Slashdot Mirror


Games That Shoot Back

syousef writes "A shooting game that shoots back, delivering electric shocks through the player's hips when they're shot, is being used for recruitment (Hey shooting people is fun) and training by the U.S. military. There's talk of developing it into a PC game. Here's a quote from the article: 'It has the same power as a stun gun. It knocks you down. You have to continue to work through the pain and keep on fighting, as that is what you need to do - to keep on fighting even when wounded.' I guess in Soviet America, games shoot you. How many law suits would this cause based on unknown heart conditions? I also hope there's some sort of built-in safety in case the thing starts to zap you repeatedly. (Deadly endless loop, anyone?)"

499 comments

  1. Suicide Booth by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this is brought to the PC games, I hope they also include a suicide feature so that I can finish myself or team mates who are suffering from electric shock.

    "Timmy, forget about the TK rules, kill me please, please!"

    1. Re:Suicide Booth by Janitha · · Score: 1, Funny

      It wont be long before someone will come up with a home made version of it, if not at least I will come up with a way

      A simple transformer, outputting a very high current with lot amps will work ideally (simple do it your self project). I see this also being worked along with the mouse as well. I see no difficulty in construction of the hardware, the trick will most likely be interfacing it with a game.

      I see more use of this such as hooked up to error messeges in your machine, when a compile is finished, alarm clock for the gamers.

    2. Re:Suicide Booth by aliasptr · · Score: 1

      Ahhh!! No not high current, that's what kills you! High voltage perhaps. Either that or this is a joke and it's totally going over my head... either way.. be careful!

      --
      It takes all types in this world. I sincerely mean it... This is just my perspective.
    3. Re:Suicide Booth by mwilli · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem I see in this is that if there is a suicide feature, some evil game developer would *accidentally* make the feature so it delivers a fatal electric shock. I know I would if I were that evil developer. Does that make me a bad person?

      Otherwise, this sounds like a game for me!

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
    4. Re:Suicide Booth by brilinux · · Score: 0

      Nope, it is the current that kills you; the thing is that if you up the voltage, the current goes up too. So up both, and you should be "safe".

    5. Re:Suicide Booth by izomiac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm... this system + virus = gamer genocide?

    6. Re:Suicide Booth by aliasptr · · Score: 1

      Does Ohm's law really apply to the body? It's quite gruesome to think about it but I'd guess that it doesn't show linear current-voltage characteristics. I'm not disagreeing, in general you can assume this. That was my point as well, the current is what kills you, but if you're building something to just shock you, you DON'T want high current flowing through your body. So you'd need to keep the voltage relatively "low" (whatever that means, doing a cursory google search, electric chairs seem to be using around 2000V for 30 seconds and then usually multiple applications of varying voltage and current.) As for your last sentence I don't know why increasing the voltage and current would help keep you safe from killing yourself or at least harming yourself! Hope to get a reply! :)

      --
      It takes all types in this world. I sincerely mean it... This is just my perspective.
    7. Re:Suicide Booth by Janitha · · Score: 1

      I meant Voltage. I was thinking about current at the time...

    8. Re:Suicide Booth by brilinux · · Score: 1

      I meant "safe" as in "should work as intended", which is why it was not in quotes. In general, such circumstances would not, in fact, render one safe from physical harm (one can assume that the mental harm has already been done if you are trying this).

      As far as the body goes, nothing really obeys Ohm's law, and the body actually acts like a large capacitor at most voltages, I believe. So, basically, if electrocution is intended, I believe that the voltage is moderate, and it is the breakdown of cell membranes eventually leading to the heart where it interrupts the pulses from the brain that is intended. But, I could be wrong. I was going to study Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, but that was too practical, so now I study Math and Cognitive Science. Perhaps I will never know.

    9. Re:Suicide Booth by brilinux · · Score: 1

      I mean why it was in quotes. My brain is dead. Pittsburgh's weather is destroying it. Back to CS homework.

    10. Re:Suicide Booth by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hopefully the manufacturer of the device will include some kind of circuit breaker or fuse to stop a lethal shock.

    11. Re:Suicide Booth by corpsiclex · · Score: 1

      me and my friend modified a ps2 controller to shock you when you were damaged (instead of the force feedback). i think he liked it more than i did, but neither of us will go near it anymore =p

      --

      eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
    12. Re:Suicide Booth by guorbatschow · · Score: 1

      afaik its either high voltage or high current if there is a transformator. the power output remains constant.

    13. Re:Suicide Booth by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the big killer for electric shocks is heart fibrillation. I believe that humans can withstand quite a zap (up to the point that tissue burning occurs) as long as the path of the current doesn't flow through the heart. (I've heard of electricians that only work one-handed near live wires for this reason). On the other side, there's an anecdote about a young midshipman in the Navy who wanted to measure the resistance of his body inside the sking and stuck two voltage test probes in his thumbs, one in each hand, and the nine-volt battery in the tester was just enough to cause fibirillation in his heart and he died.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    14. Re:Suicide Booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because a fast death is not satisfying.

    15. Re:Suicide Booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the soccer moms have a reason to complain about video games killing children...

    16. Re:Suicide Booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing either of the voltage or current component of an A/C source must retain the initial wattage. Therefore, if one is increased by way of a transformer, the other is inherently decreased. Voltage should be increased for the shock. D'you need better proof? Fine.

      Triboelectricity (static) is usually a very high voltage, sometimes (if not usually) thousands of volts. But the associated current is incredible low, so little to kno dammage is done.

    17. Re:Suicide Booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My biggest worry about this isn't heart fibrulation, considering the shock is applied across the person's hips. My concern is nerve dammage. Even if the shock is not directly applied to a nerve, it's still very dangerous. Even small shocks are demmaging after repeated use. If I remember correctly, even those little prank piezo shockers have caused nerve dammage in rare cases. It's usually the people who think it's funny and keep zapping the same place on their arms.

      So think about a taser-like sensation across someone's hips. The first time in the game won't be so bad. But when the person keeps playing and keeps getting shot in-game, the same large shock is applied to the same place repeatedly.

      Forward to several months of training later. The person is playing yet again. The person gets shot in-game, and *zap* when he tries to stand, suddenly his legs seem weaker than usual, or perhaps don't work at all. Yes, folks, it can be this sudden.

      I'll add this last disclaimer: I don't expect this to happen with most cases, or even with many. But I knowthe risk exists.

    18. Re:Suicide Booth by LucBorg · · Score: 1

      Hehe this would be an interesting development. Ever had the experience where your PC crashes in the middle of a game and the sounds that were just playing keep repeating over and over again in an endless loop until you reboot? Well imagine if that were to happen here! Please ban this "game" for civilian use!

    19. Re:Suicide Booth by VdG · · Score: 3, Funny

      So a shock transmitted through the hips is unlikely to cause heart problems. But there might be other unwanted side-effects.
      Brown trousers should be compulsory.

    20. Re:Suicide Booth by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're trying to get people to apply to be expendable human weapons. Do you REALLY think they care?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    21. Re:Suicide Booth by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Current and voltage are always proportional.

      V = IR

      Assuming that the stun gun is a voltage source, if you have high voltage and high resistance, you will have low current (I). If you have high voltage and low resistance, you will have high current.

      Human skin has a very high resistance.

      --
      -mkb
    22. Re:Suicide Booth by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes....

      Year one, week one, of any electronics course teaches you of the safety and hazards of electricity.

      The skin surface has a very high resistance. Blood has a very low resistance. Open and/or bleeding cuts in the skin are dangerous near electrical contacts. It takes a lot of current to cause any real damage through skin. That's why you can touch the terminals of a relatively low voltage battery without a problem. But touching the terminals to fresh cuts on both hands can produce a high current flow right through the heart and cause fibrillation.

      Very high voltages can overcome the resistance of unbroken skin and do the same thing. Something I discovered by being careless. I've always practiced putting one hand behind my back while working near live high voltage/current sources. I made the mistake once of resting one hand on a metal radiator in a car while turning the distributor on a running engine to set the timing. A crack in the distributor cap allowed a charge to escape to my hand, through me, and to the radiator. I've had high voltage shocks before, but not like this. I felt funny in the chest, dizzy and weak momentarily, and almost fell over before my heart started pounding like I finished a marathon. I recovered from it rather quickly, but I'm sure I rattled my heart rhythm for a moment because of that.

    23. Re:Suicide Booth by chl · · Score: 1
      Why bother with circuit breakers. Just keep shocking the player (in a more controlled manner) if he goes into fibrillation.

      chl

    24. Re:Suicide Booth by netsharc · · Score: 1

      How your heart went hay-wired sounds freaky. But, what does putting one hand behind your back accomplish?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    25. Re:Suicide Booth by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      Helps prevent the flow of electricity from one hand, across the heart, to the other hand.

      I had one hand on a grounded metal component (the radiator) and the other hand near an electrical source (the distributor). Thus, I completed an electrical circuit when the ignition fired through the leaky distributor cap.

      If I had my other hand away from things (behind my back), the electricity could of went from my arm down to my feet. But I was wearing sneakers and was insulated from the ground. I probably wouldn't have gotten a shock.

    26. Re:Suicide Booth by Janitha · · Score: 2, Funny

      It seems unlikly that they would include a features such as that.

      That would be like adding a small switch in your normal firearms to give a option of "shoot back at face"

    27. Re:Suicide Booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      colon parenthesis
      thats enough from you Sid

    28. Re:Suicide Booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Point rocket launcher at wall 6 inches in front of face.
      2. Pull trigger.
      3. Watch screen turn red, and repeat if health is still positive
      4. ???
      5. Profit!!

    29. Re:Suicide Booth by chaoaretasty · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to go back and redo electronics. V=IR for OHMIC resistors, and even then only upto a point. I'd be very surprised if skin was even close to ohmic.

    30. Re:Suicide Booth by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Actually, my electronics classes never mentioned non-ohmic resistors. good thing i'm not an electronics engineer, then!

      --
      -mkb
  2. America's Army from Hell by sumdeus · · Score: 5, Funny

    America's Army Part II -- The Final Recruitment. If you manage to live through this video game you are worthy of a sandy death.

    --
    Peter: I got an idea, an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about.
    1. Re:America's Army from Hell by Rosyna · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. It's a challenge even for Teal'c.

    2. Re:America's Army from Hell by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Our local PD contracts with a company that provides incident simulations. Basicly and officer has to run through a simulation of a likely law enforcement scenario (felony trafic stop on a stolen vehicle.)

      Often times a poor performance on the officers part will lead to a "shootout."

      The officers are outfitted with a miles-laser type system to their service weapon. Also supplied to the officer is light body armor and a shatter resistant face shield. The simulator makes use of human-aimed air guns that fire "soft" plastic pellets at the officers.

      I don't understand how these pellets mark the officers, but officer performance is determined by scoring marksman ship with the laser and marks left on the officer by the airgun. These are not "paintballs" as they are re-used repeatedly. Something similar to airsoft pellets.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    3. Re:America's Army from Hell by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now I know what those newpapers mean when they write something like "The pictures from Abu Ghraib prison have shocked the US army."

      Just beta testing...

    4. Re:America's Army from Hell by FauxReal · · Score: 1, Interesting

      More likely... governments will agree to hook up 10,000 troops at a time to these and let them fight in "simulations". The losers get shocked to death and carted out in a clean efficient way. Thus saving time, money, environment and mess.

    5. Re:America's Army from Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      offtopic? i guess the mods didn't see that episode

    6. Re:America's Army from Hell by wrecked · · Score: 1

      Until Captain Kirk comes along and spoils all the fun.

  3. Critical issues of pacing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'm thinking the pace and realism of any such games had better be closer to Operation Flashpoint than Serious Sam ;)

  4. Obvious countermeasure . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wear gloves.

    1. Re:Obvious countermeasure . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Um it works through some kind of contact on your hips. Unless you're very different to me I don't see how gloves will help!

  5. Malware by biryokumaru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who will be the first to write malware that actually kills people?

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    1. Re:Malware by mcslappy · · Score: 1

      for(int x = 1, x != 0, x++)
      {
      shock++;
      }

    2. Re:Malware by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Who will be the first to write malware that actually kills people?"

      I hear ya. I'm so sick of malware that burns up motherboards.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Malware by brsmith4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better:

      /* fake, pseudo-asm */
      #define _shock(mag) __asm__ volitile \
      ("movl %0,%%sri \ /* imaginary register for shock intensity */
      mov $1,%%sre \ /* imaginary register for shock enable */
      movl %%srs,%eax \ /* imaginary register for shock status */
      movl %eax,%1" \
      :"=r" (i) \
      :"r" (k) \
      :"eax") \ /* return status from register */

      #define _unshock() __asm__ volitile \
      ("movw $0,%%sri")

      int main(void){
      long magnitude;
      int status;

      /* lets increase the dosage every time we shock */

      for (magnitude = 10; magnitude != 0; magnitude *= 2){
      if (!(status = shock(magnitude))) return EXIT_FAILURE;
      sleep(1);
      if ((status = unshock())) return EXIT_FAILURE;
      }

      return EXIT_SUCCESS; /* we never get here */
      }

      It might not work, but at least the idea is sadistic enough...

    4. Re:Malware by brsmith4 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Using the wrong data registers... ugh, i should have done this when I was sober. And watch the overflow on that long... It will take a while, but it'll overflow.

    5. Re:Malware by glimmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It will take a while, but it'll overflow.

      thats ok, you'll be dead by that time

    6. Re:Malware by msim · · Score: 5, Funny

      sweet merciful crap, you guys think too much.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    7. Re:Malware by bobobobo · · Score: 1

      I imagine the machine won't be capable of outputting a shock capable of killing someone.

  6. Uh oh by dg41 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone forgot to turn the safety protocols back on.

    1. Re:Uh oh by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      CleverNickname's going to be pissed. He'll have to bypass the holodeck conduits and reverse the polarity by using the main deflector dish or something.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Uh oh by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      If the holodeck computer controls are fscked, the easiest way to deal with it is to turn it off. Of course, you need a functioning computer to do that.

      Since the holodecks typically run on their own power sources, you have two options: Disabling the power source, necessitating a crawl through Jeffries tubes, or trying your hand at the stiff manual override hidden in a panel under the computer interface.

      Unless you're stuck inside the holodeck...at that point, your best bet is to initiate a site-to-site transport. If your comm badge doesn't work, hold on tight. This episode's all about your problems.

    3. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad to think that the effort put into rationalising and exploring the totally fictitious Star Trek universe could probably have cured AIDS or something by now if it were applied to the real world- and not some spurious principle a bored scriptwriter contrived in order to wrap up a cheesey Season 2 story in the last 5 minutes.

    4. Re:Uh oh by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      and not some spurious principle a bored scriptwriter contrived in order to wrap up a cheesey Season 2 story in the last 5 minutes.

      What are you talking about? The site-to-site transporter was used in the first five minutes of the Voyager episode about photonic life forms from a different dimension going to war with the Chatoica character in the holodeck...

      Oh, and get a grip, and stop pissing on other peoples' hobbies. I bet you also hate it when people draw portraits as a hobby...or do those people lack the mental ability to develop an HIV vaccine?

    5. Re:Uh oh by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Two Words:

      Tacheyon Beam

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  7. Re:FP by warrenj76 · · Score: 0

    At last.. a whole new dimension to "friendly fire" ;)

    Now to Options.. turn friendly fire on... call "friend" over...

    --
    all u touch and all u see is all your life will ever be
  8. What next? by SteelV · · Score: 4, Funny

    An MMORPG that knocks you out by electric shock and steals your clothes and jewelry, etc. when you die in-game? Realism isn't always a *good* thing. I would prefer not to be shocked while playing Counter-Strike, please.

    Next.

    1. Re:What next? by Crashmaster007 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If you're playing Counter-Strike you SHOULD be shocked. Many many times.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    2. Re:What next? by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 0, Troll

      But this isn't even really a game, you didn't even have to RTFA to see that it was used for training.

    3. Re:What next? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked that anyone still plays that. :-o

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    4. Re:What next? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      There are certain several day long LARP events where you can rob the other players. Which means you have to go with friends or find someone to group up with, and someone has to do a night watch. Just like you have to do in real life, or in an RPG where the DM/GM is sapient.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    5. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about one that drives you insane and steals all your money?

      Oh, that would be Windows.

    6. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How exactly is parent a troll?
      ...being used for recruitment and training by the U.S. military
  9. Hey, by CompotatoJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all fun and games until someone does a headshot and 1000V runs through your entire body!

    1. Re:Hey, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Remember it is not volts that kill.

      10,000 volts running through your body limited to 5 mA might tingle.

      10,000 amps running through your body at 5 volts will make you a crispy critter.*

      *actually it will take more then 5 volts to send 10,000 amps through your body unless you have been drinking a lot of Gatorade.

    2. Re:Hey, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The body acts as a pretty good capacitor, though.

      I'd bet 10,000 apms at 5 volts would maker a pretty good crater.

    3. Re:Hey, by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Ever poke yourself with a DMM? Most of your resistance is in the dead cells on the outer portion of your skin. Get through that, and you quickly drop to less than an Ohm.

    4. Re:Hey, by Puma_Concolor · · Score: 1

      The body acts like a resistor,not a capacitor. It take 30 volts to overcome the resistance of dry skin and that produces a tingle. I have been bitten with 400 VDC working on a power supply before and it left scortch marks on my thumb. It takes only 100 ma to stop the beating of the heart...

    5. Re:Hey, by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Well if you are relying on the capacitance of the human body that 5 volts better be AC (Ic = CV' = 0 for DC). I measured the resistance of tongue several times and it usually is about 80-200k. Your skin, I think, is several megaohms. Some one mentioned 2000 volts for the electric chair which maybe true, but I think they wet you first, though if it were me I would beat them to the punch!

      --Joey

    6. Re:Hey, by milosoftware · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after that it's only fun.

      --
      Musicians don't die. They just decompose.
  10. You know who'll benefit from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The adult industry... in some sick and perverted way.

  11. Scary by guaigean · · Score: 1

    The scary part will be if someone hacks the system with malicious intent. Next thing you know, a birthday party of gaming turns into a massacre.

    --
    Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    1. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind the massacre at the birthday party. I'd be more worried about when the game GPF's and leaves the system in some undetermined state that happens to leave the feedback mechanism enabled. Death by bluescreen gains a whole new meaning!!! :-)

  12. The Kevorkian game by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    What a way of getting around irritating laws about euthanasia! Great way for companies to increase their market share amongst 80 year olds.

    Ain't capitalism grand?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:The Kevorkian game by bleckywelcky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seriously, if you want to die just take up some very extreme sports. If you're 65 and in constant pain, just climb Mt Everest. Or go for a 100 mile trek through the mountains with a 5 day food supply. You never hear of a BASE jumper living his days out in the old folk's home...

    2. Re:The Kevorkian game by -kertrats- · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...increase their market share...

      I'm not sure you quite understand how euthanasia works...

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    3. Re:The Kevorkian game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh I should expect he does. You see, the advantage of suicide software is that the users never survive to complain about the bugs. Ergo, no code maintenance neccesary!

    4. Re:The Kevorkian game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again you don't hear about anyone living out their days in an old folks home, we just stick them in there and forget about them don't we?

    5. Re:The Kevorkian game by mfuhrer · · Score: 1
      You never hear of a BASE jumper living his days out in the old folk's home...
      That's probably because the chap's too poor to afford living in a home, after paying all his fines and medical expenses...
    6. Re:The Kevorkian game by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      Except the customers will use the suicide machine once. When running a buisness you want your customers to keep comming back.

    7. Re:The Kevorkian game by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      You see, the advantage of suicide software is that the users never survive to complain about the bugs.

      Depends on how serious the bugs are.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    8. Re:The Kevorkian game by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Usually they work in dirty, poorly-lit sweat shops making your shoes for half a penny a week... oh wait, you said euthanasia?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
  13. Changes to Existing Games by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

    Can you say, "Wheel of Misfortune"? Spin the wheel with a couple of nasty spots where you get a real nasty jolt. It would certainly add a bit of a spark[1] to an otherwise boring game.


    [1] Did you think I wouldn't make a pun?

    1. Re:Changes to Existing Games by IorDMUX · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine what this would do to Tetris?

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    2. Re:Changes to Existing Games by rokzy · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Can you say, "Wheel of Misfortune"?

      no I can't, every time I tried to say it I got interupted, because the 1990s called, and they wanted their phrase back.

    3. Re:Changes to Existing Games by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      ...because the 1990s called, and they wanted their phrase back.

      Uh, sorry, dude. The 1980's called, and they want their phrase back... :)

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    4. Re:Changes to Existing Games by rokzy · · Score: 1

      yes, but my use of a phrase was done ironically, whereas your use is recursive and totally fscked up :-)

  14. Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounded' by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 1

    How effective is shock therapy as a means to getting better at something? Obviously its well infused in our minds (and instincts) to avoid pain at all cost, but I wonder how well it works in reality.

  15. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    No, not anti-americanism just a quote:

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/03/general.shoot/

    "WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A three-star Marine general who said it was "fun to shoot some people" should have chosen his words more carefully, the Marine Corps commandant said Thursday."

  16. Ooh by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

    A masochist's dream ^^ I want badly ^^

    1. Re:Ooh by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      No fair attaching it to your balls!

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  17. Predicted in fiction by meckardt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was written about in Piers Anthony's "Kilobyte" 20 years ago.

    1. Re:Predicted in fiction by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And 22 years ago a two-player video game appeared in the James Bond movie Never Say Never Again (1983) which would shock the losing player through dual metal joysticks. If the player let go they would lose, and the voltage increased as the other player took over their virtual territory (global conquest type game).

      Speaking of getting shocked by current flowing from one hand to the other (conveniently placing current flow dangerously close to the heart), anybody see the recent episode of Myth Busters where the assistants rig a fake Ark of the Covenant with an electric fence transformer and had the host grab a hold of the two terminals with his hands? I'm surprised someone didn't get fired (or sued) over that one.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errmm...Seann Connery also had to deal with it probably about the same time ago. I don't remember which James Bond movie it was, but it was the one where Sean Connery came back..and looked a little to old for the part. (No offense man! You were the best Bond ever!)

    3. Re:Predicted in fiction by porp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I saw that episode of Mythbusters. Why should someone be sued or fired? People touch those cattle, electric fences accidentally everyday. Shit, I've been shocked by one, and I wasn't looking to sue my grandfather. Sure it hurts, but it just scares the shit out of you more than anything.

      porp

    4. Re:Predicted in fiction by tftp · · Score: 1

      It's Killobyte actually. And it's not bad at all. Possibly one of the best role-playing systems ever described.

    5. Re:Predicted in fiction by theDunedan · · Score: 1

      I do not get cable TV. Do you mind telling me if the myth busters explained how the Ark became charged when no electric fences existed during the days of the Old Testament?

    6. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "builders" where trying to prove that you could make a battery out of a pot, metal core, and acid because a similar device was dug up in china or somewhere like that. It is obvious that it is possible because that is what a battery is; so, they altered the myth to what these ancient batteries might have been used for.
      One thing they came up with was electrified acupuncture since it is something used today. Another thing was too see if it had enough current to electro-plate with. Surprisingly it worked well but there is no way the pepole of that time had the scientific knowledge to realize they could do that.
      The last thing they came up with was for religious reasons. If you hooked a battery up to an alter or something and then someone touched it the alter would give a shock that due to there lack of scientific knowledge would seem to have come from God or a god. The shock they got from daisy chaining there pot batteries was not impressive so they hooked up an electric fence transformer. They then convinced Adam to touch there arch of the convent even though he had a suspicion they hooked up a more powerful source.
      In the end he was not happy and really pissed which they showed on camera. Even though it was not close to a lethal current, I am surprised someone didn't get fired.

    7. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errmm...Seann Connery also had to deal with it probably about the same time ago. I don't remember which James Bond movie it was, but it was the one where Sean Connery came back..and looked a little to old for the part. (No offense man! You were the best Bond ever!)

      Um, do you seriously think Sean Connery is a /. reader? Or that he cares what you think of him?

      ha

      hahaha

      hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    8. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam looked pissed. If they had done it to "giant pole up my ass" Jamie, they certainly would have been fired.

    9. Re:Predicted in fiction by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1

      Well if you attach a pad to your shoulder so that the electric current would only be running from the gun to the pad, you would be safe. If you're holding two guns and the current flows from one gun to the other across your chest, then you have a problem. IANAMD (Medical Doctor), but I remember sitting in electricity class and the teacher told us always to use one hand when dealing with electricity because if we get shocked, it will still hurt but it probably won't go through our heart (like it would if we grabbed it with 2 hands).

    10. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      Speaking of MythBusters, I would sure like to slam that redhead Kari at mach 3.7 for 6 hours, well that is if I weren't a geek and she weren't an actress paid to play a geek.

    11. Re:Predicted in fiction by theDunedan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info.

      I had heard the notion that the ark could have killed Uzzah because it was a charged capaictor and he grounded it when he touched it. But I never heard any speculation of what might have charged it. The experience these dudes had on myth busters is very instructive.

    12. Re:Predicted in fiction by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      1) electric fences shock down the length of the body (from wire to wire, or wire to ground), not across the heart.

      2) they are made for cows, not intentional use on people.

      3) hooking up something that is designed to hurt a large animal to shock somebody across their heart is stupid.

      Thus, the complete moron that ignored the most basic tenant of "never allow electricity to flow across your heart" is not only an ignorant fool, but actively dangerous to those around him. A serious reprimand of some sort is definitely in order.

      This is only a small step from the soldier who insisted to his buddy, against all his objections, that Kevlar armor protects against knife stabs. The idiot insisted on trying to prove himselft correct; the buddy ended up dead and the idiot ended up in jail. Darwin awards are only given to those who remove their *own* DNA from the gene pool. I have no sufferance for idiots who do stupid things that might remove others.

    13. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would definitely be on my friends list if I ever actually use my account. I have one, but never bother to sign in.

    14. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really depends on how much electricity is going across your body. I built shock boxes with connections for two hand held electrodes. No one ever died from touching the electrodes with both hands. It only made their arm muscles convulse.

  18. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 3, Funny
    ^---Sorry couldn't resist...

    Try harder next time
    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  19. Ouch by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

    Worst.
    Playstation.
    Accessory.
    Ever.

    Call me when they have a peripheral to go with Hentai games.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  20. Killer App by nxtr · · Score: 1

    If they hook it up to a stupid detector, it'll work great to prevent stupid people from trying to say stupid stuff on the internet.

    1. Re:Killer App by Sir_Jeff · · Score: 1, Funny

      you can count youself lucky then

      --
      --Sir_-_Jeff--
    2. Re:Killer App by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      This seems oddly relevant.

    3. Re:Killer App by Jensaarai · · Score: 1

      I'm just afraid it would live up to its name as a "Killer App" considering the common sense of some people on the Internet(s).

  21. Re:yay! by prozaic · · Score: 1

    I'de say it was anti-militarianism, which is much easier to justify.

  22. Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    Get into a fistfight.

    1. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In some countries this will land you in jail. When I was in the UK I was shocked to discover that two consenting adults in the privacy of their own home are not legally permitted to beat the shit out of each other. "Brawling" is an offense of the crown and you can be put away for it. Of course, it's an unenforcable law when you're in private, but in public it's common for two people who have agreed to fight to be sent to prison for it. How insane is that? Here in Australia if you ask someone to "step outside" the law will usually not get involved.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Aussie · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia if you ask someone to "step outside" the law will usually not get involved.

      Let me guess, Queensland or Nothern Territory ?

    3. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in NSW actually. But generally if you're not causing a disturbance you'll get no trouble from the police. "What's going on here?" "Just settling a little dispute officer." "Well do it in the alley, not in the street." is a far cry from "Right, you two, into the paddy wagon, you're off to a holding cell and you'll see the judge in the morning."

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      A duel is not acceptable no. In fact, just challenging someone to a duel is illegal in Australia. A duel is defined as the use of weapons. Essentially, if someone in Australia is assulted they have two options: call for the cops and get the person arrested, or assault them back. In the UK you have only the first option.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      two consenting adults in the privacy of their own home are not legally permitted to beat the shit out of each other

      Consenting? I think the law operates as it does because in fact consenting to being beaten up is really pretty unlikely, and the vast majority of situations where this might occur are cases of domestic violence, which surely no sane person would prefer the law turned a blind eye to. If you and a mate want a fight, go ahead - but make sure you don't create a disturbance, damage property or get any third parties involved. Usually by the time you've arranged all this you can be fairly sure the law will leave you to it - but by then presumably cool heads will have prevailed and realised the whole matter can't be settled by a fight. Fights are the last refuge of the idiot, and because society at large believes that, the law upholds that view.

    6. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never heard of s&m?

    7. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Man, that's really really stupid. "Fighting never solved anything" is the most absurd statement of all time. There's this thing called testosterone that us "idiots" have which tell us that causing someone else harm will earn their respect. Arranging a fight with someone else who feels the same takes about as long as it takes to say:

      "You tryin' to start something?"
      "You wanna go?"
      "Would you care to step outside?"

      Now maybe your society at large thinks that is unacceptable behaviour, but the vast majority of males on earth think it is the most natural thing in the world. Almost every fight finishes with two men who now understand that they are powerful and deserving of respect, and subsequently treat each other such.

      As for domestic violence, that's hardly the matter in question and is obviously not a case of prearranged agreemented combat.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by stor · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia if you ask someone to "step outside" the law will usually not get involved.

      You must live in the country, or somewhere up north.

      Here in Victoria, Australia if you're caught committing assault you'll spend the night in jail and be in front of a Magistrate so fast your head will spin.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    9. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Police Powers Act clearly states that if you are assaulted you are free to assault the person back, in which case neither party can be charged with assault.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

      Get into a fistfight.

      I was joking btw ;)

    11. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by stor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fights are the last refuge of the idiot

      From my experience fighting is the first refuge of the idiot.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    12. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by rokzy · · Score: 1

      in the UK you have the option to defend yourself but you're right in that we don't sanction assault. it's called civilisation. I thought the Simpsons episode about wanting to kick Bart was just a joke, but is sounds like you guys really are fucked up.

    13. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      From my experience fighting is the first refuge of the idiot.

      Whether it's the last or first refuge of the idiot, I'm not certain. However, we can surely learn the definitive answer by watching what this guy does.

    14. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I give you permission to hit me how is it assault? It's just such an absurd term. We're not talking about someone punching you without reason. We're talking about two consenting adults agreeing to the terms of a challenge to rectify a grievance. Whether those two adults choose to flip a coin, play rock-paper-scissors, thumb wrestle, arm wrestle or have a fist fight is no concern of the law. The problem with the UK is that you are ruled. You're subject to the whim of the crown. Since the first parliament was convened in Australia we've introduced laws that have freed us from that rule. Thankfully the crown has never intervened (like they did in the US) and we've never needed to have a revolution. Unfortunately the concept of "victim of crime" has been lost. Even in the US people are convicted of crimes to which there is no victim. I wish we could return to the days when police actually responded to greivances instead of "patrolling" the streets. If there is no victim, there is no greivance and therefore, there is no crime.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    15. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the law operates as it does because in fact consenting to being beaten up is really pretty unlikely

      Have you never heard of boxing?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    16. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Thats stupid, This device would not land you in gaol in the UK. A very popular party game is sold over there that basically involves watching a flashing light and when it stops everyone has to press their buzzer. The last person to press it gets an electric shock. Its aparently very fun.

    17. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Maybe the post that I was replying to has disappeared, I wasn't suggesting this device would land you in gaol, I was stating that "getting into a fist fight" would land you in gaol, which the post I was replying to suggested was a cheaper alternative.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    18. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      See, that's exactly the kind of behaviour that would earn you an invitation to step outside if we were in the same room. You insult me freely on Slashdot demonstrating that you have no respect for me, because you feel no threat to your person. If we were in the same room you would not be so bold. Perhaps you consider my reasoning here to be uncivilised. To that I say: it is your actions which are uncivilised. Feel free to disagree with me. Feel free to tell me so. That is showing me respect. But calling me an idiot is clearly an act of disrespect and should be met with the offer of boxed ears.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    19. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wanna say that to our faces, asshole?

    20. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for the parent, but I know that the power to kill resides in all people. It just doesn't command my respect, and if I were to be any more polite towards you in person it would likely be more out of ingrained politeness (over the internet I don't have to treat you like a real person because you're not in any way apparent) rather than fear for my physical well-being.

    21. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      call it what you will but before you insult someone, in person, your mind tends to take a look at how big they are and whether or not you can outrun them. If your mind doesn't do that I think you have reason to worry.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    22. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There's this thing called testosterone that us "idiots" have which tell us that causing someone else harm will earn their respect.

      No, violent idiots like you may earn my fear, but never respect.

    23. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Fights are the last refuge of the idiot,

      Actually, you are incorrect. Fighting is often a good way to settle a matter. Thinking that fighting is unacceptable is the last refuge of the idiot. Most people pretend to have your opinion because they're too scared to have a fight, or scared that people will think less of them.

    24. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      Boxing is regulated - unofficial boxing matches are also illegal.

    25. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      I don't pretend to hold that opinion, I do hold that opinion. As for being scared of a fight, well, I guess maybe I am, in general. That's called self-preservation. Working so far... Since I don't believe that getting into a fight either a) settles anything important or b) is likely to go my way (which may or may not be the case, but I'm in general unwilling to put that to the test), I tend to steer clear of them.

      As for respect, there is one kind of respect that goes with being beaten in a fight, but it's probably not the kind of respect that really matters. Having witnessed a number of situations where others have lost their tempers and come to blows, it's my observation that BOTH parties end up losing respect, massively, unless the "fight" was one-sided to begin with, in which case usually the one who starts it loses ALL respect.

      Maybe you just move in a different kind of social/work circle to mine.

    26. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, move out of the ghetto.

    27. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      That's amazing. So what you're saying is that you believe you should be free to insult anyone you like (much like you just called me a violent idiot) and they should have no recourse. Well if we can't get you to respect other people we can at least get you to act like you do. I hope you like living in fear.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    28. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Man. Get out from under that rock you live under. I dare you to insult anyone you don't know and see if you don't get your ass kicked. Obviously all this electronic commication has warped your brain. You can't insult people in the Real World without expecting retribution.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    29. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the whole idea of being able to insult someone without reprecussions is a big problem with forums, though the modding here helps out a bit. If mods feel that an unfair insult took place, they should hit the perp with flamebait points.

      I'm against fist fighting because I would have no chance of winning.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    30. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Well that's the point, it's not about winning, it's about showing your opponent that you are not powerless. Almost every fight ends in an apology and, as I said, a respect for each other.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    31. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, they have the recourse of returning the insult, which would seem to keep the response at an appropriate level. Personally, I think that the only thing that violence is an appropriate response to is violence or the threat of impending violence. Hitting someone because they called you an idiot seems a little over the top to me; YMMV, of course.

      Incidentally, the poster is right - beating someone up doesn't generally make them respect you. Fear, hate, resent, perhaps, but not usually respect.

    32. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      Now maybe your society at large thinks that is unacceptable behaviour, but the vast majority of males on earth think it is the most natural thing in the world. Almost every fight finishes with two men who now understand that they are powerful and deserving of respect, and subsequently treat each other such.

      Count me out. First, this is probably the most common way to mistake respect for fear. Second, would you actually beat up everyone not showing you respect? How about the lippy bus driver, the disco bouncer, or the French waiter? Third, every time anyone says the equivalent to "everybody involved thinks the same as me", the bullshit bells are ringing, loud and clear.

    33. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Man, did you read anything I wrote? You don't just hit someone, you ask them if they would like to step outside. You ask them if they would like to backup their words with fists. If they decline then you say "boo hoo, sticks and stones can break my bones but names will never hurt me" and be on your way. Now, as you appear to have never challenged someone to fight you or accepted, who are you to tell me how one feels after engaging in such a challenge.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    34. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      In the UK isn't all medical care paid for?

      If two jackasses beat the shit out of eachother, and everyone else needs to pay for their dentistry/broken noses it becomes clear that maybe people shouldn't be aloud to beat the shit out of eachother, consenting or not.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    35. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      it's amazing the number of people who have replied to my post with the accusation that I swing my fists at anyone who insults me. Challenging someone to a fight is a perfectly civil way to request that someone show you respect. Just because you've lost touch with your masculine side doesn't mean the rest of us have.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    36. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Wow, an economic argument for restricting the freedom of everyone on earth. Genius! By your logic people should be wrapped in cotton wool and never allowed to leave the house as they might hurt themselves and therefore cost the public money. Again, I must really congratulate you on this line of reasoning.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    37. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by SJ · · Score: 1

      Fights are the last refuge of the idiot...

      Actually fights and by definition, pain, is one of the only things the body responds to at a genetic level.

      If you do something which causes a "please don't do that again" response, your brain will register that the outcome was not that unpleasant and you will be more inclined to do that something again.

      If you do something which causes a "just got the shit beaten out of you" response, your brain will register that the outcome was life-threatening and subconsciously prevent you from doing it again.

      This is why a lion will belt or even bite her cub when the little one chews on moms tail too hard. It's natures way. Don't think you know better, because you don't.

      DISCLAIMER: Yes there are a few exceptions to the rule and I am in no way condoning violence of any sort.

      ...and because society at large believes that, the law upholds that view.

      Actually the law is there to deter one person from attacking another whom does not wish to be attacked. It's just that in the heat of the moment it is safer to stop everything than it is to try and work out if both parties really want to fight.

    38. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Consenting? I think the law operates as it does because in fact consenting to being beaten up is really pretty unlikely, and the vast majority of situations where this might occur are cases of domestic violence, which surely no sane person would prefer the law turned a blind eye to.

      There was a case, which I think went all the way to the House of Lords, involving people who did it...er for fun. The Lords did decide that consent wasn't a defence when causing a deliberate injury.

    39. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      *slapping my forehead* Just swallowed bait, hook, and sinker. Now where did I put that "Troll" sticker...?

    40. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by zerojoker · · Score: 1

      A british guy entering Australia: Customs: May I see your passport please? Customts: Do you have a crime record? Passenger: I didn't know one was still required?

    41. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      That's amazing. So what you're saying is that you believe you should be free to insult anyone you like (much like you just called me a violent idiot) and they should have no recourse. Well if we can't get you to respect other people we can at least get you to act like you do. I hope you like living in fear.

      You're the one who described himself as an idiot, and from all you've said (which of course is likely to be total fantasy, you could be a 14 year old girl for all I know) you're violent, or at least like to threaten violence.

      And, sorry, I'm not "living in fear", since you don't know who I am, or even which timezone I live in. That means you can't just intimidate me into showing you "respect".

      There are other responses to perceived insults than violence. A snappy one liner is generally appropriate. Or dignified silence. The Internet is full of obnoxious, tough-talking blowhards, life is too short to waste on them.

    42. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      The correct quote, BTW, is "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent" which I think has a very slightly different slant.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    43. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Mant · · Score: 1

      We haven't been at "the whim of the crown" for a long time (well before my lifetime). You may have notived it is parliment that makes the laws, and the royalty is a figure head. Laws are nominally passed in their name, but it has been parliment for a long time.

      British law doesn't let you conesnt to have violence done against your person. The thinking here is to protect people, otherwise they could be coerced into saying they consented, or feel they should consent to settle something by a fight becuase of peer or social presure.

      It is also there to protect people from being hurt. You could quite easily have someone loose their temper in a consensual fight, or just hit the other guy too hard or in the wrong place and do them a serious injury.

      If you do allow it, where do you draw the line? Is it OK to hurt somone? Burise them? Break a bone? Cripple them? Kill them?

      There a laws in most countries to stop people doing things that are likely to be dangerous to themselves, as well as other people. If someone is involved in an activity that is likely to get somehurt it is the concern of the law. This isn't unique to the UK, I don't know if it got passed, but check out http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1456 831.stm for "Australia consider new laws to protect "stupid people" after boatloads risk injury to touch sharks feeding on a whale carcass". Protecting stupid people from themselves.

      To come back on topic, I don't think games like this would be legal in most countries (out side military training) becuase even if the person constented to the shock the law wouldn't recognise that consent.

    44. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Obviously you don't go around insulting strangers in real life otherwise you'd know that it will earn you a fat lip. I'm not even encouraging that kind of behaviour. If you insulted me in a public place I'd ask if I had misheard you and would you like to step outside. That doesn't make me a violent person, it makes me a normal human male. If you wouldn't do the same then I guess you're just extradinary.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    45. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I never was on topic, so there's no need to come back onto it. I don't want laws to protect me from myself. If I give you consent to hit me then the law should stay out of it. Period. The fact that you think otherwise is what I was saying when I said you are ruled.. it doesn't matter who you are ruled by, you're still not in control of your own life.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    46. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      The problem with the UK is that you are ruled. You're subject to the whim of the crown. Since the first parliament was convened in Australia we've introduced laws that have freed us from that rule.

      This crops every now and then, and often in comparisons between US and UK as well. I'm starting to think that people outside the UK think that the monarchy actually rule. They don't. You know the Queen is just a figurehead, right? More of an ambassador than anything else, usually. She approves (signs) all laws (iirc), but if she decided not to approve a law she disagrees with...well, it's just not done or expected. There was a certain amount of unpleasantness a few hundred years ago that established this system.

      So in reality - we are ruled in the UK, but by our government. Imagine that. Just like Australia, and just like the US. And a lot of other countries.

      When people use phrases like 'whim of the crown', it makes me think they imagine the Queen sitting in Buckingham Palace, saying to Prince Philip "One thinks that one will make a law to stop people using their mobile phones in their car, that will be a laugh. Also, let's have the police pull that guy out there in the street in for questioning and beat him up. Yay me!"

      Because, that really doesn't happen. If you tell most people in the UK that they are ruled by the Queen in any material way, they'll either laugh at you, or wonder where you get such funny ideas.

    47. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If you insulted me in a public place I'd ask if I had misheard you and would you like to step outside. That doesn't make me a violent person, it makes me a normal human male.

      I wouldn't insult you unless you were doing something that deserved it. And I didn't, (again, YOU were the one who labelled yourself an idiot)you're spoiling for a fight. In real life it's easy to provoke a fight and take offence at anything someone says, or how they look at you, if you want one, as you evidently do. And while you may feel happy to resolve your problems through violence, it just means you're confident that you can win; quite likely you could beat me up, I haven't been in a fight since primary school. I don't think asking someone to "step outside" is normal in modern society, you've been watching too many cowboy movies.

    48. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1
      No, you're just taking us literally. In Australia we are ruled by our government yes, but not nearly as much as in the UK. Our laws exist to prevent and address greivances between citizens. In the US people are not ruled at all. Any attempt to rule people of the US is met with immediate distain and legislative action. If you want an example of this, consider motocycle helmets. Here in Australia you are required to wear one. I bet you're required to wear one in the UK too. Don't wanna wear one in the US? No problem. Why? Cause only by ruling the people could you force them to wear a helmet. Attempts have been made of course.. most states have tried to introduce compulsory helmet laws for motocycles but they have been ruled unconstitutional numerous times.

      BTW, when you go to court in the UK or in Australia you are prosecuted by the crown. You and I both know that is just a figure head, but what exactly does the figure head stand for?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    49. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You just live in a different culture. It's very comon to get asked to step outside if you insult a guy's manhood - which you can do with just about any insult as you're effectively saying that he is incapable of stopping you from insulting him. Now, if you're like to test this, go to your local bar, pick the guy with the brightest shirt and say something along the lines of "Jesus, you think you could have bought a brighter shirt?" You will probably get a casual laugh out of him. Then you might say "No seriously, that shirt is ugly as hell, you must be really stupid to wear a shirt like that out in public." Now you have insulted him, and I would expect just about any man to tell you to go to hell. If you were to then provoke him further you are guarenteed to get a fat lip or asked to step outside. Surely you can't disagree with that.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    50. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Cause only by ruling the people could you force them to wear a helmet.

      Or, for instance, requiring them to have a license for a concealed firearm?

      Or not allowing them to smoke in or near public buildings?

      Or look at the provisions being made for 'Homeland Security' or whatever it's called now.

      Being 'ruled' is a red herring. The governments of the UK, US and Australia are all (usually) democratically elected, and they make the laws.

      BTW, when you go to court in the UK or in Australia you are prosecuted by the crown. You and I both know that is just a figure head, but what exactly does the figure head stand for?

      The government?

    51. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      The crown is a figurative ruler. All the examples you gave are for problems that involve other people. We were talking about victimless crimes. The US people are ruled, when it comes to things like drugs and airport security. But most people in the US consider those things to be a travesty. People in the UK tend to take it as given that they need to be told what to do.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    52. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup because in the UK it's uncivilized...

      and we all know how "civilized" the people from the UK are.

      Eat yo' tea and crumpets. We need to bugger a tad mo' houses tonight!

    53. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that the case involved men nailing each others' scrotums to a table in some form of sexual experiment. Personally I felt that this was absolutely none of the state's business, and they had no right to interfere. However, there is something a bit different to this compared with being assaulted in a bar, say, or even picking a fight (hence 'consenting'). It's hard to pin down in a nutshell what the differences are, but if I was on a jury hearing the first case, i'd lobby to have the charge overturned - in the second, well, it would depend.

    54. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Surely you can't disagree with that.

      Walking up to a stranger and insulting them; yes, that's pretty obviously a signal that you want a fight. Especially in a bar, in front of his peers, the members of his tribe. That's quite different from having a disagreement and escalating to violence.

      You keep talking about "manhood". Need I mention that someone who keeps on about how masculine he is usually has some insecurities in that regard?

    55. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep talking about "manhood". Need I mention that someone who keeps on about how masculine he is usually has some insecurities in that regard?

      He means testosterone-inspired bloodlust/rage and it's a fair comment here.

      Lay off the petty bitchy sniping, it makes you sound an immature dork.

    56. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Some AC :Lay off the petty bitchy sniping, it makes you sound an immature dork.

      Let's settle this outside.

    57. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      That's right.

      Many laws are to protect you economically from othe people who don't care.

      I could say that laws against theft are restrictions on freedom for economic reasons.

      I tend to agree that consenting adults should be able to fight, but there are reasons I see it could be illegel.

      Perhaps it was turning out like a duel too often with someone badly maimed or dead, or should deling be legel too?

      Perhapos things were spilling over and causing property damage.

      Perhaps the British were less restrained then you Aussies and all too often someone would pull out a knife.

      Law is not just to right a grievence, it is also to prevent them. Should I be alloud to drive while tripping just because I have not hit anybody yet?

      How about drive through neighborhoods at 150 MPH?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    58. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      As for being scared of a fight, well, I guess maybe I am, in general. That's called self-preservation

      Self-preservation is bollocks. Everyone dies in the end, you may as well have some excitement whilst you wait. Also you might be surprised to know that most fights don't end in death.

      b) is likely to go my way

      Why are you scared of being beaten up? In case you get injured or scarred? A perfect stock body is worthless.

      As for respect, there is one kind of respect that goes with being beaten in a fight, but it's probably not the kind of respect that really matters.

      You'll find that people treat you with a lot more respect, even if subconciously and against their more 'logical' thoughts, if they know first-hand you're prepared to have a fight if needs be. When people are cowards and push-overs, you can always tell, their mannerisms and body-language usually gives them away.

    59. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fights are the last refuge of the idiot

      If that's supposed to be the plaque from Foundation, it was actually "Violence is the last resort of the incompetent". IIRC.

    60. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an argument against insults; it's an argument against the Real World.

    61. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Escalating a situation to violence shows that you are, in fact, powerless to fight words with words.

    62. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Tassach · · Score: 1
      So what you're saying is that you believe you should be free to insult anyone you like (much like you just called me a violent idiot) and they should have no recourse
      You are a violent neanderthal.

      You are free to return the insult. That is an appropriate response. If you ask me to step outside, I'll tell you to grow up. Unlike you, I don't need to prove my masculinity -- I'm quite secure in it. My son is all the proof of my manhood I require. I don't want to fight and don't particuarly like to fight -- but don't think for a moment that this means that I don't know *how* to fight.

      If you take a swing at me or lay hands on me, I *will* defend myself. I don't fight for fun or to prove a point -- I fight only in self-defense or in defense of someone I care about.

      When I have to fight, my only objective is to end it as quickly as possible with as little risk to myself as possible. This means that I don't fight fair and I don't hold back -- if I have a weapon (and I usually do), I will use it, and I won't hesitate to use every dirty trick I know to disable my opponent.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    63. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You'll find that people treat you with a lot more respect, even if subconciously and against their more 'logical' thoughts, if they know first-hand you're prepared to have a fight if needs be.
      Sorry, but you are delusional. Just look at the kind of "respect" people are giving QuantumG here.

      Maybe you'll gain the respect of other thugs, but normal people will look down on you as an uncivilized brute with poor self-control. The fact that they don't mouth off to your face might create the illusion of respect, but I guarantee that their private opinion of you is quite different. You might not like it or agree with it, but that's the way it is.

    64. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      Fuckwits like you destroy society.

    65. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but you are delusional. Just look at the kind of "respect" people are giving QuantumG here.

      It's primal alpha-male type respect, or fear almost. You didn't dare tease the big jocks at high school did you? Why not?

    66. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Escalating a situation to violence shows that you are, in fact, powerless to fight words with words.

      He's talking about testosterone-fuelled situations - when that takes over you become monosyllabic at best. In fact, that's a good sign a fight's about to kick off - when everyone talks in single syllables.

    67. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Au contraire, it *is* natural. Not feeling like that ever makes you testosterone deficient. Probably.

    68. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, here in Texas you can drive your motorcycle without a helmet if you want, but you better be able to show proof of medical insurance. I have no desire to pay for your care if you get paralyzed from the neck up because you're an idiot.

    69. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but After recent crackdowns at Columbia and Princeton , i2hub users might twice about the use of the P2P Direct Connect hub. With letter's of intent to subpoena having been received at several other universities including Carnegie Mellon, many questions are being raised targeting the source of the crackdown. How did the RIAA gain access to a Internet2 connection. Are universities cooperating in the access. How will the long hidden Direct Connect community respond?

    70. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      Self-preservation is bollocks. Everyone dies in the end, you may as well have some excitement whilst you wait. Also you might be surprised to know that most fights don't end in death.

      Well personally I can think of thousands of better ways to pass the time waiting for death than being beaten up, but eh - each to their own.

      Why are you scared of being beaten up? In case you get injured or scarred? A perfect stock body is worthless.

      Eh? "Worthless" - what are you blithering about? Or are you one of those shallow types that thinks a scar or two is "cool"? It's just a matter of balance - on the whole, getting into fights over stupid trivialities (like, e.g. someone 'looks funny' at my girlfriend or something, which seems to be a common source of provocation at least in the popular imagination) seems ridiculous. I'm just not that quick to take offence. "Leave it, it's not worth it!" is wise counsel, because usually it's true.

      When people are cowards and push-overs, you can always tell, their mannerisms and body-language usually gives them away.

      Perhaps, but I never said I wouldn't be prepared to do it if it really was the only way, it's just that I can't really think of a situation that would warrant it. I'm definitely no coward - but there are many forms of bravery and readiness to stick your fist into someone else's face simply doesn't count as one in my mind. It merely means your thinking brain has given up and allowed your primitive animal brain to override it. Maybe that's how YOU arrive at respect for another person but, well, you're welcome to it.

    71. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      I'm definitely partial to outlawing boxing (as well as bullfights, which are outlawed in my country)

      OTOH, maybe if people do need to get fighting out of their system, maybe a "sport" with rules like boxing is better than what this guy ahref=http://slashdot.org/~QuantumGhttp://slashdot .org/~QuantumG> is proposing

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  23. Not going to kill you... by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    A shock to the hip isn't going to kill you, even if you have a heart condition. It may cause some stress - and that may set off something - but no more stress than boot camp would give you anyway.

    I think the shock is there to piss you off and make sure you remember to keep your friggen head down when the baddies are shooting at you.

    1. Re:Not going to kill you... by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1

      I can see a great benefit from this. I had a housemate who had a 60" TV (do NOT watch porn on a 60" TV, it gives a whole new meaning to 'never eat anything bigger than your head'... shudder) and a PS2. He bought new video games handfuls at a time. He refused to read the directions and played every game on 'EASY.' His favorite technique was to run around in a new level as long as he could to scout the level. Just run. Until he died. I remember once he was watching me play a game he had finished and he was amazed when I morphed my character into The Undead - he'd finished the whole game without knowing morphing was the whole point. My impassioned diatribes about 'immersion' fell on deaf ears. He also ignored me when I suggested it might be a good idea to put the cover back on his PC if he was going to let his cat sleep on top of the case. His hard drive paid the price for kitty napping, but he never did get the whole video game thing. How I wish I could have given him a very special Christmas present one year! Ah well - it's probably for the best. If I'd have walked in on him playing Tomb Raider with the shock module twisted around to the front I probably would have had nightmares for the rest of my life.

      billy - who sometimes took over just long enough to kill the boss

    2. Re:Not going to kill you... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      If I can get through a game without using one of the fundamental skills...my hat's off to him.

  24. Yow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope they dont have quad damage.

  25. Shocking! by Guyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is an incredibly electrifying development. The gaming community must be arcing with excitement! I, for one, simply cannot wait to be plugged into such action and adventure. Not to mention all of the amped up individuals bolting to recruiting stations to try their hand. This kind of technology blows away all of the current games by far. Let's hope that development is met with little resistance and that the capacitance of the developers' creativity is immeasurable.

    (Yes, I know, it's horrible. The line to shoot me starts over there. *point*)

    1. Re:Shocking! by screwballicus · · Score: 1


      (Yes, I know, it's horrible. The line to shoot me starts over there. *point*)


      What would be the point? You'd probably just get back up and continue to work through the pain and keep on fighting, even when wounded.

  26. Unknown heart conditions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the positioning on the hips, I suspect unknown prostate conditions would be the major risk.

  27. Natural Evolution by purduephotog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pain is one of the greatest behavior modifiers there is.

    The whole point of a FPS trainer is to educate reality out of an individual. When you fire a pistol, sometimes your body will jerk the hand in anticipation of the shot. Dryfiring a few hundred times is enough to condition the pull back out, but it will eventually creep back.

    I'm remember reading that 3/4 of the soldiers in WWI and WWII didn't aim at anything. They were conditioned to shoot at little bullseyes, not people. Notice how the military trains on human shaped targets now? Human-aim-fire-response.

    This is all good, believe it or not.

    Getting shot in a game there is no pain and risky behaviours can continue to flourish. Getting hit with a live round is most likely to inflict pain. Therefore, make the game as realistic as possible without killing your candidate :)

    Will I play this? Nope. I already take Americas Army seriously and do my darndest not to die. But then again I'm not one of those people that beg the S-24 in order to get a pistol, either ;)

    1. Re:Natural Evolution by elhondo · · Score: 2

      Do you happen to have a cite for the bullseye line? I was in the military from 88 - 93, and we did a fair bit of shooting at bullseyes. Except for 500 yard shooting, it was mostly bullseyes. It's somewhat doubtful to me that most World War I soldiers and Marines were incapable of shooting at live targets due to never shooting at people. If anything, I would expect green troops to have poor fire discipline due to the novelty of trench warfare, but that's about it. I also don't recall any historical narratives citing any soldiers on a large scale not aiming at anything.

    2. Re:Natural Evolution by danrik · · Score: 1

      I'm remember reading that 3/4 of the soldiers in WWI and WWII didn't aim at anything. They were conditioned to shoot at little bullseyes, not people. Notice how the military trains on human shaped targets now? Human-aim-fire-response.

      I always thought that had more to do with the don't-want-to-get-my-head-blown-off instinct than the type of target they shot at in training ;-)

    3. Re:Natural Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He was talking about the Nazi soldiers. Of course, the Americans could kill 3 enemies with a single spit while somersaulting out of a burning building with a broken leg and a pretty French girl on the shoulder... It's all documented quite well in WWII Hollywood movies.

    4. Re:Natural Evolution by Nine+Mirrors+Turning · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you happen to have a cite for the bullseye line?

      Read 'On Combat' by Grossman (Of 'On Killing' fame) and Christensen. (Amazon).

      I also don't recall any historical narratives citing any soldiers on a large scale not aiming at anything.

      This is actually a well-established fact. S.L.A Marshalls study after WW2 found that only 15-20% of the individual riflemen actually fired their weapons at the enemy. Pretty controversial at its time.
      For more on this, read 'On Killing' by Grossman. All your questions will be answered.

      --
      (Elegance is not an option)
    5. Re:Natural Evolution by elhondo · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the reply. But, not aiming your weapon and not having anything to shoot are different things. One could look at that stat, and have it easily explained that most combat is over by the time it takes to run for cover. Running from a mortar shell, ducking from machine gun fire doesn't give you a chance to fire back. I'd be willing to bet that during the American Civil War, the percentage of infantry who fired their weapon was a bit higher, even though there wasn't enough ammo to spend much time shooting at targets (whether bullseye or silhouette shaped).

      My larger point is that the percentage of people shooting at a target isn't dependent on the shape of the silhouette they practice on. It just makes it easier to score "hits".

      Any newspaper of the last few years, our collective history of warfare in even the latest century should dispell any notion that violence needs to be conditioned into someone. Take a look at Rwanda, Darfur or Serbia over the last ten years and tell me how much you think that person shaped silhouettes made the difference in the amount of people killed.

    6. Re:Natural Evolution by shimmin · · Score: 1

      I'm remember reading that 3/4 of the soldiers in WWI and WWII didn't aim at anything. They were conditioned to shoot at little bullseyes, not people. Notice how the military trains on human shaped targets now? Human-aim-fire-response.

      The statistics I remember are that a full half of the infantry recruits in these wars didn't want to run the risk of killing anyone, and so fired over the enemy's heads. Another substantial fraction didn't mind killing the enemy, but didn't want to know about it if they did, and so fired in the general direction of the enemy without looking too hard to find out what the results were. Only something like 10-15% aimed their weapon at another human being and fired until he fell.

      I don't know that silhouette training would help most of those people terribly much. One feature of a volunteer army, on the other hand, is it self-selects for people who at least initially think they are willing to kill.

      Even so, a PBS show did a slot where they interviewed Gulf War fighter pilots, and it was amazing how many of them sincerely believed that for all the machinery and real estate they had blown up, they had caused no human casualties. They really believed that whoever was inside that plane or building got out, somehow.

    7. Re:Natural Evolution by Nine+Mirrors+Turning · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply. But, not aiming your weapon and not having anything to shoot are different things. One could look at that stat, and have it easily explained that most combat is over by the time it takes to run for cover. Running from a mortar shell, ducking from machine gun fire doesn't give you a chance to fire back.

      All can I say is that the research done indicates that the soldiers went to immense lengths to avoid having to fire on the enemy. The research results are actually consistent independent of who's doing the research, conflict and period (except for modern times, post-Korean War). People, including soldiers, have barriers against killing other people. In most people those barriers are hard to overcome and so they don't fire on the enemy. Note that it doesn't matter if the enemy fires on them.

      I'd be willing to bet that during the American Civil War, the percentage of infantry who fired their weapon was a bit higher, even though there wasn't enough ammo to spend much time shooting at targets (whether bullseye or silhouette shaped).

      I'd take that bet and I'd win too. Seriously, if this topic interests you, read 'On Killing'. It covers everything about this, including the Civil War.

      --
      (Elegance is not an option)
    8. Re:Natural Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, a PBS show did a slot where they interviewed Gulf War fighter pilots, and it was amazing how many of them sincerely believed that for all the machinery and real estate they had blown up, they had caused no human casualties. They really believed that whoever was inside that plane or building got out, somehow.

      I doubt they truely believed that, at least when it comes to military vehicles and inhabited structures (OTOH bridges, railways, roads, etc... can be destroyed without causalties). Instead this is a rationalization. As long as the posiblity exists that people could escape, there can be doubt as to any actual harm to other people.

  28. This would be great for fencing. by VidEdit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My geeky $.02:

    Maybe a shock belt could be used to improve the increasingly unrealistic sport of Olympic fencing.

    While fencing is not a video game, it lacks a certain realism in the sense that there is not a significant enough penalty for getting hit. In epee' fencers learn to do many very silly attacks that put their face in danger so that they can attempt a toe shot.

    By attaching a shock belt to the electronic scoring equipment that is already used, fencers would learn to use the kind of caution that they might in a real duel.

    Of course that doesn't solve the problem of sacrifice that is encouraged by making all of the target area worth the same number of points, or the unrealistic use of the coupe--where a fencer often whips his foil into a "J" shape to touch his opponent on the back. But the shock belt may be a step in the right direction along with some other changes.

    --
    1. Re:This would be great for fencing. by karnal · · Score: 1

      that they might in a real duel.

      I don't know about you, but I'd be more worried about getting a gun in my face nowadays than a fencer's foil.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:This would be great for fencing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the unrealistic use of the coupe--where a fencer often whips his foil into a "J" shape to touch his opponent on the back. But the shock belt may be a step in the right direction along with some other changes.

      Actually, the flicking attacks have been largely eliminated by recent rule changes (lengthening the time that the plunger must be depressed for the scoring box to trigger). Or so I'm told, I haven't been to a tournament in quite some time.

      As for the shock belt, I'm not sure you'd need a belt, as such. Ever seen what happens when someone sweats their glove through with an un-insulated handle?

    3. Re:This would be great for fencing. by endersdouble · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a fellow fencer, you are an *idiot*. To start with, fencing is getting unpopular enough as it is, you want to start shocking people? More importantly, it wouldn't make it better sport. Short of the simple roman circus value, it wouldn't make any difference w/r/t "realism". the flick may be an extremely unrealistic move, but in many cases, it is simply the best move to hit someone. Unless we actually change the rules in foil/sabre to get rid of right-of-way, it will remain so. Do you want to get rid of right-of-way? And to any confused non fencers, just read the first line and skip the rest.

    4. Re:This would be great for fencing. by tyman · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...but don't they already have electric fences?

    5. Re:This would be great for fencing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im from france you insensitive clod

    6. Re:This would be great for fencing. by TexVex · · Score: 1
      As a fellow fencer, you are an *idiot*. To start with, fencing is getting unpopular enough as it is, you want to start shocking people?
      As a spectator, I've never been interested in fencing. However, if the competitors started getting zapped, I'd tune in and watch. :) But I'd be even less likely to ever give participating in it a shot.
      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    7. Re:This would be great for fencing. by karnal · · Score: 1

      Then you would be afraid of... hmmm... white flags?

      --
      Karnal
    8. Re:This would be great for fencing. by VidEdit · · Score: 1, Interesting
      [Please skip this if you are not interested rather than modding it down.]

      "As a fellow fencer, you are an *idiot*."

      Well, actually I'm not, but thanks for the Ad Hominem. There is a difference between thinking my idea is stupid and saying I'm stupid. I'm all for disagreement. It is through "argument" that we can hash out our ideas and see if they have some value.

      Are shock belts a realistic idea for Olympic fencing? I'd say not, even though I proposed the idea. I still think it is a fun idea even if not practical.

      Without getting too far off the technology aspect, I think that anybody who has watched Olympic fencing on television knows that it is, well, unwatchable. The action is too fast for ordinary television cameras and their version of slo-mo to capture. The network didn't see fit to assign any of its hi-speed cameras to cover the action.

      As with all games, players have to play as close to the edge of the rules as possible to try and win. The rules in fencing that permit silly whip around light touches to count are the primary reason that the game of fencing has gotten so far away from the art of fencing. The rules need adjustment

      Technology can help with fencing, too. Technology could be used to make different areas of the target count more. Technology could also be used to discourage stupid sacrifices, such as lunging for someone's foot knowing you will be hit on the head a split second later. While the shock belt is an extreme example--especially since there is no way to calibrate it to affect different people equally--there are other ways to have some interesting interactions. One would be to have the retractible cable attached fencers (the one used for electric scoring) retract a few feet when a fencer is hit and take the fencer with it--like the ratchet pulls used in stunt work to retract a stunt man who has been "shot".

      Yes, my suggestions are a bit on the extreme side and not really practical for wide use. But for a few people who want to make fencing more interesting, they could be done. It is hardware hacking for fencers...

      --
    9. Re:This would be great for fencing. by JollyRogerX · · Score: 1

      Parent doesn't know what he is talking about. Fencing isn't exactly painless. It can hurt and leave bruises. I was even hit in the groin (foil) with no cup on. Needless to say, I was on the ground before I knew what happened to me. Then the pain hit.

      Also, Epee was invented to train gentlemen to be better fighters in duels where "first blood" determined the victory. You did not want to kill your opponent because his family would string you up and cut your testicles off. You just wanted to stab him anywhere to cause him to bleed, not die. Modern day fencing isn't supposed to mimic real sword fighting. That is because THERE ARE NO REAL SWORDFIGHTS ANYMORE. The flick that you are refering to is hard to execute and takes great skill.

      Also, you must think about scoring before you go touting new targeting systems. It would be very difficult and expensive to implement a system of electronic scoring that weights the score of different areas.

      It sounds like you want fencing to be more like LARPing. Do you expect a fencer to hold his hand behind his back if it gets hit? What if you shout "SLEEP SLEEP SLEEP?"

    10. Re:This would be great for fencing. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Technology could also be used to discourage stupid sacrifices, such as lunging for someone's foot knowing you will be hit on the head a split second later.

      It's been a long time since I fenced, so I'm not entirely a layman -- but if this sacrifical tactic is getting too common, perhaps if there is a hit, especially in a non-lethal area like the foot, a subsequent hit by the opponent (within, say 0.1 second) should also count, or perhaps just negate the foot hit. As for the J-hits on the back, perhaps the epees are too flexible? Though stiffer might be more dangerous otherwise. Anyway, electric jolts are unworkable. Competitive types would practice shocking themselves till they could ignore it, or cheat by inserting bits of conductive or insulating material or paints, etc in their costumes or skin.

    11. Re:This would be great for fencing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Modern fencing isn't about real dueling anymore. It is a sport. While based on an ancient and far more leathal game, it has developed into something else on its own, related to but seperate from its roots. A "real duel" and the sport of fencing are different things. One features skilled athletes performing amazing physical feats with physical and mental speed few non-fencers can comprehend, but any athlete can respect. The other is about regaining honor, causing physical harm, and while popular, was far from a sport.

      Penalties for getting hit? When one's opponent scores, they get a point, and that means you're that much closer to not winning. Fencers making a "silly" action arent immune to retribution. Another skilled fencer will quickly exploit the error. While some actions may be illogical in a duel, they work very well in competitive sport fencing.

      If you want more "realistic" fencing, go do SCA or something along those lines, they have rapier divisions if you're looking for duels- but if you want to compete in a sport that requires intense physical and mental abilities, go try olympic style fencing.

    12. Re:This would be great for fencing. by VidEdit · · Score: 1

      Yes, the parent admits to not being a nationally ranked fencer and does know that fencing can be painfull (especialy saber).

      And, yes, there are no "real" sword fights being fought, that I know of. Yet, there is little point to fencing if it has no relation to swordplay. I suppose it could be said that it stands on its own, but I find that an unsatisfying way of looking at fencing. Today, there is a Renaissance in the study of ancient fencing, and it is no longer the sole perview of Olympic style fencers and SCA/LARP players. There is room for more than one kind of fencing.

      While foil, saber and epee are not designed to be exact analogs of real duels, their original rules were designed to make them as similar as a gentlemen's game would permit. Today, high performance fencers are very skilled at the game of fencing, but it does not resemble the sport of old. I think I'm entitled to my nostalgia and to my desire to look to technology to help add some new twists to an ancient sport.

      Would it be so difficult and expensive to implement a weighted scoring system? It might be, but that doesn't mean that we should give up on the idea. A better scoring system may be just an innovation away. In the best spirit of invention, I choose to ignore those who say "Don't even bother."

      Your post has some valid points, but that doesn't mean that new technology has no place in fencing or that fencing can't be taken a little closer to its roots. Whether such ideas will work out can't be known unless someone tries new ideas.

      --
    13. Re:This would be great for fencing. by qc_dk · · Score: 1

      There is no need for shock belts fencing allready hurts. I have only tried the epee, but you get black and blue all over after a fight. I've even had a burst blood vessel and once i had an open wound through the armor.

      The flick, when practiced with an epee can be very painful. I had an opponent who really wanted it to work, I managed to counter each time by attacking his face/neck. This meant that his flick went all the way down my back like a metal whip, it hurt like hell and I had raised welts for a week.

      I agree with you that it is a silly sport to watch, but then i do not enjoy watching any kind of sports on tv except maybe rallying. I do find it very fun to practice though.

    14. Re:This would be great for fencing. by Seft · · Score: 1

      The timings have increased in some areas (definitely on the UK), in anticipation of a global change, or so I once remember my fencing friend telling me. He was rather a fan of those flicks.

    15. Re:This would be great for fencing. by Sirch · · Score: 1

      "The flick that you are refering to is hard to execute and takes great skill."

      A few years back, the maximum amount of bend in foils (when a 1kg weight hung on the end) was reduced in order to make the flicks harder. This was part of a number of measures proposed in order to make the sport more spectator-friendly, and in a way fair (another was to swap around the scoring lights; originally the electric scoring lights noted being hit, not scoring, so if your opponent hit you, lights on your side came on).

      I recall one British U-17 foil champion who was almost unstoppable because he'd flick his way past you. Beating him was almost impossible - certainly for me!

  29. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A three-star Marine general who said it was "fun to shoot some people" should have chosen his words more carefully, the Marine Corps commandant said Thursday."

    He only said what everybody thinks.

  30. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by Tlosk · · Score: 1

    In the real world there's always more than two options. In this situation I suspect those who have a natural aptitude for FPS games will learn more quickly than without the shocks, but for most people they will just stop playing.

  31. Join this with the new robotic fighting platforms by Freeform · · Score: 0

    Now all they need to do is attach these things as the controller for the new fighting robots they use in Iraq. The rebel fighters might be emboldened to attack the robots if they knew that by causing them damage they could "paralyze an infidel".

  32. Simple by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "How many law suits would this cause based on unknown heart conditions?"

    Out of curiosity, have stun gun manufacturers been sued for this?

    I don't think it matters much anyway, they'd likely use some form of vibration instead of shock.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Simple by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      "How many law suits would this cause based on unknown heart conditions?"

      That's probably one reason the shock goes through the hips, not the arms and chest. Anyway, in TFA, this is a system used only by military now, and they're allowed to kill people in training.

  33. Been done by DavidLeblond · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mattel created a device that would shock gamers a long time ago for the NES. They called it the Power Glove.

    1. Re:Been done by Sir_Jeff · · Score: 0

      yep - I remember reading this years ago too, thought it was playstation though

      --
      --Sir_-_Jeff--
    2. Re:Been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I used the Powerglove many moons ago (I integrated it with a primitive VR system - this is in 486-land, with no 3D cards, so make your own call on 'primitiveness') - it had a heap of buttons and some funky glove orientation and position circuitry, but nothing that shocked or even 'buzzed' the user that I recall.

      On the other hand, you could use it in "superman" mode, and point your hand in the direction that you wanted to fly. It looked fairly ridiculous to stand there with your arm outstretched, hand on hip, waving your arm around to navigate the world!

    3. Re:Been done by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Right, it was an Urban Legend. I think it was invented by parents who wanted a reason not to get their kids the glove other than "its too damn expensive."

  34. sdk by t0ny747 · · Score: 0

    I hope they release a sdk.

    while(1)
    {
    shock();
    }

    --
    Taco?
  35. Ridiculous by kamapuaa · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is so ridiculous. If only the US Military would read Slashdot's Game forums, they'd know that playing realistic violent video games have absolutely no relation to comitting violent acts. So why use it as a recruitment tool or training method?

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Ridiculous by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I suspect you're being sarcastic, but here goes...

      Playing violent video games is more of a symptom of violent behavior than a cause. So if people enjoy a violent game with a risk of real pain, they're more likely to be comfortable with the real thing.

    2. Re:Ridiculous by mark-t · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      More precisely, playing violent video games creates a feedback loop that reinforces the violent tendencies which may already be there. If one's propensity to violence is already low enough, the feedback is falls well below any perceptable threshold, no matter how much one plays. If their propensity for violence is even lower, they will probably not find such games entertaining.

  36. The best use... by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

    Punish cheaters!

    1. Re:The best use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you gotta love slap macro in game servers :)

  37. In reality... by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 1

    Not to point out the obvious, but in reality, I think avoiding pain at all costs would involve avoiding this shocking game at all costs. I know I'd rather not play this game, than play and get shocked.

    I hope this revelation isn't too shocking...heh.

  38. Wireless.... by Bifurcati · · Score: 1
    The problem comes when they decide to make it wireless for maximum flexibility, but use an insecure network. Next thing you know, soldiers and hard-core gamers everywhere are dropping like flies...

    But then again, that's completely unrealistic. No-one in this day and age would have an easily hacked network, right?

    Right?

  39. Bang Bang by Tibe · · Score: 1

    1. Research & Development
    2. Beta Testing
    3. ???
    4. Lawsuit!

  40. April f... by Thingummywut · · Score: 1

    Wait... It's no longer April 1st somewhere in the world?

  41. Guess they could market it.. by linders · · Score: 1

    A shocking experience. And it wouldn't even be false :/

  42. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by cptgrudge · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not electricity, but my buddy learned to not forget his nut cup after getting shot in the balls with a few paintballs. Learned real quick.

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  43. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " (Hey shooting people is fun)"
    yay! anti-americanism!


    Are you on crack? This quote can only be seen as an attack on someone who sees shooting people as fun. By saying it's an attack on Americanism, you're saying most Americans hold this view.

    You're either a troll or an idiot. Actually no those two might not be mutually exclusive.

  44. F#$CKING CAMPERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this is a brilliant idea to help promote violence against campers.
    I can see it now: "If you camp there and snipe me again im gonna come over there and jam the mains fair up your @ss then flick the switch" ....then again..im not entirely opposed to electrocuting campers.

  45. Not all stun guns will knock you out/down by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

    I have a few, and until you get up towards 500,000 volts the pain is tolerable, and is on the surface only. The 700,000 volt model I have is able to cut through paper with its arc, and needless to say it will knock you down and out if you were shocked for more than 5 seconds depending on your body weight. I wouldn't mind wearing a belt that was adjustable between 100,000-300,000 volts in a game of CounterStrike. As long as the amps were as low as a typical stun gun the pain would be less than paintballing, and cheaper.

    1. Re:Not all stun guns will knock you out/down by dave420 · · Score: 1

      isn't it a question of wattage, not just voltage?

    2. Re:Not all stun guns will knock you out/down by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      Of course it is. If you read my post again I state 100,000 volts at the same amperage as a typical stun gun. Watts = Volts X Amps. When you use a 9v battery source and increase the voltage to 100,000v, the amps drop considerably enough to slow the popping of the arc enough to see the individual pops, whereas if you started off with a 220v wall jack source increased increased to 100,000v you would propably kill someone because the amperage would be much higher. Thats why I specified the same amps as a typical stun gun. Simply using wattage to refer to this type of application does not explain the breakdown of it enough.

  46. Remember: by Yurka · · Score: 1

    The enemy gate is down.

    --
    I can assure you, the best way to get rid of dragons is to have one of your own.
    1. Re:Remember: by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I can assure you, the best way to get rid of dragons is to have one of your own.

      But only one instance of Dragon Army was ever any good...

  47. Different operating systems... by Bifurcati · · Score: 2, Funny
    Windows: Works really well, provided you're just getting shot in the chest. As soon as you try to do something more complicated like getting shot in the head or foot, the "Blue screen of death" takes on a whole new meaning...

    Linux: No batteries for the shock are needed, as the frustration of trying to get the hardware to interface with linux everytime you're shot is far more painful.

    SCO: The software comes with a variety of legal services built in so you can sue about that "unknown" heart condition.

    Mac: Never has it been so easy to administer high voltage electric shocks to your hips.

    1. Re:Different operating systems... by CoolGopher · · Score: 2, Funny
      OpenBSD: Even though the driver has been loaded and the config files updated, no shocks are delivered since doing so would be insecure.

      NetBSD: Once the driver is loaded, the config files updated, and the right incantations are spoken, it has never been easier to deliver high voltage electric shocks over the network.

      FreeBSD: After loading the driver and updating the config files you are left with the options of running with or without the Giant lock. With it, all shocks are Giant and hurt accordingly; Without it the system occassionaly dead-locks...

    2. Re:Different operating systems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mac: Never has it been so easy to administer high voltage electric shocks to your hips.

      But you have to drag "your hips" to trashcan to make it stop giving you the shocks.

  48. Hey. :-) by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    Good point!

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  49. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darn it, with all the idiotic knee-jerk reactions and editorializations used up by the story author, how will anybody else have anything to say here?

  50. [ot]Re:yay! by minus_273 · · Score: 0, Troll

    "You're either a troll or an idiot. Actually no those two might not be mutually exclusive."

    Funny that you would call me a troll or an idiot and then think out loud that "or" makes something mutually exclusive.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:[ot]Re:yay! by Chrax · · Score: 1

      The either-or construct is the English version of xor, and that makes something mutually exclusive.

    2. Re:[ot]Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lets vote.

      I vote you're an idiot.

  51. imagine the (mis)applications... by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

    DRM. You can download anything you want for free, provided the RIAA gets to shock you on a per megabyte basis - negative conditioning.

    Educational games. Kids are hooked up to the computer and the computer quizzes them, zapping them every time they make a mistake.

    Extreme games - apply the electrodes to areas of the body much more sensitive than they would otherwise be attached to.

    Exercise games - electrodes attached such that they automatically stimulate and tone the muscles while you work/play.

    I could go on, but i'll spare you.

    1. Re:imagine the (mis)applications... by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      Exercise games - electrodes attached such that they automatically stimulate and tone the muscles while you work/play.

      They already have these, i've seen them on infomercials before. if all of /. got one, we could actually make it up the basement stairs!
      http://www.vitalityweb.com/backstore/ems4000.htm

    2. Re:imagine the (mis)applications... by dingDaShan · · Score: 1

      This all goes to a book written by Alduos Huxley called A Brave New World. Huxley talks of a society where behavior modification is used to an extreme... might this be the start of it? (preceding comments are likely to be exhaggerations)

  52. hm by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

    "How many law suits would this cause based on unknown heart conditions?"

    None, as they probably make you sign a liability waiver before letting you put that thing on.

    --
    Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
  53. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    You want giant tentacle penises to erupt from your PS2 and rape you?

    I guess even sex-crazed demonic octopi need love.

  54. Wouldnt want a BSOD while playing such a game by mnmn · · Score: 1

    And certainly wouldnt want to be a n00b in the game.

    I'll bet everyone will be camping all the time.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  55. Coming soon.... 3-D glasses! by GlueyPorchBoy · · Score: 1

    The only thing that's surprising about this, actually, is that it took so long to arrive in a gaming environment, considering that movies have been capable of this "feature" for at least 46 years. The Tingler, starring Vincent Price, naturally, used this gimmic, wiring theater seats to shock viewers at appropriate moments. It didn't last then, and it won't last now.

  56. uh oh ... by ssand · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would hate to be hit by someone using the rocket launcher.

    1. Re:uh oh ... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > I would hate to be hit by someone using the rocket launcher.

      "Dodge that rocket, boy. Dodge it or I light you up like Times Square."

      Chris Mattern

  57. Soviet America by SquierStrat · · Score: 0

    Soviet America? That's a cheap shot.

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:Soviet America by minus_273 · · Score: 0

      funny when you consider that the Soviets were leftists.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  58. Re:Ouch by modemboy · · Score: 1

    Best.
    Playstation.
    Accessory.
    Ever.

    http://www.gamegirladvance.com/archives/2002/10/26 /sex_in_games_rezvibrator.html

    Maybe you can get it to work with hentai games...?

  59. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few paintballs?

    Doesn't sound like he learned all that quick.

  60. Never need to go out by dark+grep · · Score: 0

    I'm in! Where can I order one? Lazer tag was just too boring. Now I don't even need to risk the hazards of unhealthy fresh air to play paintball to get a pain fix.

  61. Re:yay! by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Informative

    yes, in context,


    ""You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil," Mattis said. "You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them.""


    It's so easy to take things out of context but it also says something about the point you are trying to make.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  62. More material for Jackass The Movie 2 by ylikone · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much you want to bet we will have tons of stupid teen guys attaching this thing to their nads?

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:More material for Jackass The Movie 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I for one probably would. My knee injury required me to bring home a portable electro-shock stim. machine for therapy. After a couple of weeks, I stuck the electrodes to my nads, turned up the juice and started whacking off. Talk about some crazy orgasms. I was on crutches for 3 months. What else was I supposed to do?

  63. Re:Ouch by beacher · · Score: 1

    It may not be for the PS, but here's a complete cybersex USB that lets you remotely control your partners vibrating gizmo....

    Hopefully your can get this thingy to shoot back ;)

  64. Coming soon to a warez site near you by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    "America's army v9.00 - zapeveryone hax0r" ...and for some strange reason I am reminded of the Simpson's episode featuring Dr. Marvin Munroe, when the Simpsons zap each other.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  65. They had this already. by nxtr · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but Microsoft recalled those XBox power cables.

  66. A few things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. April Fools is over. There'd be so many people dead from this thing, it would completely clean out our gene pool. I absolutely support it.

    2. What was that one James bond movie where he got the shit shocked out of him, and he was like, 60 years old when he was filming it in Monaco?

    3. Why the fuck did Kim "Did I do that?" Basinger get an Oscar for that LA Shit movie, for which she had about 3 lines, and Kate Winslet completely shut-out?

    4. Time to burn down the establishment.

  67. unsettling by potpie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it a bit sickening that the military is producing games to attract people to join. Aren't games supposed to be fun? Are they hoping for gamers to think "hmm- this game is fun, I think I'll join the army so I can HAVE FUN KILLING PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE." ?

    Does anybody else find that unsettling?

    --
    Esoteric reference.
    1. Re:unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really.

    2. Re:unsettling by darkfire5252 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but, in _my_ military, as much as I may dislike how the CinC chooses to deploy it, I want that sort of attitude. Granted, I don't want every gamer to think that way, but if the alternative is recruting people who are going to give up and run when they take a non-lethal bullet, bring on the realism. The whole point of an army is you train killers, not good people.

      I, for one, welcome our new electronic overlords.

    3. Re:unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not be American.

    4. Re:unsettling by exoir · · Score: 1
      Settle down Beavis.(SMACK!)
      Its called MARKETING.
      Why? Beacuse its a volunteer army. (Unless you'd rather go back to the draft system.)

      1.What are 18-24yr old guys in to.
      2.Could it be made with military tie-in.

      The Information age version of a heroic poem, book, poster, war movie,etc.

    5. Re:unsettling by CamMac · · Score: 1

      "Hey, Sarge, I just an idea for a recruiting method that would attract the kind of people who want to be the best at something and don't mind pushing through the pain to do it!"

      As an ex-soldier, that is EXACTLY the kind of guy I want in a HUMVEE with me. Esp if he wants to be the best more than I do:-)

      Of course, the Army could recruit people who where willing to embrace the suck in order to make someone feel better, but then where would the RedCross and amnisty international get their people?

      --Cam
      PS I can't wait to see the "Best Of" photo collection of potential recruits as they get shocked for the first time.

      --
      All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.
    6. Re:unsettling by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I find the concept of a military unsettling.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:unsettling by Afty0r · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I find it a bit sickening that the military is producing games to attract people to join ... Are they hoping for gamers to think "hmm- this game is fun, I think I'll join the army so I can HAVE FUN KILLING PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE." ?... Does anybody else find that unsettling?
      The military also pays salarys to people - are they hoping people will think "Hmm, I need some money and I can't get a job, I think I'll join the military and KILL PEOPLE FOR MONEY"?

      Well, actually, yes they are - that's why they recruit most actively in poor areas, for the same reasons that terrorist-financiers recruit most (but not all) of their suicide bombers from youngsters with no jobs and impoverished families.

      There are groups of people ideologically at odds with one another on our planet, fighting for power and control of a variety of things - there is no way to win, and the only way to avoid losing is to not play their game.
    8. Re:unsettling by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Eh, if no one got seriously hurt, war would be fun.

      Call BS? Then explain the popularity of strategy games and paintball.

      The combination of intellectual challenge and adrenaline rush is appealing to many people.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    9. Re:unsettling by Asgorath · · Score: 1

      Uhm, you do realise that soldiers also are part of the community right and there are such things as ex-soldiers. I don't think you want to train pure killers and not good people at the same time. I prefer those with the guns and the knowlage on how to kill to also have had some moral teatchings. Isn't it so that a lot of shooting incidents in the US involve ex-soldiers?

      ps. I don't think this type of game causes this. I was more replying to the idea that soldiers should be pure killers and not persee good people. Soldiers above all should be good people because they also need to be killers in some situations.

    10. Re:unsettling by wootest · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the first lawsuit where they sue people that actually do kill people as a direct consequence of a game as opposed to "he played this game and then he killed people, let's ban games" which is about as credible as "he brushed his teeth and then he killed people, let's ban toothbrushes" seeming as how, you know, killing people in games is ultimately very different from killing people in real life. But sure, if any game were to do that to people, wouldn't the military games be the prime candidates? I think sensationalist journalism has a blind spot here. (Then again, it's sensationalist journalism, for fucks sake. Someone must have snuck in the word "journalism" into that phrase when common sense wasn't looking.)

    11. Re:unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of America's Army is to teach tactics and teamwork, and provide some PR/education for the military.

      The whole point of an "America's Army: Electric Edition" is to teach you that you really, really don't want to get shot, to get you out of the "I'll try a suicide rush, who cares, I'll just respawn next round". The same way they carry out real exercises with Simunitions, solid paint balls basically - you get shot with one of those it really hurts.

    12. Re:unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is even more frustrating to me, is one the reverse of this you have politicians fighting against video games for there violent content, and how GTA is causing little Billy to shoot up the school, yet if the military leverages the same concept to try and improve recruiting for there wars abroad, a blind eye is turned.

      Land of Hypocrisy got to love it... no.. really, you have GOT to love it *Sound of pistol being cocked*

      *sigh*

    13. Re:unsettling by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I know not with what weapons World War IV will be fought, but World War III will be fought with paintball guns.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    14. Re:unsettling by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      There are groups of people ideologically at odds with one another on our planet, fighting for power and control of a variety of things - there is no way to win, and the only way to avoid losing is to not play their game.

      There's a prisoner's dilemma involved, though. Unless you can guarantee that the other party won't continue to play, you still lose.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    15. Re:unsettling by nameer · · Score: 1
      The thing is, I'm so bad at AA that it's an incredible disincentive for me to join the army. "Join the army. See the world. Be dead in under two minutes". I suppose I'm not the target audience though.

      --
      "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
    16. Re:unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Espically when they've already shown you they are playing.

    17. Re:unsettling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's the visceral reaction, but when I think about it for a second, no, not really.

      When Quake was hot stuff ('96?), my friend Jon noted that Quake was the single most effective anti-war device he had ever seen. Every few minutes (or seconds), splat ... shit, I'm dead. "There's no way I'd ever join the army", he said. Virtually every gamer I've ever met has had a similar reaction.

      Quake shows you how much fun (virtual) killing is, and also how fast you're going to die. I don't know anybody who plays computer games who thinks that killing is so much fun they'd be willing to die today for it. If you like killing things in Quake, you're going to *avoid* the army so you can stay alive to kill more stuff in Quake tomorrow.

      I think this will be used mostly by gamers -- people who play other computer games, and aren't soldiers. And people who'd join the army would, anyway. I don't realistically see this causing anybody to say "I think I'll join the army because killing is fun".

    18. Re:unsettling by Mittermeyer · · Score: 1

      The only way to avoid losing is to kick their ass before they kick yours.

      By the time passivity has you in the Warsaw ghetto, it's too late.

      --
      ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  68. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see how the Bukkake Acccessory works.

  69. The REAL question is... by HiredMan · · Score: 1


    does it shock you for shooting people on your own team or just them for getting shot? Because there's always at leasy one "team killing f**tard".

    I think we all know where this is going....

    "Dude, those are my chips.... Dude, I said, those are MY chips... Dude, alright I warned you!'

    BBBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!

    AHAHAHHAHAHAAA!!!!

    BBBZZZZZZTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!

    And what if you keep shooting him? I SO see a Jackass episode in this invention.

    =tkk

  70. Re:Is it possible to become aroused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you regret that you got involved in an inmates personal scheme? someone named "Bubba" punched out your teeth so he can enjoy hours of no-bitey BJ action?

  71. Heart Conditions? No problem! by Blind_Io_42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Heart conditions are not a problem, just go to Start > Settings > Control Pannel > Game Hardware > Shock Feedback Options and enable the Difibulator option.
    In the event of cadiac arrest the computer will automatically re-start your heart, call the paramedics, reserve a room at the hospital, notify your family, and cancel your dinner reservations. That is unless the game locks up.

    Lag would also be a pain if it happens right when you die.

    --
    No one of consequence
    1. Re:Heart Conditions? No problem! by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, only next-day on site service, for one year, is included in the base price. If you want the paramedics to come now you should upgrade to 24/7 "gold" support, for only 5x the sticker price.

    2. Re:Heart Conditions? No problem! by mikieboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      omg
      an option to remove your fibula
      that would be extremely painful and i don't see how removal of a legbone is gonna help you when your heart has stopped

    3. Re:Heart Conditions? No problem! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Um, you die in extreme pain?
      I dunno, seems like a perfectly logical feature for Microsoft to implement.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  72. Sexual apps for TENS units are old news by xtal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get with the programme.. not mainstream, but certainly not new.

    http://www.electrosexstore.com

    http://www.peselectro.com

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Sexual apps for TENS units are old news by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I'm worried you knew those ones...

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Sexual apps for TENS units are old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, violet wands would be a bit closer.

      http://home.earthlink.net/~violetwanda/wands.html [Eclectic Electric]

  73. New meaning to Dead Man Switch by davidwr · · Score: 1

    A game like this needs a dead man switch. In every sense of the word.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  74. Laaaag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fricken Lag! Outch!

  75. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
    A few paintballs?

    Well, he remembered the next time we got together. He didn't go home to get it. But he did go off the field after he collapsed with a piercing shriek following the third one.

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  76. Spawn Campers will be the end of this game by OSX1337 · · Score: 1

    10 minutes of them and you'll be looking for your refund

  77. watt a terrible post by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 4, Funny

    You should be charged with battery and kept in a cell.

    That's it for me, I'm going ohm now.

  78. I have an idea! by kdougherty · · Score: 0

    Build your own!

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to invent it. -Alan Kay
  79. This is better. by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 5, Funny

    while(1)
    {
    shockuser();
    }

    No chance of overflow with this loop.

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    1. Re:This is better. by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      > shockuser();

      When I was young, we'd implement that by posting a goatse link.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:This is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      void shockuser() {
      static shock = 0;
      shock++;
      }

  80. Battlestar Linux, by Microsoft... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Funny
    In other news, Microsoft has just bought out id Software, and is developing a new game, codenamed Battlestar Linux. The game is said to be a combination 1st- and 3rd-person shooter based on ideas from Doom, Quake, Grand Theft Auto, and the classic Kings Quest series.

    "We've developed some innovative new ideas for this game," stated Mark Davidson, project manager for the Battlestar Linux effort. "Our game will be set in an environment of post-World War 3 New York, with the city engulfed in violence from scattered rebel groups, gangs, warlords, and other nice characters. What sets this game apart from other games is a new USB we are producing that will make the gameplay feel more real. Attachments that go to a skullcap, waistband, wrist- and ankle-straps, will provide an electric shock whenever the player is 'shot' by an electrical weapon such as the raygun or cellblaster. Gas burners installed in these straps will engulf the player in real flames if the player is shot with a flamethrower. Explosives placed in a pack, worn on the player's back, will blow the player up if the player is hit with a grenade or rocket. Finally, a system of shotguns, strategically placed around the room in a surround-sound fashion, will shoot real bullets at the player when the player is hit by bullets in the game. Our effort is intended to give new meaning to the term 'virtual reality.'"

    People familiar with the matter suggest the game will only be available for Linux, a first for operating system vendor Microsoft, which usually makes applications available only for the Wintel platform and for the Mac.

  81. They have been watching movies again! by Zeussy · · Score: 0

    Well guess they have finished watching Star Wars movies and have now moved onto Starship Troopers.

    I always though replacing like an XBox's rumble system with a couple of electric shock giving pads would be good. Or on a seperate system, so every time u died in Halo Multi the controller gets shocked out of ur hands, more fun.

  82. Re:Ouch by SJ · · Score: 1

    They already do, only you have to rent them by the hour.

  83. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

    "following the third one."

    Two wasn't enough?

  84. The MILES system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a system that could replace the MILES system.

  85. Lawsuits by ari_j · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like you'd legally be assuming the risk by strapping yourself into an electroshock suit to play a video game. Assumption of the risk bars negligence lawsuits. It's almost a given that you'll have to agree, either by signing them or by reading a warning sign, to terms that explicitly state that you assume the risk of unknown heart conditions.

  86. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do make a hentai accessory. http://www.fu-fme.com/

  87. Re:Ouch by sbwilliams · · Score: 1

    Are you telling us you'd like a tentacle in the tailpipe?

  88. Timothy-Obviously you don't know military law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    "I guess in Soviet America, games shoot you. How many law suits would this cause based on unknown heart conditions? I also hope there's some sort of built-in safety in case the thing starts to zap you repeatedly. (Deadly endless loop, anyone?)" "

    It's interesting that the first thing that would cross your mind would be "Soviet America" and "Lawsuits".

    Sorry, you just contridicted your otherwise consistent anti american views.

    But I digress: You never entered the military, otherwise you would know that far more 'rigorous' training takes place than merely getting a few shocks down your hip from a video game. You have no idea what goes on, and thus your views present that of a bias unfounded. You hate America, granted, but don't worry slacker - you'll never be cut for the military with that attitude.

    But aren't you glad that people like myself defend your civilian ass while you bicker over A dead woman on a feeding tube, a child molesting black/white/whatever singer and whether or not a plaque with the 10 commandments offends you in a place where most Americans will never be - in a courtroom?

    Relax, young sir. You'll never be in the military - we don't want you. You just stay here and do what you have to do with your rhetoric, and I'll do what I have to do with my weapons.

    1. Re:Timothy-Obviously you don't know military law. by beetlefeet · · Score: 1

      I think he was refering to lawsuits that might arise if the tech is used (as suggested) in future video games sold to the public.

    2. Re:Timothy-Obviously you don't know military law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, other than brown skinned children throwing stones at tanks, have you protected us from?

    3. Re:Timothy-Obviously you don't know military law. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, with an attitude like that I'd feel so much safer with you between me and someone that wanted to hurt me. (Hint: I'd run from both of you.) Not that I'd have to. You can't even post without going AC - that hardly says you're willing to fight for anything worthwhile.

      There are things I love about America and things I hate about America. Guess which one you represent.

      Ever heard of the "In soviet Russia blah blah blahs you" jokes? As for the lawsuits, what you don't think that's a legit concern? Its not just in America where this would become an issue.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  89. Next thing you know by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

    The pr0n industry takes this technology to a new level. Then MMORPG's become MMO "Parties", with lots of people feeling it for real.

    So in short. No good can come from this.

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  90. Re:Ouch by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    There's a patent fight going on over force-feedback controls with vibrating motors in the US. I wonder it covers this?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  91. A little reverse engineering... by shadowmatter · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and we have "Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing Electro-Shock Edition."

    Wonderful. Never will your child reach typing 60 w.p.m. faster. Or with fewer fingers.

    - shadowmatter

    1. Re:A little reverse engineering... by uberjon · · Score: 1

      "It's getting hard to type as my left arm is becoming numb"

      --
      Dick Laurent is dead.
  92. Cheating by KevinDean · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine that people wouldn't have numerous circumventions for this, the easiest being simply not wearing the aparatus. How many gamers are going to endure this rather than simply disabling it somehow and just playing it like any other videogame? The honors system rarely holds up among online gamers when physical pain isn't involved... I don't think this would fare much better.

    1. Re:Cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gizmo might be able to detect that something is attached with the right current draw. Use resistors or just attach it to the cat.

  93. If I may just chip in... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've gone too far-radically too far - with the appaling punnage. They are so bad, it hertz...

    1. Re:If I may just chip in... by spot35 · · Score: 1

      ohm i god!

    2. Re:If I may just chip in... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      These puns are revolting.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  94. Thank-you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That may the funniest thing I have seen in almost a month. I can barely type almost 5 minutes after reading. So sad but so true. Thank-you for the laughs.

  95. Commentary - Shooting people is fun? by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Hey shooting people is fun"

    And you Americans wonder why the rest of the world thinks of you as ignorant, violent and lacking responsibility.

    How the fuck did this comment get past the /. editors? Moderators this isn't a troll nor is it flamebait. I'm simply pointing out that this is a damn stupid comment to make because the context the comment was in pertains to shooting people in the real world, as in the military, not in a video game sense.

    1. Re:Commentary - Shooting people is fun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the submitter is Australian. I think your point is valid though. It was a pretty stupid comment.

    2. Re:Commentary - Shooting people is fun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That quote was from one of our Generals! The issue isn't the rest of the world *thinking* we're ignorant, violent and lacking responsibility.

      It's that we really *are* ignorant, violent and lacking responsibility!

  96. being used for recruitment?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geez -- and they wonder why it's so hard to meet the numbers each month for new recruits.

  97. Lag.. by spawnofbill · · Score: 3, Funny

    Player:"hey, I got shot, where's the sho*zzzt*"

  98. Somehow I think this would change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way people think about Columbine, something tells me if they got zapped every once and awhile while playing they would have thought twice about rampaging...not that I believe the video games contributed to the issue.

  99. S.M.I.L.E.S? by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 1

    The existing target training simulation is called M.I.L.E.S. What wil the new name be, S.M.I.L.E.S? (Shocking M.I.L.E.S)

  100. Every credit card needs one hooked .... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    to your balls.

    Then when you spend it, ouch!!!

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  101. I don't wanna die! by NeuralClone · · Score: 1

    You know, just because I play 3D shooters it doesn't mean that I actually want to get shot. I'm sorry but feeling searing pain or getting knocked out of my chair while playing game isn't exactly what I'd call a good time. Of course, if the game had breasts...

    --
    find . -name "noobs" -print | xargs rm -rf && echo "pwnd."
  102. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New meaning for blue screen of death?

  103. James Bond! by peter1 · · Score: 0

    Didn't we see this in a James Bond movie? (Never Say Never Again) As I recall that was quite the cheesy game...

  104. Octopussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe it.

    No one has mentioned that in the movie "Octopussy" James Bond (you know, Agent 007) competed with the villain in a video game that gave shocks to the loser.

    Maybe you make it a Blockbuster night and check it out.

  105. Alrighty. Just need to nail all the Windows .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boxes with virus and get them to play the enemy. Then the war is mine.

  106. To a plugged in player.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sony - welcome to the new reality shock console.
    player - ah hello
    sony - would you like to register this console?
    player - no thanks
    sony - *ZZZZZAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPP*
    player - *ARRRRRRGGGGGHHH*
    sony - would you like to register this console?
    player - uhhh perhaps I would yes
    sony - would you like to purchase additional peripherals?
    player - no thanks I'd like to play this game please
    sony - *ZZZZZAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPP*
    player - *ARRRRRRGGGGGHHH*
    sony - would you like to purchase additional peripherals?
    player - uh yes I'll take two.....
    sony - please enter your credit card details
    player - wha....
    sony - *ZZZZZAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPP*
    and on and on it goes..

  107. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Sounds like he wasn't man enough to take the lesson immediately to heart.

  108. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all that smart is he?

    Perhaps getting hit in the testes has made him unable to reproduce. He deserved getting hit the 3rd time.

  109. Hmmm by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Just think about how bad it would suck to go up against a cheater.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  110. PainStation anyone? by tomasito · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember reading about some guys that made a version of Pong that would give you shocks when you screwed up. Anyone ever try one of these?

    1. Re:PainStation anyone? by herting · · Score: 0

      Well, people with severe emotional disturbances tried it... The gallery on the painstation site suggests that I have not yet dated as high a ratio of the borderline-personalities out there as I had once thought.

      --
      http://www.mample.net
  111. Can we turn off TK's? by deft · · Score: 1

    Man, that would be a mofo.

    And LAN parties, where you can walk over and hurt the guy that just stunned you to the ground... awesome.

    Why not just cut out the middle man, and buy two stun guns, and go at it... woot!

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  112. Re:Ouch by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the FAQ:

    Can I communicate with partners who use different computers than I do?

    Presently FuckU-FuckMe only works with Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows NT. Macintosh and Linux versions are currently being developed.


    Why a linux version? Would anyone be able to use it? ...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  113. A Handheld Shocker? by Zeroblitzt · · Score: 0

    Once this sort of realism becomes more popular in gaming, expect a portable shocker from Sony that you can stick in a special slot. It only takes half the battery life every time its used!

    --
    Mr. America walk on by your schools that do not teach Mr. America walk on by the minds that won't be reached
  114. Oh I can see it now... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    PLEASE NOOOO, I don't want even more campers who refuse to go anywhere near danger.

  115. Just how painful is the Taser? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This was some 20 years ago, but a colleague (we are not cops, just EEs) brought a Taser to a presentation -- his point that the Taser didn't really "stun" -- it just plain hurt. He thought the cops would find it wouldn't work, but would be mighty handy with "suspects in custody" if you know what I mean. He was warning us the Taser would be become the modern version of "rubber hoses."

    Well anyway, the idea that you could have a weapon with two settings, stun and kill, gee, where did the cops get the idea that this would come in handy? Turns out that it is hard to stun someone without killing them. The old detective movie cliche of stunning someone by hitting them over the head? An MD writing in TV guide told readers that "if you hit someone over the head, most likely you just hurt them and make them mad. If you hit them harder to knock them out, chances are you kill someone from a hematoma."

    I have seen films where they Taser a volunteer, and they start convulsing or they just faint and tip over and hit the mat in the gym they are doing this with a thud. I have seen a recent episode of "Cops" where they Tasered a whole bunch of different people, and it didn't seem to do anything. I suppose the electric shock causes intense, sudden pain, and that can cause someone to collapse, just like being shot with a bullet, only there is no tissue damage so the person doesn't bleed to death, but does it really work? I suppose a bullet doesn't always "work" in that a person can be fatally wounded but not always drop dead right away.

    Anyway, I was the only person at the meeting willing to try the Taser (it was a model with two electrodes sticking out, and it didn't have the darts for remote action). I was going to zap my forearm and I was quickly advised "better try it on your leg. So I hold the Taser up to my leg and press the trigger. I was pretty embarrassed because I yelled out "Jesus Christ!" I was more startled than anything else, and it hurt real bad, but not the kind of hurt of someone drilling into your teeth -- more like the worst kind of muscle cramp -- it really hurt but I felt like my leg muscles were seizing up.

    So what does a Taser do? Does it really knock a person out like on Star Trek, or does it merely cause a person to take the Lord's name in vain? Have they made the Taser more powerful in the last 20 years? More maybe because my finger was on the trigger, I let go when it first started to hurt, and a person has to deliver multiple jolts to get someone to collapse.

    1. Re:Just how painful is the Taser? by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the cops get to sample being on the other end of the electricity. They should experience all non-lethal weapons so they know what they're dealing with. (And for the morons who point out clipping someone with a bullet isn't lethal, you know what I'm talking about.)

      When I was an EMT in high school we carried pepper spray on our holsters and had to know the effects. It wasn't very pleasant.

    2. Re:Just how painful is the Taser? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      The taser just pisses your assailant off so instead of just mugging you and taking your money he also kills you.

      I'm told that where it hits you makes a bit of a difference. One salesman suggested hitting an attacker in the stomach so they lose bowel control. Great, so now you've pissed them off AND made them shit themself. Better hope they can't think of anything worse than killing you...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Just how painful is the Taser? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      "Anyway, I was the only person at the meeting willing to try the Taser (it was a model with two electrodes sticking out, and it didn't have the darts for remote action). I was going to zap my forearm and I was quickly advised "better try it on your leg. So I hold the Taser up to my leg and press the trigger. I was pretty embarrassed because I yelled out "Jesus Christ!" I was more startled than anything else, and it hurt real bad, but not the kind of hurt of someone drilling into your teeth -- more like the worst kind of muscle cramp -- it really hurt but I felt like my leg muscles were seizing up."

      On your arm? Your leg? If you want to impress folks, try your genatilia.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:Just how painful is the Taser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jackass called, Knoxville wants his stunt back!

    5. Re:Just how painful is the Taser? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      that was a stun gun not a taser.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Just how painful is the Taser? by Blacken00100 · · Score: 0

      I remember when I got pepper sprayed...tasering is worse. Not going to say where it happened.

  116. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    Didn't he have a belt pack to hold a few bottles of ammo? Whenever i've gone paintballing, we had those to carry extra.

    Wearing them in the front will also serve as protection.

  117. Re:Ouch by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

    Oh no no no.

    I don't need a DualTentacleShock controller!

  118. I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spawnkilling won't ever be the same after this...

  119. Drop your weapon! by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    You have 5 seconds to comply!

  120. Has it occurred to anyone... by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

    I am reading lots of comments about people "camping" more in a game like this. On a serious note, doesn't being a real soldier in combat involve a lot of "camping"? You might spent a day or even months in one spot defending one position.

  121. Re:Ouch by Dash'n'SlashDot · · Score: 1

    They have this already... It is called a Dual Shock controller~

  122. Camping (good point) by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll bet everyone will be camping all the time.

    You mean "hiding behind something bulletproof", just like most soldiers do in a REAL WAR unless the enemy is chasing them or their officers are ordering them to move? A real firefight between a dozen soldiers can take hours, since getting anyone to "rush" is both stupid and nearly impossible.

    That's why "elite units" are elite, because they will actually voluntarily put themselves in harm's way rather than only trying to stay alive. Consequently, they can make short work of conscripts and half-trained farm boys.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Camping (good point) by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      You mean "hiding behind something bulletproof", just like most soldiers do in a REAL WAR unless [...] their officers are ordering them to move?

      In a REAL WAR, they will usually keep hiding even when their officers order them to attack.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Camping (good point) by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

      Yeah, true. "Is the 2LT still saying 'Charge!'? Somebody shoot him."

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    3. Re:Camping (good point) by roskakori · · Score: 1

      That's why "elite units" are elite, because they will actually voluntarily put themselves in harm's way rather than only trying to stay alive.

      So that's what honor 25 does to you?
  123. Stun guns kill by PizzaFace · · Score: 1
    "It has the same power as a stun gun. It knocks you down."
    Stun guns can be lethal. I don't think sovereign immunity would protect the government from claims of gross negligence toward the general public, notwithstanding any disclaimers of liability in the click-through license. The Army might well use shocks to train soldiers, though. Volunteer soldiers have effectively signed their lives away at enlistment.
  124. I foresee some deadly hacks by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    Imagine some dude hacks the game and makes it repetitively shock you. Someone could actually wtfpown you over the net.

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
  125. obedience to Authority by justthisdude · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I am suprised that no-one has made the connection with Stanley Milgram's "Obedience to Authority".

    http://www.new-life.net/milgram.htm/

    Remember for each person getting shot in an on-line game, there is someone willingly doing the shooting. One additional purpose of this could be to desensitize the players to inflicting harm on others, or finding people who never minded much in the first place. For those that do especially well, there is always prison guard duty...

    --
    "I love his boyish charm, but I hate his childishness" - Leela
  126. Realism? by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    From what I heard, many bulet wounds (especialy from modern high velocity rifles with piercing ammo) do not hurt too much initialy and feel rather funny, much like a dull thud - until a crippling pain sets in, few seconds later.

    I think the real purpose of this "reality" training is to find a good material for US army - people with nascent masochist inclination and low self-preservation instinct.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  127. There was a science fiction story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hi:

    Years ago on CBC radio--and I may well have the cassette tapes somewhere--there was a radio mystery/occult/science fiction play once a week. I think it was Friday nights.

    In one episode a man gets addicted to video games. To heighten the realism, the game gives him shocks until the ultimate level is reached where he gets fried.

    Fiction fifteen years ago.

  128. Can't wait to see by thenefariousone · · Score: 1

    What the porn industry will do with this!

    --
    http://hughgordon.com/
  129. but what if it crashes? by compro01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i remember reading a story in a magazine about the first public demo of a force-feedback joystick. the game that was being played (doom) crashed and the joystick went beserk. if i remember rightly, the joy using the thing ended up with some broken fingers. moderen joysticks have a much less forcefull implimentations of this, but it askes this, what if the game crashes?

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  130. Hacks by pyro17 · · Score: 1

    I cant wait for the 'hacks' to amp up the power for an even more 'realistic' experience. oh and usb powered tazers would be fun too. The possibilitys are endless. Cant wait to read the disclaimer on this thing though.

  131. Better for message boards or chatrooms by GopherDylan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are a lot of stupid people out there that I'd love to shock via the Internet.

  132. "Shocking Tanks" by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

    Do a google for "Shocking Tanks", and you'll see one of the best presents you can get for someone (including yourself!).

    I don't have a link handy, but I got one for my brother from the Johnson Smith company. He and I were laughing our assess off while shocking one another (it's amazing the shock you get, when you consider relatively low power from regular ol' batteries!).

    I highly reccomend it! But heed the warning: Not for those with pacemakers! That would be a bad thing.

  133. Ow! by steve_vmwx · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me but I'd prefer pain from a hot chick in leather with a whip...

    It is just me? OK. Sorry...

    Stevo the Devo

    --
    Forget the truth. Science is fact.
  134. link missing by binarybum · · Score: 1

    it's probably a pretty obvious reference, but I still think that the submitter should have hyperlinked shooting people is fun

    ******************

    additionally, the article concludes with "we can put in smells and vibrations" what kind of smells?

    --
    ôó
  135. Done before by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

    A year or two ago I recall a posting here on slashdot where someone had modified an XBOX (or maybe PS2) controller to give a shock when the vibration motors were activate. It basically routed high voltage from a cattle prod type device when the motors were activated. I think it was done by someone at the late/great TechTV.

    1. Re:Done before by Sylven_1969 · · Score: 1

      If you can find any information on this on the net let me know I'd love to read more about this insane idea!

      Thanks,
      Jay

      --
      Jay Dale "If you're not living on the edge then you're taking up too much space!"
  136. Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  137. Ring ring! by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

    Ring ring!

    ps. ewww.

  138. But, it could be like Paint ball by cbreaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Paint balls hurt when they hit you. They can leave a pretty sizable welt if they hit you on a hard spot like the wrist.

    So, you REALLY try not to get hit. It's exciting!

    If there were a concequence to being shot in an FPS besides a two minute wait until the next round, it would make you think twice about rushing or doing something stupid, and develop more tactics. There would probably be more camping (not necessarily a bad thing if the level is designed well) and it would force you to overcome those camps with better tactics.

    Of course, I wouldn't want it to be as painful as a damned stun gun.

    But, in the end it wouldn't work because you have no way to be sure there's a device attached to every person playing the game over the internet. This only works if there's full participation (you know, like SPF.)

    In a LAN game it could be a blast though.

    If something like this came to the mass market, I'd expect it to be some weak vibrating belt thing, not an electric jolt.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:But, it could be like Paint ball by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      This won't catch on in typical FPSes. It might in "ultra-realistic" FPSes, specifically, the ones where the normal behavior for the player is to avoid being hit. The bullet-avoiding bit already has to be in the game mechanics for this to work appropriately - otherwise, this is just pointlessly painful. In many "unrealistic" games, people expect to be scarred a bit, and you may not even get anything done unless you get hit. Would you go rocket-jumping with this thing? I guess not...

      Personally, I wouldn't use this device anyway, but if I would, I would use it in Operation Flashpoint - a slow-paced game, quite realistic, and you really have to keep your eyes open to avoid getting shot. I sure wouldn't use this in Urban Terror, even - it's "realistic", but too fast-paced. I sure as hell wouldn't use it in Metroid Prime (the boss fights were pain without this thing's help, thank you very much).

    2. Re:But, it could be like Paint ball by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      What's typical now a days? There's always been Quake and UT, but there's a whole bunch of more realistic games - Tactical Ops (a bit old now a days,) Counter Strike, Army Ops, the Tom Clancy games, etc. These are the games that would more appropriately be used with such a device, not the grueling fast-paced deathmatch games of UT and Quake.

      I used to be in a TacOps game clan, and it was a blast. We did a ladder, and there were some damned good teams up there. We started at the bottom and worked our way up with planning and strategies. We weren't the best players, although we were certainly not bad, but the time we put into practice more then made up for it. It was the best time I ever had playing an online video game. If we all had to wear a shock belt, it would have been even better!

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    3. Re:But, it could be like Paint ball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paint balls hurt when they hit you. They can leave a pretty sizable welt if they hit you on a hard spot like the wrist.
      So, you REALLY try not to get hit. It's exciting!


      Better are simunitions - like paint balls except they're solid balls of pink soap fired from regular weapons. They really hurt wherever they hit you so you REALLY REALLY try not to get hit.

    4. Re:But, it could be like Paint ball by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      Had a thing like this on sega that supposedly made you feel the game, like in MK the hits and what not. What it turned out to be was a sub you strapped onto yourself, quite disappointing.

  139. Done Before: Tekken Torture Tournament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Torture" feed has been done before. Here's Tekken Torture where small cam's track the health bars of each player on screen. When a bar goes down, the matching human player gets an electric shock.

    Link:
    http://www.c-level.cc/tekken1.html

  140. eek by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    I also hope there's some sort of built-in safety in case the thing starts to zap you repeatedly. (Deadly endless loop, anyone?)

    Kind of reminds me of the time I had my headphones plugged in and Counter-Strike crashed on a bomb explosion, repeating the extremely loud BOOM about 5 times before I reached up to pull the headphones off, inadvertently pulled on the mouse cord wrapped around the volume knob, and twisted it to full volume, deading my hearing for about 24 hours.

    If you don't have any idea what it's like to try to sleep with a phone constantly ringing in your skull, I would suggest sticking to speakers for the rest of your gaming life.

    And I would also suggest that you look at gaming accessories other than ones that are purposely designed to give you pain.

    1. Re:eek by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      I prefer to use headphones at LAN and stuff. At home I use my 5.1 setup. But a good thing would be to check if your mouse cord is wrapped around the volume knob before you play. (How'd you manage to do that anyway?)

      --
      Error: No error occurred
    2. Re:eek by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      well, I had spilt pop earlier and that might have had something to do with it cause I was in a tight space (I use them at LAN parties too), and the mouse cord went around the back of the monitor and had a loop that got caught on the speaker (where my headphones were plugged in). The mouse practically falls off the table when I shook, and I go to catch it and instead knock it backwards, well, the loop is now against the speaker knob and since the other end is dangling from the back, I damn near lose my hearing. My blood curled, it was horrific.

  141. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by Jerf · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You know, I've wanted to say this for a while, but this is one of the worst I've seen by far.

    The whole point of that joke is that "in America", it's done the other way around by transposing the words. So... "In America, real bullets use games"?

    Not funny.

    (Yes, I know, it's a cliche. But correct usage is so not a cliche that I still laugh when I see it. Which is about once every three months.)

  142. Give me Porn by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 0

    When they come out with Porn with these things let me know.;)

  143. It's an attempt by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To put a real fighting spirit into our PlayStation Generation. And it has a good point. If you get hurt, you can't just cry and take your ball and go home. That can get you and your squad killed. Getting hurt and wounded... that doesn't mean the fight is over. That just means the fight is on! That you have to fight harder, and smarter. Training like this is a good thing. - Former Instructor at the Infantry Training Center at Ft. Benning Georgia.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  144. Long-term effects repeated shocking? by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    Are there any detrimental side-effects to being shocked repeatedly? Obviously, I'm talking about ignoring any heart conditions. I could see that being a problem for people who like to play a LOT.

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  145. Loss of voluntary muscle control by Mal-2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well as you noticed, it does make you cramp up. If you were standing, it was probably difficult to stay that way. Had you been walking or running, the sudden jolt would almost certainly make you lose your balance, which makes it quite difficult to attack someone. That is the point -- not to stun someone, but to forcibly remove their conscious control over major skeletal muscles. This only needs to take place for a few seconds in most circumstances, allowing time to surround the tas-ee and (once the juice is off) pin him down. This isn't to say that the pain doesn't play a role in it, it's quite useful as an intimidation tactic. But the real point is to stop what someone is doing without the high risk of fatal injury that comes from firearms (even with beanbags and the like).

    Another aspect is that there is no scatter, there is no projectile penetration, and there is no risk of shooting the neighbor or wife through the wall accidentally. If firing into a crowded space, or even into a fistfight, you wanna make sure you hit just your target (but if you miss and hit someone else, you don't have to zap them).

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Loss of voluntary muscle control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer flashbang grenades. just lob 30 of them in to an angry mob and they start dispersing fast.

      if they dont the cs gas and then the bz gas is used.

      finally I prefer the 8 gague shotgun shell with the tennisball on the end of it. that sucker will take down any moron.... now if they could make it pump action so I can fire more than one in a row easily.

  146. Re:yay! by Mahou · · Score: 1

    actually from TFA- In a promotional video on VirTra's website, a TV reporter trying out the simulator yells: "Hey, shooting people is fun." many people have said that but i think he's talking about the quote from the article? perhpas? maybe?

    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  147. who decides the pain threshold ? by krayfx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) who decides how much pain is enough for most people ?
    2) how conclusive is the study of pain for different persons, its all in the mind anyways, or the way one is brought up for pain perception.
    3) cant someone be killed over a massive multiplayer network game? (people have hacked sims massively and some disease is also supposed to be spereading, so what stops people from hacking these?)
    4) skynet can start from here ;) - first kill the gamers
    5) what abt shock addiction, new kind of pleasure for gamer junkies.
    6) whats the legal age for gamers to experience such shocks!
    7) what about disabled persons.
    8) will the game creators include a fineprint that they arent responsible for any damages such as heart attacks, paralysis... and other possibilities mentioned in the forum.

    ... random thoughts.

  148. Can I play? by M4N14C · · Score: 1

    Where can I sign up to play this. This could be the next addon to Counter-Strike.

  149. That was the case for me by Phil+Urich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As in, the big worry was heart fibrillation. I held on to a computer monitor as it was plugged in (the case was off), and recieved a couple tens of thousands of volts . . . burnt my thumb really had where I was holding it. I swore quite a bit, punched a locker (this was at school during a spare), walked down to the office . . . and then passed out, probably psychosomatic more than anythig else (though all that shaking does take it out of you).

    I woke up a minute later on the office floor (oddly enough, I didn't "pass out" in a classical sense, I just had all my senses slowly fade until I was essentially unconscious simply because I had no awareness of any stimuli---very disconcerting, to say the least). After that I was taken in an ambulance to the hospital, though I was quite fine. I spent quite awhile tring to explain to a doctor how this had happened, he was baffled as to how I had burnt myself so badly off of wall current. "No, no, monitors have capacitors and..." but he wasn't getting it. It was a wasted couple of hours, but at least I got to join the very exclusive club of "people that had left our school in an ambulance", and I got a pretty unique story out of it.

    It did mean that we never got that computer into the locker, though. Oh well, it probably just would've electrocuted the entire bank of lockers. On second thought, damn, that would've been interesting . . .

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    1. Re:That was the case for me by TheMMaster · · Score: 1

      I actually 'passed out' in exactly the same way once, when I was about 10 or 11 or something (I think) and I lost my last 'training tooth' or whatever it's called in English. I removed it myself and when it was out, I just fell over. I could hear, and feel everything, I just couldn't move... very, very spooky.

      I just wanted to share that :)

      --
      Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity
    2. Re:That was the case for me by confused.brit · · Score: 1

      Milk tooth is the usual term here in the uk Now, why doesn't /. have a timer so i know when the 20 secs is up?

      --
      Sigs are for wimps
    3. Re:That was the case for me by Splintax · · Score: 1

      We call them baby teeth, at least here in Australia.. ;-)

  150. it shoots back!! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    BSOD would take on a whole different meaning if the thing crashed while it was shooting ya ;)

  151. Gives new meaning to BSOD by carlmenezes · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh yeah...and in the near future on Windows update :

    ***user plays game, gets addicted to it and goes to anonymous website to download a new map*** ..some time later...

    "Windows had downloaded a security patch that will prevent a third party from gaining access to your computer and shocking you repeatedly. Click OK to update Windows."

    ***user clicks OK***

    The following dialog pops up on screen:

    "SUCKA! W1nD0z3 1s 4 n00bZ! I 0wn yoo n0w! Choose your hairstyle : Popcorn or Spikes"

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  152. how retarted. by asscroft · · Score: 1

    It's one thing to die a hundred times trying to get to the next level, but to get shocked so bad that you fall down a hundred times?

    yeah, no long term affects there.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  153. The RIAA vs the MPAA by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    ... provided the RIAA gets to shock you on a per megabyte basis - negative conditioning.

    The RIAA would never agree to per-megabyte shocking.

    Because if you did it per-meg instead of per-file, then the MPAA would get to have all the fun; RIAA would feel left out.

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
  154. OMG It would work! by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    Because the release would double the number of high-end games available for Linux, so it would get a lot of downloads.

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
  155. GyneSim 0.1Alpha by RandySC · · Score: 1

    As long as we are talking about virtual reality gaming, P O R N!

    I am sure there are some funny bugs that would be reported from buggy alpha porn software.

    Ahh, I caught a bug from my computer.

    --
    Organization: alphabetical, sometimes numerical or messy
  156. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (sigh)

    Ignorant Western barbarian...

    There are no tentacles in Hentai games.

    A hentai game is just a dating sim with "money shots."

  157. Yeah great idea by Kaorimoch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thats the last thing I want. Work all day slaving for your boss and then you come home for a break, to relax and then your computer shocks you. This must be the real circle of life, constant pain.

    Better make sure Immersion doesn't have a patent on this one Sony.

  158. Electric shocks to gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple invented this tech in the early eighties. That's why "Infinite Loop" has such a bad sound to it. It got even worse when Marathon came out.

  159. Misinformed about electricity by Fringex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Being shocked through the hips cannot cause heart problems of any sort. Electricity has to path through your heart in order to mess up the natural rythem of the heart. More importantly stun guns operate on a super high voltage with extremely low current. It isn't voltage that can cause fibrilation but current. The number of electrons passing through a single point in one second. So over all tissue damage will be minimal, it is the force of these limited amounts of electrons that causes the red marks commonly found on stun gun victims. The tissue damage commonly resulted from electrical shock is due to the bodies resistance. The best example is to compare the body to a light bulb. With enough current, it heats up causing tissue damage. You literally cook. That is why defibrilation units cause skin to smoke and hair to burn because the amount of electricity forced through the heart is the same as is required to light a 60 watt bulb. Make no mistake, no heart problems can result due to this means of training.

  160. Forget... by jon855 · · Score: 0

    Laser Tags, now the new generation Taser Tags, featuring high voltage shocks to take down your enemies and the best of all, it's fun, cheap, once in a life time experience...

    --
    May /. rule the /.ing realm
  161. RTFA by syousef · · Score: 1

    Actually its a quote from the article itself. I didn't just make it up. RTFA.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:RTFA by binarybum · · Score: 1

      err, I did, hence the second part of my reply.

      I could have said that I wished the author of the article hyperlinked it (it was after all a reporter saying it, I'm sure one savvy enough to be playing on the general Mattis story), but I guess I hold /.ers to a higher standard.

      --
      ôó
  162. Even Earlier in "The Avengers" by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Informative

    The James Bond movie simply copied the same set-up from an earlier episode of the TV show The Avengers called "Dead Man's Treasure" where Emma Peel drove a race car simulator hooked up to deliver an electric shock to the driver when a mistake was made. Similarly shocking was another episode called "The Danger Makers" from the previous year where she had to walk along a see-saw holding looped wands around electrified tracks like you sometimes see on a smaller scale at carnival games.

  163. but... by torrents · · Score: 1

    does it have a defibrillator mode for when it tops someone's heart?

    --
    Get your torrents...
  164. Your favorite language sucks :) by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's hardly a fair statement... Think too much? C'mon, it's written in C...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Your favorite language sucks :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Someone could've ported it to Brainfuck, LISP or Perl if they really wanted to be evil.

    2. Re:Your favorite language sucks :) by Jicksta · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, every orangutan's favorite programming language, Ook!.

  165. Was that a... by mogalpha · · Score: 1

    Stargate SG-1 reference? 8x06-Avatar I think was the episode. A chair that "shot back" at the user. /me is a Stargate fan, and may just be seeing Stargate references everywhere though.

  166. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    Eh, if you leave yourself open to a nut shot, you deserve it...

    Of course, I cheat at paintball and, being tall, shoot OVER most obstacles.

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  167. Painstation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is not as oldschool as the james bond (never say die? can't remember exactly which one) world domination game but it still IS painful.

    http://www.painstation.de/

  168. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, and I had to burn my mod points on random crap yesterday because they were about to expire...

  169. addendum :) by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    ****user clicks popcorn***

    next question...

    "y00 wan+ bu++er w1d dat? 1t d03s w0nd3rs 4 ur f4t 4$$. +1me30u+ 1n 10 s3cs..."

    ***rest is censored***

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  170. Put my couple hundred bucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the Aussies.

    Right-o!

  171. Painstation by Rentar · · Score: 1

    Sounds a bit like the painstation. I've had the chance to play with that thing once and it is kind of fun ... for 5 minutes at last.

  172. D-Day by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    So how many L33T clans wanna play on the D-Day map now? :)

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  173. Camers Everywhere by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The REAl problem with this will be that every player will suddenly see the inherent happyness of Camping, and nobody but those with this feature hacked to stay off will ever take a step into challenged territory.

    The REAL advantage is that maybe people will finally learn that getting shot hurts like crapass.

    *lol*

    Yeah, right.. like gamers could learn.

  174. So what do they call this thing? by tezza · · Score: 1

    The VirTra Damocles ??

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  175. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you take "So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them." out of context? The guy is talking about deriving pleasure from killing a human being. I used to think we locked people like that up and dosed them on some serious drugs, but it looks like we've been giving them jobs in the armed forces all along.

  176. painstation by remmelt · · Score: 1

    a couple of years ago i saw this in an electronic art fair. they had pictures of people who played it too long, hands with sores etc. etc.
    it's basically pong, with added pain when you lose a ball. they have pain from heat, a sort of whip and shock. as the game progresses, the pain gets worse.
    i did not try it out. you may call me a whimp, but i do not enjoy pain so much...

    looks like they have a version 2 out!
    painstation

  177. Awsome..... by C0d1ngM0nk3y · · Score: 1

    "Feel the power of the dark side!" /shoots out force lightening and fries anoying american kid playing Starwars Jedi Knight II.

  178. Welcome overclockers! by mlock · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the stupid people telling one another "I've upgraded mine to 100V" "And mine is at 400V!".

    Wait a bit, then read the newspapers for further information ...

  179. On Killing by SkiifGeek · · Score: 1

    On Killing by LTCOL Dave Grossman covers this, along with other aspects of killing other humans, including the effect of killing at range and much more. Well worth a read.

  180. AA | Hips by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    /Clicks AmericasArmy icon a little more slowly....

    Notice the charge goes through the hips to avoid the heart. Hope it doesn't choose testicles as the shortest path.

  181. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by Gumph · · Score: 1

    tch, REAL men retract their wedding tackle back into their bodies - ninja stylee!

    --
    'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
  182. Re:Ouch by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

    Is is called Painstation: http://www.painstation.de/

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  183. here is the patch by Krunch · · Score: 1

    --- shockmal.c.orig 2005-04-04 13:30:44.311341544 +0200
    +++ shockmal.c.new 2005-04-04 13:31:03.324451112 +0200
    @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@

    /* lets increase the dosage every time we shock */

    - for (magnitude = 10; magnitude != 0; magnitude *= 2){
    + for (magnitude = 10;; magnitude *= 2){
    if (!(status = shock(magnitude))) return EXIT_FAILURE;
    sleep(1);
    if ((status = unshock())) return EXIT_FAILURE;

    --
    No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    1. Re:here is the patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I spotted a different one:

      His _unshock() has a movw whereas the shock uses movl - so if you're shocking at 0x12345 then the shock will remain on at 0x10000 when you _unshock().

  184. James Bond by Ash+and+Flame · · Score: 1

    I believe I've seen this in a James Bond flick once. I'm sure someone amongst you knows what I'm referring to.

    --

    ----
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    1. Re:James Bond by PeanutGallery · · Score: 1

      Yeah, where they had the 3d pingpong table lookn' thing... I think these chumps are going through a crate of old VHS tapes and patenting anything that looks neat.

      FROM: USPTO
      SUBJECT: RE: Cool New Patent
      MESSAGE: Congradulations! Your sumbission 329-4y598345-89345937-4985, "method and apparatus for averting AI takeover of missile defese systems by having the computer play tic-tac-toe against itself" has been accepted. How do you guys do it?

      Signed,
      -Technically illiterate gov't official.

      --
      -- Just another unsolicited opinion... from the Peanut Gallery.
  185. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are no tentacles in Hentai games. A hentai game is just a dating sim with "money shots."

    You call this a "dating sim with money shots"?!

    (Link probably not safe for work; definitely not safe for anyone with a concept of "good taste")

  186. Sean Connery by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    >>> Sean Connery came back..and looked a little to old for the part.
    >>> (No offense man! You were the best Bond ever!)
    > Um, do you seriously think Sean Connery is a /. reader?
    > Or that he cares what you think of him? ha hahaha

    Well, yesh and yesh, but I post under an aliash, you inshenshitive clod.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  187. QA? by estoll · · Score: 1

    I would hate to be a tester for this game.

    --
    http://www.askthevoid.com
  188. intresting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This presents intresting opportunities for a virus when it comes to the PC> I must get coding. Anyone have an API?

  189. if reality counts... by circusboy · · Score: 1

    the game would give you the shock, tag you, and then never let you play again.

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  190. What happens when you have a high ping... by ScottSCY · · Score: 1

    Your connection is bad. You starting playing online. You wake up in a coma.

  191. New meaning to Dual Shock... by jzarling · · Score: 1

    If was to be adapted to a consumer product I doubt that it would be more than a form of "rumble" pads. Get hit it, rumbles your butt.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  192. Hmn... conserning poeples safety by neo2k.dk · · Score: 0

    It's nice for use in the military, but should definetely not be forced of at least they should be undergoing a test to see if they are fit for that sort of things. I believe that this would hit normal gamers at a certain point and that would possibly be the reason of many accidents... I hope that strict laws will be applied, otherwise this could be lethal to people with weak heart or pacemaker.

    In short, not good because this could do serious harm to the body, even small shocks.

    --
    neo2k
    1. Re:Hmn... conserning poeples safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no kidding genius. Bet it took you a long time to come up with that one. Is your brain tired now? Will it be "out" for the next couple of years?

    2. Re:Hmn... conserning poeples safety by neo2k.dk · · Score: 0

      Just trying to start the debate, so debate or get lost!

      --
      neo2k
  193. You know when... by http101 · · Score: 1

    ...your system crashes during a game, it tends to get stuck in a loop where it plays the last sound over and over and over and over... just think about when this puppy is plugged in... zap, zap, zap, zap, zap, zap...

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  194. I protest... by airship · · Score: 1

    Once again, I protest the inclusion of a standard Slashdot joke in the parent post. What are we supposed to do to amuse ourselves if parent posters continue to include "in Soviet Russia" and "I, for one, welcome..." jokes in their posts?
    This practice must stop immediately, or I will be forced to abandon /. and lurk on some board where I can continue to post "1.,2.,3.???,4.Profit!" and other such clever responses to my heart's content.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  195. Playstation? by Dasch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many playstation games have built-in support of dual shock (the controller shakes when you're shot, blown apart, etc. etc.), maybe that signal could be used to trigger the stun gun instead?

    Oh wait, dual shock is patented...

    Nevermind.

  196. Already available... by technomancer68 · · Score: 1

    Something like this has been available for quite some time.. just not for the PC.. all you need is an XBox, a spare controller, and a little time. http://www.xbox-modchips.com/tutorials/xshok.htm Basically instead of rumbling, the controller sends out a small electric shock. Basically the same thing for those sadistic enough to want to try.

    --

    The Technomancer
    "Men of lofty genius when they are doing the least work are most active."-
  197. You're all revolting! by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

    ...of this, I'm positive.

    --
    Huh?
  198. Possible sterility by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... large electric shocks through the hips, possible going through the testicular region... I think we have our new gamer population control system! Only the 133t (and those bright enough to avoid these devices) will breed.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Possible sterility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's been touched on elsewhere here - we with testicles are fairly immune because they're well away from the path of the current. But what about girl soldiers? Is it still safe for them?

  199. Re: America's Army by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    So that's what honor 25 does to you?

    In AA, "elite" really just means "lucky with good aim". I stopped playing the game as soon as I got Counter Strike Source. CS is just as realistic (i.e. just as unrealistic) and has voice comms. AA without voice comms is silly. Typing = death and so nobody coordinates an attack, EVER.

    Also, I got sick of some ass jumping in front of MY line of fire, and ME losing honor for ROE. At least in CS the "victim" can forgive for friendly fire incidents if it was really their fault. In AA it's ALWAYS your fault no matter what.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  200. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why a linux version? Would anyone be able to use it? ...

    Why not, it's supposed to be cross-platform. Linux guys can use it to have sex with Mac and Amiga girls, or something like that...

  201. Suicide Booth? Nah! Pleasure Booth! by Striikerr · · Score: 1

    I think someone would modify it to activate some sore of vibrator, placed strategically so that when he is shot, he gets some pleasure. You'll be able to recognize these guys in-game. They'll be running around in front of players with chain guns screaming shoot me!!!!.

  202. this is old news by lineman60 · · Score: 0
    back when tech tv was still(some what at least) worth watching they had a dark tip about how to mod your own.

    http://www.g4tv.com/screensavers/features/44543/Da rk_Tip_Build_an_Xshok_Controller.html/

  203. Re:yay! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    sigh. The english comprehension on slashdot has really gone down.

    shoot(v): to strike with a missile especially from a bow or gun

    kill(v): to deprive of life

    if you actually red the rest , he compares it to punching a guy in a bar because he is abusing a lady.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  204. Re:Ouch by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    You didn't get the joke ;)

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  205. Bring it on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natural selection will take care of the rest.

  206. Never happen by SamSim · · Score: 1

    This'll never happen. You can't get money from dead people.

  207. Bash by Tyrion+Moath · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody linked to the #2 post on bash.org. The similarities are surprising.

  208. Solution to heart problems: by �berhund · · Score: 1
    How many law suits would this cause based on unknown heart conditions?
    Perhaps it could double as a defibrillator.
    --
    -Uberhund
  209. In the hand-to-hand version... by GeorgeHernandez · · Score: 1

    ...they have an accessory that kicks you in the balls.

  210. .sig by Morosoph · · Score: 1

    Get Perpendicular needs to be a link, I tell ya!

  211. MM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic at worst. Not Flamebait.