Slashdot Mirror


'Revenge of the Nerds' Remake in the Works

grouchomarxist writes "According to CNN the movie 'Revenge of the Nerds' is being remade. Here is the IMDB entry for the remake." I just don't see how this could be good. Unless they let me play Goose ;)

298 comments

  1. Finally by Mr.Surly · · Score: 5, Funny

    A modern twist on a timeless classic.

    1. Re:Finally by sgt_doom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man oh man! I'm still waiting for the remake of Battlefield Earth!

    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The First Scene will be a Slashdoter reading this pages.

    3. Re:Finally by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      I think they're going to call it Bowling for Columbine.

    4. Re:Finally by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Man oh man! I'm still waiting for the remake of Battlefield Earth!

      No 1000 page book should ever be made into a movie. Ever.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I consider it a 2.0 version (whereas the sequel to the original was 1.1). Consider that the original was released before Windows, AOL, Netscape, mp3's, Linux, search engines, LambdaMOO, or even PowerPoint.

      BTW, I always saw the original as a turning point that marked the point when it became socially acceptable to be a geek. That wasn't caused by the movie - it was art imitating life. The real cause, as always, was wealth. Whatever rich people do becomes a social norm. In 1984 rich people were starting to use computers, and, conversely, computer geeks were starting to get rich.

    6. Re:Finally by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Man oh man! I'm still waiting for the remake of Battlefield Earth!

      If it involves Tom Cruise eating a placenta, it might actually be good! ;-)

    7. Re:Finally by GeekyMike · · Score: 1

      The Stand was a good miniseries which I guess is about the same as a movie. the book was in excess of 1200 pages. Of course, by good, I mean my definition of good which hinges on many points that are hard to qualify. It even got me interested enough to read the book.

      --
      Beware the fury of a patient man
      - John Dryden
    8. Re:Finally by spun · · Score: 1

      If it involves Tom Cruise coming out of the closet, it'll be even better.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    9. Re:Finally by Toxick · · Score: 1

      "A modern twist on a timeless classic."

      Amen to that! Not to mention how drastically the movie will improve thanks to all the technological advances in cinematography since 1984.

      Just think about how realistic it's going to look this time around!

      --
      BRE
      "Dude check me out. I'm like a little otter. A SEXY little otter"
    10. Re:Finally by heretic108 · · Score: 1

      Damn, where are my mod points when I need them!

      --
      -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    11. Re:Finally by rstrickster · · Score: 1

      Oh good LORD!!!! What's next, a remake of Porky's?!?!?!?

      --
      \\\TRUEFOE///
  2. yikes by BigChiefMunkey · · Score: 0

    While I definitely caught the old ones when I was a kid.. I thought I read that as there was a new one and I groaned. Reread it before I realized that it was a *remake*. Double Groan.

    IMDB doesn't mention - does anyone have a cast list for this travesty-in-the-making?

    1. Re:yikes by cheese-cube · · Score: 0

      travesty-in-the-making Well put :D

  3. Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by BTWR · · Score: 1

    Part 1 was classic. Part 2 was average, but definately had some great lines ("What if... C-A-T really spelled 'Dog?'"). Parts 3 and 4 were utter garbage. I'm glad there's potential to continue this series.

    1. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Parts 3 and 4 were utter garbage.

      I think I saw 3 (Hotel Essex?), but I'm not entirely sure it wasn't 2. One was awesome. I had no idea there was a 4. That's scary. Maybe they'd be better off making a prequel...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by Bieeanda · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Hotel Coral Essex was in part two. I know this, because I was blissfully unaware of the existence of parts 3 and 4.

    3. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by mpeg4codec · · Score: 1

      As the other reply above states, it was HOTEL CORAL ESSEX. That would be Revenge of the Nerds 2, the unforgettable concert scene.

    4. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      I guess that means I didn't sacrifice any neurons to parts 3 or 4! I don't know that that makes me any smarter, but it likely made me less dumber;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    5. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Warning: plot spoilage

      There's a Part III. Lewis(?) is married to the cheerleader, the quarterback (Stan Gable) is installed as president of Adams, Booger is an ambulance chaser (literally), The administration plants a bag of marijuana in the Lambda house in an attempt to break up Lambda Lambda Lambda, etc.

    6. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      And how can that combination not be a winner?

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    7. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Daily Show showed that joke in the past few weeks.. I didn't realize it was from this movie. (But Jon has said "NERDS!" on other occassions, maybe this one..)

    8. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      didn't say it wasn't (or was). I was merely pointing out that there was a Part III.

    9. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by RSKennan · · Score: 1

      I'll only watch it if George Lucas directs.

    10. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      argh!
      flashbacks!
      I think I've seen it...

      I had blocked it out, but now you've brought it back.....you bastard!

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    11. Re:Can't be any worse than parts 3 and 4... by Emrikol · · Score: 1

      Hot el C oral Es sex

      --
      You're all bastards!
  4. Can you spell creative bankruptcy? by Vyvyan+Basterd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, they could at least remake films that had some redeeming qualities in the first place.

    1. Re:Can you spell creative bankruptcy? by dottedlinedesign · · Score: 1

      I agree

    2. Re:Can you spell creative bankruptcy? by NcF · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I used to believe the same thing as you, until Napolean Dynamite came out and somehow managed to pull off an insane net profit. I mean, there is no redeeming value in that, it's just flat "humor".

    3. Re:Can you spell creative bankruptcy? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Man, they could at least remake films that had some redeeming qualities in the first place.

      Well, at least the concept was good. Cathartic revenge for the perpetually picked upon. Nerds using technology and cunning to strike back at those who don't understand technology and fear intelligence.

      But women falling hopelessly for nerds because they're virtually gods at sex? Well, it may be true in my rare case, but how on earth could the writers think anyone else would believe such an absurd nerd fantasy.

      TW

    4. Re:Can you spell creative bankruptcy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how on earth could the writers think anyone else would believe such an absurd nerd fantasy.

      Actually I had bought Gilbert's (?) comment to that girl, "All jocks think about is sports. But all nerds think about is sex."

      By the time I actually got around to losing my virginity, I had had plenty of time to, um, think, about it. My mind adopts things very well if they are enjoyable to me. So it made perfect sense to me when she fell head over heels in lust after the first time. I was somewhere near the 100th notch on her bedpost, but taught her things she had no idea of. Given that the brain is regarded as the most powerful sex organ, yes I do think that nerds should be better at it than jocks.

    5. Re:Can you spell creative bankruptcy? by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Man, they could at least remake films that had some redeeming qualities in the first place.

      Man, why can't they bring back or remake good shows like B.J. and the Bear. Now there's a concept I can't get enough of: a man and his monkey.

  5. Sweetness by mailman-zero · · Score: 0

    This could either be really good or really lame. We shall see.

    --
    Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
  6. Travesty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe they're going to remake a classic... Their action tonight demands an immediate retaliation. And, if we don't, we're nothing but the nerds they say we are.

  7. Nerrrrrrrdddds by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

    It won't be the same without this guy:
    http://www.horrordvds.com/reviews/misc/pictures/ne rds.jpg

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Nerrrrrrrdddds by Kirsha · · Score: 1

      Um...he became a nerd too...in the third movie I think.

    2. Re:Nerrrrrrrdddds by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Second movie, actually.

      But will they get Poindexter back, or is Timothy Busfield now too cool, since he's CJ's boyfriend on West Wing?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Nerrrrrrrdddds by wiggles · · Score: 4, Funny

      The funniest thing is what he's doing now. Apparently, he fell in with some tavern owner in Chicago and is now adding his likeness to a microbrew called "Todd's Beer" -- creative, eh? Here's the website

      I went shopping for some beer one day at a local liquor store, and there was this bus parked in front. I thought nothing of it, so I went inside. When I went inside, I was instantly accosted by his handlers and shuffled over to a table where he was sitting down signing six packs. I got a meaty "HOWYA DOIN BROTHER?!?!" handshake from him, and a signed six.

      He called me a nerd. I laughed. I still have the six pack holder tacked to my wall.

    4. Re:Nerrrrrrrdddds by Kirsha · · Score: 1

      Hahah the second it is. Its been QUITE a while.

    5. Re:Nerrrrrrrdddds by nitromatt · · Score: 1

      Ogre was classic, but too bad he couldn't hang with Booger in the burping contest.

    6. Re:Nerrrrrrrdddds by tellurian · · Score: 1

      It's true. He owns a bar in Chicago called Trader Todds (http://www.tradertodd.com/). You can find him hanging out there quite often. I know this because I live in Wrigleyville and see him whenever I go there.

  8. if they remake that song... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    I will smash a bunch of glass vases against the outside of the theater, then I'll go in and watch until the song comes on, when I'll bore a hole in the top inside of the theater and jump out of it onto the glass, thereby saving myself from the pain of ever hearing that song again!

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:if they remake that song... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > I will smash a bunch of glass vases against the outside of the theater, then I'll go in and watch until the song comes on, when I'll bore a hole in the top inside of the theater and jump out of it onto the glass, thereby saving myself from the pain of ever hearing that song again!

      Well, since you reminded me of that song, and since I can't get it out of my head anymore either... might as well share the misery.

      Clap your hands everybody, and everybody clap your hands.
      We run Linux, FreeBSD, and - Omega/GNU.
      We come here on Slashdot today, to post bad filk for you!
      We got the earbug rhythm, you insensitive clod, that'll make 'em click a mouse to to downward mod.
      We got CmdrTaco on the violin, and Hemos and Zonk will be joining in.
      We got Goatse guy, with the bunghole red, grits for Natalie Portman, Stephen King is dead,
      and there's All Your Base to which we belong, in Soviet Russia when the joke goes wrong,
      And just when, for one, you've seen it all, welcome header X-Bender, overlord of all.
      So jump on the glass through the hole you've bored, and post a video .torrent onto the board!

      /cue synthesizer bleeps, frickin' lasers, and shattering glass sound effects

    2. Re:if they remake that song... by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      oh don't worry, remember this is a REMAKE not an exact remake so that song will be changed to one of the fallowing

      1) A Rap song (it's hip with the kids today!)
      2) A whiney emo type song (It's hip with the kids today)
      3) something that sounds like techno but really isn't (Hollywood knows what people like)
      4) Something that sounds like rock but really isn't (Hollywood knows what people like)
      5) A Combination of 1-4.

      Once I saw they were doing a remake I couldn't belive it, wasn't the whole point of it about how different people were? Nerds used computers and fantasized about sex non stop, Jocks were all about competition and banging the cheerleader.

      Yet how will that go over in todays world? (Remember remakes are always updated to fit in with todays world) Jocks use computers now, so the whole difference between the two worlds is gone...unless we are to belive that computers are still $3,500 at the cheapest and require a lot of work to just get a text document to show up.

    3. Re:if they remake that song... by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Oh, hey they'll probably get DEVO 2.0 to do it... Take a look: http://disney.go.com/disneyrecords/Song-Albums/dev o20/

      ;)

    4. Re:if they remake that song... by TheMadWeaz · · Score: 1

      comma splicer.

    5. Re:if they remake that song... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      The robot the build will be replaced with an Aibo, Takashi will be an Indian guy, Gilbert will use his photoshop skills to pick up the girl, instead of his logo skills (does anyone remember logo?), Lamar will be a metrosexual instead of a homosexual, Haley Joel Osmand will play Wormser, and Ogre will be an actual Ogre using left over makeup from Lord of the Rings. Ted McGinley will still play the jock. Also the Christian Right will lobby, and the panty raid scene will unfortunately be removed from the movie.
       
      -Kap

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    6. Re:if they remake that song... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      and the panty raid scene will unfortunately be removed from the movie.

      Nooooooo!

      Ah, to be young again... and knowing a movie theater that didn't bother checking to see if you were old enough to enter...

      --
      No sig
    7. Re:if they remake that song... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since you reminded me of that song, and since I can't get it out of my head anymore either... might as well share the misery.

      Clap your hands everybody, and everybody clap your hands.
      We run Linux, FreeBSD, and - Omega/GNU.
      We come here on Slashdot today, to post bad filk for you!
      We got the earbug rhythm, you insensitive clod, that'll make 'em click a mouse to to downward mod.
      We got CmdrTaco on the violin, and Hemos and Zonk will be joining in.
      We got Goatse guy, with the bunghole red, grits for Natalie Portman, Stephen King is dead,
      and there's All Your Base to which we belong, in Soviet Russia when the joke goes wrong,
      And just when, for one, you've seen it all, welcome header X-Bender, overlord of all.
      So jump on the glass through the hole you've bored, and post a video .torrent onto the board! /cue synthesizer bleeps, frickin' lasers, and shattering glass sound effects


      Netcraft has confirmed the lyrics.

    8. Re:if they remake that song... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Oh, hey they'll probably get DEVO 2.0 to do it... Take a look: http://disney.go.com/disneyrecords/Song-Albums/dev o20/

      Did DEVO make a million bucks by swindling Disney, or the other way around? (The fact that I can't tell suggests that it's de-evolution at its finest, and that Mothersbaugh just pwn3d teh mouse.)

    9. Re:if they remake that song... by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      idunno, it strikes me somewhat as "selling out", but I'm not sure what the full story is.... heh

  9. wow another remake by schematix · · Score: 1

    Perhaps H-Wood wouldn't be in such a dire financial situation if they came up with something NEW rather than just rehashing the same OLD unoriginal crap. Maybe they could earn a few billion extra dollars? Better make sure they DRM all the media that they distribute that movie on too to make sure all of the thieves out there don't "steal" their crap!

    --
    Scott
    1. Re:wow another remake by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      They do it for the same reason that we get stuck with stuff like Starforce DRM and software that needs to be patched out of the box: because people buy it. If you want to stop it, folks, go to see a different movie or just do something else. Yes, it's the same argument that's made for lashing out against shitty software, but this time there are no mitigating circumstances like patches (unless you're George Lucas), and the hours you might spend enjoying yourself between bugs cropping up is replaced by ninety minutes you could have spent being actually entertained.

  10. But Goose Died! by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    How can they do this? We all know that Goose died after college. In fact, he died again a few years later after being reincarnated as Dr. Greene.

    What will they come up with next? A remake of The Posiden Adventure? A remake of The Hidden Fortress?

    1. Re:But Goose Died! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      How can they do this? We all know that Goose died after college

      It's a remake, not a sequel

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:But Goose Died! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already are remaking The Poseidon Adventure: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409182/

    3. Re:But Goose Died! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goose was a character in Top Gun, not ROTN. :)

    4. Re:But Goose Died! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      But.. didn't they just remake poseidon adventure in a made-for-tv film last fall?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:But Goose Died! by Nesetril · · Score: 1

      they already made a remake of The Hidden Fortress. It is called: S--- W--- Episode 4. Serious.

      --
      Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
    6. Re:But Goose Died! by jspoon · · Score: 1
      they already made a remake of The Hidden Fortress. It is called: S--- W--- Episode 4. Serious.

      IMHO the relationship between Hidden Fortress and Star Wars is overrated. There are a FEW similarities, mostly in characters. The plots don't really have that much to do with each other. I'm sure it was an inspiration, and earlier drafts of A New Hope may have been closer (I understand the differed significantly from the final product) but it certainly doesn't qualify as a remake.

      Star Wars is actually a lot closer to 'Where Eagles Dare.' Watch it and see. Sure, there aren't any obvious droid characters, but I wouldn't make too much of that congruence. The characters in Hidden Fortress who are analogues for the droids are shifty army deserters who 'Obi Wan' tricks into dragging a fortune in gold around-at one point they also draw straws with the intention that the winner rape the Princess! Yeah, smells like a remake to me.

      That said, this post probably qualifies as a one man 'Revenge of the Nerd' so those people thinking of spending millions to bring it to the big screen needn't bother.

    7. Re:But Goose Died! by MukiMuki · · Score: 1

      WHOOOOOOSH!

      That is, in fact, the sound of the great-grandparent's original joke going over the heads of both parent and grandparent.

    8. Re:But Goose Died! by jspoon · · Score: 1

      I got the joke. My comment was directed solely at its parent. Now that you mention it though, the joke doesn't work if you don't consider SW-ANH to be a remake of Hidden Fortress.

    9. Re:But Goose Died! by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      yes, i saw it in blockbuster a few weeks ago.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    10. Re:But Goose Died! by qvek · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

  11. Did CmdrTaco Even Watch The Movie?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you meant Gilbert, Goose was Anthony Edwards' character in Top Gun.

    Sheesh, Taco, think before you write.

  12. Great a remake! by npietraniec · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're always great. I suppose it's easier than writing something new. There's bound to be some sort of hollywood remake backlash coming soon... I hope.

    1. Re:Great a remake! by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

      They must be stopped!!! It's only a matter of time before they remake Gigli.

    2. Re:Great a remake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them remake Gigli....

      Hell has to freeze over and we suffer a nuclear apocalypse before they remake Ishtar.

  13. Athony Edwards, uh... by LABarr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    played "Goose" in Top Gun...

  14. 70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Sebastopol · · Score: 5, Funny

    To paraphrase The Filthy Critic -- http://www.bigempire.com/filthy -- apparently the grassfuckers in Hollywood have humped the 70's dry and there's nothing left to remake, so now they want to ass rape the pop classics of the 80's as well.

    I still can't belive they are remaking Superman.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by kindbud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They haven't humped the 70's dry yet. We got our "Poseidon Adventure" remake, but what about a new "Towering Inferno?" Imagine the box office draw if OJ were to reprise his role.

      And no 70's dry-humping would be complete without a remake of "Jaws."

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Narpak · · Score: 1

      "I still can't belive they are remaking Superman."

      I guess they said that back in 1978 to.

    3. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      AFAIC tell on IMDB, "Superman" was never a motion picture until 1978.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    4. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Black+Art · · Score: 1

      "I say we blow the fuckers up!"

      --
      "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    5. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by fm6 · · Score: 1
      We didn't get a Poseidon remake — we got a second remake less than a year after the first remake. Isn't that illegal?

      What's desperately needed now is an equivalent (not a remake, please!) of Airplane! Aside from being so funny it was dangerous to watch without an asthma inhaler, Airplane! thorough skewered the 70s fad for disaster movies. Which probably had a lot to do with there not being a sequel to the The Swarm, a second sequel to Poseidon Adventure, or a fourth sequel to Airport. For that last one alone, the directors of Airplane! deserve some kind of recognition for their service to humanity!

    6. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by mfterman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, Airplane! was a remake of a movie called Zero Hour. Some of the scenes, some of the dialog even were lifted straight from the original movie. In fact the people who made Airplane! bought the rights to Zero Hour. So technically Airplane! is a remake.

    7. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      We got our "Poseidon Adventure" remake, but what about a new "Towering Inferno?"

      To be fair, when 9/11 brought us the "Towering Inferno" for real, I'm guess that kinda took the winds out of the sails of that particular remake.

      Imagine the box office draw if OJ were to reprise his role.

      Not as much as if he reprised his role in the Naked Gun movies.

      would be complete without a remake of "Jaws."

      Yeah, but they'd probably put frickin' lasers on their heads.

      Maybe there are still veins to mine in the 70's (I wanna see "Mitchell Returns"), the 80's are due to make a comeback. I think the world is ready for "Breakin' 3" and "Howard the Duck 2".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Narpak · · Score: 1

      I am sure George Reeves would be very sad to hear that since he played superman in the movie Superman and the Mole-Men (1951); which you will find if you do the search on IMDB again and use the magic of the scroll button (some reading might also be required).

    9. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superman was a radio show in the 40's, in movie serials in the late 40's and early 50's and a television show in the 50's. Not to mention animated cartoons both in movie theaters and on television, as well as the "Lois and Clark" TV show in the 80's and "Smallville" today. Oh, and there were thousands and thousands of comic books, too. Perhaps none of these impacted your childhood like the 70's film, but the character has had such a long and varied life it's a beloved part of our culture and will continue to be updated with every new generation. I'm not even a Superman fan (just found these facts on Google) but even I can see it's a timeless character that will continue to be reinvented for decades, if not centuries to come.

      Now, I agree remaking Revenge of the Nerds for a quick buck is kind of lame, but come on, the original wasn't so great to begin with (if anything the biggest problem is that they'll probably go for a PG rating-- and the best thing about the 80's flick (and most 80's teen flicks) is how raunchy it was.) And I think your sentiment is in the right place, but you picked a bad example with Superman.

    10. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Literally, yes Airplane! is a remake of Zero Hour. (I find it particularly amusing that the famous line, "... somebody who can not only fly this plane, but didn't have fish for dinner!" was lifted unchanged out of Zero Hour.) But legally, no. Despite what it says in IMDB, Zero Hour does not appear in the credits for Airplane! — the studio lawyers vetoed it for some reason. So officially, Airplane! is an original movie, despite its origins.

      In any case. that's one more reason not to remake Airplane!. If a remake of Zero Hour is Airplane!, than a remake of Airplane! could only be another Zero Hour.

    11. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why, does she have a penis?

    12. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Pointless knowledge now, but Airplane was largely a parody of the Airport series of TV movies (Airport '77, etc), even to the point of using a lot of the same washed-up B-actors.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    13. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by motorhead · · Score: 0

      Or Porky's

      --
      Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
    14. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Creepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Airplane! is a spoof of several plane based disaster movies. It used Zero Hour as base material, kinda like Kentucky Fried Movie used Enter the Dragon as base material for A Fistful of Yen and blaxploitation movies like Cleopatra Jones as base material for the Cleopatra Schwartz segment. Both segments spoof other movies of the genre (and other genres), as well, but have one particular movie as the basis. I imagine the producers of Airplane! bought the rights to Zero Hour to use character names and some dialogs. I vaguely recall seeing Zero Hour a long time ago (I think on TV), but don't remember it being intentionally funny. I also vaguely recall the Airport movies (75, 77, the concorde one [80?] - haven't seen them since they were on TV).

    15. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you're both right. It was a parody of Airplane 77, etc, but it used a TON of footage from Zero Hour.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    16. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Besides they already remade Airplane. It was called Airplane 2.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    17. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      George Reeves was sad about a lot of things. But at least he proved once and for all that Superman was defintely NOT faster than a speeding bullet.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    18. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Airplane! parodied all the disaster movies of the time — the first scene is a reference to Jaws! That's why I give them credit for destroying the genre.

      And not just disaster movies, but every movie cliche they could work in. There's even a parting-at-the-train-station scene on the damned runway!

      (The same guys made a similarly bizarre movie called Top Secret! which I though was even funnier than Airplane! But I seem to be the only person who thinks so — people stayed away in droves, and you never hear about it any more.)

      I heard an interview with one of the directors of Airplane!, where he talked about how the movie happened. It seems they had left a VCR recording all night, hoping to pick up low-budget commercials to parody in their Kentucky Fried Theater skits. In the process, they picked up Zero Hour, and were taken with its unintentional humor. They immediately bought the rights to the movie, and borrowed heavily from it. But as I said before, the studio lawyers decided that for legal purposes, Airplane! had to be an "original".

    19. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't know the difference between a sequel and a remake.

    20. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Neither did the people who made Airplane 2.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    21. Re:70's humped dry, on to the 80's by Analog+Squirrel · · Score: 1

      Top Secret! is great! I picked it up on DVD several years ago, and it is one of the few in my "regularly rewatched" stack ;-)

      --
      I'd rather be flying
  15. Post your favorite Booger line by Savatte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been out combing the high schools all day!

    On a serious note, Curtis "Booger" Armstrong does fine voiceover work on Stroker & Hoop.

    1. Re:Post your favorite Booger line by datafr0g · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gibert: She's not that kind of girl, Booger.
      Booger: Why? Does she have a penis?

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Post your favorite Booger line by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      (After one of the jocks yells "What you lookin' at, nerd?")

      Thought I was looking at my mother's old douchebag, but that's back in Ohio....

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Post your favorite Booger line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BRAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaAP

    4. Re:Post your favorite Booger line by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      We've got bush!

    5. Re:Post your favorite Booger line by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is a frush?

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    6. Re:Post your favorite Booger line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You mus sure know how to party!"

    7. Re:Post your favorite Booger line by stor · · Score: 1

      The best Booger line:

      "I say we blow their fucking houses up"

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  16. From the guys who brought you... by guarddonkey · · Score: 1

    From the guys who are seemingly responsible for the MTV Movie Award parodies and "Not Another Teen Movie" This has box office gold written all over it...

  17. More things to avoid by MrShaggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    0Things are looking bleak.. can we just avoid the remakes ? Seems that the industry is in the same pit that the musc industry was in, during the late eighties. Rehashing all the old crap from the 60's. Untill Cobaine came along and shook things up a bit. Maybe the Worchowski(sp? for the nazis) wil be our Nirvana of film? Id rather watch a remake of DeepThroat then this. We all know how it ends anyway.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    1. Re:More things to avoid by Lord+Aurora · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd rather participate in a remake of Deep Throat, but hey, that's just me.

      --
      The heavens do not fall for such a trifle.
    2. Re:More things to avoid by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 5, Funny

      finally able to suppress that gag-reflex now?

    3. Re:More things to avoid by Lord+Aurora · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only took me four years intensive training.

      --
      The heavens do not fall for such a trifle.
    4. Re:More things to avoid by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Seems that the industry is in the same pit that the musc industry was in, during the late eighties. Rehashing all the old crap from the 60's. Untill Cobaine came along and shook things up a bit.
      That's the way it must have looked - to somebody enslaved by the Big Media Music Machine. Those of use listening to New Wave and Alternative were feasting on a broad variety of innovative music - Kurt Cobain was a latecomer who got noticed, not a creator, not an innovator.
    5. Re:More things to avoid by waferhead · · Score: 1

      You must be management.

    6. Re:More things to avoid by Lord+Aurora · · Score: 1
      That's flattering--it really is--but I'm just an intern.

      Management consists of my mistress, Dominique. We just call her The Whip.

      You can see her later, if she's out of her leather and black lipstick.

      --
      The heavens do not fall for such a trifle.
    7. Re:More things to avoid by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      All the above were genuine at the beginning. As was disco. They took innovative bands and made everyone else like them. Bansa like Duran Duran, and NIN, were one of those driving forces. I wont overblow what Cobain did, but it got the music industry thinking forward for a while. Things that are repetive like stroy lines in movies, can be re-worked, but if we are out of new ideas, maybe we shouldn't make the movie in the first place.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    8. Re:More things to avoid by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      I agree forget the remakes!

      I'm still waiting for the sequel to Spaceballs: The Movie ! When is that coming out? I heard Mel Brooks was working on it, too,... something like, Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money!

  18. I just hope... by NewmanBlur · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they can get the original guy who played Lamar. He carried part II.

    --
    Per ardua ad astra.
    1. Re:I just hope... by goodenoughnickname · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's too busy nowadays.

  19. Why? by azpenguin · · Score: 1

    I loved the original "Revenge of the Nerds" (which was filmed in my hometown) and I can't see why... just why would they want to do this. Especially in this day and age where the geeks are the ones making the big bucks and running the companies that are in the news. It's "cool" to be a geek now, unlike in 1983.

    1. Re:Why? by foundme · · Score: 1

      It's "cool" to be a geek now

      Maybe this time it's about illusional geeks/nerds who think they are cool now after graduating from college and heading into working life.

      Just when they got comfy and gathered enough courage to talk to the pretty receptionist Betty for the first time after 5 years in the company, their PHB hired a new sales and marketing team which comprises of strong and good looking guys...

      --
      Please stop entering code 2,2,7,6,6,4
    2. Re:why? by SoulRider · · Score: 1

      yes, just wait next year they are planning on remaking King Kong.

    3. Re:why? by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 1
      Do you know what a rhetorical question is?

      I'm afraid that the only way you're going to see something new come out of Hollywood is to pull a Rip Van Winkle.

      At least this is just a remake. Our kids are doomed to a remake of this remake.

      --
      Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
    4. Re:Why? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      After which their project gets canceled and they get laid off- because PHB read an article someplace that said any project that took more than 4 months was a failure.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Why? by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1
      It's "cool" to be a geek now, unlike in 1983.

      Yeah, totally. Us geeks can now all bonk the popular cheerleaders without the need to wear Darth Vader masks.

    6. Re:Why? by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      The Darth Vader mask may have been your problem...

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...who didn't know the difference between illusion and delusion.

    8. Re:Why? by misleb · · Score: 1

      Minor quibble: There is a difference between nerds and geeks. Nerds are the smart ones like most of the characters in RotN, except maybe Booger. Real geeks are just plain awkward and often (in my experience) not particularly bright (think Napoleon Dynamite). I don't think it will ever be cool to be a geek. But I think nerddom has gained some respect. Although I suspect that your average junior high nerd would beg to differ...

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    9. Re:why? by Dirk+the+Daring · · Score: 1
      > Do you know what a rhetorical question is?

      No.

  20. University of Arizona? by Speare · · Score: 1

    The original was filmed on the University of Arizona campus (the A logo subverted into the team letter for the "Atoms" instead). It was released just a year before I went there so it was fun to location-spot. Wonder where the new one will be filmed?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:University of Arizona? by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1

      Somewhere where it's still legal to have an official university-sanctioned event where each contestant has to chug a beer after each lap of the tricycle race around the track? (Remember, it was the very-easy-to-synthesize trichloromethylene that negated the effects of alcohol).

    2. Re:University of Arizona? by frenchs · · Score: 1

      Somewhere where it's still legal to have an official university-sanctioned event where each contestant has to chug a beer after each lap of the tricycle race around the track


      I can't help but think your talking about "Little 500" at IU!

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_500

      -steve
    3. Re:University of Arizona? by anjrober · · Score: 1

      the little 5 racers are definitely not drunk though. they are serious bikers...the fans are drunk, at least I always was.

    4. Re:University of Arizona? by k_187 · · Score: 1

      you mean the point of Little 5 isn't to drink?

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    5. Re:University of Arizona? by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1

      No, definitely RotN. In the greek games, which the Nerds have to win, one of the events is a tricycle race around the track. There are several laps, and each contestant needs to chug a beer at the end of each lap. Suffice to say, by the end of the race all the other teams fall off their tricycles, but the nerd keeps going to victory because his brothers gave him the chemically-impossible trichloro-methylene.

  21. MMMMM. by E10Reads · · Score: 1

    Hair Pie.

  22. Why not do something needing a remake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like The Phantom Menace????

    1. Re:Why not do something needing a remake? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Or an UN-remake of the original trilogy..

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  23. Hmm. by itomato · · Score: 4, Informative

    Then you might like Clerks II, a Harvey Weinstein Production..

    1. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meet the worst man in film... Roy Lee. Here's his partner from Vertigo Entertainment as well... Doug Davison. All they do is remake great Asian cinema into not-so-great pieces of work.

  24. EA? by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

    Is EA behind this? Will there be a game? Action, FPS, or RPG? Or maybe a nerds pack for The Sims...hmmm...

    --
    Unpleasantries.
  25. Ogre sez by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

    NERDS!

  26. Yay by istartedi · · Score: 1

    It's bad enough that a component of the "revenge" of the nerds was to demonstrate that they could do as many substances and be as callously promiscuous as the "jocks", but now they have to do a remake of it? The original had enough else going for it that I could look past that negative dimension, which was not the main idea.

    Meh. The best revenge is living well, and I'm doing that now. This flick sounds like a "must miss". Isn't anybody coming up with an original idea in Hollywood these days? They just remade The Poseiden Adventure for cyrin' out loud. If they are going to remake something, how about remaking something they screwed up really badly the first time?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Yay by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Because remaking something that doesn't have existing emotional connections won't be profitable. Don't you know that's how the movie biz works now? They're trying to screw up all their old classics so everyone hates ALL incarnations of them. New ideas are risky and scary. And all movies have to have huge budgets. Didn't you know that?

    2. Re:Yay by sporadic · · Score: 1

      Like what, Ishtar?

    3. Re:Yay by BigBadRich · · Score: 1

      Yes, I for one have by dying for someone to remake "Battlefield Earth"...

    4. Re:Yay by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
      Isn't anybody coming up with an original idea in Hollywood these days? They just remade The Poseiden Adventure for cyrin' out loud.

      Betcha they won't make a new version of Irwin Allen's other big disaster film, The Towering Inferno (or, as Mad Magazine put it, The Towering Sterno).

      Oh, wait, Oliver Stone is doing World Trade Center. Never mind.

    5. Re:Yay by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Star Trek V.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  27. Greasy Tony's! by servognome · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they'll film it again at my alma mater.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  28. why? by pxuongl · · Score: 1

    are the people in hollywood so out of ideas that they have to remake movies that are perfection?

  29. Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...or the remake of (insert recycled theme here that execs think the majority of the public isn't aware of...)

    Yuck. If it isn't the stranglehold of perpetual copyright law killing creativity ("ooooh, can't write about that theme, it sounds too close to something that someone can sue us over!"), outright fear of losing investment money ("Hey, this was a hit in 19xx - let's do it again!"), or flat-out retread of existing 'IP' rights that were purchased ages ago but are now worthless ("man - we paid HOW MUCH for that movie!? Quick! Get Tom Cruise on the phone - we gotta recoup our investment in that thing!")...?

    Screw it. I'll be hunting for indie/small-budget/out-of-the-way films from here on out (Equilibrium being a perfect example)... at least until the big motion picture houses decide to stop sucking so hard.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Boy, I sure wish Equilibrium hadn't sucked. I even gave them another swing when I watched Ultraviolet. Not even Milla whipping ass could save that movie.

      Great concept, LOUSY execution. Next time, I hope they get a dialog writer and please stop trying to be John Woo.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by suprchunk · · Score: 1
      Boy, I sure wish Equilibrium hadn't sucked.
      The count your lucky stars, because your wish has been granted. An excellent film that got overshadowed by a mediocre film by the name of "The Matrix".
    3. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I totally disagree. I thought that Equilibrium's premise had a lot going for it, but the execution was awful. The Matrix was a far more enjoyable film.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The premise was that scene were he cmacked the shotguns and blew the 2 guy away right?

      or was it when he is in the office and his pupils tighten up and the guy shits himslef (metaphoricly)?

      because the movie was worth it for those 2 scenes alone. I always figured the rest was jus putty to make those scenes have context.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Equilibrium looked like a cheap ripoff of the Matrix when I saw the ads. Then years later when I saw the film (I did want to see it in the cinema, but none of my friends went and I didnt really go see movies by myself then), I realised, yes, it was a cheap ripoff of the Matrix. The ending was pretty lame also. V for Vendetta is a similar story yet again actually, another Wachowski Bros film. I did enjoy Equilibrium, think it would be much improved with a better soundtrack though. Good to see Christian Bale getting a bigger part with Batman Forever also. I like a lot of the big 'blockbuster' type films.. looking forward to MI:3 this week.. I dont have a problem with hollywood making sequels, as long as they're good, and also the original Mission Impossible wasn't just one story either, it was a series. Some films should never have been made though, like the 1st 3 Star Wars episodes.. I've said before here, but I'll say again, that George Lucas would have been better off making up some new plots in the Star Wars universe, and making some kickass TV series (maybe with Kyle Katarn?), rather than just fleshing out what everyone already knew.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      IIRC some genius in Hollywood wants to make a movie about 9/11 (not the plane one), but due to too many "too soon" complaints, someone suggested they spin the movie as a remake of The Towering Inferno(s).

    7. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      You lost me at Equilibrium. Ugh...garbage.

    8. Re:Well, it's that or the remake of Poseidon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what a premise is?

  30. Superman Returns by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Actually, from what I've heard about it, Superman Returns is basically continuing the story of the movies from the 80's.

    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:Superman Returns by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      To be more accurate, they are continuing the series from Superman II. Superman III and IV are being ignored.

      Although checking Wikipedia, it says that the first two movies are only going to be used as a "vague backstory" and thus it is not intended to be a direct sequel.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    2. Re:Superman Returns by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      urge to kill... falling...

      Didn't know that. Thanks.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:Superman Returns by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Bryan Singer directing Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor? I'm there, dude.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Superman Returns by teal_ · · Score: 1

      Superman III was the best one!! How can we not love Richard Pryor as the computer whiz hacker dude, playing with traffic signals, manipulating satellites to fetch him some kryptonite, and then there's the whole evil angry Superman under the influence of the krypto. Best ... episode ... ever!

      I think it's a disgrace that it's being made though. I mean, Christopher Reeve IS Superman, that's it, and especially what happened to him, the man was an inspiration, I'm moved just thinking about it. Reeve as Superman was beloved, and no new actor can reprise the role. This isn't a James Bond kind of franchise where the actor playing the hero is interchangeable, and it's not like Batman where none of the actors playing the hero was impressive enough to be Batman forever (c'mon, even George Clooney played Batman!) A Superman remake does nothing but tarnish the legacy of Reeve. If you want more Superman action, just watch Smallville.

  31. They could update the tech by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

    Instead of vector graphics, the nerd could use animated digital pictures to get the girl! Or would that be too creepy?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:They could update the tech by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And I apparently should not have believed that error message about the form being invalid, silly me.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:They could update the tech by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1
      And the nerd could use digital photography to get the girl- instead of vector graphics.

      They didn't use digital photography or vector graphics to get the girl, they used another standard staple of the geek - a Darth Vader mask. Just imagine the hordes of chicks that Tron-suit-guy could have wooed.

    3. Re:They could update the tech by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      They didn't use digital photography or vector graphics to get the girl, they used another standard staple of the geek - a Darth Vader mask. Just imagine the hordes of chicks that Tron-suit-guy could have wooed.

      I was talking about the other guy, wooing the girl in the computer lab- typing rapidly as vector-graphics male and female characters met on the screen, danced, and kissed. That to me was FAR more impressive than the Darth Vader Mask scene.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:They could update the tech by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1
      Oh shit, I totally forgot about that part. Yeah, that was 'Goose', to me Louis seemed more like the stereotypical nerd.

      Yeah, you're right, that was pretty impressive, he coded that whole animation bit in what, like 5 seconds?

    5. Re:They could update the tech by kajoob · · Score: 1

      Why is it that everything you say on slashdot is so fucking stupid?

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    6. Re:They could update the tech by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right, that was pretty impressive, he coded that whole animation bit in what, like 5 seconds?

      Just about. I was rather disapointed when it took me about 45 minutes trying to impress a girl in high school- using loaded bitmaps drawn on a sketch pad on an Apple IIe (the hard part was the wierd way high res graphics was mapped into memory on the apple- I had to build an entire offset table in assembly to remap the graphics).

      These days of course- with modern RAD tools- it would take you about 5-15 seconds once you already have the cropped pictures.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:They could update the tech by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Why is it that everything you say on slashdot is so fucking stupid?

      I don't know- why didn't your second grade teacher teach you the difference between STUPID and OBVIOUS?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  32. News for Nerds. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I understand why this is on slashdot, but CNN?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:News for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you asked 100 random people if they've heard of the movie Revenge of the Nerds, how many would come up blank? That's why it's on fucking CNN.

  33. One word: by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    "Wonder Joints."

    (ok, well, two words.)

    --
    Karma: NaN
  34. They could update the tech by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

    And the nerd could use digital photography to get the girl- instead of vector graphics. Or would that be creepy instead of cute? I'm too much of a nerd to know. Hmm, could also use the ThinkGeek blimp to take picutres of the Beta Pis....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  35. ahem by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    hotel
    coral
    es sex

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:ahem by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Hey, batting 2 out of 3 ain't that bad;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  36. Oh, crud. by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    Having recently seen Bewitched, I'm half-expecting a Revenge of the Nerds remake wherein the nerds decide to make their own movie: a Revenge of the Nerds remake! I believe this sad, blatantly derivative state of affairs is exemplary of what they call "postmodernism".

    Memo to Hollywood: You got your Revenge of the Nerds remake already. It was called Napoleon Dynamite and it was more awesome than all of the trite remakes of the present century by at least an order of magnitude or two.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:Oh, crud. by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 1

      Having recently seen Bewitched, I'm half-expecting a Revenge of the Nerds remake wherein the nerds decide to make their own movie: a Revenge of the Nerds remake! I believe this sad, blatantly derivative state of affairs is exemplary of what they call "postmodernism".

      First thing that came to mind was My Name Is Bruce, actually.

    2. Re:Oh, crud. by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      I was going to dust off my soapbox and pick on you for using "postmodern", but yeah, you're pretty much dead-on with that one in a very literal interpretation of the self-awareness nascent in post-modernism.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:Oh, crud. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Funny, but if Napoleon Dynamite was more awesome a remake than any actual remake could ever be, then the original "Revenge of the Nerds" will kill anyone who lays eyes on it.

    4. Re:Oh, crud. by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      BitwizeGHC wrote:

      Having recently seen Bewitched, I'm half-expecting a Revenge of the Nerds remake wherein the nerds decide to make their own movie: a Revenge of the Nerds remake! I believe this sad, blatantly derivative state of affairs is exemplary of what they call "postmodernism".

      This has already sort of been done. In the third episode of the anime OAV Here Is Greenwood (set in a college dormitory with some very...unusual...residents), the group decides to make a sword and sorcery movie. At the end of the episode they stage a play of another movie called Castle of Cagliostro.

      Memo to Hollywood: You got your Revenge of the Nerds remake already. It was called Napoleon Dynamite and it was more awesome than all of the trite remakes of the present century by at least an order of magnitude or two.

      It is not so much the remakes that I mind. What I do mind are when the remake removes everything that worked in the original. An example of this is the movie The Stepford Wives. As a horror movie it worked, but remaking it as a comedy did not.

      I think another problem is that many things that were allowed in the original movie would not be allowed now. For example: I could not see the original Animal House able to be remade with the same gags as in the original movie. It would be completely toned down by the time it was released.

      There was a movie, PCU, that tried to be an updated version of Animal House but it came off as a very timid movie with an attempt to do humor that would not offend anyone in a movie that was touted as one that would offend everyone.

      This is the problem I forsee with a remake of Revenge of the Nerds: The remake will have to be watered down to avoid offending people.

  37. Fark did it... by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

    This story broke, like, months ago. I assume they have finalized plans? I refuse to RTFA.

  38. Nerd/geek revenge methods by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

    My favourite: the Phantom Goatse Wallpaper Install. It gets the message "I really, really hate you" across like nothing else on this Earth.

  39. On Remakes by HunterZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I went with my roommates to see Revenge of the Sith in the theater, they showed a trailer for the Spielberg remake of "War of the Worlds". I launched into my typical rant, asking one of my roommates a rhetorical question: "why does the movie industry have to keep making remakes of everything? Why can't they make movies based off of original ideas?"

    The following trailer was for the movie "Stealth". We laughed and shook our heads at the absurdity of it, and when it finished my roommate said (in reply to my previous questions): "that's why."

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:On Remakes by BobStikigreen · · Score: 1

      Stelth was a poor rip off of Macross Plus.

    2. Re:On Remakes by TabsAZ · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that Stealth isn't original either... Let's see here, advanced computer becomes sentient and tries to kill people... never been done! I prefer my planes with snakes on them...

    3. Re:On Remakes by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 0

      First of all, 'War of the Worlds' wasn't exactly a remake, in the same sense that the 'Lord of the Rings' movies weren't remakes. They were all movies derived from novels, which is a slightly (but not entirely) different thing.

      Secondly, Hollywood remakes are nothing new. Plenty of films that we regard as 'classics' are remakes. The remakes of 'The Maltese Falcon', 'The Man Who Knew Too Much', 'Gunfight at the OK Corral' and 'The Thing' are all more highly regarded than their originals.

      That said, the current crop of Hollywood remakes have mostly been egregious travesties.

    4. Re:On Remakes by munrom · · Score: 1

      War of the Worlds not a remake?

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0046534/War of the Worlds (1953)
      http://imdb.com/title/tt0407304/War of the Worlds (2005)

      I'll admit I've not seen the new one but it looks a lot like a remake to me.
      BTW just found this

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0077869/Lord of the Rings (1978)
      http://imdb.com/title/tt0120737/Lord of the Rings (2001)

    5. Re:On Remakes by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I didn't see Stealth but I saw the new War of the Worlds. If that steaming pile of crap was better than Stealth then I think Hollywood should just give up and leave the movies to Matt & Trey. At least the Southpark episode where Tom Cruise locked himself in the closest was funny. Southpark is the only good show I've seen Tom Cruise in in a long time.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    6. Re:On Remakes by AndrewStephens · · Score: 1
      The point the parent was trying to make is that War of the Worlds and The Lord of the Rings movies were both based on books. The later versons are not so much based on the previous movies, more of a "reimagining" of the source material. The 21st century version of LoTR bears little resemblence to the 1978 film.

      Of the other examples TheOriginalRevdoc gives, The Maltese Falcon and The Thing were both based on earlier works, so they don't count as straight remakes (by some people's reckoning) either.

      Remakes don't have to be worse, I would have added the 80s version of The Fly to the grandparents list. Movie revivals of old TV series always seem to be, though.

      Having said all this, I am sure the new version of Revenge of the Nerds is going to horrible. For one thing, a lot of the blatent sexual content in the original will have to be cut down.

      --
      sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
    7. Re:On Remakes by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      "Good artists copy, great artists steal." -Pablo Picasso

      Of course, Steve Jobs copied|stole the quote. (I haven't quite figured out which.)

      Shakespeare 'lifted' most of his work from other sources. Of course, in our day we call it 'adapting'. To be quite frank, most of the work that gets 'adapted' is his. So, I'm not so surprised that Hollywood is looking back to old classics for stories. I'm more shocked they aren't going to back to 'real' classics.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    8. Re:On Remakes by Harik · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and if it's modern, they wouldn't bother putting security cams in the girls dorm when they could just go on the internet for their porn.

      "Bush! We've got Bush!" just dosn't have the same mystique anymore.

      I hope it's not horrible, but I'm going to re-watch the original tonight anyway.

    9. Re:On Remakes by jalefkowit · · Score: 1
      I launched into my typical rant, asking one of my roommates a rhetorical question: "why does the movie industry have to keep making remakes of everything? Why can't they make movies based off of original ideas?"

      I used to feel the same way, until I started thinking about movies the same way I think about plays.

      Sure, there are lots of original plays being staged every day. But there are also lots and lots and lots of what you might call "remakes". How many theater companies, from the smallest community theater to the largest Broadway troupe, launch new productions of plays by Neil Simon, Shakespeare, and Aeschylus every year? Lots.

      They do so because they can re-mount an old play without closing off the chance to be creative. The actual words on the page are only a small part of what makes a play -- the actors' performances, the staging choices, and the director's vision all make each new production different than those that came before.

      Probably the best example of how these factors can change the "experience" of a play is Orson Welles' work with the Mercury Theatre in the 1930s. Welles, as director, specialized in taking old plays and staging them in radical new ways. He turned Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, for example, into a political statement by changing the sets and costumes so it appeared to be taking place in Mussolini's Fascist state, rather than ancient Rome. He restaged Macbeth into a tale of voodoo by casting an all African-American cast (an incredible gesture in the 1930s) and setting it in the Caribbean. Welles took the same words that had been staged a million times before, and turned them into something new and fresh, just by how he went about presenting them.

      So, given that this is all possible (encouraged, even!) in the theater, I actually have come around to the idea that movie remakes can be a Good Thing -- if they provide a fresh take on an old story. I might actually pay to see a "Revenge of the Nerds" remake, for example, if it was directed by Tim Burton, who might have a unique take on the story of outsiders struggling to be accepted. Wouldn't that be an interesting movie?

      Of course, most Hollywood remakes are just attempts to grab at some cash, rather than putting a new spin on the material. But that's the fault of the creatively-challenged people who run Hollywood, not of the idea of remaking old movies itself.

  40. Devil's Advocate by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rehashing an old idea is not necessarily bad. Reusing as story isn't necessarily bad. We did it for centuries before the advent of motion pictures, and it's led to some pretty brilliant movies since then when Shakespeare is the source of the rehashed ideas.

    The best version of "Richard III" that I've ever seen was a 1995 movie that placed it in a 1930s fascist England. "West Side Story" is a street gang musical based on Romeo and Juliet that is widely held in great esteem (unlike the movie "Romeo + Juliet"). One of my absolute favorite plays is "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead," an absurdist take on "Hamlet" from the POV of two bit characters who are slowly becoming aware of their unimportance and impending death by plot. Kurosawa's "Throne of Blood" and "Ran" are two of my favorite samurai movies but are based on "Macbeth" and "King Lear," respectively.

    The problem is that Hollywood is generally too lazy and too focused on churning out easy money to get it right. If Hollywood rehashed old ideas with style, it wouldn't be so much of a problem. Unfortunately, "Revenge of the Nerds" isn't exactly Shakespeare, and Hollywood's not doing this for any sort of "artistic merit."

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Devil's Advocate by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      The literature courses in took in college essentially posited that there's nothing new since Odysseus, the Old Testament, the Satyricon, and Shakespeare's body of work.

      Everything is is a rehash of the fundamental elemenents.

      Now, you can inject a boatload of creativity and trawl the depths of human emotion with skilled use of these known devices, but that's not an excuse to turn the vapid xeroxing monkey machines loose on the already limp plots of the past three decades.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:Devil's Advocate by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      there's nothing new since ... Shakespeare's body of work.

      Ha! You show me one plot line Shakespeare didn't steal from somebody else (whether a published work or a mythology/folk tale/oral tradition). He just did it better than most other versions that had been written down at the time - that we know of. There's been nothing new under the sun for millennia.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:Devil's Advocate by damian+cosmas · · Score: 1

      Ha! You show me one plot line Shakespeare didn't steal from somebody else

      Well, there is the inventive portrayal of Richard III as a child-killing cripple, although one could easily argue that he stole that particular fiction from Tudor propaganda.

    4. Re:Devil's Advocate by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      hey man, i didn't say i agreed, i just pointed out what i think i was supposed to learn (it's been 25 years!)

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    5. Re:Devil's Advocate by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      And if you liked that, I highly (really) recommend Josephine Tey's _Daughter of Time_. Its a mystery about a mystery, and covers that whole issue in detail (and with remarkably good writing at that).

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    6. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tempest. Almost entirely his own work; the main source was an account of a shipwreck off Bermuda.

  41. not surprising by Mike_ya · · Score: 1

    Given the success with recent nerd movies i.e. Napoleon Dynamite, Hollywood is just looking for a way to make a buck.

    1. Re:not surprising by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how that movie ever had any success - considering how everyone was loving it, I waited till after the credits to see if they stuck the funny in then. It never came. Then again, I've never liked stupid-funny which is definitely what ND was. Doesn't make you any less right though - considering how stupid some people I know are, I'd pretty much call Napoleon Dynamite a feel-good movie since the audience finally found someone dumber than themselves. Go ahead and mod me troll, but I honestly fail to see how anyone mildly intelligent could find failed acts of Darwinism/voluntary sterilization (consider: time travel machine) to be funny.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  42. Motivation for another generation of down trodden by RingDev · · Score: 1

    "I just don't see how this could be good."

    I look at it as just the opposite. I was a geek in grade school. Big time. My friends and I all got picked on, teased, harassed, and abused. It wasn't until we got into high school where we realised there were a bunch of people getting picked on, and that we could work together to over come the bullying. When someone was harassed in high school, we would stick up for them. It's a lot harder for a bully to pick on a geek if they are surrounded by 4 other geeks. Combat boots and trench coats don't hurt either ;)

    By my senior year the Geeks and the Hessians (for-mentioned combat boot/trench coat wearing people as they were known in my school) had a pretty smooth life. We had numbers and strong men enough to keep the jocks at bay, the hicks had lost their primary leadership the year before, and the self proclaimed 'wiggers' (truly a retarded title for a social cliche) were all show.

    Any ways, any movie that promotes geeks, nerds, and other social out-casts to unite and deter bullying (preferably non-violently) in my book is a great thing.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  43. Don't like the word 'nerds' by slofstra · · Score: 1

    Let's get rid of it. Don't like it in the 'slashdot' header either. It's the last socially prejudicial term that you can still get away with using. Why is that?

    1. Re:Don't like the word 'nerds' by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Actually, the last socially prejudicial term you can get away with using is "teenager".

    2. Re:Don't like the word 'nerds' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. "Cheese-eating surrender monkey" seems a bit more prejudicial. (Thankfully, I must say the most frequent users of it have gotten really quiet recently.)

  44. Well, you see... by jd · · Score: 1

    ...There's a bug in their hash() and rehash() functions. But because they have no idea what the output should be, they're stress-testing them until they crash.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  45. "napoleon dynamite"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched that, tho im ashamed to admit it. There cannot be enough psychoactive drugs on this planet to make that movie enjoyable...

  46. Better by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    I just don't see how this could be good. Unless they let me play Goose

    More nudity.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Better by tktk · · Score: 2, Insightful
      More nudity.

      More FEMALE nudity.

  47. No doubt PG-13. Sigh. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
    The problem is that with the new conservatism in the USA, everything is PG-13. If this remake has all the enjoyable gratuitous nudity and profanity of the original it might be worth watching, but otherwise forget it.

    (I was watching 'Die Hard' on DVD the other day and realized you couldn't make that movie these days, even if you wanted to. Pity, that.)

  48. I Knew That Sounded Familiar by jgclark123 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hotel
    Coral
    Essex

    That's the name of the Futuristic Sex Robotz' album. http://futuristicsexrobotz.com/
    They release all of their music under the Creative Commons License.

    (Not spam, just a fan.)

    --
    "May evil beware, and may good dress warmly and eat plenty of fresh vegetables." -The Tick
  49. They remade King Kong... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
    (the original, not the cheesy 80's version) so apparently they'll remake anything.

    Guess they ran out of good foreign films to rip off...

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  50. what new stereotypes? by Sebastopol · · Score: 1


    So what stereotypes will they use from the 00's?

    In the 1980's we had:

    The Japanese "Engrish" Speaker who took lots of photos
    The token minority-minority double-whammy, the black gay
    The other token black stereotype: the thug
    The cheerleader slut (do those exist anymore?)
    The preppy boytoy BMOC (do those exist either??)
    Pot smoking as rebellion (is that still true?)

    I bet the new version has at least one Arab, and one Indian stereotype. Or maybe they'll be as insipidly crass as "Me Myself and Irene" and make a "joke" by depicting the ever illusive "intelligent black teenage boy" slur.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:what new stereotypes? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the lower four all go to my ex-school in large numbers. We're a full 20 years behind the times.

    2. Re:what new stereotypes? by john.r.strohm · · Score: 1

      Well, if you REALLY want the answers to these questions, do what I did: go find out.

      Take a year off, and go back to school.

      You will be AMAZED at how hot the coeds are the second time around.

      The "preppy boytoy BMOC" still exists. He was the captain of the sailing team at my school. He was also really good people.

    3. Re:what new stereotypes? by spun · · Score: 1

      So what stereotypes will they use from the 00's?

      In the 1980's we had:
      ..
      Pot smoking as rebellion (is that still true?)

      No. Now everyone I know who smokes pot does it for their glaucoma and arthritis pain. Now where's my meds? Those damn kids stole my meds again!

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  51. Oh, the humanity! by jmb-d · · Score: 1

    For the love of Mike, why? What possible good could come from this?

    The original was, well, not even that original a concept. "Bunch of misfits get even with the popular/athletic guys by outsmarting them". If I had a nickel...

    In real life, if a bunch of nerds outmaneuvered th jocks, they wouldn't get a standing ovation from the crowd. They'd get a blanket party instead.

    --
    In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
    -- Yun-Men
  52. Revenge of the Hairy Nerds by wa2flq · · Score: 1

    TV Guide - 2201
    A modern post dotcom bust, sub-humanist reinterpretation of the classic, with a few French guys through in to provide some flavor and to give everyone hate, set in the eary 21st Century. Film in classic 2-D Film ROIN, smelless vision.

    A film Frye would love. Bender gives it 2 stars (not enough Chicks and Booze)

  53. Lamar by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    I will see it if they get Mike Tyson to play Lamar.

  54. How about... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    ...a Slashdot contest to pick somebody for a cameo role in the movie? It would be the ultimate marketing tie-in... Except that most of us probably wouldn't pay money to see a remake of Revenge of the Nerds.

    --
    Who did what now?
  55. We've Got Bush! by Trifthen · · Score: 1

    No matter any upgrades this film may experience over the original, there is definitely one scene that will *not* make the cut: We've got bush! Imagine full frontal female nudity in any non x-rated film these days...

    --
    Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    1. Re:We've Got Bush! by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      You won't get bush, because it seems the ladies are all shaving the clam these days. At least that's the way it is on Yafro and that's as close to real life as one can get on the 'net, right?

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  56. Snakes on a Plane by damian+cosmas · · Score: 2, Funny

    there's nothing new since Odysseus, the Old Testament, the Satyricon, and Shakespeare's body of work.

    You clearly are unaware of a movie about "Snakes, on a motherfuckin' plane!"

    Only problem is that for every "Snakes on a Plane" there are 10 remakes of crap from the '70s that wasn't even that good the first time.

    1. Re:Snakes on a Plane by Flower · · Score: 1

      No, snakes on a plane is just a variation of Bad ass snake in the house.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    2. Re:Snakes on a Plane by damian+cosmas · · Score: 1

      No, that's one snake. In a house.

      We're talking snakes. On a plane. Even if it's derived from previous movies (snake in a house, snake in a river, &c.), placing multiple snakes on a plane is an improvement so vast that my words cannot possibly do it justice.

    3. Re:Snakes on a Plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, and they'll be nothing like it again until we have Snakes in Space!

  57. not goose by m1ndrape · · Score: 1

    cmdrtaco should play booger, say things like there's a booger in your taco...or is my taco...

    --
    Donald Ray Moore Jr. (mindrape)
    Suspected Terrorist
  58. I'm telling Jabootu. by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

    ...though he probably orchestrated this in the first place. http://www.jabootu.com/

  59. oh fuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh fuck! everything on slashdot is advertisements! the propaganda! help me!

  60. Will Ted McGinley be in it? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    I believe that's guaranteed box office gold.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  61. Snakes. Plane. by dogbowl · · Score: 1

    "this is your captain speaking, we've just reached our cruising altitude... holy crap is that a snake... on the plane!"

    --

    These pretzels are making me thirsty.
  62. I'd argue the material is too dated by beoswulf · · Score: 1

    I don't see how the anti-social, unpopular nerd themse would work in the present day without being a stretch.

    After the tech bubble, nerd is chic (So I've been told.) Some of the richest men on the planet are nerds these days. Today, even non-nerds regularly need a nerd around not just to benchpress but to fix their computer so they can get back to MySpace, or to set up their iPod...
    Nerds make a great amount of money and have some of the best job opportunities in the hippest areas of the country. Or for example, my corporate, Wall Street type boss isn't some ex-jock use to intimidating people in HS, he's a math major.

    So the underdogs have come out on top and really gone mainstream.

    Plus with the majority of the country either obese or anorexic, shaggy, long hair apparently in style for young guys, and vintage clothing in demand, what exactly is the physical sterotype of a nerd these days?

  63. How's that supposed to work? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The "Nerds" movies lived (ok, survived in the latter parts) on the nerds being the "outcasts", the "weirdos", the smart ones who outwit the stronger and more "successful" (not necessarily with their grades, but with their college life) football jocks.

    Today, nerds ain't the underdogs anymore. We're no longer "uncool". RPGs have gone mainstream. So has the computer. And many other geek/nerd toys and pastimes.

    So how could you capture the feeling of the 80s with a remake?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:How's that supposed to work? by uncool · · Score: 1

      Today, nerds ain't the underdogs anymore. We're no longer "uncool". RPGs have gone mainstream. So has the computer. And many other geek/nerd toys and pastimes.

      Well, I beg to differ.

    2. Re:How's that supposed to work? by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the nerds won.

      "Revenge of the Jocks"?

      Nah... no one would watch that.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    3. Re:How's that supposed to work? by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      So how could you capture the feeling of the 80s with a remake?


      You can't. The 80's movie series is based around cultural events around that time - but a remake can be updated to reflect modern events.

      As a starting point: http://slashdot.org/search.pl?tid=&query=Hellmouth &author=&sort=1&op=stories

      Also, new developments in technologies can be used to create a new plot aspects - for example, mass dissemination being used to compare the bullies to... something that would trigger Godwin's law.
  64. Be looking for the remake of by n6kuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    this Slashdot article in a few days.

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    1. Re:Be looking for the remake of by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Goddamn, where are the mod points when I need em. You, sir, win slashdot for the day!

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
  65. I'm sick of remakes by spir0 · · Score: 1

    What was wrong with the original? Why do people feel that perfectly good movies need to be remade?

    --
    The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
  66. Ogre makes beer now by pancake_lover · · Score: 1

    This guy sells his own brand of beer available around Chicago. I'm too much of a nerd to try it though.

    http://www.toddsbeer.com/home.htm

    --
    Homer no function beer well without.
  67. Reruns Should Be Treated As Old Clothes by cyberscan · · Score: 2, Informative

    A jar of about a 1000 moths released at the beginning will show what old clothes and old story lines will attract.

  68. More Kurosawa by sconeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't forget "The Magnificent Seven", which was a thinly disguised remake of "The Seven Samurai". Both films were brilliant.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:More Kurosawa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And the equally brilliant "The Three Amigos"

      Ok, maybe that's getting carried away.

    2. Re:More Kurosawa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battle Beyond the Stars is another excellent Sci-Fi B movie along those same lines.

    3. Re:More Kurosawa by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      Is it as good as Robot Jox?

    4. Re:More Kurosawa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Is it as good as Robot Jox?

      The hero's spaceship in Battle Beyond the Stars was shaped like a set of boobs. What more could you ask for?

      You'll also recognize some of the explosions and sound effects that ended up in Battlestar Galactica.

    5. Re:More Kurosawa by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      The hero's spaceship in Battle Beyond the Stars was shaped like a set of boobs. What more could you ask for?

      Real boobs.

  69. They're not doing that... by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1
    That's not what they're doing here. Half of these remakes are nothing like the originals.

    It seems like they're just remaking stuff assuming that people will go to see it because they've heard the name before.

  70. Revenge of the Nerds?? by Alaskan+Snake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Very close to release, the title will be changed to "Return Of The Nerds", then instead of joining the Tri-Lams they'll join an ewok fraternity and defeat the atoms with boulders and logs.

  71. What does this have to do with Slashdot??? by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, come on. I visit Slashdot for Stuff that Matters. You know, News for... um... oh nevermind.

  72. NERD used to be a four letter word... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    Now it's a six figure one.

  73. Remake REAL GENIUS you assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Remake REAL GENIUS you assholes by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      To bad Michelle Meyrink didn't do more great movies like Revenge of the Nerds and Real Genius. Mmmmm mmmm geek girl sex appeal. I wanted her sooooo bad. If only she'd been a nude geek girl.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  74. Wow, living in your own little world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RPG's have gone mainstream? WTF is an RPG? I've been in the tech field for over ten years now and still don't know all this gaming lingo; and you expect Joe & Jane public to? What's the old saying, the first step toward recovery is acceptance? Accept the fact that 'nerds' are still the underdog, still made fun of, and still lacking in the sex dept. (doesn't mean you aren't happy though) ;)

  75. This *needs* gratuitous nudity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One ingredient in the success of the original was the chance to look at pretty, naked college girls.

    I saw Revenge of the Nerds II and was amazed that they had left out this essential ingredient. It was actually rated PG-13, not R!

    There actually were some clever bits in the original. Like this priceless dialog:

    12-year-old genius: I don't want to go to college. I want to play with kids my age!
    his mother: You can play with kids your age, when you're older.

    Somehow I doubt the new one will be even half as clever as the original. So it had better have twice the sex and nudity, to make up for it.

    P.S. You gotta love this bit from the trivia page on IMDB:

    When Jeff Kanew was interviewed by the producers, they asked what kind of movie he thought he could make given the material. He responded, "One I would be embarrassed to have my name on." They hired him immediately.

  76. nerd.com - best domain ever by mabu · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for six-figure offers.... willing to negotiate.... let's talk people.

    c'mon you VCs.... you know you want this domain.. anything tech related will kick ass.... got a new venture? don't use a boneheaded or mispelled name... not when this beauty is available. Help me raise some cash to help my sick children...

    1. Re:nerd.com - best domain ever by itsallgeek2me · · Score: 1

      But I already live in Nerdtopia.com. Now that's something that can proudly go on a T-Shirt! ;-)

  77. The sad part is... by nutsy · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...that might not be as far off as you think (or hope or wish), since the Travolta movie is based on only the first half of the novel. And then, of course, there's Hubbard's ten-volume series Mission Earth. Thank you for listening...

  78. It should be a followup by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then they could call it "Return of the revenge of the nerds."

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:It should be a followup by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      Given how many sequal there were, this brings us to:

      Son of the Revenge of the Return of the Night of the Day of the Awakening of the Dawn of the Nerds.

    2. Re:It should be a followup by BRSloth · · Score: 1

      Or they could retell the story and call it "Revenge of the Nerds Begins".

  79. Don't see what all the fuss is about by Narpak · · Score: 1

    This always happens when they remake or newmake something. I don't see what all the fuss is about. First of all there is a high number of people, especially younger people, that has not seen this movie, or any other film made before 1990 for that matter, and that never will unless the story is remade.

    If the movie is bad either: 1. Dont watch it. Or 2. Forget it. If it is good; have a few laughs, enjoy the show, leave the teater (or turn of the DvD or whatever medium you are using), have a soda and get on with your life. A bad remake does not destroy the original, it only steals a few hours of your time and seriously how much time have you wasted in your life? (Bad movies, books, games, or trying to lear to play the sitar). Surely the loss of two hours is not big deal. Hollywood will continue to produce remakes as long as people keep watching them and they continue to make money. Getting exited, ranting or throwing a fit because they just happen to remake something which matters to you is a waste of time and energy. It is pointless.

    So to recap. If good, good. If bad, bad. Whatever the case take a deep breath and move on. There are other things that deserve your attention I am sure.

  80. So true... sigh. by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  81. Sheesh by Megane · · Score: 1
    This is so lame. Why? Because they took the easy way out. The concept certainly has plenty of room for a "Revenge of the Nerds: The Next Generation" type of movie. Especially since there are so many new forms of revenge over 20 years later when the jocks have to deal with computers and the internet. They wouldn't even have to make any kind of continuity (like a main character being the son of someone from the previous movie, or a prof being someone from the previous movie), but it wouldn't hurt.

    Hollywood and their got-damn remakes. Can't they even try to come up with a half-original idea?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Sheesh by dJOEK · · Score: 1

      1992 called, they want their scenario back: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105251/

      --
      Exercise caution when modding this message up: the author acts like a jerk when his karma is excellent.
  82. Mitchell! by XanC · · Score: 1

    Would ol' Joe Don Baker come back? Oh boy!! They should invite Joel and the bots to the premeire.

  83. any NEW movies by p51d007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MPAA can't figure out why people aren't going to movies......high prices and ORIGINALITY have to figure in to it. All they do anymore is eiher remake a tv show, old movie (upcoming Posidon movie comes to mind), or part 2, part 3 etc.......movies these days are CRAP!

  84. Airplane = Scary Movie by itomato · · Score: 1

    Scary Movie is your Airplane equivalent.

    1. Re:Airplane = Scary Movie by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That would only be true if Scary Movie were actually funny.

    2. Re:Airplane = Scary Movie by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Oh, how far the Zuckers/Abrahams team have fallen. Well, they had their 10 years. It was a great run.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Airplane = Scary Movie by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      elrous0 wrote:

      Oh, how far the Zuckers/Abrahams team have fallen. Well, they had their 10 years. It was a great run.

      Recently I read that the ZAZ Team's next effort is going to be a movie that parodies recent superhero movies.

    4. Re:Airplane = Scary Movie by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      They should do a movie about washed-up directors and writers who don't know when to quit. It wouldn't be very funny but, then again, neither is anything else they've done in years.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Airplane = Scary Movie by sandman935 · · Score: 1

      My problem with Scary Movie was that it spoofed Scream, which was satire.

      --

      Defecation occurs.
  85. chicks! by crazybunny · · Score: 1

    Who are the chicks in the remake?

    i second jessica alba coz someone must have already thought abt it

  86. And then non-Kurosawa by localroger · · Score: 1

    Battle Beyond the Stars was in turn a Star Wars-inspired thinly disguised remake of The Magnificent Seven. And it was actually pretty good, unlike the five bland ripoffs of Star Wars made by George Lucas.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  87. I was going to make a snide remark . . . by Sometimes_Rational · · Score: 1

    . . . about how the "Nerds" remake should be followed up with a "Porky's" remake, until I discovered it is in the works, too.

    Now I am very afraid to make any more jokes.

    --
    Warning: The intelligence of this post may be larger than it appears.
  88. What about Data Rock? by domukun367 · · Score: 1

    From "Computer Camp Love": I Ran In to her on Computer Camp Was it 1984? Not Sure, Had my Commodore 64, Had to Score Not With a Dirty Tramp She's not a Tramp, Her Name is Judy That's a Nice Name Yeah, She's a Nice Girl Big Deal, Did You Get in Her Pants She's Not That Kind of a Girl, Booger Why? Does She Have a Penis?

    --
    Please don't send a Word document when a text file will do the job.
  89. jaws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    humping the shark? ... no no, its jumping the shark. no wonder you're bleeding.

    dude, you dont even want to know about fish sex. just dont go there. trust me.

  90. it probably won't be good by Tedium+Unleased · · Score: 1

    but having some slashdot asshole in it will just make it worse

  91. You think you're pissed off now? Just wait. by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    You know that someone is thinking abou;remaking "Real Genius" and "Office Space", updating them for the 21st Century.

    Let's see, what unfunny member of the Saturday Night Live cast has yet to make a movie? (not based on their unfunny signature SNL character, that is!)

    Yes, dear friends, it's only going to keep getting worse.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  92. Why Remakes Suck by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1
    Suppose there is a movie with a pretty good plot, which is completely botched up by sucky actors, or sucky editing, or whatever. Such a movie would totally warrant a remake. However, since it will not be a success in the first place, its name will not be associated with "quality" (or "fun") and it is hard to build an advertising campaign around making a remake of it.

    So, Hollywood will only make remakes of movies that were good in the first place. Which makes it pretty hard to create a remake that is better than the original.

    Hollywood's solution to that is fivefold:

    • Adding big special effects
    • Adding computer graphics
    • Adding well-known actors
    • Adding semi-explicit sex
    • Adding loud music

    All this to make the movie appeal to a "young audience." Unfortunately, the gross of the "young audience" is mainly interested in trash, which Hollywood's fivefold solution will help to emerge.

    Here are some movies that should be remade:

    • The Fountainhead (1949). This could have been a very good movie, but unfortunately Gary Cooper had no idea how to play Howard Roarke.
    • Trapped in Space (1994). A gripping story which is performed by fairly poor actors in an environment of low production values. This one could actually benefit from good special effects.
    • The Power (1968). A SF-Thriller-Mystery based on a great book which it manages to totally fuck up by giving it a happy ending, mainly by redoing the last few chapters.

    Furthermore, any movie based on one of Philip K. Dick's books could use a remake, that does not shy away from the more philosophical sides of his stories. True, Blade Runner is cool, but losing Mercer and thereby totally ignoring the last three chapters of "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" were big disappointments for me.

    1. Re:Why Remakes Suck by FiveDollarYoBet · · Score: 1
      Totally agree with The Fountainhead. Here's 2 more for ya....

      Starship Troopers. How about actually following the book and not trying to turn it into a comedy.
      Windtalkers. Try to remake it without having Nicolas Cage win the war single handedly.

  93. More mindless society-destroying motion pictures.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..coming to a cinema near you with the help of ZIONISTS THAT CONTROL THE AMERICAN MASS MEDIA.

    Poor Americans! by the time you realize the demoralizing crap you are being fed by zionists, it will be tool late!

  94. Booger Character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they don't use Ron Howard's brother, Clint Howard, to play a character like Booger (Curtis Armstrong), I'll be fine. For some reason, every time my dad sees Clint Howard, he's got to exclaim "Look! There's Booger!". He just can't keep those two guys straight. I can't take it anymore!

  95. Hollywood is dead by seven+of+five · · Score: 2

    .. we've been hearing the death rattle of remakes for years.

  96. Superman III by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Superman III was the best one!!

    While I certainly wouldn't go nearly that far, I do think this movie was underrated. Much of it was junk (paticularly the silliness with Robert Vaughn's character), but it did have some redeeming qualities. The high school reunion/Lana Lang stuff was well done, the "evil Superman" stuff was very funny, and the "Superman vs. Clark Kent" battle at the end was priceless.

    It certainly beats the crap out of the travesty that was "Superman IV." The sad thing is, I remember them selling IV as an "apology" for III. Some apology!

    Christopher Reeve IS Superman

    No, he hsn't been for a VERY long time now. It's been almost 25 years since a decent Superman film was made. And the depths that it sunk to by the end pretty much killed the film franchise (almost permanently). And of course, I grew up watching the George Reeves series reruns. So I hardly think of Reeve as the only one who can play Superman (though he is clearly the definitive "Superman" to date).

    If you want more Superman action, just watch Smallville.

    Uh, no thanks. If I wanted to watch a soap opera with a bunch of 20-somethings playing high-schoolers, I'd go back and watch "Berverly Hills 90210" reruns.

    From what I've seen of the "Superman Returns" trailer, I was very impressed. The director clearly has a strong appreciation of what made the original Richard Donner film so great, hitting all the right notes. He could have easily done just another crappy Batman-knockoff or an straight "look at all the pretty explosions and sound effects" CGI-fest. Clearly he has greater ambitions.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  97. Your, your, your Mitchell 2 by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    I wanna see "Mitchell Returns"

    If you want him to return, just leave some food out on the patio.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Your, your, your Mitchell 2 by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I hear the best bait for Mitchell is food whose name ends in "ami", like pastrami, salami.

      Others suggest food whose name ends in "ork chops" and "eer".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Your, your, your Mitchell 2 by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      "eer"

      Beer works pretty well but it has to be the cheap stuff, Mitchell don't cotton to that import or microbrew shit. And, if you're going to use it, make sure and use a sufficient quantity to keep him around. Remember, the average Mitchell can consume his own body weight in beer every 24 hours.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Your, your, your Mitchell 2 by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Remember, the average Mitchell can consume his own body weight in beer every 24 hours.

      Keep in mind that this requires up to 600 lbs of beer be available since approximately half will get spilled on Linda Evans.

      A fact that's not widely known is that a slightly different species, the Geronimo (pronounced "Yeronimo") has a similar attraction to milk.

      If suitable comestibles are not readily available, the subject can be momentarily distracted from wandering off if presented with an orange and a knife for peeling.

      see also: Texas, Malta, Indigestion, and "Goosio"

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  98. NO IMAGINATION by sciop101 · · Score: 0
    Hollywood is lazy. Remakes are everywhere.

    Comedians are not funny. All their jokes are politics and politics is never funny. Then they become talkshow hosts and laugh at their own jokes.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  99. Mopery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't know what the world's coming to. See that man over there? We arrested him for mopery."

    "What's mopery?"

    "Mopery is exposing yourself to a blind person!"

  100. i wonder if.... by philo_enyce · · Score: 1
    they'll faithfully recreate the date rape scene where louis nails betty while pretending to be her boyfriend.

    i was recently watching the original with my gf, who had never seen it before, and she was shocked by the casual use of rape as a plot device. i never thought of it as rape when i first saw it; times have changed attitudes i guess.

    philo

  101. You have it backwards by spun · · Score: 1

    First, there are dorks. Dorks have no social skills, and while they try to enagage in geek-like technical things, they don't really have the brains.

    Next, there are the nerds. They still have no social skills, but in one or two areas they have impressive tech-fu.

    Finally, the geeks, who have social skills, although they don't always bother to use them, and who have ultimate tech-fu in any areas they care about.

    This is why, for instance, "Star Trek Geek" is a compliment, while a "Star Trek Nerd" is sad, and a "Star Trek Dork" is just pathetic.

    Please keep your terminology straight.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:You have it backwards by misleb · · Score: 1

      Finally, the geeks, who have social skills, although they don't always bother to use them, and who have ultimate tech-fu in any areas they care about.

      You must be a geek. ;-)

      Really, The nerds are the ones with the real brains (maybe not skillz). They're the ones learning physics at age 10. The geeks and dorks all want to be nerds, but couldn't handle the study time (unless it involves learning Klingon).

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  102. Haven't the perception of nerds changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw the movie when it came out. I was 14. It made me fear persecution. (heh). But the thing is, I never really saw or heard of anyone being accosted and called "nerd!". Did it ever happen, or was this a hollywood invention?

    And now... now you see girls wearing tshirts that say "I love nerds". And supposedly "geek is chic". So how do you make a movie about nerd persecution when nerds are kinda "in", so to speak?

    PS: Funny coincidence, last saturday I went to a Taco Bell and there were 4 guys there who were BIG NERDS. And I thought to myself "Nerds!". Then I remembered I'm an old fat nerd, so who am I to judge. Heh

  103. This is all thanks to copyright law! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad to see how our modern system of copyright creates such innovative new movie offerings! Otherwise, we'ld just see people copying old ideas without making new ones! I'm so glad this movie is fresh and new!

    Thank you, copyright law, for enabling such innovative new movies to hit the marketplace!
    --
    AC,
    who is eagerly awaiting Mission Impossible III, subtitled "Tom Cruise still can't act!"

    1. Re:This is all thanks to copyright law! by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward wrote:

      I'm glad to see how our modern system of copyright creates such innovative new movie offerings! Otherwise, we'ld just see people copying old ideas without making new ones! I'm so glad this movie is fresh and new!

      Thank you, copyright law, for enabling such innovative new movies to hit the marketplace!

      Sadly, I agree that current laws are preventing new stories from being created. I think it is because so many ideas end up being close to all-ready existing story. This has been a problem for comic books, where it can take years to actually use a new superhero due to the need to avoid legal problems with a new character.

      Ironically, if many of today's copyright laws had been in place in the past, Disney could not have been able to make Pinocchio (unless they could get the author's permission) since the original story was less than 60 years old at the time the Disney movie was made.

      In my humble opinion, without new material consistently going into the public domain over time, there will be fewer and fewer new stories. The reason: Story ideas will become unusable since they are already locked away by use in still-copyrighted stories.

      On the subject of remakes: The Tim Burton Batman was a great movie and Michael Keaton did an excellent job as Batman and (especially) Bruce Wayne. But Batman Begins was an outstanding movie that is the best live-action version of Batman ever made. When a movie is remade, this is what should be striven for, to be the best version ever made, regardless of how good previous versions were. I think the reason that people have been against remakes is that so many of them have been disappointing.

  104. Pi Delta Pi house by Creosote · · Score: 1

    The house near campus that was used for the exteriors as the Pi Delta Pi sorority house is now a very pleasant bed-and-breakfast. The owners have sensibly replaced the old lawn and water-intensive landscaping with native plants, but the porch from which the girls taunted the nerds is unchanged.

  105. Zero Wing by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    I swear I read that at "Airplane was a remake of Zero Wing" and was waiting for the "Somebody set up us the bomb" joke.

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.