Slashdot Mirror


iPods to be Used as Flight Data Recorders

udamahan writes "Flight Global reports small aircraft manufacturer LoPresti is introducing a system that uses an iPod as a flight data recorder. The company states that they chose the iPod for its size, low power requirements, and the 'thousands of developers passionate about writing applications for the iPod.' The article notes that data recorders are typically used for maintenance, flight/safety analysis, or, assuming proper protection, crash investigation."

200 comments

  1. Shocking... by arlo5724 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmm, not so sure if I like the sounds of this. I broke an iPod by dropping it about 4 feet, I can only imagine how one will fare after plummeting 30,000...

    1. Re:Shocking... by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not how far it falls, it's how much shock it takes at the end. Doesn't take much high-density foam to trim the impact shock to something the drive can tolerate. Surviving a fire, on the other hand...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Shocking... by JonathanR · · Score: 2, Funny

      And since most "black box" flight recorders are actually bright orange, it makes one wonder what colour they'll choose.

    3. Re:Shocking... by Konster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just throw it out of the plane before it crashes, no need to worry about fire then.

    4. Re:Shocking... by imdx80 · · Score: 4, Funny

      and now the new shuffles make sense

    5. Re:Shocking... by jimmydevice · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think most pre-"air accident victims" are too busy doing the "life flashing before their eyes" thing to remember to save the data for the FAA's post crash analysis. Most programmers have problems doing backups after a 3 day coding marathon when all they're thinking of is beer and sleep.

    6. Re:Shocking... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you can get your single-engine piston aircraft to 30,000 feet, you're doing well. If you ran into problems, you'd have time to phone in the flight data recorder information before you hit the ground...

    7. Re:Shocking... by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Can you hear me now? Goo-*Crash*"

      Sorry, airline accident victims...

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    8. Re:Shocking... by flanktwo · · Score: 1

      What? They don't make bright orange iPods?

    9. Re:Shocking... by Falco+Danderfluff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      C++ is a great language, until...
      you use Objective-C :-)

      -- Falco

    10. Re:Shocking... by fbjon · · Score: 1
      They'll choose deep blue, since white is opposite of black and deep blue is opposite of orange.


      But please don't flame me with colour theory :p

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    11. Re:Shocking... by spagetti_code · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My flash drive says its good for 2000Gs ! I've been wondering how to test that. iPod's flash is probably something similar. It doesn't matter if the circuitry survives, just the flash.

    12. Re:Shocking... by TEMMiNK · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not it breaking we have to worry about, its having to install iTunes on the aircraft's computer systems to use the damn thing!

      --
      "The stupider people think you are, the more surprised they will be when you kill them..."
    13. Re:Shocking... by PHPfanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just press f12 to Eject

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    14. Re:Shocking... by webbod · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I killed an iPod by knocking it off a desk onto a wooden floor - planes work a lot higher than desks and the ground is a lot harder. Crazy idea - what kind of a moron would want to 'open source' avionics ?

    15. Re:Shocking... by drsquare · · Score: 2, Funny

      It may survive the pressure, but will it survive the rest of the plane smashing through it?

    16. Re:Shocking... by Joelfabulous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also, see the Otterbox...

      They say the case they sell is crushproof, waterproof, airtight and they make iPod enclosures.

      www.otterbox.com

      I might buy one eventually because I like listening to music when I swim, and I've heard good things about them. Does anyone know if the iPod stops working at something like 35000 feet or so, and would the container somehow negate this effect? I'm pretty clueless about this stuff, but I assume that case would help somewhat...

      --
      Sometimes I wonder if I think too much.
    17. Re:Shocking... by Hammer · · Score: 1

      And then the crash commision is going to try to extract data from 47 broken iPods found in the wreck :-)

    18. Re:Shocking... by jcorno · · Score: 1

      My flash drive says its good for 2000Gs ! I've been wondering how to test that. iPod's flash is probably something similar. It doesn't matter if the circuitry survives, just the flash.

      They're not talking about a Shuffle. I would be very surprised if that spinning hard drive could handle more than a few Gs.

    19. Re:Shocking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your delivery is waaay to obvious, try using a tinyurl link instead

    20. Re:Shocking... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Rendering an iPod unable to play music is not the same thing as rendering the data stored on it unrecoverable.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    21. Re:Shocking... by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      You and your iPod would stop working at 35000 feet. I assume this is a plug in your iPod in the cockpit sort of thing, so...

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    22. Re:Shocking... by koyangi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My flash drive says its good for 2000Gs ! I've been wondering how to test that. iPod's flash is probably something similar. It doesn't matter if the circuitry survives, just the flash.

      I am sure these guys can help you out there.

      The MIL-STD-901D light weight hammer test will get you there (we see over 2,000 Gs all the time), but I my personal favorite is the 901D heavy weight barge test. It will only get you about 300Gs worst case (although the shock duration is much longer), but you get to set off 65lb TNT charges. Well worth the price of admission.
    23. Re:Shocking... by Scorchio · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you're fed up with breaking your delicate iPods, why not try adapting a flight data recorder to play MP3s?

    24. Re:Shocking... by mark3748 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, Nano's are flash based as well...

    25. Re:Shocking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you realize how much OO languages suck.

    26. Re:Shocking... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      The last recorded lines were:

      I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't let you do thaaaaaaaaaaaat....

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    27. Re:Shocking... by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      It's not how far it falls, it's how much shock it takes at the end. Doesn't take much high-density foam to trim the impact shock to something the drive can tolerate.

      How much is not much?

      Let's say you hit the ground at 100m/s (that's just shy of 200kts). A fairly arbitrary number, but in the right ballpark for a light aircraft crash I'd guess. I don't know what drives they use in iPods, but I bet the specs are pretty similar to the 1.8" Hitachi C3K80 drives I could easily find specs for. That specifies maximum shock of 1500G for 1ms, as a half sine-wave. Let us (with no justification beyond keeping the estimate simple) assume it can take 1500G for as long as it takes to stop and assume it's a square wave, not a sine. Taking g as 10m/s^2, we can handle an acceleration of 15000m/s^2. 100/15000 = 0.0067, so it'll take 6.7ms to stop from 100m/s. How far do we travel during that deceleration? Assuming a constant rate of deceleration, average speed would be half the initial speed, or 50m/s, so we'd go 50*0.0067 = 0.33m. About a foot of foam. And that's assuming constant deceleration from our foam (no chance), that we can compress the foam to zero thickness (no chance), that the drive is not operating (unlikely) and we're really can exceed the specified shock load in duration by a factor of 6 (unlikely). Two feet of high-density foam would seem closer to the mark and that's actually quite a lot of foam if you ask me.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    28. Re:Shocking... by edittard · · Score: 0

      You seem to have left out the thing that is flash based and belongs to Nano.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    29. Re:Shocking... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Your calculations ignore the effect of the aircraft's crumpling as it strikes the ground, and also assumes that the impact is perpendicular to the ground. So, if the plane goes into a power dive straight down, or hits a granite cliff at its maximum crusing speed, you might have that level of impact.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    30. Re:Shocking... by The+Foo · · Score: 0

      It depends on how much protection is installed. If a black box can survive a crash, them I'm sure an iPod inside of a black box will do just fine.

      However if it is a government sponsored crash....

      --
      http://www.macinhack.com
    31. Re:Shocking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your domain should idiot.com, as you are too stupid to realize you don't need a sig exactly the same as your username.

  2. Hmm by RFaulder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would assume that they would be using flash-based iPods rather than HDD models, as I doubt a 1.8" drive could withstand an airplane crash.

    1. Re:Hmm by moro_666 · · Score: 0

      Next Post!

      But if it would, i'd love to see those pilots going numa-numa :)

      I wonder if it's actually forbidden to dance numa-numa if the plane is going down anyway ... ?

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    2. Re:Hmm by cheapwhoremonger · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's another reason they would only use the flash based players. Hard disks do not work too well above 10,000 feet. It's well known problem: http://dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post= 1783396;search_string=hard%20drive;#1783396 So, they must only be considering using the nano or shuffle...Though, the article doesn't state that.

    3. Re:Hmm by RFaulder · · Score: 1

      Forgot about that factor, thanks.

  3. Wow. by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Insightful


          "Black Boxes" are made to survive all kinds of unbelievable crashes, impacts, fires, explosions, etc.. Instead, these brainiacs are going to use something that breaks if it drops out of your pocket. Way to go, guys.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:Wow. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Drops out of your pocket? The damned things break if you drop it IN your pocket!

      --

      Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
    2. Re:Wow. by Kattspya · · Score: 1, Troll
      You must be old here. That's the only possible reason for you to not read even the summary.

      The article notes that data recorders are typically used for maintenance, flight/safety analysis,or, assuming proper protection, crash investigation."
    3. Re:Wow. by ET_Fleshy · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention spying on the pilots and using it (indirectly of course) to get them into trouble.

    4. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Black Boxes" are made to survive all kinds of unbelievable crashes, impacts, fires, explosions, etc..

      Why don't they make the plane out of the same material as the black boxes? Problem solved. You can now use the iPod for your music and videos.

    5. Re:Wow. by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. That's the only possible reason to jump to silly conclusions.

          Show me how to protect an iPod in the same way that a black box is protected. Since the internals of an iPod are not made to anywhere near the heat, shock, chemical, or other requirements of a "black box", then by the time you've provided "proper protection", you will have taken up so much of your cabin space (and perhaps used so much weight) that you could have just used a real "black box" to begin with.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    6. Re:Wow. by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      Currently, EUROCAE specifies that a recorder must be able to withstand an acceleration of 3400 g (33 km/s) for 6.5 milliseconds.
      If the same specifications apply to a HDD based FDR I wouldn't assume you could use any hard drive based medium as crash safe flight data recorder. That was my point.
    7. Re:Wow. by tkelechogi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the iPod will be embedded within a black box?

    8. Re:Wow. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Show me how to protect an iPod in the same way that a black box is protected.

      You take a flash iPod and wrap it in rubber, then wrap that in insulation, then stick the whole thing in a heavy-walled steel box with a thick rubber coating. Or if you can afford it, Titanium (stronger, a little more brittle but that's what the rubber outer is for.)

      Do I get a consulting fee for this? :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Wow. by Storebj0rn · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Black Boxes" are made to survive all kinds of unbelievable crashes, impacts, fires, explosions, etc.. Instead, these brainiacs are going to use something that breaks if it drops out of your pocket. Way to go, guys.

      Relax, it's a White Box.
      --
      "Windows are for cheaters" - Bruce Springsteen
    10. Re:Wow. by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      Someone always asks this question, and I know its not meant to be answered, but I will anyway.

      The reason they don't make the whole plane out of the same material as the black box is that if they did, it would be way to heavy to ever get off the ground (and if it did, it would use so much fuel that a plane ticket would cost 10 times as much).

      Also, in a plane crash, its not the plane breaking apart that usually causes the deaths, its that sudden stop when the plane hits the ground that gets you, and the heat from the burning jet fuel. If you somehow manage to survive the impact and the heat, there is still the problem of smoke and fumes from burning jet fuel. That stuff really has a knack for ruining your day.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
  4. And having some fun during autopiloting by QueePWNzor · · Score: 1

    The article notes that data recorders are typically used for maintenance, flight/safety analysis, or, assuming proper protection, crash investigation
    1. Re:And having some fun during autopiloting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now those will play music too!

    2. Re:And having some fun during autopiloting by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      The crash investigators need to know what kind of music the pilot likes you know.
      If the pilot dies then the iPod will be crucial in getting this information.

  5. In other news... by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    A commercial airliner has crashed killing all 182 passengers on board as well as 8 flight crew. Investigators have recovered 191 flight recorders.

    --
    I hate printers.
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and they where all broken.

    2. Re:In other news... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Investigators have recovered 191 flight recorders...
      ...and one Zune which, given its color, indicates victims may have suffered a fiery descent.
      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  6. It won't break by QueePWNzor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They'll probably secure it properly to avoid something like that. Its size will make that easily possible. Remember inertia? It can't just fly out of where it's held. If the plane crashes, it'll be still where it was attached - just under a bit of rubble.

    1. Re:It won't break by 2meen · · Score: 2, Funny

      But what if that part of the plane ends up on the other side of the island?

    2. Re:It won't break by clark0r · · Score: 1

      don't these things also act as 'beacons' so that they can be found after a crash?

    3. Re:It won't break by Threni · · Score: 1

      They're probably going to want to change the battery every month, given that a year is apparently too much to hope for.

    4. Re:It won't break by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      The problem is the hard disk platters used, you would think they'd be sensitive to a thump even with lots of padding etc.

      Then again perhaps they're using solid state memory, but then data recovery is harder (data can be retrieved off tape that has been submerged and damaged etc, this would be much harder with on-chip memory).

      Then again.. perhaps these aren't meant to be used in black boxes, and are just for recording data for maintenance etc.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    5. Re:It won't break by dosquatch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Absolutely! Similarly, the iPods will be programmed to loop "We Built This City" endlessly, virtually guaranteeing that somebody will show up to scream "Turn that crap off!"

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    6. Re:It won't break by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Nah... they can use flash no problems... I accidently put my transflash card through the washing machine twice and it still worked. No problem with submerging it.

      The question I had was if there really was THAT many people 'passionate about writing apps for the iPod'? I didn't realize you could install extra applications on an iPod.

    7. Re:It won't break by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize you could install extra applications on a flight data recorder!

    8. Re:It won't break by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize you could install extra applications on a flight data recorder!

      From TFS:
      The company states that they chose the iPod for its size, low power requirements, and the 'thousands of developers passionate about writing applications for the iPod.'

  7. Flash Disk ? by mattydont · · Score: 1

    They really should use those Corsair Flash Voyager Disks, those things take heaps of abuse from me and still work (eg, thrown at co-workers), and 16GB aint something to schoff at either

  8. OMG NAME! by Konster · · Score: 1, Funny

    The name of the product...

    Airpod.

    1. Re:OMG NAME! by deathcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer "iDead"

    2. Re:OMG NAME! by monotony · · Score: 1

      surely, what we are looking for here is the iCrash ;)

    3. Re:OMG NAME! by Mushdot · · Score: 1

      Flypod!

    4. Re:OMG NAME! by Elusive_Cure · · Score: 1

      or even better iCrash...lol

      --
      Roses are red, violets are blue, most poems rhyme, but this one doesn't... ;^)
    5. Re:OMG NAME! by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      iHopeTheyDon'tMakeACrappyTVShowAboutTheSurvivorsOf ThisCrashBeingStuckOnAnIslandWhereWierdShitHappens

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  9. Personal Flight Recorder by tymbow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think they mean to replace the "blackbox" as most people understand it. It is accurately described in TFA as a Personal Flight Recorder. As a (recreational) pilot I can imagine a number of situations where it would be useful to be able to record basic flight data such as altitidue, speed, ground track etc. to look at after a flight.

    1. Re:Personal Flight Recorder by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      I thought about that as well - a friend of mine is a glider fanatic, and uses an iPaq hooked to a GPS to record in-flight data. When he gets back, he has some really nifty software to overlay the flight path on various maps, and do all sorts of calculations for him.

      But, the article says that it will serve as a "digital data recorder, nicknamed 'black boxes' by the general media." That gives me the impression that they really do want this to be the plane's main black box.

      Now that I think about it, though, there is one upside to this: If this brings the cost down by an order of magnitude (or more), then a lot of smaller, personal planes which don't have a "black box" right now may be able to afford one. Probably not of the same quality that you'd find on a 747, but still, some of them may survive a crash. :-)

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:Personal Flight Recorder by rvw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think they mean to replace the "blackbox" as most people understand it. It is accurately described in TFA as a Personal Flight Recorder. As a (recreational) pilot I can imagine a number of situations where it would be useful to be able to record basic flight data such as altitidue, speed, ground track etc. to look at after a flight. Another thing is that most small airplanes with propeller engines crash at much lower speeds, leaving the plane a lot more intact than the crashes we see on the news. The ipod would therefor have a much bigger chance of surviving a crash.
    3. Re:Personal Flight Recorder by teuluPaul · · Score: 1

      I fly gliders and have a data logger connected to a Garmin 12XL GPS to record track, speed and height. This allows me to fly cross country and use the trace from the logger to confirm that I have achieved the flight I declared before setting off. An additional component used by many pilots is an iPaq or equivalent loaded with airspace files and waypoints. This guides them around the planned course, and also gives optimum speed to fly information - useful while gliding to get the best performance out of the glider under varying conditions. It also warns of impending aprspace infringement. I would think ipod could be used instead of an iPAQ, but it would require some work to be able to access the different parts of the program through the buttons. If you want to see the type of application for iPAQs, have a look at xcsoar - http://www.xcsoar.sourceforge.net/ for an open source example.

    4. Re:Personal Flight Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LoPresti is a company that specializes in high performance mods to airplanes so they'll go faster. They (and their customers) want to monitor engine and plane performance so they can tune the aircraft/prop/engine to get every last knot out of it they can. If you look up engine performance monitors you can see tons of examples of this. Gammi injectors, and articles written about them have used similar graphs for years. The ipod just provides a big storage media, and allows you to play music through the intercom.

      This has nothing to do with post crash analysis.

    5. Re:Personal Flight Recorder by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "That gives me the impression that they really do want this to be the plane's main black box."

      I dunno, that gave ME the impression that the reporter didn't know his ass from his elbow. Flight Data Recorders ("Black Boxes") are one type of digital data recorder. Your consumer-level GPS device is another. Conflating the two would be a lousy idea.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Personal Flight Recorder by PDMongo · · Score: 1

      I agree. As a pilot, I would love to be able to record flight data for my own use and evaluation, not necessarily data as the result of a less than optimal landing. I would think recording the data would be the easy part. The interface to the instruments to collect the data will be an exercise in frustration, given the age and veriety of instruments in most planes.

      --
      I've done the math, I know the odds, but I'm still disappointed when I don't win the lottery.
  10. A whole new meaning... by iliketrash · · Score: 5, Funny

    This brings a whole new meaning to a "disk crash."

    1. Re:A whole new meaning... by shadowknot · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's the joke Steve Wozniak (Apple co-founder) makes after crashing his plane in Pirates of Silicon Valley.

  11. And then! by Konster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Flight International is doing a similar thing, but with the Zune, it crashes before the plane does!

    1. Re:And then! by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      But the good thing is it can squirt the fact that you're crashing to all other Zune-enable aircraft in the vicinity so that they can get the hell out of your way :-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    2. Re:And then! by temojen · · Score: 1

      In California, Plane recovered after flight data recorder crash. In Soviet Russia, flight data recorder recovered after plane crash!

    3. Re:And then! by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      Last moments on Zune:

      Clippy in aviation goggles: Where do you want to go today?

      UP!UP!UP!UP!

      ---A fatal exception has occurred at address 0F56:34C7104B, altitude 0 ft.

  12. Flash drives would be better.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..as they are virtually indestructable.

    Mine has been dropped, smashed, been through both washing machine and dryer. All with no noticable damage and no dataloss.

    My HDD recorder, on the other hand, was destroyed by a small amount of coca cola :(

    1. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Lifedrive with its tiny compact flash hard drive has had some pretty spectacular falls.

      The most notable would be flying off a lecture room table and hitting the floor two meters below.
      Still works perfectly.

    2. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "flying off a lecture room table and hitting the floor two meters below"

      do you go to giant school or something?

    3. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Mine failed after an impact with one six year old girl while it was plugged into my computer. She ran past, knocked it, and the drive snapped in half.
      Ok, probably the drive survived a bit, but the supporting hardware was shredded.

      how on earth did you get coke on a HDD?

    4. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      The player was in my bag with a bottle of coke. Was in a rush to catch a plane (via a train) when I put the coke in the bag, and missed the fact that it wasn't tightly closed.

      The process of running to the train station stimulated the coke to the level that it exited its bottle and got friendly with my H340.

      Although only a small quantity of coke had escaped, it totalled the H340's hard drive :(

    5. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by brown-eyed+slug · · Score: 1

      Surely it would also make more sense to use a device from Creative, or others, that includes a voice recorder?

    6. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      That is pretty funny, but remember that most rooms that are "lecture rooms" are stadium-style rooms meant to hold lots of people. It's easy to push something off a desk and have it fall two meters.

    7. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      When it can resist being nuked from orbit, I'll be impressed.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    8. Re:Flash drives would be better.. by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Note to self, don't do what you did :-)

      My ipod survived getting utterly soaked in a downpour, but I got it dry in time.

  13. Hehe by CptChipJew · · Score: 1

    They're going to be really disappointed when they find out what happens when you leave an iPod drive spinning all day.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
  14. Bono Red? by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

    Will this be only available in Bono Red?

    --
    http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    1. Re:Bono Red? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it will also be available in Crash Yellow and Hijack Brown.

    2. Re:Bono Red? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry only available in bright orange, but for some reason we call it black.

  15. Worse still by MountainMan101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    After an accident there will be many people who need to investigate the flight data. How problematic is it going to be that they will only be able to put the data on five computers?

    1. Re:Worse still by clonmult · · Score: 1

      Better on an iPod than a zune though.

      Could you imagine trying to squirt the data over to another one for further tests, only to get to a "Feck, I needed to do another run over the data to verify, blasted DRM will only allow 3 passes."

      But of course, the DRM adds value ....

    2. Re:Worse still by sokoban · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they use a Zune though, they won't have to find the actual flight data recorder, they'll just have to find another person with a Zune.

      On second thought, it might be easier to search through a pile of charred rubble for a small piece of metal than to find another person with a Zune.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  16. FAA Regs by scatters · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, will they have to be turned off during the takeoff and landing phases of the flight per FAA AC 91.21. Seems like these are the most useful phases of the flight to record.
    I can just image it: "At this time the cabin crew would like to remind the flight crew to turn off the flight recorder. We'll let you know when we reach cruising altitide and it is safe to turn the device back on".

    Before anyone feels the need to inform me that Advisory Circulars are not the same as FAA regulations, I know already!

    --
    A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    1. Re:FAA Regs by AlphaOne · · Score: 1

      So, will they have to be turned off during the takeoff and landing phases of the flight per FAA AC 91.21. Seems like these are the most useful phases of the flight to record.

      That only applies to IFR flight. Even so, if the operator can determine that the device poses no interference hazard, they can exempt it.

      --
      All opinions presented here aren't mine.
    2. Re:FAA Regs by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the cost of certifying some electrical equipment kind of negate the cost benefit of using an iPod in the first place?

    3. Re:FAA Regs by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I believe in this case, it's essentially "at the pilot's discretion". (With certain limits - some stuff is considered safety-critical and must pass extensive certification, other stuff not necessarily so.)

      A general aviation pilot can even use non-aviation radio transmitters (There are a number of pilots who are also ham radio operators and have some VERY sophisticated multiband radio setups in their planes) in flight if they wish - they just take on legal liability for any negative effects of doing so.

      The legal liability is why airlines (and their pilots) just blanket-ban everything, but this FDR is geared towards general aviation pilots.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:FAA Regs by EchaniDrgn · · Score: 1

      Actually all that "turn you devices off during takeoff and landing" thing is a bunch of crap. The thought of any hand-held portable device causing any kind of interference with flight-deck instrumentation is insane. If a plane can take a direct lightning strike I don't think your little iPod is gonna do much to it.

      The same with turn your phone off for the duration of the flight. The Airlines and Airplane manufacturers conned the FAA into restricting in flight phone use by arguing that the hand-off rates for ground based cell phone towers would cause all the poor little phone companies a headache. That's why Airlines have flights where you can use THEIR local cell phone node with THEIR roaming charges.

      So, you see, interference from an iPod, no so much.

    5. Re:FAA Regs by darkonc · · Score: 1
      I can just see the pilot going "oh my god, I think we're going to crash.".

      Hearing this, the stewardess runs into the cockpit and turns off the flight recorder.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  17. Excellent Idea... by T-Bucket · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like an awesome idea. Chances are it's going to be used more to record normal flight data than for crash investigation. They're not aiming it at airliners. Most small single-engine piston airplanes are simple enough that the reason for the crash can be easily discerned from the wreckage. There aren't 300 redundant systems to go through. It's usually a case of "Hey, look, that piston is poking out through the engine block." or "Hmm, the 100 hour private pilot ran off the runway into a ditch trying to land in a 30kt crosswind". What it'll really be useful for is stuff like engine monitoring and whatnot. One of these reviewed by your mechanic at annual could make his job a LOT easier...

    1. Re:Excellent Idea... by smose · · Score: 1

      Most small single-engine piston airplanes are simple enough that the reason for the crash can be easily discerned from the wreckage.

      "Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)." Pilots can often survive engine and avionics failures by gliding the plane to a landing, so unless there's an obvious catasrophic failure, small aircraft incidents get classified as pilot error. Particularly as more of these small airplanes are moving from electro-mechanical gauges to digital electronic displays, the interest in having more than a steaming pile at the crash site has increased.

      I think the iPod thing is a gimmick, to be honest. Most likely it's a playback toy, because I can't see these guys paying to get the iPod past FAA certification.

  18. Why not the Zune? by kerouacsgp · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there's alot of cheap unsold Zunes lying around in BestBuy.

    1. Re:Why not the Zune? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      What? and in the middle of the flight, do you want the Zune to become suddenly "unrecognized external drive" and the pilot hits "Format" by mistake?
      Jokes apart, i think the nano flash-based stuff is what they would prefer. Not the hard-disk based for flights.
      Certification itself would take 5 years, by which time almost all hard-disk iPods running today would be extinct.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  19. What developers? by Ptur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'thousands of developers passionate about writing applications for the iPod.' What developers? At Apple? Or will PortalPlayer *finally* publish its datasheets so others can write code for it too?
    1. Re:What developers? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Maybe it means the iPod Linux developers? Apple doesn't seem too keen on giving out an SDK for the iPod.

      I don't know what it takes to get it so information can show up in the UI, but I think this "recorder" may just be using the iPod as a mass storage device. The only easy way to get information to show up on the iPod without syncing is to save a note in a particular folder.

    2. Re:What developers? by Ptur · · Score: 1

      Maybe it means the iPod Linux developers? Apple doesn't seem too keen on giving out an SDK for the iPod. And the IPL people don't have any PP datasheets either

      I don't know what it takes to get it so information can show up in the UI, but I think this "recorder" may just be using the iPod as a mass storage device. The only easy way to get information to show up on the iPod without syncing is to save a note in a particular folder. Well if they want to use it as a mass storage device, they should maybe better look at memory cards or usb sticks... they're cheaper too ;)
    3. Re:What developers? by Dionysos+Taltos · · Score: 1
      Great. I see the early moderators are clueless.

      Look here and here for some examples.

    4. Re:What developers? by Ptur · · Score: 1

      Well that depends on what you want to do.... - accessing the datafiles on the ipod (your links), no problem - writing apps on the ipod, a bit harder

    5. Re:What developers? by VWJedi · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      The iPod FDR would work with the patented iPod Dock Connector port on the bottom of the iPod, for which there is a large software developer community.

      I think they're talking about software that interacts with the iPod. I know of hardware that interacts with it (e.g. "iPod speakers"). There must be some software developers working in that area too.

  20. Without certification by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

    can you hook this thing into the avionics?

    1. Re:Without certification by AlphaOne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      can you hook this thing into the avionics?

      On experimental aircraft, yes. On certified aircraft, no.

      I'm not sure what value would be gained, though... about the best that could be recorded is OBS position and CDI deflection, maybe turn rate and bank angle if the turn coordinator/artificial horizon can provide feedback.

      If the aircraft has a GPS (big if), I guess you could record position and velocity data.

      --
      All opinions presented here aren't mine.
    2. Re:Without certification by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      For that stuff you could use something like a TomTom - there's already plenty of software for it that does this for ground based stuff, you just need to add altitude measurement... plus it runs Linux so there really *are* thousands of developers, and there's a serial port to get the externally measured data in easily. Seems a much better fit to the task than an ipod.

    3. Re:Without certification by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      The limited usefulness of this solution was the unstated crux of my question. AlphaOne points out that the package can't be hooked up to a certified aircraft. If you wanted to log instrumentation on an experimental aircraft or instrument a RPV or UAV, better, non-volatile, crash-resistant solutions exist or are already implemented in the avionics package.

    4. Re:Without certification by IainMH · · Score: 1

      If the aircraft has a GPS (big if), I guess you could record position and velocity data.

      But what's the point if they can already tell that?

      At t = t(impact):

      Position = Where the crater is

      Velocity = 0
    5. Re:Without certification by CBravo · · Score: 1

      This exists: http://volkslogger.de/cms/index.php?option=com_con tent&task=view&id=30&Itemid=66
      It is a GPS combined with a certified file format that is signed by the apparatus. Gliderpilots use it in contests. Search for .igc .

      --
      nosig today
    6. Re:Without certification by EchaniDrgn · · Score: 1

      Actually it depends on what the program is doing. There are 5 levels of Certification for the big planes: A: Failure = Most crew and passengers dead, wounded or loss of craft. Uptime: 99.999999%+ B: Failure = Few dead, few injured, probably monitored. Uptime: 99.9995%+ C: Failure = Minor injuries Uptime: 99.9%+ D: Failure = Loss of data Uptime: good if it runs E: Failure = What was that code doing anyways? Uptime: who cares There are things running on major airplanes all over the world that are Class E, I don't see this as being anything major as a secondary data recorder. Also, those certifications are for the big planes, small regional jets don't have anywhere near the Software Safety requirements of the big boys.

    7. Re:Without certification by delcielo · · Score: 1

      On experimental aircraft, yes. On certified aircraft, no.

      For now.

      The FAA's certification bureaucracy is legendary; but is navigable. They can get STCs (Supplemental Type Certificates) for different models of aircraft, and many others can probably get 337's (Major Repair and/or Major Alteration Authorization) for theirs.

      I think the real boon here is just getting one to market. Somebody will build a better one, with internal flash storage instead of an i-pod port. Especially for new GA aircraft with the Garmin and Chelton type glass cockpit displays, this kind of device is a no-brainer. It's a welcome arrival.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  21. See by mastershake_phd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Harrison Ford had it right, the Ipod can be used for data storage. Hollywood hacker movies are right again. One of these days someones going to hack the Gibson.....as soon as they build the Gibson.

  22. iPod Flight Recroder sponsored by Levis? by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

    .. now you can wire the iPod to your pants aswell as your Nikes.

    --
    http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
  23. I can see it coming: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Four FAA-investigators, putting on an earnest face, leaning over an orange Ipod Shuffle
    connected to highly professional audio Monitors:

    (Ipod-Voice from Loudspeaker) "Hello, dear audience..."
    (Ipod-Voice from Loudspeaker) "...this time I will replay the in-flight data for...."

    intense shuffling, investigators are putting in a frown

    (Ipod-Voice from Loudspeaker) "...cabin air moisture!"

    (FAA agent 1) "No, not again!"
    (FAA agent 2) "Who`s going for lunch? I`m sooo bored!"

  24. iPod as a model airplane flight recorder by heroine · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gumstix is a popular flight data recorder for models because it contains the highest computing power in the smallest space, but it's expensive. So could the cheapest $80 iPod be used as a Gumstix replacement? Can a $50 non-iPod mp3 player be used as an embedded computer or does it have to be iPod?

    1. Re:iPod as a model airplane flight recorder by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      It hasn't so much to do with the MP3-player aspect of the iPod as with the fact that it can be reprogrammed for other purposes. 99% of other MP3 players are hardware-based; you can't reprogram them.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:iPod as a model airplane flight recorder by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      You can't do a hack of a lot of reprogramming of an ipod either, short of hacking it to remove the OS and install linux - and there are a million other embedded devices that do this better and cheaper.

  25. Trouble by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without fail, my iPod used to die on me every time I flew. 20 minutes into the flight and BAM the drive goes into wacky mode. The unit locks, heats up, makes a sickening grinding noise as the battery quickly drains.

    I finally fixed it by ripping the thing apart and re-seating the drive cable. But still...

    --

    Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
  26. What about all the failed harddrives? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As much as I love my current iPod, I'm well aware that I have had several hard drives fail on me, and I have seen countless "geniuses" hold the tiny bricks up to their ear waiting for a telltale "click...click...click." I hope these guys are using flash-based Nanos, because a number of their bigger siblings die from hanging out in a moving pants pocket. I'm not saying those tiny little hard drives a cursed, I'm simply saying that a 30gig iPod wouldn't be my first choice for something that was supposed to survive a plane crash without needing data recovery service.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:What about all the failed harddrives? by addie+macgruer · · Score: 1

      Just to go off topic a little...

      When I first got the click o' death, I sent back my iPod (3G, 40gb), since it was still under warranty, o' course. And the second one, when it was CoD too. Thrid one, didn't start to get the click of death until a year had passed, so was no longer warrantied.

      Seemed to get it worse when the battery was a bit low; it didn't seem to have the juice to spin up the disk, but you couldn't charge it, because the click... click... click... seemed to be using up the charge faster than the power lead could feed it.

      Since I had nothing to lose, I popped the case open and unhooked the drive. Could then charge the battery up to full; got the 'unhappy mac' on the display. Rehooked up the drive, and off it went. Have only had the CoD since then when the battery's been allowed to run down; possibly buying a new battery would be a good plan, but that's my beer money.

      Wouldn't let an iPod anywhere near a commercial flight recorder however. My iPod suicided last week updating the music database from iTunes; all the music's still on it but it can't see it anymore; am going to have to spend some time copying it off, then letting iTunes copy it back on. Would hate a similar write-error to lose all my records of where I'd been flying.

  27. I can see the headlines now... by Hanners1979 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Despite recovering the flight data recorder from the wreckage, the caush of the crash is yet to be established. It has been confirmed however that the pilot was a big Pink Floyd fan"

    1. Re:I can see the headlines now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Despite recovering the flight data recorder from the wreckage, the caush of the crash is yet to be established. It has been confirmed however that the pilot was a big Pink Floyd fan"

      Into the distance, a ribbon of black
      Stretched to the point of no turning back
      A flight of fancy on a windswept field
      Standing alone my senses reeled
      A fatal attraction holding me fast, how
      Can I escape this irresistible grasp?

      Cant keep my eyes from the circling skies
      Tongue-tied and twisted just an earth-bound misfit, i

      Ice is forming on the tips of my wings
      Unheeded warnings, I thought I thought of everything
      No navigator to guide my way home
      Unladened, empty and turned to stone

      A soul in tension thats learning to fly
      Condition grounded but determined to try
      Cant keep my eyes from the circling skies
      Tongue-tied and twisted just an earth-bound misfit, i

      Friction lock - set.
      Mixture - rich
      Propellers - fully forward
      Flaps - set - 10 degrees
      Engine gauges and suction - check

      Mixture set to maximum percent - recheck
      Flight instruments...
      Altimeters - check both
      (garbled word) - on
      Navigation lights - on
      Strobes - on
      (to tower): confirm 3-8-echo ready for departure
      (tower): hello again, this is now 129.4
      (to tower): 129.4. its to go.
      (tower): you may commence your takeoff, winds over 10 knots.
      (to tower): 3-8-echo
      Easy on the brakes. take it easy. its gonna roll this time.
      Just hand the power gradually, and it...

      Above the planet on a wing and a prayer,
      My grubby halo, a vapour trail in the empty air,
      Across the clouds I see my shadow fly
      Out of the corner of my watering eye
      A dream unthreatened by the morning light
      Could blow this soul right through the roof of the night

      Theres no sensation to compare with this
      Suspended animation, a state of bliss
      Cant keep my eyes from the circling skies
      Tongue-tied and twisted just an earth-bound misfit, i

    2. Re:I can see the headlines now... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      "Despite recovering the flight data recorder from the wreckage, the caush of the crash is yet to be established. It has been confirmed however that the pilot was a big Pink Floyd fan".

      Now Playing: Learning to Cr^H^H Fly.

      On an unrelated note, Apple announced a new/faster way to remove the battery from an iPod.

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  28. You've gotta be kidding! by scdeimos · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard - wanting to use a hard disk-based iPod as an FDR?!? The stupid things are unreliable enough as consumer devices! I'm regularly having to "tap" mine on the desk to get the hard disk going again after it's paused itself in the middle of a song - how's it going to fare in a high-vibration aircraft environment, with regular pressure and temperature changes to boot!?

    1. Re:You've gotta be kidding! by indigest · · Score: 1

      Try opening it up and reseating the hard drive connector. It's only held by a piece of tape and the connection can get flaky. Solved my problem...

  29. It's kinda sad.... by wellingj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    assuming proper protection, crash investigation.

    There are alot of people saying that this is stupid because their iPod
    breaks when it falls out of thier pocket. I would say RTFA but, if you can't
    bother to read the whole posting on /. it's kinda pointless to expect any
    kind of intelligent posting.
    Go on, -1 troll me. See if I give a fsck, I still call BS when I see it.
    1. Re:It's kinda sad.... by gzerphey · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to be the one to troll you. I think that, in our own way, the Slashdot community is trying to provide a commentary on the situation. We know how breakable the iPod is. We have seen the stories and heard more anecdotes then I can count to attest to that.

      Yes, the community is not the most eloquent at times, but hell, if you want that go read the New Yorker or some such. This is Slashdot, you will get what you will get and people will express their opinions in their own colorful way.

      --
      I don't have a microwave. I do, however, have a clock that occasionally cooks shit.
  30. It's not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only use an ipod cause they were looking for an excuse to get one and make their company pay it...
     
    It's so obvious

  31. In Soviet Russia ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, iPod crashes YOU.

  32. Is it some kind of a joke? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Even if they use flash-based iPod as opposed to hard drive-based one, it's still a very bad choice. You can have two flash cards with any interface recording flight data in parallel (pretending to be RAID1), in a continuous stream treating both cards as ring buffers, so each bit is overwritten once per cycle. Even with $15-20 modern flash cards you can get 1G before old data will be overwritten, and 100T (assuming that the cards are never changed) before 1/2 probability of an error. If we assume that black box records voice at 8Kbps and another 8Kbps records the flight data, that's more than 135 hours. If the voice is recorded at 64Kbps, you get 30 hours from a pair of cards. That's at most $40 of storage -- it can be expanded if necessary by adding more cards.

    What is the point of adding some expensive, unreliable device that contains completely useless audio playback and input circuitry?

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  33. Should use these... by Bazman · · Score: 2, Informative


    The Monolith mp3 player. Described as 'bomb-proof'. It can also be run over by a car.

    1. Re:Should use these... by plumby · · Score: 1

      The Gadget Show in the UK tested one of these against an iPod with a rugged case (can't remember which one) last week. Tests included encasing them in cement and using a pneumatic drill to get them out, and using a car crusher on them.

      The iPod won.

    2. Re:Should use these... by Bazman · · Score: 1

      The iPod fell out of the car! Suzy Perry is no good with gaffer tape. I'd love to show her how to use it properly...

  34. Trouble is... by digitig · · Score: 1

    The flight data recorder would presumably have to be turned off during take-off and landing, and whenever the seat-belt signs are illuminated. Isn't that precisely when one most needs flight data recording?

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  35. DRM by p0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But how can you take it out of the iPod without breaking the law first?

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  36. Eh, captain.. by andr0meda · · Score: 1


      Eh, captain, I'm seeing passports flying again, are you ABSOLUTELY sure we're not about to crash into a tower?

    I had an iPod. It costed 400 euro's and it lasted about 1 year, and it is probably the first and last Apple thing I ever bought (apart from that AppleII that is sitting in the storage room).

    --
    With great power comes great electricity bills.
    1. Re:Eh, captain.. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      So, from your statistical sample of ONE you have used your amazing powers of deduction and logic, and came to the conclusion that Apple sucks? Well, FWIW, I bought an iPod Mini close to two years ago, and it's still going strong.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:Eh, captain.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First impressions are important. If I bought a product and it didn't meet my minimum expectations of quality, I wouldn't purchase another product from the company in question either. Are you in the habit of buying shoddy merchantise repeatedly from the same company?

    3. Re:Eh, captain.. by WNight · · Score: 1

      Or, it's like every piece of consumer electronics I've ever bought. The warranty is damn useless because they look at tiny signs of cosmetic damage and refuse to honor it.

      I've certainly seen a lot of shoddy products and most of them were along brand or product lines. Three IBM 75GXP drives failed, no other HD I'd used has died in less than two years, if it made it through formatting. No ATI card in the 90s had drivers that wouldn't lock up Windows. Honestly, my first thought when a product doesn't live up to expectations is that the company screwed up somehow. I've had three digital cameras and not broken one, two palm pilots, etc. But some things are just flaky.

      I skip all extended warranties and just use the purchase protection I get through buying on Visa. I *love* using it when dealing with annoying companies.

      "I'm sorry, it's not our policy to issue refunds."

      "Okay, can I get your name name on that for reference? Okay, I'm going to call Visa and tell them we can't reach an agreement and get them to cancel payment for the last month."

      "Well, let's see..."

      Fido (cellphone) was going to bill me for an extra month because I canceled too close to the end of the month. Heh. No.

    4. Re:Eh, captain.. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      But how can you determine that some certain product from one certain company is crap, if you have only one point of reference? You simply can't make sweeping statements if you have only tested one product. Yes, some people have problems with their iPods. And there are millions of people who have no problems with them. There are lemons among iPods, just like there are lemons in just about all products out there.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    5. Re:Eh, captain.. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      OK. Or, in my case, with my iPod, you could have exactly the opposite experience.

      I broke my iPod by banging it (hard) into the corner of a desk while it was in my pocket. The clickwheel was cracked more or less in half. The iPod was four months out of warranty. I took it into an Apple store, told my tale, and asked if there was any way I could pay to have it repaired. They told me I could pick up a new one the next day, at no charge.

      I'm still using that iPod over a year later.

      So, in my experience, Apple customer service is superb. Your mileage may vary.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Eh, captain.. by andr0meda · · Score: 1


      You're not wrong, assuming I have one point of reference. However, I never let it bang anywhere, I just used it a lot. And during that short period of time the battery did very strange things, it skipped at times, the database would get corrupt.. after a 3 week period of strangeness it finally gave up alltogether. I used it not just for music but also as a portable disc, so I also lost quite a bit of data on that device. Obviously it is probably a disc problem and I will take it apart to see if something can be salvaged, but I doubt it.

      So it's not one single point of reference, it is an experience that is tasted sour for many weeks, with ups and downs on a device I that should have left QA as a dependable consumer product. It did not, so I don't want to risk money again. But obviously I'm asking too much here..

      --
      With great power comes great electricity bills.
  37. Re:Excellent Idea...??? by jimmydevice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can this information be used for aircraft maintenance? It seems using a non-certified device to record data that will be used to perform service would open a repair center to a lawsuit. How can you be assured that the data is correct? It seems the only application would be to record your flight profile for playback in flightsim.

  38. iPod's don't like to get high... by adamscottphotos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live at approx 7000' in the Sierra Nevada mountains of California, and very frequently spend time over 10,000'. I've noticed that nearly everbody in our town has a cranky or dead ipod. When a strong Sierra storm rolls through, the lowered air pressure gives us an effective altitude of nearly 9000'. I've noticed a strong coorelation between blizzards here and dead drives an iPods. I spoke with a friend in Leadville, CO (12,500') and he claims they flat don't work at his altitude. Also many reports can be found via google of people's iPods not loving the tops of ski areas (Breckenridge goes to like 13,800'). I know most planes are pressurized... but... Would be nice if stock drives were happy at 15,000' - there's no real way to locally increase the air pressure around the drive, and the thinner air brings the head closer to the platters.

    --
    So quit your job, pack your bags, and move on out to snow country!
  39. I sense a new business opportunity... by ClemensW · · Score: 1

    Protective Flight Recorder Cases for iPods: 1/4" titanium shell, 1" dry-silica temperature insulation, 2" shock absorbing foam padding. Add door, fire-retardant sealings and a data connector from ext to int. Optional: Locator beacon. Anyone wants to place an order?

  40. Flash i hope by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If they are going to use the HD versions, then they might as well not bother.

    I dont care what protective case you put it in, a 20000 feet drop is going to kill a mechincal hardddrive.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  41. what about the car? by sjs132 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, now a days, every car seems wired for iPod... Why not add that to the car features, a car crash data recorder (ok, shhh... We have it built in already... I know... I know...)

    AND WHAT ABOUT MY FLYING CAR!!! I WANT MY FLYING CAR!!! With the iPod option!

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    1. Re:what about the car? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      (OT) No... every car *claims* to be wired for ipod. What most of them mean by that is they have an aux port on the stereo (the same one that has been on cars for 20 years).

    2. Re:what about the car? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      20 years?

      Shit where?

  42. What I think they mean... by KTorak · · Score: 1

    ...is that the internal workings of the Flight Data Recorder are going to be ran by the iPod, IE, the iPod will be in a protected (black) box to survive the crash. However, I think they are still taking a pretty big risk with a hard drive based iPod, but I have no idea what they use now, it very well could be a hard drive based system. Otherwise, they can just use one of those flash based systems that can survive 2000g impacts.

    --
    Kyle
  43. iPod Accessory by KoldKompress · · Score: 1, Funny

    iPod Accessories just keep getting more and more inventive. And I thought the iPod sock was inventive, but now a plane?

  44. Streaming Blackbox? by nbritton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not just have a live feed of the blackbox data streamed directly to the FAA?

    1. Re:Streaming Blackbox? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not just have a live feed of the blackbox data streamed directly to the FAA?
      I suspect you don't know any better, which is why you asked the question.
      The short answer is that it would not be technologically feasible.

      The long answer:
      1. Each stream of data is going to need its own radio channel/cell connection/other
      2. The FAA is going to have to buy gobs of storage across the country & pay for it all to be managed
      3. Every private pilot is going to have to buy a new avionics package

      That's just off the top of my head, not to mention that the FAA isn't actually sitting at every airport. They mostly make rules & investigate screw ups.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Streaming Blackbox? by nbritton · · Score: 1

      "1. Each stream of data is going to need its own radio channel/cell connection/other"

      Just use the FAA registration number of each plane as an ID tag. Then send the data up to the satellite digitally encoded and compressed.

      "2. The FAA is going to have to buy gobs of storage across the country & pay for it all to be managed"

      Nope. Just send the anomalous data, all the normal stuff can be stored on the plane and the FAA only needs to keep the data when something bad happens, you can delete all the non crash events.

      "3. Every private pilot is going to have to buy a new avionics package"

      What? who cares private pilots, they don't even have black boxes. I'm talking about just the commercial & military aircrafts.

  45. Ashes to Ashes by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    I can just see the FAA plugging in to the iPod to see what the cause of the problem was...

    "Ground control to Major Tom... your circuit's dead... there's something wrong! Can you hear me Major Tom? Can you hear me Major Tom?"

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  46. iFlight now available at iTunes by aplusjimages · · Score: 2, Funny

    But think about all the great Black Box recordings that will be available on iTunes for everyone to listen to. I see the RIAA getting their mits in on this.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  47. This wil never work by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny


    Won't the iPod disrupt the plane's flight electronics and CAUSE crashes, though? That's why the flight attendants always remind us that the use of portable electronic devices during takeoff and landing is forbidden, right?

  48. RTFA? Nah!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are light weight aircraft that most likely don't have requirements for the fancy black boxes that commercial airliners are required to have. Not to mention, it's not even intended to serve the same purpose! Think of it like an Apple iPod Nike+ for airplanes. You record your flight, like you record your run. Once back home, you can look at the records and enjoy. If it's actually available for accident analysis, that's just a lucky coincidence. (I doubt they even plan on recording the types of data required for blackbox forensics in the first place.)

  49. if only.... by chrwei · · Score: 1

    ... someone made a material that could withstand high heat without melting that you make a box from, and another material that could be wrapped around an object to insulate it from heat that you could then place inside the box! Then, you could paint the box black! how cool would that be!

    --
    - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
  50. Nothing new... iPod not required by freelunch · · Score: 1

    I did a bunch of development back in 2002 to use an Archos Recorder for automotive data acquisition. It seemed like a fairly obvious application of a low cost platform and worked very well. And so no need to keep dragging the vaio out for harsh testing.

  51. text, since so many aren't RTFA by Dionysos+Taltos · · Score: 1
    Apple iPod set to swap 'white box' for 'black box' as LoPresti launches data recorder version

    By Justin Wastnage

    Apple Computer's popular iPod music player could become a flight data recorder (FDR) following an announcement by US light aircraft manufacturer LoPresti SpeedMerchants to introduce the device in the cockpit of its Fury piston aircraft.

    The company says it plans the "full integration of the iPod into the Fury's avionics systems". The iconic 'white box' iPod will serve as a digital data recorder, nicknamed 'black boxes' by the general media. The iPod, with suitable software, acts as a hard disk with the ability to record over 500h of flight time data.

    It was not immediately clear from the company's statement which parameters would be recorded and for what purpose. Recorders are currently used to collect data for maintenance purposes through system monitoring, for post-flight analysis in training and safety-monitoring, and, when suitably protected, for crash investigation.

    Vero Beach, Florida-based LoPresti. "The iPod becomes the first truly portable, personal flight recorder with a huge recording capacity."

    "This is a watershed technology for aviation," says LoPresti vice president of operations, RJ Siegel, "and we are delighted to be the first to bring it to market." The Fury (pictured below) will prove the concept, but once certificated, the iPod FDR could be deployed on other light aircraft.

    The iPod can also act as an audio recorder, and can be used to capture two-way cockpit conversation and communication with air traffic control.

    The iPod FDR would work with the patented iPod Dock Connector port on the bottom of the iPod, for which there is a large software developer community. "This is the perfect marriage of a consumer product to the aviation market" says Siegel. "The iPod has an ideal product spec for aviation. It's light and small, with very low power requirements and a simple interface. There are thousands of developers passionate about writing applications for the iPod. With such a large body of programmers we literally have no idea what the next great aviation application may be."

  52. Use a Nano by encoderer · · Score: 1

    I can say from personal experience that Nanos are in many ways indestructible. Even if their LCD breaks the device will still play music and can take serious abuse. I read a website once where they tried throwing it up into the air as high as they could and having it bounce on cement; running over it with a car; stomping on it; etc; and the Nano still played.

    It illustrates what my philosophy has been since the iPod was introduced: a hard drive in your pocket sounds like a dumb idea to me. Eventually all iPods will be flash based for that reason.

  53. Pelican Case or UK Case! by temojen · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work at a distributor where we sell both (otterboxes are the low end line of Underwater Kinetics). Pelican and UK cases are better for this application because they're vented. Otter Boxes have a higher crush pressure, but may burst if there's sudden decompression.

    I wouldn't recommend either company's iPod cases for this application either. Go with something like a Pelican 1200 or UK 5010 so that there's LOTS of foam padding. We're not talking about 15 minutes of jogging followed by a drop from 1 meter, we're talking about hundreds of hours of vibration.

    We have customers that buy UK or Pelican cases, then drill through them to mount ruggedized connectors like Cannon or Amphenols, RF connectors (RFI or Amphenol), or Eaton harsh environment switches to use for controls. Both lines stand up well to field abuse.

  54. News at 11: A Breakthrough in NTSB investigation by JRHelgeson · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see the news report now:
    "NTSB crash investigators have been baffled as to the cause of the private plane crash that killed Steve Jobs and four others last week, but today they made a major breakthrough in their investigation. The crash investigators were initially stymied by the sequence of events leading up to the crash. Apparently, the initial confusion was resolved once they discovered the Crash.Events playback was set to shuffle."

    "In a related story, Conspiracy therorists are not buying the explanation. They say that they have proof that the flight data recorder shows the plane was in level flight after having slammed into the Mountain. They insist that this was a plot financed by former Microsoft President Bill Gates to 'send a message' that Microsoft is not to be trifled with."

    "Mr Gates was unavailable for comment as he was attending a conference on Aids in Africa."

    "To counter these claims, the NTSB has offered to share crash evidence with the general public, just as soon as they can figure out how to bypass the DRM features without running afoul of the DMCA."

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  55. Re:Excellent Idea...NOT by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Sounds more like a stupid idea. There is such a thing as using the right tool for the job. There is nothing to see here but some 'gee whiz i did it because i could' geek factor.

  56. Passenger iPods by maxrate · · Score: 1

    Better get the laser etched iPod saying 'THIS IS THE FLIGHT RECORDER', otherwise they will be going thru a lot of music.

  57. Unintended consequences of this by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

    Within 20 minutes of the plane going down, a dozen RIAA representatives, dressed in police-style raid jackets, were on site to offer their "assistance" to the FAA in locating the black box.

    "Since black boxes are, by definition, black, and current iPod Nanos only come in black on the 8GB model, we knew we would have a lot of data to comb through." remarked the lead RIAA investigator, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "We located the device, and analyzed it. Among the contents, we found Dave Matthew's 'Crash Into Me', Tom Petty's 'Free Falling', and Bruce Springsteen's 'I'm on Fire', and will basically be suing the airline for enough money that compensating relatives of the deceased and buying a new 747 just dropped to number two and three on their expenses from this incident. Another file on the black box, a recording of the pilot screaming "Oh my God we're going to DIE!', appears to not be the intellectual property of our organization, so we aren't suing over that one though we do frown on listening to non-RIAA-sanctioned recordings. Once our lawsuit over the pirated MP3's is concluded, we'll hand the unit over to the FAA for them to do their thing, but given the severity of the case, obviously our own examination of the black box comes first."

    1. Re:Unintended consequences of this by SLOviper · · Score: 1

      Actually, "black boxes" are mostly orange. :-)

      http://travel.howstuffworks.com/black-box5.htm

      --
      In theory, theory always works in practice. In practice, theory rarely works. <><
  58. Balsa wood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, those planes must be made out of wood, because now everyone will be able to get r00t on them!

  59. Will Apple insist on it have their DRM licensing and only allow the data to be accessed by iBlackBox software?

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    1. Re:DRM? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Will Apple insist on it have their DRM If you MUST make a stupid, pointless, tired joke about Apple FUD, you could at least try to do it in a sentence that makes sense.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:DRM? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      Naw, I'm too lazy, it's Slashdot after all. But I must remember to not insult Apple or suggest that they can also be lumped into the same controlling category as Microsoft, bad me.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  60. Better than nothing by delcielo · · Score: 1

    Really, that's looking a gift horse in the mouth. There is no regulatory requirement for flight data recorders on small aircraft. For the most part, the NTSB guys do a great job of analyzing needle positions, light filaments, structural deformation, etc. to determine the causes of crashes and get a good idea of the parameters the airplane was operating under when it went in.

    However, the new generation of small planes now includes glass cockpits and carbon-fibre materials. They make accident investigation much harder. I had the opportunity to speak with Greg Feith about this at length. Greg was the investigator in charge for the Valu-Jet crash, and worked on TWA800, and a number of other high profile accidents. He said it makes it much more difficult to investigate these airplanes when there are fewer instruments to analyze and a "plastic airframe" as he called it.

    I'm glad to see it come out, and I will be interested to see the future development of this and the others that are sure to follow. I'd prefer that somebody was able to tell what happened if I ever died in an accident. The cockpit voice recorder function will also be a boon. All radio transmissions to and from ATC are recorded now; but you don't get to hear what's being said in the airplane. That is good information and could be a great educational tool for the rest of the flying community.

    Whether or not the i-pod is functional after the crash, as long as data can be extracted from the flash drive, we're golden.

    There are potentially huge safety benefits to this.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  61. Been there done that. by monopole · · Score: 1

    I was on a program that built flash based flight recorders. Far from trivial. The problem is even if you use flash, the wirebonding on the chips rip off at high impact. Doing things right involves minimizing the mass of the survivable component and then putting it in a lot of squishy insulating nonflammable material, and then putting that in a titanium box, and then putting that in more squishy insulating nonflammable material. If you think an iPod could handle that put it in a standard paper envelope and post it to yourself. If it survives that, we'll get to the hard part.

  62. Re:OMG NAME! (if made by Nintendo) by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 1


    I prefer "iDead"

    "WiiDead"

    *ba-dum-dum*

    --
    R(k)
  63. Re:Eh, captain.. (mercilessly OT) by dosquatch · · Score: 1

    First impressions are important. If I bought a product and it didn't meet my minimum expectations of quality, I wouldn't purchase another product from the company in question either. Are you in the habit of buying shoddy merchantise repeatedly from the same company?

    I'm not, but circumstance has a funny way of stepping in and using my perceptions against one another.

    I had bought a Compaq years ago. It was the worst machine I've ever had. I'm talking about a semi-functional, proprietary, non-upgradable nightmare of Packard-Bell proportions.

    After taking more pain from this machine than I cared for, I shopped around and settled on an HP as its replacement. One of the best machines I've ever owned. And I swore I would never again send one of my dollars to Compaq.

    Then HP bought Compaq, and I all but wept. Damn you, Murphy.

    --
    "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
  64. Use techno jewelry for mission critical work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use this junk ass piece of techno jewelry with built-in obsolescence as a flight data recorder? There really is "one born every minute" [PT Barnum].

  65. Remote black boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why dont they send the black box info wirelessly to a remote server. This way there is no need to search for a black box in the event of an accident.

  66. FT+ New on I-Tunes ! +FT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Select your favorite 'Last Message tune' from our huge collection.
    Eg:

    top 10 List:
    FLight GFD emergency landing
    Flight XyA hits the mountain.
    Flight BVQ explodes mid-air ...

    (this one was too good a lead to let it slip :)

  67. A car, you say? by Foerstner · · Score: 1

    http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/nano.ars/3

    To be fair, the screen (which had previously been damaged) was destroyed in the process.

    --
    The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
  68. Thousands of developers???? by lord_mike · · Score: 1

    Where??? I thought the iPod was a totally closed system and apple pretty much has told third party developers to go shove it... perhaps not????

    Where does one get info on developing for the iPod?

    Thanks in advance!

    Mike

  69. The "black box" started with the 1950s equivalent by OzJeremy · · Score: 1

    That's quite appropriate, since the original invention of the black box was prompted by the "iPod" of the 1950s, a music recording/playing device called a "miniphon", which recorded on metal wire (not magnetic tape). An Australian chemist named David Warren was at a meeting investigating the Comet jet airliner crashes. He was sitting there half listening to other experts give their various theories for what had caused the crash, and half thinking about a jazz concert he was going to record that night, and someone suggested a hijacking. And he thought "pity no-one had one of these recorders there in the cockpit, or we'd know". That's what sparked off the idea which eventually resulted in the development of the black box. The first prototype model made was actually two of these miniphon recorders arranged so that as one finished its metal reel it would start recording on the second in an infinite loop. The wikipedia entry for the black box has some of the links.