Slashdot Mirror


G4 Drops TechTV Name

MrM writes "According to the latest press release from G4techTV, G4 will drop the TechTV name in mid-February 2005. This comes as a major step to the old TechTV viewers, as the focused content has become gaming-oriented once more. G4 also released a copy of their "redesigned" logo, but quickly pulled it off the web after release." The article also includes details of "two new series, "Formula D" and "Girls Gone Wired." Formula D appears to be coverage of Drift Racing (because obviously gamers love that), and unfortunately Girls Gone Wired appears to be exactly what you'd expect: Guys ogling video game characters in a beauty pageant.

498 comments

  1. Hmm... by xaqar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Nothing for you to see here, move along."

    How appropriate...

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Offtopic? Did you see the list of shows...there is nothing to see here...

  2. SOB.... by Cyberglich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I miss tech tv :( G4 is the devil.

    1. Re:SOB.... by spac3manspiff · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I miss techTV too, but glad they dropped the name. G4 only a disgrace to the TechTV name in the first place..

    2. Re:SOB.... by GFLPraxis · · Score: 1

      AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!

      Comcast should have bought TTV and kept them as seperate channels. Merging them was idiotic. They fired half the TTV cast and replaced them with rabid gamers.

      Just look at the Screen Savers! Half the cast is gone (Leo ruled) and has been replaced with these wacky game-obsessed nuts.

    3. Re:SOB.... by elecngnr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I too am glad they dropped the TechTV name. I had stopped watching TechTV when they started getting rid of people who knew what the hell they were talking about or would bring people on who knew the what they were talking about. Replacing these true techies with rejects from 'The OC' was a bad move. And, not surprisingly, with these rejects you started to see a younger client base that wanted more game crap.

      I was not aware how bad it was until a few weeks when I switched in on and it was all gaming stuff. That was enough for me. Sorry to see the old TechTV go, it was pretty cool having a station like that--although my wife appreciated it much less than I did.

      --
      Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
    4. Re:SOB.... by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      Game obsessed? All the hosts on the G4 shows are TV personality wannabes, but without the whole personality thing going for them. I'm sure they play video games, but I'm sure that they got the job by agreeing to work for peanuts.

    5. Re:SOB.... by 99x · · Score: 2, Funny

      what was comcast's intent in consolidating the 2 channels in the first place? within a couple months tech tv was barely recognizable ? what's left...TSS, Anime Unleashed and X-Play. I think the head of Comcast is a Morgan Webb fanboy and is hoping to get lucky.

      --
      wtfmeen.
    6. Re:SOB.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Screen savers went completely down the toilet when it moved to G4. I literally couldn't sit through the first episode so I quit watching. I tried watching again a couple of weeks ago, and if anything it was worse....
      I have seen better quality public access and high school student produced programs....

    7. Re:SOB.... by eheldreth · · Score: 1

      I thought patrick was an ok host, but to be honest it just wasn't tecttv after the screen savers got rid of kate.

      --
      The perversity of the Universe tends towards a maximum. - O'Toole's Corollary
    8. Re:SOB.... by maverick41 · · Score: 1

      Remember the "good ole days" when TechTV was ZDTV? You could watch Call For Help 6 times a day!

    9. Re:SOB.... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      I got Digital Cable just shortly after the aquisition of Tech TV by G4. At first i really liked it. I loved shows like "The Screen Savers" even though I new most of the stuff they were talking about already. But the programming changed so rapidly to be all games all the time. Now I like games as much as the next person, but all games all the time? BORING! When they changed the name in the digital Guide listings to just G4TV I knew it was over and removed it from may favorites list on my remote. Good job you G4 morons. You lost a viewer who makes an income of over $80,000.00 a year and has large amounts of that as discretionary spending money. I'm sure I'm not the only one either.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    10. Re:SOB.... by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

      Even those shows arn't nearly what they used to be. TSS just simply isn't good without Leo.

      --
      -- Nic
    11. Re:SOB.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discretionary spending money?

      http://www.realdoll.com

    12. Re:SOB.... by chrish · · Score: 1

      They've whored up X-Play quite a bit lately... new set, new perm, more makeup and "sexier" clothes for Morgan.

      I suppose next they'll be firing Adam or replacing him with some sort of Ken doll or something.

      --
      - chrish
    13. Re:SOB.... by Skaboi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I first watched TechTV back when it was ZDTV. At that time I was only a bit of a computer nerd and TechTV completely changed it.

      I built my first computer from instructions given by Leo Laporte on Call For Help......

      I'll miss TechTV an insane amount. Now it's just filled with crap.

      Atleast Sessler is still around.

    14. Re:SOB.... by chrish · · Score: 1

      Leo's still on the Canadian version of Call for Help. Not sure if there's anything you can do to get the Canadian flavour of G4TechTV if you're not in Canada...

      --
      - chrish
    15. Re:SOB.... by Evil_Timmy · · Score: 1

      I used to love ZDTV back when that was its title. It was great, you felt like you were really interacting with the people (the on-air email checkers were cool, and I got a mention or two there over the years). However, now they're at the point that they're firing the replacements for the replacements for the replacements, and the original cast is that much better by comparison. The criteria for being a host initially was pretty much (a) don't look like a troll (b) know the subject matter. Their personalities fit the type of show the host was doing, simply because it's what you'd expect from someone in the field. More of a discussion between friends than a 'Hey, listen to us, we're cool and on TV. Buuuuy stuuuuuf.' One of these days, someone will come out with a proper tech-junkie network. What just might work is a web-based subscription service, with different shows/segments sponsored by different websites (the /. Nerd News in Review, the HardOCP hardware update, the Gizmodo tech report, the BluesNews gaming guide, Tom's Hardware guide to buying everything, the Register tech-news-in-Europe update, etc). Make it into an hourlong show weekly, crediting all the content sources appropriately, but including videos of game demos, applications in use, and of course the hosts. With talent and a little sponsorship, something like this could really take off and show people not only how to run a techie TV show but how the internet is a viable way to distribute TV shows, beyond what BTEFNet's already proved ;).

    16. Re:SOB.... by GT_Onizuka · · Score: 1

      The show was horrible in the first place. I'm sick of all the horrible over-acting and lame jokes coming out of both of their mouths. Nonetheless, it's a lot more than anything G4 had to offer.

      --
      If you take out Country Kitchen buffet, old people won't know what to do.
    17. Re:SOB.... by TarrVetus · · Score: 1

      You know, when the Screen Savers had their final episode I felt like I was saying goodbye to family. When I watched ZDTV and TechTV it was the first time that I felt that it was ok to like technology--to be a geek or nerd. Leo and Patrick showed me that you could be a geek and still be cool, and that had a huge impact on my self-image. Not only that, but the huge success of the Screen Savers helped improve the world's perception of us. People appreciated us more after tech became more mainstream, and TechTV was largely responsible for that.

      If it wasn't for TechTV I would still be a total social recluse. TechTV taught me that I'm a geek, and that's ok. Now I watch G4/TechTV and I barely find any of the positive images I used to see of tech people; now I only see edgy teen culture, pushing the latest game and telling the world what's cool.

      TechTV opened my eyes to the greater world of technology, and brought me here to Slashdot. Rest in peace, TechTV, and bless Leo and Patrick.

    18. Re:SOB.... by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

      I believe they used this 'merger' tactic to wedge G4 onto the Dish Network, and various cable network channel line ups. No providers in my area ever carried G4, and using this tactic they've gained a much higher potential (hah) viewer base.

    19. Re:SOB.... by Jorkapp · · Score: 1

      You could pirate a Canadian satellite service like Bell ExpressVu - though i claim no responsibility for whatever troubles this may get you in.

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    20. Re:SOB.... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I had to ask myself why they even bought the channel? They got rid of most of TechTV's shows or changed them beyond recognition. The shows are different enough that they could have just made their own and left TechTV out if it. It's obvious that they had no intention of merging the channels.

      My theory is that it stems from TechTV havin XPlay. It was more of a Microsoftish move to remove the one show of competition that TechTV provided to their entire set of programming.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    21. Re:SOB.... by Cratylus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was one very simple reason why they bought TechTv - to get more viewers. TechTV was on both major satellite providers and several cable systems. These providers had no interest in G4.

    22. Re:SOB.... by burnsy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I had to ask myself why they even bought the channel?"

      The one word answer is carriage. G4 was in 15 million homes and TechTV was in 43 million homes.

      Now "G4 - Video Game Televison" is carried in 44 million homes.

    23. Re:SOB.... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      That didn't immediately occur to me. With my cable provider, G4 was one of the standard 60-something channels. TechTV was only available if you had digital cable.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    24. Re:SOB.... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Okay, right. And if I bang my head on the desk a couple times, I can even see how some MBA at G4 decided this would be a good idea. But then that spark of rationality that refuses to go away, no matter how much coffee and sugar I eat, speaks up and says, "What the hell is the point of buying the audience of a network if you're going to cut all the shows that they watched?". It'd be like Spike TV buying the O network so they can get an audience of female viewers, and then showing Stripperella and that extreme elemination show 24/7.

    25. Re:SOB.... by Syntax+Heir · · Score: 1

      Wow! Well put. ZDTV/TechTV circa 2001 those were good times indeed.

      --
      The greatest hindrance to success is a well-rationalized excuse
    26. Re:SOB.... by Syntax+Heir · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that's when they ask you, "Do you want fries with that?"

      Sometimes I splurge a little and say yes.

      --
      The greatest hindrance to success is a well-rationalized excuse
    27. Re:SOB.... by Intruger · · Score: 1

      For those who don't know... Leo Laporte is doing the Canadian version of Call for Help eversince he left the American version.

    28. Re:SOB.... by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 2, Informative
      It seemed to start out slowly, but then it snowballed.

      Megan Morrone. Gone.....
      Chris Pirillo. Gone.....
      Leo Laporte.
      Patrick Norton
      Yoshi (I think... haven't watched in a while...)

      Half a dozen others I can't remember (until I get some sleep....)

      Goodbye, TSS, CFH, Tech Live (The only news program I watched) and Thunderbirds. Goodbye Netcam Network, Call in Friday and Help-a-thons. I loved TechTV when it was still Tech.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    29. Re:SOB.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast spent 150 million bucks letting Charles Hirschorn create his all-games-all-the-time channel, G4. They had a hard time getting cable systems (even Comcast-owned ones) to pick up the channel. Then they discovered TechTV was for sale. TechTV was available in more than three times as many homes as G4 (42 or 43 million vs. 13 million). TechTV was on the block cheap -- genius visionary investory Paul Allen had bought it for more than $300 million and put in lots more to operate it and develop it over four or five years; he was willing to sell for a loss -- $290 million. So the Comcast and G4 geniuses bought it as a relatively inexpensive way of buying distribution for G4. The problem with their genius plan is that the G4 programming sucks, their programming people suck, and their on-air people suck. The channel was unrated before the merger because of its limited distribution (if they had paid for ratings, the reports would have come back "hash marks," meaning a number too low to mean anything). TechTV started getting ratings a while back -- not huge by any means, but growing steadily -- so there was a benchmark in place when the awful two-headed infant G4TechTV was born. The ratings since that bundle of joy was dumped on the doorstep of TV-land have been bad and getting worse.

      So that was Comcast's intent, and that's what came of it. Caution: Geniuses at work!!!

    30. Re:SOB.... by czd · · Score: 1

      The only reason he is doing this is because, he got backstabed by G4 & since his show was about actual 'Technology' and not games, it had to get cancelled. Too bad for all the americans who cannot watch his show.

    31. Re:SOB.... by czd · · Score: 1

      Im with you on that! Bye, bye good shows and welcome gay shows!

    32. Re:SOB.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original Extended Play was much better, with just Adam by himself (before they added Morgan, changed the name to XPlay, and "spiced it up").

      Extended Play got in more pure game reviews in a half hour than XPlay got covered in several half hour episodes. XPlay started wasting time on stupid banter; Extended Play was just pure game reviews, fast, intelligent, no-nonsense, and to the point.

    33. Re:SOB.... by sboutwell · · Score: 1

      G4 Sucks so hard, it isn't even close to what TechTV is or was. ALL GAMING ALL the time should be that channels motto. They wouldn't know a useful thing to do with a computer if it Knocked them all off their XBox's or Playstations and clones.

  3. another step in the wrong direction by lightdarkness · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Obviously G4 didn't learn anything when they lost most of their fan base. G4 buying Tech TV was the worst thing to happen in ages.

    Now they are going further away from the right thing. Getting rid of more shows, and adding lame ones.

    It's still my hope that the old TechTV crew will start their own network, that would be awesome. G4 has ruined everything they ever made me believe in (TechTV that is).

    1. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Jane_the_Great · · Score: 2, Insightful
      " Obviously G4 didn't learn anything when they lost most of their fan base. G4 buying Tech TV was the worst thing to happen in ages."
      It must be Comcast's belief that the potential audience of gamers is greater than the audience of "technology enthusiasts" [for lack of a better term]. I think this may just be correct but the question is whether the gaming audience will show up.

      "Now they are going further away from the right thing."
      Keep in mind that it is the right thing according to you and you are one person. Comcast is not going to cater individually to your interests and they must believe that the gaming audience is larger or a more compelling demographic for advertisers than the old audience was. Can you argue otherwise?

      "G4 has ruined everything they ever made me believe in (TechTV that is)."
      Oh my god - get over it. TechTV had some okay shows but a lot of them were just half hour commercials for the latest gadget and many others were so dumbed down as to be completely useless. Don't romanticize TechTV so much - it was a g.d. cable station, not a renaissance.
      --
      THIS ACCOUNT IS OFFICIALLY RETIRED/RETARDED.
    2. Re:another step in the wrong direction by beckerbuns · · Score: 4, Insightful

      After G4TechTV (or whatever it's going to be called) ruined the Screen Savers by getting rid of everyone who was entertaining and had actual knowledge, and replacing them with a bunch of good-looking young know-nothings, I stopped watching.

      It is really too bad that they've ruined a perfectly good channel. There was so much potential to make it better but they just keep making it worse.

    3. Re:another step in the wrong direction by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      ...I think this may just be correct but the question is whether the gaming audience will show up.

      Yeah. I think that most "Gamers" would rather be playing games than watching them most of the time.

      Keep in mind that it is the right thing according to you and you are one person. Comcast is not going to cater individually to your interests and they must believe that the gaming audience is larger or a more compelling demographic for advertisers than the old audience was. Can you argue otherwise?

      Of course the company will cater to the masses, that is corporate america. But Slashdot is a place for opinions, I don't think that you need to point out that his opinion was one man's opinion.

      Oh my god - get over it. TechTV had some okay shows but a lot of them were just half hour commercials for the latest gadget and many others were so dumbed down as to be completely useless. Don't romanticize TechTV so much - it was a g.d. cable station, not a renaissance.

      Geez, calm down, dude. TechTV had been on the decline before G4 bought it. Well, either that or the shows got so monotonous that I never wanted to watch them anymore. They were dumbed down too much, what I wouldn't give for a network for real computer geeks. Some Linux shows, watching people write code and secure systems. Fun for all ages! But they probably won't create a show for 5 people to watch. Oh well.

    4. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Enahs · · Score: 1
      Keep in mind that it is the right thing according to you and you are one person. Comcast is not going to cater individually to your interests and they must believe that the gaming audience is larger or a more compelling demographic for advertisers than the old audience was. Can you argue otherwise?



      It doesn't take a keen business sense to figure out that when someone's playing a game on their console game system, they're not watching TV.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    5. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Oh my god - get over it. TechTV had some okay shows but a lot of them were just half hour commercials for the latest gadget and many others were so dumbed down as to be completely useless. Don't romanticize TechTV so much - it was a g.d. cable station, not a renaissance."

      Tech TV could have made the grade. The focus was wrong when they went main stream. I use satelite TV and have a much easier time changing my subscription selections. Given that the media of TV can in future be greatly enhanched with digital tech I can see very different uses than just entertainment. There is room for streaming education and very interesting new ways to alow subscribers to access things other than just preprogrammed crap. Tech TV was heading in the right direction. Just imagine a TV subscription that alowed the user to download educational material. For instance lessons in C programming, with compilers, code examples, documentation, etc.
      The posibilities for affordable distance education are endless. You are dead wrong, G4 sucks and will fail because it eliminates choice and caters to an
      audience with no choice other than the off button.

      The Ratfynk

    6. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Jane_the_Great · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Really? Then why have other "hobby" channels had success? Wouldn't people want to be outside fishing rather than watch fishing on television? Wouldn't people want to be doing arts and crafts rather than watching it on television? Take your "keen business sense" and shove it up your ass you moron.

      --
      THIS ACCOUNT IS OFFICIALLY RETIRED/RETARDED.
    7. Re:another step in the wrong direction by drakaan · · Score: 1
      what I wouldn't give for a network for real computer geeks. Some Linux shows, watching people write code and secure systems. Fun for all ages! But they probably won't create a show for 5 people to watch. Oh well.

      Sure they will, they'll just air it as a 'torrent stream instead of a commercial broadcast. When do you want to begin production of episode 1?

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    8. Re:another step in the wrong direction by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amen. The point at which I completely dumped Screen Savers and removed it from TiVo's to do list was the day they were discussing static electricity and computer components. I kid you not, they thought "new" components were not sensitive to static anymore. To prove this, they shocked a couple sticks of RAM using a Vandergraph generator and then a STUN GUN and were genuinely surprised when the ram didn't function anymore.

      --
      !hoD
    9. Re:another step in the wrong direction by eSavior · · Score: 1

      I dont really think your examples really fit. The difference between say a fishing channel and a gaming channel is that the amount of setup to doing fishing is much greater. You have a hard day at work come home and you wish you were fishing, you cant really go fishing right now because its 11pm and you have to get up at 6am tomarrow, why not live in a fantasy a bit and watch the fishing channel. The difference is with gaming, the game is right there for you, there is no ramp up to the activity. The same person could come home and watch tv about gaming or move his finger to the right a bit and press the power button on his ps2.

    10. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. The show is just pathetic and unwatchable now....

    11. Re:another step in the wrong direction by vcjim · · Score: 1

      at leaar they ditched "Thunderbirds"

    12. Re:another step in the wrong direction by fmaxwell · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I tried to watch the new Screen Savers with an open mind, but was horrified by the complete lack of technical know-how exhibited by the pretty boys and girls that they hired. Like the other poster, I sadly removed it from TiVo's To-Do list and I later gave it "thumbs down" when TiVo took the initiative and recorded a couple of episodes on its own.

      I really don't understand the corporate mentality at Comcast. If you you have a totally different vision of what a tech channel should be, aren't interested in producing programming in the San Francisco area, and don't want to use the rights to the name "TechTV", why would you buy TechTV? Comcast's management could not have honestly believed that they would retain TechTV's audience after dumbing down the shows and replacing just about every on-screen personality with some reject from MTV's Real World. Comcast, if you don't intend to keep the people, the production facilities, the channel name, the shows, or the audience, just what were you buying?

    13. Re:another step in the wrong direction by The_Whole_Fn_Show · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more. I watched two or three episodes after Patrick left TSS, and I was especially shocked not that the quality went down, but by how quickly it went down. I couldn't watch after that. In my mind, G4 killed TSS some time ago.

      Another thing that really got to me was that back when it was just TechTV, I could check the interactive TV Guide info and it would tell me what the show was about. After the merge, the info only said "Computers". Meanwhile, all of the G4 shows displayed exactly what brain-dead garbage (IMHO) they'd be showing. I don't know, that always annoyed me, that after it became G4TechTV, the TechTV portion (which was far superior to the lowest common denominator programming of G4) appeared like the uninvited guest. Maybe I was the only one that it seemed like that to.

      I suppose it's just a point of G4's management trying to make TechTV's programming fit the G4 mold. Of course, the networks weren't even geared to the same people, so I don't know why they would try that. I was personally turned off by the G4 style of programming (if I wanted to kill brain cells, that's what alcohol is for). It's truly sad that they ruined TechTV, b/c I loved that station, and I would NEVER watch G4.

    14. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comcast, if you don't intend to keep the people, the production facilities, the channel name, the shows, or the audience, just what were you buying?

      As another poster commented: market penetration; they got to put G4 on any affiliate that was carrying TechTV.

    15. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. I didn't always agree with the stuff on Tech TV, but at least we had a voice. Heading further and further off in the direction of games is heading off further and further from reality, which is exactly what games do.

    16. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Jane_the_Great · · Score: 0

      What about the arts and crafts? You said my examples didn't fit but only showed how the fishing channel may have not been an adequate example.

      --
      THIS ACCOUNT IS OFFICIALLY RETIRED/RETARDED.
    17. Re:another step in the wrong direction by gandell · · Score: 1

      I decided last night would be my last viewing of the Screen Savers. I've been trying to give the new cast a chance (by that I mean I've seen at least one episode), but the new guy seems to know absolutely nothing about computers at all.
      To make matters worse, he also said that people should watch the movie versions of books instead of reading the books first because "reading is boring".
      Sigh. Goodbye, TechTV. And good riddance G4. I won't miss you at all.

      --
      Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
    18. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...replacing them with a bunch of good-looking young know-nothings...

      Good looking?!? Exactly what show are you watching?

    19. Re:another step in the wrong direction by eSavior · · Score: 1

      Arts and crafts applies in part. Alot of times people watch those shows to get ideas about what they can make. I could see that is being much closer in comparison than the fishing show. Watching to see which games get a high rating, or maybe cheats. Though its obviously a different group of people that a gaming show would appeal to than a bunch of people who want to do crafts. One thing to note is, some people I know who "watch" the arts and craft shows while they are doing arts and crafts. They just leave the tv on while making things. That practise would be harder to carry over with gaming due to the nature of console gaming(taking up the TV).

      So, is it as cut and dry as the parent of your parent(of your parent? lol) made it out to be? No. But it also doesnt quite fit in the art/craft/fishing grouping (mostly because the people who would be attracted to those kind of shows are very different than the 12-34 male gamer(which is who they are targeting).)

    20. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

      G4 buying Tech TV was the worst thing to happen in ages.

      For me it's been pretty swell. I picked up a new digital cable about a month or two before the merge. Sure, I liked Tech TV, and I liked some of G4... but after the merge both became unwatchable. Good thing, since that was really the only reason I had that particular package.

      I've since switched it over to another package for the same price that includes a whole bunch of discovery channels, stuff like the Science channel and international channel, the gameshow channel, and some other interesting stuff like Fit TV. I should thank G4 for making both stations so utterly unwatchable that I could switch the lineup without guilt.

    21. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in Canada! Since Comcast is only a partial owner of the station in Canada, Rogers cable (the key Canadian stakeholder) brought Leo Laporte to Canada to continue taping Call for Help episodes. Now there's much more "techTV" content on the "Canadian" version of G4 and I for one hope that the stations will continue down their different programming paths. Who knows,.. one day Rogers might be able to sell their stake in the original US concept back to American viewers.

    22. Re:another step in the wrong direction by netsfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, I stopped watching when the new cast of the screensavers were checking each others techie outfits they had on. One guy had a tee-shirt that said "ANSWER=42" on it. The girl host asked him what it was an answer to and he said he had no idea, and he picked it out of the TechTV closet because it looked cool. At the point where none of the "TechTV" staff knew what 42 means to techies, was the point that I truned off the channel - forever.

    23. Re:another step in the wrong direction by amuro98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What was Comcast buying?

      Same thing that happens with corporate mergers/takeovers. If you can't compete, you "buy them out", completely removing them from the market.

    24. Re:another step in the wrong direction by zaffir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The day i dumped them was when Dan was wearing a H2G2 t-shirt from Jynx, and NOBODY knew what it was referring to. I think Yoshi finally piped up and informed everyone on the show.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    25. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The difference is with gaming, the game is right there for you, there is no ramp up to the activity,?


      Wargames really are dead, aren't they?

    26. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Now they are going further away from the right thing."

      While I personally agree with you, and can't even watch the channel anymore because of how disgusting its become, part of me wonders if we're just being fanboys.

      I mean, while these seem like obviously dumb business moves to most of the /. crowd, I wonder if since they are targeting a much more mainstream audience, they are in fact making more money than Tech TV used to. Is viewership in fact up? Perhaps someone with more time than me can post their research findings on this.

      I mean, I'm all for bashing G4 for what they've done, but I'd be a little cautious about saying they are making bad business moves until we know for a fact whether or not viewership is up or down and whether or not revenue is up or down since the buyout.

      Never underestimate the stupidity of humanity.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    27. Re:another step in the wrong direction by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      The only show left that is worth watching anymore is XPlay (and perhaps a few of the other speciality shows like Body Hits or Nerd Nation ... whenever they can actually squeek them into the schedule). I was unable to watch anything on G4/TechTV for about 6 months and tuned in the other day to see what The Screen Savers was all about anymore. They had some hip-hop crew of dawgs and biatches for hosts (huh???) and the key feature of that particular show was their field trip to some store that sold dragon and hello kitty memorabilia or something. It was horrible. You know the situation is sad when the last remaining remnant of anything technical and interesting is Kevin Rose.

      XPlay is actually a fun show to watch. I rue the day that the G4 PHBs will turn it into a review of hardcore anime porn. You know it'll happen ... they've done nearly that with all the other shows.

    28. Re:another step in the wrong direction by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Now they are going further away from the right thing. Getting rid of more shows, and adding lame ones.

      Welcome to television! I remember when, not too long ago, Sci-Fi dumped pretty much every sci-fi program it had, in favor of reality shows and 24 Hours a Day of John Edwards. Thankfully, they're getting a little back on track now, but it was pretty bleak for a while there.

      Sooner or later all cable networks become the exact same network. In a while G4 will probably be indistinguishable from TNT.

    29. Re:another step in the wrong direction by funkify · · Score: 1

      After G4TechTV (or whatever it's going to be called) ruined the Screen Savers by getting rid of everyone who was entertaining and had actual knowledge, and replacing them with a bunch of good-looking young know-nothings, I stopped watching. Good looking? My ass!

    30. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I watched TechTV for was Anime Unleashed.

    31. Re:another step in the wrong direction by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As another poster commented: market penetration; they got to put G4 on any affiliate that was carrying TechTV.

      You and the other poster are probably correct, but the wisdom of Comcast's decision remains to be seen. Disappointing an existing loyal audience while forcing your channel into markets where the consumers aren't clamoring for it seems to be an odd way to build a successful channel. In fact, it seems like a good way to shoot yourself in the foot. Were Comcast's G4 channel to suddenly appear in addition to TechTV, I'd probably have been apathetic. But now, having been exposed to it from the standpoint of what they did to The Screen Savers, I'm actively hostile towards it.

    32. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh. i think maybe 2 people on slashdot know what it means. google tells me it's some online community the BBC runs that has some relation to hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy. no idea what Jynx is. i'm guessing it's some pseudo-hip-nerdster t-shirt and gadget store, probably online.

    33. Re:another step in the wrong direction by macshit · · Score: 1

      Comcast is not going to cater individually to your interests and they must believe that the gaming audience is larger or a more compelling demographic for advertisers than the old audience was. Can you argue otherwise?

      These new shows seemed aimed more at (some bizarre subgroup of) the NASCAR/strip-bar demographic -- larger to be sure, but more desirable for advertisers?!? My impression is that the typical techie/nerd is a lot more free with his money than the walmart crowd...

      Disclaimer: I've never watched G4 or techtv, or their mutant spawn. I don't have cable. Hell, I don't even live in the U.S.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    34. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Valen0 · · Score: 1

      > [...] what I wouldn't give for a network for real computer geeks. Some Linux shows, watching people write code and secure systems. Fun for all ages! But they probably won't create a show for 5 people to watch. Oh well.

      The is already a now defunct show for this purpose: http://www.thebroken.org/ . Rumor is the show will be restarting again sometime in the future.

      --
      -Valen
    35. Re:another step in the wrong direction by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      How am I a troll?

      And why should an AC giving "moderation lessons" be taken seriously?

      If I wanted to troll, I would have rambled on about a beowulf cluster of video game boobies spelling out "Frist Post - linux suxor!"

    36. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Jane_the_Great · · Score: 1
      "My impression is that the typical techie/nerd is a lot more free with his money than the walmart crowd..."
      Oh, that's nice. Considering that Walmart is one of the largest retailers in the U.S., the "Walmart crowd" [as you call them] is composed of more than the "NASCAR/strip-bar demographic". So, let's first assume that you believe that the Walmart crowd is more enticing to advertisers than techies. This is just wrong. What are the majority of adverts on television for? I'll tell you what - it's not cold cathode kits or books on Linux or programmable robots. Thus, the Walmart crowd is more attractive because that crowd caters to more mainstream advertisers and, since more advertisers are competing for time slots, there is more competition for time. Next, let's assume that you're only comparing this "NASCAR/strip-bar demographic" to the techie crowd. Looking at this survey it appears that NASCAR fans are much more loyal to those who sponsor programs they watch - very enticing to retailers. Can you find a similar study to say the same thing for the techie crowd? Another article shows that major companies such as AOL, Chevron, DEWALT, DuPont, Kodak, Lowes, Nabisco, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Rubbermaid, SMIRNOFF ICE TRIPLE BLACKTM, Subway, UPS, Chevrolet, Dodge, and Ford all advertise at NASCAR events. What advertisers line up to advertise to a techie crowd? Based on TechTV's old adverts, it seems that shoddy 2 year schools that give associate's degrees in IT are going to be the main crowd for such an audience. Furthermore, as demonstrated, the major car companies [who spend an incredible amount on advertising each year] already know and are comfortable with the so-called NASCAR demographic.

      Go ahead and generalize about the "NASCAR/strip-bar demographic" all you like but you should know that you're wrong.

      --
      THIS ACCOUNT IS OFFICIALLY RETIRED/RETARDED.
    37. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Syntax+Heir · · Score: 1

      Who is being trolled? Comcast loyalists?

      --
      The greatest hindrance to success is a well-rationalized excuse
    38. Re:another step in the wrong direction by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I mean, while these seem like obviously dumb business moves to most of the /. crowd, I wonder if since they are targeting a much more mainstream audience, they are in fact making more money than Tech TV used to. Is viewership in fact up? Perhaps someone with more time than me can post their research findings on this.

      I can't imagine viewership is up. Even among non-slashdot reading peers of mine, my gaming friends (those G4 is apparently targeting) aren't watching the channel. Most complain about how none of the new games are given any decent reviews. Mostly they show shareware garbage that few people are going to care about.

      I don't get or watch the channel (haven't since it got put on digital cable) so I don't really have an opinion of my own.

    39. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      I mean, while these seem like obviously dumb business moves to most of the /. crowd, I wonder if since they are targeting a much more mainstream audience

      ** Chokes on pretzel **

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    40. Re:another step in the wrong direction by skyman8081 · · Score: 1

      Who needs The Screen Savers. I get KFI.

      And my cable plan doesn't extend to G4TechTV.
      --
      Two Roommates and a Boyfriend, updates Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
    41. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. Given the chance, you would fuck the Asian chick up the ass.

    42. Re:another step in the wrong direction by funkify · · Score: 1

      Mmmm... dirt roads... nah, not even with your dick, hhehhehehe.

    43. Re:another step in the wrong direction by AgentTech · · Score: 1

      This guy couldn't be anymore right about the loss of TechTV. G4 has pushed there crapy shows to the point where that channel has almost become too annoying to watch. Shows like cheat should not be shown. If you have to cheat to beat the game, go back to playing pong! And who really wants to watch people sitting around there computers playing games. Oooohh... so much fun. X-play is the only thing keeping me really watching that channel because the G4 version of that type of show sucks. I hope it does come to the point where the TechTV cast make there own station once again and takes back X-paly and screensavers. Kill the G4!!!!

    44. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      I'll call.

      What the heck does 'H2G2' mean?

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    45. Re:another step in the wrong direction by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Even though this thread is way old, you might see this. Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy. The shirt had 42 on the front, and a reference to the towel on the back. If you've read the book you'd know what both of these things were references to instantly.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    46. Re:another step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got to attend a ScreenSavers taping before the G4 acquisition in May of 2003. I have a lovely photo of Patrick, Leo and I. I can't believe that someone thought that they didn't need to be a part of the ScreenSavers. Tragic.

  4. Just another Nail in the Coffin by The+Monkey+Boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not that this really suprises me teh whole network has gotten terrible. I guess just a guarantee they will never get my viewership back

  5. logo? by cdf12345 · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a cached copy of the new (lamer) logo?

    Damn I hate comcast.

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
    1. Re:logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  6. "Girls Gone Wired" by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh my friggin god, you weren't kidding. It's really about a virtual beauty pageant! I was under some asinine impression that it'd be about women who are into technology.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Israfels · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's because there's more virtual women than there are ACTUAL women that are into technology.

    2. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Can't be much worse than the "Who's Your Daddy?" reality show on Fox (look it up).

    3. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is too late you the world son.

      I think it is Playboy but possibly Penthouse that either has already done or plans to do a spread of a computer generated model. Wait wait, it was Playboy and the chick was from, aww crap I can't remember but some game with a hot chick in it.

    4. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Squatchman · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for "Girls Gone Wired: Penguin Style starring Linus"

    5. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by yasth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah I can't believe they used the title without dripping irony. You know a discussion about how stereotyping and harrasment is preventing women moving into computers and gaming. Ah well.

      I somehow don't see it as lasting long. (I mean selling low grade softcore porn is probably not the best way to get viewers post internet.) Though I never understood the centerfolds in gaming mags that they occasionally put in.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    6. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      And virtual girls tend to look better too. Here are some p i c s

      of ATI's virtual girl Ruby. Here are some real women ATI made to look like Ruby. This proves once again that the virtual world is better than the real one.
      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    7. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Exactly!!! Without the irony it's just stupid! In fact, without the irony, G4 is opening itself up to a trademark lawsuit from the Girls Gone Wild guys. With the irony, the shows would be different so there would be no likelihood of confusion. Without the irony, and since the shows are similar, there could be.

      If the show survives, which I doubt it will, I expect a name change real soon.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    8. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Come on, "Virtual Beauty Pageant" as a TV show concept will go far. Imagine what you'll see:
      Talent Competition: Ever see a huge-breasted male fantasy dazzle a national TV audience with her ability to recite the first book of the Aeneid from memory with perfect meter? Now you will.
      Virtual vaseline on virtual teeth.
      Commercials from Dow Chemical, padded bra manufacturers and Chiropracters!


      Why don't they just get it over with and have the Boob Network? Oh wait, they already do. Oh crap, and they've already done the favorite biologically impossible female video game star thing. Ah double crap.
      You know, not every offering on their schedule need conjure images of maladjusted 15-year-olds with joysticks in hand.

    9. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly fair; the photographs you linked to were taken under poor lighting conditions (from above alone- no flash used for that pic), probably with a non-professional camera, and are unlikely to have had much time involved in setting up.

      This came up before, and I made the same point then; trade shows, with lighting from above, and quick shot photographs do *not* make for pretty pictures.

      I saw photographs of (what I assume were) the same girls elsewhere, and they looked *much* nicer than they do in that photograph.

      "Virtual Girls" always makes me think of Lara Croft a few years back (pre-movies). Proof that you *can* go too far (stupidly narrow waist and huge breasts, which had polygon facets on them). Not that it stopped lots of 14-year olds drooling over it, but 14-year-old boys will wank over anything, so that doesn't mean much.

    10. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by urbieta · · Score: 1

      A search for wired girls gave me this :S http://www.ywcaboulder.org/wired/IHAD/group1.jpg

      whoops!

      they should interview hot women that recently adopted the new geek life of, erp, reading slashdot, carying laptops everywhere, blogging etc... I'd buy that for a buck!

    11. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      It was Playboy and the character/game was BloodRayne. It was mentioned in an earlier /. article about designing games that women would appreciate. It's a good read, and only about 4 magazine pages long (not very long). Has pictures of video game chicks too. (sarcasm)

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    12. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by TooTechForYou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, or girl's who have been into technology since they were kids. I don't really consider blogging as a "geek life" trait though. It has become the "flavor of the week." My little brother's high school had an article in the school paper on blogging. If you read some, it says "I did this because it is kewl." When I first read the title "Girls Gone Wired" I was excited because I thought it would be something for girl's like me. Then again, if they had a show specificly for girls like that, it could easily bring about more stereotypes. I could just see it now "My iPod mini is pink, isn't it so cute?"

      --
      -- Nic
    13. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      Checking out the responses, it looks noone watched "Unscrewed with Martin Sargent".

      It was a segment on his show, but it really was more about 'oh look, i found this supermodels website, here's some pix' than 'girls in technology'. I don't have high expectations. The funny thing is, I'm a cableone subscriber (pity me) and I got their "plus package" solely for TechTV. Looks like I'll be dropping that soon.

      Also, did anyone notice DanHuard's little blog post about TSS having fake calls is now gone? He's emptied his blog for some reason.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    14. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by dynamo · · Score: 1

      If they already have a Boob Network,gimme a URL to prove it.

    15. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha ha! GOD I love the year 1989!!! Which is the last time that joke was fresh.

    16. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by arkanes · · Score: 1

      In fairness, I think it's mainly the lighting and poor photography that makes those women look so horrid.

    17. Re:"Girls Gone Wired" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noticed that this show is not even scheduled anymore .. anyone wanting to keep any of this content should probably cache it now .. it's days are numbered!

  7. GGW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girls Gone Wired appears to be exactly what you'd expect: Guys ogling video game characters in a beauty pageant.

    Will they also have a post-midnight "blue" airing of Custer's Revenge?

  8. cant they think of a better name for a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geez just yesterdat we were all talking about steriotype

  9. Uh oh... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    The dumbing down of G4 starts.

    Soon you'll have "Trading CPUs" where neighbours trade machines for a day and soup them up and "What Not to Warez" where a couple of leet kids go through your hard disk and erase downloaded software.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Uh oh... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Both those shows, as dumb as they sound, are far better than any of the crap G4 puts on.

      Having said that, that 'Warez' show you mentioned might not be a bad idea for the general, spyware infested population.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Uh oh... by ViceClown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dumbing down starts? I don't think you can get any "dumber" than G4 already is. The poor TechTV souls...

      --
      Have a Happy.
    3. Re:Uh oh... by stupidfoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Queer Eye for the 'Pretending to be a 14 Year old Girl' Guy?

    4. Re:Uh oh... by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Funny

      A good show might be "Windows Eye for the Linux Guy".

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    5. Re:Uh oh... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now it's clear. G4 bought TTV to put them out of business, plain and simple. No more competition.

      Fine, they wasted their money. We're not out here *starving* for information on computers and gaming. There's lots of alternative places to go. The TTV viewers like myself won't start watching G4, we'll just be cancelling our TiVo season pass for the Screen Savers and move on.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    6. Re:Uh oh... by hawks5999 · · Score: 1

      You nailed this right on. I cancelled my SP for TSS as soon as they ditched Alex, Yoshi, etc. Now, I've removed 354 (G4) from the channels I receive list on my DirecTivo.

    7. Re:Uh oh... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Funny
      Dumbing down starts? I don't think you can get any "dumber" than G4 already is. The poor TechTV souls...

      At least not until the yet-to-be-announced merger of G4 and SpikeTV.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    8. Re:Uh oh... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      If anyone cares you can tell them how much they suck. Here is a link to a contact us page G4techTv

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    9. Re:Uh oh... by ViceClown · · Score: 1

      Good lord! That would definitely be plumbing the depths of rediculously mindless television.

      --
      Have a Happy.
    10. Re:Uh oh... by kiddailey · · Score: 1


      You are a genuis and should be a television executive.

      I actually thought "What Not To Warez" should be a show about which software was not worth the time to download though ;)

    11. Re:Uh oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is /.'s opportunity!!!!!! /.tv

    12. Re:Uh oh... by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      Actually those both sound more interesting than their current programming.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    13. Re:Uh oh... by macserv · · Score: 1

      Or maybe "Mac Style for the Dell Pile".

    14. Re:Uh oh... by ewhac · · Score: 1

      You forgot 'Leet Eye for the Lame Guy, where five gaming experts -- specializing in the fields of Strategy and Tactics, Hardware (product placement opportunity), System Configuration, Culture, and Health -- all descend on a llama, retrofit his system and connection and give him a foundation of m4d 5|<1llz to improve his game.

      Yes, I have been thinking about this...

      Schwab

    15. Re:Uh oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is any way to mod a post up above 5, the parent seriously deserves it. TNN ran itself into the ground when it became SpikeTV catering to the "Me man. Want fast cars, loose women." crowd. It sounds like G4 is heading down the same road.

    16. Re:Uh oh... by stalky14 · · Score: 1
      And then MTV...

      My god, that would so brain-draining that it would warp the images on adjacent channels, sucking away any IQ points they might offer!

      ...Sean.

    17. Re:Uh oh... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Horribly, I bet if you found the right people you could actually successfully pitch this show to G4.

    18. Re:Uh oh... by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Given G4's announced program, Girls Gone Wired, I doubt G4 management has the intellect to recognize that such a program could actually work (product placement opportunities, human interest, leverages known formula -- exactly the sort of "safe" thing Hollywood producers like).

      Schwab

    19. Re:Uh oh... by pyrofx · · Score: 1

      Why buy something they were just going to destroy anyway?

    20. Re:Uh oh... by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think there is more tech in SpikeTV than G4.

    21. Re:Uh oh... by czd · · Score: 1

      All that has to be done is, everyone subscribed to G4, cancells theyre Subscription with them, and they go out of business, then some person stars it again from the stone age. I fell so sorry for Leo and the gang!

    22. Re:Uh oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... duh.

      No one watched G4. Their target audience was watching TechTV.

  10. Well that sucks. by barryman_5000 · · Score: 1

    G4 has been pretty horrible with some of its gaming stuff. I watched some of it yesterday and the only good thing was Xplay. The shows where they show people playing tournaments are lame. I could download a replay of really good players before watching that garbage. Question: Is there no longer a screen savers or fresh gear!? At least fresh gears would do well on another network. People love electronics.

  11. With the loss of the name by castlec · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to take this time to give a final goodbye to my formerly beloved TechTV/ZDNet.

    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
  12. words fail me by RobertTaylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The network also presented TCA critics with "Girls Gone Wired," a digital beauty pageant featuring the hottest 2D and 3D women on the planet"

    Thats just sad...

    1. Re:words fail me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've met lots of 3D women hotter than that.

    2. Re:words fail me by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      >> a digital beauty pageant featuring the hottest 2D and 3D women on the planet"
      > Thats just sad...

      Yeah, how stupid just featuring video game women, overlooking such hotties as the Little Mermaid and Jane Jetson.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:words fail me by LOKIOLR · · Score: 1

      What's even sadder was how the concept was stolen from Unscrewed before they cancelled that.

    4. Re:words fail me by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      You know, I may oogle over video game and cartoon women, but at least I have the decency to do it in private or among other pervs, and to not broadcast it on TV.

    5. Re:words fail me by Osty · · Score: 1

      Except that Unscrewed used real women, not video game characters.

    6. Re:words fail me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The network also presented TCA critics with "Girls Gone Wired," a digital beauty pageant featuring the hottest 2D and 3D women on the planet"

      And you thought just the nerds were desperate perverts.

  13. I miss the old TechTV by ISmokeRocks · · Score: 1

    I have noticed a distinct lack of quality and origionality ever since G4 got involved with Tech TV.

    1. Re:I miss the old TechTV by benna · · Score: 1

      It has been getting worse and worse since ZDTV became TechTV. I stopped watching before G4 bought it. G4 only made it worse.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  14. Flushing toiltet by nickyandthefuture · · Score: 1

    Didn't Douglas Adams predict that American television would eventually devolve into an image of a toilet flushing accompanied by a riotous laugh track? Is this better or worse?

    1. Re:Flushing toiltet by umrgregg · · Score: 1
      This is approximately 42 times worse.

      Really though, This is now the network for poloshirt wearing frat boys who think Halo 2 is the first FPS to have deathmatch.

      --
      NMG
    2. Re:Flushing toiltet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's equivalent.

    3. Re:Flushing toiltet by jardun · · Score: 1

      ...up to isomorphism.

  15. Lame by alienfluid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Who watches this lame channel anyway? Please help infect my test machine at: 139.147.8.100 (unpatched WinXP and IIS)

  16. Comcast should be sued ... by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was a ploy by Comcast to get on satellite and on charter and Time Warner cable systems.

    I have noticed (although have to admit I watch the channel maybe 15 minutes a week now) that Comcast is advertising.

    Charter Communications has a large hub in my area and from what the "higher ups" have told me - they are quite angry.

    I haven't understood why the former employees and show hosts don't ban together for a class action lawsuit for wrongful termination.

    I also don't understand why us geeks (who don't want mindless gaming shows 24/7 and miss the older content) can't ban together and find an attorney that will sue Comcast for collusion and misrepresentation.

    It's obvious (especially with this move) that Comcast had NO INTENTION to keep TechTv or any of it's content.

    It's a shame Leo Laporte moved to TechTV in Canada!

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "band", not "ban". Just FYI.

    2. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Eh, Comcast will likely learn their lesson in a couple years when G4 fails miserably (Really, I don't even know any hardcore gamers who like their programming.) and someone else comes out with a TechTV-like channel that ends up being rather successful.

      I, for one, would love to see a channel that runs documentaries on stuff like the life of Babbage and the development of the IBM 360. I'd even buy digitcal cable for it.

    3. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I emailed Leo Laporte asking his thoughts on all that happened.

      I was very surprised that I even got a response but he seemed to hint that a new network is in the works.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    4. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      I haven't understood why the former employees and show hosts don't ban together for a class action lawsuit for wrongful termination.

      The illegal act of "wrongful termination" only occurs when an employer violates specific state or Federal laws, regulations, or constitutional provisions. Unfortunately, there's no law or regulation which generally protects employees from "raw deals."

      It's important to note that most states consider employment to be "at will". That legal term means that, in the absence of contracts stating otherwise, employment is presumed to be voluntary and indefinite for employees and employers. An at-will employee may quit their job whenever they want, usually without consequence. Similarly, at-will employers may terminate employees whenever they want, usually without consequence.

      In many states employers must at show "good cause" for terminating an employee. Good cause (AKA "just cause") simply means 'a legitimate business reason.' In the case of TechTV, the "good cause" could be anything from eliminating redundency after an acquisition to replacing an on-air personality with the hopes of getting better ratings.

      I also don't understand why us geeks (who don't want mindless gaming shows 24/7 and miss the older content) can't ban together and find an attorney that will sue Comcast for collusion and misrepresentation.

      Because Comcast had no legal contract with you. They don't owe you anything. You can't sue a television network every time they change their programming. To use a legal term, you don't have "standing" -- the legal right to initiate a lawsuit.

      It's obvious (especially with this move) that Comcast had NO INTENTION to keep TechTv or any of it's content.

      Nor do they have an obligation to.

      The only grounds for legal action that I can see in this whole mess is a complaint related to monopolistic practices since there were only two channels which were providing tech content, but that's something that should have been broached prior to the acquisition.

    5. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      The last time I tried watching TechTV/G4 was at my brother's over Christmas vacation. While I do have Comcast, I refuse to pay the extra $50/mo to get all the upgrades to get the channel.

      It's pretty clear to me that Comcast's aim isn't "hardcore gamers". They get far more accurate information long before G4 gets a chance to dumb it down for their audience. At least, I know that's the case for me, and I don't even consider myself a hardcore gamer anymore (not enough time ;)

      Instead, G4 is going for the same audience that Spike TV was aimming for with their travesty of an award show for video games that aired earlier this month.

      Yes, apparentally all these years, gamer that I am, I'm supposed to be more interested in rap and rock artists, while ogling the ocassional football video game for the graphics.

    6. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Of course no hardcore gamers would watch it. It's more E! than a videogame channel. With stupid-ass shows like "Cheat!" and the bullshit where they see how celebrities play games... a hardcore gamer has nothing to learn from these fools. I tried to give them a chance, especially when they kept Patrick on TSS but it was just too much to stomach. I still watch X-Play now and then 'cause it's humorously self-deprecating and a decent review show but the rest of the station bites ass.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    7. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by Kenard · · Score: 1

      I hope so. I think all the old cast/crew should join together and start another channel. Their fan base is fairly loyal, so it shouldn't take long to get back to where they were.

      --
      (appended to the end of comments you post)
    8. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by zsazsa · · Score: 1

      Charter Communications has a large hub in my area and from what the "higher ups" have told me - they are quite angry.

      This comes as no surprise as Charter is owned by Paul Allen, who owned TechTV prior to the buyout by Comcast. I can imagine that Charter customers had a hard time finding G4 on their channel lineups before the "merger." Is this just desserts?

    9. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did not keep Patrick on TSS. Patrick stayed in northern California and did not move to southern California with the other TSS cast members; he was smart enough to bail out after the G4 merger.

      Maybe you are thinking of Kevin Rose?

      Patrick was the dude with the sledgehammer and the utilikilt.

    10. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by jseale · · Score: 1

      ...and while he's at it - Viacom, GE/Universal or TimeWarner will most likely get the TechTV spoils in the US. A TimeWarner takeover of TechTV could put TechTV's late-night anime programming on Cartoon Network for example.

    11. Re:Comcast should be sued ... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Patrick stayed on after the merger for a couple months. It was Kev, Patrick, DoubleD, and Sarah for a little while, then Patrick bailed and got married... probably best for him.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  17. Alas TechTV, I knew them well... by CoMmEnT23 · · Score: 1

    At least they can't tarnish the name "TechTV" anymore with G4 gamer-style, non-geek, oriented crap.

    1. Re:Alas TechTV, I knew them well... by randallpowell · · Score: 1
      TechTV wasa littl rough around the edges at times (Leo) but at least they covered tech/sci decently plus geek culture.

      Endless shows about video games with an a virtual girl contest is lame and sad.

      Makes me wonder if Pat Norton will ever get his wn show.

  18. we knew it would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G4 taking over techtv was the worst thing to happen in cable tv since the lifetime channel. When g4 and techtv were seperate networks, techtv always beat out G4 in content and entertainment. With the merge, half of techtv's programming died, now I expect the rest to die with the name. WTG comcast!

  19. You might wanna check out the G4 forums. by thegoogler · · Score: 1
    Do a search on this, this was posted a few months back and kept getting deleated by the staff, but you can still find it somewhere on there.

    Much more in detail about WHY there dropping the techtv name too, evedently people where actually calling them saying things like "You killed techtv, so why dont you drop the name" so there PR department said they should....

    1. Re:You might wanna check out the G4 forums. by ePhil_One · · Score: 3, Informative
      Much more in detail about WHY there dropping the techtv name too, evedently people where actually calling them saying things like "You killed techtv, so why dont you drop the name" so there PR department said they should....

      Why I'm sure some folks were, given the big change in focus, but its very common in corporate renaming to run both names for a while. Its so people understand "its the same product, new name". Otherwise folks would be calling their cable companies complaining that they want their TechTV channel back, and to dump that new G4 channel.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    2. Re:You might wanna check out the G4 forums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's not the same product.

      I swear, if I hit the lottery, TechTV will return, if only in spirit and not name.

      And I would definitely put Unscrewed back on the air.

      Fuck G4. Fuck them up their stank-ass pussies.

    3. Re:You might wanna check out the G4 forums. by czd · · Score: 1

      And atleast put Leo Back on again

  20. drop by Thomas_CK · · Score: 1

    Uh huh... I drop the network when they dropped the ZDTV format.

  21. Not a huge surprise by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Does this really come as a surprise to anyone? The gradual dismantling of Tech TV has been going on for years. Pure tech is too hard to translate into a full channel, and if you dumb it down to reach a wider audience, the core people who would watch a pure tech channel can't stand the content. Tech TV struck a pretty good balance between accessibility and intelligence, but it was always a tough row to hoe.

    How about /.TV? 24 hour news and information for nerds? Fellas?

    1. Re:Not a huge surprise by wowbagger · · Score: 1
      How about /.TV? 24 hour news and information for nerds?


      Well, at least the dumbing-down has already been done, so that's not an issue.

      However, if the /. crew cannot even get together for a couple more Geeks In Space episodes, what makes you think they could do so for a 24 hour video channel?

      It would be all Timothy and Michael, all the time.

    2. Re:Not a huge surprise by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't need to do 24 hours of programming. I know people bitch and complain about dupes on /. but on TV it's perfectly acceptable to play the same show a couple times a day. ;-)

    3. Re:Not a huge surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How about /.TV? 24 hour news and information for nerds?"

      It would never make it. Everyone who was a news junkie would turn it on and say, "didn't I just watch this on CNN." Or "This story was news about 3 weeks ago"

      That along with the misinformation/distortion of facts and obvious bias would turn off most people.

      I think every time it came on people would say, "Hey isn't this that company who hired the guy who hijacked the censorware project."

      It would be a farce.

    4. Re:Not a huge surprise by ultrasonik · · Score: 1

      /. on TV use to be "The Screen Savers". If you missed a day of /. you could at least catch up on the highlights by watching the show. However, anymore it seems like the majority of the show is just being used for shameless product plugs. Also, they have replaced the old geeky hosts with new goofy hosts and thus the over all IQ of the show continues to plummet. TechTV use to be my favorite channel. I felt like I was actually learning about things that mattered. It was like the Discovery Channel of the tech world. Sadly I rarely watch it anymore because this no longer seems to be the case. G4 has killed a great thing. And for what? I don't know...

    5. Re:Not a huge surprise by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pure tech is too hard to translate into a full channel, and if you dumb it down to reach a wider audience, the core people who would watch a pure tech channel can't stand the content.

      One fix may be daytime "4 n00bs" programming, and then after, say, 8pm, when those people are watching CSI or some reality TV, have more hardcore stuff.

      8am: Anime for the jobless
      9am: Anime for the stoners
      10am: TechVision presents: Gadgets for the kitchen
      11am: Alton Brown
      12nn: Squared Foot gardening: Gardening for people in apartments
      1pm: Shojo anime
      2pm: Anime for stoners: repeat (they won't know)
      3pm: Anime for teens
      4pm: Anime for preteens who want to be teens
      5pm: Anime for kids who want to be preteens
      6pm: Robots that fight with each other
      7pm: "Call for Help" - for newbies
      8pm: New Gadgets
      9pm: Gamer's Hour
      10pm: "Call for Help" - for case modders/tweakers
      11pm: "Call for Help" - Linux/BSD (this may need to be 2 hours)
      12mid: "Disclaimer" - Hacks for Hackers on the Edge of legality
      1am: "Look what we found on Bittorrents!
      2am: "Don't do this at home"
      3am: Anime for stoners: repeat (they won't know)

    6. Re:Not a huge surprise by CoreyG · · Score: 1

      How about /.TV? 24 hour news and information for nerds? Fellas?

      At least they'll have an excuse for all the dupes: Reruns

    7. Re:Not a huge surprise by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Nah, its still the Discovery Channel of the tech world. Have you SEEN Discovery lately? All their decent shows have moved onto their other channels and now it might as we be called the decorating and motocycle building channel. At least the Science channel is still somewhat interesting, and Wings (Or the Military Channel, as I think its called now) isn't that bad.

    8. Re:Not a huge surprise by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

      TechTV sucked.

      The ScreenSavers sucked. Why? They spent too much time dwelling on OSX and powerbooks and other Apple stuff. Which, of course, is why slashdotters were so in love with it. The more I watched it, the more it became about Macs and Linux.

      Which is fine for slashdotters, but lets face it, the show was focusing on about 0.00025% of the audience. The whole channel was the same way.

      There's just wasn't enough there. Stuff was too dumbed down for a geek like me to watch, it seemed very "Sesame Street", with like 15 minute segments on what USB is and how to plug the cables in. And there was nothing to attract people with no interest in computers.

      G4 sucks just as bad, but at least it has an audience with the 14-30 year old "X-TREME GAMER LAN PARTY DOOD" set.

      The whole channel reminds me of a spoken word version of the old Nintendo Power magazine, every show they have is basically an infomercial to sell shitty games.

      It's typical "gaming" journalism where they try to portray Army Men: Sarge's Hero's as some great achievement on par with Doom 3 or Half Life 2.

      It's all just an excuse to make me pay more for "basic cable". I wish I could choose not to pay for G4, BET, ONE, Lifetime, CMT, Golf Channel, Food Network, Speed Channel, and that mexican channel I call "Channel Ocho" a la the Simpsons.

      Hopefully with all the new digital delivery methods (phone, fiber, coax, satellite), the suits will get their heads out of their asses and realize that they'd make more money by charging a small flat rate per channel I want, rather than these crappy bundles.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Not a huge surprise by SunFan · · Score: 1

      How about /.TV?

      Who would watch a 24 hour mud wrestling channel?

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    10. Re:Not a huge surprise by papasui · · Score: 1

      The first week can be compiling gentoo and the next three weeks can be compiling open office. They could do it in a sports format yelling out the compiler output playback.

    11. Re:Not a huge surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know four ex-CBS excutives perfect for the job of /. TV.

    12. Re:Not a huge surprise by SunFan · · Score: 1

      Discovery channel has exactly three good shows out of a 24x7 lineup. The rest is all "Shark Week" hype crap that leads to CNN broadcasting shark bites for 15 hours out of each day.

      I knew cable TV started hitting new lows when in one show, the host drilled five holes in a scrap 2x4 and called it a centerpiece for holding candles. I don't even think she painted it. It was really really pathetic.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    13. Re:Not a huge surprise by SunFan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pure tech is too hard to translate into a full channel...

      For hard core viewers, it is actually very easy. Just broadcast PCI bus waveform traces of people downloading porn over their network card.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    14. Re:Not a huge surprise by dj245 · · Score: 1

      I recently went to Fredricton, Canada for a ME event and saw a Mechanical Engineering fight club. Its pretty amazing what you can get away with when you don't have to pay your own health care, bad as it may be.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    15. Re:Not a huge surprise by duffduff · · Score: 1

      Stoners up at 9am is not going to happen, and I think even 2pm is a stretch.

    16. Re:Not a huge surprise by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. Ever heard of wake-n-bake? *cough cough*

    17. Re:Not a huge surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TechTV's Screen Savers and other shows were very useful to older generations and the not-so-saavy. TechTV made a lot of concepts approachable to new users and of course I had the annoying line of people outside my office repeating everything said on tech tv word for word (there's a downside for everything).
      My boss finally understood some new concepts, and friends at work started to understand issues about open source, IP and copyright laws,Linux, microsoft not being the best thing in the world, and what hardware doesn't suck!

      I've brought up most of these issues for years to people and groups but an apporachable tv show or two made these concepts clear to them and validated my perspective witht them as well.

      When I first saw g4 on the air, it had about 8 hours of merciless repeat programming EVERY DAY ALL DAY! and was mostly 1 big 'self pleasing' ad. They had some cool things like the vidgame champs at mario or 18 wheeler, but that was it. 3-5 game 'champs' repeated for months (how close to free is it to make one of those spots?!]

      I've been cableless right before techtv got the plug pulled so i haven't seen the decline but i can easliy imagine what great things vu's marketing goons are saying to avoid some blame on buying a ship and sinking it... or maybe not..

    18. Re:Not a huge surprise by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Care to clarify? As in...Fight club for MEs?

      And what abotu EEs? Can they get in on the action?

      --
      ± 29 dB
    19. Re:Not a huge surprise by dj245 · · Score: 1

      One of the Fredericton engineers had a beef with another one about the best placement for the steering wheel on their gravity car (learn more here One of them was short and wanted it closer to the seat, the other was tall and wanted it farther away. In the end they placed it according to data about the armlength of the average person. But they were still angry. Hench- Mechanical Engineering Fight Club!

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    20. Re:Not a huge surprise by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      That's nowhere near as exciting as I was hoping.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    21. Re:Not a huge surprise by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Its an annual event now the night before the race. And they really did beat the shit out of each other, one of them was knocked out and had to go to the hospital for a severe concussion. But hey, its Canada so it was a freebie

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    22. Re:Not a huge surprise by Syntax+Heir · · Score: 1

      The first rule of Mechanical Engineering fight club is you don't... awww nevermind.

      --
      The greatest hindrance to success is a well-rationalized excuse
    23. Re:Not a huge surprise by czd · · Score: 1

      Well maybe if you were a Nerd and knew something then it might actually make sence to have a 27/7 channel for geeks/Nerds!

    24. Re:Not a huge surprise by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      Stoners and/or jobless people up before 10am? What planet are you from?

      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
  22. Remember the Golden Days by sir_mud_the_hairless · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When Patrick wore his utilikilt and the network actually taught people about computers.

    --
    * "I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer." *
    1. Re:Remember the Golden Days by mopslik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...or when TLC meant "The Learning Channel" rather than "Monster $OBJECT" and "$TRENDY_HOUSE_DECORATING_SHOW"?

    2. Re:Remember the Golden Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when Discovery meant just that rather than "Norway's Scariest Police Chases" and other sensationalism, and crap like "Motorcycle Xtreme" or whatever it's called.

    3. Re:Remember the Golden Days by KrancHammer · · Score: 1

      Cheap "reality" type programming has ruined those channels. Even David Attenborough's normally wonderful animal programs kinda got into the act with the "Spy in the ___" series.

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    4. Re:Remember the Golden Days by ack154 · · Score: 1

      Actually the "Monster $OBJECT" shows are on Discovery - along with many "American $OBJECT" shows. But yes, TLC is a wasteland of decorating garbage.

    5. Re:Remember the Golden Days by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Discovery is starting to get its share of junk as well, but it does have a few decent shows. Daily Planet, though simplified for the masses, is a good overview of recent science news. But yeah, American Chopper/Hotrod/Dishwasher are pretty inane.

      And why do they air Shark Week(tm) every month?

    6. Re:Remember the Golden Days by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Actually the "Monster $OBJECT" shows are on Discovery

      Yeah, I realized that after clicking "submit". Both channels are owned by the same company, so it's no surprise I can't tell the difference. Replace "Monster $OBJECT" with "A Baby/Wedding/Brisking Story" for yet another reason to avoid TLC.

    7. Re:Remember the Golden Days by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else fear that the golden age for technology or science channels in the mainstream is over?

      I know it's not the same but at least the History Channel hasn't gone to the least common denominator yet.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    8. Re:Remember the Golden Days by SunFan · · Score: 1


      American Chopper is actually a decent show, but most of the spinoffs are crap. They try to replicate the father/son bitching, thinking that drives ratings, when people just tolerate the father/son bitching to look at the bikes and the metalwork.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    9. Re:Remember the Golden Days by k_187 · · Score: 1

      It hasn't? I would say that the History Channel has gotten better over time. There was a time that it fully deserved the monkier "The Hitler Channel" I think over the years they've gotten a lot better at showing there are other points in history beyond WWII.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    10. Re:Remember the Golden Days by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      They sure haven't *returns to "history of sex" marathon*

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    11. Re:Remember the Golden Days by Da+Web+Guru · · Score: 1

      Actually the "Monster $OBJECT" shows are on Discovery - along with many "American $OBJECT" shows.

      You are forgetting about Double Agents... Where rich people debate whether or not a 5 bedroom house is big enough for them, their two children, and their dog...

      --

      --guru

    12. Re:Remember the Golden Days by benna · · Score: 1

      Pfft. The good old days were when it was kate and leo.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    13. Re:Remember the Golden Days by mopslik · · Score: 1

      the father/son bitching

      That's exactly why the show gets on my nerves. I like what they do to the bikes and all, but a good 50% of the show is yelling and screaming at each other about how lazy/controlling/wrong/etc. the people are.

    14. Re:Remember the Golden Days by theancient2 · · Score: 1

      Daily Planet is only on Discovery Canada, so it doesn't count. :) It's the best show on there, though.

      A couple of the engineering type shows are Canadian-only as well.

    15. Re:Remember the Golden Days by Kong99 · · Score: 1
      Agree. The Discovery Channel and The Learning Channel need to change their names. Occasionally these channels have something interesting on but Monster (Fill in the Blank) and yet another Motorcycle show dominate Discovery, and silly designer shows totally dominate TLC. In fact I don't even bother checking whats on TLC anymore.

      It's a shame, both channels use to be high quality, interesting, and informative.

    16. Re:Remember the Golden Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know about that. i had cable access over the holidays and the only thing they talked about was hitler and ww2. i can't remember a time that i didn't switch it on that channel and not hear the words "hitler", "nazi" or some such.

    17. Re:Remember the Golden Days by sir_mud_the_hairless · · Score: 1

      Kate and Leo was the Beginning of the Golden Age. The end of the golden age was when they changed to TechTV, although they were still pretty good until the G4 takeover.

      --
      * "I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer." *
    18. Re:Remember the Golden Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watch it FOR the bitching because I used to work for a small company which had not two bitching people, but three! Father, mother, and son. Two parents that hate each other plus the controlling son. A Paul sr, a Mrs. Paul Sr, and Paul jr.

      And it was exactly like the Chopper dudes except the people I worked for could not DO any of the work themselves. They just stood around bitching out each other and screaming at the employees. They even sounded and looked like the chopper people. The only thing better was when the customers would come in and bitch out all of us.

      Leaving that job was one of my smarter moves. Watching these idiots on TV just takes me back to those days and allows me to laugh my ass off at them and reflect upon how much better my life is right now.

    19. Re:Remember the Golden Days by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Was Mrs. Paul the one with the beard and a tank top?

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    20. Re:Remember the Golden Days by AKMask · · Score: 1

      I bought a Utilikilt beacause of that show. I love that kilt.

    21. Re:Remember the Golden Days by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      The Golden age was Leo and Soledad O'Brien on The Site (MSNBC). The Silver Age was Leo and Kate on The Screen Savers.

  23. Well Duh. by allenw · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are obviously trying to steal "back" the viewership from Spike TV. That whole Video Game Awards thing means war!

    1. Re:Well Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Star Trek, CSI, and bog racing. Spike TV completely owns G4.

    2. Re:Well Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot MXC.

    3. Re:Well Duh. by mausmalone · · Score: 1
      That whole Video Game Awards thing means war!
      I declared war on Spike TV because of it, though mostly because it was a hollow attempt to co-opt my culture and sell it to people who'd like to punch me in the hallway and take my lunch money.
      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  24. let me get this straight by astrokid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Merge with well respected company with original content.
    2. Destroy all original content and replace with mindless crap.
    3. Disassociate yourself with merged company.
    4. Profit??

    I really miss the Tech TV of old. I was very suprised to see what G4 did to the Screensavers and all the other programming on the network.

    So what exactly was the point with merging with Tech TV in the first place? Was it just to gut it from within?

    --

    Chewie does not get a medal. Come on, George. Can a Wookie get a medal?
    1. Re:let me get this straight by Eggplant62 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I noted that they were starting to give more coverage to the Linux side of the table before the gutting took place. Maybe Comcast got paid by some software monopolist to take it over and defang the menace. We couldn't have a network that's informing the peasants that there's a choice in operating systems, could we?

    2. Re:let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was to get eyeballs, pure and simple. TechTV had many more outlets.

    3. Re:let me get this straight by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      1. Merge with well respected company with original content.
      2. Destroy all original content and replace with mindless crap.
      3. Disassociate yourself with merged company.
      4. Profit??


      That's pretty much it, except for the "profit" part.

      The whole merger was basically so G4 could gain marketshare, since many cable/satellite systems carried TechTV, but few carried G4. Mission accomplished, but it won't last long. Who actually watches this crap (I loved TechTV when it actually had an ounce of "tech")

      If the people running G4 had any sense, their business plan would have been:

      1. Merge with well respected company with original content.
      2. Dump least popular TechTV shows, and replace with popular G4 shows.
      3. Profit!

      But alas, I'm sure some douchbag executives lined their pockets and bailed long before the G4TechTV downfall.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:let me get this straight by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Maybe Comcast got paid by some software monopolist to take it over and defang the menace.

      Comcast isn't that smart and Bill Gates isn't that dumb. I have a feeling that Comcast is going to become a black hole model for media providers. Let's just hope it collapses on itself soon.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:let me get this straight by agildehaus · · Score: 1

      "So what exactly was the point with merging with Tech TV in the first place? Was it just to gut it from within?

      G4 was hardly carried anywhere, TechTV had an established market in many areas. The goal was to use TechTV to gain viewership.

  25. The reason I got DirectTV by KrancHammer · · Score: 1

    I was at a friend's house 7 or 8 years ago and was flipping through the channels when I saw this station dedicated to computers and computing. I was instantly enthralled, especially with the Screensavers with Leo and what's-her-name, the first co-host. Ok, so here is this smart, hot chick that knows computers. Wow. So, I went home and bought a directTV system so I could watch TechTv.
    G4? Bleh.

    --
    Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    1. Re:The reason I got DirectTV by kb7oeb · · Score: 1

      That I was Kate, I miss her

    2. Re:The reason I got DirectTV by Graemee · · Score: 1

      You could always get a grey market canuck dish, expressVu or Starchoice and see Leo and a hot chick who knows computers now.

    3. Re:The reason I got DirectTV by KrancHammer · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, I became engaged to a hot chick who (kinda) knows computers, so satisfying that geeky urge. It would be kinda hard to justify that expenditure.
      Besides, I could just see it: "Gee, honey, she's way smarter about computers than you!" And that, fellas, in case you don't know, is even worse and potentially more life-threatening than the whole "Is my ass fat" thing.

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    4. Re:The reason I got DirectTV by slapout · · Score: 1

      Her name is Kate Botello

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  26. This blows for TechTV fans by AwesomeJT · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have watched less of TechTV since G4 took over. That's all they seem to focus on. Little of any "real" value. Way back in the day when Leo and Patrick hosted the ScreenSavers -- I got actual advice I could use with the occasional game-oriented segments. They still have game-only shows, but TechTV focused on the computer as a whole -- not just gaming. I think this is a disservice to all loyal fans of TechTV. If you want an exclusive gaming channel -- that's fine -- go do that -- but don't ruin a decent technology channel with much broader spectrum and appeal.

    I think my days of watching G4/TechTV or whatever they call themselves has come to an end. GAME OVER!

    --
    SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
    1. Re:This blows for TechTV fans by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Way back in the day when Leo and Patrick hosted the ScreenSavers -- I got actual advice I could use with the occasional game-oriented segments.

      Back during the day when TSS would dedicate an entire hour (or 90 minutes.... back in the really old days) to motherboards and ram, or to obscure photoshop tips.
      I can only hope that Ziff Davis, or some other company comes up with a new TechTV like network... that will hopefully lure back some of TechTV's old talent.
      I knew that the G4 didn't care about TechTV the moment Leo announced his resignation. And it doesn't surprise me (or anyone else, it seems), that they're dropping the TechTV monkier.

    2. Re:This blows for TechTV fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You used to watch the screensavers in the interest of seeing something you may have missed while browsing /. or maybe learn some new trick. Once they started having guest bands on the screensavers show I knew it was time to go. It started to become less tech and more 'entertainment'.

    3. Re:This blows for TechTV fans by oni · · Score: 1

      I was always a bit surprised that one of these networks didn't actually hire malda et al to do a show on geek life or something.

  27. that is good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now there will be no past linked to TechTV so nobody wonders why it sucks so hard now.

    Just before G4 took it over techTV was getting pretty cool and the ScreenSavers was one (only) good tech shows on TV. It was getting to the point where there was some good content on the show.

    Now it is just more G4 game glam BS.

    The ScreenSavers website used to be a great site now just full of dumb content and even more adds

    Thanks G4!!!!

  28. Bollocks do they interact with real girls.... by RobertTaylor · · Score: 1

    "Our audience interacts with digital girls as much as real girls and we're tapping into that fantasy," ...ah 'fantasy'. Could be true then ;)

    They have fantasy 'real girls'!

  29. How totally "XtReMe!@#" by lewp · · Score: 1

    Does anybody even watch this channel? After I saw that emo chick's tits watching the actual programming became pointless.

    G4/(TechTV or not) has about as much to do with actual geeks or gamers as the Outdoor Life Network (you know, because we never go outside, uh huh huh).

    Besides, if they were real gamers they'd be too busy playing WoW to make television shows.

    --
    Game... blouses.
    1. Re:How totally "XtReMe!@#" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am unfamiliar with the emo chick's tits. Were they so hot as to make focusing on anything else impossible, or so horribly disfigured / nonexistent as to force you to change the channel in self-defense?

    2. Re:How totally "XtReMe!@#" by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      He's talking about Cat Schwartz. She did some personal nude photos and cropped them with Photoshop and uploaded them to her blog. Photoshop saves a thumbnail of the entire photo and the nudes got out on the net.

  30. It's poop now. by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    I stopped watching that program almost as quickly as G4 took over. TechTV was a great show, to bad they have driven it into the dirt.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  31. Formula D: more Xtreme crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drifting is to motor racing as figure skating is to hockey. Any Initial D fan that thinks drifting is the fastest way to corner has never driven a car in competition.

    The other show sounds like the NOPI Lifestyle for geeks. Maybe next they'll add wings and big tachs to their computers.

  32. Sad by ViceClown · · Score: 1

    This is almost heart breaking. TechTV was like the last bastion of smart, quirky technology reporting mixing older and younger opinions and experiences. Now the only smart parts have been evicerated and the only things that are left are the craptacularly poorly produced G4 game shows. What a shame. Terrible terrible shame.

    --
    Have a Happy.
  33. So when... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...will some other station buy XPlay so I can stop watching G4 altogether?

    I think the most disturbing TV image ever created by man is the Shadow Watermelon Carrier crafted to advertise the "G-Spot" (that term alone tells you where the minds of the stations owners lie).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So when... by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      "Shadow Watermelon Carrier"
      In fact it was so disturbing that one must assume it was done by an outside agency: nobody at G4 would have been capable of anything so creatively weird.

  34. Not a Major step by Grayswan · · Score: 1

    I think this is a incremental step toward me never watching the channel again.

    --
    If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
  35. Downward spiral to the drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The channel has gone down the drain. I don't like the hosts on ScreenSavers at all and none of the other shows on there is good enough to keep my interest in this "specialty channel". While I still enjoy seeing Leo on Call For Help (it's available here in Canada), it's not enough for me to continue paying the subscription for this channel.

    Sorry, this channel sucks now as it's entirely aimed at the gaming community now.

  36. TechTV Viewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I once watched TechTV all of the time. There were a lot of great shows about technology and innovation that were worth watching. We've stopped watching as the shows have been dumbed down.

    It's one thing to have a show about Video Games on a technology channel, it's another thing to have a channel about Video Games that has a sprinkling of technology.

    I was hoping that Comcast would use their leverage to add even more quality programming. Now it looks like all they've done is buy battle bots and XPlay and destroy the rest.

  37. This is a sad day by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

    This is a sad day in the world of technology. The reason I originally bought TechTV was because of its name. I hadn't heard too much about it, but when I found out that there was a channel called TechTV, I knew I had to have it.

    But G4? What is that, a PPC box? Its shows suck too -- the only two show I'm left watching on the whole God forsaken channel now are the Screen Savers, and Call for Help, both of which were imported from TechTV.

    Thanks a lot, G4. You've killed quality.

  38. I tried.. by wickedj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I tried to like it, I really did. But then, no one likes to watch someone else play a game. Sure, a game review might be nice once in a while but I'm not going to watch a television show for about 30 minutes where it's just a bunch of guys playing a game and not really saying anything of worth such as, "Suck it, punk b*tch!" to each other. Why watch them play a game when you could turn on your own machine and play.

    At least with TechTV, they had decent shows like the ScreenSavers.

    1. Re:I tried.. by kiddailey · · Score: 1

      With that mentality, why watch anything:
      • Why watch sports when you could go play sports
      • Why watch cooking shows when you could go cook
      • Why watch pay-per-view pr0n when you could go ...
      ... er. Nevermind.

      Seriously though, I really like the idea of having broadcast gaming as big and cool as traditional sports. A good CTF or Assault match with experienced players can be fun to watch, but it's going to take a long time before the format is perfected.
    2. Re:I tried.. by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      2 of your examples are right out.

      Playing professional sports is nothing like you grabbing a few honkeys and tossing the ball in the back yard and watching pay per view porn is nothing like the activity you're implying. But when you play a game you're playing the EXACT SAME THING they're doing on the TV. And it's not like the people they have playing are stupidly good or anything either. There's no format to perfect because 'pointing the camera at someone while they're having fun doing what you do all the time' is not a format. It's just stupid.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    3. Re:I tried.. by Nick_dm · · Score: 1

      Well maybe the problem is that the players aren't good enough, or they have the wrong game. I remember when I first watched a game of quakeworld with really top level players playing, I was completely stunned, because the way they played the game was so different to the way I played with my friends or online. When I was gaming actively I used to spend just as much time watching games as playing, if not more, it's pretty practical though as a player because you can learn stuff by watching a good player for 30 minutes that would take you months to work out on you own.

      Anyway, there are quite a lot of people out there who do like watching games, many websites providing large numbers of recordings and also web radio stations dedicated to live commentary of matches. Some big championship matches have hit 20,000+ live viewers, OK that may not be enough for TV, but there is some potential. Remember in Korea they have live televisted profesional gaming (starcraft and warcraft 3 mainly, I think), so it definately posible, but perhaps not in the West right now. But perhaps they (G4) could have carved out a niche in this area if they had sent some cameras to the major world gaming events and done some serious coverage.

  39. G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by HP-UX'er · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to get their crappy programming into millions of more homes by 'buying' TechTV's slot in most Cable Companies lineup. I mean really, no one would give them a whole freaking channel otherwise. Any clown can see their current (not original TechTV shows) shows are total shit. /rant

    1. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I really wish you were wrong.

      Unfortunately, you're right. What they've done is unforgivable. They destoryed the channel, and the shows the kept, save X-Play (which was already far superior to any of the gaming shows G4 already had), they mangled beyond recognition. The Screen Savers is no longer even worth watching.

      Call For Help? Gone.
      Fresh Gear? Gone.
      Unscrewed? Gone.
      Tech Live? Gone.

      I could go on and on and on. Ugh...it SUCKS.

      I sincerely hope someone steps up and resurrects some of this content. It used to be some of the smallest amount of worthwhile content on TV.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    2. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by HP-UX'er · · Score: 1

      yea, we are on the same page ...

    3. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by Arkhan · · Score: 1

      Of course, they'd already dropped some of the best shows, even before that:

      Big Thinkers - serious TV for nerds - long, focused interviews with people nerds would actually be interested in

      Silicon Spin - okay, it had a little bit of a sideshow feel, but still really interesting roundtable discussion of tech (and related legal, political, business) issues with the big names of the day

      Internet Tonight - stupid, sure, but that funny sort of stupid that you actually like. You know what I mean. Admit it.

      And of course, all the little special programs they'd whip up on the history of computing, famous historical figures, cryptology, etc.

      Mmm... a reason to actually watch a little TV. Can't find a reason, these days.

    4. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by numbski · · Score: 1

      Cybercrime and The Money Machine were pretty good too, now that I think about it.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    5. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Robot Wars has made the transition unscathed. Now if only they could somehow make it entertaining.

    6. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by beakerMeep · · Score: 1

      Body Hits was also a great show

      --
      meep
    7. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by irix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I sincerely hope someone steps up and resurrects some of this content.

      Leo Laporte is still doing Call for Help on G4TechTV Canada. We still get a bunch of the content from the US G4TechTV though. Is it illegal to own a Candian satellite receiver in the US?

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    8. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      Big Thinkers was an excellent show. I wished I had caught more episodes. Anybody know if you can request them on VHS/DVD at all?

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    9. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by stalky14 · · Score: 1
      This is the perfect opportunity for a small, up-and-coming channel like DIY to pick up some TechTV-like content and use it to become more popular. Something like the current Canadian incarnation of Call For Help would be a perfect fit for them. A resurrected ScreenSavers too.

      The only thing is that TechTV was all about live, realtime viewer interactivity. Most cable channels are only geared for prerecorded programming.

      [G4]TechTV was, and AFAIK still is, something like 13% owned by Echostar. Echostar is reportedly in developnent with Universal in creating a new music video channel that actually shows music videos. Perhaps after they look at G4's viewership numbers, they'll cash out and start something better there too. They certainly have the means and an obvious desire to start vertically integrating the way the likes of Time Warner has.

      ...Sean.

    10. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      You're right, I had actually forgotten about Silicon Spin and Internet Tonight. Man, they had a good little niche going.

      But like one of the other posters said, instead of their supposed audience, G4/TTV caters to the people that want to beat them up and take their lunch money.

    11. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      In your run-down of favorite ZDTV/TechTV shows, you omitted one of my own personal favorites:

      Big Thinkers

      Sure, that one was gone before ZDTV became TechTV, but I sure did enjoy watching John Dvorak ask questions of some of the folks ./ would interview online (e.g., Esther Dyson, John Gage, Steve Wozniak, Gilman Louie, Eric Schmidt, Jaron Lanier, etc.).

      It's depressing to think that the audience for TechTV's really innovative programs was smaller than NPR, and so few people (even here in Silicon Valley) bothered to tune in. It truly sucks.

    12. Re:G4 bought TechTV for one reason ... by IrishMASMS · · Score: 1

      Agreed with all the above.

      And some personal insight, from a recent event:
      Last week at CES here in Las Vegas the G4TechTV folks had a booth, where on Saturday & Sunday they were giving away free stuff - everything that had TechTV on it. T-shirts, bags, hats, pens, paperweights, you name it.
      When I showed up for the giveaways on Saturday, it was a gaggle f%ck - the G4 folks running the both had no idea how they were going to run the giveaways, it was a mass gaggle until one of the gals finally yelled for the crowd to line up. While waiting for the start, everyone in line was bitching the same complaints we read here in this Slashdot thread & that no one bothers to watch.
      The line starts, and the same gal starts ordering people around - only two items, come on pick what you want & move on, hold on it is getting too confusing/too many people at once, yadda yadda yadda. It was a total gaggle f%ck!
      I go through & plan on grabbing two White XL TechTV t-shirts; and thought I'll go through again to grab a hat & a lanyard. Nothing was said you could not go through the line twice, right? So I go through & grab the two shirts, and then join the end of the line again to complete the plan. When I get up closer to the booth, the same ordering people around gal starts yelling at me, asking what I was doing in line again & we were only allowed through once, etc. No matter of reasoning and pointing out to her what she did or did not say would make it work. She was the last word, and hell bend that she/they did not care about the TechTV fans.

      So I had a fellow conference attendee grab me the lanyard, they wanted the hat.

      I know I was borderline on not watching back in November before moving out here to Sin City; with the attitude & the amount of 'Vitamin B' of the G4 staff I interacted with at CES it is a definite. They do not care about creating & airing quality programming, or how they treat their customers. There are ways to keep your integrity, be a good businessperson, and make a profit - but these folks only think they have an understanding on making a profit.

  40. Makes perfect sense. by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    Formula D is obviously capitalizing off of popular anime Initial D. The manga version of which is sold at Radio Shack next to the RC cars. So there's plenty of geek interest there.

    As for Girls Gone Wired... that's just another example of how patheticly detached from reality our culture has become. It'll be boring though.

    (Side note: In terms of which anime is appropriate for kids to watch and which aren't, Initial D is #1 on my list for teens not too watch. That last thing you need is for them to display "imitiative behavior" and illegally race cars down treacherous mountain roads.)

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Makes perfect sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, I was attending the conference the Formula D people had at SEMA this year announcing the new show.

      Don't blame the Formula D people; these guys are geeks for cars. You'd be surprised at how parallel the worlds are.

      Anyway, there was some valuable information about what G4/TechTV (what I think I remember it being called in the conference) was looking for in the series. They were not looking for in-depth technical info or anything even computer related.

      They were looking for the viewership of the 17-29 year old male. That's it and nothing more. Hence the Formula D series. It's a very involving (viewer-wise) motorsport that is subjectively judged, so there's no truly "official" scoring system, but it's based on the judge's opinion.

      So these guys are very involving with the crowd and the viewers. Plus, there's enough "cool car" stuff to enthrall people more. The actual experience is great, much better than I expect G4 to actually capture it.

      But for them to even think about their "TechTV" roots is ludicrous. It's actually a good thing they dropped the name, since they dropped the content long ago...

      Hopefully, now, someone else will be able to use the TechTV name for a channel actually related to computer/tech programming.

  41. Gamers TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the fact that they banished Leo to the frozen north...changed the Screen Savers into an every day gamer program. A more appropriate name for them would be gamer tv. Shame that the Linux/Mac crowd has officially been castrated. If you really want to learn anything about tech now you have no choice but to listen to the MS run media.

  42. ObSimpsons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Unfortunately Girls Gone Wired appears to be exactly what you'd expect: Guys ogling video game characters in a beauty pageant."
    Homer: "Boy, you say that like it's a bad thing!"
  43. G4WackTV by CKnight · · Score: 1

    Oh where oh where has Leo Laport gone.

    I long for the days of the ZD branding when it the station wasn't just a recurring list of video game FMVs and ho hum reviews.

    No, I'm not a gamer. How could you tell?

  44. Sad to see it go. by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 1

    TechTV (formerly ZDTV) was a great channel. The daily live news shows were similar in scope to slashdot at times (most of their news came directly from slashdot). The station had a few other gems as well. Big Thinkers interviewed some of the more accomplished and unique (intelligent) people influencing the world today. Body Hits, while not different from your standard TLC or discovery documentary (before Monster House and Trading Spaces), provided a more current look at biology the way a researcher might. This is valuable to a younger audience. Eye drops was a showcase of amateur digital artwork that easily rivaled commercial artwork seen in motion pictures. The most valuable aspect of this channel, perhaps, was the opportunity for kids to not feel like they have to hide their nerdiness from others while also providing ignorant adults insight into the 'magic' behind technology. It is sad to see you go TechTV. Especially to this garbage.

    1. Re:Sad to see it go. by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Silicon Spin. Some people do not like Dvorak, but his show was entertaining. I loved how at the height of the dotcom boom, he would have on all these starry-eyed CEOs and ask them how they were going to compete. Had I paid a little more attention to their responses back then, I would have avoided some pretty sad companies...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  45. Agree, but it seems to be gone... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If Fresh Gear still lives I cannot find it. I agree that Fresh Gear was a show that lots of stations could easily fit in, as it had pretty widespread appeal... and the hosts of the show generally seemed to know what they were talking about.

    I think there are enough good ideas for technical shows to hold a whole channel together, but I don't know if we'll see that again anytime soon. I wonder if G4 is dropping TechTV from the name is the term open for others to use? Probably not, they'll just sit on it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  46. Choice quote by Benanov · · Score: 1
    The network also presented TCA critics with "Girls Gone Wired," a digital beauty pageant featuring the hottest 2D and 3D women on the planet, which is set to premiere in May. Comedian, actor and avid gamer Hal Sparks, who currently stars on Showtime's hit series "Queer as Folk," is slated to host. Sparks, along with a panel of celebrity and industry commentators, will guide viewers in G4's quest to crown the hottest video game vixen. Finalists will be announced online and G4 viewers will vote for the pageant's top beauties.

    My, your polygons are looking good today.

    Sigh. G4 has done no justice to the Tech TV moniker over the years, so it's probably best to dump it. Really seems like the content's getting 'dumbed down' in order to pull a bigger audience in. Which is fine. They are a TV show, after all.

  47. Worse thing in ages... by eSavior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    G4 buying Tech TV was the worst thing to happen in ages.
    Damn... I wish I lived in that universe. :(

    1. Re:Worse thing in ages... by PaleBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, forget the tsunami: Several of my favorite shows have been cancelled or changed!

      --
      ------ What's sadder than realizing you've filtered out your own comments?
    2. Re:Worse thing in ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Damn... I wish I lived in that universe. :(

      Sadly, you do.

  48. The Force by killerface · · Score: 1

    I feel a great disturbance as if millions of televisions screamed and suddenly turned the channel.

  49. a New Tech-TV by jbich · · Score: 0

    Well it sucks this happened, but it was worse when G4 bought tech-tv in the first place. It's pretty much sucked since then.

    X-Play is staying on the air though right?
    Oh what a life without Adam Sessler and Morgan Webb's hilarious, yet brutal reviews.

    Perhaps someone will start a new Tech-TV and us geeks will have a new home on TV.
    Any Takers?

    --
    ---- How absolute the knave is! We must speak by the card, or equivocation will undo us. -Shakespeare
    1. Re:a New Tech-TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like my women like my coffee: ground up and in the freezer.

  50. That pretty much clinches it... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    I used to enjoy some of the shows on TechTV. Since the Comcast acquisition and the change to G4 and the shift of programming to more gaming-oriented shows, it's lost all appeal to me at all. Looks like it's time to remove it from the Favorites programming on my cablebox.

  51. Another bites the dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so yet another great station finally bites the dust.....Tech TV was awsome and now G4-TechTV is for a lack of better words absolute SHIT.

  52. And the verdict is out! by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 3, Funny
    Girls Gone Wired appears to be exactly what you'd expect: Guys ogling video game characters in a beauty pageant.

    "She's not even real!"
    "But she's hot..."
    "But SHE'S NOT REAL!!!"

    1. Re:And the verdict is out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the difference if they're real or not? The Tech TV watching nerds out there have exactly as much "chance" with a runway model or celebrity actress as they do with a virtual woman, which is to say, zero.

      Besides, with as full of plastic and silicone as most of those "real" women are, the gap is narrowing all the time.

    2. Re:And the verdict is out! by rebill · · Score: 1

      Pssst, ZeeExSixAre, c'mere.

      If Duhbya over there falls in love with a virtual woman, then maybe he WONT BREED. It's in the best interest of the gene pool, Zee!

      --

      Chivalry is not dead, it's just frequently misspelt. - M. Langley

  53. Are you kidding?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, you must be over 14 dude. In other words, outside of G4's demographic. ;-)

    The big problem with G4's management is I think they rely too much on ONLINE demographic data such as the average age of game related message forum users, etc. Teens have the most time to waste and are the most fanatical, which makes them APPEAR to be the core demographic, but they're not.

    1. Re:Are you kidding?? by piper-noiter · · Score: 1

      Somebody's been reading other slashdot articles: I am HUMAN

      --
      Shick's Law: There is no problem a good miracle can't solve.
    2. Re:Are you kidding?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You guys are complaining to the wrong bunch, we're the choir. If you want the execs to take notice, write letters, make petitions, etc.. and in this context, include your age. Let them know they're quite mistaken about their core demographic. And if they don't listen, let's push the network into obscurity. How? Tell your computer illiterate neighbour that tech tv isn't worth the air it's broadcasted over, and so on. It's not much, but it's a start.

    3. Re:Are you kidding?? by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      The network pushed itself into obscurity. It's too late for us to do anything about it. TechTV is gone, and G4 should fail without our help.

  54. I got news for you... by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    There is a very very slim chance that you may one day bang Angelina Jolie. But you will never ever bang Lara Croft.

    Still a big difference between fantasy real girls and fantasy fake girls.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:I got news for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a very very slim chance that you may one day bang Angelina Jolie.

      The good news is that one day in the future you will get to bang Angelina Jolie. The bad news is that she will be 94 years old by that time.

  55. Get over it by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    Face it. Noone watched TechTV. It was a dismal failure.

    The content was too watered down for a geek, I just couldn't sit and watch ScreenSavers since most of the info they'd give was pretty much remedial to me. (Coming up next! We'll show you how to change the background color of your desktop!)

    As far as non-geeks who don't really care about Tech, well, why would they watch TechTV?

    The only thing they had going for them was the anime, but then Cartoon Network beat them at their own game with the Adult Swim and Miguzi programming blocks.

    For the record, G4 is even worse. I can't believe anyone watches that shit.

    I swear they just create these bullshit cable channels so they (the cable co) can justify yearly rate hikes.

    Hooray, now I get the Golf channel, two Black channels (BET and ONE), two Womens channels (Lifetime and WET), G4, the Food network, CMT. I'm not black and don't want to watch Good Times reruns, I'm not a woman, I don't cook or listen to country music.

    I can't wait for real digital delivery to happen, I predict schemes where I just pay some fee per channel I want (a couple of bucks a month).

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Get over it by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Face it. Noone watched TechTV. It was a dismal failure.

      In the early days, when it was ZDTV, and first changed to tech TV, it did fairly good ratings for a cable network.

      The content was too watered down for a geek, I just couldn't sit and watch ScreenSavers since most of the info they'd give was pretty much remedial to me. (Coming up next! We'll show you how to change the background color of your desktop!)

      I realize that you are kidding, but Screen Savers was mostly a mixed bag when I watched it. One day it would be something like "how to change file extensions in windows" another day it would be "We compare disk partionioning programs for duel booting Windows and Linux!". Call for help always seemed hopelessly remdial.

      As far as non-geeks who don't really care about Tech, well, why would they watch TechTV?

      I know non-geek people (ie, people who don't work in IT, program, or spend much time at the computer) who would watch TechTV from time to time just to get computer tips, especially screen savers and call for help.

      The only thing they had going for them was the anime, but then Cartoon Network beat them at their own game with the Adult Swim and Miguzi programming blocks.

      I had techtv dropped by my cable provider by the time they started doing the anime thing, I never got why they did it they should have just stuck to tech.

      For the record, G4 is even worse. I can't believe anyone watches that shit.

      I'm a gamer (as in, I've been to tournments, played in OGL ladders, etc), and it doesn't appeal to me.

      I swear they just create these bullshit cable channels so they (the Hooray, now I get the Golf channel, two Black channels (BET and ONE), two Womens channels (Lifetime and WET), G4, the Food network, CMT.

      I get four spanish channels, three womens channels, two to three black channels, and god knows what else. I don't even know what all the channels are anymore, I gave up on my TV after they dropped TechTV and picked up telemundo 4 and The Operah channel. I watch the history channel, cable news, and whatever sporting events are on. I plan on moving in the next 2 years, and I might not even bother with cable once I move. They obviously are marketing channels to everyone but me, so they won't have my money.

      I'm not black and don't want to watch Good Times reruns, I'm not a woman, I don't cook or listen to country music.

      Well, geeks aren't profitable to advertise to I guess. Who wants to advertise to 12-35 males who have decent spending power...oh wait a second.........

      I can't wait for real digital delivery to happen, I predict schemes where I just pay some fee per channel I want (a couple of bucks a month).

      Won't happen, John McCain was trying to make it happen but some crooked congress study came to the conclusion that cable TV ala Carte wouldn't save consumers money because they would just buy so many channels that the tradeoff would be the same.

      Somehow I'm betting that congress study was funded by comcast and time warner.

  56. Writings on the wall by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anybody who didn't see this coming is...well....dumb enough to watch G4.

    TechTV is dead. Long live TechTV.

    1. Re:Writings on the wall by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      TechTV is dead. Long live TechTV.

      hmm. Isn't that an oxymoron?

    2. Re:Writings on the wall by Rectum2003 · · Score: 1

      Read that paragraph. It's not an oxymoron.

  57. Give me old TechTV back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to watch TechTV a lot... before the G4 disaster. Leo's Call For Help, and Leo/Patrick on the ScreenSavers were my favorites and I rarely missed any shows. Sure it was partly because it was Leo, but it was more than that. I've watched ScreenSavers a few time since and it's not the same.

    1. Re:Give me old TechTV back by hh1000 · · Score: 1

      I second that. Either G4's demographic research is completely wrong, or I have reason to be depressed at what typical computer users are like these days.

      FWIW, my teenagers could give a flying #@@#! about G4 et al.

      So exactly who are they trying to appeal to?

  58. I'm glad I stopped watching TV by Apreche · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Completely ceasing all TV watching was the best thing I ever did. Although I do like drift racing, I doubt that show will be very good.

    You know, since there isn't any TV or radio for nerds like us, you think we would have made some already? I mean, just have people create video and audio content in an open source fashion. Collect it and place it in categories. Then by using a combination of RSS and BitTorrent, which is an idea everyone and their mother is implementing, voila nerd tv and radio. When someone doesn't make software we like, we make it ourselves. But when someone doesn't make television we like we whine and complain. Lets make it ourselves!

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:I'm glad I stopped watching TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you're that pretentious fucktard I read about in The Onion.

    2. Re:I'm glad I stopped watching TV by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      Completely ceasing all TV watching was the best thing I ever did.

      I've got to agree with you there. About 2 years ago, I completely stopped watching TV. No news, no shows, nothing from broadcast.

      Nowadays, I only watch some movies I rent, and I'm all the happier. It's funny though, the look on people's faces when they go:

      "Hey did you see that new advertisement about product X? You didn't? How couldn't you it's all over the place!!!"

      Same thing for crappy shows or the news. Watching TV news is like piercing your cranium with knitting pins.

      Meh, that rant for another thread!

  59. girls gone wired... by Gribflex · · Score: 1

    ...unfortunately Girls Gone Wired appears to be exactly what you'd expect: Guys ogling video game characters in a beauty pageant

    Well that's super lame.

    I had actually expected it would be a show about the rising use of video games, and personal electronics among women. Hopefuly with an emphasis on software/hardware that would be more appealing to a female audience (sims, iPod minis, Pink iPods/GBAs, new cell phone features, web cams, etc).

    My wife would have loved a show like that.

    1. Re:girls gone wired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ually expected it would be a show about the rising use of video games, and personal electronics among women. Hopefuly with an emphasis on software/hardware that would be more appealing to a female audience (sims, iPod minis, Pink iPods/GBAs

      Damn, you've got the female demographic down to a tee.

      I've just figured out how to sell to women. Just take every existing boys' toy and make it PINK!

      Hopefully, one of the three female contributors to Slashdot will beat you to death with a pink iPod Mini for being such a patronising git :-P

    2. Re:girls gone wired... by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of offended by that. I hate the Sims. I'd rather play a good game of UT2004 or Halo2. I'd rather see a show about girls who are trying to get into male dominated careers such as sys admn and such.

      --
      -- Nic
  60. Big F'in Deal... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

    ...really. I stopped watching that channel a long time ago. The history channel has a lot better technology coverage than G4 does.

  61. G4.. by NfoCipher · · Score: 1

    ..TV made for kids like our friend Bobby:After you beat the death star level, there should be a snow level, then a small speederbike level. They should make a Matrix game in the theme of Star Wars. So then you take out your sword and run up to a guy and go, "Chiiing!" And after you saw though his head, you fly inside your X-wing.

    --
    I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am.
  62. Watching TechTV was like never leaving work by Therlin · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me, but the novelty of TechTV quickly wore off and it felt like I had not left work.

    I have not watched TechTV for a long, long time for that reason alone.

  63. TechTV... R.I.P. by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

    TechTV... R.I.P.

    I knew thee well, for Screensavers was a righteous show with actual substance. Farewell to all that had a great idea. Time to move on and stay with Cartoon Network, Sci-Fi channel, and Comedy.

    But, alas, let's not for get Anime Unleashed!

  64. TechTV Good, G4 Sux by limbo1686 · · Score: 1

    TechTV was had some good stuff. I liked several of the shows. The Screen Savers was great, and I liked Inventions (or something like that) also. Once G4 took it over - it was all over. I no longer watch the channel. With any luck, Comcast will not include it in my lineup anymore either as I see no need to pay for it.

  65. Nothing good can come out of anything G4... by Calikinakka · · Score: 1

    I was a hardcore TechTv fanatic. When G4 bought them, everything sucked. Even TSS started to suck. X-play got moved for hideously awful shows, and the hosts on half of these talk to the audience like they are moronic half-wits. Please, give us back our TechTv! Leo, Patrick, Adam, Morgan! We need more of these people!

    1. Re:Nothing good can come out of anything G4... by Jane_the_Great · · Score: 0, Troll
      "X-play got moved for hideously awful shows"
      XPlay was moved to 11:00 and the show's name changed to XPlay [previously: Extreme Play] before Comcast purchased TechTV.

      "Please, give us back our TechTv! Leo, Patrick, Adam, Morgan! We need more of these people!"
      You need them. I don't need minor cable celebrities in my life. Go read a book.
      --
      THIS ACCOUNT IS OFFICIALLY RETIRED/RETARDED.
    2. Re:Nothing good can come out of anything G4... by onlyoneshinobi · · Score: 1

      Techtv was a good thing, but G4 ruined it. I think someone else might try to start a tech channel.

  66. A real shame by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    The way I found out about TechTV was back when it was still ZDTV and this was from a 55 year old phone company tech. The guy was soon to be retired and just got a home-built PC from a coworker. In fiddling around with it he was told about ZDTV and soon became addicted to Screen Savers.

    Now I've never really been to big into TechTV (I watch a little X-Play but when Morgan showed up... ugh) but the fact that it could reach a novice end user (one at an age where you "aren't supposed to be learning new things") impressed me. It keep him interested, made him excited about computers and technology, and informed him without either talking down nor over his head (something a lot of tech folks seem incapable of doing).

    TV can be a strong informational medium: it can keep pretty current, it is pretty passive (unlike reading a book or trade mag), and provide multimedia interaction. That the one channel that was about exposing everybody to the latest ish has been replaced with juvenille porn is a shame. I'd almost prefer there to be a hardcore sex basic cable station. Then these other channels would have no reason to outscandalize each other for that 15-28 year old male demo. We might get something approaching substance.

    Yeah: frogs, wings, bumps, asses a hoppin'.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  67. Dan Rather's new job by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget Dan Rather's new TV show on G4 after he leaves CBS. His first show is an expose on Bill Gates' monopolistic tendencies. He uses as evidence Microsoft Office 97 files which Gates filled out with incriminating information in 1977.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Dan Rather's new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be more funny. Please.

    2. Re:Dan Rather's new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Dan Rather's new TV show on G4 after he leaves CBS. His first show is an expose on Bill Gates' monopolistic tendencies. He uses as evidence Microsoft Office 97 files which Gates filled out with incriminating information in 1977.

      Luckily, in both cases the premise of the expose would be correct. It's one piece of the proof that's incorrect. Kinda sad when 'the memo was a fake' is more news than 'the President was a poor officer.'

    3. Re:Dan Rather's new job by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      My friend Mr. Funny Modpoint says you are wrong, buster.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  68. Girls Gone Wired? by keyne9 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is G4 not-so-secretly pretending to be Spike Network?

  69. Just imagine... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    How about /.TV? 24 hour news and information for nerds? Fellas?

    Imagine if there's a slashdot show with people calling in... we'll have people trolling "FIRST CALL!", "Props to the GNAA!", etc.

    Thankfully, it's pretty hard to do a phone/audio rendition of the goatse.

    1. Re:Just imagine... by SunFan · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, it's pretty hard to do a phone/audio rendition of the goatse.

      Goatse sound effects...*shudder*

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    2. Re:Just imagine... by Syntax+Heir · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Frost Cawl?

      --
      The greatest hindrance to success is a well-rationalized excuse
  70. In all seriousness... by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

    Is this press release real? Sounds like some MBAs are trying to turn this channel into Nickelodeon for teenagers with ricer cars and a PS2 in the steering wheel instead of an airbag. I'm glad they at least are being straight about sucking, instead of pretending like they still have some TechTV life in them.

  71. Try again? by michael+path · · Score: 1

    TechTV was an excellent product after the name change from ZDTV. The shows were great, albeit repeated often, but interesting.

    Why can't someone try again with a similar format?

    Though I'm convinced most of G4's acquisition of TechTV was for the sake of employing Morgan Webb's breasts to supply to the SpikeTV crowd - people were watching TechTV, finding it useful, and it appeared that they had no problems finding advertisers.

    Leo LaPorte was great. Here's a guy who put up with any and every end user question, no matter how dumb - and he managed to help them understand without making fun of them. I know he was on two of the major shows and contributed largely to their success.

    Further, the TechTV programming - though sometimes tacky, was never as lowbrow as the dreadful and boring G4 programming.

    I'm surprised there's no DellTV or Microsoft WindowsVision (MSNBC excluded). I just don't understand why a format that's already worked well enough to be purchased couldn't be successful again.

  72. comcast board meeting transcript: by Packet+Fish · · Score: 3, Funny

    comcast board meeting transcript (spring 2004):

    TechTV guy: No, I think our game content is fine the way it is. Plus our rating have never been higher.

    Comcast G4 guy: Fine, I didn't want to own your network anyway. I'll just go start my own network with my own shows, with black-jack, and hookers. Infact, forget the shows.

  73. Who cares about Leo and Patrick, I want Dvorak ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring Dvorak Back. Silicon Spin was AWESOME!

    Time for a new "niche" network about Computers, Hardware, Software and live coverage from all conferences/expos.

  74. This is GREAT NEWS!!! by bman08 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, an opportunity to get my knitting show aired. If anyone from G4 is reading this; it's a show about knitting... FOR GAMERS. The needles are sharp, and so is the humor. This is a match made in heaven. G4 CONTACT ME!!! I've got other shows too that'll be perfect for the gamers; including an English Lit project that... it's just a fit. I know it.

    1. Re:This is GREAT NEWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...including an English Lit project that... it's just a fit.

      This made me laugh extra.

    2. Re:This is GREAT NEWS!!! by electr01nik · · Score: 1
      deathmatch knitting

      capture the needle

      escort the duvet

      last man spinning yark

      crochet domination

  75. Is it April 1? by believekevin · · Score: 1

    Guys ogling video game characters in a beauty page This has to be a joke.

  76. Reality Show Also Scheduled by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    A new release just indicated a new Reality show for G4, it actually sounds kind of interesting. It is based out of Redmond, Washington and follows a team of software engineers / managers around as they tackle the daunting task of operating system design. They say the title is based on a Robin Cook Novel. But for the life of me I can't figure out why they would base a tech show on , oh waitaminute....Virus, now I get it.

  77. "Formula D" and "Girls Gone Wired" by Phu5ion · · Score: 1

    Just when i thought SpikeTV had gone as low as humanly possible when it comes to games, G4 is bringing out the backhoe to show us just how deep this pit really is.

    Of course, if i happen to turn on G4 when "GGW" is on, i might watch it to see how bad it is.

    *wink* *wink*

    --
    Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
  78. Next up... by bill^2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... the merger with Yahoo, creating G4Y! network.

    Geeks everywhere nod in agreement.

    /bev/null... need more beer

  79. Girls Gone Wired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really hoping it would be Japanese college girls on spring break.

  80. Has anyone noticed by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    In the line-up of standard cable channels, real educational channels have been usurped by revenue-generating, reality tv. With the exception of the History channel, which to this day, still airs great material, every other channel has gone down this path.

    TLC: WTF happened to that channel?
    Discovery: Unless you have the extendend package, the only thing that airs anymore are these assinine motorcycle shows which have absolutely no relevance. In no way do these shows give any real insight into mechanics or building a motorcycle. Its all about the "reality" aspect.

    TechTV is just another victim in the war for demographics. Like food companies, tv companies must find ways to make their shows appealing to the most people. The fact that our beloved channels have become little more than outlets for social drivel, product advertising, and limited information, shows only the state of the target demographic: mainstream viewers.

    I never really cared for techtv, however, i thought the show was great for people that, although tech-oriented, did not have that great a footing in the area. It is a crying shame that the target demographic is so infantile and, well, stupid, that educational tv is being phased out to generate ad revenue.

    1. Re:Has anyone noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could this be evidence that society as a whole is getting dumber?

      Cause I have noticed all of the above. TLC every time I turn it on its Trauma Life In the ER. Ghey, but evidently that is what the people want. And that is because the people are stupid.

    2. Re:Has anyone noticed by randallpowell · · Score: 1
      I agree. The more crap on the cable, the dumber people will get. We need to open source entertainment content and slap it on torrent. Mac users could start us out.

      At a time like this, where is Goatse when he is needed to visit G4 managers?

  81. Why did they bother? by caldroun · · Score: 1

    I liked TechTV just like it was. These guys must be in cahoots with the people at FOX that cancelled Firefly, Futurama, and Family Guy. Farking Idiots. (I see an F pattern here)

    What the crap did they get for thier purchase of TechTV? The title of a show (The Screensavers) and a bunch of alienated viewers. Big Whoop.

    --
    "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
  82. Time for someone to put real "Tech" in "Tech TV" by bpechter · · Score: 1

    I watched tech tv in the early ZD days and it was ok, but I figured with the amount of people doing real technology IT stuff in the world there should be a channel on broadband with room for REAL serious tech stuff... Linux, *BSD, server load balancing, Cisco, VOIP.

    I keep wondering if there's enough interest to fund programs like that in today's environment.

    Would some IT tech companies sponsor a webcast site for independant reviews and coverage?

    This ex-Vax geek turned Unix admin would love a real news show (kind of stuff from http://www.theregister.com, slashdot, http://www.theinquirer.net etc.

  83. Damn G4 to HELL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to watch TechTV for 6 hours at a time some days. They had high quality intelligent and unique programming. G4's shows are worse than some infomercials. I can barely sit through five minutes with out wondering if the hosts have lobotomies. Its should be obvious to everyone now that G4 was just gutting TechTV to get their wider distribution. The G4 management should be made to answer for their deceptive actions in a court of law.

    In short, Damn G4 to hell! I'd rather watch the weather channel.

  84. SLASHDOT TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about /.TV? 24 hour news and information for nerds?

    Coming soon ... SLASHDOT TV.

    You heard it here first.

    OK fine I'm lying. Don't sue me. If slashdot wants this idea they should pay me lots of money (and yeah I know it was the parent poster's idea .. but since when has prior art mattered?)

  85. The all-time worst G4 show ever... by British · · Score: 1

    ....was so bad I cant remember the name.

    It was some guy and his magical computer where they do these weird REd vs. blue like skits with MMORPG avatars. It aired late night, and every joke fell flat. You almost felt sorry for the host.

    It aired late at night when most kids have turned off the station. Didn't G4 originally have about 5 hours of original programming per day and just a ton of Pringles ads?

    Come to think of it, I think Pringles was their only major sponsor.

    1. Re:The all-time worst G4 show ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The STILL refer to their show Cheat (get your SNES cheatcodes here kiddies!) as "Cheat, Pringles Gamer's Guide"

      Blissfully, I never had G4 back when Pringles was the only sponsor so I never knew WHY this stupid show carried the Pringles name, and now that I do know, I feel like eatin' some REAL chips! Screw Pringles.

    2. Re:The all-time worst G4 show ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Show was called Portal

    3. Re:The all-time worst G4 show ever... by ewhac · · Score: 1

      That would be Portal and, yes, it is a complete and utter waste of 30 minutes of air time.

      Schwab

  86. Long Time Viewer by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

    I've been watching G4 since about when it started and TechTV from about that time too (it was around the time I got digital cable so I recieved all the pretty channels). G4 has gone from a mix of horrible shows and some pretty good shows, to a channel that tried to reinvent itself as "gangstah" but really just screwed up some more, and finally they acquired TechTV and lost almost all the good shows and turned the network into an MTV with a few videogames. The latest GPhoria awards are evidence: a bunch of photogenic, cheering fans who obviously have never touched a game console and a bunch of celebrity emcees who have played Madden and GTA and that's about it. The awards were more or less legitimate since it was the fans who voted on who won, but the whole presentation was a little heavy on the popular music and a little light on anything good. At all. I've stuck with G4 through thick and thin, but I think it's time to stop watching. I don't need a show about drifting when I don't own a single racing game or "Girls Gone Wired" when I have the internet. G4 doesn't want the true gamers as viewers; it wants the "Walks into Wal-Mart and buys a Madden game or something that looks cool when they get a paycheck" gamers. They're the majority, sure, but are they the ones who are going to spend their time watching a whole channel devoted to games? They have SpikeTV for their needs. I want to go to G4 for informed people talking about stuff that I want to hear, not rap music and drift racing and scantily clad polygons.

    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    1. Re:Long Time Viewer by leland242 · · Score: 1

      You make a lot of good points.

      I got digital cable a few months ago. I immediately flipped on G4 and loved it - it was like hanging out with gamer friends, except without having anyone over. The wife didn't love it, but I thought it was great.

      Then they took TSS and fired the cool guy. Now the channel seems to be full of lame asian chicks.

      Meh. Girls gone Wired. How fucking droll and insulting.

  87. Monster Garage by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    My 4-year-old enjoys watching Monster Garage, and I must say that it's encouraged her to look at things in different ways. She gets to see other people tearing cars apart and building new "things" out of the pieces - so daddy's not so strange after all (daddy races with SCCA.)

    While it's pandering to the "great unwashed masses," it's still better than Disney's "All Product Marketing, All The Time" Channel.

    1. Re:Monster Garage by SunFan · · Score: 1

      Disney's "All Product Marketing, All The Time" Channel.

      At the Disney website they place advertisements right in the middle of children's activities, invite kids to download unknown software onto their computers, and they hype up the Disney brand at every opportunity. And don't get me started on the "vault." It may appear subtle, but they are working pretty hard on trying to train our youth to be good little consumers in the future. Children just don't need to be bombarded by marketing at such a young age. It is bad for them--just look at the studies behind ADD. Disney: the antithesis of a healthy childhood.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  88. From G4's Programing Office... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

    What this coffin needs is more nails.

  89. One Less Reason... by 06metzp · · Score: 1

    Wow. There were about 4 channels that used to make me wish I had cable or some other TV service (yes, some of us still use an antenna...) so, make that three.

    Can't say I've seen it, but according to the website, they might as well create a show called "reasons we suck" consisting, of course, of watching people play games. Maybe they could have one of the top five sexy 2D girls slide across the bottom of the screen... and if the 1986 version of princess peach isn't up there, I don't know what sort of crap gamers they took a vote from. =P

    --
    This sig left blank for page turns.
  90. Back to square one? by slapout · · Score: 1

    So now they've gone back to where they started. They were G4 before the merger, now they're G4 after the merger. The only difference (besides a couple of cast members they got from techtv) is that they are on DirecTv now. I wonder if that was what this was about all along. Maybe they simply wanted to get into TechTv's markets.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  91. Why drop the good shows? by radux · · Score: 1

    I understand why G4 bought techTV (expanded viewship), but why on earth are they replacing techTV's good shows? I can't imagine the crap they have on there now gets more viewers then Fresh Gear or the original Screen Savers.

    If the girls in 'Girls Gone Wired' were intelligent, gave technical advice as well as being scantily clothed that would explain this.

    --

    Kanga: That's not a fish, that's a bird.
    Pooh: Yes, but is it a starling or a mackeral?
  92. ho hum by east+coast · · Score: 1

    Oh well, it's not like G4 was ever any good to begin with and TechTV should have had a "For Dummies" logo attched to it somewhere... Let's move on.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  93. X-Play: the only thing worth watching on G4. by 2Flower · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to watch Judgment Day for my video game reviews (beats forking money over to gamespot...) until I realized how boring and biased it can be. X-Play makes the whole "self-effacing sarcastic gamer culture game reviews" gimmick work without being as stupid as the other shows on G4 where the cast and writers clearly don't understand games.

    What I'm wondering now is: When G4 folds and dies (which WILL happen, and this announcement only speeds the process) will X-Play be able to pack up and move to another channel, like Spike? Or are they directly funded by the channel rather than simply a company contracted to produce a show?

    1. Re:X-Play: the only thing worth watching on G4. by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

      X-Play was indeed the one and only reason I was keeping G4 in my cable lineup. I finally said enough and dumped the channel about a week ago. I will, however, miss X-Play. They had great preview coverage, downright funny reviews, and constant in-jokes for the gaming crowd.

      Which isn't to say Adam acting dim didn't get on my nerves more than a few times.

    2. Re:X-Play: the only thing worth watching on G4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gamespot's game reviews are free. You can even stream the video reviews for free. You do need to register, but it's pretty easy supply bogus info. Other content on Gamespot does cost $, but not the reviews.

    3. Re:X-Play: the only thing worth watching on G4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cinematech is love.

      Well it was until recently.... the Cinematech DS was indeed lame.

    4. Re:X-Play: the only thing worth watching on G4. by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's kinda sad when your entire network is about gaming, and the best gaming show you have is the one that came from another channel!

    5. Re:X-Play: the only thing worth watching on G4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard some people on the team talking about presenting the show to a bigger network like MTV or something if G4 didn't treat them right. So if G4 folded I wouldn't count X-Play as dead, maybe the name, but not the entire crew.

  94. TechTv is dead by slapout · · Score: 1

    TechTv is dead. Long live TechTv.

    But may G4 die the horrible death it deserves.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  95. What did G4 get from buying TechTV? by papasui · · Score: 1

    I see two main things.. a loss of it's #1 competitor and the name and shows. The name is now gone, the TechTV people are gone, and while some of the shows remain the content is mostly different. But at least with G4 I now know how many ways you can frag someone.

    1. Re:What did G4 get from buying TechTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They got TWO things allright: channel 354 on DirecTV and channel 191 on Dish Network.

      Those two things alone were what Comcast wanted. Nothing more. Not one bit more.

    2. Re:What did G4 get from buying TechTV? by papasui · · Score: 1

      good point, hadn't thought about that angle.

  96. Tech TV wasnt just for geeks by Dreadknott · · Score: 1

    Some have implied that Tech Tv was just for geeks and most of the viewing public couldnt find it interesting. Well, I am one of those few who owe Tech TV quite a lot. I was completely computer impaired, but thanks to all those people on Call for Help and TSS, I was able to build my own computer. I could not have developed the interest without those shows. In the three years since I started watching Tech TV I not only built that first computer, but have hacked Xboxes, PS2s, built a dozen PCs, learned Windows, got an A+, Network+, set up a wireless hotspot in my neighborhood, and bult simple FTP and Web sites. I am now a regular at my local LUG "Linux users group" and will be continuing my education. I miss my Tech TV...

  97. Does anyone even watch this channel? by TheMayor · · Score: 1

    Are there even enough viewers to support this channel?

  98. Redesigned logo by jejones · · Score: 1, Troll

    A graphic that is said to be the redesigned logo is on this thread in G4's "The Screen Savers" forum. I can understand why they'd pull that... it looks like a really bad 60's era logo/test pattern, right down to the blur.

  99. What about the Canadian G4TechTV? by Recovery1 · · Score: 1

    does anyone know what this will mean for the Canadian version of the channel? as I recall a while ago they tried to appeal to have anime added to their programming and couldn't because they had applied as a news channel. I don't think the CRTC would allow them to continue on canadian cable as a all gaming channel since they are supposed to be a news channel.

  100. Better yet by Swamii · · Score: 1, Funny

    Query Eye for the Oracle guy

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  101. XPlay is not enough by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1

    To save this worthless POS channel. At least they droped the illusion of having anything to do with technology.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  102. sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is sad. techtv used to be the sht with lots of knowledge. i am a hardcore gamer but to watch digital pagents is sick. g4tv is the stupidest channel of this year.

  103. Extended Play Rocked. X-Play SUCKS! by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    Are you watching the same show? Back when Adam did just 'Extended Play' it was a great game review show. But then they had to go add the hip morgan and change the name to 'x-play' and it got freaking stupid. My spending money went way up because I quit watching the lame ass version. Extended Play sold quite a few Nintendo and PC games I'd never have looked at without. It almost sold an x-box with that Mech game but lucky me it was sold out when I had the urge, and then the urge passed

    I quit watching it well before the G4 debacle destroyed it.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  104. It's all about market penetration by BobPaul · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now they are going further away from the right thing. Getting rid of more shows, and adding lame ones.

    G4 never intended to carry the TechTV shows. As an astute commenter correctly predicted in response to the /. article Inside TechTV all G4 wanted was to get their channel aired on more cable networks. They bought TechTV for the market penetration it had spent years acquiring it and for nothing else.

    1. Re:It's all about market penetration by rfunches · · Score: 1

      "They bought TechTV for the market penetration it had spent years acquiring"

      Great, they got their market. That's like a pirate on his sinking ship saying "I'm rich." They already lost their TechTV audience, and I guarantee you they won't be picking up a lot of gamers with show titles that are bad knockoffs of shows aired on scrambled channels at 2 AM.

  105. At Liest be Good at what you Do! by Reapy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If g4 is for gamers, why is it so lame? I understand techTV is dead and phased out and it is all about games, but the shows are still incredibly bad.

    I haven't cought them all since I don't watch tv too often and I can only stomach G4 for so long at a time. But the review show is terrable. There is one guy who actually makes sense on it, but he keeps getting talked over by his annoying co-host who yells out things like "YEEE HAWWWWWW". I am sure he's told to act like a jack ass, but I want to hear about the game they are reviewing, not all the guys stupid comments and bad jokes.

    Why don't they give gamers what they want? We don't want to watch some no names play video games against each other. They showed some people playing Call of Duty and SOCOM against each other. I don't know the games, so all I see are random people killing eachother at unknown points in an unknown map.

    But they can fix this so easily. First off, go talk to the major "pro leagues" for gaming, go to the cpl, go over to korea, whatever, get the people actually out there winning money to play games, who you know are really good. Now, film them playing.

    Except, for the big final games, give me the whole experience. I don't want a 30 second recap of watching someone die. I want to see the whole match, how he set up, where he moved. I want an announcer to point out to me the clever things he did to get where he is, and how he set that guy up for the kill. How close was he to dieing. So show me the whole game, not a meaningless string of people shooting each other.

    So this pro show is great, because you can probably cover a match in 30 minutes, and there are lots of pros in lots of important matches in a variety of games. Call it "Pro MatchX" (X for extreeM!!!)

    Next they need a show about teaching you to play games better. Take a multiplayer game, they hang around longer then singleplayer ones, so the show can get out while people are still playing the game. Then, get to showing me how to win pub servers. I didn't get what was going on in call of duty. So, pick a map, show me where I spawn in on a map, show me where to go for choke points. You can go one of these three routs to the other guys flags. When you run this rout, bad guys start appearing at these sections. The stairs here are a choke point. Show me these things, from start to finish. Show me where people camp. Show me great places to plant mines to trick people.

    So there are two shows I'd watch. Ones that tell me how to get better at a multiplayer game, and run through some maps. Another showing me the worlds best playing games, with real coverage of the game and not just some joe schmoe at the point of the kill message. Create some suspence for the kills at liest and do it half a second before it happens.

    I don't think these shows would be any more difficult to create then what they already have, and would make a lot better gamer television.

    1. Re:At Liest be Good at what you Do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but your idea will not work on G4, for the simple fact that it's a good idea. Perhaps you haven't notice management's latest trend, which they like to call "synergy", and which we like to call "DESTROYING EVERY GOOD THING THAT THE CHANNEL EVER HAD"

    2. Re:At Liest be Good at what you Do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The review show you're talking about is Review On The Run and it is not a G4 show, it's a syndicated show from Canada. The review you saw was no doubt the Duke Of Hazzard game review, in which tommy tallarico kept fooling around about the silliness of the game.

  106. Is Weird Al out there? by eberry · · Score: 1

    I got a new song idea for you.

    I want my,
    I want my,
    I want my TechTV.

    Or maybe he can save the channel with the help of Michael Richards.

    --
    Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
    1. Re:Is Weird Al out there? by Aard88 · · Score: 1

      Pirillo already did that. I looked for the link but the Lockergnome must have deleted all reference to it....

  107. Dropping TechTV from name is humane thing to do by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

    Honestly, at this point, dropping TechTV from the name of the network is the only humane thing to do at this point. G4/Comcast have utterly gutted the TechTV programming and talent and made only lame/half-hearted attempts to retain TechTV viewership. Gone are quality shows like "Big Thinkers," "Call for Help," and "Tech Live." But the network sticks with brain-dead fare like "Robot Wars," "Cheat," "Sweat," and "Filter." "The Screen Savers" is now a joke and the name of that show should be changed as well out of common decency and respect.

  108. G4 buying TechTV saved my marriage! by LoaTao · · Score: 1

    Since TechTV was the ONLY reason I got digital cable I dropped it after the G4 buy out. Now I have more time for my wife and kids and I'm saving a few bucks on my cable bill. Thank you G4! (not really).

    --
    The smartest man in the whole, wide world really don't know that much. - Mose Allison
  109. One Less Channel... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    I started watching TechTV a few years ago (somewhere in 2000-2002). I enjoyed the Screen Savers, which was the anchor serious tech show for me. I enjoyed Xplay and its previous incarnation (who was the red haired girl that used to be co-host, before it was Xplay?). Call For Help was a nice 'lite' show, marked by the occasional accidental posting of topless sidekick photos to the TechTV web site. I think I preferred Martin Sergeant when he was a segment on the Screen Savers.

    What I was disappointed to see was the gradual replacement over the years of what felt like actual characters with more and more generic people I felt were there to be telegenic rather than knowledgeable. The gradual move from an eclectic bunch of geeks to G4's pablum has been a sad, sad thing to see happen.

    I watched 4 or 5 shows on TechTV on a regular basis. When it became G4TechTV, I would flip by that channel when bored, then maybe stop for one show if it was a TechTV show. Refuse to watch the evil that is G4. I think now i'll have to actively avoid the channel all together.

    Shame to see them go.

  110. WTF by cnycompguy · · Score: 1

    Man, Tech TV gas gone to Hell quick. i'm almost embarassed that i used to watch TSS, now that it's basicly been lobotomised...

    and guys oogling videogame character chicks? that's just friggin retarded, they could always pull their heads out of their asses over there at G4 and give that wasted time slot to a show hosted by the old TSS hosts, you know, the ones who knew what they were talking about, those who could answer user calls without having them staged.

  111. Good by smagruder · · Score: 1

    This makes a good companion pair to my dropping my viewing of that channel after the slaughter, I mean merger.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  112. south of market or demographic escape velocity? by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    If you no longer like something that used to appeal to you.. chances are you are either south of market or have left the target demographic. Get used to it my 20somethings for it will happen again in ways you can't even begin to imagine.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:south of market or demographic escape velocity? by jrf83317 · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? There is a difference between becoming older and not liking Sesame Street anymore. This is talking about the HOSTILE take over of techTV by the evil assholes at comcast thus totally changing the format of the channel and finally eliminating it. Go back to bed grandpa you need some rest.

    2. Re:south of market or demographic escape velocity? by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      This is talking about the HOSTILE take over of techTV by the evil assholes at...

      Painful, isn't it? Grandpa knows but grandpa doesn't care.

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    3. Re:south of market or demographic escape velocity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are seriously fucking retarded.

  113. Anyone surprised? Bueller, anyone, anyone? by gmknobl · · Score: 1

    Next on the hit list will be the last of the old ZDNet/TechTV shows.

    Screensavers - a shadow of what it once was will disappear entirely. The only thing keeping X-Play on the air is the female member of the cast, if I read G4's tastes right. That leaves what? Nothing, I think (sorry if I missed a show).

    This is a golden opportunity to start a *NEW* ZDNet TV network. First step is to get The Chris Pirillo Show on the network and work forward from there.

  114. Who is G4 doing this for? by gronne · · Score: 1

    Maybe I haven't been looking very hard, but I wonder where the G4 enthusiasts are. I know a lot of former TechTV enthusiasts, but haven't heard anyone say "thank God G4 straightened the Screen Savers out." Or something to that effect.

    1. Re:Who is G4 doing this for? by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      I would guess people who like G4 are not people who read Slashdot, or even the g4techtv.com forums. They are little kids whose FIRST console was the Gamecube or maybe PS2.

      Basically the people who actually like G4 are too ignorant to see how bad it is.

      "Hey, look, they are doing a show about Pikmin. Coooooooooool!!!!"

  115. In Related News... by 1am · · Score: 1

    Comcast has released a new channel line-up for 2005 which included a channel dedicated to technology related news and programming. Sources have released the name of the proposed new channel "TechTV"

  116. Re:Extended Play Rocked. X-Play SUCKS! by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh how much I agree. I'm not really a console gamer, but the casual entertaining way that he presented what was largely console games made for a very enjoyable watch, and when nothing better was on (most always) my wife and I would watch it. We can't stomach the new, hipper version.

    A week or so back I commented on how much the show has gone downhill, and in return was scored -1 Flamebait for it -- apparently I offended the sensibilities of the sort of sad little nerd that thinks any "untouchable" girl is "H0t!". That Morgan is, and this is obviously subjective personal opinion, a paper-bagger, and she certainly wouldn't get attention in any food court across the land. Make her inaccessible, and thus a convenient substitute for real female companionship, and suddenly she's the hottest thing around to dungeon nerds across the land. Screensavers a couple of years back had a host who was entirely plain - she wasn't ugly but at a bar she'd be the cute girl's ugly friend - and she commented several times about how people need to stop sending proposals. Give me a break...

  117. I am happy they are letting it die by aka_big_wurm · · Score: 1

    Having TechTV in the name was like having someone on life support, The network was brain dead. I am sad that it is gone but happy that it can now rest in peace.

    Maybe the rumors are true and there will be a rebirth of the network or something like it.

  118. i've been using the phrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time something good is bought or taken over and then turned into complete garbage it got 'g4'd' . I've been saying that ever since TSS moved to LA.

  119. It's not for us. Not for any of us. by mbourgon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing that seems consistent, down to the new logo - they're not just going after gamers, but specifically console gamers. After all, Halo 2 made more than a Hollywood blockbuster, so there's tons of people just waiting to watch console game stuff, right? That's my bet - they'll keep dumbing it down (which is sad - Call4Help and TSS were, depending, already fairly dumbed down) further, so the 15-year-olds with a PS2 can be happy. That's where the money is.

    I wonder if I can call Charter and ask that they drop G4 and put on something else instead?

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  120. TechTV no more by tiefling · · Score: 0

    Gee imagine that... now the channel will still suck.
    Corporate Exec 1: "We're doing horrible! This other network is doing well."
    Corporate Exec 2: "Lets buy them and then get rid of all of their programs."
    Corporate Exec 1: "Then continue to use our same format."
    Both: " Brilliant! "

  121. Re:Extended Play Rocked. X-Play SUCKS! by numbski · · Score: 1

    That same girl co-hosted Extended Play for a while too...(or was it still Gamespot TV back then? Wow...)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  122. UWTV by CypherXero · · Score: 1

    If you want technology, look no further than the University of Washington TV, available via Satellite and Streaming Video on their website. It features lectures and presentations from actual classrooms at UW. I've been watching this channel for a couple of months now, and it's so much better than TechTV, or G4.

  123. Comcast loses $19/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got digital cable just for BBC America, MTV2 and TechTV. However, everything on BBCA eventually ends up on DVD, MTV2 is getting as bad as MTV - what happened to the slogan "It's where the music's at" - by becoming the wasteland for MTV's reruns, and TechTV became G4TechTV and dropped all of it's good programming.

    The Screen Savers was a great show when it had Leo, Patrick, and Alex A. Now it has craptacular Kevin Pierra(?) and Chi-Lan "love you longtime" Li. Neither know what a computer is or for that matter what show they are on. TSS now has the feel of Home Shopping Network.

    Oh well Comcast loses my extra $19/month. If only my apartment complex had a place for me to mount a dish...

  124. Re:Extended Play Rocked. X-Play SUCKS! by numbski · · Score: 1

    Kate Botello

    Took me a while to remember.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  125. After all the stories by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

    After hearing stories of how G4 treats their staff, both on air and off I really don't want to give them any of my money. Wasn't the reason they bought TechTV because they wanted a bigger audience? And now they are returning to their previous format? Does this make sense to anyone? Sounds like poor decision making somewhere in the chain.

  126. A second day of no news at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What is with these people? Is there NOTHING interesting happening in the world of technology?? Oh and BTW... I was curious about this "drift racing" so I looked it up on Wikipedia and found this:


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drift_racing

    1. Re:A second day of no news at Slashdot by rwrife · · Score: 1

      Excellent....I've been laughing for almost 20 minutes over this.

  127. Limited domain by blorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, forget the tsunami: Several of my favorite shows have been cancelled or changed!

    Funny (maybe), but not insightful: I think it's implied that the original poster was using 'worst thing that happened in ages' in a limited domain. It's not like just because something really bad happens, we immediately stop considering other, lesser bad things that might be happening - although many governments would like you to (I'm thinking War on Terror vs civil liberties here.)

    1. Re:Limited domain by PaleBoy · · Score: 1

      Your point is completely valid, the only thing we disagree on is whether the limited domain was implied- I think the original poster just wasn't considering a larger domain, as opposed to implying a smaller one. I'm sure with even modest reflection they'd refine/retract their statement: "worst thing to happen to television", "a grievous blow to nerds who care about tv everywhere", etc.

      --
      ------ What's sadder than realizing you've filtered out your own comments?
    2. Re:Limited domain by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      "Of course the people don't want war. But after all it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's awlways a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a facist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them that they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for their lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger"
      --Hermen Goring

  128. You have a dim view of my expectations. by TYC · · Score: 1
    unfortunately Girls Gone Wired appears to be exactly what you'd expect: Guys ogling video game characters in a beauty pageant.

    I want to state publicly, that this is FAR, FAR BELOW my lowest expectations. And I thought they were low already. Now I can appear in a public nerd forum and state "I've never watched TechTV or G4 TechTV" without losing my geek license.

  129. To say the "m" word... by Upaut · · Score: 1

    What G4 TechTV did was very bad marketing. Their ratings were poor, they were a constant mockery amongst the tech-savvy, and all they did was waste money. TechTV on the other hand was doing quite well. What G4 should of done was keep TechTV the same, and gradually reduce their own programming to one or two shows that seem to have good ratings, add that to TechTV, and THEN eliminate their own channel. But no, they just sat down and said "You know, they really have the viewership that we always wanted, so now our programs can be heard..."
    Ah, marketing departments, is there anything you don't think you can do?

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  130. What G4 stands for by eelsfan · · Score: 1

    From the release: ...programming that covers every aspect of the video game culture - games, gear, gadgets and girls

    A little sexist, I think.

    Sexist Baby Clothes: http://www.diaperdevil.com/

    1. Re:What G4 stands for by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      That's strange because before the merger, G4 said G4 stands for the 4 types of gaming:
      console, computer, handheld, and arcade.

    2. Re:What G4 stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is even funnier, cause they used to claim it stood for the fourth generation of gaming which is what we all live in. Or something.

      I forget what the previous three generations were supposed to be.

      Arcade, Game+Watch, home console, and now... online?

      But I think it really should refer to the number of people watching the channel, as in four viewers. Anybody serious about games enough to give a damn is probably PLAYING those games instead of watching TV shows about games (or not about games).

      Same thing is wrong with the outdoor life network: anybody THAT into outdoor sports is probably out DOING them. Well, maybe the people with broken legs are watching. Shrug.

  131. THE NEW LOGO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:THE NEW LOGO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, my, God, that is SO gay. I could shit out a better graphic.

    2. Re:THE NEW LOGO!! by czd · · Score: 1

      That is the gayest thing ive seen in my life!!!

  132. In a nutshell by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    I used to watch TechTV now and then. Not a lot, since it wasn't very balanced as far as OSes go, but once in a while.
    I never really watched G4, just once or twice to see what it ws about. Yawn.
    When G4 bought them, I watched a little to see what would happen.
    I now no longer watch G4 at all.
    Rest in Peace, TechTV. It was a great concept, and hopefully someday, somebody will see clear to ressurect it or create their own computer tech channel.
    "Phoenix-Tech" anyone ?

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  133. Just an oddball idea by Jensaarai · · Score: 1

    MTV was successful in working its way into homes with a campaign to get people to call in and demand it be added to the cable roster. G4 weaseled its way in by buying a superior channel out, gutting it, then returning itself to the same form that neither the cable companies OR the viewers wanted/asked for. So is it possible to pull a reverse MTV? What if we started a campaign here to call in to our cable companies and demand en masse that they remove this crap channel nobody wanted?

  134. G4 Kills TechTV by mark_p_howell · · Score: 1

    Well, it is official.

    What was once a pretty cool cable channel aimed towards entertaining some geeks, myself included, is about to be dead.

    I had a feeling Comcast/G4's purchase of TechTV was for nothing more than to get G4 into more homes, and that they didn't give a (Frank) about the TechTV brand, or anything they had done. And, it looks like Comcast got what they wanted and I was right.

    I can't stand all the gaming content they show now. I don't want to watch people play video games, I want to play video games. I can handle watching clips and news shows about the games and such because that has some sort of interesting and informational value to it, but most of the shows on the network are just plain bad.

    Oh, but now they are coming up with sure-fire winning show ideas such as centering a show around racing and guys drooling over women-in-video-games.

    Ugh, forget them...

    I think I'll just block them off my TV like I've done with MTV, Fox News and a few other channels...

    1. Re:G4 Kills TechTV by DannyiMac · · Score: 1

      More power to ya! I really hate what's happened too, but I'll probably still watch XPlay and Icons... those two shows are the only good ones... they've ruined TSS.

      I just thought of something, there should be a slashdot TV!

      --
      - Danny
  135. Re:Digital Pimp by rax262 · · Score: 1

    You forgot the late-night tech infomercials:

    "Unemployed? Living in your parents basement? Find out how I made my first million rating digital beauties online..."

  136. The "drift racing" show idea is even dumber. by Darlington · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK, maybe nothing's dumber than the "Girls Gone Wired" idea, but "Formula D" is right up there:
    "Formula D," the first-ever series to showcase the world of drift racing, will burn up the screen in April on G4.
    For those who don't know, drifting is the act of powersliding your car sideways. It's something rally drivers do to maintain speed around tight corners, but apparently idiots get together in parking lots and just drift in big stupid circles for hours. So it's not even a sport, it's a small part of a sport. It's as if someone took away the football and just had 22 guys run up and down the field for three hours, and said, "look, a new sport."

    I was going to tell Comcast to drop dead, but clearly they're trying to commit commercial suicide and don't need my encouragement.

    1. Re:The "drift racing" show idea is even dumber. by Osty · · Score: 1

      For those who don't know, drifting is the act of powersliding your car sideways. It's something rally drivers do to maintain speed around tight corners, but apparently idiots get together in parking lots and just drift in big stupid circles for hours. So it's not even a sport, it's a small part of a sport. It's as if someone took away the football and just had 22 guys run up and down the field for three hours, and said, "look, a new sport."

      Just a small addition. That should read, "It's something rally drivers do to maintain speed around tight corners in low-traction situations." Rally drivers don't drift on tarmac, because sliding is a good way to lose speed when you have adequate traction available.

      Anyway, I agree that drift racing is pretty stupid. It's also horribly named, as it's not "racing" at all. Competitors are judged on form and distance, not time or head-to-head competition. In this respect, drift racing is closer to gymnastics or figure skating than it is to racing (solo against the clock or wheel to wheel).

    2. Re:The "drift racing" show idea is even dumber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Rally drivers don't drift on tarmac, because sliding is a good way to lose speed when you have adequate traction available.

      As long as you're going to nitpick, I'll nitpick too. I'll pull the handbrake and drift on wet tarmac when the situation warrants, and other rally drivers do as well. So to be accurate, rally drivers don't drift on dry tarmac.

    3. Re:The "drift racing" show idea is even dumber. by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Drifting is cool, but only IF you have a rear wheel drive car and IF it produces enough torque to pull you out of the drift. And oh yeah, it's nice if the car is balanced and has a stiff chassis so that while you're spending all that time going sideways your front wheels that control steering are still on the ground. Most of the idiots who try to drift don't know this and think that the neato car daddy bought them is going to go sideways. But I'm all for the show if it will teach thes people that it wont.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    4. Re:The "drift racing" show idea is even dumber. by proub · · Score: 1
      Rally drivers don't drift on tarmac, because sliding is a good way to lose speed when you have adequate traction available.
      As long as you're going to nitpick, I'll nitpick too. I'll pull the handbrake and drift on wet tarmac when the situation warrants, and other rally drivers do as well. So to be accurate, rally drivers don't drift on dry tarmac.
      Yeah, but only when they're in their cars -- almost never when walking. I mean, come on people, let's get the details right.
      --
      "Irony is so September 10th"
      Matt Miller, alt.fan.spinnwebe
  137. Great Exec Decision...APPLAUSE! by munkeypants · · Score: 1

    We must all understand that this is a great move on G4's behalf. Death will come sooner for this piece of cow dung of a channel now as it moves farther away. Drop any mention of what made it a good channel and move even closer to something than only 12 year old boys with an allowance and xbox watch, lame game reviews and mainstream anime. Trust me, I'll never watch that channel again...even though TechTV was a mixed bag, I could at least learn something I didn't know before sometimes. This only opens the door for a new channel with programming for our audience to come along (please). Bad business ideas, especially when they ruin good ones, should be punished with failure. I hope somebody starts a movement to ban or cancel G4 from their providers and disuade advertisers. Count me in! Is there a website yet?...www.g4sucks.com, www.g4boycott.com, etc. with a list of execs and advertisers?

  138. Appealing to the Mainstream by superultra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am clueless on sports, and when I watch ESPN I feel even more clueless. The deluge of statistics, rules, various sports overwhelms me. Yet, how many ESPN channels are there? Like 20, each more categorically detailed than its parent channel? ESPN is unarguably difficult to "get" into. If you don't know sports, ESPN is a morass of numbers and names and terms you know nothing about.

    Kind of like video games and computing. Video games and computing on TV have more in common with TV sports than any other form of entertainment. There is something of a learning curve for video games and computing, and like sports they have generally appealed to a specific demographic. But what G4 is doing is the exact opposite of ESPN. They're trying to be more mainstream, instead of appealing to the niche like ESPN does. The fact is that ESPN makes the niche look so cool, and they do it so well, that the niche becomes mainstream. G4 is trying to be mainstream without appealing to the specific demographic of people who love - really love - video games and technology.

    I guess one could ask why the hell they're parading "the best of 2D and 3D girls" if they're trying to go mainstream. But it's like the kid in high school wearing the Walmart Wranglers jeans and knockoff brand jacket trying to fit into the cool clique. It's obvious that G4 is trying too hard. X-Play is the only thing they have going for them. Adam and Morgan* appeal to the niche, but at the same time they do it so well that it becomes cool. Friends who have no love of video games love to watch X-Play.

    G4 should be modeling ESPN, not Fox. The channel should cater to the people who love video games and technology, not shun them by canceling their favorite shows.

    * Ok, plus, Morgan is hot. But what she is not is a "2D or 3D girl." How lame.

  139. How far from reality are they? by Batu+Can · · Score: 1

    "Our audience interacts with digital girls as much as real girls" Not playing with a full deck would be my guess

  140. 300 million for what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they paid 300 million dallors to acquire TechTV just so they could drop the name and the shows? This makes no sense. Sounds like the work of a corporate suit with some fancy schmancy Point Point sales/ratings projects in his arsenal.

    1. Re:300 million for what? by cqnn · · Score: 1

      No, they paid 300 Mil to get access to the cable markets that TechTV had worked their way into.

  141. Anyone catch the new logo? by JSDopefish · · Score: 1

    The main story said there was a new logo posted, but then it was taken down. Anyone save a copy of it?

    --
    Joe Siegler
    Webmaster - 3D Realms & Black Sabbath Online
  142. sigh by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

    Yet another great decision from G4. Of course we probably shouldn't be surprised since their original business plan could be summarized as "TV for people who don't watch TV".

    Doorknobs.

  143. Most Likely to Kick Enemy Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Our audience interacts with digital girls as much as real girls and we're tapping into that fantasy,"

    commented Laura Civiello, Vice President of Acquisitions and Development for G4. "'Girls Gone Wired' is the first pageant of its kind on television with contestants competing for titles like "Hottest Newcomer," "Sexiest Voice" and "Most Likely to Kick Enemy Ass."

    Perhaps the saddest PR I've ever read. Laura realy has a kickass job, hope it pays well.

  144. Lawsuit coming soon by v2 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it takes Apple to sue G4?

  145. What's up with TSS? by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    Why do they keep switching hosts every week? I think the only one left that was there 2 months ago is Sarah (rrowl!)

    G4 is rapidly going down the toilet. At least that will give me one less reason to pay for digital cable.

    I still like XPlay though.

    1. Re:What's up with TSS? by czd · · Score: 1

      TSS, used to be good before Leo got skrewed over from G4! TSS was actually interesting. Now about the people that play in it, the only person who is there that was there since TechTV was really TechTV, is Kevin Rose. Every one elce is new and sucks at doing anyhthing, and dont know squat!

  146. Don't you see? this was their plan all along by Chr1s-Cr0ss · · Score: 1

    Step 1: "merge" with competing technology channel that has more viewers than you
    Step 2: Slowly shift the programming towards your original content
    Step 3: Take their name off of yours
    Step 4: Laugh maniacally as you splash puddles onto the original TechTV staff with your Lamboghini, blowing your nose into a thousand-dollar bill.

    --

    68.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    1. Re:Don't you see? this was their plan all along by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      Step 5: Watch your viewership plummet, because your entire network is based on the flawed premise that anyone but a handful of people enjoy watching others play games.

  147. Didn't We All Kinda Know This Was Coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, what country do you think this is?? You think the good 'ole U.S of A. was going to just sit back and allow useful television programming to fill the airwaves?? Oh no!!

    It seems today's motto in network television is "the more ass the better", so why waste time with the stupid tech theme? I say G4 should just dump shows like The Screen Savers and create a new reality show called "Who Wants To Marry a Database Developer". And whatever you do, make sure some talentless, silicon infested, hot blonde is typing on the keyboard. This helps to keep the ratings up.

  148. Best on KR and SL? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    So how long do you think Kevin and Sarah have before they are fired?

  149. TechTV gets screwed once again by wolf68k · · Score: 1

    G4 and Comcast are such bastages First they screw over TechTV and it's fans by dropping good shows, then screw up the formats of the shows they do keep, then just before Thanksgiving of Nov. 2004 they fire a ton of people mostly from what is left over from the original TechTV crew which also kills off more TechTV shows. Now they are screwing over Martin Sargent and Unscrewed by stealing the idea and name of "Girls Gone Wired". Originally "Girls Gone Wired" (for those that didn't watch the show) was showing pics of hot girls that have their own web sites. Even if the pics showed nudity, in the TechTV days they would just blur out the good bits. Plus they would link to the sites, but if they were adult they would put up their own warning page. After G4 got their dirty mitts onto the controls, not only could they not show the pics that just needed the blur but they also couldn't link to any of the sites. I don't think they were too thrilled with the Search Sperts with the cam girls taking off their clothes. Joey "The Intern" once wrote on his block that MS is rumored to buy back TechTV and restore it to it's original glory. But seeing how things are going, and being a pessimist that I am, I'm not going to hold my breath that it'll happen, let along that it'll work out very well.

  150. Worst Episode Ever! by rwrife · · Score: 1

    The whole G4 thing reminds me of the simpsons episode where the comic book guy said "worst episode ever!" (which was also the title of the Simpsons episode)

  151. Great idea for a show by Austin+Milbarge · · Score: 1

    How about a show where at the end of each episode you are given a binary number (0 or 1). After months of watching you collect the numbers to form an ASCII string. The first caller to call in with the string receives a free pass to change the channel because the network sucks!!

  152. Crap by any other name, would smell like crap. by MrCobaltBlue · · Score: 1

    Whats the big news? Wasn't it already all G4? Its just a name change to show the true intentions of Comcast. I'm glad they're not going to drag TechTv's name through the mud anymore with "What Games Celebrities Play" and "New Games Coming In 1998". TechTv forever!

    --
    mount /dev/me
  153. Shame it didnt goe with it by Fentekreel · · Score: 1

    Should of went with the name....It is too painful to watch something syndicated by idiots...seriously how many times is the dood going to keep hitting on the robotic voice that play ever crack for him and his joystick....

  154. I think X-Play has a bright future. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    Now that Morgan has gotten more comfortable doing the show, she seems like a good match for Mr. Whacky-Awesome Guy Adam Sessler. They give some really great unbiased reviews, can poke fun of themselves and the other gimmicks the rest of the industry picks up on. Unlike Judgement Day, they dont mind reading text in games, and are always willing to compare modern day games with old school games from way back when. They are very detailed with everything they say and rate, and it just works.

    Watching Judgement Day is like watching the 2 Stooges screaming at each other. "HAY THIS RPG HAS TOO MUCH TEXT I HATE TEXT!! LOL NINTENDO IS FOR KIDDIES BUY XBOX LOL OLLOLOL" or "THIS GAEM HAS LOTS OF BREASTS AND I LIEK IT A LOT!! 8.7 OUT OF 10!!!! BUY IT!!"

    I mean, c'mon .. Get those bozos off the air already.

  155. sheep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth.

    Fuck you comcast! i hope you get cancer and die!

  156. Aw man.. by Klowner · · Score: 1

    For a moment there I had hopes that "Girls Gone Wired" was actually just "Girls Gone Wild", except filmed in some asian country.

    (if this quip made you chuckle, visit engrish.com)

  157. No Offense Met... by Gribflex · · Score: 1

    I'd rather play a good game of UT2004 or Halo2.

    And I'm so glad to hear it.

    Apologies if I've offended you, but the honest truth is that while the number of female gamers/geeks is climbing at an alarming rate, this growth is not happening in the "male domintated" areas.

    I fully support anyone, of any gender, playing the video games, or pursuing the career of their choice. However, I more support a simple increase in the number of women who use technology on a day to day basis - for whatever reason at all. The more women that are using technology, the more it will feel comfortable to them, and the more that it will be considered acceptable as a career option for their daughters, and themselves.

    And the more girls that get into technology today, for whatever reason, the more women there will be in this field in the future.

    What is motivating the market today are the types of things that I mentioned in my earlier post. Pink iPods, pink game boys, Barbies Seaside Adventure (and other such GBA games), the Sims, cell phones (again, sadly the pink ones), digital cameras, PDAs, home decorating software, scraobooking software, entry level computers so that people can stay connected with their loved ones.

    Five years ago, none of this stuff was around, and most of the females that I encountered thought that electronics, games and computers were stupid boy things.

    That has changed SO much through the advent of 'girly' technology. While I would love it if the number of ladies purchasing Doom 3, and Halflife 2 was similar to the number of guys. But its not a reality. So instead of trying to push ladies into playing games that they do not enjoy, I'd sooner welcome them into a world where technology is viewed as welcome change, and an integral part of their lives.

  158. TechTV Canada by flyingheath · · Score: 1

    I had always wondered why G4 bought TechTV and started putting game shows all over the place. We have Call For Help in Canada but that is the only show worth watching. We do not get most of the regular G4 content as it conflicts with established Canadian channels. Outside of Call For Help there are 5 other programs that are played in a loop 24/7.

    1. Re:TechTV Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yah this is to fill up the channel selections on Bell ExpressVu and Shaws lineup. It also helps to satisfy CCR (Canadienne Content Regulations) or to Yanks Credence Clearwater regulations the same reason why you still hear Terry Jacks and Edward Bear on Vancouver oldy radio 4-5 times per day.

      Hopefully the CBC or Glowball will get innovative and fill the gap caused by the Microsoft centric American broadcasters, by castrating the doings of Leo and company. Atleast we here in the GWN can still get timely warnings about MS software holes. I just wonder when MS is going to go after /., the same way it did in the screenshavers.

      Afterall Paul Allen did own Tech TV and Tivo, at one time. What has transpired with the American media is only understandible if you consider the role MS plays in dictating government and network policy. I would not even be suprised if G4 is just a pupit network of MSNBC, the same way that SCO has become a pupit corporation.

  159. Why is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I worked at TechTV for over three years, and when the G4 merger -- I mean acquisition -- occured, the writing was on the wall. It was clear they'd drop "TechTV" from the name and logo eventually, since TechTV programming isn't what G4 did. It was totally temporary to keep viewers, and more importantly, big-ticket advertisers who were betrayed. Charles Hirschorn told us as much when he treated us like children upon announcing the merger.

    G4 made TV programs about videogames. However, we all knew well that they'd pull whatever relevant video-gaming aspects they could from techtv, and assess whether they made sense from their programming standpoint. Why wouldn't they? They were looking primarily for cable and satellite distribution, which we had, but sure as rain they were also hard up for creative (shows and website ideas).

    This new drifting show is a perfect example of that, since Tech Live did a few stories on the phenomenon and it quickly became clear that this whole culture around the "sport" might be worthy of following more closely. The other 2D/3D beauty pageant is obvious eye candy that TechTV even latched on to, back in the day. Anyone remember Unscrewed? If you ever visited the show's website, you would've see the hugely popular "Girls Gone Wired" section (gee, I wonder where they got the name for the show?) - basically models and porn stars who built their own websites.

    Anyway, every time I see a post on /. that's nostalgic for the old days of TechTV makes me laugh. Get over it people, the network is gone, and isn't coming back. Tech on TV never really worked. Yeah, we were getting more and more viewers and visitors to our website, but come on. An entire network dedicated to it was really a dream, or perhaps ahead of its time. Paul Allen may not have been the best dad for us, but he was no dummy either. He got rid of it for all the right reasons.

    Yeah, it's too bad for the fans and employees who poured their hearts into watching the shows and creating them. But, y'all will move on. Anyway, one thing technology and the tech industry should teach everyone, is that there's always a next big thing (and the grass is often greener elsewhere).

  160. One good fucking show left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Icons.

  161. Slashdot TV!!! by DannyiMac · · Score: 1

    Fine, G4 has bought TechTV, gutted it for the valuable parts, and now has thrown the carcass to the curb. We are now missing a computer/technology channel.

    I suggest Slashdot TV or some other new channel! Slashdot offers a wide variety of computing and technology content. All that needs to be done now is just start a channel! I know it wouldn't be easy or cheap but damnit, we need this!

    Slashdot TV: We don't cast Coms here.

    --
    - Danny
  162. I'm stunned...knock me down with a feather :|

    (Next year it will be all used car salesmen TV)

  163. Archiving TechTV shows by Gax · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm in the UK, so I have never seen TechTV. However, it seems we have lost a record of computing culture. There are dozens of sites dedicated to the preservation of computing magazines, but no one has considered the importance of TV coverage. What happens to these TV series after they are taken off the air? Unless it is speculated in the original contract, they are never reshown and sit in a TV archive gathering dust. I wish production companies would make older shows available on the web. The cost of streaming/downloading 100Mb+ videos and legal implications make it a risky proposition, but I believe there is a market. As a fan of retro nut I would gladly pay for DVDs containing old episodes of Micro Live, Gamesmaster, Bad Influence, Bits or any of the other shows shown in the UK. Tutorials, such as those shown on TechTV, have a wider use for people trying to learn a new application. It may even create a demand for the show to resurrected a few years later.

    In the absence of official support I would hope fans would make an effort. P2P networks are a possible option, but most people seem to prefer the latest episode of Enterprise to a Photoshop tutorial.

  164. Amen by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You have a very good point there. I had not thought of it that way, but you are right - the G4 people seem not to have enough talent to have made it.

    Perhaps it's really a coded message for help from a former TechTV staffer still working there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  165. Sad day by kanoswrx · · Score: 1

    First I hear that 99.1 HFS in Washington D.C. changed over to a Mexican Radio station today. And now officialy Tech TV is dead. The world is coming to an end, haha. But seriously this really sucks. Screen Savers died when they got those two new hosts that suck and just talk about games all the time now. Now they are getting a show called Formual D (rip off of Initial D). Don't even get me started on this. I am a huge auto sport fan, and race my cars myself (not drag strips, real races). I respect what japanese drivers do drifting down mountain sides like in initial d, its not the fastest way to drive, but takes a lot of skill. And here in America they not only turned initial d into a horrible Fast and the Furious show with the edited/cut Dubbed (english language) version. But also in real life all americans do is drift around in circles on a big open concrete parking lot. Its like all americans do is drive fast in a straight line (fast and the furious) or go in circles (nascar). America is just sad when it comes to autosports.

  166. Farewell TechTV by ddarkchild · · Score: 1

    It's a shame that this popular niche television programming has been put through the wringer like it has. With the core TechTV shows nearly gone, the channel has nothing left to offer. After all, the staple of G4 is their gaming shows, and they are of the lowest possible quality. There is stuff on Lifetime that is more interesting than the highest quality G4 gaming show.

    _Kevin

    --
    _Desmond
  167. I'm sorry but... by ShawnMcCool42 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the TechTV people never knew what was going on. I've been watching them a while. I think Yoshi is the only guy who can do anything decent. At least they got rid of that annoying little dork dude that was on there a few years back.

    I welcome G4. They have some decent shows about games. Drop that lame shit like the screen savers. Tech Live was utter crap. Who cares about random stupid ass gadgets for assholes who want to waste their money and an addiction to fads. This isn't Japan we're supposed to be smarter than that (yea right).

    Bring on the games, bring on the stories, bring on the interactivity. Screw the rest.

    1. Re:I'm sorry but... by ygrqnnt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude. You really need to get a life.

      Life is more than a game. Do something new. Take your wife or girlfriend friend on a date. You might like it.

    2. Re:I'm sorry but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get this straight... he likes G4 over TechTV and you imply he has a girlfriend/wife?

      That is SO wrong.

    3. Re:I'm sorry but... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      " Who cares about random stupid ass gadgets for assholes who want to waste their money and an addiction to fads."

      Let's change one thing in what you said, and to me it makes more sense:
      "Who cares about random stupid ass video games for idiots who want to waste their money and an addiction to fads."

      There, makes more sense. And to any gamers I offended, I only wanted to comment on the incredible stupidity of this guy.

    4. Re:I'm sorry but... by ShawnMcCool42 · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is what is up with the massive emphasis on having a wife or girlfriend on this site. Have you people never seen a girl before? Yes, relationships are nice and fine and all. But there's other things out there. Things that can be quite a bit more interesting than picking out drapes, or dealing with hormonal level deficiencies. Some people just thirst too damn strongly for relationships and you know it's those people who either don't get any, or who must not have much to offer other than the cyclical work of maintaining a relationship. Do what you want, but there's other things to life out there.

  168. Drift racing? by Pentomino · · Score: 1

    I noticed as soon as G4 bought TechTV, suddenly I saw at least one show or segment about drift racing EVERY DAY.

    Now drift racing is getting its own show.

    And I never hear a word about drift racing on any other TV channel, ever.

    I wonder how much of this might be the whim of some trust-fund kid who's got a garage full of riced-out Hondas and some influential position in the network.

  169. Saw this coming... by dcr · · Score: 1

    when the buyout of TechTV happened. Pity, though - TechTV, like its predecessor ZDTV, was one of the few channels where a technophile like me could feel at home.

    Admittedly, the quality of the content was heading downhill as the different personalities left over time (Jim Louderback, John Dvorak, Kate Botello, and Sumi Das all spring immediately to mind). Some of the newer offerings did nothing for me (Unscrewed, Battlebots (or whatever it's called), Body Hits, etc.). The channel was definitely losing steam even before the G4 buyout.

    Still, what has been announced today was exactly what folks predicted when the buyout was announced. The smaller network has bought the bigger one, junked the content of the bigger network, run off their talent pool, and we're left with the same old junk that G4 ran - just more folks are able to be subjected to it.

    The thing that G4's management has not (apparently) figured out is that TechTV was bigger for a reason - their content was better than G4's!

  170. Propsed TechTV schedule by dav1ross · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd like the above listed schedule; just move Alton Brown to a more prominent spot than 11AM.

  171. Lets make our own! by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

    Hey, what dont we just produce our own show and stream it over the internet? (This is not intended to be a joke. For a couple thousand bucks It would be possible for anyone to start their own little call-in show online. Unfortunatly there is the problem of having enough bandwidth for thousands of viewers (wich can be handled with a peer-to-peer video streaming solution) Getting lots of viewers (slashdot announcement) and getting money to pay for it (OK this im at a loss for. Someone else will need to figure out this step before profit, but if theres someone whos willing to donate for this, or a lot who are willing to donate a little it should be feasable))

    --
    All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    1. Re:Lets make our own! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what we should do, it's a great idea, kind of like The Broken.

      Damn G4 BLOWS!

  172. MOD UP Parent!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD UP!!!!

    The cancer statement is awesome!

  173. Their not even gamers by DyslexicDan · · Score: 1

    These people that they have on the shows don't even know anything about games let alone tech. All they do is pimp games that are movie or tv tie-ins.

  174. Drifting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well maybe if they have drifting i'll have to watch it. Other then that g4 really has only 1 or 2 good shows. I watch x-play and arena once and a while.

  175. Laporte, Rose, Norton, Pregger, etc. form alliance by LGEKoji · · Score: 1

    Listen to Leo Laporte's CES podcast. Leo and Kevin announce a Grand Alliance of former TechTV cast and friends to make genuine OldSchool TechTV-type content. http://www.leoville.com/blog/ LONG LIVE THE GOOD OLD DAYS

  176. Re:Laporte, Rose, Norton, Pregger, etc. form allia by LGEKoji · · Score: 1

    Correction, it was at the MacWorld conf..

  177. Where's Starcade? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    It was great when G4 showed it when they were a standalone channel. Will G4 ever play it again? They can add it somewhere within the Cheat, Judgement Day, Cinematech, ad nauseum rotation.

  178. Why G4 kept the techTV names & some of the sho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G4 had to keep the techtv name and half of the original TechTV lineup to prevent cable providers from dropping their existing contracts with TechTV. Now that G4 has renegotiated their distribution contracts with cable providers they can drop the techtv name and all of it's programming. Mission accomplished.

    There is a Cnet interview with G4's CEO from before the merger where Cnet asks Hirshhorn why they would launch a technology related channel when ZDTV/TechTV has struggled so much over the years and Hirshhorns response is that G4 had nothing to do with technology and that Technology was more of a science and business based subject and G4 would never be like that. Well about a year and a half after that interview G4 purchased TechTV and killed off the network. It's so freaking sad. I wish they could have sucked the life out of some other channel that I did not watch. If they wanted to kill another channel to get more distribution for G4 why couldn't they have killed Women's Entertainment or some crap channel that I don't ever watch?

  179. a good thing by Prime+Mover · · Score: 1

    As a former TechTV employee, I'm glad they are removing the name. It really brought down what I remembered about TTV. As others have noted, the purchase of TTV was all about the distribution rights. G4 wasn't that serious about the web content. At first they only wanted the last few months. We had to convince them to take it all. I still get stories from TTV-ers on the inside about how terrible it is there. Plus the Wil Wheaton expose...
    And if any former TTV employees want to start it all up again, I'm still unemployed...and I still have the CVS repository on my computer.

  180. G4 = PoseTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should change their name to PoserTV.

  181. I can sum it up in one word by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1

    vomit

  182. put a fork in it by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

    cuz it's done. i sat through a few hours of g4 programming yesterday. it sucks.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  183. Maybe they'll go out of business... by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'll go out of business or something. I can always hope. Their programming is filled with poorly executed, uniformative drivel most of the time. TechTV, on the other hand, while still suffering from growing pains, actually contained information that I gave a crap about.

    The last nail in the coffin, it seems.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  184. G4 is trash by suezz · · Score: 1

    G4 buying techtv was just bad - they trashed that station - I took it off of my tv station list - It is just crap - It was kind of neat having a tech tv - I looked forward to seeing leo and patrick every night when I could - but now it is nothing but gaming - it sucks, it sucks, it sucks, it sucks. yes gaming should of been part of the station but not ALL of it. what the hell is g4 thinking - I am in the age group they are trying to get and I don't want any part of their crap. I barely have time for my personal life much less fricken gaming why the hell do I want to watch a station about pc gaming. g4 - please sell techtv and let it go back to what it was - a informative useful station. not the crap you are showing.

    1. Re:G4 is trash by malbosher · · Score: 1

      I agree whole heartedly.

  185. You heard it here first... by Atario · · Score: 1

    ...SlashdotTV. Coming soon to a cable/satellite TV provider near you.

    Logo:
    /.TV
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  186. Re:Extended Play Rocked. X-Play SUCKS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Extended Play with just Adam was a much better show than XPlay; it got more reviews done in the same half hour because it wasn't wasting time on stupid banter.

    HOWEVER even the dumbed down XPlay was superior to any of the garbage that originated on G4, with a few honorable exceptions like Icons, which was a series of documentaries on the history of video games that gave the distinct impression that it was produced by literate adults and not juvenile amateurs, which is the distinct reek one gets a whiff of when watching most of the other G4 produced content - moronic lowest common denominator crap.

  187. Cool idea for a game Show by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Have a live show where paople join a public (private, whatever) multiplayer server and have a play by play of the shots. IE. a halo2 server where people join up, and then have live coverage of the gibbing. Talk about completely interactive TV. =)

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  188. And more channels that have turned lame... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    Along with Discovery Channel and TLC; wtf happened to the Travel Channel? All Vegas, All The Time? And what's with the poker shows? I never thought anything could be more boring than watching golf on tv but, damn!, I was wrong.

    PBS still draws me back, over and over. Too bad it runs commercials now.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  189. G4 is hacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    g4 is full of the biggest tryhard hacks on tv... using forced lingo and cheesy production

  190. Change name to C4tv by reefer-92 · · Score: 1

    The whole name should be changed. I agree that TechTV should be dropped because the shows that are left from that channel has nothing to do with technology now. Leo and Patrick would keep us informed on the latest virus, on what to look for, and updates on the newest of everything out there. They were there for the new people like me and the ones who have been "around the block" too! We have lost Call for Help; the next to best show. (By the way, what happened to the call-ins on the Screen Saver?) G4 hasn't only hit rock bottom, they are still digging further. Come on!!! Girls Gone Wired! Instead of G4TV, they should change the name to C4TV...Crap 4 television!

  191. garbage4gamers by asciilogic · · Score: 1

    this channel is garbage! does it appeal 2 any gamers? all the hardcore gamers i know DON'T watch this! i dropped it from my channel favorites after they f*cked up the screensavers. kevin rose needs 2 bail off the sinking ship that is G4! hope his contract is up soon!

    --
    -asciilogic
  192. About G4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From their own press release:

    G4 is the only 24/7 television network dedicated to videogames. It features all original programming that covers every aspect of the video game culture - games, gear, gadgets and girls - with live shows, insider information and breaking news. The network is available in 50 million cable and satellite homes nationwide.

    That about says it all. Tech is dead at G4. I give the network a year (at most) before it dies, too.

  193. Techtv to G4 by sir_eot · · Score: 1

    Well this is the third name change I've seen it used to be ZDtv known as techtv anyway the show sucks now because it's not like in the old days when leo and kate were running it they were great everything got covered. I hate when networks try to remake a show and mess everything up with fake plastic advertising with no substance to it what so ever just want your money type plastic show is what it is now , when they gave the game guy his own segment all he did was act like an idiot and invite girls on the show so he could oggel them, it was a mess, it looked like howard stern on crack ! I say give us a damn show about the computer world thats only interested in the technology behind the computer wizardry we still want to see the man behind the curtan , not the curtan it's self

  194. Re:Laporte, Rose, Norton, Pregger, etc. form allia by kestrel55 · · Score: 1

    That would be great. The show sux now that comcast ownz it. No information anymore, could be someone, somewhere thought too much info was being distributed. Yes long live the good old days!!