Slashdot Mirror


Would You Drink This Water?

theodp writes "NEWater looks like any other glacier-clear bottled H20. Except, reports Salon, it gushes from the toilets of Singapore instead of a bubbling spring. NEWater is the product of Singapore's new water-treatment system, and it's wastewater that's been purified through advanced synthetic membranes called ZeeWeed, which could help 20% of the world's population that doesn't have easy access to clean water."

583 comments

  1. Alternative link to Salon by erick99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try this FREE article from the Syney Morning Herald. or pay Salon to read it (or Salon will allow you to sit through a commercial and then you get a free one day pass).

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Alternative link to Salon by erick99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the article linked directly from google news without requiring registering but if you go again from my link, above, you will be presented with a registration screen. Sorry.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    2. Re:Alternative link to Salon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      user: infowantstobefree
      pass: pass

    3. Re:Alternative link to Salon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I clicked it, its not a shock site. It shows a login screen.

    4. Re:Alternative link to Salon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks

    5. Re:Alternative link to Salon by Cognitive+Dissident · · Score: 1

      That's because many sites (including Salon.com and the New York Times) give free access to otherwise paid-access articles if the Referer: header is http://news.google.com/

      If you have a proxy which can tamper with headers -- *cough*Proxomitron*cough* you can read this and many other articles on many different sites without the registration hassles by forcing your Referer: to be http://news.google.com/ all the time.

  2. Let's get pissed!! by MarsBar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmm. Brit joke only, methinks.

    1. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, it works in Canada too. Here, "pissed" means drunk or angry. If Joe's pissed, you might want to ask him to buy the next round. If Joe's pissed at you, you might want to avoid him.

    2. Re:Let's get pissed!! by TAGmclaren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While the UK is lucky in that it always rains (you can afford to make jokes about it!), Australia isn't so. We're effectively a desert continent with green patches around the outside. Water is a very scarce resource here, and right now, most of our major cities have water restrictions on them (can't wash cars, can't water except during restricted hours, can't hose down paved areas).

      How do we solve this? Well, one Australian state is doing what the Singaporeans are doing - they're recycling the water. But a number of other Australian states are afraid to follow the lead of Victoria and South Australia, simply on the "yuk" factor of recycled water.

      The problem is that if something isn't done soon for the rest of us - we're going to be turning the taps on, but nothing will be coming out.

      The importance of water recycling can't be overstated. It can help avoid dams (which just kill the environment); because the water that is used just keeps going round in a virtually endless cycle. Rivers can start running free again. We won't be held captive to the rain gods.

      So, next time you're about to make a joke about water recycling, spare a thought for those of us not living in the British Isles, with its endless wet season ;)

      -- james

      --
      Iran has endorsed
    3. Re:Let's get pissed!! by aslate · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently we get the "wrong type of rain" (as opposed to the wrong types of snow and sunshine that our rail companies use as excuses), which results in it not feeding into the reservoirs or something and eventually ends up with us getting hosepipe bans in the Summer. So no, we don't get enough [of the right type of] rain!

    4. Re:Let's get pissed!! by jrumney · · Score: 5, Interesting
      While the UK is lucky in that it always rains (you can afford to make jokes about it!), Australia isn't so. We're effectively a desert continent with green patches around the outside. Water is a very scarce resource here, and right now, most of our major cities have water restrictions on them (can't wash cars, can't water except during restricted hours, can't hose down paved areas).

      London's rainfall, at around 600mm/year is about half of what Sydney's is, and the same as Melbourne. Don't be fooled by your preconceived ideas (my preconceptions would have picked Melbourne as rainier than Sydney if I hadn't just looked that up).

    5. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Random_Goblin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So, next time you're about to make a joke about water recycling, spare a thought for those of us not living in the British Isles, with its endless wet season ;)

      ah you are obviously unaware that most of the rainfall in the UK is "the wrong sort of rain" and due to a victorian water system with cronic lack of maintenance for years, we frequently have extensive hose pipe bans here too...

      Although i will grant you not as bad as the ones down under. They are perhaps a little bit more frustrating considering the relative amounts of rainfall.
    6. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about desalinization? Surely there must be efforts underway in that area.

    7. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But a number of other Australian states are afraid to follow the
      > lead of Victoria and South Australia, simply on the "yuk" factor
      > of recycled water.

      Last time I was in adelaide I remember they had this novel idea for recycling water, just pump the raw sewerage straight back into your taps!

      (for those who haven't been there before, the water hadn't been fit to drink up until the mid 1990s. It may still be. It had to be boiled and filtered before it became near the mild muck of even Sydney's water)

    8. Re:Let's get pissed!! by rufu · · Score: 0

      Actually I remember reading that in London your tap water is likely to have already passed through 12 other people before reaching you. This is because drinking water is drawn from the Thames and waste water is purified (hopefully) before being sent back into the Thames.

    9. Re:Let's get pissed!! by bl4nk · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Australia, but here in Washington State, we use dams for hydro-electricity... having recycled water won't get rid of dams anytime soon.

    10. Re:Let's get pissed!! by jrumney · · Score: 2, Funny
      This is because drinking water is drawn from the Thames

      No, that's just the Budweiser factory in Mortlake.

    11. Re:Let's get pissed!! by JDevers · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've noticed the same preconceptions people have about rain at various places. For instance, most of the southeast US gets at least 50 inches of rain a year (far more around the Gulf coast...), but it is sunny for much of the year. The northwest coast though generally gets much less rain (outside of a very small line right on the coast) but is generally not very sunny. If you were to ask most people though, they would tell you that it is far more "rainy" in Portland, OR (1029 mm or 40.5 inches) than it is in Memphis, TN (1244 mm or 49 inches) or even New Orleans, LA (1574 mm or 62 inches).

      Personally I would have thought that London would have received more rain than Sydney OR Melbourne. To learn that London is actually pretty DRY definitely shatters some preconceptions I had...

    12. Re:Let's get pissed!! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " (which just kill the environment)"

      change, they change the enviroment. Which, btw, is your goal. You want to change it from a dry enviroment to a wetter one.

      "Rivers can start running free again. We won't be held captive to the rain gods."

      nice dream, but evaporation says that won't happen.
      Now, you want to start eveloping better desalination techniques and distribution, your on to something.

      I am not opposed to treated water, as long as the equipment and water is checked regularly.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My mom lives in a costal suburb in Florida and her neighborhood gets its water from reverse osmosis, pulled right from the Gulf of Mexico. Clean, tasty and no need to add salt. My skin is never as soft as when I shower at her house. I understand they're building a huge RO plant in Saudi Arabia, and more in California.

      Might be a solution for Australia and the southwest U.S.

    14. Re:Let's get pissed!! by BigGerman · · Score: 5, Informative

      one thing to keep in mind is how fast those inches come down. For SW states, most of the rain comes during short severe thunderstorms when maybe several inches can fall in an hour. For northwest, they can have the same inches spread across several days of drizzle.

    15. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water, scarce? You're surrounded by it! ;)

    16. Re:Let's get pissed!! by JDevers · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oh, definitely I agree. Especially for the more extreme SE states (I assume you meant SE and not SW, as they don't get much rain at ALL ;). I was just discussing preconceived notions people have. Basically, most people would think it rains far more in the northwest than it really does (except for a small area where it REALLY does rain, over 100 inches a year in some places) because it is overcast there a LOT.

    17. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      they're recycling the water.

      Remember, all water is recycled. (Ok, not counting the occasional few grams of ice from space.) The only question is the process.

      Right now, around here it's usually my toilet - sewage treatment - Back River - ocean - evaporation - rain - Prettyboy Reservoir - water treatment - 100% recycled water at my kitchen sink. This just compresses a few steps, taking some of the load off of our spaceship's main recycling system.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    18. Re:Let's get pissed!! by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Actually the joke is a pun on the word pissed which in the UK is a slang word for getting drunk. You may now get off your high horse.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    19. Re:Let's get pissed!! by tidge · · Score: 1

      that depends on what you mean by "rainy".
      I know, as you have stated, that Memphis has more rain overall the Portland. But I would bet that Portland has more days, or hours of rain than Memphis does. ...or maybe I'm just bitter because the constant drizzle has started in Portland and we probably won't see the sun again until May.

    20. Re:Let's get pissed!! by linzeal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We may not get as much rain in the Northwest in some places but we have fog which is another water resource that collects on trees and what not and ends in the watertable. The gaseous form of water deposits 10's of inches of rain here every season.

    21. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data of interest is not the annual rainfall, but the frequency of rainfall. While in London it rains a little most of the time, in Sydney it doesn't rain most of the time then they get a deluge for a short period.

      In the end the problem comes to the same thing as electricity/energy: storage.

    22. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Jameth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a major distinction between being rainy and getting a lot of rainfall. Rainy applies no matter how much is actually coming down and can extend for days without much water actually coming down. However, actually rainfall is an exact matter that can come down over a very short period of time.

    23. Re:Let's get pissed!! by pgrb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It has been calculated that London water has passed through an average of seven sets of kidneys before it is drunk, because of the development of water distribution and sewerage systems on the Thames both in London and upstream of London.

      So Singapore isn't first.

      Essentially, someone in Reading drinks a glass of water, and processes it naturally. The sewage outfall disperses the (treated) wastewater into the Thames, where it is re-abstracted further downstream (say Maidenhead) and the cycle goes round again. Eventually the water gets to London.

      Obviously, not all the glassful will have been through someone elses kidneys, as the Thames isn't dry between water abstraction points and sewage outfalls, but the principle applies.

      If you want to drink water that doesn't have at least some quantity that has gone through somebody (or something) else's kidneys, drink melted deep Greenlandic (or Antarctic) glacier ice, or water from (very) old aquifers.

      Every breath you take has some air molecules in common with Julius Caesar's last breath (bar pathological exceptions). You probably drink some of his natural liquid output every time you drink as well. Ain't life wonderful!

      --
      This line intentionally left..uh..blank?
    24. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Andr0s · · Score: 1

      I would venture a speculation here... perhaps the exact volume of rain isn't the only factor in the amount of water rain contributes to useable water pool. One would imagine that, with Sydney or Melbourne being warmer and sunnier than London (no, I didn't bother to check avg. temperatures and sunny days/year, I'm speculating), higher percentage of water (both rain and other) ends up evaporating instead of draining into the ground to contribute to the useable water pool?

      --
      '...computers in the future may have only 1000 vacuum tubes and perhaps weigh 1.5 tons...' Popular Mechanics, 03/49'
    25. Re:Let's get pissed!! by bluprint · · Score: 1

      I think when most people talk about "how much it rains", they are really discussing "# of rainy days", instead of water supply. So, in terms of the weather (what should I wear today?), it does rain more in Portland (I assume...maybe that's yet another misconception). If you are a water-expert or something, then yes, you might be more interested to know that the *amount* of rain fall in the SE is greater, but that doesn't represent most people.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    26. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't send them water, send them luggage! Tell them to move to where the water is. We have deserts in the US too; we just don't live in them!

      George Carlin rules :-)

    27. Re:Let's get pissed!! by sharekk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      London's rainfall, at around 600mm/year is about half of what Sydney's is, and the same as Melbourne. Don't be fooled by your preconceived ideas (my preconceptions would have picked Melbourne as rainier than Sydney if I hadn't just looked that up).

      Look at a map of Australia. Maybe http://www.theodora.com/maps/australia_map.html. Then notice that Sydney and Melbourne are around the outside. Then read the grandparent who says "We're effectively a desert continent with green patches around the outside."

      So the parent did good research but only on the rainfall bit not on the location bit (which is just as important) making his comparisons irrelevant.

    28. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the aim isn't to make the environment wetter, it's to provide drinking water to people in cities. if that can be accomplished without changing the environment, it should be embraced.

      also, if you recycle a large portion of your water, you don't need to rely on rainfall. it just keeps going round in a big endless loop.

    29. Re:Let's get pissed!! by nolife · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not about the amount of rain people have the perception of, it is the percentage of time or the amount of days it is raining. A thunderstorm pattern consistant with the mid west and east coast summers can drop several inches of rain in an hour and then turn sunny and hot again. In Portland, it can rain for a week straight before that accumulation occurs. Most people have issues if it is raining in general, not how much is failing in a certain time.

      Portland
      Rainy days per year: 122
      Total rain per year: 36 in

      Memphis
      Rainy days per year: 89.7
      Total rain per year: 52.1 in

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    30. Re:Let's get pissed!! by iceperson · · Score: 1

      I think most people refer to the number of times it rains when talking about how rainy a place is. The last big rain we had produced up to 5 inches of rain in one day which was more than we had in the previous 2+ months combined. I would say a place that had 20 times as many days with rainfall is more rainy even if it produced less precipitation.

    31. Re:Let's get pissed!! by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      Australia isn't so. We're effectively a desert continent with green patches around the outside.
      The importance of water recycling can't be overstated.


      Is it not possible to purify seawater? Simple distillation would seem sufficient. Given that, I don't exactly see the advantage to recycling wastewater.

    32. Re:Let's get pissed!! by aj50 · · Score: 1

      London is one of the driest places in the UK, some places in north-west scotland get around 2000mm per year, the notable thing about rainfall in the UK is that is is (realaively) constant and regular throughout the year, all year, every year.

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    33. Re:Let's get pissed!! by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      The weather in Florida is just annoying wishy-washy. It rains almost every day for a while, then 5 minutes later it's sunny and the ground dries quickly. It really bugged me when I was there a couple of week ago.

      In Pittsburgh, when it rains it has the integrity to stay cloudy and keep raining for weeks on end.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    34. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the process is not really any different than it is in nature.

      Take dirty water. Run it through a variety of sedimentation and filter stages. Run it through UV, Ozone and Chlorination stages. Let it sit outside for awhile in a lake to let the finest stuff fall out, as well as be exposed to oxygen and the best UV source in the world.

      To be all goofy about it, while holding a bottle of Dasani or your local "bottled water" is a high point of hypocrisy.

      A nice, low-tech way to sterilize water in arid areas is to fill plastic bottles with filtered (run it through a sand bed first) water, and put the filled bottles on the roof of your house. They will get hot enough to cook most bacteria, and the UV light (it's not blocked by the plastic used for most soda bottles nowdays) breaks down most of the remaining viruses and bad organic compounds.

      If you have arsenic-laced water, get a big barrel or two, fill it with nails, screws, whatever small bits of steel or iron scrap, and add that to your filtering stage as well. This just showed up on-line this week, so you should be able to find references to it in Google News.

      You still need the dams and lakes. Besides, in a desert area, WTF do you care about the rivers blocked by the dams? Are there fisheries up/down stream that would be affected? Would the net changes, perhaps benefitting some migratory birds, not also be a good thing?

      You need some way to bank the water, and it probably needs to spend a few months outside anyways before going back into the potable water system again. Maybe pumping it back into the aquifers might work as well.

      Except now you don't have to worry about fish, deer/sheep and birds shitting in your fresh water supply first (assuming you have surface reservoirs as part of your water supply system, instead of pumping it out of the ground).

    35. Re:Let's get pissed!! by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The key words were: most of our major cities. Your comparison of the desert areas of Australia to major metropolitan areas is what is irrelevant.

    36. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one thing to get an inch of rain in an hour or two, compared to having it spread out over 24 hours a day, for 2 weeks in a row.

      Personally, I find the Pacific Northwet no cloudier than Chicago...

      But, yes, I'd rather take 20degF and clear over 35-40degF, rainy and windy all winter long, if I had to be outside all the time, but the plus here in the PNW is everything stays green through the winter, including the grass.

      Keep your head, hands and feet warm and dry, and chances are you will feel that way too, even if the rest of you isn't.

    37. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Asprin · · Score: 1


      Do you know if either this filtration system or the Australian one removes salt? If it does, you could just run sea water through this thing just as easy as sewer water. You 've got plenty of that around somewhere and it should minimize the yuck factor, shouldn't it?

      Obligatory W.C. Fields:
      "Water? Never touch the stuff. Fish function in it."

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    38. Re:Let's get pissed!! by jrumney · · Score: 1
      I think most people refer to the number of times it rains when talking about how rainy a place is.

      You might be surprised at how little difference there is between Sydney and London there as well.

      Sydney: 1200mm rainfall spread over 138 days.
      London: 600mm rainfall spread over 145 days.

    39. Re:Let's get pissed!! by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      Steam distillation uses a LOT of energy, since you're basically boiling water. The only real way it could be cost effective is if it's coupled with power generation. Boil seawater to make steam, Steam turns turbine, then is cooled as distilled water. The only place this is done I can think of where this is done is nuclear submarines.

      Only problem is having your power plant pass FDA/USDA/? approval for production of foodstuffs.

      There are other ways using membranes/osmosis and evaporation.

      --
      - Sig
    40. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another thing to keep in mind is that the qualification of a desert is an area where more water evaporates in a given time frame than was precipitated. So just because a place like sydney gets more water than london doesn't mean it's dryer, it's hotter on average in sydney, therefore one could expect more evaporation. Also, humidity will play into it in that high levels of humidity will inhibit evaporation.

    41. Re:Let's get pissed!! by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      I lived in Memphis for a short while. It did not rain often but when it did rain it was usually a storm. All the water ran off into the muddy river nearby and was gone.

    42. Re:Let's get pissed!! by ripsnorta · · Score: 1
      I agree. This is something we should have been doing, or at least looking at doing, in Australia for years. Unfortunately, the cost of building desalination plants causes the government to stick its collective head in the sand. They only want cheap solutions that bring in short term political payoffs.

      Unfortunately, sometimes the actions with greater longer term benefits cost more to do. And nobody wants to pay that cost.

      --

      Hollywood: The place good stories go to die.

    43. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      My first though on reading this was...

      They're taking the piss, right?

    44. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Drogo+Knotwise · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting how much of this evaporates. A lot more water is going to evaporate from a reservoir in Sydney, where it gets hot, than will evaporate from a reservoir in London. That's why Sydney spends much of its summer with water restrictions, while London doesn't.

    45. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      My first thought on reading this was...

      They're taking the piss!

      Then I read a bit further and realized they were bottling it and selling it too!!

    46. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Malc · · Score: 1

      For those of us who grew up in more rural environments (Buckinghamshire in my case), we don't have the hills riddled with Victorian plumbing. Our acquifers (sp?) were often very low anyway leading to a four year hose-pipe ban a few years back (maybe quite a few as I emmigrated away a decade ago ;)

    47. Re:Let's get pissed!! by johndeeregator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This water can't possibly be worse than the dreck I drink from my kitchen sink in DC every day. I don't know what coliform is, but according to the notice I got last week, there's an unacceptable level of it in my pipes.

    48. Re:Let's get pissed!! by UrgleHoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to drink water that doesn't have at least some quantity that has gone through somebody (or something) else's kidneys, drink melted deep Greenlandic (or Antarctic) glacier ice...

      People have his image of glaciers being clean and pure, but thats just not the case. Glaciers aren't all that clean. They're full of dirt and debris and every once in a while, an eons old corpse comes to the surface.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    49. Re:Let's get pissed!! by bani · · Score: 1

      at the very least theyre sprinkled with a light coating of cometary and other space debris.

    50. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Culture · · Score: 1

      This cracked me up after I had made several trips to "wet" seattle, washington from the "desert" of houston, texas. It averages 3-5 inches a month in houston, year round. I have seen one day of rain in three, two weeks trips to washington. Folks, if you have never been to houston, it is a swamp that is only slightly dried than a tropical rain forest.

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    51. Re:Let's get pissed!! by falsified · · Score: 1
      I thought this was a common thing to do. I know that in my former hometown (Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA), the city gets the water from Lake Michigan and purifies it. We also sanitized and purified our liquid waste and dumped that into Lake Michigan. I think that the story is that they're bottling it and selling it BECAUSE it's cleaned piss.

      Social psychology aside, there's nothing wrong from drinking urine, even in its natural form. There is a joint disorder that can make itself apparent via high amounts of uric acid in the bloodstream, but oddly enough, there isn't much evidence showing that drinking urine causes this problem. I know that a former prime minister of India drank his own urine daily and lived to be about 100.

      I think I'll stick to diet and exercise though.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    52. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maidenhead? Is that like Hymietown?

    53. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      Yeah, you don't really need to boil it to separate off the water. You can make a black polythene tunnel (really the black doesn't matter, but it absorbs heat better) over a large tray with gutters at the sides. Put dirty or salty water in the tray in the middle, and arrange the water to drip off the tent into the gutters. The water will evaporate, condense on the polythene and drip into the gutters where it can be collected.


      This works well, even without much real sunlight.

    54. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The large cities in South Africa all recycle their water - they just don't advertise it...

    55. Re:Let's get pissed!! by lashi · · Score: 1
      >Personally I would have thought that London would have received more rain than Sydney OR Melbourne. To learn that London is actually pretty DRY definitely shatters some preconceptions I had...

      London rains a lot, especially in the fall. But it's very very light rain. If you walk around in the rain, you can barely feel it. I lived in London for 2 years and I can only remember pouring rain maybe 3 or 4 times there. I didn't buy an umbrella the whole time I was there. So counting inches of rain makes it seems like London is fairly dry but it's not.

      Of course, the rain falls on the London streets and make everything very muddy because the streets there are always dirty and dusty. The water in London coming out of the faucet is supposed to be safe but very undrinkable.

      On the other hand, when I travelled to Devon on the UK westcoast. I drunk water out of the faucet that was pure and sweet. Better than bottled water in North America. This old lady at a b & b I stayed at joked that water there has only been drunken once while water in London has run through many people.

    56. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "For instance, most of the southeast US gets at least 50 inches of rain a year (far more around the Gulf coast...), but it is sunny for much of the year."

      That's because we get all our rain at once, from storms that have names (Charlie, Frances, Ivan, Ivan again, Jeanne...)

    57. Re:Let's get pissed!! by lashi · · Score: 1
      >Every breath you take has some air molecules in common with Julius Caesar's last breath (bar pathological exceptions). You probably drink some of his natural liquid output every time you drink as well. Ain't life wonderful!

      "what? You mean every body is made up of every body else?" (disc world paraphrase)

    58. Re:Let's get pissed!! by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the joke (which I can't remember exactly)

      A guy on his death bed asks a friend to pour a bottle of scotch on his grave after he dies. After the funeral, the caretaker finds the friend pissing on the grave and asks what the hell he's doing. The friend says, "His last request... he didn't say I couldn't pass the scotch through my kidneys."

    59. Re:Let's get pissed!! by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    60. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      For SW states, most of the rain comes during short severe thunderstorms when maybe several inches can fall in an hour. For northwest, they can have the same inches spread across several days of drizzle.

      There's also the issue of absorption. Dry, baked clay for soil is terrible for soaking up water quickly. Water accumulates on the surface, resulting in a flash flood. When arid regions get a heavy rainfall, watch out! There's also no plant root system to hold the soil together.

      Other

    61. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Summer is the "dry" season in western Washington, in that you can expect to see the sun, and that it may go a week or more without rain.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    62. Re:Let's get pissed!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It has been calculated that London water has passed through an average of seven sets of kidneys before it is drunk, because of the development of water distribution and sewerage systems on the Thames both in London and upstream of London."

      Hmm...I think I'll stick to beer. At least on the last leg of the trip...it went through yeast first...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    63. Re:Let's get pissed!! by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Considering the recent research regarding
      pharmacutical medications that are excreted
      and then chemically modified in the "purification"
      process and turns into potential cancer-producing
      byproducts, my answer is: Absolutely NOT!

    64. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      "coliform" is fecal coliform bacteria. The bacteria themselves are harmless, but the fecal coliform count is a good indication of if the water is contaminated with sewage.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    65. Re:Let's get pissed!! by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Every breath you take has some air molecules in common with Julius Caesar's last breath (bar pathological exceptions). You probably drink some of his natural liquid output every time you drink as well. Ain't life wonderful!

      Gee, I feel so much better now I know that I've DRUNK CAESAR'S PISS.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    66. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      Recycling water is kind of a joke in the fact that it is already recycled, many times over.

      Water doesn't leave the earth, it doesn't just "magically" disappear. It gets reworked into the earth through a very complex process with stages so simple, it gets taught in the third grade here in the states. I imagine you already know this, as public education standards here in the states blow ass in comparison to the rest of the world.

      I would spend less time promoting a natural process and perhaps more concentrating on the quality of the synthetic process in comparison to earth's. Realistically, the next time you have a glass of water, realize that at some point it's very likely that it was urine, regardless of the invention of this process. I'll take the earth's filtration any day over something man made.

      Personally, I blame overpopulation, especially in parts of the world that weren't really ideal to house humans, and modern plumbing (and the cost of it) doesn't help much. But it's kind of hard to fault anyone for getting their freak on.

    67. Re:Let's get pissed!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you not surrounded by 360 degrees of wonderful seawater? Start boiling morans!

    68. Re:Let's get pissed!! by dwayrynen · · Score: 1

      Gotta love Phoenix:

      The normal annual rainfall at Sky Harbor International Airport is 8.29 inches :-)

    69. Re:Let's get pissed!! by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in New Orleans, you get that rain in 3 days from Ivan.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  3. Holy reusable resources batman! by CoolVibe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Even though it sounds distasteful, it's recycling done right.

    I'd drink the water.

    1. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd drink the water.

      Ewwww, it seems you're already on Zee Weed.

    2. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by nocomment · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno, just the thought of where it came from. The name is appropriate because I would have to be "zmoking ze weed" to drink that.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    3. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by cybersaga · · Score: 0

      I'd drink it to. Think of it this way: it'll give your immune system something to do. After all, practice makes perfect!

    4. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Even though it sounds distasteful, it's recycling done right. /i.

      Basically all drinking water is recycled from toilets to some degree.

      It still seems ooky.

    5. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      I would drink it too. With some of the modern filtration methods available, you can achieve water so pure that it acts as a very good insulator rather than conducting any electircal current.

      Between distillation, ion exchange, activated carbon, chemical treatments, reverse osmosis, microfiltration, ion collecting, and UV radiation, you can take the scummiest water and clean it up to near perfection.

      I have made pure water in a college lab where the pH would drop as soon as it was exposed to the air from dissolving CO2.

    6. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. This is biological feedback, connecting human waste to human intake - you'd better be very sure that you are removing pathogens. If you fail to remove sufficient pathogen, ie leaving than the minimum number for infection, you will select those that are more virulent, infect with a lower number of organisms and shed in greater numbers. This undermines all public health policy since John Snow.

      2. State of the art recycling systems have trouble with known pathogens. One is Cryptosporidium which just last year was found to be widespread in US reclaimed water output (Rose et al). Minimum innoculum required is 10 organisms, perhaps as few as 1 organism, especially in immunocompromised subjects. Cryptosporidium was responsible for several deaths in Chicago a few years back.

      3. We have no monitoring in place for the health of the general population. Threshold to an epidemic to be recognized is pretty high, people have to start dying in quite significant numbers before the CDC or equivalent takes notice.

      4. Historically contamination of the water supply leads to a slow economic decline in a society, not a precipitous crisis. Its so slow you don't even notice. This seems to be how early societies that failed to protect their drinking water disappeared and why wells have walls around them - to prevent runoff contamination from sources of human waste.

    7. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      You and my dog.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    8. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "I'd drink the water."

      Its Singapore; if you don't, if people don't then it will just be mandated by law if necessary. And then people will.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    9. Re:Holy reusable resources batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking the toilette water?

      Well, I guess if it were part of the water system and it came out of my tap I'd be glad that it was there rather than air or dust.

      But pay special for a bottle of it? Man, here in the USA I think it's wierd enough that people are willing to pay $1.25 for just some freakin water. Then to be like "Holy shit! This water came from toilettes in Singapore! Where's my wallet?!" Really, if you want a selling point "We pulled all the shit out of this water with some sweet ass filters!" (heh) is perhaps not the advertising gimmick that I would most quickly succumb to.

  4. Whooaa by savagedome · · Score: 4, Funny

    it gushes from the toilets of Singapore instead of a bubbling spring

    That is DISGUSTING. I don't think I will be drinking any water today. And thanks for adding 'gushing'.

    1. Re:Whooaa by Enigma_Man · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All the water you've ever drank has been:
      Shat in
      Peed in
      Had babies made in
      Had things died in

      So... don't get so squeamish now :D

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    2. Re:Whooaa by frankthechicken · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're right, and after what I've heard today, I certainly won't be drinking any more rain water either.

      Have you heard where it originally came from?

      Disgusting.

    3. Re:Whooaa by daniil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps i should remind you that the milk you're drinking right now gushed out of a cow.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    4. Re:Whooaa by arose · · Score: 1

      The problem with rainwater isn't where it comes from, but the atmosphere it comes trough.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:Whooaa by aonifer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not mine. I burn hydrogen to get my water. No one's messing with my precious bodily fluids.

    6. Re:Whooaa by dan+g · · Score: 1

      "Why do we drink cow's milk? Who was the first guy who first looked at a cow
      and said 'I think I'll drink whatever comes out of these things when I squeeze
      em!'?" -- Calvin

    7. Re:Whooaa by Temporal · · Score: 1

      In fact, statistically, the chances are nearly 100% that any glass of water you drink contains molecules that were part of Ceasar's last piss. (Or, for that matter, any piss of any human ever, provided enough time has passed for that piss to be distributed equally around the world.)

    8. Re:Whooaa by daniil · · Score: 1

      According to Rudyard Kipling, it was a very wise woman.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    9. Re:Whooaa by sk8king · · Score: 1

      And people used to make fun of me when I said that there was water in a glass of water that had once been in the body of Christ [sorry, just a historical example...could have been anyone famous from 2000 years ago].

      I was then subsequently teased about my 'recycled Jesus' water. Oh, how kids...I mean people in their mid-20's, can be so cruel.

    10. Re:Whooaa by devilsadvoc8 · · Score: 1

      No offense, but I doubt you have any stats to back that up. I agree with the concept though, that water since the beginning of time has intermixed throughout the globe from a variety of sources. The 100% bit is taking it too far.

      --
      B O R I N G
    11. Re:Whooaa by pla · · Score: 1

      Not mine. I burn hydrogen to get my water. No one's messing with my precious bodily fluids.

      Ah, not any better. You could just as well prove that in any given glass of "newly made" H2O, you have a few million hydrogen molecules that once gave Hitler the winds...

      You just can't escape the "bio" part of living in a biosphere.

    12. Re:Whooaa by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      have you ever been on a dairy farm?

      if there are any cats around, you can often see some of them walking up to cows' dripping teats and licking the milk.

      I'd think humans weren't the first to think about drinking it.

    13. Re:Whooaa by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      As an exercise for the student:

      calculate the probability that a molecule of water drank by Christ was also drank by Hitler. Produce a formula for the same, given any two people and the time between when they lived.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    14. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the fact the milk is bad for you http://www.notmilk.com/. I've stopped drinking it because factory farms have taken over. I've curtailed eating beef and pork because of factory farms and switched over to lamb. I still eat beef and pork, but try to get Nimam Ranch http://www.nimanranch.com/ now. I buy cheese that originate from Europe, since USian products are much more likely to have Monsanto's grubby hands in the works. What a horrible state of affairs that allowed Corporations to take over government!

    15. Re:Whooaa by david.given · · Score: 1
      Not mine. I burn hydrogen to get my water. No one's messing with my precious bodily fluids.

      You do realise that the oxygen you're burning it with is actually nuclear waste produced in giant, orbiting fusion reactors?

    16. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this being slashdot.. I'd say your milk came from Linus'...

      oh wait!

    17. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I import my hydrogen from Jupiter.

    18. Re:Whooaa by devilsadvoc8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even distribution is a big assumption. You assume that each molecule has an equal chance of being anywhere else in the world given enough time. That is not so. Given infinite time, yes, but we only have a couple thousand years give or take a couple hundred depending on which Caeser you refer to with certain distance, weather, and local problems. Again, I do not argue with the possibility, I argue with the 100% part which would only occur with the lifting of certain restrictions to the dispersion of the water molecules AND infinte time (in the absense of a water molecule dispersion model).

      --
      B O R I N G
    19. Re:Whooaa by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      Too true, in fact, here in the California, the water districts are required to give out water quality charts to the residents once a year. Take a look at the levels of "Coloform Bacteria". Check out the "safe" limits. Where does that come from eh?!?!? We are drinking shit now!

      If the "newater" levels are the same or lower than what we currrently drink, then what is all the fuss about?

      Here, there are currently annoying political ads slamming a certain candidate because they dare to even support research in this area. The closed mindedness of the human race is hard to be believed at times.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    20. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget, fish f-ck in water...guess thats where the extra protien comes in...(no pun intended)

    21. Re:Whooaa by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I get mine from mining comets.

    22. Re:Whooaa by Technician · · Score: 1

      I burn hydrogen to get my water.

      Wow. My new fuel cell car won't even have a tailpipe. Just a water storage jug.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    23. Re:Whooaa by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 1

      ...from an udder mashed in the cow's own feces several hours a day.

      --
      Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    24. Re:Whooaa by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be more interesting if one of the people was Kevin Bacon.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    25. Re:Whooaa by daniil · · Score: 1

      ...and you drink it out of a bottle (or a carton) that you just opened with the same fingers that you just used for scratching your crotch...

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    26. Re:Whooaa by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Nice Dr. Strangelove reference!

      From Doctor Strangelove:

      General Jack D. Ripper: You know when fluoridation first began?
      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: I-- no, no. I don't, Jack.
      General Jack D. Ripper: Nineteen hundred and forty-six. Nineteen forty-six, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.
      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    27. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your water was belong to my pee

    28. Re:Whooaa by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Hah, I hope you don't get your hydrogen by reducing it from methane :)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    29. Re:Whooaa by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      YOu think that's air you're breathing?

      Hm.

      AGAIN!

    30. Re:Whooaa by DarkHand · · Score: 1

      Sounds good except I don't know anyone that pees 10 times a day :P

    31. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, milk is really really bad for you. That's why you see calfs falling over dead all the time.

      Wonder how babies survive on breast milk which contains even more evil fat and proteins.

      Friggin' morons.

    32. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually most likely not. Modern dairy facilities are much cleaner than you imagine. For one, the udders are washed before the milking machine is attached. Second, the stalls are cleaned very regularly.

      Thirdly, cows eat grass and grain. Cows digest it and poop out what is essentially wet nutrition free grass with some bacteria in it. Now its the bacteria we need to be worried about isn't it? Well oddly enough some famous guy Louis Pasteur invented a process by which milk is sterilized without destroying its flavor. This is why people dont die from drinking milk anymore...but did you know they actually used to die from it?

      Oh and just for your knowledge, a cows udders don't hang down low enough to drag in the poop anyway.

    33. Re:Whooaa by Uncle_Destroy · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that the gushing milk contains 1-2 percent pus. Mmmm, time for milk and cookies.

    34. Re:Whooaa by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well... the trouble is, that distribution problem would greatly decrease the likelyhood of a "glass" of water in the middle of the Indian ocean - or really, any specific out-of-the-way ocean - from containing as much... and increase the likelyhood of anyone anywhere in Europe getting more. Unless there has been enough time to disperse it, in which case we're back to square one.

      But I sure as @#&@ don't want to do the maths.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    35. Re:Whooaa by dagur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wohoo! That means we actually drink some of jesus in the church wine!

    36. Re:Whooaa by Temporal · · Score: 1

      Based on deego's math, it doesn't look like the probability is so close to 100%, though it is high. 2000 years should be enough for even distribution.

      My assumption that it was very near 100% was based on an example problem in my highschool stats textbook, which showed that the probability that any breath you take contains molecules from Ceasar's last breath is, in fact, very close to 100%. Like, 99.999999% or something. Looking at the numbers again, though, it looks like the expected number of shared molecules between any two breaths -- given time for complete diffusion in between -- is only 1. So maybe I'm remembering wrong. The chance is still well over 50%, though.

    37. Re:Whooaa by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      At least it didn't gush out of a bull...

    38. Re:Whooaa by Derkec · · Score: 1

      Glad to someone else caught the reference. That was a thing of beauty.

    39. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... which comes to around O(10)

      That's not what big-Oh notation means. It describes asymptotic dependency on one or more variables. It doesn't mean "about". O(1) is the same as O(10) is the same as O(10^50); it simply means "constant".

      If a person lives 50 years (10^4 days) and pees 10 times a day, he peed 10^28 molecules. The number of people that have ever lives is 80 billion: 10^11, making it 10^39 molecules (M).

      If each one had never been peed before. In fact, the amount of water is roughly constant, and some have been peed 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ..., big-number times.

    40. Re:Whooaa by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm pretty sure Jesus kept kosher ;)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    41. Re:Whooaa by casuist99 · · Score: 1

      Can't argue with your book, diffusion in sparse fluids like our atmosphere can indeed occur quite rapidly even for large volumes of gas. Thousands of years should be plenty of time. It's diffusion in a denser fluid such as water that I'd worry about. True that ocean currents, etc, could circulate molecules in addition to the diffusion you'd otherwise only see, but I think equating the "wavy-hand" math for air to a model in water is a bit of a stretch.

    42. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the overlap from Caesar's pee, as I live on a different continent.

    43. Re:Whooaa by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      It's those Damned commies trying to pollute our essence. P.O.E.!!

    44. Re:Whooaa by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      I think you're making an unsupportable assumption here.

    45. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! It's not milk I'm drinking and it sure didn't gush out of a cow... *slurp*.. ugh.. on second thought, maybe it did. damn.

    46. Re:Whooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad there is no evidence of Jesus ever living. Gospels written well after anyone with him would have died from old age don't count and the later Gospels that have the most delails about his life including his childhood are almost word for word copies of the earlier gospels.

    47. Re:Whooaa by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      But normally no-one goes out of their way to point it out while I am drinking a glass of water ;)

    48. Re:Whooaa by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, I Imagine cows were the first to "think" of it, and man being the observant, inventive sort, saw that, sampled it, and began to cultivate it. Just like grass, or apples, or goats.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    49. Re:Whooaa by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Ever see a sitting bull, or cow?? They don't USUALLY sit in cowpies, but if they are penned as many dairy cattle are, then they may sit where they stand and stand in the place where they defecate.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  5. If it's good enough for the astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Then it's still kinda disgusting.

  6. I live in Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No

  7. mmmm... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    sweet, sweet singapore toilet water.
    ahhhhh....

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  8. Overblown toilet FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most water we drink today have been recycled from sever/toilet treatment plants anyway. This is nothing more than nonsensical urban FUD.

    1. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by erick99 · · Score: 1
      Good point. And, here is what the water goes through before it is available for drinking:

      Effluent is collected and pumped into three "factories" where it is forced through two sets of tube-like membranes. Holes about a millionth of a metre wide in the membranes trap particles, bacteria, protozoa and even viruses. In a second treatment stage, called reverse osmosis, the water is pushed under pressure back through another membrane. Bacteria and viruses that survive the first two processes are then killed by a burst of ultraviolet light. The bulk of the treated water is piped to industry.

      I would drink it. I wouldn't linger too long on where it came from, but I would drink it.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    2. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. Even your other precious bottled water is basically filtered tap water. Just because the bottle says "state of the art HydRO-7 purification system" doesn't mean that it isn't recycled right out of the urinary tracts of your neighbors.

    3. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sever/toilet treatment plants

      Does it run a shit operating system?

    4. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

      Well, too bad I posted to this discussion, because the phrase "Overblown toilet FUD" is the funniest fucking thing I have heard in ages. +5 funny.

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    5. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that all the water on the planet is recycled. There's roughly the same amount of water now as there was when the planet was formed. Like famine, poverty, etc., water shortages are caused by mismanagement on our part. We can pipe gas and oil thousands of miles across the continents. It should be trivial to do the same with water from wet flooded areas to the drier places. We could harvest the rain water that falls on the oceans(natures great de-salinator(sp)).

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by goeldi · · Score: 1
      Most water we drink today have been recycled

      No, ALL the water we drink today has been recycled. We piss in the toilet, it gushes into a river, streams down to the sea, goes up to some clouds, and reappears as filtered, clean rain.

    7. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by Jubal+Kessler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Semantics, please. Most water we drink today comes directly from wells and reservoirs, not sewage treatment plants.

      Sewage treatment plants pipe the processed water back into various bodies of water, which through the act of evaporation, precipitation, etc. end up back in our reservoirs.

    8. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by jackbird · · Score: 1
      And the water in those wells and reservoirs got there how? Any animal pee in there? Mammoth pee? Dinosaur pee? Stromatolite pee?

      The way people talk about water, you'd think it was mixed from hydrogen and oxygen shortly before coming out of the tap...

    9. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ditto!

      Now mod me up as insightful you garcia suckassing dipshits.

    10. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you knew what he was talking about you would be confused as to why he wasn't modded up to +5.

      He's referring to Aquafina bottled water which claims on the label that its "HydRO-7" purification system consistently removes substances most other bottled waters leave in.

      But see, since no one has a clue on Slashdot anymore he suffers at a measly +3.

    11. Re:Overblown toilet FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And suffer he does. It's a friday, and all his AIM buddies must be offline, and he's unable to tell people what to mod up.

      Poor Garcia!

  9. Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morning by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

    An H2O molecule is an H2O molecule, is an H2O molecule. If the water is truly purified (A chemical/spectral/whatever analysis can find that out) it really doesn't matter. Should I remind people that the water they drink is pumped from rivers, lakes, and wells where animals (submarine and above ground) piss in it all the time? With a well, nature filters it out using the soil. Other methods require us to perform filtering to clean the water and remove any pollutants we added.

    I'm not even going to go into closed system water recycling... :-)

    In other news, does the name mean "NEW Water" or "Any Water"? Both names seem somehow appropriate. Perhaps it was an intentional double-pun?

  10. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it's good enough for the dog...

    1. Re:Why not? by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      My cat does that too...

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    2. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it watch you pee? Appearently when I do it, it's the equivalent of must see tv.

  11. ZeeWeed by murderlegendre · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is pretty much what one would have to be smoking, before one might consider drinking water from an Asian toilet.

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
  12. Given that most/all the water on the planet... by aborchers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... has been circulating for years and was likely piss at one time or another anyway, who cares what the filtration system is (ZeeWeed or natural aquifer) so long as one verifies the output is clean water.

    I think it was Tom Robbins who postulated that life was invented by water as a means of transporting itself from one place to another?

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    1. Re:Given that most/all the water on the planet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This the same tim robbins that found freedom via a sewer pipe?

    2. Re:Given that most/all the water on the planet... by aborchers · · Score: 1

      *Tom* Robbins and there's no connection.

      Nice political troll, though, twit...

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
  13. RO Water by ljyang · · Score: 1

    I'll stick to Reverse Osmosis for my filtering needs.

  14. Wow, how new by Confused · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, how new the information that water is being purified and then reused. Water treatment plants have been doing that for the past century and most of it is redistributed as drinking water.

    Probably it was the c0o1 name of the weed to merit a story here.

    1. Re:Wow, how new by dkellis · · Score: 1
      And in this specific case, NEWater has been around for what, a year?

      This isn't news, this is olds.

      (I'm Singaporean, incidentally. And yes, I have drunk NEWater before, and it's exactly the same as any other water. I have no idea why they wanted to "brand" it.)

      --
      !sig
  15. okay... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    You lost me at gushes.....

  16. Water is always recycled naturally by Xpilot · · Score: 1

    But we don't get squeamish about drinking, say, rainwater, when some of it may have evaporated from rivers of sewage. I guess there's a psychological stigma to water recycled artificially, since we *know* where it came from.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  17. you gotta drink by carrett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if these people don't have access to clean water, i think they'll trust the cleaning method and go for this. the only reason they would have for not accepting it would be if they were rich enough to buy clean water from a more reliable/comforting source (like, one with water that hasn't been in a toilet). either way, people need water right?

    --
    I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
  18. Possible by Aimak · · Score: 0

    Well, if you take away all the shit and poisonous substances and microorganisms, what you get? Plain water.

  19. I don't drink water... by Suhas · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....fish fuck in it

    1. Re:I don't drink water... by forgetmenot · · Score: 4, Funny

      They don't even do that... the female deposits her eggs and the male... nevermind.

    2. Re:I don't drink water... by rbrander · · Score: 1

      Hey, dude, you should give W.C. Fields the credit on that joke.

    3. Re:I don't drink water... by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't mind I took the liberty of fertilizing your caviar.

    4. Re:I don't drink water... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Fry: "Well, it turned out I loved her, but I wasn't in love with her."

    5. Re:I don't drink water... by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't she be the other kind of mermaid with the fish part on the top and the lady part on the bottom!?!?!?

      --
      -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
  20. Reminds me of this... by thirteenVA · · Score: 4, Informative

    This company plastered incredibly funny billboards all over northeastern pennsylvania to gauge what kind of marketing buzz they'd get from the idea of recycled water.

    1. Re:Reminds me of this... by The+Queen · · Score: 1

      They had it down here in Virginia, too. They got a bad write-up in the local paper (FUD mostly) so the billboards went away as quickly as they had come...

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    2. Re:Reminds me of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's interesting is their color scheme. Piss yellow and green. I'm surprised they got much positive reaction. Even though I might normally consider the product, knowing full well it's recycled (even recycled toliet water) the color scheme alone turns my stomach.

      Then again, maybe that's why it was popular, some people get a kick out of causing shock and awe in others.

    3. Re:Reminds me of this... by thirteenVA · · Score: 2, Informative

      The color scheme is intentional. The billboards would say things like "We're number 1 not number 2" and "People are excited to meet us but won't shake our hands".

      The original website also had a toilet flushing noise play when you first opened it.

  21. Funny how... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... when I read this writeup, my eyes skimmed over to the "Will the Red Sox Win the World Series" poll and I saw all those "no" options.

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    1. Re:Funny how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa?! What side of the bed did you wake up on?

    2. Re:Funny how... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to be offtopic or inflammitory at all, I was trying to be funny and point out that I thought all the "no" options would fit this article well if it were a poll.... Sorry if people misunderstood :-P

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  22. mmm Tasty by mzkhadir · · Score: 1

    You might be thinking mmm Tasty, but what about the people of singapore.

  23. Salon article - sans ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. More info in case of slashdot'ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    NEWater is Reverse Osmosis Water
    NEWater is the product from a multiple barrier water reclamation process. The first barrier is the conventional wastewater treatment process whereby the used water is treated to globally recognised standards in the Water Reclamation Plants.

    The second barrier is the first stage of the NEWater production process known as Microfiltration (MF). In this process, the treated used water is passed through membranes to filter out and retained on the membrane surface suspended solids, colloidal particles, disease-causing bacteria, some viruses and protozoan cysts. The filtered water that goes through the membrane contains only dissolved salts and organic molecules.

    The third barrier or the second stage of the NEWater production process is known as Reverse Osmosis (RO). In RO, a semi-permeable membrane is used. The semi-permeable membrane has very small pores which only allow very small molecules like water molecules to pass through. Consequently, undesirable contaminants such as bacteria, viruses, heavy metals, nitrate, chloride, sulphate, disinfection by-products, aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides etc, cannot pass through the membrane. Hence, NEWater is RO water and is free from viruses and bacteria and contains very low levels of salts and organic matters.

    At this stage, the water is already of a high grade water quality. The fourth barrier or third stage of the NEWater production process really acts as a further safety back-up to the RO. In this stage, ultraviolet or UV disinfection is used to ensure that all organisms are inactivated and the purity of the product water guaranteed.

    With the addition of some alkaline chemicals to restore the acid-alkali or pH balance, the NEWater is now ready to be piped off to its wide range of applications.

    In fact, RO is a widely recognized and established technology which has been used extensively in many other areas. This includes the production of bottled drinking water and production of ultra-clean water for the wafer fabrication and electronics industry. RO is also becoming increasingly popular as one of the technologies used in desalination of seawater for human consumption. It is also used to recycle used water to drinking water on space shuttles and on International Space Stations.

    1. Re:More info in case of slashdot'ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use RO on my tap water. I haven't tried peeing in my RO unit. Mostly because it needs a lot of pressure to work, and the pressure comes from the tap. I could get a pressurizing pump, but I'm not sure if it's worth the cost just to taste my own purified urine.

  25. er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They already have this on the market. Its called Dasani.

    _
    windows cursors

    1. Re:er... by micromoog · · Score: 1

      Speaking of, take a look at the label next time you're drinking Coca-Cola-brand Dasani. It contains freakin' salt.

    2. Re:er... by hazee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, and DaSani was laughed out of the UK because it turned out that it was actually less safe than the tap-water it was made from. The "purification" processs unwittingly added carcinogenic processes (the ozone they treated with the water turned the bromine they added into the carcinogenic bromate). And to think that people were prepared to pay for that crap...

    3. Re:er... by JQuick · · Score: 1

      They add both NaCl (regular table salt) and other salts. They do so for flavor.

      In Great Britain a while back they also added bromine for flavor, and treated it by bubbling ozone through it. Just as water with larger dissolved O2 in it tastes fresher, ozone imparts a similar flavor.

      The problem is that bromine (which is harmless at moderate levels) become bromate when it reacts with ozone.

      Bromate is a stong carcinogen.

      Basically Coca-Cola, was pumping water from the Thames, filtering it, and adding carcinogens for flavor!

      Dasani was recalled temporarily.

      Teach the world to sing my ass!

      In the USA the bottled water phenomenon saddens me. On average the quality, purity, and safety of tap water is higher than most bottled water. How did people get conned into spending more for water in many cases than for milk or gasoline? Are they really that F'ing stupid?

    4. Re:er... by badmonkey · · Score: 1

      Another think I don't understand is why you have to pay a deposit (5 cents) for a bottle of soda or beer, but all these water bottles have no deposit? Seems to me that the deposit is there to encourage recycling, so why shouldn't it be applied to water as well?

    5. Re:er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they really that F'ing stupid?

      More like brainwahsed. Americans are driven by money and consumerism. The average American judges how much fun they've had by how much money they've spent. To them, anything they have to pay for must be better than free stuff. A lot of this comes from marketing and advertisement, Americans are bombarded constanly by advertisements that have one goal in mind: buy buy buy.

    6. Re:er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why prostitution does so well though there is plenty of "free" around. Free as in beer, not open source to Geeks.:)

    7. Re:er... by waterguy · · Score: 1

      Being in the water treatment business, I drink bottled water only when travelling, for convenience. Water from the tap (in developed countries, anyway) is more highly regulated, better tested, and generally of better quality than bottled water. Bottled water does not receive the scrutiny that your tap water does.

  26. Caught the typo by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 4, Funny
    advanced synthetic membranes called ZeeWeed

    That's spelled WeeWeed.

    1. Re:Caught the typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      advanced synthetic membranes called ZeeWeed

      That's spelled WeeWeed.


      Maybe PeeWeed is more appropriate?

    2. Re:Caught the typo by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 1

      There's a port-a-potty company in this area called "Oui Oui".

    3. Re:Caught the typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, mayhaps, "WeePeed"?

  27. NASA by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

    I'm sure NASA has looked into using this for providing drinking water to astronauts on extended stays in space. I think it's been suggested that this method could be used on the 9 month flight to Mars. That makes me wonder, where does the ISS get its' water from?

    1. Re:NASA by wes33 · · Score: 1

      already state of the art recycling system see for example here.

  28. Don't drink the water by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

    Don't drink the water
    Don't drink the water
    There's blood in the water
    Don't drink the water

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
    1. Re:Don't drink the water by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot, I really needed to think of bloody diarrhea just before lunch... :-/

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  29. Oh, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, also, germs can't survive on a cold porcelain toilet, so let's all just eat our dinner off the shitter. It's perfectly safe!

  30. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by savagedome · · Score: 2, Funny

    An H2O molecule is an H2O molecule, is an H2O molecule

    The next time your beer tastes 'funky' and your roomie is smiling...

  31. If you bottled in correctly, by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    I guarantee that the vain people of the world would purchase it for $3.50

    NEWater, the purity of Singapore's natural springs now availiable to your home or business.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:If you bottled in correctly, by micromoog · · Score: 1

      NEWater is PEOPLE!!

    2. Re:If you bottled in correctly, by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      I guess it would be the same idea as the Monkey Poo coffee beans that are like $600 a kilo.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
  32. Eau de Toilette by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    "NEWater ... it gushes from the toilets of Singapore instead of a bubbling spring.

    New meaning for Eau de Toilette

    NEWater is the product of Singapore's new water-treatment system, and it's wastewater that's been purified through advanced synthetic membranes called ZeeWeed, which could help 20% of the world's population that doesn't have easy access to clean water."

    You see where this is going, right? You find some damn way to purify pee and poop water (along with the odd cigarett butt and chunder) and everyone will have cheap water. And as human nature goes, they'll consume it to the limit, futher putting strain on ZeeWeed and toilets.

    Heck, you'll probably be required to flush your toilet in the event of a national water shortage...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Eau de Toilette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You find some damn way to purify pee and poop water...

      I think you mean dam way.

  33. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, I'd drink it. Certainly wouldn't pay any more for it than standard tap water though.

  34. Newater by xiangpeng · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a Singaporean, I have personally drank Newater during one of our National Day Parades. It was given out to all the spectators of the parade. There ain't much to the taste, if you ask me to put it to a taste, I'll say it taste rather like distilled water.

    Newater is currently pumped back into reserviors from the plants instead of being directly piped for comsumption. It is also currently used industrial purposes in Singapore too.

    Out friendly neighbours Malaysia also had a field day making remarks such as "Singaporeans are resorting to drinking their own pee" and stuff as we had some bilateral issues regarding the sale of water from Malaysia to Singapore. This is one of the reasons why Newater technology is developed in Singapore.

    --
    You must defeat Sheng Long to stand a chance.
    1. Re:Newater by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have personally drank Newater .... There ain't much to the taste ...

      And, if you stop to think about where it comes from, that's a good thing!

    2. Re:Newater by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      IINA biochemist, but i understand that drinking distilled water is detrimental to one's health as water stripped of all its impurities strongly attracts certain minerals and compounds, stripping them from your tissues.

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
    3. Re:Newater by tvjames · · Score: 0

      As a young expat in singapore (from AU) I agree. The whole thing about it is that the singapore government is attempting to keep water prices from going higher as the price to import increases.

      That said i couldnt care less if it flowed through the taps of my HDB ... i boil my drinking water anyway (and given the filtration they use on the "new" water is probably a lot better then just boiling)

      and i probably tastes better then boar water.

      --
      Sig: ...
    4. Re:Newater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also currently used industrial purposes in Singapore too.

      Yes, they are used in FAB plants that produced your chips which are goes into the computer that you are using to view slashdot now.

    5. Re:NEWater by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. It just has a secret ingredient that gives it its unique taste.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    6. Re:Newater by ckulpa · · Score: 1

      I'm wearing a stillsuit, you insensitive clod!!

    7. Re:Newater by csk_1975 · · Score: 1
      As a Singaporean if you drink tap water then you have been drinking "watered down" NEWater since March 2003. Here is the relevent quote from a speech by the then PM of Singapore:-
      We will also use NEWater for domestic purposes. Last year, PUB mounted a public education exercise on NEWater as a source of drinking water. The support far exceeded PUB's expectations. I am told that responding to popular demand, PUB issued 1.5 million bottles of NEWater to the public in a short period of six months. An independent poll by Forbes Research in October 2002 showed an overwhelming level of NEWater acceptance among Singaporeans. 82% indicated that they were prepared to drink it directly, while 16% were prepared to drink it indirectly through mixing with reservoir water.

      As announced by PUB in September last year, we are adopting the indirect approach for NEWater as a source of drinking water. Starting today, we are introducing 2 mgd of NEWater into our reservoirs. This is just under 1% of the amount of water that we consume daily . We will increase the amount progressively to 10 mgd by 2011, about 2.5% of our daily consumption then.
      I have also drunk NEWater - the bottled unadulterated version - it doesn't taste good, its not offensive but its certainly not branch water.
    8. Re:Newater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Out friendly neighbours Malaysia also had a field day making remarks such as "Singaporeans are resorting to drinking their own pee"

      Next time, ask the Malaysians if they use natural fertilizers to grow vegetables. When they say yes, tell them "so you've resorted to eating bullshit."

    9. Re:Newater by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Out friendly neighbours Malaysia also had a field day making remarks such as "Singaporeans are resorting to drinking their own pee"

      Carry around a bottle of apple juice for when the next person makes a comment like that. Be proud and take a swig of the apple juice. Offer them some.

      They'll never bring it up again.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    10. Re:Newater by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      If you stop to think about where it came from, you ain't gonna drink it.

    11. Re:Newater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      IINA biochemist, but i understand that drinking distilled water is detrimental to one's health as water stripped of all its impurities strongly attracts certain minerals and compounds, stripping them from your tissues.

      IINA, but IAMTO (I Am Married To One), and I think you are wrong. Although osmosis does work at cellular level, amount of impurities "normal" water has (compared to distilled water) is insignificant for it to really matter. Minerals your body needs are generally/mostly not from your drinking water, but from food. Thus, you normally pee (and sweat) off NaCL and other minerals (in general all kinds of chemical compouneds).

      In short, there's no measurable effect between drinking 'normal' and distilled water.

    12. Re:Newater by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Shit, missed that.

      Thanks for the pointer, bro, you've now given me an excuse to continue on Mountain Dew.

    13. Re:NEWater by evilviper · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of Soylent Cola...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  35. Water by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Any water consumed, is recycled in some manner. From government owned resevoirs, wastewater treatment plants, etc. What we drink now already has some very nasty stuff (anybody ever been to a solids filtering station at a wastewater treatment plant can appreciate this) filtered out of it, albeit by nature, and not as directly as in this case.

    That being said, what happens when one process or another fails in this NEWater. Would it be catastrophic, ie Hepatitis or something in bottles? In nature, the process is long enough that a failure or two may not matter. With our potable drinking supply, failure can lead to some bad things - but not on nearly the same level as if it was directly processed wastewater.

    I think I'll wait until this has been proven in practice for quite somke time.

    1. Re:Water by dkellis · · Score: 1

      It's been in circulation for about a year or so now.

      --
      !sig
    2. Re:Water by mwlewis · · Score: 1

      I think that's why we put chlorine in the water. There's still lots of living stuff in water that you wouldn't want to drink [while it's still alive, anyway]. There are occaisional failures or problems with water treatment today, and people are told to use bottled/boiled for drinking, cooking, dish washing and sometimes bathing.

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    3. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A study by the Rand Corporation, on areas in Los Angeles, found that there was a statistically significant increase in hepatic cancer in areas where reclaimed waste water reached the source aquifers. That is *far* less "direct" than putting reclaimed water into the domestic supply directly.

      Rand Corporation did some hand-waving and dismissed the adverse findings in their conclusion then published their report directly rather than using peer review that would have identified their false analytical methodology.

      So its been proven unsafe.

      Now, would you dink it? Everyday?

    4. Re:Water by anethema · · Score: 1

      Yes but hopefully NUwater filtering is better than filtering for your tap water.

      If you think tap water is good try running some electricity through it (hint: water does NOT conduct electricity)

      Or you can just fill a pot 3-4 times and keep boiling the water out..you will be left with a lot of gross shit in the pot.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    5. Re:Water by dacarr · · Score: 1
      As is pointed out elsewhere, the process is reproduced and accordingly tested with your own city water.

      In the case of Anaheim, California, if I might use an example, water is filtered into aquifers via the Santa Ana River (an exposed river that fish shit in and birds swim in) and many reservoirs throughout the city (again, all open air), pumped out of wells, and filtered like crazy before it's released to the municipal plumbing.

      Even those wells that some bottled water companies use have to go through that process before it's considered fit for something other than gray water or sewage filler. It has to be sterile before they put it in a carboy and put it on a truck for delivery to your door.

      I mean, really, where do you think they're getting the stuff?

      In this case, it's no different. They're just using the water from treated sewage and reprocessing it. It's no different than taking a leak into a reservoir.

      --
      This sig no verb.
  36. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    No.

    More like an Engrish speaking ad-agency could not spell right ;-)

    I think it means "any" water, because I've observed that a lot of teenagers tend to use "ne" as a chat substitute for "any" ((especially common in Asia).

    "ne1 here?" --> That's just a sample :-)

  37. ObSimpsons|Gross by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mmmmmmm..... Singapore toilet water.....

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  38. sicknesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we know why many sicknesses start out in asia. (Sars, Bird flu, etc..)

  39. Get used to it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given his environmental record, if Bush gets in again this year, we'll ALL be drinking water like this. Except it won't be filtered to this level.

  40. Yeah, but... by genkael · · Score: 3, Funny

    where's the caffeine?

    --
    GeneralKael -- Slacker Extraordinaire
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      where's the caffeine?

      Dunno about you, but my piss certainly has quite a lot of caffeine in it.

      Incidentally, this whole thread is starting to remind me of Kopi Luwak coffee. Those two companies definitely need to get together...

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  41. W.C. Fields once said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't drink water; fish fuck in it.

  42. Is it toilet water or is it... by CrazyDwarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perfume? I couldn't help but remember my high school french class where I learned what that "eau de toilette" label on the perfume bottle translated into. I guess now we'll have to double check if we're drinkin it or putting it on for the scent.

    --
    It's easy to stand out when the general level of competence is so low.
    1. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by Botty · · Score: 1

      Just because I can't tell if you're kidding or not...do you know the definition of the word toiletry? It just means something used in the bathroom like a toothbrush or shaving cream. Not omg shaving cream is a toiletry its made from toiletwater. Or omg my toothbrush is a toiletry now that I dropped it in the toilet.

      Im sure it means toiletry. Just like there are plenty of idioms in other countrys. Football being soccer in most european countries. And "I ownz joo" meaning im a helpless 12 year old gamer/hacker. I cant think of any right now but im sure there are some English idioms that would seem weird or even gross to others if translated literally. Thats the trick about knowing two languages. Weeding through the idioms, not just looking up words in a dictionary.

    2. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      no - thats toilet tree - the word toiletry was developed by the american goverment, in order to prevent you from knowing the secrets of the toilet-tree, and where those sponge like loafer things come from.

    3. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Actually, in French "toilette" has always meant the same thing; it's English where the word toilet shift meaning to refer to a specific bathroom fixture instead of the original meaning it had when we stole it from the French language.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eau de toilette literally translates to "Toilet water." I don't see what you are so upset about.

    5. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why isn't it blue, er, bleu?

    6. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by DeputySpade · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, in French "toilette" has always meant the same thing; it's English where the word toilet shift meaning to refer to a specific bathroom fixture instead of the original meaning it had when we stole it from the French language.

      We didn't steal it. They surrendered it to us.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    7. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least I LOLed.

    8. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I'd be willing to buy that.... but this answer just begs another question: "What's french for toilet?" (Babelfish responds with toilette)

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    9. Re:Is it toilet water or is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant think of any right now but im sure there are some English idioms that would seem weird or even gross to others if translated literally.

      "I just farted around all day." --> "I passed gas continually from sunrise to sunset."

      "Bill Gates is full of shit." --> "Bill Gate's internal organs are composed primarily of excrement."

      "Stop acting like an asshole." --> "Stop pretending to be an oriface exuding fecal material."

      "Microsoft Windows is piss-poor." --> "Microsoft Windows suffers from a severe urine deficiency."

      "Iraq is stockpiling weapons of mass destruction." --> "I'm an incompetant fucking idiot."

  43. Water, water everywhere... by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    While it may not sound appealing, water has been recycled for millions and millions of years now, so this is not such a new thing after all. What is novel, though, is how the water is being filtered, and, of course, that a government is getting into the business of selling bottled water.

    If we are ever to have a lasting presence in space, it is technologies like this which will be needed.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
  44. Prions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the filtering system good enough to filter out prions? Or could this be another way to get mad cow disease (from rendering plant waste water, or an infected person's urine/feces)?

    1. Re:Prions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prions are basically what happens when you take a protein and it gets deformed by a heavy metal ion. This is caused by the heavy metal ions that are present in the chemical pesticides such as organophosphate pesticide (Phosmet). So basically its an environmental trigger that creates these things. not an "infectious agent" as the media would have you believe.

  45. Personalized NEWater by JDRipper · · Score: 1

    I could see this being big like the personalized iPods. Personalized NEWater that's been recycled from your favorite star's very own "waste water". You could buy Madonna flavored NEWater and be sure that it comes from a kosher Kaballah source. Or for those a little more daring, try the new Keith Richard's flavor, "Just like his blood, it's refreshingly recycled." Seriously, there's money to be made here.

    --
    "You know Myra, some people might think you're cute. But me, I think you're one very large baked potato."
  46. whats the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In space the astronauts process thier own urine to make water. H20 is H20. actually the "natural spring" water probably has alot of toxic junk in it. The only thing I can say is that totally pure H20 has no taste nor is it very nutritious. Its better to add some minerals ions to give it some taste.

  47. ...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as it's been treated, it's fine. Remember the water cycle, it's likely the water you're drinking now was probably someone's (or some animals) piss at one point.

    This is just pure FUD. Guess how water ended up in that bubbling spring?

  48. Eh yeah by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    Some one else watched too much Law and Order for this to be today's posting.

    But to the question posed F*** NO !

    All it takes is one little perf in the membrane and that batch is contaminated, whats wrong with desalination of sea water for bringing water to the masses ? Yeah it requires energy , but solar is GREAT for it, this requires energy too, is it cost effective ?

    1. Re:Eh yeah by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter the source of your water. If there is one little perf in the membrane the batch is contaminated.

      You aren't even supposed to drink from streams and lakes in the High Sierras without a filter because of the various bacteria in the water that are toxic to humans.

      The fact that it uses reverse osmosis already makes it better than what comes out of your tap with all the chlorine and other crap in there.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re: Eh yeah by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1
      But to the question posed F*** NO !

      All it takes is one little perf in the membrane and that batch is contaminated, whats wrong with desalination of sea water for bringing water to the masses ?
      Do you live in the U.S. or Canada? If so, there's a good chance you're already drinking water that went thru a ZeeWeed filter. The company that makes them is apparently based in Canada, and has municipal customers all over North America. According to their August 2004 financial report, they've recently added customers in Ontario, Alberta, Pennsylvania, Florida, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Maryland.
      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  49. Better than what they currently are drinking... by nyc_paladin · · Score: 1

    Given that this gives people in the world a better option than drinking the contaminated water they have, I'm all for it and would drink it. This will help in so many areas: 1. Clean water for drinking and cooking. 2. Less diseases spread. 3. Possibly less conflict over water rights in certain areas. Just my two cents...

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. --Edmund Burke
  50. Yeah, that's nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is DISGUSTING...

    The way /. put this was very unfortunate, of course you'll get responses like the asshole above. While large parts of the world are in serious need of water, we can be snobby about this, as well. Where do you think Dasani and Aquafina come from? From your municipal source! Maybe not your sewage, but certainly not a glacier in Switzerland.
  51. 'm smokin' zeeweed and wastewater cant hurt either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    smokin craq and ZeeWeed, keeps the mind at high-speed.

    wastewater is teh hit, im smoking too much o'dis'shit.

    nuff said

  52. I'd rather drink purified sewage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...than water from a mountain stream that has bacteria in it. Every bit of water on the earth has been cycled through some organism or another before it reaches me anyway.

  53. Caffine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put some caffine in it and I bet most /.'ers would drink it!

  54. Nothing to see here, move along by Derf_X · · Score: 1
    What, this is news?!?!?! Every city has beeen doing this for quite a long time, so nothing new here. Cities (I should say villages) that take water from springs or underground water are becoming quite rare, especially at rate everything is becoming more and more polluted.

    So this is not news, it's ignorance from the poster of the story. Like I said: no news, nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Brazil, the great majority of cities take the water from springs or underground water.
      In fact, I think all of them do.

    2. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Denmark only uses underground water for drinking. We do have at least one city.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  55. Reminds me of a waste treatment plant by panurge · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I had on the output from a plating plant. We had to meter the output water because it was as clean as the input water, and the water company refunded the normal waste treatment charge on it.

    If you live near a reservoir, go and look at that. Scum floats on it, fish crap in it, the odd sheep or wading bird dies in it. And then it gets treated and you drink it. What exactly is your problem with what Singapore is doing, people?

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Reminds me of a waste treatment plant by ljavelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then why output the water? Why not save some $ and reuse it in your processes?

    2. Re:Reminds me of a waste treatment plant by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I would guess that the water is in fact used for something, if it comes out as clean as it goes in it is probably warmer on the way out.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Reminds me of a waste treatment plant by panurge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since you ask, by the time the water was output it had gone through several processes. However, the last process required a treatment which resulted in a raw output at a pH of about 9.5, and a chromium content of about 1-2 parts per billion. This actually suited the water company since their bacteria need a tiny amount of chromium. To recycle the water at this point would have required an expensive two stage treatment to remove the last tiny amount of chromium and then lower the pH, followed by another pass through the DI system. Since the water company preferred to have the water just as it was, there was no point. Even so, the plant consumed less than 1/3 the water of a conventional plant. It is still running, though I have long ceased to have anything to do with it.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  56. Of course you would by billysielu · · Score: 1

    If you were one of those people who didn't have access to clean water I think you'd take the risk of drinking fish pee in order to survive!

    --
    -Mike Whitehurst www.mike-whitehurst.co.uk
  57. Filtering... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
    With a well, nature filters it out using the soil.

    Which works well for particles, but not so for anything in solution. Los Angeles water from Owens River is high in salts and is run through ground wells to remove some of it, but the wells are overused and the salt content of the city's water is increasing. Saline content of Colorado River water is on the rise, too, as the water has been reused many times, some for agriculture which means trace amounts of pesticides.

    A side note... I used to live in Midland, Michigan, years ago and the director of the water treatment plant had the last name of ... Filter. Not making it up, it's true.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  58. Another fact vs. perception collision? :) by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 1

    I used to work for the Water Utilities Department in San Diego. We had an experimental poo water to drinking water facility, but they were fighting the same perception issue. Desalinization was dirtier and more labor intensive to get 2x the impurities.

    And no, I didn't try any of the processed water, either. :) They didn't exactly have dixie cups and a spigot at the end.

  59. NEWater by Viceman001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is made of people!!!!

    --
    "It's not the despair, I can take the despair, it's the hope that's killing me!"
  60. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by cybersaga · · Score: 0

    I agree.
    For those of us living in Southern Ontario, our water comes from Lake Ontario. Is that any better?

  61. BARF! by therealjason · · Score: 0

    Ok, I read the article, but I just not sure about one thing. Do they really expect people to buy and drink this stuff??

    Im all for recycling, but that is a mental hurdle that I doubt people will be able to overcome.

  62. Worse for astronauts by spectrokid · · Score: 5, Informative

    On a trip to Mars, astronauts will have to drink recycled "grey" water (washing, dishes,...) and recycled "black" water (you guessed it). Recycling will most likely be biological where the organic content is consumed by algae under strong UV illumination. The algae then become part of the food again....

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:Worse for astronauts by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      On a trip to Mars, astronauts will have to drink recycled

      Eh, most of the water knocking around planet earth has been knocking around for millions of years, and has been recycled more than a few times.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    2. Re:Worse for astronauts by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      From what I gather, the astronauts on IIS have been doing that for a while already as it is. To some degree.

      I believe I heard that their solid wastes are packaged for shipment back to earth, and then the liquid wastes are purified and provided for consumption again. On a limited scale, the liquid waste purification isn't that complex. It's more than feasable to create something in your own house which would do the same, to a limited degree (reverse osmosis being a large component of that).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Worse for astronauts by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...the organic content is consumed by algae under strong UV illumination.

      The parent probably means that the organic content is digested by algae (or more likely bacteria...) and then the output water is filtered and treated with UV to kill any residual live bits.

      Strong UV illumination will kill algae--and most other creatures in water, for that matter.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  63. Old news, was on massivechange.com over a year ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is old news .. it has been listed as part of the massivechange.com project for a long time. In fact we had some in our studio and it wasn't bad at all to drink :P

    The link to that story is here.

  64. Wee*Weed* by andrew_j_w · · Score: 1

    Do you get the munchies after drinking it?

    1. Re:Wee*Weed* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but you should probably wait a month before trying to get a job ;-)

  65. How exactly does this help... by morgdx · · Score: 1

    "...which could help 20% of the world's population that doesn't have easy access to clean water."

    This isn't a cheap mechanism for purifying drinking water. The ZeeWeed filters are used to further filter water with a low level of solid pollutants within an existing water purification plant. This isn't some magic method of providing unlimited clean water for the world's poor.

    --
    http://jfin.org/jFin pure java open source financial library
  66. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by dkellis · · Score: 1
    I'd say it's the product of an ad agency that wanted to sound "cool".

    It's pronounced "New Water". Well, the promoters pronounced it as such, anyway.

    --
    !sig
  67. Londons water has been thorough seven people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been popularly rumoured. Anyone got any information on what exactly they mean / how they work out its seven?

  68. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by swb · · Score: 1

    I'd wager that anyone who lives on the Mississippi south of St. Cloud, Minnesota is drinking water that has been used to flush all manner of human excrement. Minneapolis gets its water from the river and we all dump purified sewage waste back in about 25 miles south.

    How would you like to live in New Orleans, or drink the tap water in Memphis?

  69. Apologies... by aborchers · · Score: 1

    ... to the AC. I read the post again and realized it was a crack on The Shawshank Redemption, not a commentary on TR's views. The election season's really getting to me...

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
  70. I'm surprised... by rampant+mac · · Score: 3, Insightful
    People are going to be extremely uptight about this, but this water will probably more pure than Dasani or Aquafina, since they are nothing more than filtered tap water.

    We freak about purified water that comes from a questionable source, yet most of us probably think nothing about cooking with tap water (I certainly have no idea where my tap water comes from, other than the faucet).

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    1. Re:I'm surprised... by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 3, Informative
      People are going to be extremely uptight about this, but this water will probably more pure than Dasani or Aquafina, since they are nothing more than filtered tap water.

      And don't forget that Dasani even managed to start with London tap water and actually make it worse.

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    2. Re:I'm surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tap, it's called a tap.

    3. Re:I'm surprised... by Technician · · Score: 1

      (I certainly have no idea where my tap water comes from, other than the faucet).

      Maybe here...

      http://www.outhousesprings.com/itsnumber1poster. ht ml ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:I'm surprised... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      We freak about purified water that comes from a questionable source, yet most of us probably think nothing about cooking with tap water (I certainly have no idea where my tap water comes from, other than the faucet)

      This highlights the fact that we take reasonably clean water for granted.

      The fundamental truth is clean water is more precious than gold.

      And integral to this truth is that you can't dump crap in clean water and still have it "clean".

      Another fact - Dubya is not a friend of clean water.

      Another thing to think about as you grab that glass of water and go vote.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  71. H20? or H2O? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is H-twenty anyways?

  72. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by cybersaga · · Score: 0

    I just realized something. Maybe that's why this company's worldwide headquaters is in Oakville.

  73. Help the 3rd world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, we're literally going to piss on the 3rd world

  74. What do most people drink? Duh. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Until the bottled water craze really took off a few years ago, what do you think everyone in the USA and Canada (and half of Europe) was drinking? What comes out of your tap is recycled water in most cases-- just like this.

    When I had a paper route as a teenager, one of my customers was the local water treatment plant. They gave me a personal, guided tour. It was pretty cool. Up til then I really hadn't thought much about water purification, and afterwards I just didn't worry about it. They did a great job, and everyone was healthy as could be.

    I have no problem drinking water like this. I would have a problem paying bottled water prices for it anywhere besides a third world country.

  75. good idea by Treeleaf · · Score: 1

    I think it's a good idea, although not so new.. But there are still a lot of places where there is not much water, like on islands, maybe this thing could help.

  76. I don't drink toilet water... by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    CowboyNeal fucks in it

  77. Question #2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you drink this Miracle Water from Christian Evangelist Peter Popoff that has been blessed by the grace of god, proven to cure all ailments?

  78. Salon article (sans ads) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mwt Would you drink this water?
    NEWater looks like any other glacier-clear bottled H20. Except it gushes from the toilets of Singapore instead of a bubbling spring.

    - - - - - - - - - - - -
    By Corrie Pikul

    printe-mail

    Oct. 22, 2004 | The promotional bottle for Singapore's NEWater looks like any other bottled water, right down to its snappy name and bright label. And it tastes the same as other premium bottled-water brands -- maybe even better, if you prefer the metallic edge of Evian to the airy sweetness of Poland Springs. But while NEWater is transparent, its story is not, and it's frankly not terribly appetizing.

    NEWater is the product of Singapore's new water-treatment system, and it is wastewater that has been purified through advanced synthetic membranes called ZeeWeed. That's right: The crystal-clear NEWater that gushes through the country's faucets isn't gurgling from a mountain spring. Most recently, it was flushed from a toilet.

    The water is first treated in a traditional water plant before going through a three-stage purification that uses high-quality ZeeWeed membranes, which filter out even the most microscopic bacteria. By the time it's processed, NEWater meets all the drinking-water standards specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the World Health Organization.

    Don't panic. There is no plan to bring NEWater -- or anything like it -- to the United States anytime soon. "It's unacceptable to [U.S.] consumers to drink their own waste stream," acknowledges Ashok Gadgil, an Indian-born environmental physicist who works at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (though he quickly points out that astronauts use the technology in long-term outer-space trips).

    The great promise is that this and other new technologies can, in some way, help solve an increasingly dire global water crisis. Nearly 20 percent of the world (1.2 billion people) does not have easy access to clean water -- 400 children die every hour from water-borne causes, according to Gadgil. And even in developed countries like the United States, fear of tainted water is on the rise -- and not just the non-kosher copepods that sneaked through New York's filtration system this summer, worrying Orthodox Jews.

    In the United States, sand filtration systems have traditionally been used to remove particles and sediment from our surface water, which is then treated with chemicals like chlorine. But some strains of bacteria, including Cryptosporidium, have started to develop immunity to chlorine. In 1993, the microscopic "crypto" parasites spread through the municipal water systems of southeastern Wisconsin, causing an outbreak of a flulike disease that affected more than 400,000 people and killed approximately 100. While the outbreak has been linked to the inadequate treatment of drinking water taken from Lake Michigan, no specific source of the Cryptosporidium was ever identified. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that in the past 20 years, crypto has become recognized as one of the most common causes of waterborne disease within humans in the United States.

    While the CDC assures us that the American drinking-water supply is normally safe, and that it has been taking precautions to handle outbreaks like the one in Wisconsin, it issues a reminder on its Web site that disease that spreads through water is still a very real problem. Crypto may be found in drinking water and recreational water in every region of the United States and throughout the world.

    Membrane technology may also help the United States protect itself from terrorist attacks on the nation's water supply. Some membranes could act as a reliable barrier to contaminants such as sarin and anthrax. However, membranes can screen only water that goes into the treatment plant. Once it leaves the plant on its way to individual homes, water again becomes vulnerable, which is why government researchers stress that a viable water-security strategy must consist of two parts: treatment

  79. Not a problem! by MysticalMatt517 · · Score: 1

    I actually don't have a problem with this. Nature does the same thing with its water cycle, only slower. This is just speeding up the process. As long as I'm certain that the water is truly purified then I'm cool with it.

  80. That tears it! by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing but pure grain alcohol for me from now on!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:That tears it! by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      water is an alcohol

    2. Re:That tears it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go check your facts.

      Water is not an alcohol. Alcohol requires a carbon bond. H20 doesn't contain carbon.

      Wikipedia article on Alcohol.

  81. Bear Whiz Beer by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    our favorite. It's all in the water. That's why it's yellow!

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Bear Whiz Beer by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Anheuser-Busch has been doing this for years. They say that you don't buy beer, you just rent it...

  82. This sounds familiar by farlcow · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall Kevin Costner doing this in Waterworld (1995), so at least the idea has been around for quite some time. Its funny that desalination has been around for awhile and he uses the urine->water method when on the open sea surrounded by salt water.

    1. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're the guy that saw Waterworld.

  83. fitting by LiquidMind · · Score: 1

    this supposedly happened a few years ago. It seemed appropriate...

    "In Italy, a compaign for Schweppes Tonic Water translated the name into Schweppes Toilet Water!" (source)

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  84. Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by reporter · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Fundamentally, there is nothing wrong with water extracted from waste water. Consider mountain spring water that companies charge outrageous prices to sell. That water came from the snow that fell from the skies. That snow is frozen water from the clouds. The moisture in the clouds is water that evaporated from the ground. That water from the ground could have been anywhere -- including water in fecal matter, water in piss, etc.

    The only problem that I can see is that the treatment process is run in a country like Singapore. It is not a Western nation and does not have the same quality standards that exist in the West: Japan, USA, Canada, etc.

    Singapore is a Chinese society. I would not consume any food or drink exported from Singapore.

    I, however, have no problem with Dasani, manufactured by CocaCola. Dasani is purified water from city sewage.

    1. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by dkellis · · Score: 0, Troll
      The only problem that I can see is that the treatment process is run in a country like Singapore. It is not a Western nation and does not have the same quality standards that exist in the West: Japan, USA, Canada, etc.

      Singapore is a Chinese society. I would not consume any food or drink exported from Singapore.

      ... actually, this smacks so much of troll-dom.

      How is, say, Japan more "Western" than Singapore?

      --
      !sig
    2. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1
      Dasani is purified water from city sewage.

      Source?

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    3. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by dkellis · · Score: 1
      Yes.

      Why do you feel the need to troll? And why do you use false information to troll at that?

      --
      !sig
    4. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... then what are you an American Bigot? Or, a Japanese Bigot?

    5. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      How is, say, Japan more "Western" than Singapore?

      Err, the communism and sweatshops for starters :D

    6. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by dkellis · · Score: 2, Informative
      Feh. We're not communist.

      Fascist, possibly.

      --
      !sig
    7. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by lol+vlad+did+wtc · · Score: 1

      What? Singapore is communist? You've got to be kidding.

      Singapore is perhaps one of the most unabashedly capitalist societies in the Eastern Hemisphere. It is highly-developed and is at the forefront of many of the world's newest technologies. Unfortunately, it is also a very authoritarian society, with high levels of government surveillance on its citizens, restrictions on freedom of speech, and harsh punishments for relatively minor crimes. Singapore is a perfect example of how capitalism does not always result in a free and democratic society.

    8. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Singapore is probably the cleanest city in the world. I would have no proble consuming food from there.

    9. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      The only problem that I can see is that the treatment process is run in a country like Singapore. It is not a Western nation and does not have the same quality standards that exist in the West: Japan, USA, Canada, etc. Singapore is a Chinese society. I would not consume any food or drink exported from Singapore.

      Perhaps because you're too busy smoking crack?

      I visit Singapore about once a month. It's about the cleanest place you'll ever see. It's one of the few places where if I dropped half my candy bar on the sidewalk I would cheerfully pick it up and eat it.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    10. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's one of the few places where if I dropped half my candy bar on the sidewalk I would cheerfully pick it up and eat it.

      Many Indians think in that way, resulting in a diseased, filthy place called "India".

      If Singapore is "just as good as the USA", then wes should slam the door shut on Singaporean emigration to the USA.

    11. Re:Mountain Spring Water is Just Recycled Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I visit Singapore about once a month. It's about the cleanest place you'll ever see. It's one of the few places where if I dropped half my candy bar on the sidewalk I would cheerfully pick it up and eat it.


      Yes, and it's also one of the few places where if you do *not* pick up your candy bar, you're likely to face some sort of public punishment...
  85. Fizzy yellow water... by 3nuff · · Score: 2, Informative

    is beer!

    Seriously, having working in the IT sector of water treatment (yes there is one), I can say that, at least in Southern California, the water from the tertiary plants are cleaner than from your tap.

    At one particular tertiary plant wastewater is dumped in basins, allowed to filter through the ground, then extracted via well pumps. The water is then run through one of the largest UV light arrays that I've ever seen. Impressive.

    Done right reclaimed water is viable.

    --
    "Give me taste, give me funk, give me fury, gimme some more."
  86. This reminds me..... by dickeya · · Score: 0

    .... of my water here in L.A., minus the filtering.

  87. In theory by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

    Isn't all water recycled? By some way or another? Either Pepsi, MotherNature, or by anyone else?
    I guess the trick is to get water that is cleaner then what is readily available.

  88. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as you put it in a bottle and give it a fancy name, people will pay to drink it.

  89. In other news by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    In other news, the water cycle doesn't give a shit.

    Also, trees will convert carbon from farts and minerals from all sorts of shit into the food you eat.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  90. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    It's even worse than that. The fork of the Mississippi that runs into Chicago used to flow into Lake Michigan. Chicagoans got tired of their filth, however, and set up some explosive charges to reverse the direction of the river. Thankfully, a court order was obtained to stop the procedure at the last minute.

    Only one problem. Being typical Chicagoans, some unknown entity detonated the explosives in the middle of the night. The river's flow was reversed, and all of Chicago's crap now flows into the Mississippi.

    You're welcome. :-)

  91. Nothing new really is it? by lxt · · Score: 1

    In Britain you can (if you'd really want to) go on tours of sewage treatment facilities. One of the highlights is drinking the water that comes out of the end of process (to prove the point that they really do clean the water before they dump it back into the rivers). It's really not that bad at all...Is the idea of pumping this treated water back into the mains really that new an idea?

    1. Re:Nothing new really is it? by apanap · · Score: 1

      Well, no, it's not new... They started doing this while I was doing my exchange studies in Singapore two years ago. Tried a couple bottles of it too (the first time without knowing where it came from, a friend just gave me a bottle of water...), and well... It's just frickin water.

      --
      Give me a job. Please?
  92. Pipe dreams by JawFunk · · Score: 1
    So its drinkable, how does that help the millions of people in urban slums in African nations and India? Are you gonna find someone to go into a politically unstable country and install a ZeeWeed® 500 based water treatment machine, or enough to supply clean water to those densely populated areas. Oh, and who pays? Maintains? Regulates?, so some rebel doesn't monopolize the thing and rape anyone who doesn't feel obliged to pay him.

    Pipe dreams my friends. As wonderful as it sounds, the realities of implementation are far more severe. You can lure the investors, but don't blow smoke up my ass.

    --
    [Please sign here]
  93. Soyelent yellow is PEE! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Great, something else for Charlton Heston to get in a tizzy about!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Soyelent yellow is PEE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

  94. Wait Wait! by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Funny

    ZeeWeed is people! Tell everyone!

    1. Re:Wait Wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZeeWeed is people! Tell everyone!

      Well, people are pretty advanced filtration systems...

    2. Re:Wait Wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's made by zee Germans, Tommy.

  95. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about this: http://www.johnellis.com/
    Any possibility that water molecules actually do posess memory?

  96. even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. It's water -- taste isn't a factor... by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 1

    For Christ's sake -- it's friggin' water. You drink water because you're thirsty. You don't drink water because you want it to taste this way or that. If you do, then you're drinking tea. Or soda. Or beer. Or dirty water.

    And that's really the issue here -- is it DIRTY? HORRORS! Could it have been pissed, pooped, or fish fucked in? Christ -- every drop of water on this planet, I would think given my crappy government school science class-based environmental education, has been pissed, pooped, or fish fucked in at some point.

    Taste is only a factor if the damned H2O doesn't taste like, well, H20 -- that taste is called WATER. There is no variant to it, unless it's dirty.

    I don't see what the damned big deal is. They're recycling. Enjoy their efforts.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:It's water -- taste isn't a factor... by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't drink their water if they "failed" to recycle the diseases out of it properly.

  98. Had a bottle in 2002! by fideaux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FYI, this is old news. Started in 2002, and I was given a bottle at the Singapore National Day Parade (2002).

    So, it's mega filtered. Yes, the concept is *yech*, but astronauts and others do this type of reuse.

    It's a water issue in the area driving it, like it will in other places sooner than later. Malaysia and Singapore don't see eye-to-eye on fresh water rights...

    So before you condemn, it's still better than many 'local', rural water sources to the north.

  99. what people are missing... by tomstdenis · · Score: 0

    Sorry to sound all "sick" and all...

    When you take a dump and the log hits the bowl... um it's not entirely cleaned out when you flush. So no. even with pristine clear perfectly clean water coming into the bowl it wouldn't be safe to drink.

    What the fuck is wrong with people? Holy crap literally!

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  100. It's alright by laggist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, i'm singaporean and i must admit the locals were a tad squirmish with the whole idea when it started. but then again, singapore's a small country, and a step toward self dependence on essentials like water means greater political bargaining power.

  101. There's still lots of recycling by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the UK is lucky in that it always rains...

    The climate may be wet, but don't think that there isn't also a great deal of treatment/recycling going on. Legend has it that in central London, the water coming out of the taps has on average passed through seven bodies before it reaches you.

    This becomes a particular concern when you think about what people put in their waste water that can't easily be filtered by treatment plants, drugs such as antibiotics or contraceptives, for example.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    1. Re:There's still lots of recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Legend has it that in central London, the water coming out of the taps has on average passed through seven bodies before it reaches you.

      I'll go you one better: given that land life has existed on this planet for about 500 million years, all water everywhere on earth has passed through several million generations of bodies before it reaches you!

    2. Re:There's still lots of recycling by riqnevala · · Score: 1
      in central London, the water coming out of the taps has on average passed through seven bodies before it reaches you.

      I don't get it. Only Seven bodies - since when? I have imagined that the water has always:
      • circled around
      • underground
      • in a cloud
      • through your mouth
      • in and out.
      Bottle of water - how much of it is really new - as in just reformed H2O?
      --
      love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
    3. Re:There's still lots of recycling by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Only Seven bodies - since when?

      Since it was vapour in the air and then fell as rain; before it goes back to the sea as water, there to evaporate once more...

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    4. Re:There's still lots of recycling by mlu035 · · Score: 1

      This becomes a particular concern when you think about what people put in their waste water that can't easily be filtered by treatment plants, drugs such as antibiotics or contraceptives, for example.

      Probably something like prozac!

      --
      "Feel the force, mother fucker." (Shaft Windu)
  102. Recycled Water Source by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many commenters have pointed out that all (more or less) water is recycled. No problem there.

    I think many readers are capitalizing on the wording of the headline: "it gushes from the toilets of Singapore instead of a bubbling spring". The connotation of that wording makes it seem as if the water is being bottled from the toilet bowl.

    I seriously doubt that that's the bottling process, but correct me if I'm wrong.

    1. Re:Recycled Water Source by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Well, why don't you RTFA and find out!

  103. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by maynard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Should I remind people that the water they drink is pumped from rivers, lakes, and wells where animals (submarine and above ground) piss in it all the time?

    And let's not forget that certain waste byproduct is actually desirable to drink! I'd like to find a lake full of this stuff. Hmmmmmm..... --M

  104. That's why it tastes funny. by funkdid · · Score: 1
    Years ago I was bored at a previous job so I started calling the 800 numbers on anything that I could find. I did the obligatory call to Poland Spring to ask "so where's the source?" The interesting thing is their scipted response is "Our sources are protected sources since we took ownership in 1977." I of course asked "Well who owned it before you?" Of course they could not provide this info.

    I asked "If this source is in a rural area then you most likely purchased the land from farmers, who sprayed God knows what chemicals, which have all leached into your water. Perhaps they even dumped some of their old tractors and their pinto in the reservior. Perhaps they bathed in it. Perhaps they have leaking septic systems, maybe they let their cows swim in it." They of course had no info on this other then to tell me that it is heavily purified.

    The good bottled water is NYC tap water. What makes NYC's water so good is that it comes from Reserviors in Upstate NY. The water travels through 100 mile tunnels that are over a hundred years old. These tunels are caked with MUNG like you can't belive, and all that bacteria filters our water. (Anyone with a fish tank knows what I'm talking about, biological filtration.) The only downside of our water is that once it gets here it travels throughout the city before it gets to you, through really old rusty or lead pipes way, way below the street. Some of them are near impossible to get to when one breaks, and many are near impossible to update / replace.

    It sure does taste good though unless you live in certain parts of Queens where the water from the tap looks like milk until it settles. Yum.

    --

    I boycott signatures

  105. *ALL* water is recycled by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Unless you are creating H2O molecules from scratch, the water we have now has been recycled by the largest recycling plant we know.. the earth..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:*ALL* water is recycled by nsayer · · Score: 1
      Even if you are creating H2O molecules from scratch.... Where did you get the Hydrogen? Probably by separating water...

  106. "Seattle Times" --Dasani is Purified Sewage Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check this story out. Dasani Water comes from city tap water. City tap water is purified sewage water.

  107. Re:What do most people drink? Duh. by whovian · · Score: 1

    And if a person is so intent on getting "better" water, it would likely be more cost effective to refill your own bottles with filtered home water (slap a filter on the faucet or buy one of those filtering pitchers), or subscribe to one of those water delivery services.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  108. All in the name by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    People are so paranoid now that they pay hundreds of pounds a year to drink "purified water" yet won't touch tap water which is the same.... There was a documentry on it here a couple of weeks back. As soon as they put a flashy logo on the tap-water bottles the guy sold out (Series was, "should I worry about").

    People will drink anything they see as "cool". Call the water "Purified" or "cleaned" water and people will drink it like any other bottled water.

    --
    I like muppets.
  109. Will test such a system next year in Antarctica by dargaud · · Score: 1

    I'll be wintering over at Dome C in 2005 (in the center of Antarctica). We'll be taking with us a prototype recycling system designed by the European Space Agency, able to recyle grey waters (also black 'waters' in 2006, but it will be after my time). So, yes, we'll be drinking and showering with past shower and dishwasher water... I won't go into details but the system has 4 successive filtering systems, and the water is so pure in the end that we have to add minerals to it. The funny thing is that the only thing that passes through unfiltered is alcohol; so since the water is recycled at only 75% (100% in 2006), it means that the alcohol content of the water will increase over time. Yum, I'm looking forward to the showers after a few months of pissing beer !!!

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Will test such a system next year in Antarctica by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 1
      dargaud wrote: We'll be taking with us a prototype recycling system designed by the European Space Agency, able to recyle grey waters [...] only thing that passes through unfiltered is alcohol; so [...] the alcohol content of the water will increase over time. I'm looking forward to the showers after a few months of pissing beer!

      You probably know this, but other Slashdot folks might not: Ethanol is metabolized to acetaldehyde and then to a bunch of other stuff fairly rapidly. The filter system almost certainly removes those metabolic byproducts. If there's any appreciable ethanol in your piss, you probably need medical attention. OTOH, you could pour some Everclear down the drain and enjoy "showers plus" if you really wanted to.

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    2. Re:Will test such a system next year in Antarctica by dargaud · · Score: 1
      If there's any appreciable ethanol in your piss, you probably need medical attention
      I assumed (incorrectly as you pointed out) that the alcohol would come from urine. Since their tests shows it accumulate in the recycled water, maybe it comes from the dishwashing water (more reasons to finish all the glasses then). I'll let you know how it worked out in 2006 after I get back !!!

      BTW, in case anyone is wondering why we just don't melt some of the 4km of ice we are sitting over is that in winter it's too cold (-84C) to get out with a Caterpillar to fill the melter with snow.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  110. I bet it tastes better than Ohio's water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have lived in Ohio all my life and never have liked the water here. Out-of-staters notice it smells like chlorine. I can only imagine water from a toilet being an improvement.

  111. Blown out of proportion by kid_wonder · · Score: 1

    Why do you have to drink it?

    How about using it to water lawns, wash cars, put out fires, etc, etc.

    Perhaps down the line you may need to, but in the mean time use it for other tasks and keep the "fresh" water for drinking.

    --

    "Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called everyone, they meet at the bar."
    1. Re:Blown out of proportion by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      That is sort of done now (at least where I live) with watering large areas of City property along roads and such. But for residential use, it requires running multiple pipes to everyones house and that is NOT going to happen any time soon. :(

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  112. nanotech by mrbeaton · · Score: 1

    Seldon Technologies is a small nanotech research company that has been working on making purification filters.

    Not sure what you do with all the stuff that it catches in the filter, but it's interesting stuff. I don't know if they're gone to production yet, but I believe that they've been working with the USAF.

  113. Why would I need this when we can make water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all once we go the hydrogen based economy We can take all the clean newly created water and drink that right. So fresh water for all. Never mind the incredible amount of power we need to get the hydrogen.

  114. Glacier Clear? by wworf · · Score: 1

    In my experience (at least from Olympic National Park in Washington), water from glaciers is not very clear because of the minerals trapped in the ice. It is one of the ways to tell if a creek in the park is spring-fed (clear water) or glacier-fed (cloudy). In fact, the park service warns against using mechanical water filters with glacier-fed streams as the minerals will clog up the mechanism in short order.

    1. Re:Glacier Clear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You almost got it right. The water from the glaciers is quite clear. Since the glacial ice is nothing more than accumulated snow, and since there is virtually no "minerals" in rain water (granted, it is not distilled or anything), the glacier water is not filled with minerals.

      What you describe is known as "glacial flour". It is not really contained in the ice, per se, but is the accumulation of pulverized rock from the point of contact between the bottom of the glacier, and the solid land surface below. The vast majority of this "flour" is picked up after the meltwater has cut through the glacier, and starts running through the boundary area between the ice, and land.

      So, you are correct when describing the look, and content of glacial runoff, however, water from the glacier, is actually very clear. Were you to cut a chunk of glacier off, and melt it, it would not look "milky" like a runnoff stream looks.

  115. oh my baldder by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

    The water you drink and use every day has been pissed out over and over again since the days of the dinosaurs and before. So get over it already.

  116. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by WindBourne · · Score: 1
    ...the water they drink is pumped from rivers, lakes, and wells where animals (submarine and above ground) piss in it all the time? With a well, nature filters it out using the soil. Other methods require us to perform filtering to clean the water and remove any pollutants we added.

    Well, the real problem is not the animal wastes from lakes, wells, etc. The amount is minimal and easily broken down. The human waste can be filtered. What is the real problem with this, is that we are slowly building up toxic chemicals in the water. While a number are easily pulled out, there are many that will not be. Until we learn to handle our toxic waste (most from manufactuering processes) in a responsible fashion, I think that we will see biological issues start to show up in our populations. Think DDT and how long that took to be realized

    In fact, I have been wondering how fullerenes will break down in nature. They will shed, and it will be interesting to see what kind of damages that cause long term

    OTH, glad to see some amount of decent cleaning.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  117. Same filter is in my stillsuit by samberdoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    The spice must flow.

  118. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 0

    Or it could be short for Not Even Water? now we just need Fabio to go and film a commercial. "I can't belive it's not even water!" And then get a close-up of his new yellow smile.

  119. Chicago by simpl3x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since we've treated the Great Lakes as sewers for a hundred years, Chicagoans are essentially doing the same thing. The water treatment plant here is considered one of the best in the world since its completion in the 1970's.

    I would imaging that having a water distiller (there are interesting versions requiring little energy) in the home will be increasingly demanded in the future. pumping drinking water thorugh pipes is a bit much.

    1. Re:Chicago by DougWebb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got a distiller; it's like a big coffee maker.
      The tap water in New Jersey is over-chlorinated, and we've got lots of very old pipes too. I had a Pur filter, but it wasn't really doing the trick.

      My wife and I switched to bottled water, which was costing us around $0.25/gallon from Costco, in bulk. That wasn't too expensive, but we were creating a mountain of plastic bottles, and sometimes a whole case would be bad: if they sit out in the sun, the plastic leaches into the water.

      So I got a distiller; every night I fill it with a gallon of tap water, and four hours later I have a gallon of very pure and good-tasting water to drink. I've got a two-gallon storage container in the fridge, and another gallon on the counter.

      Between the cost of the distiller ($400) and the cost of electricity, it'll take a few years for this to be more cost-effective than the water from Costco. But the advantages are worth it:

      - No more trips to the store or running out of water
      - No more 'bad' water
      - The costs are hidden in my electric bill, which is less painful
      - No more plastic bottles
      - Less money for Costco

    2. Re:Chicago by operagost · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't like drinking distilled water much. I mean, there's no minerals left in the water. It would be like drinking air.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Chicago by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      with the cost of gas as high as it is, you've probably already paid for the distiller already by saving yourself a trip to costco. also, how much electricity does it use? you may have already paid for the water as well. and your environmental impact is less, which is more "pay".

      it'll take less time than you think to make it more cost-effective.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    4. Re:Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking distilled water is a Bad Idea.

      It very agressively dissolves minerals in your body. Also, before you drink it it will dissolve CO2 from the air, and end up being (weak) carbonic acid before you drink it.

      (It's fine for a detox program, or in the case of illness where you NEED to avoid impurities, but as a regular source of water it's bad).

    5. Re:Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he probably still goes to Costco for the "food" component

    6. Re:Chicago by zrobotics · · Score: 1

      In our home we have a reverse osmosis unit under the sink. since our water comes from a well, it tastes kinda funny, and doesn't pass water quality tests until it runs through the unit. If i recall correctly, it cost several hundred dollars (American) and we need to get $30 worth of filters once a year, but it doesn't use any additional electricity, and the water ends up tasting better than bottled water (usually it ends up tasting plasticy by the time it gets to the store). cheaper, too.

    7. Re:Chicago by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you are forgetting one big point..

      Human sewage tends to go through a treatment plant to remove 90% of the ookies and nasties.. I.E. filter out the turds and condoms.

      what do you think that 100% of the wildlife over the past 95,000,000,000,000 years has been doing in that water?

      when you drink water, you are drinking fish, bear, deer, squirrel, moose, and whatever else piss, crap, spooge, etc....

      hell it's still safe to dip a cup in lake superior and drink it in some locations.

      and yes, I am an expert on this, I spent over 10 years running a Water filtration plant on Lake Michigan.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Chicago by austad · · Score: 1

      Admit to your true usage of this distiller. You are putting mash through it and making moonshine. And even if you're not, you could be, so the ATF is at your door right now. Run!

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    9. Re:Chicago by promethean_spark · · Score: 1

      Many people already have reverse osmosis sytems under their sinks.

  120. A different solution for abundant dirty water by LauraLolly · · Score: 2, Informative
    "...and it's wastewater that's been purified through advanced synthetic membranes called ZeeWeed, which could help 20% of the world's population that doesn't have easy access to clean water."

    Water recycling to this extent is only useful in areas with water systems. ZeeWeed, and all other municipal systems such as this, are just too expensive for people in poor rural areas, such as much of India, China, and major parts of the African continent.

    A much more practical solution for poor rural areas with abundant dirty water is household filtration and chlorination. This can be done with low-tech methods. The only middling tech item is a small bottle of sodium hypochlorite (bleach) that is used on a household basis. Since the bottle costs under US$0.40, and is lasts for several (six to ten) weeks depending on the household size, this truly is an affordable solution.

    Science News ran the details some time back.
  121. We're #2!! by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 2, Funny

    I see billboards in my area for recycled water. (Outhouse Springs?)

    Anyway, their tag line is "We're number two!!"

    Humerous, but I don't know if I would drink it. I don't mind drinking recycled water, but the name just turns me off.

    1. Re:We're #2!! by drew · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is Outhouse Springs, and if I remember correctly the tagline is something like "It's number 1, not number 2!"

      I've seen billboards for it, but only along a small stretch of I94 in southern michigan. The fact that I only ever saw the billboards in that one area and have never actually seen it sold anywhere has led me to wonder whether the whole thing was just a joke.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    2. Re:We're #2!! by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      ahh yes. I don't want to be drinking #2. :-)

      Thanks!

      I've seen them in the Allentown, PA area.

    3. Re:We're #2!! by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      This was an advertising campaign designed to show the power of billboard advertising. I heard it was so succesful they are launching an actual product in Piggly-Wiggly stores, (southern US chain).

    4. Re:We're #2!! by kryptkpr · · Score: 1
      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  122. hah by jotok · · Score: 1

    it gushes from the toilets of Singapore instead of a bubbling spring

    Did anyone else think this was about Coke trying to market "Dasani II?"

  123. Kinda like Biosanitized.... by jwb4273 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Out in the Rural areas of USA (where sewers don't run) we have these things called Aerobic septic systems. Basically they take the waste water from homes, bubble air through it, chlorinate it (using some sort of a biosanitizer tablet chemical), and then store it in a tank until there's enough to spray off through a series of sprinkler heads.

    My family cut the sprinkler heads off and uses it to water our flower beds and landscaping... but supposedly the water that comes out of it is clean enough to drink. We haven't had anyone brave enough to try it, though.

  124. Now to get the PROZAC out of the water supply... by Need+More+RWHP · · Score: 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3545684.stm BBC Story: Prozac 'found in drinking water' This is completely weird with all of the other 1984 and brave new world stuff going on right now.

  125. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  126. SF story about astronauts and recycled water by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    The title escapes me but there was an SF story published circa 1956 about a group of astronauts whose drinking water is purified from their wastes, and get into trouble (perish, IIRC) because psychologically they cannot accept the idea and start believing that the water tastes foul...

    I remember another about astronauts who, under conditions of weightlessness, start gibbering "I'm falling! I'm falling" and go mad...

  127. No by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    No, I would not drink this water. For the record, I never drink tap water although it is generally of good quality in my place and I only buy natural mineral water from local springs as well as water imported from France (Vichy springs rules!).

    In theory there would be no problem to drink recycled purified water. H2O is just H2O and the "natural water" we drink has already been polluted, but we drink it anyway.

    So my problem with recycled water isn't that I don't trust the science of water purification.

    My problem is that I don't trust the humans who perform the purification, be it corporate managers or government officials.

    Humans are motivated by profit. They wouldn't care if their recycled water is really purified or not, as long as the consumers believe it is clean and safe to drink.

    I am afraid in the future very poor Africans will have no water at all, low-to-middle-class Latinos and Asians will drink recycled "purified" water, middle-to-high-class Westerners will drink really purified water and only the very rich Westerners will enjoy true natural water.

    And what can be done about it? Nothing, until the humans adopt an "open source" solution to the water problem (or should I say "open springs"?) i.e. they should have an altruistic approach to production, purifying water for the common good ("public domain purified water for free!"), and not profit-driven.

  128. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  129. Great by phaze3000 · · Score: 1

    Now the people in Singapore can get Prozac in their water just like us Brits!

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  130. singapore by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    as i reacall, singapore has some serious issues with water. Fro those who dont know it is a small chinese enclave off of malaysia. It is also 100% urban and doesnt have any easy way of getting something we take for granted; drinking water. Singapore over the years has done a lot of experiments with rain water collection and water treatment to get water. No surprise they would be advancing that technology.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  131. Marketing-speak wins again by SidV · · Score: 1

    How s this any different than any other water sytem.

    All water is recycled

    Simplest system is what I have, well water with a septic system. Water is pumped up from underground, I use it, then it flows into a septic system, which leaches back into the ground water, filtered by soil and rock. Cycle complete.

    Everything in all of these articles have been done many times before all over the world. At best they took 3 old technologies and put them in the same place. Aain, something I'm sure has been done before.

    In fact, this sounds about exactly the same as the public water supply used to supplement people private water supplies in the Bahama during dry spells. I can't find any difference whatsoever in this BS NEWater system, and any other modern water treatment plant.

    It's the equivalent of someone claiming they have a new pneumatically filled rubber system of rotary rolling transportation.

    It's been done folks.

    Reminds me of when Segway (Faggy Scooter TM) made a big deal about Helical gears and how it lowered noise, and reduced wear. Yeah, so? Car manufacturers have been doing that for over a century.

    Complete BS in this article. It's just some guy trying to get venture capital.

  132. After all, Singapore is the hq of the WTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    World Toilet Organization


    Closer to home. If you think NYC has the best drinking water there is, I advise goind upstate during the summer to go tubing at Phoenica, NY. There you will make the observation that tubers drink a lot of beer as evidenced by a minumum of two six packs lashed to the tube, the water is cold (with the subsequent effect on the kidneys), and nobody has ever been seen to stop and run into the woods. Oh, and did I mention the creek connects one NYC reservior to another?

  133. OF COURSE IT'S PURE!!! by dewbie · · Score: 1

    Any water that had passed through so many kidneys, they reasoned, had to be very pure indeed.
    ---terry pratchett

  134. If you live in Columbus, OH you already are... by hopemafia · · Score: 1

    In Columbus the city well field sits near the Scioto river downstream from the the sewage treatment plant outflow. I don't have the numbers in front of me now, but the city gets a large percentage of it's water from these wells, which draw a large percentage of their water from the river, which gets a large percentage of it's dischage from the sewage outflow. In the end reckoning most people in Columbus, are drinking what went down their own drains.

    I'm sure there are similar situations all around the world.

    No need for major concern though...thanks to strict EPA standards, sewage outflows are some of the cleanest water on the planet. There are malfunctions of course, which is why you hear about boil water orders from time to time.

    You should be more concerned about your water quality if you have a private well and a septic system...that is where the real problems with bacterial contamination are. You just don't hear about them because the don't affect 1,000's of people at once.

    IAAHydrogeologist

    --
    If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  135. Well ... by cfuse · · Score: 1

    People drink from the Ganges everyday (and I challenge anyone to find a more festering river of cess anywhere). If the only clean water you could get was recycled, would you really care where it came from?

    I live in Australia, and we have water quality in our sewers that beats the drinking water in many parts of the world. All that water ends up either out at sea, or flooding paddocks after secondary treatment. We currently have water restrictions here. I think that we would have less of a problem if we stopped throwing away perfectly good water. It's just stupid not to recycle it.

  136. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Insightful
    An H2O molecule is an H2O molecule, is an H2O molecule.
    There are whole branches of pseudoscience and associated commerce that are based on that not being the case - homeopathy, and "activated water" products.

    Giventhe degree this nonsense is accepted by the mainstream, it's no surprise that these recycling systems are controversial.

  137. Composting toilets by catchy_handle · · Score: 1

    Using potable water to flush a toilet is just dumb. There's a story about a woman who brought an African to (England?) for some political reason. She was mortified when she discovered that he had crapped in the sink. He of course was embarassed. The reason was he had never seen a toilet and could not imagine that someone would defile perfectly good water and the sink was his best guess as to what these first world people did with their waste.

  138. It's bound to happen by PMuse · · Score: 1
    Predictions:

    Eventually, they will learn that something is getting through the filter and harming a couple of people.

    Between now and eventually, thousands or millions of people will be made more healthy by this good water supply.

    When the contaminent is identified, all that will be forgotten.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  139. A Nobel Prize for.... by megarich · · Score: 1

    The man that can turn the sludge in the hudson river to purify water.

    Remeber its not only the "3rd world country" that have dirty water spots.

  140. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else think it's ironic that there is such a water shortage, while over 70% of the world is composed of water? I'm aware that desalination is expensive but I think that is the method that needs to be persued.

  141. Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessary by ugene · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a Singaporean i feel compelled to explain why i feel NEWater is important to us.

    To understand why the development of NEWater is necessitated you need to know some background about us.

    We(Singapore) are tiny(640km Square) and have no natural resources, our water supply is mianly from Malaysia(northen neighbours) and our reservoirs and some from Indonesia(Southern neighbours).

    The bulk of water supply agreeements with Malaysia were made just before and after UK left Singapore (no longer colonised).

    However in recent history, Politicians in Malaysia (namely Mahathir) have used Singapore as a whipping boy in their domestic elections. They have many a times delared their intent to cut off our water supply(which will lead to war) if we do not "do" as they wish(numerous interference in our domestic issue).

    That of course is impossible as we are a sovereign nation in our own right.

    This is because of baggage from the past as Singapore was once part of Malaysia before the Brits colonised us. And Malaysia and Singapore were part Malaysian federation for 2 years after the Brits left (We left because we wanted a society built on meritoracy, not based on racial preferences which to this day Malaysia still has - affirmative action for Malays, which forms the MAJORITY of the population in Malaysia, meaning minorities(Chinese, Indians) are discriminated against!!!!).

    So somehow, the older generation of leaders there are resentful of the fact that we have separated and have done very well without them for the past 38years.

    Hence the need to develop altenative sources of DRINKING water. For our SURVIVAL, Should they go against international law and revoke the water supply contracts.

  142. I'll believe it when I see it. by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

    ...which could help 20% of the world's population that doesn't have easy access to clean water.

    Could, if only they could afford it.

  143. umm, evian is the same way... by goobenet · · Score: 1

    evian water is from the new jersey water treatment center. They ship it overseas so they can say "Bottled in the swiss alps".

    Stupid eh?

    1. Re:umm, evian is the same way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to Evian, France and I've seen their bottling facilities. Why in God's name do you think they ship water to France so they can bottle it and ship it back here? That's ludicrous, man.

  144. In Soviet Russia... by wramsdel · · Score: 0

    ...Zee weed filters bong water!

  145. Testing by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Well, of course accidents do happen, but they would be testing the output to detect this before the product went out the door..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  146. The same thing is planned for San Diego by winkydink · · Score: 1
    They were calling it toliet-to-tap... I hope they have a new marketing agency.

    Many links on Google

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  147. Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessary by ugene · · Score: 1

    As a Singaporean i feel compelled to explain why i feel NEWater is important to us.

    To understand why the development of NEWater is necessitated you need to know some background about us.

    We(Singapore) are tiny(640km Square) and have no natural resources, our water supply is mianly from Malaysia(northen neighbours) and our reservoirs and some from Indonesia(Southern neighbours).

    The bulk of water supply agreeements with Malaysia were made just before and after UK left Singapore (no longer colonised).

    However in recent history, Politicians in Malaysia (namely Mahathir) have used Singapore as a whipping boy in their domestic elections to distract voters from domestic issues. They have many a times delared their intent to cut off our water supply(which will lead to war) if we do not "do" as they wish(numerous interference in our domestic issue).

    That of course is impossible as we are a sovereign nation in our own right.

    This is because of baggage from the past as Singapore was once part of Malaysia before the Brits colonised us. And Malaysia and Singapore were part Malaysian federation for 2 years after the Brits left (We left because we wanted a society built on meritoracy, not based on racial preferences which to this day Malaysia still has - affirmative action for Malays, which forms the MAJORITY of the population in Malaysia, meaning minorities(Chinese, Indians) are discriminated against!!!!).

    So somehow, the older generation of leaders there are resentful of the fact that we have separated and have done very well without them for the past 38years.

    Hence the need to develop altenative sources of DRINKING water. For our SURVIVAL, Should they go against international law and revoke the water supply contracts.

  148. virginia's already been doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link to article about Virginia's water recycling. Alot of info there too.

  149. But what about .... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    My first concern is the removal of virus. FRTFA is says zeewee has a pore size of 0.02 m. Virus have a size of roughly 10 to 50 nm so it sounds like that will not be a problem.

    Next what about heavy metals, PCB's and dioxons. No mention about that...

  150. Singapore's dependence on Malaysia's water by colin_n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The interesting thing about Singapore is that most of the country's water comes across a bridge from Malaysia. They are in an interesting Military / Strategic dilemma where their dependence on another country for fresh water is a severe national security issue. To be able to recycle waste water and use it for drinking is a huge deal that could lead to aqua independence from Malaysia. If only the US could make gasoline out of CO2!

    --

    --------- I have no signature
    1. Re:Singapore's dependence on Malaysia's water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only the US could make gasoline out of CO2!

      Better yet, make gasoline out of self-centered arrogance. You'd have a surplus within seconds.

    2. Re:Singapore's dependence on Malaysia's water by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      2 phrases:
      Corn belt and bio-diesel.
      The potential is there. It's still cheaper to buy it though. If worse comes to worst, we won't be up a creek without a paddle. We just won't have our 200HP outboard any more.

  151. Moot. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    It's still likely that at one point the hydrogen you are going to burn was part of a water molecule in a brontasuaraus colon.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  152. What Yuck Factor? by qray · · Score: 1

    All water is recycled anyway, whether that is by man or by nature.

    You think nothing urinates in rivers that cities draw their water from?

    If the "Yuk" factor bothers them, maybe they should get thirsty enough for them to forget about it.

    Reminds me of the shock factor some people have when they are faced with the fact that the meat they are eating was once a living animal.

    1. Re:What Yuck Factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't drink the water, Fish Fuck in it

    2. Re:What Yuck Factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have always believed that if you are willing to eat it, you should also have to feed the thing at one time. If you can deal with raising and slaughtering something that you are going to eat, go ahead. If you have problems with that, then you need to eat some veggies.

      dealing with the truth of what you do everyday is important to live life responsibly.

    3. Re:What Yuck Factor? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      All water is recycled anyway, whether that is by man or by nature.

      Exactly. Take a drink. Do you realize you're drinking horse urine? Statistically speaking, some amount of the ~10^24 molecules you just drank (or would have, if you didn't just spew them) were at some point over the last five billion years a component of a little equine piss.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    4. Re:What Yuck Factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, this shouldn't be score 0 - it's a famous (and applicable) quote from W. C. Fields. And one of my favorites. :-)

  153. Distillers: Call for experts by Bozdune · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I believe I read somewhere that distillers don't really do the trick, because many of the volatiles that you really need to get rid of have roughly the same or lower boiling point than water, which means you aren't really filtering them out by distilling.

    Anyone else know the real story on this?

    1. Re:Distillers: Call for experts by turbosk · · Score: 4, Informative

      IAAAC (I am an analytical chemist) and feel qualified to answer this. When something is "volatile", that means it evaporates readily at normal temperatures and pressures. This works wonderfully for distilling purposes. The idea being, you start heating your initial charge, let everything go to waste until you get to ~100 degrees C, then start collecting only the stuff that comes over at that temperature. Water itself isn't considered a "volatile" substance in this case, since you're probably talking about VOCs, or "Volatile Organic Compounds". These chemicals will burn off well below 100 degrees C and won't be collected in the recovery system.

      Hope this helps, lemme know if you have questions.

    2. Re:Distillers: Call for experts by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      Thanks, this is interesting. So the distillation system ought to be two-stage, I take it -- heating the fluid to, say, 80C, waiting a bit, then flushing the system -- then heating the fluid to 100C, wasting a bit of that as well, and then collecting everything else. I wonder if home distillers go to all that trouble, or if they err and simply collect everything? Maybe the grandparent poster knows the answer from his/her product literature.

    3. Re:Distillers: Call for experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In commercial operations (Such as an oil refinery), distillation is done continuously and in series.

      The top of the column will be rich in the most volatile component. This is condensed and pumped away. The bottom of the column, which is generally still liquid is pumped forward to the next distillation column where the next most volatile component is removed at a higher temperature than the previous. This process is repeated until you can no longer separate your bottom product with distillation.

      It should also be noted that distillation does not remove any kind of dissolved solids as they usually have extraordinarily high boiling points (>1000 deg F). Also, depending on the relative volatility of the chemicals, you may or may not be able to separate them by distillation.

      Hope this helps.

    4. Re:Distillers: Call for experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, won't it be sufficient to just boil the water and 'denature' the organics? Could boiling water turn say progesterone from a birth control pill into a cancer causing chemical?

    5. Re:Distillers: Call for experts by Mspangler · · Score: 2, Informative
      The above is true for a batch still. For a continuous still, where feedwater enters and brine exits all the time, this is not true. Any volatiles that enter with the feed will go to the product.

      Most stills over a couple liters per hour do run in continuous mode.

    6. Re:Distillers: Call for experts by jshine · · Score: 1

      As a PhD student in chemical engineering, I second this post.

    7. Re:Distillers: Call for experts by waterguy · · Score: 1

      Finally, something I know about on /.! There are many types of contaminants in wastewater, both organic and inorganic. Certain of both types are sufficiently volatile to appear in distilled water. For example, boron is one inorganic material that will appear in distilled water produced from seawater. Presently the US EPA regulates over 120 organic materials that are found in water and wastewater supplies, and is watching several hundred others. Many of these, particularly solvents, are volatile and can be found at higher concentrations in distilled water than in the source water. That's why NewWater doesn't use distillation - it uses reverse osmosis (RO). RO removes most inorganic materials and does a pretty good job on most organics, although some will get through it as well. So, NewWater does even more! The ZeeWeed membrane mentioned is not RO - it's an ultrafilter that removes particles above say 0.04 micrometers. That includes pretty much all bacteria and most viruses - say 6 logs (99.9999%) for the bacteria and 2 logs for viruses. The RO then removes most of the remaining viruses along with dissolved substances. Then, the water goes through carbon adsorbers to remove the organics that RO didn't get. Finally, the water is disinfected with ozone, that cleans up pretty much anything that might be left. What you end up with is some of the purest water on the planet- better than that stuff from Greenland. While I didn't work on NewWAter, I did get to work on a similar project in San Diego. It died because a state politician needed to get reelected, and decided that the recycled water would tend to go to poor people more than rich people. That treatment process would theoretically remove 29 logs (that's 99.99....9%, with 29 "9"s) of pathogens. Bottom line, we know how to clean water up very, very well.

  154. supertrooopers? by poison_reverse · · Score: 1

    its no one's water. It's God's water!

    --
    _+_+__+_+_+_+_+_+_+++
    when i moo u moo - just like that
  155. Dune? by ErisCalmsme · · Score: 1

    So how far away are we from those cool suits from Dune that recycle every last drop of water?

    --
    Chaos is Divine *
  156. W.C.Fields... by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 1

    ..used that excuse to justify being an alcoholic.

    Works for me *hic*

  157. Goes Good With The Cat Poop Coffee by Ginnungagap42 · · Score: 1
  158. Dune by Awestruckin · · Score: 1

    How far are we away from actually having Stillsuits? At least then we would be drinking out own wastes!

    "STILLSUIT: body-enclosed garment invented on Arrakis. Its fabric is a micro-sandwich performing functions of heat dissipation and filter for bodily wastes. Reclaiming moisture is made available by tube from catchpockets."

  159. Glacier Water Isn't Clear, Dammit! by Java+Commando · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gimme a break! Glacier water isn't clear. Anyone who's actually seen runoff from a glacier knows that the water yielded presents with a cloudy appearance (Turbidity, for all of us Geology enthusiasts). It's actually a very interesting characteristic, as is any natural Earth process...

    1. Re:Glacier Water Isn't Clear, Dammit! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      What attributes cause this turbidity of the glacial runoff? Is it due to the fact that the glacier in question was slowly formed (allowing for dust and other matter to form with it), or is there a property of the glacial ice (high levels of nitrogen, whatever) that results in the coloration?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Glacier Water Isn't Clear, Dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I believe most of the turbidity is caused by powdered rock that results from the glacier sliding over the underlying rock.

  160. Singapore and NewWater... by KJACK98 · · Score: 1

    One of the reasons why Singapore even has to consider this is, is because they actually pay for the river water that comes through Malaysia. The problem is Malaysia wants more money, which is kinda wierd, considering the water is just going to flow to the ocean anyways... If you ever been there, Its quite amazing how much of the rain water they try to catch and hold, there only issue is they got little land so their water cachment area is small.

  161. Funny stuff to say to homeopath ;) by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I mean, aren't they actively purporting that water keep memory and stuff as to "proove" their non-scientific theory ? Well next time one try to convince me, I will just let speak of what hapenned with the water he drinks ;).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  162. that's a typo... by scenturion · · Score: 1

    It's really EWWWWWWWWater. The "N" got on there by mistake. :)

    -Jonathan

  163. The boring details by igzat · · Score: 0

    An H2O molecule is an H2O molecule, is an H2O molecule. If the water is truly purified (A chemical/spectral/whatever analysis can find that out) it really doesn't matter. Should I remind people that the water they drink is pumped from rivers, lakes, and wells where animals (submarine and above ground) piss in it all the time? With a well, nature filters it out using the soil. Other methods require us to perform filtering to clean the water and remove any pollutants we added.

  164. Copepods in the water?! by NoData · · Score: 1

    The Salon article has a tangential mention and link to an article about Orthodox Jews filtering NYC water because, while being "some of the purest municipal water in the world," it is contaminated with copepods, which are tiny crustaceans, and thus not kosher. What shocked me about this is that copepods are very large when it comes to filtration...for .2mm up to 10mm, with most around a milimeter according to this and some species are human parasites! (though almost certainly not the species found in NYC tap water, I'm presuming). And yet the article on NYC claims the NYC Department of Environmental Protection claims they are "impossible to do away."

    Now, what surprises me is that a contaminant this large is a problem to do away with. What does that say about the ability of NYC water treatment to filter out far tinier contaminants like bacteria and protists? Are the copepods infiltritating the system post-treatment? Clearly, if NYC has some of the purest municipal water in the world, there's something missing from the story here. I'm sure there's some hydrologist or inverterbrate zoologist reading Slashdot that could shed more light on what's going on,

  165. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by Technician · · Score: 1

    I'm not even going to go into closed system water recycling... :-)

    I will....

    If given a choice of water that just passed through some filter to remove most of the gross chunks and bacteria and water that was distilled by nature (rainwater), I would take the water that has a better chance of having been seperated from trace metals such as zinc, mecury, lead, arsnic, and other contaminates such as bacteria and viruses. Let the vapor go aloft and be exposed to the sun's UV rays for a while.

    In some areas of the world, the air is so bad, that filtered waste water may be the cleaner choice, but in areas near an ocean with the predomimate breeze from the ocean, rain water gets my vote. This water is usualy collected at higher elevations to take advantage of gravity feed and puts the collection source above most of the populations drain systems.

    As examples of this look up where Portand Oregon gets it's water. Only recently are they overgrowing the Bull Run watershed and are considering using more well water or river water.

    The US Navy didn't want to connect to the Portaland City water supply when they visited. They thought there was a problem with the water because it doesn't have enough chlorene in the water. The assumption was made the system wasn't working properly.

    Little Chlorene in the water indicates either the purification system isn't doing it's job properly, or very little is needed to purify the water.

    From a quick Google search on Bull Run Watershed pulls up this quick tidbit.

    The Bull Run watershed is the primary source of water for Portland, Oregon. It is located in the Mount Hood National Forest, separated from the mountain itself by a ridge. The watershed is about 102 square miles in area, and typically receives 80-170 inches of rainfall per year. It includes reservoirs, which store water for use during the city's dry summer months.

    The watershed is reserved solely for producing drinking water. The quality of its water is so high that the city does not treat or filter the water.


    I would drink recycled water, but if possible, I prefer mother nature to do the recycling. Too bad most of the world does not have a pure source of drinking water.

    I have traveled to other parts of the world. Most places have awful tasting water.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  166. A link that works by Willard+B.+Trophy · · Score: 1
    The URL given in the story is very broken. You can find out more about the ZeeWeed® 1000 system here. They have some very cool tech, including Membrane Bioreactor technology.

    DISCLAIMER: The webmaster of Zenon Environmental is a good buddy of mine. He now owes me beer. Unrecycled, for preference, though you never can tell with Canadian beer ...

  167. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by sebol · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a Malaysian, I dont like water issue flame war.

    I admit that the price singapore got to pay to Malaysia is very low, because it was signed a long time ago. It's time to negotiate better price.
    not too low, not too high.

    Forget politics, for me, Malaysia should continue supplying water to singapore for humanitary reason.
    I hope both party not take any advantage such as setting pricing too high or too low.

    Malaysian X-PM is quite anti Singapore, but the currrent one is not.

    --
    -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
  168. Used water? by jamarsa · · Score: 1

    Come on, rain/river/spring water is just recycled water (and a lot of times) by Nature. Just the same here.

  169. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Apparently, this water goes through Reverse Osmosis, then micro-particle filtering, then UV exposure to ensure that it's completely clean and safe. I don't think it's content is much of a problem.

  170. OLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NewWater has been around for many years now in Singapore. Why is this being posted now? Just a few YEARS too late!

  171. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by swb · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that the "Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal"?

  172. Re:What do most people drink? Duh. by mog007 · · Score: 1

    Damn right, and I proudly drink tap water. Why? Because my tax money already goes toward making it drinkable. Keep your bottled water, I'll stick with the stuff that's 1/1000th the price.

  173. Recycled water in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a similar product for sale in the US (apparently just the Charleston area for now) called Outhouse Springs.

  174. Re:What do most people drink? Duh. by geoffspear · · Score: 1

    Of course, if you don't sterilize the bottles before refilling them, you end up with a whole lot of bacteria building up.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  175. OB W.C. Fields reference by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1

    "Water? Fish copulate in that stuff!"

  176. It's all dinosaur piss, anyway. by lysium · · Score: 1
    I once read that all of the available water on the planet has passed through a excretive system at least once. The average brontosaur created a pondful of urine on a daily basis; mulitply such quantities over hundreds of millions of years, and you can easily see this as possible.

    I see little difference between recently-recycled and distantly-recycled water.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  177. Huh? by misleb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought water treatment was standard practice in many places. It is in the US. Even where water isn't necessarily scarce. Really, I thought all "city water" came from a treatment facilities. That is where they add the chlorine and flouride and stuff.

    Perhaps this new treatment method makes better water than most facilities, but is it really that unusual to be drinking water that was once flushed down the toilet?

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  178. hmmm.. I don't remember eating that!!! by Amdmhz · · Score: 1

    Ummm.. I think I went too far with that one.

  179. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by iabervon · · Score: 1

    Makes me wonder whether the use of hydrogen gas for energy will lead to people getting newly-synthesized water (probably only as a luxury item, though). You can be sure that there's nothing but H2O in your water, because it was H2 and O2 until it was bottled.

  180. Full text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oct. 22, 2004 | The promotional bottle for Singapore's NEWater looks like any other bottled water, right down to its snappy name and bright label. And it tastes the same as other premium bottled-water brands -- maybe even better, if you prefer the metallic edge of Evian to the airy sweetness of Poland Springs. But while NEWater is transparent, its story is not, and it's frankly not terribly appetizing.

    NEWater is the product of Singapore's new water-treatment system, and it is wastewater that has been purified through advanced synthetic membranes called ZeeWeed. That's right: The crystal-clear NEWater that gushes through the country's faucets isn't gurgling from a mountain spring. Most recently, it was flushed from a toilet.

    The water is first treated in a traditional water plant before going through a three-stage purification that uses high-quality ZeeWeed membranes, which filter out even the most microscopic bacteria. By the time it's processed, NEWater meets all the drinking-water standards specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the World Health Organization.

    Don't panic. There is no plan to bring NEWater -- or anything like it -- to the United States anytime soon. "It's unacceptable to [U.S.] consumers to drink their own waste stream," acknowledges Ashok Gadgil, an Indian-born environmental physicist who works at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (though he quickly points out that astronauts use the technology in long-term outer-space trips).

    The great promise is that this and other new technologies can, in some way, help solve an increasingly dire global water crisis. Nearly 20 percent of the world (1.2 billion people) does not have easy access to clean water -- 400 children die every hour from water-borne causes, according to Gadgil. And even in developed countries like the United States, fear of tainted water is on the rise -- and not just the non-kosher copepods that sneaked through New York's filtration system this summer, worrying Orthodox Jews.

    In the United States, sand filtration systems have traditionally been used to remove particles and sediment from our surface water, which is then treated with chemicals like chlorine. But some strains of bacteria, including Cryptosporidium, have started to develop immunity to chlorine. In 1993, the microscopic "crypto" parasites spread through the municipal water systems of southeastern Wisconsin, causing an outbreak of a flulike disease that affected more than 400,000 people and killed approximately 100. While the outbreak has been linked to the inadequate treatment of drinking water taken from Lake Michigan, no specific source of the Cryptosporidium was ever identified. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that in the past 20 years, crypto has become recognized as one of the most common causes of waterborne disease within humans in the United States.

    While the CDC assures us that the American drinking-water supply is normally safe, and that it has been taking precautions to handle outbreaks like the one in Wisconsin, it issues a reminder on its Web site that disease that spreads through water is still a very real problem. Crypto may be found in drinking water and recreational water in every region of the United States and throughout the world.

    Membrane technology may also help the United States protect itself from terrorist attacks on the nation's water supply. Some membranes could act as a reliable barrier to contaminants such as sarin and anthrax. However, membranes can screen only water that goes into the treatment plant. Once it leaves the plant on its way to individual homes, water again becomes vulnerable, which is why government researchers stress that a viable water-security strategy must consist of two parts: treatment and monitoring.

    ZeeWeed -- the illustrious membrane that processes NEWater -- is just one of the successful new technologies used to purify water of bacteria. But it's so captivating a product that it is developing a cultlike devotion amo

  181. It IS water. by Game+Genie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course I would drink it. It's water. On the other hand I would never pay a dollar for a bottle of it, just like I would not pay a dollar for any a bottle of any water. Cut the sensationalism.

  182. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    "We(Singapore) are tiny(640km Square)..."

    Oh, come on. 640km ought to be enough for everyone.

  183. They drink it in space every day by Cnik70 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the water drank by astro/cosmonauts in the ISS is nothing more than purified humidity/urine/sweat/etc. If I remember correctly, the Mir space station was the first to make use of this sort of process.

    --
    -Cnik
  184. Would _I_ drink this water? by Skudd · · Score: 1

    HELL NO!

  185. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, maybe you guys should have thought of that BEFORE you went and declairded your independance...

    Sheeesh!

  186. Only 0.02 um? by mkcheme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a biopharm engineer, I don't trust anything more open than a 200-300 kDa filter (about 10-15 nm) to clear all viruses by size excplusion. [/shameless plug] ;-)

  187. water by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    a lot of people are commenting that water coming out of our pipes (ugh..) were actually from water coming out from animal's "pipes" - so what's the big deal.

    the thing is not only about where the water is coming from - the thing is that the water is bottled and branded - being sold for money.

    guess that gives my nickname a whole new meaning...

  188. The BBC did a water study by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    1: London is not wet. It's on the east side and all the weather has already fallen on the western side of the country. I'm from Glasgow. That's wet, it's just north of Ireland and all that weather from the atlantic just drizzles in constantly.

    2: The tap water in the UK is as good as it gets. It's as good, it's better than any bottled water you can buy. It gets sampled in thousands of locations and tested for *everything* on a weekly basis. Water quality is taken very very seriously indeed.

    I worked at a water purification board during university, each day samplers went out to hundreds of locations across the region and took samples, this was done *every* day, covering the whole region they were responsible for, the samples were all tested the same day in state of the art labs for anything you care to mention, including hormones and drugs.

    http://www.dwi.gov.uk/

    So, basically you *are* full of shit, but it's your own shit, not somebody elses.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The BBC did a water study by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Thanks for the superfluous geography lecture. Note that I wrote about the climate in the UK and not the weather in London.

      2. I never said the tap water in UK wasn't as good as it gets (Coca-cola have learned something about the quality of tap water), but drugs in the water is a legitimate concern. Even if the specific claims about prozac, for example, are truly unfounded, it's still right that consumers continue to demand the highest standards possible, especially when the industry is run by private corporations.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    2. Re:The BBC did a water study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are being a defensive twat.

      --The World p.s. Sorry about your small penis.

    3. Re:The BBC did a water study by amorsen · · Score: 1
      I'm sure that London water is perfectly safe to drink. That doesn't mean I have to like the taste. And last time I visited the UK I spent the time near Birmingham. The water tasted noticeably of chlor. Perhaps the water in London is better.

      Oh and bottled water is of very different quality and taste. Some is utter crap that wouldn't be allowed as tap water in Denmark.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    4. Re:The BBC did a water study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard this same concern raised stateside (prescription drugs, chemicals, pesticides, etc) entering the water supply as consumer waste that is not adaquately filtered.

      I definitely don't want to drink that, and generallizing the whole usa is probably useless, I think quality really varies. I haven't been able to find any good numbers and the ones I do see, I halfway think they are baked and anyone producing results that would be alarming would be let go and branded a junk scientist. I don't know. Do what you can to take care of yourself I suppose.

    5. Re:The BBC did a water study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but drugs in the water is a legitimate concern.

      ahhhh... too bad it's not lsd....

    6. Re:The BBC did a water study by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      It is chlorinated, put it in a jug in the fridge for an hour, or like the rest of us, filter it through an ion exchange column to take out the hardness.

      --
      Deleted
  189. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    I'm living in Singapore right now, and it's definately pronounced "NEW water".

  190. "it gushes from the toilets of Singapore" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    That's quite an image you call up there.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  191. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    affirmative action for Malays, which forms the MAJORITY of the population in Malaysia, meaning minorities(Chinese, Indians) are discriminated against!!!!).


    That's something I've never gotten - affirmative action. How is it that affirmative action for the minorities is acceptable (as is the case in the US and elsewhere, I'd imagine), but affirmative action for the majority is not?

    Discrimination is discrimination. Period. It's not just.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  192. Don't risk it! by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

    Only accept a source you can trust - drink your own urine!

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  193. Re:What do most people drink? Duh. by zrail · · Score: 1

    My stepdad is one of the water operators in my hometown. All of the equipment and procedures that are in place at the waste water treatment plant exists for the single purpose of cleaning up the water before they pipe it five miles out of town to the nearest river, which drains into the Mississippi.

    Most of the water for communities that are not near major bodies of water (lakes, large rivers, etc) comes from deep aquifers via wells that are more than 1000 feet deep. This water hasn't been through a living being for at least a few hundred years, if not more. It can take quite a while for water to get down that far, and by the time it does its some of the cleanest water available anywhere.

  194. Official Link by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    Here is the NEWater website by the Public Utilities Board in Singapore. Mostly propagandaist, but check it out.

  195. Re:"Seattle Times" --Dasani is Purified Sewage Wat by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    They still sell that stuff?

    They tried it in the UK and had to withdraw it, because it emerged they were taking standard tapwater and adding chemicals to it (then charging 1000% of the cost price). The result failed several water safety tests, and had to be withdrawn from shelves and destroyed for public safety reasons.

    Shortly after the debacle they announced they were discontinuing the product for 'business reasons'.

  196. Bottled tap water. by caluml · · Score: 1

    Drinking toilet water? That's nothing. Coca Cola bottled it and sold it us.

  197. Re:"Seattle Times" --Dasani is Purified Sewage Wat by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    Before anyone yells "Source!!" here it is, btw.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3566233.stm

  198. nasa has another way - phytoremediation by fuchead · · Score: 1

    Wolverton Environmental Services, Inc. (WES, Inc.), founded in 1990 by B. C. "Bill" Wolverton, Ph.D., is a small environmental consulting firm providing consultant services in the field of phytoremediation. The Company advocates the use of plants and their root-associated microorganisms to biodegrade and treat indoor air and water pollution. http://www.ssc.nasa.gov/environmental/docforms/wat er_research/water_research.html http://www.ssc.nasa.gov/~ssctrs/abstracts/cit.html http://www.wolvertonenvironmental.com/book1.htm

  199. Doomed flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I gather, the astronauts on IIS have been doing that for a while already as it is.

    IIS? I hear that one already crashed.

  200. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by return_of_ffalcon · · Score: 1
    An H2O molecule is an H2O molecule, is an H2O molecule.
    Of course, that's not true. Some H20 molecules contain deuterium, some don't,etc...
  201. Alkaline Chemicals? Why? by janvo · · Score: 1

    If this water was really 'purified', why would they need to add alkaline chemicals to restore the pH? doesn't that imply that the water isn't purified and that there's an acidic compound still in it?

    1. Re:Alkaline Chemicals? Why? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      The water should match the ph of your body reasonably well or it's not very healthy for you.

      Drinking water that has been ROed or steam purified should have minerals and such put back into it to give it taste and make it not suck stuff out of your own body when you drink it :)

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  202. I have a friend there... by ssg4605 · · Score: 1

    ...and he said it tastes like shit. :-)

  203. "Glacier-clear"? by lnixon · · Score: 1

    NEWater looks like any other glacier-clear bottled H20.

    Ehm. Even seen meltwater from a glacier? It's blue-green and opaque from silt.

  204. Already done in the Netherlands... since yesterday by Vincent77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The drinking water treatment plant, located at Andijk, the Netherlands, serves approximately 500,000 people and treats approximately 25 million cubic metres of water per year. It is expected to be the largest installation involving UV technology in Europe and is the first of its kind to treat micropollutants. "Ultraviolet systems have, for some time, been proven as an effective barrier against a wide range of pathogens, including E.coli, Cryptosporidium and Giardia," said Marvin DeVries, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Trojan Technologies. "This project will optimize the design of a UV treatment system, using Advanced Oxidation, that will effectively treat a much wider range of contaminants, that, with extended exposure, may be harmful to human health." It is an alternative to Chlorine-desinfection, but better for the environment. They also claim better results than the chlorine-method. If you search the web for 'UV' and 'Andijk' you'll find more about it. I think this method can help any country in the world, even the UK and Australia.

  205. In all seriousness, though by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    Thanks to slashdot, I finally have step 2 of the business plan I've been working on, which until now looked like this:

    Phase 1: Collect rancid toilet water
    Phase 2: ???
    Phase 3: Profit!

    1. Re:In all seriousness, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA!!!!

      friended :-)

  206. Been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kryten: ... There's a whole case of that wine I brewed out of urine recyc, just lying there, practically untouched.

    Lister: Call me pretentious if you like, but for me, a truly great wine should not leave you with a moustache that you can only remove with turps.

  207. Actually by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    After I read that it gushed out my nose.

  208. NEWater is Cleaner than you Think! by chrischoo · · Score: 1

    While I am not an engineer by training, my gf who is in her final year of Civil Engineering (with minor in Environmental Engrg) at the National University of Singapore has shared with me some interesting facts about NEWater. (Hey correct me here if I make gross mistakes)

    1) Singapore's NEWater does not come from the sewers. They are too squimish to run their reverse osmosis and whatever through the sai (shit) that passes through our sewerage system. Instead NEWater comes from drain water, which is a hell lot easier to clean than sewerage.

    2) NEWater is pumped back into our reservoirs. Because NEWater lacks nutrients and minerals for human consumption, it is important that it is pumped back into the reservoirs so that it gets some of these properties back. Drinking NEWater over the long term (which is not what any of us do anyway) is not good for health.

    3) NEWater is valued by industries. Manufacturing plants for instance do not need to process treated water and can instead use NEWater directly for things like cleaning PCBs and other electronic equipment since it is pure.

    Overall NEWater is a good thing! I felt quite honoured to have been one of the guys staging the first public drinking of NEWater during the National Day Parade 2002... Altho all of us (even the Colonels from the Army) referred to it as sai-chui (Shit-Water) :D

  209. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by Technician · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's content is much of a problem.

    Unless it's contaminated with organic solvents or pesticides.

    Some contaminates are not compatible with Reverse Osmosis. Check with a reputable dealer of Reverse Osmosis equipment. Find out if your source water is compatible. Reverse Osmosis is very good, but not perfect. I've been in places where Reverse Osmosis was used and had to monitor the incomming supply for possible shutdown due to contaminates.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  210. Isn't there a massive below sea level salt lake? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Within just a few miles of the sea? The Lake Eyre basin. It obviously used to be part of the sea anyway, build a few canals and fill it back up with water, the surrounding areas will become far greener than they are at the moment.

    --
    Deleted
  211. Ban LAWN WORK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for those of you who have never been outside

    - - - - -
    people do this weird ritual where they grow grass and call it a lawn
    - - - - -

    we should ban all lawn work...it would make me very happy and converse water

  212. Re:"Seattle Times" --Dasani is Purified Sewage Wat by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 1

    According to the article, n1 selling bottled water in US is "Aquafina", which is also purified tap water... More interesting is that "Aquafina" is the also name of the government company that filters all sewage water in Belgium.

    --
    "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
  213. Re:"Seattle Times" --Dasani is Purified Sewage Wat by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    They also won the IG Noble prize for chemistry in recognition of their efforts.

  214. Re:Distiller by aolsheepdog · · Score: 1

    Ahh, blanket statements

    Of course you live where I do (Asmara, Eritrea) and you can't drink the regular water no mater how well you filter it, the distiller is the only way to go.
  215. tad squirmish by bani · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...arent you the people who made chewing gum illegal though?

    1. Re:tad squirmish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >> ...arent you the people who made chewing gum illegal though?

      Though? Though what? Does keeping the streets clean imply something about the appropriateness of reusing water? Do you bug out when you hear music played using rechargable batteries?

      I'm confused by your use of "though". Though what? How does making gum illegal take anything away from their acheivement?

      You bring up an interesting point of trivia but why the "though"?

    2. Re:tad squirmish by laggist · · Score: 1

      well uh, illegal for import to sell, but not illigal for personal consumption. there's a hell lot of grey area over here in sunny singapore~ ^^

    3. Re:tad squirmish by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Sale of "medicinal" chewing gum (ie Wrigley's) is allowed in pharmacies. You'll have to show your I/C though or something.

  216. Irradiated water? by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 1
    They are talking about how important this could be for regions without good access to clean water, and in the end, someone mentions a UV light sterilization system that's much cheaper. One thing I've always wondered: why not use plain old gamma rays to treat water? We have no shortage of powerful gamma ray emitters around. Once the gamma ray emitter is set up, it powers itself for a long time. It sterilizes everything. Piping water through some type of irradiation system seems like it would really sterilize it at a very low cost, and yet I've never heard of such a system.

    Of course there are safety concerns. If some of the radio isotopes managed to get into the water as it went past, that would be bad. Fortunately, it's not hard to contain such things, and also, it's very easy to monitor the outgoing water to see if there is any leak of radioactive materials.

    It just seems to make sense but I've never heard of such a system in use.

  217. bigots... by bani · · Score: 0, Troll

    malaysia is not just full of racial bigotry, but religious bigotry as well.

    one comes to expect this sort of thing from islamic states. its the rule rather than the exception.

    1. Re:bigots... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      The irony in the parent comment is left as an exercise to the reader.

  218. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, look at all these losers (USA, India) that declared independency from the UK... who has heard anything from them ever since? Me thinks other areas like.... ummm.... like.... Falkland Islands ... made the right choice!

  219. Webserver responding with text/plain? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1
    What's up with this URL: http://www.pub.gov.sg/NEWater

    $ lynx -dump -head http://www.pub.gov.sg/NEWater
    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:34:16 GMT
    Server: Apache
    Last-Modified: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:59:07 GMT
    ETag: "301cf-16a-411d71eb"
    Accept-Ranges: bytes
    Content-Length: 362
    Connection: close
    Content-Type: text/plain
  220. Comman Practice by Lossy · · Score: 1

    We (the U.S. army) already currently employ R.O. technology to filter our water we employ units with the acronym of ropu to filter the water, push it through an ro unit, add chlorine and then store it in bladders or tanks. They can do an impressive 3000 gallons of low salt water an hour. RO units are also frequently installed underneath kitchen sinks. Quite comman practice... Although I've never peed in mine...

  221. Common myth. by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Suck stuff out of your body? You say it like its a bad thing. One of the reasons humans drink water is to help flush stuff out of the body.

    You'd get far more minerals (esp biologically usable minerals) from food than you'd get from water that's fit for drinking.

    So drinking really pure water is perfectly fine and likely to be even healthier than mineral water or other water (esp given the amounts of sodium present in some bottled waters).

    --
    1. Re:Common myth. by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Pure water tastes bad.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:Common myth. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I haven't tasted really pure water, but RO and distilled water taste good to me - hardly any taste (if any).

      If I wanted my water to have flavour I'd drink some other beverage.

      --
  222. Come round to my house. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    The water comes from a well near the top of a hill above my house, flows into a settling tank where the worst of the sediment settles out, goes through a simple mesh filter to get the rest out, and down to the house. Real fresh Highland spring water. Very very cold, too.

  223. What's the big deal? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I live in Mexico City, and much of the water comes from water-treatment plants.

    It's completely pure (problem is, water gets re-contaminated later due to poor transport, leaks, etc - so much for treatment, heh! :P ).

    So, the question is: "Would you drink water that just came out of a water-treatment plant?"

    Of course, what's the big deal? As long as it doesn't contain pathogen agents, it's OK. And that's what water treatment is about, isn't it?

  224. another filter technology for the third world by buzzlightyear · · Score: 1

    The Zenon system may be suitable where the existing infrastructure and economy can support it, but in many places in the third world where clean water is hard to get, it is going to be too expensive to buy, install and maintain. Fortunately, there's another technolgy which has been proven successful in many of the poorest countries in the world. Biosand filters are cheap and simple, as well as effective - qualities that make them appropriate where Zenon may not be. For more details, see The Centre for Affordable Water and Sanitation Technology: http://www.cawst.org/technology/watertreatment/fil tration-biosand.php/

  225. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

    Israel has no water either and manages just fine... Desalination is a great technology.

  226. Quality of the recycled water by dillee1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am concerned about the quality of those recycled water. Sure it should have removed most contagious subtances, but how about heavy metal, toxin and may be human hormones?
    American man have mark drop sperm count due to contamination of drink water with female hormone; which originate from birth control pills and get into drinking water via recycling sewage.

    Will that ZeeWeed system remove all these contaminants? I really doubt.

  227. I dunno bout me.... by germaniumdiode · · Score: 1

    I wouldnt drink it, but my dog might

  228. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  229. Tried It !!! by slappy_guru · · Score: 1

    It really taste's like crap !!

    --
    "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" Richard Feynman
  230. Hey, how's your toothbrush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how many decimeters is it from the water surface in your toilet bowl to the place where you hang your toothbrush?

  231. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by hendridm · · Score: 1
    In other news, does the name mean "NEW Water"

    NEWater = Neoterically Evacuated Water

  232. All Are Connected by Databass · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's one of those head trips people tend to think of in grade school:

    "The water I drink has been on this planet for so long. Who knows where this drop of water right here has been before? Maybe it was even inside a dinosaur!"

    It seems possible and maybe even likely that all the water you drink has been pissed out of SOMETHING in the billions of years this planet has existed. And it wasn't filtered by ZeeWeed then.

  233. My wife works at Zenon... by TrickFred · · Score: 1

    ...at the corporate offices to be precise [she's an electrician, builds the panels that run the systems] - and once a week, she fills up a few 18 gallon water cooler bottles at work, and brings them home. This stuff is perfectly safe, or else we wouldn't let out 4 year old drink it. Last year, they refitted the Samsung plant with one of the larger systems, the one in Korea. Being able to shit in one side and have pure water come out the other is one of their selling points. These guys are world wide, and this is the future of water processing.

  234. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    That's something I've never gotten - affirmative action. How is it that affirmative action for the minorities is acceptable (as is the case in the US and elsewhere, I'd imagine), but affirmative action for the majority is not?

    Because it is trying to equal out the historic hurdles. For example, without AA, an incompetent C student that it white can get in to Yale over a better qualified black person. Yale uses alumni preference, and a vast majority of alumni are white. So Bush Jr. with crappy grades gets in while the more qualified black students are kept out.

    The same happens in other parts of business. Most CEOs are white males. They are more likely, in the absense of all other factors, to hire more people like themselves. AA requires that they consider others, not just their brother's kids (also white).

    Without AA, white males will receive preference over others. AA will force the consideration of those that aren't white males. It is not to require a less qualified minority be selected over a more qualified white male, though under-qualified white males are still chosen over more qualified minorities, like Bush Jr. for Yale. So even the current AA doesn't do enough to even out the playing field for the nepotistic white males in power.

  235. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by Vasan · · Score: 2, Informative

    While I understand why Singaporeans such as you feel you have the need to 'defend yourselves' from the 'big brother' Malaysia north of you, here is the other point of view.

    p.s. I am Malaysian, but I like Singaporeans, and I don't understand why the fuck we need to blow this all out of proportion. Kisses to the Singaporean girls :)

  236. Re:What do most people drink? Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is that, in the US at least, the discharge from most municipal sanitation systems is cleaner than the body of water it is discharging into.

    San Diego went through this about 6 years ago. They have a sewage water reclaimation plant in Santee. San Diego and Santee wanted to put that water back into the municipal water stream. OH THE UPROAR!

    So instead it is practically given away to area golf courses, parks and other open spaces, as well as to industrial (food manufacturing? don't know) users. In Santee, the hydrants and faucets that are supplied by this water are painted barney-purple.

    Oh well. If only they got their water from a river, then maybe it would have been OK. After all, it doesn't stop places like the Tri-Cities, Washington,(you know, they're just downstream from Hanford on the Columbia River) from getting their water from potentially questionable places. Not only Hanford spewing/leaching into the Columbia, but think of all the chemical runoff from the Columbia Basin agriculture as well.

    Here is one instance where the collective intelligence is very FITH. So much for "science-based" decision-making.

  237. Isn't this how they do it in spaceships? by lashi · · Score: 1
    >it gushes from the toilets of Singapore instead of a bubbling spring.

    Isn't this how they do it in spaceships? Recycle water? Drink your own urine essentially?

    Well, if it's good enough for the Astronauts, then it's good enough for you. (But not me, of course. That's disgusting!)

  238. So purified means something else? by sapgau · · Score: 1

    If astronauts drink from their own piss, how come this is different? Is there a bad soul lurkin in recyled water?

  239. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    >does the name mean "NEW Water" or "Any Water"?

    It's obviously pronounce "Ni!"

    ("Ahhhhh! Please stop!")

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  240. "It's a Wise Woodsman... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ...Who Knows What's Biting Him" was the name of a great old book about roughing it.

    In it, Richard Frisbie realizes / explains that freshwater fish have to process a lot of fluids to maintain their salt balance. This means freshwater fish piss a lot. An enormous amount compared to dessicated sorts like humans. A great portion of any freshwater pond/lake/stream you've assumed to be pristine is more like dilute fish pee.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  241. Weird??? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    "One of the reasons why Singapore even has to consider this is, is because they actually pay for the river water that comes through Malaysia. The problem is Malaysia wants more money, which is kinda wierd, considering the water is just going to flow to the ocean anyways"

    Singapore is getting water from Malaysia at a very low price (as part of two contracts/agreements IIRC).

    "The water is just going to flow to the ocean anyways" is a really silly reason to justify supplying it to another country at a very low price (or even another state for that matter).

    Prices are usually based mainly on what the market can bear, not mainly on cost. Even if you want to get rid of stuff, if you can charge for it, you charge for it.

    Even if there is excess water now, is no guarantee of there being excess water in the future. Johor (the Malaysian state where the water comes from) is a fairly populous state with quite a number of industries. Future contracts should take that into account if the Malaysian parties in future negotiations do their job properly.

    If you divert water from a river the river becomes smaller - that is not something to take lightly either - divert enough and the impact could be significant.

    Also, supplying the water from the river to Singapore involves pipes and other infrastructure, that's not super cheap either.

    Finally even if the water is really just going to flow to the ocean and never ever anywhere else, it's fresh water. Blood has been spilled for much less.

    --
  242. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Out friendly neighbours Malaysia also had a field day making remarks such as "Singaporeans are resorting to drinking their own pee" and stuff as we had some bilateral issues regarding the sale of water from Malaysia to Singapore. This is one of the reasons why Newater technology is developed in Singapore.

    So what you're saying is that this, ZeeWeed thing was created as part of a pissing contest?
  243. sounds like fucking to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't even do that... the female deposits her eggs and the male... nevermind.

    from http://floridafisheries.com/Fishes/other.html

    EASTERN MOSQUITO FISH
    (Gambusia holbrooki)

    Common names - Mosquito fish (gambusia, pot belly).

    Description - A diminutive silver-colored, live-bearing minnow that is common throughout Florida...

    Spawning Habits - A live-bearer the male has a modified anal fin (gonopodium) used for inserting the sperm into the vent of the female, which gives live birth. ...

    sounds like fucking to me

  244. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uric acid is not composed of H20.

  245. Not just any water, NE Water! by GnomeAttic · · Score: 1

    NEWater could come from NE Where!

  246. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by amorsen · · Score: 1

    Pure H2O has a very dull taste. You won't have much luck marketing it I don't think. Then again, you never know. Some of the mineral water you can buy tastes noticeably worse than distilled water.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  247. bottled water joke by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    (I forget the attribution on this one..)

    Some french industrialists are sitting around smoking cigarettes.
    Frenchman: [takes drag] How stupid do I think ze Americans are? [takes drag] I bet we could sell zem water.

    BTW, kudos to Singapore. They're dealing with the impending water crisis, which is more than I can say for my country (Florida in particular has their head up their patoot w/ regard to water usage). Yeah, I'd drink NEWater. It's cleaner than plain tap, or rainwater, so what's the big deal? No sense in getting emotional about where it's been, it's just water. It isn't going to relapse on a habit and spontaneously turn into pee. The "yuk" factor is just attention-seeking on the part of journalists. *Whap*! Bad journos!

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  248. Every time I think about it... by PoochieReds · · Score: 1

    A poem attributed to my high-school environmental science teacher 15 years ago or so:

    Every time I think about it,
    it always makes me sadder,
    to know that every drop of rain,
    has been through someone's bladder.

  249. drinking pee by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    See this /. articlerecently about US ARMY having new MRE's that could be "hydrated" with urine. We hail our new urine-detoxifying overlords!

    See you in the global water crisis! (Just add... er.... nameless liquids)

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  250. Perception by Arpie · · Score: 1

    For the geek crowd that says "Yuck! Pee water!" only smoking "ZeeWeed", etc.:

    Just think: same situation, same filtration process, drinking (made from) pee water. The only difference is you are in a spaceship. Water and air must be recycled. Would you still drink it for the chance of being in a real spaceship, zooming through the galaxy?

    I bet 99% of the geeks here (me included) would love to volunteer for that, pee water or no pee water.

    Changes your perception, heh?

    --
    /* TAANSTAFL */
  251. I have a better name! by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    Shitwater

    or

    PissWater

    The marketing practically writes itself!

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  252. Might be OK for tea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would you like one lump or two?

  253. Zenon Environmental....... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    I thought Zenon Environmental was a Canadian company. They have a rather large building near my home.

    Let's take a look here:

    http://www.zenonenv.com/contact/contact.shtml

    ZENON Environmental Inc.
    Corporate Headquarters
    3239 Dundas Street West
    Oakville, Ontario L6M 4B2
    Canada
    Tel: 905-465-3030
    Fax: 905-465-3050

    ZeeWeed is just a one of their products.

  254. Newsflash! by null-sRc · · Score: 1

    ...all water is recycled...

    the water from a glacier has perfectly preserved caveman urine...

    what's the difference?

    --
    -judging another only defines yourself
  255. Nothing to see here... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Dogs have been drinking toilet water for decades with no ill effects. Move along!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  256. Why yes I would. by alimk · · Score: 1

    I grew up in Bahrain which is in the Middle East. Bahrain is a little island located east of Saudi Arabia in the Persian Gulf. The natural fresh water supply was is very limited. As far as I know I grew up on processes water. Most of the water (drinking, washing, and pretty much anything else) comes from either the sea or processed sewage water. I would drive by the processing plant every day almost... man it stinks. BUT, getting to the point! Processed water when done right is completely safe to drink or to use for anything else. I'm currently living in Texas and when I've told people about the processed sewage water I get weird stares. It's almost as if the thought that the water comes from sewage completely negates the fact that it's also perfectly safe to drink. Yes people, through the miracle of what we call science, we did figure out a way to make sewage water drinkable. It has been in popular use in areas where there are limited supplies of fresh water.

    --
    "Religion is the Opium of the masses." - Karl Marx
  257. Absolutely! by danmanx · · Score: 1

    I'd drink this water in a heartbeat. If we don't reclaim water like this, the human race will be doomed.

  258. Prefered by... by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

    The water prefered by 4 out of every 5 Kevin Costner's.

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  259. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  260. Where do you live? by billybob · · Score: 1

    I would have to guess that you dont live in a major metro area, eg LA, NYC, DC, or some other random places like New Jersey. Have you ever tasted the tap water that comes out of these places? You can feel your life shortening by weeks at a time with each gulp of it. It is NASTY and just tastes like chemicals.

    I dont live in a big city but hvae visited all places mentioned above. The tap water here in Oregon is pretty good, but I still throw it through a brita filter, because it does help get rid of the slight chemical taste.

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:Where do you live? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I would have to guess that you dont live in a major metro area, eg LA, NYC, DC, or some other random places like New Jersey. Have you ever tasted the tap water that comes out of these places? You can feel your life shortening by weeks at a time with each gulp of it. It is NASTY and just tastes like chemicals. I dont live in a big city but hvae visited all places mentioned above.

      Did you drink the water? New York's water is about the best there is, far better than almost any bottled water you can buy, for example. Maybe you were in a building with bad pipes.

      Now DC's water, that's got a funny taste. And of course there was the issue this year with all the leader feeder pipes...

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:Where do you live? by billybob · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in NY was maybe 8 years ago, perhaps thigns have changed. But back then it was horrible. Maybe it was just the building, but I cant imagine how one of the biggest cities on the planet could have clean water as you suggest? I mean obviously they have treatment plants and all, but I've never been to a big polluted city and drinken decent tap water.

      --
      Joseph?
    3. Re:Where do you live? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I cant imagine how one of the biggest cities on the planet could have clean water as you suggest? I mean obviously they have treatment plants and all, but I've never been to a big polluted city and drinken decent tap water.

      I think you're letting your preconceptions cloud your perceptions. There's no reason I can think of why a big city would have worse water than a small town, unless you are talking about people wandering over to the nearest river and fetching their drinking water with a pail. Most of the worst water contamination comes from agricultural and industrial activities that are mainly found in rural and suburban areas, and exacerbated by flat terrain.

      Big cities often have much more stringent water quality requirements, more active watchdog groups, and the resources (if only through economies of scale) to apply much more elaborate and effective technology to the problem.

      In the case of New York, water is piped from mountains upstate into the city, so in a way you're not really drinking water from NYC at all.

      By the way, construction started in 1970 on the legendary Water Tunnel Number Three, a 50-year project (scheduled for completion in 2020 though the first section is in use already) to dig a 6-meter-diameter, 100km-long tunnel that starts over 200 meters below New York City and ends up in the mountains to the north. It's one of the most ambitious civil engineering projects in American history and well worth googling if you're interested in such things.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:Where do you live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd call Tampa a pretty big city... but that's just me. I only worry about the tap water when a watermain breaks because of a hurricane or storm, and the city announces we should boil our water beforehand.

    5. Re:Where do you live? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Although I guess that conservation alone wouldn't have been able to solve the water supply problems of a metropolis the size of NYC, I wonder if the man-in-the-street has ever stopped to consider the cost ( in dollars alone) of NOT conserving resources - while you still have plenty of them.

      I wonder what Las Vegas ( the Meadows - oh, the irony) will do to stave of the coming crunch as its water resources are outstripped by its growth rate.

      Still, the NYC project is quite impressive.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  261. Distillers: Call - You need a distillation Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Nobody is going to use a batch system. What you need is a distillation column.

    Think of a non-corroding metal column usually several feet high. Different heights are maintained at different temperatures. You have an outlet at the boiling (which is also condensation) point of the material that you wish to remove and an outlet at the point in the column that is maintained at 100C.

    The lower-temperature outlets will contain mixtures of water and whatever you want to filter; you can recycle this back to get some of the remaining water (you cant get all).

  262. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by ugene · · Score: 1

    We do desalination too Right now NEWater figures to be slightly more cost effective. We have also flirted with obtaining water from moisture in the air (www.hyflux.com)

  263. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by ugene · · Score: 1

    Yes I agree I believe the issue is blown out of proportion by politicians for their own gain. As for the points noted in your MFA, I could point to you another version in my MFA with exact opposite facts, so its all redundant posturing by us mere mortals. (Only LKY and Mahathir knows the real agenda) What i do know is that in your media, you only see what the government print so, your view may or may not be biased. BUT then again, seeing you on slashdot tells me you are not the average mindless person on the street =) As for the "defend" against big borther, well how would u feel if someone else from say a "rich and influential" landlord family tells u how to run your family? and stresses that if you don't comply they'll make life difficult for you? I know you guys may feel we are paranoid, but also put yourselves in our shoes and feel for a moment. Anyway with abdullah doing a great job cleaning up the MY political scene, things are lokking better each day =) Continued success to both sides of the causeway in future i say!! Anyway, cheers to girls on both sides of the causeway, I made a couple of really hot girl friends, while partying in KL :P~~

  264. This is the same process... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    ...used in those machines you find in front of the grocery store that sell drinking water for 25 cents a gallon. (Or 15 cents at ours, used to be 25.) Carbon filtration, reverse osmosis, UV, more carbon filtration. It tastes exactly like the stuff we used to get delivered at 10 times the cost -- $7.50 per 5 gallons vs. 75 cents per 5 gallons.

    The technology is not new. What may be new is allowing people to get a system smaller than your average refrigerator.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:This is the same process... by Dr.X · · Score: 1

      Maytag is actually using ZENON's ZeeWeed technology in it's central water system for the home. This is like central air or central vac but with water.

      www.maytagwater.com

  265. Re:Take two hydrogen atoms and call me in the morn by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    NEWater it is. Remember, this is official gov.sg approved propaganda, and everyone knows gov.sg speaks puurrrfect Queen's English.

    That said, this is pretty old news already; we've had NEWater out here in sg for, what, two years now..?

  266. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    Relax man. Take a breather, drink some NEWater from the tap.

    Now consider this: even if M'sia cuts off all our water tomorrow, we WILL NOT go thirsty. You see, not only do we have desalination efforts going on, we also have this secret water project in Indonesia on which we can rely on in the near long-term.

    The NEWater project has three primary goals:-

    Industrial water supply (there are some chip factories in Kranji etc that need water)

    Awesome diplomatic firepower when that water link treaty comes up for re-negotiation.

    Making space for ourselves: sg is currently 4 mil people. By 2020, gov.sg wants that number to swell to 9 mil, either through emigration, or through "natural" growth (aka baby bonuses)

    I mean, if even it is Bumiputra-first M'sia, I really don't think politicians there are reckless enough to break treaties. The Malay Muslim Nutcracker is less strong than you think. :-)

  267. Re:"Seattle Times" --Dasani is Purified Sewage Wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe so, but Aquafina (the water) is made by Pepsi.

    Dasani is made by Coca-Cola.

    These water brands are just small parts of a much larger corporate battle.

  268. Does that water look it is... by mikefe · · Score: 1

    a very light shade of brown?

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  269. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
    Well, maybe you guys should have thought of that BEFORE you went and declairded your independance...

    Yeah, because now Singapore's stuck being one of the richest, safest, and most-developed countries on the planet, poor suckers.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  270. Re:Some Info/Background as why NEWater was necessa by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
    (We left because we wanted a society built on meritoracy, not based on racial preferences which to this day Malaysia still has - affirmative action for Malays, which forms the MAJORITY of the population in Malaysia, meaning minorities(Chinese, Indians) are discriminated against!!!!)

    I live in Malaysia, and it's pretty clear to me that the main victims of this discrimination scheme are the Malays. It's a powerful demotivator. Unfortunately it's got a lot of demagogue resonance, so it's probably not going anywhere anytime soon. But as long as it lasts, you can expect the Malays to be underrepresented in business and overrepresented in unsatisfying token government jobs.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  271. Oblig. Red Dwarf quote by Timbotronic · · Score: 1

    The water's been recycled so many times it's beginning to taste like Dutch Lager!

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  272. My stilsuit keeps me going just fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along with the windtraps and water caches...
    I've already got decaliters saved up... /herbert

  273. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's there nothing wrong with it! However the only case when I wouldnt drink it would be if the population started to spread a really scary virus. :)

  274. Thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been trying to tell my Singaporean friends for years, that they should jump on the latest water efficiency technology, and quit having to depend on Malaysia for their lives. That said...

    I have never heard any Singaporean acknowledge that the old British-era water deal is still giving Singapore its water at *far* below normal international market prices. (I don't remember the exact numbers, unfortunately.) But even the parent poster acknowledges that Mahathir & Co still haven't raised the rates, despite campaign promises to do so.

    On another of your points, don't think for a moment that it is "impossible" to simply give in to the demands of another, bigger "sovereign nation". It sucks, but it happens all the time--just like majority oppression of minorities. Nobody else really gives a care if you go back to your motherland.

    Singapore's situation is far from unique. It is populated by immigrants who arrived in the past 300 years, just like say, the USA and Australia. Singapore broke away from its "motherland" during that time, just like (for comparison) the USA and Taiwan. Malaysia can theoretically foist "historical" arguments to say that they should own Singapore--just as legitimately as Britain can claim the USA, or China can claim Taiwan.

    But none of that is relevant, because "history" as bludgeoned around in politics, is simply each group's exercise in hallucinatory self-aggrandizement. What matters is that these nations can defend themselves now, and make something of themselves for the future. For Singapore, that has meant producing probably the world's most efficient government, though they really haven't got democracy any better than their neighbors.

    Taiwan for comparison has probably the closest thing to democracy in East Asia; and both countries have excellent levels of human resource development. The USA has done alright in the past too, sometimes outshining the rest of the British Empire, though I am not sure what they are up to now.

    Slashdotters will be interested in a few statistics: Singapore has a population of 3.5 million, with an ethnic-Chinese minority that runs the country. Malaysia has 21 million, of which 7 million are ethnic Chinese. Indonesia has maybe 210 million, of which also 7 million are ethnic Chinese--who dominate the economy, and incur resentment thereby.

    Indonesia claims (or claimed under Sukarno, after their independence) a historical mandate to own Malaysia, including of course Singapore, due to the commonality of Malayo-Polynesian ethnic groups dominating the region for about the last 1,500 years. Thus they threaten both of the other two, even though the reality is that the Malayo-Polynesian races are so disparate and fractured that Indonesia's existence is an unfortunate accident of the Dutch empire. (Java would be a great country on its own, if it didn't perpetually waste its energy hammering the rest of the country down.)

    So it ends up that, even with their vastly different populations, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia have approximately equal militaries in terms of equipment--meaning equal numbers of tanks, planes, and ships.

    That's the expediency of ethnopolitics for you.

  275. Re:Already done in the Netherlands... since yester by Dr.Ruud · · Score: 1

    But that would remove the Prozac from the water of the UK, I am not sure of that to be a good idea.
    google: prozac uk drinking

  276. Placing trust in your own tech by heiders · · Score: 1

    Most of the water you drink has passed through someone else at some point or another, its not like sewage is ejected into outer space or something. The ZENON HQ in Oakville, Ontario has a set amount of water. It is recycled continuously using their own technology. It is tested at least 3 times a day (my sister worked there, it was a nuisance) and if at any point it fails, they bring in water on big trucks. This is rare, but not unheard of. So if you go there and have a drink out of the tap, it has certainly been through more than 7 people!

  277. Re:wtf? by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    I was referring to the first post made. It was a full page ad for for Gay N****rs ( a vulgar term used for people of the African race) that are Angry or GNA. I never thought about it being removed, and then my exclamation was taken out of context.