I'm not sure if this has anything to do with my post at all...
I'm also certain that Java code cannot, in it's entirety and full functionality, translate into js. This is where my confusion sets in. How can you debug javascript, in Java, before it has been "translated" to javascript. What if I create an object in java using inheritance, interfaces, constructors, destructors, function overloading... etc. How would that ever possibly translate? Or am i missing the point?
How about you read the docs? It's all there. Partial support of the java.util and java.lang packages. No destructor support...and interfaces are only used on the Java side for type-checking (which is fine, it's what they're for). Furthermore, Javascript supports inheritance through the prototype chain already. There are also constructors.
As far as overloading goes, as long as you're controlling the compiler, you can choose to output multiple methods - one for each overload.
The script wouldn't work. The problem isn't that the images' backgrounds are white, it's that the matte color is white. Matting is a technique used in image formats that don't support partial transparency. The effect is that the colors of bordering on transparent regions are precalculated.
So the script would have to find the semi-white pixels bordering transparent area, and convert them to semi-transparent colored pixels. I'm not even sure the image contains enough information to automate this process and produce usable results.
I can't even play Japanese movie-fests. Star Control makes you feel like you're a part of something. It's pretty amazing really. Funny, exciting, rich in interesting characters, difficult and has a great battle engine (you can play melee against your friends for hours).
It's easily in my top 5 games of all time, along with MOO2, X-COM, Fallout 2 and Buldar's Gate 2, none of which are 3D.
Slashdot Mirror
It's an element of the REAL numbers, not the rationals.
Express it in the form of p/q, and I'll concede.
I'd mod this insightful if I had points...and I'm on the IDE side of this argument. I've just never seen things that way before.
So what's the question?
I'm not sure if this has anything to do with my post at all...
I'm also certain that Java code cannot, in it's entirety and full functionality, translate into js. This is where my confusion sets in. How can you debug javascript, in Java, before it has been "translated" to javascript. What if I create an object in java using inheritance, interfaces, constructors, destructors, function overloading... etc. How would that ever possibly translate? Or am i missing the point?
How about you read the docs? It's all there. Partial support of the java.util and java.lang packages. No destructor support...and interfaces are only used on the Java side for type-checking (which is fine, it's what they're for). Furthermore, Javascript supports inheritance through the prototype chain already. There are also constructors.
As far as overloading goes, as long as you're controlling the compiler, you can choose to output multiple methods - one for each overload.
Fine, but what Google did is neither really. It's a way of writing Java code (which has great error checking) to produce XHTML and JavaScript.
Java is still involved, but it really isn't in either a client or server roles here.
This might sound strange...but I know the smell of DVDs quite well. It's a strong scent...
If you ask me, they can have it. That thing is outdated and uncool.
Pfft...Ridiculous.
I did that once when a TA mixed up the difference between "++i" and "i++". Never went back either.
I used to use WMP until it couldn't handle the amount of music I had anymore.
I HATED iTunes at first, and went to winamp. When I bought an iPod, my tune changed pretty quickly (ark ark). Just give it a chance.
It's very good.
You lost me at Equilibrium. Ugh...garbage.
That is to be seen.
Apparently Google doesn't share that view.
I don't believe that.
When you're a programmer, you think up things that you want to do with a computer.
Like when my girlfriend needed to update her podcast and kept screwing up the XML file, I just wrote a little app to do it for her.
I'm constantly writing tools that make my experience with computers a bit more streamlined and fun.
The script wouldn't work. The problem isn't that the images' backgrounds are white, it's that the matte color is white. Matting is a technique used in image formats that don't support partial transparency. The effect is that the colors of bordering on transparent regions are precalculated.
So the script would have to find the semi-white pixels bordering transparent area, and convert them to semi-transparent colored pixels. I'm not even sure the image contains enough information to automate this process and produce usable results.
ANALOG!
I think they have one...aren't they just buying the competition?
Nice tip! I'll check it out.
I'm 23 years old.
And FFXI it doesn't come close.
I can't even play Japanese movie-fests. Star Control makes you feel like you're a part of something. It's pretty amazing really. Funny, exciting, rich in interesting characters, difficult and has a great battle engine (you can play melee against your friends for hours).
It's easily in my top 5 games of all time, along with MOO2, X-COM, Fallout 2 and Buldar's Gate 2, none of which are 3D.
We really should have age limits on Slashdot...
haha, I love it.
I'm pretty sure Airset does most of this. http://www.airset.com/
I've been playing around with Airset lately, and it's not bad.
http://www.airset.com/
Doom 3 and Quake 4's stories are great? Both those games seemed like mindless monster shooters to me.
Just thought about it...and yeah, ignore that.
I haven't had a coffee yet.
You're right.
And doesn't this seem like a technology that could be entirely implemented on the client? Why even have a "database" unless you're watching people?
Wow, this is so strange. Anyways isn't said elsewhere? I DO say it all the time. Is it considered improper?