Finding something that "mother earth likes" is the least of our (us humans') worries.
Um, actually I would consider that the *most* of our worries, if climate science could be said to have any relevant effect on humans, much more than an economic effect, no matter how much money is involved.
Assuming, of course, the climate scientists are right.
I believe Mrs. Clinton needs to play a little GTA. The game does not encourage your to have sex with hookers and kill them, it merely presents the option.
And if I recall, the game is rated "mature." If the "children" are playing a "mature game" then it is because their parents either purchased it for them, or were too lazy to prevent them from owning such a game.
Shame on you Mrs. Clinton for going after easy political points.
Are we finally reaching the point when we're looking to objects and galaxies so incredibly far away, we're seeing things that only existed in the much younger universe?
Surely with something so far away, the light would take ages to reach here.
MTV was successful in working its way into homes with a campaign to get people to call in and demand it be added to the cable roster.
G4 weaseled its way in by buying a superior channel out, gutting it, then returning itself to the same form that neither the cable companies OR the viewers wanted/asked for.
So is it possible to pull a reverse MTV? What if we started a campaign here to call in to our cable companies and demand en masse that they remove this crap channel nobody wanted?
Ok, I'm a College Freshman. I call shenanigans on the post above. Was he seriously suggesting that teaching the 1 or 2 kids who know how to muck about with a calculator in a "fair" is better than some sort of robotics convention? Are you sure you're a high school kid?
How many different versions of "Robot Wars" and "battle Bots" are there on TV? How many pop culture references towards fighting robots have been made in just the past couple years alone?
If you want wide appeal, robots are the way to go. Anyone will watch a robot do stuff, and the geeks would love to learn to make one. My science teacher in Middle-of-nowhere, New Mexico was able to offer a high school robotics course, and the kids loved it.
Just have a couple fighting robots, then show they can be done for other stuff, etc, and you're guaranteed to garner interest IF it is promoted right. (Link up with the school's student council to get them to promote it.
Sorry, but playing with a calculator won't appeal to that many people.
That showing their true colors in the unending and childish attempt to limit choice and hoard votes might actually be proving Nader right?
Their attacks upon him have been vicious, relentless, and going on since before John Kerry was even selected as the nominee. For the Dems, *ANY* candidate was more important than Ralph Nader, they always viewed him as a spoiler. They could have nominated a one eyed Chihuahua and still would be complaining Ralph was "spoiling" it for them. This election is *their* fight, and they won't even consider the prospect of there being a better candidate than theirs available to the public.
So what do they do? They make sure there isn't one available. When was the last time you heard a Democrat criticise Ralph Nader as an inferior candidate as far as honesty, integrity, or stance on the issues?
Yeah.
Slashdot Mirror
Until it's working in the real world, it's just vaporware.
Even when it's working in the real world, won't "vaporware" work as a name for what fuel cells do anyways?
I'm just afraid it would live up to its name as a "Killer App" considering the common sense of some people on the Internet(s).
Finding something that "mother earth likes" is the least of our (us humans') worries.
Um, actually I would consider that the *most* of our worries, if climate science could be said to have any relevant effect on humans, much more than an economic effect, no matter how much money is involved.
Assuming, of course, the climate scientists are right.
I believe Mrs. Clinton needs to play a little GTA. The game does not encourage your to have sex with hookers and kill them, it merely presents the option. And if I recall, the game is rated "mature." If the "children" are playing a "mature game" then it is because their parents either purchased it for them, or were too lazy to prevent them from owning such a game. Shame on you Mrs. Clinton for going after easy political points.
I can't access it.
Well, it was a good idea while it lasted. Lifetime storage, but nobody can get to it!
Are we finally reaching the point when we're looking to objects and galaxies so incredibly far away, we're seeing things that only existed in the much younger universe? Surely with something so far away, the light would take ages to reach here.
Homo Florescent lights?
And all it got were a fist full of Mardi Gras beads for flashing...
When the sued pointed out they were simply trying to make up their lost money for seeing xXx.
"I heard that there were rumors, uh, on the Internets."
MTV was successful in working its way into homes with a campaign to get people to call in and demand it be added to the cable roster. G4 weaseled its way in by buying a superior channel out, gutting it, then returning itself to the same form that neither the cable companies OR the viewers wanted/asked for. So is it possible to pull a reverse MTV? What if we started a campaign here to call in to our cable companies and demand en masse that they remove this crap channel nobody wanted?
Ok, I'm a College Freshman. I call shenanigans on the post above. Was he seriously suggesting that teaching the 1 or 2 kids who know how to muck about with a calculator in a "fair" is better than some sort of robotics convention? Are you sure you're a high school kid?
How many different versions of "Robot Wars" and "battle Bots" are there on TV? How many pop culture references towards fighting robots have been made in just the past couple years alone?
If you want wide appeal, robots are the way to go. Anyone will watch a robot do stuff, and the geeks would love to learn to make one. My science teacher in Middle-of-nowhere, New Mexico was able to offer a high school robotics course, and the kids loved it.
Just have a couple fighting robots, then show they can be done for other stuff, etc, and you're guaranteed to garner interest IF it is promoted right. (Link up with the school's student council to get them to promote it.
Sorry, but playing with a calculator won't appeal to that many people.
That showing their true colors in the unending and childish attempt to limit choice and hoard votes might actually be proving Nader right? Their attacks upon him have been vicious, relentless, and going on since before John Kerry was even selected as the nominee. For the Dems, *ANY* candidate was more important than Ralph Nader, they always viewed him as a spoiler. They could have nominated a one eyed Chihuahua and still would be complaining Ralph was "spoiling" it for them. This election is *their* fight, and they won't even consider the prospect of there being a better candidate than theirs available to the public. So what do they do? They make sure there isn't one available. When was the last time you heard a Democrat criticise Ralph Nader as an inferior candidate as far as honesty, integrity, or stance on the issues? Yeah.