uh, I believe we're talking about server situations, not consumers. Having a GPU on an ARM chip or on an X64/x86 chip is a nonsequitur. Or did I miss something here? I fail to see where you come up with this shit considering even Intel is trying to make an ARM chip.. You think they're doing it because supposedly arm doesn't run as well or about having GPU's on the chip? Hint: Intel is shitting their pants over ARM right now.
And? Your focus has nothing to do with what we're talking about. You're arguing a hypothetical (countersuing) based on a second hypothetical (that google will even countersue) . This is so asinine it hurts me to read such a backwards statement. Then you flip it again, saying that countersuing is defensive, and guess what? It could or couldn't be, depending on how it's done.
If I sue you for a misdemeanor but you countersue pushing for a felony is that exactly defensive? No.
are non sequiturs stupid? this next, demonstrated by David Gerard.
Google doesn't sue with patents or consolidate. Could any company run out of steam? yes. Doesn't say much for google that has anything to do with a: these patents and article or b: what google is doing in general.
Eye tracking is about as accurate as imagination. I hope people realize that. Head tracking, moderately accurate.
Eye tracking requires that you sit in a specific location in order to be accurate. Moving your head around and this shit won't keep track of anything. Nor will it accurately track your eyes if it's tracking your head in any fashion.
This isn't a solution, it's a farce. I'm so tired of the 3d hype.
The comedy was that instead of building your own solution the site was an advertisement for windows skydrive and goodsync, paid solutions -which are not solutions, then. To also act like you can trust microsoft over dropbox is also completely hilarious. You really think Microsoft of all companies should be trusted with *any* form of data? I bet their privacy policy on skydrive, if it's still as I recall it, is basically nonexistent.
You are correct. It's been known for a long time, but it's a tough issue to deal with because: no antivirus program will catch everything, even the most robust that exists today, as there will be new things tomorrow. Etc etc.
So beyond them trying to keep it above a level of "unreliable", there's a level of "keeping out malware" they will never successfully reach anyway.
a library card is not at all like spotify, nor are the things you have access to.
Why should I care? I can get the songs for free or I can rip it from spotify. Spotify is just making it a little bit easier. Songs have little to no value to me anyway, so why should I be paying more than zero for what amounts to nothing?
Who is willing to govern with a sense of rationality?
I can tell you who doesn't: democrats AND republicans. When have politicians in the last 20 years ever done things for their constituents? How long have we been waiting for this stupid "piracy OMG PIRACY" shit to end? 10 years? 15? Now they want to push for censorship? They've gone against the constituents directly and we have no fault to blame but our own for letting these jackasses get in office (hint: about 80% of congress/senate should not be there).
If you think this is a party issue you are looking at the wrong focus. Corporatism owns both sides of the argument. Why do you think that the Patriot act got signed again with not a single minute of debate? Was that a "republican" or "democratic" issue? No.
National health care would be a good thing if we had it in a good form. However, how quickly did both sides buckle on that shit? Where is any form of actual preventative care? Where is any focus on moving things towards preventing problems? Simply having it ensures it's going to be a: useless and b: Expensive as fuck and c: watch your employers go from covering 50-70% of costs to about 25-50% because they'll be contributing the same amounts while the plan costs go up. We still have problems with medical patents increasing the cost of healthcare tenfold and above, like the situation where a retroactive patent on a drug was granted and the costs went through the roof.
You have tunnel vision. There's so much shit wrong, that focusing on one part will allow it to be exploited.
Estoppel could stop the case entirely, as sun and oracle have written "We're damn glad for android" articles which have recently and quietly been taken down.
I don't know that google will have to go anywhere near it if the judge accepts estoppel as the main answer.
That is also why it's the biggest scam ever. Literally you are buying into DRM. The difference is that you have a way to deal with actually getting a return value here. When you stop paying, you have nothing. You don't even own what you paid to access. Remember their suit with wowglider? You know why they're pissed, because all it did was prevented them from being as successful at being a timesink and deliberately extracting people's money.
World of warcraft is literally the most profitable scam masquerading as legitimate business outside of hundreds of other businesses already doing the same thing, in quite a long time.
Do I trust Spotify? No. Do I trust my hard drive with what I choose to put on it? Yes. This is pretty much equivalent to forking an app, except that we can't really trust the labels any more than spotify.
Slashdot Mirror
Oblig:
http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2320#comic
uh, I believe we're talking about server situations, not consumers. Having a GPU on an ARM chip or on an X64/x86 chip is a nonsequitur. Or did I miss something here? I fail to see where you come up with this shit considering even Intel is trying to make an ARM chip.. You think they're doing it because supposedly arm doesn't run as well or about having GPU's on the chip? Hint: Intel is shitting their pants over ARM right now.
Yeah, right. guess who gets charged transaction fees for that? Not who pays it, but who will the fingers be pointed at?
Blizzard.
"who needs courage when you've got a gun?"
ignore the dude who replied. the answer is yes, it's the same.
And? Your focus has nothing to do with what we're talking about. You're arguing a hypothetical (countersuing) based on a second hypothetical (that google will even countersue) . This is so asinine it hurts me to read such a backwards statement. Then you flip it again, saying that countersuing is defensive, and guess what? It could or couldn't be, depending on how it's done.
If I sue you for a misdemeanor but you countersue pushing for a felony is that exactly defensive? No.
are non sequiturs stupid? this next, demonstrated by David Gerard.
Google doesn't sue with patents or consolidate. Could any company run out of steam? yes. Doesn't say much for google that has anything to do with a: these patents and article or b: what google is doing in general.
Google has never countersued anyone regarding patents, and has made it clear they will not do so.
This will never happen, not from apple or google.
Or let's look at it this way:
Feinstein: Anti constitutional rights
Wyden&Udall: anti spying
Considering that feinstein is the head, we're kinda screwed. That and the complete lack of transparency, not that they were ever going to make good on it .
and the mac one isn't free, but way to skip that. Again, who trusts microsoft?
might be a while .
Eye tracking is about as accurate as imagination. I hope people realize that. Head tracking, moderately accurate.
Eye tracking requires that you sit in a specific location in order to be accurate. Moving your head around and this shit won't keep track of anything. Nor will it accurately track your eyes if it's tracking your head in any fashion.
This isn't a solution, it's a farce. I'm so tired of the 3d hype.
The comedy was that instead of building your own solution the site was an advertisement for windows skydrive and goodsync, paid solutions -which are not solutions, then. To also act like you can trust microsoft over dropbox is also completely hilarious. You really think Microsoft of all companies should be trusted with *any* form of data? I bet their privacy policy on skydrive, if it's still as I recall it, is basically nonexistent.
ARM chips are designed for power efficiency. They kick the crap out of atom's in that sense. Atom's are just seriously underclocked, old processors.
You are correct. It's been known for a long time, but it's a tough issue to deal with because: no antivirus program will catch everything, even the most robust that exists today, as there will be new things tomorrow. Etc etc.
So beyond them trying to keep it above a level of "unreliable", there's a level of "keeping out malware" they will never successfully reach anyway.
Uh, this is so far off from an accurate argument I hope you get your head of the sand someday.
Renting physical equipment, and the subscription fee from it, are not comparable to ripping music from spotify. Not even remotely.
a more accurate depiction would be:
if you were to photocopy/xerox the books from the library when you borrow them. Guess what, that's legal and free.
what ridiculousness is this?
a library card is not at all like spotify, nor are the things you have access to.
Why should I care? I can get the songs for free or I can rip it from spotify. Spotify is just making it a little bit easier. Songs have little to no value to me anyway, so why should I be paying more than zero for what amounts to nothing?
Who is willing to govern with a sense of rationality?
I can tell you who doesn't: democrats AND republicans. When have politicians in the last 20 years ever done things for their constituents? How long have we been waiting for this stupid "piracy OMG PIRACY" shit to end? 10 years? 15? Now they want to push for censorship? They've gone against the constituents directly and we have no fault to blame but our own for letting these jackasses get in office (hint: about 80% of congress/senate should not be there).
If you think this is a party issue you are looking at the wrong focus. Corporatism owns both sides of the argument. Why do you think that the Patriot act got signed again with not a single minute of debate? Was that a "republican" or "democratic" issue? No.
National health care would be a good thing if we had it in a good form. However, how quickly did both sides buckle on that shit? Where is any form of actual preventative care? Where is any focus on moving things towards preventing problems? Simply having it ensures it's going to be a: useless and b: Expensive as fuck and c: watch your employers go from covering 50-70% of costs to about 25-50% because they'll be contributing the same amounts while the plan costs go up. We still have problems with medical patents increasing the cost of healthcare tenfold and above, like the situation where a retroactive patent on a drug was granted and the costs went through the roof.
You have tunnel vision. There's so much shit wrong, that focusing on one part will allow it to be exploited.
Estoppel could stop the case entirely, as sun and oracle have written "We're damn glad for android" articles which have recently and quietly been taken down.
I don't know that google will have to go anywhere near it if the judge accepts estoppel as the main answer.
That is also why it's the biggest scam ever. Literally you are buying into DRM. The difference is that you have a way to deal with actually getting a return value here. When you stop paying, you have nothing. You don't even own what you paid to access. Remember their suit with wowglider? You know why they're pissed, because all it did was prevented them from being as successful at being a timesink and deliberately extracting people's money.
World of warcraft is literally the most profitable scam masquerading as legitimate business outside of hundreds of other businesses already doing the same thing, in quite a long time.
Doesn't really matter. You paid for the subscription, you should own the content. http://www.spotifyrip.com/ is one solution. Legal? Grey area. Provable in court? Not in a million years. You're recording the playback. There have been apps that do this for everything from shoutcast to a variety of other things. Streamripper equivalents for spotify can probably do this. I see http://spotiplay.com/how-to-rip-music-from-spotify/ pointing to other alternatives.
That was the first result of https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=export+music+from+spotify&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t , and I'm sure that more is coming, especially with US demand.
Do I trust Spotify? No. Do I trust my hard drive with what I choose to put on it? Yes. This is pretty much equivalent to forking an app, except that we can't really trust the labels any more than spotify.
wait, you're citing the patents that have been found invalid or reduced in scope to almost nothing? Are you serious, even in jest?
"in the wrong" in some fantasy world, perhaps.
Oracle's case is falling apart, and the judge is getting tired of them.
Google will not get a slap on the wrist, they are out for blood with oracle at this point.
Reading comprehension would be good. I said at the theatre. Not "simply not worth seeing"
http://www.digitaldreamdoor.com/pages/movie-home.html shows these magic lists for every decade, so I don't see your point here.