is cartoon. As it should be.

    -Hope

  216. No grounds to charge them, probably by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    Something similar to this happened in Canada, namely involving U.S. DirecTV. (Un)fortunately, DTV signals get to canada just as well as the rest of the united states, and furthermore, you can get pirated DTV boxes and cards to decrypt the network and watch it for free. For a long time it was a "grey" area due to one very similar reason: You can't buy directTV here. If you can't buy it, you're not stealing it. As such, there has been rulings about it, and Bell argued that they offer a service similar to DTV and thus this is unfair loss of profits (Bell's potential profits).

    Anyways, to sum it up, the court ruled in favour of the citizens, as you can't buy DTV here so they should offer it before complaining.

    Now, that's Canada's courts, i'm not sure how America's operates, but i have a feeling it's borderline shitty.

  217. Burn in HFIL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone who doesn't get this, I know there's a DBZ episode where some oni have "HELL" written on their t-shirts. When it came to America, they censored that as "HFIL" which makes NO sense at all. I don't remember if they even tried to explain it. I know they did a lot of other things like that, many of them very confusing, but I don't know if they referenced "HFIL" anywhere else. (Ob sidenote: Final Fantasy players should know that that "white" spell you saw so much of was really "holy" but was also censored. They did something like a search & replace to make "holy" into "white" in US releases).

  218. It's about consumer choice... by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    I can't begin to list all the reasons why fansubbers do what they do. All I know is I appreciate the service they provide. Since they are providing content that is interesting to me. The 'official' channels of distribution are failing. They are just bitching because it's now big enough so their accountants are saying they are loosing x millions of dollars over this.

    Bullshit. Adapt or wither away.

    The digital lifestyle is here. Get with the times big name distributors and provide a way for your Internet userbase to get the content legally. That means either changing the laws or providing some sort of Internet mandate of fair use.

    Sure once people have something for free they are ill pressed to start paying for it. Unless it offers something of value to them.

    How about:

    1) Better quality.
    2) Good translations.
    3) Non-overbearing DRM (although I prefer no DRM).

    Once they provide those, Internet anime fans will pay for it. Unlike now, the fansubbers provide everything they want. Beat em at their own game.

    Am I the anly one who sees this solution?

    *sheese*

    -FlynnMP3

  219. Fansubbers are the problem? by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

    But even with this new interest, sales of DVDs--which amount to about 5.7 million copies a year, according to internal industry estimates--are holding steady or dropping. Companies worry that the easy prerelease availability of fansub versions means that the otaku class has already seen their products, and no longer need to buy anything but the must-haves. Of course, it's got to be the fansubbers. It certianly can't be the fact that it's $25 for a DVD that only has three or four episodes of the 26 episode series...

  220. Yes, but not malicious by Little+Brother · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes, it is flagrant, organized large(ish) scale copyright infringement. However, the fansubers are almost completly supportive of the copyright holders. Every fansubber I know, including, sorta, myself (I have never been an official member of any groups, but have sent in corrections to a few) will buy the DVD once they are available. Furthermore, in the case of movies, we tend to see them in the theatre SEVERAL times when they actualy make it to US theatres, sometimes driving for over an hour to get to the nearest theatre that is playing it.

    We have, until now, always beleived that the companies knew this and were SUPPORTIVE of our efforts at getting the american populace intrested in Anime. Often major distributors use the popularity of a fansub to figure out what to take the trouble to make official translations. We are the market and the advertisers. We did more even than Pokemon to get Americans intrested in Anime. We want good translation to be available on the shelves at blockbuster and many of us regularly send email to such chains making such requests. We always thought we were not just tolerated, but even appriciated. (The "leaks" of some scripts furthered this beleif.) We tried our best not to interfere with the ligitimate distribution channels.

    If you see a fansub Anime, it WILL include screens, possibly at the beginning and end, possibly cutting the Anime like commercials on broadcast telivision, imploring all users of the file NOT to distribute after liscensing, often this is followed up with a request for the viewer to BUY the DVD once it is out. Most of us do. I will continue to buy liscensed Anime, and I will continue to download fansubs, but only from companies that HAVN'T sent their cease and disist letters. I won't fansub your stuff if you don't want me to, but I also won't buy it.

    The announcement BTW to many of us felt like being hit in the groin with a 2x4. We were shocked and truly hurt. Perhaps we were delusional about the companies views of us, but we felt betrayed. I hope that this isn't the beginning of the end but hope is a thin, and insubstantual thing. I'm not sure it is enough to hold up the community. I am glad you are here with me Sam, here at the end of all things

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  221. pots/kettles, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the Media Factory episode has shaken the complacency of the fast-growing anime file-swapping community"

    now.. the non-shareholding observer might infer that the fast-growing anime file-swapping community has shaken the complacency of lazy media companies...

    Consumers in the US and EU markets badly want these series in target-language form.
    If a bunch of fanboys in the US and Europe have full (and accurate) subbed versions available before the distributors do, then the company that produced the film has quite clearly missed an opportunity to enter the richest media market in the world with a product that cannot be locally substituted.

    If Media Factory were a publicly-traded entity in the USA, they would be lucky not to be sued by shareholders for dereliction of fiduciary duty after announcing something like this - along the lines of "if 5,000 people have downloaded fansub-x over bittorrent, then why the hell wasn't it on sale in their local DVD store?"

    I don't imagine people in the US realise this, but the extent of piracy on the net has already had a demonstrable beneficial effect for UK consumers; previously, to save money, studios had held back the release of US films in the UK for several months, to allow them to send over English-language prints that had previously done the rounds in the US, thus saving tens of thousands of dollars on extra celluloid prints, while Germany and France got the film in the same week as the USA.

    Now, thanks to studios shitting their pants about kazaa and edonkey, releases in the US and UK are simultaneous.
    So digital piracy is bad for everyone, right?

  222. My 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe most studios in Japan make most of their money off of merchandise sales, not revenue from DVD sales and/or TV rights. So up till now, these studios in Japan have had US companies pay them for licenses and/or have had college kids do a lot of free work on their behalf getting their products into the American viewing public, creating more merchandise selling opportunities. Maybe that's why they have been staying quiet all this time? It's basically a win-win situation for most of these Japanese studios.

  223. So what IS wrong with big business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, fansubbing and the fans who download them are (mostly) different from those who have a hard drive filled with enough music to program a radio station for the better part of a year. It's not just about getting free stuff; it's about getting their hands on a product they love and would buy if there were actually a legal avenue available for them.

    The aforementioned moral code about stopping distribution once a show is licensed is for the most part followed. Unfortunately, as it gets easier to download high quality subs, and more folks come online with broadband, the percentage of 'moral' vs the 'free-for-allers' will tilt more in favor of the new kids on the block (think free). This is unfortunate, and sucks for those of us who are loading up on DVDs in between mammoth downloading jags.

    But what I really want to get at is what the HELL is wrong with big business these days? In the current climate, no business seems to want to have anything to do with taking a risk or exploring the possibilities of a new revenue stream because there's a chance it just might fail.

    Blame it on the government. Blame it on cookie cutter marketing automatons. Blame it on those Ameritraders who demand ROI on every share of stock purchased. Whatever.

    The popularity of fansubbing proves there is a massive untapped market out there. For example, let's look at episodes 112-114 of Naruto (which is admittedly THE poster child of successful fansubbing). These three episodes were downloaded an average of approx 129k times each. If the big business of Anime were to get off their collective ass and figure out a way to successfully charge the very reasonable amount of a buck per episode, they'd have generated over $15 mil of additional revenue over the run of this series. That's probably enough to either pay the throngs of animators who work on the series a serious bonus, or produce several more seasons without worry of losing a dime.

    Granted, this is a utopian scenario; if episodes cost a buck, certainly the number of "paid" downloads would drop. However, the situation is now, absolutely no revenue is being generated from this show in the English-speaking world. With around 120 episodes, the only real hope is to license it to a network and put together a few highlight DVDs, as there's no room on the self for the entire opus. How long will it take to match the $15 mil that could have already been earned?

    Instead, we have the current situation, where fansubbers are in danger of becoming vilified on account of trying to obtain a product they want but absolutely cannot buy legally with any convenience. (If you call Japanese language only R2 DVDs convenient for the masses, you're on a planet that lacks a sufficient supply of oxygen.) Instead, many of us are stuck with the likes of Best Buy whose shelves are stuffed with yet another rerelease director's platinum cut of Evangelion (which I already love and own).

    Folks, while I realize Anno Hideaki still has to cover his bills for ongoing therapy, the fact is that business carping about failing to grow their DVD business is pure BS. Give us a little diversity, not another round of platinum reissues of the same seven classic series.

    Back in the boardroom, I'll bet those same marketing automatons I mentioned earlier are plotting how much cash they can wring out of the High-Def revolution when it finally arrives.

    Of course, most of them will have been downsized or replaced by a new guard of young "talent" by then. I'm sure they'll have some new ideas about packaging....

  224. View from an ex-fansub promoter by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    Every so often somebody ask's if I'm THAT cryptochrome of the "Cryptochrome's Hotline Anime Review" AKA CHAR website from way back when. I am. Yes, it's dead. Read on for why.

    I first got started on anime back when a Japanese friend loaned me unsubtitled videotapes straight from Japan of popular TV shows and OVAs; The original Patlabor, Dirty Pair, and Urusei Yatsura Movie 4 (which I have since seen subtitled, and it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense - thanks, Mamoru Oshii). I was immediately hooked (especially on Dirty Pair). Later I joined the anime club in high school, saw Akira and Tank Police (also untranslated, but at least we had a script), and my fate was sealed.

    I watched rented anime now and again in college, but there were few titles available, multi-volume series were never complete at any local video stores, and buying was far too expensive for my student budget. Plus I had other distractions.

    And then I discovered online fansubs. Suddenly a wealth of anime was at my fingertips, in a variety of formats. There was VivoPlayer, which I think was not so bad for the time except it lacked little things like "fast-forward", "reverse", and any sort of seek. MPEG was good quality but far too large, and so RealVideo took over. A standard episode was about 50MB in size and was likely a bad capture of a videotaped fansub. Hotline (now defunct) servers grouped themselves into ad-hoc communities of file traders. Lacking a steady broadband connection, I started a website with reviews of all the anime I had seen.

    Then somebody hacked together the original DivX, which immediately took over the scene. Fansubbing groups began to organize themselves in IRC channels, and do their own work. The then-new DVDs and recording cards made capturing clean video much easier. File sizes and screen resolution quickly grew with the advent of broadband, higher computing power, and big hard drives, eventually settling on the now-standard 175MB per episode (that's 4 per CD-ROM). There were only two problems. Number one, raws were hard to come by, because somebody in Japan had to send them to America. Somehow that was resolved thanks to clandestine Japanese P2P. The other, and more important one, was that fansub distribution was bottlenecked - there were never enough servers. The IRC channels were your best bet, and products eventually percolated down to DirectConnect sites (Hotline Software had imploded by this time).

    Then somehow I discovered BitTorrent - relatively early, with the free porn to beta test it - and I realized immediately it would change everything. That this was what would allow unfettered anime distribution, and it would be a killer app for BitTorrent itself. I told Bram - he wasn't interested. I told the IRC distro servers, but they were too busy serving to care. I think I even borrowed a tracker and seeded a choice episode or two, but most people were too busy trying to get a download slot on the regular servers to install some beta software they'd never heard of. But a few months later, a couple major channels set up stable torrents for their releases. Weeks later, every major fansubbing group that didn't suck was doing it. The gates were open. Viewership and fansubbing groups increased dramatically. EVERYTHING that came out of Japan was getting fansubbed. I discovered the parallel world of manga scanlation (comics translation) around this time, which I strongly suspect was an offshoot.

    Funny thing is... by this time, I was getting tired of anime. Like Hollywood movies, once you've seen enough of them you realize they are all the same, and most aren't very good. Sturgen's law applies: 90% of anime is crap - but then again, 90% of everything is crap. I always knew that, but I had to burn out on it before I would stop trying to watch everything I could get my hands on, which thank to the exploding Fansub community was a lot. Fortunately, 10% of it is not, which is the only stuff I try to watch these days. But I let my site die, which was ta

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  225. Fansubs are cool. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Nothing wrong with that at all. I wish they'd create more subtitles, in every language, for movies and maybe even their own alternative soundtracks.

    What I can't figure out is why they'd bother encoding the whole show and distributing it. Why not let the viewer buy the regular untranslated DVD and just download the alternative subtitles or soundtracks they want and let the player synchronize everything. It's not that hard.

    I don't see how THAT could be considered illegal. And then people could remix the movie and burn it back to DVD for their own use.

    I know a lot of people that'd be interested in alternative soundtracks of some movies just to remove the foul language and things like that. It's not hard to create a control file that tells the movie to blip out words or even skip frames (that might have nudity or whatever) and I could see some major support behind a group that did those kind of fan editing. Get a big pro-family organization to fund the legal battle to protect these rights.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Fansubs are cool. by Mirror_ID · · Score: 1

      It's late, so this isn't going to be as complete as it could be, but here's a start.

      Anyway...

      Why not let the viewer buy the regular untranslated DVD and just download the alternative subtitles or soundtracks they want and let the player synchronize everything. ...

      I don't see how THAT could be considered illegal.


      Still illegal. The Berne Convention provides for the International Protection of copyright, which includes the right to translation. There have been groups that do actually release DVD Subfiles to, as you said, synchronize with the DVD and be burned back off for later use (WeSuck Fansubs). The problem herein lies with the "immoral" pirate releases commonly referred to as HK DVDs. There frequently are only three indicators of an HK DVD when you see it: Region 0 or 255(Free), Chinese Subtitles, and crappy editing. Providing these files removes quite a large part of the process for these groups. Furthermore, despite what others have posted here, Fansubs are more than capable of having extremely competent editing, superior to a professional domestic release, even (the comparison of Rice-Box Fansubs' "Dust Chute" vs. the domestic releaser, Geneon's "Trash -Shoot-" comes to mind). Again, this gives the illegitimate HKDVD releases superior quality without any added difficulty. While this may be good for the people buying these DVDs, it certainly isn't good for any potential licensor. If people buy the HK DVDs and they have competent translation and editing, why would they go out and purchase a legitimate domestic release? Would they even suspect it wasn't a legitimate release? It's possible the naive might not.

      Moving on...

      I know a lot of people that'd be interested in alternative soundtracks of some movies just to remove the foul language and things like that.

      Fansubbers, at best, have access to the original soundtracks which provide the background music, and maybe to some vocal songs. They do not have access to the raw dialogue audio stream. Elegantly "blipping" words out would be near impossible. Sure, you could just not say the word in the subtitles, as well. But then why not just phrase it in a lighter manner?

      Looking ahead...

      It's not hard to create a control file that tells the movie to blip out words or even skip frames (that might have nudity or whatever)

      Sure, creating a control file isn't that hard. Back before these modern days of MPEG-4 technology with XviD and DivX 5 codecs (tools for video compression and decompression), we used to use "ECFs," Encoding Control Files. While these files were used to control the amount of data given to each frame, the concept here is similar. Instead of running it through at encode time, you'd attach it to the RIFF headers of a .avi file post-encode. Maybe we don't care about the elegance of the censoring, to simplify the example (and also because it's how it would have to be to be dynamic, anyway). The file would layout "naughty frames" (video) and "naughty cells" (audio) Okay, so now we have this control file that says what not to play if not desired. Now, you would run these files through.... Oh, wait, you know what? There's no implementation for this. The closest thing you have to this is DVD spidering per parental guidelines on DVD players, however there's no specification for a normal PC file to do this. Fansubbers would have to come up with an implementation for this device. Hmm, yes. "It's not hard," indeed.

      Plugging along still...

      Get a big pro-family organization to fund the legal battle to protect these rights.

      Such rights, quite simply, do not exist. I agree the DMCA oversteps the boundaries that copyright holders should have, but the fact of the matter is that there is absolutely no legal standing ground here to "protect these rights" for others to edit copyrighted material. While the DMCA has no actual use here directly, in the case of DVD editing, it could. However, more direct is the basic copyright laws. All rights are reserved to the copyright holder until such a time as they choose to license them off.

    2. Re:Fansubs are cool. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      You're right, I guess translations would possibly still be illegal. Unlike releasing fill copies of altered movies though I think it'd have a lot larger chance of either being given the green light from the original distributor or being ruled fair use by a court. Unlike a book, a translation of a movie still requires you to buy the movie to get the benefit of having the movie. I think that'd be a strong argument for the legal defense of translating.

      I don't see how this would be a problem for distributors at all. The original distributor (copyright holder) gets the benefit of their product being able to reach a much wider audience at little or no additional cost. For re-distributors like ADV they get to make the product easier to buy (locally available and region-encoded to the customers region) without having to go through the expense of translating everything themselves.

      Also true, to make a new soundtrack either the original copyright holder would have to willingly participate or the subbers would have to recreate the entire soundtrack. There are ways to subtract voices from the soundtrack though. These don't always work but soemtimes they do. In this case it'd be possible to just replace the voices.

      Making a DVD player that could skip undesirable material or use alternate material wouldn't require any special device. Just rip it and reencode it in the desirable format and it should play on a regular dvd player like any movie that's been edited. As for software for making easy applying those changes I'd imagine it already exists but it'd not be to hard to talk an opensource programmer into developing.

      Rights exist if you fight for them and win them. If you never fight for them then they won't exist because other people will expand their own rights until yours no longer exist. Sure you have legal ground to fight for the right to alter movies you've legally purchases. First, it could be considered fair use. Second, you can always take the case to congress. The DMCA and similar efforts have not yet removed our ability to change the law. What we need is financial backing so that we can get the attention of politicians and raise popular support for our cause.

      In the end though I think the fansub community needs to join with the opensource community and others to work towards fully open content. We can develop the software. We can create new subtitles and sound tracks. Somebody out there must be able to write scripts, create story boards, draw, etc. Put it all together and we can produce our own content from scratch as a community project. We don't have to replace the anime and movie industries - we only have to be successful enough to give them a reason not to alienate their fan base. A peer is a much more reasonable person to barter with than someone that feels they have you over a barrel.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  226. What the hell? by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else with anime specifically disabled in their preferences see that fsck'in green haired wanton on their front page?

    ANIME SUCKS

  227. It's just piracy (Sad but true) by generalleoff · · Score: 1

    While I have to say i'm not at all an Anime nerd but I do know the general diffrence with "fansubers" of today and the ones of just 10 years ago is the great majority of the stuff they release as "fansubed" is comericaly avalible in most languages already. Too many "fansubers" will just rip the DVD appropriate to the language they want to release in and claim it as there own. And that has crosed the line of fansubing and flat out piracy. This is just not the days of trading low quality 3rd generation VHS tapes at conventions. Today the greater majority of Anime is released all over the world. I wont name names but today we have groups releasing stuff like Cowboy Bebop and claiming it as a fan sub when all they did was rip a R1 DVD and keep the R1 subtitles as they are. If thats not piracy then I just dont know what piracy is.

  228. Not the same thing, and it's your fault! by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
    Ok, you lump them together. You blatently violated copyrights on music you could have purchased. You blatently violated copyright on AMERICAN movies. You started the ball rolling. Without people like you, who don't care if the origional producers are EVER recompensated for your downloads, I'm comfident the anime companies would have been happy to let us get our anime the only way we could, since we would almost certentaly buy it once it came out in our country.

    Your lack of forsight and ethics (yes the RIAA and MPAA also lack ethics, that doesn't change a thing) have brought this down on those who had a well known moral code to respect the copyrights when possible. You have turned this from grey market to black market. You fired the first shot. You, because you didn't want to pay for something legaly when you could get it free illegaly, ruined a beutiful thing. Yes, some things are, indeed sacred. Or should be. Things like ethics, law, and responcibility. These are things those like you care nothing for. It was never your music. They were never your movies. It was never your Anime. But you didn't care. Now the best source of Anime is threatened. Online communities are threatened. A wonderful multicultural learning tool is threatened. Because you didn't want to pay for what you took.

    I write this post not only for the poster of the parent, but also perhaps even mainly for, those who echoed his sentiment without even the faint hint of humor he seems to have injected. I write this for those who truly somehow think they are entitled to the fruits of other people's work. You can try to justify it, you can point to pages of atrocities comitted by "the other side" but two wrongs have never made a right. If you think you are going to change laws with your "civil disobedience" think again. You have changed laws. You brought us the DMCA. You will continue giving your opponents a target and continue making any true copyright reform a marginal issue, because it can easily be pointed out that you just want stuff for free. You make me sick.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

    1. Re:Not the same thing, and it's your fault! by Leveler+of+Nations · · Score: 1

      Here's a bucket. Go get some air, take a Tums, and try not to vomit.

      You make good points sir, but you obviosuly don't know me. I understand that many of the people who use these networks just take, take, take and never return. I also look at the other side of the coin, something you seem too stuborn to do. I believe that anything worth having is worth buying, but how do I know something is worth having without already buying it? I can't count how many times I've bought a game only to beat it in only a few hours after purchase. That disappointment in quality doesn't lead to more reasearch like the manufacturers want, it leads to methods of trying before you buy. Before you start talking about demo discs, those have a limited number of games, and usually a lot of movies on them, most of which I've already seen on the net. And so we come to P2P.

      For most of my games and movies, I'll rent them. Online game downloads for consoles are usually unreliable and require expensive chips and can ruin the chance of online play on some systems.

      The only things I would download, is a TV show I miss. Last week, I missed Lost, so I'll try and find that. I could see how downloading Cable programming could be harmful, but I don't watch them.

      Now, to try and justify the theft of music and other such media. From what I always here at award shows, entertainers are entertainers because of the fans. I've never heard one say they did it for the money. They make music and star in movies for the fans, and to be famous. Free distribution of materials doesn't harm this at all. And as for the music/movie industry suffering financially, how do you explain the record sales numbers reported each week when a major portion of all online traffic is Bit Torrent?

      --
      Ughnnnnerrrrahhhhh.
    2. Re:Not the same thing, and it's your fault! by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
      I apoligize, I intended to minimize this with my statement:

      I write this post not only for the poster of the parent, but also perhaps even mainly for, those who echoed his sentiment without even the faint hint of humor he seems to have injected.

      I cannot, based on anything written here, tell what kind of a person you are. I even considered quite a while not making my post. I finaly decided that even if you were not the kind of person that I was lamblasting, someone who read the thread probably was. Thus I went ahead and made the post, but I added the above quoted disclaimer.

      I cannot, in truth, say I am sorry that I posted my post. I can, however, say that had I known the content of your reply beforehand, I would have attached the post elsewhere in the thread. I may well, again, have posted it in a place that made to many assumptions about the poster, I don't know. I hope you can agree that my points needed to be made, and I hope you don't overly mind that I used your post as a stepping stone to make my point.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  229. What you might be forgetting by AnonymousPhysicist · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that from the japanese companies perspective, the subtitles might not even enter into the equation.

    This is somewhat like the copies of the Star Wars movies that showed up all over the internet, with the minor inconvenience of Thai or Korean subtitles. To a Japanese native speaker, the subtitles are an annoying distraction, but you still have a high-quality rip of the show (along with a chance to practice your english).

  230. Sales by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    I don't understand how you can say they'd see "lower sales" when everyone claims fansubbing takes place because there are no sales, hence the need. Now that the company is making the move to sell subtitled media, fansubbers should stop illegally pirated material and *support* what they watch by buying it.
    Which is, theoretically, what happens. Once a piece is licensed in the US, the anime-fansubbers stop distributing it. Many pieces also have a disclaimer at the beginning to this effect. *wry grin* Whether it actually happens or not is debatable. Also, whether the people who'd downloaded it buy the official edition when it comes out is debatable too, although there's really no evidence either way, just claims by either side.

    One of the problems I've heard of with digital fansubbing versus the old VHS-way is the same problem shown by software. Electronic copies are perfect (or at least close enough to perfect for me), which means that when a piece is fansubbed, the 50th person in line to get it still has a fairly pristine copy. In comparison, VHS tapes generally came with a "generation" number which told you how many times it had been copied from a copy. By definition, fansubs were second-generation at least, as the tape had to be copied to get the subtitles in. By the 3rd generation, the image quality was muddy. 5th generation was practically unwatchable. Because fansubs were generally lower-quality by this copy-of-a-copy, there was a strong reason to buy official versions when they came out. Now, the only real reason is for one's conscience, and for the little extras that come with the product. (If nothing else, most DVD cases have original artwork by the animators which are rather stunning)

    Now the other issue which I've yet to see confronted is what happens when the official release comes out and it's crap. Take, for example, Nausicaa and the Valley of the Wind. A badly translated and heavily editted version labeled "Warriors of the Wind" was released in the US which had muddy quality, bad translation, and about half the movie missing. Most people I know salved their conscience by buying the US release, then using their fansub, at least until they could get a Jpanese import, but it is an interesting dilemna.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  231. Corollary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he's really a Flamebaiting Troll, then why have so many people responded? No, his post would have been ignored by all but the greenest Internet noobs.

    The moderation tally says Troll but every one of the 40 Replies Beneath My Current Threshold say Interesting.

  232. I'm sorry to hear that. by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    Oh my goodness, chortle chortle, it's the cowardly freeloader again.

    Since the IRS code requires the IRS to send out an invoice for taxes owed, I will wait until they follow their rules and do so. April 15th is only the deadline for my own voluntary filing of a claim if I choose to do so.

    However, as also stated in the IRS code, since I have made no money from what they define as "Revenue Taxable Activities", that is profiting from the sale of alcohol, tobacco and/or firearms, I do not expect to receive such an invoice exactly as I have not in the past.

    I don't know what you do on April 15th, I party.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    1. Re:I'm sorry to hear that. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      It took you a week to come up with that? I'd recommend starting on your taxes right away. Searching your trailer for your W-2's will take a while I imagine.

      Pay your taxes, you unemployed masturbator.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:I'm sorry to hear that. by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

      What I'm actually sad about is that you had to follow a perfectly good posting with this crap. I didn't mean that "you" were back, I meant that the awful personality trait that causes you to abuse other people had returned.

      I had hopes, I really did, that you might have chosen civil discourse to abuse. I'd be very pleased if you would.

      Bob-

      --
      The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    3. Re:I'm sorry to hear that. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      OK, I've really enjoyed abusing you. It's in my nature, as my username implies. What you consider an awful personality trait is a great source of enjoyment to me. So are you in Alaska? If so that would explain the frozen brain.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    4. Re:I'm sorry to hear that. by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

      I'm pleased that you have enjoyed our discourse. Adversarial conflict, although I prefer the rational kind, does tend to boil issues down to fundamentals.

      Myself, I like Statesmen. Statesmen being dead politicians, the world needs more Statesmen.

      Peace, may your aim never waver,

      Bob-

      --
      The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics