Right because there's absolutely no difference between things that literally make this a playable videogame and politicized sexist racist tokenism shoved in people's faces followed by attacks that if you don't adore it you're an alt-right russian bot nazi.
You realise that well over 80% of the population is outright sick or your shit, right? Particularly the very minorities that you, the single most homogenously rich and white group in the US, insist you speak for.
Anyone who did this would be utterly unpersoned. Feminism is the new Catholic Church, burning heretics and witches and mounting crusades against the unbelievers.
"All"? No, but there will wind up a clear decision that the overwhelming majority accept once the major halahic (jewish law) authorities finish hashing out their disagreements. It's possible this will wind up with different customs similar to how jews from the middle east, north africa, and iberia eat beans and rice during passover while jews from eastern europe don't.
There's no such thing as "whataboutism". That's nothing more than a bad faith silencing tactic from the same family of fallacies as loaded questions. Even moreso when your entire shtick is claiming a moral highground and particular belief system and someone is pointing out the invalidity of those claims.
Whataboutism is shouting that you're egging someone's house because you oppose all animal cruelty and meat eating and then crying foul when someone points out that you spent your morning kicking puppies and have the people throwing eggs had bacon at breakfast.
Alternatively you can interpret machines being female because they're precious, valuable, and cherished by those around them. Your problem is that your entirely worldview and thought process always starts with the same foregone conclusion and simply works backwards to invent justifications for it from there.
There's literally no difference between this law and the law that says you don't need to try to run away from people who break into your home to rape and kill you. None at all. Also if you want to live somewhere with a disarmed populace may I suggest one of the countries with the highest rates of gun control, like the latin american or African dictatorships? Maybe China? North Korea?
The prosecution ALWAYS has to prove you're guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That's the very foundation of liberal principles of justice and law. The only thing Stand Your Ground does is say you have no legal obligation to retreat and may meet force with force in any place you're legally permitted to be.
What on earth gave you any of those ideas? China is a bullshitocracy in which "science" all but can't exist due to the culture of complete dishonesty and corruption in academia and research.
Every single job I see with the word "data" in the name has some of the most comically excessive and overbroad requirements along with every adjective in the thesaurus for "expert". Positions described as "entry level" demand 5+ years of experience in a half dozen technologies ranging from python and SQL to tensorflow, hadoop, spark, and you have be a ninja, wizard, expert, and rockstar in all of them. As for degrees? That's the most hilarious part. They'll take anything from computer science to economics as long as it's a "highly quantitative field".
Personally I'd rather take someone who proves they understand how to work with noisy and ugly real world data, and tell when the numbers are bullshit, and teach them to code than take someone who knows how to code and try to teach them to grok data.
We're entering an era where journalists not only lie through their teeth to smear political opponents, they also routinely engage in blackmail to knock people off the internet and even take tens off thousands of dollars away from charities just because they don't like people.
Really all you're arguing here is that twitter doesn't have a biased algorithm it just deliberately employs every conceivable kind of silencing tactic against wrongthinkers.
Except twitter has repeatedly taken mass action far beyond the scope of what any human or team of humans could possibly accomplish, proving they are acting algorithmically. They've also clearly turned verified status into a way to heavily weight (or outright whitelist people from) their algorithms. Twitter is not acting in accordance with safe harbor provisions anymore and hasn't been for a long time.
Fantastic, enjoy getting yourself banned from twitter and thrown in the pit as an evil alt-right nazi. Also I'm not responsible for your repetitive strain injury from the enormous amount of clicking you'll be doing. Why don't we start with left wing racism and violence in general since really it all comes from the same place. There's far more out there and I'm sure going through these tweets you'll be able to find it. (Ignore this: Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3)Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3)Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3)..)
Except, yknow, in the real world we already have years of very public examples of the left calling everyone up to and including orthodox and gay jews "nazis" just because they're not further left than the Khmer Rouge.
So really the conversation is more like this:
Regressive: Twitter is full of nazis like Shapiro and Rubin! Conservative: What are you talking about they're jewish, Rubin's gay for chrissake Regressive: OMG YOU'RE AN ALT-RIGHT NAZI TOO!
Ad Hitlerum. And also don't forget that rampant antisemitism is perfectly ok for anyone on the left.
Ah yes the SPLC... the same organization that has no problem with Tamika Mallory taking selfies with a holocaust denier who publicly praises Hitler but thinks that anti-salafism women's rights activists like Ayaan Hirsi-Ali are "dangerous extremists".
Slashdot Mirror
SJWs always lie, SJWs always project, SJWs always double down. Right on schedule.
Considering the original "nazi" you SJWs rioted over, literally waging a multi-month armed street war with law enforcement, was an ORTHODOX JEW...
I want you to scroll up for a second and remind yourself what article you're commenting on because apparently you forgot.
BF5 pandered to SJWs, FC5 pissed off SJWs. That's the difference.
Right because there's absolutely no difference between things that literally make this a playable videogame and politicized sexist racist tokenism shoved in people's faces followed by attacks that if you don't adore it you're an alt-right russian bot nazi.
You realise that well over 80% of the population is outright sick or your shit, right? Particularly the very minorities that you, the single most homogenously rich and white group in the US, insist you speak for.
Did you even read anything? They submitted their stuff to the most respected feminist and social justice journals in the world, like Hypatia.
"Stories of the far left's violence, antisemitism, and intolerance are a lie" - Says the Far Left.
Anyone who did this would be utterly unpersoned. Feminism is the new Catholic Church, burning heretics and witches and mounting crusades against the unbelievers.
Or fins and scales.
Speak for yourself, Judaism has accepted the possibility of alien life for millenia.
"All"? No, but there will wind up a clear decision that the overwhelming majority accept once the major halahic (jewish law) authorities finish hashing out their disagreements. It's possible this will wind up with different customs similar to how jews from the middle east, north africa, and iberia eat beans and rice during passover while jews from eastern europe don't.
There's no such thing as "whataboutism". That's nothing more than a bad faith silencing tactic from the same family of fallacies as loaded questions. Even moreso when your entire shtick is claiming a moral highground and particular belief system and someone is pointing out the invalidity of those claims.
Whataboutism is shouting that you're egging someone's house because you oppose all animal cruelty and meat eating and then crying foul when someone points out that you spent your morning kicking puppies and have the people throwing eggs had bacon at breakfast.
Alternatively you can interpret machines being female because they're precious, valuable, and cherished by those around them. Your problem is that your entirely worldview and thought process always starts with the same foregone conclusion and simply works backwards to invent justifications for it from there.
There's literally no difference between this law and the law that says you don't need to try to run away from people who break into your home to rape and kill you. None at all. Also if you want to live somewhere with a disarmed populace may I suggest one of the countries with the highest rates of gun control, like the latin american or African dictatorships? Maybe China? North Korea?
The prosecution ALWAYS has to prove you're guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That's the very foundation of liberal principles of justice and law. The only thing Stand Your Ground does is say you have no legal obligation to retreat and may meet force with force in any place you're legally permitted to be.
What on earth gave you any of those ideas? China is a bullshitocracy in which "science" all but can't exist due to the culture of complete dishonesty and corruption in academia and research.
That's not rule 34, it's 36: No matter what it is, it's someone's fetish.
Every single job I see with the word "data" in the name has some of the most comically excessive and overbroad requirements along with every adjective in the thesaurus for "expert". Positions described as "entry level" demand 5+ years of experience in a half dozen technologies ranging from python and SQL to tensorflow, hadoop, spark, and you have be a ninja, wizard, expert, and rockstar in all of them. As for degrees? That's the most hilarious part. They'll take anything from computer science to economics as long as it's a "highly quantitative field".
Personally I'd rather take someone who proves they understand how to work with noisy and ugly real world data, and tell when the numbers are bullshit, and teach them to code than take someone who knows how to code and try to teach them to grok data.
We're entering an era where journalists not only lie through their teeth to smear political opponents, they also routinely engage in blackmail to knock people off the internet and even take tens off thousands of dollars away from charities just because they don't like people.
Really all you're arguing here is that twitter doesn't have a biased algorithm it just deliberately employs every conceivable kind of silencing tactic against wrongthinkers.
Except twitter has repeatedly taken mass action far beyond the scope of what any human or team of humans could possibly accomplish, proving they are acting algorithmically. They've also clearly turned verified status into a way to heavily weight (or outright whitelist people from) their algorithms. Twitter is not acting in accordance with safe harbor provisions anymore and hasn't been for a long time.
Fantastic, enjoy getting yourself banned from twitter and thrown in the pit as an evil alt-right nazi. Also I'm not responsible for your repetitive strain injury from the enormous amount of clicking you'll be doing. Why don't we start with left wing racism and violence in general since really it all comes from the same place. There's far more out there and I'm sure going through these tweets you'll be able to find it. (Ignore this: Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3)Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3)Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 25.3)..)
https://twitter.com/AnnaCafoll...
http://archive.is/C4e9C
https://twitter.com/karengeier...
http://archive.is/ZuDFs
https://twitter.com/zackroth/s...
http://archive.is/Ihyc5
https://twitter.com/stevehowey...
http://archive.is/7USCr
https://twitter.com/laraeparke...
http://archive.is/FbkD6
https://twitter.com/johnhornor...
http://archive.is/kJxO7
https://twitter.com/yosoymicha...
http://archive.is/xyc1N
https://twitter.com/tressiemcp...
http://archive.is/JxZqH
https://twitter.com/arthur_aff...
http://archive.is/hHK8M
https://twitter.com/zellieiman...
http://archive.is/lZY2J
https://twitter.com/andreagrim...
http://archive.is/rFlqZ
https://twitter.com/JeanGreasy...
http://archive.is/53kNY
https://twitter.com/moshekashe...
http://archive.is/rslxf
https://twitter.com/LouisPeitz...
http://archive.is/KwYN5
https://twitter.com/OrganikHip...
http://archive.is/SnD2K
https://twitter.com/ShinobiNin...
http://archive.is/qdMJ1
https://twitter.com/tomdefeat/...
http://archive.is/bup4m
https://twitter.com/travishelw...
http://archive.is/j6FLa
Except, yknow, in the real world we already have years of very public examples of the left calling everyone up to and including orthodox and gay jews "nazis" just because they're not further left than the Khmer Rouge.
So really the conversation is more like this:
Regressive: Twitter is full of nazis like Shapiro and Rubin!
Conservative: What are you talking about they're jewish, Rubin's gay for chrissake
Regressive: OMG YOU'RE AN ALT-RIGHT NAZI TOO!
Ad Hitlerum. And also don't forget that rampant antisemitism is perfectly ok for anyone on the left.
Ah yes the SPLC... the same organization that has no problem with Tamika Mallory taking selfies with a holocaust denier who publicly praises Hitler but thinks that anti-salafism women's rights activists like Ayaan Hirsi-Ali are "dangerous extremists".
They call for genocide all the time. Against jews.