Just like Coca-Cola introduced the "New Coke" in the 80s simply to draw attention to their brand, meanwhile planning all along to reintroduce "Coke Classic"... which eventually became the only Coke available. (Though I'm still not sure if the switch from cane sugar to corn syrup had anything to do with it.)
That's a myth: http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/newcoke.asp
New Coke was not introduced as a ploy to draw attention to their brand, with the intention of reintroducing Coke Classic. It was in fact a failure, from which Coke recovered brilliantly.
A minor point, but we don't actually assume that 1+1=2.
We can prove it.
We do assume some things, though, just not that.
Google for "ordinal arithmetic" and "Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms", if you're interested.
Slashdot Mirror
possibly the worst +5 modded comment I've ever seen.
That's a myth: http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/newcoke.asp New Coke was not introduced as a ploy to draw attention to their brand, with the intention of reintroducing Coke Classic. It was in fact a failure, from which Coke recovered brilliantly.
A minor point, but we don't actually assume that 1+1=2.
We can prove it.
We do assume some things, though, just not that.
Google for "ordinal arithmetic" and "Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms", if you're interested.
obviously, the circle is on a cone.
Wow! TI calculators can graph complex functions? Cool. I wonder how they portray four real dimensions.