Sure- you *might* be able to theoretically build a ship that could go further
And the minute anyone seriously suggests that it's theoretically possible that maybe it's plausible, Roland Piquepaille will post a story saying that it's been done and FTL drives are available right now.
No, NASA is not priorities. Priorties is plural, so they^H it would be "are priorities", if it wasn't for the fact that it are^H is the National Aeronautical and Space Administration.
I was thinking along much the same lines, so I read TFA a bit more closely.
Despite what it says, it's got sod all to do with storing energy - more like using some at low demand times to avoid using it at peak times, e.g. by pre-chilling the cold store at night. It's just that the retards who wrote the original article and submitted it don't have a clue between them.
There's nothing more fun than switching back and forth between reading about the history of human evolution, and following the latest speculation about the identity of the mysterious R.A.B. in the Harry Potter books
Is this from the needs-to-get-a-fucking-life dept or what?
Apart from the fact that life is too short to argue over this one, consider that it arises from an inconsistency in English.
So what? It is how it is, and if you use it wrongly you're wrong. If you ever get round to learning any other languages you'll learn that they're not exactly as regular as C++ either.
I'll reinforce the point someone else made: even if it's excusable for the submitter to make the error, an editor should have caught & corrected it - it's what they're there for.
Next question: who isn't an editor?
You seem to have left out the thing that is flash based and belongs to Nano.
- December
- December
- December
- December
- December
- December
- December
- December
- December
- December
- November *
- December
* Only the last weekIt's March, FFS. Shouldn't we only get this top-ten-tripe around year end?
Despite what it says, it's got sod all to do with storing energy - more like using some at low demand times to avoid using it at peak times, e.g. by pre-chilling the cold store at night. It's just that the retards who wrote the original article and submitted it don't have a clue between them.
But apart from that, what have the Romans ever done for us?
Yes. The article is, as usual, bullshit.
I'll reinforce the point someone else made: even if it's excusable for the submitter to make the error, an editor should have caught & corrected it - it's what they're there for.
Tihs Zokn guy, has he toltatty lots the polt or waht?
Sigh, dupes here too. See: http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/26/ 0851218 - and both posted by Cliff.
I reckon he's Roland Piquepaille's sockpuppet.
Can we have a section just for these lists? Because ... er, I totally like them so much I want to be able to find them among all the boring real news.