It is important to note, however, that we never prevent P2P activity, or block access to any P2P applications, but rather manage the network in such a way that this activity does not degrade the broadband experience for other users.
So, they are not even coming close to telling you the truth!
How exactly sending RST packets to peers doesn't fall under "prevent P2P activity" I don't understand.
When I worked at staples, they paid me 7.70/h to do it. As an actual "easy tech". And I was the "business machines specialist" - AKA department supervisor.
What I love is that (the summary at least) article states you can use this to see if someone is monitoring your network.
Excuse me? How in the hells would you tell of someone was passively reading incoming radio waves? Isn't that the point of active vs passive radar systems, for instance? You can't!
You make it sound like it is easy to just randomly break encryption. It isn't! Usually the way they are broken is brute-forcing keys, stealing keys, or comparing plaintext to ciphertext to extract the key. When it comes time for encryption to be in the way, it is usually far faster, easier, and cheaper to get around it. Think human intelligence, not signals intelligence.
You realize when you run tor you get a big warning about it being experimental software, and not to use it for strong privacy? HEED THE WARNINGS. Contents may be hot, handle with care.
An excellent tool. Careful using it though, as it attaches to the system through debugging hooks and hence certain copy protection systems scream at you and make you reboot, and not run it... I'm staring at you SecureROM!
Exactly. The solution isn't necessarily a better operating system (although it helps, and I personally consider Windows inferior to others).
The true solution is getting rid of stupid users. But then again I'm a bit of an elitist. I think computers are (and always were) complex tools, except it's hard to get a computer to saw off your finger when you fuck up. I personally think you shouldn't be using a computer if you don't know how to use it!
Mine is not. You push it to start it, it clicks, and the returns to position ALMOST all the way. To turn it off, you push it, the mechanical switch releases, and pulls the linkage apart. CLICK! No more power to the electronics.
Yea, and you can tell. ALL redhat-hosted websites are hosed, and that makes it really hard for me to go and install cygwin. Does nobody have that damn setup.exe mirrored? arg!
Hmm, thats an idea. You COULD draw a picture, but if you "sign" a password, that only adds to the complexity of what an intruder must duplicate.
After a long time doing it, you would get damn fast at it too.
One problem however is disability. If I had a horrible accident and became a quadrapole, I could still recite my password to someone if need be... good luck doing that with this kind of authentication.
Think of the resonant frequency as a hash of the structure... while you can have a collision (remember, we are talking about an exact frequency...) that would be incredibly rare...
Slashdot Mirror
Looks like glare. If you zoom in you get an image from another angle, and its salt like the rest of the flat.
Hmm, i would love to see a bittorrent derivative that didn't use TCP at all. Just UDP.
They can send RST packets all they want and it won't do a damn thing as there isn't a "connection" to terminate.
So, they are not even coming close to telling you the truth!
How exactly sending RST packets to peers doesn't fall under "prevent P2P activity" I don't understand.
13/h?
When I worked at staples, they paid me 7.70/h to do it. As an actual "easy tech". And I was the "business machines specialist" - AKA department supervisor.
Talk about underpaid.
What I love is that (the summary at least) article states you can use this to see if someone is monitoring your network.
Excuse me? How in the hells would you tell of someone was passively reading incoming radio waves? Isn't that the point of active vs passive radar systems, for instance? You can't!
Does the eeePC support booting from the net? (pxe, rarp, etc)
You make it sound like it is easy to just randomly break encryption. It isn't! Usually the way they are broken is brute-forcing keys, stealing keys, or comparing plaintext to ciphertext to extract the key. When it comes time for encryption to be in the way, it is usually far faster, easier, and cheaper to get around it. Think human intelligence, not signals intelligence.
pastebin is your friend for that kind of thing - they can go away after a month (these don't)
Ick, I don't like it. To much like OSX. I hope that look is optional (it SHOULD be, knowing how KDE is configurable)
Then again, much of that is as much due to the colors and icons, and not so much the actual programs.
You realize when you run tor you get a big warning about it being experimental software, and not to use it for strong privacy? HEED THE WARNINGS. Contents may be hot, handle with care.
An excellent tool. Careful using it though, as it attaches to the system through debugging hooks and hence certain copy protection systems scream at you and make you reboot, and not run it... I'm staring at you SecureROM!
It's a mockup. The article(s) specifically state high-resolution images
That is merely showing the HUD that is projected onto the image.
Yes, and in so doing encourage him to seek alternative wages...
Exactly. The solution isn't necessarily a better operating system (although it helps, and I personally consider Windows inferior to others).
The true solution is getting rid of stupid users. But then again I'm a bit of an elitist. I think computers are (and always were) complex tools, except it's hard to get a computer to saw off your finger when you fuck up. I personally think you shouldn't be using a computer if you don't know how to use it!
Mine is not. You push it to start it, it clicks, and the returns to position ALMOST all the way. To turn it off, you push it, the mechanical switch releases, and pulls the linkage apart. CLICK! No more power to the electronics.
You know, Like an actual power switch?
http://www.suse.de/~agruen/acl/linux-acls/online/
Note the date on the document.
Er, like what? Can you give us some examples?
Yea, and you can tell. ALL redhat-hosted websites are hosed, and that makes it really hard for me to go and install cygwin. Does nobody have that damn setup.exe mirrored? arg!
Er, yes. In my attempt at creating a word, I merely duplicated an existing one. You got my point, however.
Hmm, thats an idea. You COULD draw a picture, but if you "sign" a password, that only adds to the complexity of what an intruder must duplicate.
After a long time doing it, you would get damn fast at it too.
One problem however is disability. If I had a horrible accident and became a quadrapole, I could still recite my password to someone if need be... good luck doing that with this kind of authentication.
Think of the resonant frequency as a hash of the structure... while you can have a collision (remember, we are talking about an exact frequency...) that would be incredibly rare...
Yes, but could you get that for $2,400?
If so... I would enjoy knowing where... and do they sell lathes, etc?
Er, yes. You could, actually. Just make sure you clean it when your done, if you really want to do that.
I could think of more... constructive things to do with it, but each to his/her own.
Two words. Maybe one, depends on how you look at it...
Write-in.
Honestly I can't see that happening.... and only in extremely rare cases.
Remember, for such mutations to succeed they have to both improve survivability without decreasing it.