The difference is that government SHOULD be under surveillance by the citizens, while the citizens SHOULD NOT be under surveillance by the government (without cause).
1. That's for 2.4, not for 2.5 as this is 2. That seems great to speed a CAD-savy user into using Blender. It is not however a good starting point for someone new to the 3D field.
Re:Another already out of date book.
on
Beginning Blender
·
· Score: 1
Indeed. Why bother writing a book about a transitional version of an application? 2.5 is in flux - it won't be "stable" until they finish with it!
... and this 'solution' puts the camera screen in the dashboard - the opposite direction your head should be facing when you are backing up.
Yea, this is going to make a big difference. Instead, people will look at the camera - gaining a clear rear-view, but losing the rear-side quarters instead...
There's a large difference between censoring what goes in or out, and manipulating the system so things that were not intended to go in do so (supposedly for intelligence gathering)
The only problem with that is when IPs change. For major sites, it doesn't happen often, but when it does it may toss you through a loop.
You might find it easier (and more efficient) to just build yourself a caching nameserver and set the TTLs high (hell you can do this on the workstation itself). Couple this with your existing method if you wish, there's no reason they can't work together.
I'm just saying the wording was bad. Just find a more neutral way to say it, is all I meant. (something like "the addon 'SuperHappyKittySearchbar' was installed in an unusual manner. Do you wish to enable it?")
Then why bother? Fluxbox does that very fast and with a teensy footprint.
Well, I don't think anyone would care nearly as much if you sheared copyrighted works.
After all, you probably need to go buy another copy after you go about doing that!
The difference is that government SHOULD be under surveillance by the citizens, while the citizens SHOULD NOT be under surveillance by the government (without cause).
Most cheat. Some get away with it.
1. That's for 2.4, not for 2.5 as this is
2. That seems great to speed a CAD-savy user into using Blender. It is not however a good starting point for someone new to the 3D field.
Indeed. Why bother writing a book about a transitional version of an application? 2.5 is in flux - it won't be "stable" until they finish with it!
... and this 'solution' puts the camera screen in the dashboard - the opposite direction your head should be facing when you are backing up.
Yea, this is going to make a big difference. Instead, people will look at the camera - gaining a clear rear-view, but losing the rear-side quarters instead...
Even my near-first-gen netbook has a larger resolution screen than a DVD...
Even that won't always cut it.
Remember the PNG exploit?
To do this, they HAD to look beyond the title.
Super Meat Boy has nothing to fucking do with meat on a dietary level. What the hell went through the minds of those at PETA?
It's better than mortars, if that's your only concern.
Much better.
Probably much cheaper than mortar rounds and bombs...
And a fuckload cheaper than the costs associated with a casualty.
There's a large difference between censoring what goes in or out, and manipulating the system so things that were not intended to go in do so (supposedly for intelligence gathering)
SOMEONE has a fucking clue!?!?
(go figure it's an AC)
The only problem with that is when IPs change. For major sites, it doesn't happen often, but when it does it may toss you through a loop.
You might find it easier (and more efficient) to just build yourself a caching nameserver and set the TTLs high (hell you can do this on the workstation itself). Couple this with your existing method if you wish, there's no reason they can't work together.
No, I'm speaking on behalf of everyone that isn't China.
You should read what I wrote, not the words that you assume are between the lines.
At what point are we going to get sick enough of this garbage to just completely segregate China from the rest of the internet?
I'm just saying the wording was bad. Just find a more neutral way to say it, is all I meant. (something like "the addon 'SuperHappyKittySearchbar' was installed in an unusual manner. Do you wish to enable it?")
Yea, or.. you know, a fucking checkbox or Y/N question during some install.
That verbiage is bad. You can't know if it was with consent or not.
Sounds like a driver had an oopsie.
Gold wasn't useful beyond a century or so ago. It was valued because it was rare, difficult/impossible to fake, and I suppose pretty.
These days we have more mundane uses for gold, but everyone is still stuck on it for those silly historic reasons.
Then a needed commodity is being needlessly held up by assholes looking out for themselves?
(tip: please pick something rare but -useless- to back currency in the future)
I still fail to see any violence.
You seem to be thinking I'm saying something I am not.
Stop reading behind the lines, there's nothing there. I mean exactly what I wrote, and nothing more. There is simply no act of violence.
More info on this actual misson:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA-212