Bullshit. You can say all the sexist, racist, antisemitic things you want on mainstream social media as long as you use a few feminsit buzzwords now and again. If you actually gave a fuck about the values you pretend to have you'd be losing your shit over Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory continuing to be blue checkmarks on twitter.
How about that leftist that shot up a church over rape culture after other leftists spent 10 hours on the poorest blackest two streets in all of NYC? Oh, right, you guys pretended he was a right winger.
Conservatives aren't the ones so bad at telling the difference between Nazis and literally anyone else in the world that they'll call even Orthodox Jews "Nazis". You're thinking of the regressive left.
Bullshit. Twitter actively defends this kind of thing as long as it's someone like Sarsour or Farrakhan doing it. They're perfectly happy to allow people to advocate violence against jews, men, asians, anyone as long as they're using the right feminist buzzwords in the process and kiss the ring of social justice.
And once again we see how deeply dishonest the fallacy of "whataboutism" is. If you want to deplatform people you accuse of being violent extremists you don't get to ignore the fact that all of these tech giants are actively defending groups like antifa and even very blatantly antisemitic fanatics like tankies.
When the entire argument is a claimed moral high ground, or the claimed unacceptability of certain things, then it's 100% legitimate and relevant to bring up when they actually do accept and condone those same things. You don't get to scream "blue shirts are unacceptable" and then turn right around and say "that's whataboutism!" when people start bringing up the thousands and thousands of people in r/commieblueshirtclub.
And thanks for that live demonstration of both the phenomenal hypocrisy of the social justice movement as well as absurd dishonest moon logic I was just talking about. The only provocation is wearing a MAGA hat around the alt-left. The only deception is snopes attempting to lie and claim that someone who was attacked was actually the perpetrator because reasons. It's remarkable that no amount of evidence is enough to defend a police officer when BLM decides to throw their weight behind a violent criminal, but when that police officer is saying something politically convenient to you no amount of evidence is enough to defend a victim of left wing violence.
There's nothing unfounded, and the noly misrepresentation here is your outright misrepresentation of the raw video recorded facts.
>Facebook tried to force it by putting Snopes links next to fake news, so the fake news peddlers starting attacking Snopes for being fake/biased.
And what else would you call it when they allow their partisan prejudice to affect their judgements to such an obscene degree that they will watch a live video proving something happened and say it's "false" or "inconclusive" because of some obscene batshit moon logic twisted interpretation of the precise wording of the claim made.
If I hadn't seen a string of articles from the usual suspects (polytaku et al) pushing the same narrative you are here that one might have actually superficially appeared reasonable until the last line where you let your slip show. All you're doing though is parroting the latest addition to the party line, that allowing mere peasants to have a voice and post reviews is wrong and bad and only our glorious social justice leaders should be allowed to decide what is or isn't good for us.
Kotaku is pathological incapable of an honest or decent writeup of anything. They're a living example of some of the most dishonest, unethical, and misleading agitprop on the internet today. They're right up there with infowars, dailykos, and AJ+.
And like I called in my original post they immediately went straight to raising hue and cry over dehumanization and fascism when that's exactly what they themselves have been doing for years dehumanizing everyone that disagrees with them and spouting pro-violence propaganda.
>The more clicks, the more views, the more ads that get views, the more revenue you get. Someone spending 15 minutes reading a comment and writing a response generates one ad view. Someone spending 10 seconds reading a post and 10 seconds replying over those 15 minutes hits two orders of magnitude more ads.
Do you feel like your attention span has been impacted by this too? I used to find it rather effortless to spend time having long-form discussion on websites like/. but in recent years it feels like somehow that skill has eroded and I find myself looking for transcripts rather than watching videos and skipping through lots of long articles.
Then again maybe it's just quality of content that's the issue. I feel like almost every article I read these days has entire paragraphs of substanceless repetition of the same two or three sentences.
Maybe people can't tell the difference because so many real people have been smeared as "Russian Bots" that it's even been used to delegitimize anyone who didn't like The Last Jedi. They can't tell the difference because there isn't one... not because humans and bots behave the same, but because the term is applied to humans so much to dilute it beyond worthlessness.
Ironically the NPC meme provoked immediate outrage and accusations of literal fascism and genocide rhetoric.
take a look at how much influence the Saudis have bought in mainstream media outlets and academia. There's a reason the former will lie through their teeth about Israel even as Hamas claims armed combatants and live video shows armed terrorists with guns and high explosives, and latter is increasingly full of people who will openly violently attack jewish students just for existing while heaping praise on arab colonialism.
Except for, yknow, the many experts who've explicitly said his science was spot on. The ones multiple people have linked you to multiple times (myself included) which you continue to throw down the memory hole and pretend don't exist.
As opposed to all of your arguments which are universally: If they agree with me they're right, if they disagree with me they're woman hating alt-right nazis.
Sorry what was that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of you once again loudly proving that in reality you and feminism stand for the exact opposite of all the values you loudly claim to stand for and are really just a hypocritical sexist bigot hiding behind rhetoric about "equality".
Funny I remember you absolutely stark fucking raving over the fappening leaks but when people you like post leaked pornography of a famous man suddenly it's the end of democracy as we know it when they face consequences for their actions. Once again Serviscope you prove yourself a hypocritical sexist.
No antifa means "Those openly militarized uniform wearing flag carrying feminists who called me, a practicing jew, a nazi and threatened to murder me on my own college campus."
"A totalitarian dictator rose to power because the state wasn't totalitarian enough to silence and repress his movement before he became a dictator!"
Yeah that argument doesn't really sound too compelling. It's kinda like when the military wing of the social justice movement, Antifa, shows up in their black and red uniforms with their black and red flags and start violently attacking everyone who disagrees with them... starting with the practicing jews they call "nazis".
Slashdot Mirror
Bullshit. You can say all the sexist, racist, antisemitic things you want on mainstream social media as long as you use a few feminsit buzzwords now and again. If you actually gave a fuck about the values you pretend to have you'd be losing your shit over Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory continuing to be blue checkmarks on twitter.
Not as much as it takes to be a leftist that calls orthodox jews "nazis"
How about that leftist that shot up a church over rape culture after other leftists spent 10 hours on the poorest blackest two streets in all of NYC? Oh, right, you guys pretended he was a right winger.
Conservatives aren't the ones so bad at telling the difference between Nazis and literally anyone else in the world that they'll call even Orthodox Jews "Nazis". You're thinking of the regressive left.
What's particularly ironic is that SJWs are the most homogenously rich and white group out of basically everyone in the US.
Bullshit. Twitter actively defends this kind of thing as long as it's someone like Sarsour or Farrakhan doing it. They're perfectly happy to allow people to advocate violence against jews, men, asians, anyone as long as they're using the right feminist buzzwords in the process and kiss the ring of social justice.
Also SJWs have been screaming how jews are white european colonialists who control the world for the last ten years now.
And once again we see how deeply dishonest the fallacy of "whataboutism" is. If you want to deplatform people you accuse of being violent extremists you don't get to ignore the fact that all of these tech giants are actively defending groups like antifa and even very blatantly antisemitic fanatics like tankies.
When the entire argument is a claimed moral high ground, or the claimed unacceptability of certain things, then it's 100% legitimate and relevant to bring up when they actually do accept and condone those same things. You don't get to scream "blue shirts are unacceptable" and then turn right around and say "that's whataboutism!" when people start bringing up the thousands and thousands of people in r/commieblueshirtclub.
And that son's name? Baralbert Obamastein!
"Fuck you, who else are you going to go to?"
And thanks for that live demonstration of both the phenomenal hypocrisy of the social justice movement as well as absurd dishonest moon logic I was just talking about. The only provocation is wearing a MAGA hat around the alt-left. The only deception is snopes attempting to lie and claim that someone who was attacked was actually the perpetrator because reasons. It's remarkable that no amount of evidence is enough to defend a police officer when BLM decides to throw their weight behind a violent criminal, but when that police officer is saying something politically convenient to you no amount of evidence is enough to defend a victim of left wing violence.
There's nothing unfounded, and the noly misrepresentation here is your outright misrepresentation of the raw video recorded facts.
Yes because Blaire White doesn't exist, isn't a real person, and wasn't attacked repeatedly in a single night just for wearing a MAGA hat.
>Facebook tried to force it by putting Snopes links next to fake news, so the fake news peddlers starting attacking Snopes for being fake/biased.
And what else would you call it when they allow their partisan prejudice to affect their judgements to such an obscene degree that they will watch a live video proving something happened and say it's "false" or "inconclusive" because of some obscene batshit moon logic twisted interpretation of the precise wording of the claim made.
If I hadn't seen a string of articles from the usual suspects (polytaku et al) pushing the same narrative you are here that one might have actually superficially appeared reasonable until the last line where you let your slip show. All you're doing though is parroting the latest addition to the party line, that allowing mere peasants to have a voice and post reviews is wrong and bad and only our glorious social justice leaders should be allowed to decide what is or isn't good for us.
Kotaku is pathological incapable of an honest or decent writeup of anything. They're a living example of some of the most dishonest, unethical, and misleading agitprop on the internet today. They're right up there with infowars, dailykos, and AJ+.
And like I called in my original post they immediately went straight to raising hue and cry over dehumanization and fascism when that's exactly what they themselves have been doing for years dehumanizing everyone that disagrees with them and spouting pro-violence propaganda.
>The more clicks, the more views, the more ads that get views, the more revenue you get. Someone spending 15 minutes reading a comment and writing a response generates one ad view. Someone spending 10 seconds reading a post and 10 seconds replying over those 15 minutes hits two orders of magnitude more ads.
Do you feel like your attention span has been impacted by this too? I used to find it rather effortless to spend time having long-form discussion on websites like /. but in recent years it feels like somehow that skill has eroded and I find myself looking for transcripts rather than watching videos and skipping through lots of long articles.
Then again maybe it's just quality of content that's the issue. I feel like almost every article I read these days has entire paragraphs of substanceless repetition of the same two or three sentences.
Maybe people can't tell the difference because so many real people have been smeared as "Russian Bots" that it's even been used to delegitimize anyone who didn't like The Last Jedi. They can't tell the difference because there isn't one... not because humans and bots behave the same, but because the term is applied to humans so much to dilute it beyond worthlessness.
Ironically the NPC meme provoked immediate outrage and accusations of literal fascism and genocide rhetoric.
take a look at how much influence the Saudis have bought in mainstream media outlets and academia. There's a reason the former will lie through their teeth about Israel even as Hamas claims armed combatants and live video shows armed terrorists with guns and high explosives, and latter is increasingly full of people who will openly violently attack jewish students just for existing while heaping praise on arab colonialism.
Except for, yknow, the many experts who've explicitly said his science was spot on. The ones multiple people have linked you to multiple times (myself included) which you continue to throw down the memory hole and pretend don't exist.
As opposed to all of your arguments which are universally: If they agree with me they're right, if they disagree with me they're woman hating alt-right nazis.
I've worn stuff like that, I don't get guys that wear even tshirts that tight. It's like being saran wrapped in sandpaper once you start sweating.
Sorry what was that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of you once again loudly proving that in reality you and feminism stand for the exact opposite of all the values you loudly claim to stand for and are really just a hypocritical sexist bigot hiding behind rhetoric about "equality".
Funny I remember you absolutely stark fucking raving over the fappening leaks but when people you like post leaked pornography of a famous man suddenly it's the end of democracy as we know it when they face consequences for their actions. Once again Serviscope you prove yourself a hypocritical sexist.
No antifa means "Those openly militarized uniform wearing flag carrying feminists who called me, a practicing jew, a nazi and threatened to murder me on my own college campus."
"A totalitarian dictator rose to power because the state wasn't totalitarian enough to silence and repress his movement before he became a dictator!"
Yeah that argument doesn't really sound too compelling. It's kinda like when the military wing of the social justice movement, Antifa, shows up in their black and red uniforms with their black and red flags and start violently attacking everyone who disagrees with them... starting with the practicing jews they call "nazis".